Information Notice 1986-57, Operating Problems with Solenoid Operated Valves at Nuclear Power Plants: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
Created page by program invented by StriderTol
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:11$S ORIGINAL                                 SSINS No.:
{{#Wiki_filter:11$S ORIGINAL
                                                              IN 86-57  6835 UNITED STATES


SSINS No.: 6835 IN 86-57
===UNITED STATES===
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
===OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT===
WASHINGTON, D.C.
 
20555


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 July 11, 1986 IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 86-57:   OPERATING PROBLEMS WITH SOLENOID OPERATED
===July 11, 1986===
IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 86-57:  


===OPERATING PROBLEMS WITH SOLENOID OPERATED===
VALVES AT NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
VALVES AT NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS


Line 35: Line 42:
This notice is to advise recipients of a series of valve failures that have
This notice is to advise recipients of a series of valve failures that have


occurred recently at several nuclear power plants. It is expected that recipi- ents will review the events discussed below for applicability to their facili- ties and consider actions, if appropriate, to preclude similar valve failures
occurred recently at several nuclear power plants.
 
It is expected that recipi- ents will review the events discussed below for applicability to their facili- ties and consider actions, if appropriate, to preclude similar valve failures


occurring at their facilities. However, suggestions contained in this notice
occurring at their facilities.


===However, suggestions contained in this notice===
do not constitute NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written
do not constitute NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written


Line 49: Line 59:
involving failures of certain valves that are actuated by solenoid operated
involving failures of certain valves that are actuated by solenoid operated


valves (SOVs) to operate properly. These failures have adversely affected the
valves (SOVs) to operate properly.


===These failures have adversely affected the===
intended functions of the main steam isolation system, pressure relief and
intended functions of the main steam isolation system, pressure relief and


fluid control systems. Attachment 1 to this information notice describes the
fluid control systems.
 
Attachment 1 to this information notice describes the


failure events and the corrective actions taken.
failure events and the corrective actions taken.
Line 60: Line 73:
In most of the cases described in Attachment 1, the cause for triggering the
In most of the cases described in Attachment 1, the cause for triggering the


event was attributed to a malfunctioning SOV that served as a pilot valve. This
event was attributed to a malfunctioning SOV that served as a pilot valve.
 
This


in turn resulted in the malfunction of the associated main valve. The failures
in turn resulted in the malfunction of the associated main valve.


===The failures===
of the SOVs can be traced to the following different causes: (1) potentially
of the SOVs can be traced to the following different causes: (1) potentially


Line 73: Line 89:


air systems) are being used periodically and are not designed to "oil-free"
air systems) are being used periodically and are not designed to "oil-free"
  specifications as required for Class IE service, (3) chloride contaminants
specifications as required for Class IE service, (3) chloride contaminants


causing open circuits in coils of the SOVs, possibly as a result of questionable
causing open circuits in coils of the SOVs, possibly as a result of questionable
Line 83: Line 99:
in SOVs has not been adequately maintained, and (5) lubricants have been used
in SOVs has not been adequately maintained, and (5) lubricants have been used


excessively during maintenance. ASCO provides installation and maintenance
excessively during maintenance.


===ASCO provides installation and maintenance===
8607090425
8607090425


Attachment 1 IN 86-57 July 11, 1986 b.   Viton has superior high-temperature performance when compared to EP
===Attachment 1===
IN 86-57 July 11, 1986 b. Viton has superior high-temperature performance when compared to EP
 
and is impervious to hydrocarbons.


and is impervious to hydrocarbons. Its major disadvantage is that it
===Its major disadvantage is that it===
is less resistant to radiation than EP by a factor of ten.


is less resistant to radiation than EP by a factor of ten. ASCO
ASCO


recommends Viton for applications that are not oil-free and where
recommends Viton for applications that are not oil-free and where
Line 105: Line 126:
replaced all Unit 2 dual solenoid valves with valves having Viton seats
replaced all Unit 2 dual solenoid valves with valves having Viton seats


and seals. Because Viton has a 20-megarad limit, the licensee plans to
and seals.
 
Because Viton has a 20-megarad limit, the licensee plans to


replace these elastomers every 3.3 years to meet environmental qualifica- tion requirements for the MSIV application.
replace these elastomers every 3.3 years to meet environmental qualifica- tion requirements for the MSIV application.
Line 118: Line 141:


using the subject dual solenoid valve.)
using the subject dual solenoid valve.)
On October 5, 1985, the dc coils of two MSIVs failed during the perfor- mance of post-maintenance testing of the MSIVs. Investigation into the
On October 5, 1985, the dc coils of two MSIVs failed during the perfor- mance of post-maintenance testing of the MSIVs.


failures indicated an open circuit in the dc coils. The coils were
===Investigation into the===
failures indicated an open circuit in the dc coils.


===The coils were===
replaced and the valves subsequently retested satisfactorily.
replaced and the valves subsequently retested satisfactorily.


On October 15, 1985, an unplanned closure of an MSIV occurred while Unit 2 was operating at 99 percent full power. Closure of the MSIV occurred when
On October 15, 1985, an unplanned closure of an MSIV occurred while Unit 2 was operating at 99 percent full power.


===Closure of the MSIV occurred when===
the ac solenoid coil portion of the MSIV associated SOV was de-energized
the ac solenoid coil portion of the MSIV associated SOV was de-energized


in accordance with a periodic test procedure. It was not known then that
in accordance with a periodic test procedure.


===It was not known then that===
there was an open circuit in the associated dc solenoid coil portion of
there was an open circuit in the associated dc solenoid coil portion of


the dual SOV. Consequently, when the ac coil was de-energized, closure of
the dual SOV. Consequently, when the ac coil was de-energized, closure of


the MSIV resulted. The failed dc coil was replaced and then retested
the MSIV resulted.


===The failed dc coil was replaced and then retested===
satisfactorily.
satisfactorily.


Line 142: Line 170:
that the failures appeared to be separation of the very fine coil wire at
that the failures appeared to be separation of the very fine coil wire at


the junction point where it connects to the much larger field lead. This
the junction point where it connects to the much larger field lead.
 
This


connection point is a soldered connection that is then taped and
connection point is a soldered connection that is then taped and
Line 152: Line 182:
storage) by the CP&L Research Center indicated the separation might be
storage) by the CP&L Research Center indicated the separation might be


corrosion induced by chloride contaminants. To date, the licensee and
corrosion induced by chloride contaminants.


ASCO are unable to determine the source of the chloride. However, followup investigation by the NRC revealed that ASCO had previously
===To date, the licensee and===
ASCO are unable to determine the source of the chloride.


experienced similar dc coil open circuit anomalies after a surface ship- ment of SOVs overseas to Japan. At that time, ASCO believed that the salt
However, followup investigation by the NRC revealed that ASCO had previously


experienced similar dc coil open circuit anomalies after a surface ship- ment of SOVs overseas to Japan.
===At that time, ASCO believed that the salt===
water ambient conditions during shipping may have been the source of the
water ambient conditions during shipping may have been the source of the


chlorine-induced failures. ASCO recommends specific handling, packaging, and storage conditions for spare parts and valves at facilities.
chlorine-induced failures.
 
ASCO recommends specific handling, packaging, and storage conditions for spare parts and valves at facilities.


Attachment 1 IN 86-57 July 11, 1986 The licensee initiated a temporary surveillance program to monitor opera- bility of the solenoid coils on October 16, 1985. A modification was
===Attachment 1===
IN 86-57 July 11, 1986 The licensee initiated a temporary surveillance program to monitor opera- bility of the solenoid coils on October 16, 1985. A modification was


performed to install a voltage dropping resistor in the individual coil
performed to install a voltage dropping resistor in the individual coil
Line 170: Line 207:
control room. This allows continuity of the coil circuitry to be verified
control room. This allows continuity of the coil circuitry to be verified


by measuring a voltage drop across the resistor. According to the
by measuring a voltage drop across the resistor.


===According to the===
licensee, until the cause for failure can be determined, plans are to
licensee, until the cause for failure can be determined, plans are to


check the coil circuitry for continuity on a daily basis.
check the coil circuitry for continuity on a daily basis.


2.   Scram Discharge Solenoid Valve Failure
2.


In November 1985, Carolina Power and Light's Brunswick facility experi- enced problems with several scram discharge SOVs. The problems were
===Scram Discharge Solenoid Valve Failure===
In November 1985, Carolina Power and Light's Brunswick facility experi- enced problems with several scram discharge SOVs.


===The problems were===
identified during periodic surveillance testing to determine the single
identified during periodic surveillance testing to determine the single


rod insertion times and resulted in several rods with slow insertion
rod insertion times and resulted in several rods with slow insertion


times. Initial troubleshooting isolated the problem to the SOVs in the
times.
 
Initial troubleshooting isolated the problem to the SOVs in the


scram discharge line for two of the control rods, which were subsequently
scram discharge line for two of the control rods, which were subsequently
Line 202: Line 244:
valves' internal passages or caused sticking of the diaphragms, thereby
valves' internal passages or caused sticking of the diaphragms, thereby


contributing to the slow insertion times. The technical manual for the
contributing to the slow insertion times.


===The technical manual for the===
subject valves states that body passage gaskets should be lubricated with
subject valves states that body passage gaskets should be lubricated with


Line 216: Line 259:
required by the Technical Specifications provides sufficient assurance
required by the Technical Specifications provides sufficient assurance


that this problem does not exist in other SOVs. In addition, the licensee
that this problem does not exist in other SOVs.


===In addition, the licensee===
stated that maintenance procedures and practices would be reviewed and
stated that maintenance procedures and practices would be reviewed and


Line 227: Line 271:
On September 10, 1985, the Haddam Neck Nuclear Power Plant was operating at 100
On September 10, 1985, the Haddam Neck Nuclear Power Plant was operating at 100
percent power when one of the six SOVs in the auxiliary feedwater system (AFW)
percent power when one of the six SOVs in the auxiliary feedwater system (AFW)
failed to change state when de-energized. This failure was detected during the
failed to change state when de-energized.


===This failure was detected during the===
performance of a preventive maintenance procedure developed to periodically
performance of a preventive maintenance procedure developed to periodically


cycle each of the six SOVs to prevent a sticking problem similar to SOV fail- ures previously experienced on November 2, 1984. In that earlier event, two
cycle each of the six SOVs to prevent a sticking problem similar to SOV fail- ures previously experienced on November 2, 1984.
 
===In that earlier event, two===
feedwater bypass valves failed to open automatically and the cause was deter- mined to be sticking SOVs.
 
The faulty SOV was ASCO Model NP8320A-185E and the
 
licensee has been unable to determine the cause of the malfunction.
 
The
 
===Attachment 2===
IN 86-57


feedwater bypass valves failed to open automatically and the cause was deter- mined to be sticking SOVs. The faulty SOV was ASCO Model NP8320A-185E and the
===July 11, 1986===
LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED


licensee has been unable to determine the cause of the malfunction. The
===IE INFORMATION NOTICES===
Information


Attachment 2 IN 86-57 July 11, 1986 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED
Date of


IE INFORMATION NOTICES
Notice No.


Information                                  Date of
Subject


Notice No.    Subject                        Issue   Issued to
Issue


86-56          Reliability Of Main Steam      7/10/86 All PWR facilities
Issued to


Safety Valves                          holding an OL or CP
86-56


86-55          Delayed Access To Safety-      7/10/86 All power reactor
===Reliability Of Main Steam===
Safety Valves


Related Areas And Equipment            facilities holding
7/10/86


During Plant Emergencies              an OL or CP
===All PWR facilities===
holding an OL or CP


86-54          Criminal Prosecution Of A      6/27/86 All holders of by- Former Radiation Safety               product, source, or
86-55
86-54 Delayed Access To Safety-


Officer Who Willfully                  special nuclear
===Related Areas And Equipment===
During Plant Emergencies


Directed An Unqualified                material
===Criminal Prosecution Of A===
Former Radiation Safety


Individual To Perform
===Officer Who Willfully===
Directed An Unqualified


===Individual To Perform===
Radiography
Radiography


86-53          Improper Use Of Heat Shrink-   6/26/86 All power reactor
Improper Use Of Heat Shrink- able Tubing
 
7/10/86
6/27/86
6/26/86
86-53
86-52 Conductor Insulation Degrada- 6/26/86 tion On Foxboro Model E
 
Controllers
 
Excessive Pneumatic Leakage
 
6/18/86 In The Automatic Depressuriza- tion System


able Tubing                            facilities holding
===All power reactor===
facilities holding


an OL or CP
an OL or CP


86-52          Conductor Insulation Degrada- 6/26/86  All power reactor
All holders of by- product, source, or


tion On Foxboro Model E                facilities holding
special nuclear


Controllers                            an OL or CP
material


86-51          Excessive Pneumatic Leakage 6/18/86    All BWR facilities
===All power reactor===
facilities holding


In The Automatic Depressuriza-        holding an OL or CP
an OL or CP


tion System
===All power reactor===
facilities holding


86-50          Inadequate Testing To Detect  6/18/86 All power reactor
an OL or CP


Failures Of Safety-Related            facilities holding
===All BWR facilities===
holding an OL or CP


Pneumatic Components Or                an OL or CP
===All power reactor===
facilities holding


Systems
an OL or CP
 
===All power reactor===
facilities holding
 
an OL or CP
 
===All BWR facilities===
holding an OL or CP


86-49         Age/Environment Induced        6/16/86 All power reactor
86-51
86-50
86-49


Electrical Cable Failues              facilities holding
===Inadequate Testing To Detect===
Failures Of Safety-Related


an OL or CP
===Pneumatic Components Or===
Systems


86-48          Inadequate Testing Of Boron 6/13/86    All BWR facilities
Age/Environment Induced


Solution Concentration In The          holding an OL or CP
===Electrical Cable Failues===
Inadequate Testing Of Boron


===Solution Concentration In The===
Standby Liquid Control System
Standby Liquid Control System


OL = Operating License
6/18/86
6/16/86
6/13/86
86-48 OL = Operating License


CP = Construction Permit}}
CP = Construction Permit}}


{{Information notice-Nav}}
{{Information notice-Nav}}

Latest revision as of 11:08, 16 January 2025

Operating Problems with Solenoid Operated Valves at Nuclear Power Plants
ML031220718
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, 05000000, Zimmer, Fort Saint Vrain, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant, Skagit, Marble Hill, Crane
Issue date: 07/11/1986
From:
NRC/IE
To:
References
IN-86-057, NUDOCS 8607090425
Download: ML031220718 (4)
v • d • e


11$S ORIGINAL

SSINS No.: 6835 IN 86-57

UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

WASHINGTON, D.C.

20555

July 11, 1986

IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 86-57:

OPERATING PROBLEMS WITH SOLENOID OPERATED

VALVES AT NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

Addressees

All nuclear power reactor facilities holding an operating license or a

construction permit.

Purpose

This notice is to advise recipients of a series of valve failures that have

occurred recently at several nuclear power plants.

It is expected that recipi- ents will review the events discussed below for applicability to their facili- ties and consider actions, if appropriate, to preclude similar valve failures

occurring at their facilities.

However, suggestions contained in this notice

do not constitute NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written

response is required.

Description of Circumstances

The NRC has received reports from licensees of operating nuclear power plants

involving failures of certain valves that are actuated by solenoid operated

valves (SOVs) to operate properly.

These failures have adversely affected the

intended functions of the main steam isolation system, pressure relief and

fluid control systems.

Attachment 1 to this information notice describes the

failure events and the corrective actions taken.

Discussion:

In most of the cases described in Attachment 1, the cause for triggering the

event was attributed to a malfunctioning SOV that served as a pilot valve.

This

in turn resulted in the malfunction of the associated main valve.

The failures

of the SOVs can be traced to the following different causes: (1) potentially

high-temperature ambient conditions are not being continuously monitored in areas

where SOVs are installed and operating in an energized state, (2) hydrocarbon

contaminants, probably because backup air systems (e.g., plant service or shop

air systems) are being used periodically and are not designed to "oil-free"

specifications as required for Class IE service, (3) chloride contaminants

causing open circuits in coils of the SOVs, possibly as a result of questionable

handling, packaging, and storage procedures, (4) an active replacement parts

program associated with the elastomers and other short-lived subcomponents used

in SOVs has not been adequately maintained, and (5) lubricants have been used

excessively during maintenance.

ASCO provides installation and maintenance

8607090425

Attachment 1

IN 86-57 July 11, 1986 b. Viton has superior high-temperature performance when compared to EP

and is impervious to hydrocarbons.

Its major disadvantage is that it

is less resistant to radiation than EP by a factor of ten.

ASCO

recommends Viton for applications that are not oil-free and where

radiation levels do not exceed 20 megarads.

On the basis of a licensee review of the Brunswick Station maintenance

history, which showed the performance of Viton to be satisfactory in ASCO

valves, and the available literature and industry experience, the licensee

replaced all Unit 2 dual solenoid valves with valves having Viton seats

and seals.

Because Viton has a 20-megarad limit, the licensee plans to

replace these elastomers every 3.3 years to meet environmental qualifica- tion requirements for the MSIV application.

After replacing the faulty valves with valves having Viton disc and seal

material, the licensee experienced several SOV failures resulting from

open circuits of the dc coils on Unit 2. (Brunswick Station employs ASCO

NP8323A36V valves that use one ac coil and one dc coil in applications

using the subject dual solenoid valve.)

On October 5, 1985, the dc coils of two MSIVs failed during the perfor- mance of post-maintenance testing of the MSIVs.

Investigation into the

failures indicated an open circuit in the dc coils.

The coils were

replaced and the valves subsequently retested satisfactorily.

On October 15, 1985, an unplanned closure of an MSIV occurred while Unit 2 was operating at 99 percent full power.

Closure of the MSIV occurred when

the ac solenoid coil portion of the MSIV associated SOV was de-energized

in accordance with a periodic test procedure.

It was not known then that

there was an open circuit in the associated dc solenoid coil portion of

the dual SOV. Consequently, when the ac coil was de-energized, closure of

the MSIV resulted.

The failed dc coil was replaced and then retested

satisfactorily.

Investigation into the failures of the dc coil by the licensee determined

that the failures appeared to be separation of the very fine coil wire at

the junction point where it connects to the much larger field lead.

This

connection point is a soldered connection that is then taped and

lacquered.

Further analysis of the coils (two failed dc coils plus five spares from

storage) by the CP&L Research Center indicated the separation might be

corrosion induced by chloride contaminants.

To date, the licensee and

ASCO are unable to determine the source of the chloride.

However, followup investigation by the NRC revealed that ASCO had previously

experienced similar dc coil open circuit anomalies after a surface ship- ment of SOVs overseas to Japan.

At that time, ASCO believed that the salt

water ambient conditions during shipping may have been the source of the

chlorine-induced failures.

ASCO recommends specific handling, packaging, and storage conditions for spare parts and valves at facilities.

Attachment 1

IN 86-57 July 11, 1986 The licensee initiated a temporary surveillance program to monitor opera- bility of the solenoid coils on October 16, 1985. A modification was

performed to install a voltage dropping resistor in the individual coil

circuits so that they can be monitored directly from cabinets in the

control room. This allows continuity of the coil circuitry to be verified

by measuring a voltage drop across the resistor.

According to the

licensee, until the cause for failure can be determined, plans are to

check the coil circuitry for continuity on a daily basis.

2.

Scram Discharge Solenoid Valve Failure

In November 1985, Carolina Power and Light's Brunswick facility experi- enced problems with several scram discharge SOVs.

The problems were

identified during periodic surveillance testing to determine the single

rod insertion times and resulted in several rods with slow insertion

times.

Initial troubleshooting isolated the problem to the SOVs in the

scram discharge line for two of the control rods, which were subsequently

replaced and tested satisfactorily.

The licensee disassembled the failed SOVs, which were manufactured by ASCO

(Model HV-90-405-2A), for failure analysis. When the valves were disas- sembled, it was noted that copious amounts of silicone lubricant had been

applied by the licensee to all gaskets, seals, and diaphragms internal to

the valves during previous routine maintenance.. The licensee believes

that the excessive amount of lubricant may have blocked some of the

valves' internal passages or caused sticking of the diaphragms, thereby

contributing to the slow insertion times.

The technical manual for the

subject valves states that body passage gaskets should be lubricated with

moderate amounts of Dow Corning's Valve Seal Silicone Lubricant or an

equivalent high-grade silicone grease.

The licensee conducted successful scram tests on all other rods. A

periodic retest of 10 percent of the control rods every 120 days as

required by the Technical Specifications provides sufficient assurance

that this problem does not exist in other SOVs.

In addition, the licensee

stated that maintenance procedures and practices would be reviewed and

modified, as required, to prevent the application of excessive amounts of

lubricant during repair or overhaul of components.

Haddam Neck Nuclear Power Plant

On September 10, 1985, the Haddam Neck Nuclear Power Plant was operating at 100

percent power when one of the six SOVs in the auxiliary feedwater system (AFW)

failed to change state when de-energized.

This failure was detected during the

performance of a preventive maintenance procedure developed to periodically

cycle each of the six SOVs to prevent a sticking problem similar to SOV fail- ures previously experienced on November 2, 1984.

In that earlier event, two

feedwater bypass valves failed to open automatically and the cause was deter- mined to be sticking SOVs.

The faulty SOV was ASCO Model NP8320A-185E and the

licensee has been unable to determine the cause of the malfunction.

The

Attachment 2

IN 86-57

July 11, 1986

LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

IE INFORMATION NOTICES

Information

Date of

Notice No.

Subject

Issue

Issued to

86-56

Reliability Of Main Steam

Safety Valves

7/10/86

All PWR facilities

holding an OL or CP

86-55

86-54 Delayed Access To Safety-

Related Areas And Equipment

During Plant Emergencies

Criminal Prosecution Of A

Former Radiation Safety

Officer Who Willfully

Directed An Unqualified

Individual To Perform

Radiography

Improper Use Of Heat Shrink- able Tubing

7/10/86

6/27/86

6/26/86

86-53

86-52 Conductor Insulation Degrada- 6/26/86 tion On Foxboro Model E

Controllers

Excessive Pneumatic Leakage

6/18/86 In The Automatic Depressuriza- tion System

All power reactor

facilities holding

an OL or CP

All holders of by- product, source, or

special nuclear

material

All power reactor

facilities holding

an OL or CP

All power reactor

facilities holding

an OL or CP

All BWR facilities

holding an OL or CP

All power reactor

facilities holding

an OL or CP

All power reactor

facilities holding

an OL or CP

All BWR facilities

holding an OL or CP

86-51

86-50

86-49

Inadequate Testing To Detect

Failures Of Safety-Related

Pneumatic Components Or

Systems

Age/Environment Induced

Electrical Cable Failues

Inadequate Testing Of Boron

Solution Concentration In The

Standby Liquid Control System

6/18/86

6/16/86

6/13/86

86-48 OL = Operating License

CP = Construction Permit


Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=Information_Notice_1986-57,_Operating_Problems_with_Solenoid_Operated_Valves_at_Nuclear_Power_Plants&oldid=5420818"