ML15014A120

From kanterella
Revision as of 17:01, 31 October 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Feedback for Specific Public Meetings
ML15014A120
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 01/14/2015
From:
Southern California Edison Co
To:
NRC/EDO
Cai J, OEDO, 415-5192
References
Download: ML15014A120 (8)


Text

Feedback for Specific Public Meetings Survey: SONGS Communications Feedback For the 06/18/2012 meeting at the San Juan Capistrano Community Center, to the best of your recollection, please provide feedback on the following:

Not Applicable/

Strongly Somewhat Somewhat Strongly No Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Agree Opinion Responses

a. The meeting location, starting time, and 2 0 1 2 3 0 8 duration were reasonably convenient 25.0% 0.0% 12.5% 25.0% 37.5% 0.0%
b. The meeting facility was appropriate for 2 1 0 1 4 0 8 the size of the meeting 25.0% 12.5% 0.0% 12.5% 50.0% 0.0%
c. The room set up supported the purpose 2 0 0 1 5 0 8 of the meeting 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 62.5% 0.0%
d. The purpose/objectives of the meeting 2 0 0 2 4 0 8 were made clear 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 50.0% 0.0%
e. The structure of the meeting (e.g., 3 1 0 2 2 0 8 presentation format and flow) supported the 37.5% 12.5% 0.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0%

meeting objectives

f. The presentations and explanations given 2 0 1 4 1 0 8 by the NRC staff were understandable 25.0% 0.0% 12.5% 50.0% 12.5% 0.0%
g. The amount of time allotted for topics 2 2 1 2 1 0 8 was appropriate 25.0% 25.0% 12.5% 25.0% 12.5% 0.0%
h. The meeting helped me to understand the 2 0 2 1 3 0 8 topics discussed 25.0% 0.0% 25.0% 12.5% 37.5% 0.0%
i. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity 3 1 1 2 1 0 8 to ask questions or express their views 37.5% 12.5% 12.5% 25.0% 12.5% 0.0%
j. Attendees were listened to and 2 1 1 2 2 0 8 understood by NRC staff 25.0% 12.5% 12.5% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0%
k. The facilitator maintained control and 2 0 0 3 3 0 8 focus of the meeting 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 37.5% 37.5% 0.0%
l. The facilitator was fair and balanced 2 0 0 3 3 0 8 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 37.5% 37.5% 0.0%
m. Overall, the meeting achieved its stated 2 1 0 4 1 0 8 purpose 25.0% 12.5% 0.0% 50.0% 12.5% 0.0%
n. Overall, I am satisfied with the NRC staff 2 1 0 0 5 0 8 who participated in the meeting 25.0% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 62.5% 0.0%

1

For the 10/09/2012 meeting at the St. Regis Monarch Beach, to the best of your recollection, please provide feedback on the following:

Not Applicable/

Strongly Somewhat Somewhat Strongly No Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Agree Opinion Responses

a. The meeting location, starting time, and 3 1 1 4 2 0 11 duration were reasonably convenient 27.3% 9.1% 9.1% 36.4% 18.2% 0.0%
b. The meeting facility was appropriate for 3 1 0 1 6 0 11 the size of the meeting 27.3% 9.1% 0.0% 9.1% 54.5% 0.0%
c. The room set up supported the purpose 3 0 0 2 6 0 11 of the meeting 27.3% 0.0% 0.0% 18.2% 54.5% 0.0%
d. The purpose/objectives of the meeting 4 0 0 1 6 0 11 were made clear 36.4% 0.0% 0.0% 9.1% 54.5% 0.0%
e. The structure of the meeting (e.g., 5 1 1 1 3 0 11 presentation format and flow) supported the 45.5% 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 27.3% 0.0%

meeting objectives

f. The presentations and explanations given 3 0 1 4 3 0 11 by the NRC staff were understandable 27.3% 0.0% 9.1% 36.4% 27.3% 0.0%
g. The amount of time allotted for topics 4 1 0 4 2 0 11 was appropriate 36.4% 9.1% 0.0% 36.4% 18.2% 0.0%
h. The meeting helped me to understand the 3 0 1 3 4 0 11 topics discussed 27.3% 0.0% 9.1% 27.3% 36.4% 0.0%
i. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity 5 1 1 3 1 0 11 to ask questions or express their views 45.5% 9.1% 9.1% 27.3% 9.1% 0.0%
j. Attendees were listened to and 4 0 0 3 4 0 11 understood by NRC staff 36.4% 0.0% 0.0% 27.3% 36.4% 0.0%
k. The facilitator maintained control and 4 1 0 3 3 0 11 focus of the meeting 36.4% 9.1% 0.0% 27.3% 27.3% 0.0%
l. The facilitator was fair and balanced 4 0 1 2 4 0 11 36.4% 0.0% 9.1% 18.2% 36.4% 0.0%
m. Overall, the meeting achieved its stated 4 1 1 4 1 0 11 purpose 36.4% 9.1% 9.1% 36.4% 9.1% 0.0%
n. Overall, I am satisfied with the NRC staff 4 0 0 2 4 0 10 who participated in the meeting 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 0.0%

2

For the 11/30/2012 meeting at the Hills Hotel, to the best of your recollection, please provide feedback on the following:

Not Applicable/

Strongly Somewhat Somewhat Strongly No Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Agree Opinion Responses

a. The meeting location, starting time, and 1 0 2 2 2 0 7 duration were reasonably convenient 14.3% 0.0% 28.6% 28.6% 28.6% 0.0%
b. The meeting facility was appropriate for 1 1 0 3 2 0 7 the size of the meeting 14.3% 14.3% 0.0% 42.9% 28.6% 0.0%
c. The room set up supported the purpose 1 0 0 3 3 0 7 of the meeting 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 42.9% 42.9% 0.0%
d. The purpose/objectives of the meeting 1 0 1 2 3 0 7 were made clear 14.3% 0.0% 14.3% 28.6% 42.9% 0.0%
e. The structure of the meeting (e.g., 2 0 1 2 2 0 7 presentation format and flow) supported the 28.6% 0.0% 14.3% 28.6% 28.6% 0.0%

meeting objectives

f. The presentations and explanations given 1 0 1 2 3 0 7 by the NRC staff were understandable 14.3% 0.0% 14.3% 28.6% 42.9% 0.0%
g. The amount of time allotted for topics 2 1 0 1 3 0 7 was appropriate 28.6% 14.3% 0.0% 14.3% 42.9% 0.0%
h. The meeting helped me to understand the 1 0 2 2 2 0 7 topics discussed 14.3% 0.0% 28.6% 28.6% 28.6% 0.0%
i. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity 2 1 0 2 1 0 6 to ask questions or express their views 33.3% 16.7% 0.0% 33.3% 16.7% 0.0%
j. Attendees were listened to and 1 0 1 3 2 0 7 understood by NRC staff 14.3% 0.0% 14.3% 42.9% 28.6% 0.0%
k. The facilitator maintained control and 1 1 0 4 1 0 7 focus of the meeting 14.3% 14.3% 0.0% 57.1% 14.3% 0.0%
l. The facilitator was fair and balanced 1 0 1 2 3 0 7 14.3% 0.0% 14.3% 28.6% 42.9% 0.0%
m. Overall, the meeting achieved its stated 1 0 3 2 1 0 7 purpose 14.3% 0.0% 42.9% 28.6% 14.3% 0.0%
n. Overall, I am satisfied with the NRC staff 1 0 1 1 4 0 7 who participated in the meeting 14.3% 0.0% 14.3% 14.3% 57.1% 0.0%

3

For the 12/18/2012 meeting at NRC headquarters in Rockville, MD, to the best of your recollection, please provide feedback on the following:

Not Applicable/

Strongly Somewhat Somewhat Strongly No Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Agree Opinion Responses

a. The meeting location, starting time, and 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 duration were reasonably convenient 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
b. The meeting facility was appropriate for 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 the size of the meeting 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
c. The room set up supported the purpose 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 of the meeting 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
d. The purpose/objectives of the meeting 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 were made clear 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
e. The structure of the meeting (e.g., 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 presentation format and flow) supported 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

the meeting objectives

f. The presentations and explanations given 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 by the NRC staff were understandable 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
g. The amount of time allotted for topics 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 was appropriate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
h. The meeting helped me to understand the 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 topics discussed 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
i. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 to ask questions or express their views 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
j. Attendees were listened to and 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 understood by NRC staff 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
k. The facilitator maintained control and 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 focus of the meeting 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
l. The facilitator was fair and balanced 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
m. Overall, the meeting achieved its stated 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 purpose 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
n. Overall, I am satisfied with the NRC staff 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 who participated in the meeting 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

4

For the 01/16/2013 meeting at NRC headquarters in Rockville, MD, to the best of your recollection, please provide feedback on the following:

Not Applicable/

Strongly Somewhat Somewhat Strongly No Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Agree Opinion Responses

a. The meeting location, starting time, and 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 duration were reasonably convenient 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
b. The meeting facility was appropriate for 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 the size of the meeting 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
c. The room set up supported the purpose 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 of the meeting 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
d. The purpose/objectives of the meeting 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 were made clear 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
e. The structure of the meeting (e.g., 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 presentation format and flow) supported the 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

meeting objectives

f. The presentations and explanations given 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 by the NRC staff were understandable 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
g. The amount of time allotted for topics 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 was appropriate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
h. The meeting helped me to understand the 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 topics discussed 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
i. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 to ask questions or express their views 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
j. Attendees were listened to and 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 understood by NRC staff 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
k. The facilitator maintained control and 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 focus of the meeting 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
l. The facilitator was fair and balanced 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
m. Overall, the meeting achieved its stated 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 purpose 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
n. Overall, I am satisfied with the NRC staff 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 who participated in the meeting 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

5

For the 02/12/2013 meeting at the Capo Beach Church, to the best of your recollection, please provide feedback on the following:

Not Applicable/

Strongly Somewhat Somewhat Strongly No Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Agree Opinion Responses

a. The meeting location, starting time, and 0 1 1 1 2 0 5 duration were reasonably convenient 0.0% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 40.0% 0.0%
b. The meeting facility was appropriate for 0 2 1 0 2 0 5 the size of the meeting 0.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0%
c. The room set up supported the purpose 0 0 1 2 2 0 5 of the meeting 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 40.0% 0.0%
d. The purpose/objectives of the meeting 0 0 1 1 3 0 5 were made clear 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 20.0% 60.0% 0.0%
e. The structure of the meeting (e.g., 1 0 1 2 1 0 5 presentation format and flow) supported the 20.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0%

meeting objectives

f. The presentations and explanations given 0 0 1 2 2 0 5 by the NRC staff were understandable 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 40.0% 0.0%
g. The amount of time allotted for topics 1 1 0 1 2 0 5 was appropriate 20.0% 20.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 0.0%
h. The meeting helped me to understand the 0 0 2 1 2 0 5 topics discussed 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 20.0% 40.0% 0.0%
i. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity 1 1 0 2 1 0 5 to ask questions or express their views 20.0% 20.0% 0.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0%
j. Attendees were listened to and 0 1 0 2 2 0 5 understood by NRC staff 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 40.0% 40.0% 0.0%
k. The facilitator maintained control and 0 0 1 3 1 0 5 focus of the meeting 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 60.0% 20.0% 0.0%
l. The facilitator was fair and balanced 0 0 1 2 2 0 5 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 40.0% 0.0%
m. Overall, the meeting achieved its stated 0 0 2 3 0 0 5 purpose 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0%
n. Overall, I am satisfied with the NRC staff 0 0 1 0 3 0 4 who participated in the meeting 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0%

6

For the 02/27/2013 meeting at the NRC headquarters in Rockville, MD, to the best of your recollection, please provide feedback on the following:

Not Applicable/

Strongly Somewhat Somewhat Strongly No Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Agree Opinion Responses

a. The meeting location, starting time, and 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 duration were reasonably convenient 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
b. The meeting facility was appropriate for 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 the size of the meeting 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
c. The room set up supported the purpose 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 of the meeting 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
d. The purpose/objectives of the meeting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 were made clear 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
e. The structure of the meeting (e.g., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 presentation format and flow) supported the 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

meeting objectives

f. The presentations and explanations given 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 by the NRC staff were understandable 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
g. The amount of time allotted for topics 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 was appropriate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
h. The meeting helped me to understand the 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 topics discussed 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
i. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 to ask questions or express their views 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
j. Attendees were listened to and 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 understood by NRC staff 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
k. The facilitator maintained control and 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 focus of the meeting 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
l. The facilitator was fair and balanced 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
m. Overall, the meeting achieved its stated 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 purpose 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
n. Overall, I am satisfied with the NRC staff 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 who participated in the meeting 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

7

For the 04/03/2013 meeting at the NRC headquarters in Rockville, MD, to the best of your recollection, please provide feedback on the following:

Not Applicable/

Strongly Somewhat Somewhat Strongly No Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Agree Opinion Responses

a. The meeting location, starting time, and 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 duration were reasonably convenient 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
b. The meeting facility was appropriate for 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 the size of the meeting 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
c. The room set up supported the purpose 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 of the meeting 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
d. The purpose/objectives of the meeting 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 were made clear 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
e. The structure of the meeting (e.g., 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 presentation format and flow) supported the 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%

meeting objectives

f. The presentations and explanations given 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 by the NRC staff were understandable 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
g. The amount of time allotted for topics 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 was appropriate 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
h. The meeting helped me to understand the 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 topics discussed 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
i. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 to ask questions or express their views 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
j. Attendees were listened to and 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 understood by NRC staff 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
k. The facilitator maintained control and 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 focus of the meeting 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
l. The facilitator was fair and balanced 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
m. Overall, the meeting achieved its stated 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 purpose 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%
n. Overall, I am satisfied with the NRC staff 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 who participated in the meeting 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%

8