ML18102B361

LER 96-004-02:on 960307,containment Isolation Valve Missed TS Surveillance.Caused by Lack of Adequate Controls & Inadequate Design Review.Ts Surveillance Improvement Project Has Been Initiated for Plant,Units 1 & 2.W/970528 Ltr

ML18102B361
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	05/28/1997
From:	GARCHOW D F, RITZMAN R A Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
LER-96-004, LER-96-4, LR-N970323, NUDOCS 9706050035
Download: ML18102B361 (6)

Text

., ... *

• Public Service Electric.and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 Nuclear Business Unit MAY 2 8 1997 LR-N970323 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 LER 272/96-004-02 SALEM GENERATING STATION -UNIT 1 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-70 DOCKET NO. 50-272 Gentlemen:

This Licensee Event Report supplement entitled "Containment Isolation Valve Missed Technical Specification Surveillance" is being.submitted pursuant to the requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations 10CFR50. 73 (a) (2) (i) (B). QJff tJ Attachment David r Garchow General Manager Salem Operations I/; '7,1 1/ J--* RAR C Distribution LER File 3.7 9706050035 970528 PDR ADOCK 05000272 S PDR The power is in your hands. I llllll 111111111111111111111111111111111

• &&31i1D5*

95-2168 REV. 6/94

• NRC FORM 366 ---***-U.O). NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150-0104

-* (4-95) EXPIRES 04/30/98 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS MANDATORY INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS. REPORTED LESSONS LEARNED ARE INCORPORATED INTO LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) THE LICENSING PROCESS AND FED BACK TO INDUSTRY.

FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TD THE INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (T-6 F33J. U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION.

WASHINGTON.

DC 20555-0001.

AND TO THE . -'. PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-0104).

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BU_DGET. (See reverse for required number of WASHINGTON.

DC 20503. digits/characters for each block) FACILITY NAME 111 DOCKET NUMBER (21 PAGE (3) SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 05000272 1 of 5 TITLE (4) Containment Isolation Valve Mis.sed Technical Specification Surveillance EVENT DATE (5) LER NUMBER (6) REPORT DATE (7). OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8) I I FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION MONTH DAY YEAR Unit NUMBER NUMBER Salem 2 05000311 03 07 96 96 004 02 05 28 97 FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER --OPERATING N THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TD THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR §: (Check one or more) ( 11) MODE (9) 20.2201(b) 20.2203(a)(2)(v) x 50.73(a)(2Jlil 50.73(a)(2)(viii)

POWER 000 20.2203(a)(1) 20.2203(a)(J)(i) 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(x)

LEVEL (10) 20.2203(a)(2)(i) 20.2203(a)(J)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 73.71 -20.2203(a)(2)(ii) 20.2203(a)(4) 50.73(a)(2)(iv)

OTHER 20.2203(a)(2)(iii) 50.36(c)(1) 50.73(a)(2)(v)

Specify in Abstract below or in NRC Form 366A 20.2203(a)(2)(iv) 50.36(c)(2) 50.73(a)(2)(vii)

LICENSEE CONTACT FDR THIS LER (12) NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER (lncludo Ar11 Codo) Robin A. Ritzman, Licensing Engineer -609-339-1445 COMPLETE ONE LINE FDR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13) CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE t CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE TO NPROS I TO NPRDS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14) EXPECTED MONTH DAY YEAR IYES x IND SUBMISSION (If yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE). DATE (15) ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 siagle-spaced typewritten lines) (16) On March 7, 1996, a determination was made that the requirements of Technical Specification 4.6.1.1 were not ful:ly implemented at Units 1 and 2. Specifically, the monthly surveillance procedure that has been used to implement Technical Specification 4.6.1.1 did not direct position verification of the Refueling Canal Supply and Discharge Containment Isolation Valves. This condition has existed since at least 1986. As a corrective action, a review of the Salem Unit 2 containment isolation valves was performed, and additional valves were determined to be missing from the appropriate surveillance procedure.

The apparent cause of this occurrence is attributed to a lack of adequate controls for the development and maintenance of Technical Specification surveillance procedures.

This weakness was previously identified in LER 311/95-008. Corrective actions as stated in this previous LER are still in progress, and will include verification of the adequacy of Technical Specification surveillance procedures, with limited exceptions, and verification that controls are in place to maintain the adequacy of the procedures.

This event is reportable in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a) (2) (i) (B) I any condition prohibited by the plant's Technical Specifications.

NRC FORM 366 (4-95)

. I 1i *

• NRC FORM 366A (4-951 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LEH) TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME 111 SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 TEXT Of mare space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366AI 1171 PLANT AND SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION Westinghouse

-Pressurized Water Reactor Waste. Disposal Liquid System (WL) Chemical and Volume Control System (CB) Safety Injection System (BQ) Containment Spray System (BE) Main Stearn System (SB) Feedwater System (SJ) C9rnponent Cooling Water System (CC) Stearn Generator Blowdown System (GB) IDENTIFICATION OF OCCURRENCE Discovery Date*: March 7, 1996 DOCKET NUMBER 121 05000272 LEK NUMBER 161 PAGE 131 YEAR I SEQUEllTIAL I REVISIOI IUMBER llllollER 2 OF 96 -004 -02 Event Dates: The failure to perform adequate, docurne_nted verification of the referenced containment isolation valves occurred during each required surveillance interval, possibly since initial licensing, with the plants in Modes 1 through 4 . . CONDITIONS PRIOR TO OCCURRENCE At the time of identification, Units 1 and 2 were shutdown and defueled.

The Technical Specification surveillanc*e Mode applicability is 1 through 4. DESCRIPTION*

OF OCCURRENCE Technical Specification 4.6.1.1 states, "Primary CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY shall.be demonstrated at least once per 31 days by verifying that all penetrations not capable of being closed by OPERABLE containment automatic isolation valves and required to be closed during accident conditions are closed by valves, blind flanges, or deactivated automatic valves secured in their positions, except as provided in Table 3.6-1 of Specification and all equipment hatches are closed and sealed." ._, 5 In response to questions raised during the NRC Restart Assessment Team Inspection at Hope Creek, Salem Station initiated a review of its procedure for containment isolation valve position verification.

The review identified four valves (1WL190, 1WL191, 2WL190, and 2WL191) that were not included in the monthly (31 day) Containment Isolation Valves surveillance procedure.

A random sampling of historical records showed that the valves had been missing from the surveillance tests at both units since at least 1986. The valves had been listed in Table 3.6-1 of the Unit 1 and 2 Technical Specifications since the licenses were issued. NRC FORM 366A (4-95) 1-\ *

• NRC FORM 366A (4-951 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) ' J"EXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME 111 DOCKET NUMBER 121 SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 05000272 TEXT Of more space is required, usa 11dditional copies of NRC Form 366A) ( 1 7) DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE (cont'd) YEAR I LER NUMBER 161 IEDUEllTIAL I IUMBEft llEVISIOI W!llEH 96 -004 -02 PAGE 131 3 OF As part of corrective action 1 of LER 272/96-004-00, a review of the Salem Unit 2 containment isolation valves (CIVs) was performed to assure that CIVs were properly identified and tested. This review identified that Unit 2 manual valves CV291, GB18, MS130, MS55, MS201, MS199, VC24, and VC25 are within the containment isolation boundary; however, these valves were not included in periodic position verification procedures.

The review also determined that valve 21VC20 was incorrectly identified in Technical Specification Table 3.6-1 as valve 21SF20. It was also determined by this review that valves 2SJ71, the Fuel Transfer Tube, 2CS903, and 2CV98 are not CIVs although they are listed on Technical Specification Table 3.6-1. Technical Specification Table 3.6.:...1 also identified.valves CV68 and CV69 as Phase A CIVs; however, these valves only isolate on a Safety Injection Signal ("S" signal) as stated in the UFSAR. *The Phase "A isolation signal is either generated from the "S" signal or from* a sensed containment high pressure which is also an input for safety injection actuation.

5 Further reviews have identified 52 additional valves determined to be missing from surveillance procedures, and two valves (21SJ146 and 22SJ146 valves) that were being tested.on a 92 day versus 31 day testing frequency.

The same problem is expected to be found 6n Unit 1. . . CAUSE OF OCCURRENCE The cause of this occurrence is attributed to a lack of adequate controls for the development and maintenance of Technical Specification*surveilJ..ance.

procedures and inadequate design review during the development of Technical Specification Table 3.6-1. This weakness was identified in LER 311/95-008.

PRIOR SIMILAR OCCURRENCES A review of LERs for Salem Uz:!its 1 and 2 issued in the last two years identified eight LERs related to missed surveillances due to deficiencies (272/96-005, 272/96-024, 272/96-026, 272/96-035, 272/96-039, 272/96-040, 311/95-008 and 311/96-007).

The corrective actions were specific to the missed surveillance issues addressed in each LER. The identification of similar programmatic issues resulted in the initiation of the Technical Specification Surveillance Improvement Program (TSSIP) described in LER 311/95-008.

The TSSIP should ensure that Technical Specification surveillance requirements are adequately proceduralized.

NRC FORM 366A (4-95)

'j ., *

• NRC FORM 366A (4-95) U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LEH) TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME 111 DOCKET NUMBER 121 SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 05000272 TEXT Of mor111p11c11 is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366AJ 1171 SAFETY CONSEQUENCES AND IMPLICATIONS LER NUMBER 161 PAGE 131 YEAR I SEDUEllTlAL I REVISION IUMBER IUMIER 4 OF 96 -004 -02 Administrative controls such as post outage valve lineup checks would likely have ensured that the 1(2)WL190

& 1(2)WL191 valves were properly shut prior to power operations following an outage. Additionally, the monthly surveillance procedures included position verification of the outside Containment Refueling Canal Supply and Discharge isolation valves (1SF22, 1SF36, 2SF22, and 2SF36) . Thus there were no safety consequences associated with this condition since containment integrity would not have been affected in the unlikely event of an accident.

Testing was performed for valve 21VC20 and is .currently being performed that meets the Technical Specification surveillance testing required for this CIV, thus there were no safety consequences associated with this condition.

For CV291, VC24, and VC25 administrative controls such as post outage valve lineup checks would likely have ensured that these valves were properly shut prior to power operations following an outage. Thus there was no safety consequences associated with this condition since containment integrity would not have been affected in the unlikely event of an accident.

The MS199 is a manual valve that supplies the Main Steam strut pipe heating system. This valve remains open to support the proper operation of the Main .steam Safety Valves. The MS55 and *MS201 valves are one inch manual drain valves off of the steam supply lines to the turbine driven auxiliary feedwater pump. These valves remain open. during normal operation to ensure removal of condensate to assure operation of the turbine without the presence of water slugs. The MS130 is a manual valve that remains open to provide a continuous supply to the Main Steam radiation monitors and secondary side sampling.

PSE&G evaluated the impact of these valves remaining open during normal operation.

Analyses performed to support the Control Area Ventilation Upgrade *project indicate that the offsite doses from the Steam Generator Tube Rupture and Main Steam Line Break events will remain well within the guidelines of lOCFRlOO.

Results also indicate that control room doses remain within the guidelines of GDC 19. , Although the GBlB valves were not included in the surveillance test procedure for containment integrity, the GB19 valves which are manual valves downstream of the GBlBs were included in the surveillance procedure for position verification.

Thus there were no safety consequences associated with this condition since containment integrity would not have been affected in the unlikely event of an accident.

NRC FORM 366A (4-95) 5

• NRC FORM 366A (4-95) U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LEH)

CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME 111 DOCKET NUMBER 121 LER NUMBER 161 PAGE 131 SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 05000272 TEXT Of more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366AI 1171 SAFETY CONSEQUENCES AND IMPLICATIONS (cont'd) YEAR I SEDUEllTIAL I IUMBER RmSllll IUr.llER 96 -004 -02 5 OF Although valves CV68 & CV69 do not receive a direct Phase A isolation signal, these valves close on a Safety Injection Signal which generates a Phase A isolation.

The only direct automatic actuation for Phase A isolation is from a sensed containment high pressure.

The sensed containment high pressure will also generate a safety injection actuation signal. The CV68 and CV69 valves are surveilled in accordance with their technical specification frequency to isolate on a safety injection signal. Thus there is no safety significance associated with this condition since the valves will isolate in the unlikely event of an accident.

The 52 additional valves missing from position verification surveillances reported in this supplement are drains, vents or test connections located inside the Containment.

All of the valves are connected to systems which are pressurized during normal plant operations.

All affected valves would either have been identified by system leakage or have a second normally closed valve in the line that would have provided at least one closed valve on the penetration.

The safety significance of not surveilling these valves is considered minimal. The 21(22)SJ146 valves were being surveilled on a 92 day versus 31 day frequency.

The valves are located behind sealed hatches that were also surveilled on the 92 day frequency.

The safety significance of surveilling these valves on an incorrect frequency is considered minimal. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS 1. A review is being performed to ensure that all containment isolation valves are included, as required, in the periodic position verification surveillance tests. This review will also verify the proper isolation signals for phase A and phase B containment isolation valves. The review for Unit 2 has been completed.

The review for Unit 1 will be completed prior to the restart Unit 1. 2. A Technical Specification Surveillance Improvement Project (TSSIP) has been initiated for Salem Units 1 and 2. The scope and content of the TSSIP program was described previously in LER 311/95-008-00.

The TSSIP review is expected to be complete by December 31, 1997. 3. PSE&G evaluated the impact of manual valves MS199, MS55, MS201, and MS130 remaining open during normal operation and determined the safety consequences to be minimal. 4. The identified missing Unit 1 and Unit 2 valves have been added to the appropriate surveillance procedures and the surveillance frequencies have been corrected.

NRC FORM 366A (4-95) 5