ML20126G424: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Cooper Nuclear Station - Acceptance Review of License Amendment Request to Adopt Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-566, (EPID L-2020-LLA-0074) | Cooper Nuclear Station - Acceptance Review of License Amendment Request to Adopt Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-566, (EPID L-2020-LLA-0074) | ||
By letter dated April 1, 2020 (ADAMS Accession No. ML20101H298), Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD) submitted a license amendment request for Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS). The proposed amendment would adopt Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) traveler TSTF-566, Revise Actions for Inoperable RHR [Residual Heat Removal] Shutdown Cooling Subsystems. The proposed amendment would revise the CNS technical specification (TS) actions applicable when a residual heat removal shutdown cooling subsystem is inoperable. | By {{letter dated|date=April 1, 2020|text=letter dated April 1, 2020}} (ADAMS Accession No. ML20101H298), Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD) submitted a license amendment request for Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS). The proposed amendment would adopt Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) traveler TSTF-566, Revise Actions for Inoperable RHR [Residual Heat Removal] Shutdown Cooling Subsystems. The proposed amendment would revise the CNS technical specification (TS) actions applicable when a residual heat removal shutdown cooling subsystem is inoperable. | ||
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | ||
Latest revision as of 10:51, 22 August 2022
| ML20126G424 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 05/05/2020 |
| From: | Thomas Wengert NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL4 |
| To: | Dewhirst L Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD) |
| Wengert T | |
| References | |
| L-2020-LLA-0074 | |
| Download: ML20126G424 (3) | |
Text
From: Wengert, Thomas Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 9:49 AM To: Dewhirst, Linda R.
Cc: Van Der Kamp, David W.; Forland, Thomas J.; Dixon-Herrity, Jennifer
Subject:
Cooper Nuclear Station - Acceptance Review of License Amendment Request to Adopt Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-566, (EPID L-2020-LLA-0074)
By letter dated April 1, 2020 (ADAMS Accession No. ML20101H298), Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD) submitted a license amendment request for Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS). The proposed amendment would adopt Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) traveler TSTF-566, Revise Actions for Inoperable RHR [Residual Heat Removal] Shutdown Cooling Subsystems. The proposed amendment would revise the CNS technical specification (TS) actions applicable when a residual heat removal shutdown cooling subsystem is inoperable.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the TSs) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 120 hours0.00139 days <br />0.0333 hours <br />1.984127e-4 weeks <br />4.566e-5 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review with 12 months, which is May 2021. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during our routine interactions.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change due to several factors, including requests for additional information and unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Tom Wengert, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (301) 415-4037
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DRMA Email Number: 567 Mail Envelope Properties (MN2PR09MB574001476F7F68D30AE5C0648FA70)
Subject:
Cooper Nuclear Station - Acceptance Review of License Amendment Request to Adopt Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) Traveler TSTF-566, (EPID L-2020-LLA-0074)
Sent Date: 5/5/2020 9:48:30 AM Received Date: 5/5/2020 9:48:00 AM From: Wengert, Thomas Created By: Thomas.Wengert@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Van Der Kamp, David W." <dwvande@nppd.com>
Tracking Status: None "Forland, Thomas J." <tjforla@nppd.com>
Tracking Status: None "Dixon-Herrity, Jennifer" <Jennifer.Dixon-Herrity@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Dewhirst, Linda R." <lrdewhi@nppd.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: MN2PR09MB5740.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3454 5/5/2020 9:48:00 AM Options Priority: Normal Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: