|
|---|
Category:Memoranda
MONTHYEARML23356A0212023-12-0101 December 2023
American Nuclear Insurers, Secondary Financial Protection (SFP) Program
ML23103A2742023-04-25025 April 2023
04-25-23 - Letter to the Honorable Charles Schumer, Et Al., Responds to Concerns Regarding Holtec Decommissioning Internationals Plans to Release Effluents at the Indian Point Energy Center
ML21232A2342021-08-20020 August 2021
Memo - Revised Transcript for Public Meeting Held on July 29, 2021, in Tarrytown, Ny, Re IP Energy Center Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report
ML21056A0772021-04-0707 April 2021
Memo to File: Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for Initial and Updated Decommissioning Funding Plans for Indian Point ISFSI (Docket: 72-51)
ML20104A3882020-04-13013 April 2020
Tasking in Response to the Concerns Pertaining to Gas Transmission Lines at the Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant Follow Up Activities Agency Level
ML20104A7232020-04-13013 April 2020
Tasking in Response to the Concerns Pertaining to Gas Transmission Lines at the Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant; Follow Up Activities; Office Level
ML20099F7752020-04-0909 April 2020
Report Transmittal Memo to the Commissioners, from: Margaret M. Doane
ML20058E3542020-02-27027 February 2020
Tasking Memo to Dskeen Re Concerns Identifed in Report Pertaining to Gas Transmission Lines
ML20056F0952020-02-13013 February 2020
Concerns Pertaining to Gas Transmission Lines at the Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant
ML18046B4412018-02-23023 February 2018
Review of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Revision 7
ML17271A0532017-09-29029 September 2017
2017 Summary of Annual Decommissioning Funding Status Reports for Reactors in Decommissioning
ML17180A5032017-09-21021 September 2017
04/19/2017 Summary of Teleconference with Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Concerning Request for Additional Information Pertaining to the Indian Point Unit Nos. 2 and 3 License Renewal Application
ML17157B5422017-06-20020 June 2017
Conference Call on 2nd Round RAIs - Final
ML17128A3352017-05-23023 May 2017
Summary of Telephone Conference Call Between the NRC and Entergy Concerning RAIs Pertaining to IP2 and IP3
ML17060A6602017-04-12012 April 2017
Potentially Cost-Beneficial SAMAs
ML17082A3112017-04-11011 April 2017
Summary of Clarification Call with Entergy Regarding Follow-Up RAIs on ISG-2012-02
ML16336A4992017-01-18018 January 2017
Notice of Significant Licensing Action
ML17052A3002017-01-11011 January 2017
Security Exclusion Zone Acoustic Tag Detection Study, 9 November 2016
ML17052A3092017-01-11011 January 2017
Atlantic Sturgeon Distribution Memo
ML16088A2042016-03-28028 March 2016
Memo T Bowers from s Ruffin, Technical Assistance Requests - Review 2015 Tri-Annual Decommissioning Funding Plans for Multiple Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations W/ Encl 2 (Template)
ML16088A2052016-03-28028 March 2016
Enclosure 1 - (72.30 DFP Reviews to Be Completed 2015) - Memo T Bowers from s Ruffin, Technial Assistance Requests - Review 2015 Tri-Annual Decommissioning Funding Plans for Multiple Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installations
ML15190A2912015-07-22022 July 2015
070115, Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and Entergy Concerning the RAIs Pertaining to the Indian Point LRA Safety Review
ML15139A1952015-05-19019 May 2015
Special Inspection Team Charter - Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit 3 - Water Accumulation in Safety-Related Switchgear Room Following Deluge of Main Transformer Fire
ML15107A1752015-04-28028 April 2015
041615, Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and Entergy Concerning the RAIs Pertaining to the Indian Point LRA Environmental Review
ML15091A0972015-04-0101 April 2015
Figures from Indian Point Quarter 3 2014 Groundwater Monitoring Report - Part 4
ML14344A9652014-12-18018 December 2014
Summary of Telephone Conference Call Held Between NRC and Entergy Concerning the RAIs Pertaining to the Indian Point LRA Environmental Review
ML14269A1972014-10-0303 October 2014
LTR-14-0463-1 - Proposed Comments to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission'S Draft Environmental Impact Statement Algonquin Incremental Market Project (Docket No. CP14-96-000)
ML13256A0432013-09-10010 September 2013
Request for Additional Information to Entergy Nuclear Northeast, Indian Point Units 2 and 3, Regarding NTTF Recommendation 9.3 Phase 1 Staffing Assessments Submittal
ML13218A0862013-08-0808 August 2013
Notice of Forthcoming Meeting with Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. and Netco to Discuss the Goals and Objectives of the Long-Term Spent Fuel Pool Improvement Program for Indian Point Unit 2 and 3
ML13102A1242013-04-15015 April 2013
Summary of April 11, 2013, Telephone Conference Call Between NRC and Entergy Entry of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 2 Into the Period of Timely Renewal
ML12361A1552012-12-26026 December 2012
Summary of Entergy Drop-In on December 19, 2012
ML12296A9292012-10-23023 October 2012
Memo Draft Request for Additional Information for Indian Point Units 1 and 2 Memo
ML12215A2482012-09-17017 September 2012
Summary of Conference Call Held on June 4, 2012, Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Concerning the Reactor Vessel Internals Program at Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3
ML12213A0612012-08-0101 August 2012
8/16/12 Forthcoming Conference Call with NextEra Energy and Florida Power & Light Concerning Generic Letter 2004-02 and Request for NRC Staff Review of Draft Proposed Guideline for Strainer Fiber Bypass Test Protocol
ML13196A2202012-06-0606 June 2012
Memo from B. Balsam, NRR and D. Logan, NRR to J. Susco, NRR on Summary of Section 7 Consultation Activities Related to the National Marine Fisheries Service'S Final Rule to List the Atlantic Sturgeon
ML12137A0602012-05-29029 May 2012
Nuclear Regulatory Commission'S Analysis of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Decommissioning Funding Status Report for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 & 3; and Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station
ML1122701452011-08-30030 August 2011
Summary of Conference Call Between NRC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Regarding Non-EQ Inaccessible Medium-Voltage Cable Program for Indian Point Units 2 & 3
ML11201A3062011-07-29029 July 2011
Summary of Telephone Conference Calls Held on June 20, June 22, and June 29, 2011, Regarding the Ongoing Endangered Species Act Consultation for the Proposed Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3 License Renewal
NL-11-093, Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification Waiver2011-07-29029 July 2011
Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification Waiver
ML1118703442011-07-0606 July 2011
Memorandum and Order (Ruling on Pending Motions for Leave to File New and Amended Contentions)
ML1115704052011-06-0606 June 2011
Notice of Meeting with Entergy Operations, Inc., to Discuss Implementation of Quality Oversight and Verification Programs at Entergy Sites Including Actions Being Taken to Enhance Effectiveness
ML11102A0062011-05-0909 May 2011
01/12/11 Summary of Telephone Conference Call Between Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Concerning the Final SEIS for the Proposed License Renewal of Indian Point, Units 2 and 3
ML1110909492011-04-25025 April 2011
Notice of Meeting G20110221/EDATS:OEDO-2011-0226- with the State of New York Attorney General'S Office (the Petitioner) Requesting Action Under 10 CFR 2.206 Regarding Fire Protection at Indian Point
ML1110909052011-04-22022 April 2011
NRC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. Held a Category 1 Public Meeting on April 18, 2011, to Discuss the Shortnose Sturgeon
ML1110103962011-04-11011 April 2011
Notice of Forthcoming Meeting with Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. to Discuss the License Amendment Requests to Permit the Transfer of Spent Fuel from the Indian Point Unit 3 Spent Fuel Pool to the Unit 2 Spent Fuel Pool
ML1109803932011-04-0808 April 2011
Forthcoming Meeting with NRC and Entergy Operations, Inc
ML11223A0412011-03-23023 March 2011
Memorandum from J. Boska, NRR to T. Quay, NRR on Review of 10 CFR 2.206 Petition on Gas Pipelines Near the Indian Point Reactors
ML1107504052011-03-21021 March 2011
Notice of Meeting with Entergy Operations, Inc., to Discuss Fleetwide Submittal for Proposed Technical Specification and Quality Assurance Program Manual Changes Related to Unit Staff Qualification Requirements
ML1029106182010-10-14014 October 2010
Documentation of Telephone Conversation Between Mr. David Lochbaum Regarding Follow-Up Questions Related to NRC Letter Dated July 28, 2010 (ML102040807)
ML0931701682009-11-17017 November 2009
Summary of Teleconference Call Held on 11/3/09 Between the U.S. NRC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Concerning Meteorological Data Used for the Severe Accident Mitigation Alternative Analyses
2023-04-25
[Table view] |
Text
,,~,..R REGlJ~ UNITED STATES
+~v "'01' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
!!
<<
~
0 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001
\ii :
\, ,i May 9, 2011
~') ~o
LICENSEE: Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
FACILITY: Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JANUARY 12, 2011, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC., CONCERNING THE FINAL SEIS FOR THE PROPOSED LICENSE RENEWAL OF INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy). held a telephone conference call on January 12. 2011, in order for Entergy to share its concerns about the staffs analysis of aquatic ecology impacts in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS) Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3. Entergy provided a written summary of its concerns via e-mail on February 4, 2011, available in the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System under accession number ML110410355.
Enclosure 1 contains a participant list, while Enclosure 2 contains a summary of the teleconference.
Andrew L. Stuyvenberg, Project Manager Environmental Review and Guidance Update Branch Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286
Enclosures:
As stated cc w/encl: Listserv
Teleconference Regarding Indian Point Final SEIS Aquatic Ecology Impacts Concerns January 12, 2011 PARTICIPANTS Affiliation Fred Dacimo Entergy Nuclear Operations. Inc. (Entergy)
Dara Gray Entergy Larry 8arnthouse Entergy Doug Heimbuch Entergy Mark Mattson Entergy John Young Entergy Andy Imboden U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
Dennis Logan NRC Andrew Stuyvenberg NRC ENCLOSURE 1
Teleconference Regarding Indian Point Final SEIS Aquatic Ecology Impacts Concerns January 12, 2011 Summary Entergy indicated to NRC staff that it had specific questions about the staffs aquatic ecology impacts analysis in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS), and requested an opportunity to share them with the staff. The staff set up a teleconference for Entergy to present its concerns. NRC staff indicated that it would listen to Entergy's concerns, but not specifically respond to them in the course of the teleconference. Entergy staff and NRC staff discussed a possible follow-up public meeting at a later date to address the concerns, if necessary.
Entergy indicated that it had concerns in three broad areas: 1) interpretation and use of Hudson River data; 2) the NRC staff's impact levels; and 3) the model NRC staff used to assign impacts.
- 1. Interpretation and use of Hudson River data Entergy asserted that NRC staff estimates of total organisms impinged at Indian Point, as shown in Table 1-42 of the FSEIS, is too large by three orders of magnitude (1000 times), and asserted that NRC staff had misinterpreted the data that Entergy provided to NRC. Entergy indicated that the NRC numbers were three orders of magnitude higher than data reported to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
- 2. Impact Levels Entergy expressed concern about the criteria staff used to assign SMALL, MODERATE, and LARGE impact levels in the FSEIS. Entergy indicated that the NRC staffs approach for differentiating SMALL impacts from non-SMALL impacts was clear, but the difference between MODERATE and LARGE impacts was unclear. Specifically, Entergy expressed uncertainty about how NRC staff defines a destabilizing impact on a population (a criterion for a LARGE impact) and how one would establish that destabilization is occurring.
- 3. Staffs Model Entergy inquired as to how the staffs model accounts for mortality. Entergy asserted that any measureable impact to a species would, over enough time, appear to lead to extinction for a species. Entergy asserted that this type of model assumes that there's no maximum sustainable yield for fish species analyzed, and thus does not appear consistent with fisheries science.
Entergy asserted that the staffs model accounts for entrainment and impingement mortality, as well as internal variability, but also appears to respond to two other factors. First, the number of years of records has an effect on the strength of connection; if enough years are included, then any species will have a positive strength of connection. Second, Entergy asserts that the NRC's use of detectability as a criterion in its definition of impact levels introduces a bias against high ENCLOSURE 2
-2 quality monitoring programs because the ability to detect change increases with the amount of data used.
Regarding NRC staff's entrainment assessment, Entergy indicated that Hudson River Segment 4 is not a closed section with defined populations, so using data only from Segment 4 leads to higher impacts because the data only includes a part of the Hudson River's population of a given species. Entergy asked why NRC staff based their estimates on Segment 4 rather than riverwide data combined with conditional entrainment mortality rates and conditional impingement mortality rates from the 1999 Hudson River Utilities DEIS.
Finally, Entergy asserted that NRC staff may have included some species in its strength of connection analysis for which insufficient data were available. Entergy asserted that some species for which relatively few individuals were captured in some surveys - including bluefish, white catfish, and weakfish - should not have been included in the strength of connection analysis.
ML11102A006 *concurrence via e-mail OFFICE LA:DLR PM:RERB:DLR BC:RPB2:DLR PM:RERB:DLR NAME YEdmonds BBalsam DWrona AStuyvenberg (BBalsam for)
DATE 04/21/2011 04/22/2011 05/04/2011 05/09/2011
Memo to Entergy Nuclear Operations. Inc. from Andrew L. Stuyvenberg dated May 9, 2011
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON JANUARY 12.
2011. BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC .. CONCERNING THE FINAL SEIS FOR THE PROPOSED LICENSE RENEWAL OF INDIAN POINT NUCLEAR GENERATING UNIT NOS. 2 AND 3.
DISTRIBUTION:
HARD COPY:
DLR R/F E-MAIL:
PUBLIC RidsNrrDlr Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb1 Resource RidsNrrDlrRpb2 Resource RidsNrrDlrRerb Resource RidsNrrDlrRpob Resource RidsOgcMailCenter Resource DWrona GMalone, RI BPham GMeyer, RI KGreen RConte, RI AStuyvenberg JBoska RAuluck DScrenci. RI OPA ADias NSheehan. RI OPA MKowal PCataldo, RI STurk.OGC CHott, RI DJackson. RI NMcNamara, RI BMizuno, OGC BWelling, RI SBurnell. OPA ECobey, RI DMclntyre, OPA TKoonce, RI EDacus,OCA
