ML15149A059: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: George, Andrea Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 7:27 PM To: 'CLARK, ROBERT W' Cc: 'PYLE, STEPHENIE L'; 'MOSHER, NA TALIE B'; 'BICE, DAVID B (ANO)' | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review Results - LAR to Re vise the ANO Cyber Security Plan Full Implementation Date - TAC Nos. MF6258 and MF6259Mr. Clark, By letter dated May 20, 2015 (Agencywide Document s Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15140A611), Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy, the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2 (ANO-1 and ANO-2, respectively). The proposed amendment would modify the physical protection license conditions in the Renewed Facility Operating Licenses for ANO-1 and ANO-2 in order to revise the ANO Cyber Security Plan Milestone 8 full implementation date. | Acceptance Review Results - LAR to Re vise the ANO Cyber Security Plan Full Implementation Date - TAC Nos. MF6258 and MF6259Mr. Clark, By letter dated May 20, 2015 (Agencywide Document s Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15140A611), Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy, the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2 (ANO-1 and ANO-2, respectively). The proposed amendment would modify the physical protection license conditions in the Renewed Facility Operating Licenses for ANO-1 and ANO-2 in order to revise the ANO Cyber Security Plan Milestone 8 full implementation date. | ||
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technica l review by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technica l review by separate correspondence. | ||
Sincerely, Andrea George Project Manager | Sincerely, Andrea George Project Manager | ||
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1081 | Division of Operating Reactor Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1081 | ||
Revision as of 02:26, 9 July 2018
| ML15149A059 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 05/28/2015 |
| From: | Andrea George Plant Licensing Branch IV |
| To: | Clark R W Entergy Nuclear Operations |
| References | |
| TAC MF6258, TAC MF6259 | |
| Download: ML15149A059 (2) | |
Text
1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: George, Andrea Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 7:27 PM To: 'CLARK, ROBERT W' Cc: 'PYLE, STEPHENIE L'; 'MOSHER, NA TALIE B'; 'BICE, DAVID B (ANO)'
Subject:
Acceptance Review Results - LAR to Re vise the ANO Cyber Security Plan Full Implementation Date - TAC Nos. MF6258 and MF6259Mr. Clark, By letter dated May 20, 2015 (Agencywide Document s Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML15140A611), Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy, the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2 (ANO-1 and ANO-2, respectively). The proposed amendment would modify the physical protection license conditions in the Renewed Facility Operating Licenses for ANO-1 and ANO-2 in order to revise the ANO Cyber Security Plan Milestone 8 full implementation date.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the NRC staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technica l review by separate correspondence.
Sincerely, Andrea George Project Manager
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-1081
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2115 Mail Envelope Properties (6F9E3C9DCAB9E448AAA49B8772A448C5025510D47DA8)
Subject:
Acceptance Review Results - LAR to Revise the ANO Cyber Security Plan Full Implementation Date - TAC Nos. MF6258 and MF6259 Sent Date: 5/28/2015 7:26:36 PM Received Date: 5/28/2015 7:26:00 PM From: George, Andrea Created By: Andrea.George@nrc.gov Recipients: "'PYLE, STEPHENIE L'" <SPYLE@entergy.com> Tracking Status: None
"'MOSHER, NATALIE B'" <NMOSHER@entergy.com> Tracking Status: None "'BICE, DAVID B (ANO)'" <DBICE@entergy.com>
Tracking Status: None
"'CLARK, ROBERT W'" <RCLARK@entergy.com> Tracking Status: None
Post Office: HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2534 5/28/2015 7:26:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: