ML19259D507
| ML19259D507 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Three Mile Island  |
| Issue date: | 01/31/1975 |
| From: | Arnold R METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19259D505 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910240772 | |
| Download: ML19259D507 (12) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:* ~ e 4 METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRIC COMPANY IHREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION LEI 1 Operating License No. DPR-50 Docket No. 50-289 Technical Specification Change Request No. 8 This Technical Specification Change Request is submitted in support of Licensee's request to change Appendix B to Operating License No. DPR-50 for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 1. As a part of this request, proposed replacement pages for Appendix B are also included. METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY By l b
- Vice Preildent-Generation Sworn and subscribed to me this 31 day of v , 1975 u c/
M
~
dotary Public R.C ut ~UTM Notar/ Puthe ' #
- * :- E : C3.
My Commiss.cr. Ex;4in a;anur 23,1978 1459 245 saaee. 791024077%
i I Three 5"le Island Suclear Station Unit 1 Operating License No. DPR-50 Docket No. 50-289 Technical Specification Change Recuest No. 8 Licensee requests that the following changes be =ade to Appendix B of the Technical Specifications. A copy of proposed changed pages marked
" Change Requast No. 8" is attached.
Chang = 9equest 8.1 Page 3, Fir.t and Last Paragraphs: Change the last line from " decrease at a rate exceeding 2 F/hr." to "be changed by core than 2 F during any one-hour period." Reason for Change Request 8.1 The change is proposed for consistency with the IMI Environmental Report. Environ = ental Analysis Justifying Change 8.1 The proposed change reflects a core conservative requirement and therefore will provide further protection to the environnent. The change does not involve a significant hazards consideration and will not cause undue risk to the health and safety of the public. Cost-Benefit Analysis Supporting Change 8.1 No additional expense is involved in implementing the change and will provide additional protection to the environment. Change Request 8.2 Add Figure 2A, Plant Pathology Transects and Bird I=paction areas as - page 44a. Page 2: Add Figure 2A to List of Figures. Page 43, Spec-ification 4.2.2.2, Para. 2: Zns ert "shown on Figure 2A" after the word area in the second line. Reason for Change Request 8.2 In the preoperational envirenzental nonitoring program (prior to June 5, 1975) , monthly examinations of natural vegetation and agricultural crops were made along the transects shown in attached Figure 2A, rather than in the areas shown in Figure 2, which was referenced in error and is not applicable. The sane treasects should be examined during the operational study. Due to an oversight, Figure 2A was not included previously. By adding Figure 2A, the figures would tore accurately reflect the on-going program at TMI to assess the effect of cooling tower salt drift en crops and natural vegetation. Environmental Analysis Justifying Change 8.2 Since the preoperational plant pathology transects were performed at the locations indicated in Figure 2A, it would be preferable to include the figure showing these transects and continue to obtain data from the 1459 246
same transects during operations. In this way, the figures will depict the studies providing data for determination of possible salt drift effect on plants in the i==ediate vicinity of TMI. This change does not involve a significant hazard consideration and vill not cause undue risk to the health and safety of the public. Cost-Benefit Analysis Supporting Change 8.2 No additional expense is involved in referencing Figure 2A and it would be beneficial 'to build upon the preoperational data for co=parative purposes rather than use new data. Change Request 8.3 Replace the current Figure 2 with the attached Figure 2 (Rev. 2) . Reason for Change Request 8.3 On June 3,1974, Metropolitan Edison Co. was notified by its consultant that the vegetation sampling area encircled in Figure 2 was placed under cultivation. Since the land has been tilled the vegetation cannot be restored or studied. As an alternative a new sampling area adjacent to the old area is now under study. The revised Figure 2 would accurately reflect the present vegetation analysis program at TMI. Environmental Analysis Justifying Change 8.3 In view of the fact that the sampling area in the vicinity of the 500 KV substation was cultivated, the next logical alternative was to choose a similar plot. In this context, similar is used to mean a plot of land that, af ter preli=inary observations, had many of the dominant vegetation species found in the original sampling plot. This fact plus the geographical proximity of the two sampling areas are the basis for the selection of the new sampling area. It should be noted that the two sampling areas could naturally vary in species composition and relative abundance. Therefore, any measureable vegetation changes in the new sampling area will be determinable only if they are reflected in major changes of the dominant species. Other differences may exist between the preoperational campling area and the new (operational) area due to nature. Cost-Benefit Analysis Supporting Change 8 .3 No significant increase in cost will result from relocating the vegetation sampling plots. The only other alternative would be to do no additional sampling. Benefits will be derived in that information will be gained on the potential effects of cooling tower salt drift on natural vegetation.
"~ Change Request 8 .4 Page 65, Para. 1, Line 4: Change "one week" to "two weeks".
Reason for Proposed Change 14 Regula to ry Guide 1.16 (Rev. 2) requires that non-routine written reports for the Safety Technical Specifications be submitted within two weeks . It is preferable that reporting requirements of the Safety and Environmental Technical Specifications be uniform. In addition, the additional time will per=1t time for more extensive review and fact finding and further consideration of measures to prevent repetition. 1459 247
Environmental Analysis Justifying Change 8.4 As telephone or telegraph notification to the regional Directorate of Regulatory Operations Of fice (DCRO) continues to be rade within 24 hc trs of the event, the AEC will continue to be aware of Environmental Incide.'ts soon after occurrence. The change involves no unreviewed safety question or unreviewed environmental impact. Cost-Benefit Analysis Supporting Change 8.4 The proposed change does not involve additional costs and additional benefits will be derived fro 2 the extra time for review. 1459 248
. IMI 2 Change Rege
- 270. 3
..:..:.- r .:.,-..__.-._g Secticn ,
Pace TECHIIICAL SPECIFICATICUS Dg 1 DEFI!!TIOtiS (J h D O 1-1 1,1 RATED POWER l-1 1.2 REACTOR OPERATII~G CC:'3ITIC'!: , 1-1 1.2.1 COLD SEUTDOWII l-1 1.2.2 HOT SHUTD011I l-1 1.2.3 REACCOR CRITIC 27 7 1.2.4 HOT STXiDBY l-1 1.2.5 PO'JER CPERATIO:i 1-1 1.2.6 Ru-,dE u. ,...,,i.sv onu woo..
-A 1.2.7 REFUELING OPERA' TO:: 1-2 1.2.8 REFUELING In w ?tAL 1-2 1.2 9 STARTUF 1-2 1.2.10 TAVG 1-2 1.2.11 HEATUP-C00LDO*J3 MODE l-2 1.2.12 STATION, UUIT, PLA'!T, AUD FACILITY l-2 1.3 OPERABLE l-2 1.h PROTECTIVE IIISTUU'EI!TATIC'I LCGIC 1-2 1.h.1 INSTRUMEIiT CHAL.ca 1-2 1.4.2 REACTOR PROTECTIC:7 SYSTE1 1-2 1.h.3 PROTECTION CHA'i 7L 1-3 1.h.h REACTOR PROTECTIC:I SYSTE LCGIC 1-3 1.h.5 ENGINEERED SA:2..? FIA' URES SYSTEM 1-3 1.4.6 DEGREE OF REDU; D.CC '3 -
1.5 INSTRU?E'ITATICU SUF7EILL.CCT 7-3 1.5.1 TRIP TEST 1-3 1.5.2 CHANUEL TECT 1-3 1.5.3 INSTRU EIT CEEi:IEL CEEC:: 1-3 1.5.h INSTRUICIT CHAIT:iEL CALIE?.A IC:I lh 1.5.5 HEAT BALAITCE CEEC7 7h 1.5.6 HEAT BALKiCE CALIERATICU 1h 1.6 PCWER DISTRIEUTICH 1-5 1.6.1 QUADRAUT P0 ITER TILO l-5 1.6.2 REACTCR POWER I'GADliCE l-5 1.7 CONTAIID'EI!T INTEG?ITf 1-5 1.8 AB:!OR:'AL CCCURRE' ICE l-6 2 SAFETY LI!ETS AI!D LI'E __. 3 san _ l SYSTE'/ SITTI:!GS 2-1 2.1 S m' m_ c T r " I mM!'A "w'. 0.._7_'.~.~_u^'. c.c . 7 _ c^ _' 2.2 SAFETY LD'ITS , ZACTC S?ET-'" PRESSURE 24 2.-a r-a .ir. r'.'11. a S A:. -. _ .c 'e . _'_ . : : _ _ _ - _. _; . o. .n r.cr r_ c., _ _0.'T _Iji,STRC'E:ITAT:0:7 2-5 3 LnETInc CO:iDITIONS FCP CPI'ATI':7 3-1 3.1 REACTOR COOL /.'iT SYST' 1459 249 3-1 3.1.1 OPERATICUAL CC:20:!E';TS 3-1 3.1.2 PRESSURIZATIC:!, :-Z_2."UP, A'?D CCOLDOWII LDETATICI!S 3-3
T:/ 'l Change 2equest :!c. 3 LIST OF TA3LES Table Title Pare 2.3-1 Reactor Protection Systen Trip Setting Limits 2-9 3.5-1 Instruments Operating Cenditions 3-29 k.1-1 .Instrunent Surveillance Requirements h-3 h.1-2 Mininus Equipment Test Frequency h-8 h.1-3 Minimus Sa:pling Frequency h-9 h.2-1 Instrument Surveillance Progrn:. k-lk h.h-1 Selected Tendons and Corresponding Inspection Periods k-35a h.h-2 Tendons Selected for Tendon Physical Condition Test k-36 h.h-3 Ring Girder Surveillance h-36g h.15-1 Radioactive Liquid Waste Sanpling and Analysis h-59 k.15-2 Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis h-63 1459 250
AnJ. ..C...o C .m4 .ww . . .
-...r..,-..,...
.w . . s . ._,..: :. . . . . .1 u a t: .C 7. : w,,.. .s-, mu. ,a
,.S.,,,,.,...,e, u- - .: : .v:2. :
"o. Paga 1 Aquatic Envir:nnental Msnitoring Stations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . El 2 Vegetation Sampling Areas.............................. 4h 2A Plant Pa:hologf Transects eni 3ird Inpaction Area::. . . . . pa 3 Radiological Eneironne ate 1 :.:::i:oring sta tions . . . . . . . . . 50 h Fish, Air end ?recipi:ntion Sanpling Stations. . . . . . . . . . 53 5 T o Indicator stations................................. 54 6 TLD 3sekground Sta:10ns................................ 55 7 Milk and Creps Sampling 3tstions....................... 56 3 Organization f:r Imple.e.entation of Environmentel Technical Specificati:n2............................... 59 D*" '
TY > s bd W e !J , J 1459 251
_3_ 2.0 LIMITING C0!!DITIONS FOR OPERATION Specification (Ccnt'd) Specification (Cont'd) llg (2) During reactor cooldown conditions discharge temperature shall not exceed 12*F above inlet temperature and this temperature differential shall not be changed by more thnn 20F during any one-hour period. (3) If intake water temperature is 87'F or higher discharge temperature'during normal operation shall be maintained at or below river ambient.
- b. During the period between October 1 and b. 'the delta temperature recorder Jocated in March 31 the following effluent temper- the control room shall by used for nonitoring ature limits will apply: the difference between river water inlet (1) During normal operation discharge temperature and the discharge temperature.
Should this delta temperature recorder be out g temperature shall be no greater than of service, the difference between the river 12*F above inlet temperature or 3*F water inlet temperature and the discharge { below inlet temperature. temperature shall be obtained f rom recorders ' __, located in the mechanical draf t cooling tower 43, (2) During reactor cooldown conditions pumphouse. l (y, discharge temperature shall not exceed j s43 20*F above inlet temperature and this y temperature differential shall not . IN) be changed by more than 20F duri.ng f(] any one-hour period. $ 9 C
T."! 1 Cher.ge 2equest :::. 3
, _ .3 _
and the ground around the base of each teuer out to a distance of 100 feet from the base. .by dead or injured birds found will be collected, identified, and the numbers and locations will be recorded. On days in which incidents of tortality or injury occur, description of neteorological conditions of the previous day and/or night will be included in the daily log. This program will be con-tinued for one year. Bases Since some potential exists for bird injury and mortality due to impaction on the natural draft cooling towers, and since the pos-sible levels of this i=paction are not known, specific report levels, protection limits or the ne2d for such ressures cannot be establish:2 at this time. The study described herein will provide infor ution needed to establish a protection limit or report level or to establish that the ceasure ent of bird impaction is not necessary due to an insignificant icpact. The documentation of bird cortality and injury due to icpaction will allow an esticate to be made of the effect of the cooling towers on nigrating birds. 4.1.2.2 Effects of Cooling Tower Salt Drif t on Crops and Natural Vetetatien Objective . The purpose of the cooling tower salt drif t study is to determina if damage to natural vegetation and crops is occurring from salt drift. Specification The study areas, at locations indicated on Figure 2, which were used in a vegetational analysis durin; preoperation will be checked annually to determine if measurable changes are occurring in species cocposition, relative abundance and relative dominance of naturally occurring vegetation due to salt drift. Sa=pling will be done near the station in the predicted area of drift influence and also in control areas removed from the station. Ibathly visual examination of natural vegetation and agricultural crops will be cade in the creas shown on Figure 2A durin;; the grening cceson (Aur- ^ through October) to detect if any physical damage is occurring. ^ Sacples of any suspected drif t-damaged vegetation found t-ill be 1459 253
~
..--L.s:....- .
. y.=> .>.a
- f. . .
, ?., x
-~,-- , ,,,; .
,sG - , " . .
, * .~, .4. _, ;- ,,
/. < . . s,.
f x ;, -" I .' ~ l. .,,,,,r* g , {'# f .. s .. - N - ' a 3 . 3 . 6* A s.,
, k.' & ._.
. N_, :. - s 4.. 4.-
- 4. :.W< D..- .,3'7- - Q,1, H y: g .h, 9 ,<
*
- ml -
ft .ss,- ->- s. . . , , s , ~.. ,
- p. ' \. * -%
,a o . :s
% N. i2 c. -
f,.b* .,h7G;h S'
;, -: , , , _
&k rk $a
~1". ,Es ' y b A , ~ , *(t *
. % -( .~, *i
,,,,.s
,,. . E 2 is au l - , ,-
f.4 s i' N. j .,,s.
.r'.
*- ( ,,. / /.f.. , . ,t 1,). N.. g:. vi_o
...y - -~- w -w;,,.. \ s.', .. ..
.s,,... t i
. n- ..s ,u
.m
.%.' . %. %. g
, ,. . p. J.. , . .
s . t
.., q' , -
~
x f,, e m', . 3 a ;. n% ;', .
- < g~ <
- : 3
. /, . , r . 1 3. - a
'-)(g.
r*W-r* ff t . s, %.' s ,
" , .4 , .
', y
...m n
- 2. ,.
nua
'?~- /' , /j
* . .s1., ( g ,- '
3 ,
- e;w h* % ,.,,,. oyz
-{ . g. ,,r ' ,- ," . .g g5 e 7
- b. !,#-=.,,&es.,c.1.3T.,-M ~ </ G . ."'. .
c.4'_'_' ' r ., :.fW, %. gw.y\
; 1) : 553 rw 3 > .
<- w
- r. c , ., y. .. . \ . . ,
% 'Q'%&
4 - N W,s: ,' .:: .<c..&s ,,
. m' C , . ;:. 5*.
&g. '. o ,ll _ .'z.} N- . ~Q:n -p. ; '~ 5' z s s ..e . - ,
g '-: % j . .,.s g.y 3s; . ' I$. .',.g. v,Y
?)- d (. . [ ,'i.,. -a, S,' h w'.. d. ,~., ~ . V M t - i g . \,, .
i s i
., p f
- 'D %
' f.
; - s.(
~
~ _ .? {~l .- '
.h $ l d E.,, %g., ,y . . . I
,N.., -
- N g,t < .
g %,'. /' g . '.-s N.
. .. . ., . -. v A , _
e
- 5
- i. , ;. t b. 'N .. i J(J'::.
'=="*
.s . /r G. .', l.. ..'.4 .',~,c.a . ,' t ,
',/ a.... . .;;'
,.1 ., , .?':,,% !Q\ ../ 7:e %:' , ~.W' :- ' 5 [>. ,1 .
.c ,\ %s. ~o.
. s-m . ~ . r.: . . .s. .*.e , , -
g c , , . o
/h-3 Y%
%y J.g. . . .s5 .10
'e h* .(% T, ,\(N.Eg.:
^~.
' ' ., m, n -d.:'."\.
\f'-
Y ,s',3 v < (Te,(.v{$h g
}
/ n. Yx.%j. ;; .. -- ?tf ~. .:
, ~.- Cm'.D,\.t .%T. y.,t, el s ,, e. , ,'- A:*v ; , - ,j <
# . s . .
i ( ,., , . a.,, q* > '
~~',e s.;
< s
.c,~,,,
.5 s 9 . . s.%, . , ;.s o { . .'-
r ., . .
,,s. yW
- .-;
,- , . c. , n. s . .
i y)</ ..:ga. n ,j.is.. ,s t- -
, .e ., ..s m m. c y+
.r... - . t .y gQ"* e- ') y n 4
s-
' chr,Q(,,.a,,6.:
. - s .
s . a,
'-:::$] '
~
M $ . ' . . *. . *~ ; , i.- - , c' i kn5 u.
,< .. e, h . m.y & ' , d ' Q 5s'm-s ..
/.
4 _._ k%iWl 5n,. -se - a. :. , a . a D;
,;. - c_ -: .:: .s. - \ __ . . ,-
.- / ,
..9 e. ..
p,,+g.a a = % = v ~~ # '"~~ ' ' , k'['. :~.3t 3 ,4( 4-r~~~[h , @v- ,
-.,p-c' - n
;4 W ,.g_gn-,.,'-- 5 . .$- b,,
- - a g pu-c _
g-- 3g-
-Q a<\ i nivsa11n >l. si g c g 5.--,g .r s s .r . , - , ., - .. ...--
- s. 4 .
9,,s. . r* % %-
- j d***9*""?** *S .
V
$6 1 j. _., ;, , ~ _ -
~ $ ,$ '% h .i'#
,.* 3.! *' h ,,r-f_! ' f N
f
.;
V p,. M) %'\N
; ~m!! f,e.
pt.: w- _ m u. = > g:. ., m ,: ,w, ,g.. .%y _
\
$k:
y g"%.'' .
*' * ** 5
= x ,,,,,2" .~
-c
~~
.~ n a .a .w > .,.y2"he e
\, p['., ~_fj. .:,3l=;... , . .s . -
cER w.
. - m , & *'..__ N.'"*'~il%g; s. , .-A. -d I.s -S a - -
. t.' : ~ N 'l l
-' , ' r-"
1-)7 ~h-+ 'S= Y~~~ k.h* * * * ,' - !,.1, ., .M [ ~r ,. _ n *.),- , ha \[14'Mh,,ga,
/
\\ !.M' : ~:. ,d' ~7 h <'J N,N. M,, '
"i. M .E,E A $'cJ._! . .-:.d. %g,
* ;. , . ~~~'~-
~ .. - . .
% .. 8.- i' \' .y e'f **;I ~
p Q. . ,' p.$.,.W. W.\.'N'.'A,- o' uy . . . s: tr . ,.
.ea . -- { % -.s.
* - s.-
isa e.
%.:Q .' %
10% gi')'... e ',h. ,/ -Q.'. ~%,
.s t, s
.[.? ., 4 r I t.- .% ,
.. r .
b- '.#I: 3
. 4?-; ."7
'.Afh, p-
.,,fhisJ ~', '
ls [ N, . M M .UY +. .'f.-[. . 3 e %[h .h; 'D.5 U y-
-i k- ~f, h '.
7 .r: .
~
'. ,,) '" .' S
(. 't
. \.m.
n ,g.. gs,b
., y, s, g r-m,.y
.. kl w, ( .g
..c.<
,s.
e 87'~',.
- 3. .m, , .e.... -.--My's
. , ,. . i ; ,se sa 3w; v' .-.\ , ,
v; v, . . g . 3 _9 . . l
-[,) \.# '
./, I - D ) - [ 'i .,k' j' h Ni E* N .N; M
..s ; ,~. c.
t p_, . e.h. . . +
,s. vb.~ s s3s .\. gs.. %s, f
. y v,1. q. ' \, - I u. .- . g . es.
, <\/ .j y W*s.:.
M w c,,, ,- Q,- . *- fk.q. ' ?\\ . ,t s..^% ,. j '\ . ..
' $ j #<.*% -,.'-O<.'~,s.,
.f y
.., j . .f.... , . . . ,,.. . . . . - -
c .
- , a
' :"' ) ' . . '
\ . ~, N .
- y . .' .
\ ,- .. ~,
%. ;-~._ r. . . '. y.
.n ., : - .:, ~
~. : h-
-[ sN i~~. ~ T. 2.'V ,,_[,'; _J ' ' --). .c.Q, y ..y(Q-J. '[~'
~. . ? -]. ..,,.
Q._. y.y , 'K ';~ '
. 'Qgm g[@3
. .a ., .
s s~4=. m,. , . e ~, n..,
.a 1459 254
y..,,,:i,
\
; .
..y . . r -
yz .- - ,m
~
/- ~ ' t ~~ .,
,,: q' . . t . ::-
n
~a
//x f ~: xSnri W. x . ' J's g
,'N y, '
'N ':'
__ q
! h 'h h5 \; '
.h'
.J W'.
// e/<K's\\dsh.,
s.. s. _ NV-I Sit.2.M. , V, %j' ,. . i\ . f{fV@i # I l 1 :
. %.' .- s s
. s' f.h 5 . .-
/-14l dt N Q]-N%,, %
%g ??/ *. \ l'd M, i -
N \\\ yf f
/
.q;ffe fQ :
i 1
~
\. '
.__ . u /, . /
) I N-\.,'
1l ' ~ . 3f,;\'l,-Q'\s :'- q -
! '/
J o a e t .\iey % I/ w..a w-\
- ':u at O.,4.v 4
N. ; 7's
/ f
/
) -
s s f.'$l
* ' " " , '.l .b 7 t V'. \ -
* \' '
-?
f,&@y Wj!Y/
/
) 5 , ' . . '.
'li 11 T
/
l!
) }\ . JbNh 6A2! \i i
I-( I i '.i. 1 B t 4, U
* \Co.e-[
1 no ; DIO ' h*wO Gm I. - w ,
;s
\, wy : + -
e~ch o n h.. , t- .- n ,i l ,' :%- ./ .~ -/ :+ n . . s .)g
..f.;, a mN,.,\,,.
~.,
{ .1 ,
', r .
,,o, i .~.. ,o .F L.
<)1
} d ,ima 1 5
..i
\ s.a ,fn M- e . .h.
f l3 b
- s , y .\ -
r l b'-n,. ,.
*:'N ,
'f. *
- n. W,o'(
\ s, :\ ,
. x."- \ ,- -
~. \ f K ( %' ~,
61, Q
\ .i* i.9 i4 1
~' e r.~~ .-
' f N.
\ 's .. '
c-(,,l (' :. . g
\ %\
O zK Q }p 5-l' ' %) ! ' ,,g.)lfU
.\ ..
\". . " k.. .
-, hk,'b, h. k - ' 1.,..:,,.,. 2ki / v i s i ,, - M .'
- i N'/-952 ', Q s. N.',x \ '/ Q~ Q , ' ,,.
i/ -
/
/
- v. 1 I : .
v.~,. ~. s NN (p.:.. : - u 7/-., U b'\ V-s ' '. - '/ Ni r - hh': . /h ? nou n poos.tL:vs w '" ,D ,h,, j Q.3- - p / cA .. % 9 8 9 V, e/.- ..:n*' \ . ,b' ' {,p(TE yM . 9
=. t,'.'/ > ! e. s
' a.
NV-931 %s/'?k
%;? .
!,'45. .
.j. - . .;-.g- A p('? [ ~YM@'N -.. N '
'./b'11
.e \
x- .) ' Le;end: 9q ' 3,- ,N n- - D 0'D D N. w. ws x' s o - 0 een:ory g , u -@ w 3 MN
- 3fA
\ U - Unders: cry 3
c . crcono cover yEGETATION SAMPLING AP.:.a,, flV - VEGETATI C'l c1 ALY SIS THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 1 FIGURE 2
.1459 255
':I 1 Chr.: e ?.ecue ,t !!o. 3
_ g5 _ TV.I 1 Change Request UO. 8 w w .- . , - ~ ~ - ~ - ~- - - - ~ ' - - .. m....->..ee.
~ - - - - - - -
( c. Honradiolorical In the event a Liniting Condition for Op: ration is exceeded, u report vill be cade vithin 21 h:urs by telephone and telegraph to the Director of ?.egulatory Cperations Regica 1 followed by a written report withintvo weeks to the Director of Regulatory l Operations
- Region 1 (ce to Director of Licensing, USAEC).
The written report and, to the extent possibic, the preliminary telephone and telegraph repcrt, vill:
- 1) Describe, analyse and evaluate the occurrence including extent and =agnitude of the inpact;
- 2) Describe the cause of the cecurrence; and
- 3) Indicate the corrective action taken (including any significant changes made in procedures) to preclude repetition of the occurrence and to prevent s4-41ar occurrences involving similar components or systers.
- d. Chances
- 1) When a change to the plant design, to the plant cs eration or to the procedures describei in Sectica 5 5 is planned which r vould have a significant adverse effect on the environment
- or which involves an envi"-r-artal catter or question not previously reviewed and evaluated by the AIC, a report on the change wi -= -ade tc the AEC prior to inplementation. .
The report will include a description and evaluation of the change including a supporting benefit-cost analysis.
- 2) Changes or additions to perrits and certificates required by Federal, State, local and regional authorities for the protection of the environ:ent vill be reported. When the required changes are su'enitted to the concerned agency for approval, they vill also be sutaitted to the Deputy Director for Reactor Projects, Directorate of Licensing, USAIC, for information. The sutrittal vill include an evaluation of the environ = ental in;act of the change.
- 3) Requests for changes in Environ ental Technical Specification:
vill be submitted to the Deputy Directer for Ecacter Projects, Directorate of licensing, USAIC, for prior review and
,_ authorization. Che reques: will include an evaluation of the Lapact of the che.nge, including a supporting benefit . cost analycis.
om o, D D 7D- 2, ee e 1 lAL 1459 256
]
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION IN THE MATIER OF DOCKET No. 50-289 LICENSE NO. DPR-50 METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY This is to certify that a copy of Technical Specification Change Request No. 8 to Appendix B of the Operating License for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 1, dated January 31, 1975, and filed with the U . S . Atomic Energy Commission on January 31, 1975, has this 31st day of January been served on the chief executives of Londonderry Township, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania and Dauphin County, Pennsylvania by deposit in the United States mail, addressed as follows: Dr. Edward O. Swartz , Chairman Mr. Charles P. Hoy, Chairman Board of Supervisors of Board of County Commissioners Londonderry Township of Dauphin County R. D. #1, Geyers Church Road Dauphin County Court House Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057 P. O. Box 1295 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY By M Vice President-Generation 1459 257 133R}}