ML12136A554
ML12136A554 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Pilgrim |
Issue date: | 05/14/2012 |
From: | Lynch J R Entergy Nuclear Operations |
To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
2.12.039 | |
Download: ML12136A554 (78) | |
Text
SEn tergy Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station 600 Rocky Hill Road Plymouth, MA 02360 May 14, 2012 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555
SUBJECT:
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Docket No.: 50-293 License No.: DPR-35 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for January 1 through December 31, 2011 LETTER NUMBER: 2.12.039
Dear Sir or Madam:
In accordance with Pilgrim Technical Specification 5.6.3, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc submits the attached Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011.This letter contains no commitments.
Should you have questions or require additional information, I can be contacted at (508) 830-8403.Sincerely, Joseph R. Lynch Licensing Manager FXM
Attachment:
Pilgrim Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for January 1 through December 31, 2011 cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 1 2100 Renaissance Blvd, Suite 100 King of Prussia, PA 19406-2713 USNRC Senior Resident Inspector Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Mr. Richard V. Guzman, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-8-C2 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD. 20852 Attachment 1 Letter Number 2.12.039 Pilgrim Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for January 1 through December 31, 2011 PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION Facility Operating License DPR-35 Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report January 1 through December 31, 2011 M-Entergy SEntk9W PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION Facility Operating License DPR-35 ANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT JANUARY 01 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2011 Prepared by: , K.JLkojko-a Senior HF 46emistry Specialist Reviewed by:
Chemistry Manager Reviewed by-Radiation Protection Manager Page 2 Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report January-December 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 3.0 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 5.0 6.0 6.1 6.2 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D SECTION TITLE EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT DATA Supplemental Effluent Release Data Gaseous Effluent Data Liquid Effluent Data METEOROLOGICAL DATA MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL DOSES Doses From Noble Gas Releases Doses From Gaseous Effluent Releases Doses From Liquid Effluent Releases OFFSITE AMBIENT RADIATION MEASUREMENTS PERCENT OF ODCM EFFLUENT CONTROL LIMITS Gaseous Effluent Releases Liquid Effluent Releases RADIOACTIVE WASTE DISPOSAL DATA OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL REVISIONS PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM REVISIONS REFERENCES Meteorological Joint Frequency Distributions Onsite Groundwater Monitoring Program Corrections to Previous Effluent Reports Changes to PNPS Offsite Dose Calculation Manual PAGE 5 8 8 8 9 19 20 20 22 28 34 37 37 40 43 45 46 47 48 69 75 76 Page 3 Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Jan-Dec 2011 LIST OF TABLES TABLE TABLE TITLE PAGE 2.1 Supplemental Information 10 2.2-A Gaseous Effluents
-Summation of All Releases 11 2.2-B Gaseous Effluents
-Elevated Releases 12 2.2-C Gaseous Effluents
-Ground Level Releases 14 2.3-A Liquid Effluents
-Summation of All Releases 16 2.3-B Liquid Effluents 17 4.1 Maximum Doses from Noble Gas Releases During 2011 21 4.2-A Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Gaseous Effluents 23 Jan-Mar 2011 4.2-B Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Gaseous Effluents 24 Apr-Jun 2011 4.2-C Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Gaseous Effluents 25 Jul-Sep 2011 4.2-D Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Gaseous Effluents 26 Oct-Dec 2011 4.2-E Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Gaseous Effluents 27 Jan-Dec 2011 4.3-A Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Liquid Effluents 29 Jan-Mar 2011 4.3-B Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Liquid Effluents 30 Apr-Jun 2011 4.3-C Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Liquid Effluents 31 Jul-Sep 2011 4.3-D Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Liquid Effluents 32 Oct-Dec 2011 4.3-E Maximum Individual Organ Doses from Liquid Effluents 33 Jan-Dec 2011 5.0 Average TLD Exposures by Distance Zone During 2011 36 6.1 Percent of ODCM Effluent Control Limits for Gaseous Effluent 38 Releases During 2011 6.2 Percent of ODCM Effluent Control Limits for Liquid Effluent Releases 41 During 2011 7.0 Solid Waste and Irradiated Fuel Shipments 44 A-1 Joint Frequency Distribution of Wind Directions and Speeds for the 48 33-ft Level of the 220-ft Tower A-2 Joint Frequency Distribution of Wind Directions and Speeds for the 58 220-ft Level of the 220-ft Tower Page 4 EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION ANNUAL RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT JANUARY 01 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2011 INTRODUCTION This report quantifies the radioactive gaseous, liquid, and radwaste releases, and summarizes the local meteorological data for the period from January 01 through December 31, 2011. This document has been prepared in accordance with the requirements set forth in the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (PNPS) Technical Specifications and Revision 1 of Regulatory Guide 1.21,"Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Material in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Light Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants". This document has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of PNPS Technical Specifications section 5.6.3.The quantity of radioactive material released from PNPS was determined from sample analyses and continuous on-line monitoring of gaseous releases from the main stack, reactor building vent, turbine building, and various decontamination facilities, and liquid releases into the discharge canal.The quantity and volume of radioactive waste shipped offsite from PNPS for processing and burial were determined from data contained on the radwaste shipping documentation.
The meteorological data were obtained from monitoring instruments located on the 220-foot meteorological tower located at Pilgrim Station.GASEOUS EFFLUENTS Gaseous radioactive releases for the reporting period are quantified in Tables 2.2-A, 2.2-B, and 2.2-C. Radioactive noble gases released during the period totaled 11.5 Curies., Releases of radioactive iodines and particulates with half-life of greater than 8 days totaled 0.00738 Curies, tritium releases totaled 38.0 Curies, and carbon-14 totaled 7.36 Curies. No gross alpha radioactivity was detected in gaseous effluents.
Noble gases released in gaseous effluents resulted in a maximum total body dose of 0.0020 mrem, with a corresponding skin dose of 0.0068 mrem. The release of radioactive particulates, iodines, tritium, and carbon-14 in gaseous effluents from PNPS during the reporting period resulted in a total body dose to the maximum-exposed hypothetical individual of about 0.027 mrem. The maximum hypothetical dose to any organ from radioactive particulates, iodines, tritium, and carbon-14 was about 0.079 mrem. The maximum, hypothetical total body dose from the combined release of all airborne radioactivity in gaseous effluents was 0.081 mrem.The maximum individual doses from gaseous radioactive effluents were compared to the applicable ODCM dose limits. Noble gas doses were less than 0.051% of the corresponding 10CFR50 dose objectives.
Maximum doses resulting from releases of particulates, iodines, tritium, and carbon-14 in gaseous effluents were less than 0.53% of corresponding 10CFR50 objectives.
Page 5 LIQUID EFFLUENTS Liquid radioactive releases for the reporting period are quantified in Tables 2.3-A and 2.3-B.Twenty-nine discharges of liquid effluents containing radioactivity occurred during the reporting period. These discharges contained
4.4 Curies
of tritium and 0.0038 Curies of fission and activation products.
The resulting maximum total body dose was 0.00032 mrem, with a corresponding organ dose of 0.0012 mrem. All doses from liquid discharges were less than 0.029% of corresponding 10CFR50 objectives.
METEOROLOGICAL DATA Meteorological joint frequency distributions are listed in Appendix A. Data recovery for the entire annual period was 100% for the 33-ft and 100% for the 220-ft levels of the tower. The predominant wind direction was from the south-southwest, which occurred approximately 16% of the time during the reporting period. The predominant stability class was Class D, which occurred about 43% of the time during the reporting period OFFSITE AMBIENT RADIATION MEASUREMENTS Ambient radiation exposure was evaluated to complete the assessment of radiological impact on humans. A small number of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) indicated an elevation in ambient radiation exposure on Entergy property in close proximity to the station, when compared to background levels in the region. This elevation is due to nitrogen-16 contained within the plant steam system, as opposed to radioactive effluent released from the plant. The dose to the maximum-exposed member of the public at the PNPS Health Club, even though they are within the owner-controlled area, was estimated as being about 1.5 mrem during 2011. There was no measurable increase during 2011 in ambient radiation measurements at the location of the nearest resident 0.8 km southeast of PNPS.COMBINED DOSE IMPACT The collective total body dose to a maximum-exposed hypothetical member of the public from airborne radioactivity, liquid-borne radioactivity, and ambient radiation exposure resulting from PNPS operation during 2011 was calculated as being about 0.62 mrem. This amount is about 0.2% of the typical dose of 300 to 400 mrem received each year by an average person from other sources of natural and man-made radiation.
Although this calculated collective dose occurs to a maximum-exposed hypothetical individual, it is also well below the NRC dose limit of 100 mrem/yr specified in 10CFR20.1301, as well as the EPA dose limit of 25 mrem/yr specified in 40CFR190.Both of these limits are to be applied to real members of the general public, so the fact that the dose to the hypothetical maximum-exposed individual is within the limits ensures that any dose received by a real member of the public would be smaller and well within any applicable limit.RADIOACTIVE SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL Solid radioactive wastes shipped offsite for processing and disposal during the reporting period are described in Table 7.0. Approximately 900 cubic meters of solid waste, containing almost 191 Curies of radioactivity, were shipped during the reporting period.Page 6 ONSITE GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM In response to the Nuclear Energy Institute Groundwater Protection Initiative, Pilgrim Station instituted a groundwater monitoring program during 2007. Four monitoring wells were installed onsite during the fourth quarter of 2007, and the first samples were collected in late November 2007. This sampling program was continued in 2011, and twelve additional sampling wells were added to the program in 2011. Low levels of tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen, were detected in these onsite wells. No other plant-related radioactivity was detected in the samples.Concentrations of tritium ranged from non-detectable at less than 295 picoCuries per Liter up to 25,552 picoCuries per Liter. The average concentration of tritium detected in these onsite monitoring wells was well below the voluntary communications reporting level established by the EPA Drinking Water Standard of 20,000 pCi/L. Although the EPA Standard provides a standard for comparison, no drinking water sources are affected by this tritium. Results of the groundwater monitoring program are presented in Appendix B.CONCLUSION The PNPS Offsite Dose Calculation Manual contains effluent controls to limit doses resulting from releases of radioactivity to the environment.
None of the effluent controls associated with liquid or gaseous effluents were exceeded during the reporting period, as confirmed by conservative dose assessments performed at weekly and monthly intervals.
Conformance to the PNPS ODCM effluent control limits ensures that releases of radioactivity in liquid and gaseous effluents are kept as low as reasonably achievable in accordance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I. Compliance with the ODCM also demonstrates that requirements of the Environmental Protection Agency's nuclear fuel cycle standard, 40CFR190.10, Subpart B, have been met. Based on the dose assessment results for 2011, there was no significant radiological impact on the general public from PNPS operation.
Page 7
2.0 RADIOACTIVE
EFFLUENT DATA Radioactive gaseous and liquid releases for the reporting period are given in the standard format presented in Tables 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, and Supplemental Information table from NRC Regulatory Guide 1.21 (Reference
- 1) format.2.1 Supplemental Effluent Release Data Supplemental information related to radioactive gaseous and liquid releases for the reporting period are given in the standard NRC Regulatory Guide 1.21 format in Table 2.1.2.2 Gaseous Effluent Data Gaseous radioactivity is released from Pilgrim Station to the atmosphere from the main stack, reactor building vent, turbine building, and various decontamination facilities.
Combined gaseous effluent releases from all release points are summarized in Table 2.2-A. No alpha activity was detected on any of the particulate filters collected during the reporting period. The total gaseous releases for various categories of radionuclides, as well as the corresponding average release rates, can be summarized as follows: " Noble gases: 11.5 Ci, 0.366 pCi/sec* lodines and particulates with 0.00738 Ci, 0.000234 pCi/sec half-life greater than 8 days* Tritium: 38.0 Ci, 1.20 pCi/sec" Carbon-14:
7.36 Ci, 0.233 uCi/sec Effluent releases from the main stack are detailed in Table 2.2-B. The main stack is 335 feet tall, and represents an elevated release point with a total height of approximately 400 feet above sea level. The main stack is located about 700 feet west-northwest of the reactor building.Ground-level effluent releases are detailed in Table 2.2-C. Data in this table include releases from the reactor building vent, turbine building, and assorted equipment decontamination facilities (e.g., hot machine shop, carbon dioxide pellet decon trailer, plastic media decon trailer, etc.) used during the period. Due to the close proximity of the reactor building, all of these release points are considered to be mixed-mode/ground level release points.Following the revision of Regulatory Guide 1.21 in 2009, the nuclear industry re-assessed their gaseous effluent releases in accordance with the new definition of "principal radionuclide".
Under this new definition, any radionuclide that contributed greater than 1% of the effluent dose calculated to demonstrate compliance with 10CFR50 Appendix I, or contributed more than 1% of the total activity for that type of effluent release, would be classified as a principal radionuclide.
Although Carbon-14 (C-14) had been exempted from gaseous effluent calculations in the 1970s, industry assessments in 2009 revealed that Carbon-14 would qualify as a principal radionuclide.
Based on this 2009 re-assessment, licensees were required to begin reporting C-14 gaseous effluents in the Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report beginning with calendar-year 2010.Carbon-14 releases for 2011 are summarized in Tables 2.2-A through 2.2-C, and the dose consequences from C-14 are incorporated into the dose assessments documented in Section 4.2 of this report.Page 8
2.3 Liquid
Effluent Data Liquid radioactivity is released from PNPS to Cape Cod Bay via the circulating water discharge canal. These effluents enter Cape Cod Bay at the outfall of the canal, which is located about 1100 feet north of the reactor building.Liquid effluent releases are summarized in Table 2.3-A. Detailed breakdowns for individual radionuclides are listed in Table 2.3-B. There were twenty-nine discharges of liquid effluents containing radioactivity during the reporting period. Total releases for the various categories of radionuclides, as well as their corresponding mean concentrations, can be summarized as follows:* Total Effluent Volume:* Total Dilution Volume:* Fission/Activation products:* Tritium: 1,240,000 Liters 582 billion Liters 0.00375 Ci, 0.00000000000646 pCi/mL 4.43 Ci, 0.00000000762 pCi/mL* Dissolved/entrained noble gases: 0 Ci, 0 pCi/mL Page 9 Table 2.1 Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Supplemental Information January-December 2011 FACILITY:
PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION LICENSE: DPR-35 1. REGULATORY LIMITS a. Fission and activation gases: 500 mrem/yr total body and 3000 mrem/yr for skin at site boundary b,c. lodines, particulates with half-life:
1500 mrem/yr to any organ at site boundary>8 days, tritium d. Liquid effluents:
0.06 mrem/month for whole body and 0.2 mrem/month for any organ (without radwaste treatment)
- 2. EFFLUENT CONCENTRATION LIMITS a. Fission and activation gases: 10CFR20 Appendix B Table II b. lodines: 10CFR20 Appendix B Table II c. Particulates with half-life
> 8 days: 10CFR20 Appendix B Table II d. Liquid effluents:
2E-04 [tCi/mL for entrained noble gases;10CFR20 Appendix B Table II values for all other radionuclides
- 3. AVERAGE ENERGY Not Applicable
- 4. MEASUREMENTS AND APPROXIMATIONS OF TOTAL RADIOACTIVITY
- a. Fission and activation gases: High purity germanium gamma spectroscopy for all b. lodines: gamma emitters; radiochemistry analysis for H-3, c. Particulates:
Fe-55 (liquid effluents), Sr-89, and Sr-90 d. Liquid effluents:
- 5. BATCH RELEASES Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Dec 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 a. Liquid Effluents 1. Total number of releases:
12 14 0 3 29 2. Total time period (minutes):
1.31E+03 1.29E+03 N/A 3.48E+02 2.95E+03 3. Maximum time period (minutes):
1.52E+02 1.50E+02 N/A 1.35E+02 1.52E+02 4. Average time period (minutes):
1.09E+02 9.22E+01 N/A 1.16E+02 1.02E+02 5. Minimum time period (minutes):
8.30E+01 7.70E+01 N/A 1.05E+02 7.70E+01 6. Average stream flow during periods of release of efflueint pintos a lowingestr1.19E+06 9.61 E+05 N/A 1.19E+06 1.09E+06 effluents into a flowing stream (Liters/min):
- b. Gaseous Effluents None None None None None 6. ABNORMAL RELEASES a. Liquid Effluents None None None None None b. Gaseous Effluents None None None None None Page 10 Table 2.2-A Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Gaseous Effluents
-Summation of All Releases January-December 2011 Est.RELEASE PERIOD Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Dec Total 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 Error A. FISSION AND ACTIVATION GASES Total Release: Ci 6.46E+00 3.52E-01 1.78E-01 4.56E+00 1.15E+01 Average Release Rate: ipCi/sec 8.19E-01 4.46E-02 2.26E-02 5.78E-01 3.66E-01 +/-22%Percent of Effluent Control Limit* .....B. IODINE-131 Total Iodine-131 Release: Ci 6.69E-04 3.47E-04 2.03E-04 1.47E-04 1.37E-03 Average Release Rate: CrCi/sec 8.49E-05 4.40E-05 2.58E-05 1.86E-05 4.33E-05 +/-20%Percent of Effluent Control Limit*...C. PARTICULATES WITH HALF-LIVES
> 8 DAYS Total Release: Ci 1.76E-03 5.55E-04 2.56E-04 1.17E-04 2.69E-03 Average Release Rate: jiCi/sec 2.23E-04 7.04E-05 3.24E-05 1.49E-05 8.52E-05 Percent of Effluent Control Limit* +/-2...Gross Alpha Radioactivity:
Ci NDA NDA NDA NDA NDA D. TRITIUM Total Release: Ci 1.01E+01 5.88E+00 1.35E+01 8.46E+00 3.80E+01 Average Release Rate: pCi/sec 1.29E+00 7.46E-01 1.72E+00 1.07E+00 1.20E+00 +/-20%Percent of Effluent Control Limit* .....E. CARBON-14 Total Release: Ci 1.99E+00 1.34E+00 2.15E+00 1.88E+00 7.36E+00 Average Release Rate: pCi/sec 2.53E-01 1.70E-01 2.73E-01 2.38E-01 2.33E-01 N/A Percent of Effluent Control Limit* .....Notes for Table 2.2-A:* Percent of Effluent Control Limit values based on dose assessments are provided in Section 6 of this report.1. NDA stands for No Detectable Activity.2. LLD for airborne gross alpha activity listed as NDA is 1 E-1 1 jiCi/cc.3. N/A stands for not applicable.
Page 11 Table 2.2-B Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Gaseous Effluents
-Elevated Release January-December 2011 CONTINUOUS MODE RELEASES FROM ELEVATED RELEASE POINT Nuclide Released I Jan-Mar2011 Apr-Jun2011 Jul-Sep2011 Oct-Dec2011 f Jan-Dec2011
- 1. FISSION AND ACTIVATION GASES: Ci Ar-41 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Kr-85 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Kr-85m 9.47E-03 7.15E-02 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 8.1OE-02 Kr-87 2.79E-02 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 2.79E-02 Kr-88 1.68E-02 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.68E-02 Xe-131m 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Xe-1 33 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Xe-133m 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Xe-135 5.84E-03 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.07E-01 1.13E-01 Xe-135m 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Xe-137 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Xe-1 38 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Total for Period 6.OOE-02 7.15E-02 0.OOE+00 1.07E-01 2.39E-01 2. IODINES: Ci 1-131 2.47E-05 1.93E-05 1.57E-05 1.48E-05 7.44E-05 1-133 3.95E-05 2.30E-05 1.78E-05 4.40E-06 8.47E-05 Total for Period 6.42E-05 4.23E-05 3.35E-05 1.92E-05 1.59E-04 3. PARTICULATES WITH HALF-LIVES
> 8 DAYS: Ci Cr-51 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Mn-54 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Fe-59 0.OOE+00 6.88E-07 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 6.88E-07 Co-58 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Co-60 0.OOE+00 1.02E-06 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.02E-06 Zn-65 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Sr-89 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 9.37E-07 0.OOE+00 9.37E-07 Sr-90 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Ru-103 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Cs-134 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Cs-137 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Ba/La-140 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 2.50E-06 0.OOE+00 2.50E-06 Total for Period 0.OOE+00 1.71 E-06 3.44E-06 0.OOE+00 5.14E-06 4. TRITIUM: Ci H-3 3.15E-02 2.48E-02 4.87E-02 2.76E-02 1.33E-01 5. CARBON-14:
Ci C-14 1.93E+00 1.30E+00 2.09E+00 1.82E+00 7.14E+00 Notes for Table 2.2-B: 1. N/A stands for not applicable.
- 2. NDA stands for No Detectable Activity.3. LLDs for airborne radionuclides listed as NDA are as follows: Fission Gases: I E-04 1 iCi/cc lodines: 1 E-12 pCi/cc Particulates:
1E-11 gCi/cc Page 12 Table 2.2-B (continued)
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Gaseous Effluents
-Elevated Release January-December 2011 BATCH MODE RELEASES FROM ELEVATED RELEASE POINT Nuclide Released I Jan-Mar 2011 Apr-Jun 2011 Jul-Sep 2011 Oct-Dec 2011 F Jan-Dec 2011 1. FISSION AND ACTIVATION GASES: Ci Ar-41 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Kr-85 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Kr-85m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Kr-87 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Kr-88 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Xe-131 m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Xe-133 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Xe-133m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Xe-135 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Xe-135m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Xe-137 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Xe-138 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total for period N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2. IODINES: Ci 1-131 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1-133 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total for period N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 3. PARTICULATES WITH HALF-LIVES
> 8 DAYS: Ci Cr-51 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Mn-54 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Fe-59 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Co-58 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Co-60 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Zn-65 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Sr-89 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Sr-90 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ru-103 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Cs- 134 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Cs-137 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ba/La-140 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total for period N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4. TRITIUM: Ci H-3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5. CARBON-14:
Ci C-14 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Notes for Table 2.2-B: 1. N/A stands for not applicable.
- 2. NDA stands for No Detectable Activity.3. LLDs for airborne radionuclides listed as NDA are as follows: Fission Gases: 1 E-04 piCi/cc lodines: 1 E-12 piCi/cc Particulates:
1E-11 Page 13 Table 2.2-C Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Gaseous Effluents
-Ground-Level Release January-December 2011 CONTINUOUS MODE RELEASES FROM GROUND-LEVEL RELEASE POINT Nuclide Released I Jan-Mar 2011 Apr-Jun 2011 Jul-Sep 2011 Oct-Dec 2011 Jan-Dec 2011 1. FISSION AND ACTIVATION GASES: Ci Ar-41 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Kr-85 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Kr-85m 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Kr-87 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00
- 0.OOE+00 Kr-88 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Xe-131m 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Xe-133 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.71E+00 1.71E+00 Xe-133m 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 Xe-135 1.66E+00 2.80E-01 1.78E-01 2.74E+00 4.87E+00 Xe-135m 1.75E-01 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.75E-01 Xe-137 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Xe-138 4.56E+00 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 0.OOE+00 4.56E+00 Total for period 6.40E+00 2.80E-01 1.78E-01 4.45E+00 1.13E+01 2. IODINES: Ci 1-131 6.45E-04 3.27E-04 1.88E-04 1.32E-04 1.29E-03 1-133 1.97E-03 5.42E-04 4.46E-04 2.97E-04 3.25E-03 Total for period 2.61E-03 8.69E-04 6.34E-04 4.29E-04 4.54E-03 3. PARTICULATES WITH HALF-LIVES
> 8 DAYS: Ci Cr-51 0.OOE+00 2.95E-05 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 2.95E-05 Mn-54 2.78E-06 2.44E-06 5.62E-07 0.OOE+00 5.78E-06 Fe-59 2.23E-06 4.48E-05 2.42E-06 1.27E-06 5.07E-05 Co-58 0.OOE+00 4.43E-06 0.OOE+00 0.00E+00 4.43E-06 Co-60 2.93E-06 8.53E-05 1.05E-05 0.OOE+00 9.87E-05 Zn-65 0.OOE+00 2.48E-05 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 2.48E-05 Sr-89 0.OOE+00 3.56E-05 4.38E-05 3.25E-05 1.12E-04 Sr-90 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 1.27E-06 0.OOE+00 1.27E-06 Ru-103 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Cs-134 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Cs-137 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Ba/La-140 1.75E-03 3.27E-04 1.94E-04 8.36E-05 2.36E-03 Total for period 1.76E-03 5.53E-04 2.52E-04 1.17E-04 2.68E-03 4. TRITIUM: Ci H-3 1.01E+01 5.85E+00 1.35E+01 8.44E+00 3.79E+01 5. CARBON-14:
Ci C-14 5.98E-02 4.02E-02 6.46E-02 5.63E-02 2.21 E-01 Notes for Table 2.2-C: 1. N/A stands for not applicable.
- 2. NDA stands for No Detectable Activity.3. LLDs for airborne radionuclides listed as NDA are as follows: Fission Gases: 1E-04 1 ,Ci/cc lodines: 1 E-12 pCi/cc Particulates:
1 E-1 1 pCi/cc Page 14 Table 2.2-C (continued)
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Gaseous Effluents
-Ground-Level Release January-December 2011 BATCH MODE RELEASES FROM GROUND-LEVEL RELEASE POINT Nuclide Released Jan-Mar 2011 Apr-Jun 2011 Jul-Sep 2011 Oct-Dec 2011 Jan-Dec 2011 1. FISSION AND ACTIVATION GASES: Ci Ar-41 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Kr-85 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Kr-85m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Kr-87 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Kr-88 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Xe-131m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Xe-133 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Xe-133m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Xe-135 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Xe-135m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Xe-1 37 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Xe-1 38 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total for period N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2. IODINES: Ci 1-131 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1-133 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total for period N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 3. PARTICULATES WITH HALF-LIVES
> 8 DAYS: Ci Cr-51 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Mn-54 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Fe-59 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Co-58 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Co-60 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Zn-65 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Sr-89 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Sr-90 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ru-103 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Cs- 134 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Cs-137 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ba/La-140 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total for period N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4. TRITIUM: Ci H-3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 5. CARBON-14:
Ci C-14 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Notes for Table 2.2-C: 1. N/A stands for not applicable.
- 2. NDA stands for No Detectable Activity.3. LLDs for airborne radionuclides listed as NDA are as follows: Fission Gases: 1E-04 pCi/cc lodines: 1 E-12 pCi/cc Particulates:
1E-11 pCi/cc Page 15 Table 2.3-A Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Liquid Effluents
-Summation of All Releases January-December 2011 Est.RELEASE PERIOD Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Dec Total 1 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 Error A. FISSION AND ACTIVATION PRODUCTS Total Release (not including 7.87E-05 3.68E-03 N/A NDA 3.75E-03 tritium, gases, alpha): Ci Average Diluted Concentration 5.18E-13 3.00E-1 1 N/A NDA 6.46E-12 +/-12%During Period: pCi/mL Percent of Effluent Concentraion Eflimt 4.62E-05%
3.24E-04%
N/A O.OOE+00%
8.03E-05%Concentration Limit*B. TRITIUM Total Release: Ci 1.58E-01 4.22E+00 N/A 5.18E-02 4.43E+00 Average Diluted Concentration 1.04E-09 3.45E-08 N/A 3.37E-10 7.62E-09 During Period: pCi/mL +/-9.4%Percent of Effluent_
__ _ _I _Concentraion Eflumt 1.04E-04%
3.45E-03%
N/A 3.37E-05%
7.62E-04%Concentration Limit*C. DISSOLVED AND ENTRAINED GASES Total Release: Ci NDA NDA N/A NDA NDA Average Diluted Concentration NDA NDA N/A NDA NDA Duringj Period: +/-t16%Percent of Effluent_
___ _I _Pecn0fEfun
.00E+00% 0.00E+00%
N/A 0.00E+00%
0.00E+00%Concentration Limit*D. GROSS ALPHA RADIOACTIVITY Total Release: Ci N/A NDA N/A NDA NDA +/- +/-34%E. VOLUME OF WASTE RELEASED PRIOR TO DILUTION Waste Volume: Liters 3.96E+05 7.42E+05 N/A 1.OOE+05 1.24E+06 +/-5.7%F. VOLUME OF DILUTION WATER USED DURING PERIOD Dilution Volume: Liters 1.52E+11 1.22E+11 1.53E+11 1.54E+11 5.82E+11 +/-10%Notes for Table 2.3-A:* Additional percent of Effluent Control Limit values based on dose assessments are provided in Section 6 of this report.1. N/A stands for not applicable.
- 2. NDA stands for No Detectable Activity.3. LLD for dissolved and entrained gases listed as NDA is 1 E-05 p.Ci/mL.4. LLD for liquid gross alpha activity listed as NDA is 1E-07 1.Ci/mL.Page 16 Table 2.3-B Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Liquid Effluents January-December 2011 CONTINUOUS MODE RELEASES Nuclide Released Jan-Mar 2011 Apr-Jun 2011 Jul-Sep 2011 Oct-Dec 2011 Jan-Dec 2011 1. FISSION AND ACTIVATION PRODUCTS:
Ci Cr-51 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Mn-54 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Fe-55 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Fe-59 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Co-58 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Co-60 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Zn-65 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Zn-69m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Sr-89 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Sr-90 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Zr/Nb-95 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Mo/Tc-99 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ag-110m N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Sb-124 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1-131 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1-133 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Cs-134 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Cs-137 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ba/La-140 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ce-141 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total for period N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 2. DISSOLVED AND ENTRAINED GASES: Ci Xe-1 33 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Xe-135 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total for period N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Notes for Table 2.3-B: 1. N/A stands for not applicable.
- 2. NDA stands for No Detectable Activity.3. LLDs for liquid radionuclides listed as NDA are as follows: Strontium:
5E-08 [tCi/mL lodines: 1E-06 jiCi/mL Noble Gases: 1E-05 1.Ci/mL All Others: 5E-07 [tCi/mL Page 17 Table 2.3-B3 (continued)
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Liquid Effluents January-December 2011 BATCH MODE RELEASES Nuclide Released Jan-Mar 2011 Apr-Jun 2011 Jul-Sep 2011 Oct-Dec 2011 Jan-Dec 2011 1. FISSION AND ACTIVATION PRODUCTS:
Ci Na-24 4.56E-06 NDA N/A NDA 4.56E-06 Cr-51 NDA 1.OOE-03 N/A NDA 1.OOE-03 Mn-54 3.86E-06 1.30E-03 N/A NDA 1.30E-03 Fe-55 NDA NDA N/A NDA NDA Fe-59 NDA 2.32E-04 N/A NDA 2.32E-04 Co-58 NDA 1.04E-04 N/A NDA 1.04E-04 Co-60 2.41 E-07 8.49E-04 N/A NDA 8.49E-04 Zn-65 NDA 1.54E-04 N/A NDA 1.54E-04 Zn-69m NDA NDA N/A NDA NDA Sr-89 8.43E-08 NDA N/A NDA 8.43E-08 Sr-90 NDA NDA N/A NDA NDA Zr/Nb-95 NDA 8.66E-06 N/A NDA 8.66E-06 Mo/Tc-99 NDA NDA N/A NDA NDA Ag-110m NDA 2.37E-05 N/A NDA 2.37E-05 Sb-124 NDA NDA N/A NDA NDA 1-131 NDA NDA N/A NDA NDA 1-133 NDA NDA N/A NDA NDA Cs-134 NDA NDA N/A NDA NDA Cs-137 7.OOE-05 4.81E-06 N/A NDA 7.48E-05 Ba/La-140 NDA NDA N/A NDA NDA Ce-141 NDA NDA N/A NDA NDA Ce- 144 NDA NDA N/A NDA NDA Total for period 7.87E-05 3.68E-03 N/A NDA 3.75E-03 2. DISSOLVED AND ENTRAINED GASES: Ci Xe-133 NDA NDA N/A NDA NDA Xe-i 35 NDA NDA N/A NDA NDA Total for period NDA NDA N/A NDA NDA Notes for Table 2.3-B: 1. N/A stands for not applicable.
- 2. NDA stands for No Detectable Activity.3. LLDs for liquid radionuclides listed as NDA are as follows: Strontium:
5E-08 [tCi/mL l Iodines: 1E-06 ptCi/mL Noble Gases: 1E-05 1 iCi/mL All Others: 5E-07 1.Ci/mL Page 18
3.0 METEOROLOGICAL
DATA Meteorological data are summarized for the reporting period in Appendix A, in the standard joint frequency distribution format as given in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.21.The predominant meteorological conditions observed during the annual reporting period can be summarized with their corresponding frequencies as follows:* Stability Class: Class D, 43%* 33-ft Wind Direction (from): South-southwest, 17%* 33-ft Wind Speed: 3.5-7.5 mph, 56%* 220-ft Wind Direction (from): South-southwest, 15%* 220-ft Wind Speed: 12.5-18.5 mph, 36%Joint data recovery for both the 33-ft level and 220-ft level of the tower was 100%, well in excess of the 90% annual data recovery goal specified by the NRC.Page 19
4.0 MAXIMUM
INDIVIDUAL DOSES Doses to the maximum exposed individual resulting from radionuclides in effluents released offsite were calculated using methods presented in the PNPS Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM, Reference 2), NRC Regulatory Guide 1.109 (Reference 3), NRC Regulatory Guide 1.111 (Reference 4), and the Pilgrim Station Unit 1 Appendix I Evaluation (Reference 5). Maximum individual doses are calculated separately for: (1) noble gases in gaseous effluents, (2)particulates, iodines, and tritium in gaseous effluents; and, (3) liquid effluents.
Maximum consumption and use factors for various pathways from Table E-5 of the PNPS ODCM are used for calculating the doses to the maximum exposed individual.
Information related to liquid and gaseous effluent releases are summarized Section 2 of this report.These effluent release data were used as input to computer programs to calculate the resulting doses. PNPS ODCM methodologies were used to calculate the dose contributions to the various organs in each age class from major exposure pathways.4.1 Doses From Noble Gas Releases Gaseous effluent release data presented in Tables 2.2-A, 2.2-B, and 2.2-C from this effluent release report were used as input to a dose assessment computer program to calculate radiation doses. These data include gaseous releases from the PNPS main stack, reactor building vent, and turbine building roof exhausters.
Meteorological data obtained from the PNPS 220-foot meteorological tower during the 10-year period from 1994 through 2003 were used as input to the"AEOLUS-3" computer program (Reference 6). This program was used to calculate the annual average atmospheric dispersion and deposition factors used in the dose assessment computer program to calculate maximum individual doses.The maximum individual doses resulting from radioactive noble gases released in gaseous effluents are presented in Table 4.1 according to specific receptor locations.
This table includes all noble gas doses for the individual calendar quarters and total calendar year.Noble gases released in gaseous effluents from PNPS during 2011 resulted in a maximum total body dose of 0.0020 mrem. The maximum skin dose was 0.0068 mrem. Both of these doses occurred to a hypothetical individual, assumed to be present 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> per day, 365 days per year, at the site boundary location yielding the highest dose (0.64 km ESE of the Reactor Building).
For the more "realistic" individuals at offsite locations, the maximum total body dose was 0.0015 mrem (nearest residence, 0.80 kilometers ESE from the Reactor Building), while the maximum skin dose was 0.0048 mrem (nearest residence, 0.80 kilometers ESE from the Reactor Building).
Page 20 Table 4.1 Maximum Doses From Noble Gas Releases During 201 1 (a)Gamma Beta Total Release Air Dose Air Dose Body Dose Skin Dose Period mrad/period mrad/period mrem/period mrem/periojd (location) (location) (location) (location) 2.54E-03 4.15E-03 1.70E-03 5.51 E-03 Jan-Mar (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE)3.01E-05 1.11E-04 1.99E-05 1.07E-04 Apr-Jun (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE)1.90E-05 7.03E-05 1.25E-05 6.79E-05 Jul-Sep (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE)Oct-Dec 3.26E-04 1.37E-03 2.13E-04 1.16E-03 (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE)Jan-Dec 2.92E-03 5.70E-03 1.95E-03 6.84E-03 (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE) (0.64 km ESE)(a) All directions and distances are with -respect to the reactor building vent.Page 21
4.2 Doses
From Gaseous Effluent Releases Gaseous effluent release data presented in Tables 2.2-A, 2.2-B, and 2.2-C from this effluent release report were used as input to a dose assessment computer program to calculate radiation doses. These data include gaseous releases from the PNPS main stack, reactor building vent, and turbine building roof exhausters.
Meteorological data obtained from the PNPS 220-foot meteorological tower during the 10-year period from 1994 through 2003 were used as input to the"AEOLUS-3" computer program (Reference 6). This program was used to calculate the annual average atmospheric dispersion and deposition factors used in the dose assessment computer program to calculate maximum individual doses.The maximum individual doses resulting from radioactive particulates, radioiodines, tritium and carbon-14 released in gaseous effluents are presented in Tables 4.2-A through 4.2-E. These tables cover the individual calendar quarters and the total calendar year, respectively.
Doses resulting from releases of noble gases are addressed independently in the PNPS ODCM.Therefore, none of these tables for maximum individual doses include any dose contribution from noble gases. The presentation and analysis of doses resulting from noble gases are addressed in Section 4.1 of this report.Tables 4.2-A through 4.2-E summarize the maximum total body and organ doses for the adult, teen, child, and infant age classes resulting from the major gaseous exposure pathways.
These tables present the dose data according to specific receptor location and the exposure pathways assumed to occur at that location.
For example, the second column of the tables presents the information for the hVpothetical maximum-exposed at the most restrictive site boundary location, where only inhalation and ground deposition exposure pathways are assumed to occur. Since this is a shoreline location controlled by Entergy, the other pathways of garden vegetable production, milk production, and meat production are assumed not to occur. Doses for other offsite locations not under Entergy control, where other exposure pathways can and do occur, are presented in subsequent columns of the tables, and represent the potential maximum doses to individuals at these locations.
For consistency, all distances listed in the first row of Tables 4.2-A through 4.2-E are measured from the Reactor Building Vent. However, doses at the specific receptor locations are calculated based on the actual distances from the applicable release points (PNPS main stack, reactor building vent, and turbine building roof exhausters).
Radioactivity (particulates, radioiodines, tritium, and carbon-14) released in gaseous effluents from PNPS during 2011 resulted in a maximum total body dose of 0.027 mrem (child age class at nearest garden location, 0.84 kilometers SE from the Reactor Building), while the maximum organ dose was 0.079 mrem (child bone at nearest garden location, 0.84 kilometers SE from the Reactor Building).
Carbon-14 contributed 0.015 mrem (57%) of the 0.027 mrem child total body dose, and 0.077 mrem (98%) of the 0.079 mrem child bone dose at the location of the nearest garden.Page 22 Table 4.2-A Maximum Individual Organ Dose at Receptor Location -- mrem From Gaseous Release Period: Jan-Mar 2011 Receptor:
Bound Resident Garden Cow/Goat Cow/Meat Meat Direction:
NW ESE SE WSW W S Distance 1: 0.54 km 0.80 km 0.84 km 3.97 km 5.77 km 3.80 km Pathway 2: DI DI DIV 3 DIVCG 3 DIVCM 3 DIVM 3 Age Class: Adult Bone 1.89E-04 1.41E-04 5.43E-03 2.18E-03 1.91E-03 3.32E-03 GI-LLI 1.25E-03 8.46E-04 3.21E-03 6.12E-04 4.87E-04 7.92E-04 Kidney 1.17E-03 7.95E-04 3.1OE-03 6.10E-04 4.85E-04 7.85E-04 Liver 1.17E-03 7.92E-04 3.09E-03 6.07E-04 4.84E-04 7.84E-04 Lung 1.34E-03 9.07E-04 3.16E-03 6.08E-04 4.84E-04 7.87E-04 Thyroid 2.89E-03 1.93E-03 7.44E-03 1.89E-03 1.17E-03 1.07E-03 T.Body 1.17E-03 7.89E-04 3.08E-03 6.05E-04 4.83E-04 7.84E-04 Age Class: Teen Bone 2.71E-04 2.02E-04 8.76E-03 3.67E-03 2.88E-03 4.68E-03 GI-LLI 1.28E-03 8.67E-04 4.06E-03 9.33E-04 6.91E-04 1.07E-03 Kidney 1.20E-03 8.16E-04 3.97E-03 9.36E-04 6.92E-04 1.06E-03 Liver 1.20E-03 8.11E-04 3.96E-03 9.32E-04 6.90E-04 1.06E-03 Lung 1.48E-03 9.96E-04 4.09E-03 9.33E-04 6.90E-04 1.07E-03 Thyroid 3.38E-03 2.26E-03 7.95E-03 2.82E-03 1.69E-03 1.31 E-03 T.Body 1.19E-03 8.07E-04 3.96E-03 9.29E-04 6.88E-04 1.06E-03 Age Class: Child Bone 3.73E-04 2.78E-04 2.09E-02 8.85E-03 6.78E-03 1.08E-02 GI-LLI 1.11E-03 7.57E-04 7.28E-03 2.05E-03 1.51 E-03 2.34E-03 Kidney 1.09E-03 7.40E-04 7.24E-03 2.06E-03 1.52E-03 2.34E-03 Liver 1.08E-03 7.35E-04 7.23E-03 2.05E-03 1.52E-03 2.34E-03 Lung 1.32E-03 8.93E-04 7.33E-03 2.05E-03 1.51 E-03 2.34E-03 Thyroid 3.68E-03 2.46E-03 1.29E-02 5.69E-03 3.43E-03 2.70E-03 T.Body 1.08E-03 7.32E-04 7.23E-03 2.05E-03 1.51E-03 2.33E-03 Age Class: Infant Bone 2.76E-04 2.06E-04 1.71 E-04 5.57E-03 3.87E-03 7.42E-05 GI-LLI 6.47E-04 4.40E-04 3.30E-04 1.32E-03 8.91E-04 3.11E-05 Kidney 6.42E-04 4.37E-04 3.27E-04 1.35E-03 9.05E-04 3.10E-05 Liver 6.40E-04 4.36E-04 3.26E-04 1.35E-03 9.03E-04 3.09E-05 Lung 8.57E-04 5.79E-04 4.32E-04 1.33E-03 8.93E-04 3.61 E-05 Thyroid 3.03E-,03 2.02E-03 1.49E-03 9.54E-03 5.15E-03 8.88E-05 T.Body 6.34E-04 4.32E-04 3.23E-04 1.33E-03 8.95E-04 3.08E-05 1 Distances are measured with respect to the reactor building vent.2 Pathway designations are as follows: D = Deposition (Ground Plane) I = Inhalation V = Vegetable Garden C = Cow Milk G = Goat Milk M = Meat 3 Doses are conservative since it is unlikely for vegetables to be grown outside or for animals to be fed on pasture during winter months.Page 23 Table 4.2-B Maximum Individual Organ Dose at Receptor Location -- mrem From Gaseous Release Period: Apr-Jun 2011 Receptor:
Bound Resident Garden Cow/Goat Cow/Meat Meat Direction:
NW ESE SE WSW W S Distance 1: 0.54 km 0.80 km 0.84 km 3.97 km 5.77 km 3.80 km Pathway2:
DI DI DIV DIVCG DIVCM DIVM Age Class: Adult Bone 1.25E-04 9.35E-05 3.73E-03 1.47E-03 1.29E-03 2.23E-03 GI-LLI 7.OOE-04 4.74E-04 2.02E-03 3.99E-04 3.22E-04 5.28E-04 Kidney 6.81E-04 4.62E-04 1.90E-03 3.94E-04 3.17E-04 5.16E-04 Liver 6.80E-04 4.61E-04 1.90E-03 3.94E-04 3.18E-04 5.18E-04 Lung 8.01E-04 5.41E-04 1.94E-03 3.93E-04 3.16E-04 5.18E-04 Thyroid 1.41E-03 9.44E-04 3.99E-03 1.04E-03 6.65E-04 6.58E-04 T.Body 6.78E-04 4.59E-04 1.90E-03 3.92E-04 3.16E-04 5.17E-04 Age Class: Teen Bone 1.79E-04 1.34E-04 6.01E-03 2.47E-03 1.94E-03 3.15E-03 GI-LLI 7.16E-04 4.86E-04 2.58E-03 6.13E-04 4.57E-04 7.12E-04 Kidney 6.99E-04 4.74E-04 2.47E-03 6.12E-04 4.55E-04 7.03E-04 Liver 6.97E-04 4.73E-04 2.48E-03 6.11E-04 4.55E-04 7.05E-04 Lung 8.81E-04 5.95E-04 2.54E-03 6.09E-04 4.54E-04 7.07E-04 Thyroid 1.61E-03 1.08E-03 4.36E-03 1.56E-03 9.58E-04 8.26E-04 T.Body 6.94E-04 4.71E-04 2.48E-03 6.08E-04 4.54E-04 7.04E-04 Age Class: Child Bone 2.47E-04 1.84E-04 1.44E-02 5.97E-03 4.56E-03 7.28E-03 GI-LLI 6.38E-04 4.34E-04 4.65E-03 1.35E-03 1.OOE-03 1.56E-03 Kidney 6.34E-04 4.31E-04 4.59E-03 1.36E-03 1.01E-03 1.55E-03 Liver 6.32E-04 4.30E-04 4.61E-03 1.36E-03 1.01E-03 1.56E-03 Lung 7.84E-04 5.31E-04 4.64E-03 1.35E-03 1.OOE-03 1.56E-03 Thyroid 1.70E-03 1.14E-03 7.30E-03 3.19E-03 1.97E-03 1.73E-03 T.Body 6.30E-04 4.29E-04 4.62E-03 1.36E-03 1.01E-03 1.56E-03 Age Class: Infant Bone 1.82E-04 1.36E-04 1.13E-04 3.75E-03 2.60E-03 4.98E-05 GI-LLI 3.74E-04 2.55E-04 1.92E-04 8.82E-04 5.96E-04 1.93E-05 Kidney 3.75E-04 2.55E-04 1.92E-04 8.93E-04 6.02E-04 1.93E-05 Liver 3.74E-04 2.55E-04 1.91 E-04 8.95E-04 6.03E-04 1.93E-05 Lung 4.88E-04 3.30E-04 2.47E-04 8.78E-04 5.93E-04 2.20E-05 Thyroid 1.35E-03 9.03E-04 6.70E-04 5.04E-03 2.75E-03 4.32E-05 T.Body 3.72E-04 2.54E-04 1.90E-04 8.84E-04 5.97E-04 1.92E-05 Distances are measured with respect to the reactor building vent.2 Pathway designations are as follows: D = Deposition (Ground Plane) I = Inhalation V = Vegetable Garden C = Cow Milk G = Goat Milk M = Meat Page 24 Table 4.2-C Maximum Individual Organ Dose at Receptor Location -- mrem From Gaseous Release Period: Jul-Sep 2011 Receptor:
Bound Resident Garden Cow/Goat Cow/Meat Meat Direction:
NW ESE SE WSW W S Distance 1: 0.54 km 0.80 km 0.84 km 3.97 km 5.77 km 3.80 km Pathway 2: DI DI DIV DIVCG DIVCM DIVM Age Class: Adult Bone 2.03E-04 1.51E-04 6.21E-03 2.38E-03 2.07E-03 3.60E-03 GI-LLI 1.55E-03 1.05E-03 3.88E-03 6.97E-04 5.48E-04 8.80E-04 Kidney 1.54E-03 1.05E-03 3.83E-03 6.96E-04 5.47E-04 8.77E-04 Liver 1.54E-03 1.04E-03 3.83E-03 6.95E-04 5.47E-04 8.77E-04 Lung 1.58E-03 1.07E-03 3.85E-03 6.95E-04 5.46E-04 8.78E-04 Thyroid 2.OOE-03 1.35E-03 5.07E-03 1.08E-03 7.52E-04 9.61E-04 T.Body 1.54E-03 1.04E-03 3.84E-03 6.95E-04 5.47E-04 8.77E-04 Age Class: Teen Bone 2.89E-04 2.16E-04 9.96E-03 3.99E-03 3.13E-03 5.08E-03 GI-LLI 1.58E-03 1.07E-03 4.88E-03 1.05E-03 7.71E-04 1.18E-03 Kidney 1.57E-03 1.07E-03 4.83E-03 1.05E-03 7.71E-04 1.18E-03 Liver 1.57E-03 1.07E-03 4.83E-03 1.05E-03 7.70E-04 1.18E-03 Lung 1.63E-03 1.11E-03 4.86E-03 1.05E-03 7.70E-04 1.18E-03 Thyroid 2.16E-03 1.45E-03 5.96E-03 1.61 E-03 1.07E-03 1.25E-03 T.Body 1.57E-03 1.06E-03 4.84E-03 1.05E-03 7.70E-04 1.18E-03 Age Class: Child Bone 3.98E-04 2.97E-04 2.37E-02 9.62E-03 7.35E-03 1.17E-02 GI-LLI 1.42E-03 9.63E-04 8.60E-03 2.28E-03 1.67E-03 2.57E-03 Kidney 1.42E-03 9.62E-04 8.57E-03 2.28E-03 1.67E-03 2.57E-03 Liver 1.42E-03 9.61E-04 8.57E-03 2.28E-03 1.67E-03 2.57E-03 Lung 1.47E-03 9.95E-04 8.59E-03 2.28E-03 1.67E-03 2.57E-03 Thyroid 2.1OE-03 1.42E-03 1.02E-02 3.35E-03 2.24E-03 2.67E-03 T.Body 1.41E-03 9.60E-04 8.60E-03 2.28E-03 1.67E-03 2.57E-03 Age Class: Infant Bone 2.91E-04 2.17E-04 1.81 E-04 6.01E-03 4.17E-03 8.OOE-05 GI-LLI 8.30E-04 5.65E-04 4.22E-04 1.46E-03 9.79E-04 3.72E-05 Kidney 8.31 E-04 5.65E-04 4.22E-04 1.47E-03 9.83E-04 3.73E-05 Liver 8.30E-04 5.65E-04 4.22E-04 1.47E-03 9.82E-04 3.72E-05 Lung 8.75E-04 5.94E-04 4.44E-04 1.46E-03 9.79E-04 3.83E-05 Thyroid 1.46E-03 9.82E-04 7.30E-04 3.89E-03 2.25E-03 5.27E-05 T.Body 8.29E-04 5.64E-04 4.21E-04 1.47E-03 9.80E-04 3.72E-05 1 Distances are measured with respect to the reactor building vent.2 Pathway designations are as follows: D = Deposition (Ground Plane)C = Cow Milk I = Inhalation G = Goat Milk V = Vegetable Garden M Meat Page 25 Table 4.2-D Maximum Individual Organ Dose at Receptor Location -- mrem From Gaseous Release Period: Oct-Dec 2011 Receptor:
Bound Resident Garden Cow/Goat Cow/Meat Meat Direction:
NW ESE SE WSW W S Distance':
0.54 km 0.80 km 0.84 km 3.97 km 5.77 km 3.80 km Pathway 2: DI DI DIV 3 DIVCG 3 DIVCM 3 DIVM3 Age Class: Adult Bone 1.72E-04 1.28E-04 5.16E-03 2.06E-03 1.80E-03 3.13E-03 GI-LLI 9.80E-04 6.64E-04 2.70E-03 5.52E-04 4.44E-04 7.26E-04 Kidney 9.76E-04 6.61E-04 2.69E-03 5.51E-04 4.44E-04 7.25E-04 Liver 9.75E-04 6.61E-04 2.68E-03 5.51E-04 4.44E-04 7.25E-04 Lung 9.89E-04 6.70E-04 2.69E-03 5.50E-04 4.43E-04 7.25E-04 Thyroid 1.29E-03 8.72E-04 3.55E-03 8.21E-04 5.90E-04 7.85E-04 T.Body 9.74E-04 6.60E-04 2.69E-03 5.51E-04 4.43E-04 7.25E-04 Age Class: Teen Bone 2.46E-04 1.84E-04 8.34E-03 3.46E-03 2.72E-03 4.41 E-03 GI-LLI 1.OOE-03 6.80E-04 3.51E-03 8.52E-04 6.35E-04 9.88E-04 Kidney 9.99E-04 6.78E-04 3.49E-03 8.53E-04 6.36E-04 9.87E-04 Liver 9.98E-04 6.77E-04 3.49E-03 8.52E-04 6.35E-04 9.87E-04 Lung 1.02E-03 6.92E-04 3.50E-03 8.51E-04 6.35E-04 9.88E-04 Thyroid 1.40E-03 9.44E-04 4.27E-03 1.25E-03 8.47E-04 1.04E-03 T.Body 9.97E-04 6.76E-04 3.49E-03 8.52E-04 6.35E-04 9.87E-04 Age Class: Child Bone 3.39E-04 2.54E-04 1.99E-02 8.35E-03 6.39E-03 1.02E-02 GI-LLI 9.05E-04 6.16E-04 6.48E-03 1.90E-03 1.41E-03 2.18E-03 Kidney 9.05E-04 6.16E-04 6.47E-03 1.90E-03 1.41E-03 2.18E-03 Liver 9.04E-04 6.15E-04 6.47E-03 1.90E-03 1.41E-03 2.18E-03 Lung 9.24E-04 6.28E-04 6.48E-03 1.90E-03 1.41 E-03 2.18E-03 Thyroid 1.38E-03 9.28E-04 7.60E-03 2.66E-03 1.81 E-03 2.26E-03 T.Body 9.03E-04 6.14E-04 6.48E-03 1.90E-03 1.41E-03 2.18E-03 Age Class: Infant Bone 2.50E-04 1.87E-04 1.56E-04 5.23E-03 3.64E-03 6.97E-05 GI-LLI 5.33E-04 3.64E-04 2.73E-04 1.23E-03 8.31E-04 2.72E-05 Kidney 5.34E-04 3.64E-04 2.73E-04 1.24E-03 8.34E-04 2.73E-05 Liver 5.34E-04 3.64E-04 2.73E-04 1.23E-03 8.34E-04 2.73E-05 Lung 5.53E-04 3.76E-04 2.82E-04 1.23E-03 8.31E-04 2.77E-05 Thyroid 9.68E-04 6.52E-04 4.85E-04 2.96E-03 1.74E-03 3.80E-05 T.Body 5.33E-04 3.63E-04 2.72E-04 1.23E-03 8.32E-04 2.72E-05 1 2 Distances are measured with respect to the reactor building vent.Pathway designations are as follows: D = Deposition (Ground Plane) I = Inhalation V = Vegetable Garden C = Cow Milk G = Goat Milk M = Meat' Doses are conservative since it is unlikely for vegetables to be grown outside or for animals to be fed on pasture during winter months.Page 26 Table 4.2-E Maximum Individual Organ Dose at Receptor Location -- mrem From Gaseous Release Period: Jan-Dec 2011 Receptor:
Bound Resident Garden Cow/Goat Cow/Meat Meat Direction:
NW ESE SE WSW W S Distance 1: 0.54 km 0.80 km 0.84 km 3.97 km 5.77 km 3.80 km Pathway 2: DI DI DIV 3 DIVCG 3 DIVCM 3 DIVM 3 Age Class: Adult Bone 6.89E-04 5.14E-04 2.05E-02 8.09E-03 7.07E-03 1.23E-02 GI-LLI 4.48E-03 3.04E-03 1.18E-02 2.26E-03 1.80E-03 2.93E-03 Kidney 4.38E-03 2.96E-03 1.15E-02 2.25E-03 1.79E-03 2.90E-03 Liver 4.37E-03 2.96E-03 1.15E-02 2.25E-03 1.79E-03 2.90E-03 Lung 4.71E-03 3.19E-03 1.16E-02 2.25E-03 1.79E-03 2.91E-03 Thyroid 7.59E-03 5.09E-03 2.01E-02 4.83E-03 3.18E-03 3.47E-03 T.Body 4.36E-03 2.95E-03 1.15E-02 2.24E-03 1.79E-03 2.90E-03 Age Class: Teen Bone 9.85E-04 7.35E-04 3.31E-02 1.36E-02 1.07E-02 1.73E-02 GI-LLI 4.58E-03 3.11E-03 1.50E-02 3.45E-03 2.56E-03 3.95E-03 Kidney 4.48E-03 3.03E-03 1.48E-02 3.45E-03 2.55E-03 3.94E-03 Liver 4.46E-03 3.03E-03 1.48E-02 3.44E-03 2.55E-03 3.94E-03 Lung 5.01 E-03 3.39E-03 1.50E-02 3.44E-03 2.55E-03 3.94E-03 Thyroid 8.55E-03 5.74E-03 2.25E-02 7.24E-03 4.56E-03 4.43E-03 T.Body 4.45E-03 3.02E-03 1.48E-02 3.44E-03 2.55E-03 3.94E-03 Age Class: Child Bone 1.36E-03 1.01E-03 7.89E-02 3.28E-02 2.51E-02 4.OOE-02 GI-LLI 4.08E-03 2.77E-03 2.70E-02 7.58E-03 5.60E-03 8.65E-03 Kidney 4.04E-03 2.75E-03 2.69E-02 7.60E-03 5.61 E-03 8.64E-03 Liver 4.03E-03 2.74E-03 2.69E-02 7.59E-03 5.60E-03 8.64E-03 Lung 4.49E-03 3.05E-03 2.70E-02 7.58E-03 5.59E-03 8.64E-03 Thyroid 8.86E-03 5.94E-03 3.80E-02 1.49E-02 9.45E-03 9.36E-03 T.Body 4.02E-03 2.73E-03 2.69E-02 7.58E-03 5.60E-03 8.64E-03 Age Class: Infant Bone 9.99E-04 7.46E-04 6.21 E-04 2.06E-02 1.43E-02 2.74E-04 GI-LLI 2.39E-03 1.62E-03 1.22E-03 4.90E-03 3.30E-03 1.15E-04 Kidney 2.38E-03 1.62E-03 1.21E-03 4.95E-03 3.32E-03 1.15E-04 Liver 2.38E-03 1.62E-03 1.21E-03 4.95E-03 3.32E-03 1.15E-04 Lung 2.77E-03 1.88E-03 1.40E-03 4.90E-03 3.30E-03 1.24E-04 Thyroid 6.81E-03 4.55E-03 3.38E-03 2.14E-02 1.19E-02 2.23E-04 T.Body 2.37E-03 1.61E-03 1.21E-03 4.91E-03 3.30E-03 1.14E-04 1 Distances are measured with respect to the reactor building vent.I-aLIIWay des1ig aionIsI: are as IIIUWs:.D = Deposition (Ground Plane)C = Cow Milk I = Inhalation G = Goat Milk V = Vegetable Garden M = Meat 3 Doses are conservative since it is unlikely for vegetables to be grown outside or for animals to be fed on pasture during winter months.Page 27
4.3 Doses
From Liauid Effluent Releases Liquid effluent release data presented in Tables 2.3-A and 2.3-B were used as input to the dose assessment computer program to calculate radiation doses. The maximum individual doses resulting from radionuclides released in liquid effluents are presented in Tables 4.3-A through 4.3-E. These tables cover the individual calendar quarters and the total calendar year, respectively.
Tables 4.3-A through 4.3-E summarize the maximum total body and organ doses for the adult, teen, and child age classes resulting from the major liquid exposure pathways.
NRC Regulatory Guide 1.109 does not recognize the infant age class as being exposed to the liquid effluent pathways.
Therefore, doses for this age class are not included in any of the tables.It should be noted that doses calculated for the entire year might not equal the sum of the doses for the individual quarters.
Doses from liquid effluents are based on the concentration (activity divided by volume) of radionuclides released in the effluent, as prescribed by the NRC in Regulatory Guide 1.109. If a larger proportion of activity is released with a relatively smaller volume of dilution water during a given quarter, the resulting concentration for that quarter will be higher than concentrations from other quarters.
This will result in a proportionally higher dose for that quarter. However, when that quarter's activity values are included in the annual sum, and divided by the total annual dilution flow, the resulting dose contribution will be smaller. In such a situation, the annual dose will actually be less than the sum of the individual quarterly doses.Radioactivity released in liquid effluents from PNPS during the reporting period resulted in a maximum total body dose (child age class) of 0.000316 mrem. The maximum organ dose (adult age class, GI-LLI) was 0.00122 mrem.Page 28 Table 4.3-A Maximum Individual Organ Doses -- mrem From Liquid Release Period: Jan-Mar 2011 Age Class Organ Dose -mrem *Organ Adult Teen J Child Bone 2.19E-06 3.35E-06 2.92E-06 GI-LLI 7.41E-07 1.66E-06 4.51E-07 Kidney 1.32E-06 2.37E-06 1.21 E-06 Liver 3.15E-06 4.22E-06 2.97E-06 Lung 6.86E-07 1.78E-06 6.66E-07 Thyroid 3.84E-07 1.43E-06 3.70E-07 T.Body 2.16E-06 2.39E-06 7.66E-07* These doses are conservative since the same usage factor was applied for each quarter.In reality, it is unlikely that anyone would be swimming or boating during the entire year.However, the resulting dose is considerably lower than those from other pathways and does not contribute much to the total dose.Page 29 Table 4.3-B Maximum Individual Organ Doses -- mrem From Liquid Release Period: Apr-Jun 2011 Age Class Organ Dose -mrem Organ Adult Teen Child Bone 2.56E-04 2.58E-04 2.75E-04 GI-LLI 1.45E-03 9.65E-04 3.72E-04 Kidney 3.42E-04 3.27E-04 2.57E-04 Liver 7.65E-04 7.23E-04 6.24E-04 Lung 7.78E-05 1.17E-04 7.10E-05 Thyroid 1.32E-05 4.94E-05 1.27 E-05 T.Body 3.43E-04 3151E-04 3.74E-04 Page 30 Table 4.3-C Maximum Individual Organ Doses -- mrem From Liquid Release Period: Jul-Sep 2011 Age Class Organ Dose -mrem Organ Adult Teen Child Bone 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 GI-LLI 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Kidney 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Liver 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Lung 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 Thyroid 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 T.Body 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 Page 31 Table 4.3-D Maximum Individual Organ Doses -- mrem From Liquid Release Period: Oct-Dec 2011 Age Class Organ Dose -mrem *Organ Adult Teen Child Bone 0.OOE+00 O.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 GI-LLI 4.83E-08 3.57E-08 3.08E-08 Kidney 4.83E-08 3.57E-08 3.08E-08 Liver 4.83E-08 3.57E-08 3.08E-08 Lung 4.83E-08 3.57E-08 3.08E-08 Thyroid 4.83E-08 3.57E-08 3.08E-08 T.Body 4.83E-08 3.57E-08 3.08E-08* These doses are conservative since the same usage factor was applied for each quarter.In reality, it is unlikely that anyone would be swimming or boating during these months.However, the resulting dose is considerably lower than those from other pathways and does not contribute much to the total dose.Page 32 Table 4.3-E Maximum Individual Organ Doses -- mrem From Liquid Release Period: Jan-Dec 2011 Age Class Organ Dose -mrem *Organ Adult Teen -[ Child Bone 2.18E-04 2.21E-04 2.34E-04 GI-LLI 1.22E-03 8.14E-04 3.14E-04 Kidney 2.89E-04 2.77E-04 2.18E-04 Liver 6.47E-04 6.13E-04 5.28E-04 Lung 6.63E-05 1.01E-04 6.05E-05 Thyroid 1.1 5E-05 4.31 E-05 1.11 E-05 T.Body 2.91E-04 2.98E-04 3.16E-04* These doses are conservative since the same usage factor was applied for each quarter.In reality, it is unlikely that anyone would be swimming or boating during the entire year.However, the resulting dose is considerably lower than those from other pathways and does not contribute much to the total dose.Page 33
5.0 OFFSITE
AMBIENT RADIATION MEASUREMENTS The PNPS ODCM does not contain control limits related specifically to offsite ambient radiation exposure.
However, Regulatory Guide 1.21 (Reference
- 1) recommends calculation of ambient radiation exposure as part of the overall assessment of radiological impact on man.Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) are located at 83 sites beyond the boundary of the PNPS restricted/protected area. A number of these TLDs are located within the site boundary, on Entergy property in close proximity to the station proper. The TLDs are collected on a quarterly basis and used to calculate the ambient radiation exposure in milliRoentgen (mR) over the exposure period. These TLDs are grouped into four zones of increasing distance from the station.Average exposure values for each of these zones were calculated for each calendar quarter and the total year. The average exposure values (mR) for the four zones are presented in Table 5.0.In addition to responding to ambient radiation exposure, TLDs will also record radiation resulting from noble gases (plume and immersion exposure), particulate materials deposited on the ground, cosmic rays from outer space, and from naturally-occurring radioactivity in the soil and air.Typically, the exposure from cosmic rays and other natural radioactivity components is about 40 to 70 mR/year. As calculated in Sections 4.1 and 4.2 of this report, the ambient radiation component of doses from PNPS effluent emissions are below 1 mrem/yr and would not be discernible above the natural radiation exposure levels.The major source of ambient radiation exposure from PNPS results from high-energy gamma rays emitted from nitrogen-16 (N-16) contained in steam flowing through the turbine. Although the N-16 is enclosed in the process lines and turbine and is not released into the environment, the ambient radiation exposure and sky shine from this contained source accounts for the majority of the radiation dose, especially in close proximity to the station. Other sources of ambient radiation exposure include radiation emitted from contained radioactive materials and/or radwaste at the facility.
Despite these sources of ambient radiation exposure at PNPS, increases in exposure from ambient radiation are typically not observable above background levels at locations beyond Entergy controlled property.The average exposure values presented in Table 5.0 appear to indicate an elevation in ambient exposures in Zone 1, those TLDs within 2 miles of PNPS. Most of this elevation is due to increases in exposure levels measured at TLD locations on Entergy property in close proximity to the station proper. For example, the annual exposure at TLD location OA, located at the Overlook Area near the PNPS Health Club (I&S Building), was 193 mR for the entire year. This location is immediately adjacent to the station proper and overlooks the turbine building, therefore receiving the highest direct ambient and sky shine exposure.
When the near-site TLDs (those located within 0.6 km of the Reactor Building) are removed from the calculation of averages, the mean annual exposure in Zone 1 falls from 77.0 +/- 26.1 mR/yr to 65.9 +/- 8.8 mR/yr. Such a corrected dose is not statistically different from the Zone 4 average of 63.7 + 6.8 mR/yr, and is indicative of natural background radiation.
Although the annual exposure at TLD location OA was 129 mR above the average Zone 4 exposure, members of the general public do not continuously occupy this area. When adjusted for such occupancy, a hypothetical member of the public who was at this location for 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> per year would only receive an incremental dose of 0.59 mrem over natural background radiation levels. At the nearest residence
0.8 kilometers
(0.5 miles) southeast of the PNPS Reactor Building, the annual exposure was calculated as being 61.1 +/- 8.4 mR (based on continuous occupancy at this location), which compares quite well to the Zone 4 annual average background radiation level of 63.7 +/- 6.8 mR. Statistically, there is no difference between these two values.Page 34 It must be emphasized that the projected ambient exposures discussed on the previous page are calculated to occur to a maximum-exposed hypothetical individual.
Even though conservative assumptions are made in the projection of these dose consequences, all of the projected doses are well below the NRC dose limit of 100 mrem/yr specified in 1OCFR20.1301, as well as the EPA dose limit of 25 mrem/yr specified in 40CFR190.
Both of these limits are to be applied to real members of the general public, so the fact that the dose to the hypothetical maximum-exposed individual is within the limits ensures that any dose received by a real member of the public would be smaller and well within any applicable limit.In 1994, Pilgrim Station opened the old training facility (I&S Building) overlooking the plant as a health club for its employees.
This site is immediately adjacent to the protected area boundary near monitoring location OA and receives appreciable amounts of direct ambient and sky shine exposure from the turbine building.
Although personnel using this facility are employees of Entergy, they are considered to be members of the public. Due to their extended presence in the facility (500 hr/yr, assuming utilization of the facility for 2 hr/day, 5 days a week, for 50 weeks/yr), these personnel represent the most conservative case in regards to ambient radiation exposure to a member of the public within the PNPS owner controlled area. Their annual incremental radiation dose above background during 2011 is estimated as being about 1.5 mrem, based on the average exposure measured by the TLD in the building.The exposures measured by the TLD located in the health club would also include any increase in ambient radiation resulting from noble gases and/or particulate activity deposited on the ground from gaseous releases.
However, they would not indicate any internal dose received by personnel in this facility from inhalation of small amounts of PNPS-related radioactivity contained in the air.An environmental air sampler located immediately adjacent to the health club did not indicate any PNPS-related activity during 2011. Dose calculations performed in the same manner as those outlined in Section 4.2 for airborne effluent releases yielded a projected total body dose to the maximum-exposed individual (500 hr/yr exposure) of about 0.00095 mrem, resulting from inhalation.
Again, it must be emphasized that the above-described exposures were received by personnel who are employees or contractors of Entergy, accessing areas or facilities on property under the ownership and control of Entergy. Since this exposure was received within the owner-controlled area, it is not used for comparison to the annual dose limit of 25 mrem/yr specified in 40CFR190.This regulation expressly applies to areas at or beyond the owner-controlled property, and is not applicable in this situation.
As stated earlier, TLDs at and beyond the site boundary do not indicate elevated ambient radiation levels resulting from the operation of Pilgrim Station.Although some of the TLDs in close proximity to PNPS indicate increases in exposure levels from ambient radiation, such increases are localized to areas under Entergy control. For members of the general public who are not employed or contracted with Entergy and are accessing Entergy controlled areas (e.g., parking lots, etc.), such increases in dose from ambient radiation exposure are estimated as being less than 1.0 mrem/year.
Page 35 Table 5.0 Average TLD Exposures By Distance Zone During 2011 Average Exposure +/- Standard Deviation:
mR/period Exposure Zone 1* 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4 Period 0-3 km* 3-8 km 8-15 km >15 km Jan-Mar 20.7 +/- 7.0 16.0 +/- 2.1 14.5 +/- 1.4 15.3 +/- 1.4 Apr-Jun 19.1 +/- 6.0 15.2 +/- 1.8 14.9 +/- 1.8 16.6 +/- 2.0 Jul-Sep 20.3 +/- 8.0 15.0 +/- 2.5 14.3 +/- 2.4 15.7 +/- 1.9 Oct-Dec 16.9 +/- 4.0 14.9 +/- 1.6 15.0+/- 1.2 16.0 +/- 1.6 Jan-Dec 77.0 +/- 26.1** 61.2 +/- 8.2 58.8 +/- 6.8 63.7 +/- 6.8 Zone 1 extends from the PNPS restricted/protected area boundary outward to 3 kilometers (2 miles), and includes several TLDs located within the site boundary.When corrected for TLDs located within the site boundary, the Zone 1 annual average is calculated to be 65.9 +/- 8.8 mR/yr.Page 36
6.0 PERCENT
OF ODCM EFFLUENT CONTROL LIMITS The PNPS ODCM contains dose and concentration limits for radioactive effluents.
In addition, the effluent controls specified ensure that radioactive releases are maintained as low as reasonably achievable.
The percentage of the PNPS ODCM Control limit values were determined from doses calculated in Section 4, the effluent releases summarized in Section 2, and the ODCM Control limits/objectives listed in Tables 6.1 and 6.2.The percent of applicable control limit values are provided to supplement the information provided in the Section 2 of this report. The format for the percent of applicable limits is modified from that prescribed in Regulatory Guide 1.21 (Reference
- 1) to accommodate the Radioactive Effluents Technical Specifications (RETS) that became effective March 01, 1986. The percentages have been grouped according to whether the releases were via liquid or gaseous effluent pathways.6.1 Gaseous Effluent Releases Dose-based effluent controls related to exposures arising from gaseous effluent releases are presented in Table 6.1. The maximum quarterly air doses and annual whole body doses listed in Table 4.1 were used to calculate the percentage values shown in Table 6.1. All doses resulting from noble gas exposure were a small percentage of the applicable effluent control.Organ dose limits for the maximum-exposed individual from radioactive particulates, iodines, and tritium from the PNPS ODCM are also shown in Table 6.1. The maximum quarterly and annual organ doses from Tables 4.2-A through 4.2-E were used to calculate the percentages shown in Table 6.1. The resulting organ doses from Pilgrim Station's gaseous releases during 2011 were a small percentage of the corresponding effluent control.Page 37 Table 6.1 Percent of ODCM Effluent Control Limits for Gaseous Effluent Releases During 2011 A. Instantaneous Dose Rate Limit -Noble Gases PNPS ODCM Control 3.3.1.a Limit: 500 mrem/yr Total Body Dose Period Jan-Dec Value -mrem/yr 1.95E-03 Fraction of Limit 3.89E-04%B. Instantaneous Dose Rate Limit -Noble Gases PNPS ODCM Control 3.3.1.a Limit: 3000 mrem/yr Skin Dose Period Jan-Dec Value -mrem/yr 6.84E-03 Fraction of Limit 2.28E-04%C. Instantaneous Dose Rate Limit -Particulates, lodines, & Tritium PNPS ODCM Control 3.3.1.b Limit: 1500 mrem/yr Organ Dose Period Jan-Dec Value -mrem/yr 7.89E-02 Fraction of Limit 5.26E-03%D. Quarterly Dose Objective
-Noble Gas Gamma Air Dose PNPS ODCM Control 3.3.2.a Objective:
5 mrad Gamma Air Dose Period Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Value -mrad 2.54E-03 3.01 E-05 1.90E-05 3.26E-04 Fraction of Limit 5.08E-02%6.03E-04%3.79E-04%6.53E-03%E. Annual Dose Objective
-Noble Gas Gamma Air Dose PNPS ODCM Control 3.3.2.b Objective:
10 mrad Gamma Air Dose Period Jan-Dec Value -mrad/yr 2.92E-03 Fraction of Limit 2.92E-02%Page 38 Table 6.1 (continued)
Percent of ODCM Effluent Control Limits for Gaseous Effluent Releases During 2011 F. Quarterly Dose Objective
-Noble Gas Beta Air Dose PNPS ODCM Control 3.3.2.a Objective:
10 mrad Beta Air Dose Period Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Value -mrad 4.15E-03 1.11 E-04 7.03E-05 1.37E-03 Fraction of Limit 4.15E-02%1.11 E-03%7.03E-04%1.37E-02%G. Annual Dose Objective
-Noble Gas Beta Air Dose PNPS ODCM Control 3.3.2.b Objective:
20 mrad Beta Air Dose Period Value -mrad/yr Jan-Dec 5.70E-03 H. Quarterly Dose Objective
-Particulates, lodines, Tritium, PNPS ODCM Control 3.3.3.a Objective:
7.5 mrem Organ Dose Fraction of Limit 2.85E-02%and Carbon-14 Fraction of Limit 2.79E-01%1.92E-01%3.16E-01%2.66E-01%Period Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Value -mrem 2.09E-02 1.44E-02 2.37E-02 1.99E-02 1. Annual Dose Objective
-Particulates, lodines, Tritium, and Carbon-14 PNPS ODCM Control 3.3.3.b Objective:
15 mrem Organ Dose Period Jan-Dec Value -mrem/yr 7.89E-02 Fraction of Limit 5.26E-01%Page 39
6.2 Liquid
Effluent Releases Liquid effluent concentration limits and dose objectives from the PNPS ODCM are shown in Table 6.2. The quarterly average concentrations from Table 2.3-A were used to calculate the percent concentration limits. The maximum quarterly and annual whole body and organ doses from Tables 4.3-A through 4.3-E were used to calculate the percentages shown in Table 6.2. The resulting concentrations, as well as organ and total body doses from Pilgrim Station's liquid releases during the reporting period were a small percentage of the corresponding effluent controls.Page 40 Table 6.2 Percent of ODCM Effluent Control Limits for Liquid Effluent Releases During 2011 A. Fission and Activation Product Effluent Concentration Limit PNPS ODCM Control 3.2.1 Limit: 1OCFR20 Appendix B, Table 2, Column 2 Value Period Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Dec Value -LiCi/mL 5.18E-13 3.OOE-1 1 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 6.46E-1 2 Fraction of Limit 4.62E-05%3.24E-04%O.OOE+00%0.OOE+00%8.03E-05%B. Tritium Average Concentration Limit PNPS ODCM Control 3.2.1 Limit: 1.OE-03 pCi/mL Period Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Dec Value -iCi/mL 1.04E-09 3.45E-08 O.OOE+00 3.37E-10 7.62E-09 Fraction of Limit 1.04E-04%3.45E-03%O.OOE+00%3.37E-05%7.62E-04%C. Dissolved and Entrained Noble Gases Concentration Limit PNPS ODCM Control 3.2.1 Limit: 2.OE-04 ýiCi/mL Period Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Dec Value -IACi/mL 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 Fraction of Limit 0.OOE+00%0.OOE+00%0.OOE+00%0.OOE+00%0.OOE+00%Page 41 Table 6.2 (continued)
Percent of ODCM Effluent Control Limits for Liquid Effluent Releases During 2011 D. Quarterly Total Body Dose Objective PNPS ODCM Control 3.2.2.a Objective:
1.5 mrem Total Body Dose Period Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Value -mrem 2.39E-06 3.74E-04 0.OOE+00 4.83E-08 Fraction of Limit 1.59E-04%2.50E-02%0.OOE+00%3.22E-06%E. Annual Total Body Dose Objective PNPS ODCM Control 3.2.2.b Objective:
3 mrem Total Body Dose Period Jan-Dec Value -mrem 3.16E-04 Fraction of Limit 1.05E-02%F. Quarterly Organ Dose Objective PNPS ODCM Control 3.2.2.a Objective:
5 mrem Organ Dose Period Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Value -mrem 4.22E-06 1.45E-03 O.OOE+00 4.83E-08 Fraction of Limit 8.44E-05%2.89E-02%0.OOE+00%9.66E-07%G. Annual Organ Dose Objective PNPS ODCM Control 3.2.2.b Objective:
10 mrem Organ Dose Period Jan-Dec Value -mrem 1.22E-03 Fraction of Limit 1.22E-02%Page 42
7.0 RADIOACTIVE
WASTE DISPOSAL DATA Radioactive wastes that were shipped offsite for processing and disposal during the reporting period are described in Table 7.0, in the standard NRC Regulatory Guide 1.21 format.The total quantity of radioactivity in Curies and the total volume in cubic meters are summarized in Table 7.0 for the following waste categories: " Spent resins, filter sludges, and evaporator bottoms;* Dry activated wastes, contaminated equipment, etc.;* Irradiated components, control rods, etc.; and,* Other.During the reporting period approximately 70.2 cubic meters of spent resins, filter sludges, etc., containing a total activity of about 165 Curies were shipped from PNPS for processing and disposal.
Dry activated wastes and contaminated equipment shipped during the period totaled 830 cubic meters and contained 26.0 Curies of radioactivity.
No shipments of irradiated components or wastes falling into the "Other" category occurred during the reporting period. No shipments of irradiated fuel were made during the reporting period.Estimates of major radionuclides, those comprising greater than 1% of the total activity in each waste category shipped, are listed in Table 7.0. There were seventeen shipments to Energy Solutions' Bear Creek Facility; four shipments to Energy Solutions' Gallaher Road Facility; ten shipments to Studsvik Processing Facility in Erwin, TN; one shipment to Studsvik/Race in Memphis, TN; and three shipments to IMPACT Services in Oak Ridge, TN.Page 43 Table 7.0 Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Report Solid Waste and Irradiated Fuel Shipments January-December 2011 A. SOLID WASTE SHIPPED OFFSITE FOR BURIAL OR DISPOSAL (Not irradiated fuel)1. Estimate of volume and activity content by type of waste Jan-Dec 2011 Type of waste Volume -m 3 Curies Total Error a. Spent resins, filters, filter sludges, 7.02 E+01 1.65 E+02 +/- 25%evaporator bottoms, etc.b. Dry activated waste, contaminated 8.30 E+02 2.60 E+01 +/- 25%equipment, etc.c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 N/A d. Other (describe):
Hi-Rad Trash/Metals 0.OOE+00 0.OOE+00 N/A 2. Estimate of major nuclide composition by type of waste 1 Type of waste J Radionuclide
] Abundance J Total Error a. Spent resins, filters, filter sludges, Mn-54 6.09% + 25%evaporator bottoms, etc. Fe-55 39.67% + 25%Co-60 28.13% +/- 25%Ni-63 2.80% +/- 25%Zn-65 12.11% +/- 25%Cs-137 10.31% +/- 25%b. Dry activated waste, contaminated Mn-54 18.98% + 25%equipment, etc. Fe-55 36.37% +/- 25%Co-60 35.80% +/- 25%Ni-63 1.01% +/- 25%Zn-65 2.05% +/- 25%Cs-137 3.21% +/-25%c. Irradiated components, control rods, etc. Not Applicable Not Applicable N/A d. Other (describe):
Hi-Rad Trash/Metals Not Applicable Not Applicable N/A"Major" is defined as any radionuclide comprising
>1% of the total activity in the waste category.3. Solid Waste Disposition Number of Shipments Mode of Transportation Destination Tractor-trailer Energy Solutions Bear Creek Facility 2 (Hittman Transport)
Oak Ridge, TN Tractor-trailer Energy Solutions Gallaher Road Facility 2 (Hittman Transport)
Kingston, TN Tractor-trailer Studsvik Processing Facility," (Hittman Transport)
Erwin, TN Tractor-trailer Studsvik/RACE, LLCz (Hittman Transport)
Memphis, TN Tractor-trailer IMPACT Services (Eastern Technologies)
Oak Ridge, TN This processor provides volume reduction services for dry compressible waste, contaminated equipment, etc.Remaining radioactive wastes will be shipped to Chem Nuclear Systems, Inc. in Barnwell, SC, or Envirocare, Inc.in Clive, UT for final disposal.B. IRRADIATED FUEL SHIPMENTS
& DISPOSITION Number of Shipments Mode of Transportation Destination None N/A N/A Page 44
8.0 OFFSITE
DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL REVISIONS The PNPS Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) was not revised during the calendar year of 2011. Information regarding revisions to the ODCM can be found attached as Appendix D of this report.Page 45
9.0 PROCESS
CONTROL PROGRAM REVISIONS There was one change to the PNPS Process Control Program (PCP) during the calendar year of 2011. Although Pilgrim Station adopted the Entergy fleet-wide PCP in 2010 as indicated in the 2010 Annual Effluent Release Report, fleet procedure EN-RW-105, "Process Control Program", was not revised until 2011 to reflect the inclusion of Pilgrim Station under the fleet-wide PCP. This revision was strictly administrative in nature, and did not impact the requirements or conduct of the PCP.Page 46
10.0 REFERENCES
- 1. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Light-Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants", Regulatory Guide 1.21, Revision 1, June 1974.2. "Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station Offsite Dose Calculation Manual", Revision 9, June 2003.3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10CFR50 Appendix I", Regulatory Guide 1.109, Revision 1, October 1977.4. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water-Cooled Reactors", Regulatory Guide 1.111, July 1977.5. Boston Edison Company, "Pilgrim Station Unit 1 Appendix I Evaluation", April 1977.6. Entech Engineering Inc., P100-R19, "AEOLUS-3
-A Computer Code for the Determination of Atmospheric Dispersion and Deposition of Nuclear Power Plant Effluents During Continuous, Intermittent and Accident Conditions in Open-Terrain Sites, Coastal Sites and Deep-River Valleys" Page 47 APPENDIX A Meteorological Joint Frequency Distributions TABLE TABLE TITLE PAGE A-1 Joint Frequency Distribution of Wind Directions and Speeds for the 48 33-ft Level of the 220-ft Tower A-2 Joint Frequency Distribution of Wind Directions and Speeds for the 58 220-ft Level of the 220-ft Tower Page 48 Table A-1 Joint Frequency Distribution of Wind Directions and Speeds For the 33-ft level of the 220-ft Tower Jan-Mar 2011 Class A 0rec 0.079 ph N IN EI N NE ENE E1 E I S E SsE] IsE S SE IS S IvsvW v IvsvvI NW I vNNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3.5-7.5 17 21 10 5 9 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 4 31 20 19 141 7.5-12.5 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 9 9 3 29 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 18 21 112 8 9 2 1 I0 0 0 1 1 12 6 140 129 122 1 171 Class B 0req 0.035 ph N I NNE N E IENE IE I ESE ISE SSE S I SSW I SW IWSWI W IWNWI NW INNWI TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3.5-7.5 1 1 1 6 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 4 10 7 6 8 47 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 5 2 0 11 2 0 25 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 2 1 I1 18 I1 13 0 0 0 2 7 I I i0 18 1I 75 Class C Freq 0.043 mph N NNE NE ENE E E SE SSE S ISSW I SW IvSWv W IWvvv NW I vNNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 3.5-7.5 3 3 3 6 4 1 0 0 2 2 3 9 7 8 6 3 60 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 2 6 2 0 3 6 4 0 27 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TTA 3 3 I4 7 4 4 101 0 1016191 01 141111 4 93 Class D Fre: 0.449 m2ph IN INE N E INE E I S SSE S W I SW IWvvl W IvWNWvNW INNWv TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.95-3.5 6 6 8 5 8 1 5 6 1 4 4 6 7 14 10 8 99 3.5-7.5 9 14 32 28 22 24 8 7 30 40 44 43 94 97 73 17 582 7.5-12.5 5 4 4 2 4 14 5 7 25 35 13 3 54 46 47 5 273 12.5-18.5 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 0 2 0 2 0 14 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 20 27 44 36 34 39 [ 18 [ 20 57 84 1 61 52 1[157 157 133 3I 969 Page 49 Table A-1 (continued)
Jan-Mar 2011 Class E Freq0327 mph N NNE NE ENE E I S SE SSE S I SSW ISW WSW WI WNW NW NNW I TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 1 8 0.95-3.5 2 4 7 3 1 6 14 15 18 14 19 24 28 22 12 6 195 3.5-7.5 2 1 2 4 1 13 9 19 18 43 62 96 86 36 13 1 406 7.5-12.5 0 1 3 2 1 1 1 3 8 36 7 3 12 7 0 0 85 12.5-18.5 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 4 7 1 12 I 10 31 21 124 140 471 99 88 123 127 I 67 [26 I81 706 Class F Freq 0.061 mph I N INNEI NE ENE E I ESE I SE I ssE Is ]ssw sW WsW W WNW [NW I NNW [TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 10 28 14 1 2 0 60 3.5-7.5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 11 35 7 1 1 0 0 60 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 10 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 5 15 52 5 116 [ 2 2 0[ 131 Class G Freq 0.006 mph! I NI NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE SI SSW ISWV WSW W WNW NW NNW I TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 5 3.5-7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 7 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL I0 0 10 0 010 [ 0 0 J 0[ 4 6 4 0 0 I 0 14 Class All Freq 1.000 mph NI NNE NE ENE S E ESSE SSE S I SSW SW WSW I WV WNW NW NNW [TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 2 2 1 10 0.95-3.5 9 10 17 8 10 7 19 21 23 19 34 62 49 37 25 15 365 3.5-7.5 33 40 48 49 36 41 18 29 51 97 147 161 202 180 118 48 1298 7.5-12.5 6 5 8 10 5 20 6 10 35 85 38 8 71 79 62 8 456 12.5-18.5 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 2 4 12 2 0 2 0 2 0 30 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL [ 48 [ 59 1731 69 1511 69 1431 63113 1 214 12211 231 1326 1 298 12091 72 1 2159 Page 50 Table A-1 (continued)
Apr-Jun 2011 Class A Fre 0.115 mph N INNTEI ENE E (ESE I I SW Iwswl W IwNwl NW I1NWl TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 4 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 13 3.5-7.5 18 39 22 24 12 7 5 1 1 6 1 5 8 10 5 4 168 7.5-12.5 2 7 1 0 4 1 0 0 2 24 6 5 7 9 0 0 68 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 24 48 27 24 117 8 5 1 3 32 7 10 15 119 1 5 6 251 Class B Frec 0.053 mph N I NNEI I NE IENEI E ESEI SE ISSE I S I SW IWSwl W IWNW] NW INNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 3 2 5 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 13 3.5-7.5 8 5 2 6 8 5 4 2 3 8 5 4 8 6 1 0 75 7.5-12.5 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 16 3 0 1 1 0 0 25 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 17 7 7 7 8 18 15 2 1 3 126 18 14 19 8 1 10 115 Class C Freq 0.046 mph N NNE NE [ENET E ESE SE SSE S ISSW ISW SWWs W IWNWI NW NNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 5 4 0 2 2 2 2 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 1 23 3.5-7.5 6 3 2 4 0 2 4 2 3 7 6 6 0 4 0 3 52 7.5-12.5 2 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 7 4 0 1 0 0 0 25 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 13 13 2 12 15 6 13 1 7 114 112 17 12 4 10 14 100 Class D Freq 0.419 mph I N INNE] NE [ENEI E IESEI SE ISSE] S Isswl SW IWSw W IWNWINW INNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 29 28 36 28 26 15 20 26 26 9 3 1 6 12 11 28 304 3.5-7.5 33 47 12 15 16 23 11 21 49 76 23 14 28 18 21 24 431 7.5-12.5 3 32 5 2 1 7 6 3 10 72 13 0 4 2 3 2 165 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1 65 1107 I 53 145 1 43 1 45 1 37 1 50 1 86 1172 1 39 1 15 38 32 35 1 54 I 916 Page 51 Table A-1 (continued)
Apr-Jun 2011 Class E Freq: 0.271 mph N NNE NE EE E ESEI SE ISSEl S ISSWvI SWV IVsvlVV W I VVWINNW[ TOTAL Calm-0.95 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.95-3.5 15 12 7 13 19 16 19 21 17 8 7 12 14 12 23 18 233 3.5-7.5 11 9 2 3 4 23 13 6 28 63 40 43 34 11 5 4 299 7.5-12.5 0 4 1 0 1 4 4 1 6 20 7 0 8 0 0 0 56 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 27 125 16 1 24 44 136 28 52 91 154 55 156 23 28 22 592 Class F Freq 0.083 mph N INNEI NE IENE E ESEI SE SSEI S ISSWI SW IWSWI W IWNWI NW INNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.95-3.5 0 0 3 14 4 1 2 3 11 6 8 20 12 7 7 3 101 3.5-7.5 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 2 4 47 13 4 1 1 0 76 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 3 15 3 2 3 13 10I 59 133 16 8 1 8 I3I 182 Class G Fre: 0.013 mph N INNE NE IENE] E ESEI SE SSE IS ISSW I SW IWSWV [ IWNWI NW INNWI TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 8 3.5-7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 14 2 0 0 1 0 18 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 10 I0 I0 0 2 I 1 0 1 0 1 17 4 0 0 2 0 28 Class All Freg: 1.000 maph IN INN I NE [ENE E IESE SE ISSE I SSW I SW IWSWI [W IWNWI NW INNWl TOTAL Calm-0.95 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.95-3.5 56 48 55 58 54 35 44 52 54 23 21 36 33 32 42 52 695 3.5-7.5 76 103 40 52 42 62 37 32 86 165 136 87 82 50 34 35 1119 7.5-12.5 8 49 7 2 6 16 10 4 22 139 39 5 21 12 3 2 345 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1141 200 103 [113 1102 1114 91 I 88 164 1346] 196 1 328 61 94 I79 [ 89 1 2184 Page 52 Table A-1 (continued)
Jul-Sep 2011 Class A Freq 0.056 mph I N [NNE] NE IENE E IESE] SE [SSE S I SSWVI SVV IVSV IV W IVV NW INNWV TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 10 3 9 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 35 3.5-7.5 2 38 13 10 10 2 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 5 4 89 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 12 41 22 15 16 12 0 0 1 2 10 I1 0 I1 1 5 16I 124 Class B Fre: 0.025__rp_ N NNE EI N ENE E IESE] SE ISSEI S ISSWVI SW IWSWV VW IWNW NW INNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 3 1 3 4 2 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 18 3.5-7.5 0 0 1 2 4 0 0 1 3 11 4 3 2 2 1 0 34 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 3 I1 4 L6 W6 I0 1 1 3 116 4 [4 3 2 1 0 55 Class C Fre: 0.057 rmph N I NNE NE IENE E ESE SE SSE S ISSWVI SW IWSV W IWWNW[ NW I NNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 6 7 8 4 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 4 4 4 4 47 3.5-7.5 0 1 1 2 4 3 1 1 10 16 16 7 2 0 1 1 66 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 13 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL I6 I8 I9 I 6 7 3 I 3 I 1 10 128 117 8 6 4 5 1 5 126 Class D Frec 0.366_Mph I N INNENE IENEI E [ESEI SE ISSEI S ISSSWI SW IWSW I W IWNWIVNW INNWI TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.95-3.5 23 32 24 26 28 17 19 17 13 10 8 9 16 18 12 23 295 3.5-7.5 4 8 9 10 9 21 11 3 73 181 48 12 13 13 8 5 428 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 10 55 4 3 0 0 1 0 78 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 127 j40 33 136 37 [ 40 32 21 [102 246 60 [24 29 32 211281 808 Page 53 Table A-1 (continued)
Jul-Sep 2011 Class E Freq: 0.334 rnp L N NNEINE E NE E IESE] SE [SSE I S Ivv SW IVSVI W IVNVl NW INNW[ TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 7 0.95-3.5 14 19 11 21 26 27 30 37 42 15 9 24 23 20 22 16 356 3.5-7.5 2 4 10 10 10 17 2 2 43 145 68 30 3 3 2 4 355 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6 10 0 0 0 0 0 18 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL I1 I 24 22 I 31 36I 44 34 40 I8 168 87 I55 26 23 25 20 737 Class F Freg: 0.134 mph ININNEI NE IENEI E IESEI SE ISSEI S ISSWI SW IWSWI W IWNWI NW INNWI TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 4 1 0 0 1 12 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 2 1 4 10 19 17 22 40 29 9 1 0 154 3.5-7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 21 87 10 0 0 0 1 122 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 7 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 2 I1 4 11 23 4 2 116 [ 54 1 30 1 9 1 2 295 Class G Freq 0.029 mph IN INNEI NE IENEIE ISI SE SSEI SSWI Sw [V Vwl VW IWNW[ NWINNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 0.95-3.5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 12 12 2 0 0 1 34 3.5-7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 21 5 0 0 0 0- 27 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 2 I0 I0 0 0 0I0I0I0I 6 134 18 2 0 1 0 I 1 63 Class All Freq: 1.000 maph IN INN I NE IENEI E IESEI SE ISSEI S ISSWI SW IWSWI W IWwl NW[ INNWI TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 4 3 6 1 1 1 1 22 0.95-3.5 58 62 55 60 67 45 56 64 74 49 51 87 75 51 39 46 939 3.5-7.5 8 51 34 34 37 43 14 7 133 377 244 68 20 19 17 15 1121 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 11 78 20 3 0 0 1 0 119 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 66 1114 I 90 I0 94 1104 I 90 I74 I74 225 1508 318 164I 96 71 58 62 2208 Page 54 Table A-1 (continued)
Oct-Dec 2011 Class A Freq 0.054 mph N NNEI NE ENE [ IESE SE SSE SISSW VVW IVSVl W IVNWI NW INNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 8 3.5-7.5 4 8 9 6 0 1 11 5 1 9 4 2 9 8 11 4 92 7.5-12.5 2 1 2 1 2 1 0 1 1 1 5 0 1 0 0 0 18 12.5-18.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL I7[9 14 I7 2 3 12 I6 I2 10 9 2 10 11 4I 119 Class B 0.034 mpIh N [NNEI NE EN E IESEI SE SSE S ISSWvl SW IWSWI [W IVNW NW INNWv TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 7 3.5-7.5 4 4 6 3 0 0 0 2 2 11 4 2 6 2 3 3 52 7.5-12.5 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 3 0 1 15 12.5-18.5 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 7 8 9 4 0 0 0 3 2 1 12 6 2 8 7 1 3 1 5 76 Class C Freq 0.085 maph I N [ INN N "E I E ESE SE SSE S I sSW ISW IWsw] V" IWNWI NW INNWv TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 1 4 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 2 4 0 19 3.5-7.5 9 5 4 0 0 1 3 1 4 28 6 7 8 6 3 5 90 7.5-12.5 4 3 3 0 1 0 0 1 2 39 16 0 3 0 4 2 78 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 114 12 7 1 3 1 3 3 6 1 68 22 7 1 14 8 11 7 187 Class D 0.468 ---mpIh N N[ NEI NE ENE E IESEI SE SSE S IsSW SW WSWI W INWI NW INNW TOTA Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 4 7 6 7 11 4 5 8 4 13 13 16 14 8 13 14 147 3.5-7.5 39 64 23 15 10 24 14 25 39 91 75 69 60 32 70 40 690 7.5-12.5 9 13 0 2 0 2 1 4 6 63 23 3 42 6 12 5 191 12.5-18.5 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL [54 85 29 24 22 I 30 20 [37 49 168 [I 1 88 116 [ 46 95 1 60I 1034 Page 55 Table A-1 (continued)
Oct-Dec 2011 Class E Frec 0.265 mph. ININNE NE ENE l E IESEI SSE S ISWI SW IWSWI W IwNwl W I NWl TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.95-3.5 6 6 10 9 6 9 14 21 32 35 24 31 18 9 12 7 249 3.5-7.5 3 11 2 1 3 7 5 29 30 52 82 56 16 6 3 4 310 7.5-12.5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 17 1 2 0 0 1 25 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 10 18 12 10 10 16I 19 50 62 9 1123 88 1 36 15 15 [ 12 586 Class F Freg 0.080 mph IN NNEI NE IENE E ESEI SE ISSEI S ISSWI SW IWSWI W IWNWI NW INNWI TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 1 0 0 0 1 2 2 8 8 12 10 20 11 1 1 1 78 3.5-7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 13 39 28 3 0 0 0 88 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 10 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 11 0 0 0 11 2 2 10111 25159 481 14 11 1 1 176 Class G Fre: 0.014 mph I N INNEI NE [ENE] E [ESEI SE ISSE SISSWI SW IWSW[ W IWNWI NW [NNWI TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 5 2 2 0 0 17 3.5-7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 11 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 114 1 I2 T 3 1 0 1 0 30 Class All Freq 1.000 mph IN INNEI NE [ENET SEESI SE SSEL S ISSWl SW IWSW [ W IWNWI NW INNWl TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0.95-3.5 13 17 19 18 20 16 22 39 44 61 55 72 50 26 30 23 525 3.5-7.5 59 92 44 25 13 33 33 64 79 204 215 170 102 54 90 56 1333 7.5-12.5 19 20 6 3 3 3 1 6 9 107 74 4 49 9 16 9 338 12.5-18.5 2 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 93 11321 71 46 38 52 56 109 1132 1 373 1 344 1246 1201 90 1136 [891 2208 Page 56 Table A-1 (continued)
Jan-Dec 2011 Class A Freq 0.076 m IN I NNE INE ENE ESE I SF S ISSW I SW I _svv _ V IVVv NW I NNvW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 15 5 16 5 7 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 4 57 3.5-7.5 41 106 54 45 31 12 17 6 3 17 5 10 21 50 41 31 490 7.5-12.5 5 8 4 4 6 2 0 1 3 25 12 5 10 18 9 3 115 12.5-18.5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 161 119] 75 54 44 15 18 7] 6 44 17 15 32 170 50 38I 665 Class B Freg 0.037 mph N NNEI NE ]ENE E ] ESE I SE I SSE I S ISSWvI SW IWSWI W IWNWI W INNW I TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 7 3 9 6 3 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 2 3 0 1 40 3.5-7.5 13 10 10 17 12 6 4 5 8 31 14 13 26 17 11 11 208 7.5-12.5 4 3 1 2 0 5 0 0 0 21 10 2 2 15 2 1 68 12.5-18.5 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL [24 17 121 I25 ]15 1 11 6 6 8 156 ]25 1 16 130 135 113 113 1 321 Class C reg 0.058 ph I .I NE NE INE IE ] ESE I SE I SSE I S ISSWV I SWV IWSWI W IWVvl NW IINNWv TOtAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 12 15 9 7 7 2 4 2 0 1 2 2 8 6 9 6 92 3.5-7.5 18 12 10 12 8 7 8 4 19 53 31 29 17 18 10 12 268 7.5-12.5 6 9 3 1 1 4 0 1 8 64 23 0 7 6 8 2 143 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL [36 36 22 20 16 13 12 I 7 27 1120 157 131 132 130 127 120 1 506 Class D Freq 0.426 mp I N] NNE] NE ENE E SEI SSE I S ISSW I SW IvWSWI W IWNW] NW INNwI TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.95-3.5 62 73 74 66 73 37 49 57 44 36 28 32 43 52 46 73 845 3.5-7.5 85 133 76 68 57 92 44 56 191 388 190 138 195 160 172 86 2131 7.5-12.5 17 49 9 6 5 25 14 15 51 225 53 9 100 54 63 12 707 12.5-18.5 2 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 8 21 0 0 2 0 2 1 42 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1166 259 159 1141 136 154 1107 128 294 670 271 1179 340 267 284 11721 3727 Page 57 Table A-1 (continued)
Jan-Dec 2011 Class E Freq 0.299 mph N I NNEE IN ENE E e ESE I SE I SSE I S I SSW I SW I WSW I W I WNW INW INNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 1 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 2 2 1 19 0.95-3.5 37 41 35 46 52 58 77 94 109 72 59 91 83 63 69 47 1033 3.5-7.5 18 25 16 18 18 60 29 56 119 303 252 225 139 56 23 13 1370 7.5-12.5 1 5 4 2 2 5 6 4 15 65 41 4 22 7 0 1 184 12.5-18.5 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 3 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL I 57 74 57 ] 67 173 1125 11131158 1247 1 448 [ 352 1 321 1245 1 128 194 1 62 1 2621 Class F Frec 0.090 mph IN NNE INE ENE I E ESEI SE [SSE I S I SSW I SW I WSW W IWNW NW INNWI TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 4 2 0 0 1 14 0.95-3.5 1 0 3 14 7 4 8 21 42 36 50 108 66 18 11 4 393 3.5-7.5 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 5 9 49 208 58 8 2 1 1 346 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 26 0 0 0 0 0 31 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 2 [0 3 115 9 6 8 27 52 92 286 I170 76 20 12 6 I 784 Class G Fre_ 0.015 mh N [NNE NE ENE E I ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW I W WNW NW NNW I TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 3 0.95-3.5 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 0 5 22 23 4 2 1 1 64 3.5-7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 42 13 0 0 1 0 58 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 10 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL I2 I00 10 211 10 1 0 11 171 137 14 3 1211 I 135 Class All Freq 1.000 mph I NNE I EN E I ESE ISE I SSE I S ISSW I SW I WSW I W IWW INWINNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 5 3 6 3 4 3 2 38 0.95-3.5 136 137 146 144 151 103 141 176 195 152 161 257 207 146 136 136 2524 3.5-7.5 176 286 166 160 128 179 102 132 349 843 742 486 406 303 259 154 4871 7.5-12.5 33 74 21 15 14 41 20 21 77 409 171 20 141 100 82 19 1258 12.5-18.5 2 6 2 2 1 1 0 3 12 32 2 0 2 0 2 1 68 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL [ 348 1 505 1337 1 322 12951 325 1264 1 334 1634 1 1441 1 1079 [ 769 17591 553 14821 312 8759 Page 58 Table A-2 Joint Frequency Distribution of Wind Directions and Speeds For the 220-ft level of the 220-ft Tower Jan-Mar 2011 Class A Freq 0.079 mph N i NNEI NE I ENE I E [ESE [SE SSE S ISSW I SW IWSWI W IWNWI NW INNWI TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5-7.5 1 6 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 7.5-12.5 4 9 2 2 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 7 4 44 12.5-18.5 2 3 1 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 15 11 13 54 18.5-24 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 20 9 6 42>24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 9 4 19 TOTAL 9 19 7 6 5 8 i1 0 0 0 i1 2 2 1 48 1361271 171 Class B Freg 0.035 Smph IN [NNE [E EN E [ I ESE I SE I SSE I S ISSW I SW IWSI W IJWNWI NW INNWI TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5-7.5 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 5 7.5-12.5 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 4 4 2 1 2 19 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 4 2 3 4 23 18.5-24 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 6 2 0 15>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 7 5 0 13 TOTAL 1I 0 5 31 3 01 0 [0 I1 [8 6 10 1711i 8j 75 Class C Freq: 0.043 mp I E'N INNE NE [ENEI E ESE S SSEI S I[ SS I Sv IvSv I W IWNW NW NNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5-7.5 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 10 7.5-12.5 0 2 1 3 2 2 1 0 4 0 2 5 3 1 1 0 27 12.5-18.5 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 3 3 1 1 5 1 19 18.5-24 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 3 3 0 0 1 8 2 3 24>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 5 5 0 13 TOTA 0 4 4 5 2 16 1 0 7 1 7 1 6 11 1 5 115 116 1 4 93 Class D re 0.449 mph!L N INNE I NE jENE J7 1 ESE ISE ISSE IS IJSSWI SW IWSWI7W WNWJ NW I NWI TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 13 3.5-7.5 3 2 7 2 3 4 2 2 1 1 4 4 7 7 6 7 62 7.5-12.5 1 5 11 4 5 5 3 7 18 17 24 21 13 11 11 2 158 12.5-18.5 3 4 16 19 12 13 2 9 9 32 33 18 38 49 43 11 311 18.5-24 4 4 4 9 8 17 10 7 16 22 7 2 24 52 35 9 230>24 9 2 4 1 2 2 2 2 1 5 1 0 15 72 67 10 195 TOTAL 21 1 18 1 44 T 36 J 32 41 20 1 27 1 46 1 77 69 1 45 J 98 192 162 411 969 Page 59 Table A-2 (continued)
Jan-Mar 2011 Class E Fre: 0.327 mph N I NNE INE IENEI E ESEI SSEI SI SSW ISW IWSW I W I WNW NIW I NNW I TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 4 2 0 1 2 2 3 1 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 20 3.5-7.5 6 5 8 4 1 3 4 9 2 2 5 5 4 3 5 3 69 7.5-12.5 2 2 2 5 1 6 8 10 11 12 15 9 21 25 15 6 150 12.5-18.5 2 1 0 2 2 3 8 13 14 29 33 36 78 50 20 2 293 18.5-24 1 0 0 0 4 4 6 7 6 28 22 1 14 20 6 3 122>24 0 2 3 3 2 0 0 5 2 10 0 1 11 11 2 0 52 TOTAL 15 1 12 1131 15 1121 18 1291 45 1351 82 1.75.1 52 11291 111 1491 14 I 706 Class F Freq 0.061 mph N NNE NE I ENE I E I ESE I SE I SSE I S SSW I SWj WSW I W I WNW NW I NNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 1 2 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 12 3.5-7.5 2 2 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 5 2 5 2 26 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 4 0 10 10 3 3 35 12.5-18.5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 11 9 6 2 1 0 36 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 7 0 0 1 0 20>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 TOTAL 3 14 13 121 1 1 115 15 9 25 17 221 15 I1 I 5J 131 Class G Freg 0.006 mph I N I NNE INE I ENE IE I ESE ISE ISSEI S I SSW I SW I WSW I W I WNW INW I NNW I TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3.5-7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 TOTAL 1 I 0 lll I0101 1 0 0 71 I 01 0 21 0 14 Class All Fr 1.000 mph I NI NNE INE I EN E I ESE I SE I SSE I S I SSW I SW WSW I W I WNW IW INWI TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 6 4 5 4 6 3 4 2 2 1 1 0 3 4 2 2 49 3.5-7.5 13 16 24 9 6 7 7 11 3 4 10 13 16 12 21 14 186 7.5-12.5 7 18 17 15 13 19 12 18 36 31 45 39 51 57 38 17 433 12.5-18.5 8 9 17 24 15 20 11 26 24 64 87 71 128 119 83 31 737 18.5-24 6 5 5 15 12 2616 14 25 57 40 10 42 106 55 21 455>24 10 4 7 4 4 2 2 7 3 19 8 1 26 100 88 14 299 TOTAL I 50 [ 56 1 75] 71 561 77 152 1 7 8 1 9 3 1 176 11911 134 12661 398 1 287.1 99 1 2159 Page 60 Table A-2 (continued)
Apr-Jun 2011 Class A Fre: 0.115 m- N NNE .NE ENE I E I ESE SE SSE 0S JIsw S SW I 0 ]WNW] NW NNW TOTAL_Ca0m-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5-7.5 5 3 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 7.5-12.5 11 13 10 11 9 5 2 0 1 4 0 2 4 3 0 6 81 12.5-18.5 8 7 2 2 3 3 8 1 7 16 5 8 0 3 1 1 75 18.5-24 17 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 5 1 0 5 9 2 4 52>24 5 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 7 1 3 25 TOTAL 4 6 28 19 115 14 1 12 10 1 9 27 6 10 114 22 1 4 114 251 Class B Freq 0.053 mph N INNE I NE I E I ESE SE I SSE I S ISW] I SW IVWSWv V IVVv NWV NNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5-7.5 1 3 4 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 16 7.5-12.5 3 2 0 1 3 9 5 2 2 3 1 4 4 0 0 1 40 12.5-18.5 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 14 4 1 4 1 1 1 33 18.5-24 5 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 0 1 5 1 0 0 18>24 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 1 8 TOTAL 7 4 5 I5 12 6 3 5 24 I6 I6 113 I4 I 1 I3I 115 Class C Freq 0.046 mph N NNE NE SENSS I E ESE I S ISE I S ISS W I S IVWSW V IWWNWV NW I[NNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5-7.5 6 3 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 3 22 7.5-12.5 1 0 0 1 2 0 8 2 1 2 5 3 1 2 1 1 30 12.5-18.5 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 6 7 4 2 1 2 0 0 27 18.5-24 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 10>24 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 11 TOTAL 118 15 12 13 4 2 10 2 7 113 13 6 2 6 I1 6 100 Class D Freq: 0.419 ph IN I NNE I NE I ENE I E I[ESE SE ISSE [ I[SSW I [WV IVW [WI [W IVNW[ N I NNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 3 2 9 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 22 3.5-7.5 11 14 29 18 13 13 5 9 15 9 4 1 2 4 7 15 169 7.5-12.5 14 9 15 5 10 16 17 25 25 34 8 2 6 4 7 10 207 12.5-18.5 29 22 4 5 6 8 5 14 26 54 32 10 14 12 17 26 284 18.5-24 10 10 1 1 10 9 4 2 4 37 10 0 10 7 4 14 133>24 26 8 2 1 0 4 5 0 1 37 1 0 1 5 6 4 101 TOTAL I93[ 65 [60 [32 [40 [50 37 [5o [72 171 [55 [13 33 33 I41 71I 916 Page 61 Table A-2 (continued)
Apr-Jun 2011 Class E Fre(0.2717 mrnph [ NJ NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SWV WSW W WNW NW NNW I TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 4 1 6 2 6 1 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 0 1 38 3.5-7.5 5 7 8 3 3 5 10 6 7 9 1 0 0 4 4 7 79 7.5-12.5 13 3 3 3 8 16 7 8 12 7 1 6 1 7 2 7 104 12.5-18.5 7 4 0 1 6 10 10 7 10 40 26 15 31 17 13 12 209 18.5-24 3 1 0 0 3 2 3 8 9 34 20 2 25 9 3 4 126>24 3 8 0 0 3 4 4 0 2 2 0 0 3 5 1 1 36 TOTAL 35 24 ]17 [ 9 129 ] 38 140 30 I3 41 193 149 24 161 47 123 321 592 Class F Freq 0.083 mph I NI NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE IS] SSW ISWV WSW W WNW JNW NNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 1 0 0 2 2 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 4 0 1 16 3.5-7.5 1 1 2 1 3 3 0 5 2 2 4 3 0 1 3 2 33 7.5-12.5 4 1 0 0 2 2 4 5 4 5 4 3 5 5 4 3 51 12.5-18.5 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 2 1 1 8 21 11 3 3 2 58 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 14 0 2 0 1 0 22>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 TOTAL 61 2 1 3 6 10 8 44 14 8 11 31 27 119 14 11 8 182 Class G Freq 0.013 maph N [ NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW ISWV WSW WI WNW NW NNW I TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3.5-7.5 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 7 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 2 1 0 0 0 8 18.5-24 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 9>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1010 101310 12 101011i1311014 1112 12101 28 Class All Fre 1.000 M IN NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW ISWV WSW IWI WNW NW NNW I TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 8 3 15 6 9 4 7 1 3 2 2 1 1 10 1 4 77 3.5-7.5 29 31 52 31 24 23 15 20 25 22 12 5 2 11 15 27 344 7.5-12.5 46 28 28 21 34 48 43 42 45 56 19 20 21 23 14 28 516 12.5-18.5 45 36 7 11 17 22 26 25 53 133 83 59 62 38 35 42 694 18.5-24 37 17 1 3 14 18 7 12 14 83 52 5 47 26 10 24 370>24 44 16 2 1 4 9 9 0 3 46 2 0 10 20 8 9 183 TOTAL 209 1 131 1105 1 73 1102 124 110 7] 100 143 [342 1170 [ 90 11431 128 1 83 1 134 1 2184 Page 62 Table A-2 (continued)
Jul-Sep 2011 Class A Freq 0.056 mph N [NNE NE ENE I I ESE I SE ISSE I S [ SSW I SVV IVVvI W IWNWI NW INNWv TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5-7.5 6 13 4 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 7.5-12.5 14 19 2 7 8 4 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 1 4 65 12.5-18.5 3 1 5 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 19 18.5-24 0 A 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 9>24 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 TOTAL 124 38 11 12 113 7 I 1 0 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 1 3 8 124 Class B Freg 0.025 mp N [NNE [NE ENE I E IESE I SE I SSE S I I SW IWSIwWI W IWNWI NW I NNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5-7.5 3 3 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 13 7.5-12.5 1 0 0 3 2 3 0 1 1 3 2 4 2 2 0 0 24 12.5-18.5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 10 0 1 0 1 0 0 17 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 4 4 [ 4 1 5 3 ]0 12 4 15 12 ]5 ]3 4 ]0 0 55 Class C Fre: 0.057 mph N I NNE I NE I ENE ]EJ ESE J SE] SSE I S I SSW I SW IWSWI W IWNWI NW INNWL TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5-7.5 6 6 6 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 2 2 5 34 7.5-12.5 3 1 0 0 3 4 2 1 2 5 11 8 3 3 1 1 48 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 9 14 2 2 0 2 0 0 33 18.5-24 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 1 1 0 11>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 9 1 81 6 4 3 ] 7 I3 1 11] 27 115 110 1 4 8 4 6 126 Class D Fre: 0.366 mph N NNE I NE I E ESE I S SSE S SSW I WW I W IVNVI NW INNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 4 5 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 0 18 3.5-7.5 8 8 20 12 17 13 11 5 4 5 2 3 3 7 6 10 134 7.5-12.5 11 10 4 5 5 16 24 13 22 45 24 11 6 9 8 11 224 12.5-18.5 13 3 4 7 3 14 9 4 50 128 39 8 9 13 2 13 319 18.5-24 4 0 0 1 1 5 0 1 4 44 10 1 0 5 4 0 80>24 0 1 0 0 0 2 3 1 4 9 4 3 0 1 4 1 33 TOTAL 40 27 31 25 27 50 47 24 841232 81 26 18 35 I 808 Page 63 Table A-2 (continued)
Jul-Sep 2011 Class E Fre 0.334__ Ih N NNE I NEI ENE I ESE I SE SSE I S I SSW SWV WSW W WNW I NW I NNW [TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.95-3.5 2 3 3 1 2 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 19 3.5-7.5 7 5 5 13 8 10 15 5 5 2 3 1 3 4 2 4 92 7.5-12.5 10 6 10 4 11 20 19 15 16 21 11 4 11 6 12 8 184 12.5-18.5 8 2 2 17 6 14 7 20 32 92 45 13 24 13 4 22 321 18.5-24 0 2 0 1 0 2 2 2 0 51 29 5 3 2 3 5 107>24 0 0 0 5 0 1 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 13 TOTAL 127 [19 1201 41 1271 49 147 I 43 153 1169 188 1 23 143 1 26 122 1 40 1 737 Class F Fre 0134 mph NI NN I NE ENE I[E ESE SE SSE ISI SSW SWI WSW IW I WNW NW NNW I TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 3.5-7.5 1 1 0 1 2 2 6 4 3 3 3 1 3 2 1 1 34 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 2 3 9 9 6 4 4 4 15 11 9 11 4 91 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 8 10 15 20 27 10 19 8 123 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 10 23 3 0 1 1 1 41>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 2 1 1 0 3 51 13 16 15 18 28 14 39 1 41 22 32 14I 295 Class G Fre: 0.029 mph I N I NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW ISWV WSW W V WNW NW NNW I TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3.5-7.5 0 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 1 0 2 2 3 1 2 0 19 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 3 2 5 1 2 0 16 12.5-18.5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 10 6 1 1 24 18.5-24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2>24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 13 1 0 101 0 14 5 10 0 4 2 7 6 1 18 8 5 1 I 63 Class All Fre 1.000 mph I N E I NEI I EENE EI ES I SE ISSEI S ISSW SW WSW W WNW INW INNWI TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.95-3.5 7 8 6 1 4 4 3 0 1 2 3 0 2 1 2 0 44 3.5-7.5 31 36 35 32 36 32 32 14 13 13 11 7 14 16 13 20 355 7.5-12.5 39 36 16 21 32 56 55 36 49 80 55 45 38 31 35 28 652 12.5-18.5 25 7 11 27 11 32 18 30 102 255 103 46 70 47 27 45 856 18.5-24 5 7 0 3 1 7 2 3 7 112 63 9 3 10 10 9 251>24 2 2 0 5 0 3 4 2 4 12 4 3 0 1 5 2 49 TOTAL 1 109 1 97 1681 89 1841 134 11141 85 11761 474 12391 110 11271 106 192 1 104 2208 Page 64 Table A-2 (continued)
Oct-Dec 2011 Class A Freq: 0.054 mp [ NNE INE ENE EIESEI SE [SSE I S SWV ISWI VW IVNVlNW INW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5-7.5 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 7.5-12.5 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 4 1 1 16 12.5-18.5 4 3 2 6 0 0 9 2 1 4 11 0 5 4 6 4 61 18.5-24 0 0 1 1 0 2 4 1 0 0 1 0 3 6 4 1 24>24 3 0 3 1 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 13 TOTAL 9 6 I10 9 2 2 14 6 1 6 1 13 0 8 1 14 113 1 6[1 119 Class B Freq 0.034 mph IN NNE NE ENE E ESE SE ISSEI S ISSWI SW V WSW I W IVWNW NW I'NNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3.5-7.5 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 7.5-12.5 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 2 1 11 12.5-18.5 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 9 7 1 3 2 0 2 27 18.5-24 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 3 3 5 21>24 4 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 12 TOTAL I4 9 4 I7 I0 I0 1 1 I2 10 I 9 2 I5 6 1 6 1 76 Class C Freq 0.085 mph N NNE I NE I ENE E I ESEI SE I SSEI S ISSWI SW IWSWl W IWNWI NW I NNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5-7.5 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 1 13 7.5-12.5 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 3 5 3 0 0 1 0 0 16 12.5-18.5 3 1 1 0 0 1 3 0 2 35 12 6 3 5 2 3 77 18.5-24 2 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 23 13 0 2 5 2 6 58>24 7 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 4 23 TOTAL 112 5 9 1 3 2 5 1 5 63 2 8 7 7I 1 14 I[ 187 Class D Freq 0.468 mph N" INNE NE (ENEI E IE SE ]SSEI S ISSW]I SW IWSW I W IWNWI NW [NNWI TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.95-3.5 1 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 9 3.5-7.5 3 2 9 3 5 5 0 2 0 4 6 4 2 4 5 5 59 7.5-12.5 6 13 18 7 8 3 8 15 22 28 23 17 23 11 3 11 216 12.5-18.5 12 19 2 14 6 3 9 12 26 56 78 43 30 35 26 11 382 18.5-24 16 8 0 7 10 0 2 0 4 45 22 4 30 13 44 35 240>24 21 4 0 5 8 0 1 3 0 4 1 0 16 11 25 28 127 TOTAL 1 59 I 48 29 [ 37 J I39 1I21 I 21 I 53 [137 11301 68 [101 I 74 1103 9g1l 1034 Page 65 Table A-2 (continued)
Oct-Dec 2011 Class E Freq: 0.265 nph N NEI NE ENE E IESE SE [SSEI S ISSW[ SWSW I W IWNWl NW INNWl TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 18 3.5-7.5 4 4 4 4 7 8 7 2 3 3 4 5 3 4 10 5 77 7.5-12.5 2 7 4 7 9 9 13 17 12 21 16 8 15 26 3 3 172 12.5-18.5 2 5 0 4 5 4 4 31 16 20 69 25 28 8 7 0 228 18.5-24 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 8 41 7 10 6 1 3 83>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 4 8 TOTAL 110 [21 10 [17 I.24 I 23 I 25 [52 33 152 1133 45 157 I 46 [ 22 116 1 586 Class F Freq 0.080 mp I N INNE NE IENEI E ESE SE SSEI S ISSW SW IWSWI W IWNwl NW INNWl TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 8 3.5-7.5 3 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 4 0 4 3 2 4 0 0 26 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 5 3 6 4 5 5 9 1 1 43 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 6 19 5 15 4 2 0 62 18.5-24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 7 11 3 0 1 34>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 TOTAL 4 1 0 2 3 3 3 1 14 10 112 41 [21 134 121 4 13 176 Class G Freq 0.014 mph IN I NNEI NE TENEI E IESEI SE SSE S ISSWI SW [WSWI W IWNWINW INNW[ TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3.5-7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 4 4 1 0 0 12 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 6 12.5-18.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 3 18.5-24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 0 0 8>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 "0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 2 7 13 I1 1 1 0 30 Class All Freg: 1.000 m N NNE NE [ENEI E I[ESE SE I SSE I I [SSWl SW IWSW [ W IWNWI NW [NNWI TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.95-3.5 3 5 2 3 3 2 2 2 4 0 0 1 2 3 2 3 37 3.5-7.5 11 11 17 11 15 14 10 5 9 7 14 17 13 15 16 11 196 7.5-12.5 9 23 27 16 19 14 23 41 41 63 49 32 45 51 10 17 480 12.5-18.5 21 29 5 25 11 8 25 54 48 130 196 82 85 58 43 20 840 18.5-24 19 17 4 10 11 3 7 3 4 77 90 18 64 36 54 51 468>24 35 5 7 8 11 0 2 5 0 4 7 0 16 13 35 38 186 TOTAL I98 90 62 [73 71 1 41 69 1I10 1106 281 1356 1150 1225 1176 1160 1401 2208 Page 66 Table A-2 (continued)
Jan-Dec 2011 Class A Freq 0.076 Cmph N INNE NE IENE IE ESE SE SSE S [SSWISWIWSW
[ W [WNW[NW [ NNW TOTAL_Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5-7.5 13 24 15 4 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 7.5-12.5 30 42 17 21 20 14 3 1 3 7 1 3 4 16 9 15 206 12.5-18.5 17 14 10 11 5 8 18 3 8 20 17 10 6 24 19 19 209 18.5-24 18 10 2 5 0 5 4 1 1 5 2 0 9 35 16 14 127>24 10 1 3 1 3 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 5 12 12 7 59 TOTAL 88 91 47 42 34 29 [26 7 12 [ 34 [ 20 113 124 187 [ 56 155I 665 Class B Freg: 0.037 mph N NNE I E [ENE [ E [ESE [SE S S I I S[S Ivvv W IWNWv NW IvNNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3.5-7.5 5 7 6 8 5 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 0 2 38 7.5-12.5 4 3 2 6 7 13 6 3 4 7 4 13 11 4 3 4 94 12.5-18.5 0 4 0 2 1 0 1 3 6 33 17 5 11 6 4 7 100 18.5-24 5 5 1 3 0 5 0 0 0 4 2 1 8 11 5 5 55>24 6 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 9 6 3 33 TOTAL 120[ 20 [ 10 [21 [ 13 [ 18 7 6 [ 11 50 [ 25 [ 19 31 31 18 21I 321 Class C Fre 0 0.058 mh IN [NNE NE ENE I E IESE SE ISSE I S ISSW I SW IWNWI NW IvNNW TOTAL_Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.5-7.5 12 12 13 5 3 2 0 0 0 2 2 5 3 5 6 9 79 7.5-12.5 4 4 2 4 8 6 11 4 10 12 21 16 7 7 3 2 121 12.5-18.5 4 3 1 2 0 5 6 0 17 58 21 13 5 10 7 4 156 18.5-24 4 3 2 2 0 4 1 0 3 35 16 0 3 14 5 11 103>24 15 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 2 0 0 7 11 4 47 TOTAL I39I 22 j 21 13 12 17 I 19 I 4 30 1 110 62 34 1 8 4 3 1 3 2 1 30 1 506 Class D 0 req 0.426 mh N I NNELI NE I ENE IE IESE ISE ISSE IS IJSSW I SW LWSWI W IWNWI NW I NNW I TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.95-3.5 9 10 14 4 5 0 3 1 3 1 2 0 1 2 2 5 62 3.5-7.5 25 26 65 35 38 35 18 18 20 19 16 12 14 22 24 37 424 7.5-12.5 32 37 48 21 28 40 52 60 87 124 79 51 48 35 29 34 805 12.5-18.5 57 48 26 45 27 38 25 39 111 270 182 79 91 109 88 61 1296 18.5-24 34 22 5 18 29 31 16 10 28 148 49 7 64 77 87 58 683>24 56 15 6 7 10 8 11 6 6 55 7 3 32 89 102 43 456 TOTAL 2 1 3 1158 1 164 130 138 1521 125 134 1255 617 13351 152 1250 1334 J332 12381 3727 Page 67 Table A-2 (continued)
Jan-Dec 2011 Class E Fre 0.299 mph NI NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE I S I SSW SWV I WS I JW I W NW IN NW I V I TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.95-3.5 12 8 11 6 12 6 13 2 3 2 1 1 5 10 1 2 95 3.5-7.5 22 21 25 24 19 26 36 22 17 16 13 11 10 15 21 19 317 7.5-12.5 27 18 19 19 29 51 47 50 51 61 43 27 48 64 32 24 610 12.5-18.5 19 12 2 24 19 31 29 71 72 181 173 89 161 88 44 36 1051 18.5-24 4 6 0 1 8 9 11 19 15 121 112 15 52 37 13 15 438>24 3 10 3 8 5 5 5 6 4 15 3 1 14 16 5 6 109 TOTAL 87 ] 76 J 60 82 92 ] 128 1141 [170 162 J 396 1345 1 144 1290 1 230 11161 102 1 2621 Class F Freq 0.090 mph N I NNE NE ENE IEl ESE SE SSE SI SSW I SW I SW I WI WNW INW NNW I TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 2 2 2 3 4 7 0 1 3 2 3 1 2 6 2 2 42 3.5-7.5 7 4 4 6 7 5 9 9 9 6 12 8 10 9 9 5 119 7.5-12.5 4 1 0 2 6 13 14 17 14 16 16 23 31 33 19 11 220 12.5-18.5 1 0 1 3 2 0 1 19 13 18 53 55 59 19 25 10 279 18.5-24 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 16 56 17 13 4 3 2 117>24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 1 1 0 0 7 TOTAL 115 I 7 14 120 25 24 48 141 60 143 104 116 72 58 30 784 Class G Fre 0015 mh NI NNE NE ENE E ESE I SE SSE I S SSW [SWI WSW IWV WNW NW NNW I TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.95-3.5 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 7 3.5-7.5 0 0 0 1 3 7 0 1 4 1 3 6 7 2 5 0 40 7.5-12.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 3 4 3 6 3 2 0 25 12.5-18.5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 7 12 6 1 1 36 18.5-24 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 2 7 0 0 0 21>24 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 6 TOTAL 14 0 I 141 7 10 1417 18 1321 11 ]1011 I 135 Class All Freq 1.000 mph I (N NE I NE I ENE I E ESE I SE I SSE I S I SSW I SW WSW IW WNW IvNW NNW TOTAL Calm-0.95 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.95-3.5 24 20 28 14 22 13 16 5 10 5 6 2 8 18 7 9 207 3.5-7.5 84 94 128 83 81 76 64 50 50 46 47 42 45 54 65 72 1081 7.5-12.5 101 105 88 73 98 137 133 137 171 230 168 136 155 162 97 90 2081 12.5-18.5 99 81 40 87 54 82 80 135 227 582 469 258 345 262 188 138 3127 18.5-24 67 46 10 31 38 54 32 32 50 329 245 42 156 178 129 105 1544>24 91 27 16 18 19 14 17 14 10 81 21 4 52 134 136 63 717 TOTAL 1 466 [ 374 1310 1 306 1313 [ 376 13421 373 151811273 1956 ] 484 1761 [ 808 1622 [ 477 1 8759 Page 68 APPENDIX B Results of Onsite Groundwater Monitoring Program In response to the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Groundwater Protection Initiative, Pilgrim Station instituted a groundwater monitoring program during 2007. Four monitoring wells were installed during the fourth quarter of 2007, and the first samples were collected in late November 2007. All four wells were installed onsite, within the protected area fence. Since these are onsite wells, they are not considered part of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP), and data from these wells are being reported in the annual Radiological Effluent Release Report. Also, there were no leaks or spills of radioactive material at Pilgrim Station during 2011 that could have affected onsite or offsite groundwater Two pre-existing wells were incorporated into the groundwater monitoring program in early 2008.Monitoring well MW3 is located in the owner-controlled area near Rocky Hill Road, and was added to the program during the first quarter of 2008. Since monitoring well MW3 is located slightly uphill of Pilgrim Station approximately 0.2 mile southwest of the power block, it is upgradient of the PNPS power block and outside of natural groundwater flow direction.
As such, it is considered to be a control well indicative of baseline levels in the vicinity of Pilgrim Station. Monitoring well MW4 is located within the protected area near the main transformer, and was added to the program during the 2 nd quarter of 2008 as an additional onsite monitoring well.In response to recommendations from assessments performed in 2009 by Entergy and NEI, six new monitoring wells were installed within the Pilgrim Station protected area in April 2010 to better characterize groundwater flow characteristics and perform monitoring closer to selected systems, structures and components (SSCs) the contain radioactive material and could lead to groundwater contamination if leaks were to develop. One of the wells MW202-1 was an intermediate-level (45-feet deep) well installed adjacent to MW202 that had been installed in 2007. Monitoring well MW205 was a 25-ft well installed slightly down-gradient from the Condensate Storage Tanks (CSTs), and MW206 was a 25-ft well installed near the radwaste truck lock. MW207 was a 25-ft well installed on the southwest corner of the power block. Two additional wells were installed upgradient, approximately 300 yards southeast of the power block; MW208-S was a 25-ft shallow-level well, and was installed adjacent to MW208-I, a 45-ft intermediate level well.The first samples were collected from these new wells in May-2010, and the radioactivity content was assessed.
Analyses of samples from wells MW202-], MW207, MW208-S, and MW208-I were consistent with the other wells installed in 2007. Tritium levels in MW205 and MW206 were higher than those observed from the wells installed in 2007, and the sampling frequency was changed from the normal quarterly sampling interval to once per week to obtain more information.
Both wells MW205 and MW206 continued to show wide fluctuations during the summer of 2010, and six additional sampling wells were installed in August 2010. All six of the wells installed in August were shallow wells, approximately 25-ft in depth. Monitoring well MW209 was installed on the north side of the reactor building truck lock. Monitoring well MW210 was installed immediately adjacent to the condensate storage tank to provide indication of any CST leakage that would be anticipated to move toward MW205, one of the wells indicating higher concentrations.
Monitoring well MW21 1 was installed on the south side of the reactor building truck lock, in an area that could potentially be affected by storm drain leakage and the underground liquid radwaste discharge line.MW212 was installed between the underground radwaste discharge line and the intake screenhouse, and was intended to monitor for lateral flow of groundwater at the site. MW213 was installed on the north side of the PNPS Warehouse, and was intended to characterize groundwater on the east side of the plant site. Finally, MW214 was installed on the north side of the trash compaction facility to characterize groundwater flows along the northeast boundary of the site.Page 69 Additional efforts were undertaken to try to identify potential sources of the elevated tritium detected in the monitoring wells. A technical team was assembled to review various systems and processes that might influence introduction of tritium into groundwater, and Pilgrim Station has contracted the services of a professional hydrogeological firm to assist in the effort. Samples of roof runoff, storm drain runoff, and accumulated water in manholes were collected and analyzed for tritium, but provided inconclusive results. Soil samples were collected from borings performed in the vicinity of wells MW205 and MW206 to determine the possibility of "pockets" of tritium that might be suspended above the water table that could lead to "spikes" of tritium as precipitation percolated through the soil. These results also proved inconclusive, as no detectable tritium was detected in the soil samples. A dye tracer study was conducted in January 2011 on four underground systems to detect any potential for leakage in these systems that might carry tritium to the monitoring wells. However, due to slow rate of water movement through the soil (approximately 6-inches/day), it may take several months for dye to migrate from the underground systems to the monitoring wells. Despite the extensive efforts to date, no likely candidates for the sources of tritium in the groundwater have been identified.
All samples collected were analyzed for tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen, and well as for gamma emitting radionuclides and hard-to-detect beta emitting nuclides.
In accordance with industry practice established under the NEI initiative, lower limits of detection (LLDs) used for analysis of REMP samples were used when assessing these samples for the presence of radioactivity.
Tritium was the only radionuclide detected in the samples that is attributed to operations of Pilgrim Station. No plant-related gamma emitting radionuclides or hard-to-detect beta emitting radioactivity was detected in any of the samples. Naturally-occurring radioactivity was detected in the samples. Such levels of natural radioactivity are expected as these radionuclides are dissolved into the groundwater from the rocks and soil. The fact that these low levels of naturally-occurring radioactivity can be detected demonstrated the ability of the gamma spectroscopy analyses to detect radioactivity in groundwater.
If any plant-related gamma activity was contained in the groundwater, the analytical techniques used would be able to detect them.Results of the tritium analyses are presented in the following tables. In these tables, a value of"NDA < xx" in the columns indicates that no activity was detected in the sample when analyzed to the minimum-detectable level following the "<" sign. For example, the sample collected from MW201 on 19-Apr-2011 contained no detectable tritium, and a minimum detectable concentration of 347 pCi/L was achieved on that sample. The achieved sensitivity of 347 pCi/L is well below the required REMP LLD of 3000 pCi/L, and no tritium was detected even when counted to this more sensitive level of detection.
Analyses for hard-to-detect nuclides, such as iron-55 (Fe-55), nickel-63 (Ni-63), strontium-89 (Sr-89), strontium-90 (Sr-90), and gross alpha were performed on the samples collected during the fourth quarter of 2007 and the first quarter of 2008. Analyses for these hard-to-detect radionuclides were also performed on initial samples collected from all of the new wells installed during 2010, and for wells MW215 and MW217 installed in Dec-2011.
Since no plant-related gamma activity and no Fe-55, Ni-63, Sr-89, or Sr-90 was detected in any of these samples, further analyses for these hard-to-detect nuclides will not be performed unless there is a significant increase in tritium levels, or if plant-related gamma activity is detected.Low levels of tritium, a radioactive isotope of hydrogen, were detected in the onsite wells. Although gamma spectroscopy and gross alpha analyses indicated the presence of naturally-occurring radioactivity, such as potassium-40 and radon daughters from the uranium/thorium decay chains, there was no indication of any plant-related radioactivity in the samples, other than tritium.Concentrations of tritium detected in the onsite wells ranged from non-detectable at less than 301 pCi/L, up to a maximum concentration of 13,400 pCi/L. The average concentrations from these onsite wells are well below the voluntary communication reporting level of 20,000 pCi/L as established by the EPA Drinking Water Standard.
Although the EPA Standard provides a baseline Page 70 for comparison, no drinking water sources are affected by this tritium. All of the affected wells are onsite, and the general groundwater flow pathway is under Pilgrim Station and out into the salt water of Cape Cod Bay. As such, there is no potential to influence any off-site drinking water wells.Even if worst-case assumptions were made and the water from monitoring well MW-205 (average concentration
= 4200 pCi/L) was consumed as drinking water for an entire year, the maximum dose consequence would be less than 0.26 mrem/yr. In actuality, any dose consequence would be much less than this, as any tritium-laden water potentially leaving the site would be diluted into the seawater of Cape Cod Bay before being incorporated into any ingestion pathways.
No drinking water ingestion pathway exists.The following tables list the tritium concentrations observed in the samples collected from the monitoring wells during 2011. The first two tables list the results from the priority wells sampled on a weekly basis during the first and second halves of the year, respectively, while the third and fourth tables list results from the non-priority wells sampled on a less frequent basis.Sample Tritium Concentration by Monitoring Well -pCi/Liter Value +/- 1-sigma uncertainty Date MW201 MW205 MW206 MW209 MW211 MW215 MW217 01/04/11 875 +/- 123 1410 +/- 138 4360 +/- 198 01/10/11 928+/-118 2430+/-151 3700+/-176 1370+/-129 927+/-121 01/17/11 928 +/- 120 7240 +/-222 3450 +/- 169 01/25/11 647+/-125 830+/-129 3820+/-195 1010+/-137 763+/-126 01/31/11 704 +/- 125 1080 136 Inaccessible 02/07/11 768 +/- 130 1060 + 142 2500 +/- 183 1280 +/- 147 Inaccessible 02/14/11 499 +/- 117 10900 +/-263 2650 +/- 169 02/22/11 446+/-108 1330+/-129 3640+/-171 1130+/-124 956+/-121 03/01/11 546+/-111 9080+/-279 1990+/-139 758+/-114 856+/-144 03/08/11 592+/-119 1080+/-156 2700+/-211 1240+/-162 1170+/-161 03/15/11 477 +/- 109 5470 +/- 215 2320 +/- 157 1320 +/-133 940 123 03/22/11 712 +/- 121 1460 +/- 141 3600 +/- 187 1030 +/-129 1020 129 03/29/11 546 +/- 124 4250 +/- 211 1750 +/- 158 985 +/-124 1010 +/-124 04/05/11 454 +/- 117 5190 +/- 225 Lost in Transit Lost in Transit 1070+/- 136 04/12/11 324 +/- 97.6 6320 +/-226 975 +/-118 1030 +/-120 1450 +/-130 04/19/11 NDA<347 921 +/-136 1560 +/-153 932 137 973 +/-137 04/27/11 695 +/- 116 2630 +/-164 2090 +/-152 979 124 1120 +/-139 05/03/11 461 +/- 122 5680+/- 237 905 137 1040 +/-140 970 138 05/11/11 529 +/- 122 13400 +/-358 1840 +/-162 1070 +/-140 1410 +/-150 05/19/11 NDA<374 1920 +/- 168 2430 181 898 +/-140 921 139 05/24/11 422+/-127 1790+/-170 1110+/-149 908+/-145 835+/-142 06/02/11 342 +/- 104 5340 +/- 197 975 +/-120 1030 121 1250 +/-126 06/07/11 422 +/- 106 9250 +/-246 1230 126 923 +/-118 1120 +/-123 06/15/11 362+/-110 6710+/-240 1250+/-138 1060+/-133 1040+/-132 06/21/11 399+/-111 1950+/-237 620+/-132 1080+/-162 979+/-152 06/28/11 541 +/- 120 7900 +/- 255 953 +/- 133 969 +/- 129 Inaccessible Page 71 Sample Tritium Concentration by Monitoring Well -pCi/Liter Value +/- 1-sigma uncertainty Date MW201 MW205 [ MW206 MW209 MW211 MW215 MW217 07/07/11 585 +/- 119 3330 +/- 189 1750 155 948 +/- 132 949 +/- 131 07/13/11 542 +/- 130 3240 +/- 197 804 137 970 +/- 142 803 +/- 137 07/19/11 588 +/- 121 1710 +/- 154 845 131 1160 141 847 +/- 131 07/27/11 572 +/- 131 9100 +/- 300 1220 +/-147 736 +/-133 1030 +/-143 08/02/11 NDA<376 2520 +/- 192 1840 171 669+/- 138 626+/- 137 08/09/11 529 +/- 128 5320 +/-237 1380 +/-152 833 137 1240 +/-149 08/16/11 557 +/- 135 4730 +/-237 NDA<342 729 +/-139 1150 122 08/23/11 685 +/- 125 7330 +/-274 953 +/-135 1320 147 1330 +/-146 08/30/11 653 +/- 132 2140 +/- 173 2280 +/-176 879 +/-139 1380 +/-153 09/06/11 Inaccessible 1500 +/- 144 2010 +/- 159 1120 +/- 135 Inaccessible 09/13/11 399 +/- 121 1190 +/- 146 1400 +/-149 1060 +/-140 1290 +/- 147 09/19/11 600 +/- 107 1890 +/- 139 2970 +/-159 1370 +/-127 1240 +/- 124 09/27/11 493 +/- 122 4650+/- 240 3740 +/-222 1570 +/-152 1270 +/- 139 10/04/11 Inaccessible 2040 +/-167 2650 +/- 182 1520 +/- 153 1720 +/- 158 10/11/11 618+/-124 7110+/-238 1950+/-153 1280+/-140 1620+/-146 10/18/11 533 +/- 132 4340 +/-224 1590 +/- 164 1170 +/-153 1370 +/- 158 10/25/11 512 +/- 102 4900 166 1400 +/- 111 1160 108 1130 +/- 107 11/01/11 Inaccessible 712 140 1110 +/- 151 1240 156 1290 +/- 156 11/08/11 661+/-123 3840+/-183 3380+/-174 1450+/-135 1790+/-143 11/15/11 967 +/- 127 2880 191 1960 +/- 174 1180 +/- 153 1010 +/- 143 11/22/11 Inaccessible 6790 +/-227 3050 +/- 169 1080 +/- 128 1260 +/- 132 11/29/11 413+/-127 3530+/-207 3060+/-198 1180+/-151 1320+/-154 12/06/11 NDA<395 6860 +/-275 3730 +/- 218 1010 +/- 153 1200 +/- 158 12/13/11 419 +/- 130 2550 +/- 183 5050+/- 230 1290 +/- 153 1330 +/- 154 12/22/11 454 +/- 115 5390 +/-228 3330 +/- 187 1570 +/- 149 1420 +/- 144 1820 +/- 152 542 +/- 116 12/29/11 348 +/- 110 2380 +/- 170 3610 +/- 194 1210 +/- 137 1240 +/- 138 1330 +/- 140 530 +/- 117 Sample Tritium Concentration by Monitoring Well -pCi/Liter Value +/- 1-sigma uncertainty Date MW202 MW202-1 MW203 MW204 MW207 MW208-S MW208-1 01/10/11 308 +/- 95.2 365 +/- 96.8 NDA<347 375 +/- 116 589 +/- 123 NDA<351 NDA<346 01/25/11 NDA<339 NDA<342 NDA<352 NDA<380 582 +/- 126 NDA<353 NDA<381 02/07/11 NDA<342 NDA<333 NDA<390 NDA<395 648 +/- 126 NDA<334 NDA<393 03/01/11 NDA<396 NDA<398 NDA<400 547 +/- 116 438 +/- 106 NDA<328 NDA<398 03/29/11 384 +/- 120 NDA<326 NDA<325 NDA<329 467 +/- 112 NDA<328 NDA<329 04/27/11 NDA<390 NDA<391 NDA<390 NDA<390 494 +/- 135 NDA<391 NDA<390 05/24/11 NDA<366 NDA<370 NDA<355 NDA<373 NDA<372 NDA<373 NDA<370 06/21/11 NDA<329 NDA<313 NDA<319 NDA<318 521+/-114 NDA<318 NDA<317 07/19/11 NDA<310 337+/-112 345+/-105 470+/-118 NDA<309 NDA<306 359+/-106 08/16/11 NDA<375 NDA<376 NDA<375 NDA<375 427 +/- 130 NDA<377 NDA<377 09/13/11 NDA<373 NDA<374 NDA<375 NDA<375 NDA<372 NDA<339 NDA<376 10/11/11 NDA<301 483 +/- 106 373 +/- 104 NDA<306 NDA<302 322 +/- 103 341 +/- 103 11/08/11 NDA<399 NDA<402 NDA<398 NDA<401 NDA<393 NDA<400 NDA<401 Page 72 Sample Tritium Concentration by Monitoring Well -pCi/Liter Value +/- I-sigma uncertainty Date MW210 MW212 MW213 MW214 MW3 [ MW4 01/10/11 769 +/- 109 583 +/- 111 NDA<346 NDA<342 NDA<345 NDA<364 01/25/11 520 +/- 122 415 +/- 118 NDA<353 Inaccessible Inaccessible NDA<356 02/07/11 529 +/- 123 628 +/- 129 NDA<391 Inaccessible NDA<391 NDA<390 03/01/11 421 +/- 114 578 +/- 111 NDA<398 NDA<397 NDA<397 NDA<337 03/29/11 484 +/-122 Inaccessible 385 +/- 120 NDA<327 NDA<329 NDA<328 04/27/11 NDA<389 NDA<389 NDA<390 NDA<390 NDA<390 NDA<391 05/24/11 429 +/- 123 569 +/- 132 NDA<358 NDA<370 NDA<372 NDA<374 06/21/11 312+/-108 428+/-112 377+/-109 NDA<318 NDA<319 NDA<320 07/19/11 461+/-110 640+/-115 450+/-110 NDA<307 NDA<306 451+/-109 08/16/11 NDA<380 503 +/- 134 NDA<306 NDA<377 NDA<377 No sample 09/13/11 397 +/- 127 402 +/- 127 NDA<376 NDA<374 NDA<374 No sample 10/11/11 664 +/- 111 792 +/- 115 333 +/- 103 NDA<305 NDA<301 NDA<302 11/08/11 782 +/- 145 685 +/- 145 NDA<401 NDA<410 NDA<399 No Sample Although there are no indications that the groundwater containing low concentrations of tritium is actually migrating offsite, a bounding calculation was performed to assess the potential dose impact of such a scenario.
Based on the tritium concentrations detected during 2011, the annual average concentrations of tritium in groundwater in the four monitoring wells most closely adjacent to the shoreline (MW204, MW205, MW202, and MW201) were used to estimate tritium migration into the intake bay. Hydrological characteristics of the compacted backfill in the vicinity of these wells were measured in 2010 and indicate the hydraulic conductivity ranges from 0.002 cm/sec to about 0.006 cm/sec. When coupled with the hydraulic slope of 0.014 and average porosity of 0.3, the flow velocity was calculated as being between 0.08 and 0.23 meters per day. Using an assumed horizontal shoreline interface area 236 meters long by 3 meters deep that could potentially transmit groundwater into the intake bay, the annual discharge of groundwater would be about 12.5 million Liters of water per year. Assuming this volume of 12.5 million liters contained the segment-weighted average concentration of 1150 pCi/L, the annual discharge of tritium into the intake bay under this hypothetical scenario would be 0.0144 Curies. This activity represents less than 0.038% of the annual airborne effluent of tritium released from the reactor building vent (see Table 2.2-C). Such airborne effluents can be washed down to the ground surface during precipitation events and infiltrate into the ground, thereby introducing tritium into the groundwater.
In the hypothetical scenario described above, the 0.0144 Curies of tritium entering the intake bay would be further diluted into the circulating water flow of the plant. As documented in Table 2.3-A, the total volume of circulating water flow during 2011 was 582 billion Liters, yielding an effective concentration of tritium in the intake bay of about 0.025 pCi/L. Such a concentration would be well below the detection sensitivity of about 450 pCi/L used to analyze water collected from the discharge canal as part of the radiological environmental monitoring program (REMP). The calculated dose to the maximum-exposed member of the public from such a hypothetical release would be 0.000000014 millirem, resulting from tritium incorporated into fish and shellfish.
Since the tritium would be incorporated into seawater, there is no drinking water ingestion pathway in the described scenario.Page 73 The following table lists the hydrological characteristics in the vicinity of each of the monitoring wells used to estimate tritium migration.
Predicted flow velocities, annual discharge volumes, average tritium concentrations, and hypothetical tritium discharges are listed for each shoreline segment represented by each monitoring well.Shoreline Segment Number 1 2 3 4 Monitoring Well Number MW204 MW205 MW202 MW201 Hydraulic Conductivity
-cm/sec 1.99E-03 4.27E-03 3.13E-03 5.64E-03 Hydraulic Slope 0.014 0.014 0.014 0.014 Porosity 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 Flow Velocity -m/day 8.02E-02 1.72E-01 1.26E-01 2.27E-01 Flow Velocity -ft/yr 9.61E+01 2.06E+02 1.51E+02 2.72E+02 Length of Shoreline Segment -m 61.0 38.1 45.7 91.4 Thickness of Water Layer -m 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Volumetric Discharge
-m 3/day 4.40E+00 5.90E+00 5.19E+00 1.87E+01 Volumetric Discharge
-Liter/yr 1.61 E+06 2.16E+06 1.90E+06 6.84E+06 Annual Average H-3 Concentration
-pCi/L 4.64E+02 4.20E+03 3.77E+02 5.74E+02 Annual Segment Tritium Discharge
-Ci/yr 7.46E-04 9.05E-03 7.15E-04 3.92E-03 Total Volumetric Discharge
-L/yr 1.25E+07 Total H-3 Discharge
-Ci/yr 1.44E-02 Annual Circulating Water Flow -Liter/yr 5.82E+ 11 Discharge Canal H-3 Concentration
-Ci/L 2.48E-14 Discharge Canal H-3 Concentration
-pCi/L 2.48E-02 Max. Indiv. Dose Factor -mrem/yr per Ci/L 5.73E+05 Maximum Individual Dose -mrem/yr 1.42E-08 In conclusion, there were no known leaks or spills of radioactive material at Pilgrim Station during 2011 that could have affected onsite or offsite groundwater.
The only radionuclide detected in groundwater during the 2011 monitoring effort that is attributable to Pilgrim Station operations is tritium, and all concentrations were well below any reporting criteria established in the Pilgrim Station Offsite Dose Calculation Manual and through EPA safe drinking water standards.
Page 74 APPENDIX C CORRECTIONS TO PREVIOUS EFFLUENT REPORTS There were no corrections to past effluent reports to include in the 2011 annual report.Page 75 APPENDIX D CHANGES TO PNPS OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL No revisions were made to the PNPS Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) during calendar year 2011.Page 76