ML18162A026: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Prairie Island License Amendment Request to Reclassify Certain Fuel Handling Equipment June 12 2018 Northern States Power  
{{#Wiki_filter:Prairie Island License Amendment Request to Reclassify Certain Fuel Handling Equipment June 12 2018 Northern States Power  
- Minnesota   
- Minnesota   
*License Amendment Request
*License Amendment Request
  *Background *Scope *Example *Additional Information
  *Background
*Scope *Example *Additional Information
  *Summary Presentation Outline
  *Summary Presentation Outline


Line 24: Line 25:
-related) to QA Type III (commercial grade)
-related) to QA Type III (commercial grade)
  *Changes are consistent with industry standards
  *Changes are consistent with industry standards
  -ANSI/ANS 58.14-1993 Section 5.6.1, Item 9 -ANSI/ANS 57.1-1992, Section 6.3
  -ANSI/ANS 58.14
-1993 Section 5.6.1, Item 9 -ANSI/ANS 57.1
-1992, Section 6.3
  *Purchasing safety
  *Purchasing safety
-related spare parts does not provide commensurate public health and safety benefits.
-related spare parts does not provide commensurate public health and safety benefits.
Line 31: Line 34:
*PINGP was designed and build in late 1960's/early 1970s
*PINGP was designed and build in late 1960's/early 1970s
  -Prior to issuance of GDCs
  -Prior to issuance of GDCs
  -Before guidance for classifying SSCs  *Original A/E developed standard of 1% of 10 CFR 100 limits for classifying SSCs Background
  -Before guidance for classifying SSCs  *Original A/E developed standard of 1% of 10 CFR 100 limits for classifying SSCs
 
===Background===
 
*PINGP is approved for full scope AST -10 CFR 50.67 replaces 10 CFR 100 as licensing basis
*PINGP is approved for full scope AST -10 CFR 50.67 replaces 10 CFR 100 as licensing basis
  *Fuel handling accident offsite dose consequences fall below 10% of 10 CFR 50.67 limits.
  *Fuel handling accident offsite dose consequences fall below 10% of 10 CFR 50.67 limits.
  *Fuel handling equipment is currently classified as            QA-Type I (safety-related)  Background Fuel Handling Equipment to be Reclassified as "QA Type III":
  *Fuel handling equipment is currently classified as            QA-Type I (safety-related)  Background
   *Auxiliary Building Crane *Spent Fuel Pool Crane
 
Fuel Handling Equipment to be Reclassified as "QA Type III":
   *Auxiliary Building Crane
*Spent Fuel Pool Crane
  *Manipulator Cranes, including Load Cells
  *Manipulator Cranes, including Load Cells
  *Spent Fuel Assembly Handling Tools
  *Spent Fuel Assembly Handling Tools
  *Rod Cluster Control Changing Tools
  *Rod Cluster Control Changing Tools
  *Spent Fuel Transfer System and its constituent components (conveyors, upenders, and related equipment), exclusive of transfer tubes and blind flanges   Scope Example   
  *Spent Fuel Transfer System and its constituent components (conveyors, upenders, and related equipment), exclusive of transfer tubes and blind flanges Scope Example   
*The QA classification of fuel handling equipment, including cranes, is not discussed in the NSPM QA Manual
*The QA classification of fuel handling equipment, including cranes, is not discussed in the NSPM QA Manual
  *The scope of this amendment does not impact "important to safety" SSCs described in the PINGP ISFI USAR.  
  *The scope of this amendment does not impact "important to safety" SSCs described in the PINGP ISFI USAR.  
  *Approval requested by September 1, 2019 to support 1R30 *Precedence   Additional Information  
  *Approval requested by September 1, 2019 to support 1R30
*Precedence Additional Information  


*Proposed LAR will reclassify certain fuel handling equipment as QA Type - III (commercial grade
*Proposed LAR will reclassify certain fuel handling equipment as QA Type  
)  *Original PINGP classification scheme (1% of 10 CFR 100 limits) is more conservative than current standards
- III (commercial grade)  *Original PINGP classification scheme (1% of 10 CFR 100 limits) is more conservative than current standards
  *PINGP was approved for full scope AST
  *PINGP was approved for full scope AST
  *Fuel handling accident consequences fall below 10% of 10 CFR 50.67 limits  Summary}}
  *Fuel handling accident consequences fall below 10% of 10 CFR 50.67 limits  Summary}}

Revision as of 22:40, 5 July 2018

Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 - License Amendment Request to Reclassify Certain Fuel Handling Equipment
ML18162A026
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/12/2018
From:
Northern States Power Co, Xcel Energy
To:
Plant Licensing Branch III
Kuntz R F, 415-3733
References
Download: ML18162A026 (9)


Text

Prairie Island License Amendment Request to Reclassify Certain Fuel Handling Equipment June 12 2018 Northern States Power

- Minnesota

  • License Amendment Request
  • Background
  • Scope *Example *Additional Information
  • Summary Presentation Outline
  • Approval of USAR changes that revise the PINGP Quality Group classification for certain fuel handling equipment from QA Type I (safety

-related) to QA Type III (commercial grade)

  • Changes are consistent with industry standards

-ANSI/ANS 58.14

-1993 Section 5.6.1, Item 9 -ANSI/ANS 57.1

-1992, Section 6.3

  • Purchasing safety

-related spare parts does not provide commensurate public health and safety benefits.

License Amendment Request

  • PINGP was designed and build in late 1960's/early 1970s

-Prior to issuance of GDCs

-Before guidance for classifying SSCs *Original A/E developed standard of 1% of 10 CFR 100 limits for classifying SSCs

Background

  • PINGP is approved for full scope AST -10 CFR 50.67 replaces 10 CFR 100 as licensing basis
  • Fuel handling accident offsite dose consequences fall below 10% of 10 CFR 50.67 limits.
  • Fuel handling equipment is currently classified as QA-Type I (safety-related) Background

Fuel Handling Equipment to be Reclassified as "QA Type III":

  • Auxiliary Building Crane
  • Spent Fuel Pool Crane
  • Manipulator Cranes, including Load Cells
  • Spent Fuel Assembly Handling Tools
  • Rod Cluster Control Changing Tools
  • Spent Fuel Transfer System and its constituent components (conveyors, upenders, and related equipment), exclusive of transfer tubes and blind flanges Scope Example
  • The QA classification of fuel handling equipment, including cranes, is not discussed in the NSPM QA Manual
  • The scope of this amendment does not impact "important to safety" SSCs described in the PINGP ISFI USAR.
  • Approval requested by September 1, 2019 to support 1R30
  • Precedence Additional Information
  • Proposed LAR will reclassify certain fuel handling equipment as QA Type

- III (commercial grade) *Original PINGP classification scheme (1% of 10 CFR 100 limits) is more conservative than current standards

  • PINGP was approved for full scope AST
  • Fuel handling accident consequences fall below 10% of 10 CFR 50.67 limits Summary