ML14167A089

Operating License Renewal

ML14167A089
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	05/27/2014
From:	Finfera J US Dept of Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service
To:	Briana Grange NRC/NRR/DLR/RERGUB
References
Download: ML14167A089 (4)

Text

1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Finfera, Jennifer [jennifer_finfera@fws.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 11:48 AM To: Grange, Briana

Subject:

Re: Davis Besse operating license renewal Briana, For the tower lights if it possible these should either be eliminated or set so that if they blink they are off more than on. The longest time off possible would be the most beneficial. For lights within the complex they should be down-shielded or set on motion dete ctors so they are not on continuously. I am going to check and see if there is any sort of timeframe for the evaluation of the red knot and that will help us determine how to proceed.

Jenny On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Grange, Briana <

Briana.Grange@nrc.gov

> wrote: Okay. Sounds good. Thanks for the update!

From: Finfera, Jennifer [mailto:jennifer_finfera@fws.gov

] Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 1:43 PM To: Grange, Briana

Subject:

Re: Davis Besse opera ting license renewal Briana, I need to talk with one of our bi ologist who does most of the bird work. I know that having the lights on continuous instead of flashing doe s help reduce bird collisions and by the information you included these collisions have been reduced. Af ter I find out if there are any other avoidance or minimization measures I will give you a call so we can discuss this further. It will probably be next week. As I will be in the field most o f the rest of this week.

Jenny Jenny 2 On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Grange, Briana <

Briana.Grange@nrc.gov

> wrote: Hi Jenny, Per your request, I have attached an assessment for the proposed long-eared bat. In the course of considering the bat, I also identified another proposed species-the red knot-that occurs in the action area. Both species are considered in the attached assessment.

As you will see, I concluded "not likely to adversely affect" for the long-eared bat, but "may affect" for the red knot due to the potential for collision with plant structures. Given the "may affect" conclusion and the fact that the red knot is a proposed species at this time, I am not sure what the appropriate path forward will be. Maybe we can talk after you read the assessment? Thanks, Briana ______________

Briana A. Grange Biologist U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR/DLR/RERB (301) 415-1042 briana.grange@nrc.gov

-- Jenny Finfera Wildlife Biologist Ecological Services 3 4625 Morse Road, Suite 104 Columbus, Ohio 43230 Phone: 614-416-8993 ext.13

Fax: 614-416-8994

--

Jenny Finfera Wildlife Biologist Ecological Services

4625 Morse Road, Suite 104 Columbus, Ohio 43230

Phone: 614-416-8993 ext.13

Fax: 614-416-8994

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1372 Mail Envelope Properties (CAAtVZcM6-6BzVhNdBtavBW=+4+JxQo+EFpoNpmF0eZ2Z0L2Wqw)

Subject:

Re: Davis Besse operating license renewal Sent Date: 5/27/2014 11:47:32 AM Received Date: 5/27/2014 11:47:44 AM From: Finfera, Jennifer Created By: jennifer_finfera@fws.gov Recipients: "Grange, Briana" <Briana.Grange@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None

Post Office: mail.gmail.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2796 5/27/2014 11:47:44 AM

Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: