ML18106A396

LER 98-005-00:on 980219,inoperability of Twelve EDG Fuel Oil Transfer Pump (FOTP) Noted.Caused by Installation of Incorrect Control Switch.Installed Correct off-auto-manual Switch & Verified Operability of Twelve FOTP.W/980320 Ltr

ML18106A396
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	03/20/1998
From:	Bakken A, Knieriem B Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
LER-98-005-01, LER-98-5-1, LR-N980138, NUDOCS 9803270057
Download: ML18106A396 (7)

Text

'

OPS~~

• Public Service Electric and Gas Company P.O. Box 236 Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 Nuclear Business Unit MAR 2 0 1998 LR-N980138 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 LER 272/98-005-00 SALEM GENERATING STATION - UNIT 1 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-70 DOCKET NO. 50-272 Gentlemen:

This Licensee Event Report entitled "lnoperability Of The 12 Fuel Oil Transfer Pump Due To Installation Of Incorrect Control Switch" is being submitted pursuant to the requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations ****10CFR50.73 (a)(2)(i)(B)****.

Sincerely, A. C. Bakken 111 General Manager Salem Operations

/ /

/

I '

Attachment / f RBK/ .. 't *c:

C Distribution LER File 3.7 9803270057 980320 PDR ADOCK 05000272 S PDR The power is in your hands.

95-2168 REV. 6/94

NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY APPROVED BY OMB NO. 3150-0104 COMMISSION EXPIRES 04/30/98 (4-95) ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS MANDATORY INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUEST: 50.0 HRS. REPORTED LESSONS LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) LEARNED ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE LICENSING PROCESS AND FED BACK TO INDUSTRY. FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN

- - ESTIMATE TO THE INFORMATION AND RECORDS MANAGEMENrBRANCH

.. - - (T-6 F33), U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, DC (See* reverse for required n*umber of 20555-0001, AND TO THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION PROJECT (3150-digits/characters for each block) 0104), OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, WASHINGTON, DC 20503.

FACILITY NAME (1) DOCKET NUMBER (2) PAGE (3)

SALEM UNIT 1 05000272 1 OF 6 TITLE (4)

Inoperability Of The 12 Fuel Oil Transfer Pump Due To Installation Of Incorrect Control Switch EVENT DATE (5) LER NUMBER (6) REPORT DATE (7) OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED (8)

FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR YEAR SEQUENTIAL I REVISION MONTH DAY YEAR NUMBER NUMBER I

FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 02 19 98 98 -- 005 -- 00 03 20 98 OPERATING THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR §: (Check one or more) ( 11)

MODE (9) 4 20.2201(b) 20.2203(a)(2)(v) x 50.73(a)(2)(i) 50. 73(a)(2)(viii)

POWER 20.2203(a)(1 l 20.2203(a)(3)(i) 50. 73(a)(2)(ii) 50. 73(a)(2)(x)

LEVEL (10) 000 20. 2203(a)(2)(i) 20.2203(a)(3)(ii) 50. 73(a)(2)(iii) 73.71 20.2203(a)(2)(ii) 20.2203(a)(4) 50. 73(a)(2)(iv) OTHER 20.2203(a)(2)(iii) 50.36(c)(1 l 50. 73(a)(2)(v) Specify in Abstract below or in NRC Form 366A 20.2203(a)(2)(iv) 50.36(c)(2) 50. 73(a)(2)(vii)

LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12)

NAME TELEPHONE NUMBER (Include Area Code)

Brooke Knieriem, Licensing Engineer (609) 339-1782 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)

CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE TO NPRDS TO NPRDS SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14) EXPECTED MONTH DAY YEAR SUBMISSION

!YES (If yes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE). x INO DATE(15)

ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) ( 16)

This LER documents the inoperability of the Salem Unit 1, 12 Emergency Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Transfer pump (FOTP) due to the installation of an incorrect control switch. The incorrect control switch was configured in a way that did not allow automatic operation of the FOTP.

This event is reportable under 10 CFR5 0 . 7 3 (a) ( 2 ) ( i) ( B) , any operation or condition prohibited by the plant 1 s Technical Specifications.

Specifically, contrary to Technical Specification (TS) 3.8.1.1, A. c.

Sources, and TS 3.0.4, entry into an operational mode or other condition, Salem Unit 1 entered (from Mode 5) and operated in Mode 4 with the 12 FOTP inoperable, and without the knowledge of the operators.

The apparent cause of the inoperability of the 12 FOTP was the failure of planning and maintenance personnel to ensure that the proper configuration of the 12 FOTP was maintained by installation of the correct control switch.

Additionally, station personnel failed to ensure that an adequate post maintenance retest was performed to verify that the 12 FOTP was restored to an operable condition following the maintenance.

NRC FORM 366 (4-95)

NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4-95)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY -NAME ( 1) - -ooCKET NUMBER (2) LER NUMBER-(6) PAGE (3)

YEAR I SEQUENTIAL NUMBER I REVISION NUMBER SALEM UNIT 2 05000311 98 -- 005 -- 00 2 OF 6 TEXT (If.more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)

PLANT AND SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION Westinghouse - Pressurized Water Reactor Emergency Diesel Generator {EK/DG}

• Energy Industry Identification System (EIIS) codes and component function identifier codes appear as {ss/cc}

CONDITIONS PRIOR TO OCCURRENCE Hot Shutdown, Mode 4 DESCRIPTION OF OCCURRENCE During Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) operation, two FOTPs for each unit are used to automatically transfer fuel oil from the Fuel Oil Storage tanks to the Fuel Oil Day Tank (FODT) for each engine. Each of the FOTPs is controlled through a Regular-Backup selector switch and an Off-Auto-Manual selector switch. By alignment of the two switches,* one FOTP is aligned to start at the Re~ular FODT start level of 33 inches (Regular-Backup switch in the Regular position, Off-Auto-Manual selector switch in the Auto position) to refill the FODT. The other FOTP is aligned as the Backup pump (Regular-Backup switch in the Backup position, Off-Auto-Manual selector switch in the Auto position) . In the event that the Regular FOTP fails to start or fails to deliver adequate flow to maintain FODT level, the Backup pump will start when level reaches the FODT low level alarm setpoint.

On February 18, 1998 Salem Unit 1 entered Mode 4. On the following day, Salem personnel began a 31 day surveillance test of the Auto start feature of the 12 FOTP to verify its operability. This test is performed under procedure Sl.OP-ST.DG-OOOS(Q), "12 Fuel Oil Transfer System Operability Test". During the test, the 12 FOTP was aligned to start at the Regular FODT start level but failed to start. The pump was then declared inoperable.

At the time of the unsatisfactory surveillance, Salem Unit 1 was in Hot Shutdown (Mode 4). TS 3.8.1.1.b.2 requires that in Modes 1-4, two FOTPs be operable. With one of the above required FOTPs inoperable, the action statement requires that the inoperable FOTP be restored to an operable status within seventy-two hours or the unit must be placed in Hot Standby (Mode 3) within the next six hours and in Cold Shutdown (Mode 5) within the following thirty hours. Additionally, contrary to TS 3.0.4, Unit 1 entered Mode 4 from Mode 5 during the time that the 12 FOTP was inoperable, without the knowledge of the operators.

NRG FORM 366A (4-95)

NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4-95)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

.)

TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY-NAME (1.) DOCKET NUMBER (2) LER NUMBER -(6) PAGE (3)

YEAR I SEQUENTIAL NUMBER I REVISION NUMBER SALEM UNIT 2 05000311 98 -- 005 -- 00 3 OF 6 TEXT (If. more space is required. use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) ( 17 I Description (Cont_)

An inspection of the 12 FOTP Off-Auto-Manual selector switch was performed and it was determined that an incorrect switch was installed for the Off-Auto-Manual selector switch_ The incorrect switch (part number 910PDD511) was configured in a manner that did not permit automatic operation.

The correct switch for this application (part number 910PGC513) was identified and installed. Operability of the 12 FOTP was then verified through satisfactory performance of Sl.OP-ST_DG-0005(Q), and the action statement was exited_

In November 1997, station personnel identified that the 12 FOTP Off-Auto-Manual switch would not spring return from the Manual to the Auto position. A work order was written to replace the switch. During the planning process for this work order an incorrect switch (part number 910PDD511) was staged and issued for installation. This part was not adequately verified to be correct by planning and maintenance personnel prior to installation.

Upon completion of the maintenance in January 1998, the post-maintenance retest was performed as specified by the work package_ The retest required verification that equipment and components disturbed during the performance of the maintenance had been returned to the proper plant configuration. Since the incorrect switch installation was not discovered, the specified retest was not adequately accomplished.

Additionally, the post-maintenance retest only required verification that the configuration be verified. It did not require that testing be performed to verify that the 12 FOTP was opeiable.

A field inspection was performed to verify the configuration of the switches for the 11, 21, and 22 FOTPs. The installed Off-Auto-Manual selector switch for the 21 FOTP was also found to be incorrect (also a part number 910PDD511) _ However, up to the time of discovery, the 21 FOTP had been operating satisfactorily as verified by surveillance testing_ It appears that this switch was modified to function as an Off-Auto-Manual selector switch. Specifically, a cam roller from part 910PGC513 switch appears to have been installed in a part 910PDD511 switch to make it function as an Off-Auto-Manual switch. The acceptability of this configuration was evaluated and determined to be acceptable. However, the 21 FOTP Off-Auto-Manual switch will be replaced with the correct switch at the earliest opportunity.

APPARENT CAUSE OF OCCURRENCE The apparent cause of this event was the failure of planning and maintenance personnel to verify that the correct replacement switch was identified, staged, and installed for the 12 FOTP Off-Auto-Manual selector switch.

NRC FORM 366A (4-95)

NRG FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4-95)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

TEXT CONTINUATION

_ FACILITY NAME (1 )- - DOCKET NUMBER (2)- -- LER NUMBER (6f PAGE (3)

YEAR I SEQUENTIAL NUMBER I REVISION NUMBER SALEM UNIT 2 05000311 98 -- 005 -- 00 4 OF 6 TEXT (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)

APPARENT CAUSE OF OCCURRENCE(cont.)

Additionally, the post-maintenance retest that was specified to verify that equipment and components disturbed during the performance of the maintenance were returned to the proper plant configuration was not adequately performed because the installation of an incorrect switch was not identified. The post-maintenance retest also was not adequate in that it did not verify the operability of the FOTP following maintenance.

PRIOR SIMILAR OCCURRENCES A review of LERs for Salem Units 1 and 2 issued in the last two years identified one LER which discussed a similar occurrence. LER 311/97-002-00 reported the installation of non-seismically qualified pressure switches in the Auxiliary Building Ventilation system. The cause of this event was not determined.

SAFETY CONSEQUENCES AND IMPLICATIONS During EDG operation, each FOTP has sufficient capacity to ensure that the Fuel Oil Day tanks are kept at the level required to support EDG operation. Normally, one FOTP is arranged to supply the Fuel Oil Day tanks-for each EDG. Its operation is controlled by a level switch in the Day Tank. The other FOTP is lined up as the backup, also operating in response to a level switch in the Day Tank. The level switch controlling the backup FOTP also activates the Day Tank low level alarm.

Should the regular pump fail to start, the backup pump will start and is capable of supplying sufficient flow to maintain Day Tank levels for all three EDGs. At the time the backup pump starts, the low level alarm is received and will alert operators to the condition. The Day Tank low tank level setpoint is based upon maintaining no less than a sixty minute fuel oil reserve. This would provide operators with adequate time to take manual control of a FOTP and restore Day Tank level should both FOTPs fail to automatically start.

Should a single failure of a FOTP (the backup FOTP) occur with the other FOTP inoperable, no means would be available to maintain level in the FODTs during EDG operation. Under this condition, and in the event of a postulated event (Loss of Coolant Accident coincident with a Loss of Off site Power), power would not be available to equipment necessary to remove decay heat and to mitigate the consequences of the accident once the FODTs were emptied.

NRC FORM 366A (4-95)

'J NRC FORM 366A U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (4-95)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1) DOCKET NUMBER (2) LER NUMBER (6) PAGE (3)

YEAR I SEQUENTIAL NUMBER I REVISION NUMBER SALEM UNIT 2 05000311 98 -- 005 -- 00 5 OF 6 TEXT (It more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) ( 17)

Safety Consequences (Cont.)

TS 3.8.1.1.b.2 requires that in Modes 1-4, two FOTPs be operable. With one FOTP inoperable, the action statement requires that the inoperable FOTP be restored to an operable status within seventy-two hours or the unit must be placed in Hot Standby (Mode 3) within the next six hours and in Cold Shutdown (Mode 5) within the following thirty hours. Because the inoperability of the 12 FOTP was identified, corrected and the FOTP restored to operability within the time specified by TS, Unit 1 was not in a condition that would impact the health and safety of the general public.

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

1. A field inspection was performed to verify the configuration of the switches for the 11, 21, and 22 FOTPs. The Off-Auto-Manual switch for the 21 FOTP was found to have an incorrect part number. However, this pump was operable based on surveillance test performance since the switch was installed. This configuration was evaluated by the Operations Department through the performance of an Operability Determination and was found to be acceptable for continued operation.

2. The correct Off-Auto-Manual switch (part number 910PGC513) was installed and the operability of the 12 FOTP was verified (WO 00980219074) .

3. The correct Off-Auto-Manual switch (part number 910PGC513) will be installed for the 21 FOTP at the next available opportunity. (WO 00980227082).

4. The requirement to review drawings to verify that parts being staged are correct has been reinforced with planning personnel. Planning personnel have also been reminded of their responsibility to specify the appropriate testing requirements on work orders in accordance with; NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0050(Q), "Station Testing Program", NC.NA-TS.ZZ-0050(Q),

"Station Testing Program Matrix".

5. All personnel involved have been held accountable in accordance with PSE&G's procedures and policies.

6. An inspection will be performed of a random sampling of thirty switches in safety related applications to determine if any other instances of incorrect switch configuration exist. The results of this sampling will serve as the basis for further inspection.

(PIR 00980219131, CRCA 02)

7. As a part of second quarter In-service Day training, Maintenance department personnel will receive a rollout discussion on the importance of (1) ensuring that replacement parts are correct by comparing them to NRC FORM 366A (4-95)

NRC FORM 366A (4-95)

• LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

TEXT CONTINUATION

• U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION FACILITY NAME (1 I DOCKET NUMBER (2) LER NUMBER (6) PAGE (3)

YEAR I SEQUENTIAL NUMBER I REVISION NUMBER SALEM UNIT 2 05000311 98 -- 005 -- 00 6 OF 6 TEXT (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) ( 17)

CORRECTIVE ACTIONS(Cont.)

the Bill Of Materials and by comparison to the removed parts, (2) verifying the correct contact switch configuration on new contacts, (3) performing modifications to replacement parts only in accordance with approved procedures. (PIR 00980219131, CRCA 01)

8. Operations department personne1 will receive a rollout discussion to emphasize the importance of reviewing completed work against planned work to ensure that adequate retests are performed in accordance with procedure NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0009 (Q), "Work Control Process". (PIR 00980.'.219131, CRCA 03)

NRC FORM 366A (4-95)