ML003670061
| ML003670061 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 12/23/1999 |
| From: | Labarge D NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD2 |
| To: | Mccollum W Duke Energy Corp |
| References | |
| TAC MA6868, TAC MA6869, TAC MA6870 | |
| Download: ML003670061 (3) | |
Text
December
==
23,
==
1999
==
Mr.
==
W.
==
R.
==
McCollum,
==
Jr.
==
Vice
==
President,
==
Oconee
==
Site
==
Duke
==
Energy
==
Corporation
==
P.
==
0.
==
Box
==
1439
==
Seneca,
==
SC
==
29679
==
SUBJECT:
==
OCONEE
==
NUCLEAR
==
STATION,
==
UNITS
==
1,
==
2,
==
AND
==
3
==
RE:
==
EXEMPTION
==
FROM
==
10
==
CFR
==
50,
==
APPENDIX
==
J
==
REQUIREMENTS
==
FOR
==
AIR
==
LOCK
==
LEAKAGE
==
TESTING
==
(TAC
==
NOS.
==
MA6868,
==
MA6869,
==
AND
==
MA6870)
==
==Dear
==
Mr.
==
McCollum:==
==
The
==
Commission
==
has
==
approved
==
the
==
enclosed
==
exemption
==
from
==
certain
==
requirements
==
of
==
Title
==
10
==
of
==
the
==
Code
==
of
==
FederalRegulations
==
(CFR),
==
10
==
CFR
==
Part
==
50,
==
Appendix
==
J,
==
Section
==
III.D.2(b)(ii),
==
pursuant
==
to
==
10
==
CFR
==
Part
==
50.12.
==
This
==
action
==
is
==
in
==
response
==
to
==
your
==
application
==
dated
==
October
==
5,
==
1999,
==
to
==
allow
==
performance
==
of
==
a
==
containment
==
air
==
lock
==
door
==
seal
==
leak
==
test
==
in
==
lieu
==
of
==
a
==
full
==
pressure
==
test
==
at
==
the
==
Oconee
==
Nuclear
==
Station,
==
Units
==
1,
==
2,
==
and
==
3.
==
The
==
exemption
==
allows
==
a
==
pressure
==
test
==
of
==
the
==
containment
==
air
==
lock
==
seals
==
to
==
fulfill
==
the
==
air
==
lock
==
testing
==
requirements
==
specified
==
in
==
10
==
CFR
==
Part
==
50,
==
Appendix
==
J,
==
Section
==
III.D.2(b)(ii)
==
providing
==
that
==
no
==
work
==
is
==
performed
==
on
==
the
==
containment
==
air
==
locks
==
that
==
could
==
affect
==
air
==
lock
==
sealing
==
capability
==
during
==
periods
==
covered
==
by
==
the
==
requirement.
==
A
==
copy
==
of
==
the
==
exemption
==
has
==
been
==
forwarded
==
to
==
the
==
Office
==
of
==
the
==
Federal
==
Register
==
for
==
publication.
==
Sincerely,
==
Original
==
signed
==
by:
==
David
==
E.
==
LaBarge,
==
Senior
==
Project
==
Manager,
==
Section
==
1
==
Project
==
Directorate
==
II
==
Division
==
of
==
Licensing
==
Project
==
Management
==
Office
==
of
==
Nuclear
==
Reactor
==
Regulation
==
Docket
==
Nos.
==
50-269,
==
50-270,
==
and
==
50-287
==
Distribution:
==
HBerkow
==
==
Docket
==
File
==
DLaBarge
==
GHill
==
(6)
==
Enclosure:
==
Exemption
==
PUBLIC
==
MBoyle
==
==
==
11-2
==
Rdg.
==
CHawes
==
cc
==
w/encl:
==
See
==
next
==
page
==
COgle,
==
RII
==
Document
==
Name:
==
G:\PDII-1\OCONEE\EXE
==
A6868.WPD
==
To
==
receive
==
a
==
copy
==
of
==
this
==
document,
==
indicate
==
in
==
the
==
box:
==
"C"=
==
Copy
==
without
==
attachment/enclosure
==
"E"=
==
Copy
==
with
==
attachment/enclosure
==
"N"
==
=
==
No
==
copy
==
OFFICE
==
==
IIP
==
L
==
LA:PDII/S1
==
IOLB
==
I
==
==
SC:PDII/S1lj
==
NAME
==
D
==
/?J*99e:
==
(L{
==
CHawes
==
R**ECORDCOchP
==
DATE
==
/4A
==
,
==
tEs
==
[?"/-I,/gg/99-
==
,ZI9
==
JOIA
==
Ip1,*0199
==
L"
==
OFFICIAL
==
RECORD
==
COPY
==
".-'v
==
40fkfCR
==
,,3G.*'pgREGUq,,
==
UNITED
==
STATES
==
_-
==
- NUCLEAR
==
REGULATORY
==
COMMISSION
==
==
D.C.
==
20555-0001
==
S*
==
-December
==
23,
==
1999
==
Mr.
==
W.
==
R.
==
McCollum,
==
Jr.
==
Vice
==
President,
==
Oconee
==
Site
==
Duke
==
Energy
==
Corporation
==
P.
==
0.
==
Box
==
1439
==
Seneca,
==
SC
==
29679
==
SUBJECT:
==
OCONEE
==
NUCLEAR
==
STATION,
==
UNITS
==
1,
==
2,
==
AND
==
3
==
RE:
==
EXEMPTION
==
FROM
==
10
==
CFR
==
50,
==
APPENDIX
==
J
==
REQUIREMENTS
==
FOR
==
AIR
==
LOCK
==
LEAKAGE
==
TESTING
==
(TAC
==
NOS.
==
MA6868,
==
MA6869,
==
AND
==
MA6870)
==
==Dear
==
Mr.
==
McCollum:==
==
The
==
Commission
==
has
==
approved
==
the
==
enclosed
==
exemption
==
from
==
certain
==
requirements
==
of
==
Title
==
10
==
of
==
the
==
Code
==
of
==
FederalRegulations
==
(CFR),
==
10
==
CFR
==
Part
==
50,
==
Appendix
==
J,
==
Section
==
III.D.2(b)(ii),
==
pursuant
==
to
==
10
==
CFR
==
Part
==
50.12.
==
This
==
action
==
is
==
in
==
response
==
to
==
your
==
application
==
dated
==
October
==
5,
==
1999,
==
to
==
allow
==
performance
==
of
==
a
==
containment
==
air
==
lock
==
door
==
seal
==
leak
==
test
==
in
==
lieu
==
of
==
a
==
full
==
pressure
==
test
==
at
==
the
==
Oconee
==
Nuclear
==
Station,
==
Units
==
1,
==
2,
==
and
==
3.
==
The
==
exemption
==
allows
==
a
==
pressure
==
test
==
of
==
the
==
containment
==
air
==
lock
==
seals
==
to
==
fulfill
==
the
==
air
==
lock
==
testing
==
requirements
==
specified
==
in
==
10
==
CFR
==
Part
==
50,
==
Appendix
==
J,
==
Section
==
III.D.2(b)(ii)
==
providing
==
that
==
no
==
work
==
is
==
performed
==
on
==
the
==
containment
==
air
==
locks
==
that
==
could
==
affect
==
air
==
lock
==
sealing
==
capability
==
during
==
periods
==
covered
==
by
==
the
==
requirement.
==
A
==
copy
==
of
==
the
==
exemption
==
has
==
been
==
forwarded
==
to
==
the
==
Office
==
of
==
the
==
Federal
==
Register
==
for
==
publication.
==
Since
==
David
==
E.
==
LaBarge,
==
Senior
==
Project
==
Manager,
==
Section
==
1
==
Project
==
Directorate
==
II
==
Division
==
of
==
Licensing
==
Project
==
Management
==
Office
==
of
==
Nuclear
==
Reactor
==
Regulation
==
Docket
==
Nos.
==
50-269,
==
50-270,
==
and
==
50-287
==
Enclosure:
==
Exemption
==
cc
==
w/encl:
==
See
==
next
==
page
==
Oconee
==
Nuclear
==
Station
==
cc:
==
Ms.
==
Lisa
==
F.
==
Vaughn
==
Mr.
==
L.
==
E.
==
Nicholson
==
Legal
==
Department
==
(PBO5E)
==
Compliance
==
Manager
==
Duke
==
Energy
==
Corporation
==
Duke
==
Energy
==
Corporation
==
422
==
South
==
Church
==
Street
==
Oconee
==
Nuclear
==
Site
==
Charlotte,
==
North
==
Carolina
==
28201-1006
==
7800
==
Rochester
==
Highway
==
Seneca,
==
South
==
Carolina
==
29672
==
Anne
==
W.
==
Cottingham,
==
Esquire
==
Winston
==
and
==
Strawn
==
Ms.
==
Karen
==
E.
==
Long
==
1400
==
L
==
Street,
==
NW
==
Assistant
==
Attorney
==
General
==
==
==
20005
==
North
==
Carolina
==
Department
==
of
==
Justice
==
Mr.
==
Rick
==
N.
==
Edwards
==
P.
==
0.
==
Box
==
629
==
==
Technologies
==
Raleigh,
==
North
==
Carolina
==
27602
==
Suite
==
525
==
1700
==
Rockville
==
Pike
==
L.
==
A.
==
Keller
==
Rockville,
==
==
20852-1631
==
Manager
==
-
==
Nuclear
==
Regulatory
==
Licensing
==
Manager,
==
==
Duke
==
Energy
==
Corporation
==
==
Corporation
==
526
==
South
==
Church
==
Street
==
2650
==
McCormick
==
Drive,
==
3rd
==
Floor
==
Charlotte,
==
North
==
Carolina
==
28201-1006
==
Clearwater,
==
==
34619-1035
==
Mr.
==
Richard
==
M.
==
Fry,
==
Director
==
Senior
==
Resident
==
Inspector
==
Division
==
of
==
Radiation
==
Protection
==
U.
==
S.
==
Nuclear
==
Regulatory
==
North
==
Carolina
==
Department
==
of
==
Commission
==
Environment,
==
Health,
==
and
==
7812B
==
Rochester
==
Highway
==
Natural
==
Resources
==
Seneca,
==
South
==
Carolina
==
29672
==
3825
==
Barrett
==
Drive
==
Raleigh,
==
North
==
Carolina
==
27609-7721
==
Virgil
==
R.
==
Autry,
==
Director
==
Division
==
of
==
Radioactive
==
Waste
==
Management
==
Mr.
==
Steven
==
P.
==
Shaver
==
Bureau
==
of
==
Land
==
and
==
Waste
==
Management
==
Senior
==
Sales
==
Engineer
==
Department
==
of
==
Health
==
and
==
Environmental
==
Westinghouse
==
Electric
==
Company
==
Control
==
5929
==
Carnegie
==
Blvd.
==
2600
==
Bull
==
Street
==
Suite
==
500
==
Columbia,
==
South
==
Carolina
==
29201-1708
==
Charlotte,
==
North
==
Carolina
==
28209
==
7590-01
==
-P
==
UNITED
==
STATES
==
OF
==
AMERICA
==
NUCLEAR
==
REGULATORY
==
COMMISSION
==
In
==
the
==
Matter
==
of
==
)
==
)
==
DUKE
==
ENERGY
==
CORPORATION
==
)
==
Docket
==
Nos.
==
50-269,
==
50-270,
==
and
==
50-287
==
)
==
(Oconee
==
Nuclear
==
Station,
==
Units
==
1,
==
2,
==
and
==
3))
==
EXEMPTION
==
I.
==
The
==
Duke
==
Energy
==
Corporation
==
(Duke/the
==
licensee)
==
is
==
the
==
holder
==
of
==
Facility
==
Operating
==
License
==
Nos.
==
==
==
and
==
==
that
==
authorize
==
operation
==
of
==
the
==
Oconee
==
Nuclear
==
Station,
==
Units
==
1,
==
2,
==
and
==
3
==
(Oconee),
==
respectively.
==
The
==
licenses
==
provide,
==
among
==
other
==
things,
==
that
==
the
==
facilities
==
are
==
subject
==
to
==
all
==
rules,
==
regulations,
==
and
==
orders
==
of
==
the
==
U.S.
==
Nuclear
==
Regulatory
==
Commission
==
(the
==
Commission)
==
now
==
or
==
hereafter
==
in
==
effect.
==
The
==
facilities
==
consist
==
of
==
three
==
pressurized
==
water
==
reactors
==
located
==
on
==
Duke's
==
Oconee
==
site
==
in
==
Seneca,
==
Oconee
==
County,
==
South
==
Carolina.
==
II.
==
Title
==
10
==
of
==
the
==
Code
==
of
==
FederalRegulations
==
(10
==
CFR)
==
Part
==
50,
==
Appendix
==
J,
==
contains
==
the
==
following
==
requirements:
==
==
a.
==
Section
==
IlI.D.2(b)(i)
==
requires
==
that
==
air
==
locks
==
be
==
tested
==
prior
==
to
==
initial
==
fuel
==
loading
==
and
==
at
==
6-month
==
intervals
==
thereafter
==
at
==
an
==
internal
==
pressure
==
not
==
less
==
than
==
Pa
==
(the
==
calculated
==
peak
==
containment
==
internal
==
pressure
==
related
==
to
==
the
==
design
==
basis
==
accident).
==
==
b.
==
Section
==
III.D.2(b)(ii)
==
requires
==
that
==
air
==
locks
==
opened
==
during
==
periods
==
when
==
containment
==
integrity
==
is
==
not
==
required
==
shall
==
be
==
tested
==
at
==
the
==
end
==
of
==
such
==
periods
==
at
==
Pa'
==
==
c.
==
Section
==
llI.D.2(b)(iii)
==
requires
==
that
==
air
==
locks
==
opened
==
during
==
periods
==
when
==
containment
==
integrity
==
is
==
required
==
shall
==
be
==
tested
==
within
==
3
==
days
==
after
==
being
==
opened.
==
For
==
air
==
locks
==
opened
==
more
==
frequently
==
than
==
once
==
every
==
3
==
days,
==
the
==
air
==
lock
==
shall
==
be
==
tested
==
at
==
least
==
once
==
every
==
3
==
days
==
during
==
the
==
period
==
of
==
frequent
==
openings.
==
For
==
air
==
lock
==
doors
==
having
==
testable
==
seals,
==
testing
==
the
==
seals
==
fulfills
==
the
==
3-day
==
test
==
requirement.
==
Ill.
==
The
==
proposed
==
action
==
is
==
in
==
accordance
==
with
==
the
==
licensee's
==
application
==
for
==
exemption
==
contained
==
in
==
a
==
submittal
==
dated
==
October
==
5,
==
1999.
==
Whenever
==
the
==
plant
==
is
==
in
==
cold
==
shutdown
==
(Mode
==
5)
==
or
==
refueling
==
(Mode
==
6),
==
containment
==
integrity
==
is
==
not
==
required.
==
However,
==
if
==
an
==
airlock
==
is
==
opened
==
when
==
in
==
Modes
==
5
==
or
==
6
==
(which
==
is
==
usually
==
the
==
case),
==
10
==
CFR
==
50,
==
Appendix
==
J,
==
Section
==
Ill.D.2(b)(ii)
==
requires
==
that
==
an
==
overall
==
air
==
lock
==
leakage
==
test
==
at
==
not
==
less
==
than
==
Pa
==
be
==
performed
==
before
==
plant
==
heatup
==
and
==
startup
==
(i.e.,
==
before
==
Mode
==
4
==
is
==
entered).
==
The
==
licensee
==
has
==
requested
==
an
==
exemption
==
that
==
would
==
allow
==
this
==
test
==
requirement
==
to
==
be
==
met
==
by
==
performing
==
an
==
air
==
lock
==
door
==
seal
==
leakage
==
test
==
per
==
10
==
CFR
==
50,
==
Appendix
==
J,
==
Section
==
III.D.(b)(iii)
==
during
==
plant
==
startup
==
prior
==
to
==
entering
==
Mode
==
4
==
if
==
no
==
maintenance
==
has
==
been
==
performed
==
on
==
the
==
air
==
lock
==
that
==
could
==
affect
==
its
==
sealing
==
capability.
==
If
==
maintenance
==
has
==
been
==
performed
==
that
==
could
==
affect
==
its
==
sealing
==
capability,
==
an
==
overall
==
air
==
lock
==
leakage
==
test
==
per
==
10
==
CFR
==
50,
==
Appendix
==
J,
==
Section
==
III.D.2(b)(ii)
==
would
==
be
==
necessary
==
prior
==
to
==
establishing
==
containment
==
integrity.
==
The
==
existing
==
air
==
lock
==
doors
==
are
==
designed
==
so
==
that
==
the
==
air
==
lock
==
pressure
==
test
==
can
==
only
==
be
==
performed
==
after
==
a
==
strongback
==
(structural
==
bracing)
==
has
==
been
==
installed
==
on
==
the
==
inner
==
door,
==
since
==
the
==
pressure
==
used
==
to
==
perform
==
the
==
test
==
is
==
opposite
==
that
==
of
==
accident
==
pressure
==
and
==
would
==
tend
==
to
==
unseat
==
the
==
door.
==
Performing
==
the
==
full
==
air
==
lock
==
test
==
in
==
accordance
==
with
==
the
==
present
==
requirements
==
takes
==
approximately
==
12
==
hours,
==
since
==
it
==
requires
==
installation
==
of
==
the
==
strongback,
==
performing
==
the
==
test,
==
and
==
removing
==
the
==
strongback.
==
During
==
the
==
test,
==
access
==
through
==
the
==
air
==
lock
==
is
==
prohibited,
==
which,
==
therefore,
==
requires
==
evacuation
==
of
==
personnel
==
from
==
the
==
containment
==
or
==
the
==
personnel
==
must
==
remain
==
inside
==
the
==
containment
==
during
==
the
==
test
==
until
==
Mode
==
4
==
is
==
reached.
==
The
==
licensee
==
has
==
determined
==
that
==
pressurizing
==
the
==
volume
==
between
==
the
==
seals
==
to
==
60
==
pounds
==
per
==
square
==
inch
==
==
pressure
==
after
==
each
==
opening,
==
and
==
prior
==
to
==
establishing
==
containment
==
integrity,
==
provides
==
the
==
necessary
==
surveillance
==
to
==
ensure
==
the
==
sealing
==
capability
==
of
==
the
==
door
==
seals.
==
If
==
the
==
periodic
==
6-month
==
test
==
of
==
10
==
CFR
==
50,
==
Appendix
==
J,
==
Section
==
III.D.(b)(i)
==
and
==
the
==
test
==
required
==
by
==
10
==
CFR
==
50,
==
Appendix
==
J,
==
Section
==
III.D.(b)(iii)
==
are
==
current,
==
no
==
maintenance
==
has
==
been
==
performed
==
on
==
the
==
air
==
lock
==
that
==
could
==
affect
==
its
==
sealing
==
capability,
==
and
==
the
==
air
==
lock
==
is
==
properly
==
sealed
==
as
==
determined
==
by
==
the
==
seal
==
test,
==
there
==
is
==
no
==
reason
==
to
==
expect
==
that
==
the
==
air
==
lock
==
will
==
leak
==
just
==
because
==
it
==
has
==
been
==
opened
==
in
==
Modes
==
5
==
or
==
6.
==
Therefore,
==
there
==
is
==
no
==
impact
==
on
==
plant
==
operation
==
or
==
safety.
==
In
==
addition,
==
due
==
to
==
the
==
design
==
of
==
the
==
air
==
lock,
==
the
==
6-month
==
test
==
should
==
detect
==
air
==
lock
==
deterioration.
==
IV.
==
Pursuant
==
to
==
10
==
CFR
==
50.12,
==
the
==
Commission
==
may,
==
upon
==
application
==
by
==
any
==
interested
==
person
==
or
==
upon
==
its
==
own
==
initiative,
==
grant
==
exemptions
==
from
==
the
==
requirements
==
of
==
10
==
CFR
==
Part
==
50,
==
when
==
(1)
==
the
==
exemptions
==
are
==
authorized
==
by
==
law,
==
will
==
not
==
present
==
an
==
undue
==
risk
==
to
==
public
==
health
==
or
==
safety,
==
and
==
are
==
consistent
==
with
==
the
==
common
==
defense
==
and
==
security;
==
and
==
(2)
==
when
==
special
==
circumstances
==
are
==
present.
==
This
==
is
==
also
==
consistent
==
with
==
the
==
determination
==
that
==
the
==
staff
==
has
==
reached
==
for
==
other
==
licensees
==
under
==
similar
==
conditions
==
based
==
on
==
the
==
same
==
considerations.
==
Accordingly,
==
the
==
staff
==
concludes
==
that
==
the
==
licensee's
==
proposed
==
approach
==
of
==
substituting
==
the
==
3-day
==
seal
==
leakage
==
test
==
requirements
==
of
==
10
==
CFR
==
50,
==
Appendix
==
J,
==
Section
==
IIl.D.(b)(iii)
==
for
==
the
==
full
==
pressure
==
test
==
of
==
10
==
CFR
==
50,
==
Appendix
==
J,
==
Section
==
III.D.(b)(ii)
==
is
==
acceptable
==
when
==
no
==
maintenance
==
that
==
could
==
affect
==
the
==
sealing
==
capability
==
has
==
been
==
performed
==
on
==
the
==
air
==
lock.
==
Whenever
==
maintenance
==
that
==
could
==
affect
==
the
==
sealing
==
capability
==
has
==
been
==
performed
==
on
==
the
==
air
==
lock,
==
the
==
full
==
pressure
==
test
==
requirements
==
of
==
10
==
CFR
==
50,
==
Appendix
==
J,
==
Section
==
III.D.(b)(ii)
==
must
==
still
==
be
==
met.
==
Therefore,
==
the
==
staff
==
concludes
==
that
==
requesting
==
the
==
exemption
==
under
==
the
==
special
==
circumstances
==
of
==
10
==
CFR
==
50.12(a)(2)(ii)
==
is
==
appropriate
==
and
==
that
==
application
==
of
==
the
==
regulation
==
is
==
not
==
necessary
==
to
==
serve
==
the
==
underlying
==
purpose
==
of
==
the
==
rule.
==
The
==
underlying
==
purpose
==
of
==
the
==
rule
==
is
==
to
==
ensure
==
that:
==
(a)
==
leakage
==
through
==
the
==
primary
==
containment,
==
and
==
systems
==
and
==
components
==
penetrating
==
the
==
primary
==
containment,
==
does
==
not
==
exceed
==
the
==
allowable
==
leakage
==
rate
==
values
==
specified
==
in
==
the
==
Technical
==
Specifications
==
or
==
associated
==
Bases;
==
and
==
(b)
==
periodic
==
surveillance
==
of
==
containment
==
penetrations
==
and
==
isolation
==
valves,
==
and
==
systems
==
and
==
components
==
penetrating
==
the
==
containment,
==
is
==
performed
==
so
==
that
==
proper
==
maintenance
==
and
==
repairs
==
are
==
made
==
during
==
the
==
service
==
life
==
of
==
the
==
containment.
==
V.
==
Accordingly,
==
the
==
Commission
==
has
==
determined
==
that,
==
pursuant
==
to
==
10
==
CFR
==
50.12(a),
==
the
==
exemption
==
is
==
authorized
==
by
==
law,
==
will
==
not
==
endanger
==
life
==
or
==
property
==
or
==
common
==
defense
==
and
==
security,
==
and
==
is,
==
otherwise,
==
in
==
the
==
public
==
interest.
==
Therefore,
==
the
==
Commission
==
hereby
==
grants
==
Duke
==
an
==
exemption
==
from
==
the
==
requirements
==
of
==
10
==
CFR
==
Part
==
50,
==
Appendix
==
J,
==
Section
==
III.D.2(b)(ii)
==
for
==
containment
==
air
==
lock
==
tests
==
as
==
described
==
above,
==
for
==
the
==
Oconee
==
Nuclear
==
Station,
==
Units
==
1,
==
2,
==
and
==
3.
==
Pursuant
==
to
==
10
==
CFR
==
51.32,
==
the
==
Commission
==
has
==
determined
==
that
==
the
==
granting
==
of
==
this
==
exemption
==
will
==
not
==
result
==
in
==
any
==
significant
==
effect
==
on
==
the
==
quality
==
of
==
the
==
human
==
environment
==
64
==
FR
==
70072)
==
This
==
exemption
==
is
==
effective
==
upon
==
issuance.
==
FOR
==
THE
==
NUCLEAR
==
REGULATORY
==
COMMISSION
==
Original
==
signed
==
by:
==
John
==
A.
==
Zwolinski,
==
Director
==
Division
==
of
==
Licensing
==
Project
==
Management
==
Office
==
of
==
Nuclear
==
Reactor
==
Regulation
==
Dated
==
at
==
Rockville,
==
==
this
==
23rd
==
day
==
of
==
December
==
1999.
==
Document
==
Name:
==
G:\PDII-1\OCONEE\EXE
==
A6868.WPD
==
To
==
receive
==
a
==
copy
==
of
==
this
==
document,
==
indicate
==
in
==
the
==
box:
==
"C"
==
=
==
Copy
==
without
==
attachment/enclosure
==
"E"
==
=
==
Copy
==
with
==
attachment/enclosure
==
"N"
==
=
==
No
==
copy
==
- See
==
parallel
==
pn~urrence
==
OFFICE
==
PDII-1
==
P,
==
PDII-1/LA
==
IB
==
A
==
NAME
==
DLg9
==
cn
==
- 57Hawes
==
-
==
,jW*fe
==
,
==
WB
==
.
==
$//
==
/99
==
an
==
Ii
==
L2
==
?
==
'/
==
9
==
9
==
,i
==
/
==
'
==
/9
==
9
==
/C4'/
==
/
==
,J.?
==
.
==
/99
==
==
T
==
E
==
/9
==
OFFICE
==
==
10
==
I
==
SC:PDII/S41
==
D:
==
D:
==
'
==
NAME
==
[&/7ivrT,2
==
REmch
==
H
==
eNK6
==
JZI!6Wl
==
DATE
==
)!
==
9/99
==
1
==
Z./l
==
0./99
==
1J/0J
==
/99
==
I'*./
==
)499
==
OFFICIAL
==
RECORD
==
COPY
==
Pursuant
==
to
==
10
==
CFR
==
51.32,
==
the
==
Commission
==
has
==
determined
==
that
==
the
==
granting
==
of
==
this
==
exemption
==
will
==
not
==
result
==
in
==
any
==
significant
==
effect
==
on
==
the
==
quality
==
of
==
the
==
human
==
environment
==
(64
==
FR
==
70072
==
).
==
This
==
exemption
==
is
==
effective
==
upon
==
issuance.
==
FOR
==
THE
==
NUCLEAR
==
REGULATORY
==
COMMISSION
==
John
==
A.
==
Zwolinski,
==
Director
==
Division
==
of
==
Licensing
==
Project
==
Management
==
Office
==
of
==
Nuclear
==
Reactor
==
Regulation
==
Dated
==
at
==
Rockville,
==
==
this
==
23rd
==
day
==
of
==
December
==
1999.