Text

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report
	ML101380328
Person / Time
Site:	Quad Cities
Issue date:	05/12/2010
From:	Tulon T; Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	SVP-10-021
	Download: ML101380328 (116)
	v • d • e

Exeltn.

Exelon Generation Company, LLC Cuad Cities Nuclear Power Station www.exelOnCOTP.COM Nuclear 22710 206th Avenue North Cordova, IL61242-9740 SVP-10-021 May 12, 2010 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-29 and DPR-30 NRC Docket Nos. 50-254 and 50-265

Subject:

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Pursuant to Technical Specifications Section 5.6.2, enclosed is the 2009 Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station. This report contains the results of the radiological environmental and meteorological monitoring programs. Also included is the 2009 Radiological Groundwater Protection Program (RGPP) Report, as Appendix E of the enclosure.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact Wally J. Beck at (309) 227-2800.

Respectfully, hy J. Tulon

'ice President Cities Nuclear Power Station

Enclosure:

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report cc: Regional Administrator - NRC Region III NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Ric

Enclosure Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Docket No: 50-254 50-265 QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS 1 and 2 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report 1 January Through 31 December 2009 Prepared By Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Exek n .

Nuclear Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Cordova, IL 61242 May 2010

Table' Of Contents I.mS a r n C o nc'l~usi'o n~s .-::.. :":-.....'.ý'.;..i. ;... .... :...".... ................. i :............ i...i.. ................ :............. 1 I. Summary and Con.......s .. . . . . .. . . . . .

I1. Introd uctio n ....................................................................................................... . ... . 3 A . O bjectives of the R E MP ........................................ .... . ................................... 3 B. Im plem entation of the:O bjectives.!?.... ................. . ............................................... 3 Ill. P rogram D escription ................................................................................................ . .3 ple

'A.sam Collection -..... .......... . . .. ..... ..-..... 3.....

B. Sample Analysis ............................... ........... 5 C. D ata Interpretation .................................................................................... . ... .6 D. Program Exceptions ....................................................................................... 7 E. Program Changes ..... .................................... 9 IV. Results and Discussion . . ............. .. . 9 A, Aquatic Environm ent..':;...... ............ ............. .................... ...................... . . . . 9

1. Surface Water ..................................... 9

2. G round W ater .................................................................................. . . 10 3 . F is h ................................................................................................... . .1. 1.1 4 . Sed im e nt .......................................................................................... . . 11 B. Atmospheric Environment........ ....... ;t! ...................................

11

1. A irb o rn e .................................................... ............................................. 1 1 a.- A ir Particul~tes ........ ..................... ...... ....... .......................... ...... 11

b. A irborne Iodine ...................................................................... . . 12 2 . T e rrestria l ......................................................................................... . . 12

a. Mik......... ............... ........ ý.,? . ........... 12

b. Food Products ........................................................................ 13 C . A m bient G am m a Radiation ........................................................................... 13 D. Independent Spent Fuel Storage ....... ................. ......

I 13

E. Land Use S urvey., ..................................

.,_.. ,........... ....................... 13 F. Errata Data .... .......... ............ 14 G. Summary of Results - Inter-laboratory Comparison Program ........... 15

Appendices Appendix A Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Summary Tables Table A-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Annual Summary for Quad Cities Nuclear Power' Station, 12009 Appendix B Location Designation, Distance & Direction, and Sample Collection &

Analytical Methods Tables Table B-i: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009 Table B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009 . . ..

Figqures Figure B-I: Quad Cities REMP Sampling Locatidns- `2 Mile Radius,`2009 Figure B-2: Quad Cities REMP Sampling Locations - 9.3 Mile Radius, 2009 Appendix C Data Tables and Figures - Primary Laboratory Tables Table C-1.1 Concentrations of Gross Beta in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009.

Table C-1.2 Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009.

Table C-1.3 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009.

Table C-11.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Ground Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009.

Table C-I1.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Ground Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009.

Table C4lIl. 1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters,in, Fish Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities'Nucear Power Station, 2009.

Table C-IV.1 Concentrations of Gamma EUhitters in Sediment Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities' Nuclear Power Station, 2009.

Table C-V.1 Concentrations of Gross Beta in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009.

Table C-V.2 Monthly and Yearly Mean Values of Gross Beta Concentrations Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity ofQuad Cities Nuclear.

Power Station, 2009.

Table C-V.3 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009.

Table C-V1,1 Concentrations of I-131 in Air Iodine SamplessCollected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear PowerStation, 2009.

Table C-VII.1 Concentrations of 1-131 -in Milk Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009.

Table C-VII.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Milk Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Citie's Nuclear Power Station, 2009.

Table C-VIII.1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Food Products Samples.,

Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009.

Table C-IX,1 Quarterly TLD Results for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009.

Table C-IX,2. Mean Quarterly TLD Results. for the Inner Ring, Outer Ring, Other and Control Locations for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009.

Table C-IX.3 Summary of the Ambient Dosimetry Program for Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009.

Figqures Figure C-1 Surface Water - Gross Beta - Stations Q-33 and Q-34 (C) Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000 - 2009.

Figure C-2 Surface Water - Tritium - Stations Q-33 and Q-34 (C) Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000 - 2009.

Figure C-3 Ground Water - Tritium - Station Q-35 and Q-36 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000 - 2009.

Figure C-4 Air Particulates - Gross Beta - Stations Q-01 and Q-02 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000 - 2009.

Figure C-5 Air Particulates - Gross Beta - Stations Q-03 and Q-04 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000 - 2009.

Figure C-6 Air Particulates - Gross Beta - Station Q-07 (C) Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000 - 2009.

Figure C-7 Air Particulates - Gross Beta -. Stations Q-13 and Q-16 Collected in the Vicin'ity of QCNPS, 2005- 2009.."

Figure C-8 Air Particulates - Gross Beta - Stations Q-37 and Q-38 Collected in the Vicinity'of QCNPS, 2005 - 2009.

Figure C-9 Air Particulates - Gross Beta - Stations Q-41 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2009.','

Appendix D Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program' Tables Table D-1 Analytics Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check, Program Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2009, Table D-2 ERA Envir6nmentall Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne BrownhEngineering, 2009 Table D-3 DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)

Teledyne Brown Engineering, 2009, Table D-4 ERA Statistical Summary Proficiency Testing Program Environmental, Inc., 2009 Table D-5 DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)

Environmental, Inc., 2009 Appendix E Annual Radiological'Gro'undwaýter Protectibn Prograra Report (ARGPPR)

Summarykand Conclusions In 20091the Qiuad Cities Generating Station released to the environment through the radioactive effluent liquid and gaseous pathways approximately.172 curies of noble gas, fission and activation products and approximately 121- curies of tritium.

The dose from. both liquid and gaseous effluents was conservatively calculated for the Maximum Exposed Member of the Public. The results of those calculations and their comparison to the allowable limits were as follows:

Gaseous and liquid radiation doses to members of the public at locations Applicable Estimated Age Location % of Site Unit Effluents Organ Dose Group Distance Direction Applicable Limit

- (meters) - "(toward) Limit Noble Gas Gamma - Air Dose 8.40E-04 AI[ .1029 . ESE 20 mRad Noble Gas Beta - Air Dose. 4.32E-04 All .1029 ..... ESE 40 mRad 1.08E-03 Noble Gas Total Body (Gamma) 4.30E-03 . Child 1029 ESE 10: mrem 4.30E-02 Iodine, Particulate & Thyroid 2.94E-01 Infant '1029 NNE "980E-01 30 mrem Tritium Liquid Total Body* 6.11E-03 Adult RDT via South Diffuser 1.01E-01 6 mrem Liquid Liver 9.67E-03 Teen RDT via South Diffuser 4.84E-02 20 mrem Total Body - Direct 7.29E+00 All 800 N 2.92E+01 25 mrem 40CFR1 90* Radiation

Thyroid and Organ doses <1% of 40CFR190 Limits.

The doses as a result of the radiological effluents released from the Quad Cities Generating Station were a very small percentage of the allowable limits, with the exception of 40CFR190 direct radiation which was calculated to be 29.2% of the 25 mrem/yr limit.

This report on the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) conducted for the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station (QCNPS) by Exelon covers the period 1 January 2009 through 31 December 2009. During that time period, 1,436 analyses were performed on 1,534 samples. In assessing all the data gathered for this report and comparing these results with preoperational data, it was concluded that the operation of QCNPS had no adverse radiological impact on the environment.

Surface water samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta, tritium and gamma emitting nuclides. Ground water samples were analyzed for concentrations of tritium and gamma emitting nuclides. No fission or activation products were detected. Gross beta activities detected were consistent with those detected in previous years and consistent with the control stations.

1 of 109

Fish (commercially and recreationally important species) and sediment samples were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides:. No fission or activation products were detected in fish. A small concentration of Cs-1 37 was found in three of four sediment samples., No other fission products or activation products were found in sediment.

Air particulate samples were analyzed for conicentrations of gross beta and gamma emitting nuclides. No fission or activation productswere detected.

High sensitivity 1-131 analyses were performed on air samples. No 1-131, was detected.

Cow milk samples were analyzed for concentrations of 1-131 and gamma emitting nuclides. No-1-131 was detected. Concentrations of naturally occurring isotopes were consistent with those detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were detected.

Food product samples were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides. No fission or activation products were detected.

Environmental gamma radiation measurements were performed quarterly using thermoluminescent dosimeters. Levels detected were consistent with those observed in previous years.

2 of 109

II. Introduction The Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station (QCNPS), consisting of two 2957 MWth boiling water reactor owned and operated by Exelon Corporation, is located in Cordova, Illinois along the Mississippi River. Unit No. 1 went critical on 16 March 1972. Ufnit No. 2 went Critical on .02'December'1973.. The siteý is located in northern Illinois, .approximately 182 mileswest of Chicago, Illinois.

This report covers those-analyses performed by Teledyne Brown Engineering

-':(TBE), Global Dosimetry, and Environmental Inc. (Midwest.Labs),on samples collected during the period 1 January 2009 through, 31 December 2009.

A. Objective of the. REMP The objectives of the;REMP are to:

1. Provide data on measurable levels of radiation and radioactive materials in the site environs.

2. Evaluate the relationship between quantities of radioactive material released from the plant and resultant radiation doses to individuals from principal pathways of exposure.

B.- Implementationrof the Objectives The implementation of the objectives is accomplished by:

1. Identifying significant exposure. pathways..

2. Establishing baseline, radiological data. of media within those pathways.

3. Continuously monitoring those media before and during Station operation to assess Station radiological effects (if any) on man and the environment.

Ill. Program Description A. Sample Collection Samples for the QCNPS REMP were collected for Exelon Nuclear by Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs). This section describes the general sampling methods used by Environmental Inc. to obtain environmental samples for the QCNPS REMP in 2009. Sample locations and 3 of 109

descriptions can be found in Table B-1 and Figures B-i -and B-2, Appendix B.

Aquatic Environment The aquatic environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of surface water, ground water, fish; and sediment.

Surface water samples were collected weekly from two locations, Q-33 and Q-34 (Control). Ground water samples were collected quarterly from two locations, Q-35 andQ-36. All water samples were collected in ;new containers, which were rinsed with source water prior to collection,,:.

Fish samples comprising the edible portions of commercially and recreationally important species were collected semiannually at two locations, Q-24 and Q-29 (Control). .Sediment samples composed of recently deposited substrate were collected at two locations semiannually, Q-39 and Q-40 (Control).

Atmospheric Environment The atmospheric environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of air particulate, airborne iodine, and milk. Airborne iodine and particulate samples were collected and analyzed at ten locations (Q-01, Q-02, Q-03, Q-04, Q-07, Q-13, Q-16, Q-37, Q-38, and Q-41). The control location was Q-07. Airborne iodine and particulate samples were obtained at each location, using a-vacuum pump with charcoal and glass fiber filters attached. The pumps were run continuously and sampled air at the rate of approximately one cubic foot per minute. The air particulate filters and air iodine samples were replaced weekly and sent to the laboratory for analysis.

Milk samples were collected biweekly at one location (Q-26) from May through October, and monthly from November through April. All samples were collected in new plastic containers from the bulk.tank, preserved with sodium bisulfite, and shipped promptly to the laboratory.

Food products were collected annually in July at five locations (Q-Quad 1 Control, Q-Quad 1, Q-Quad 2, Q-Quad 3, and Q-Quad 4). The control location was Q-Quad 1 - Control. Various types of broadleaf and root vegetables were collected and placed in new plastic bags, and sent to the laboratory for analysis.

Ambient Gamma Radiation Direct radiation measurements were made using thermoluminescent 4 of 109

dosimeters (TLD). Each location consisted of 2 TLD sets. The TLD locations were placed on and around the QCNPS site as follows:

An inner rinq consisting of 15 locations (Q-101, Q-102, Q-103, Q-104, Q-105, Q-106, Q-107, Q-108, Q-109, Q-111, Q-112, Q-113, Q-114, Q-115 and Q-116). These TLD are located in- 15-of the 16 meteorological sectors in the general area of the site boundry (approximately 0.1 - 3 miles from the site). There are no TLDs located in the SSW sector because this sector is located over water.'

An outer ring consisting of 16 locations (Q-201, Q-202, Q-203, Q-204, Q-205, Q-206, Q-207, 0-208, Q-209, Q-210;0Q-211, Q-212, Q-213, Q-214, Q-215 and Q-216). These TLDs are located in each of the 16 meteorological sectors (approximately 3.7 - 5 miles from the site)

An other set consisting ofnine locations (Q-01, Q-02, Q-03, Q-04, Q-13, Q-16, Q-37, Q-38 and Q-41). The locations are at each of the air sample stations around the site.

The'balance of one location (0-07),is the control site.

The specific TLD locations were determined by the following criteria:

1.' The presence of relatively dense population;

2. Site meteorologibal data taking into account distance and elevation for each of the sixteen-22 1/2 degree sectors around the site,

-where estimated annual dose from QCNPS, if any, would be most significant;

3. On hills free from local obstructions and within sight of the stack

.'(where practical);

4. And near the closest dwelling to the stack in the prevailing downwind direction.

The TLDs were exchanged quarterly and sent to Global Dosimetry for analysis.

B. Sample Analysis This section describes the general analytical methodologies used by TBE and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) to analyze the environmental samples for radioactivity for the QCNPS REMP in 2009 and the type of analyses. The analytical procedures used by the laboratories are listed in 5 of 109

Table B-2.

In order to achieve the stated objectives, the current program includes the following analyses:.

1. Concentrations of beta emitters in surface water~and air particulates.

2. Concentrations of gamma emitters in ground and surface water, air particulates, milk, fish, sediment and vegetation.

3. Concentrations of tritium in ground and surface water.

4. -Concentrations of 1-131 in air and milk.

5.. Ambient gamma radiation levels at various site environs.

C. Data Interpretation The radiological and direct radiation data collected prior to Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station becoming operational were used as a baseline with which these operational data were compared. For the purpose of this report, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station was considered operational at initial criticality. In addition, data were compared to previous years' operational data for consistency and trending. Several factors were important in the interpretation of the.-data:

1. Lower Limit of Detection and -Minimum Detectable Concentration The lower limit of detection (LLD) was defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that would yield a net count (above background) that would be detected with only a 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal. The LLD was irntended as -an a priori(a before the fact) estimate of a system (including instrumentation, procedure and sample type) and not as an a posteriori(after the fact) criteria for the presence of activity,, All analyses were designed to achieve the required QCNPS detection capabilities for environmental sample analysis.

The minimum detectable concentration (MDC) is defined above with the exception that the measurement is an a posteriori(after the fact) estimate of the presence of activity.

6 of 109

2. 'Net Activity Calculation and Reporting of Results Net activity for'asample was calculated by subtracting background activity from the sample activity. Since the REMP measures extremely small changes in radioactivity in the environment, background'variations may result in sample activity being lower than the background activity effecting a negative number. An MDC was reported in.,all cases where positive activity was not detected.

Gamma spectroscopy results for each type of sample were

grquped as follows:

For surface water, groundwater and vegetation 12 nuclides, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Zr-95, Nb-95, 1-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ba-140; and La-140'were reported.

For fish, sediment, air particulate and milk 11 nuclides, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Nb-95, Zr-95, Cs-1 34, Cs-1 37 and Ba-140 and La-.140 were reported.

Means and standard deviations of the results were calculated. The standard deviations represent the variability of measured results for different, samples rather than single analysis uncertainty.

D. Program Exceptions For 2009 the QCNPS REMP had a sample recovery rate in excess of 99%. Sample anomalies and missed samples are listed in the tables below:

Table D-1 LISTING OF SAMPLE ANOMALIES Sample Location Collection Reason Type Code Date A/I Q-41 01/02/09 Low reading of 42.3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months due to startup of new locations as of 12/31/08.

A/I Q-41 04/03/09 Low reading of 138.3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months due to tripped breaker. Collector reset breaker.

TLD Q-205-1 04/03/09 Results were outside 3 sigma administrative trend. Duplicate TLD 205-4 in the same sector read as expected.

7 of 109

Table D-1, LISTING OF SAMPLE ANOMALIES (continued)

Sample. Location Collection ,Reason-Type Code Date A/I Q-41 05/08/09 Low reading of120.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months due to blown breaker during storm.

A/I Q-01 06/12/09 LoW reading of 61.7 hours8.101852e-5 days 0.00194 hours 1.157407e-5 weeks 2.6635e-6 months due to power outage at air station; workers replaced GFI TLD Q-205-1 07/01/09 Results were outside 3 sigma administrative trend. Duplicate TLD 205-4 in the same sector read-as expected.

A/I Q-38 . 08/14/09 Low reading of 162.9 hours1.041667e-4 days 0.0025 hours 1.488095e-5 weeks 3.4245e-6 months due to severe weather causing power outages in the area.

TLD Q-201-1 09/04/09 TLD was found on the ground; remounted.

TLD Q-204-2 10/01/09 Results were outside 3 sigma administrative trend. Duplicate TLD 204-1 in the same sector-e~ad as expected.

A/I Q-13 12/11/09 Low reading of 166.8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months due to power outage from snow storm.

A/I Q-41 12/11/09 Low reading of 137.6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months due to power outage from show storm.

A/I Q-41 12/24/09 Low reading of 109.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months due to power outage from ice storm.

A/I Q-13 12/24/09 Low reading of 132.2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months due to power outage from ice storm.

A/I Q-41 01/01/10- Low reading of 64.5 hours5.787037e-5 days 0.00139 hours 8.267196e-6 weeks 1.9025e-6 months due to blown surge protector. GFCI was replaced.

Table D-2 LISTING OF MISSED SAMPLES Sample- Location Collection Reason Type Code Date SW .Q-33 01/02/09 - 02/20/09 No sample'; water frozen SW Q-34 01/02/09 - 02/06/09 No sample; water frozen 8 of 109

'"Table D-2 -` 'LISTING 0F MISSED SAMPLES (continued)

Sample Location, Collection Reason Type Code Date TLD Q-41-1 04/03/09 TLDs were missing for 2 nd quarter Q-41 exchange. Collector placed spare TLDS at both locations.

TLD Q-13-1 .04/03/09: V

.Vendor misplaced TLDs upon Q-13-2 .. receiving them. No data available for the,2nd quarter.

A/I Q-37 10/23/09 Low reading of 0.3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months due to ground fault outlet malfunction; collector replaced. Insufficient run time for viable sample.

A/I Q-37 10/30/09 Low reading'of 0.8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months due to pump malfunction; collector replaced pump. Insufficient run time for viable sample.

SW .Q33 12/!,1/09 - 01/01/10 No sample; water frozen Q-34 The overall sample recovery rate indicates that the appropriate procedures and equipment are in place to assure reliable program implementation..

E. Program Changes TLD and A/I station Q-41 was added to the AREOR program on January 01,2009.

Sediment station Q-40 was added to the AREOR program on January 01, 20090.'

IV. Results and Discussion A. Aquatic Environment

1. Surface Water Samples were taken weekly and composited monthly at two 9 of 109

locations (Q-33 and Q-34). Of these locations, only Q-33 located downstream, could be affected by Quad Cities' effluent releases.

The following, analyses were performed.

Gross Beta Samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta (Table C-1.1, Appendix C). Gross beta activity was detected in 19 of 22 samples. The values ranged from 3.2 to 9.4 pCi/L. Concentrations detected were consistent with those:

detected in previous years and the control location (Figure C-1, Appendix C). The required LLD was met.

Tritium Quarterly composites of weekly collections were analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-1.2, Appendix C). No tritium activity was detected (Figure C-2, Appendix C). The 2000 pCi/L OCDM and contractually required 200 pCi/L LLDs were met.

-Gamma Spectrometry Samples from both locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-1.3, Appendix C). No nuclides were detected and all required LLDs were met.

Ground Water Quarterly grab samples were collected at two locations (Q-35 and Q-36). Both locations could be affected by Quad Cities' effluent releases. The following analyses were performed:

Tritium Quarterly grab samples from the locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-11.1, Appendix C). No'tritium activity was detected (Figure C-3, Appendix C). The 2000 pCi/L OCDM and contractually required 200 pCi/L LLDs were met.

Gamma Spectrometry Samples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-11.2, Appendix C). No nuclides were detected.

10 of 109

3. Fish Fish samples comprised, of various commercially and recreationally winportant species were cillected~attw6 locations (Q-24 and Q-29) semiannually. Location Q-24 could be affected by Quad Cities' effluent releases". The following analysis was performed:

Gamma Spectromet

,The edibleforportion anIalyzed of fish samplesfrom both locations was gamma emittihg nuclides (Table C-I11.1, Appendix C).

No nuclides were detebted and all reqluired LLDs were met.

4. Sediment Aquatic sediment samples'were collected at two locations (Q-39 and Q-40) semiannually.' The'locati6n, *located downstream, could be affected by Quad Cities' effluent releases. The following analysis was performed:&

Gamma Spectrometry Sediment samples from *Q-39:and Q-40 were analyzed for gamma

.emitting nuclides (Table C-IV.1, Appendix C). Cesium-137 was

detected in three of fou-r samples. The values ranged from 64 to 496 pCi/kg dry. No other nuclides were detected and all required LLDs were met.

B. Atmospheric Environment

1. Airborne

a. Air Particulates Continuous air particulate samples Were collected from ten locations on a weekly basis. The ten locations were separated into three groups: Near-field samplers within 4 km of the site (Q-01, Q-02, Q-03 and Q-04), far-field samplers between 4 and 10 km from the site (Q-13, Q-16, Q-37, Q-38, Q-41) and the Control sampler between 10 and 30 km from the site (Q-07). The following analyses were performed:

11 of 109

Gross Beta Weekly samples.were, analyzed for concentrations of beta emitters (Table C-V.1 and C-V.2, Appendix C).

DetectableQgross beta activity was observed at all locations.

Comparison of results among the four groups aid in determining the effects, if any, resulting from the operation of QCNPS. The results from the near-field locations (Group 1)ranged from 5 to39 E-3 pCi/m 3 with a mean of 20 E-3 pCi/m . The results from the far-field locations (Group II) ranged from 5 to 4.1 E-3 pCi/m 3 with a mean of 20 E-3 pCi/m 3 . The results from the Control location (Group Ill) ranged from 6 to 42 E-3 pCi/m 3 with a mean of 22 E-3 pCi/m 3 . Comparison of the 2009 air particulate data with

.previous years data indicate no effects from the operation of QCNPS. In addition a comparison.of the weekly mean values for 2009 indicate no notable differences among the three groups (Figures C-4 through C-6, Appendix C).

Gamma Spectrometry Weekly samples were.composited quarterly and analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-V.3, Appendix C). No nuclides were detected and,all required.LLDs were met.

b. Airborne Iodine Continuous air samples-were collected-from ten locations (Q-01, Q-02, Q-03, Q-04, Q-07, Q-13, Q-16, Q-37, Q-38 and Q-41) and analyzed weekly for 1-131 (Table C-VI.1, Appendix C). All results were less than the MDC and the required LLD was met.

2.. Terrestrial

a. Milk Samples were collected from one location (Q-26) biweekly May through October and monthly November through April.

- The following analyses were performed:

Iodine-1 31 Milk samples from the location were analyzed for 12 of 109

.concentratiohs of'1-131 (Table CG-VII.1,Appendix C). No

"'--13 Was detected and the LLDwas met.

Gamma Spectrometry Each milk sample was analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-VII:2, Appendix C). No nudlides were detected:and all required LLDs were met.

b. Food Products.

Food product samples were collected at four locations plus a control location (9-Quad 1 - Control, Q-Quad 1, Q-Quad 2, Q-Quad 3, and Q-Quad 4) annually during growing season.

Four-locations, (Q-Quad 1, Q-Quad 2, Q-Quad 3 and Q-Quad 4) could be affected by Quad Cities' effluent releases. The following analysis was performed:

Gamma Spectrometry Samples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-VIII.1, Appendix C). No nuclides were detected and all required LLDs Were met.

C. -Ambient Gamma.Radiation Ambient gamma radiation levels were measured utilizing thermoluminescent dosimeters. Forty-one TLD locations were established around the site. Results of TLD measurements are listed in Tables C-IX.1 to C-IX.3, Appendix C.

Most of the TLD measurements were-below 30 mR/quarter, with a range of 17 to:30 mR/quarter. A comparison of the Inner Ring, Outer Ring and Other data to the Control Location data, indicate that the ambient gamma radiation levels from all the locations were comparable.

D. Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation QCNPS commenced use of an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) in Dec 2005. There were no measurable changes in ambient gamma and radiation level as a result-of ISFSI operations.

E. 'Land Use Survey, A Land Use Survey conducted during August 2009 around QCNPS was 13 of 109

performed by Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) for Exelon Nuclear to comply with the Quad Cities' Offsite Dose Calculation Manual. The purpose of the survey was to document the nearest resident and milk producing animals in each of the sixteen 22 1/2 degree sectors around the site. The results from the land use census have not identified any locations, which yield a calculated dose or dose commitment, via the same pathway, that is at least 20% greater than at a location from which samples are currently being.obtained. The results of this survey are summarized below.

Distance in Miles from QCNPS Sector- Residence Livestock Milk Farm Miles . Miles Miles N 0.6 . 2.7 NNE. 3.8 6.0 NE I 1.3.

ENE 2.9 2.9 E 2.0 2.7 ESE 2.8 3.1 3.1 SE 2.5 3.2 -

SSE 1.1 3.6 6.6,11.5 S 0.8 1.6 SSW 3.2 SW 2.9 3.3 WSW 2.2 2.2 W 2.6 4.3 4.6 WNW 2.7 3.8 NW 2.6 4.7 NNW', 2.1 2:2 F. Errata Data During a self assessment (AT 981645) the following, errors Were noted in the 2008 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report:

1. Sample anomaly from 8/8/08 was not included in the annual report.

During this particular sampling period, air particulate sampling station Q-02 read low in overall sampling hours. The recorded time was 87.2 and should have read approximately 168 hours0.00194 days 0.0467 hours 2.777778e-4 weeks 6.3924e-5 months . The GFCI was found to be faulty and replaced. The pump was restarted with no further-issues. (Reference IR 808162)

2. Sample-anomaly from 10/3/08 was noted twice in the Program Exceptions table. This repeat anomaly was for TLDs Q-1 11-1 and nd Q-114-1, which were not exchanged 2 . quarter of 2008 due to flood waters. The table should only reflect one entry for these samples on 10/3/08.

14 of 109

3:. Sample anomaly listings from 5/2/08, 6/27/08, and 10/3/08 reflect non-specific location Codes listed in the'('Other') Program Exceptions table. Each of these location codes should have read

'Q-202-1.'

G.. Summary of Results - Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program The primary and secondary laboratories analyze d Performance Evaluation (PE) samples of air particulate, air. iodine, milk, soil, vegetation and water matrices (Appendix D).. The PE samples, supplied by Analytics Inc.,-Environmental Resource Associates (ERA) and DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP),**were evaluated against the following pre-set acceptance criteria:

1. Analytics Evaluation Criteria '

Analytics' evaluation report provides a ratio of laboratory results and Analytics' known value. Since flag'values'are not assigned by Analytics, TBE-ESevaluates the reported ratios based on internal QC requirements, which' are&based on the DOE MAPEP criteria.

2. ERA Evaluation Criteria ERA's evaluation report provides an acceptance range for control and warning limits with associated flag values. ERA's acceptance limits are established per the USEPA, NELAC, state specific PT program requirements' Or ERA's SOP for the Generation of Performance Acceptance Limits, as applicable. The acceptance limits are either determined by a regression -equation specific to each analyte or a 'fixed percentagelimit promulgated under the appropriate regulatory document .

3., DOE Evaluation Criteria MAPEP's evaluation report provides an acceptance range with

..,.associated flag values.

The MAPEP* defines three levels of performance: Acceptable (flag = "A"), Acceptable with Warning (flag = "W"), and Not Acceptable (flag = "N"). Performance is considered acceptable when a mean result for the specified analyte is +/- 20% of the reference value. Performance is acceptable with warning when a mean result falls in the range from +/-20% to +/-30% of the reference value (i.e., 20% < bias < 30%). If the bias is greater than 30%, the results are deemed not acceptable.

15 of 109

For the primary laboratory, 17 out of 18 analytes met the specified acceptance criteria. One sample did not.meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reason: -.

1. Teledyne Brown Engineering's Analytics June 2009 Zn-65 in AP result of 137 pCi/L was higher than the known value of 101 pCi/L, resulting in a found to known ratio of 1.36. NCR 09-23 was initiated to investigate.this failure. The failure appears to be a result of a slightly high bias on Detector 7. A recount on Detector 17 resulted ina Zn,-65 result of 101 pCi/L. The detector has been tagged odt-of-service until a recalibration can be performed.

Detector 7. is not used for client samples.

For the secondary laboratory, Environmental,Inc., 11 out of 14 analytes met the specified acceptance criteria. Four samples did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons:

1. Environmental Inc.'s ERA April 2009 Cs--137 in water result of 147.7 pCi/L exceeded the lower control limit of 151.0 pCi/L. All gamma emitters showed a. low bias. A large plastic burr found on the base ofthe Marinelli kept the beaker from sitting directly on the detector. Recounting in a different beaker gave an acceptable result of 155.33 +/- 14.55 pCi/LJ-

2. Environmental Inc.'s ERA April 2009 H-3 in water result of 22819 pCi/L exceeded the upper'contr'ol limit of 22300 pCi/L. A recount of the original vials aver'aged 23,009'pCi/L. Reanalysis results were acceptable at 19,170 pCi/L. No cause could be found for the failure.

3. Environmental Inc.'s MAPEP.January 2009 Sr-90 in AP result of 0.93 exceeded the upper control limit of 0.83., Reanalysis results were acceptable at 0.54 +/- 0.12. Bq/filter. No cause could be found for the failure.

4. Environmental Inc.'s MAPEP July 2009 Sr-90 in soil result of 310.5 Bq/kg exceeded the lower control limit of 319 Bq/kg. Reanalysis results were acceptable at 363.3 Bq/kg. Incomplete separation of strontium from calcium could'result in a higher recovery percentage and consequently lower reported activity.

The Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program provides evidence of "in control" counting systems and methods, and that the laboratories are producing accurate and reliable data.

16 of 109

APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT

SUMMARY

17 of 109

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 NAME OF FACILITY: QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 & 50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY: CORDOVA, IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2009 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE- RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS SURFACE WATER GR-B 22 4 6.0 5.2 6.0 Q-33 INDICATOR (PCI/LITER) (9/11) (10/11) (9/11) CORDOVA (3.2/9.4) (3.3/7.1) (3.2/9.4) 3.1 MILES SSW OF SITE H-3 2000 <LLD <LLD GAMMA 22 MN-54 15 <LLD. <LLD 0 CO-58 15 <LLD <LLD 0 FE-59 30 <LLD .. .. <LLD 0 CO-60 15 <LLD <LLD 0 ZN-65 30 <LLD <LLD 0 00 0

0,, NB-95 15 <LLD <LLD MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)

FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 NAME OF FACILITY: QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 & 50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY: CORDOVA, IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2009 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS SURFACE WATER ZR-95 30 <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/LITER) 1-131 15 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-134 15 <LLD <LLD 0 t'J CS-137 18 <LLD <LLD 0 BA-140 60 <LLD <LLD 0 LA- 140 15 <LLD <LLD . 0 GROUND WATER H-3 8 2000 <LLD NA 0 (PCI/LITER) 0 GAMMA 8 MN-54 15 <LLD NA 0 MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)

FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 NAME OF FACILITY: QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 & 50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY: CORDOVA, IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2009 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS ,LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) . MEASUREMENTS GROUND WATER CO-58 15 <LLD NA (PCI/LITER)

FE-59 30 <LLD NA CO-60 15 <LLD NA ZN-65 30 <LLD NA 0 NB-95 15 <LLD NA 0 ZR-95 30 <LLD NA 0.

1-131 15 <LLD NA 0 0'

0 CS-134" 15 .... < LD NA 0 MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)

FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-i RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 NAME OF FACILITY: QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 & 50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY: CORDOVA, IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2009 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS GROUND WATER CS-137 18 <LLD NA 0 (PCI/LITER)

BA-140 60 <LLD NA 0 LA- 140 15 <LLD NA 0 FISH GAMMA 8 (PCI/KG WET) MN-54 130 <LLD <LLD CO-58 130 <LLD <LLD FE-59 260. <LLD <LLD 0 CO-60 130 <LLD <LLD 0 0

ZN-65 260 <LLD <LLD 0 MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)

FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 NAME OF FACILITY: QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 & 50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY: CORDOVA, IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2009 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS FISH NB-95 NA <LLD *LLD (PCI/KG WET)

ZR-95 NA <LLD <LLD CS-134 130 <LLD <LLD 0 6>

CS-137 150 <LLD <LLD 0 BA-140 NA <LLD <LLD 0 LA-140 NA <LLD <LLD 0 SEDIMENT GAMMA 4 (PCI/KG DRY) MN-54 NA <LLD <LLD 0 t'J 0o 0

CO-58 NA <LLD <LLD 0 MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)

FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 NAME OF FACILITY: QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 & 50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY: CORDOVA, IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2009 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS SEDIMENT FE-59 NA. <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG DRY)

CO-60 NA- <LLD <LLD 0 ZN-65 NA <LLD <LLD 0 NB-95 NA <LLD <LLD 0 ZR-95 NA <LLD <LLD 0 CS-134 150 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-137 180 112 280- 280 Q-40 CONTROL 0 (1/2) (?/2) (2/2) NORTH OF ALBANY (64/496) (64/496) 8.9 MILES NE OF SITE 0

BA-140 NA _ <LLD cLLD 0 MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)

FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 NAME OF FACILITY: QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 & 50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY: CORDOVA, IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2009 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS SEDIMENT LA-140 NA <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG DRY)

AIR PARTICULATE GR-B 518 10 20 22 22 Q-13 INDICATOR 0 (E-3 PCI/CU.METER) (463/466) (51/52) (52/52) PRINCETON (5/41) (6/42) (9/41) 4.7 MILES SW OF SITE GAMMA 40 MN-54 NA <LLD <LLD CO-58 NA .<LLD <LLD FE-59 NA <LLD <LLD 0 CO-60 . NA <LLD <LLD ZN-65 NA <LLD <LLD 0 0

NB-95 NA <LLD <LLD 0 MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)

FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 NAME OF FACILITY: QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 & 50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY: CORDOVA, IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2009 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS AIR PARTICULATE ZR-95 NA <LLD <LLD 0 (E-3 PCI/CU.METER)

CS-134 50 <LLD <LLD 0 00 CS-137 60 <LLD <LLD 0 BA-140 NA <LLD <LLD 0 LA- 140 NA <LLD <LLD 0 AIR IODINE GAMMA 518 (E-3 PCI/CU.METER) 1-131 70 <LLD; <LLD 0 MILK 1-131 20 I <LLD NA 0 (PCI/LITER) 0 GAMMA 20 MN-54 NA <LLD NA 0 MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)

FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 NAME OF FACILITY: QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 & 50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY: CORDOVA, IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2009 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS MILK CO-58 NA <LLD NA (PCI/LITER)

FE-59 NA <LLD NA CO-60 NA <LLD NA 0 ZN-65 NA <LLD NA 0 NB-95 NA <LLD NA 0 ZR-95 NA <LLD NA 0 CS-134 15 <LLD NA 0 0

CS-137 18 <LLD NA 0 MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)

FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 NAME OF FACILITY: QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 & 50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY: CORDOVA, IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2009 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS MILK BA-140 60 <LLD NA 0 (PCI/LITER)

LA- 140 15 <LLD NA 0

,> VEGETATION GAMMA 10 (PCI/KG WET) MN-54 NA <LLD <LLD 0 CO-58 NA <LLD. <LLD 0 FE-59 NA <LLD <LLD 0 CO-60 NA <LLD <LLD. 0 ZN-65 NA <LLD <LLD 0 0

i-NB-95 NA <LLD <LLD 0 MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)

FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 NAME OF FACILITY: QUAD CITIES DOCKET NUMBER: 50-254 & 50-265 LOCATION OF FACILITY: CORDOVA, IL REPORTING PERIOD: ANNUAL 2009 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN (M)

LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN (M) MEAN (M) MEAN (M) STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSIS ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS VEGETATION ZR-95 NA <LLD <LLD 0 (PCI/KG WET) 1-131 ,60 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-134 60 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-137 80 <LLD <LLD 0 BA-140 NA <LLD <LLD 0 LA-140 NA <LLD <LLD 0 DIRECT RADIATION TLD-QUARTERLY 328 NA 22.1 21.6 26.5 Q-205-1 INDICATOR 0 (MILLI-ROENTGEN/QTR.) (320'/320) (8/8) (4/4)

(17/30) (14/25) (25/29) 4.7 MILES E 0-00 MEAN AND RANGE BASED ON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY (M)

FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)

APPENDIX B LOCATION DESIGNATION, DISTANCE & DIRECTION, AND SAMPLE COLLECTION & ANALYTICAL METHODS 29 of 109

TABLE B-i: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009 Location Location Description Distance & Direction From Site A. Surface Water Q-33 Cordova (indicator) 3.1 miles SSW Q-34 Camanche, Upstream (control) 4.4 miles NNE B. Ground/Well Water 1.5 miles S 0-35 McMillan Well (indicator)

Q-36 Cordova Well (indicator) 3.3 miles SSW C. Milk - bi-weeklv / monthly Q-26 Bill Stanley Dairy (indicator) 3.5 miles ESE D. Air Particulates / Air Iodine Q-01 Onsite 1 (indicator) 0.5 miles N Q-02 Onsite 2 (indicator) 0.4 miles ENE Q-03 Onsite 3 (indicator) . ,.- 0.6 miles S Q-04 Nitrin (indicator) 1.7 miles NE Q-07 Clinton (control) 8.8 miles NE Q-13 Princeton (indicator) 4.7 miles SW Q-16 Low Moor (indicator) 5.7 miles NNW Q-37 Meredosia Road (indicator) 4.4 miles ENE Q-38 Fuller Road (indicator) . .. 4.7 milesE Q-41 Camanche (indicator) ... 4.3 miles NNE E. Fish Q-24 Pool #14 of Mississippi River, Downstream (indicator) 0.5 miles SW Q-29 Mississippi River, Upstream (control) 1.0 miles N F. Sediment Q-39 Cordova, Downstream on Mississippi River (indicator) 0.8 miles SSW Q-40 North of Albany, Upstream on Mississippi River(control) 8.9 miles NE G. Food Products Quadrant 1 Ken DeBaille 2.3 miles ENE Quadrant 2 Dale Nimmic 3.0 miles ESE Quadrant 3 Amy Johnston 1.8 miles S Quadrant 4 Mike Fawcett 4.5 miles NW Control Charles Leavens 9.5 miles NE H. Environmental Dosimetry - TLD Inner Ring Q-101-1 0.6 miles N Q-101-2 0.9 miles N Q-102-1 1.3 miles NNE Q-102-3 1.4 miles NNE Q-103-1 and -2 1.2 miles NE Q-104-1 1.1 miles ENE Q-104-2 0.9 miles ENE Q-105-1 and -2 0.8 miles E Q-106-2 and -3 0.7 miles ESE Q-107-2 0.7 miles SE Q-107-3 0.8 miles SE Q-108-1 1.0 miles SSE Q-108-2 0.9 miles SSE B-1 30 of 109

TABLE B-i:' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009 Location Location Description Distance & Direction From Site H. Environmental Dosimetry - TLD (continued)

Inner Ring Q-109-1 0.9 miles S Q-109-2 1.2 miles S Q-111-1 2.6 miles SW Q-111-2 2.5 miles SW Q-112-1 2.5 miles WSW Q-1 12-2 2.2 miles WSW Q-113-1 and -2 2.5 miles W Q-114-1 2.1 miles WNW Q-114-2 2.5 miles WNW Q-115-1 2.6 miles NW Q-115-2 2.3 miles NW Q-116-1 2.3 miles NNW Q-116-3 2.4 miles NNW Outer Ring Q-202-1 4.4 miles NNE Q-202-2 4.8 miles NNE Q-203-1 4.7 miles NE Q-203-2 5.0 miles NE Q-204-1 4.7 miles ENE Q-204-2 4.5 miles ENE Q-205-1 4.7 miles E Q-205-4 4.8 miles E Q-206-1 and -2 4.8 miles ESE Q-207-1 and -4 4.7 miles SE Q-208-1 4.3 miles SSE Q-208-2 4.9 miles SSE Q-209-1 and -4 4.7 miles S Q-210-1 and -4

4.1 miles SSW Q-210-5 3.3 miles SSW Q-211-1 and -2 4.5 miles SW Q-212-1 5.4 miles WSW Q-212-2 4.4 miles WSW Q-213-1 4.3 miles W Q-213-2 4.8 miles W Q-214-1 4.7 miles WNW Q-214-2 4.4 miles WNW Q-215-1 5.0 miles NW Q-215-2 4.2 miles NW Q-216-1 4.6 miles NNW Q-216-2 4.3 miles NNW Other Q-01 Onsite 1 (indicator) 0.5 miles N Q-02 Onsite 2 (indicator) 0.4 miles ENE Q-03 Onsite 3 (indicator) 0.6 miles S Q-04 Nitrin (indicator) 1.7 miles NE Q-13 Princeton (indicator) 4.7 miles SW Q-16 Low Moor (indicator) 5.7 miles NNW Q-37 Meredosia Road (indicator) 4.4 miles ENE Q-38 Fuller Road (indicator) 4.7 miles E Q-41 Camanche (indicator) 4.3 miles NNE B-2 31 of 109

TABLE B-i: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009 Location Location Description Distance. & Direction.

From Site H. Environmental Dosimetry - TLD (continued)

Control Q-07 Clinton (control) 8.8 miles NE

Removed from ODCM in December 2006 and replaced by Q-210-5. Q-210-4 is for trending only.

B-3 32 of 109

TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009 Sample Analysis Sampling Method Analytical Procedure Number Medium . . *"..

Surface Water Gamma Spectroscopy Monthly composite from TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis weekly grab samples.

Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by

__ _. gamma spectroscopy Surface Water Gross Beta Monthly composite from TBE, TBE-2008 Gross Alpha and/or gross beta activity in weekly grab samples. various matrices Env. Inc., W(DS)-O1 Determination of gross alpha and/or

'_ _'_ _ _gross beta in water (dissolved solids or total residue)

Surface Water Tritium., Quarterly composite TBE, TBE-2011 Tritium'analysis in drinking water by liquid from weekly grab scintillation

' samples.

Env. Inc., T-02 Determination of tritium in water (direct

,__________,_method)

Ground Water Glmma Spectroscopy Quarterly grab samples. TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by

______ _ gamma spectroscopy Ground Water Tritium Quarterly grab samples. TBE, .TBE-2011 Tritium analysis in drinking water by liquid scintillation Env. Inc., T-02 Detemination of tritium in water (direct

_________method)

Fish GammaSpectroscopy. Semi-annual, samples 4TBE-2007 Gamriia emitting radioisotope analysis collected via:

electroshocking or other Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by techniques gamma spJectroscopy Sediment Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual grab ., TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis samples .

. Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by

. ... .... _______. .___ . gamma spectroscopy Air Pafticulates Gross Beta "One-week composite of TBE, TBE-2008,Gross Alpha and/or gross beta activity in S ...coritinuous airsamPling various matrices through glass fiberfilter,- n" . A paper . nv. 02 Determination of gross alpha and/or gross

-, . ; , b6eta in air particulate filters Air Particulates Gamma Spectroscopy Quarterly comý6silteof TBE,,,TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis

... a'ch station

.,* ' Env., . '

, *. , Envlnc GS-01 Deterrmintionof gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy -

Air Iodine Gamma Spectroscopy Weekly composite of TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis continuous air sampling through charcoal filter

Env. Inc., 1-131-02'Determination of 1-131 in charcoal S" canisters by gamma spectroscopy (batch method)

Milk 1-131, "; Bi-weekly grab sample TBETBE-2012 Radioiodine in various matrices when cows are~on pasture. Monthly all " Env. Inc., 1-131-01 Determination of 1-131 in milk by.anion other times.,, exchange Milk Gamma Spectroscopy Bi-weekly grab sample TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analysis

.- when cows are on

-. pasture. Monthly all Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by other times' gamma spectroscopy Food Products Gamma Spectroscopy Annual grab samples. TBE, TBE-2007 Gamma emitting radioisotope analyis Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma spectroscopy TLD Thermoluminescence Quarterly TLDs Global Dosimetry Dosimetry B-4 33 of 109

U 101-121 i* 01

North IS-U-l,t t o7 i-00tie- -

io-i. a i*

ii .

.5il - aM i-i,.1 S1 , S=

3-0 itoi,- -

q0 . I/- 1.5 7k QUAD CITIES S , STATION 0 I*,

RFIGURE6-1 REMP Sample Locations

.I- 1-ýJ-gnm 0* fl-j-ý K +/- - .1. - £~0 0

Figure B-1 Quad Cities REMP Sample Locations - 2 Mile Radius, 2009

101-1.233N11E 012 NNI NE0'IT.2 NEA E 02 a ENS 33 NS3 v,, I .,....I...1- ___-1.2 Sw 01-2.3 N 3 S 111 400 10 ,-2.

..... 10014 2 ONE 3N 101 1R. N2 N -E 0130 00 102-1.2 NN or 00 0-l.a NE

.00 3 30 01

. NN S - R7-i-*jJ' <.200-1.2 ESE A 300EONOLOCICOE 10W00 S20-1.2 m;+ 2 SNE NWN 110 0 I ASýTCT -

l 210-1.0 3SSW 3100001 213-1.2 wNNt A,0.1

o. r22M33 .... 000.

7300203LREIN QUAD CITIES IS

... 031 ..... 0 3 STAT I O N Figure B-2 Quad Cities REMP Sampling Locations 9 93 Mile Radius, 2009

APPENDIX C DATA TABLES AND FIGURES PRIMARY LABORATORY 36 of 109

TABLE C-I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2'SIGMA COLLECTION Q-33 Q-34 PERIOD I

01/03/09 - 01/31/09 (1) (1) 02/13/09 - 02/27/09 5.7 +/- 2.0 6.8 +/- 2.1 03/06/09 - 03/27/09 6.5 +/- 1.9 5.9 +/- 1.9 04/03/09 - 04/23/09 8.0 +/-2.2 6.5 +/- 2.1 05/01/09 - 05/29/09 7.4 +/- 2.2 7.1 +/- 2.2 06/05/09 - 06/26/09 < 3.0 3.3 +/- 2.1 07/03/09 - 07/31/09 9.4 +/- 2.3 5.5 +/- 2.1 08/07/09 - 08/28/09 3.6 +/- 1.9 4.1 +/- 2.0 09/04/09 - 09/25/09 3.4 +/-2.0 3.8 +/- 2.0 10/02/09 - 10/30/09 3.2 +/- 1.8 3.7 +/- 1.9 11/06/09 - 11/27/09 < 3.0 < 3.0 12/04/09 - 12/04/09 6.5 +/- 2.2 5.6 +/-2A1 MEAN 6.0 +/- 4.4 5.2 +/- 2.8 TABLE C-I.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE-WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/-2 SIGMA COLLECTION Q-33 Q-34 PERIOD 02/13/09 - 03/27/09 176 176 04/03/09 - 06/26/09 120 121 07/03/09 - 09/25/09 173 171 10/02/09 - 12/04/09 161 162 MEAN "

MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES C-I 37 of 109

TABLE C-1.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED INTHE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD Q-33 01/03/09 - 01/31/09 (1) 02/13/09 - 02/27/09 <1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <7 <1 <2 < 14 <4 03/06/09 - 03/27/09 <1 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2. <3 < 14 <1 <2 < 21 <7 04/03/09 - 04/23/09 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 ,< 1 <1 < 12 <1 <1 < 16 <5 05/01/09 - 05/29/09 <1 <1 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 < 11 <1 <1 < 17 S<4 06/05/09 - 06/26/09 <1 <2 <3 <1 <2 <2 <3 <8 <1 <1 < 14 S<4 07/03/09 - 07/31/09 <1 <2 <4 <1 <3 .< 2 <3 < 14 <1 <1 < 20 <6 08/07/09 - 08/28/09 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 < 1. <2 <9 <1 <1 < 15 - <5 09/04/09 - 09/25/09 <1 <2 <4 <1 <3 < 2 <3 < 14 <1 <2 < 20 <7 10/02/09 - 10/30/09 <3 <3 <6 <3 <5 '<3 <5 < 13 <2 <3 <26 <8 11/06/09 - 11/27/09 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <4 < 10 <2 <.2 < 19 <6 12/04/09 - 12/04/09 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 < 10 <1 <1 :< 42 < 14 MEAN Q-34 01/03/09 - 01/31/09 (1) 02/13/09 - 02/27/09 <1 <2 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <7 <1 <2 <14 <4 03/06/09 - 03/27/09 <1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 <14 <2 <2 <20 <6 04/03/09 - 04/23/09 <1 <1 <2 <1 <1 <1 <2

15 <1 <*1 <17 <4 05/01/09 - 05/29/09 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <8 <1 <1 <12 <4 06/05/09 - 06/26/09 <1 <1 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <8 <1 <'1 <13 * <4 07/03/09 - 07/31/09 <1 <2 <4 <1 <<3 <<2 <3 15 <1 < 22 <6 08/07/09 - 08/28/09 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <1 <2 <7 <1 <1 <11 .- <4 09/04/09 - 09/25/09 <1 <2 <3 <1 <2 <2 <3 <11 <2 <1 < 17 < 5 10/02/09 - 10/30/09 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <11 < 2 <2 <19 <5 11/06/09 - 11/27/09 <2 <2 <5 < 2 <4 <2 <4 <11 <2 < 2 <20 <6

<1 .<2 <1I <:1 < 39 < 13 12/04/09 - 12/04/09 <1 <1 <3 < 1' <2 <9 00 0 MEAN 0

(1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION

TABLE C-I1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OFTRITIUM IN GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION Q-35 Q-36 PERIOD 01/09/09 - 01/09/09 < 172 < 175 04/10/09 - 04/10/09 < 182 < 181 07/10/09 - 07/10/09 < 130 < 136 10/09/09 - 10/09/09 < 175 < 187 MEAN C-3' 39 of 109

TABLE C-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GROUND WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD Q-35 01/09/09 - 01/09/ 09 <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <4 < 12 <2 <2 < 21 <6 04/10/09 - 04/10/ 09 <1 <2 <4 <1 <3 <2 <3 < 14 <1 <1 < 19 <6 07/10/09 - 07/10/ 09 <1 <2 <3 <1 <3 <2 <3 <7 <1 <1 < 12 <4 10/09/09 - 10/09/ 09 <4 <4 <7 <3 <7 <4 <7 < 12 <4 <4 < 28 MEAN Q-36 01/09/09 01/09/09 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <2 <3 <8 <1 <2 < 15 <-5 04/10/09 04/10/09 <1 <1 <3 <1 <2 <2 <3 < 13 <1 <1 < 17 <6 07/10/09 07/10/09 <1 <1 <2 <1 <2 <1 <2 <5 <1 <1 <8 <3 10/09/09 10/09/09 <4 <3 <9 <4 <8 <4 <7 < 11 <4 <4 < 27 <8 MEAN 0*

0

TABLE C-II1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN FISH SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD Q-24 Channel Catfish 05/14/09 < 58 < 87 < 160 < 62 < 97 < 75 < 110 < 55 < 52 < 3760 < 1170 Common Carp 05/14/09 < 73 < 79 < 229 < 49 < 118 < 81 < 190 < 50 < 67 < 3980 < 1000 Bigmouth Buffalo 10/14/09 < 35 < 36 < 113 < 42 < 94 < 55 < 93 < 42 < 35 < 725 < 154 Common Carp 10/14/09 < 57 < 80 < 184 < 57 < 142 < 81 < 134 < 51 < 56 < 1000 < 321 MEAN

( Q-29

- Common Carp 05/14/09 < 54 < 75 < 149 < 49 < 107 < 87 < 120 < 44 < 47 < 3320 < 1120 Largemouth Bass 05/14/09 < 36 < 48 < 130 < 32 < 72 < 59 < 112 < 32 < 35 < 2130 < 652 Bigmouth Buffalo 10/14/09 < 51 < 63 < 145 < 50 < 133 < 74 < 118 < 45 < 52 < 891 < 266

< 106 Common Carp 10/14/09 < 53 < 64 < 175 < 56 < 64 < ill < 48 < 51 < 985 < 378 MEAN C

TABLE C-IV.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG DRY +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD Q-39 05/25/09 <52 <58 < 109 <45 < 108 < 56 < 107 <37 112 +/- 47 < 777 < 189 10/22/09 < 19 < 19 < 50 < 13 < 27 < 23 < 33 < 11 < 25 < 266 < 45 MEAN 112 Q-40 05/25/09 < 68 < 81 < 184 < 61 < 160 < 98 < 141 < 60 496 +/- 74 < 947 < 348 10/22/09 < 22 < 23 < 42 < 21 < 51 < 25 < 35 < 17 64+/- 46 < 272 < 69 MEAN -" 280 +/- 611 0

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-V.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA INAIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED INTHE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION GROUP I GROUP II I GROUP III l

PERIOD Q-01 Q-U2 Q-03 Q-04,- Q-13 Q-16 Q-37 Q-38 Q-41 Q-07 01/03/09 - 01/09/09 32 +/- 6 36 +/- 6 31 +/- 6 3 7 +/-6 35 +/-5 40 +/-6 35 +/- 6 33 +/- 6 37 +/- 5 38 +/- 5 01/09/09 - 01/16/09 22 +/- 5 31 +/- 5 30 +/- 5 31 +/-5,, . 28+/- 5 27 +/- 5 .26 +/- 5 29 +/- 5 25 +/- 5 33 +/- 5 01/16/09 - 01/23/09 35 +/- 5 19 +/- 4 34 +/- 5 37 +/-5 36 +/-5 34 +/- 5 3ý3+/- 5 30 +/- 5 39 +/- 5 34 +/- 5 01/23/09 - 01/30/09 35 +/- 5 35 +/- 5 36 +/- 5 39 +/-5:. 36+/-5 : 38-+/-5 36+/-5 ,35 +/- 5 39 +/- 5 42 +/- 6 01/30/09 - 02/06/09 16 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 20 +/- 4 18+/-4 18+/-4 22+/-5 16 +/-4 '17 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 02/06/09 - 02/13/09 33 +/- 5 28 +/- 5 29 +/- 5 32 +/-5 26 +/-5 33 +/- 5 33 +/-'5 26 +/- 4 26 +/- 5 29 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 19 +/- 4 11 +/-4 17+/- 4 02/13/09 - 02/20/09 20 +/- 4 21 +/- 4 20 +/- 4 2 1 +/-5 23+/-4 17+/-4 02/20/09 - 02/27/09 26 +/- 5 30 +/- 5 30 +/- 5 33+/-5 38+/-6 31 +/-5 29 +/- 5 31 +/- 5 32 +/-5 28 +/-5

.22+/-5 17+/- 4 21 +/-5 02/27/09 - 03/06/09 24 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 22 +/- 5 2 5 +/-5., '22 +/ 23-+/-'5. '18 +/- 4 03/06/09 - 03/12/09 22 +/- 4 24 +/- 5 20 +/- 4 20 +/-4-' 23 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 24 +/- 5 19 +/- 4 20 +/-5 22 +/-5 03/12/09 - 03/20/09 28 +/- 4 21 +/- 4 21 +/- 4 2'6+4. 26 +/-4 23 +/-4 22 +/- 4 23 +/- 4 21 4 27 +/-4 03/20/09 - 03/27/09 19 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 21 +/- 4 2'1 4 21 +/-4 22 +/-4 20 +/-'4 .18 +/- 4 19+/- 4 21 +/-4 03/27/09 - 04/03/09 14 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 14 +/- 4 16 +/-4 18 +/-4 17+/-44 11 +/-3 .15 +/- 4 -11 +/- 5 16+/- 4 04/04/09 - 04/10/09 11 +/-4 16 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 3 +/-.4 15 +/-4 18 +/-4 16 +/-'4 16 +/- 4 13+/- 4 15+/- 4 04/10/09 - 04/17/09 16+/- 4 21 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 20 +/-4 19 +/-4 21 +/-4 22 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 16 +/-4 23 +/-4 04/17/09 - 04/23/09 17 3 17 +/- 3 18 +/- 4 5+/-3 20+/-4 15+/-4 1.5 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 18+/- 4 23+/- 5 04/23/09- 05/01/09 10 +/-4 10 +/- 4 8+/-3 7 +/-4 12 +/-4 11 +/-4 tl +/-4 8+/-3 7+/-3 7+/-3 05/02/09 - 05/09/09 24 +5 21 +/- 4 20+/- 4 20 +/ 20 +/-4 21+/-4 24 +/-5 23 +/-4 26 +/- 6 22 +/-4 05/09/09 - 05/15/09 10 +/- 4 11 +/-4 12+/- 4 3+/-4 9+/-4 9+/-4 :8 +/-4 8+/-4 13 +/- 4 6+/-3 05/15/09 - 05/22/09 18 +/- 4 21 +4 17+/- 4 8 +/-4' 16 +/-4 17+/-4 19 +/-4 .19 +/-4 6+/-3 17+/- 4 05/22/09 - 05/29/09 12 +/- 4 10 4 14+/- 4 4 +/-4 17 +/-4 14 +/-4 14+/- 4 16+/- 4 13+/- 4 16+/- 4 05/29/09 06/05/09 13 +/- 4 14 +4 15+/- 4 23 +/-5 18 +/-4 18 +/-4 15+/- 4 14 +/-4 13 +/-4 17+/- 4 06/05/09 - 06/12/09 26 +/- 5 8+/-5 <7 11 +/-5 10+/-5 8+/-5 < 7- 15+/-5 <.7 <7 06/12/09 - 06/19/09 17 +/- 4 21 +/-4 20 +/-4 9 +/-4 19 +/-4 17 +/-4 16 +/-4 16 +/-4 ,18 +/- 4 21 +/-4 17 +/- 4 17+/- 4 18+/- 4 21 +/-5 13+/-4 18+/-5 21 +/-5 19 +/-5 "13+/- 4 16+/- 5 06/19/09 - 06/26/09 2 11 +/-4 11 +/-4 7+/-3 21 +/-4 06/26/09 - 07/03/09 13 +/- 4 12 4 14+/- 4 4 +/-4 12 +/-4 13 4 07/03/09 - 07/10/09 19 +/- 5 17+/- 4 22 +/-5 21 +/-5 17+/-44, 15+/-4 .19+/-4 19 +/-4 14 4 18 +/- 4 07/10/09 07/17/09 16 +/- 4 16+/- 4 18+/- 4 8 +/-4: 13 +/- 4 16+/- 4 18 +/-4 13+/- 4 ,.12 +/-4 18 +/- 4 07/17/09 - 07/24/09 13 +/- 4 19+/- 4 14+/- 4 7+/-4 17+/-4 22+/-5 17 +/-4 10+/- 4 8+/-4 17 +/- 4 07/24/09- 07/31/09 16 +/- 4 19+/- 4 11 +/-4 6 +/-4 b9 +/-4 15 +/-4 16+/- 4 .17 +/-4 .14 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 1

07/31/09 7 08/07/09 19 +/- 5 14 +/-4 18+/- 5 6+/-4 1.7 +/-5. 14 +/- 4 19 "+/-'5 16 +/- 5 13 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 08/07/09 7 08/14/09 19 +/- 4 16+/- 4 20 +/-4 5 +/- 5 21 +/- 4 19-+/- 4 20 +/-4 20 +/-5 19 +/- 4 20 +/- 4 08/14/09 - 08/21/09 21 +/- 4 24 +/-5 20 +/-4 2 +/-5 .21 +/-4 23+/-5 18 +/- 4 17+4 20 +/- 4 19 +/- 4 08/21/09 - 08/28/09 14 +/- 4 13+/- 4 13+/- 4 9+/-4 17+/-4 14+/-4 16 +/- 4 15 +/-4 15 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 08/28/09 - 09/04/09 16 +/- 4 19+/- 4 16+/- 4 2 7 +/-4 16 +/-4 17 +/-4 15 +/- 4 15+/- 4 18 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 09/04/09 - 09/11/09 28 +/- 5 30 +/-5 27 +5 36 +/-.6 34 +/- 6 29 +/-5 27 +/- 5 26 +/-5 .. :30 +/- 5 35 +/- 6 09/11/09 - 09/18/09 28 +/- 5 27 +/-5 25 +/- 5 3 +/-5 33 +/- 5 37 +/-5 27 +/- 5 30 +/-5 29 +/- 5 32 +/- 5 09/18/09 09/25/09 33 +/- 4 28 +/-4 30 +/- 4 0 +/-4 33 +/-4 ,29 +/-4 27 +/- 4 33 +/-4 31 +/- 4 30 +/- 4 09/25/09 10/02/09 20 +/- 4 19+/- 4 17 +/- 4 7 4 20 +/-4 17 +/-4 17+/- 4 15+/- 4 21 +/- 4 22 +/- 4 10/02/09. - 10/09/09 10 +/- 4 5+/-3 8+/-4 9+/-4 11 +/-4 9+/-4 8 +/-3 5+/-3 10 +/- 4 10 +/- 4 10/09/09 10/15/09 7+/-4 17+/- 4 15+/- 4 215 4 16+/-5 13+/-5 13+/- 4 13+/- 4 16 +/- 5 13 +/- 5 10/16/09 - 10/23/09 20 +/-4 14+/- 4 14 4 25 +/-4 19 +/-4 13 +/-4 (1) 15+/- 4 11+/- 4 17 +/- 4 10/23/09 - 10/30/09 17+/- 4 14+/- 4 16+/- 4 9 +/-4 18 +/-4 12 +/-4 (1) 12+/- 4 14 +/-4 15 +/- 4 10/30/09 - 11/06/09 22 +/-4 18 4 27 +4 39 4 17 +/-4 19 +/-4 20 +/-4 21 +/-4 17 +/-4 18 +/- 4 11/06/09 . 11/13/09 14+/- 4 19 +/- 5 17+/- 5 8+/-5 26+/-5 26+/-5 15+/- 4 15+/-4 28 +/-5 25 +/- 5 11/15/09 11/20/09 12+/- 5 12 +/- 5 13 5 2 6 +/-6 16 +/-4 18+/-4 13+/- 5 9+/-5 8+/-4

18+/-4 29 +/- 4 11/20/09 - 11/27/09 23 +/- 4 26 +/- 4 26 +/- 4 8 +/-4 33 +/-5 26+/-4 .27 +/-4 24 +/- 4 30 +/- 4 11/27/09 - 12/04/09 25 +/- 4 20 +/- 4 19 +/- 4 2 7 +/-4 25 +/-4 24 +/-4 22.+/- 4 21 +/-4 25 +/- 4 26 +/- 4 12/04/09 - 12/11/09 33 +/- 5 24 +/- 5 26 +/- 5 8 +/-5 24 +/- 5 19 +/- 5 27 +/-'5 26 +/- 5 15 +/- 5 23 +/- 5 12/11/09- 12/18/09 36 +/- 4 34 +/- 4 31 +/- 4 7 +/-4 35 +/-4 34 +/-.4 32 +/-4 35 +/-4 34 +/- 4 32 +/- 4 12/19/09 - 12/26/09 33 +/- 5 16 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 2 +/-5 41 +/- 7 40 +/-7 24 +/- 5 28 +/- 5 36 +/- 8 37 +/- 6 12/26/09 - 01/02/10 33 +/- 5 28 +/- 5 27 +/- 5 0 +/-5 32 +/-5 31.+/-5 31 +/- 5 20 +/- 5 26 +/- 10 29 +/-5 MEAN 21 +/- 15 20 +/- 14 20 +/- 13 22 +/- 16 22 +/- 16 21 +/- 16 20 +/- 14 19 +/- 15 19 +/- 18 22 +/- 16

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-7 43 of 109

TABLE C-V.2 MONTHLY AND YEARLY MEAN VALUES OF GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA GROUP I - NEAR-SITE LOCATIONS GROUP II - FAR-FIELD LOCATIONS GROUP III - CONTROL LOCATIONS COLLECTION MIN MAX MEAN+/-: COLLECTION MIN MAX MEAN+/- COLLECTION MIN MAX MEAN+

PERIOD 2SD PERIOD 2SD PERIOD 2SD 1 01/03/09 U II)UIUu au 3o - --

v IIUOIUu -

LU3 .+v 34 +/- 9 01/03109 - 01/30/09 33 42 37 +/- 8 01/30/09 02/27/09 15 33 25 +/-13 01/30/09 - 02/27/09 11 38 24 +/- 15 01/30/09 - 02/27/09 14 29 22 +/- 15 02/27/09 04/04/09 14 28 20 +/-8 02/27/09 - 04/04/09 11 26 20 +/- 8 -"02/27/09 - 04/04/09 16 27 +/-8 821 04/04/09 04/25/09 11 21 16 +/-5 04/04/09 - 04/25/09 7 22 16 7 04/04/09 - 04/25/09 7 23 17 +/- 151 04/25/09 05/29/09 7 24 *15~ +10 04/25/09 - 05/29/09 6 26 15+ 11 04/25/09 - 05/29/09 6 22 15 +/- 13 05/29/09 07/03/09 8 26 16 +/-9 05/29/09 - 07/03/09 7 21 15 8 05/29/09 - 07/03/09 16 21 19 +/-:5 07/03/09 07/31/09 11 22 ý17 +6 -07/03/09 -. 07/31/09 8.. .22 15 +/- 7 07/03/09 - 07/31/09 16 18 17 +/-;2 07/31/09 08/28/09 9 25 18 +/-9 07/31/09 -' 08/28/09 13 23 18 5 07/31/09 - 08/28/09 15 20 17 +/- 5 08/28/09 10/02/09 16 36 *25. +13 08/28/09 - 10/02/09 15 37 25 +/-.14 08/28/09 - 10/02/09 17. 35 27 +/- '15.

80 10/02/09 10/23/09 5 20 12 +/-9 10/02/09 - 10/23/09 5 19 13 +/- 7 10/02/09 - 10/23/09 10 17 14 +/-+5 10/23/09 11/27/09 12 29 19 +11 10/23/09 11/27/09 8 33 20 +/- 14 10/23/09 - 11/27/09 18 30 23 +/- *12 11/27/09 01/02/10 13 36 27 +/-.12 11/27/09 - 01/02/10 15 41 28 +/- 13 11/27/09 - 01/02/10 23 37 30 +/-'1;i, 01/03/09 - 01/02/10 5 39 20 +/- 15 01/02/09 - 01/02/10 5 41 20 +/- 16 01/02/09 - 01/01/10 6 42 22 +/--16 I

0

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-V.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER+ 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD Q-01 01/03/09 - 04/04/09 <3 <5 < 12 <2 <6 <5 <7 <3 <2 < 134 < 59 04/04/09 - 07/03/09 <4 < 13 < 36 <4 < 14 < 16 < 25 <5 <4 < 15500 < 5160 07/03/09 - 10/02/09 <4 <6 < 22 <4 < 10 <7 < 11 <5 <3 < 1110 < 353 10/02/09 - 01/02/10 <5 <5 < 8* <.4' < 10 <-8 < 6'

<5 < 71 < 19

< 5' MEAN Q-02 01/03/09 - 04/04/09 <3 <5 < 14 <4 <9 <4 <9 <4 <4 < 165 < 73 04/04/09 - 07/03/09 <3 <7 < 38 <2 <7 <8 < 17 <3 <2 < 8420 < 4200 07/03/09 - 10/02/09 <4 <8 < 20 <4 < 11 <9 < 15 <5 <4 < 1290 < 528 C) 10/02/09 - 01/02/10 <3 <4 < 10 <3 < 10 <3 <:7-" <3 < 3 < 46ý <17.

MEAN Q-03 01/03/09 - 04/04/09 <3 <5 < 16 <4 <7 <4 <8 <3 <3

192 < 56 04/04/09 - 07/03/09 <4 < 11 < 37 <3 < 10 < 11 < 18 <3 <3 < 13100 < 5110 07/03/09 - 10/02/09 <5 <9 < 27 <4 < 13 < 10 < 16 <5 <4 < 1420 < 527 10/02/09 - 01/02/10 <4 <4 < 12 <4 <5 <4 <8 <4 < 3* < 55 < 20 MEAN

<3 Q-04 01/03/09 0-4/04/09 <3 <3 < 9 <3 <6 <4 < 7 < 2 *<129 *<50 04/04/09 - 07/03/09 <5 < 13 <;45 <.3 < 10 < 14 < 33 <4. <-4 < 14300 < 6600 07/03/09 - 10/02/09 <3 <5 <19 <2 <5 <6 <7 <3 <2 < 926 < 353 10/02/09 - 01/02/10 <3. <4 -7 <2 .<8 <3 <4 <3 <2 < 62 < 19 MEAN PC 0/

TABLE C-V.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS INAIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED INTHE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 FeL59 Co-60 Zný65 Nb-95 Zrý95 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD "

Q-07 01/09/09 - 04/03/09 <3 <6 < 18 <3 <8 <5 < 10 <3 <2 < 195 < 74 04/03/09 - 07/03/09 <3 <9 < 37 <3 <11 <5 < 13 <3 <3 < 9920 < 3660 07/03/09 - 10/02/09 <5 <9 < 28 <6 <11 < 10 < 16 <5 <5 < 1280 < 516 10/02/09 - 01/01/10 <2 <2 < 5' <2 < 3 <3 <-3 <2 <2 < 38 < 10 MEAN Q-13 01/09/09 - 04/03/09 <3 <4 <13 <2 <7 <5 <7 <3 <3 <137 < 62 04/03/09 - 07/03/09 <4 < 11 < 56 <3 <9 < 11 < 20 <3 <2 < 13300 < 4730 07/03/09 - 10/02/09 <3 <6 < 13 <3 <7 <7 <9 <3 <2 < 683 < 320

"< 3 10/02/09 - 01/01/10 <3 <.5 < 10 <8 <4 <'9 <-4 <:3 < 73 <-23 0*

MEAN -

Q-16 01/09/09 - 04/03/09 <4 <7 < 15 <3 <11 <5 <9 <4 <3 < 244 < 30 04/03/09 - 07/03/09 <3 <6 < 39 <2 <7 <9 < 14 <2 <2 < 9850 < 2700 07/03/09 - 10/02/09 <3 <6 < 22 <3 <9 <7 < 12 <4 <3 < 1030 < 496 10/02/09 - 01/01/10 <3 <3 <8 <5 c<6 <4 < 7 <2 <4 < 33 < 23 MEAN Q-37 01/03/09 - 04/04/09 <3 <4 < 12 <7 <4 <8 <3 <3 <172 < 58

< 4990 04/04/09 - 07/03/09 9 < 34 < 4 < 13 < 14 < 28 .<4, .< 3 '< 13800

<3 <5 07/03/09 - 10/02/09 < 16 <3 <9 <5 <9 <3 <2 < 699 < 316

< 3 10/02/09 - 01/02/10 S<6 <4 <6' - <4 <5 <2 <3 <43 < 18 MEAN ON 0

0

TABLE C-V.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS INAIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS.IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-1'i40 PERIOD Q-38 01/03/09 - 04/04/09 <2 <4 *< 10 <3 < 5 5 <4 <7 <3 <2 < 156 < 38 04/04/09 - 07/03/09 <2 <7 < 36 <2 <7 <5 < 12 <3 <2 < 9230, < ;290 07/03/09- -. 10/02/09 <3 <6 ,< 18, <3 <9 <8 < 12 <3 <3 < 1100, < 265 10/02/09 - 01/02/10 <3 <.4 < 12 <4 < 7 <5 <3 <4 <69 < 26 MEAN Q-41 01109109 - 04/10/09 <3 <5 < 13 <4 '< 9 <5- '<8 <3 <2 < 101 < 43 04/03/09 - 07/03/09 <5 < 10 < 50 <5 < 13 < 12 < 23 <4 <3 < 12200 < 3530 07/03/09 - 10/02/09 <4 <*6 < 20 <3 A 10 <57- <.12 <4 <43 < 996 < 367-

<5 < 5 < 11 "< 9 10/02/09 - 01/01/10 < 5 <5 '<10 <4 ,<4 < 68 < 28 MEAN 0

TABLE C-VI-.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN AIRIODINE SAMPLES -.

COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION GROUPI GROUP II IGROUP III PERIOD Q-01 Q-02 Q-03 Q-13 Q-16 Q037 Q-38 Q-41 Q-07 01/02/09 - 01/09/09 < 33 < 59 < 59 < 61t < 40 < 52 < 64 < 64 < 53 < 49 01/09/09 - 01/16/09 < 29 < 53 < 53 < 55 < 48 < 60 < 56 < 56 < 60 < 57 01/16/09 - 01/23/09 < 63 < 38 < 63 < 65 < 33 < 62 <64 < 64 < 62 < 62 01/23/09 - 01/30/09 < 35 < 65 < 65 < 67 < 50 < 65 < 65 < 65 < 66 < 66 01/30/09 - 02/06/09 < 56 < 56 < 28 < 58 < 35 < 66 < 65 < 65 < 66 < 56 02/06/09 - 02/13/09 <9 < 16 < 16 < 16 < 35 < 63 < 59

59 < 62 < 17 02/13/09 - 02/20/09 < 35 < 35 < 35 < 22 < 19 < 37 < 35 < 35 . < 36 < 37 02/20/09 - 02/27/09 < 10 < 18 < 18 < 19 <8 < 16 < 16 < 16 - < 16 < 18 02/27/09 - 03/06/09 < 16 < 16 < 16 < 16 <9 < 17 < 17- < 17 < 17 < 11 03/06/09 - 03/12/09 < 26 < 46 < 46 < 48 -< 38 < 50 < '49 < 49 < 50 < 47 03/12/09 - 03/20/09 < 23 < 45 < 45 < 47 < 25 < 39 < 38 < 38 '-<40 < 47 03/20/09 - 03/27/09 < 15 < 28 < 28 < 29 < 39 < 48 < 49 < 49 < 48 < 28 03/27/09 - 04/03/09 < 22 < 43 < 43 < 45 < 51 < 35 < 41 < 40 < 62 < 55 04/03/09 - 04/10/09 < 40 < 50 < 50 < 52 < 27 < 50 < 53 < 53 . < 50 < 47 04/10/09 - 04/17/09 < 19 < 34 < 34 < 35 ; 33 < 34 < 29 < 36 , < 34 < 33 04/17/09 - 04/23/09 < 16 < 37 < 37 < 38 < 34 < 65 < 42 < 42 < 65 < 57 04/23/09 - 05/01/09 < 26 < 32 < 32 < 33 < 40 < 40 < 40 < 22 < 40 < 33 05/02/09 - 05/15/09 < 34 < 62 < 62 < 64 < 43 < 44 < 48 < 48 -< 37 < 57 05/15/09 - 05/22/09 < 31 < 59 < 43 < 44- < 26 < 63. < 63 < 63 < 63 < 44 05/22/09 - 05/29/09 < 27 < 49 < 49 < 51 < 37 < 51 < .51 < 51 < 51 < 50 05/29/09 - 06/05/09 < 20 < 36 < 36 < 37 < 36 < 47 < 45 < 46 < 47 < 37 06/05/09 - 06/12/09 < 57 < 25 < 47 < 48 < 17 < 17 < 17 <'12 < 57 < 49 06/12/09 - 06/19/09 < 50 < 50 < 50 < 51 <34 < 36 < 36 < 37 < 20 < 21 06/19/09 - 06/26/09 < 64 < 64 < 35 < 66 < 31 < 56 <*56 < 58 < 59 < 68 06/26/09 - 07/03/09 < 24 < 42 < 42 < 43 < 40 < 18 <40- <*41 < 41 < 43 07/03/09 - 07/10/09 < 34 < 32 < 32 < 18 < 21 < 51 < .49 < 51 < 51 < 33 07/10/09 - 07/17/09 < 37 < 36 < 36 < 37 < 62 < 63 <,.59 < 61 < 27 < 21 07/17/09 - 07/24/09 < 31 < 54 < 56 < 55. < 60 < 62 <,61 <-35 < 62 < 54 07/24/09 - 07/31/09 < 22 < 21 < 21 < 22 < 26 < 26 <'26 <26 .< 14 < 15 07/31/09 - 08/07/09 < 29 < 37 < 38 < 38 < 25 < 25 < 24 < 14 <25 < 38 08/07/09 - 08/14/09 < 22 < 38 < 39 < 39 < 41 < 41 < 42 < 19 <41 < 37 08/14/09 - 08/21/09 < 20 < 34 < 35 < 35 < 45 < 19 <-45 < 47 <46 < 35 08/21/09 - 08/28/09 < 44 < 42 < 44 < 44. < 19 < 44 <ý44 < 45 < 44 < 24 08/28/09 - 09/04/09 < 22 < 22 < 22 < 22 < 34 < 14 <133 < 34 . < 33 < 12 09/04/09 - 09/11/09 < 37 < 64 < 66 < 66 < 57 < 56 <':56 < 58 "<24 < 65 09/11/09 - 09/18/09 < 42 < 66 < 68 < 65 < 22 < 50 <'51 < 53 . '<50 < 65 09/18/09 - 09/25/09 < 55 < 53 < 55 < 55 < 55 < 33 < 52 < 53 < 55 < 35 09/25/09 - 10/02/09 < 11 < 20 < 21 < 21.

29 < 29 <"30 <13 <29 < 20 10/02/09 - 10/09/09 < 24 < 24 < 13 < 24 < 34 < 34 <'34 < 15 < 34 < 24 10/09/09 - 10/15/09 < 28 < 49 < 51 < 50 < 30 < 54 <l41 <42 < 54 < 65 10/15/09 - 10/22/09 < 32 < 31 < 18 < 32 < 36 < 36 (1) < 36 < 36 < 33 10/22/09 - 10/30/09 < 62 < 32 < 60 < 60 < 53 < 53 .. (1). < 56 < 53 < 57 10/30/09 - 11/06/09 < 66 < 64 < 66 < 66 < 25 < 45 < 32 < 32 < 45 < 52 11/08/09 - 11/20/09 < 26 < 58 < 60 < 60 < 35 < 35 <22 < 52 < 35 < 40 11/20/09 - 11/27/09 < 44 < 43 < 44 < 59 < 28 < 65 < 65 < 65 < 65 < 44 11/27/09 - 12/04/09 < 23 < 52 < 53 < 53 < 51 < 51 < 23 < 54 < 51 < 52 12/04/09 - 12/11/09 < 50 < 49 < 50 < 50 < 60 < 59 < 49 < 49 < 31 < 34 12/11/09 - 12/18/09 < 60 < 58 < 60 < 60 < 23 < 53 < 49 < 49 < 53 < 36 12/18/09 - 12/24/09 < 62 < 60 < 62 < 62 < 34 < 58 < 39 < 38 < 69 < 39 12/26/09 - 01/02/10 < 24 < 55 < 57 < 57 < 51 < 51 <57 < 57 < 52 < 51 MEAN (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-12 48 of 109

TABLE C-VII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN MILK SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA INDICATOR FARM COLLECTION 0Q26 PERIOD 01/03/09 < 0.6 02/06/09 < 0.7 03/06/09 < 0.6 04/04/09 < 0.5 05/02/09 < 0.5 05/15/09 < 0.6 05/29/09 < 0.6 06/12/09 < 0.9 06/26/09 <0.6 07/10/09 < 0.7 07/24/09 < 0.7 08/07/09 < 0.5 08/21/09 < 0.8 09/04/09 < 0.9 09/18/09 < 0.7 10/02/09 < 0.5 10/16/09 *<0.6 10/30/09 < 0.8 11/13/09 < 0.6 12/04/09 < 0.8 MEAN C-13 49 of 109

TABLE C-VII.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN MILK SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD Q-26 01/03/09 <4 <4 < 11 <4 <9 <4 <7 <3 <4 < 36 <11 02/06/09 <5 <5 < 10 <4 < 10 <6 <9 <5 <5 < 37 < 14 03/06/09 <5 <6 < 13 <5 < 12 <6 < 10 <5 <6 < 58 <9 04/04/09 <6 <7 < 14 <6 < 13 <6 < 12 <5 <6 < 49 < 14 05/02/09 <2 <3 <8 <2 <5 <3 <5 <2 <2 < 54 < 14 05/15/09 <2 <2 <7 <2 <5 <2 <4 <2 <2 < 31 <<9 05/29/09 <7 <7 < 18 <8 < 20 <9 < 12 <7 <8 < 45 < 15 06/12/09 <3 <4 < 10 <3 <7 <4 <6 <3 <3 < 38 <13 06/26/09 <4 <4 < 11 <5 <9 <4 <8 <4 <4 < 36 < 11 07/10/09 <4 <5 < 10 <4 < 10 <5 <9 <4 <5 < 41 < 12, 07/24/09 <5 <5 < 12 <5 < 11 <6 < 10 <4 <5 < 36 " 12 08/07/09 <7 <7 < 16 <7 < 15 <7 < 11 <6 <6 < 36 < 13 08/21/09 <7 <9 < 20 < 12 < 19 <8 < 14 <9 <8 < 53 <11 09/04/09 <5 <5 < 14 <6 < 13 <5 < 11 <5 <6 <34 < 12 09/18/09 <5 <4 < 11 <5 < 10 <5 <8 <4 <5 < 22 < 6 10/02/09 <4 <4 < 10 <4 < 10 <4, <7 <4 <4 < 25 <7 10/16/09 <4 <5 <9 <5 < 10 <5 <8 <4 <5 < 24 .< 10 10/30/09 <5 <5 < 12 <5 < 11 <5 < 10 <4 <5 < 41 <12 11/13/09 <6 <7 < 15 <6 < 14 <7 < 11 <5 <5 < 46 <15 -

12/04/09 <4 <5 < 12 <4 <9 <5 <9 <4 <5 < 38 <12 "

MEAN 0h 0

TABLE C-VIII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN FOOD PRODUCT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 - La-140 PERIOD Q-CONTROL Potatoes 07/08/09 < 12 < 11 < 34 < 12 < 35 < 14 < 24 < 51 < 10 < 13 < 99 <29 Rhubarb Leaves 07/08/09 < 11 < 13 < 29 < 12 < 28 < 13 < 25 < 54 < 12 < 13 < 124 <:24 MEAN Q-QUAD 1 Lettuce 07/08/09 < 12 < 14 < 31 < 11 <24 < 14 < 22 < 54 < 11 < 14 < 3 <26 Potatoes 07/08/09 < 14 < 15 < 34 < 11 < 25 < 14 < 24 < 55 < 11 < 13 < I11 < 29 MEAN Q-QUAD 2 Potatoes 07/08/09 *11 < 12 <32 < 12 <25 < 12 <25 <58 < 11 <13 < 92 < 28 Rhubarb Leaves 07/08/09 <8 < 9 < 26 < 10 < 19 < 11 < 19 < 39 < 8 < 9 < 78 <.23 MEAN Q-QUAD 3 Lettuce 07/08/09 < 13 < 15 < 32 <<14 < <17 26 < 54 < 13 < 13. < 118 < 31

<14. < 14 <, 38 .. < 14, < 36 < 17 .< 30 < 51 *< 12 < 1.17 < 1118 <'25 Sunchokes 07/08/09 MEAN Q-QUAD 4 Potatoes 07/08/09 < 17 < 16 < 40 < 15 < 35 < 18 < 30 < 56 < 13 < 17 < 117 < 29 Rhubarb Leaves 07/08/09 < 15 < 15 < 44 < 18 < 35 < 15 < 28 < 58 < 13 < 15 < 132 < 39 0/ MEAN 0

TABLE C-IX.1 QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROETGEN/QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS STATION MEAN JAN - MAR APR - JUN JUL SEP OCT - DEC CODE +/-2 S.D.

Q-01-1 21.5 +/-,3.8 23 21 19 23 Q-01-2 22.0 +/- 2.8 23 22 20 23 Q-02-1 22.5 +/- 4.2 25 22 20 23 Q-02-2 20.8 +/- 4.1 21 21 18 23 Q-03-1 19.5 +/- 3.5 21 18 18 21 Q-03-2 20.8 +/- 3.4 21 19 20 23 Q-04-1 22.8 +/- 6.2 23 21 20 2.7 Q-04-2 22.0 +/- 4.6 24 20 20 24 Q-07-1 21.3 +/- 4.1 23 20 19 '23, Q-07-2 22.0 +/- 4.9 23 20 20 25.

Q-13-1 22.3 +/- 3.1 22 (1) 21 24 Q-13-2 22.0 +/- 5.3 23 (1) 19 24 Q-16-1 20.8 +/- 3.0 22 19 20 ;22 Q-16-2 20.5 +/- 3.5 20 19 20 23 Q-37-1 22.5 +/- 5.3 26 21 20 23 Q-37-2 22.0,+/- 2.8 23 22 20 23 Q-38-1 23.0 +/- 2.3 24 22 22 24 Q-38-2 23.5 +/- 5.3 24 22 21 27' Q-41-1 20.3 +/- 4.6 (1) 19 19 .23.

Q-41-2 20.0 +/- 5.3 (1) 19 18 23 Q-101-1 21.5 +/- 5.0 21 19 2'1 25 Q-101-2 22.3 +/- 7.5 27 21 18 23 Q-102-1 22.3 +/- 4.4 25 21 20 23 Q-102-3 22.3 +/- 4.4 24 23 19 23 Q-103-1 20.8 +/- 6.2 21 19 18 25, Q-103-2 22.0 +/- 1.6 22 22 21 23 Q-104-1 20.8 +/- 4.1 22 19 19 23 Q-104-2 21.5 +/- 6.0 23 19 19 25 Q-105-1 21.0 +/- 2.8 22 19 21 22 Q-105-2 20.5.+/- 5.0 20 18 20 24 Q-106-2 21.0, + 2.3 22 20 20 22 Q-106-3 21.5 +/- 5.3 22 19 20 25 Q-107-2 22.0 +/- 5.2 23 21 19 25 Q-107-3 20.8 +/- 3.4 21 20 19 23 Q-108-1 21.3 +/- 5.3 -21 20 19 25 Q-108-2 20.8 +/- 7.0 22 19 17 25 Q-109-1 22.0 +/- 4.3 22 21 20 25.

Q-109-2 21.3 +/- 4.4 24 20 19 22 Q-111-1 23.8 +/- 3.4 24 23 26 22 Q-111-2 21.3 +/- 3.0 22 20 20 23 Q-112-1 21.5 +/- 2.6 23 21 20 22 Q-112-2 20.3 +/- 1.9 21 19 20 21 Q-113-1 20.5 +/- 2.6 21 20 19 22 Q-113-2 19.5 +/- 2.6 20 19 18 21 Q-114-1 20.0 +/- 5.4 19 19 18 24-Q-114-2 22.8 +/- 5.7 25 19 22 25 Q-115-1 20.8 +/- 4.4 22 18 20 23 Q-115-2 21.3 +/- 5.7 22 19 19 25 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-16 52 of 109

TABLE C-IX.1 QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROETGEN/QUARTER +/-2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS STATION MEAN, , JAN-MAR, APR-JUN JUL - SEP OCT - DEC CODE +/- 2 S.D:

Q-116-1 23.0 +/- 5.7 27 21 21 23 Q-116-3. 21:.5 +/- ,5.3 22

19 20 25 Q-201 -1 21.8 +/- 3.0 23 20 21 23 QG201-2 21.8 +/- '4.7 22 20 S20 S 25 Q-202-1 20.3 +/- 4.4 21 19 18 23 Q-202-2. . 22.0 +/- 0.0 22 22 22 22 Q-203-1 22.8 +/-.6.0 26 22 19 24 Q-203-2 25.0 +/- 6.3 26 22 23 29 Q-204-1 23.0 +/- 3.7 24 21 22 25 Q-204-2 25.0 +/- 7.1 25 22 23 30 Q-205-1 26.5 +/- 3.5 25 26 29 26 Q-205-4 24.8 +/- 6.6 28 23 21 27 Q-206-1 23.5 +/- 5.0 23' 23 21 27 Q-206-2 22.0 +/- 6.3 23 20 19 26 Q-207-1 23.3 +4.1 23 21 23 26 Q-207-4 22.8 + 1.0 23 22 23 23 Q-208-1 22.0 + 5.7 22 20 20 26 Q-208-2 22.8 +/-+4.4 24 22 20 25 Q-209-1 24.5 +/- 4.8 .24 23 23

28 Q-209-4 21.5 +/- 3.8 22 20 20 24 Q-210-1 23.8 +/- 4.4 26 23 21 25 Q-210-4 22.5 +/-*2.6 23 22 21 24 Q-210-5 20.0 +/- 3.7 22 18 19 21 Q-211-1 24.3 +/- 1.9 25 23 24 25 Q-211-2 24.8 +/- 1.0 25 25 25 24 22.8 22 22 23 24 Q-212-1 +/- 1.9 S 22 : 21 * *

18 23 Q-212-2 21.0 i+4.3 Q-213-1 22.8 +/-6:2 27' 21 20 23 Q-213-2 20.3 +/- 1.9 '21 20 .19 21 Q-214-1 21.5 +/- 2.6 22 21 20 23 Q-214-2 24.5 +/- 2.6 25 .23 m -24..- 26 Q-215-1 24.8 +/- 5.5 23 26. 22 28 Q-215-2 22.5 +/- 3.5 ... . 24 21 21 24 Q-216-1 23.5 +/- 4.8 26 21 22 25 Q-216-2 23.5 +/- 3.5 25 22 22 25 C-17 53 of 109

TABLE C-IX.2 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR THE INNER RING, OUTER RING, OTHER AND CONTROL LOCATION FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 . . * . 'I .... :j' RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLIkROETGEN/QUARTER +/-2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA COLLECTION INNER RING OUTER RING OTHER CONTROL PERIOD +/-2 S.D.

JAN-MAR 22.4 +/- 3.7 23.8 +/- 3.6 22.8 +/- 3.2 23.0 +/- 0.0 APR-JUN 19.9 +/- 2.6 21.7 +/- 3.5 .20.4 +/- 2.8 20.0 +/- 0.0 JUL-SEP 19.7 +/- 3.2 21.5 +/- 4.5 19.7 +/- 2.1 19.5 +/-- 1.4 OCT-DEC 23.5 +/- 2.7 24.8 +/- 4.2 23.5 .+/- 2.9 24.0 +/- 2.8 TABLE C-IX.3

SUMMARY

OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN/QUARTER LOCATION SAMPLES PERIOD PERIOD PERIOD MEAN ANALYZED MINIMUM MAXIMUM +/-+2 S.D.

INNER RING 120 17 27 21.4 +/- 4.4 OUTER RING 132 18 30 22.9 +/- 4.8 OTHER 68 18 27 21.6 +/- 4.2 CONTROL 8 19 25 .21.6 +/- 4.3 INNER RING STATIONS - Q-101-1, Q-101-2, Q-102-1, Q-102-3, Q-10311, Q-103-2, Q-104-1, C-104-2, Q-105-1, Q-105-2, Q-106-2, Q-106-3, Q-107-2, Q-107-3, Q-108-1, Q-108-2, Q-109-1, Q-109-2, Q-111-1, Q-111-2, Q-112-1, Q-112-2, Q-11-3-1, Q-113-2, Q-114-1, Q-114-2, Q-115-1, Q-115-2, Q-116-1, Q-116-3 OUTER RING STATIONS - Q-201-1, Q-201-2, Q-202-1, Q-202-2, Q-203-1, Q-203-2, Q-204-1, Q-204-2, Q-205-1, Q-205-4, Q-206-1, Q-206-2, Q-207-1, Q-207-4, Q-208-1, Q-208-2, Q-209-1, Q-209-4, Q-210-1, Q-210-4, Q-210-5, Q-211-1, 0-211-2, Q-212-1, Q-212-2, Q-213-1, Q-213-2, Q-214-1, Q-214-2, Q-215-1, Q-215-2, Q-216-1, Q-216-2, OTHER STATIONS - Q-01-1, Q-01-2, Q-02-1, Q-02-2, Q-03-1, Q-03-2, Q-04-1, Q-04-2, Q-13-1, Q-13-2, Q-16-1, Q-16-2, Q-37-1, Q-37-2, Q-38-1, Q-38-2, Q-41-1, Q-41-2 CONTROL STATIONS - Q-07-1, Q-07-2 C718 54 of 109

FIGURE C.-

SSurface Water;- Gross Beta'- Stations' Q-33 and Q-34 (C)

Collected ,inlthe Viciinity of QCNPS, 2000- 2004 Q-33 Cordova 12.0 r No samples; 10.0 -1 No samples; water frozen.

water frozen.

8.0+:

6.0+/-

I 4,0-2.0 0.0 i I I I 01-01-00 12-31-00 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 Q-34 (C) Camanche 10.0 8.0 No samples; water frozen.

6.0 0J UJ 2.0-K no 4 I I 01-01-00 12-31-00 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 C-19 55 of 109

FIGURE C-1, (cont.)

Surface Water - Gross Beta - Stations Q-33 and Q-34 (C)

Collected in the, Viciniity of QCNPS, ,2005,- 2009 Q-33 Cordova 12.0 T 10.0 +

8.0 +

.-J 6.0 +

0.

4.0 +

2.0 an J I I I I 12-01-04 12-07-05 12-13-06 12-19-07 12-24-08 12-30-09 Q-34 (C) Camanche 12.0 -

10.0 -

8.0 -

-L 6.0 +

0.

4.0 -

2.0 +

n0.0 I I I I I 12-01-04 12-07-05 12-13-06 12-19-07 12-24-08 12-30-09 DUE TO VENDOR CHANGE, < VALUES ARE LLD VALUES JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 2005 AND MDC VALUES AFTER JULY 2005 C-20 56 of 109

ý FIGURE C-2 Surface Water - Tritium.- Stations Q-33 and Q-34 (C)

Coected 1 in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000 - 2004 Q-33 Coyrdova 500 -

400 -

300

_J 200 4-100 0+

-100 4 I 01-01-00 12-31-00 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04

,_Q.34 (9C),Camanche 500 -r 400-300+

.J cl 200-100 +

0

-100 1 I l *

01-01-00 12-31-00 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 C-21 57 of 109

FIGURE C-2 (cont.)

Surface Water- Tritium - Stations Q-33 and Q-34J(C)

Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2005 - 2009 Q-33 Cordova 500 400 300 L. 2 CL 200 1UU -

0 1 03-01-05 02-17-06 02'05-07 01-24-08 01-11-09 12-30-09 Q-`34 (C)Camanche 500 T 400 +

300 +

,J 0.

200 100 -

0 i i i i ii 03-01-05 02-17-06 02-05-07 01-24-08 01-11-09 12-30-09 DUE TO VENDOR CHANGE, < VALUES ARE LLD VALUES JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 2005 AND MDC VALUES AFTER JULY 2005 C-22 58 of 109

FIGURE C-3 S*G'round Water - Tritium -. Station's Q-35 and Q-36 Coilected in the Vicinityeof QCNPS,ý 2000 2004 Q-35 McMillan Well 500 400 300

-J 200

100 .X 0-

-100-

-200 - I I 01-01-00 12-31-00 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 Q,-36Cqrdova Well 500 400 300 200 100-

-100

-200 I I I 01-01-00 12-31-00 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 C-23 59 of 109

FIGURE.C-3 (cont.)

Ground Water - Tritium - Stations Q-35 and Q-36 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS,:,2005w- 2009 Q-35 McMillan Well 500 400 300

-J 0.

200 --- I - V ý -_

100 0 -

03-31-05 03-07-06 02-11-07 01-18-08 12-24-08 ý 11-30-09 Q-36 Cordova Well 500 T 400 +

300 +

-J C.)

0.

200

/-

100 o 4I-03-31-05 03-07-06 02-11-07 01-18-08 12-24-08 11-30-09 DUE TO VENDOR CHANGE, < VALUES ARE LLD VALUES JANUARY THROUGH JUNE 2005 AND MDC VALUES AFTER JULY 2005 C-24 60 of 109

FIGURE C-4 AirParticulates - Gross Beta- Stations Q-01 and Q-02 C"ollected 'in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2000 - 2004 Q-01 Onsite No. 1 10.0 8.0 6.0 3

4.0 2.0 0.0 I 01-01-00 12-31-00 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 Q-02 Onsite No. 2 10.0 8.0 6.0 0.

CLl 9

us 4C0 2.0 0.0 -t.

01-01-00 12-31-00 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 C-25 61 of 109

FIGURE C-4 (cont.)

Air Particulates.- Gross Beta-Stations Q-01 and Q-02 Collected in the Vicinity 0f QCNPS, :2005,-72009 Q-01 Onsite No. 1 60.0 50.0 40.0 E

0. 30.0 Cl 9

Lu o 20.0 . .

W 10.0 '

10.0 01-07-05 01-07-06 01-07-07 01-07-08 01-06-09 01-06-10 Station Q-01 lost power 10-07 10-21-05.

Q-02 Onsite No.02 60.0 50.0 E 40.0 0.

CL 30.0 9

Lu 012 20.0 10.0 0.07-01-07-05 01-07-06 01-07-07 01-07-08 01-06-09 01-06-10 Station Q-02 lost power 08-19 08-26-05.

DUE TO VENDOR CHANGE IN 2005, THE REPORTED UNITS CHANGED FROM E-02 PCI/M3 TO E-03 PCI/M3 C-26 62 of 109

FIGURE C-5 Air'Particulates "'Gross Beta- Stations Q-03 and Q-04 Ciollecited in the Vicinity of QCNPS,-2000 - 2004 Q-03 Onsite No. 3 10.0 8-0 E 6.0 C

N, 4.0 2.0 0.0 -

01-01-00 12-31-00 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 Q-04 Nitrin 10.0 8.0 6.0 4 V 2.O 0.0 1 1 01-01-00 12-31-00 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 C-27 63 of 109

FIGURE C-5 (cont.)

Air Particulates - Gross Beta- Stations Q-03 and Q-04 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2005 - 2009 Q-03 Onsite No. 3 60.0 50.0 40.0 E

6 0L 30.0 9M ED 20.0 10.0 0.0 -

01-07-05 01-07-06 01-07'07 01-07-08 01-06-09 ' 01-06-10 Q,04 Nitrin 60.0 50.0 40.0

0. 30.0 9

CD 20.0 10.0 0.0 -

01-07-05 01-07-06 01-07-07 01-07-08 01-06-09 01-06-10 DUE TO VENDOR CHANGE IN 2005, THE REPORTED UNITS CHANGED FROM E-02 PCI/M3 TO E-03 PCI/M3 C-28 64 of 109

FIGURE C-6 Air Particulates - Gross. Beta- Stations Q-07 (C)

ý'Colledcted ,inthe Vicinity of QCNPS, -2000 2009 Q-07 (C) Clinton 10.0 8.0 60.-

0 4,0 1h, 01-01-00 12-31-00 12-31-01 12-31-02 12-31-03 12-30-04 Q-07 (C) Clinton 60.0 50.0 en 40.0 30.0 CL w

0 20.0 10.0 0.0 -

01-07-05 01-07-06 01-07-07 01-07-08 01-06-09 01-06-10 DUE TO VENDOR CHANGE IN 2005, THE REPORTED UNITS CHANGED FROM E-02 PCI/M3 TO E-03 PCI/M3 C-29 65 of 109

, FIGURE C-7 Air Particulates - Gross Beta-, Stations Q-13 and Q-16 Collected in the. Vicinity, f QCNPS, 2005 -2009 Q-13 Princeton 60.0 50.0 E 40.0 m

a.

30.0

=0 20.0 10.0 "-

0.0 1 07-08-05 06-01-06 04-25-07 03-18-08 02-09-09 01-03-10 Q-16 Princeton 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 07-08-05 06-01-06 04-25-07 03-18-08 02-09-09 01-03-10 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA ANALYSES OF FAR FIELD LOCATIONS STARTED IN JULY 2005 DUE TO VENDOR CHANGE IN 2005, THE REPORTED UNITS CHANGED FROM E-02 PCI/M3 TO E-03 PCI/M3 C-30 66 of 109

FIGURE C-8 Air Particulates - Gross Beta-Stations Q-37 and Q-38 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2005 - 2009 Q-37 Meredosia Road 60.0 50.0 40.0

0. 30.0 9

o 20.0 10.0 0.0 i 07-08-05 06-01-06 04-25-07 03-18-08 02-09-09 01-03-10 STATION Q-37 YEILDED AN INSUFFICIENT RUN TIME FOR SAMPLE TO BE OBTAINED 10/23/09 - 10/30/09 Q-38 Fuller Road 60.0 50.0 M 40.0 0L 30.0 9

o 20.0 10.0 0.0 I 07-08-05 06-01-06 04-25-07 03-18-08 02-09-09 01-03-10 AIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA ANALYSES OF FAR FIELD LOCATIONS STARTED IN JULY 2005 DUE TO VENDOR CHANGE IN 2005, THE REPORTED UNITS CHANGED FROM E-02 PCI/M3 TO E-03 PCI/M3 C-31 67 of 109

FIGURE C-9 Air Particulates - Gross Beta- Stations Q-41 Collected in the Vicinity of QCNPS, 2009,,:ý Q-41 Camanche 50.0 40.0

30.0 C-)

0.

9 20.0 0 10.

10.0 0.0 I i I I I 01-03-09 03-05-09' 05-05-09 07-05-09 09-04-09 '11-04-09 01-04-10 C-32 68 of 109

APPENDIX D INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 69 of 109

TABLE D-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2009 (PAGE 1 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)

March 2009 E6533-396 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 102 97.7 1.04 Sr-90 pCi/L 14.9 15.6 0.96 E6534-396 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 66.7 79.3 0.84 Ce-141 pCi/L 87.5 94.9 0.92 Cr-51 pCi/L 275 305 0.90 Cs- 134 pCi/L 82.0 93.7 0.88 Cs-137 pCi/L 111 111 1.00 Co-58 pCi/L 114 119 0.96 Mn-54 pCi/L 136 128 1.06 Fe-59 pCi/L 112 99.9 1.12 Zn-65 pCi/L 160 156 1.03 Co-60 pCi/L 142 142 1.00 E6536-396 AP Ce-141 pCi 120 115 1.04 Cr-51 pCi 385 371 1.04 Cs-1 34 pCi 113 114 0.99 Cs-1 37 pCi 149 135 1.10 "pCi' Co'-58 153 145 1.06 Mn-54 pCi 155 155 1.00 Fe-59 pCi 118 121 0.98 Zn-65 pCi 195 189 1.03 Co-60 pCi 190 173 1.10 E6535-396 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 82.8 79.4 1.04 A June 2009 E6742-396 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 107 112 0.96 A Sr-90 pCri/L', 19.0 16.7 1.14 A E6743-396 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 98.1 102.0 0.96 A Ce-141 pCi/L 260 284 0.92 A Cr-51 pCi/L 389 400 0.97 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 144.0 166 0.87 A Cs-137 pCi/L 185 192 0.96 A Co-58 pCi/L 86.9 91.9 0.95 A Mn-54 pCi/L 133 137 0.97 A Fe-59 pCi/L 126 122 1.03 A Zn-65 pCi/L 173 175 0.99 A Co-60 pCi/L 298 312 0.96 A E6745-396 AP Ce-141 pCi 186 163 1.14 A Cr-51 pCi 262 231 1.13 A Cs-1 34 pCi 101 95 1.06 A Cs-1 37 pCi 135 111 1.22 W Co-58 pCi 61 53 1.16 A Mn-54 pCi 83.1 79 1.05 A Fe-59 pCi 84 70 1.19 A.

Zn-65 pCi 137 101 1.36 N (1)

Co-60 pCi 202 180 1.12 A E6744-396 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 92.2 95.8 0.96 A D-1 70 of 109

TABLE D-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE*BROWN ENGINEERING, 2009 (PAGE 2 OF 3)

Identification' Reported Known 'Ratio (c)

Month/Year- 'Number, , Matrix' Nuclide, ..... Units Value.(a) Value (b) TBE/Analytips .Eyaluation (d)

September 2009 E'16897-396 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 113- 107 1.06 A Sr-90 pCi/L 17.4 18.8 0.93 A E6898-396 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 89.2 98.6 0.90 A Ce-141 pCi/L 249 275 0.91 A Cr-51 pCi/L 213 221 0.96 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 104.0 123 0.85 A Cs-1 37 pCi/L 172 185 0.93 A Co-58 pCi/L 96.3 99.4 0.97 A Mn-54 pCi/L 201 206 0.98 A Fe-59 pCi/L 154 147 1.05 A Zn-65 pCi/L 213 204 1.04 A Co-60 pCi/L 154 160 0.96 A E6900-396 AP Ce-141 pCi 181 161 1.12 A Cr-51 pCi 145 130 1.12 A Cs-134 pCi 71.8 72 0.99 A Cs-137 pCi 115 109 1.06 A Co-58 pCi 62 58 1.06 A Mn-54 pCi 129 121 1.07 A Fe-59 pCi 97 98 0.98 A Zn-65 pCi 110 120 0.92 A Co-60 pCi 98.7 94.1 1.05 A E6899-396 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 89.5 92.3 0.97 A December 2009 E6946-396 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 131 131 1.00 A Sr-90 pCi/L 19.3 17.9 1.08 A E6947-396 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 79.2 87.3 0.91 A Ce-141 pCi/L 193 202 0.96 A Cr-51 pCi/L 512 548 0.93 A Cs-134 pCi/L 222 253 0.88 A Cs-137 pCi/L 163 179 0.91 A Co-58 pCi/L 200 211 0.95 A Mn-54 pCi/L 178 178 1.00 A Fe-59 pCi/L 176 178 0.99 A Zn-65 pCi/L 326 345 0.94 A Co-60 pCi/L 240 256 0.94 A E6949-396 AP Ce-141 pCi 103 103 1.00 A Cr-51 pCi 290 280 1.04 A Cs-134 pCi 116 129 0.90 A Cs-137 pCi 93.4 91.5 1.02 A Co-58 pCi 111 108 1.03 A Mn-54 pCi 81.0 90.8 0.89 A Fe-59 pCi 106 90.8 1.17 A Zn-65 pCi 155 176 0.88 A Co-60 pCi 135 131 1.03 A D-2 71 of 109

TABLE D-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2009 (PAGE 3 OF 3)

Identification Reported -Known., Ratio (c) "

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide Units. Value (a) Value (b)' TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)

December 2009 E6948-396 Charcoal 1-131 pCi. 93.3 .93.9 0.99. A (1) Detector 7 appearsto have a slightly high bias. Detector 7 was removed from service until it can be recalibrated. NCR 09-23 (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The Analytics known value is equal to 100% of the parameterpresent in the standardas determinedby gravimetricand/or volumetric measurements made during standardpreparation.

(c) Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineeringto Analytics results.

(d) Analytics evaluationbased on TBE internal QC limits: A= Acceptable. Reported result falls within ratio limits of 0.80-1.20.

W-Acceptable with warning. Reported result falls within 0. 70-0.80 or 1.20-1.30. N =Not Acceptable. Reported result falls outside the ratio limits of < 0. 70 and > 1.30.

D-3 72 of 109

TABLE D-2 ERA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2009 (PAGE 1 OF 1)

Idehtification Reported Known

.Month/Year -Number .'..... Media Nuclide , Units. . Value (a) Value (b) , Control Limits Evaluation (c)

April 2009 RAD 77 Water Sr-89 pCi/L 57.4 48.3 37.8 - 55.7 N (1)

Sr-90 pCi/L 30.6 31.4 22.9 - 36.4 A Ba-1 33 pCi/L- 55.2 52.7 43.4 - 58.3 A Cs-i 34 pCi/L 65.8 72.9 59.5 - 80.2 A Cs-1 37 pCi/L 157 168 151 - 187 A Co-60 pCi/L 86.4 88.9 80.0 - 100 A Zn-65 pCi/L 85.5 84.4 76.0- 101 A Gr-A pCiL'. 47.7 54.2 28.3 - 67.7 A Gr-B pCi/L 45.2 43.5 29.1 -50.8 A 1-131 pCi/L 25.2 26.1 21.7 - 30.8 A H pCi/L 19733 20300 17800 - 22300 A October 2009 RAD 79 Water Sr-89 pCi/L 64.75 62.2 50.2 - 70.1 A Sr-90 pCi/L 30.30 30.7 22.4 - 35.6 A Ba-1 33 pCi/L 97.9 92.9 78.3- 102 A Cs-134 pCi/L 76.8 79.4 65.0 - 87.3 A Cs-137 pCi/L 59.9 54.6 49.1 - 62.9 A Co-60 pCi/L 121 117 105- 131 A Zn-65 pCi/L 115 99.5 89.6-119 A Gr-'A pCi/L 19.6 23.2 11.6-31.1 A Gr-B pCi/L 28.5 26.0 16.2 - 33.9 A 1-131 pCi/L 22.1 22.2 18.4 - 26.5 A H pCi/L 16133 16400 14300- 18000 A (1) Calculationdid not allow for Y-90 ingrowth on the'Sr-89 mount. NCR 09-14 (a) Teledyne Brown Engineeringreportedresult.

(b) The ERA known value is equal to 100% of the parameterpresent in the standardas determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standardpreparation.

(c) ERA evaluation: A=acceptable. Reported result falls within the Warning Limits. NA=not acceptable. Reported result falls outside of the Control Limits. CE=check for Error. Reported resultfalls within the Control Limits and outside of the Warning Limit.

D-4 73 of 109

TABLE D-3 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP]

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2009 (PAGE 1 OF 2)

Identification Reported Known... Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide Units Value,(a) Value (b) Range Evaluation (c)

March 2009 09-MaW20 Water. Cs-134 Bq/L 18.8 22.5 18.5-29.3 A Cs-137 Bq/L 0.0601 (1) A Co-57 Bq/L 17.0 18.9 13.2-24.6 A Co-60 Bq/L 16.1 17.21 12.05 - 22.37 A H-3 Bq/L 332 330.9 231.6 - 430.2 A Mn-54 Bq/L 13.8 14.7 10.26- 19.06 A Sr-90 Bq/L 6.88 7.21 5.05- 9.37 A Zn-65 Bq/L 13.2 13.6 9.5- 17.7 A 09-GrW20 Water Gr-A Bq/L 0.529 0.635 >0.0 - 1.270 A Gr-B Bq/L 1.87 1.27 0.64-1.91 A 09-MaS20 Soil Cs-1 34 Bq/kg 433 467 327 - 607 A Cs-137 Bq/kg 649 605 424 - 787 A Co-57 Bq/kg. -0.120 (1) A Co-60 Bq/kg 3.91 4.113 (2) A Mn-54 Bq/kg 339 307 215 -399 A K-40 Bq/kg. 644 570 399 - 741 A Sr-90 Bq/kg 245 257 180 - 334 A Zn-65 Bq/kg 272 242 169-315 A 09-RdF20 AP Cs-134 Bq/sample 2.77 2.93 2.05 - 3.81 A Cs-1 37 Bq/samp!e 1.41 1.52 1.06- 1.98 A Co-57 Bq/sample 1.24 1.30 0.91 -1.69 A Co-60 Bq/sample 1.33 1.22 0.85 - 1.59 A Mn-54 Bq/sample 2.42 2.2709 1.5898 - 2.9522 A Sr-90 Bq/sample 0.713 0.64 0.448 - 0.832 A Zn-65 Bq/sample 1.30 1.36 0.95 - 1.77 A 09-GrF20 AP Gr-A Bq/sample 0.188 0.348 >0.0 - 0.696 A Gr-B Bq/sample 0.313 0.279 0.140 - 0.419 A March 2009 09-RdV20 Vegetation Cs-134 Bq/sample 3.48 3.40 2.38 - 4.42 A Cs-1 37 Bq/sample 1.15 0.93 0.65- 1.21 W Co-57 Bq/sample 3.12 2.36 1.65-3.07 N (3)

Co-60 Bq/sample -0.0105 (1) A Mn-54 Bq/sample 2.98 2.3 1.61 - 2.99 W K-40 Bq/sample 64.1 (4)

Sr-90 Bq/sample 1.09 1.260 0.882 - 1.638 A Zn-65 Bq/sample 1.73 1.3540 0.948 - 1.760 W September 2009 09-MaW21 Water Cs-1 34 Bq/L 26.5 32.2 22.5-41.9 A Cs-1 37 Bq/L 37.2 41.2 28.8-53.6 A Co-57 Bq/L 32.2 36.6 25.6 - 47.6 A Co-60 Bq/L 14.0 15.40 10.8-20.0 A H-3 Bq/L 705 634.1 443.9 - 824.3 A Mn-54 Bq/L -0.1015 (1) A Sr-90 Bq/L 13.9 12.99 9.09- 16.89 A Zn-65 Bq/L 26.2 26.9 18.8-35.0 A 09-GrW21 Water Gr-A Bq/L 1.27 1.047 >0.0 -,2.094 A Gr-B Bq/L 9.70 7.53 3.77 - 11.30 A D-5 74 of 109

TABLE D-3 ' DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING, 2009 (PAGE 2 OF 2)

Identification ' . .* :.,.. Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number ... Me dia Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) Range Evaluation (c)

September 2009 09-MaS21' Soil- Am-241 Bq/kg S.74.7-. 89:8- - 62.9 - 116.7. A Cs-134 Bq/kg 0.554 (1) A Cs-137 Bq/kg 706 . 669 468-870' A Co-57 Bq/kg 606 586 410-762. A Co-60 Bq/kg 350* 327.000 229-425 A Mn-54 Bq/kg 876 796 557-1035 A K-40 Bq/kg 425 *-375 263- 488 A Sr Bq/kg 505 455 319-592 A

-1178 *85 1531.

Zn-65 Bq/kg 1370 A S (1) A 09-RdF21 AP Cs-1 34 Bq/sample -0.02 Cs-137 Bq/sample 1.4 1.4 .0,98 -1.82 A Co-57 Bq/sample 5.98 6.48., 4.54- 8.42 A Co-60 Bq/sample 1.01 1.03 0.72-1.34 A Mn-54 Bq/sample 5.16 5.49 3.84-7.14 A Sr-90 Bq/sample 0.925 0.0835 0.585 - 1.086 A Zn-65 Bq/sample 4.39 3.93 2.75-5.11 A 0.357 09-GrF21 AP Gr-A Bq/sample 0.659., >0.0- 1.318 A Gr-B" Bq/sample 1.403 1.320 0.66-1.98 A 09-RdV21 Vegetation Cs-134 Bq/sample -0.0027 (1). A 2.43' 1.70-3.16 A Cs-137 Bq/sample 2.36 Co-60 Bq/sample 2.58, 2.57 1.80 - 3.34 A Mn-54 Bq/sample 8.36 7.9 5.5- 10.3 A K-40 Bq/sample 57.8 (4)

Sr-90 Bq/sample 1.73 1.78 1.25-2.31 A Zn-65' Bq/sample -0.59 (1) A (1) False positive test.

(2) Sensativity evaluation.

(3) Homogeniety problem. MAPEP requires using entire sample but due to geometry limitations we can only use partof the sample. NCR 09-13 (4) Not evaluated by MAPEP.

(a) Teledyne Brown Engineeringreported result.

(b) The MAPEP known value is equal to 100% of the parameterpresent in the standardas determinedby gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standardpreparation.

(c) DOEIMAPEPevaluation: A=acceptable, W=acceptable with warning, N=not acceptable.

D-6 75 of 109

TABLE D-4 ERA (a) STATISTICAL

SUMMARY

PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2009 (Page 1 of 1)

Concentration (pCi/L)

Lab Code Date . Analysis Laboratory ... ERA. Control.,

Resultb Resultc Limits Acceptance STW-1181 04/06/09 Sr-89 41.0 +/- 5.8 48.3 37.8 - 55.7 Pass STW-1 181 04/06/09 Sr-90 32.4 +/- 2.4 31.4 22.9 - 36.4 Pass STW-1182 04/06/09 Ba-1 33 44.6 +/- 3.1 52.7 43.4 - 58.3 Pass STW-1182 04/06/09 Co-60 81.0 +/- 3.1 88.9 80.0 - 100.0 Pass STW-1182 04/06/09 Cs-1 34 65.6 +/- 5.2 72.9 59.5 - 80.2 Pass STW-1182 04/06/09 Cs-1 37 147.7 +/- 5.3 168.0 151.0 - 187.0 Fail STW-1182 04/06/09 Zn-65 79.8 +/- 7.5 84.4 76.0 -101.0 Pass STW-1183 04/06/09 Gr. Alpha 47.6 +/- 2.1 54.2 28.3 - 67.7 Pass STW-1183 04/06/09 Gr. Beta 38.5 +/- 1.3 43.5 29.1 --50.8 Pass STW-1184 04/06/09 1-131 24.4 +/- 2.5 26.1 21.7 - 30.8 Pass STW-1186 04/06/09 H-3 22819.0 +/- 453.0 20300.0 17800.0 - 22300.0 Fail STW-1193 10/05/09 Sr-89 53.0 +/- 6.0 62.2 50.2 - 70.1 Pass STW-1193 10/05/09 Sr-90 31.1 +/- 2.2 30.7 22.4 - 35.6 Pass STW-1194 10/05/09 Ba-133 82.5 +/- 3.5 92.9' 78.3 -102.0 Pass STW-1194 10/05/09 Co-60 116.8 +/- 3.3 117.0 105.0 - 131.0 Pass STW-1194 10/05/09 Cs-134 78.8 +/- 5.7 78.8, 65.0- 87.3 Pass STW-1194 10/05/09 Cs-137 54.2 +/- 3.7, 54.6 49.1 -62.9 Pass STW- 1194 10/05/09 Zn-65 102.5 +/- 6.2 99.5 89.6 -119.0 Pass STW-1195 10/05/09 Gr. Alpha 20.3 +/- 2.0 23.2 11.6 -31.1 Pass STW-1 195 10/05/09 Gr. Beta 23.7 +/- 1.4 26.0 16.2 - 33.9 Pass STW-1196 10/05/09 1-131 22.4 +/- 1.4 22.2 18.4 - 26.5 Pass STW-i 198 10/05/09 H-3 17228.0 +/- 694.0 16400.0 14300.0 - 18000.0 Pass a Results obtainedby Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratory as a participantin the crosscheck program for proficiency testing in drinking water conducted by EnvironmentalResources Associates (ERA).

Unless otherwise indicated, the laboratoryresult is given as the mean +/- standarddeviation for three determinations.

c Results are presented as the known values, expected laboratoryprecision (1 sigma, 1 determination) and control limits as providedby ERA.

d All gamma -emitters showed a low bias. A large plastic burr found on the base of the Marinellikept the beaker from sitting directly on the detector. Result of recount in a different beaker, Cs-137, 155.33

+/- 14.55 pCi/L.

e Samples were recounted and also reanalyzed.,A recount of the original vials averaged 23,009 pCi/L.

Reanalysis results were acceptable, 19,170 pCi/L.

D-7 76 of 109

TABLE D-5 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEPr ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2009 (Page 1 of 2)

.- .Concentration Known Control Lab Code c Date Analysis Laboraio r'result Activity Limits d Acceptance STW-1 170 01/01/09 Co-57 19.60 +/- 0.40 18.90 13.20 -24.60' Pass 12.05'-22.37 STW-1 170' 01/01/09 Co-60 16.60 +/- 0.30- 17.21 Pass STW-1 170 01/01/09 Cs-1 34 20.40 +/- 0.50 22.50 15.80 - 29.30 Pass STW-1 170 e 01/01/09 Cs-137 0.10 +/- 0.20 0.00 0.00-1.00 Pass STW-1170 01/01/09 H-3 359.90 +/- 33.90 330.90 231.60 - 430.20 Pass STW-1170 01/01/09 Mn-54 15.00 +/- 0.40 14.66 10.26 - 19.06 Pass STW-1170 01/01/09 Sr-90 7.87 +/- 1.39 7.21 5.05 - 9.37 Pass STW-1170 01/01/09 Zn-65 14.00 +/- 0.70 13.60 9.50 - 17.70 Pass STW-1171 01/01/09 Gr. Alpha 0.56 +/- 0.06 0.64 0.00 - 1.27 Pass STW-1171 01/01/09 Gr. Beta 1.29 +/- 0.05 1.27 0.64-1.91 Pass STSO-1172 e 01/01/09 Co-57 0.00 +/- 0.00 0.00 0.00-1.00 Pass STSO-1 172 01/01/09 Cs-134 458.60 +/- 7.40 467.00 327.00 - 607.00 Pass STSO-1 172 01/01/09 Cs-137 652.30 +/- 3.50 605.00 424.00- 787.00- Pass STSO-1 172 01/01/09 K-40 636.40 +/- 9.50 570.00 360.40 - 669.40 Pass STSO-1 172 01/01/09 Mn-54 346.40 +/- 3.10 307.00 215.00 -399.00- Pass STSO-1 172 01/01/09 Sr-90 180.60 +/- i2.10 257.00 180.00 -334.00' Pass STSO-1 172 01/01/09 Zn-65 268.30 +/- 4.00 242.00 169.00 - 315.00 Pass STVE-1 173 01/01/09 Co-57 2.75 40.11 2.36 1.65 -3.07 Pass STVE-1173 e 01/01/09 Co-60 0.06 +/- 0.09 0.00 0.00-1.00 Pass STVE-1 173 01/01/09 Cs-1 34 3.49 +/- 0.22 3.40 2.38 - 4'.42 Pass STVE-1 173 01/01/09 Cs-1 37 1.01 +/- 0.11 0.93 0.65-1.21 Pass STVE-1 173 01/01/09 Mn-54 2.52 +/- 0.14 2.30 1.61 -2.99 Pass Zn-65 1.52 +/- 0.18 1.35 0.95 -1.76 Pass STVE-1 173 01/01/09 STAP-1 174 01/01/09 Co-57 1.25 +/-0.05 1.30 0.91 - 1.69 Pass STAP-1 174 01/01/09 Co-60 1.17 +/- 0.06 1.22 0.85-*1.59 Pass STAP-1 174 01/01/09 Cs-1 34 2.67 +/- 0.14 2.93 2.05 -3.81 Pass STAP-1 174 01/01/09 Cs-1 37 1.53 +/- 0.08 1.52 1.06-1.98 Pass STAP-1 174 01/01/09 Mn-54 2.34 +/- 0.09 2.27 1.59 -2.95 Pass STAP- 1174 01/01/09 Sr-90 0.93 +/- 0.14 0.64 0.45 -0.83 Fail STAP-1 174 01/01/09 Zn-65 1.44 +/- 0.14 1.36 0.95-1.77 Pass STAP- 1175 01/01/09 Gr. Alpha 0.22 +/- 0.03 0.35 0.00 -0.70 Pass STAP-1 175 01/01/09 Gr. Beta 0.36 + 0.04 0.28 0.14 -0.42 Pass STW-1192 07/01/09 'Co-57 37.20 +/- 1.50 36.60 25.60 - 47:60 Pass STW-1192 07/01/09 Co-60 15.10 +/- 0.90 15.40 10.80 -20.00 Pass STW-1 192 07/01/09 Cs-1 34 30.30 +/- 2.10 32.20 22.50 -41.90 Pass STW-1 192 07/01/09 Cs-1 37 41.90 +/- 1.80 41.20 28.80 - 53.60 Pass STW-1192 07/01/09 H-3 680.30 +/- 33.60 634.10 443.90 - 824.30 Pass STW-1192 07/01/09 Mn-54. 0.01 +/- 0.26 0.00 0.00-1.00 Pass STW-1192 07/01/09 Sr-90 12.90 +/- 1.70 12.99 9.09 -16.89 Pass STW-1192 07/01/09 Zn-65 28.50 +/- 2.40 26.90 18.80 -35.00 Pass D-8 77 of 109

TABLE D-5 DOE'S MIXEDANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEPr ENVIRONMENTAL, INC., 2009 (Page 2 of 2)

Concentration b Known Control Lab Code c Date Analysis Laboratory result Activity Limits d Acceptance STW-1191 07/01./09. Gr. Alpha 0.88 +/- 0.07 1.05 0.00 - 2.09 Pass STW-1191 07/01/09 Gr. Beta 7.29 +/- 0.10 7.53 3,77 -11.30 Pass STSO-1 188 07/01/09 Co-57 674.60 +/- 9.00 586.001 410.00 -762.00 Pass STSO-1 188 07/01/09 Co-60 356.40 +/- 6.30 327.00 229.00 - 425.00 Pass STSO-1 188 07/01/09 Cs-1 34 0.20 +/- 1.90 0.00 0.00 -1.00 Pass STSO-1 188 07/01/09 Cs-1 37 767.50 +/- 12.00 669.00 468.00 - 870.00 - Pass STSO-1 188 07/01/09 K-40 433.00 +/- 37.20 375.00 263.00 - 488.00 Pass STSO-1 188 07/01/09 Mn-54 931.60 +/- 14.10 796.00 557.00 -1035.00 Pass STSO-1 188 g 07/01/09 Sr-90 310.50 +/- 12.20 455.00 319.00 - 592.00 Fail STSO-1 188 07/01/09 Zn-65 1433.90 +/- 25.20 1178.00 825.00 -1531.00 Pass STVE-1 190 07/01/09 Co-57 8.90 +/- 0.60 8.00 5.60-10.40 Pass STVE-1 190 07/01/09 Co-60 2.50 +/- 0.36 2.57 1.80 -3.34 Pass STVE-1 190 07/01/09 Cs-1 34 0.01 +/- 0.11. 0.00 0.00,70.10 Pass STVE-1 190 07/01/09 Cs-1 37 2.42 +/- 0.16 2.43 1.70 -3.16 Pass STVE-1 190 .07/01/09 Mn-54 8.35 +/- 0.70 7.90 5.50 -10.30 Pass STVE-1 190 07/01/09 Zn-65 0.01 +/- 0.26 0.00 0.00-0.10 Pass STAP-1189 07/01/09 Gr. Alpha 0.33 +/- 0.04 0.66 0.00-1.32 Pass STAP-1189 07/01/09 Gr. Beta 1.57 +/- 0.07 1.32 0.66-1.98 Pass STAP-1 190 07/01/09 Co-57 6.78. +/- 0.27 6.48 4.54 - 8.42 Pass STAP-1 190 07/01/09 Co-60 1.06 +/- 0.18 1.03, 0.72,-1.34 Pass STAP-1 190 07/01/09 Cs-134 0.01 +/- 0.06 0.00 0.01 - 0.05 Pass STAP-1 190 07/01/09 Cs-137 1.49 +/- 0.27 1.40 0.98-1.82 -Pass STAP-1 190 07/01/09 Mn-54 6.00 +/- 0.45 5.49 3.84 -7.14 Pass STAP-1 190 07/01/09 Sr-90 0.79 +/- 0.13 0.84 0159 -1.09 Pass STAP-1 190 07/01/09 Zn-65 4.55 +/- 0.66 3.93 2.75.-5.11 Pass a Results obtainedby Environmental, Inc., Midwest Laboratoryas a participantin the Department of Energy's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program, Idaho Operationsoffice, Idaho Falls, Idaho Results are reported in units of Bq/kg (soil), Bq/L (water)or Bq/total sample (filters, vegetation).

c Laboratorycodes as follows: STW (water), STAP (airfilter), STSO (soil), STVE (vegetation).

d MAPEP results are presented as the known values and expected laboratoryprecision (1 sigma, I determination)and control limits as defined by the MAPEP.

e Included in the testing series as a "false positive".

No reason was determined for the initialhigh results. The analysis was repeated; result of reanalysis; 0.54 +/- 0.12 Bq/filter.

9 Incomplete separationof strontium from calcium could result in a higherrecovery percentage and consequently lower reported activity. The analysis was repeated; result of reanalysis 363.3 +/- 28.6 Bq/kg.

D-9 78 of 109

APPENDIX E ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL GROUNDWATER PROTECTION PROGRAM REPORT (ARGPPR) 79 of 109

Docket No: 50-254 50-265 QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION UNITS 1 and 2 Annual Radiological Groundwater Protection Program Report 1 January Through 31 December 2009 Prepared Byt.

Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services ExeknS.

Nuclear Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station Cordova, IL 61242 May 2010 80 of 109

Table Of Contents I. Summary and Conclusion .................................................... 1 II. Introduction .................................................. 4

- A ., O bjectives of the RG PP ........ .................... ................. .................... 4 B. Implementation of the Objectives...'.. .......... ; .... ....... 4 C . P rogram D escription ...................................................................................... 5 Ill. P rog ra m D escriptio n ............................ .................................... : ...................... .............. 6 A. Sample Analysis . .. .......... ............................ 6 B. Data Interpretation ......................... .............. 6 C . Background Analysis ............. ............ . ....................... . ......................... 7

1. Background Concentrations of Tritium ....... :.......... ......... I........................ 7 IV . R esults and D iscussion ........................................................................................... 9 A. Groundwater Results ................................................. ............. 9 B . S urface W ater Results .................................................................................. 10 S.8, , 109 81 of 109

Appendices Appendix A Location Designation Tables Table A-i: Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009 Figqures Figure A-I: Sampling Locations Near the Site Boundary of the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009 Figure A-2: Sentinel Monitoring Point Locations, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009 Appendix B Data Tables Tables Table B-I.1 Concentrations of Tritium and Strontium in Groundwater Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009.

Table B-1.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Groundwater Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009.

Table B-11.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009.

Table B-11.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009.

Table B-111.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Groundwater Samples Collected and Anaylzed by Quad Cities Station Personnel, 2009.

82 of 109

Summary and Conclusions This report on the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program (RGPP) conducted for the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station (QCNPS) by Exelon Nuclear covers the period 0.1 Januar.2009 through 31 December 2009.

In 2006, Exelon undertook a Fleetwide Assessment of groundwater at and in the vicinity of its nuclear power generating facilities forthe presence of radionuclides. The data collected. from the Quad Cities Station as part of the Fleetwide Assessment was summarized in a report entitled

-,ý "Hydrogeologic.Investigation Report, Fleetwide Assessment, Quad Cities

.Generation ,Station, Cordova, ,Illinois", dated September 2006. This report was submitted to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) in September 2006. The Quad Cities Hydrogeologic Investigation Report concluded that tritium had, not migrated :off Site at detectable concentrations.

Following the Fleetwide Assessment, Exelon continued groundwater monitoring for radionuclides at the Site. As a result of this monitoring, Exelon detected higher than expected tritium levels, in the vicinity of the station's Service Building and. Tu~rbine Building., Quad Cities undertook supplemental investigative activities to determine and characterize the source of the tritium ,These investigative activities included completion of an aquifer pumping test, installationof sentinel monitoring wells in the vicinity of the Service Building and Turbine Building, and several' additional rounds of hydraulic mohitoring arid groundwater sampling.The collected groundwater data was utilized to assist with an extensive underground piping inspection program tolocbate the source of the ..tritium.

In May 2008, during the underground piping inspection program, Exelon located a small leak in the Unit 1 Residual Heat' Removal (RHR) suction line located near the Service Building/ Turbine Building area. The line was isolated and through further testing, Exelon determined it to be a source of the monitored tritium levels. In June 2008, the line was repaired, thereby eliminating this source of tritiated water.

In a letter dated June 5, 2008, Exelon informed the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) of its plan to prepare a Migration Control Plan (MCP) to minimize migration of the tritium plume offsite. The MCP was submitted to the IEPA July 17, 2008. The MCP listed Monitored Natural Attenuation as the preferred remediation option.

83 of 109

This report covers groundwater samples, collected from the' environment on station property in 2009. During that time period, RGPP samples were collected from 53 locations. ' -

Sample locations include twenty-seven;'designated *monitoring Wells,"two surface water monitoring points, nine production wells (three of which are used for site drinking water) and fifteen sentinel wells.'The twenty-seven designated monitoring well's are sampled' on a quarterly basis for tritium, annually for gamma, and biannual for Sr-90'.Samples from the twenty-seven designated monitoring wells were collected by a contractor (Envirohmental inc.) and analyzed by a contract iab (Teledyne Brown). Theremaining sample locations are collected quarterly (at a minimum) by' site' ersonnel andanalyzed'fr t'ritium by Teledyne Brown or onsite by station personnel.

Tritium concentrations ranged from less than:the LLD of 200 pCi/L at the site boundaries up to 771,000 pCi/L in a sentinel monitoring well. Tritium concentrations ranged from less than the LLD of 200 pCi/L to 611 pCi/L in surface water'monit6ring locations.-

Gamma-emitting radionuclides associated with licensed plant operations were not -detected at concentrations greater'than'their respective Lower Limits, of Detection (LLDs) as specified in the Offsite Dose 'alculationManual (ODCM) in any of the groundwater samples.. In,the case of tritium, .Exelonspecified that it's laboratories achieve. a lower limit of detection, 10 times lower than that required by federal. regulation., .Most ofthe tritium that wasdetected in groundwater at the Station is on the south and west side of the Reactor / Turbine buildings.

Strontium-90 was not detected at concentrations greaterthan the Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) of 2.0 pCi/L asspecifie~d in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM).

In assessing all the data gathered for this report, it,was concluded that the operation of QCNPS had no adverse radiological. impact on the environment offsite of QCNPS. .

84 of 109

Intentionally left blank 85 of 109

II. Introduction The Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station (QCNPS), consisting of two 2957 MWth boiling water reactor owned and operated by Exelon Corporation, is located in Cordova, Illinois along the Mississippi River. Unit No. 1 went critical on 16 March 1972. Unit No. 2 went critical on 02 December 1973. The site is located in northern Illinois, approximately 182 miles west of Chicago, Illinois.

A. Objective of the RGPP The long-term objectives of the RGPP are as follows:

1. Identify suitable locations to monitor and evaluate potential impacts from station operations before significant radiological impact to the environment and potential drinking water sources.

2. Understand the local hydrogeologic regime in the vicinity of the station and maintain up-to-date knowledge of flow patterns on the surface and shallow subsurface.

3. Perform routine water sampling and radiological analysis of water from selected locations.

4. Report new leaks, spills, or other detections with potential radiological significance to stakeholders in a timely manner.

5. Regularly assess analytical results to identify adverse trends.

6. Take necessary corrective actions to protect groundwater resources.

B. Implementation of the Objectives The objectives identified have been implemented at Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station as discussed below:

1. Exelon and its consultant identified locations as described in the Phase 1 study. Phase 1 studies were conducted by Conestoga Rovers and Associates (CRA) and the results and conclusions were made available to state and federal regulators as well as the public on an Exelon web site in station specific reports.

http://www.exelonCorp.com/ourcompanies/powerqen/nuclear/Tritiu m.htm 86 of 109

2. The Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station reports describe the local hydrogeologic regime. Periodically, the flow patterns on the surface and shallow' subsurface are updated based on'ongoing measurements.

3. Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station will continue to perform routine sampling and radiological analysis of water from selected locations.

4. Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station has implemented procedures to identify and report leaks, 'spills, or other detections with potential radiological significance in a timely manner.

5. Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station staff and' consulting hydrogeologist assess analytical results on an ongoing basis to identify adverse trends.

C. Program Description

1. Sample Collection Sample locations can be found in Table A-1 and Figures A-1 & A-2, Appendix A.

Groundwater and'Surface Water Samplesof-water-are collected, managed, transported and analyzed In accordance with approved procedures following 7"reculatory methods. Both- groundwater and surface water are collected. Sample locations, sample collection frequencies and

a. nalýtical frequencies-are controlled in'accordance with approved station procedures. Contractor and/or station personnel are trained in the collection, preservation management, analysis, and shipment of samples, as wellý'as in documentation of sampling events.

Analytical laboratories are subject to internal quality assurance programs, inter-laboratory cross-check programs, as well as nuclear industry audits. 'Station personnel review and evaluate all analytical data deliverables after initial review by the contractor.

Analytical data results are reviewed by both station personnel and an independent hydrogeologist for adverse trends or changes to hydrogeologic conditions.

87 of 109

Ill. Program Description This section covers those analyses performed by Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE) on samples collected in 2009.

A. Sample Analysis This section describes the general analytical methodologies used by TBE

,and station personnel to analyzethe environmental samples for radioactivity for the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station RGPP in 2009.

In order to achieve the stated objectives, the current program includes the following analyses:

1. Concentrations of gamma emitters in groundwater and surface water.

2. Concentrations of strontium in groundwater and surface water.

3. Concentrations of tritium in groundwater and surface water.

B. Data Interpretation The radiological data collected prior to Quad Cities N.uclear Power Station becoming operational were used as a baseline With which these operational data were compared. For the purpose of. this report, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station was considered operational at initial criticality. Several factors were important in the interpretation of the data:

1. Lower Limit-of Detection and Minimum Detectable Concentration The lower limit of detection (LLD) is specified by federal regulation as a minimum sensitivity value that must be achieved routinely by the analytical parameter.

2. Laboratory Measurements Uncertainty The estimated uncertainty in measurement of tritium in environmental samples is frequently on the order of 50% of the measurement value.

Statistically, the exact value of a measurement is expressed as a range with a stated level of confidence. The convention is to report results with a 95% level of confidence. The uncertainty comes from calibration standards, sample volume or weight 88 of 109

measurements, sampling uncertainty and other factors. Exelon reports Sprocessthe uncertainty of a measurement created by statistical (c"ounting error) as well'as all sources of error (Total

'Propagated Uncertainty or TPU). Each result has two values calculated. ExelOn reports the TPU by-following the result with plus or minus +/- the estimated sample standard deviation, as TPU, that is obtained by propagating all sources of analytical uncertainty in measurements.

Analytical uncertainties are reported at the 95% confidence level in this report for ieporting consistency with the Annual Radiological Environmental'Operating Report (AREOR).

Gamma spectroscopy results for each type of sample were grouped as follows:

For groundwaterand surface Water'14;nuclides, Be-7, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Nb-95, Zr-95, 1-131, Cs-134, Cs-1 37, Ba-140 and La-140 were reported.

C. Background Analysis A pre-operational radiological environmental monitoring program (pre-operational REMP) was conducted to establish background radioactivity levels prior to:0peration of'the Station. The environmental media sampled and analyzed during the. pre-operational REMP were atmospheric radiation,, fall-out, domestic water, surface water, marine life, and vegetation. The results of the monitoring wer'e detailed in the reports entitled, Quad Cities Nuclear P'bwer Plant Environmental Monitoring Report, Commonwealth Edison- Company, covering the period from July 1968 through September 1971.

The pre-operational REMP contained analytical results from samples collected from the surface water and groundwater.

1.., Background Concentrations of Tritium The purpose of the following discussion is to summarize background measurements of tritium in various media performed by others.

a. Tritium Production Tritium is created in the environment from naturally occurring processes both cosmic and subterranean, as well as from 89 of 109

anthropogenic (i.e., man-made) sources. In the upper atmosphere, "Cosmogenic" tritium is produced from the bombardment of stable, nuclides and combines with oxygen to form tritiated water, which will then enter the hydrologic cycle. Below grotund, "lithogenic" tritium is produced by the bombardment of natural, lithium present in crystalline rocks by neutrons produced by the radioactive decay of naturally abundant uranium and thorium. Lithogenic production of tritium is usually negligible compared to other sources due to the limited abundance of lithium in rock. The lithogenic tritium is introduced directly to groundwater.

A major anthropogenic source of tritium and strontium-90 comes from the former atmospheric testing of thermonuclear weapons. Levels of tritium in precipitation increased significantly during the 1950s and early,1 960s, and later with additional testing, resulting in the release of significant amounts of tritium to the atmosphere. The Canadian heavy water nuclear power reactors, other commercial power reactors, nuclear research and weapons production continue to influence tritium concentrations in the environment.

b. Precipitation Data Precipitation samples are routinely collected at stations around the world for the analysis of tritium and other radionuclides. Two publicly available databases that provide tritium concentrations in precipitation are Global Network of Isotopes in, Precipitation (GNIP) and USEPA's RadNet database. GNIP providestritium precipitation concentration data for.samples collected world wide from 1960 to 2006.

RadNet provides tritium precipitation concentration data for samples collected at stations through out the U.S. from 1960 up to and including 2006. Based on GNIP data for sample stations located in the U.S. Midwest, tritium concentrations peaked around 1963. This peak, which approached 10,000 pCi/L for some stations, coincided with the atmospheric testing of thermonuclear weapons. Tritium concentrations in surface water showed a sharp decline up until 1975 followed by a, gradual decline since that time. Tritium concentrations in Midwest precipitation have typically been below 100 pCi/L since around 1980. Tritium concentrations in wells may still be above the 200 pCi/L detection limit from the external causes described above.

90 of 109

c. Surface Water Data

. 'Tritiumconcentrations are routinely measured in large surface Water bodies, including the Mississippi River. Illinois surface water'data were typically less than 100 pCi/L.

The USEPA RadNet surface water data typically has a reported 'Combined Standard Uncertainty' of 35 to 50 pCi/L.

According to USEPA, this corresponds to a +/- 70 to 100 pCi/L 95% confidence bound on each given measurement.

Therefore, the typical background data provided may be subject to measurement uncertainty of approximately +/- 70 to 100 pCi/L.

ýThe radio-analytical laboratory is counfting tritium results to an Exelon specified LLD of 200ýpCi/L. Typically, the lowest positive measurement will be reported Within a range of 40 -

240 pCi/L or 140 +/- 100 pCi/L. Clearly, these sample results cannot be distinguished as different from. background at this concentration.

IV. Results and Discussion A. Groun'dwater-Results""

Groundwater Samples were collected from on-site wells in accordance with the station radiological groundwater protection program. Analytical results and anomalies are discussed below.

Tritium Samples from all locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table B-1.1 & B-1ll.1 Appendix B). Tritium values ranged from the detection limit to 771,000 pCi/I. All samples obtained at the site boundaries were less then the detection limit of 200 pCi/L. The location most representative of potential offsite user of drinking water was <200 pCi/L.

Strontium Strontium-90 was not detected above the Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) of 2.0 pCi/L. (Table B-1.1 Appendix B) 91 of 109

Gamma Emitters .

Naturally occurring PotassiuMT40: was detected in six of 33 samples. The concentratJons ranged from 102 pCi/liter to 180 pCi/liter. No other gamma emitting nuclides were detected. (Table B-1.2, Appendix B)

B. Surface Water Results Surface Water Tritium, Samples from two locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table 3B-II.1 Appendix B). Tritium was detected above the detection limit of 200 pCi/i in six of 10:samples. The concentrations ranged from 264 to 61 1 pCi/L.

Strontium Strontium-90 was not analyzed in 2009. (Table B-I.1 Appendix B)

Gamma Emitters No gamma emitting nuclides were detected. (Table B-II.2, Appendix B) 92 of 109

APPENDIX A LOCATION DESIGNATION 93 of 109

TABLE A-1: Radiological Groundwater Protection Program - Sampling Locations, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009 Site Site Type MW-QC-1 Monitoring Well MW-QC-2 Monitoring Well MW-QC-1011 Monitoring Well MW-QC-101S Monitoring Well MW-QC-102D Monitoring Well MW-QC-1 021 Monitoring Well MW-QC-1 02S Monitoring Well MW-QC-1031 Monitoring Well MW-QC-104S Monitoring Well MW-QC-1051 Monitoring Well MW-QC-1061 Monitoring Well MW-QC-106S Monitoring Well MW-QC-1071 Monitoring Well MW-QC-108D Monitoring Well MW-QC-1081 Monitoring Well MW-OC-108S Monitoring Well MW-QC-1091 Monitoring Well MW-QC-109S Monitoring Well MW-QC-1i101 Monitoring Well MW-QC-111 D1 .,Monitorih'g Well MW-OC-i 11 D2 Monitoring Well MW-QC-1 111 Monitoring Well MW-QC-1 121 Monitoring Well MW-QC-1 131 Monitoring Well MW-QC-1 141

Mohitoririg, Well MW-QC-1 15S " M6nitoring Well MW-QC-1 16S Monitoring Well SURFACE WATER #1 Surface Water SURFACE WATER #2 Surface Water WELL #1 Production Well WELL #5 Production Well WELL #6 LITTLE FISH Production Well WELL #7 BIG FISH WELL Production Well WELL #8 FIRE TRAINING WELL Production Well WELL #9 DRY CASK WELL Production Well WELL #10 FISH HOUSE WELL Production Well WELL #11 SPRAY CANAL WELL Production Well STP SAND POINT WELL Production Well QC-GP-1 Sentinel Well QC-GP-2 Sentinel Well QC-GP-3 Sentinel Well QC-GP-4 Sentinel Well QC-GP-5 Sentinel Well QC-GP-6 Sentinel Well QC-GP-7 Sentinel Well QC-GP-8 Sentinel Well QC-GP-9 Sentinel Well QC-GP-10 Sentinel Well QC-GP-11 Sentinel Well QC-GP-12 Sentinel Well QC-GP-13 Sentinel Well QC-GP-14 Sentinel Well QC-GP-15 Sentinel Well A-2 94 of 109

Wt

$t~I

i. 4 rfr kI 1TI' M7-1143U2 -RDVt PUJELK;DISLOSUPE EXE104GEERATIONC ~AfNY1L

=3 4 Exal-n, FIGURE A-1 Sampling Locations Near the Site Boundary of the Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009

1-14 '4a-r~ r~j 32 a--

(F

- ~ C)~ __

LE~~~47-f L _L

-~ -

~ - ~'.

-ýo~ L1, t-.t' Jf1L 111 Wj t

~

figure I MON=TORING WELL LOCATIONS EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC.

QUAD CITIES GENERATING STATION ON Co~rao / ilOas 401 1%W;4 0D FIGURE A-2 Sentinel Monitoring Point Locations, Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, 2009

L*'.,,*i..

APPENDIX B DATA TABLES 97 of 109

TABLE B-1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM AND STRONTIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 SR-90 MW-QC-1 03/10/09

191 MW-QC-1 06/02/09

183 MW-QC-1 08/25/09

174 MW-QC-1 11/03/09

182 MW-QC-2 03/10/09

185 MW-QC-2 06/02/09

180 MW-QC-2 08/25/09

180 MW-QC-2 11/03/09

180 MW-QC-1011 03/10/09

185 MW-QC-1011 06/02/09

148 MW-QC-101I 08/25/09 < 168 MW-QC-101I 11/03/09 < 163 MW-QC-101S 03/10/09 < 177 MW-QC-101S 06/02/09 < 145 MW-QC-101S 08/25/09 < 167 MW-QC-1O1S 11/03/09 < 164 MW-QC-102D 03/10/09 6120 +/- 681 MW-QC-102D 06/02/09 5340 +/- 572 MW-QC-102D 08/25/09 5940 +/- 629 MW-QC-102D 11/03/09 5450 +/- 591 MW-QC-1021 03/10/09 4220 +/- 493 MW-QC-1 021 06/02/09 1330 +/- 182 MW-QC-1021 08/25/09 849 +/- 168 MW-QC-1021 11/03/09 270 +/- 115 MW-QC-102S 03/10/09 < 191 MW-QC-102S 06/02/09 < 147 MW-QC-102S 08/25/09 < 167 MW-QC-102S 11/03/09 < 165 MW-QC-1031 03/10/09 < 193 MW-QC-1031 06/02/09 < 150 MW-QC-1031 08/25/09 < 167 MW-QC-1031 11/03/09 < 157 MW-QC-104S 03/10/09 ORIGINAL 43200 +/- 4380 MW-QC-104S 03/10/09 RERUN 39900 +/- 4040 MW-QC-104S 06/02/09

144 MW-QC-104S 08/25/09 < 190 MW-QC-104S 11/03/09 221 +/- 110 MW-QC-1051 03/10/09 77500 +/- 7750 MW-QC-1051 06/02/09 30600 +/- 3080 MW-QC-1051 08/25/09 87100 +/- 8690 MW-QC-1051 11/03/09 37200 +/- 3760 MW-QC-1061 03/10/09 < 190 MW-QC-1061 06/02/09 < 160 MW-QC-1061 08/25/09 < 191 MW-QC-1061 11/03/09 < 165 B-1 98 of 109

TABLE B.I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM AND STRONTIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES C&OLLECTED IN THE VICI NITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LiTER +/-+2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE .. .H-ý3., I SR-90 .

MW-QC-106S 03/10/09 < 190 MW-QC-106S 06/02/09

142 MW-QC-106S 08/25/09

191 MW-QC-106S 11/03/09

162 MW-QC-1071 03/09/09

191 MW-QC-1 071 06/01/09

163 MW-QC-1071 08/26/09

193 MW-QC-1071 11/03/09

180 MW-QC-108D 03/11/09 7060 +/- 775 MW-QC-108D 06/03/09 6930 +/- 725 MW-QC-108D 08/26/09 6180 +/- 668 MW-QC-108D 11/04/09 6670 +/- 720 MW-QC-1081 03/11/09

190 MW-QC-1081 06/03/09 185 +/- 115 MW-QC-1081 08/26/09

189 MW-QC-1081 11/04/09 828 +/- 156 MW-QC-108S 03/11/09

192 MW-QC-108S 06/03/09 180 +/- 111 MW-QC-108S 08/26/09

182 MW-QC-108S 11/04/09

182 MW-QC-1091 03/10/09 230 +/- 128 MW-QC-1091 06/02/09 514 +/- 139 MW-QC-1091 08/25/09 442 +/- 139 MW-QC-1091 11/03/09 296 +/- 126 MW-QC-109S 03/10/09

199 MW-QC-109S 06/02/09

162 MW-QC-109S 08/25/09

186 MW-QC-109S 11/03/09

181 MW-QC-1 101 06/03/09

160 MW-QC-1101 08/26/09

187 MW-QC-1101 11/04/09

180 MW-QC-111D1 03/11/09

194 MW-QC-111D1 06/03/09

163 MW-QC-111D1 08/26/09

178 MW-QC-111D1 11/04/09

180 MW-QC-1 11 D2 03/11/09

193 MW-QC-1 11 D2 06/03/09

162 MW-QC-1 11 D2 08/26/09

170 MW-QC-1 11 D2 11/04/09

181 MW-QC- 1111 03/10/09

193 MW-QC- 1111 06/03/09 < 166 MW-QC-1 111 08/26/09 < 182 MW-QC- 1111 11/04/09 < 181 B-2 99 of 109

TABLE B-I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM AND STRONTIUM-IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 SR-90 MW-QC-1 121 03/09/09 199 MW-QC-1 121 06/01/09 163 MW-QC-1 121 08/25/09 171 MW-QC-1 121 11/02/09 183 MW-QC-1 131 03/11/09 194 MW-QC-1 131 06/03/09 160 MW-QC-1 131 08/26/09 173 MW-QC-1 131 11/04/09 182 MW-QC-1 141 03/11/09 190 MW-QC-1 141 06/03/09 162 MW-QC-1 141 08/26/09 173 MW-QC-1 141 11/04/09 176 MW-QC-1 15S 03/09/09 181 MW-QC-1 15S 06/01/09 182 MW-QC-1 15S 08/26/09 175 MW-QC-1 15S 11/03/09 182 MW-QC-1 16S 03/09/09 193 MW-QC-1 16S 06/01/09 183 MW-QC-1 16S 08/25/09 170 MW-QC-1 16S 11/03/09 182 QC-GP-9 09/18/09 < 0.8-QC-GP-9 12/01/09 <. 0.5, QC-GP-13 09/18/09 < 06; QC-GP-13 12/01/09 < 0:8 QC-GP-14 09/18/09 < 0.9 QC-GP-14 12/01/09 < 0.4 B-3 100 of 109

TABLE B-1.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140. La-140 PERIOD MW-QC-1 08/25/09 < 40 < 39 < 4 <4 <9 <4 <9 <5 <8 <25 <4 <4 <40! < 15 MW-QC-2 08/25/09 < 38 180 +/- 54 <4 < 4 < 11 <4 <7 <5 <7 < 23 <4 < 4 < 42 < 15 MW-QC-1011 08/25/09 < 41 < 89 < 4 < 5 < 10 <4 <9 <6 <9 < 17 < 4 < 5 < 36 < 14 MW-QC-1O1S 08/25/09 <47 105 +/-64 <6 <6 <15 <7 <9 <7 <9 < 23 < 5 < 6 < 45 < 14 MW-QC-102D 08/25/09 <33 <34 <3 <4 <9 <3 <7 <4 <7 <15 <3 <4 <29 <10 MW-QC-1021 08/25/09 < 43 < 42 < 4 < 5 < 10 <5 <10 <5 <7 < 20 <4 < 5 < 36 < 11 MW-QC-102S 08/25/09 <50 <54 <5 <5 <12 <5 <11 <8 <9 <21 <5 <5 <42 < 15 MW-QC-1031 08/25/09 < 48 < 41 <5 < 5 < 11 <4 <10 <6 <8 < 20 <4 < 5 < 38 < 14 MW-QC-104S 08/25/09 < 33 < 27 <4 <4 < 7 <4 <7 <4 <7 < 14 < 3 < 3 <28 < 13 MW-QC-1051 08/25/09 < 38 < 25 <4 < 5 < 7 <4 <6 <5 <6 < 15 < 3 < 4 < 30 < 10 MW-QC-1 061 08/25/09 < 42 < 87 <4 < 5 < 10 <5 <10 <5 <10 <17 <4 <5 <32 <13 MW-QC-1 06S 08/25/09 < 51 < 43 <5 < 5 < 16 <5 <8 <6 <10 <22 <4 <6 <45 <15 MW-QC-1071 08/26/09 < 59 < 112 <6 <6 < 15 <5 <11 <7 <9 < 24 < 6 < 6 <49 < 10 MW-QC-108S 08/26/09 < 34 < 20 <3 < 4 < 9 <4 <7 <5 <9 <13 <3- <3 <23 <9 MW-QC-1081 08/26/09 <35 <31 <3 <4 <9 <4 <8 <5 <7 <20 <3. <4 <35 < 14 MW-QC-108D 08/26/09 < 45 < 85 <4 < 5 < 12 <4 <11 <6 <10 < 26 < 4 < 5 < 46 < 15 MW-QC-1091 08/25/09 < 35 < 29 <4 < 4 < 9 <3 <6 <4 <7 <20 < 3 <4 <40 < 13 MW-QC-109S 08/25/09 <36 130 +/-46 <4 <4 <9 <3 <7 <5 <7 < 23 <3 <4 < 37 < 12 MW-QC-1101 08/26/09 < 33 < 30 <3 < 4 < 9 <3 <7 <4 <6 < 22 < 3 < 4 < 34 < 10 MW-QC- 1111 08/26/09 < 33 < 24 <3 < 4 < 7 <3 <6 <4 <6 <19 <3- <3 <34 <9 MW-QC-1 11 Dl 08/26/09 <42 145 +/-69 <4 <4 <11 <5 <8 <5 <8 < 24 <4, <4 <40 < 15 MW-QC-1 11 D2 08/26/09 < 33 < 27 < 3 < 4 < 7 <3 <7 <4 <6 < 19 < 3 <3 < 30 < 11 MW-QC-1 121 08/25/09 < 30 < 29 <3 < 3 < 8 <3 <7 <4 <6 < 21 < 3. <3 < 39 < 12 MW-QC- 1131 08/26/09 <42 <61 <3 <4 <8 <3 <7 <4 <7 <26 <3, <4 <40 < 11 MW-QC-1 141 08/26/09 < 29 < 26 <3 < 3 < 7 <3 <7 <4 <6 < 19 <3 < 3 < 31 <9 MW-QC-1 15S 08/26/09 <45 132 +/-46 <4 < 5 < 10 <4 <8 <5 <8 <27 <4: <4 <44 < 14 MW-QC-1 16S 08/25/09 < 33 < 31 <3 < 3 < 8 <3 <6 <4 <6 < 21 < 3 <3 < 36 < 9 QC-GP-9 09/18/09 < 39 < 47 <4 < 4 < 10 <3 <8 <4 <8 < 14 <4: <4 <28 < 10 QC-GP-9 12/01/09 < 25 < 28 <3 < 3 < 6 <3 <6 <3 <5 <14 <2. <3 <27 <8 QC-GP-13 09/18/09 < 38 < 40 <5 < 5 < 10 <5 <10 <5 <9 < 15 <4. <5 < 30 < 12 QC-GP-13 12/01/09 < 26 < 58 <2 < 3 < 5 <2 <4 <2 <4 <14 <2. <2 <21 <7 0

QC-GP-14 09/18/09 < 43 102 + 60 <4 < 5 < 11 <5 <8 <5 <9 <15 <4 <5 <33 <7 0 QC-GP-14 12/01/09 < 23 < 29 < 2 < 2 < 6 <2 <5 <2 <5 <12 <2 <3 <24 <5 0

TABLE B-1I.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA COLLECTION SITE DATE H-3 Surface Water #1 03/09/09

188 Surface Water #1 06/01/09 < 179 Surface Water #1 08/25/09 611 + 161 Surface Water #1 08/25/09 483 + 160 Surface Water #1 11/03/09 264 -I 124 Surface Water #2 03/09/09 < 190 Surface Water #2 06/01/09 < 182 Surface Water #2 08/25/09 480 +/-1 152 Surface Water #2 08/25/09 455 :t 155 Surface Water #2 11/03/09 313 -I 127 B-5 102 of 109

TABLE B-1I.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS INSURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF QUAD CITIES NUCLEAR POWER STATION, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD Surface Water #1 08/25/09 <38 <35 <4 <4 <11 <4 <9 <5 <8 <24 <4 <4 <44 <14 Surface Water #2 08/25/09 < 31 < 31 < 3 < 3 < 8 < 3 <6 <4 < 6 < 22 < 3 <3 < 36 < 10 0*

0

TABLE B-Ill.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AND ANALYZED BY QUAD CITIES STATION PERSONNEL, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER COLLECTION SITE DATE ACTIVITY AQUIFER

-I QC-GP-1 01/05/09 3,390 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-1 01/28/09 2,640 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-1 03/06/09 8,350 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-1 03/30/09 6,560 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-1 04/14/09 7,090 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-1 05/03/09 7,690 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-1 05/26/09 6,650 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-1 06/22/09 12,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-1 07/13/09 14,500 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-1 08/12/09 10,400 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-1 09/01/09 31,100 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-1 10/05/09 11,700 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-1 11/02/09 34,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-1 12/01/09 2,880 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-QP-2 01/05/09 46,500 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-QP-2 01/28/09 28,500 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-QP-2 02/12/09 38,200 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-QP-2 03/06/09 23,300 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-QP-2 03/30/09 9,420 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-QP-2 04/14/09 22,500 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-QP-2 05/03/09 43,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-QP-2 05/26/09 15,700 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-QP-2 06/22/09 2,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-QP-2 07/13/09 2,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-QP-2 08/12/09 2,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-QP-2 09/01/09 12,200 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-QP-2 10/05/09 2,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-QP-2 11/02/09 2,560 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-QP-2 12/01/09 2,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-3 01/05/09 2,920 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-3 01/28/09 2,980 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-3 02/12/09 2,150 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-3 03/06/09 2,850 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-3 03/30/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-3 04/14/09 3,200 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-3 05/03/09 2,120 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-3 05/26/09 2,880 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-3 06/22/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-3 08/12/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-3 09/01/09 2,710 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-3 10/05/10 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-3 11/02/10 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-3 12/01/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-4 01/05/09 211,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-4 01/28/09 198,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-4 02/12/09 187,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-4 03/06/09 175,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-4 03/30/09 123,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-4 04/14/09 89,900 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-4 05/03/09 96,500 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-4 05/26/09 63,800 SHALLOW AQUIFER B-7 104 of 109

TABLE B-Ill., CONCENTRATIONS &OFTRITIUMIN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AND ANALYZED BY QUAD CITIES STATION PERSONNEL, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER COLLECTION SITE DATE 'ACTIVITY -:AQUIFER QC-GP-4 06/22/09 106,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-4 07/13/09 113,000, SHALLOW AQUIFER.

QC-GP-4 08/12/09 123,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-4 09/01/09 .139,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-4 10/05/09 124,000: SHALLOW.AQUIFER QC-GP-4 11/02/09 . 117,000. SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-4 12/01/09 92,700 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-4 12/14/09. -88,100 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-5 01/05/09 15,300 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-5 01/28/09 14,600 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-5 02/12/09 32,100 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-5 03/06/09 .73,700 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-5 03/30/09 10,900., SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-5 04/14/09 43,600 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-5 05/03/09 *16,100. SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-5 05/26/09 16,100 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-5 06/22/09 .12,200 SHALLOW AQUIFER-QC-GP-5 07/13/09 5,940 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-5 08/12/09 6,370 SHALLOW AQUIFER.

QC-GP-5 09/01/09 5,950. SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-5 10/05/09 :4,670 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-5 11/02/09 7,830 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-5 12/01/09 , 5,380 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-6 01/05/09 .4,400 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-6 01/28/09, 10,600. SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-6 02/12/09 19,800 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-6 03/06/09 2,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-6 03/30/09 .6,570. SHALLOW AQUIFER-.

QC-GP-6 04/14/09 2,100 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-6 05/03/09 2,110, SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-6 05/26/09 5,350 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-6 06/22/09. 2000. SHALLOW AQUIFER.

QC-GP-6 07/13/09 2,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER.

QC-GP-6 08/12/09. .5,890 SHALLOW AQUIFER, QC-GP-6 09/01/09 .3,540 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-6 10/05/09 2,000. SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-6 11/02/09 2,000. SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-6 12/01/09. 2,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-7 01/05/09 38,100 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-7 01/28/09: 23,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-7 02/12/09 21,400 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-7 03/06/09 22,700 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-7 03/30/09 22,100 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-7 04/14/09 21,300 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-7 05/03/09 19,700 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-7 05/26/09 20,200 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-7 06/22/09 13,400 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-7 07/13/09 11,200 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-7 08/12/09.- 6,960 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-7 09/01/09 6,590 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-7 10/05/09 5,700 SHALLOW AQUIFER B-8 105 of 109

TABLE B-Ill.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AND ANALYZED BY QUAD CITIES STATION:PERSONNEL, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER COLLECTION SITE DATE ACTIVITY AQUIFER QC-GP-7 11/02//09 .-, 5,940,... SHALLOW AQUIEER QC-GP-7 12/01/09 6,240 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-8 01/05/09 <2000 " SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-8 01/28/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-8 03/06/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-8 03/30/09 <2000 ' SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-8 04/14/09 <200' SHALLOW AQUIFER" QC-GP-8 05/03/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-8 05/26/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-8 06/22/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-8 07/13/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-8 08/12/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-8 09/01/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-8 10/05/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-8 11/02/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-8 12/01/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-9 01/05/09 86,700 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-9 01/28/09 ' 94,700 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-9 02/12/09 - 106,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER" QC-GP-9 03/06/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-9 03/30j09' 6,030 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-9 04/14/09 - 55,900 SHALLOW AQUIFER" QC-GP-9 05/03/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-9 05/26/09 57,600 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-9 06/22/09 <2000- SHALLOW AQUIFER*

QC-GP-9 07/13/09 '73,600 SHALLOW AQUIFER-QC-GP-9 08/12/09 172,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-9 09/01/09 126,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER' QC-GP-9 09/18/09 189,000' SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-9 10/05/09' 313,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-9 10/19/09" 156,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER' QC-GP-9 11/02/09 69,800' SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-9 11/16/09 i7,400 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-9 12/01/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-9 12/14/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-10 01/05/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-10 03/06/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-10 03/30/09 <2000 " SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-10 04/14/09 507 - SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-10 05/03/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-10 05/26/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-10 06/22/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-10 07/13/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-10 08/12/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-10 09/01/09 3,670 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-10 10/05/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-10 11/02/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-10 12/01/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-11 01/05/09 20,600 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-1 1 01/28/09 17,700 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-1 1 02/12/09 15,700 SHALLOW AQUIFER B-9 106 of 109

TABLE B-i11.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF'TRITIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AND ANALYZED BY QUAD CITIES STATION PERSONNEL, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER COLLECTION SITE DATE ACTIVITY AQUIFER QC-GP-1 1 03/06/09 17,700 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-1 1 03/30/09 43,500. SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-1 1 04/14/09- 70,200 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-1 1 05/03/09 79,200 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-1 1 05/26/09 98,400 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-11 06/22/09 31,600 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-11 07/13/09 26,500 SHALLOW AQUIFER.

QC-GP-11 08/12/09 25,700 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-11 09/01/09 .18,400 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-11 10/05/09 14,200 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-11 11/02/09 13,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-11 12/01/09 . 18,800 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-12 01/05/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-12 03/06/09., ,;2000 SHIALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-12 03/30/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-12 04/14/09 <200 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-12 05/03/09ý <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-12 05/26/09., <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-12 06122/.09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-12 07/13/09 <2000, SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-12 08/12/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-12 09/01/09 <2000. SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-12 10/05/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-12 11/02/09 '<2'000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-12 12/01/09 <2060 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-13 01/05/09 48,300 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-13 01/28/09 16,500 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-13 02/12/09 10,100 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-13 03/06/09 39,700 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-13 03/30/09 162,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-13 04/14/09 165,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-13 05/03/09 184,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-13 05/26/09 160,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-13 06/22/09 94,900 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-13 07/13/09 85,800 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-13 08/12/09 31,300 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-13 09/01/09 140,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-13 09/18/09 30,500 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-13 10/05/09 36,200 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-13 11/02/09 52,400 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-13 11/16/09 190,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-13 12/01/09 147,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-13 12/14/09 206,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-14 01/05/09 597,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-14 01/28/09 740,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-14 02/12/09 771,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-14 03/06/09 771,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-14 03/27/09 390,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-14 03/30/09 404,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-14 04/14/09 592,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-14 05/03/09 740,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER B-10 107 of 109

TABLE B-Ill.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AND ANALYZED BY QUAD CITIES STATION PERSONNEL, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER COLLECTION SITE DATE ACTIVITY AQUIFER

-I QC-GP-14 05/26/09 516,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-14 06/22/09 313,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-14 07/13/09 197,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-14 08/12/09 62,100 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-14 09/01/09 70,900- SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-14 09/18/09 62,500 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-14 10/05/09' 32,600 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-14 11/02/09 51,400 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-14 11/16/09 102,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-14 12/01/09 199,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-14 12/14/09 356,000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-15 01/05/09 4,680 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-15 01/28/09 9,500 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-15 02/12/09 6,950 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-15 03/06/09 4,620- SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-15 03/36/09 9,700 SHALLOW AQUIFER' QC-GP-15 04/14/09 14,300 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-15 05/03/09 5,690 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-15 05/26/09 <2000' SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-15 06/22/09 6,690 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-15 07/13/09 14,300 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-15 08/12/09 5,930 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-15 09/01/0"9 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER-QC-GP-15 10/05/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-15 11/02/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER QC-GP-15 12/01/09 <2000 SHALLOW AQUIFER MW-QC-1051 03/31/09 62,300 MW-QC-1051 04/14/09 27,100 MW-QC-1 051 05/04/09 39,000 MW-QC-1 051 09/02/09 99,200 MW-QC-1051 10/07/09. 92,500" MW-QC-1051 12/02/09 <2000 SURFACE WATER #1 04/14/09 <200 SURFACE WATER #1 12/02/09 <200 SURFACE WATER #2 04/14/09 <200 SURFACE WATER #2 12/02/09 <200' WELL #1 03/09/09 <200 WELL #1 06/01/09 <200 WELL #1 08/24/09 <200 WELL #1 11/02/09 <2Q0 WELL #5 03/09/09 <200 WELL #5 06/01/09 <200 WELL #5 08/24/09 <200 WELL #5 11/02/09 <200 WELL #6 03/09/09 <200 WELL #6 06/01/09 <200 WELL #6 08/24/09 <200 WELL #6 11/02/09 <200 WELL #7 03/09/09 <200 B-11 108 of 109

TABLE B-Ill.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN GROUNDWATER SAMPLES COLLECTED AND ANALYZED BY QUAD CITIES STATION PERSONNEL, 2009 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER COLLECTION SITE DATE ACTIVITY AQUIFER WELL #7 06/01/09 <200 WELL #7 08/24/09 246 WELL #7 09/02/09 <200 WELL #7 10/07/09 <200 WELL #7 11/02/09 <200 WELL #7 12/02/09 <200 WELL #8 03/09/09 <200 WELL #8 06/01/09 <200 WELL #8 08/24/09 <200 WELL #8 11/02/09 <200 WELL #9 03/09/09 <200 WELL #9 06/01/09 <200 WELL #9 08/24/09 <200 WELL #9 11/02/09 <200 WELL #10 03/09/09 <200 WELL #10 06/01/09 <200 WELL #10 08/24/09 <200 WELL #10 11/02/09 <200 WELL #11 03/09/09 <200 WELL #11 06/01/09 <200 WELL #11 08/24/09 <200 WELL #11 11/02/09 <200 STP SAND POINT 03/09/09 <200 STP SAND POINT 06/01/09 <200 STP SAND POINT 08/24/09 <200 STP SAND POINT 11/02/09 <200 B-I2 109 of 109

SVP-10-021, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Contents

Text

Subject:

Enclosure:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

SVP-10-021, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Text

Subject:

Enclosure:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search