ML13003A260

From kanterella
Revision as of 00:38, 29 April 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0, Vogtle Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic. Part 17 of 20
ML13003A260
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Volodarsky D
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2270 SNCV061-RPT-01, Ver 1.0
Download: ML13003A260 (39)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Stanis:(Y-N U: Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. /-- / t Equip. Class', Equipment Description C.7' ,.Location:

Bldg. 0723 FloorEf. 2ok Room, Area l Manufacturer, Model,.Etc. (optional but recommended)

/?,I7f.~ t~,TInstructionsJfor Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkd6wn of an item of eqUiPment on the SWEL..,The spacc below each of the following questions may be used to record the resulis ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this, checklist for documentihg.

other comments.Anchoragte

1. Is the:anchorage configu. rati6n verification required (i.e,, is the item one ofethle % of SWEL.items requiring such verification)?

Yg .N , 2. Is the.anctiorage.frec:ofbent, broken,missing or loose hardware?3. Is theancthorage free of corrosi6o thatis more than mi i'd'tirface oxidatiiii?

4'!;ls the arnchoragefree of visible cracks in the concietchar the anchors?5. anichorage con.figuration consistent with plant documentatioIn?(N.t Tl-ihis liuesiirnny applies if the item isone.of:the 50% tr.whiichn anchorage, cbnfiginrafion verifitafion-:is requir d.)Or~ 1A':X 4 6. Based on thc above ahchornge!.,"Suations, is the auchorage free0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?.

YW/NO U[ N/A[, Y NOC UC N./AC'Y0N.U N/AD'YmK1Nr UEI N/AM YE'NEJ UEJ OvI:~e..cqwipmeatcc ass name froin Appeid.ix 13: CL~ssesof Equlpti~ihf (C-3 >PAGE 630 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheetz2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment iDNo. 1 :-111/4 7 12qup. Class......

Equpmntesro C .-p Class/ !Equipment Description e Interaction Effects: 7. Are soft targets fiee from impact by nearby equipment or, stnictyures?

8. Are overhead.equipment, distribution systemsj, eiling tiles ard lighting, andnmasonry blockwalls not likely to collapsc dhto the equipment?

A9 Do attached lines.have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on.the above.seismic interadtion, evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YffYNrl UE3 WIAD, YýNEJ UfJ N/Ar Y2 .fý[ UE3 N/AEJ YO'IND GOJ Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no. other seismic conditions thatcould YI0"NEI UnE adversely affect the safety ftimctions of the equipment?

Comments (Additi0aal pages~iay be added as niecessary)

Evaluated

~/~~~ Y-i Date:< 04 >PAGE 631 of 668 tA CHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .010 PAGE 632 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Sfatus:) N. U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

g/-i1 8-4uip. Class .-Equipment Description

., Gd,"/f, C'ca( Q,/.,-. Location:

Bldg;, ..FloorEl. 2.O6:ý-: 6' Room,.Area

/ ,4-Manufacturer, Model, Etc, (optional but recomrnended):

Instructions for C(ompleting Checklist This checklist may be used, to document the results of theSeismic Walkdown.of an item of equipment potnthe SWEL. The space below each of the.following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of'this checklist for documentingother commcnts, Anchorag L. s the anchorage configuration verification required (iLe., is the item .one of the 50% of SWEL.items requiring such verification)?

Y L"!'§UC UC NAC.2,; !sthe anchorage free of bent,broken, missing or lobSe hardware?3.. Is the anchorage free of corrosiOn that is more than mild.:surfhce Y 4 NEI UE N/AC o'xidation?

041 1j cp!,J,44 ýuf 4; I the, anchorage free of Visible cracksin the concrete near the anchors? Y[01'NE3 UIC N/ACI.5,, sthe ancloibageConfiguration congisteni with:plantdocumeiradtion?

'(Ndte: This qWestiononly applies if the item is o-he of the 50% for Wliihh an ý:inchoragec.onifigutratiori Veifit~tion'is required.)

6. Based onithe above anchorag is the anchorage, free of potentially advyCrsc sismvriC conditions?

Y0NC UE1 N/AC Y~ 4-N El tI FEntcrý thecqtupmcn~tclass na~nic (rom Appendkix n iý5 Claws ofipr~<03 PAGE 633 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2. of 2 Seismic Walkdown Cheodk~ist (SWC)ýEquip'mient D No., -i /1 no -60 27 Equip. Class" ~ .,, Equipment Descriotibn.

____ J_____ __7______interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets ftrbee nearby structures?

8. Are :ov0erhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles 3and lightingi and: masonry' block walls not likely to'collapse onto the equir ment'?9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10., Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yfl E lE N/ACI YEN1.UE] U-E N/An]Ytfd NE1 UE] N/AC YE(E] U[]Other Adverse Conditions
11. HaveCyou and foundj-noothetismic conditions that could Y a/N] ,UE: advefse[y affect, the safety functions of Lhe equipment?

Coqmnieni.s (Addi'ioiial pages maoy be added "necessary)

Evaluated b _ _ _ _ _ _ _Date:0, -Zi"< C-4 >PAGE 634 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 100 PAGE 635 of 668 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOONO PAGE 636 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet, 1 of 2 Status: (9 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)*Equipment

[.DNo. 5- -5151S Equip. Class1 2'4 EquipmentD'escription

...T -- -FSX Location:

Bldg. ¢Ai .Floor El. Ifl._IL Room, Area It, r '0 5 Manufacturer, Model, Etc; (optional but recommended)

Trhis checklist may-bezused to document the results.of the Seismic Walkdown of an item ofe uiprent on the SWE L The space bel ow each: of the following questions may be used to:record the, results ofj udgmen's and.findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of tiis checklist fordodumenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such -verification)?:

YN NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free ofcorrsion that'is more than mild surface oxidation?, 4. s: the free of v. ible cracks,in the concrete near the 5. Is theanchorage configuration consisten with plant'documentation?(Note:.This:question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verificationis required.)

6. Biased on the.aibove aichotage evaluations, is, the anchorage .f potentfiallyIa'dverse seismic conditions?.

YRI NO 130 N/AO1 YN Nn Uf] N/An YXI NO U0 !A YV NEO 1Un N/AU YI NO U1" En~t~erthe equi prilnt claiss nanw front Appendi~ K4: BýCl ssdf Equipmentr 4 C-3 )>PAGE 637 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Shee't 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist

.(SWC), Equipmenti:D No. l-l.....$3.i..

-. Equip. c Equipment Description , Ib15 X Interaction Effec(s 7. Are sofl targets free from impact by nearby equipment or. structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiJling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9.. Do attached lines have adequateiflexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismicinteraction effects?YZ NO LJO N/AE YO NO U 'NW/At: YM Nt Ut YvJ NO Ut: Other Adverse Conditions It. Have you looked for and'found no other seismic conditions that could Y .NEI Ur adversely affect the safety ltinctions of the equipment2?

9- io.1.p , A -Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:.Date:9 i -<"'C-4>PAGE 638 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 639 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 640 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 V PAGE 641 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 642 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2" Status: Y' ) U Sesmic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. v l.5-, -. Equip. Cass'2 4, EquipmientDescription g ______

Bldg. A_ .FloorEl. #U Room,,Area RAO\Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optiona:l.but'recommiiended)

Ihstructions, for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the resultS of'the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the foIlowing questions may be uscd to :record the results of judgments and,'findings.;

Additional space is providedat the end ofthis checklIist for documenting

'other comments.Anehorageý

1. is the anchorage configuration verifi catioireq ired (i.e., is the iten one. NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring suchverification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?-7 -&t~~ -#J4 l 6p 3. Is the amihorage free of corrosion that)is moree than mild surfae oxidation?
4. is-the anchorage free of visible.qracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is'jthe Anchorage c6nfiguration consistent.

with plant, documentationi?(Note:;This quiestion only applies ifthe item is one of the 5.0% for which an. anchdro ge configuration verification is required.)

Kt SSýNm& tMOLMS 61 Based dn the abbve anchorage:

evaliuations, is the.anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

XE U N/AO Yo j N (U`YX NO UD N/Ax YONO U N/AX YONO N AD:NF1 :UO3 Enter the equi~nient class harrie frorn ANp'd' ,E e 0h -!sof e< ýC-3 >~PAGE 643 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. ';A Equip .C.ass.2..-- , 1Eauinment D '~Equipment Dcýscrintiot!'

Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8.o Are0overheadequipment, distributtion systemrs,.ceiling tiles tmd lighting,.

and masonry blocikwalls not likbely to onto the equipment?

-9. Do attached lines ýhiav adequate, flexibility to avoid damage?NO yE N/AE1 1V EI0 N/AEI Yk/NEI UE N/AE1 i0, Based on-the above seismicc iteraction evaluatIons, is eqluipnient free NEI UE of potentially.

adverse seismic interactibh effects?-Other Adverse Conditions 1 l Uave you Iooked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y4,NEn U El adverselyaffect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional.pages tiay be added as npcessafy)

Evaluatedhby:

Date: -< C-4 >PAGE 644 of 668 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 AFWI I PAGE 645 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS O0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 646 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 647 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOONO PAGE 648 of 668 3 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONOO PAGE 649 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 qjllý!Cuti OIL-Status:- & N U Seismic Wafkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment tD No.,- .i 13 ti" ) Equip Class's___ ~~~2-1j c j FTiiipment D'escript .ion, Pi. ~tt t4X A-Location:

Bldg, " X Floor EL flct L! Room, Area 3.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recormnended).

iWstructions for Completing Checklist Tis checklist may be used to document thetresults of the Seismic Walkdon of an ite'm of equipment on the SWEL. The, spac below each of the follwi questimns may be used to record the results ofjudpgents and findings.

Additional space is provided attthe end of this checkdist for documenting other commens.t. Is the a0chorage cW fguaion s verifioreir(one ND of the 56)% Of SWE'L itm requiring such veriflea, on)? Y 12. Is te anchorage free ofbent, broken, missing-or loose hardware?3, Is te; achorage free of corroson that is mor han mild surfaice.oxidation'!

4. s~te achoagefiee of visible cracksninthe concrete near te anchiors?Is the anchorage configuration consisteat with plant documentation?(Note: This qaestiononly applies if the itemi is 'one of the 50% fox whch an nhbotage configuration verifiction isreqtitfed.)

.6. Based on theabove nhorage vauations, is the anchorage fee of potettlially adverse seismiuc condlitions!

YNO tIC N/AD U NO UD N/AD Yý ND0 li N/AD.ND tiC /A'~ne teeqipreneicllass na~me fromi Appendix B:Claset of Equipmenit.

< C-3 >PAGE 650 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2of2*Seismic Walkdown Checki st.(SWC)EquipmentlD No. 14-i Wý&6L"-t Equip. Class'22.I (T~-~ci Fk'.:Equipment Description S-,0it Pit1-6I+A interaction Effects 7. Are soft tatrgets free from impact by nearby equipment.oT stnictthes?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceilingtiles and. lighting, and masonry-block walls. not likely to collapse:onto the- equipment?
9. Do attached :lines haveadequate flexibility to ayoid damage?10, Based on: the abve seismiciintleraction evalations,.is equipment:

fee ofpotentially adverse Seismic interaction:

effects?Y&N[D U[ N/AO Yý.N UO N/IA 4NEI UD) N/AD1 Yk NO UD., Other Adverse Conditions I'l. Have you for and found ho other seismic condlitions that could, Yf Nn uc]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

]Evaluated by: A I ~ -~ TY~-'b~~'- )/4~~Date- 'Wp~<C-4 >PAGE 651 of 668 9 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIOP PAGE 652 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERS100NO PAGE 653 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of!2 Status: & N U seismic:Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equip..nt 1N z 1 .&-.,o Equip. Class12_" ( t,4 Equipment Description ', t -Location.:

Bldg. ..Floor El. ' Room, Area Af7 Manufacturer, Model, Etc, (optiohial but rccommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist Thischecklist may be used to document the results of!the.Seismic talkdown of an item of equipment n;the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage.

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.,is the iteinone:

Y1 NiE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2 Is :the anchorage freebof bent, broken,:missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free.of corrosion that is more than mild surfar4e okidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks: in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the, anchorage configuration consistent with plaht documentation?(Note: This qlcion onlyapplies if theitem insofie ofthe.50%fori, which an anchorage c6nfiguratibnviwrification is required.)

'PtZ4.yq -W 64iý4013ý4W65

-c j A xzfvi4x7FA 4 /1~ý-ýJ 6. Based on the above'anchorage evaluations, is the anchoiage fzie¢of pot6dtially:

adverse seismic conditions?

Ni] i]U N/AEi YKIN Ui] NIAi]Y Ni] Ui 1 2 Enter thezouinment class namne fromn Appendix B:, Classes, of E olpircnt.<0C-3 >PAGE 654 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment iDINo. -0', 1 _" Equip., Classn .fc1A~1 P (kc~v&wTAL)

Equipment Description

$a P/F'rka~ P.ýT 6ý 4'r% p' fMP Inteiaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impacI by nearby equipment or strumfue?8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,.

and masonry block walls. not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse, seismic interaction effects?yX NO UEC N/ACI Yk Nr UC N/AC YkN[ UC N/AO YNEIUpC Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no othierseismic conditious that could .NCI U-:adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

COmments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by;L ~-~s ~iA.'i Date;::< C04. >PAGE 655 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSIONPO (PAGE 656 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDN0, !. i Z I3 -bA 6-I04 Equip. Classn 0ý .'- o-rac.R.Equipment Description

.Pt(MP A 1roi-Ai"XT0AI VAL-V Location:

Bldg. F(4I Floor El, 05-'0' Room, Area -A 0 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

InStructions for CompletingtChecklist This checklist may be used to document the results of theSeismic Walkdown of an ifein of equiminent on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be usod to record the results ofejudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other cormnents.

Anchorake.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWPL items requiring such verification)?

YO NVt 2. is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3, Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more thanmild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in theconcrete nea the anchors?5, Is the anchorage configuration-consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only :applies if the item is one of the,50% for which an anchorage configuration verification .is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage eva.luations,is ihe anchorage free'of potentially adverse seismic, conditions?

YD Nn UD N/A9 Y 0 NO TJD.N/AM YO 'NDI UD IA YO ND UD /V Enter tlm:iqjipnient clas:naime from Appendix B: Clamses ofE~uipmrnet,<.C3>PAGE 657 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 2 Seismic Walkdown .Checklist(SWC)

Equipment ID Noo. 1- W-5 I ` 4-, Equip. Class!z A,- yr 1 Equipment Description S ' Wi'A Su 7-10,,/ JSOLAT!r~eW VALS4, Interaction Effects 7. gft targets free from impact by heahby equipment or structuteS?

.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems. ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block 'va1ls not likely to collapse ontothe equipment?

9. Do, attached lines have adequate.

flexibility to, avoid damage?10, Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YVNO. UO N/AO Y' NO UO N/AO'Yý,NO VO. N/AO Y19 No UP Other Adverse Conditions 11, Have you looked for:and found 0o other seismicconditions.

that 0ould Y NO U[3 adversely affrct the safety functions of the equipiint?

" Comments (Additional pages mpay be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:, A zx~- *Z~ ~< C-4 .>PAGE 658 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 9 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 659 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1 .0 Sheet I of 2 staltusv §)N U AP", Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentJD No. I" 7.,'J Equip. Class',,.

77#k>(Equipment Desýcription, 00:479L1T 7 0T4TC ,ALI tI/Location:

Bldg. i.96 ,'Floor El. Room, Area A4 o 7 Manufacturer, ModeI,,Etc. (optional but recommended)

.6..Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used toldocurnent the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item6 of equipment on the SWEL. The: spacebelow each of the following questionsmay be, used .to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage.IsJ the anchorage configumtion, verificatiori required (i~e., is the item one Y"] NX ofthe 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2, Is theanchorage free of bent, broken, missing or tIoose:hardware?

3.Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface.oxidation?

4, Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in, the concrete near the anchors?5. Is. the anchorage configuration consistent with plant-documentationp?(Note:: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration Verification is'required.)

6. Based onthe above.anchorage evalhations, is the, Ahchoiage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y 117 NM] UE]NýYEI NEI UE] NIA, YE] NEI VE NIA~Ym NE] TIE] , /ýKNE VE1]12 Enertbe equipmeent class name~ from Appendix 13: Cla~ms0EfIquipmien.

-< C-3 >~PAGE 660 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet.Zo2.2 ,Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)ýEquipmentDNo, fID NZ7SY Equip. Class'2 f C &A t Equipment DesCription P 13 t(tx aa1ET- ;rp¢Tr- oin Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targcts free from impact byriearby equipfinent or stnietures?

8. Are overhead equiipment, distribution.systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic4interaction evaluationsi is equipmenit free of potentially adyvrse seismic inteiaption effects?YNCO UC. N/AC Y0 NO UC N/AC YO.NO UC N/AC YONCUC Other Adverse Conditions.l1 ..Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could4 Yý N3 tfC adversely affect the safetyfunctions0of the equipment?

na.~ zi5~f PA F04' A Avecsa.Commnenfts(Addidonal pages may. be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:~'" Date:__ _ _ _ _ _iuz(-~ff~

ii PAGE 661 of 668

  • ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 662 of 668 ACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 663 of 668 9 TACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 PAGE 664 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentJiD No. I -61 'VC&Equip.

Cass'2s 0 o'W~Equipment Description M V IYU, tWIJ e- [ a tL f Location:

Bldg. .:L. Floor El. I Room, Area P I2A S--3 Manufacturer, Model,:Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructionsf6Ir Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown.

of an item of equipment on the, SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided, at the end of this checklist for documenting, other cominents; Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (ie., is the item one YD N ofthe 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?X

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks inithe-concrete fiear the anchors?5. Is ihe ancboragecoiifiguration consistent with plant:docuimentation?(Note: This question only applies itthe item is one of the.50% fo 0r which-an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchoirage evaluations, is-the anchorage.

free of potentially adverse seismnic.conditions?

y N NDI UD N/ADO NO UDD N/AD]YDND NuD NIAs XE ND UOD.t'Intler the'equipment c1iiss unwntfrom Appendix.B:,Clwises oFEj~fipmerft.

C-3 >PAGE 665 of 668 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of2:Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equjpme~nt ID o. I- -13No-, -Equip. Class" Equipment Description v M ct A ..e'A U _S 1nteraction Effects 7. Are soft ffgets free from impact by nearby. equipment or.struttures?

NYj NOUDN/AIJ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, NO: UO :N/AD and block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above'seismic interactionevaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?4 NO- U[ N/AF EX0UEJ Other Adverse Conditions i ,, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NO, UCI, adversely affect the safety ffunctionsO of the eqUipment?

Cotntments (Additional pages may be added as fnece'sary)

S .F. .1 -v Evialulated by-Date:, ( C-4>PAGE 666 of 668 AACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0 NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 667 of 668 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCV061-RPT-01, VERSION .0 PAGE 668 of 668

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML13003A260&oldid=1544968"