ML18162A026: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Prairie Island License Amendment Request to Reclassify Certain Fuel Handling Equipment June 12 2018 Northern States Power - Minnesota
{{#Wiki_filter:Prairie Island License Amendment Request to Reclassify Certain Fuel Handling Equipment June 12 2018 Northern States Power  
*License Amendment Request *Background *Scope *Example *Additional Information *Summary Presentation Outline
- Minnesota
*Approval of USAR changes that revise the PINGP Quality Group classification for certain fuel handling equipment from QA Type I (safety-related) to QA Type III (commercial grade) *Changes are consistent with industry standards -ANSI/ANS 58.14-1993 Section 5.6.1, Item 9 -ANSI/ANS 57.1-1992, Section 6.3 *Purchasing safety-related spare parts does not provide commensurate public health and safety benefits. License Amendment Request
 
*PINGP was designed and build in late 1960's/early 1970s -Prior to issuance of GDCs -Before guidance for classifying SSCs  *Original A/E developed standard of 1% of 10 CFR 100 limits for classifying SSCs Background
*License Amendment Request
*PINGP is approved for full scope AST -10 CFR 50.67 replaces 10 CFR 100 as licensing basis *Fuel handling accident offsite dose consequences fall below 10% of 10 CFR 50.67 limits. *Fuel handling equipment is currently classified as             QA-Type I (safety-related)  Background Fuel Handling Equipment to be Reclassified as "QA Type III": *Auxiliary Building Crane *Spent Fuel Pool Crane *Manipulator Cranes, including Load Cells *Spent Fuel Assembly Handling Tools *Rod Cluster Control Changing Tools *Spent Fuel Transfer System and its constituent components (conveyors, upenders, and related equipment), exclusive of transfer tubes and blind flanges   Scope Example   
*Background
*The QA classification of fuel handling equipment, including cranes, is not discussed in the NSPM QA Manual *The scope of this amendment does not impact "important to safety" SSCs described in the PINGP ISFI USAR.  *Approval requested by September 1, 2019 to support 1R30 *Precedence   Additional Information  
*Scope *Example *Additional Information
*Proposed LAR will reclassify certain fuel handling equipment as QA Type - III (commercial grade)  *Original PINGP classification scheme (1% of 10 CFR 100 limits) is more conservative than current standards *PINGP was approved for full scope AST *Fuel handling accident consequences fall below 10% of 10 CFR 50.67 limits  Summary}}
*Summary Presentation Outline
 
*Approval of USAR changes that revise the PINGP Quality Group classification for certain fuel handling equipment from QA Type I (safety
-related) to QA Type III (commercial grade)
*Changes are consistent with industry standards
-ANSI/ANS 58.14
-1993 Section 5.6.1, Item 9 -ANSI/ANS 57.1
-1992, Section 6.3
*Purchasing safety
-related spare parts does not provide commensurate public health and safety benefits.
License Amendment Request
 
*PINGP was designed and build in late 1960's/early 1970s
-Prior to issuance of GDCs
-Before guidance for classifying SSCs  *Original A/E developed standard of 1% of 10 CFR 100 limits for classifying SSCs
 
===Background===
 
*PINGP is approved for full scope AST -10 CFR 50.67 replaces 10 CFR 100 as licensing basis
*Fuel handling accident offsite dose consequences fall below 10% of 10 CFR 50.67 limits.
*Fuel handling equipment is currently classified as QA-Type I (safety-related)  Background
 
Fuel Handling Equipment to be Reclassified as "QA Type III":
  *Auxiliary Building Crane
*Spent Fuel Pool Crane
*Manipulator Cranes, including Load Cells
*Spent Fuel Assembly Handling Tools
*Rod Cluster Control Changing Tools
*Spent Fuel Transfer System and its constituent components (conveyors, upenders, and related equipment), exclusive of transfer tubes and blind flanges Scope Example   
*The QA classification of fuel handling equipment, including cranes, is not discussed in the NSPM QA Manual
*The scope of this amendment does not impact "important to safety" SSCs described in the PINGP ISFI USAR.  
  *Approval requested by September 1, 2019 to support 1R30
*Precedence Additional Information  
 
*Proposed LAR will reclassify certain fuel handling equipment as QA Type  
- III (commercial grade
)  *Original PINGP classification scheme (1% of 10 CFR 100 limits) is more conservative than current standards
*PINGP was approved for full scope AST
*Fuel handling accident consequences fall below 10% of 10 CFR 50.67 limits  Summary}}

Revision as of 22:55, 28 June 2018

Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request to Reclassify Certain Fuel Handling Equipment
ML18162A026
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/12/2018
From:
Northern States Power Co, Xcel Energy
To:
Plant Licensing Branch III
Kuntz R F, 415-3733
References
Download: ML18162A026 (9)


Text

Prairie Island License Amendment Request to Reclassify Certain Fuel Handling Equipment June 12 2018 Northern States Power

- Minnesota

  • License Amendment Request
  • Background
  • Scope *Example *Additional Information
  • Summary Presentation Outline
  • Approval of USAR changes that revise the PINGP Quality Group classification for certain fuel handling equipment from QA Type I (safety

-related) to QA Type III (commercial grade)

  • Changes are consistent with industry standards

-ANSI/ANS 58.14

-1993 Section 5.6.1, Item 9 -ANSI/ANS 57.1

-1992, Section 6.3

  • Purchasing safety

-related spare parts does not provide commensurate public health and safety benefits.

License Amendment Request

  • PINGP was designed and build in late 1960's/early 1970s

-Prior to issuance of GDCs

-Before guidance for classifying SSCs *Original A/E developed standard of 1% of 10 CFR 100 limits for classifying SSCs

Background

  • PINGP is approved for full scope AST -10 CFR 50.67 replaces 10 CFR 100 as licensing basis
  • Fuel handling accident offsite dose consequences fall below 10% of 10 CFR 50.67 limits.
  • Fuel handling equipment is currently classified as QA-Type I (safety-related) Background

Fuel Handling Equipment to be Reclassified as "QA Type III":

  • Auxiliary Building Crane
  • Spent Fuel Pool Crane
  • Manipulator Cranes, including Load Cells
  • Spent Fuel Assembly Handling Tools
  • Rod Cluster Control Changing Tools
  • Spent Fuel Transfer System and its constituent components (conveyors, upenders, and related equipment), exclusive of transfer tubes and blind flanges Scope Example
  • The QA classification of fuel handling equipment, including cranes, is not discussed in the NSPM QA Manual
  • The scope of this amendment does not impact "important to safety" SSCs described in the PINGP ISFI USAR.
  • Approval requested by September 1, 2019 to support 1R30
  • Precedence Additional Information
  • Proposed LAR will reclassify certain fuel handling equipment as QA Type

- III (commercial grade

) *Original PINGP classification scheme (1% of 10 CFR 100 limits) is more conservative than current standards

  • PINGP was approved for full scope AST
  • Fuel handling accident consequences fall below 10% of 10 CFR 50.67 limits Summary