ML19225D138

From kanterella
Revision as of 02:35, 2 February 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Comments Re Review of Des,Including Daily Commuting of Laborers & Evaluation of Energy Needed to Operate Cooling Alternatives
ML19225D138
Person / Time
Site: New England Power
Issue date: 08/07/1979
From: Keohane H
ENERGY, DEPT. OF
To: Cota P
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7908070399
Download: ML19225D138 (1)


Text

h Department of Energy Region 1 150 Causeway Street Boston, Mass. 02114 Dr. Philip C. Cota Project Manager Division of Site Safety &

Environmental Analysis Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 02555 _

Dear Dr. Cota:

The Department of Energy, Region I, has completed their review of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, "New England Power Units 1 & 2 (NEP 1 & 2)", Docket Numbers STN 50-568 and STN 50-569. We have the following comments:

1. Page 4-20, second paragraph - It is estimated that 90% of the laborers will ccumute daily to the work site.

a) What is the average travel distance?

b) What effect upon energy (gasoline) consumption will this mass movement have?

c) Can mass transit be provided to reduce energy consumption?

2. Page 9-4, fourth paragrrch, second line - An indication should be made that FPC is ncw FERC, pai t of DOE.
3. Page 9-5, second paragraph, first line - Change Federal Power Commissian to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
4. Page 9-96, sections 9.3.1.8 and 9.3.1.9 - These sections shouTd include a statement evaluating the energy needed to operate these cooling al ternatives.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment.

Sincerely, l

Q Harold

4 lKeohane%L-J.

Regional Representative cc: Rooert Stern, Off. cf NEPA Affairs ^

h\Q 427 2l6 *. .

"8%o 3p' b,