ML111940308

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Acceptance Review of License Amendment Request to Include an Alternate Method of Verifying Drywell Leakage - TAC Nos ME6521 & ME6522
ML111940308
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  
Issue date: 07/13/2011
From: Peter Bamford
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Croft W
Exelon Corp
Bamford, Peter J., NRR/DORL 415-2833
References
TAC ME6521, TAC ME6522
Download: ML111940308 (1)


Text

From:

Bamford, Pe Sent:

Wednesday, To:

'Wendi.Croft Cc:

'david.helke

Subject:

Acceptance Method of V By letter dated June 14, 2011, Exelo amendment request (LAR) for Limer amend the LGS, Units 1 and 2, Tech method of verifying that unidentified The purpose of this email is to provid (NRC) staff's acceptance review of t performed to determine if there is su NRC staff to complete its detailed te identify whether the application has characterization of the regulatory req The NRC staff has reviewed your ap information in sufficient detail to ena and make an independent assessm amendment in terms of regulatory re and the environment. If additional in review, you will be advised by separ Peter Bamford NRR/DORL/LPL 1-2 Limerick & TMI-1 Project Manager 301-415-2833 eter

, July 13, 2011 1:36 PM t@exeloncorp.com' r@exeloncorp.com' Review of License Amendment Request to Include an Verifying Drywell Leakage - TAC Nos ME6521 & ME652 on Generation Company, LLC submitted a license rick Generating Station (LGS), Units 1 and 2, pro hnical Specifications to include the addition of an leakage in the drywell is within limits.

de the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Co this amendment request. The acceptance review ufficient technical information in scope and depth echnical review. The acceptance review is also in any readily apparent information insufficiencies i quirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

pplication and concluded that it does provide tech able the staff to proceed with its detailed technica ent regarding the acceptability of the proposed lic equirements and the protection of public health a nformation is needed for the staff to complete its t rate correspondence.

n Alternate 22 e

posing to alternative mmission w was to allow the ntended to n its hnical al review cense nd safety technical