ML18026A932

Application for Amend to Licenses DPR-33,DPR-52 & DPR-68, Changing Tech Spec Description of Physical Security Plan. Requirements Will Be Implemented within 120 Days After Approval

ML18026A932
Person / Time
Site:	Browns Ferry
Issue date:	04/03/1984
From:	MILLS L M TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:	DENTON H R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML18026A933	List: ML18026A932 ML18026A934
References
NUDOCS 8404090319
Download: ML18026A932 (6)

Text

ACCESSION NBR;8404090319 DOC DATE!84/04/03 NOTARIZED; YES DOCKET.FAGIL:50 259 Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Stations Unit 1<Tennessee 05000259 50-260 Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Stations Unit 2~Tennessee 05000260 50 296 Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Stations Unit 3~Tennessee 05000296'AUTH BYNAME'UTHOR AFFILIATION MILLSIL~MD Tennessee Valley Authority HECIP~NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DENTONtH~RE Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulations Director SUBJECTS Application for amend to License DPR-33~DPR 52 8 DPH-68<changing Tech Spec description of physical security plani Requirements will be-implemented within 120 days after.approval, DISTRIBUTION CODE: S003S COPIES RECEIVED:LTR j ENCL J SIZE': 9+t,, TITLEi Non"Proprietary Info He Security Plans NOTES!NMSS/FCAF 1cy, 1cy NMSS/FCAF/PM+

NMSS/FCAF 1cy, 1cy NMSS/FCAF/PM'MSS/FCAF 1cy~1cy NMSS/FCAF/PM, 05000259 05000260 05000296 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NRA ORB2 BC CLARKgR, INTERNAL!IE/DQAS IP/ORPB5 NRR/D/SAB 09 E'01'OPIES LTTR ENCL 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 RECIP IENT ID CODE/NAME NRR ORB2 LA-CLARKgR NMSS/SGPI 04 NRR/DL/SSPB SGI RGN2 06 COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 EXTERNAL'CRS 07 NRC PDR 02 NOTES: 1 1 1 2 I PDR NTIS 03 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REVUIRED: LTTR 16 ENCL 12 hr 4 S hI r)fih>t'h h'rh tt 4 4'hh S 3I',<<l>H gir1>>'il t f f>>ti'q i>>hli g f f hi,ii>S~,NO Mt~r<<,, h~r V,,l'>>, I'I~I, I~t'll'(rhh II.>>tl lilt f r>>;g,<<c<S'l<<7 II)II 0t.h II i gR ill 4 I ff t'~II Mthht Ig i1$Iil'I, (III ll'tI M li i~I II, j('I t>>i>>r I I, I'ht~h'lt'MII, hit I 1<<hh Ill t'WI~'I~I,l WS, 4 kit I e.II q'I I II h~h lql>>tr>>)t IIqh'4'I i'tt')tJ 1 I'<<'ll M (9t W IrM(Mf f(fr Mf'yrI>', f It if'>'>'M'yf f'lf hif f'>M tg 1'I'"hf'f y'I f f g,,,I 1 M f II r 0 I"h;l,)3 tI.h, i"M(, i IJM IIIII t'3l MM/t 4l r g II f ltiiIW'A'1.I I tI>><<Ital i~f1, I I Iftlltw ll<<l ,<lIlk'f M)'I hh W gdMW)I M s y,ML W]E(4'<<t>>,y 44>>,p g , MJ(~~MIM', e g>W.$$Sh 4'hl<<h>>~'}t tent(III I M IIt t" IIl II M l I,II'I,M Wl Ii 1 1,: lit II It hl I MNJ 4 r W M i I, Jh I, ii,I Iy TI II I jl JgM t l<<'$',I M ,II I,I I~hhg Wili<<St 4'MX i"4 4'I"<<<<, E X ll tt M Mth I IIX w'I ri i'i'I~

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CHATTANOOGA.

TENNESSEE 37401 400 Chestnut Street Tower II April 3, 1984 Mr.Harold R.Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.20555

Dear Mr.Denton:

In the Matter of the Tennessee Valley Authority Docket Nos.50-259 50-260 50-296 By my letter to you dated June 11, 1982, we submitted the revised Physical Security Plan (PSP)for the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant for NRC review and approval.Revisions to that plan were submitted by my letter to you dated August 31, 1982 and by D.S.Kammer's letter to you dated October 19, 1982.We just recently learned that the delay in approval was a result of confusion regarding our submittals.

As clarification of our intent in submitting the plan we hereby request that it be reviewed and approved pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR Part 50.34(c)and 10 CFR Part 50.90.We are very concerned that the review of the PSP seems to be moving so slowly.To expedite approval we are submitting as an enclosure a proposed paragraph for inclusion into the operating licenses for each unit.The enclosed paragraph would replace the paragraph currently in the license.The enclosed is consistent in wording and content with the amended Sequoyah licenses.In the June 11, 1982 letter we stated that 90 days after approval would be needed to implement the requirements.

As discussed with the Browns Ferry Project Manager, we find that we will need 120 days to implement the plan.Please document the acceptability of 120 days for implementation in your letter to TVA.In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 170.22, we have determined this proposed amendment to be Class III for unit 1 and Class I for units 2 and 3.These classifications are based on the facts that the pr oposed amendment involves a single safety issue which does not involve g4040903i 00P59 q 840403 pDR iaDDCK p An Equai Opportunity Empioyer gag%i(1 C S h h l4 II dl h E t l.I%.l A'f l'\l<<4(

Mr.Harold R.Benton Apr il 3, 1984 a significant hazard consideration for unit 1, and the proposed amendments for units 2 and 3 are duplicates of the unit 1 proposed amendment.

The remittance for$4,800 ($4,000 for unit 1 and$800 for units 2 and 3)is being wired to the NRC, Attention:

Licensing Fee Management Branch.Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY q>(<Subscribe arijd sworn to me't is~day of V eforg L.M.Mills, anager Nuclear Licensing 1984.Notary Public My Commission Expires Enclosur e cc: U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II ATTN: James P.O'Reilly, Regional Administrator 101 Marietta Street, NM, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Geor gia 30303 Mr.R.J.Clark Browns Ferry Prospect Manager U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814

~a, ,P II*7