|
---|
Category:INTERNAL OR EXTERNAL MEMORANDUM
MONTHYEARML20135F6941996-11-27027 November 1996 Informs That Time Provided by NRC Regulation within Which Commission May Act to Review Decision of Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Terminating Proceedings in Docket Has Expired.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 961127 ML20128L7761996-10-10010 October 1996 Notification of 961023 Meeting W/Wppss,Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council & State & Local Govt Agencies in Elma,Wa to Discuss Proposed Termination of CP & OL Application for Plant ML20058C2811990-10-26026 October 1990 Summary of 901018 Meeting W/Util Re Potential Restart of Units 1 &/Or 3 ML20151T9551988-08-0808 August 1988 Notification of 880915 Meeting W/Util in Rockville,Md to Review 880630 Submittal to Resolve Open Issues Re Ground Motion Attenuation ML20155E8511988-06-0909 June 1988 Notification of 880707 Meeting W/Util in Rockville,Md to Discuss Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Submitted by ML20196J9081988-06-0909 June 1988 Notification of 880707 Meeting W/Util in Rockville,Md to Discuss Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Submitted by .Meeting Room Changed ML20150C4201988-03-10010 March 1988 Forwards BNL Re Ssi/Deconvolution Issue.Ltr Received for Distribution to Applicant,Util & Lpdrs ML20149K1061988-02-18018 February 1988 Notification of 880301-02 Meetings W/Util in New York,Ny to Discuss Soil Structure Interaction/Deconvolution Issue ML20236W0451987-12-0101 December 1987 Notification of 871215 Meeting W/Util in Bethesda,Md to Discuss soil-structure Interaction/Deconvolution Analysis Used in Facility Seismic Evaluation ML20236N1221987-11-0909 November 1987 Forwards Structural & Geosciences Branch Observation & Findings Re Concrete Module on (C3-02) - Const Assurance Program.Observation & Findings Should Be Identified to Region V Lead Reviewer ML20236A7421987-10-14014 October 1987 Forwards Draft Status of Plant Seismic Review to Be Filed ML20214P5991987-05-21021 May 1987 Notification of Significant Meeting on 870529 W/Util in Walnut Creek,Ca to Discuss Licensee Overview Presentation of Completed Activities of Readiness Review Const Assurance Module C3-02 Re Concrete ML20215F9171986-12-11011 December 1986 Notification of Significant Meeting on 870107 W/Util at Region V Ofc to Review Commitments & Schedules for Readiness Review Program ML20207E5431986-07-18018 July 1986 Notification of 860801 Meeting W/Util in Walnut Creek,Ca to Discuss Const Assurance Program Earthwork Module ML20211G7741986-06-16016 June 1986 Advises That G Dick Assigned as Licensing Project Manager for Facility.Dick Will Be point-of-contact for All NRR Activities,Including Readiness Review ML20141D3631986-03-25025 March 1986 Suggests That Response to Util Re Delay Should Be Sent by NRR Rather than EDO ML20153F1681986-02-21021 February 1986 Requests Approval/Disapproval of Encl DOE Proposal, Readiness Review,Const Assurance Program Insp of Washington Nuclear Plant,Unit 3 ML20210B9881986-02-0505 February 1986 Forwards Util 850731 Request for Review of Itt Grinnell Stiff Clamps.Util Prepared to Make Presentation of Rept & Respond to Questions.Complete Review Requested by 860430 ML20137R8821986-02-0404 February 1986 Notification of 860213 Meeting W/Util in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Recent Developments Re Engineering Assurance Program of Readiness Review Program ML20210A9471986-01-15015 January 1986 Responds to 851219 Request for Info Re S&W Engineering Assurance Program.Principal Differences Between Engineering Assurance Program & Idvp Is Review Timing & Who Performs Review ML20210A6731985-12-0606 December 1985 Forwards Summary of OL Review Costs & Supporting Documentation for 840624-1222.W/o Supporting Documentation from Program Ofcs ML20209H0891985-10-0707 October 1985 Concurs w/marked-up Environ & Hydrologic Enginering Branch Review of Section 2.4 of Draft SER Re PMF on Streams & Rivers & Potential Dam Failures ML20132F2071985-09-27027 September 1985 Notification of Significant Licensee Meeting on 851029 W/Util in Elma,Wa to Examine Readiness Review Const Appraisal Program ML20209H0691985-09-19019 September 1985 Forwards marked-up Section 2.4 of Draft SER for Use in Responding to T Novak Undtd Memo.Figures 2.4.1 & 2.4.2 Missing from Draft ML20209H0811985-09-19019 September 1985 Recommends Concurrence W/Draft SER.Marked-up Page 6-19 of Draft SER Re Combustible Gas Control Sys Encl ML20198A1571985-09-19019 September 1985 Comments on WPPSS Project 3 Draft Ser,Including Sections 13.2,14 & 18 Re Training,Initial Test Program & Human Factors Engineering,Respectively.Comments on Sections 13.1, 13.4 & 13.5 Not Provided ML20210A7421985-09-11011 September 1985 Advises That Input in Draft SER Contains Outstanding Issues, Including Responses to Concerns Received in June 1984.Issues Must Be Received & Resolved at Such Time as Licensing Process Reinstated for Unit ML20210A7451985-09-0404 September 1985 Forwards Draft SER for Comments & Concurrence by 850920. Identification of Change in Staff Positions from Feb 1984 - Aug 1985 Requested So That Applicant May Be Advised of Items Requiring Reconsideration.W/O Encl ML20209G1251985-08-29029 August 1985 Forwards Draft SER for Comments & Concurrence by 850920. Draft Originally to Be Issued in Feb 1984.Draft to Provide Baseline Record of Review in Case Const Reinstated. W/O Encl ML20209G1101985-08-23023 August 1985 Forwards Draft SER Input,Based on FSAR Submitted to Date. Unresolved Issues Requiring Addl Info Listed ML20197K2061985-08-21021 August 1985 Recommends That a Bournia & T Cox Be Made Available If Members of NRR Required to Provide Depositions in WPPSS Securities Litigation.Listing of NRR Personnel Involved in Review of CPs of Facilities Forthcoming ML20209E5861985-06-28028 June 1985 Forwards Comments on Design Review Program to Be Implemented by Util as Second Module of Readiness Review Program,Per 850607 Memo.Specific Input from NRR (Secondary Reviewer) Not Required ML20127G1161985-06-21021 June 1985 Responds to Jg Partlow 850508 Memo Requesting Comments on Eight Draft Emergency Preparedness Preoperational Procedures.Program Should Be Similar to Other IE Insp Programs.Inclusion of Procedure 82102 Not Supported ML20209E5021985-06-12012 June 1985 Forwards Meeting Notice on Readiness Review Program Scheduled by Region V for 850701-02.T Ankrum Comments on Meeting Submitted.Implementation of Design Review Ie/Region V Responsibility.W/O Encl ML20197J5561985-05-0202 May 1985 Forwards Fes for Final Concurrence to Permit Issuance. Responses Received Re 841123 Memo Resolved.W/O Encl ML20209E3071985-04-16016 April 1985 Describes Site Environ Status,As Determined by 850411 Telcons W/F Hahn,A Moore & a Christian.Stabilization & Revegetation Efforts Along Stein Creek & Elizabeth Creek Satisfactory.Site Visit Not Necessary for Environ Review ML20209E3681985-04-12012 April 1985 Informs That Development of Draft SER Not Worthwhile,Per 850129 Request That Draft SER Be Provided by 850301,since Most Responses to Questions Not Received.No Approved Schedule Exists for Facility ML20209E0271985-03-0404 March 1985 Advises That Branch Has No Further Input to 831013 Draft SER & Section 3.11,per 850129 Request.Addl Input for Section 3.10 Will Be Provided at Later Time ML20209E0761985-03-0101 March 1985 Forwards Draft SER Re FSAR Chapter 14 Concerning Initial Plant Test Program.Test Program Acceptable & Meets Requirements of 10CFR50 ML20209D9871985-02-26026 February 1985 Forwards Draft SER Input on FSAR Section 4.2, Fuel Sys Design. License Condition 4.2.3.1(g) Re Maintaining Shoulder Gap Clearance During First Two Refueling Outages Should Be Relaxed ML20209E0061985-02-25025 February 1985 Confirms 850208 Notes That No Revs or Additions to 831213 Draft SER Input Provided,Per 850129 Request ML20209D9541985-02-19019 February 1985 Forwards Proposed License Condition & Safeguards SER Input, Based on Review of Facility Security Plan.Protected SER App Containing Safeguards Info Available from E Mcpeek. SALP Input Also Encl ML20209D9711985-02-19019 February 1985 Advises That Meteorology Sections in Draft SER Require No Changes & Should Be Used,Per G Knighton 850129 Request ML20209D9771985-02-15015 February 1985 Advises of Dr Muller 840511 Memo to Tm Novak That Provided Final SER Input Identifying One Open Item Re Control Room Habitability from Section 6.4.Item Remains Open Due to Lack of Info from Util ML20209D9371985-02-0808 February 1985 Forwards 831031 Draft SER Re Radiation Exposure in Response to 850129 Memo.Fsar Review Status Continuing Since Response to Eight Open Items Not Yet Received.W/O Encl ML20209D8971985-02-0606 February 1985 Discusses Review of Section 4.0, Identification of Vital Areas & App of Safeguards SER for Facility.No Concerns Re 10CFR73.55 Found ML20209D8481985-01-29029 January 1985 Informs That Draft SER Issuance Rescheduled for Mar 1985. Draft SER Input Indicating Appropriate Findings Re Topic Review or Inadequate Applicant Response Requested by 850301 ML20209D7321985-01-0303 January 1985 Forwards Summary of Review Costs Incurred by Various Program Ofcs Directly Involved in Processing of Ol.W/O Encl ML20209D6671984-12-0505 December 1984 Informs That Listed Items Should Be Corrected in Draft Fes. Corrections Needed Include Encl Table 4.7 Changes Re Population Distribution within 0-10 Miles in 1980 & Changes to Sections 4.2.2 & 5.9.4.4(2) Per Encl 840927 Memo ML20209D6331984-11-30030 November 1984 Forwards Comments on Portions of Fes,Per T Novak 841123 Request 1996-11-27
[Table view] Category:MEMORANDUMS-CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20135F6941996-11-27027 November 1996 Informs That Time Provided by NRC Regulation within Which Commission May Act to Review Decision of Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Terminating Proceedings in Docket Has Expired.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 961127 ML20128L7761996-10-10010 October 1996 Notification of 961023 Meeting W/Wppss,Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council & State & Local Govt Agencies in Elma,Wa to Discuss Proposed Termination of CP & OL Application for Plant ML20058C2811990-10-26026 October 1990 Summary of 901018 Meeting W/Util Re Potential Restart of Units 1 &/Or 3 ML20151T9551988-08-0808 August 1988 Notification of 880915 Meeting W/Util in Rockville,Md to Review 880630 Submittal to Resolve Open Issues Re Ground Motion Attenuation ML20155E8511988-06-0909 June 1988 Notification of 880707 Meeting W/Util in Rockville,Md to Discuss Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Submitted by ML20196J9081988-06-0909 June 1988 Notification of 880707 Meeting W/Util in Rockville,Md to Discuss Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Submitted by .Meeting Room Changed ML20150C4201988-03-10010 March 1988 Forwards BNL Re Ssi/Deconvolution Issue.Ltr Received for Distribution to Applicant,Util & Lpdrs ML20149K1061988-02-18018 February 1988 Notification of 880301-02 Meetings W/Util in New York,Ny to Discuss Soil Structure Interaction/Deconvolution Issue ML20236W0451987-12-0101 December 1987 Notification of 871215 Meeting W/Util in Bethesda,Md to Discuss soil-structure Interaction/Deconvolution Analysis Used in Facility Seismic Evaluation ML20236N1221987-11-0909 November 1987 Forwards Structural & Geosciences Branch Observation & Findings Re Concrete Module on (C3-02) - Const Assurance Program.Observation & Findings Should Be Identified to Region V Lead Reviewer ML20236A7421987-10-14014 October 1987 Forwards Draft Status of Plant Seismic Review to Be Filed ML20214P5991987-05-21021 May 1987 Notification of Significant Meeting on 870529 W/Util in Walnut Creek,Ca to Discuss Licensee Overview Presentation of Completed Activities of Readiness Review Const Assurance Module C3-02 Re Concrete ML20215F9171986-12-11011 December 1986 Notification of Significant Meeting on 870107 W/Util at Region V Ofc to Review Commitments & Schedules for Readiness Review Program ML20207E5431986-07-18018 July 1986 Notification of 860801 Meeting W/Util in Walnut Creek,Ca to Discuss Const Assurance Program Earthwork Module ML20211G7741986-06-16016 June 1986 Advises That G Dick Assigned as Licensing Project Manager for Facility.Dick Will Be point-of-contact for All NRR Activities,Including Readiness Review ML20141D3631986-03-25025 March 1986 Suggests That Response to Util Re Delay Should Be Sent by NRR Rather than EDO ML20153F1681986-02-21021 February 1986 Requests Approval/Disapproval of Encl DOE Proposal, Readiness Review,Const Assurance Program Insp of Washington Nuclear Plant,Unit 3 ML20210B9881986-02-0505 February 1986 Forwards Util 850731 Request for Review of Itt Grinnell Stiff Clamps.Util Prepared to Make Presentation of Rept & Respond to Questions.Complete Review Requested by 860430 ML20137R8821986-02-0404 February 1986 Notification of 860213 Meeting W/Util in Bethesda,Md to Discuss Recent Developments Re Engineering Assurance Program of Readiness Review Program ML20210A9471986-01-15015 January 1986 Responds to 851219 Request for Info Re S&W Engineering Assurance Program.Principal Differences Between Engineering Assurance Program & Idvp Is Review Timing & Who Performs Review ML20210A6731985-12-0606 December 1985 Forwards Summary of OL Review Costs & Supporting Documentation for 840624-1222.W/o Supporting Documentation from Program Ofcs ML20209H0891985-10-0707 October 1985 Concurs w/marked-up Environ & Hydrologic Enginering Branch Review of Section 2.4 of Draft SER Re PMF on Streams & Rivers & Potential Dam Failures ML20132F2071985-09-27027 September 1985 Notification of Significant Licensee Meeting on 851029 W/Util in Elma,Wa to Examine Readiness Review Const Appraisal Program ML20209H0691985-09-19019 September 1985 Forwards marked-up Section 2.4 of Draft SER for Use in Responding to T Novak Undtd Memo.Figures 2.4.1 & 2.4.2 Missing from Draft ML20209H0811985-09-19019 September 1985 Recommends Concurrence W/Draft SER.Marked-up Page 6-19 of Draft SER Re Combustible Gas Control Sys Encl ML20198A1571985-09-19019 September 1985 Comments on WPPSS Project 3 Draft Ser,Including Sections 13.2,14 & 18 Re Training,Initial Test Program & Human Factors Engineering,Respectively.Comments on Sections 13.1, 13.4 & 13.5 Not Provided ML20210A7421985-09-11011 September 1985 Advises That Input in Draft SER Contains Outstanding Issues, Including Responses to Concerns Received in June 1984.Issues Must Be Received & Resolved at Such Time as Licensing Process Reinstated for Unit ML20210A7451985-09-0404 September 1985 Forwards Draft SER for Comments & Concurrence by 850920. Identification of Change in Staff Positions from Feb 1984 - Aug 1985 Requested So That Applicant May Be Advised of Items Requiring Reconsideration.W/O Encl ML20209G1251985-08-29029 August 1985 Forwards Draft SER for Comments & Concurrence by 850920. Draft Originally to Be Issued in Feb 1984.Draft to Provide Baseline Record of Review in Case Const Reinstated. W/O Encl ML20209G1101985-08-23023 August 1985 Forwards Draft SER Input,Based on FSAR Submitted to Date. Unresolved Issues Requiring Addl Info Listed ML20197K2061985-08-21021 August 1985 Recommends That a Bournia & T Cox Be Made Available If Members of NRR Required to Provide Depositions in WPPSS Securities Litigation.Listing of NRR Personnel Involved in Review of CPs of Facilities Forthcoming ML20209E5861985-06-28028 June 1985 Forwards Comments on Design Review Program to Be Implemented by Util as Second Module of Readiness Review Program,Per 850607 Memo.Specific Input from NRR (Secondary Reviewer) Not Required ML20127G1161985-06-21021 June 1985 Responds to Jg Partlow 850508 Memo Requesting Comments on Eight Draft Emergency Preparedness Preoperational Procedures.Program Should Be Similar to Other IE Insp Programs.Inclusion of Procedure 82102 Not Supported ML20209E5021985-06-12012 June 1985 Forwards Meeting Notice on Readiness Review Program Scheduled by Region V for 850701-02.T Ankrum Comments on Meeting Submitted.Implementation of Design Review Ie/Region V Responsibility.W/O Encl ML20197J5561985-05-0202 May 1985 Forwards Fes for Final Concurrence to Permit Issuance. Responses Received Re 841123 Memo Resolved.W/O Encl ML20209E3071985-04-16016 April 1985 Describes Site Environ Status,As Determined by 850411 Telcons W/F Hahn,A Moore & a Christian.Stabilization & Revegetation Efforts Along Stein Creek & Elizabeth Creek Satisfactory.Site Visit Not Necessary for Environ Review ML20209E3681985-04-12012 April 1985 Informs That Development of Draft SER Not Worthwhile,Per 850129 Request That Draft SER Be Provided by 850301,since Most Responses to Questions Not Received.No Approved Schedule Exists for Facility ML20209E0271985-03-0404 March 1985 Advises That Branch Has No Further Input to 831013 Draft SER & Section 3.11,per 850129 Request.Addl Input for Section 3.10 Will Be Provided at Later Time ML20209E0761985-03-0101 March 1985 Forwards Draft SER Re FSAR Chapter 14 Concerning Initial Plant Test Program.Test Program Acceptable & Meets Requirements of 10CFR50 ML20209D9871985-02-26026 February 1985 Forwards Draft SER Input on FSAR Section 4.2, Fuel Sys Design. License Condition 4.2.3.1(g) Re Maintaining Shoulder Gap Clearance During First Two Refueling Outages Should Be Relaxed ML20209E0061985-02-25025 February 1985 Confirms 850208 Notes That No Revs or Additions to 831213 Draft SER Input Provided,Per 850129 Request ML20209D9541985-02-19019 February 1985 Forwards Proposed License Condition & Safeguards SER Input, Based on Review of Facility Security Plan.Protected SER App Containing Safeguards Info Available from E Mcpeek. SALP Input Also Encl ML20209D9711985-02-19019 February 1985 Advises That Meteorology Sections in Draft SER Require No Changes & Should Be Used,Per G Knighton 850129 Request ML20209D9771985-02-15015 February 1985 Advises of Dr Muller 840511 Memo to Tm Novak That Provided Final SER Input Identifying One Open Item Re Control Room Habitability from Section 6.4.Item Remains Open Due to Lack of Info from Util ML20209D9371985-02-0808 February 1985 Forwards 831031 Draft SER Re Radiation Exposure in Response to 850129 Memo.Fsar Review Status Continuing Since Response to Eight Open Items Not Yet Received.W/O Encl ML20209D8971985-02-0606 February 1985 Discusses Review of Section 4.0, Identification of Vital Areas & App of Safeguards SER for Facility.No Concerns Re 10CFR73.55 Found ML20209D8481985-01-29029 January 1985 Informs That Draft SER Issuance Rescheduled for Mar 1985. Draft SER Input Indicating Appropriate Findings Re Topic Review or Inadequate Applicant Response Requested by 850301 ML20209D7321985-01-0303 January 1985 Forwards Summary of Review Costs Incurred by Various Program Ofcs Directly Involved in Processing of Ol.W/O Encl ML20209D6671984-12-0505 December 1984 Informs That Listed Items Should Be Corrected in Draft Fes. Corrections Needed Include Encl Table 4.7 Changes Re Population Distribution within 0-10 Miles in 1980 & Changes to Sections 4.2.2 & 5.9.4.4(2) Per Encl 840927 Memo ML20209D6331984-11-30030 November 1984 Forwards Comments on Portions of Fes,Per T Novak 841123 Request 1996-11-27
[Table view] |
Text
.
A, ,
February 19, 1965 Dncket No. 50-508 MEMORANDUM FOR: Thomas M. Novak, Assistant Director for Licensing Division of Licensing FROM: Dennis M. Crutchfield, Assistant Director for Safety Assessment Division of Licensing
SUBJECT:
PROPOSED LICENSE CONDITION AND SAFEGUARDS SER INPUT -
WPPSS NUCLEAR PROJECT - 3 (WNP-3)
Enclosed are a proposed license condition and a safeguards SER input resulting from the review of the Security Plan submitted by the Washington Public Power Supply System for WNP-3. .
A copy of the protected SER appendix, which contains Safeguards Informa-tion, may be obtained from Eugene McPeek in Room 336. This protected appendix is being withheld from public disclosure. Also enclosed for your use is the SALP evaluation input.
Dennis M. Crutchfield, Assistant Director for Safety Assessment Division of Licensing
Enclosures:
- 1. Proposed License Condition
- 2. SER Input
- 3. SALP Evaluation Input cc: w/ enclosures V. Nersus G. Knighton J. Lee
Contact:
E. McPeek, x24782 DISTRIBUTION-SSPB Reading P. Noonan E. McPeek H. Berkow C. Thomas f@bgD D.; $ '
DL:SSPB - "
DL (ycorian:ac E4 sek HBerkow io s t 0Cru hfield 02////85 0?/l9/85 02/i;/85 02 p 5 '602// /85 8502220367 850219 -
M ADOCK 0500 00 ;
p/g.
~
m ,
,#[ o,
, UNITED STATES 7.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j wAsu NGTON. D. C. 20555 Februa ry 19, 1985 Docket No. 50-508 .
MEMORANDUM FOR: Thomas M. Novak. Assistant Director for Licensing Diytsion of Licensing l
FROM:
Dennis M. Crutchfield. Assistant Director for Safety Assessment Division of Licensing
SUBJECT:
PROPOSED LICENSE CONDITION AND SAFEGUAkDS SER INPUT -
WPPSS NUCLEAR PROJECT - 3 (WNP:3) '
Enclosed are a proposed license condition and a safeguards SER input resulting from the review of the Security Plan submitted by the Washington Public Power Supply System for WNP-3.
A copy of the protected SER appendix, which contains Safeguards Informa-tion, may be obtained from Eugene McPeek in Room 336. This protected appendix is being withheld from public disclosure. Also enclosed for your use is the SALP evaluation input.
&ennis Crutc M.7/l.
eld for Safety Assessme t ssistant Director Division of Licensing
Enclosures:
- 1. Proposed License Condition
- 2. SER Input
- 3. SALP Evaluation input cc: w/ enclosures V. Nersus G. Knighton J. Lee
Contact:
E. McPeek, x24782
,-D ,
, 50-508 ENCLOSURE 1 PROP 0 SED LICENSE CONDITION The applicant shall fully implement and maintain in effect all provisions of the Commission approved physical security, guard training and oualification, and safeguards contingency plans, including amendments made pursuant to the authority of 10 CFR 50.54(p). The approved plans, which contain Safeguards Infomation as described in 10 CFR 73.21, are collectively entitled, "WNP-3 Physical Security Plan" dated January 20,1982 (transmittal letter dated May 26, 1982), with Revision 1 dated November 10, 1982 (transmittal letter dated December 1, 1982) and Revision 2 dated October 5, 1983 (transmittal letter dated October 17,1983); "WNP-3 Safeguards Contingency Plan", dated January 20, 1982 (transmittal letter dated May 26,1962) with Revision 1 datedNovember4,1982(transmittalletterdatedOctober 17,1983)and Revision 2 dated October 5, 1983 (transmittal letter dated October 17, 1983); and "WNP-3 Training and Qualificatfor. Plan" dated March 19, 1982 (transmittal letter dated March 23,1982).
l e
i 1 m. .,
4 S
50-508 ENCLOSURE 2 i
SAFEGUARDS SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT WNP-3 O
~ .
_1. 0 Introduction ' t
. The Wa,shington Public Power Supply System has filed with the Nuclear Regulatory Commissio9 for the WNP-3 site a Physical Security Plan, Saf.eguards Contingency Plan, and a Security Training and Qualificatio9 Plan.
This Safety Evaluatio9 Report (SER) summarizes how'the applicant has provided for meeting the requirements of 10 CFR Part 73.
The ,SER is composed of a basic smalysis that i s available for public review, and a protected Apoendix.
2.0 Physical Security Organization To satisfy the requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(b) the Washington Public Power Supply System has provided a physical security organization that includes a Shift Supervisor who is onsite at aLL times with the authority tg. direct the physica,L-proteEionactivities.
To implement'the commitments made in the physical security plan, train 19g and qualification plan, a9d the safeg'uards co9 tinge 9cy plan, writte9 security procedures specifying the duties of the security organization members have been develop $d and are available for inspection. '
The training program and critical security tasks and duties for the security organir,ation persoq9el.are defined in the
- "L4NP-3' Security Personnel Traiqi9g-a9d Qualificatio9 Plan" .
which meets the requirements of 10 CFR Part 73, Appendix 8 1
e L 4
t
. .. - 2-for the traiqing,' equipping and qu'alification of the security orga91zatio9 members. The physical security pla9 a9d the ,
tra19199 program provide commitme9ts that preclude the assigque9t of a9y 19dividual,to a security relate,d duty or task i.
prior to the 19dividual be11g trai9ed, equipped a9d qualified to perform the assig7ed' duty 19 accorda9ce with the approved guard trai911g a9d qualificatio9 plaq.
3.0 Physical Barriers In meeting the requireme9ts of 10 CFR 73.55(c) the applicant has provided 'a protected area barrier which meets the defiqition 19 10 C FR 13.2 (f) (1) . An isolation zone, to permit observation of activities alo9g the barrier, of at least 20 feet is proyided o9 both sides of the barrier with the exception of the Locatio9s Listed 19 the Appendix. The staff has reviewed thos.e locations and determined that the security measures in place are satisfactory and co9tique to meet the requirements cf 10 CFR 73.55(c).
Illumi9atio9 of 0.2 foot-ca9dles is mainta19ed for the isolation zo9es, protected area barrier, a9d exterqal i
portioqs of the protected area. Ia areas where illumi9atio9 of 0.2 foot-candles ca99ot be maintained, special procedures are applied as described 19 the l
Appendix.
! 4.0 Identification of Vital Areas The Appendix conta19s a d.iscussio9 of the applicant's program a9d ide9tifies those areas aqd equipme9ts determined to be l vital. -
I 1
r
. -s ,
.3- '
Vita'L, equipment is Located within vital areas which are located 1
within the protected area and which' requires passage through'at Least two barriers, as defi.ned in 10 CFR 73.2(f)(1) and (2), to ,
i
, . gain access tv the vital equipment. Vital area barriers are separated from the protected area barrier. '
The control room and central alarm station are provided with butLet-resistant walls, doors, ceilings, floors, and windows.
Based on these findings and the analysis set forth .n paragraph D of the Appendix, the staff has concluded that '
the applicant's program for identification and prt tection of vital equipment satisfies the regulatory intent. However, this prograa is subject to onsite validation by the staff in the futuce, and to subsequent changas.jf found to be necessary.
5.0 Access Requirements In accordance with 10 CFR 73.55(d) aLL points'of personnel and vehicle access to the protecte.d area are controlled. The individual responsible for controlling the final point of access into the protected area is located in a bullet-resistant structure. As part of the access control program, vehicles (except under emergency conditions), personnel, packages, and materials entering the protected area are searched for explosives, firearms and incendiary devices by electronic search equipment and/or physical search.
Vehicles admitted to the protected area, except Licensee designated vehicles, are controlled by escorts. . Licensee G
-4.
desig'nated vehicles are. Limited to on site
- station functions an,d remain in the protected area except for operational
. maintenance, repair, s'ecurity and emergency purposes.
Positive control over the vehicles is maintained bf personnel authorized to use the vehicles or by the escort personnel.
A picture badge / key card system, utilizing encoded information, icentifies individuals that are authorized unescorted access to protected and vital areas, and is used to control access to these areas. Individuals not autho-ized unescorted access are 1ssued non picture badges that indicate an escort is required.
Access authorizations are Limited to those individuals wh'o have a need f or access to perform their duties. -
Unoc~cupied vital areas are Locked and alarmed. During periods of refueling or major maintenance, access to the reactor containment is positively controlled by a member of the security o'rganization to assure that only authorized individuals and ma,terials are permitted to enter. In addition, aLL doors and personnel / equipment hatches into the reactor conteinment are Locked and alarmed. Keys, Locks, combinations and related equipment are changed on an annual basis. In addition, when an individual's access authorization has been terminated due to the lack of reliability,or trustworthiness, or for poor wo x performance, the keys, Locks, combinations and related equipment to which 'that person had access are changed.
,m -
6.0 Detection Aids In satisfying the requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(e) the -
applicant has install'ed intrusion detection systems at the protected area barrier, at entrances to vital areas, and at aLL emergency exits. The applicant has exceeded the regulation by providing two separate and dissimilar perimeter intrusion detection systems at the protected area barrier. Alarms from the intrusion detection system a,qunciate within the continuously manned central alarm station and a secondary alarm station Located within the protected area. The central alarm station is located such that the interior of the station,is not visible from outside the perimeter of the protected area. In addition, the central-station is constr cted so that walls, floors, ceitings, and doora are bullet-resistant. The alarm stations are located and designed in such a manner so a single act cennot interdict the capability of calling for assistance or responding to alarms.
The central alarm station contain's no other functions or
(
duties that would interfere with its alarm response function.
The intrusion detection system transmission Lines and associated alarm annunciation hardware are self-checking and
. tamper-indicating. Alarm annunciators indicate the type of 1 alarm and its location when activated. An automatic. indication of when the alarm system is on standby power is provided in the central alarm station.
l
7.0 commun'ications As recuired in 10 CFR 73.55(f) the applicant has provided fo'r the capability of contin,uous communications betwee,n the central and secondary atarm station operators, guards, watchmen, and armed response personnel through the use of a co venticreat telephone system, and a security radio system.- In addition, direct communication with the local Law enforcement authorities is maintained through the use of a conventional telephone system and two way FM radio Links.
ALL non-portable communication Links, except the conventional telephone system, are provided with an uninterruptible emergency power sourts. .
8.0 Test and Maintenance Requirements -
In heeting the requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(g) the applicant has established a program for the testing and maintenance of aLL intrusion alarms, emergency alarms, communication equipment,-
physical ' barriers and other security related devices and equipment.
Equipment or devices that do not meet the design performance criteria or have failed to otherwise operate wilL be compensated for by appropriate compensatory measures as defined in the "WNP-3 Physical Security Plan" and in site-procedures.
' The compensatory measures defined in these plans will assure that the effectiveness of the security system is not reduced by failures or other conting7ncies affecting the 1 operation of the secu'rity related equipment or structures.
1 Intrusion detection systems are tested for proper performance !
l i
at th beginning and end of any peri.od that they.are used for.
security.-
Such testing'wiLL be conducted at least once every seven days.
'C'o m mu'n i c a t'i o n' s y s t e m s for onsite communications ane tested at the beginning of each security shift. ,0ffsite communications are tested at least once each day.
Audits of the security program are conducted once every 12 months by personnel independent of site security management and supervision. The audits, focusing on the effectiveness of the physical protection provided by the onsite security organization implementing the approved security program plans,
' ~
include, but are not limited to: a review of the security procedures and practices; system testing and maintenance programs; and local Law enforcement assistance agreements. A report is prepared documenting audit findings-and recommendations and is submitted to the Plant Management.
9.0 Response Requirements In meeting the requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(h) the applicant has provided for armed responders immediately available for respanse duties en alL shifts consistent with the requireme~nta of the r e gu l a t i or.s . Considerations used in support of this-number are attached (see Appendit). In addition, liaison with local Law enforcement authorities to provide additional response support in the event of security events has been established and documented.
l
rh Th e a'pp li cant 's safeguards contingency plan for cealing with thefts, threats, and radiological sabotage events satisfies the requirements of 10 CFR Part 73, Appendix C.
The Plan identifies appropriate securi.ty events which couldrinitiate a radiological' sabotage e' vent and identifies the applicant's preplanning, response r'esources, safeguards contingency participants and coordination activities for each identified event. Through this plan, upon the detection of abnormal presence or activities within the protected or vital areas, response activities using the available resources would be initiated. The response activities and objectives include the neutrali,,zation of the existi.ng threat by requiring the response force members to interpose theessives between the -
adversary.and their objective, instructions to use force commensurate with that used by the adversary, and authority to request sufficient assistance from the local Law enforcement authorities to maintain control over the situation.
To assist in the assessment / response activities a closed circuit television system, providing the capability to observe the entire protected area perimeter, isolation tones and a majority'of the protected area, is provided to the security organization.
's, -
f ,
_9
_10. 0- Employe'e Screening Program In meeting the requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(a) to protect against the design basis threat as stated in 10 CFR.73.1 (a)(1)(ii),- the Washington Pub Lic Power Supply System h as provided an employee screening program. Personnel ~who successfulLy comple'te the employee screening program or its equ.ivalent may ,be granted unescorted access to protected and vital areas at the WNP-3 site. AlL other personnel requiring access to the site are escorted by persons authorized and trained for escort duties and who have successfulLy completed the employee screening ' program.
The employee screening program is based upon accepted industry standards and includes a background investigation, .
a psyciological evaluation, and a continuing observation program. In addition, the applicant may recognize the screening program of other nuclear utilities or contractors based upon,a comparability review. The plan also provides for a " grandfather clause" exclusion which atLows recognition of a certain period of trustworthy service with the utility or contractor, as being equivalent to the overaLL employee screening program. The staff has reviewed' the applicant 's .
screening program against the accepted industry standards (ANSI N18.17 1973) and has determined that the Was.hington Public Power Supply System's program is acceptable.
.- .. l
'. l ENCLOSURE 3 50-508 '
SALP INPUT EVALUATION ,
WNP-3 ,.'.
Criteria , Category
- 1. Management Involvment and Control in Assuring Quality 1 Applicant has provided evidence of. prior planning and proper prioritization of safeguards matters. Safeguards issues are decided by plant management.
- 2. Approach to Resolution of Technical Issues from a Safety Standpoint 1 Applicant has demonstrated an understanding of safeguards issues. Approaches to safety / safeguards matters are sound, thorough and conservative.
- 3. Responsiveness to NRC Initiatives _. 1 Applicant provided technica11y sound responses in a timely manner.
- 4. Enforc~ement History N/A
- 5. Reporting and Analysis of Reportable Events N/A
- 6. Staffing (Including Management) 1 Positions are identified, authorities .and responsibilities are well defined.
- 7. Training and Qualification Effectiveness 1 The safeguards training and qualification plan and procedures 1
contribute ,to a well defined security program.
l l
l