ML18295A531

From kanterella
Revision as of 23:26, 30 October 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Limerick Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 - Limerick: Acceptance Review: Relief Request I4R-08, Revision 1 for the Fourth Inservice Inspection Interval of Limerick Generating Station (LGS) Units 1 and 2 (EPID:L-2018-LLR-0127)
ML18295A531
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/22/2018
From: V Sreenivas
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Tom Loomis
Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear
Sreenivas V, NRR/DORL/LPLI, 415-2597
References
EPID L-2018-LLR-0127
Download: ML18295A531 (1)


Text

1 Bennett, Sharon From: Sreenivas, V Sent: Monday, October 22, 2018 2:15 PM To: Tom Loomis Cc:Danna, James; Ruffin, Steve; Min, Seung; Collins, Jay

Subject:

RE: Limerick: Acceptance Review: Relief R equest I4R-08, Revision 1 for the fourth inservice inspection interval of Limerick Generating Station (LGS) Units 1 and 2 (EPID:L-2018-LLR-0127)

B y letter dated October 1, 2018 (Agencywide Docu ments and Access Management System (ADAMS)

Accession No. ML18274A015), Exelon Generation Co mpany, LLC (the licensee) submitted Relief Request I4R-08, Revision 1 for the fourth inservice inspection interval of Limerick Generating Station (LGS) Units 1 and 2, pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(z)(1). In the request, the licen see proposed that the local leak rate testing in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix J (Option B) will be utilized to meet the pressure testing requirements specified in ASME Code,Section XI, IW C-5000 for the selected containment atmospheric control penetration piping including the hardened containment vent line of LGS Unit 2.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its deta iled technical review and make an assessment regarding the acceptability of th e proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compar ed to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequat e acceptance review. If ad ditional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this request will take approximately 168 hours7 days <br />1 weeks <br />0.23 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is Oc tober, 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interact ions with the assigned project manager.

These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory co mmittees or hearing-related activities.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2597.

___________________________________V. Sreenivas, Ph.D., C.P.M.Licensing Project ManagerLimerick and Ginna, Plant Licensing Branch IDivision of Operating Reactor LicensingOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation