ML17139B671: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm | {{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Hall, Randy Sent:Thursday, May 18, 2017 9:33 AM To:Ken McElroy Cc:Joyce, Ryan M. (RMJOYCE@souther nco.com); jjhutto@southernco.com | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - | Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Acce ptance of Amendment Request Regarding Secondary Containment Access Op enings (CAC NOS. MF9590 and MF9591)May 18, 2017 | ||
Mr. G. Ken McElroy Licensing Manager Southern Nuclear Operating Company | |||
==Dear Ken,== | ==Dear Ken,== | ||
By letter dated April 7, 2017 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management | By letter dated April 7, 2017 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management Syst em Accession No. ML17097A322), the Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC, the licensee) submitted a license amendment request for the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (HNP). The proposed amendment would revise HNP Technical Specification (TS) 3.6.4.1, "Secondary Containment," Surveillance Requirement 3.6.4.1.2 to provide an allowance for brief, inadvertent, simultaneous opening of redundant secondary containment access doors during normal entry and exit conditions. | ||
The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::350 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review within 12 months, which is consistent with your | |||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::350 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review within 12 months, which is consistent with your re quested approval date of April 7, 2018. If there are emergent co mplexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | |||
These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. | These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-4032. | If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-4032. | ||
2 Sincerely, | 2 Sincerely, Randy Hall, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing | ||
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation USNRC (301) 415-4032 Randy.Hall@nrc.gov | |||
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3521 Mail Envelope Properties (Randy.Hall@nrc.gov20170518093200) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Amendment Request Regarding Secondary Containment Access Openings (CAC NOS. MF9590 and MF9591) Sent Date: 5/18/2017 9:32:32 AM Received Date: 5/18/2017 9:32:00 AM | Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Amendment Request Regarding Secondary Containment Access Openings (CAC NOS. MF9590 and MF9591) Sent Date: 5/18/2017 9:32:32 AM Received Date: 5/18/2017 9:32:00 AM From: Hall, Randy Created By: Randy.Hall@nrc.gov Recipients: "Joyce, Ryan M. (RMJOYCE@southernco.com)" <RMJOYCE@southernco.com> Tracking Status: None "jjhutto@southernco.com" <jjhutto@southernco.com> Tracking Status: None "Ken McElroy" <gkmcelro@southernco.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None | Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3187 5/18/2017 9:32:00 AM | ||
Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:}} |
Revision as of 20:18, 29 June 2018
ML17139B671 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Hatch ![]() |
Issue date: | 05/18/2017 |
From: | Randy Hall Plant Licensing Branch II |
To: | McElroy G K Southern Nuclear Operating Co |
References | |
MF9590, MF9591 | |
Download: ML17139B671 (3) | |
Text
1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Hall, Randy Sent:Thursday, May 18, 2017 9:33 AM To:Ken McElroy Cc:Joyce, Ryan M. (RMJOYCE@souther nco.com); jjhutto@southernco.com
Subject:
Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Acce ptance of Amendment Request Regarding Secondary Containment Access Op enings (CAC NOS. MF9590 and MF9591)May 18, 2017
Mr. G. Ken McElroy Licensing Manager Southern Nuclear Operating Company
Dear Ken,
By letter dated April 7, 2017 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management Syst em Accession No. ML17097A322), the Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC, the licensee) submitted a license amendment request for the Edwin I. Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (HNP). The proposed amendment would revise HNP Technical Specification (TS) 3.6.4.1, "Secondary Containment," Surveillance Requirement 3.6.4.1.2 to provide an allowance for brief, inadvertent, simultaneous opening of redundant secondary containment access doors during normal entry and exit conditions.
The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 350 hours14.583 days <br />2.083 weeks <br />0.479 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review within 12 months, which is consistent with your re quested approval date of April 7, 2018. If there are emergent co mplexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-4032.
2 Sincerely, Randy Hall, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation USNRC (301) 415-4032 Randy.Hall@nrc.gov
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3521 Mail Envelope Properties (Randy.Hall@nrc.gov20170518093200)
Subject:
Hatch Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Amendment Request Regarding Secondary Containment Access Openings (CAC NOS. MF9590 and MF9591) Sent Date: 5/18/2017 9:32:32 AM Received Date: 5/18/2017 9:32:00 AM From: Hall, Randy Created By: Randy.Hall@nrc.gov Recipients: "Joyce, Ryan M. (RMJOYCE@southernco.com)" <RMJOYCE@southernco.com> Tracking Status: None "jjhutto@southernco.com" <jjhutto@southernco.com> Tracking Status: None "Ken McElroy" <gkmcelro@southernco.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3187 5/18/2017 9:32:00 AM
Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: