ML12342A260
| ML12342A260 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek  |
| Issue date: | 11/30/2012 |
| From: | Wolf Creek |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| ET 12-0032 WCAP-17678-NP, Rev 0 | |
| Download: ML12342A260 (98) | |
Text
A-223 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: LFFV0096 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves EauiDment DescriDtion: CTMT NOR SUMPS TO F*LR DRN TK OUTSIDE CTMT ISO LFFV0096 9-19 196 LFFV0096 9-19 198 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-224 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: LFFV0096 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
CTMT NOR SUMPS TO FLR DRN TK OUTSIDE CTMT ISO LFFV0096 9-19 199 LFFV0096 9-19 200 November 2012 WCAP-1 7678-NP WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-225 Status: r-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NE002 Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment
Description:
STANDBY #2 Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB, 2000.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes Item shares common skid with KKJOIB.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Item shares common skid with KKJO1B. Refer to Note 5 for KKJO1B. No hazard.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-226 Status: L N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NE002 Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment
Description:
STANDBY #2 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Noted ruggedly-supportedcrane overhead with hoist chains tied off. Fall protection yo-yos above also well-secured. No hazards.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
See Note 7 above. No hazards.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Noted minor surface oxidation on heat exchangerbolts, but no indication of strength loss. Therefore no seismic concern.
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-227 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NE002 Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment
Description:
STANDBY #2 Photos NE002 9-17 002 NE002 9-17 004 NtAUU2 9-11I UUJ WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-228 Status: r] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NE002 Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment
Description:
STANDBY #2 NE002 9-17 005 NE002 9-17 006 NE002 9-17 007 NEO02 9-17 008 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-229 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NE002 Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment
Description:
STANDBY #2 NE002 9-17 009 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-230 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NF039B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
Description:
CONT SHED/SEQ CH 4 LOGIC Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): CTRL, 2047.50 ft, 3605 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-231 Status: Y-- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NF039B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
Description:
CONT SHED/SEQ CH 4 LOGIC Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Adjacent cabinets are flush. Concern regardingpotentialsensitive equipment changing state due to chatter. Check that cabinets are attached.
Licensing Basis Evaluation: SWT review of WCNOC CalculationXX-FH-009-002 confirms that cabinet NFO39B and adjacent cabinets NFO39A and NF039C have been analyzed for proximity concerns with adjacentcabinets and are therefore acceptable.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-232 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NF039B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
Description:
CONT SHED/SEQ CH 4 LOGIC Z4.- Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 Photos WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-233 Status: Li] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NF039B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets EauiDment DescriDtion: CONT SHED/SEQ CH 4 LOGIC Nf-U39B 9-18 138 NF039B 9-18 139 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-234 Status: [r] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NF039B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets ioment DescriDtion: CONT SHED/SEQ CH 4 LOGIC NF039B 9-18 141 November 2012 WCAP-1 7678-NP WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-235 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NF039B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets EauiDment
Description:
CONT SHED/SEQ CH 4 LOGIC NFO39B 9-18 142 November 2012 WCAP-I 7678-NP WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-236 Status: Y N-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NG002B Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Equipment
Description:
480 VAC MOTOR CONTROL CENTER Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2026.00 ft, 1409 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion:' that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-237 Status: Y N-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NG002B Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Equipment
Description:
480 VAC MOTOR CONTROL CENTER Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Approximately Y3/4" of an inch between top drip shield and P1001 unistrut support on SE corner. From close inspection drip shield edge would pass between P1001 channel flanges, so actual N-S clearanceis greaterthan 2".
No spatial interactionconcern.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Heavy cable tray observed above but ruggedly supportedby P1001 members. No hazard.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Unknown adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Cabinet internals could not be accessed during at-power walkdowns.
Internalswill be inspected during next bus outage.
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-238 Status: Y N Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NG002B Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Equipment
Description:
480 VAC MOTOR CONTROL CENTER NG002B 9-20 073 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-239 Status: Y N -y--
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NG002B Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Equipment
Description:
480 VAC MOTOR CONTF NG002B 9-20 074 NG002B 9-20 075 NG002B 9-20 076 NG002B 9-20 077 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-240 Status: Y N [l]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NG002B Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers
~........
.A An^ I I A ^ IAvrrl
& ^r~k 1,r N{l-;I H EYK' 111*/P4I/F NUUUZU: U-ZU U/IV NG002B 9-20 080 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-241 Status: Y N Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NG004C Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Equipment
Description:
480 VAC Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2047.50 ft, 1501 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-242 Status: Y N I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NG004C Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Equipment
Description:
480 VAC Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Observed 1-7/8" clearancefrom back of MCC (drip shield) to concrete wall.
There is concern that the MCC could close the gap in SSE event and cause equipment to malfunction. Verification needed to ensure gap is sufficient given MCC flexibility (gaporiented in weak direction) and high elevation of the Aux Building (2047.5').
Licensing Basis Evaluation: Using a conservative lower bound frequency estimate of 5 Hz, a modal shape factor of 1.6 for cantilever action, and taking the peak spectralacceleration of approx. Ig at the 2047.5 ft. elevation for 3%
damping (conservative), the upper-bound displacement is 6.3 in (= 1.6*386.4 in/sA2
- ig / (2*pi*5 Hz)A2). Therefore, a 1-7/8" gap is acceptable.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Unknown adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Cabinetinternalscould not be accessed during at-power walkdowns.
Internals will be inspected during next bus outage.
Comments WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-243 Status: Y N -*
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NG004C Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Equipment
Description:
480 VAC Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 Photos NG004C 9-19 419 NG004C 9-19 420 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-244 Status: Y N F--]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NG004C Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Eauinment
Description:
480 VAC NG004C 9-19 421 NG004C 9-19 422 NG004C 9-19 423 NG004C 9-19 424 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-245 Status: Y N F Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NG004C Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers F-if=Jinmantna-errintinn' pn \/Ar.
,/
NG004C 9-19 425 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-246 Status: Y N -U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NG006E Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Equipment
Description:
480 VAC Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): ESW, 2000.00 ft, UNK Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% N0o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-247 Status: Y NO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NG006E Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Equipment
Description:
480 VAC Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Unknown adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Cabinetinternalscould not be accessed during at-power walkdowns.
Internals will be inspected during next bus outage.
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-248 Status: Y N[--
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NG006E Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers Equipment
Description:
480 VAC Photos NG006E 9-17 151 NG006E 9-17 152 N(UU0E 9-17 153 NGU06E 9-17 154 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-249 Status: Y N F0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NG006E Equipment Class: (1) Motor Control Centers EauiDment DescriDtion: 480 VAC NG006E 9-17 155 NG006E 9-17 157 NG006E 9-17 159 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-250 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NK012 Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment
Description:
125-VDC NO.2 60-CELL BATTERY Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): CTRL, 2016.00 ft, 3411 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Component has identical anchorageas NK014 (RM 3405).
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-251 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NK012 Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment
Description:
125-VDC NO.2 60-CELL BATTERY Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-252 Status: [ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NK012 Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment
Description:
125-VDC NO.2 60-CELL BATTERY Photos NK012 9-18 101 NK012 9-18 102 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-253 Status: Y-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NK012 Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks EauiDment
Description:
125-VDC NO.2 60-CELl LBATTERY L BATTERY NK012 9-18 105 NKU12 9-15 103 NK012 9-18 106 NK012 9-18 107 WCAP-i 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-254 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NK012 Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks iDment DescriDtion: 125-VDC NO.2 60-CELL BATTERY NK012 9-18 108 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-255 Status: Y-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NK014 Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment
Description:
125-VDC NO.4 60-CELL BATTERY Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): CTRL, 2016.00 ft, 3405 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-256 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NK014 Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment
Description:
125-VDC NO.4 60-CELL BATTERY Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Rod-hung piping overhead is noted; however piping is low mass with ductile connections. Therefore, there is no seismic hazard.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-257 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NK014 Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment
Description:
125-VDC NO.4 60-CELL BATTERY Photos NK014 9-18 096 NK014 9-18 097 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-258 Status: Y-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: NK014 Equipment Class: (15) Batteries on Racks Equipment
Description:
125-VDC NO.4 60-CELL BATTERY NKU14 9-16 U99 NK014 9-18 098 NK014 9-18 100 November 2012 WCAP- 7678-NP WCAP-I17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-259 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PAL01B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
AUX FEEDWATER PUMP Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2000.00 ft, 1325 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-260 Status: E-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PAL01B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
AUX FEEDWATER PUMP Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes W site glass is in zone of influence of hoist rig. However rig cannot uplift from rail and is no hazard.Also chains are tied off No adverse seismic concerns.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-261 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PAL01B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
AUX FEEDWATER PUMP Photos PAL01B 9-19 298 PAL01B 9-19 299 PAL01 B 9-19 300 PALO IB 9-19 301 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-262 Status: [-M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PAL01B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
AUX FEEDWATER PUMP PALOIB 9-19 302 PAL01B 9-19 303 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-263 Status: r N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PAL01B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps EauiDment
Description:
AUX FEEDWATER P UMP UMP PALO1B 9-19 304 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-264 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PAL01B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
AUX FEEDWATER PUMP PAL01B 9-19 306 PAL01B 9-19 307 PALOi1B 9-19 308 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-265 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PAL02 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
AFW PUMP--TURBINE DRIVEN Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2000.00 ft, 1331 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes Minor surface oxidation noted but no indication of strength loss. Therefore no hazard.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-266 Status: iI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PAL02 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
AFW PUMP--TURBINE DRIVEN Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Hoist overhead well-supported with rig away from equipment and chains tied off. No hazard.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Noted leveling bolts missing on N end. Large anchors are adjacentat 4 corners; therefore no adverse seismic condition. WCNOC is checking on bolt.
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Ztý 4 e* Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-267 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PAL02 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
AFW PUMP--TURBINE DRIVEN Photos PAL02 9-19 253 PAL02 9-19 254 PAL02 9-19 255 PAL02 9-19 256 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-268 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PAL02 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Eouioment
Description:
AFW PUMP-TURBIN
%4 WIA I I1EY 4-1* 1 II*
I I I 1M W-w-.~ l%
IVALUZ V-1W ZbU:J FALUZ 9-19 Zb1 November 2012 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-269 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PAL02 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
AFW PUMP-TURBINE DRIVEN PAL02 9-19 263 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-270 Status: [M] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PAL02 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
AFW PUMP-TURBINE DRIVEN V'ALUZ U-I1d ZOO November 2012 WCAP-1 7678-NP WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-271 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PBG02B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP MOTOR Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 1974.00 ft, 1116 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes Minor grout cracks noted but no concrete cracks in pump pedestal No adverse concern.
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-272 Status: [ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PBG02B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP MOTOR Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Ztý Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-273 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PBG02B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP MOTOR Photos PBG02B 9-19 084 PBG02B 9-19 085 PBG02B 9-19 087 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-274 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PBG02B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
BORIC ACID TRANSFER PUMP MOTOR WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-275 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PBG04 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
NORMAL CHARGING PUMP Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 1974.00 ft, 1115 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes Minor grout cracks noted. No adverse concern.
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-276 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PBG04 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
NORMAL CHARGING PUMP Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead hoist well-supported with rig parked away from pump. No hazard.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-277 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PBG04 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
NORMAL CHARGING PUMP Photos PBG04 9-19 061 PBG04 9-19 062 PBG04 9-19 063 P'bUU4!J-1UJ Uti4 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-278 Status: L] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PBG04 Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumi ps Equipment
Description:
NORMAL CHARGII PBG04 9-19 066 PBG04 9-19 067 PBG04 9-19 068 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-279 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PBG05B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 1974.00 ft, 1107 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-280 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PBG05B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Noted scaffolding near air tubing running to pump. Scaffolding is well-supported, well-braced and has adequateclearance. Fall protectionharness mounted on scaffold but far enough away not to be in zone of influence of the tubing. No hazards.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overheadhoist noted to be well-supported with chains tied off. No hazard.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-281 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PBG05B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP Photos PBG05B 9-19 008 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-282 Status: EI- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PBG05B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Eauinment Descrintion: CENTRIFUGAL CHAIRGING PBG05B 9-19 010 PBG05B 9-19 011 PBG05B 9-19 012 PBG05B 9-19 013 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-283 Status: Eli] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PBG05B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
CENTRIFUGAL CHAIRGING PUMP PBG05B 9-19 015 PBIGO5B 9-19 014 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-284 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PECO1B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
FUEL POOL COOLING PUMP Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): FB, 2000.00 ft, 6104 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-285 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PECO1B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
FUEL POOL COOLING PUMP Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Hoist overhead, well supported and hoist chains tied off at south end away from pump. Good practice noted; no hazard.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-286 Status: 1N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PECO1B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
FUEL POOL COOLING PUMP Photos PECOIB 9-18 230 PECOIB 9-18 231 November 2012 WCAP-I 7678-NP WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-287 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PECO1B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps EauiDment
Description:
FUEL POOL COOLINIG PUMP PECO1B 9-18 233 VtLA)Ib U-16 zjz WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-288 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PECO1 B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps ipment
Description:
FUEL POOL COOLING PUMP November 2012 WCAP- 7678-NP WCAP-I17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-289 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PEGO1B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
COMPONENT COOL. WATER PUMP Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2026.00 ft, 1401 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-290 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PEG01B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
COMPONENT COOL. WATER PUMP Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Scaffolding and overhead hoist are well-supported and properlybraced. Hoist rig is in safe position with chains tied off. No hazards.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-291 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PEGO1B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
COMPONENT COOL. WATER PUMP Photos PEG01B 9-20 138 WCAP-I 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-292 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PEG01B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps pment
Description:
COMPONENT COOL. WATER PUMP tIoI::lU1b 9-ZU 14U PEGO1B 9-20 141 PEG01B 9-20 142 PEG01B 9-20 143 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-293 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PEGO1B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps EauiDment DescriDtion: COMPONENT COOL . WATER PUMP PEGO1 B 9-20 144 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-294 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PEJ01B Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
Description:
RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL PUMP Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 1974.00 ft, 1109 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-295 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PEJ01B Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
Description:
RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL PUMP Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Scaffolding observed to be approximately 1" from tank legs. Tank legs and scaffold are stiff enough that distance is adequate. Hoist above is well supported with riggingparked away from equipment and tied off. No hazards.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?, Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-296 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PEJ01B Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
Description:
RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL PUMP Photos PHJU1B 9-19 146 PUJ013 9-19 141 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-297 Status: Mj N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PEJ01B Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps EauiDment DescriDtion: RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL PUMP PEJOIB 9-19 149 P*JUIB 9-19 148 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-298 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PEN01B Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
Description:
Containment Spray Pump B Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 1974.00 ft, 1110 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-299 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PENOIB Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
Description:
Containment Spray Pump B Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Noted blockout wall adjacent and with rugged external supports. No concern.
Overheadhoist well supported with chains tied off. No concerns.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
See Note 7 above. No hazards.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: HunterYoung Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-300 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PENO0 B Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
Description:
Containment Spray Pump B Photos PEN01B 9-19 121 PEN01B 9-19 122 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-301 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PEN01B Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps EauiDment DescriDtion: Containment SDrav Pur PENOIB 9-19 123 PEN01B 9-19 124 WCAP-I 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-302 Status: M-1 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PEN01 B Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps iDment
Description:
Containment Spray Pump B PEN01B 9-19 125 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-303 Status: T N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PKJ03B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
AUXILIARY LUBE-OIL (KEEP-WARM) PUMP FOR KKJ01B Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB, 2000.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable Pump is rigidly mounted to diesel skid.
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchoragefree of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-304 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PKJ03B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
AUXILIARY LUBE-OIL (KEEP-WARM) PUMP FOR KKJO1B Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-305 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: PKJ03B Equipment Class: (5) Horizontal Pumps Equipment
Description:
AUXILIARY LUBE-OIL (KEEP-WARM) PUMP FOR KKJO1B Photos PKJ03B 9-17 010 PKJ03B 9-17 011 PKJ03B 9-17 012 November 2012 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-306 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: RL017 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
Description:
ESF MCB Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): CTRL, 2047.50 ft, 3601 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes Welds on rearof panel are inaccessible due to floor tile that requires excessive dismantling to view. SWT observed over 50% of anchorage,which is deemed sufficient to verify the equipment as anchored. No adverse concern.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-307 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: RL017 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
Description:
ESF MCB Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-308 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: RL017 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
Description:
ESF MCB Photos RL017 9-18 109 RL017 9-18 110 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-309 Status: Mi N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: RL017 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets EauiDment Descrotion: ESF MCB ILU1I U-1h UUZ RL017 9-19 001 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-310 Status: [-M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: RL017 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets iDment
Description:
ESF MCB RLO17 9-19 004 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-3I1 Status: -Y-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: RL017 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets EauiDment
Description:
ESF MCB KLU1 t 9-19 U0b RL017 9-19 006 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-312 Status: EM N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: RL017 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
Description:
ESF MCB
'(LU I 0-I1UUt WCAP-I 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-313 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: RL020 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
Description:
ESF MCB Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): CTRL, 2047.50 ft, 3601 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of:=anlitem of equipment on the SWEL. The space-below each of the following questions may be-used to-record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes Welds on rearof panel are inaccessibledue to floor tile that requires excessive dismantling to view. SWT observed over 50% of anchorage, which is deemed sufficient to verify the equipment as anchored. No adverse concern.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-314 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: RL020 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
Description:
ESF MCB Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-315 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: RL020 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
Description:
ESF MCB Photos RL020 9-18 111 RL020 9-18 112 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-316 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: RL020 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets EauiDment DescriDtion: ESF MCB I*LU,&U .-1W UUZ WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-317 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: RL020 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets iDment
Description:
ESF MCB Ri RL020 9-19 004 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-318 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: RL020 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets manIu Equipment
Description:
ESF MCB I
KLUZU ýJ--1 t UUbý KLUZU 1-W1 U UUt0 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-3 19 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: RL020 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
Description:
ESF MCB I-LUZU UJ-1h UU(
WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-320 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: RL021 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
Description:
REACTOR AUXILIARIES PANEL Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): CTRL, 2047.50 ft, 3601 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoragie
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% N10 of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes Welds on rearof panel are inaccessibledue to floor tile that requires excessive dismantling to view. SWT observed over 50% of anchorage,which is deemed sufficient to verify the equipment as anchored. No adverse concern.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0