ML20057B783: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:mar m M A8W AMGt'YY S$$ | ||
. es4; | |||
~~ ' | |||
j | |||
-g u_ | |||
e | |||
..a% | |||
5., | |||
y | |||
-[ | |||
t | |||
.P | |||
<e r' | |||
ADJUDICATORYsISSUE | |||
= - | |||
October 3, 1983 q# | |||
NEGATIVE CONSENT) | |||
SECY-83-335A A | |||
Nr | |||
- g *. ' | |||
For Th Commission $$ | |||
: ? $ t % 'J % 5 G From: | |||
E. Leo Slaggie," Acting Solicitor | |||
, w q o y.y y s Subj ect.: | |||
LORION V. NRC _ (D.C. CIR. HO. 82-1132) | |||
A "S id si'$. M Discussion: | |||
On September 22, 1983 the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied our Petition for Rehearing with a Syggestion for Rehearing e_n Banc in this case. | |||
On September 27,,1983 we filed a x tion to stay issuance of the. mandate for' thirty days to allow the Government time _to decide whether to seek Supreme Court review. | |||
k F C % 'i @ v F | |||
t | |||
/ | |||
f \\ | |||
C-Y D \\ | |||
I. | |||
[ | |||
. ~ = | |||
i. | |||
3.- | |||
L 1 | |||
;4 - | |||
3-The Court in Lorion held, t Courts of Appeals do not have jurisdiction under section'189b' of-the Atomic Energy Act to review NRC denials of requests' for enforcement action under 10 CFR 2.206. | |||
The opinion was fully discussed in SECY-83-335. | |||
.na s n i | |||
4 | |||
& 1' | |||
!nfonoSn m this record was daMed | |||
/ | |||
3 in accoidance with Me f edom of !nformdion 3 | |||
Act, atmptans -._& | |||
FDIA - ) ) : V]b - | |||
.a s | |||
==Contact:== | |||
''* 4~ | |||
y 7,. | |||
Rick Levi, OGC, 41465 3 | |||
'n h[ | |||
C 9309240002 930428 PDR FOIA Y-- | |||
l GILINSK92-436 PDR i | |||
I 8 | |||
.c | |||
: v4r, | |||
c in31ewjo.ij | |||
# )/ | |||
L l | |||
( | |||
J i | |||
f l | |||
l | |||
, c.gyg. y, L | |||
.p.ysy.. | |||
.. :. z : | |||
. {. | |||
'"? M. ' | |||
h* | |||
.s.. | |||
y | |||
. c.L.g;. | |||
5 b | |||
_..ejo.E. I,eo Slaggie | |||
- Acting Solicitor | |||
,{. | |||
t, | |||
...r 'f F | |||
A % @3 - | |||
In the absenc[e of instructions to the contrary, jfS 1 :~ | |||
SECY NOTE: | |||
SECY will notiify OGC on Tuesday, October 12, 1983 that the Co::: mission by negative consent, to the action propos,ed in this paper. | |||
assents t | |||
.. M:.... | |||
j | |||
''80.,; | |||
* DISTRIBUTION: | |||
{ | |||
. fi*GQ'd;C;, | |||
J Con::nissioners | |||
'PA; ; - | |||
OGC | |||
,-; ~ t | |||
'I CPE c. | |||
, z*X g s? | |||
EDO ELD 1 | |||
SECY f* | |||
.l' i | |||
1 | |||
? | |||
r. | |||
[ | |||
t i | |||
3' | |||
( | |||
l a | |||
.a | |||
*c r | |||
} | |||
v | |||
: - i;^c., | |||
j c | |||
.. a ::,;< | |||
., -. : : c.. : | |||
? | |||
'. :-i;;.ir;f,::;. | |||
-z y | |||
~_ | |||
-}} |
Latest revision as of 12:15, 17 December 2024
ML20057B783 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 10/03/1983 |
From: | Slaggie E NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC) |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML20049A457 | List:
|
References | |
FOIA-92-436 SECY-83-335A, NUDOCS 9309240002 | |
Download: ML20057B783 (2) | |
Text
mar m M A8W AMGt'YY S$$
. es4;
~~ '
j
-g u_
e
..a%
5.,
y
-[
t
.P
<e r'
ADJUDICATORYsISSUE
= -
October 3, 1983 q#
NEGATIVE CONSENT)
SECY-83-335A A
Nr
- g *. '
For Th Commission $$
- ? $ t % 'J % 5 G From:
E. Leo Slaggie," Acting Solicitor
, w q o y.y y s Subj ect.:
LORION V. NRC _ (D.C. CIR. HO. 82-1132)
A "S id si'$. M Discussion:
On September 22, 1983 the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied our Petition for Rehearing with a Syggestion for Rehearing e_n Banc in this case.
On September 27,,1983 we filed a x tion to stay issuance of the. mandate for' thirty days to allow the Government time _to decide whether to seek Supreme Court review.
k F C % 'i @ v F
t
/
f \\
C-Y D \\
I.
[
. ~ =
i.
3.-
L 1
- 4 -
3-The Court in Lorion held, t Courts of Appeals do not have jurisdiction under section'189b' of-the Atomic Energy Act to review NRC denials of requests' for enforcement action under 10 CFR 2.206.
The opinion was fully discussed in SECY-83-335.
.na s n i
4
& 1'
!nfonoSn m this record was daMed
/
3 in accoidance with Me f edom of !nformdion 3
Act, atmptans -._&
FDIA - ) ) : V]b -
.a s
Contact:
* 4~
y 7,.
Rick Levi, OGC, 41465 3
'n h[
C 9309240002 930428 PDR FOIA Y--
l GILINSK92-436 PDR i
I 8
.c
- v4r,
c in31ewjo.ij
- )/
L l
(
J i
f l
l
, c.gyg. y, L
.p.ysy..
.. :. z :
. {.
'"? M. '
h*
.s..
y
. c.L.g;.
5 b
_..ejo.E. I,eo Slaggie
- Acting Solicitor
,{.
t,
...r 'f F
A % @3 -
In the absenc[e of instructions to the contrary, jfS 1 :~
SECY NOTE:
SECY will notiify OGC on Tuesday, October 12, 1983 that the Co::: mission by negative consent, to the action propos,ed in this paper.
assents t
.. M:....
j
80.,;
- DISTRIBUTION:
{
. fi*GQ'd;C;,
J Con::nissioners
'PA; ; -
,-; ~ t
'I CPE c.
, z*X g s?
EDO ELD 1
SECY f*
.l' i
1
?
r.
[
t i
3'
(
l a
.a
- c r
}
v
- - i;^c.,
j c
.. a ::,;<
., -. : : c.. :
?
'. :-i;;.ir;f,::;.
-z y
~_
-