ML18162A026: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Prairie Island License Amendment Request to Reclassify Certain Fuel Handling Equipment | {{#Wiki_filter:Prairie Island License Amendment Request to Reclassify Certain Fuel Handling Equipment June 12 2018 Northern States Power | ||
*License Amendment Request *Background *Scope *Example *Additional Information *Summary Presentation Outline | - Minnesota | ||
*Approval of USAR changes that revise the PINGP Quality Group classification for certain fuel handling equipment from QA Type I (safety-related) to QA Type III (commercial grade) *Changes are consistent with industry standards -ANSI/ANS 58.14-1993 Section 5.6.1, Item 9 -ANSI/ANS 57.1-1992, Section 6.3 *Purchasing safety-related spare parts does not provide commensurate public health and safety benefits. License Amendment Request | |||
*PINGP was designed and build in late 1960's/early 1970s -Prior to issuance of GDCs -Before guidance for classifying SSCs *Original A/E developed standard of 1% of 10 CFR 100 limits for classifying SSCs Background | *License Amendment Request | ||
*PINGP is approved for full scope AST -10 CFR 50.67 replaces 10 CFR 100 as licensing basis *Fuel handling accident offsite dose consequences fall below 10% of 10 CFR 50.67 limits. *Fuel handling equipment is currently classified as | *Background | ||
*The QA classification of fuel handling equipment, including cranes, is not discussed in the NSPM QA Manual *The scope of this amendment does not impact "important to safety" SSCs described in the PINGP ISFI USAR. *Approval requested by September 1, 2019 to support 1R30 *Precedence | *Scope *Example *Additional Information | ||
*Proposed LAR will reclassify certain fuel handling equipment as QA Type - III (commercial grade) *Original PINGP classification scheme (1% of 10 CFR 100 limits) is more conservative than current standards *PINGP was approved for full scope AST *Fuel handling accident consequences fall below 10% of 10 CFR 50.67 limits Summary}} | *Summary Presentation Outline | ||
*Approval of USAR changes that revise the PINGP Quality Group classification for certain fuel handling equipment from QA Type I (safety | |||
-related) to QA Type III (commercial grade) | |||
*Changes are consistent with industry standards | |||
-ANSI/ANS 58.14 | |||
-1993 Section 5.6.1, Item 9 -ANSI/ANS 57.1 | |||
-1992, Section 6.3 | |||
*Purchasing safety | |||
-related spare parts does not provide commensurate public health and safety benefits. | |||
License Amendment Request | |||
*PINGP was designed and build in late 1960's/early 1970s | |||
-Prior to issuance of GDCs | |||
-Before guidance for classifying SSCs *Original A/E developed standard of 1% of 10 CFR 100 limits for classifying SSCs | |||
===Background=== | |||
*PINGP is approved for full scope AST -10 CFR 50.67 replaces 10 CFR 100 as licensing basis | |||
*Fuel handling accident offsite dose consequences fall below 10% of 10 CFR 50.67 limits. | |||
*Fuel handling equipment is currently classified as QA-Type I (safety-related) Background | |||
Fuel Handling Equipment to be Reclassified as "QA Type III": | |||
*Auxiliary Building Crane | |||
*Spent Fuel Pool Crane | |||
*Manipulator Cranes, including Load Cells | |||
*Spent Fuel Assembly Handling Tools | |||
*Rod Cluster Control Changing Tools | |||
*Spent Fuel Transfer System and its constituent components (conveyors, upenders, and related equipment), exclusive of transfer tubes and blind flanges Scope Example | |||
*The QA classification of fuel handling equipment, including cranes, is not discussed in the NSPM QA Manual | |||
*The scope of this amendment does not impact "important to safety" SSCs described in the PINGP ISFI USAR. | |||
*Approval requested by September 1, 2019 to support 1R30 | |||
*Precedence Additional Information | |||
*Proposed LAR will reclassify certain fuel handling equipment as QA Type | |||
- III (commercial grade | |||
) *Original PINGP classification scheme (1% of 10 CFR 100 limits) is more conservative than current standards | |||
*PINGP was approved for full scope AST | |||
*Fuel handling accident consequences fall below 10% of 10 CFR 50.67 limits Summary}} |
Revision as of 22:55, 28 June 2018
ML18162A026 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Prairie Island ![]() |
Issue date: | 06/12/2018 |
From: | Northern States Power Co, Xcel Energy |
To: | Plant Licensing Branch III |
Kuntz R F, 415-3733 | |
References | |
Download: ML18162A026 (9) | |
Text
Prairie Island License Amendment Request to Reclassify Certain Fuel Handling Equipment June 12 2018 Northern States Power
- License Amendment Request
- Background
- Scope *Example *Additional Information
- Summary Presentation Outline
- Approval of USAR changes that revise the PINGP Quality Group classification for certain fuel handling equipment from QA Type I (safety
-related) to QA Type III (commercial grade)
- Changes are consistent with industry standards
-ANSI/ANS 58.14
-1993 Section 5.6.1, Item 9 -ANSI/ANS 57.1
-1992, Section 6.3
- Purchasing safety
-related spare parts does not provide commensurate public health and safety benefits.
License Amendment Request
- PINGP was designed and build in late 1960's/early 1970s
-Prior to issuance of GDCs
-Before guidance for classifying SSCs *Original A/E developed standard of 1% of 10 CFR 100 limits for classifying SSCs
Background
- PINGP is approved for full scope AST -10 CFR 50.67 replaces 10 CFR 100 as licensing basis
- Fuel handling accident offsite dose consequences fall below 10% of 10 CFR 50.67 limits.
- Fuel handling equipment is currently classified as QA-Type I (safety-related) Background
Fuel Handling Equipment to be Reclassified as "QA Type III":
- Auxiliary Building Crane
- Spent Fuel Pool Crane
- Manipulator Cranes, including Load Cells
- Spent Fuel Assembly Handling Tools
- Rod Cluster Control Changing Tools
- Spent Fuel Transfer System and its constituent components (conveyors, upenders, and related equipment), exclusive of transfer tubes and blind flanges Scope Example
- The QA classification of fuel handling equipment, including cranes, is not discussed in the NSPM QA Manual
- The scope of this amendment does not impact "important to safety" SSCs described in the PINGP ISFI USAR.
- Approval requested by September 1, 2019 to support 1R30
- Precedence Additional Information
- III (commercial grade
) *Original PINGP classification scheme (1% of 10 CFR 100 limits) is more conservative than current standards
- PINGP was approved for full scope AST
- Fuel handling accident consequences fall below 10% of 10 CFR 50.67 limits Summary