ML17207A597: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm | {{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Wiebe, Joel Sent:Wednesday, July 26, 2017 3:31 PM To:Ryan Sprengel | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review and Resource Estimate for Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, and Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, | Acceptance Review and Resource Estimate for Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, and Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Licens e Amendment Request to Revise Control Room Ventilation Temperature Control System Technical SpecificationRyan, By letter dated June 30, 2017 (Agencywide Document s Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML17181A276), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon), submitted a license amendment request revise Technical Specification (TS) 3.7.11, "Control Room Ventilation (VC) Temperature Control System," to modify the TS Actions for two inoperable VC Temperature Control System trains. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 200 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is June, 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 200 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is June, 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | |||
Joel S. Wiebe, Sr. Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA | These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-6606. | |||
Joel S. Wiebe, Sr. Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3625 Mail Envelope Properties (Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov20170726153100) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review and Resource Estimate for Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, and Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Revise Control Room Ventilation Temperature Control System Technical Specification Sent Date: 7/26/2017 3:31:22 PM Received Date: 7/26/2017 3:31:00 PM | Acceptance Review and Resource Estimate for Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, and Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Revise Control Room Ventilation Temperature Control System Technical Specification Sent Date: 7/26/2017 3:31:22 PM Received Date: 7/26/2017 3:31:00 PM From: Wiebe, Joel Created By: Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov | ||
Recipients: "Ryan Sprengel" <ryan.sprengel@exeloncorp.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2771 7/26/2017 3:31:00 PM | |||
Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:}} | |||
Revision as of 17:26, 29 June 2018
| ML17207A597 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron, Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 07/26/2017 |
| From: | Joel Wiebe Plant Licensing Branch III |
| To: | Sprengel R Exelon Corp |
| References | |
| Download: ML17207A597 (2) | |
Text
1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Wiebe, Joel Sent:Wednesday, July 26, 2017 3:31 PM To:Ryan Sprengel
Subject:
Acceptance Review and Resource Estimate for Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, and Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Licens e Amendment Request to Revise Control Room Ventilation Temperature Control System Technical SpecificationRyan, By letter dated June 30, 2017 (Agencywide Document s Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML17181A276), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon), submitted a license amendment request revise Technical Specification (TS) 3.7.11, "Control Room Ventilation (VC) Temperature Control System," to modify the TS Actions for two inoperable VC Temperature Control System trains. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 200 hours0.00231 days <br />0.0556 hours <br />3.306878e-4 weeks <br />7.61e-5 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is June, 2018. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-6606.
Joel S. Wiebe, Sr. Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3625 Mail Envelope Properties (Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov20170726153100)
Subject:
Acceptance Review and Resource Estimate for Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, and Byron Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Revise Control Room Ventilation Temperature Control System Technical Specification Sent Date: 7/26/2017 3:31:22 PM Received Date: 7/26/2017 3:31:00 PM From: Wiebe, Joel Created By: Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov
Recipients: "Ryan Sprengel" <ryan.sprengel@exeloncorp.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2771 7/26/2017 3:31:00 PM
Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: