ML110400659

2011/01/18 Watts Bar 2 OL - FW: 20110107 Open Item List Master TVA Update 01-07-11.docx

ML110400659
Person / Time
Site:	Watts Bar
Issue date:	01/18/2011
From:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
References
Download: ML110400659 (50)

Text

WBN2Public Resource From: Poole, Justin Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:17 PM To: Garg, Hukam; Darbali, Samir; Carte, Norbert; Singh, Gursharan Cc: WBN2HearingFile Resource

Subject:

FW: 20110107 Open Item List Master TVA Update 01-07-11.docx Attachments: 20110107 Open Item List Master TVA Update 01-07-11.docx FYI Justin C. Poole Project Manager NRR/DORL/LPWB U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301)4152048 email: Justin.Poole@nrc.gov From: Clark, Mark Steven [1]

Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 3:19 PM To: Crouch, William D Cc: Hilmes, Steven A; Poole, Justin; Knuettel, Edward Terry

Subject:

20110107 Open Item List Master TVA Update 01-07-11.docx Bill:

Please forward the attached update to Justin.

Thanks, Steve Steve Clark Bechtel Power Corp.

Control Systems Watts Bar 2 Completion Project Phone: 423.365.3007 e-mail: msclark0@tva.gov 1

Hearing Identifier: Watts_Bar_2_Operating_LA_Public Email Number: 250 Mail Envelope Properties (19D990B45D535548840D1118C451C74D7B6471553B)

Subject:

FW: 20110107 Open Item List Master TVA Update 01-07-11.docx Sent Date: 1/18/2011 4:17:18 PM Received Date: 1/18/2011 4:17:23 PM From: Poole, Justin Created By: Justin.Poole@nrc.gov Recipients:

"WBN2HearingFile Resource" <WBN2HearingFile.Resource@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Garg, Hukam" <Hukam.Garg@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Darbali, Samir" <Samir.Darbali@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Carte, Norbert" <Norbert.Carte@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Singh, Gursharan" <Gursharan.Singh@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR02.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 693 1/18/2011 4:17:23 PM 20110107 Open Item List Master TVA Update 01-07-11.docx 440542 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N B (

1. Y 001 All All A The Watts Bar Nuclear Plant FSAR red-line for Unit 2 (Agency 12/15/2009 Presentation Slides Closed Closed EICB RAI 3/12/2010 NNC 11/19/09: The FSAR contains B (

2. Y 002 All All A Are there I&C components and systems that have changed to a 12/15/2009 Presentation Slides Closed Closed EICB RAI 3/12/2010 NNC 11/19/09: The FSAR contains B (

3. Y 003 All All A Because a digital I&C platform can be configured and programmed 12/15/2009 Presentation Slides Closed Closed EICB RAI 3/12/2010 NNC 11/19/09: The FSAR contains

( B 004 All All Please identify the information that will be submitted for each Responder: Webb 1/13/10 Public Meeting 4. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI January 13, 2010 NNC 11/19/09: LIC-110 Rev. 1 Section 005 7.1.3.1 By letter date February 28, 2008 (Agencywide Documents Access Responder: Craig/Webb 5. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated D 6. Y

( ( ( (

006 Amendment 95 of the FSAR, Chapter 7.3, shows that change 7.3- By letter dated February 5, 2010: TVA provided the Unit 2 Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated NNC: WCAP-12096 Rev. 7 007 7.1.3.1 a ( The setpoint methodology has been reviewed and approved by the TVA Letter Dated March 12, 2010 (Enclosure 1, Item No. 7 7. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated TVA to provide Rev. 8 of the Unit 1 008 7.3 G G G G There are several staff positions that provide guidance on setpoint TVA Letter Dated March 12, 2010 (Enclosure 1, Item No. 8 8. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated r A 009 7.3.2 5.6, Change 7.3-2, identified in Watts Bar Nuclear Plant FSAR red-line TVA Letter Dated March 12, 2010 (Enclosure 1, Item No. 9 9. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI 3/12/10,

(

010 7.3 7.3 The original SER on Watts Bar (NUREG-0847) documents that the TVA Letter Dated March 12, 2010 (Enclosure 1, Item No. 10 10. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI 3/12/10, D

a r

(

011 7.3.2 5.6, NUREG-0847 Supplement No. 2 Section 7.3.2 includes an TVA Letter Dated March 12, 2010 (Enclosure 1, Item No. 11 11. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI ML101680598, D

a r

( 12. Y 012 7.4 7.4 ( D The original SER on Watts Bar (NUREG-0847) documents that the TVA Letter Dated March 12, 2010 (Enclosure 1, Item No. 12 Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated G a r 13. Y 013 7.1.3.1 Chapter 7 and Chapter 16 of Amendment 95 to the FSAR do not TVA Letter Dated March 12, 2010 (Enclosure 1, Item No. 13 Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated TS have been docketed.

014 All All ( B Provide the justification for any hardware and software changes Date: 4/27/10 14. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting TVA Letter dated 015 D ( Verify that the refurbishment of the power range nuclear Date: 4/27/10 15. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting TVA Letter dated

(

016 a C ( Identify the precedents in license amendment requests (LARs), if Date: 4/27/10 16. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting TVA Letter dated G

r a A 17. Y 017 7.3.1 7.3.1, Identify precedents in LARs, if any, for the solid state protection Date: 4/27/10 Closed Closed NRC Meeting TVA Letter dated

(

018 Identify any changes made to any instrumentation and control Date: 4/27/10 18. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting TVA Letter dated 019 Verify that the containment purge isolation radiation monitor is the Date: 4/27/10 19. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting TVA Letter dated

( D 020 Provide environmental qualification information pursuant to Section Date: 4/27/10 20. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting TVA Letter dated NNC 4/30/10: SRP Section 7.0 states:

021 7.3 ( ( ( ( ( For the Foxboro Spec 200 platform, identify any changes in Date: 5/25/10 21. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting TVA Letter dated The resolution of this item will be C a G G G G G 022 7.3.2 5.6, Verify the auxiliary feedwater control refurbishment results in a Date: 4/27/10 22. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting TVA Letter dated a r 023 Provide environmental qualification (10 CFR 50.49) information for Date: 4/27/10 23. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting TVA Letter dated NNC 4/30/10: SRP Section 7.0 states:

024 Provide a schedule by the January 13, 2010, meeting for providing During the January 13, 2010 meeting, TVA presented a 24. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting N/A - Request for NNC 4/30/10: Carte to address

( ( ( ( ( (

025 7.5.2 7.5.1 For the containment radiation high radiation monitor, verify that the Date: 4/27/10 25. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting ML101230248, 026 Provide environmental qualification (10 CFR 50.49) information for Date: 4/27/10 26. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting TVA Letter dated NNC 4/30/10: SRP Section 7.0 states:

( ( ( (

027 7.7.1.4 For Foxboro I/A provide information regarding safety/non-safety- Date: 4/27/10 27. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting TVA Letter dated 028 For the turbine control AEH system, verify that the refurbishment Responder: Mark Scansen 28. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting TVA Letter dated C C C C C S 029 For the rod control system, verify that the refurbishment results in a Date: 4/27/10 29. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting TVA Letter dated G G G G 030 Regarding the refurbishment of I&C equipment, identify any Responder: Clark 30. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting TVA Letter dated 031 For the rod position indication system (CERPI), provide information Date: 4/27/10 31. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting TVA Letter dated CERPI is non-safety related.

a a a a a i 032 For the process computer, need to consider cyber security issues Date: 4/27/10 32. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting TVA Letter dated EICB will no longer consider cyber 033 For the loose parts monitoring system, provide information Date: 4/27/10 33. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting TVA Letter dated The loose parts monitoring system is 034 2/4/2010 Responder: TVA 34. Y Closed Closed N/A TVA Letter dated 034.1 ( Chapter 7.1 - Introduction 35. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A

( a 034.2 D Chapter 7.2 - Reactor Trip System 36. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A M ( r 034.3 7.3 7.3 a Chapter 7.3 - ESFAS 37. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A a G g r 38. Y 034.4 7.5.1.1 7.5.2 Chapter 7.5 - Instrumentation Systems Important to Safety Closed Closed N/A N/A Closed 034.5 7.5.1.1 7.5.2 Chapter 7.6 - All Other Systems Required for Safety 39. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A Closed r

c u

034.6 Chapter 7.7 Control Systems 40. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A n

g h

/

035 ( 2/18/2010 Responder: Clark 41. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 1 TVA Letter dated LIC-110 Section 6.2.2 states: Design

( (

M 036 7.5.2 7.5.1 C S February 18, 2010 Date: 5/25/10 42. Y Closed Closed NRC Meeting NNC: Unit 2 FSAR Section 7.5.1, Post a

a i 43. Y 037 7.5.1.1 7.5.2 2/18/2010 Responder: Clark Date: 5/25/10 Closed Closed N/A TVA Letter dated FSAR Amendment 100 provides

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N 038 7.5.1.1 7.5.2 ( 2/18/2010 Responder: Clark Date: 5/25/10 44. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated The slides presented at the December 039 ( ( M January 13, 2010 Responder: Clark Date: 5/25/10 45. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI FSAR amendment The equation for the calculation of the G G a 46. Y 040 January 13, 2010 Responder: Clark Date: 5/25/10 Closed Closed EICB RAI EICB RAI FSAR amendment The equation for the calculation of the B

042 All All February 25, 2010: Telecom Date: 5/25/10 47. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated The drawing provided did not have the 044 7.5.2 7.5.1 February 25, 2010 Date: 5/25/10 48. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated

( ( ( ( ( (

045 February 25, 2010 Date: 5/25/10 49. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated

(

046 February 25, 2010 Date: 5/25/10 50. Y Closed Closed N/A - Request for N/A C C C C C C (

047 7.5.2 7.5.1 4/8/2010 Responder: WEC/Hilmes Date: 5/25/10 51. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated G

048 7.5.2 7.5.1 April 8, 2010 Date: 5/25/10 52. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated a a a a a a A 049 7.5.2 7.5.1 4/8/2010 Responder: WEC Date: 5/25/10 53. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 051 April 15, 2010 Date: 5/25/10 54. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A Review addressed by another Open

(

052 7.5.2 7.5.1 April 19, 2010 Date: 5/25/10 55. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 12 S

i

(

053 7.5.2 7.5.1 April 19, 2010 Date: 5/25/10 56. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 13 S

i

(

054 7.5.2 7.5.1 4/19/2010 Responder: Slifer/Clark Date: 5/25/10 57. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 14 TVA Letter dated S

i

(

055 7.5.2 7.5.1 4/19/2010 Responder: Slifer/Clark Date: 5/25/10 58. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 15 TVA Letter dated S

i

(

056 April 19, 2010 Date: 5/25/10 59. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 16 TVA Letter dated Sorrento Radiation Monitoring S

i

(

057 7.5.2 7.5.1 4/19/2010 Responder: TVA I&C Staff Date: 5/25/10 60. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 17 TVA Letter dated S

i

(

058 7.5.0 7.5 April 19, 2010 Date: 5/25/10 61. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 18 TVA Letter dated S

i

( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (

059 7.5.2 7.5.1 April 19, 2010 Date: 62. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 19 TVA Letter dated 060 7.5.2 7.5.1 April 19, 2010 Date: 5/25/10 63. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A Addressed by Open Item No. 47 061 7.5.2 7.5.1 April 19, 2010 Date: 5/25/10 64. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A Addressed by Open Item No. 48

( (

062 7.5.2 7.5.1 April 19, 2010 Date: 5/25/10 65. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A Addressed by Open Item No. 49 063 7.5.2 7.5.1 April 19, 2010 Date: 5/25/10 66. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A Addressed by Open Item No. 50 C C C C C C C C C C S 064 7.5.2 7.5.1 By letter dated March 12, 2010 TVA stated that the target submittal Responder: Webb Date: 4/8/2010 67. Y Closed Closed N/A - No question TVA Letter dated 065 7.5.2 7.5.1 By letter dated March 12, 2010 TVA stated that the target submittal Responder: WEC Date: 5/25/10 68. Y Closed Closed N/A - No question TVA Letter dated G G 066 7.5.2 7.5.1 By letter dated March 12, 2010 TVA stated that the target submittal Responder: WEC Date: 5/25/10 69. Y Closed Closed N/A - No question TVA Letter dated 072 7.5.2 7.5.1 By letter dated March 12, 2010 TVA stated that the target submittal Responder: WEC Date: 5/25/10 70. Y Closed Closed N/A - No question N/A a a a a a a a a a a i 076 7.5.2 7.5.1 By letter dated March 12, 2010 TVA stated that the target submittal Responder: Clark Date: 5/25/10 71. Y Closed Closed N/A - No question N/A 077 7.5.2 7.5.1 By letter dated March 12, 2010 TVA stated that the target submittal Responder: WEC Date: 5/25/10 72. Y Closed Closed N/A - No question TVA Letter dated 078 4/26/2010 Responder: Clark Date: 5/25/10 73. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 079 4/26/2010 Responder: Clark Date: 5/25/10 74. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated Reviewed under Item 154 080 ( ( ( 4/26/2010 Responder: WEC 75. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 2 TVA Letter dated 083 7.5.2 7.5.1 C C S May 6, 2010 Date: 6/18/10 76. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 084 7.5.2 7.5.1 a a i May 6, 2010 Date: 6/18/10 77. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated

(

087 7.5.2 7.5.1 May 6, 2010 Date: 5/24/10 78. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 20 TVA Letter dated S

i 088 7.5.2 7.5.1 May 6, 2010 Date: 5/24/10 79. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 21 TVA Letter dated

(

089 D ( ( ( 5/6/2010 Responder: Clark 80. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated NNC: Docketed response states that 090 a C C S 5/6/2010 Responder: Clark Date: 5/25/10 81. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated r a a i 82. Y 091 7.4 7.4 May 20, 2010 Date: 5/25/10 Closed Closed EICB RAI No.1 TVA Letter dated 093 ( May 20, 2010 Date: 5/25/10 83. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A Will be reviewed under item 154 D ( (

094 a 5/20/2010 Responder: Clark Date: 5/25/10 84. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A Information was found in FSAR r G G 095 7.8.1, XX May 20, 2010 Date: 85. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI No. 2 TVA Letter dated

(

096 7.7.5 XX 5/20/2010 Responder: 86. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI No.3 TVA Letter dated D

a r

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N

(

097 7.4.2 7.4 May 20, 2010 Date: 87. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI No.4 TVA Letter dated D

a r

(

098 7.4.2 7.4 May 25, 2010 Date: 88. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI No.5 TVA Letter dated D

a r

099 April 12, 2010 Date: 89. Y Closed Closed Closed to Item 129

(

(

100 D ( ( 5/20/2010 Responder: WEC 90. Y Closed Closed N/A - No question N/A B

102 a C C May 24, 2010 Date: 5/24/10 91. Y Closed Closed N/A TVA Letter dated Request for schedule not information.

a r a a 92. Y 103 7.4 7.4 5/27/2010 Responder: Ayala Date: 5/27/10 Closed Closed EICB RAI No.1 TVA Letter dated Submittal date is based on current

( 93. Y 104 7.4 7.4 ( D 5/27/2010 Responder: Merten Date: 5/27/10 Closed Closed EICB RAI No.1 TVA Letter dated Submittal date is based on current G a r 94. Y 105 April 29, 2010 Date: Closed Closed N/A N/A Will be reviewed under item 154.

106 May 6, 2010 Date: 5/25/10 95. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 9 TVA Letter dated

(

S i

107 ( May 6, 2010 Date: 5/28/10 96. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 22 TVA Letter dated D ( (

108 a S May 6, 2010 Date: 5/25/10 97. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A Will be reviewed under OI#154 r G i 109.a 7.8 XX 5/6/2010 Responder: N/A 98. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A

(

109.b 5/6/2010 Responder: N/A 99. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A Duplicate of another open Item.

110 May 6, 2010 Date: 100. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A Information was found.

111 May 6, 2010 Date: 5/28/10 101. Y Closed Closed N/A TVA Letter dated Request to help find, not a request for D ( ( (

112 June 1, 2010 Date: 102. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A Information was received

( ( ( ( ( (

113 6/1/2010 Responder: Clark 103. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated a C C C 114 7.2 7.2 6/1/2010 Responder: WEC 104. Y Close Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated G G G G G G 115 2/25/2010 Responder: Clark 105. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 116 6/3/2010 Responder: WEC 106. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated Letter sent to Westinghouse requesting r a a a 117 7.1 7.1 6/3/2010 Responder: Hilmes 107. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 118 7.4 7.4 6/8/2010 Responder: Merten 108. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI No.1 TVA Letter dated Submittal date is based on current

(

119 June 10, 2010 Date: 109. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 23 TVA Letter dated 120 5/6/2010 Responder: Hilmes/Merten/Costley 110. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated D ( ( ( (

121 5/6/2010 Responder: Webb/Webber 111. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated a C C C S 122 June 14, 2010 Date: 112. Y Closed Closed N/A - Request for N/A r a a a i 123 7.7.3 7.4.1, 6/14/2010 Responder: 113. Y Closed Closed ML101720589, TVA Letter dated

(

124 7.7.5 XX 6/14/2010 Responder: 114. Y Closed Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated D

a r

(

125 7.7.8 7.7.1.12 6/14/2010 Responder: 115. Y Closed Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated D

a r

126 7.8 7.8 ( June 14, 2010 Date: 116. Y Closed Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated

( ( D 127 7.2 7.2 a 6/16/2010 Responder: WEC/Clark 117. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated G G r 128 7.2 7.2 6/18/2010 Responder: WEC Drake /TVA Craig 118. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated Track through SE open item

(

129 6/12/2010 Responder: WEC 119. Y Closed Closed N/A TVA Letter dated P

o

(

130 6/28/2010 Responder: Clark 120. Y Closed Closed N/A TVA Letter dated P

o

(

131 6/28/2010 Responder: Clark 121. Y Closed Closed N/A TVA Letter dated P

o

(

132 6/28/2010 Responder: Clark 122. Y Closed Closed N/A TVA Letter dated P

o

(

133 6/28/2010 Responder: Clark 123. Y Closed Closed TVA Letter dated P

o

( (

134 6/28/2010 Responder: Clark 124. Y Closed Closed TVA Letter dated 135 7.3.1 7.3.1 6/30/2010 Responder: Clark 125. Y Closed Closed RAI not necessary TVA Letter dated 136 7.3.2, 7.4, 5.6,( ( ( D D ( 6/30/2010 Responder: Clark 126. Y Closed Closed RAI not necessary TVA Letter dated 137 C C C a a P Several WBN2 PAMS documents contain a table titled, Document Responder: WEC 127. Y Closed Closed ML101650255, Item TVA Letter dated 139 The WBN2 PAMS System Requirements Specification (WBN2 Responder: WEC 128. Y Closed Closed ML101650255, Item TVA Letter dated WBN2 PAMS System Requirements a a a r r o 141 Deleted by DORL Date: 129. Y Closed Closed ML101650255, Item WBN2 PAMS System Requirements

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N

( ( (

146 6/17/2010 Responder: 130. Y Closed Closed ML101650255, Item PAMS System Requirements 147 6/17/2010 Responder: 131. Y Closed Closed ML101650255, Item PAMS System Requirements 148 6/17/2010 Responder: 132. Y Closed Closed ML101650255, Item PAMS System Requirements

( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (

149 7.2 7.2 FSAR Section 7.1.1.2(2), Overtemperature delta T and Responder: Tindell 133. Y Close Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated 150 7.2 7.2 Many of the changes were based on the Westinghouse document Responder: Clark 134. Y Close Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated 151 7.2 7.2 Provide the EDCR 52378 and 54504 which discusses the basis for Responder: Clark 135. Y Close Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated C C C 152 7.2 7.2 Deleted portion of FSAR section 7.2.3.3.4 and moved to FSAR Responder: Merten/Clark 136. Y Close Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated 153 7.2 7.2 FSAR section 7.2.1.1.7 added the reference to FSAR section Responder: Craig/Webb 137. Y Close Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated 154 7.2 7.2 FSAR section 7.2.1.1.10, setpoints: NRC staff has issued RIS Responder: Craig/Webb 138. Y Closed Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML102861885 sent to DORL G G G G G G G G G G G G G G G 155 7.2 7.2 Summary of FSAR change document section 7.2 states that Date: 139. Y Closed Closed ML101720589, Item 156 7.2 7.2 FSAR section 7.2.2.1.1 states that dashed lines in Figure 15.1- Responder: WEC 140. Y Closed Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated Response on hold pending 157 7.2 7.2 FSAR section 7.2.2.1.1, fifth paragraph was deleted except for the Responder: Tindell 141. Y Close Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated a a a 158 7.2 7.2 FSAR section 7.2.2.1.1, paragraph six was changed to state that Responder: Tindell 142. Y Closed Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated 159 7.2 7.2 FSAR section 7.2.2.1.2 discusses reactor coolant flow Responder: Craig 143. Y Close Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated 160 7.2 7.2 FSAR section 7.2.2.2(7) deleted text which has references 12 and Responder: Tindell 144. Y Close Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated 161 7.2 7.2 FSAR section 7.2.2.3 states that changes to the control function Responder: Clark 145. Y Closed Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated 162 7.2 7.2 FSAR section 7.2.2.2(14) states that bypass of a protection Responder: Tindell 146. Y Closed Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated 163 7.2 7.2 Deleted by DORL Date: 147. Y Closed Closed ML101720589, Item 164 7.2 7.2 FSAR section 7.2.2.2(20) has been revised to include the plant Responder: Perkins 148. Y Closed Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated Item No. 8 sent to DORL a

r g

l

(

165 7.2 7.2 FSAR section 7.2.2.3.2, last paragraph of this section has been Responder: Clark 149. Y Closed Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated 166 7.2 7.2 Changes to FSAR section 7.2.2.2(20) are justified based on the Responder: Clark 150. Y Closed Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated 167 7.2 7.2 FSAR section 7.2.2.4, provide an analysis or reference to chapter Responder: Clark 151. Y Close Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated

( (

168 7.2 7.2 FSAR table 7.2-4, item 9 deleted loss of offsite power to station Responder: Clark 152. Y Close Closed ML101720589, Item TVA Letter dated 169 6/18/2010 Responder: Clark 153. Y Closed Closed 170 6/17/2010 Responder: Clark 154. Y Closed Closed

( D ( ( ( ( (

171 7.2 7.2 6/17/2010 Responder: Craig 155. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated Closed to SE Open Item 172 6/17/2010 Responder: Craig 156. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI M M ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (

173 7.1 7.1 6/17/2010 Responder: Craig/Webb/Powers 157. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI 174 6/28/2010 Responder: Hilmes/Craig 158. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI 175 June 28, 2010 Responder: 159. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI C a C C C C C 176 7.1 7.1 6/28/2010 Responder: Craig/Webb 160. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI 177 7.5.2.1 7.5.1 7/15/2010 Responder: Clark 161. Y Closed Closed N/A TVA Letter dated RAI not required a a G G G G G G G G G G G G 178 7.5.2.1 7.5.1 7/15/2010 Responder: Clark 162. Y Closed Closed N/A TVA Letter dated RAI not required 179 An emphasis is placed on traceability in System Requirements Responder: WEC 163. Y Closed Closed N/A - Closed to NA 180 The SRP, BTP 7-14, Section B.3.3.1 states that Regulatory Guide Responder: WEC 164. Y Closed Closed N/A - Closed to NA a r a a a a a 181 An emphasis is placed on traceability in System Requirements Responder: WEC 165. Y Closed Closed N/A - Closed to NA 182 Characteristics that the SRP states that a Software Requirements Responder: WEC 166. Y Closed Closed N/A - Closed to NA 184 7/15/2010 Responder: WEC 167. Y Closed Closed N/A - Closed to N/A 186 7.7.8 7.7.1.12 7/15/2010 Responder: Perkins/Clark 168. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI No.6 TVA Letter dated 188 By letter dated June 30, 2010, TVA docketed, Tennessee Valley Responder: Clark 169. Y Closed Closed ML101970033, Item TVA Letter dated

(

189 7.6.7 7/20/2010 Responder: Clark 170. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 3 TVA Letter dated S

i 190 7.9 ( ( FSAR Table 7.1-1 states: Regulatory Guide 1.133, May 1981 Responder: Clark 171. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 4 TVA Letter dated Closed to OI-331.

C S a i 172. Y 191 7.9 NUREG-0800 Chapter 7, Section 7.9, "Data Communication Responder: Jimmie Perkins Closed Closed ML10197016, Item TVA Letter dated

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N

( ( ( ( (

192 7.5.1.1 7.5.2 The NRC Staff is using SRP (NUREG-0800) Chapter 7 Section Responder: Clark 173. Y Closed Closed Item No. 1 sent to TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML1028618855 sent to 193 7.5.1.1 7.5.2 The WBU2 FSAR, Section 7.5.2, Plant Computer System, Responder: Clark 174. Y Closed Closed Item No. 2 sent to TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML1028618855 sent to 194 7.5.1.1 7.5.2.1 M M M M M The WBU2 FSAR Section 7.5.2.1, Safety Parameter Display Responder: Costley/Norman 175. Y Closed Closed Item No. 3 sent to TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML1028618855 sent to a a a a a 195 7.5.1.1 7.5.2.2 Bypassed and Inoperable Status Indication (BISI) Responder: Costley/Norman 176. Y Closed Closed Item No. 4 sent to TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML1028618855 sent to 196 7.5.1.1 7.5.2.2 Bypassed and Inoperable Status Indication (BISI) Responder: Costley/Norman 177. Y Closed Closed Item No. 5 sent to TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML1028618855 sent to 197 ( ( Open Item 197 was never issued. 178. Y Closed Closed 198 7.5.1.1 7.5.2.2 M M X SRP Section 7.5, Subsection III, Review Procedures states: Responder: Costley/Norman 179. Y Closed Closed Item No. 6 sent to TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML1028618855 sent to a a 180. Y 199 7.5.1.1 7.5.2.3 The WBU2 FSAR Section 7.5.2.3, Technical Support Center and Responder: Costley/Norman Closed Closed Item No. 7 sent to TVA Letter dated Related SE Section 7.5.5.3 EICB RAI 200 7.2 7/21/2010 Responder: Clark 181. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated

( ( ( ( ( (

201 7.7.1.1 7.7.11 7/21/2010 Responder: Webb 182. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 203 7.5.1.1 7.5.2 7/26/2010 Responder: Clark 183. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML102861885 sent to DORL

( ( ( (

204 7.5.1.1 7.5.2 7/26/2010 Responder: Costley/Norman 184. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML102861885 sent to DORL M M M M ( M M 205 7/26/2010 Responder: Clark 185. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated Question B related to prior NRC 206 7.5.1.1 7.5.2 7/27/2010 Responder: Clark 186. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML102861885 sent to DORL C C C C 207 July 27, 2010 Date: 187. Y Closed Closed a a a a G a a 208 7.5.2.1 7.5.1 7/27/2010 Responder: Clark 188. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML102861885 sent to DORL 209 7.5.2.1 7.5.1 7/27/2010 Responder: Clark 189. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML102861885 sent to DORL a a a a 210 7.5.2.1 7.5.1 7/27/2010 Responder: Clark 190. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML102861885 sent to DORL 211 7.5.1.1 7/27/2010 Responder: Clark 191. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated Relates to SE Sections:

214 7/27/2010 Responder: WEC 192. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated

( ( (

215 7/29/2010 Responder: WEC 193. Y Closed Closed 216 7.5.1.1 7.5.2 7/29/2010 Responder: Clark 194. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML102861885 sent to DORL 217 7/6/2010 Responder: Clark 195. Y Close Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated

( ( ( ( (

218 7/6/2010 Responder: Clark 196. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 219 8/4/2010 Responder: TVA Licensing 197. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI

( ( ( M ( ( M ( ( ( ( M 220 8/4/2010 Responder: Ayala 198. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 221 7.7.1.2 7.7.1.3 8/4/2010 Responder: Trelease 199. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML102861885 sent to DORL 222 8/4/2010 Responder: Clark 200. Y Close Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated C C C C P 223 8/4/2010 Responder: Clark 201. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI 224 7.5.1.1 7.5.2 8/4/2010 Responder: Norman (TVA CEG) 202. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML102861885 sent to DORL G G G a G G a G G G G a 225 8/4/2010 Responder: Scansen 203. Y Close Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 226 8/4/2010 Responder: TVA Licensing 204. Y Closed Closed N/A - Information TVA Letter dated See also Open Item Nos. 41 & 270.

a a a a o 227 8/4/2010 Responder: Clark 205. Y Close Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 228 8/4/2010 Responder: Clark 206. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 229 8/4/2010 Responder: Clark 207. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 230 8/4/2010 Responder: Webb 208. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 231 8/4/2010 Responder: Clark 209. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated

( ( ( (

232 8/4/2010 Responder: Clark 210. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 5 TVA Letter dated

( (

233 8/4/2010 Responder: Clark 211. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated C C C S 234 8/4/2010 Responder: 212. Y Closed Closed N/A - Duplicate N/A G G 235 8/4/2010 Responder: TVA Licensing 213. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A a a a i 236 8/4/2010 Responder: Clark 214. Y Close Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 237 8/4/2010 Responder: Clark 215. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N 238 ( ( 8/4/2010 Responder: Webb/Hilmes 216. Y Closed Closed N/A - Duplicate N/A

(

239 C C 8/4/2010 Responder: Hilmes 217. Y Closed Closed N/A - Meeting N/A G

a a 218. Y 240 8/4/2010 Responder: Clark Close Closed Ml102910008 TVA Letter dated

( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (

241 8/4/2010 Responder: Davies 219. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 10 TVA Letter dated 242 8/4/2010 Responder: Hilmes 220. Y Close Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 243 8/3/2010 Responder: WEC 221. Y Closed Closed N/A - Closed to N/A 247 8/8/2010 Responder: WEC 222. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI Response is LIC-101 Rev. 3 Appendix B Section 4,

(

248 8/8/2010 Responder: WEC 223. Y Closed Closed Response is LIC-101 Rev. 3 Appendix B Section 4, 249 8/8/2010 Responder: WEC 224. Y Closed Closed LIC-101 Rev. 3 Appendix B Section 4, 253 8/8/2010 Responder: Clark 225. Y Closed Closed TVA Letter dated Related to Open Item no. 83.

254 8/10/2010 Responder: WEC 226. Y Closed Closed N/A - Request to TVA Letter dated C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C S 255 8/10/2010 Responder: WEC 227. Y Closed Closed N/A - Request to TVA Letter dated 256 8/10/2010 Responder: WEC 228. Y Closed Closed N/A - Request to TVA Letter dated 257 8/10/2010 Responder: WEC 229. Y Closed Closed N/A - Request to N/A G

258 8/10/2010 Responder: WEC 230. Y Closed Closed N/A - Request to N/A 259 8/10/2010 Responder: WEC 231. Y Closed Closed N/A - Request to TVA Letter dated 260 8/10/2010 Responder: WEC 232. Y Closed Closed N/A - Request to N/A 261 8/10/2010 Responder: WEC 233. Y Closed Closed N/A - Closed to TVA Letter dated LIC-110 Rev. 1 Section 6.2.2 states:

a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a i 262 8/10/2010 Responder: WEC 234. Y Closed Closed N/A - Request to N/A 263 8/11/2010 Responder: WEC 235. Y Closed Closed ML101650255, Item 264 8/11/2010 Responder: WEC 236. Y Closed Closed ML101650255, Item 265 8/11/2010 Responder: WEC 237. Y Closed Closed ML101650255, Item 266 8/11/2010 Responder: Webb/Webber 238. Y Closed Closed TVA Letter dated 267 8/11/2010 Responder: WEC 239. Y Closed Closed 268 8/19/2010 Responder: WEC 240. N Open Closed

( (

269 8/20/2010 Responder: NRC 241. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A 270 ( ( ( 8/23/2010 Responder: Clark 242. Y Closed Closed See also Open Item Nod. 41 & 245.

M M C C P 271 8/23/2010 Responder: WEC 243. Y Closed Closed N/A - Closed to NA 272 7.5.2.1 7.5.1 a a 8/26/2010 Responder: Clark 244. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML102861885 sent to DORL a a o 273 7.5.2.1 7.5.1 8/26/2010 Responder: Clark 245. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML102861885 sent to DORL 274.b ( ( 8/26/2010 Responder: Stockton 246. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 6 TVA Letter dated M S a i 274.a 7.5.2.1 7.5.1 8/26/2010 Responder: Clark 247. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML102861885 sent to DORL

(

275 8/27/2010 Responder: Clark 248. Y Closed Closed Not Required N/A 276 7.6 7.6 8/27/2010 Responder: Webb 249. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated D (

277 7.6 7.6.3 8/27/2010 Responder: Clark 250. Y Close Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated

( ( ( ( ( (

278 7.6 7.6.6 8/27/2010 Responder: Trelease 251. Y Close Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated a S 279 7.6 7.6.6 8/27/2010 Responder: Mather 252. Y Close Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated G G G G G G 280 7.6 7.6.6 8/27/2010 Responder: Trelease 253. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated r i 282 7.6 7.6.9 8/27/2010 Responder: Trelease 254. Y Close Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 283 7.7.5 XX 8/27/2010 Responder: Clark 255. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI No.13 TVA Letter dated This item is a follow-up question to item

(

284 7.7.3 7.4.1 8/27/2010 Responder: Webber 256. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI No.14 TVA Letter dated This item is a follow-up question to item D

a r

(

285 7.3.3 7.3 8/27/2010 Responder: McNeil 257. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI No.15 TVA Letter dated This item is a follow-up question to item D

a r

(

286 7.7.3 9.3.4.2. 8/27/2010 Responder: Webber 258. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI No.16 TVA Letter dated D

a r

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N

( 259. Y 287 7.3 7.3-1 ( D 8/27/2010 Responder: Elton Closed Closed ML102390538, Item Response G a r 260. Y 288 7.3 9/2/2010 Responder: McNeil Closed Closed EICB RAI

(

289 9/2/2010 Responder: Faulkner 261. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 24 TVA Letter dated 290 7.7 ( 9/7/2010 Responder: Clark 262. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A This item is a duplicate of item 291.

D ( ( ( 263. Y M (

291 7.7 9/7/2010 Responder: Clark Closed Closed TVA Letter dated 292 7.2.5 7.2 a C C S 9/7/2010 Responder: Craig 264. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 293 7.7.4 7.2.2.3. a G 9/8/2010 Responder: Craig 265. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML102861885 sent to DORL r a a i 294 7.3 7.3.1.1. 9/9/2010 Responder: Elton 266. Y Closed Closed ML102390538, Item Response

(

295 7.3 7.3.1.1. 9/9/2010 Responder: Elton 267. Y Closed Closed ML102390538, Item Response D

a r

(

296 7.3 7.3.1.2. 9/9/2010 Responder: Elton 268. Y Closed Closed ML102390538, Item Response D

a r

297 7.3 7.3.1.2. ( ( 9/9/2010 Responder: Elton 269. Y Closed Closed ML102390538, Item Response

( D D 298 7.3 XX C a a 9/9/2010 Responder: Clark 270. Y Closed Closed ML102390538, Item Response a r r 271. Y 299 Provide Common Q Software Requirements Specification Post Attachment 41 of the 10/5 letter contains the Common Q Closed Closed TVA Letter dated

(

300 Need Radiation Monitoring System Description/Design Criteria Responder: Temples/Mather 272. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 25 TVA Letter S

i

(

301 1.TVA is requested to address the consequences of software Responder: WEC/Davies/Clark 273. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 11 TVA Letter dated Note 1:

302 7.5.2.1 7.5.1 09/17/2010 Responder: Tindell 274. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML102861885 sent to DORL

( ( ( (

303 7.5.2.1 7.5.1 09/17/2010 Responder: Tindell 275. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML102861885 sent to DORL 304 7.5.2.1 7.5.1 09/17/2010 Responder: Tindell 276. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML102861885 sent to DORL D (

305 7.5.2.1 7.5.1 09/17/2010 Responder: Tindell 277. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated EICB RAI ML102861885 sent to DORL

( ( ( ( ( ( ( M M M M 306 7.1 7.1 FSAR amendment 100, page 7.1-12 provides the definition of Responder: Hilmes 278. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 307 7.1 7.1 (1) FSAR amendment 100, Section 7.1, page 7.1-12, definition of Responder: Hilmes 279. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated a S 308 7.1 7.1 (1) FSAR Amendment 100, Section 7.1, page 7.1-13, definition of Responder: Hilmes 280. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated G G G G G G G a a a a 309 7.1 7.1.2.1. (1) FSAR amendment 100, Page 7.1-14, Westinghouse setpoint Responder: Hilmes 281. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 310 7.1 7.1.2.1. (1) FSAR amendment 100, Page 7.1-14, TVA setpoint Responder: Hilmes 282. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated r i 311 7.1 7.1 Both Westinghouse and TVA setpoint methodology do not have Responder: Hilmes 283. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 312 7.0 By letter dated September 10,2010, TVA provided the summary Responder: Stockton 284. Y Close Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated 313 7.7.8 7.7.1.12 EDCR 52408 (installation of AMSAC in Unit 2) states that Design Responder: Ayala 285. Y Closed Closed EICB RAI No.18 TVA Letter dated

( 286. Y 314 7.3 7.3 ( D The following 50.59 changes were listed in the March 12 RAI Responder: Stockton Closed Closed EICB RAI No. 19 TVA Letter dated Related to OI 10 G a r 287. Y 315 7.5.3 7.5.3 IE Bulletin 79-27 required that emergency operating procedures to Responder: S. Smith (TVA Operations) Close Closed EICB RAI TVA Letter dated

(

316 7.5.2.3 7.5 TVA has provided various documents in support of RM-1000 high Responder: Temples/Mather 288. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 26 S

i

(

317 7.5.2.3 7.5 TVA has provided a proprietary and a non-proprietary version of Responder: Temples 289. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 27 TVA Letter dated S

i

(

319 7.5.2.3 7.5 TVA provided System Verification Test Results 04507007-1TR Responder: Temples 290. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 29 TVA Letter dated S

i E

320 I Per Westinghouse letter WBT-D-2340, TENNESSEE VALLEY Responder: Clark 291. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A Duplicate of item 156 321 B For the purposes of measuring reactor coolant flow for Reactor Responder: Clark 292. Y Closed Closed N/A N/A Duplicate of OI# 157

(

322 7.7.1.11 ( ( E Section 7.7.1.11 will be added to FSAR Amendment 101 to provide Responder: Clark 293. Y Closed Closed M

324 G C I Per the NRC reviewer, the BISI calculation is not required to be 294. Y Closed Closed a

a a 295. Y 325 The Unit 2 loops in service for Unit 1 that are scheduled to be Responder: TVA Startup Olson Closed Closed Closed to open item ?

B 326 TVA uses double-sided methodology for as-found and as-left Responder: Webb 296. Y Closed Closed TVA Letter dated

(

G a

(

328 7.5.2.3 7.5 Provide the model number for the four containment high range Responder: Temples 297. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 30 TVA Letter dated S

i

( 298. Y 329 7.6.1 7.6.7 D ( Section 7.6.7 of the FSAR (Amendment 100) states that, The Responder: Clark Closed Closed RAI No. 1 TVA Letter dated a S r i 299. Y 330 7.3 7.3 Related to Item 298 Responder: Hilmes/Faulkner Closed Closed EICB RAI No.20 Item 7, TVA letter 331 7.6.1 7.6.7 ( ( As a follow up of OI 190, Staff has reviewed the proprietary version Responder: WEC/Harless/Clark 300. Y Closed Closed RAI No. 8 TVA Letter dated Follow-up of OI-190.

M S a i 332 7.5.2.1 7.5.1 10/26/2010 301. Y Closed Closed ML103000105 Item TBD EICB RAI ML103000105 sent to DORL

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N

(

333 7.5.2.1 7.5.1 10/27/2010 302. Y Closed Closed ML103000105 Item TBD EICB RAI ML103000105 sent to DORL M

a

(

336 7.5.2.3 7.5 Re: RM-1000 Report 04508905-QR Responder: GA 303. Y Closed Closed S

i

(

337 7.5.2.3 7.5 Re: RM-1000 Report 04508905-QR Responder: GA 304. Y Closed Closed S

i

(

342 7.5.2.3 7.5 Please confirm that RM-1000 monitors and the associated The RM-1000 containment high range radiation monitors are 305. Y Closed Closed S

i

(

343 7.5.2.3 7.5 Seismic RRS in the 04508905-QR report Figures 3-2 and 3-3 (1) The cause of the difference between the RRS and TRS 306. Y Closed Closed S

i 041 7.5.2 7.5.1 2/19/2010 Responder: WEC 1. N Open Open-NRC Review NRC Meeting TVA Letter dated See also Open Item Nos. 226 & 270.

EICB (Carte)

Summary NRC 6/18/10 Please provide the following Westinghouse documents: Items (1) and (2) were docketed by TVA letter dated April 8, Final Response included in Due: Meeting Summary (1) WNA-DS-01617-WBT Rev. 1, "PAMS System Requirements 2010. letter dated 12/3/10 (3) 12/3/10 ML093560019, Item TVA Letter dated Specification" (4) 12/10/10 No. 11 10/5/10 (2) WNA-DS-01667-WBT Rev. 0, "PAMS System Design Item (3) will be addressed by Revision 2 of the Licensing Specification" Technical Report. Due 12/3/10 Partial Response is included in TVA to docket (3) WNA-CD-00018-GEN Rev. 3, "CGD for QNX version 4.5g" letter dated 10/5/10. information indentified Please provide the following Westinghouse documents or pointers Item (4) will be addressed by Westinghouse developing a The SysRS and SRS in ISG6.

to where the material was reviewed and approved in the CQ TR or WBN2 Specific Test Plan to compensate for the fact that the incorporate requirements from SPM: NRC disapproved WNA-PT-00058-GEN during the original many other documents by (4) WNA-PT-00058-GEN Rev. 0, "Testing Process for Common Q Common Q review. Due 12/7/10 reference.

Safety systems" (5) WNA-TP-00357-GEN Rev. 4, "Element Software Test Item (5) Procedures that are listed in the SPM compliance NNC 8/25/10: (3) An earlier Procedure" table in the Licensing Technical Report revision 1 supersede version of this report was that test procedure WNA-TP-00357-GEN.Due 10/22/10 docketed for the Common Q topical report; therefore, there For Item 3, Attachment 19 contains the Westinghouse should be no problem to docket document Post-Accident Monitoring System (PAMS) this version. (4) Per Licensing Technical Report, WNA-LI-00058-WBT, Revision ML091560352, the testing 2, dated December 2010. Attachment 20 contains the process document does not Westinghouse Application for Withholding for the Post- address the test plan Accident Monitoring System (PAMS) Licensing Technical requirements of the SPM.

Report, WNA-LI-00058-WBT, Revision 2, dated December Please provide a test plan that 2010. implements the requirements of the SPM.

For Item 4, Attachment 9 contains the Westinghouse document Nuclear Automation Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects, Post Accident Monitoring System Test Plan, WNA-PT-00138-WBT, Revision 0, dated November 2010. Attachment 10 contains the Westinghouse Application for Withholding for the WNA-PT-00138-WBT, Revision 0 Nuclear Automation Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects, Post Accident Monitoring System Test Plan, WNA-PT-00138-WBT, Revision 0, dated November 17, 2010.

043 7.5.2 7.5.1 2/19/2010 Responder: WEC Date: 5/25/10 2. N Open Open-NRC Review EICB RAI TVA Letter dated NNC 8/25/10: A CQ PAMS ISG6 EICB (Carte)

ML102910002 2/5/10 compliance matrix was docketed on: (1)

The PAMS ISG6 compliance matrix supplied as Enclosure 1 to The PAMS ISG6 compliance matrix supplied as Enclosure 1 Revised response included in Due 12/1/10 Item No. 2 February, 5 12010, (2) March 12, 2010, TVA letter dated February 5, 2010 is a first draft of the information to TVA letter dated February 5, 2010 is a first draft of the letter dated 12/22/10. TVA Letter dated & (3) June 18, 2010. The staff has needed. The shortcomings of the first three lines in the matrix are: information needed. 5/12/10 expressed issued with all of these compliance evaluations. The staff is still Line 1: Section 11 of the Common Q topical report did include a By letter dated April 8, 2010 TVA provided the PAMS Response is included in letter TVA Letter dated waiting for a good compliance commercial grade dedication program, but this program was not Licensing Technical Report provided additional information. dated 10/5/10. 6/18/10 evaluation.

approved in the associated SE. Westinghouse stated that this was the program and it could now be reviewed. The NRC stated that Attachment 3 contains the revised Common Q PAMS ISG-6 Revised compliance matrix is TVA Letter dated NNC 11/23/10: WNA-LI-00058-WT-P TVA should identified what they believe was previously reviewed Compliance Matrix, dated June 11, 2010, that addresses unacceptable. 10/5/10 Rev. 1 Section 7 does not include the and approved. these items (Reference 13). RSED documents, and it should. Table NNC 8/12/10: It is not quite 6-1 Item No. 15 should also include the Line 2: TVA stated the D3 analysis was not applicable to PAMS, By letter Dated June 18, 2010 (see Attachment 3) TVA enough to provide all of the RSED RTMs.

but provided no justification. The NRC asked for justification since provided a table, "Watts Bar 2 - Common Q PAMS ISG-6 documents requested. There

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N SRP Chapter 7.5 identified SRM to SECV-93-087 Item II.Q as Compliance Matrix." are two possible routes to being SRP acceptance criteria for PAMS. review that the NRC can It is TVAs understanding that this comment is focused on undertake: (1) follow ISG6, and Line 3: TVA identified that the Design report for computer integrity the fact that there are documents that NRC has requested (2) follow the CQ SPM. The was completed as part of the common Q topical report. The NRC that are currently listed as being available for audit at the TVA response that was noted that this report is applicable for a system in a plant, and the Westinghouse offices. For those Common Q PAMS originally pursued was to follow CQ topical report did no specifically address this PAMS system at documents that are TVA deliverable documents from ISG6, but some of the Watts Bar Unit 2. Westinghouse, TVA has agreed to provide those to NRC. compliance items for ISG6 were Westinghouse documents that are not deliverable to TVA will addressed by referencing the NRC then concluded that TVA should go through and provide a be available for audit as stated above. Requirements SPM. The NRC approved the more complete and thorough compliance matrix. Traceability Matrix issues will be tracked under NRC RAI CQ TR and associated SPM; it Matrix Items 142 (Software Requirements Specification) and may be more appropriate to 145 (System Design Specification). Commercial Item review the WBN2 PAMS Dedication issues will be tracked under NRC RAI Matrix application to for adherence to Item 138. This item is considered closed. the SPM that to ISG6. In either path chosen, the applicant TVA Response to Follow-up NRC Request: should provide documents and a justification for the acceptability WNA-LI-00058-WT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident Monitoring of any deviation from the path System (PAMS) Licensing Technical Report submitted in chosen. For example, it TVA Letter to NRC dated December 3, 2010, (Reference 1) appears that the contains the following changes to address the NRC Westinghouse's CDIs are requests: commercial grade dedication plans, but Westinghouse (1) While RSEDs are not specifically mentioned, Section 7 maintains that they are has been revised to be applicable to both hardware and commercial grade dedication software which includes the RSEDs. reports; this apparent deviation (2) Table 6-1 item 15 reference added for WNA-VR-00280- should be justified or explained.

WBT (RESD) 050 7.5.2 7.5.1 4/8/2010 Responder: WEC Date: 5/25/10 3. N Open Open-NRC Review EICB RAI TVA Letter dated NNC 11/18/10: SysRS Rev. 2 contains EICB (Carte)

ML102910002 6/18/10 several Reference 8, however, How should the "shall" statements outside of the bracketed These sections are descriptive text and not requirements. Revised response included in Due12/22/10 Item No. 8 Reference 8 has been deleted.

requirements in Common Q requirements documents be The next revision of the Watts Bar Unit 2 PAMS System letter dated 12/22/10. Discuss at 11/22 phone TVA Letter dated interpreted? Requirements Specification will remove shall from the call. 10/29/10 wording in those sections. A date for completing the next Enclosure 1 Item revision of the System Requirements Specification will be TVA response is inconsistent This will be corrected in No. 1 provided no later than August 31, 2010. (e.g., WNA-DS-01667-WBT the Revision 3 Rev. 1 page 1-1, Section 1.3.1 document due to TVA The System Requirements Specification will be revised by implies that "SysRS Section 12/10/10 September 30, 2010 and submitted within two of receipt from ###" has requirements. See Westinghouse. also SDS4.4.2.1-1 on page 4-32).

TVA Revised Response Is there a requirement on the Shall statements within the scope of the System shall referenced above??

Requirements Specification (SysRS) and System Design Specification (SysDS) were reviewed by Westinghouse. The Response is provided in letter statements were either relocated to the numbered dated 10/29/10.

requirements section or the wording was changed to identify that it was not a requirement. This item is resolved by TVA Revised Response in TVA submittal of revision 2 of the SysRS and the SysDS Letter dated 10/29/10 Enclosure (attachments 7 and 8 of TVA Letter to NRC dated 10/25/10). 1 Item No. 1 is Acceptable TVA Response to Follow-up NRC Request: NNC 11/18/10: Revised Response is not a statement of This item is corrected in the revision 3 requirements fact. SysRS Rev. 2 (i.e., WNA-documents. DS-01617-WBT Rev. 2) contains many shalls that are

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N Attachment 1 contains the proprietary version of WNA-DS- not within numbered 01617-WBT-P, Revision 3, Post Accident Monitoring requirements sections, for System- System Requirements Specification, dated example:

November 2010. Attachment 2 contains the non-proprietary (1) Page 2-1, Section 2.3.1 -

version WNA-DS-01617-WBT-NP, Revision 3, Post See guidance statement Accident Monitoring System - System Requirements (2) Page 2-10, top of page 1 -

Specification, dated December 2010. Attachment 3 See guidance statement contains the Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure, WNA-DS-01617-WBT-P, Revision 3, Nuclear Automation Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects, Post Accident Monitoring System - System Requirements Specification (Proprietary),

dated December 6, 2010.

Attachment 4 contains the proprietary version of WNA-DS-01667-WBT-P, Revision 3, Post Accident Monitoring System - System Design Specification, dated November 2010. Attachment 5 contains the non-proprietary version WNA-DS-01667-WBT-NP, Revision 3, Post Accident Monitoring System - System Design Specification, dated December 2010. Attachment 6 contains the Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure, WNA-DS-01667-WBT-P, Revision 3, Nuclear Automation Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects Post Accident Monitoring System - System Design Specification (Proprietary), dated December 6, 2010.

Attachment 7 contains the proprietary version of WNA-SD-00239-WBT-P, Revision 3, Software Requirements Specification for the Post Accident Monitoring System, dated November 2010. Attachment 8 contains the non-proprietary version WWNA-SD-00239-WBT-NP, Revision 3, Software Requirements Specification for the Post Accident Monitoring System, dated December 2010. Attachment 9 contains the Application for Withholding Proprietary Information from Public Disclosure, WNA-SD-00239-WBT-P, Revision 3, Nuclear Automation Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects, Software Requirements Specification for the Post Accident Monitoring System (Proprietary), dated December 8, 2010.

067 7.5.2 7.5.1 By letter dated March 12, 2010 TVA stated that the target submittal Responder: WEC Date: 5/25/10 4. N Open Open-NRC Review N/A - No question TVA Letter dated EICB (Carte) date for the "Commercial Grade Dedication Instructions for AI687, was asked. Item 6/18/10 AI688, Upgraded PC node box and flat panels." was September The following status is from the revised WB2 Common Q Response included in letter Due 12/3/10 was opened to track 28, 2010. PAMS ISG-6 Compliance Matrix submitted in response to dated 12/22/10. comm8ittment Item 43: made by applicant.

This item is addressed in Rev. 2

a. AI687, AI688 - Scheduled for September 28, 2010 of the Licensing Technical Report

b. Upgraded PC node box and flat panel displays - Per Westinghouse letter WBT-D-2024 (Reference 7), these items are available for audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office.

c. Power supplies - Per Westinghouse letter WBT-D-2035 (Reference 12), these items are available for audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office.

To be addressed during 9/20-9/21 audit

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N TVA Response to Follow-up NRC Request:

WNA-LI-00058-WT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident Monitoring System (PAMS) Licensing Technical Report submitted in TVA Letter to NRC dated December 3, 2010, (Reference 1) contains the following change to address the NRC request:

Section 7, Commercial Grade Dedication Process, has been revised to describe the general commercial grade dedication process for both hardware and software and uses a description of the AI687 dedication process as an example of how the process is applied.

068 7.5.2 7.5.1 By letter dated March 12, 2010 TVA stated that the target submittal Responder: WEC Date: 5/25/10 5. N Open Open-NRC Review N/A - No question TVA Letter dated EICB (Carte) date for the "Summary Report on acceptance of AI687, AI688, was asked. Item 6/18/10 Upgraded PC node box, flat panels, and power supplies." was The following status is from the revised WB2 Common Q Response included in letter Due 12/3/10 was opened to track September 28, 2010. PAMS ISG-6 Compliance Matrix submitted in response to dated 12/22/10. comm8ittment Item 43: made by applicant.

a. AI687, AI688 - Scheduled for September 28, 2010 This item is addressed in Rev. 2 of the Licensing Technical

b. Upgraded PC node box - Per Westinghouse letter WBT- Report D-2024 (Reference 7), this item is available for audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office.

c. Flat panel displays - Per Westinghouse letter WBT-D-2024 (Reference 7), this item is available for audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office.

d. Power supplies - Per Westinghouse letter WBT-D-2035 (Reference 12), these items are available for audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office.

To be addressed during 9/20-9/21 audit TVA Response to Follow-up NRC Request:

For the commercial grade dedication process, please see the response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) item 3 in this letter, NRC Matrix Item 067.

The component level EQ/Seismic summary reports for the hardware listed above are available for NRC review/audit as described below:

(1) AI687 and AI688, the following documents were submitted in TVA Letter to NRC dated October 26, 2010, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN) Unit 2 -

Instrumentation and Controls Staff Information Requests, (Reference 5):

a. EQ-EV-62-WBT, Revision 0, Common Q PAMS Comparison of Tested Conditions for the AI687 and AI688 Common Q Modules and Supporting Components to the Watts Bar Unit 2 (WBT)

Requirements, dated September 10, 2010

b. EQLR-171, Revision 0, Environmental and Seismic Test Report, Analog Input (AI)687 &

AI688 Modules for use in Common Q PAMS, dated September 10, 2010

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N

c. CN-EQT-10-44, Revision 0, Dynamic Similarity Analysis for the Watts Bar Unit 2 Post Accident Monitoring System (PAMS), dated September 28, 2010 (2) Upgraded PC Node Box - As stated in Westinghouse letter WBT-D-2024, dated June 9, 2010 NRC Access to Common Q Documents at the Westinghouse Rockville Office, (Reference 6), the following documents are available for NRC audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office:

a. CDI-3722, Revision 7, Next Generation PC Node Box Commercial Dedication Instruction

b. LTR-EQ-10-50 PC Node Box/Flat Panel Display System Components Qualification Summary (3) Flat Panel Displays - As stated in Westinghouse letter WBT-D-2024, dated June 9, 2010 NRC Access to Common Q Documents at the Westinghouse Rockville Office, (Reference 6), the following documents are available for NRC audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office:

a. CDI-3803, Revision 8, Next Generation Flat Panel Display (FPD) Commercial Dedication Instruction

b. LTR-EQ-10-50 PC Node Box/Flat Panel Display System Components Qualification Summary (4) Power supplies - As stated in Westinghouse letter WBT-D-2035 dated June 11, 2010 NRC Access to Common Q Documents at the Westinghouse Rockville Office (Reference 7), the following documents are available for NRC audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office:

a. CDI- 4057, Revision 4, Commercial Dedication Instruction

b. EQ-TP-1 05-GEN, Revision 0, Electromagnetic Compatibility Test Plan and Procedure for Quint Power Supplies and Safety System Line Filter

c. Breakers, EQ-TP-114-GEN, Revision 0, Seismic Qualification Test Procedure For Common Q Power Supplies, Quint Power Supplies, Line Filter Assemblies, and South Texas Units 3 & 4 Circuit

d. EQ-TP-117-GEN, Revision 0, Environmental Qualification Test Procedure For Common Q Powe Supplies, Quint Power Supplies, and Line Filter Assemblies 070 7.5.2 7.5.1 By letter dated March 12, 2010 TVA stated that the target submittal Responder: WEC Date: 5/25/10 6. N Open Open-NRC Review N/A - No question TVA Letter dated NNC 11/23/10: The dues date in this EICB (Carte) date for the "Concept and Definition Phase V&V Report" was was asked. Item 6/18/10 open item does not agree with the due March 31, 2010. Per Westinghouse letter WBT-D-1961, this document is Final Response included in Due 12/17/10 was opened to track dated in Open Item No. 71.

available for audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office. letter dated 12/3/10 comm8ittment TVA Letter dated made by applicant. 8/20/10 WNA-VR- 00283-WBT, Rev 0 was submitted on TVA letter Partial Response is included in to the NRC dated August 20, 2010. letter dated 10/5/10. TVA Letter dated 10/5/10 The submitted V&V did not address the Requirements Regulations require that the Traceability Matrix and did not summarize anomalies. At the NRC review be based on September 15th public meeting, Westinghouse agreed to docketed material. Awaiting for include the Concept and Definitions Phase Requirements document to be docketed by

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N Traceability Matrix (RTM) in the next IV&V report along with TVA.

partial Design Phase updates to the RTM.

NNC 8/25/10: Requirements TVA Revised Response: Phase SVVR provided by TVA TVA submitted WNA-VR- 00283-WBT, Rev 0 to NRC in letter dated 8/20/10.

letter dated August 20, 2010 (Reference 6). NNC 11/23/10: The The next Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) requirements Phase SVVR report will include the Design provided by TVA on 8/20/10, is Phase Requirements Traceability Matrix. The Design Phase not complete. This report IV&V Report will be submitted should address the RTM, which to NRC by February 11, 2011. it did not. TVA/WEC agreed to address the concept phase RTM Attachment 14contains the Westinghouse document in the next revision.

Nuclear Automation Watts Bar Unit 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects, IV&V Summary Report for the Post Accident Monitoring System, WNA-VR-00283-WBT, Revision 1, dated November 2010. Attachment 15 contains the Westinghouse Application for Withholding for the WNA-VR-00283-WBT, Revision 1, Nuclear Automation Watts Bar Unit 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects, IV&V Summary Report for the Post Accident Monitoring System, dated November 8, 2010.

NOTE: Due to document sequencing, this IV&V Phase Summary Report references a previous version of the contract compliance matrix. Refer to the Licensing Technical Report Revision 2 (Attachment

19) for the current contract compliance matrix.

071 7.5.2 7.5.1 By letter dated March 12, 2010 TVA stated that the target submittal Responder: WEC Date: 5/25/10 7. N Open Open-NRC Review N/A - No question N/A NNC 11/23/10: The dues date in this EICB (Carte) date for Revision 2 of the I V&V Report" covering the Design and was asked. Item open item does not agree with the due Implementation phases was July 30, 2010. Attachment 16 contains the Westinghouse document IV&V Response included in letter Due 12/10/10 was opened to track dated in Open Item No. 70.

Summary Report for the Post Accident Monitoring System, dated 12/3/10 commitment made WNA-VR-00283-WBT, Revision 2, dated November 2010. by applicant.

Attachment 17 contains the Westinghouse Application for Awaiting for document to be withholding for the IV&V Summary Report for the Post docketed by TVA.

Accident Monitoring System, WNA-VR-00283-WBT, Revision 2, dated November 2010.

NOTE: Due to document sequencing, this IV&V Phase Summary Report references a previous version of the contract compliance matrix. Refer to the Licensing Technical Report Revision 2 (Attachment

19) for the current contract compliance matrix.

073 7.5.2 7.5.1 By letter dated March 12, 2010 TVA stated that the target submittal Responder: WEC Date: 5/25/10 8. N Open Open-NRC Review N/A - No question N/A EICB (Carte) date for Revision 3 of the IV&V Report covering the Integration was asked. Item phase was October 29, 2010. WNA-VR-00283-WBT, Revision 3, IV&V Summary Report Response included in letter Due 12/22/10 was opened to track for the Post Accident Monitoring System, covers the dated 12/22/10 commitment made Integration phase. Attachment 10 contains the proprietary by applicant.

version of IV&V Summary Report for the Post Accident Awaiting for document to be Monitoring System, WNA-VR-00283-WBT-P, Revision 3, docketed by TVA.

dated December 2010. Attachment 11 contains the non-proprietary version IV&V Summary Report for the Post Accident Monitoring System, WNA-VR-00283-WBT-NP, Revision 3, dated December 2010. Attachment 12 contains the Application For Withholding Proprietary Information From Public Disclosure WNA-VR-00283-WBT, Revision 3, Nuclear Automation Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N Program I&C Projects, IV &V Summary Report for the Post Accident Monitoring System (Proprietary), dated December 10, 2010.

075 7.5.2 7.5.1 By letter dated March 12, 2010 TVA stated that the target submittal Responder: WEC Date: 5/25/10 9. N Open Open-NRC Review N/A - No question N/A EICB (Carte) date for the "Watts Bar 2 PAMS Specific FAT Procedure" was was asked. Item September 30, 2010. Attachment 12 contains the Westinghouse document Response included in letter Due 12/3/10 was opened to track Nuclear Automation Watts Bar Unit 2 NSSS Completion dated 12/3/10 commitment made Program I&C Projects, Post Accident Monitoring System by applicant.

Channel Integration Test/Factory Acceptance Test, WNA- Awaiting for document to be TP-02988-WBT, Revision 0, dated November 2010. docketed by TVA.

Attachment 13 contains the Westinghouse Application for Withholding for WNA-TP-02988-WBT, Revision 0,Nuclear Automation Watts Bar Unit 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects, Post Accident Monitoring System Channel Integration Test/Factory Acceptance Test, dated November 2010.

082 7.5.2 7.5.1 5/6/2010 Responder: WEC Date: 6/18/10 10. N Open Open-NRC Review EICB RAI TVA Letter dated NNC 11/18/10: See also Open Item No.

EICB (Carte)

ML102910002 7/30/10 41, Item No. 3.

The PAMS Licensing Technical Report (WNA-LI-00058-WBT Rev. These components can be found in the Summary Revised response included in Due 12/3/10 Item No. 10 0, Dated April 2010), in Section 2.3, lists hardware/software Qualification Report Of Hardware Testing For Common Q letter dated 12/22/10 changes to the Common Q PAMS previously reviewed by the Applications, 00000-ICE-37764, Rev 3 and Commercial Grade NRC. However the Common Q ISG-6 Compliance Matrix does not TWICE Qualification Status Report, WNAQR-00011-SSP Regulations require that the Dedication to be contain activities that address qualification of all changes Per Westinghouse letter WBT-D-2024, (Reference __) dated NRC review be based on addressed in LTR Rev.

specifically: June 9, 2010, these documents are available for audit at the docketed material. Awaiting for 2, Westinghouse Rockville Office. document to be docketed by 2.c - CI527 AF100 Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) TVA.

interface card TVA provided information by letter dated July 30, 2010

3. - Common Q TC514 AF100 Fiber Optic Modems (Evolutionary (ML102160349) - See Enclosure 1 Item No. 7. NNC 8/9/10: per telephone Product Maintenance/Improvements) conversation on 8/5/10, it is not 4.a - PM646A Processor Module Revision 1 of the Licensing Technical Report provides clear how Westinghouse 4.b - CI631 AF100 Communication Interface Module additional detail on the platform specific to WBN2 and Commercial Grade Dedication 4.e - DO620 Digital Output Card references to the evaluation documentation. Plans and Reports for Digital I&C. Westinghouse agree to Please provide sufficient detail regarding the changes for the NRC TVA Response to Follow-up NRC Request: present to the NRC in a public to independently evaluate the acceptability of the changes. meeting on August 17, 2010, Please see the response to Request for Additional and explanation of how their Information (RAI) item 3 in letter dated 12/22/10, NRC Matrix system addresses regulatory Item 067. criteria for both commercial grade dedication and equipment qualification.

NNC 8/25/10: In the August 17, 2010 public meeting Westinghouse stated that the CDI were the plans. The NRC requested that the plans and associated reports be docketed.

NNC 11/18/10: During the September 20-21, 2010 audit, TVA agreed to put a description of the commercial grade dedication program and implementation in Rev. 2 of the CQ PAMS LTR.

085 7.5.2 7.5.1 CB 5/6/2010 Responder: WEC 11. N Open Open-NRC Review EICB RAI (C

art ML102910002

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N Please provide a detailed description of the PAMS MTP data link Is the WEC ISG4 evaluation inadequate? Revised response included in Due 12/3/10 Item No. 13 to the plant computer. This description should identify all letter dated 12/22/10 equipment (model & version) and describe the functions that each Operation of the MTP as a barrier device. MTP Fails as a Hardware is in Rev. 1 piece of equipment performs. This description should be of barrier device. Describe what prevents a MTP failure from A response will be provided by of the Licensing sufficient detail for the NRC to independently evaluate the propagating to the AC160? 10/31/10 Technical Report due statements made in WNA-LI-00058-WBT Rev. 0, Section 5.3. 10/22.

Node loss on the bus? Bus loss? NNC 8/11/10: Design information should be available NNC 8/25/10:

Revise the ISG4 section of the Licensing Technical Report now. By letter dated July 30, Disagree with path (Rev. 2) to provide a more detailed description of the MTP as 2010 (ML102160349) TVA forward input by TVA a barrier device. stated that the MTP was above. An explanation connected to a Red Hat Linux is about the design is TVA Response to Follow-up NRC Request: Server (see Enclosure 1, Item needed.

No. 14 part b.). It is presumed WNA-LI-00058-WBT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident that this server is not safety- FAT test procedure to Monitoring System (PAMS) Licensing Technical Report related. IEEE 603-1991 Clause include data storm submitted in TVA letter to NRC dated December 3, 2010 5.6.3(1) states, "Isolation testing of the MTP (Reference 1), contains the following changes to address the devices used to affect a safety interface NRC requests: system boundary shall be classified as part of the safety NNC 11/18/10: WEC Section 2.2, System Description page 2-3 provides a system." response states that description of the MTP Fiber-Optic (FO) data link to the plant CQ PAMS LTR Rev. 2 computer. Section 2.2.1.4, Hardware has been expanded Please describe how the MTP will contain relevant to include a table detailing all hardware changes that have serves as the isolation device. information.

occurred since the initial submittal. Section 2.2.2, Software has been expanded to include a table detailing all software changes that have occurred since the initial submittal.

101 4/12/2010 Responder: Slifer 12. Y Open Open-NRC Review N/A TVA is working with the vendor to meet DORL (Poole) the 6/30 date, however there is the The non-proprietary versions of the following RM-1000, The documents, and affidavits for withholding for the listed Documents provided in letter Due 10/14/10 potential this will slip to 7/14.

Containment High Range Post Accident Radiation Monitor documents were submitted to the NRC on TVA letter to the dated 07/15/10 documents will be provided by June 30, 2010. NRC dated July 15, 2010. Confirm receipt.

1. V&V Report 04508006A

2. System Description 04508100-1TM

3. Qualification Reports 04508905-QR, 04508905-1 SP, 04508905-2SP, 04508905-3SP

4. Functional Testing Report 04507007-1TR 138 By letter dated February 3, 2010, Westinghouse informed TVA that Responder: WEC 13. N Open Open-NRC Review ML101650255, Item EICB (Carte) certain PAMS documentation has been completed. No. 2 This item is used to track all Commercial Grade Revised response included in Due 12/3/10 (a) The draft ISG6 states that a commercial grade dedication plan Dedication issues. letter dated 12/22/10 should be provided with an application for a Tier 2 review. To be addressed by

a. WNA-LI-00058-WT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident TVA agreed to include a Rev. 2 of the Licensing By letter dated February 5, 2010, TVA stated that the commercial Monitoring System (PAMS) Licensing Technical Report description of the generic Technical Report.

grade dedication plan was included in the Common Q Topical submitted in TVA Letter to NRC dated December 3, Westinghouse hardware Report Section 11, Commercial Grade Dedication Program. 2010, (Reference 1) contains the following changes to commercial grade dedication Section 11 includes a description of the Common Q Commercial address the NRC request: process in the PAMS licensing Grade Dedication Program, and states: A detailed review plan is technical report. (see developed for each Common Q hardware or software component Section 7, Commercial Grade Dedication Process has ML102920031 Item No 1) that requires commercial grade dedication. been revised to describe the general commercial grade dedication process for both hardware and software and TVA agreed to include (in the Please provide the commercial grade dedication plans for each uses a description of the AI687 dedication process as PAMS licensing technical report)

Common Q hardware or software component that has not been an example of how the process is applied. an evaluation of WBN2 critical previously reviewed and approved by the NRC. characteristics for commercial As listed in Table 6-3. Westinghouse Watts Bar 2 Westinghouse hardware (b) The draft ISG6 states that a commercial grade dedication Common Q PAMS Documents at Westinghouse components against the generic report should be provided within 12 months of requested approval Rockville Office, the following commercial grade critical characteristics. (see for a Tier 2 review. dedication documents are available for NRC audit at the ML102920031 Item No 2)

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N Westinghouse Rockville office: (list included in letter)

(i) Please provide 00000-ICE-37722 Rev. 0, Commercial Grade TVA agreed to include a Dedication Report for the QNX Operating System for Common Q b. It is TVAs understanding that the submittal of the description of the generic Applications. documents listed in (b.i) and (b.ii) is no longer required. Westinghouse software Rather, it was agreed, that the inclusion of a description commercial grade dedication (ii) Please provide WNA-CD-00018-GEN Rev. 3, Commercial of the commercial grade dedication process in revision process in the PAMS licensing Dedication Report for QNX 4.25G for Common Q Applications. 2 of the Post-Accident Monitoring System (PAMS) technical report. (see Licensing Technical Report, WNA-LI-00058-WT-P, ML102920031 Item No 3) would be sufficient to address this request.

TVA agreed to include (in the PAMS licensing technical report) an evaluation of WBN2 critical characteristics for commercial software components against the generic critical characteristics. (see ML102920031 Item No 4) 140 The first requirement in the WBN2 PAMS SysRS (i.e., R2.2-1) Responder: Clark 14. N Open Open-NRC Review ML101650255, Item TVA Letter dated WBN2 PAMS System Requirements EICB (Carte) states: The PAMS shall be capable of operation during normal No. 4 10/29/10 Specification and abnormal environments and plant operating modes. The WBN Unit 2 FSAR Amendment 100 Section 7.5.1.8, Post Revised response included in Due 12/3/10 Enclosure 1 Item rational for this requirement is that it is necessary to meet Accident Monitoring System (PAMS) specifies the Reg. letter dated 12/22/10 No. 10 TVA docketed WNA-DS-01617-WBT Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.97. Guide 1.97 variables implemented in the Common Q based TVA to docket PAMS Rev. 1, RRAS Watts Bar 2 NSSS WBN Unit 2 PAMS NNC 11/3/10: The origin of the Licensing Technical Completion Program I&C Projects Post What document specifies which RG 1.97 variables are requirements in the SysRS are Report Rev. 2. Accident Monitoring System- System implemented in the Common Q based WBN2 PAMS? TVA Response to Follow-up NRC Request: not clearly document. Rev. 1 of Requirements Specification, dated the Common Q PAMS Licensing December 2009.

WNA-LI-00058-WT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident Monitoring Technical Report contains an System (PAMS) Licensing Technical Report was submitted open item that will be addressed in TVA Letter to NRC, dated December 3, 2010 (Reference in Rev. 2; this open item is to 1). Revision 2 contains the following change to address this include TVAs enhanced request: contract compliance matrix. It is expected that this matrix will Section 11, TVA Contract Compliance Matrix has been address this open item.

added. Specifically the items of concern are addressed by Requirements 7 through 19 (pages 11-1 and 11-2).

142 The applicable regulatory guidance for reviewing the WBN2 PAMS Responder: WEC 15. N Open Open-NRC Review ML101650255, Item WBN2 PAMS System Requirements EICB (Carte)

SysRS would be IEEE 830 as endorsed by Regulatory Guide No. 6 Specification 1.172 and BTP 7-14 Section B.3.3.1, Requirements Activities - This item is used to track all traceability issues with the Response included in letter Due 12/22/10 Software Requirements Specifications. IEEE 830-1994 Section Software Requirements Specification (SRS). dated 12/22/10 TVA docketed WNA-DS-01617-WBT 4.3.8, Traceable, states: A [requirements specification] is To be addressed by Rev. 1, RRAS Watts Bar 2 NSSS traceable of the origin of each of its requirements is clear 1. How did TVA ensure the traceability of each TVA/Westinghouse agreed to Revision of the RTM, Completion Program I&C Projects Post requirement in the WBN2 PAMS SysRS. include the V&V evaluation of SRS, SysRS, and Accident Monitoring System- System

1. How did TVA ensure the traceability of each requirement in their reusable software element SysDS. Requirements Specification, dated the WBN2 PAMS SysRS. TVA Response: development process in the December 2009.

V&V design phase summary

2. Explain the source(s) of the requirements present in the Post Traceability of requirements for the WBN Unit 2 report. This evaluation would Accident Monitoring Systems Software Requirements Common Q PAMS is ensured by: include an evaluation against Specification. To clarify, many documents have the development process requirements that are incorporated by reference into the a. Preparation of the TVA Contract Compliance Matrix requirements. This evaluation SRS, but what served to direct the author to include those contained in WNA-LI-00058-WBT-P, Revision 2, would also include an evaluation various documents in the SRS or, if the requirement is based Post-Accident Monitoring System (PAMS) of how the WBN2 specific on the System Requirements Specification, what directed the Licensing Technical Report submitted in TVA requirements were addressed author to include the requirement there? Letter to NRC dated December 3, 2010 (Reference by the reusable software 1). elements. (see ML102920031

3. Clarify whether the unnumbered paragraphs in the Post Item No 5)

Accident Monitoring Systems Software Requirements b. Engineering review/comment/status of each Specification, such as in the section headings, or are all such revision of:

sections simply considered to be informative?

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N

i. WNA-DS-01617-WBT, Post Accident Does the same apply to documents referenced by the SRS? Monitoring System - System Requirements Such as WCAP-16096-NP-A, Rev. 1A, Software Program Specification Manual for Common Q Systems, which is incorporated by reference in requirement R2.3-2 in the SRS. ii. WNA-DS-01667-WBT, Post Accident Monitoring System - System Design R2.3-2 [The PAMS software shall comply with the Specification (hardware) requirements and guidelines defined in WCAP-16096-NP-A, Software Program Manual for Common Q Systems iii. WNA-SD-00239-WBT, Software (reference 5).] Requirements Specification for the Post Accident Monitoring System (software)

If any requirements are expressed in such unnumbered paragraph form instead of individually identified requirements, 2. Explain the source(s) of the requirements present in the please list them, describe why they satisfy the fundamental Post Accident Monitoring Systems Software requirement of unambiguity, and describe how they were Requirements Specification. To clarify, many verified. documents have requirements that are incorporated by reference into the Software Requirements Specification

4. Are there any sources of requirements in parallel with the (SRS), but what served to direct the author to include Post Accident Monitoring Systems Software Requirements those various documents in the SRS or, if the Specification? Meaning does the SRS contain, explicitly or requirement is based on the System Requirements by reference, all the requirements that were used in the Specification, what directed the author to include the design phase for the application specific software, or do requirement there?

software design phase activities use requirements found in any other source or document? If so, what are these TVA Response:

sources or documents?

As documented in the RTM, some software

5. References 12, 27, 29, and 31-44 in the Post Accident requirements are taken from generic documents. The Monitoring Systems Software Requirements Specification decision to include generic software requirements was are various types of Reusable Software Element. to reduce the overall scope for Common Q features that are unchanged across projects. Westinghouse reviewed These references are used in the body of the SRS, for the generic PAMS requirements and included those example: requirements that were applicable to WBN Unit 2 PAMS.

R5.3.14-2 [The Addressable Constants CRC error signal shall be TRUE when any CAL CRC's respective ERROR Source: E-mail from Westinghouse (Matthew A.

terminal = TRUE (WNA-DS-00315-GEN, "Reusable Software Shakun) to Bechtel (Mark S. Clark), RE: December 22 Element Document CRC for Calibration Data" [Reference letter review, dated December 17, 2010 (Reference 13) 12]).]

3. Clarify whether the unnumbered paragraphs in the Post They are also included via tables such as found in Accident Monitoring Systems Software Requirements requirement R7.1.2-1 Specification, such as in the section headings, contain requirements or are all such sections simply considered

[The Watts Bar 2 PAMS shall use the application-specific to be informative?

type circuits and custom PC elements listed in Table 7.1-1.]

Does the same apply to documents referenced by the Do the referenced reusable software element documents include SRS? Such as WCAP-16096-NP-A, Rev. 1A, Software requirements not explicitly stated in the SRS? If so what is their Program Manual for Common Q Systems, which is origin? incorporated by reference in requirement R2.3-2 in the SRS.

R2.3-2 [The PAMS software shall comply with the requirements and guidelines defined in WCAP-16096-NP-A, Software Program Manual for Common Q Systems (reference 5).]

If any requirements are expressed in such unnumbered paragraph form instead of individually identified requirements, please list them, describe why they satisfy the fundamental requirement of unambiguity,

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N and describe how they were verified.

TVA Response:

Unnumbered paragraphs in the Post Accident Monitoring Systems Software Requirements Specification, such as in the section headings, are informative and are not to be interpreted as requirements. All requirements are explicitly numbered.

It depends on the document type. The statement would be true for requirements documents (such as the SysRS or SDS) if they were incorporated by reference.

However, for the specific item cited, WCAP-16096-NP-A, Rev. 1A, it does not contain numbered requirements.

The requirements contained in this document are contained within the text of the various sections.

Source: E-mail from Westinghouse (Matthew A.

Shakun) to Bechtel (Mark S. Clark), RE: December 22 letter review, dated December 17, 2010 (Reference 13)

4. Are there any sources of requirements in parallel with the Post Accident Monitoring Systems Software Requirements Specification? Meaning does the SRS contain, explicitly or by reference, all the requirements that were used in the design phase for the application specific software, or do software design phase activities use requirements found in any other source or document? If so, what are these sources or documents?

TVA Response:

The Westinghouse SRS, WNA-SD-00239-WBT, Revision 3 contains references to other Westinghouse software requirements documents. Specifically, 00000-ICE-3238, Revision 5, Software Requirements Specification Post Accident Monitoring System 00000-ICE-3239, Revision 13, Software Requirements Specification for the Common Q Generic Flat Panel Display Software Source: E-mail from Westinghouse (Matthew A.

Shakun) to Bechtel (Mark S. Clark), RE: December 22 letter review, dated December 17, 2010 (Reference 13)

5. References 12, 27, 29, and 31-44 in the Post Accident Monitoring Systems Software Requirements Specification are various types of Reusable Software Element.

These references are used in the body of the SRS, for example:

R5.3.14-2 [The Addressable Constants CRC error signal shall be TRUE when any CAL CRC's respective

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N ERROR terminal = TRUE (WNA-DS-00315-GEN, "Reusable Software Element Document CRC for Calibration Data" [Reference 12]).]

They are also included via tables such as found in requirement R7.1.2-1

[The Watts Bar 2 PAMS shall use the application-specific type circuits and custom PC elements listed in Table 7.1-1.]

Do the referenced reusable software element documents include requirements not explicitly stated in the SRS? If so what is their origin?

TVA Response:

Requirements for the reusable software elements (RSEDs) are evaluated in WNA-VR-00283-WBT-P, Revision 3, IV&V Summary Report for the Post Accident Monitoring System, dated December 2010 (Attachment 10).

RSED traceability is contained in WNA-VR-00280-WBT, Revision 2, Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects Requirements Traceability Matrix for the Reactor Vessel Level Indication System (RVLIS)

Custom PC Elements. This document can be made available for audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office.

At the September 15 public meeting in Rockville, the following actions were agreed to. These items address the traceability concerns with the Software Requirements Specification.

6. Westinghouse will perform a review of the Requirements Traceability Matrix(RTM), using the issues identified at the 9/15 public meeting as a guide (documented below) and update the RTM as required.

TVA Response:

Please see response to letter Item 13 (NRC Matrix Item 145).

7. The next issue of the IV&V report will include the Requirements phase review of the RTM and a partial review for the Design phase.

TVA Response:

Please see response to letter Item 13 (NRC Matrix Item 145).

8. Westinghouse will add a comments column in the Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) to address items not in the SRS or SysRS.

TVA Response:

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N A comments column has been added to WNA-VR-00279-WBT, Revision 3, Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects Requirements Traceability Matrix for the Post Accident Monitoring System.

Source: E-mail from Westinghouse (Matthew A.

Shakun) to Bechtel (Mark S. Clark), RE: December 22 letter review, dated December 17, 2010 (Reference 13)

9. IEEE 830 says you shouldnt have planning information in the SRS. Westinghouse has agreed to remove this information.

TVA Response:

Westinghouse has confirmed that process requirements have been removed from the SRS.

Source: E-mail from Westinghouse (Andrew P. Drake) to Bechtel (Mark S. Clark), RE: Common Q RAI concerns, dated December 8, 2010 (Reference 17)

10. IEEE 830 says you shouldnt have process requirements in the SRS. Westinghouse has agreed to remove these requirements.

TVA Response:

Westinghouse confirmed that process requirements have been removed from the SRS.

Source: E-mail from Westinghouse (Andrew P. Drake) to Bechtel (Mark S. Clark), RE: Common Q RAI concerns, dated December 8, 2010 (Reference 17)

11. Westinghouse will perform and document an evaluation of the SRS to ensure compliance with Reg. Guide 1.172 and justify any deviations.

TVA Response:

WNA-LI-00058-WBT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident Monitoring System (PAMS) Licensing Technical Report submitted in TVA Letter to NRC dated December 3, 2010, (Reference 1):

Section 9, Compliance Evaluation Of The Watts Bar 2 PAMS Software Requirements Specification To IEEE Standard 830-1998 And Regulatory Guide 1.172 has been added.

12. 25 issues identified by V&V where some requirements have not been included in the System Design Specification (SDS) (14) and SRS (11) at the revisions reviewed by V&V. Have these been addressed?

TVA Response:

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N The twenty-five (25) issues are captured in Exception Reports (ERs): V&V-769 and V&V-770. These ERs have all been addressed and the ERs have been closed satisfactorily by Westinghouse IV&V.

Source: E-mail from Westinghouse (Matthew A.

Shakun) to Bechtel (Mark S. Clark), RE: December 22 letter review, dated December 17, 2010 (Reference 13)

13. Some hardware requirements are contained in the SRS instead of the System Design Specification (SDS).

These will be removed from the SRS and incorporated into the next revision of the SDS.

TVA Response:

The hardware requirements in the Software Requirements Specification have been deleted and moved to System Design Specification.

Source: E-mail from Westinghouse (Matthew A.

Shakun) to Bechtel (Mark S. Clark), RE: December 22 letter review, dated December 16, 2010 (Reference 15)

14. RTM item R4.2-2 protection class software set to 0.

Needs to be fixed internally. Write CAPs to revise the application restrictions document on AC160.

TVA Response:

Westinghouse CAPs IR# 10-259-M034 has been issued. This item will be addressed in revision 4 of the RTM.

Source: E-mail from Westinghouse (Matthew A.

Shakun) to Bechtel (Mark S. Clark), RE: December 22 letter review, dated December 17, 2010 (Reference 13)

15. Westinghouse to improve the traceability of the tests that are performed with the function enable (FE) switch in the ENABLE position.

TVA Response:

The tests that are performed with the FE keyswitch in the ENABLE position are defined in the SRS Sections:

6.2 Manually Initiated Testing, 7.2.23 Annunciator Test Display, 7.2.25 Saturation Margin Test Display, and 7.2.26 Analog Output Test Display.

16. Westinghouse to revise documents to be consistent with referring to the FE switch in the ENABLE position.

TVA Response:

Westinghouse has elected to standardize on the terms FE keyswitch and ENABLE. A review of recent documents for compliance with this comment and

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N commitment was performed with the following results:

a. Revision 3 of the SysRS, and SDS have been revised to use the terms FE keyswitch. Revision 3 of the SDS is consistent in use of the term ENABLE.

b. SysRS Revision 3 is not consistent in use of the term ENABLE as noted below:

i. R2.5.2.1-2 uses the term ENABLED instead of ENABLE ii. R2.5.2.1.3-3, R2.6.3.3-1, R2.6.3.3-2, R2.6.3.3-3, and R2.6.3.3-7, use the term Enable instead of ENABLE

c. Revision 3 of the SRS is not consistent in use of the terms FE keyswitch and ENABLE as noted below:

i. Tables 7.2-1 Train A PAMS Data Transmitted to the Plant Computer and 7.2-2 Train B PAMS Data Transmitted to the Plant Computer items 101 and 102 in the SRS refer to the FE switch.

All other items in the SRS refer to the FE keyswitch.

ii. Section 2.1, page 2-4, uses the term Enable instead of ENABLE iii. Requirements R7.2.14-6 and R7.2.16-7 use the term active instead of ENABLE iv. Requirements R7.2.23-2, R7.2.25-2, R7.2.26-2, R7.2.31-4, 7.2.56 FPDS Availability, and R7.2.57-4 use the term enabled instead of ENABLE

d. WNA-AR-00180-WBT-P, Revision 0, Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for the Post Accident Monitoring System, dated October 2010, submitted in TVA letter to NRC dated (Reference

12) is not consistent in use of the term FE keyswitch as noted below:

i. Section 2.2 System Description and Table 3-1 WB2 PAMS FMEA refer to the FE switch.

ii. Table 3-1 describes the switch as the Functional Enable (FE) switch and the FE key-switch

e. Revision 2 of the Licensing Technical Report is not consistent in use of the term FE keyswitch as noted below:

i. Sections 2.2, 5.3 use the term (FE) keylock switch on pages 2-3 (2 places), page 5-3, page 5-6 (4 places)

The identified discrepancies in the use of the terms FE keyswitch and ENABLE in the SysRS, SRS, FMEA and Licensing Technical Report, will be corrected in the next revision of the documents.

17. The flow of information is from the SysRS to the SDS (hardware) and SRS (software). Describe how the documents are used. Describe in 1.1 of the SysRS.

Need a good write up of how the process works.

TVA Response:

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N Please see response to letter item 13 (NRC Matrix Item 145).

18. Westinghouse and TVA will develop a revised schedule for document submittals and provide it to the NRC no later than 9/30/10 TVA Response:

The revised document submittal schedule was included as item 3 NRC Request (Matrix Item Number 142, TVA Commitments Nos. 10 and 17) in TVA letter to NRC dated October 26, 2010 (Reference 5).

19. TVA will update the Procurement Requisition Resolution Matrix and submit it to show how the Common Q PAMS design meets the contract requirements.

TVA Response:

The Procurement Requisition Resolution Matrix has been updated and is included in WNA-LI-00058-WBT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident Monitoring System (PAMS)

Licensing Technical Report submitted in TVA Letter to NRC dated December 3, 2010, (Reference 1), as Section 11, TVA Contract Compliance Matrix.

20. Westinghouse to add the Software Design Descriptions to the RTM TVA Response:

The Software Design Description documents were added to the RTM in WNA-VR-00279-WBT, Rev 2.

Source: E-mail from Westinghouse (Matthew A.

Shakun) to Bechtel (Mark S. Clark), RE: December 22 letter review, dated December 17, 2010 (Reference 13)

21. Westinghouse to clarify how requirements or documents are incorporated by reference into the Common Q PAMS requirements.

TVA Response:

When a Common Q PAMS requirements document references a section of another document, all requirements in that section are applicable.

Source: E-mail from Westinghouse (Matthew A.

Shakun) to Bechtel (Mark S. Clark), RE: December 22 letter review, dated December 17, 2010 (Reference 13)

22. Westinghouse to review the use of shall outside of numbered paragraphs in requirements documents to ensure that all requirements are captured and clearly identified.

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N TVA Response:

See response in letter dated December 22, 2010, item 2 (NRC Matrix Item 050).

23. Westinghouse to resolve the following questions concerning Software Design Descriptions (SDDs)

a. Is the SDD a standalone document or will it incorporate the generic SDD by reference?

b. What are the SDDs?

c. PAMS is a delta document so how do we capture all the generic requirements for traceability.

TVA Response:

a. There are three SDDs prepared specifically for the Watts Bar 2 PAMS project. These are listed below in Item b. These documents and superior requirements documents refer to other generic SDDs also listed in Item b.

b. The SDDs developed for this project are:

i. WNA-SD-00248-WBT, Revision 1, Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects Software Design Description for the Post Accident Monitoring System Flat Panel Display ii. WNA-SD-00250-WBT, Revision 1, Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects Software Design Description for the Post Accident Monitoring System AC160 Software iii. WNA-SD-00277-WBT, Revision 2, Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects Software Design Description for the Post Accident Monitoring System Flat Panel Display System Screen Design Details iv. Other generic SDDs referenced by the PAMS project are:

(a) 00000-ICE-20157, Revision 18, Software Design Description for the Common Q Generic Flat-Panel Software (b) 00000-ICE-30152, Revision 5, Software Design Description Post Accident Monitoring System AC160 (c) 00000-ICE-30140, Revision 4, Software Design Description for the Common Q Core Protection Calculator

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N System Database and Utility Functions

c. Refer to WNA-VR-00279-WBT, Revision 3.

Source: E-mail from Westinghouse (Matthew A.

Shakun) to Bechtel (Mark S. Clark), RE: December 22 letter review, dated December 17, 2010 (Reference 13)

24. For Reusable Software Elements, Westinghouse to describe as qualified libraries by following the SPM and qualified using the Software Elements Test procedure under Appendix B program. Provide a summary of RSEDs generic WCAP. Westinghouse to determine if the WCAP was docketed under the AP1000. RSED concept is not in the SPM. WCAP-15927 AP-1000 does not discuss RCEDs. WCAP process was acceptable. RSEDs are listed in the SDD References.

TVA Response:

Section 3.2.4.1 of WCAP-15927 describes the RSED design process for custom PC elements and type circuits. The Glossary of Terms in the SPM defines custom PC elements and type circuits as modules.

Therefore, the relationship between WCAP-15927 describing the RSED process as circuits, is defined in the SPM requirements for software module development.

WCAP-15927 is on the AP1000 docket.

Source: E-mail from Westinghouse (Matthew A.

Shakun) to Bechtel (Mark S. Clark), RE: December 22 letter review, dated December 17, 2010 (Reference 13) 143 The WBN2 PAMS Software Requirements Specification (WBN2 Responder: WEC 16. N Open Open-NRC Review ML101650255, Item WBN2 PAMS System Requirements EICB (Carte)

PAMS SRS - ML101050202) contains a table (see page iii) titled, No. 7 Specification Document Traceability & Compliance, which states that the Addressed in the 9/15 public meeting and 9/20 - 9/21 audit. Response included in letter Due 12/22/10 WBN2 PAMS SRS was created to support the three documents A detailed explanation will be provided. dated 12/22/10 TVA docketed WNA-DS-01617-WBT identified (one of which is the WBN2 PAMS SysRS). Section 1.1, To be addressed by Rev. 1, RRAS Watts Bar 2 NSSS Overview, of the WBN2 PAMS SRS states: This document TVA Response: Revision of the RTM, Completion Program I&C Projects Post describes requirements for the major software components SRS, SysRS, and Accident Monitoring System- System (a) and (b) The requested information is provided in the SysDS. Requirements Specification, dated (a) Please list and describe each of the major software following documents: December 2009.

components. Please include a description of any NRC review for i. WNA-LI-00058-WBT-P, Revision 2, Post-each of these components. Accident Monitoring System (PAMS) Licensing Technical Report, Table 6-1, Document (b) Please list and describe each of the other software Requirements which lists the software components. Please include a description of any NRC review for documentation requirements for the Common Q each of these components. PAMS and Section 11 TVA Contract Compliance Matrix submitted in TVA Letter to (c) What other documents contain the requirements for the other NRC, dated December 3, 2010 (Reference 1).

software components? ii. WNA-DS-01617-WBT-P, Revision 3, Post Accident Monitoring System- System The WBN2 PAMS System Design Specification (WBN2 PAMS Requirements Specification, dated December SDS) contains a table (see page iii) titled, Document Traceability 2010 (Attachment 1)

& Compliance, which states that the WBN2 PAMS SysRS was iii. WNA-SD-00239-WBT-P, Revision 3, Software created to support the WBN2 PAMS SysRS. Section 1.1, Requirements Specification for the Post Accident Purpose, of the WBN2 PAMS SDS states: The purpose of this Monitoring System, dated December 2010

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N document is to define the hardware design requirements (Attachment 7) iv. WNA-VR-00279-WBT, Revision 3, Watts Bar 2 (c) Do the WBN2 PAMS SRS and SDS, together, implement all of NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects the requirements in the WBN2 PAMS SysRS? Requirements Traceability Matrix for the Post Accident Monitoring System (available for NRC (e) Please briefly describe all of the documents that implement audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office) the WBN2 PAMS SysRS. To the best of TVAs knowledge, no prior NRC review of the software components has been performed.

(c) WNA-VR-00280-WBT, Revision 2, Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects Requirements Traceability Matrix for the Reactor Vessel Level Indication System (RVLIS) Custom PC Elements (available for NRC audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office)

(d) No. Please see Item (e) below.

(e) The documents that describe the requirements that implement the WBN Unit 2 SysRS are:

i. WNA-VR-00279-WBT, Revision 3, Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects Requirements Traceability Matrix for the Post Accident Monitoring System (available for NRC audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office) ii. WNA-VR-00280-WBT, Revision 2, Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects Requirements Traceability Matrix for the Reactor Vessel Level Indication System (RVLIS) Custom PC Elements (available for NRC audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office)

Source: E-mail from Westinghouse (Matthew A. Shakun) to Bechtel (Mark S. Clark), RE: December 22 letter review, dated December 17, 2010 (Reference 13) 144 The WBN2 PAMS Software Requirements Specification (WBN2 Responder: WEC 17. N Open Open-NRC Review ML101650255, Item TVA Letter dated WBN2 PAMS Software Requirements EICB (Carte)

PAMS SRS) contains a table (see page iii) titled, Document No. 8 10/5/10 Specification Traceability & Compliance, which states that the WBN2 PAMS (a) The purpose of NABU-DP-00014-GEN document is to Revised response included in Due 12/3/10 SRS was created to support the three documents identified (two of define the process for system level design, software design letter dated 12/22/10 By letter dated April 8, 2010 these documents have been provided on the docket). and implementation, and hardware design and Responses to items a (ML10101050203), TVA docketed implementation for Common Q safety system development. Response provided in letter and e provided. WNA-SD-00239-WBT, Revision 1, (a) Please describe the third document (i.e., NABU-DP-00014- This document supplements the Common Q SPM, WCAP- dated 10/5/10 "RRAS Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion GEN Revision 2, Design Process for Common Q Safety 16096-NP-A. The scope of NABU-DP-00014-GEN includes NNC 11/18/10: Program I&C Projects, Software Systems). the design and implementation processes for the application NRC Review and WEC to (1) Items b-d closed to Requirements Specification for the Post development. For a fuller description of the design process complete response. other Open Item nos. Accident Monitoring System, dated (b) Please describe the flow of information between these three described in NABU-DP-00014-GEN please refer to the (2) The point of these February 2010 (ML101050202).

documents. Design Process for AP1000 Common Q Safety Systems, b-d to be addressed at public questions was to WCAP-15927 on the AP1000 docket. Since this is a meeting and audit. Will require understand how the (c) Does the PAMS SRS implement the requirements in these Westinghouse process document that is not specifically information to be docketed. origin of the three documents? referenced in the SRS, it will be removed in the next revision requirements in the of the document. requirements (d) Please describe if and how these three documents are used in specifications were the development of the PAMS Software Design Description. (b) - Closed to items 142 and 145 documented. TVA stated that the origin of (e) Do the WBN2 V&V activities include verification that the (c) - Closed 142 the requirements would requirements of these three documents have been incorporated be demonstrated in into the WBN2 PAMS SRS. (d) - Closed to Item 142 Rev. 2 of the CQ PAMS LTR.

(e) WBN2 PAMS Software Requirements Specification (WNA-SD-00239-WBT, Rev. 1) refers to Document

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N Traceability & Compliance table on page iii. This table has three entries; Design Process for Common Q Safety Systems (NABU-DP-00014-GEN, Rev. 2), RRAS Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects Post Accident Monitoring System - System Requirements Specification (WNA-DS-01617-WBT, Rev. 1), and RRAS Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects Post Accident Monitoring System - System Design Specification (WNA-DS-01667-WBT, Rev. 1).

IV&V performed a Requirements Traceability Assessment during which it reviewed Software Requirements Specification (WBN2 PAMS SRS, WNA-SD-00239-WBT, Rev. 1) against System Requirements Specification (WNA-DS-01617-WBT, Rev. 1) and System Design Specification (WNA-DS-01667-WBT, Rev. 1). Requirements within Software Requirements Specification that are referring to NABU-DP-00014-GEN, Rev 2, Design Process for Common Q Safety Systems, have also been reviewed for traceability and compliance. During IV&V's RTA effort the anomaly reports V&V-769 and V&V- 770 have been initiated and reported in the IV&V Phase Summary Report for the System Definition Phase, WNA-VR-00283-WBT, Rev. 0.

IV&V has verified that the requirements in SRS are derived from the specified documents listed in the Document Traceability and Compliance Table of WBN2 PAMS SRS.

TVA Response to Follow-up NRC Request:

(1) Item (a) in the original list, NABU-DP-00014-GEN Revision 2, Design Process for Common Q Safety Systems, is available for NRC audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office.

(2) WNA-LI-00058-WT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident Monitoring System (PAMS) Licensing Technical Report submitted in TVA Letter to NRC dated December 3, 2010, (Reference 1) contains the following change to address the NRC request:

Section 11, TVA Contract Compliance Matrix showing the origin of the requirements was added.

145 The WBN2 PAMS System Design Specification (WBN2 PAMS Responder: WEC 18. N Open Open-NRC Review ML101650255, Item WBN2 PAMS System Design EICB (Carte)

SDS) contains a table (see page iii) titled, Document Traceability No. 9 Specification

& Compliance, which states that the WBN2 PAMS SDS was (1) The review and update of the RTM is complete. The Response included in letter Due 12/22/10 created to support the WBN2 PAMS SysRS. revised RTM can be made available for NRC audit at dated 12/22/10 TVA docketed WNA-DS-01667-WBT the Westinghouse office in Rockville. To be addressed by Rev. 1, RRAS Watts Bar 2 NSSS (a) Does the WBN2 PAMS SDS implement all of the hardware During the September 20-21, Revision of the RTM, Completion Program I&C Projects Post requirements in the WBN2 PAMS SysRS? (2) Please see letter Item 10 (NRC Matrix Item 142, sub 2010 audit at Westinghouse, it SRS, SysRS, and Accident Monitoring System- System item 13). was acknowledged that SysDS. Design Specification, dated December (b) Please briefly describe all of the documents that implement the TVA/Westinghouse had 2009.

hardware requirements of the WBN2 PAMS SysRS. (3) Please see letter Item 10 (NRC Matrix Item 142, sub previously (in September 15, item 12). 2010 public meeting) stated:

This item is used to track all traceability issues with the System Design Specification (SDS). (4) Section 11 TVA Contract Compliance Matrix was TVA would provide the RSED added to WNA-LI-00058-WBT-P, Revision 2, Post- RTM. (see ML102920031 Item At the September 15 public meeting in Rockville, the following Accident Monitoring System (PAMS) Licensing No 6)

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N actions were agreed to. These items partially address the Technical Report submitted in TVA Letter to NRC traceability concerns with the System Design Specification. dated December 3, 2010, (Reference 1). TVA would revise and resubmit This item will be updated with the results of the September 20 the PAMS RTM to address all and 21 Commercial Grade Dedication and SDS RTM audit. (5) WNA-VR-00283-WBT, Revision 1, IV&V Summary types of issues identified in the Report for the Post Accident Monitoring System, public meeting. (see

1. Westinghouse will perform completed a review of the submitted in TVA to NRC letter dated December 3, ML102920031 Item No 7)

Requirements Traceability Matrix(RT), using the issues 2010 (Reference 1) includes the Requirements and identified at the 9/15 public meeting as a guide (documented Design phase reviews. TVA would revise and resubmit below) and update the RTM as required. the Software Verification and (6) Per Westinghouse letter WBT-D-2268 NRC Access to Validation phase summary

2. Some hardware requirements are contained in the SRS Common Q Documents at the Westinghouse Rockville report for the requirements instead of the System Design Specification (SDS). These will Office dated August 16, 2010 (Reference 9) System phase to document the be removed from the SRS and incorporated into the next Requirements Specification for the Common Q Generic completion of the requirements revision of the SDS. Flat Panel Display, 00000-ICE-30155, Revision 9 is phase review. (see available for audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office. ML102920031 Item No 8)

3. 25 issues identified by V&V where some requirements have not been included in the SDS (14) and SRS (11) at the The generic AC160 specifications are contained in the revisions reviewed by V&V. Have these been addressed? documents listed below. The documents are available Yes. The next revisions of the SDS and SRS address these for NRC audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office in issues. accordance with the letter number referenced. List is contained in letter.

4. TVA will update the Procurement Requisition Resolution Matrix and submit it to show how the Common Q PAMS (7) A schedule was developed and is reviewed weekly by design meets the contract requirements. Westinghouse and TVA project management.

5. The next issue of the IV&V report will include the (8) The revised document submittal schedule was Requirements phase review of the RTM and a partial review included as item 3 NRC Request (Matrix Item Number for the Design phase. 142, TVA Commitments Nos. 10 and 17) in TVA letter to NRC dated October 26, 2010 (Reference Error!

6. Westinghouse to provide the generic AC160 and flat panel Reference source not found.).

specifications.

(9) The flow of documentation information was provided to

7. Westinghouse and TVA to develop a schedule of licensing the NRC inspector during the Common Q PAMS audit.

document submittals that can be met by the project team.

Source: E-mail from Westinghouse (Andrew P. Drake) to

8. The flow of information is from the SysRS to the SDS Bechtel (Mark S. Clark), RE: RAI on SysRS, dated (hardware) and SRS (software). Describe how the December 8, 2010 (Reference 18) documents are used. Describe in 1.1 of the SysRS. Need a good write up of how the process works.

183 7/15/2010 Responder: WEC 19. Y Open Open-NRC Review EICB RAI TVA Letter dated EICB (Carte)

ML102980066 Item 10/21/10 An emphasis is placed on traceability in System Requirements The generic Software Requirements Specification applies Revised response included in Due 12/3/10 No. 9 Enclosure 1 Item Specifications in the SRP, in the unmodified IEEE std 830-1993, except as modified by the WBN Unit 2 System Requirements letter dated 12/22/10. No. 4 and even more so given the modifications to the standard listed in Specification. NNC 11/18/10: The Regulatory Guide 1.172, which breaks with typical NRC use of the point behind this open word should to say Each identifiable requirement in an SRS TVA Response to Follow-up NRC Request: Response provided in letter item was that TVA must must be traceable backwards to the system requirements and the dated 10/21/10 demonstrate that the design bases or regulatory requirements that is satisfies Please see the response to RAI item 12 in letter dated origin of each 12/222/10, NRC Matrix Item 144. requirement in the On page 1-2 of the Post Accident Monitoring Systems Software WEC requirements Requirements Specification in the background section, is the specification is known sentence Those sections of the above references that require and documented. TVA modification from the generic PAMS are defined in the document stated that this referring purely to the changes from WNA-DS-01617-WBT Post information would be in Accident Monitoring System-System Requirements Specification CQ PAMS LTR Rev. 2.

or is it saying that there are additional changes beyond those and that the SRS defines them?

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N If there are additional changes, what is their origin?

185 7/15/2010 Responder: WEC 20. N Open Open-NRC Review EICB RAI EICB (Carte)

ML102980066 Item An emphasis is placed on the traceability of requirements in Steve Clark to look at how to combine traceability items. Response included in letter Due (1) 12/3/10 No. 17 Software Requirements Specifications in the SRP, in the dated 12/22/10. (2) 12/22/10 unmodified IEEE std 830-1993, and even more so given the Was addressed to during the 9/15 meeting and 9/20 - 9/21 modifications to the standard listed in Regulatory Guide 1.172, audit. NNC 11/18/10: (1)The which breaks with typical NRC use of the word should to say point behind this open Each identifiable requirement in an SRS must be traceable TVA Response to Follow-up NRC Request: item was that TVA must backwards to the system requirements and the design bases or demonstrate that the regulatory requirements that is satisfies Also the NRC considers (1) Please see the response to Item 12 in this letter (NRC origin of each that the SRS is the complete set of requirements used for the Matrix Item 144). requirement in the design of the software, whether it is contained within one WEC requirements document or many. In order to evaluate an SRS against the (2) There is no RTM for development of the individual specification is known guidance in the SRP the staff needs access to all the reusable software elements. As listed in item 15 of and documented. TVA requirements. Table 6-1 Document Requirements of WNA-LI-00058- stated that this WT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident Monitoring System information would be in References 12, 27, 29, and 31-44 in the Post Accident Monitoring (PAMS) Licensing Technical Report submitted in TVA CQ PAMS LTR Rev. 2.

Systems Software Requirements Specification are various types Letter to NRC, dated December 3, 2010, a RTM for (2) TVA also said it of Reusable Software Element. implementation of the RSEDs (WNA-VR-00280-WBT) would provide a RTM for the WBN Unit 2 Common Q PAMS has been for the RSED These references are used in the body of the SRS, for example: developed. This document is available for NRC audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office.

R5.3.14-2 [The Addressable Constants CRC error signal shall be TRUE when any CAL CRC's respective ERROR terminal = TRUE (WNA-DS-00315-GEN, "Reusable Software Element Document CRC for Calibration Data" [Reference 12]).]

They are also included via tables such as found in requirement R7.1.2-1

[The Watts Bar 2 PAMS shall use the application-specific type circuits and custom PC elements listed in Table 7.1-1.]

Do the referenced reusable software element documents include requirements not explicitly stated in the SRS? If so what is their origin?

187 By letter dated June 18, 2010, TVA docketed responses to NRC Responder: Merten 21. N Open Open-NRC Review ML101970033, Item TVA Letter dated Are these connections already EICB (Carte) requests for information. No. 1 & 2 10/5/10 docketed?

1) Please refer to the revised response to letter dated Revised response included in Due 12/22/10

1) Enclosure 1, Item No. 33 of the TVA letter dated June 18, 2010, 10/5/10 Item 18 (RAI Matrix item 115). letter dated 12/22/10.

did not identify any connection from the PAMS Operator Modules Revise Response (OMs) to the plant computer and printers; however, Figure 2.1-1 of Partial Response provided in the PAMS System Requirements Specification (WNA-DS-01617- 2) This is a duplicate of closed RAI Matrix Item 45. letter dated 10/5/10 WBT Rev. 1 - ML101680578) shows a TCP connection from the OMs to the plant computer and printer. Please explain. TVA Response to Follow-up NRC Request:

NNC 8/25/10: Why did TVA not

2) Please clarify whether any digital safety-related systems or A review of the following documents determined that the catch this on the review of the components have a digital communications path to non-safety- connection between the OM and the plant computer has PAMS SysRS or SRS? Does related systems or with safety related systems in another division. been changed to a connection to a printer: TVA check that the CQ PAMS If so, NRC staff will need these paths identified on the docket. system meets the requirements

1. WNA-DS-01617-WBT-P, Revision 3, Post Accident in its purchase specifications?

Monitoring System - System Requirements Specification, dated November 2010 (Attachment 1)

2. WNA-DS-01667-WBT-P, Revision 3, Post Accident Monitoring System - System Design Specification, dated November 2010 (Attachment 4)

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N

3. WNA-LI-00058-WBT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident Monitoring System (PAMS) Licensing Technical Report, dated November 2010, submitted in TVA to NRC letter December 3, 2010 (Reference 1)

Review of the newly released Common Q PAMS documents listed below confirmed they correctly show a connection from the OM to a printer and not the plant computer. None of the other newly released documents contain a figure of the Common Q PAMS system showing the connection from the OM. The exception is WCAP-17351 which was created to allow a non-proprietary version of a generic Common Q document to be submitted on the docket and was not intended to reflect the WBN Unit 2 configuration.

Note: The OM printer connection is only used for maintenance. A printer is not normally connected to the OM. To use the OM printer connection, the FE keyswitch must installed and be in the ENABLE position.

(1) WNA-TP-02988-WBT, Revision 0, Post Accident Monitoring System Channel Integration Test/Factory Acceptance Test, dated November 2010, submitted in TVA to NRC letter December 3, 2010 (Reference 1)

(2) WNA-AR-00180-WBT-P, Revision 0, Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for the Post Accident Monitoring System, dated October 2010, submitted in TVA to NRC letter November 5, 2010 (Reference 12) 212 7.5.2 7/27/2010 Responder: WEC 22. N Open Open-NRC Review EICB RAI EICB (Carte)

ML102980066 Item By letter dated June 18, 2010 (ML101940236) TVA stated Application specific requirements for testing. This cannot be Response included in letter Due 12/22/10 No. 10 (Enclosure 1, Attachment 3, Item No. 3) that the PAMS system addressed in a topical report. Evaluation of how the dated 12/22/10.

design specification and software requirements specification hardware meets the regulatory requirements. To be addressed by contain information to address the "Design Report on Computer WBN2 specific test plan Integrity, Test and Calibration..." The staff has reviewed these WEC to provide the information and determine where the documents, and it is not clear how this is the case. information will be located.

(1) Please describe how the information provided demonstrates compliance with IEEE 603-1991 Clauses 5.5, 5.7, 5.10, & 6.5. 1. IEEE-603 1991 (2) Please describe how the information provided demonstrates conformance with IEEE 7-4.3.2-2003 Clauses 5.5 & 57. 5.5 System Integrity. The safety systems shall be designed to accomplish their safety functions under the full range of applicable conditions enumerated in the design basis.

TVA Response: The applicable conditions and Common Q PAMS system compliance are contained in WNA-LI-00058-WBT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident Monitoring System (PAMS) Licensing Technical Report submitted in TVA Letter to NRC dated December 3, 2010, (Reference 1) Section 11, Contract Compliance Matrix items:

87 and 88 Seismic 89, 90, 91, 92 and 185 EMI/RFI

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N 300, 301 and 302 Environmental 5.7 Capability for Test and Calibration. Capability for testing and calibration of safety system equipment shall be provided while retaining the capability of the safety systems to accomplish their safety functions.

The capability for testing and calibration of safety system equipment shall be provided during power operation and shall duplicate, as closely as practicable, performance of the safety function. Testing of Class 1E systems shall be in accordance with the requirements of IEEE Std 338-1987 [3]. Exceptions to testing and calibration during power operation are allowed where this capability cannot be provided without adversely affecting the safety or operability of the generating station. In this case:

(1) appropriate justification shall be provided (for example, demonstration that no practical design exists),

(2) acceptable reliability of equipment operation shall be otherwise demonstrated, and (3) the capability shall be provided while the generating station is shut down.

TVA Response: The requirements for test and calibration and Common Q PAMS system compliance, are contained in WNA-LI-00058-WBT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident Monitoring System (PAMS) Licensing Technical Report Section 11, TVA Contract Compliance Matrix items:

202 self test 350 Maintenance Bypass 351 Loop Tuning Parameters, 400 and 401 3.7.2 Testing, Calibration, and Verification 402, 403 and 404, 3.7.3 Channel Bypass or Removal from Operation 5.10 Repair. The safety systems shall be designed to facilitate timely recognition, location, replacement, repair, and adjustment of malfunctioning equipment.

TVA Response: The requirements for repair and Common Q PAMS system compliance are contained in WNA-LI-00058-WBT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident Monitoring System (PAMS) Licensing Technical Report Section 11, TVA Contract Compliance Matrix items:

179 Mean time to repair 202 self test 398 3.7 Maintenance 399 3.7.1 Troubleshooting 6.5 Capability for Testing and Calibration

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N 6.5.1 Means shall be provided for checking, with a high degree of confidence, the operational availability of each sense and command feature input sensor required for a safety function during reactor operation.

This may be accomplished in various ways; for example:

(1) by perturbing the monitored variable, (2) within the constraints of 6.6, by introducing and varying, as appropriate, a substitute input to the sensor of the same nature as the measured variable, or (3) by cross-checking between channels that bear a known relationship to each other and that have readouts available.

6.5.2 One of the following means shall be provided for assuring the operational availability of each sense and command feature required during the post-accident period:

(1) Checking the operational availability of sensors by use of the methods described in 6.5.1.

(2) Specifying equipment that is stable and retains its calibration during the post-accident time period.

TVA Response: The requirements for sense and command feature testing and Common Q PAMS system compliance are contained in WNA-LI-00058-WBT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident Monitoring System (PAMS) Licensing Technical Report Section 11 TVA Contract Compliance Matrix items:

10, display of sensor diagnostic information 202 self test 205 self diagnostics and watchdog timer 264 through 271, system self checks 311 system status displays, 341 alarms, 344 on-line diagnostics

2. IEEE 7-4.3.2-2003 5.5 System integrity In addition to the system integrity criteria provided by IEEE Std 603-1998, the following are necessary to achieve system integrity in digital equipment for use in safety systems:

Design for computer integrity Design for test and calibration Fault detection and self-diagnostics 5.5.1 Design for computer integrity The computer shall be designed to perform its safety

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N function when subjected to conditions, external or internal, that have significant potential for defeating the safety function. For example, input and output processing failures, precision or round off problems, improper recovery actions, electrical input voltage and frequency fluctuations, and maximum credible number of coincident signal changes.

If the system requirements identify a safety system preferred failure mode, failures of the computer shall not preclude the safety system from being placed in that mode. Performance of computer system restart operations shall not result in the safety system being inhibited from performing its function.

TVA Response: Common Q PAMS system reliability and failure modes are described in:

WNA-AR-00180-WBT, Revision 0, Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for the Post Accident Monitoring System WNA-AR-00189-WBT, Revision 0 Post Accident Monitoring System Reliability Analysis The requirements for mean time between failure and Common Q PAMS system compliance are contained in WNA-LI-00058-WBT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident Monitoring System (PAMS) Licensing Technical Report, Section 11 TVA Contract Compliance Matrix item 178.

5.5.2 Design for test and calibration Test and calibration functions shall not adversely affect the ability of the computer to perform its safety function. Appropriate bypass of one redundant channel is not considered an adverse effect in this context. It shall be verified that the test and calibration functions do not affect computer functions that are not included in a calibration change (e.g., setpoint change).

V&V, configuration management, and QA shall be required for test and calibration functions on separate computers (e.g., test and calibration computer) that provide the sole verification of test and calibration data.

V&V, configuration management, and QA shall be required when the test and calibration function is inherent to the computer that is part of the safety system.

V&V, configuration management, and QA are not required when the test and calibration function is resident on a separate computer and does not provide the sole verification of test and calibration data for the computer that is part of the safety system.

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N TVA Response: The requirements for test and calibration and Common Q PAMS system compliance are contained in WNA-LI-00058-WBT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident Monitoring System (PAMS) Licensing Technical Report Section 11 TVA Contract Compliance Matrix items:

202 self test 350 Maintenance Bypass 351 Loop Tuning Parameters, 400 and 401 3.7.2 Testing, Calibration, and Verification 402, 403 and 404, 3.7.3 Channel Bypass or Removal from Operation 5.5.3 Fault detection and self-diagnostics Computer systems can experience partial failures that can degrade the capabilities of the computer system, but may not be immediately detectable by the system.

Self-diagnostics are one means that can be used to assist in detecting these failures. Fault detection and self-diagnostics requirements are addressed in this sub-clause.

The reliability requirements of the safety system shall be used to establish the need for self-diagnostics. Self diagnostics are not required for systems in which failures can be detected by alternate means in a timely manner. If self-diagnostics are incorporated into the system requirements, these functions shall be subject to the same V&V processes as the safety system functions.

If reliability requirements warrant self-diagnostics, then computer programs shall incorporate functions to detect and report computer system faults and failures in a timely manner. Conversely, self-diagnostic functions shall not adversely affect the ability of the computer system to perform its safety function, or cause spurious actuations of the safety function. A typical set of self-diagnostic functions includes the following:

Memory functionality and integrity tests (e.g.,

PROM checksum and RAM tests)

Computer system instruction set (e.g., calculation tests)

Computer peripheral hardware tests (e.g.,

watchdog timers and keyboards)

Computer architecture support hardware (e.g.,

address lines and shared memory interfaces)

Communication link diagnostics (e.g., CRC checks)

Infrequent communication link failures that do not result in a system failure or a lack of system functionality do not require reporting.

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N When self-diagnostics are applied, the following self-diagnostic features shall be incorporated into the system design:

a) Self-diagnostics during computer system startup b) Periodic self-diagnostics while the computer system is operating c) Self-diagnostic test failure reporting TVA Response: The requirements for fault detection and self diagnostics and Common Q PAMS system compliance are contained in WNA-LI-00058-WBT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident Monitoring System (PAMS)

Licensing Technical Report Section 11 TVA Contract Compliance Matrix items:

107 error free download 202 self test 205 self diagnostics and watchdog timer 263 primary and backup communication 264 through 271, continuous on-line self checks 311 system status displays, 341 alarms, 344 on-line diagnostics 5.7 Capability for test and calibration No requirements beyond IEEE Std 603-1998 are necessary.

TVA Response: No response required.

Concurrence: E-mail from Westinghouse (Andrew P. Drake) to Bechtel (Mark S. Clark), RE: RAI 212 Response - Errors in the Contract Compliance Matrix, dated December 17, 2010 (Reference 14) 213 7.5.2 7/27/2010 Responder: WEC 23. N Open Open-NRC Review EICB RAI EICB (Carte)

ML102980066 Item By letter dated June 18, 2010 (ML101940236) TVA stated Conformance with IEEE 603 is documented in the revised Response is included in letter Due 12/31/10. No. 18 (Enclosure 1, Attachment 3, Item No. 3) that the PAMS system Common Q PAMS Licensing Technical Report and the dated 10/25/10 design specification and software requirements specification Common Q PAMS System Design Specification.

contain information to address the "Theory of Operation NNC to review and revise this Description." The staff has reviewed these documents, and it is Attachment 1 contains the proprietary version of question after LTR R2 is not clear how this is the case. The docketed material does not Westinghouse document Tennessee Valley Authority received.

appear to contain the design basis information that is required to (TVA), Watts Bar Unit 2 (WBN2), Post-Accident Monitoring evaluate compliance with the Clause of IEEE 603. System (PAMS), Licensing Technical Report, Revision 1, (1) Please provide the design basis (as described in IEEE 604 WNA-LI-00058-WBT-P, Dated October 2010 Clause 4) of the Common Q PAMS.

(2) Please provide a regulatory evaluation of how the PAMs Attachment 8 contains the proprietary version of complies with the applicable regulatory requirements for the theory Westinghouse document Nuclear Automation Watts Bar 2 of operation. NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects Post Accident For example: Regarding IEEE 603 Clause 5.8.4 (1) What are the Monitoring System - System Design Specification, WNA-manually controlled protective actions? (2) How do the documents DS-01667-WBT, Rev. 2 dated September 2010.

identified demonstrate compliance with this clause?

244 CB 8/3/2010 Responder: WEC 24. N Open Open-NRC Review EICB RAI Response is LIC-101 Rev. 3 Appendix B Section 4, (C

art ML102980066 Item provided in letter "Safety Evaluation" states: "the

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N Section 8.2.2 of the Common Q SPM (ML050350234) states that The process related requirements have been removed from Revised response is included in Due 12/22/10 No. 14 dated 10/25/10. information relied upon in the SE must the Software Requirements Specification (SRS) shall be developed revision 2 of the Software Requirements Specification (SRS). letter dated 12/22/10 be docketed correspondence."

using IEEE 830 and RE 1.172. Clause 4.8, "Embedding project requirements in the SRS," of the IEEE 830 states that an SRS Attachment 3 of letter dated 10/25/10 contains the Response is provided in letter LIC-101 Rev. 3 states: "The safety should address the software product, not the process of producing proprietary version of Westinghouse document Nuclear dated 10/25/10. analysis that supports the change the software. In addition Section 4.3.2.1 of the SPM states "Any Automation, Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion Program, I&C requested should include technical alternatives to the SPM processes or additional project specific Projects, Software Requirements Specification for the Post NNC 11/18/10: SysRS Rev. 2 information in sufficient detail to enable information for the ...SCMP...shall be specified in the PQP. Accident Monitoring System, WNA-SD-00239-WBT, also contains process the NRC staff to make an independent Revision 2, Dated September 2010. requirements that are more assessment regarding the acceptability Contrary to these two statements in the SPM, the WBN2 PAMS appropriately incorporated into of the proposal in terms of regulatory SRS (ML101050202) contains many process related requirements, TVA Response to Follow-up NRC Request: process documentation. requirements and the protection of for example all seventeen requirements in Section 2.3.2, public health and safety."

"Configuration Control," address process requirements for As shown is the listed documents, process related configuration control. requirements have been deleted from the SRS and SysRS in Revision 3:

Please explain how the above meets the intent of the approved SPM. Attachment 1 contains proprietary version of WNA-DS-01617-WBT-P, Revision 3, Post Accident Monitoring System-System Requirements Specification, dated December 2010.

Attachment 7 contains the proprietary version of WNA-SD-00239-WBT-P, Revision 3, Software Requirements Specification for the Post Accident Monitoring System, dated December 2010.

Source: E-mail from Westinghouse (Andrew P. Drake) to Bechtel (Mark S. Clark), RE: Common Q RAI concerns, dated December 8, 2010 (Reference 17) 245 8/3/2010 Responder: WEC 25. N Open Open-NRC Review EICB RAI LIC-101 Rev. 3 Appendix B Section 4, EICB (Carte)

ML102980066 Item "Safety Evaluation" states: "the Section 5.8 of the Common Q SPM (ML050350234) identifies the Relates to the commitment to provide the test plan and the Response included in letter Due 12/22/10 No. 119 information relied upon in the SE must required test documentation for systems developed using the SPM compliance matrix dated 12/3/10 be docketed correspondence."

Common Q SPM. Please provide sufficient information for the NRC staff to independently assess whether the test plan for WBN2 Attachment 9 contains the Westinghouse document Post LIC-101 Rev. 3 states: "The safety PAMS, is as described in the SPM (e.g., Section 5.8.1). Accident Monitoring System Test Plan, WNA-PT-00138- analysis that supports the change WBT, Revision 0, dated November 2010. Attachment 10 requested should include technical contains the Westinghouse Application for Withholding for information in sufficient detail to enable the Post Accident Monitoring System Test Plan, WNA-PT- the NRC staff to make an independent 00138-WBT, Revision 0, dated November 2010. assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposal in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety."

246 8/3/2010 Responder: WEC 26. N Open Open-NRC Review EICB RAI Response is LIC-101 Rev. 3 Appendix B Section 4, EICB (Carte)

ML102980066 Item provided in letter "Safety Evaluation" states: "the Section 4.3.2.1, "Initiation Phase" of the Common Q SPM As agreed ISG6 does not apply to the Common Q PAMS Response is provided in letter Due 10/22/10 No. 15 dated 10/25/10 information relied upon in the SE must (ML050350234) requires that a Project Quality Plan (PQP) be platform. The information required to address this question dated 10/25/10 be docketed correspondence."

developed. Many other section of the SPM identify that this PQP concerning the PQP and SPM has been added to NNC 11/18/10: NRC to should contain information required by ISG6. Please provide the compliance matrix in revision 1 of the Licensing Technical NNC 11/18/10: PQP has not go to WEC Rockville LIC-101 Rev. 3 states: "The safety PQP. If "PQP" is not the name of the documentation produced, Report. been provided and CQ PAMS Offices and look at analysis that supports the change please describe the documentation produced and provide the LTR Rev. 1 does not contain PQP to decide if it must requested should include technical information that the SPM states should be in the PQP. Attachment 1 of letter dated 10/25/10 contains the comparable information. docketed. information in sufficient detail to enable proprietary version of Westinghouse document Tennessee the NRC staff to make an independent Valley Authority (TVA), Watts Bar Unit 2 (WBN2), Post- assessment regarding the acceptability Accident Monitoring System (PAMS), Licensing Technical of the proposal in terms of regulatory Report, Revision 1, WNA-LI-00058-WBT-P, Dated October requirements and the protection of 2010 public health and safety."

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N 250 8/8/2010 Responder: WEC 27. N Open Open-NRC Review LIC-101 Rev. 3 Appendix B Section 4, EICB (Carte)

"Safety Evaluation" states: "the The SPM describes the software and documents that will be Westinghouse develops Software Release Reports/Records Revised response included in Due 12/22/10 information relied upon in the SE must created and placed under configuration control. The SCMP (e.g., and a Configuration Management Release Report. Describe letter dated 12/22/10 be docketed correspondence."

SPM Section 6, Software Configuration Management Plan) the documents and when they will be produced. Summarize 10/25/10 is a partial describes the implementation tasks that are to be carried out. The guidance on how to produce these records, focus on project Response included in letter response. Still waiting LIC-101 Rev. 3 states: "The safety acceptance criterion for software CM implementation is that the specific requirements in SPM etc. dated 10/25/10. on Software Test Plan analysis that supports the change tasks in the SCMP have been carried out in their entirety. and all other testing requested should include technical Documentation should exist that shows that the configuration TVA Response to Follow-up NRC Request: documentation. information in sufficient detail to enable management tasks for that activity group have been successfully the NRC staff to make an independent accomplished. Please provide information that shows that the CM The following documentation shows that the configuration assessment regarding the acceptability tasks have been successfully accomplished for each life cycle management tasks for that activity group have been of the proposal in terms of regulatory activity group. successfully accomplished. requirements and the protection of public health and safety."

1. WNA-LI-00058-WT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident Monitoring System (PAMS) Licensing Technical Report submitted in TVA Letter to NRC dated December 3, 2010, (Reference 1) contains the following changes to address the NRC requests:

a. Section 2.2.1 Hardware/Software Change Process has been added to describe the process of how changes are evaluated.

b. Section 2.2.2, Software has been expanded to include a table detailing evolutionary software changes that have occurred since the initial submittal and the change evaluation of the life cycle.

2. WNA-PT-00138-WBT, Revision 0, Nuclear Automation Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects, Post Accident Monitoring System Test Plan, (Proprietary), dated November 2010 submitted in TVA Letter to NRC, dated December 3, 2010 (Reference 1).

251 8/8/2010 Responder: WEC 28. N Open Open-NRC Review LIC-101 Rev. 3 Appendix B Section 4, EICB (Carte)

"Safety Evaluation" states: "the The SPM describes the software testing and documents that will The software testing performed and documents created are Revised response included in Due 12/22/10. information relied upon in the SE must be created. The SPM also describes the testing tasks that are to addressed by the SPM Compliance matrix contained in letter dated 12/22/10 be docketed correspondence."

be carried out. The acceptance criterion for software test Revision 1 of the Licensing Technical Report. 10/25/10 is a partial implementation is that the tasks in the SPM have been carried out Partial response is provided in response. Still waiting LIC-101 Rev. 3 states: "The safety in their entirety. Please provide information that shows that Attachment 1 of the letter dated 10/25/10 contains the letter dated 10/25/10 on Software Test Plan analysis that supports the change testing been successfully accomplished. Proprietary version of Westinghouses document titled: and all other testing requested should include technical Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), Watts Bar Unit 2 documentation. information in sufficient detail to enable (WBN2), Post-Accident Monitoring System (PAMS), the NRC staff to make an independent Licensing Technical Report, Revision 1, WNA-LI-00058- assessment regarding the acceptability WBT-P, Dated October 2010 of the proposal in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of TVA Response to Follow-up NRC Request: public health and safety."

Please see the response to RAI item 21 in letter dated 12/22/10, NRC Matrix Item 250.

252 8/8/2010 Responder: WEC 29. N Open Open-NRC Review LIC-101 Rev. 3 Appendix B Section 4, EICB (Carte)

"Safety Evaluation" states: "the The SPM contain requirements for software requirements Explain response to AP1000 audit report. Response included in letter Due 12/22/10 information relied upon in the SE must traceability analysis and associated documentation (see Section RTM docketed NRC awaiting V&V evaluation of RTM. dated 12/22/10 be docketed correspondence."

5.4.5.3, Requirements Traceability Analysis). Please provide information that demonstrates that requirements traceability The following responses are based on WBN Unit 2 Common Read ML091560352 Check on this Hilmes LIC-101 Rev. 3 states: "The safety

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N analysis has been successfully accomplished. Q PAMS traceability: analysis that supports the change requested should include technical Software requirements traceability analysis is described in information in sufficient detail to enable the following documents: the NRC staff to make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability

1. WNA-LI-00058-WBT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident of the proposal in terms of regulatory Monitoring System (PAMS) Licensing Technical requirements and the protection of Report submitted in TVA Letter to NRC dated public health and safety."

December 3, 2010, (Reference 1) Section 11, TVA Contract Compliance Matrix

2. WNA-VR-00279-WBT, Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects Requirements Traceability Matrix for the Post Accident Monitoring System (available for NRC audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office)

3. WNA-VR-00280-WBT, Watts Bar 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects Requirements Traceability Matrix for the Reactor Vessel Level Indication System (RVLIS) Custom PC Elements (available for NRC audit at the Westinghouse Rockville office) This document addresses the RSEDs used in the WBN Unit 2 Common Q PAMS.

The V&V evaluation of the RTM is documented in section 2.2.2 of the following documents:

1. The Independent Verification & Validation (IV&V) report covering the Concept and Definition phases (Nuclear Automation Watts Bar Unit 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects, IV&V Summary Report for the Post Accident Monitoring System, (Proprietary), WNA-VR-00283-WBT, Revision 1, dated November 2010), submitted in TVA Letter to NRC dated December 3, 2010 (Reference 1).

2. The Independent Verification &Validation (IV&V) report covering the Design and Implementation phases (Nuclear Automation Watts Bar Unit 2 NSSS Completion Program I&C Projects, IV&V Summary Report for the Post Accident Monitoring System, (Proprietary), WNA-VR-00283-WBT, Revision 2, dated November 2010), submitted in TVA Letter to NRC dated December 3, 2010 (Reference 1).

3. The integration phase is covered in Attachment 10, the proprietary version of IV&V Summary Report for the Post Accident Monitoring System, WNA-VR-00283-WBT-P, Revision 3, dated December 2010.

Attachment 11 contains the non-proprietary version of IV&V Summary Report for the Post Accident Monitoring System, WNA-VR-00283-WBT-NP, Revision 3, dated December 2010. Attachment 12 contains the Application For Withholding Proprietary Information From Public Disclosure WNA-VR-00283-WBT-P, Revision 3, IV &V Summary Report for the Post Accident Monitoring System (Proprietary), dated December 2010.

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N 327 Attachment 36 contains Foxboro proprietary drawings 08F802403- Responder: Webber 30. Y Open Open-NRC Review SC-2001 sheets 1 through 6. An affidavit for withholding and non-DORL (Poole) proprietary versions of the drawings will be submitted by January In accordance with correspondence from Foxboro, there is Response Included in letter Due 11/24/10 31, 2011. no proprietary information contained in the 08F802403-SC- dated 11/24/10 2001 drawings. Based on this, no affidavit for withholding is required. Attachment 1 contains versions of the drawings with the proprietary information block removed.

092 5/20/2010 Responder: Hilmes 1. Y Open Open-TVA Continuous review as items are added DORL (Poole) TVA to review Licensee Open Item list and determine which items This item will close when we are no longer using this Due: SER Issue are proprietary. document as a communications tool.

323 WCAP-13869 revision 1 was previously reviewed under WBN Unit Responder: Hilmes/Unit 1 1. Y Open Open-TVA Unit 1 TVA Letter dated 1 SER SSER 13 (Reference 8). Unit 2 references revision 2. An 10/29/10 analysis of the differences and their acceptability will be submitted Attachment 12 contains the WCAP 13869 Revision 1 to Response is included in letter Due: 12/22/10 Enclosure 1 Item to the NRC by November 15, 2010 Revision 2 Change Analysis. dated 10/29/10 No. 36 EICB(Garg)

The staff is confused with the response since both units have reference leg not insulated Rev 2 should apply to Unit 1 also and there should be no difference between Unit 1 and 2 281 7.6 7.6.8 8/27/2010 Responder: Webb 1. Y Open Open-TVA/Bechtel EICB RAI TVA Letter dated EICB (Garg)

ML102910008 10/29/10 For FSAR Section 7.6.8 in amendment 96, redline version has Attachment 5 contains the WBN Unit 2 FSAR markup for Response provided in letter Due 11/24/10 Item#65 Enclosure 1 Item completely rewritten this section of the FSAR, however, the staff is Section 7.6.8, Interlocks for RCS Pressure Control During dated 10/29/10 No. 16 not able to determine any changes made to the section. Explain Low Temperature Operation, showing what was changed Provide the basis for what changes have been made to this FSAR Section. between Amendments 95 and 96. the changes. Look at FSAR Amendment 101 did not Foxboro I/A impact.

TVA Response to Follow-up NRC Request: reflect the changes in 7.6.8 associated with implementation The interlock for the RCS Pressure Control for Unit 2 is of the DCS. Provide the basis implemented differently than Unit 1 implementation. There for acceptance to use Foxboro are no differences between Unit 1 and Unit 2 interlocks, I?A DCS inplace of analog operation of interlocks and operator interface for operation of instrumentation and relays.

the RCS Pressure Control. Primary sensing elements and final control elements are identical and operations of these devices are identical. For Unit 2, once signals are processed by the Eagle 21 system, interlock implementation is by software modules in the Foxboro I/A Distributed Control System (DCS). Hardware outputs, generated in the DCS, operate the PORVs. The Unit 2 DCS is implemented via EDCRs 52378 and 54504. Section 7.6.8 in Amendment 101 of the WBN Unit 2 FSAR reflects the Unit 2 changes associated with implementation of the DCS.

TVA Response to Second Follow-up NRC Request:

The highlighted text from FSAR Amendment 101 Section 7.6.8 reflects the installation of the Foxboro DCS.

7.6.8 Text from FSAR Amendment 101 The wide range temperature signals, as inputs to the Protection Sets I and II, continuously monitor RCS temperature conditions. In Protection Set I, the existing RCS wide range temperature channels on RCS loops 1 and 2

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N provide inputs to the Eagle 21 digital process protection system. Eagle 21 provides isolated analog signals to the digital process control system. An auctioneer function selects the lowest temperature signal which is then used to calculate an acceptable reference pressure limit (PORV setpoint) considering the plants allowable pressure and temperature Protection Set III. The calculated reference pressure is compared to the actual RCS pressure monitored by the wide range pressure channel. The auctioneered temperature signal will annunciate a main control room (MCR) alarm whenever the measured temperature approaches, within a predetermined amount, the reference temperature for arming the system. Similarly, whenever the measured pressure approaches within a predetermined amount of the programmed setpoint, another MCR alarm will be generated.

When the measured RCS pressure is equal to or above the programmed setpoint (nominal values), a PORV open signal is initiated and a MCR alarm is actuated. A manually armed permissive allows this actuation signal to control the Train A PORV (PCV-68-340A). The manually armed permissive also serves to block a spurious PORV opening due to potential instrument failure whenever the RCS temperature is above the arming reference temperature.

The monitored generating station variables that generate the actuation signal for the Train B PORV (PCV-68-334) are processed in a similar manner. The RCS loops 3 and 4 wide range temperature signals and the RCS pressure signal are provided from Protection Set II. Therefore, the generating station variables used for the Train B PORV are derived from a protection set that is independent of the sets from which generating station variables used for the Train A PORV are derived. The wide range temperature auctioneer function and the programmed pressure setpoint calculation for the Train B PORV are performed in a different group of the digital process control system than those for the Train A PORV. Each of these control groups has a fault tolerant, redundant processor pair and redundant power supplies with different power sources.

318 7.5.2.3 7.5 TVA has provided the following documents for RM-1000 Responder: Temples 2. N Open Open-TVA/Bechtel RAI No. 28 TVA Letter dated equipment qualification: ML102980005 10/29/10, Encl 1 Revised response is included in Due 12/22/10 10/26/2010 Item 34, and TVA (i) Qualification Test Report for RM-1000 Processor Module letter dated 12/22/10. letter 11/24/10, and Current-To-Frequency Converter 04508905-QR (i) Applicable to WBN Unit 2. 04508905-1QR is Response update Att. 2.

(January 2001) applicable only in regards to the RM-1000, with the Note check 04508905-1QR or required. It is clear that (ii) Qualification Test Report Supplement, RM-1000 Upgrades exception of re-qualification of certain RM-1000 QR. Staff version is QR only. 04508903-2SP and -

04508905-1SP (June 2006) equipment differences covered in the -1SP report. 3SP are not applicable.

EICB (Singh)

(iii) Qualification Test Report Supplement, RM-1000 Upgrades The Current-to-Frequency (I-F) converter module Response is included in letter The response for 04508905-2SP (June 2008) qualifications in the base report and the -1SP report dated 10/29/10 applicability of (iv) Qualification Test Report Supplement, RM-1000 Upgrades are not applicable to the RM-1000s, and will be used 04508905-QR and -

04508905-3SP (May 2008) later as references in the WBN Unit 2 specific 1SP to RM-1000 and IF qualification reports. converter is not clear.

Please clarify whether all of these are fully applicable to WBN2 or are they applicable with exceptions? If with exceptions, then (ii) Applicable to WBN Unit 2. Check page numbers of please clarify what those are. Appendix F (iii) Not applicable to WBN Unit 2 (missing/duplicate Supplement 3 was issued one month prior to supplement 2. (iv) Not applicable to WBN Unit 2 pages).

Please explain the reason for the same. Check applicability of

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N The 04508905-3SP report was prepared for another TVA Appendix C to RM1000 plant, as a monitor system-level report, where the system instead of RM2300?

included equipment mostly based on the base report See items 336 and 337.

equipment items. These two -2SP and -3SP supplement reports were essentially worked concurrently, but the -2SP All equipment document review/release process resulted in the release qualification reports time difference. including supplements 2SP and 3SP have TVA Response to Follow-up NRC Request: been reviewed as vendor drawings for NOTE: The response for the current to frequency (I to F) WBN-2. Please explain converter in item 1 below is a reversal of the the reason for response previously provided in TVA to NRC letter applicability of one dated October 29, 2010 (Reference 22). General report and not the Atomics Electronic Systems Inc. (GA-ESI) notified other.

TVA of this change on December 8, 2010 (Reference 20). Further all TVA/Bechtel reviews seems to be (1) The applicability of the qualification reports from GA- dispositioned as Code ESI e-mail dated December 10, 2010 (Reference 19) is 4, Review not required.

as follows: Work may proceed.

The applicable reports

a. 04508905-QR Qualification Test Report for RM-should have been 1000 Processor Module and Current-to-reviewed prior to Frequency Converter is applicable to the WBN dispositioning them.

Unit 2 RM-1000 and I to F converter modules.

Please explain the

b. 04508905-1SP Supplement to Qualification Test apparent lack of review Report for RM-1000 Processor Module and of WBN-2 applicable Current-to-Frequency Converter is applicable to documents. Was the WBN Unit 2 RM-1000 module. appropriate review guidance used?

c. 04508905-1SP is not applicable to the WBN Unit 2 I to F converter module. Further update required

d. 04508905-2SP Qualification Test Report Provide model Supplement, I-F Converter Upgrades is number/part number for applicable to the WBN Unit 2 I to F converter the RM-1000 and I/F module. converter used for WBN-2. This GA-ESI provided two other reports required to support information is needed qualification of the containment high range radiation to verify that the model monitors. The report descriptions are from GA-ESI e- or part number used is mail on December 8, 2010 (Reference 20). The the equipment that has reports are: been qualified for WBN-2.

e. GA-ESI report 04038903-QSR, Qualification Summary Report for Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit Provide qualification 2 Replacement Radiation Monitors: The report is reports 04038903-QSR the principle report and the starting point for all and 04038903-7SP by the radiation monitors provided as part of the the dues date of replacement contract. The report describes each 1/22/11.

monitor; referenced to the technical manual for the physical and functional description and lists Submit a copy of any the major components of the monitor system. other relevant reviewed Report section 3 identifies the TVA Watts Bar Unit versions of the 2 Environmental, Seismic, Electromagnetic qualification reports.

Compatibility (EMC), and software requirements for each monitor. In section 4 a brief description Submit copies of the of GA-ESI generic qualification programs for all reviewed reports for

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N radiation monitoring equipment in each of the four 04508905-QR, above areas is provided. The qualification basis 04508905-1SP, for each monitor is provided in a separate 04508905-2SP.

supplement to the principle report and is identified in section 5. Clarification of applicability of existing

f. GA-ESI report 04038903-7SP, Qualification reports is acceptable.

Basis for 04034101-001 (2-RE-90-271, -272, -

273, & -274) [TVA Note: These are the containment post accident high range radiation monitors.]: GA-ESI report 04038903-7SP is divided into subsections to address the Environmental, Seismic, EMC, and Software qualification basis for the High Range Area Monitors. Within each subsection, the HRAM is compared to a tested or analyzed article to demonstrate similarity and/or evaluate differences, the tests that were performed, and evaluation to demonstrate qualification. In most cases, the qualification basis references other documents. In addition to qualification, a section is provided that lists the life of those replaceable components that have life expectancy less than 40 years.

(2) This is addressed by response to RAI Question 336 in TVA to NRC letter dated November 24, 2010 (Reference 8)

(3) This is addressed by response to RAI Question 337 in TVA to NRC letter dated November 24, 2010 (Reference 8)

(4) The 04508905-3SP Qualification Test Report Supplement, RM-1000 Upgrades is not applicable to WBN Unit 2 (Reference 19).

Please see Item 1, above, for applicability of the other reports.

(5) TVA provided the proprietary versions of the reports by letter dated March 12, 2010 (Reference 10). By letter dated July 15, 2010 (Reference 23), TVA provided the non-proprietary version of the reports and included a copy of the proprietary report which had been erroneously marked as having not been reviewed.

04508905-QR report has been reviewed by TVA. The review of the remaining reports is ongoing.

(6) See item 5.

338 7.5.2.3 7.5 In page 3-15 and appendix B of Qualification Test Report Responder: Civil EQB 3. N Open Open-TVA/Bechtel 04508905-QR, licensee described the selection of seismic EICB (Singh) required response spectra (RRS) and indicated Figure 3-2 (page Get date from Bob Brown Due: 12/22/10 3-17), Figure 3-3 (page 3-18) are the RRSs used. The RRS curves used for actual testing are lower than the RRS curves that are shown on Figures 3-2 and 3-3. The RRS curves used for testing are shown in Figure 4-5, 4-6, 4-7, 4-8, 4-11, 4-12, 4-13, and 4-14 (pages 4-25, 4-26, 4-28, 4-29, 4-37, 4-38, 4-40, 4-41).

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N Please clarify and justify why the RRS curves used in actual tests are lower than the RRS curves determined in Figures 3-2 and 3-3.

In addition please justify that the RRS used for testing envelopes the RRS required for WBN-2 application specific seismic conditions.

339 7.5.2.3 7.5 In the Qualification Test Report 04508905-QR, the licensee Responder: Bob Brown 4. N Open Open-TVA/Bechtel provided only eight Safe Shutdown Earthquake (SSE) Test EICB Response Spectra (TRS) as mentioned in the previous open item Due: 12/22/10 (Singh) (OI-338). Please provide all SSE and Operating Basis Earthquake (OBE) TRS plots for NRC review.

340 7.5.2.3 7.5 Provide test result curves for all EMI/RFI tests listed in Table 3.2.3 Responder: GA 5. Y Open Open-TVA/Bechtel (page 3-8) of the Qualification Test Report 04508905-QR. In addition, please provide the standards or the guidance documents The following responses are based on e-mail: GA-ESI to Response included in letter Provide the qual reports used as the source for ENV 50140, ENV 55011 Class A, and EN Bechtel, dated December 8, 2010 (Reference 20), dated 12/22/10. by 1/28/11 per TVA 55022 Class B. letter of 12/22/10.

(1) The EMI/RFI tests described in Table 3-2 are based on GA-ESI report 04509050 and are summarized in GA- Due:12/22/10 ESI report 04508905-QR. The independent laboratory report, with curves, is part of GA-ESI report 04509050.

Subsequent to issuing GA-ESI report 04508905-QR additional EMC testing was performed in accordance with TVA specific requirements. The results of the subsequent EMC testing are reported in GA-ESI report 04038800. GA-ESI report 04038800 includes the test curves and the report is used as the basis for EMC qualification of the Upper and Lower Inside Containment Post Accident Radiation Monitors (2-RE-EICB (Singh)90-271 through -274). The results of the testing and the acceptability of the RM-1000 monitors for use at WBN Unit 2 are addressed in GA-ESI report 04038903-7SP. This report will be submitted no later than January 28, 2010.

(2) ENV 50140, EN 55011, and EN 55022 are British Standard Institution (BSI) publications concerning equipment electromagnetic and radio frequency performance. The standard titles are shown below:

a. ENV 50140 - Electromagnetic Compatibility -

Basic Immunity Standard - Radiated Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Field - Immunity Test

b. EN 55011 - Industrial, scientific and medical equipment - Radio-frequency disturbance characteristics - Limits and methods of measurement

c. EN 55022 - Information technology equipment -

Radio disturbance characteristics - Limits and methods of measurement 341 7.5.2.3 7.5 FSAR Tables 3.10 list seismically qualified equipment. However, A review of WBN Unit 2 FSAR amendment 102 chapters 6. Y Open Open-TVA/Bechtel these tables do not list the containment high range radiation 3.10, 11 and 12 was performed. The reviewer was unable to monitors. Please add them to the appropriate FSAR table(s) or locate seismic qualification information for the radiation Will be closed on EICB (Singh) justify why they should not be included in the FSAR 3.10 series of monitoring system in those chapters. A review of chapter update of FSAR 3.10 tables. 3.11 confirmed that radiation monitoring is included in the series tables.

environmentally qualified systems.

It appears that seismic qualification of the radiation monitoring equipment was unintentionally omitted from

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N FSAR chapter 3.10. FSAR chapter 3.10 will be updated to include the qualified radiation monitoring equipment in a future FSAR amendment.

344 7.6.6  ? Unit 1 SE discussed in Section 7.6.5, Valve Power Lockout. The requested information is contained in FSAR Amendment 7. N Open Open-TVA/Bechtel There is no section in FSAR which provides discussion on this 102 as follows:

subject. SE section discusses compliance with PSB-18. Provide a discussion which can be used by the staff to determine similar 7.6.2.1 Description conclusion as Unit 1 and if the design is similar to Unit 1 then make a statement to that effect. Also provide the list of the valves where 5th paragraph: The motor-operated bypass valves are power lockout during normal reactor operation is utilized for valves located in bypass lines paralleling the normal RHR suction Eicg(Garg) whose inadvertent operation could affect plant safety. isolation valves FCV 74-1 and FCV 74-2 which are in series in the flowpath. Valves FCV 74-8 and FCV 74-9 are normally closed and remain closed with power locked out unless one of the two main isolation valves (FCV 74-1 or FCV 74-2) cannot be opened and the plant must be cooled down.

And:

7.6.6 Spurious Actuation Protection for Motor Operated Valves 345 7.5.2.3 7.5 Provide the normal temperatures and expected periods of high/low 8. N Open Open-TVA/Bechtel temperature excursions to assess aging requirements. TVA to further clarify if 86ºF for 40 years was used as the qualification EICB (Singh) requirement for aging tests. This has been stated in some of the subsections under section 4.2 of the 04508905-QR report but the rationale for using 86ºF (includes an internal temperature rise of 18ºF) for 40 years has not been justified in the 04508905-QR report or the supplement reports. TVA to provide the rationale for this acceptance criteria for WBN-2.

346 7.5.2.3 7.5 TVA has previously stated in response to open item 319 that RM- 9. N Open Open-TVA/Bechtel 1000 System Verification Test Results report, 04507007-1TR is not EICB applicable to WBN-2. However, TVA has not provided a WBN-2 (Singh) specific test results report. Please identify and provide the appropriate test results reports to complete the review.

347 7.5.2.3 7.5 Qualification report 04508905-1SP does not address EMI/RFI 10. N Open Open-TVA/Bechtel EICB qualification for the new RM-1000 modules. TVA to provide the (Singh) updated qualification or explain the basis for not addressing the EMI/RFI qualification.

348 7.5.2.3 7.5 Qualification report 04508905-2SP does not address EMI/RFI 11. N Open Open-TVA/Bechtel EICB qualification for the new I/F converters. TVA to provide the (Singh) updated qualification or explain the basis for not addressing the EMI/RFI qualification.

349 7.5.2.3 7.5 Radiation testing was not considered in any of the test reports as In response to aquestion about Common Q PAMS 12. N Open Open-TVA/Bechtel all the equipment has been assumed to be located in nuclear equipment qualification, TVA re-evaluated the Control and power plant areas with mild environments and radiation dosages Aux Instrument Room TID and concluded it to be less than less than 1 x 103 rads for total integrated dose (TID). However, 1x103 RAD.

the radiation monitors and the I/F converters are located in the EICB (Singh) main control room which is defined as mild environment. For WBN-2 mild environment is defined as room or building zone where (1) the temperature, pressure, or relative humidity resulting from the direct effects of a design basis event (DBE) (e.g.,

temperature rise due to steam release) are no more severe than those which would occur during an abnormal plant operational condition, (2) the temperature will not exceed 130ºF due to indirect effects of a DBE, (3) the event radiation dose is less than or equal to 1 x 104 rads, and (4) the total event plus the 40 year TID (total

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N integrated dose) is less than or equal to 5 x 104 rads (reference WB-DC-40-54). TVA to address lack of radiation qualification for WBN-2.

350 7.5.2.3 7.5 The seismic required response spectra (RRS) is shown in Figures 13. N Open Open-TVA/Bechtel 3-1 of 04508905-1SP and Figure 3-1 of 0458905-2SP report. The actual test response spectra are shown in Figures 4-5 and 4-6 of EICB (Singh) 04508905-QR report. The actual test response spectra does not seem to fully envelope the RRS. However, this statement is based on visual reading of unidentified numbers. TVA to provide clarification to the values at the inflection point of all lines on the RRS and the actual test response spectra. The seismic qualification issue is open till further clarification is received from TVA.

351 7.5.2.3 7.5 The replacement schedule for the components that have a 14. N Open Open-TVA/Bechtel qualified life of less than 40 years is noted in Table 6-1 of the supplemental qualification report 04508905-1SP. It is not clear if the components identified for replacement in this report are the EICB (Singh) only components or if the components which are in addition to the components previously identified in qualification report 04508905-QR.

Are there any age sensitive components for the I/F converter used for WBN-2? (Note: Report 04508905-2SP does not state any age sensitive components that require replacement during the qualified life).

352 7.5.2.3 7.5 Please calrify how many RM-1000 radaition monitors are being 15. N Open Open-TVA/Bechtel procured for WBN-2, is the quantity 2 or four. MR 25402-011-EICB MRA-HARA-00002, R4 under Item 1.6 indicates that the quantity is (Singh) 2. If so, is WBN-2 using dual channel indication on each RM-1000 unit. TVA to clarify.

334 7 7 FSAR Figure 7A-3 Mechanical Flow and Control Diagram Responder: Stockton 1. Y Open Open-TVA/Licensing RAI not required. N/A RAI not required because the figure is Symbols doesnt show the symbols for the first column of valves. not part of any SE section.

EICB (Darbali)

Please correct this in a future FSAR amendment. Figure will be corrected in FSAR Amendment 103.

Update:

Please fix symbols for Gate Valve, Globe Valve and Float operated valve.

069 7.5.2 7.5.1 By letter dated March 12, 2010 TVA stated that the target submittal Responder: WEC Date: 5/25/10 1. N Open Open-TVA/WEC N/A - No question N/A EICB date for the "Watts Bar 2 PAMS Specific FAT Report" was October was asked. Item (Carte) 2010. Awaiting for document to be Due 2/18/11 was opened to track docketed by TVA. comm8ittment made by applicant.

074 7.5.2 7.5.1 By letter dated March 12, 2010 TVA stated that the target submittal Responder: WEC Date: 5/25/10 2. N Open Open-TVA/WEC N/A - No question N/A EICB date for the Post FAT IV&V Phase Summary Report was was asked. Item (Carte) November 30, 2010. TVA to provide due date. Due 2/21/11 was opened to track commitment made by applicant.

081 7.5.2 7.5.1 5/6/2010 Responder: Merten/WEC 3. N Open Open-TVA/WEC EICB RAI TVA Letter dated NNC 1/5/11: See Also Open Item No.

EICB (Carte)

ML102910002 6/18/10 86 and 202.

The PAMS Licensing Technical Report (WNA-LI-00058-WBT Rev. The codes and standards documents listed in Section 7 of ML101600092 Item No.1: There Due 12/22/10 Item No. 9 0, Dated April 2010), in Section 7, lists codes and standards the Common Q PAMS Licensing Technical Report are the are three sets of regulatory applicable to the Common Q PAMS. This list contains references documents that the Common Q platform was licensed to criteria that relate to a Common TVA to provide to old revisions of several regulatory documents, for example: when the NRC approved the original topical report and Q application (e.g. WBN2 requested information.

(1) RG 1.29 - September 1978 vs. March 2007 issued the approved SER. The WBN Unit 2 Common Q PAMS):

(2) RG 1.53 - June 1973 vs. November 2003 PAMS is designed in accordance with the approved (a) Common Q platform

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N (a) IEEE 379-1994 vs. -2000 Common Q topical report and approved SER and the codes components - Common Q TR (3) RG 1.75 - September 1975 vs. February 2005 and standards on which the SER was based. Since the (b) Application Development (a) IEEE 384-1992 vs. -1992 current versions referenced are not applicable to WBN Unit Processes - Common Q SPM (4) RG 1.100 - June 1988 vs. September 2009 2, there is no basis for a comparison review. (c) Application Specific - current (a) IEEE 344-1987 vs. -2004 regulatory criteria (5) RG 1.152 - January 1996 vs. January 2006 Bechtel to develop a matrix and work with Westinghouse to The Common Q Topical Report (a) IEEE 7-4.33.2-1993 vs. -2003 provide justification. and associated appendices (6) RG 1.168 - September 1997 vs. February 2004 primarily addressed (a) and (b).

(a) IEEE 1012-1986 vs. -1998 The Common Q SER states:

(b) IEEE 1028-1988 vs. -1997 (7) IEEE 279-1991 vs. 603-1991 Appendix 1, Post Accident (8) IEEE 323-1983 vs. -1974 (RG 1.89 Rev. 1 June 1984 Monitoring Systems, provides endorses 323-1974) the functional requirements and However, LIC-110, "Watts Bar Unit 2 License Application Review," conceptual design approach for states: "Design features and administrative programs that are upgrading an existing PAMS unique to Unit 2 should then be reviewed in accordance with the based on Common Q current staff positions." Please identify all differences between the components (page 58, Section versions referenced and the current staff positions. Please provide 4.4.1.1, Description)On the a justification for the acceptability PAMS with respect to these basis of the above review, the differences. staff concludes that Appendix 1 does not contain sufficient information to establish the generic acceptability of the proposed PAMS design (page 56, Section 4.4.1.3, PAMS Evaluation)

The NRC did not approve the proposed PAMS design.

Section 6, References, and Section 7, Codes and Standards Applicable to the Common Q PAMS, of the PAMS Licensing Technical Report contain items that are not the current regulatory criteria.

Please provide an explanation of how the WBN2 PAMS conforms with the application specific regulatory criteria applicable to the WBN2 PAMS design. For example IEEE Std. 603-1991 Clause 5.6.3, Independence Between Safety Systems and Other Systems, and Clause 6.3, Interaction Between the Sense and Command Features and Other Systems, contain application specific requirements that must be addressed by a PAMS system.

Awaiting TVA Response.

086 7.5.2 7.5.1 CB 5/6/2010 Responder: WEC Date: 5/24/10 4. N Open Open-TVA/WEC EICB RAI TVA Letter dated NNC 1/6/11: See Also Open Item No.81 (C

art ML102910002 6/18/10 & 202

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N The PAMS Licensing Technical Report (WNA-LI-00058-WBT Rev. The regulatory documents listed in the Common Q PAMS TVA to address with item OI Due 12/22/10 Item No. 14 0, Dated April 2010), in Section 6, lists references applicable to the Licensing Technical Report are the documents that the 81.

Common Q PAMS. This list contains references to old revisions of Common Q platform was licensed to when the NRC several regulatory documents, for example: approved the original topical report and issued the approved (1) DI&C-ISG04 - Rev. 0 (ML072540138) vs. Rev. 1 SER. The WBN Unit 2 Common Q PAMS is designed in (ML083310185) accordance with the approved Common Q topical report and However, LIC-110, "Watts Bar Unit 2 License Application Review," approved SER and the regulatory documents on which the states: "Design features and administrative programs that are SER was based. Since the current versions referenced are unique to Unit 2 should then be reviewed in accordance with the not applicable to WBN Unit 2, there is no basis for a current staff positions." Please identify all differences between the comparison review.

versions referenced and the current staff positions. Please provide a justification for the acceptability PAMS with respect to these Rev 0 of the Licensing Technical Report references Rev. 1 of differences. ISG4 202 7.5.2 7/22/2010 Responder: WEC 5. N Open Open-TVA/WEC EICB RAI TVA Letter dated NNC 1/5/11: See Also Open Item No.

EICB (Carte)

Response included in letter ML102980066 Item 10/5/10 81 and 86.

The letter (ML0003740165) which transmitted the Safety Revision 1 of the Licensing Technical Report will provide dated 12/22/10 to provide information No. 4 Evaluation for the Common Q topical report to Westinghouse more detailed information on the changes to the platform. requested.

stated: "Should our criteria or regulations change so that our Partial Response provided in conclusions as to the acceptability of the report are invalidated, CE Rev. 2 of the Licensing Technical Report will include the letter dated 10/5/10 Due TBD Nuclear Power and/or the applicant referencing the topical report applicability of guidance.

will be expected to revise and resubmit their respective NNC 1/5/11: Summary provided documentation, or submit justification for continued applicability of TVA Response to Follow-up NRC Request: in Licensing Technical Report the topical report without revision of the respective WNA-LI-00058-WBT-P, Revision 2, Post-Accident R2 has been reviewed and documentation." Question No 81 identified many criteria changes; Monitoring System (PAMS) Licensing Technical Report found to be unacceptable.

please revise the respective documentation or submit justification (LTR) submitted in TVA Letter to NRC dated December 3, for continued applicability of the topical report. 2010, (Reference 1) contains the following change to LTR Section 9 evaluates the address the NRC request: compliance of the SRS to IEEE 830-1998. There are two issues Section 9, Compliance Evaluation of the Watts Bar 2 PAMS with this evaluiation:

Software Requirements Specification to IEEE Standard 830- (1) IEEE 830-1998 is not the 1998 and Regulatory Guide 1.172 to show the origin of the current SRP acceptance criteria.

requirements has been added. IEEE 830-1998 has not been formally endorsed by a The descriptions and commitments in the Topical Report regulatory guide.

(TR) still apply. The LTR provides compliance evidence to (2) Westinghouse committed to the new ISG-04 criteria. The statement in the SE means that evaluate the SRS against 830 the TR can be evaluated against later NRC criteria when it when the NRC identified several appears. inconsistencies.

Source: E-mail from Westinghouse (Matthew A. Shakun) to Yes ISG-4 is one new criteria, Bechtel (Mark S. Clark), RE: December 22 letter review, and an evaluation against it has dated December 17, 2010 (Reference 13) been provided.

In addition, LTR Rev. 2 Section 13 states: The applicable NRC regulatory guides, IEEE and EPRI industry standards fo the common Q PAMS are shown below. Compliance to these codes and standards are stated in Section 4 of Reference 1.

Reference 1 is the common Q topical report.

335 7.6.1 7.6.7 LPMS: Reference to OI-331, sub item 2. Responder: WEC 6. Y Open Open-TVA/WEC EICB Provide analysis, test, or combined analysis and test for normal TVA has reviewed the information provided by Partial Response included in Submit qual report by (Singh) operating radiation, temperature, and humidity environment per Westinghouse describing how the Loose Part Monitoring letter dated 12/22/10 3/11/11 as stated in regulatory position C.1.g of RG 1.133. As an alternate TVA may System (LPMS) sensor is qualified for normal operating TVA letter of 12/22/10,

Agenda for Weekly Telecom with TVA (I&C Chapter 7 only) rad94FD7.docx Open Items to be Resolved for SER Approval

Response

SE FSAR NRC No. Issue TVA Response(s) Acceptable Status/ Current Actions Resolution Path RAI No. & Date RAI Resp. Date Comments Sec. Sec. POC Y/N confirm that the required equipment has been qualified for the conditions provided in Westinghouse letter WBT-D-2782, Encl 1, Item 28.

environments stated in RG 1.133, position C.1.g and that TVA has dated December 17, 2010 (Reference 11) as addressed in reviewed the test report and found it acceptable. regulatory position C.1.g of Reg. Guide 1.133 and found it Due 12/22/10 acceptable. The qualification information on the softline cable and charge converter/preamplifier is being assembled and will be submitted by March 11, 2011.