ML12342A259: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:A-1 13 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: EGHV0102 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | {{#Wiki_filter:A-1 13 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | ||
Equipment ID No.: EGHV0102 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | CCW TO RHR HX B ISO Interaction Effects | ||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and. Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | |||
: 10. Based on'the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-114 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EGHV0102 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | CCW TO RHR HX B ISO EGHV0102 9-20 121 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-115 Status: [LýV N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EGHV0102 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | CCW TO RHR HX B ISO EGHV0102 9-20 122 EGHV0102 9-20 123 November 2012 WCAP- 7678-NP WCAP-117678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-116 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EGHV0102 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves EauiDment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | CCW TO RHR HX B ISO I:L*MVVUIz j-zu 1Z4 EGHV0102 9-20 125 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-I 17 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EGLT0002 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | CCW SURGE TK B Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2047.50 ft, 1502 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-118 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EGLT0002 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | CCW SURGE TK B Interaction Effects | ||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes SWT observed scaffolding in zone of influence of level transmitterwith no bracing or wall anchorageat top bay (3 bays total). Members appear suitable to withstand moment so as to preclude collapse, but verification is required from scaffolding documentation on site. | |||
Licensing Basis Evaluation: SWT received WCNOC Scaffolding Evaluation (Scaffold Request # 12-S0189, Work Order # 11-345393) that validates scaffold installationin accordancewith procedure. SWT concludes from engineeringjudgment that scaffolding is acceptable given member capacityin bending and light loading due to single bay at the top. No adverse seismic concern. | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-1 19 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EGLT0002 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | CCW SURGE TK B Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 Photos EGLT0002 9-19 452 EGLT0002 9-19 453 November 2012 WCAP- 7678-NP WCAP-I17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-120 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
CCW SURGE TK B 1=tiL I UUUZ W-1 V 404.EGLT0002 9-19 455 EGLT0002 9-19 457 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | Equipment ID No.: EGLT0002 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Eauinment Descrintion: CCW SURGE TK B 1=tiL I UUUZ W-1 V 404. | ||
EGLT0002 9-19 455 EGLT0002 9-19 457 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-121 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EGTE0032 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment | |||
CCW HX B OUTLET TEMP Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | == Description:== | ||
AUX, 2026.00 ft, 1401 Manufacturer/Model: | CCW HX B OUTLET TEMP Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2026.00 ft, 1401 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | Anchorage | ||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable Component is in-line with parent component piping. | ||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable | ||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-122 Status: T] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EGTE0032 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment | |||
CCW HX B OUTLET TEMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | == Description:== | ||
Yes Adjacent scaffolding noted to be well-braced and anchored with adequate clearance. | CCW HX B OUTLET TEMP Interaction Effects | ||
No hazard.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Adjacent scaffolding noted to be well-braced and anchored with adequate clearance. No hazard. | ||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate 'flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions | : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | : 9. Do attached lines have adequate 'flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | ||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | ||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-123 Status: I-i N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EGTE0032 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment | |||
CCW HX B OUTLET TEMP Photos EGTE0032 9-20 152 EGTE0032 9-20 151 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | == Description:== | ||
CCW HX B OUTLET TEMP Photos EGTE0032 9-20 152 EGTE0032 9-20 151 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-124 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EGTV0030 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
CCW HX B TEMP CV WAFER BTTFLY VLV Project: WcNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | == Description:== | ||
AUX, 2026.00 ft, 1401 Manufacturer/Model: | CCW HX B TEMP CV WAFER BTTFLY VLV Project: WcNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2026.00 ft, 1401 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | Anchorage | ||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable | ||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable | ||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | ||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-125 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EGTV0030 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
CCW HX B TEMP CV WAFER BTTFLY VLV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | == Description:== | ||
CCW HX B TEMP CV WAFER BTTFLY VLV Interaction Effects | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions | : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | ||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | ||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-126 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EGTV0030 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
CCW HX B TEMP CV WAFER BTTFLY VLV EGTV0030 9-20 154 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | == Description:== | ||
CCW HX B TEMP CV WAFER BTTFLY VLV EGTV0030 9-20 154 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-127 Status: 7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EJFCV0611 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
RHR PUMP B MINIFLOW VALVE Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | == Description:== | ||
AUX, 1974.00 ft, 1109 Manufacturer/Model: | RHR PUMP B MINIFLOW VALVE Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 1974.00 ft, 1109 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | Anchorage | ||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable | ||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable | ||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | ||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-128 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EJFCV0611 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
RHR PUMP B MINIFLOW VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | == Description:== | ||
RHR PUMP B MINIFLOW VALVE Interaction Effects | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions | : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | ||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | ||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Z* Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-129 Status: [II N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EJFCV0611 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
RHR PUMP B MINIFLOW VALVE Photos EJFCV0611 9-19 157 | == Description:== | ||
RHR PUMP B MINIFLOW VALVE Photos EJFCV0611 9-19 157 7678-NP November 2012 WCAP-I WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-130 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EJFCV0611 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
RHR PUMP B MINIFLOW VALVE I:JI-UVUbi I U-1U 1ou WCAP-1 7678-NP | == Description:== | ||
RHR PUMP B MINIFLOW VALVE I:JI-UVUbi I U-1U 1ou November 2012 WCAP-1 7678-NP WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-131 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EJFIS0611 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks RHR PMP PEJ01B MINIFLOW CONTROL DISCHARGE <TIME CRITICAL Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
ACTION EQUIPMENT> | ACTION EQUIPMENT> | ||
Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2000.00 if, 1314 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
AUX, 2000.00 if, 1314 Manufacturer/Model: | Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | Anchorage | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | ||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes | ||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes | : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes | ||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes | ||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-132 Status: r-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EJFIS0611 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks RHR PMP PEJ01B MINIFLOW CONTROL DISCHARGE <TIME CRITICAL Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
ACTION EQUIPMENT> | ACTION EQUIPMENT> | ||
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | Interaction Effects | ||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions | : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | ||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | ||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-133 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EJFIS0611 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks RHR PMP PEJ01B MINIFLOW CONTROL DISCHARGE <TIME CRITICAL Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
ACTION EQUIPMENT> | ACTION EQUIPMENT> | ||
Photos EJFIS0611 9-19 363 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | Photos EJFIS0611 9-19 363 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-134 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EJFIS0611 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks RHR PMP PEJ01B MINIFLOW CONTROL DISCHARGE <TIME CRITICAL Eauinment Descrintion: ACTION EQUIPMENT> | |||
LINZJI- OU1 Vt-1 V i.to EJFIS0611 9-19 366 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-135 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EJHV8809B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | RHR TO ACCUM INJ LOOPS 3 & 4 ISO VLV Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2000.00 ft, 1322 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-136 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EJHV8809B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | RHR TO ACCUM INJ LOOPS 3 & 4 ISO VLV Interaction Effects | ||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to Iollapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-137 Status: l N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EJHV8809B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | RHR TO ACCUM INJ LOOPS 3 & 4 ISO VLV Photos November 2012 WCAP-1 7678-NP WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-i138 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EJHV8809B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | RHR TO ACCUM INJ LOOPS 3 &4 ISO VLV EJHV8809B 9-19 188 EJHV8809B 9-19 189 EJHV8809B 9-19 190 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-139 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EKJ03B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | INTERCOOLER HEAT EXCHANGER Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB, 2032.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
SWT could not verify 1-1/4" anchorbolts in field. Verify from CLB documentation. | |||
Licensing Basis Evaluation: AB-83 bolts verified as 1-1/4" per C-1C51 11. | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-140 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EKJ03B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | INTERCOOLER HEAT EXCHANGER Interaction Effects | ||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 7678-NP November 2012 WCAP-117678-NP WCAP- November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-141 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EKJ03B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | INTERCOOLER HEAT EXCHANGER Photos EKJ03B 9-17 067 EKJ03B 9-17 066 tIKJUJS V-1 I Ut5I WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-142 Status: Ml N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EKJ03B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | INTERCOOLER HEAT EXCHANGER WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-143 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EKJ04B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | LUBE OIL COOLER Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB, 2032.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable HX is mounted to diesel skid. | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-144 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EKJ04B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | LUBE OIL COOLER HX is mounted to diesel skid. | ||
Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-145 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EKJ04B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | LUBE OIL COOLER Photos EKJ04B 9-17 060 EKJ04B 9-17 061 EKJ04B 9-17 062 bt.JU4t5 9-1If UbJ WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-146 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EKJ04B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat E Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | LUBE OIL COOLER tI¶4V4b U-1 f U04 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-147 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EKJ06B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | DIESEL JACKET WATER HEAT EXCHANGER Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB, 2032.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes See Note 11. No hazards. | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-148 Status: r-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EKJ06B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | DIESEL JACKET WATER HEAT EXCHANGER Interaction Effects | ||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Noted approximately3/16" clearance between HX and pipe support overhead. Pipe support appears flexible but pipe itself is 8" and rigidly connected to HX, which gives considerablestiffness. Accordingly, there is no spatialinteractionconcern. | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Noted mild surface oxidation; however no indication of strength loss. No hazard but informed WCNOC. | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-149 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EKJ06B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | DIESEL JACKET WATER HEAT EXCHANGER Photos EKJ06B 9-17 029 EKJ06B 9-17 030 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-150 Status: [] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EKJ06B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Eauipment DescriDtion: DIESEL JACKET WATER HEAT EXCHANGER EKJO6R 9-17 031 EKJ06B 9-17 032 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-151 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EMFT0917B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
CCP B TO BIT FLOW TRANSMITTER | == Description:== | ||
CCP B TO BIT FLOW TRANSMITTER Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 1974.00 ft, 1126 Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-152 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EMFT0917B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
CCP B TO BIT FLOW TRANSMITTER | == Description:== | ||
CCP B TO BIT FLOW TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Component is noted to be in zone of influence of tall scaffolding. Scaffolding observed to be well-braced and frequently anchored to the wall. No hazard. | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
Although the area is noted to be congested, all pipes overhead and conduit are well-supported. No hazards. | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-153 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EMFT0917B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
CCP B TO BIT FLOW TRANSMITTER Photos LWM1- U91 (Ii9-19 102 November 2012 WCAP- 7678-NP WCAP-II17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-154 Status: 7Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EMFT0917B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Eauioment DescnDtion: CCP B TO BIT FLOW TRA t:M-.l I UtI IM V!-1tl I 4 EMFTO917B 9-19 105 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-155 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EMHV8814B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | Sl PUMP B RETURN TO RWST ISO VALVE Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 1974.00 ft, 1113 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-156 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EMHV8814B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | SI PUMP B RETURN TO RWST ISO VALVE Interaction Effects | ||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-157 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EMHV8814B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | SI PUMP B RETURN TO RWST ISO VALVE Photos EMHV8814B 9-19 047 EMHV8814B 9-19 048 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-158 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EMHV8814B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | SI PUMP B RETURN TO RWST ISO VALVE EMHV8814B 9-19 049 E=MHV8814B 9-19 050 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-159 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EMHV8923B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | SAFETY INJECTION PUMP B SUCT ISO VLV Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 1974.00 ft, 1108 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-160 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EMHV8923B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | SAFETY INJECTION PUMP B SUCT ISO VLV Interaction Effects | ||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-161 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EMHV8923B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | SAFETY INJECTION PUMP B SUCT ISO VLV Photos EMHV8923B 9-19 034 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-162 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: EMHV8923B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Eauioment DescriDtion: SAFETY INJECTION PUMP B SUCT ISO VLV EMHV8923B 9-19 037 EMHV8923B 9-19 036 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-163 Status: Y N-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: FC0219 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
LOCAL CONTROL PANEL FOR TD AFW PUMP | == Description:== | ||
LOCAL CONTROL PANEL FOR TD AFW PUMP Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2000.00 ft, 1331 Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-164 Status: Y N F-* | |||
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: FC0219 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
LOCAL CONTROL PANEL FOR TD AFW PUMP Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Noted flexible Gaitronics speakers above panel. Given low demands at ground level, support of speakeris adequate so as to preclude collapse. No hazard. | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
: | Other Adverse Conditions | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Unknown adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
: | Cabinetinternals could not be accessed during at-power walkdowns. | ||
Internals will be inspected during next bus outage. | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-165 Status: Y N fI-U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: FC0219 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
LOCAL CONTROL PANEL FOR TD AFW PUMP Photos FC0219 9-19 271 FC0219 9-19 272 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-166 Status: Y N LfII Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: FC0219 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets EauiDment DescriDtion: LOCAL CONTROL PANEL FOR TD AFW PUMP FC0219 9-19 275 November 2012 WCAP-1 7678-NP WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-167 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: FCHV0312 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | AUX FW PUMP TURBINE MECH TRIP/THROT VLV Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2000.00 ft, 1331 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space isprovided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-168 Status: V N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: FCHV0312 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | AUX FW PUMP TURBINE MECH TRIP/THROT VLV Interaction Effects | ||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes WCNOC alertedthe SWT to sensitive operatorfor this component. Noted well-supported overhead hoist with rigging at other end of room and chains tied off No hazard. | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-169 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: FCHV0312 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | AUX FW PUMP TURBINE MECH TRIP/THROT VLV Photos WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-170 Status: FY-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: FCHV0312 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== Description:== | == Description:== | ||
AUX FW PUMP TURBINE MECH TRIP/THROT VLV FCHV0312 9-19 269 FCHV0312 9-19 268 FCHV0312 9-19 270 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
ESW SELF-CLEAN STRAIN. (MTR OP.-IN MOV PROG.) | A-171 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | ||
Equipment ID No.: FEF02B Equipment Class: (0) Other EquipmentDescription: ESW SELF-CLEAN STRAIN. (MTR OP.-IN MOV PROG.) | |||
Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): ESW, 2000.00 ft, UNK Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes SWT noted significant surface corrosion on flange bolts; however no indicationof strength loss. Therefore no hazard but notified WCNOC. | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-172 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: FEF02B Equipment Class: (0) Other,, | |||
Equipment | |||
ESW SELF-CLEAN STRAIN. (MTR OP.-IN MOV PROG.) | == Description:== | ||
ESW SELF-CLEAN STRAIN. (MTR OP.-IN MOV PROG.) | |||
Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-173 Status: I TN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: FEF02B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
ESW SELF-CLEAN STRAIN. (MTR OP.-IN MOV PROG.) | |||
Photos FEF02B 9-17 141 I-I-I-IJ1"I-C U.-.1 f 1"Tj FEF02B 9-17 143 FEF02B 9-17 144 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-i174 Status: LI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: FEF02B Equipment Class: (0) Other ipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
ESW SELF-CLEAN STRAIN. (MTR OP.-IN MOV PROG.) | |||
FEF02B 9-17 148 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-]175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: FEF02B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
ESW SELF-CLEAN STRAIN. (MTR OP.-IN MOV PROG.) | |||
FEF02B 9-17 150 FEF02B 9-17 149 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-176 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: FKJ02C Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
KKJ01B AIR INTAKE FILTER Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB, 2032.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | Anchorage | ||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes | ||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes | ||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | ||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | SWT could not verify 3/4" double-nutted anchorbolts in field. Verify from CLB documentation. | ||
Licensing Basis Evaluation: AB-69 anchorbolt verified as 3/4" and double nutted per C-0033. | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-177 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: FKJ02C Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
KKJ01B AIR INTAKE FILTER Interaction Effects | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions | : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | ||
Comments | : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | ||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-178 Status: [ YN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: FKJ02C Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
KKJ01B AIR INTAKE FILTER Photos FKJ02C 9-17 071 FKJ02C 9-17 072 FKJ02C 9-17 073 FKJ02C 9-17 074 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-179 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: FKJ02C Equipment Class: (0) Other EauiDment DescriDtion: KKJ01B 1MIR INTAKE FILTER FKJ02C 9-17 075 WCAP-I 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-180 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GKV0766 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | SGK04B WATER REGULATING VALVE Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2047.50 ft, 1501 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-181 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GKV0766 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | SGK04B WATER REGULATING VALVE Interaction Effects | ||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Contained inside SGK04B equipment assembly. | |||
Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-182 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GKV0766 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | SGK04B WATER REGULATING VALVE Photos GKV0766 9-19 405 GKV0766 9-19 406 GKV0766 9-19 407 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-183 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GKV0768 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | SGK05B WATER REGULATING VALVE Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): CTRL, 2016.00 ft, 3415 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-184 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GKV0768 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | SGK05B ýWATER REGULATING VALVE Interaction Effects | ||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Valve is containedwithin the chillerassembly and is free from impact hazards. | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-185 Status: rj] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GKV0768 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | SGK05B WATER REGULATING VALVE GKV0768 9-18 078 November 2012 WCAP- 7678-NP WCAP-117678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-186 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GMHZ0019 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | DSL GEN RM EXH DMPR B, GMD0010 Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB, -9999.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% N10 of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-187 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GMHZ0019 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | DSL GEN RM EXH DMPR B, GMD0010 Interaction Effects | ||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: HunterYoung Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-188 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GMHZ0019 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | DSL GEN RM EXH DMPR B, GMD0010 Photos GMHZ0019 9-17 086 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-189 Status: M] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GMHZ0019 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | DSL GEN RM EXH DMPR B, GMD0010 GMHZ0019 9-17 090 GMHZ0019 9-17 089 GMHZ0019 9-17 091 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-190 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GMTE001 I Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | DIESEL GEN VENT SUPPLY FAN 1B Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB1 2000.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-191 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GMTEOO1 1 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
DIESEL GEN VENT SUPPLY FAN 1B Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments, Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-192 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GMTE001 I Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
DIESEL GEN VENT SUPPLY FAN 1B Photos WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-193 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GMTE001 1 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors iDment Descrition: DIESEL GEN VENT SUPPLY FAN 1B (GMTE0011 9-17 122 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-194 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GMTZ0011B Equipment Class: (0) Other, Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
ACT FOR DG VENT SUPPLY FAN DAMPER GMD0007 Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB;, -9999.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model: | |||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion; that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-195 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GMTZ0011B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
ACT FOR DG VENT SUPPLY FAN DAMPER GMD0007 Interaction Effects | |||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-196 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GMTZ0011B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | ACT FOR DG VENT SUPPLY FAN DAMPER GMD0007 Photos T | ||
GMTZ00 11 B 9-17 083 GMTZ001 1B 9-17 084 November 2012 WCAP-I 7678-NP WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-197 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
ACT FOR DC SUPPLY FAN DAMPER GMD0007 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | Equipment ID No.: GMTZ0011B Equipment Class: (0) Other Diment DescriDtion: ACT FOR DC SUPPLY FAN DAMPER GMD0007 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-198 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GNPT0934 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
CONTAINMENT ATMOSPHERE Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | == Description:== | ||
AUX, 2026.00 ft, 1409 Manufacturer/Model: | CONTAINMENT ATMOSPHERE Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2026.00 ft, 1409 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | Anchorage | ||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes | ||
Anchorage documentation brought in field was not sufficient to verify anchorage. | : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes | ||
Verify whether as- | : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes | ||
Licensing Basis Evaluation: | : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | ||
SWT received M-771-00048-W04, which calls out 4 no. 3/8" bolts for mounting. | Anchorage documentation brought in field was not sufficient to verify anchorage.Verify whether as-installedconfiguration which was as-built in field consisting of 4 no. 3/8" bolts meets CLB anchorageconfiguration documentation. | ||
Anchorage | Licensing Basis Evaluation: SWT received M-771-00048-W04, which calls out 4 no. 3/8" bolts for mounting. Anchorage configurationis verified. | ||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-199 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GNPT0934 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
CONTAINMENT ATMOSPHERE | CONTAINMENT ATMOSPHERE | ||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | ||
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | Interaction Effects | ||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions | : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | ||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | ||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-200 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GNPT0934 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
CONTAINMENT ATMOSPHERE Photos GNPT0934 9-20 088 WCAP-1 7678-NP | == Description:== | ||
CONTAINMENT ATMOSPHERE Photos GNPT0934 9-20 088 November 2012 WCAP-1 7678-NP WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-201 Status: MY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GNPT0934 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks EauiDment DescriDtion: CONTAINMENT ATMOSPIHERE HERE UNPT10934 9-2U 089 GNPTU934 9-20 090 GNPT0934 9-20 091 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-202 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GSHV0021 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | H2 PURGE OUTER CTMT ISO BUTT VLV Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2000.00 ft, 1322 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
H2 PURGE OUTER CTMT ISO BUTT VLV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | A-203 Status: V N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | ||
Equipment ID No.: GSHV0021 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes Noted approximately 6" piping running into the valve from containment but supported on an approximate span of 7' across the Auxiliary Building /Containment building gap. Small differential movement is | |||
No hazard.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions | == Description:== | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | H2 PURGE OUTER CTMT ISO BUTT VLV Interaction Effects | ||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes | ||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes Noted approximately 6" piping running into the valve from containment but supported on an approximate span of 7' across the Auxiliary Building / | |||
Containment building gap. Small differential movement is anticipatedgiven the rugged structures,coupled with the adequate span for 6" pipe, the flexibility is judged to be sufficient. No hazard. | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-204 Status: l N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: GSHV0021 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
H2 PURGE OUTER CTMT ISO BUTT VLV Photos GSHV0021 9-19 224 GSHV0021 9-19 225 GSHV0021 9-19 226 GSHV0021 9-19 227 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | == Description:== | ||
H2 PURGE OUTER CTMT ISO BUTT VLV Photos GSHV0021 9-19 224 GSHV0021 9-19 225 GSHV0021 9-19 226 GSHV0021 9-19 227 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-205 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: JELT0021 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
EMER FUEL OIL DAY TK B LEV <TIME CRITICAL ACTION EQUIPMENT> | EMER FUEL OIL DAY TK B LEV <TIME CRITICAL ACTION EQUIPMENT> | ||
Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB, 2000.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
DGB, 2000.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model: | Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | Anchorage | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | ||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable Item is steel mounted. | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | ||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-206 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: JELT0021 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
EMER FUEL OIL DAY TK B LEV <TIME CRITICAL ACTION EQUIPMENT> | EMER FUEL OIL DAY TK B LEV <TIME CRITICAL ACTION EQUIPMENT> | ||
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | Interaction Effects | ||
Yes Air tubing observed to be well-protected from | : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Air tubing observed to be well-protected from spatialinteraction. No hazard. | ||
No hazard.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | ||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions | : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | ||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | Other Adverse Conditions | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-207 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: JELT0021 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
EMER FUEL OIL DAY TK B LEV <TIME CRITICAL ACTION EQUIPMENT> | EMER FUEL OIL DAY TK B LEV <TIME CRITICAL ACTION EQUIPMENT> | ||
Photos WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | Photos WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-208 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: JELT0021 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks JtL IUUZ1 U-1 ( U00 JELT0021 9-17 054 November 2012 WCAP-I 7678-NP WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-209 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: KAPCV0103 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | TKA05 OUTLET PRESSURE CONTROL VALVE Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2000.00 ft, 1304 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-210 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: KAPCV0103 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | TKA05 OUTLET PRESSURE CONTROL VALVE Interaction Effects | ||
: 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes 3/8" clearanceobserved by SWT between valve and pipe support. Given that the valve is immediately supportedon both ends, the SWT concluded that the clearanceis sufficient to preclude impact. No hazard. | |||
: 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | |||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-211 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: KAPCV0103 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | TKA05 OUTLET PRESSURE CONTROL VALVE Photos KAPCV0103 9-19 316 KAPCV0103 9-19 317 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-212 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: KJ0122 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
== | == Description:== | ||
Description:== | GAUGE PANEL Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB, 2000.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | |||
Anchorage | |||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes Although the rearweld is partiallyobscured due to insulation,the SWT verified approximately 70% of the anchorage configuration. Given the proportionverified and the regularweld pattern, the SWTjudged the anchorage configuration as verified and acceptable. | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes | |||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes | |||
: 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-213 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: KJ0122 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
GAUGE PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | == Description:== | ||
GAUGE PANEL Interaction Effects | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions | : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | ||
Comments.Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | ||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Comments | |||
.Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-214 Status: E-i N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: KJ0122 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment | |||
GAUGE PANEL Photos | == Description:== | ||
GAUGE PANEL Photos NJUI I %.4--II LJi.1 KJ0 122 9-1 f U~b KJ0122 9-17 U2U WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-215 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: KKJ01B Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
STANDBY DIESEL (GENERATOR) | STANDBY DIESEL (GENERATOR) | ||
Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB, 2000.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
DGB, 2000.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model: | Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | Anchorage | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | : 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | ||
: 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes Noted holes forjacking screws (confirmed by WCNOC Operations) without screws being present. Jacking screws do not serve a structuraldesign function and therefore are not requiredper the seismic Current license basis. | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | Therefore, no adverse seismic condition. | ||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes | ||
SWT observed an | : 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes | ||
Verification | : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | ||
Licensing Basis Evaluation: | SWT observed an anchorbolt with 10" projection whereas 8" requiredper CLB documentation. Verification requiredto determine whether condition was previously analyzed or condition is acceptable as-installed. | ||
Licensing Basis Evaluation: OperabilityEvaluation KJ-12-015 via CR 57391 determined that the as-installedcondition is not in violation of the seismic WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-216 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: KKJ01B Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
STANDBY DIESEL (GENERATOR) licensing basis given that all bolts undergo zero net uplift under all design load combinations | STANDBY DIESEL (GENERATOR) licensing basis given that all bolts undergo zero net uplift under all design load combinations | ||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | : 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | ||
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | Interaction Effects | ||
Yes Noted ruggedly- | : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Noted ruggedly-supportedcrane overhead with hoist chains tied off. Fall protection yo-yos above also well-secured. Therefore no hazards. | ||
Therefore no hazards.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | ||
See Note 7 above. No hazard.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions | See Note 7 above. No hazard. | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | ||
Noted minor surface oxidation on heat | : 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | ||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Noted minor surface oxidation on heat exchangerbolts, but no indication of strength loss. Therefore no hazard. | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-217 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: KKJ01B Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
STANDBY DIESEL (GENERATOR) | STANDBY DIESEL (GENERATOR) | ||
Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 Photos KKJ01B 9-17 001 KKJ01B 9-17 002 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-218 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: KKJO1B Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators ipment | Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 Photos KKJ01B 9-17 001 KKJ01B 9-17 002 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-218 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: KKJO1B Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators ipment | |||
== Description:== | == Description:== | ||
STANDBY DIESEL (GEl KKJO1B 9-17 003 KKJO1B 9-17 005 KKJO1B 9-17 006 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-219 Status: F-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: KKJ01B Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment | |||
== Description:== | |||
STANDBY DIESEL (GENERATOR) | STANDBY DIESEL (GENERATOR) | ||
KKJ01B 9-17 007 KKJO1B 9-17 008 rrAJu-I b ý-iI f MI WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | KKJ01B 9-17 007 KKJO1B 9-17 008 rrAJu-I b ý-iI f MI WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | ||
A-220 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: LFFV0096 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
CTMT NOR SUMPS TO FLR DRN TK OUTSIDE CTMT ISO Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): | == Description:== | ||
AUX, 2000.00 ft, 1322 Manufacturer/Model: | CTMT NOR SUMPS TO FLR DRN TK OUTSIDE CTMT ISO Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2000.00 ft, 1322 Manufacturer/Model: | ||
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. | Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments. | ||
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% I of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | Anchorage | ||
: 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% I 0o of SWEL items requiring such verification)? | |||
: 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? | : 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable | ||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | : 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable | ||
: 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable | |||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions? | : 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) | ||
: 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions? | |||
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-221 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: LFFV0096 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
CTMT NOR SUMPS TO FLR DRN TK OUTSIDE CTMT ISO Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? | == Description:== | ||
CTMT NOR SUMPS TO FLR DRN TK OUTSIDE CTMT ISO Interaction Effects | |||
: 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions | : 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes | ||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | : 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? | ||
Ops notified that valve fails in safe position (closed) on loss of air.Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | : 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes | ||
: 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? | |||
Other Adverse Conditions | |||
: 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? | |||
Ops notified that valve fails in safe position (closed) on loss of air. | |||
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 | |||
A-222 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) | |||
Equipment ID No.: LFFV0096 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment | |||
CTMT NOR SUMPS TO FLR DRN TK OUTSIDE CTMT ISO Photos LFFV0096 9-19 191 LFFV0096 9-19 193 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0}} | == Description:== | ||
CTMT NOR SUMPS TO FLR DRN TK OUTSIDE CTMT ISO Photos LFFV0096 9-19 191 LFFV0096 9-19 193 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0}} |
Latest revision as of 18:05, 11 November 2019
ML12342A259 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Wolf Creek |
Issue date: | 11/30/2012 |
From: | Wolf Creek |
To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
ET 12-0032 WCAP-17678-NP, Rev 0 | |
Download: ML12342A259 (110) | |
Text
A-1 13 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EGHV0102 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
CCW TO RHR HX B ISO Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and. Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on'the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-114 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EGHV0102 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
CCW TO RHR HX B ISO EGHV0102 9-20 121 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-115 Status: [LýV N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EGHV0102 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
CCW TO RHR HX B ISO EGHV0102 9-20 122 EGHV0102 9-20 123 November 2012 WCAP- 7678-NP WCAP-117678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-116 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EGHV0102 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves EauiDment
Description:
CCW TO RHR HX B ISO I:L*MVVUIz j-zu 1Z4 EGHV0102 9-20 125 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-I 17 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EGLT0002 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
Description:
CCW SURGE TK B Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2047.50 ft, 1502 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-118 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EGLT0002 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
Description:
CCW SURGE TK B Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes SWT observed scaffolding in zone of influence of level transmitterwith no bracing or wall anchorageat top bay (3 bays total). Members appear suitable to withstand moment so as to preclude collapse, but verification is required from scaffolding documentation on site.
Licensing Basis Evaluation: SWT received WCNOC Scaffolding Evaluation (Scaffold Request # 12-S0189, Work Order # 11-345393) that validates scaffold installationin accordancewith procedure. SWT concludes from engineeringjudgment that scaffolding is acceptable given member capacityin bending and light loading due to single bay at the top. No adverse seismic concern.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-1 19 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EGLT0002 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
Description:
CCW SURGE TK B Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 Photos EGLT0002 9-19 452 EGLT0002 9-19 453 November 2012 WCAP- 7678-NP WCAP-I17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-120 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EGLT0002 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Eauinment Descrintion: CCW SURGE TK B 1=tiL I UUUZ W-1 V 404.
EGLT0002 9-19 455 EGLT0002 9-19 457 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-121 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EGTE0032 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment
Description:
CCW HX B OUTLET TEMP Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2026.00 ft, 1401 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable Component is in-line with parent component piping.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-122 Status: T] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EGTE0032 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment
Description:
CCW HX B OUTLET TEMP Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Adjacent scaffolding noted to be well-braced and anchored with adequate clearance. No hazard.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate 'flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-123 Status: I-i N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EGTE0032 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment
Description:
CCW HX B OUTLET TEMP Photos EGTE0032 9-20 152 EGTE0032 9-20 151 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-124 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EGTV0030 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
CCW HX B TEMP CV WAFER BTTFLY VLV Project: WcNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2026.00 ft, 1401 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-125 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EGTV0030 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
CCW HX B TEMP CV WAFER BTTFLY VLV Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-126 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EGTV0030 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
CCW HX B TEMP CV WAFER BTTFLY VLV EGTV0030 9-20 154 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-127 Status: 7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EJFCV0611 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
RHR PUMP B MINIFLOW VALVE Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 1974.00 ft, 1109 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-128 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EJFCV0611 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
RHR PUMP B MINIFLOW VALVE Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Z* Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-129 Status: [II N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EJFCV0611 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
RHR PUMP B MINIFLOW VALVE Photos EJFCV0611 9-19 157 7678-NP November 2012 WCAP-I WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-130 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EJFCV0611 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
RHR PUMP B MINIFLOW VALVE I:JI-UVUbi I U-1U 1ou November 2012 WCAP-1 7678-NP WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-131 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EJFIS0611 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks RHR PMP PEJ01B MINIFLOW CONTROL DISCHARGE
Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2000.00 if, 1314 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-132 Status: r-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EJFIS0611 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks RHR PMP PEJ01B MINIFLOW CONTROL DISCHARGE
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-133 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EJFIS0611 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks RHR PMP PEJ01B MINIFLOW CONTROL DISCHARGE
Photos EJFIS0611 9-19 363 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-134 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EJFIS0611 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks RHR PMP PEJ01B MINIFLOW CONTROL DISCHARGE
LINZJI- OU1 Vt-1 V i.to EJFIS0611 9-19 366 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-135 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EJHV8809B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
RHR TO ACCUM INJ LOOPS 3 & 4 ISO VLV Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2000.00 ft, 1322 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-136 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EJHV8809B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
RHR TO ACCUM INJ LOOPS 3 & 4 ISO VLV Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to Iollapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-137 Status: l N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EJHV8809B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
RHR TO ACCUM INJ LOOPS 3 & 4 ISO VLV Photos November 2012 WCAP-1 7678-NP WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-i138 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EJHV8809B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
RHR TO ACCUM INJ LOOPS 3 &4 ISO VLV EJHV8809B 9-19 188 EJHV8809B 9-19 189 EJHV8809B 9-19 190 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-139 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EKJ03B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
Description:
INTERCOOLER HEAT EXCHANGER Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB, 2032.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
SWT could not verify 1-1/4" anchorbolts in field. Verify from CLB documentation.
Licensing Basis Evaluation: AB-83 bolts verified as 1-1/4" per C-1C51 11.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-140 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EKJ03B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
Description:
INTERCOOLER HEAT EXCHANGER Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 7678-NP November 2012 WCAP-117678-NP WCAP- November 2012 Revision 0
A-141 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EKJ03B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
Description:
INTERCOOLER HEAT EXCHANGER Photos EKJ03B 9-17 067 EKJ03B 9-17 066 tIKJUJS V-1 I Ut5I WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-142 Status: Ml N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EKJ03B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
Description:
INTERCOOLER HEAT EXCHANGER WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-143 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EKJ04B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
Description:
LUBE OIL COOLER Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB, 2032.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable HX is mounted to diesel skid.
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-144 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EKJ04B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
Description:
LUBE OIL COOLER HX is mounted to diesel skid.
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-145 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EKJ04B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
Description:
LUBE OIL COOLER Photos EKJ04B 9-17 060 EKJ04B 9-17 061 EKJ04B 9-17 062 bt.JU4t5 9-1If UbJ WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-146 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EKJ04B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat E Equipment
Description:
LUBE OIL COOLER tI¶4V4b U-1 f U04 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-147 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EKJ06B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
Description:
DIESEL JACKET WATER HEAT EXCHANGER Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB, 2032.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes See Note 11. No hazards.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-148 Status: r-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EKJ06B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
Description:
DIESEL JACKET WATER HEAT EXCHANGER Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Noted approximately3/16" clearance between HX and pipe support overhead. Pipe support appears flexible but pipe itself is 8" and rigidly connected to HX, which gives considerablestiffness. Accordingly, there is no spatialinteractionconcern.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Noted mild surface oxidation; however no indication of strength loss. No hazard but informed WCNOC.
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-149 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EKJ06B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
Description:
DIESEL JACKET WATER HEAT EXCHANGER Photos EKJ06B 9-17 029 EKJ06B 9-17 030 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-150 Status: [] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EKJ06B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Eauipment DescriDtion: DIESEL JACKET WATER HEAT EXCHANGER EKJO6R 9-17 031 EKJ06B 9-17 032 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-151 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EMFT0917B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
Description:
CCP B TO BIT FLOW TRANSMITTER Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 1974.00 ft, 1126 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-152 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EMFT0917B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
Description:
CCP B TO BIT FLOW TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Component is noted to be in zone of influence of tall scaffolding. Scaffolding observed to be well-braced and frequently anchored to the wall. No hazard.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Although the area is noted to be congested, all pipes overhead and conduit are well-supported. No hazards.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-153 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EMFT0917B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
Description:
CCP B TO BIT FLOW TRANSMITTER Photos LWM1- U91 (Ii9-19 102 November 2012 WCAP- 7678-NP WCAP-II17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-154 Status: 7Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EMFT0917B Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Eauioment DescnDtion: CCP B TO BIT FLOW TRA t:M-.l I UtI IM V!-1tl I 4 EMFTO917B 9-19 105 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-155 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EMHV8814B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
Sl PUMP B RETURN TO RWST ISO VALVE Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 1974.00 ft, 1113 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-156 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EMHV8814B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
SI PUMP B RETURN TO RWST ISO VALVE Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-157 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EMHV8814B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
SI PUMP B RETURN TO RWST ISO VALVE Photos EMHV8814B 9-19 047 EMHV8814B 9-19 048 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-158 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EMHV8814B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
SI PUMP B RETURN TO RWST ISO VALVE EMHV8814B 9-19 049 E=MHV8814B 9-19 050 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-159 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EMHV8923B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
SAFETY INJECTION PUMP B SUCT ISO VLV Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 1974.00 ft, 1108 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-160 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EMHV8923B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
SAFETY INJECTION PUMP B SUCT ISO VLV Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-161 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EMHV8923B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
SAFETY INJECTION PUMP B SUCT ISO VLV Photos EMHV8923B 9-19 034 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-162 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: EMHV8923B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Eauioment DescriDtion: SAFETY INJECTION PUMP B SUCT ISO VLV EMHV8923B 9-19 037 EMHV8923B 9-19 036 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-163 Status: Y N-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: FC0219 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
Description:
LOCAL CONTROL PANEL FOR TD AFW PUMP Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2000.00 ft, 1331 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-164 Status: Y N F-*
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: FC0219 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
Description:
LOCAL CONTROL PANEL FOR TD AFW PUMP Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Noted flexible Gaitronics speakers above panel. Given low demands at ground level, support of speakeris adequate so as to preclude collapse. No hazard.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Unknown adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Cabinetinternals could not be accessed during at-power walkdowns.
Internals will be inspected during next bus outage.
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-165 Status: Y N fI-U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: FC0219 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
Description:
LOCAL CONTROL PANEL FOR TD AFW PUMP Photos FC0219 9-19 271 FC0219 9-19 272 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-166 Status: Y N LfII Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: FC0219 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets EauiDment DescriDtion: LOCAL CONTROL PANEL FOR TD AFW PUMP FC0219 9-19 275 November 2012 WCAP-1 7678-NP WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-167 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: FCHV0312 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
AUX FW PUMP TURBINE MECH TRIP/THROT VLV Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2000.00 ft, 1331 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space isprovided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-168 Status: V N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: FCHV0312 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
AUX FW PUMP TURBINE MECH TRIP/THROT VLV Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes WCNOC alertedthe SWT to sensitive operatorfor this component. Noted well-supported overhead hoist with rigging at other end of room and chains tied off No hazard.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-169 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: FCHV0312 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
AUX FW PUMP TURBINE MECH TRIP/THROT VLV Photos WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-170 Status: FY-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: FCHV0312 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
AUX FW PUMP TURBINE MECH TRIP/THROT VLV FCHV0312 9-19 269 FCHV0312 9-19 268 FCHV0312 9-19 270 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-171 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: FEF02B Equipment Class: (0) Other EquipmentDescription: ESW SELF-CLEAN STRAIN. (MTR OP.-IN MOV PROG.)
Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): ESW, 2000.00 ft, UNK Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes SWT noted significant surface corrosion on flange bolts; however no indicationof strength loss. Therefore no hazard but notified WCNOC.
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-172 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: FEF02B Equipment Class: (0) Other,,
Equipment
Description:
ESW SELF-CLEAN STRAIN. (MTR OP.-IN MOV PROG.)
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-173 Status: I TN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: FEF02B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
Description:
ESW SELF-CLEAN STRAIN. (MTR OP.-IN MOV PROG.)
Photos FEF02B 9-17 141 I-I-I-IJ1"I-C U.-.1 f 1"Tj FEF02B 9-17 143 FEF02B 9-17 144 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-i174 Status: LI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: FEF02B Equipment Class: (0) Other ipment
Description:
ESW SELF-CLEAN STRAIN. (MTR OP.-IN MOV PROG.)
FEF02B 9-17 148 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-]175 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: FEF02B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
Description:
ESW SELF-CLEAN STRAIN. (MTR OP.-IN MOV PROG.)
FEF02B 9-17 150 FEF02B 9-17 149 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-176 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: FKJ02C Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
Description:
KKJ01B AIR INTAKE FILTER Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB, 2032.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
SWT could not verify 3/4" double-nutted anchorbolts in field. Verify from CLB documentation.
Licensing Basis Evaluation: AB-69 anchorbolt verified as 3/4" and double nutted per C-0033.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-177 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: FKJ02C Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
Description:
KKJ01B AIR INTAKE FILTER Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-178 Status: [ YN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: FKJ02C Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
Description:
KKJ01B AIR INTAKE FILTER Photos FKJ02C 9-17 071 FKJ02C 9-17 072 FKJ02C 9-17 073 FKJ02C 9-17 074 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-179 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: FKJ02C Equipment Class: (0) Other EauiDment DescriDtion: KKJ01B 1MIR INTAKE FILTER FKJ02C 9-17 075 WCAP-I 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-180 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GKV0766 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
SGK04B WATER REGULATING VALVE Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2047.50 ft, 1501 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-181 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GKV0766 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
SGK04B WATER REGULATING VALVE Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Contained inside SGK04B equipment assembly.
Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-182 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GKV0766 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
SGK04B WATER REGULATING VALVE Photos GKV0766 9-19 405 GKV0766 9-19 406 GKV0766 9-19 407 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-183 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GKV0768 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
SGK05B WATER REGULATING VALVE Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): CTRL, 2016.00 ft, 3415 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-184 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GKV0768 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
SGK05B ýWATER REGULATING VALVE Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Valve is containedwithin the chillerassembly and is free from impact hazards.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-185 Status: rj] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GKV0768 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
SGK05B WATER REGULATING VALVE GKV0768 9-18 078 November 2012 WCAP- 7678-NP WCAP-117678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-186 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GMHZ0019 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
Description:
DSL GEN RM EXH DMPR B, GMD0010 Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB, -9999.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% N10 of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-187 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GMHZ0019 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
Description:
DSL GEN RM EXH DMPR B, GMD0010 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: HunterYoung Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-188 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GMHZ0019 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
Description:
DSL GEN RM EXH DMPR B, GMD0010 Photos GMHZ0019 9-17 086 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-189 Status: M] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GMHZ0019 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
Description:
DSL GEN RM EXH DMPR B, GMD0010 GMHZ0019 9-17 090 GMHZ0019 9-17 089 GMHZ0019 9-17 091 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-190 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GMTE001 I Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment
Description:
DIESEL GEN VENT SUPPLY FAN 1B Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB1 2000.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-191 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GMTEOO1 1 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment
Description:
DIESEL GEN VENT SUPPLY FAN 1B Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments, Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-192 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GMTE001 I Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors Equipment
Description:
DIESEL GEN VENT SUPPLY FAN 1B Photos WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-193 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GMTE001 1 Equipment Class: (19) Temperature Sensors iDment Descrition: DIESEL GEN VENT SUPPLY FAN 1B (GMTE0011 9-17 122 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-194 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GMTZ0011B Equipment Class: (0) Other, Equipment
Description:
ACT FOR DG VENT SUPPLY FAN DAMPER GMD0007 Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB;, -9999.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion; that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-195 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GMTZ0011B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
Description:
ACT FOR DG VENT SUPPLY FAN DAMPER GMD0007 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-196 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GMTZ0011B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
Description:
ACT FOR DG VENT SUPPLY FAN DAMPER GMD0007 Photos T
GMTZ00 11 B 9-17 083 GMTZ001 1B 9-17 084 November 2012 WCAP-I 7678-NP WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-197 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GMTZ0011B Equipment Class: (0) Other Diment DescriDtion: ACT FOR DC SUPPLY FAN DAMPER GMD0007 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-198 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GNPT0934 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
Description:
CONTAINMENT ATMOSPHERE Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2026.00 ft, 1409 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage documentation brought in field was not sufficient to verify anchorage.Verify whether as-installedconfiguration which was as-built in field consisting of 4 no. 3/8" bolts meets CLB anchorageconfiguration documentation.
Licensing Basis Evaluation: SWT received M-771-00048-W04, which calls out 4 no. 3/8" bolts for mounting. Anchorage configurationis verified.
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-199 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GNPT0934 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
Description:
CONTAINMENT ATMOSPHERE
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-200 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GNPT0934 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
Description:
CONTAINMENT ATMOSPHERE Photos GNPT0934 9-20 088 November 2012 WCAP-1 7678-NP WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-201 Status: MY N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GNPT0934 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks EauiDment DescriDtion: CONTAINMENT ATMOSPIHERE HERE UNPT10934 9-2U 089 GNPTU934 9-20 090 GNPT0934 9-20 091 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-202 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GSHV0021 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
H2 PURGE OUTER CTMT ISO BUTT VLV Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2000.00 ft, 1322 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-203 Status: V N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GSHV0021 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
H2 PURGE OUTER CTMT ISO BUTT VLV Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes Noted approximately 6" piping running into the valve from containment but supported on an approximate span of 7' across the Auxiliary Building /
Containment building gap. Small differential movement is anticipatedgiven the rugged structures,coupled with the adequate span for 6" pipe, the flexibility is judged to be sufficient. No hazard.
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-204 Status: l N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: GSHV0021 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
H2 PURGE OUTER CTMT ISO BUTT VLV Photos GSHV0021 9-19 224 GSHV0021 9-19 225 GSHV0021 9-19 226 GSHV0021 9-19 227 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-205 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: JELT0021 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
Description:
EMER FUEL OIL DAY TK B LEV
Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB, 2000.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable Item is steel mounted.
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-206 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: JELT0021 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
Description:
EMER FUEL OIL DAY TK B LEV
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Air tubing observed to be well-protected from spatialinteraction. No hazard.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-207 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: JELT0021 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
Description:
EMER FUEL OIL DAY TK B LEV
Photos WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-208 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: JELT0021 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks JtL IUUZ1 U-1 ( U00 JELT0021 9-17 054 November 2012 WCAP-I 7678-NP WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-209 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: KAPCV0103 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
TKA05 OUTLET PRESSURE CONTROL VALVE Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2000.00 ft, 1304 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-210 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: KAPCV0103 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
TKA05 OUTLET PRESSURE CONTROL VALVE Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes 3/8" clearanceobserved by SWT between valve and pipe support. Given that the valve is immediately supportedon both ends, the SWT concluded that the clearanceis sufficient to preclude impact. No hazard.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-211 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: KAPCV0103 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
TKA05 OUTLET PRESSURE CONTROL VALVE Photos KAPCV0103 9-19 316 KAPCV0103 9-19 317 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-212 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: KJ0122 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
Description:
GAUGE PANEL Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB, 2000.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes Although the rearweld is partiallyobscured due to insulation,the SWT verified approximately 70% of the anchorage configuration. Given the proportionverified and the regularweld pattern, the SWTjudged the anchorage configuration as verified and acceptable.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-213 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: KJ0122 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
Description:
GAUGE PANEL Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments
.Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-214 Status: E-i N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: KJ0122 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
Description:
GAUGE PANEL Photos NJUI I %.4--II LJi.1 KJ0 122 9-1 f U~b KJ0122 9-17 U2U WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-215 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: KKJ01B Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment
Description:
STANDBY DIESEL (GENERATOR)
Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): DGB, 2000.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yes Noted holes forjacking screws (confirmed by WCNOC Operations) without screws being present. Jacking screws do not serve a structuraldesign function and therefore are not requiredper the seismic Current license basis.
Therefore, no adverse seismic condition.
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Yes
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
SWT observed an anchorbolt with 10" projection whereas 8" requiredper CLB documentation. Verification requiredto determine whether condition was previously analyzed or condition is acceptable as-installed.
Licensing Basis Evaluation: OperabilityEvaluation KJ-12-015 via CR 57391 determined that the as-installedcondition is not in violation of the seismic WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-216 Status: FY] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: KKJ01B Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment
Description:
STANDBY DIESEL (GENERATOR) licensing basis given that all bolts undergo zero net uplift under all design load combinations
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes Noted ruggedly-supportedcrane overhead with hoist chains tied off. Fall protection yo-yos above also well-secured. Therefore no hazards.
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
See Note 7 above. No hazard.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Noted minor surface oxidation on heat exchangerbolts, but no indication of strength loss. Therefore no hazard.
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-217 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: KKJ01B Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment
Description:
STANDBY DIESEL (GENERATOR)
Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 Photos KKJ01B 9-17 001 KKJ01B 9-17 002 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-218 Status: M-I N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: KKJO1B Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators ipment
Description:
STANDBY DIESEL (GEl KKJO1B 9-17 003 KKJO1B 9-17 005 KKJO1B 9-17 006 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-219 Status: F-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: KKJ01B Equipment Class: (17) Engine-Generators Equipment
Description:
STANDBY DIESEL (GENERATOR)
KKJ01B 9-17 007 KKJO1B 9-17 008 rrAJu-I b ý-iI f MI WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-220 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: LFFV0096 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
CTMT NOR SUMPS TO FLR DRN TK OUTSIDE CTMT ISO Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area): AUX, 2000.00 ft, 1322 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% I 0o of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation? Not Applicable
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Not Applicable
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-221 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: LFFV0096 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
CTMT NOR SUMPS TO FLR DRN TK OUTSIDE CTMT ISO Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yes
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Ops notified that valve fails in safe position (closed) on loss of air.
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0
A-222 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No.: LFFV0096 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
Description:
CTMT NOR SUMPS TO FLR DRN TK OUTSIDE CTMT ISO Photos LFFV0096 9-19 191 LFFV0096 9-19 193 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0