|
|
Line 14: |
Line 14: |
| | page count = 9 | | | page count = 9 |
| }} | | }} |
| {{#Wiki_filter:SSINS No.: 6835IN 87-54UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20555October 23, 1987NRC INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 87-54: EMERGENCY RESPONSE EXERCISES | | {{#Wiki_filter:SSINS No.: 6835 IN 87-54 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY |
| | |
| | COMMISSION |
| | |
| | ===OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION=== |
| | WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 October 23, 1987 NRC INFORMATION |
| | |
| | NOTICE NO. 87-54: EMERGENCY |
| | |
| | RESPONSE EXERCISES |
|
| |
|
| ==Addressees== | | ==Addressees== |
| :All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear powerreactors. | | : |
| | All holders of operating |
| | |
| | licenses or construction |
| | |
| | permits for nuclear power reactors. |
|
| |
|
| ==Purpose== | | ==Purpose== |
| :This information notice is being provided to remind addressees of flexibilitythat exists in certain rewuiremnents contiined in emergency planning rules. Itis expected that recipientsvwill review&the information for applicability totheir program. However, suggestions contained in this information notice donot constitute NRC requirements'; therefore,'no'specific action or writtenresponse is'required. | | : This information |
| | |
| | notice is being provided to remind addressees |
| | |
| | of flexibility |
| | |
| | that exists in certain rewuiremnents |
| | |
| | contiined |
| | |
| | in emergency |
| | |
| | planning rules. It is expected that recipientsvwill |
| | |
| | review&the |
| | |
| | information |
| | |
| | for applicability |
| | |
| | to their program. However, suggestions |
| | |
| | contained |
| | |
| | in this information |
| | |
| | notice do not constitute |
| | |
| | NRC requirements'; |
| | therefore,'no'specific |
| | |
| | action or written response is'required. |
| | |
| | Description |
| | |
| | of Circumstances: |
| | To satisfy the current requirements |
| | |
| | of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appen-dix E, each licensee must' annually exercise its emergency |
| | |
| | plan. In addition, each licensee is required to exercise with offsite authorities |
| | |
| | such that the State and local government |
| | |
| | emergency |
| | |
| | plans'are |
| | |
| | exercised |
| | |
| | biennially. |
| | |
| | Currently there are no specific requirements |
| | |
| | which address whether each exercise scenario must lead to the declaration |
| | |
| | of A General Emergency. |
| | |
| | Mowever, perhaps as a carryover |
| | |
| | from the 'previous |
| | |
| | requirements |
| | |
| | for annual State and local exercises, almost all exercise scenarios |
| | |
| | are planned to progress to a General Emergency condition. |
| | |
| | Discussion: |
| | While it may be-appropriate |
| | |
| | for biennial offsite exercises |
| | |
| | to proceed to a General Emergency |
| | |
| | declaration, exercises |
| | |
| | other than biennial offsite exercises (off-year |
| | |
| | exercises) |
| | are not required to proceed to severe core damace. Such exercises |
| | |
| | can provide an opportunity |
| | |
| | forlmore realistic |
| | |
| | emergency |
| | |
| | response trainine and evaluation |
| | |
| | of licensee staff. For example, before severe core damage would be expected to occur, the operating |
| | |
| | staff may be given the oppor-tunity to diagnose and attempt-to |
| | |
| | correct the problem through an interactive |
| | |
| | scenario. |
| | |
| | In addition, some exercise scenarios. |
| | |
| | may be. designed with initiating |
| | |
| | events at the Alert or Site Area Emergency |
| | |
| | classification. |
| | |
| | Since actual events may go directly to these higher level classifications |
| | |
| | without sequencing |
| | |
| | 8710190144 |
| | ' -is'.IN 87-54 October 23, 1987 through each emergency |
| | |
| | classi advance.Opportunity |
| | |
| | to-activate |
| | |
| | response facili-ties may not occur. The flexibility |
| | |
| | within the requirements |
| | |
| | allows for the development |
| | |
| | of other realistic |
| | |
| | scenarios |
| | |
| | which, in turn, can improve emergency response capability. |
| | |
| | 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.3.f, states that "licensees |
| | |
| | shall enable any State or local government |
| | |
| | located within the plume exposure.pathway |
| | |
| | EPZ to participate |
| | |
| | in annual exercises |
| | |
| | when requested |
| | |
| | by such State or local government." To satisfy this requirement, it may be necessary |
| | |
| | for licensees |
| | |
| | to develop an exercise scenario which provides opportunities |
| | |
| | to test the appropri-ate aspects of the offsite response plan. Such participation |
| | |
| | may need to be negotiated |
| | |
| | between the.licensee |
| | |
| | and the offsite.authorities... |
| | |
| | Licensees |
| | |
| | that have conducted |
| | |
| | realistic |
| | |
| | and interactive |
| | |
| | exercises |
| | |
| | have identi-fied and corrected |
| | |
| | weaknesses |
| | |
| | in their ability to respond to such simulated |
| | |
| | ;onsite events as fire, loss of electrical |
| | |
| | power, and equipment |
| | |
| | failure. The response of personnel |
| | |
| | and availability |
| | |
| | and utilizationof |
| | |
| | alternate.equipment, to mitigate simulated |
| | |
| | severe, off-normal |
| | |
| | plant conditions |
| | |
| | have been;.challenging |
| | |
| | and.have led somellicensees |
| | |
| | to conduct further training and provide added.procedures |
| | |
| | and support equipment. |
| | |
| | In addition, interactive |
| | |
| | exercises-can |
| | |
| | provide a training opportunity |
| | |
| | for personnel |
| | |
| | that Would be called upon to make strategic |
| | |
| | decisions |
| | |
| | in areas that are not addressed |
| | |
| | by existing procedures.-Licensees-arni |
| | |
| | applc-a-its- may-_fShto-cons4de -neorpet-tig--thesetconcep~tsn, planning and conducting |
| | |
| | off-year emergency |
| | |
| | response-exercises.- |
| | The revision to the exercise frequency |
| | |
| | requirements |
| | |
| | of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E has been previously |
| | |
| | discussed |
| | |
| | in.IE Information |
| | |
| | Notice 85-55,: "Revised Emergency |
| | |
| | Exercise Frequency |
| | |
| | Rule." No specific action or written response is required by.this information!notice., If you have any questions |
| | |
| | about.this |
| | |
| | matter, please contact.the |
| | |
| | technical. |
| | |
| | contact listed below or the Regional Administrator |
| | |
| | of the appropriate |
| | |
| | regional office.Charles E. Rossi, Director Division of Operational |
| | |
| | ===Events Assessment=== |
| | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| | |
| | Technical |
| | |
| | Contact: Cheryl A. Sakenas, AEOD .(301) 492-9004 Attachment: |
| | List of Recently Issued NRC Information |
| | |
| | Notices |
| | |
| | 4I-Attachment. |
| | |
| | IN-87-54 October 23, 1987.LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED INFORMATION |
| | |
| | NOTICES 1987 i I-I k, I Information |
| | |
| | Date of Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to 87-53 87-52 87-51 87-50 Auxiliary |
| | |
| | Feedwater |
| | |
| | Pump Trips Resulting |
| | |
| | from Low Suction Pressure Insulation |
| | |
| | Breakdown |
| | |
| | of Silicone Rubber-Insulated |
| | |
| | Single Conductor |
| | |
| | Cables During High Potential |
| | |
| | Testing Failure of Low Pressure Safety Injection |
| | |
| | Pump Due to Seal Problems Potential |
| | |
| | LOCA at High-and Low-Pressure |
| | |
| | Tnterfaces |
| | |
| | from Fire Damage 10/20/87 10/16/87 10/13/87 10/9/87 All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors.All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors.All nuclear power reactor facilities |
| | |
| | holding an OL or CP.All nuclear power reactor facilities |
| | |
| | holding an OL or CP.87-49 Deficiencies |
| | |
| | in Outside.! -Containment |
| | |
| | Flooding -Protection |
| | |
| | 10/9/87 i o... .1 '7 , .,w E ..All nuclear power reactor facilities |
| | |
| | holding an OL or CP.87-48 87-47 87-46 87-45 Information |
| | |
| | Concerning |
| | |
| | the Use of Anaerobic |
| | |
| | Adhesive/Sealants Transportation |
| | |
| | of Radio-graphy Devices Undetected |
| | |
| | Loss of Reactor Coolant Recent Safety-Related |
| | |
| | Violations |
| | |
| | of NRC Requirements |
| | |
| | by Industrial |
| | |
| | Radiography |
| | |
| | Licensees 10/9/87 10/5/87 9/30/87 9/25/87 All nuclear power reactor facilities |
| | |
| | holding an OL or CP.All NRC licensees authorized |
| | |
| | to manu-facture, distribute |
| | |
| | and/or operate radio-graphic exposure devices and/or source changers.All PWR holding facilities |
| | |
| | on OL or CP.All NRC licensees authorized |
| | |
| | to possess and use sealed sources for industrial |
| | |
| | radio-graphy.OL = Operating |
| | |
| | License CP = Construction |
| | |
| | Permit |
| | |
| | IN 87-54 October 23, 1987 through each emergency |
| | |
| | class, advance opportunity |
| | |
| | to activate response facili-ties may not occur. The flexibility |
| | |
| | within the requirements |
| | |
| | allows for the development |
| | |
| | of other realistic |
| | |
| | scenarios |
| | |
| | which, in turn, can improve emergency response capability. |
| | |
| | 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.3.f, states that "licensees |
| | |
| | shall enable any State or local government |
| | |
| | located within the plume exposure pathway EPZ to participate |
| | |
| | in annual exercises |
| | |
| | when requested |
| | |
| | by such State or local government." To satisfy this requirement, it may be necessary |
| | |
| | for licensees |
| | |
| | to develop an exercise scenario which provides opportunities |
| | |
| | to test the appropri-ate aspects of the offsite response plan. Such participation |
| | |
| | may need to be negotiated |
| | |
| | between the licensee and the offsite authorities. |
| | |
| | Licensees |
| | |
| | that have conducted |
| | |
| | realistic |
| | |
| | and interactive |
| | |
| | exercises |
| | |
| | have identi-fied and corrected |
| | |
| | weaknesses |
| | |
| | in their ability to respond to such simulated onsite events as fire, loss of electrical |
| | |
| | power, and equipment |
| | |
| | failure. The response of personnel |
| | |
| | and availability |
| | |
| | and utilization |
| | |
| | of alternate |
| | |
| | equipment to mitigate simulated |
| | |
| | severe off-normal |
| | |
| | plant conditions |
| | |
| | have been challenging |
| | |
| | and have led some licensees |
| | |
| | to conduct further training and provide added procedures |
| | |
| | and support equipment. |
| | |
| | In addition, interactive |
| | |
| | exercises |
| | |
| | can provide a training opportunity |
| | |
| | for personnel |
| | |
| | that would be called upon to make strategic |
| | |
| | decisions |
| | |
| | in areas that are not addressed |
| | |
| | by existing procedures. |
| | |
| | Licensees |
| | |
| | and applicants |
| | |
| | may wish to consider incorporating |
| | |
| | these concepts in planning and conducting |
| | |
| | off-year emergency |
| | |
| | response exercises. |
| | |
| | The revision to the exercise frequency |
| | |
| | requirements |
| | |
| | of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E has been previously |
| | |
| | discussed |
| | |
| | in TE Information |
| | |
| | Notice 85-55,"Revised Emergency |
| | |
| | Exercise Frequency |
| | |
| | Rule." No specific action or written response is required by this information |
| | |
| | notice.If you have any questions |
| | |
| | about this matter, please contact the technical contact listed below or the Regional Administrator |
| | |
| | of the appropriate |
| | |
| | regional office.Charles E. Rossi, Director Division of Operational |
| | |
| | ===Events Assessment=== |
| | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| | |
| | Technical |
| | |
| | Contact: Cheryl A. Sakenas, AEOD (301) 492-9004 Attachment: |
| | List of Recently Issued NRC Information |
| | |
| | Notices*SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES |
| | |
| | R C/OGCB:DOEA:NRR |
| | |
| | D/DREP:NRR |
| | |
| | CHBerlinger |
| | |
| | FCongel 87 10/ /87 10/ /87*PPMB:ARM |
| | |
| | OGCB:DOEA:NRR |
| | |
| | IR : OA:A D C/IRB:DOA:AEOD |
| | |
| | C/PEPB:DREP:NRR |
| | |
| | TechEd JERamsey CASakenas |
| | |
| | KEPerkins |
| | |
| | DBMatthews |
| | |
| | 09/29/87 10/ /87 10/ /87 10/ /87 10/ /87 IN 87-XX October xx, 1987 through each emergency |
| | |
| | class, advance opportunity |
| | |
| | to activate response facili-ties may not occur. The flexibility |
| | |
| | within the requirements |
| | |
| | allows for the development |
| | |
| | of other realistic |
| | |
| | scenarios |
| | |
| | which, in turn, can improve emergency response capability. |
| | |
| | 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.3.f, states that "licensees |
| | |
| | shall enable any State or local government |
| | |
| | located within the plume exposure pathway EPZ to participate |
| | |
| | in annual exercises |
| | |
| | when requested |
| | |
| | by such State or local government." To satisfy this requirement, it may be necessary |
| | |
| | for licensees |
| | |
| | to develop an exercise scenario which provides opportunities |
| | |
| | to test the appropri-ate aspects of the offsite response plan. Such participation |
| | |
| | may need to be negotiated |
| | |
| | between the licensee and the offsite authorities. |
| | |
| | Licensees |
| | |
| | that have conducted |
| | |
| | realistic |
| | |
| | and interactive |
| | |
| | exercises |
| | |
| | have identi-fied and corrected |
| | |
| | weaknesses |
| | |
| | in their ability to respond to such simulated onsite events as fire, loss of electrical |
| | |
| | power, and equipment |
| | |
| | failure. The response of personnel |
| | |
| | and availability |
| | |
| | and utilization |
| | |
| | of alternate |
| | |
| | equipment to mitigate simulated |
| | |
| | severe off-normal |
| | |
| | plant conditions |
| | |
| | have been challenging |
| | |
| | and have led some licensees |
| | |
| | to conduct further training and provide added procedures |
| | |
| | and support equipment. |
| | |
| | In addition, interactive |
| | |
| | exercises |
| | |
| | can provide a training opportunity |
| | |
| | for personnel |
| | |
| | that would be called upon to make strategic |
| | |
| | decisions |
| | |
| | in areas that are not addressed |
| | |
| | by existing procedures. |
| | |
| | Licensees |
| | |
| | and applicants |
| | |
| | may wish to consider incorporating |
| | |
| | these concepts in planning and conducting |
| | |
| | off-year emergency |
| | |
| | response exercises. |
| | |
| | i-nadd4F4-en, 4c4ersees-may-w4-sh-te-oons |
| | |
| | rsrlflrPRk |
| | |
| | r generi-e---PRA |
| | |
| | f o in selecting |
| | |
| | other reallsti exercise osenarf-ix. |
| | |
| | Reference: |
| | The revision to the exercise frequency |
| | |
| | requirements |
| | |
| | of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E has been previously |
| | |
| | discussed |
| | |
| | in IE Information |
| | |
| | Notice 85-55,"Revised Emergency |
| | |
| | Exercise Frequency |
| | |
| | Rule." No specific action or written response is required by this information |
| | |
| | notice.If you have any questions |
| | |
| | about this matter, please contact the technical contact listed below or the Regional Administrator |
| | |
| | of the appropriate |
| | |
| | regional office.Charles E. Rossi, Director Division of Operational |
| | |
| | ===Events Assessment=== |
| | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| | |
| | Technical |
| | |
| | Contact: Cheryl A. Sakenas, AEOD (301) 492-9004 Attachment: |
| | List of Recently Issued NRC Information |
| | |
| | Notices N105*SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES |
| | |
| | D/DOEA:NRR |
| | |
| | C/OGCB:DOEA:NRR |
| | |
| | D/DREP:NRR~4 C CERossi CHBerlinger |
| | |
| | FCongel J 10/ /87 10/I /87 10/j5/87 II.l*PPMB:ARM |
| | |
| | Of O Ut:NRR IRB:DOA:AEOD |
| | |
| | C :A C/PEPB:DR |
| | |
| | flR TechEd JE~ msey CASakons o l';r LV DBMatthew |
| | |
| | l 09/29/87 10/13/87 ! /87 _ 10/1 /87 10/15/87 IN 87-XX October xx, 1987 through each emergency |
| | |
| | class, advance opportunity |
| | |
| | to activate response facili-ties may not occur. The flexibility |
| | |
| | within the requirements |
| | |
| | allows for the development |
| | |
| | of other realistic |
| | |
| | scenarios |
| | |
| | which, in turn, can improve emergency response capability. |
| | |
| | 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.3.f, states that "licensees |
| | |
| | shall enable any State or local government |
| | |
| | located within the plume exposure pathway EPZ to participate |
| | |
| | in annual exercises |
| | |
| | when requested |
| | |
| | by such State or local government." To satisfy this requirement, it may be necessary |
| | |
| | for licensees |
| | |
| | to develop an exercise scenario which provides opportunities |
| | |
| | to test the appropri-ate aspects of the offsite response plan. Such participation |
| | |
| | may need to be negotiated |
| | |
| | between the licensee and the offsite authorities. |
| | |
| | Licensees |
| | |
| | that have conducted |
| | |
| | realistic |
| | |
| | and interactive |
| | |
| | exercises |
| | |
| | have identi-fied and corrected |
| | |
| | weaknesses |
| | |
| | in their ability to respond to such simulated onsite events as fire, loss of electrical |
| | |
| | power, and equipment |
| | |
| | failure. The response of personnel |
| | |
| | and availability |
| | |
| | and utilization |
| | |
| | of alternate |
| | |
| | equipment to mitigate simulated |
| | |
| | severe off-normal |
| | |
| | plant conditions |
| | |
| | have been challenging |
| | |
| | and have led some licensees |
| | |
| | to conduct further training and provide added procedures |
| | |
| | and support equipment. |
| | |
| | In addition, interactive |
| | |
| | exercises |
| | |
| | can provide a training opportunity |
| | |
| | for personnel |
| | |
| | that would be called upon to make strategic |
| | |
| | decisions |
| | |
| | in areas that are not addressed |
| | |
| | by existing procedures. |
| | |
| | Licensees |
| | |
| | and applicants |
| | |
| | may wish to consider incorporating |
| | |
| | these concepts in planning and conducting |
| | |
| | off-year emergency |
| | |
| | r 7 sponse exercises. |
| | |
| | 7n aoldtov&, l'4nfolb' oIt7Eer trho rtmtt of pdste or Vancieif P.4 Reference: |
| | 4A leaAect'm1 .Eovr tramitc eewrta 1 s1¢nQrO.The revision to the exercise frequency |
| | |
| | requirements |
| | |
| | of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E has been previously |
| | |
| | discussed |
| | |
| | in IE Information |
| | |
| | Notice 85-55,"Revised Emergency |
| | |
| | Exercise Frequency |
| | |
| | Rule." No specific action or written response is required by this information |
| | |
| | notice.If you have any questions |
| | |
| | about this matter, please contact the ftgoena4 JAdm4fistratc |
| | |
| | w-ef-the-approprH -e5he-t;heona4o*4o |
| | |
| | t44#-ef+ce% |
| | +tchnijcs |
| | |
| | cow otAjt 1tad blksv or the flQonl Adef4inM.tmtcr |
| | |
| | dlf en aopprocrte |
| | |
| | steil *Charles E. Rossi, Director Division of Operational |
| | |
| | ===Events Assessment=== |
| | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| | |
| | Technical |
| | |
| | Contact: Cheryl A. Sakenas, AEOD (301) 492-9004 Attachment: |
| | List of Recently Issued NRC Information |
| | |
| | Notices |
| | |
| | IN 87-XX October xx, 1987 through each emergency |
| | |
| | class, advance opportunity |
| | |
| | to activate response facili-ties may not occur. The flexibility |
| | |
| | within the requirements |
| | |
| | allows for the development |
| | |
| | of other realistic |
| | |
| | scenarios |
| | |
| | which, in turn, can improve emergency response capability. |
| | |
| | 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.3.f, states that "licensees |
| | |
| | shall enable any State or local government |
| | |
| | located within the plume exposure pathway EPZ to participate |
| | |
| | in annual exercises |
| | |
| | when requested |
| | |
| | by such State or local government." To satisfy this requirement, it may be necessary |
| | |
| | for licensees |
| | |
| | to develop an exercise scenario which provides opportunities |
| | |
| | to test the appropri-ate aspects of the offsite response plan. Such participation |
| | |
| | may need to be negotiated |
| | |
| | between the licensee and the offsite authorities. |
| | |
| | Licensees |
| | |
| | that have conducted |
| | |
| | realistic |
| | |
| | and interactive |
| | |
| | exercises |
| | |
| | have identi-fied and corrected |
| | |
| | weaknesses |
| | |
| | in their ability to respond to such simulated onsite events as fire, loss of electrical |
| | |
| | power, and equipment |
| | |
| | failure. The response of personnel |
| | |
| | and availability |
| | |
| | and utilization |
| | |
| | of alternate |
| | |
| | equipment to mitigate simulated |
| | |
| | severe off-normal |
| | |
| | plant conditions |
| | |
| | have been challenging |
| | |
| | and have led some licensees |
| | |
| | to conduct further training and provide added procedures |
| | |
| | and support equipment. |
| | |
| | In addition, interactive |
| | |
| | exercises |
| | |
| | can provide a training opportunity |
| | |
| | for personnel |
| | |
| | that would be called upon to make strategic |
| | |
| | decisions |
| | |
| | in areas that are not addressed |
| | |
| | by existing procedures. |
| | |
| | Licensees |
| | |
| | and applicants |
| | |
| | may wish to consider incorporating |
| | |
| | these concepts in planning and conducti o -year emergency |
| | |
| | respopse exercises. |
| | |
| | Irn h s io ¢ MA J WtA to ther lth rfts wrt t < aoh4t ao"#Fsc PX4 or Reference: |
| | f.^c^u Pnd hkisbk5 In oel4tIVn ceewr nflwi*tlc |
| | |
| | e~Gfrci6 fermn os.The revision to the exercise frequency |
| | |
| | requirements |
| | |
| | of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E has been previously |
| | |
| | discussed |
| | |
| | in IE Information |
| | |
| | Notice 85-55,"Revised Emergency |
| | |
| | Exercise Frequency |
| | |
| | Rule." No specific action or written response is required by this information |
| | |
| | notice.If you have any questions |
| | |
| | about this matter, please contact the Regional Administrator |
| | |
| | of the appropriate |
| | |
| | regional office or this office.Charles E. Rossi, Director Division of Operational |
| | |
| | ===Events Assessment=== |
| | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| | |
| | Technical |
| | |
| | Contact: Cheryl A. Sakenas, AEOD (301) 492-9004 Attachment: |
| | List of Recently Issued NRC Information |
| | |
| | Notices*SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES |
| | |
| | D/DOEA:NRR |
| | |
| | C/OGCB:DOEA:NRR |
| | |
| | D/DREP:NRR |
| | |
| | CERossi CHBerlinger |
| | |
| | FCongel 10/ /87 10/ /87 10/ /87*PPMB:ARM |
| | |
| | OGCB:DOEA:NRR |
| | |
| | IRB:DOA:AEOD |
| | |
| | C/IRB:DOA:AEOD |
| | |
| | C/PEPB:DREP:NRR |
| | |
| | TechEd JERamsey CASakenas |
| | |
| | KEPerkins |
| | |
| | DBMatthews |
| | |
| | 09/29/87 10/ /87 10/ /87 10/ /87 10/ /87 |
| | -I >IN 87-XX September |
| | |
| | xx, 1987 through each emergency |
| | |
| | class, advance opportunity |
| | |
| | to activate response facili-ties, for example, may not occur. This flexibility |
| | |
| | allows for the development |
| | |
| | of more realistic |
| | |
| | scenarios |
| | |
| | which, in turn, can improve emergency |
| | |
| | response capability. |
| | |
| | 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.3.f states that "Licensees |
| | |
| | shall enable any State or local government |
| | |
| | located within the plume exposure pathway EPZ to participate |
| | |
| | in annual exercises |
| | |
| | when requested |
| | |
| | by such State or local government." In order to satisfy these requirements, it may be necessary |
| | |
| | for licensees |
| | |
| | to develop an exercise scenario which provides opportunities |
| | |
| | to test the appropriate |
| | |
| | aspects of the offsite response plan. The particulars |
| | |
| | of such participation |
| | |
| | may need to be negotiated |
| | |
| | between the licensee and the offsite authorities. |
| | |
| | Licensees |
| | |
| | that have conducted |
| | |
| | more realistic |
| | |
| | and interactive |
| | |
| | exercises |
| | |
| | have identified |
| | |
| | and corrected |
| | |
| | weaknesses |
| | |
| | in their ability to respond to such simu-lated onsite events as fire, loss of electrical |
| | |
| | power, and equipment |
| | |
| | failure.The response of personnel |
| | |
| | and availability |
| | |
| | and utilization |
| | |
| | of alternate |
| | |
| | equip-ment to mitigate simulated |
| | |
| | severe off-normal |
| | |
| | plant conditions |
| | |
| | have been chal-lenging and have led some licensees |
| | |
| | to conduct further training and provide added procedures |
| | |
| | and support equipment. |
| | |
| | Interactive |
| | |
| | exercises |
| | |
| | can provide a training opportunity |
| | |
| | for personnel |
| | |
| | that would be called upon to make strategic |
| | |
| | decisions |
| | |
| | should an actual event pro-gress beyond existing procedures. |
| | |
| | Licensees |
| | |
| | and applicants |
| | |
| | may wish to con-sider incorporating |
| | |
| | these concepts in planning and conducting |
| | |
| | off-year emer-gency response exercises. |
| | |
| | Reference: |
| | The revision to the exercise frequency |
| | |
| | requirements |
| | |
| | of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E has been previously |
| | |
| | discussed |
| | |
| | in IE Information |
| | |
| | Notice 85-55,"Revised Emergency |
| | |
| | Exercise Frequency |
| | |
| | Rule." No specific action or written response is required by this information |
| | |
| | notice. If you have any questions |
| | |
| | about this matter, please contact the Regional Administrator |
| | |
| | of the appropriate |
| | |
| | regional office or this office.Charles E. Rossi, Director Division of Operational |
| | |
| | ===Events Assessment=== |
| | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| | |
| | Technical |
| | |
| | Contact: Cheryl A. Sakenas, AEOD (301) 492-9004 Attachment: |
| | List of Recently Issued NRC Information |
|
| |
|
| ==Description of Circumstances==
| | Notices D/DOEA:NRR |
| :To satisfy the current requirements of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appen-dix E, each licensee must' annually exercise its emergency plan. In addition,each licensee is required to exercise with offsite authorities such that theState and local government emergency plans'are exercised biennially. Currentlythere are no specific requirements which address whether each exercise scenariomust lead to the declaration of A General Emergency. Mowever, perhaps as acarryover from the 'previous requirements for annual State and local exercises,almost all exercise scenarios are planned to progress to a General Emergencycondition.Discussion:While it may be-appropriate for biennial offsite exercises to proceed to aGeneral Emergency declaration, exercises other than biennial offsite exercises(off-year exercises) are not required to proceed to severe core damace. Suchexercises can provide an opportunity forlmore realistic emergency responsetrainine and evaluation of licensee staff. For example, before severe coredamage would be expected to occur, the operating staff may be given the oppor-tunity to diagnose and attempt-to correct the problem through an interactivescenario. In addition, some exercise scenarios. may be. designed with initiatingevents at the Alert or Site Area Emergency classification. Since actual eventsmay go directly to these higher level classifications without sequencing8710190144 | |
| ' -is'.IN 87-54October 23, 1987 through each emergency classi advance.Opportunity to-activate response facili-ties may not occur. The flexibility within the requirements allows for thedevelopment of other realistic scenarios which, in turn, can improve emergencyresponse capability.10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.3.f, states that "licensees shallenable any State or local government located within the plume exposure.pathwayEPZ to participate in annual exercises when requested by such State or localgovernment." To satisfy this requirement, it may be necessary for licensees todevelop an exercise scenario which provides opportunities to test the appropri-ate aspects of the offsite response plan. Such participation may need to benegotiated between the.licensee and the offsite.authorities...Licensees that have conducted realistic and interactive exercises have identi-fied and corrected weaknesses in their ability to respond to such simulated ;onsite events as fire, loss of electrical power, and equipment failure. Theresponse of personnel and availability and utilizationof alternate.equipment,to mitigate simulated severe, off-normal plant conditions have been;.challengingand.have led somellicensees to conduct further training and provide added.procedures and support equipment. In addition, interactive exercises-canprovide a training opportunity for personnel that Would be called upon to makestrategic decisions in areas that are not addressed by existing procedures.-Licensees-arni applc-a-its- may-_fShto-cons4de -neorpet-tig--thesetconcep~tsn,planning and conducting off-year emergency response-exercises.-The revision to the exercise frequency requirements of 10 CFR Part 50,Appendix E has been previously discussed in.IE Information Notice 85-55,:"Revised Emergency Exercise Frequency Rule."No specific action or written response is required by.this information!notice.,If you have any questions about.this matter, please contact.the technical.contact listed below or the Regional Administrator of the appropriate regionaloffice.Charles E. Rossi, DirectorDivision of Operational Events AssessmentOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
| |
|
| |
|
| ===Technical Contact:===
| | C/OGCB:DOEA:NRR |
| Cheryl A. Sakenas, AEOD .(301) 492-9004Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
| |
|
| |
|
| 4I-Attachment.IN-87-54October 23, 1987.LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUEDINFORMATION NOTICES 1987iI-Ik,IInformation Date ofNotice No. Subject Issuance Issued to87-5387-5287-5187-50Auxiliary Feedwater PumpTrips Resulting from LowSuction PressureInsulation Breakdown ofSilicone Rubber-InsulatedSingle Conductor CablesDuring High Potential TestingFailure of Low PressureSafety Injection Pump Dueto Seal ProblemsPotential LOCA at High-and Low-Pressure Tnterfacesfrom Fire Damage10/20/8710/16/8710/13/8710/9/87All holders of OLsor CPs for nuclearpower reactors.All holders of OLsor CPs for nuclearpower reactors.All nuclear powerreactor facilitiesholding an OL or CP.All nuclear powerreactor facilitiesholding an OL or CP.87-49 Deficiencies in Outside.! -Containment Flooding -Protection10/9/87i o... .1 '7 , .,w E ..All nuclear powerreactor facilitiesholding an OL or CP.87-4887-4787-4687-45Information Concerning theUse of Anaerobic Adhesive/SealantsTransportation of Radio-graphy DevicesUndetected Loss of ReactorCoolantRecent Safety-RelatedViolations of NRCRequirements by IndustrialRadiography Licensees10/9/8710/5/879/30/879/25/87All nuclear powerreactor facilitiesholding an OL or CP.All NRC licenseesauthorized to manu-facture, distributeand/or operate radio-graphic exposuredevices and/orsource changers.All PWRholdingfacilitieson OL or CP.All NRC licenseesauthorized to possessand use sealed sourcesfor industrial radio-graphy.OL = Operating LicenseCP = Construction Permit
| | D/DREP:NRR |
|
| |
|
| IN 87-54October 23, 1987 through each emergency class, advance opportunity to activate response facili-ties may not occur. The flexibility within the requirements allows for thedevelopment of other realistic scenarios which, in turn, can improve emergencyresponse capability.10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.3.f, states that "licensees shallenable any State or local government located within the plume exposure pathwayEPZ to participate in annual exercises when requested by such State or localgovernment." To satisfy this requirement, it may be necessary for licensees todevelop an exercise scenario which provides opportunities to test the appropri-ate aspects of the offsite response plan. Such participation may need to benegotiated between the licensee and the offsite authorities.Licensees that have conducted realistic and interactive exercises have identi-fied and corrected weaknesses in their ability to respond to such simulatedonsite events as fire, loss of electrical power, and equipment failure. Theresponse of personnel and availability and utilization of alternate equipmentto mitigate simulated severe off-normal plant conditions have been challengingand have led some licensees to conduct further training and provide addedprocedures and support equipment. In addition, interactive exercises canprovide a training opportunity for personnel that would be called upon to makestrategic decisions in areas that are not addressed by existing procedures.Licensees and applicants may wish to consider incorporating these concepts inplanning and conducting off-year emergency response exercises.The revision to the exercise frequency requirements of 10 CFR Part 50,Appendix E has been previously discussed in TE Information Notice 85-55,"Revised Emergency Exercise Frequency Rule."No specific action or written response is required by this information notice.If you have any questions about this matter, please contact the technicalcontact listed below or the Regional Administrator of the appropriate regionaloffice.Charles E. Rossi, DirectorDivision of Operational Events AssessmentOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
| | J EIpssi CHBerlinger |
|
| |
|
| ===Technical Contact:===
| | FCongel (0 /87 ep/ /87 &/ /87 PPMB:AR2 4 OGCB:DOEA:NRR |
| Cheryl A. Sakenas, AEOD(301) 492-9004Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices*SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES R C/OGCB:DOEA:NRR D/DREP:NRRCHBerlinger FCongel87 10/ /87 10/ /87*PPMB:ARM OGCB:DOEA:NRR IR : OA:A D C/IRB:DOA:AEOD C/PEPB:DREP:NRRTechEd JERamsey CASakenas KEPerkins DBMatthews09/29/87 10/ /87 10/ /87 10/ /87 10/ /87 IN 87-XXOctober xx, 1987 through each emergency class, advance opportunity to activate response facili-ties may not occur. The flexibility within the requirements allows for thedevelopment of other realistic scenarios which, in turn, can improve emergencyresponse capability.10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.3.f, states that "licensees shallenable any State or local government located within the plume exposure pathwayEPZ to participate in annual exercises when requested by such State or localgovernment." To satisfy this requirement, it may be necessary for licensees todevelop an exercise scenario which provides opportunities to test the appropri-ate aspects of the offsite response plan. Such participation may need to benegotiated between the licensee and the offsite authorities.Licensees that have conducted realistic and interactive exercises have identi-fied and corrected weaknesses in their ability to respond to such simulatedonsite events as fire, loss of electrical power, and equipment failure. Theresponse of personnel and availability and utilization of alternate equipmentto mitigate simulated severe off-normal plant conditions have been challengingand have led some licensees to conduct further training and provide addedprocedures and support equipment. In addition, interactive exercises canprovide a training opportunity for personnel that would be called upon to makestrategic decisions in areas that are not addressed by existing procedures.Licensees and applicants may wish to consider incorporating these concepts inplanning and conducting off-year emergency response exercises. i-nadd4F4-en,4c4ersees-may-w4-sh-te-oons rsrlflrPRk rgeneri-e---PRA f o in selecting other reallsti exercise osenarf-ix.Reference:The revision to the exercise frequency requirements of 10 CFR Part 50,Appendix E has been previously discussed in IE Information Notice 85-55,"Revised Emergency Exercise Frequency Rule."No specific action or written response is required by this information notice.If you have any questions about this matter, please contact the technicalcontact listed below or the Regional Administrator of the appropriate regionaloffice.Charles E. Rossi, DirectorDivision of Operational Events AssessmentOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
| |
|
| |
|
| ===Technical Contact:===
| | IRB:DOA:AEOD |
| Cheryl A. Sakenas, AEOD(301) 492-9004Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information NoticesN105*SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES D/DOEA:NRR C/OGCB:DOEA:NRR D/DREP:NRR~4 CCERossi CHBerlinger FCongel J10/ /87 10/I /87 10/j5/87 II.l*PPMB:ARM Of O Ut:NRR IRB:DOA:AEOD C :A C/PEPB:DR flRTechEd JE~ msey CASakons o l';r LV DBMatthew l09/29/87 10/13/87 ! /87 _ 10/1 /87 10/15/87 IN 87-XXOctober xx, 1987 through each emergency class, advance opportunity to activate response facili-ties may not occur. The flexibility within the requirements allows for thedevelopment of other realistic scenarios which, in turn, can improve emergencyresponse capability.10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.3.f, states that "licensees shallenable any State or local government located within the plume exposure pathwayEPZ to participate in annual exercises when requested by such State or localgovernment." To satisfy this requirement, it may be necessary for licensees todevelop an exercise scenario which provides opportunities to test the appropri-ate aspects of the offsite response plan. Such participation may need to benegotiated between the licensee and the offsite authorities.Licensees that have conducted realistic and interactive exercises have identi-fied and corrected weaknesses in their ability to respond to such simulatedonsite events as fire, loss of electrical power, and equipment failure. Theresponse of personnel and availability and utilization of alternate equipmentto mitigate simulated severe off-normal plant conditions have been challengingand have led some licensees to conduct further training and provide addedprocedures and support equipment. In addition, interactive exercises canprovide a training opportunity for personnel that would be called upon to makestrategic decisions in areas that are not addressed by existing procedures.Licensees and applicants may wish to consider incorporating these concepts inplanning and conducting off-year emergency r7sponse exercises. 7n aoldtov&, l'4nfolb' oIt7Eer trho rtmtt of pdste or Vancieif P.4Reference: 4A leaAect'm1 .Eovr tramitc eewrta 1 s1¢nQrO.The revision to the exercise frequency requirements of 10 CFR Part 50,Appendix E has been previously discussed in IE Information Notice 85-55,"Revised Emergency Exercise Frequency Rule."No specific action or written response is required by this information notice.If you have any questions about this matter, please contact the ftgoena4JAdm4fistratc w-ef-the-approprH -e5he-t;heona4o*4o t44#-ef+ce% +tchnijcs cow otAjt1tad blksv or the flQonl Adef4inM.tmtcr dlf en aopprocrte steil *Charles E. Rossi, DirectorDivision of Operational Events AssessmentOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
| |
|
| |
|
| ===Technical Contact:===
| | C/IRB:DOA:AEOD |
| Cheryl A. Sakenas, AEOD(301) 492-9004Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
| |
|
| |
|
| IN 87-XXOctober xx, 1987 through each emergency class, advance opportunity to activate response facili-ties may not occur. The flexibility within the requirements allows for thedevelopment of other realistic scenarios which, in turn, can improve emergencyresponse capability.10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.3.f, states that "licensees shallenable any State or local government located within the plume exposure pathwayEPZ to participate in annual exercises when requested by such State or localgovernment." To satisfy this requirement, it may be necessary for licensees todevelop an exercise scenario which provides opportunities to test the appropri-ate aspects of the offsite response plan. Such participation may need to benegotiated between the licensee and the offsite authorities.Licensees that have conducted realistic and interactive exercises have identi-fied and corrected weaknesses in their ability to respond to such simulatedonsite events as fire, loss of electrical power, and equipment failure. Theresponse of personnel and availability and utilization of alternate equipmentto mitigate simulated severe off-normal plant conditions have been challengingand have led some licensees to conduct further training and provide addedprocedures and support equipment. In addition, interactive exercises canprovide a training opportunity for personnel that would be called upon to makestrategic decisions in areas that are not addressed by existing procedures.Licensees and applicants may wish to consider incorporating these concepts inplanning and conducti o -year emergency respopse exercises. Irnh s io ¢ MA J WtA to ther lth rfts wrt t < aoh4t ao"#Fsc PX4 orReference: f.^c^u Pnd hkisbk5 In oel4tIVn ceewr nflwi*tlc e~Gfrci6 fermn os.The revision to the exercise frequency requirements of 10 CFR Part 50,Appendix E has been previously discussed in IE Information Notice 85-55,"Revised Emergency Exercise Frequency Rule."No specific action or written response is required by this information notice.If you have any questions about this matter, please contact the RegionalAdministrator of the appropriate regional office or this office.Charles E. Rossi, DirectorDivision of Operational Events AssessmentOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
| | C/PEPB:DREP:NRR |
|
| |
|
| ===Technical Contact:===
| | TechEM J!Ramsey tJtakenas |
| Cheryl A. Sakenas, AEOD(301) 492-9004Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices*SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES D/DOEA:NRR C/OGCB:DOEA:NRR D/DREP:NRRCERossi CHBerlinger FCongel10/ /87 10/ /87 10/ /87*PPMB:ARM OGCB:DOEA:NRR IRB:DOA:AEOD C/IRB:DOA:AEOD C/PEPB:DREP:NRRTechEd JERamsey CASakenas KEPerkins DBMatthews09/29/87 10/ /87 10/ /87 10/ /87 10/ /87
| |
| -I >IN 87-XXSeptember xx, 1987 through each emergency class, advance opportunity to activate response facili-ties, for example, may not occur. This flexibility allows for the developmentof more realistic scenarios which, in turn, can improve emergency responsecapability.10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.3.f states that "Licensees shallenable any State or local government located within the plume exposure pathwayEPZ to participate in annual exercises when requested by such State or localgovernment." In order to satisfy these requirements, it may be necessary forlicensees to develop an exercise scenario which provides opportunities to testthe appropriate aspects of the offsite response plan. The particulars of suchparticipation may need to be negotiated between the licensee and the offsiteauthorities.Licensees that have conducted more realistic and interactive exercises haveidentified and corrected weaknesses in their ability to respond to such simu-lated onsite events as fire, loss of electrical power, and equipment failure.The response of personnel and availability and utilization of alternate equip-ment to mitigate simulated severe off-normal plant conditions have been chal-lenging and have led some licensees to conduct further training and provideadded procedures and support equipment.Interactive exercises can provide a training opportunity for personnel thatwould be called upon to make strategic decisions should an actual event pro-gress beyond existing procedures. Licensees and applicants may wish to con-sider incorporating these concepts in planning and conducting off-year emer-gency response exercises.Reference:The revision to the exercise frequency requirements of 10 CFR Part 50,Appendix E has been previously discussed in IE Information Notice 85-55,"Revised Emergency Exercise Frequency Rule."No specific action or written response is required by this informationnotice. If you have any questions about this matter, please contact theRegional Administrator of the appropriate regional office or this office.Charles E. Rossi, DirectorDivision of Operational Events AssessmentOffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
| |
|
| |
|
| ===Technical Contact:===
| | WSPerkins |
| Cheryl A. Sakenas, AEOD(301) 492-9004Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information NoticesD/DOEA:NRR C/OGCB:DOEA:NRR D/DREP:NRRJ EIpssi CHBerlinger FCongel(0 /87 ep/ /87 &/ /87PPMB:AR24 OGCB:DOEA:NRR IRB:DOA:AEOD C/IRB:DOA:AEOD C/PEPB:DREP:NRRTechEM J!Ramsey tJtakenas WSPerkins atthews09/f27/87 ANY /87 t/87 A/ I/ /87lo
| |
|
| |
|
| }} | | atthews 09/f27/87 ANY /87 t/87 A/ I/ /87 lo}} |
|
| |
|
| {{Information notice-Nav}} | | {{Information notice-Nav}} |
Emergency Response ExercisesML031130496 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Three Mile Island, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, 05000000, Zimmer, Fort Saint Vrain, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant |
---|
Issue date: |
10/23/1987 |
---|
From: |
Rossi C E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
---|
To: |
|
---|
References |
---|
IN-87-054, NUDOCS 8710190144 |
Download: ML031130496 (9) |
|
Similar Documents at Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Three Mile Island, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, 05000000, Zimmer, Fort Saint Vrain, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant |
---|
Category:NRC Information Notice
MONTHYEARInformation Notice 2020-02, Flex Diesel Generator Operational Challenges2020-09-15015 September 2020 Flex Diesel Generator Operational Challenges ML20225A0322020-09-0303 September 2020 NRC Choice Letter to NAC International with Attached Safety Inspection Report, IR 0721015/2020201, February 24-27, 2020 and July 22, 2020, Inspection of NAC International in Norcross, Georgia Information Notice 2012-09, PWROG-16043-NP-A, Revision 2, PWROG Program to Address NRC Information Notice 2012-09: Irradiation Effects on Fuel Assembly Spacer Grid Crush Strength for Westinghouse and CE PWR Fuel Designs.2019-11-30030 November 2019 PWROG-16043-NP-A, Revision 2, PWROG Program to Address NRC Information Notice 2012-09: Irradiation Effects on Fuel Assembly Spacer Grid Crush Strength for Westinghouse and CE PWR Fuel Designs. Information Notice 2011-20, NRC060 - NRC Information Notice 2011-20: Concrete Degradation by Alkali-Silica Reaction (Nov. 18, 2011)2019-07-24024 July 2019 NRC060 - NRC Information Notice 2011-20: Concrete Degradation by Alkali-Silica Reaction (Nov. 18, 2011) ML19196A2452019-07-15015 July 2019 Public Notice - Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 - Exigent Amendment to Facility Operating License Information Notice 2019-01, Inadequate Evaluation of Temporary Alterations2019-03-12012 March 2019 Inadequate Evaluation of Temporary Alterations ML16028A3082016-04-27027 April 2016 NRC Information Notice; IN 2016-05: Operating Experience Regarding Complications From a Loss of Instrumentation Air Information Notice 2015-05, Inoperability of Auxiliary and Emergency Feedwater Auto Start Circuits on Loss of Main Feedwater Pumps2015-05-12012 May 2015 Inoperability of Auxiliary and Emergency Feedwater Auto Start Circuits on Loss of Main Feedwater Pumps Information Notice 2015-05, Inoperability Of Auxiliary And Emergency Feedwater Auto Start Circuits On Loss Of Main Feedwater Pumps2015-05-12012 May 2015 Inoperability Of Auxiliary And Emergency Feedwater Auto Start Circuits On Loss Of Main Feedwater Pumps Information Notice 2013-20, OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000538-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-20: Steam Generator Channel Head and Tubesheet Degradation (October 3, 2013) (ML13204A143)2013-10-0303 October 2013 OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000538-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-20: Steam Generator Channel Head and Tubesheet Degradation (October 3, 2013) (ML13204A143) Information Notice 2013-20, Official Exhibit - NYS000538-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-20: Steam Generator Channel Head and Tubesheet Degradation (October 3, 2013) (ML13204A143)2013-10-0303 October 2013 Official Exhibit - NYS000538-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-20: Steam Generator Channel Head and Tubesheet Degradation (October 3, 2013) (ML13204A143) Information Notice 2013-11, OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000551-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-11: Crack-Like Indication at Dents/Dings and in the Freespan Region of Thermally Treated Alloy 600 Steam Generator Tubes (July 3, 2013)2013-07-0303 July 2013 OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000551-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-11: Crack-Like Indication at Dents/Dings and in the Freespan Region of Thermally Treated Alloy 600 Steam Generator Tubes (July 3, 2013) Information Notice 2013-11, Official Exhibit - NYS000551-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-11: Crack-Like Indication at Dents/Dings and in the Freespan Region of Thermally Treated Alloy 600 Steam Generator Tubes (July 3, 2013)2013-07-0303 July 2013 Official Exhibit - NYS000551-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-11: Crack-Like Indication at Dents/Dings and in the Freespan Region of Thermally Treated Alloy 600 Steam Generator Tubes (July 3, 2013) Information Notice 2010-12, Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Contain2012-08-17017 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Containment Liner Cor Information Notice 2010-12, Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Con2012-08-17017 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Containment Liner Cor Information Notice 2010-12, Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend And/Or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notic2012-08-17017 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend And/Or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Containment Liner Cor Information Notice 2012-13, Boraflex Degradation Surveillance Programs and Corrective Actions in the Spent Fuel Pool2012-08-10010 August 2012 Boraflex Degradation Surveillance Programs and Corrective Actions in the Spent Fuel Pool Information Notice 2012-13, Boraflex Degradation Surveillance Programs And Corrective Actions In The Spent Fuel Pool2012-08-10010 August 2012 Boraflex Degradation Surveillance Programs And Corrective Actions In The Spent Fuel Pool Information Notice 2012-11, Age Related Capacitor Degradation2012-07-23023 July 2012 Age Related Capacitor Degradation ML12031A0132012-02-0606 February 2012 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Investigation Report No. 2-2010-058, Cpn International, Inc Information Notice 2011-19, Licensee Event Reports Containing Information Pertaining to Defects to Basic Components2011-09-26026 September 2011 Licensee Event Reports Containing Information Pertaining to Defects to Basic Components Information Notice 2011-15, Steel Containment Degradation and Associated License Renewal Aging Management Issues2011-08-0101 August 2011 Steel Containment Degradation and Associated License Renewal Aging Management Issues Information Notice 2011-17, Calculation Methodologies for Operability Determinations of Gas Voids in Nuclear Power Plant Piping2011-07-26026 July 2011 Calculation Methodologies for Operability Determinations of Gas Voids in Nuclear Power Plant Piping Information Notice 2011-13, Official Exhibit - NYS000329-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (NRC in 2011-13)2011-06-29029 June 2011 Official Exhibit - NYS000329-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (NRC in 2011-13) Information Notice 2011-13, Official Exhibit - Nys000329-00-Bd01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (Nrc in 2011-13)2011-06-29029 June 2011 Official Exhibit - Nys000329-00-Bd01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (Nrc in 2011-13) Information Notice 2011-13, OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000329-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (NRC in 2011-13)2011-06-29029 June 2011 OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000329-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (NRC in 2011-13) Information Notice 2011-04, IN: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors2011-02-23023 February 2011 IN: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors Information Notice 2011-04, In: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors2011-02-23023 February 2011 In: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors Information Notice 2011-04, in: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors2011-02-23023 February 2011 in: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors Information Notice 2010-26, New England Coalition'S Motion for Leave to Reply to NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 and Entergy'S Response to the Supplement to Nec'S Petition for Commission Review of LBP-10-2010-12-30030 December 2010 New England Coalition'S Motion for Leave to Reply to NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 and Entergy'S Response to the Supplement to Nec'S Petition for Commission Review of LBP-10-19 Information Notice 2010-26, New England Coalition'S Motion for Leave to Reply to NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 and Entergy'S Response to the Supplement to Nec'S Petition for Commission Review2010-12-30030 December 2010 New England Coalition'S Motion for Leave to Reply to NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 and Entergy'S Response to the Supplement to Nec'S Petition for Commission Review of LBP-10-19 Information Notice 2010-26, 2010/12/21-NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-262010-12-21021 December 2010 2010/12/21-NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 ML13066A1872009-12-16016 December 2009 Draft NRC Information Notice 2009-xx - Underestimate of Dam Failure Frequency Used in Probabilistic Risk Assessments ML1007804482009-11-23023 November 2009 Email from Peter Bamford, NRR to Pamela Cowan, Exelon on TMI Contamination Control Event Information Notice 2009-11, NSP000059-Revised Prefiled Testimony of Northard/Petersen/Peterson-NRC Information Notice 2009-112009-07-0707 July 2009 NSP000059-Revised Prefiled Testimony of Northard/Petersen/Peterson-NRC Information Notice 2009-11 Information Notice 2009-10, Official Exhibit - NYS000019-00-BD01- NRC Information Notice 2009-10, Transformers Failures - Recent Operating Experience (Jul. 7, 2009) (NRC in 2009-10)2009-07-0707 July 2009 Official Exhibit - NYS000019-00-BD01- NRC Information Notice 2009-10, Transformers Failures - Recent Operating Experience (Jul. 7, 2009) (NRC in 2009-10) Information Notice 2009-09, Improper Flow Controller Settings Renders Injection Systems Inoperable and Surveillance Did Not Identify2009-06-19019 June 2009 Improper Flow Controller Settings Renders Injection Systems Inoperable and Surveillance Did Not Identify Information Notice 2008-12, Reactor Trip Due to Off-Site Power Fluctuation2008-07-0707 July 2008 Reactor Trip Due to Off-Site Power Fluctuation Information Notice 2008-11, Service Water System Degradation at Brunswicksteam Electric Plant Unit 12008-06-18018 June 2008 Service Water System Degradation at Brunswicksteam Electric Plant Unit 1 Information Notice 2008-04, Counterfeit Parts Supplied to Nuclear Power Plants2008-04-0707 April 2008 Counterfeit Parts Supplied to Nuclear Power Plants Information Notice 1991-09, Counterfeiting of Crane Valves2007-09-25025 September 2007 Counterfeiting of Crane Valves Information Notice 2007-28, Potential Common Cause Vulnerabilities in Essential Service Water Systems Due to Inadequate Chemistry Controls2007-09-19019 September 2007 Potential Common Cause Vulnerabilities in Essential Service Water Systems Due to Inadequate Chemistry Controls Information Notice 2007-29, Temporary Scaffolding Affects Operability of Safety-Related Equipment2007-09-17017 September 2007 Temporary Scaffolding Affects Operability of Safety-Related Equipment Information Notice 2007-14, Loss of Offsite Power and Dual-Unit Trip at Catawba Nuclear Generating Station2007-03-30030 March 2007 Loss of Offsite Power and Dual-Unit Trip at Catawba Nuclear Generating Station Information Notice 2007-06, Potential Common Cause Vulnerabilities in Essential Service Water Systems2007-02-0909 February 2007 Potential Common Cause Vulnerabilities in Essential Service Water Systems Information Notice 2007-05, Vertical Deep Draft Pump Shaft and Coupling Failures2007-02-0909 February 2007 Vertical Deep Draft Pump Shaft and Coupling Failures Information Notice 2006-31, Inadequate Fault Interrupting Rating of Breakers2006-12-26026 December 2006 Inadequate Fault Interrupting Rating of Breakers Information Notice 2006-29, Potential Common Cause Failure of Motor-operated Valves as a Result of Stem Nut Wear2006-12-14014 December 2006 Potential Common Cause Failure of Motor-operated Valves as a Result of Stem Nut Wear Information Notice 2006-29, Potential Common Cause Failure of Motor-operated Valves As a Result of Stem Nut Wear2006-12-14014 December 2006 Potential Common Cause Failure of Motor-operated Valves As a Result of Stem Nut Wear Information Notice 2006-13, E-mail from M. Mclaughlin on NRC, Regarding NRC Information Notice 2006-13: Groundwater Contamination2006-07-13013 July 2006 E-mail from M. Mclaughlin on NRC, Regarding NRC Information Notice 2006-13: Groundwater Contamination 2020-09-03 The following query condition could not be considered due to this wiki's restrictions on query size or depth: <code> [[:Beaver Valley]] OR [[:Millstone]] OR [[:Hatch]] OR [[:Monticello]] OR [[:Calvert Cliffs]] OR [[:Dresden]] OR [[:Davis Besse]] OR [[:Peach Bottom]] OR [[:Browns Ferry]] OR [[:Salem]] OR [[:Oconee]] OR [[:Mcguire]] OR [[:Nine Mile Point]] OR [[:Palisades]] OR [[:Palo Verde]] OR [[:Perry]] OR [[:Indian Point]] OR [[:Fermi]] OR [[:Kewaunee]] OR [[:Catawba]] OR [[:Harris]] OR [[:Wolf Creek]] OR [[:Saint Lucie]] OR [[:Point Beach]] OR [[:Oyster Creek]] OR [[:Watts Bar]] OR [[:Hope Creek]] OR [[:Grand Gulf]] OR [[:Cooper]] OR [[:Sequoyah]] OR [[:Byron]] OR [[:Pilgrim]] OR [[:Arkansas Nuclear]] OR [[:Three Mile Island]] OR [[:Braidwood]] OR [[:Susquehanna]] OR [[:Summer]] OR [[:Prairie Island]] OR [[:Columbia]] OR [[:Seabrook]] OR [[:Brunswick]] OR [[:Surry]] OR [[:Limerick]] OR [[:North Anna]] OR [[:Turkey Point]] OR [[:River Bend]] OR [[:Vermont Yankee]] OR [[:Crystal River]] OR [[:Haddam Neck]] OR [[:Ginna]] OR [[:Diablo Canyon]] OR [[:Callaway]] OR [[:Vogtle]] OR [[:Waterford]] OR [[:Duane Arnold]] OR [[:Farley]] OR [[:Robinson]] OR [[:Clinton]] OR [[:South Texas]] OR [[:San Onofre]] OR [[:Cook]] OR [[:Comanche Peak]] OR [[:Yankee Rowe]] OR [[:Maine Yankee]] OR [[:Quad Cities]] OR [[:Humboldt Bay]] OR [[:La Crosse]] OR [[:Big Rock Point]] OR [[:Rancho Seco]] OR [[:Zion]] OR [[:Midland]] OR [[:Bellefonte]] OR [[:Fort Calhoun]] OR [[:FitzPatrick]] OR [[:McGuire]] OR [[:LaSalle]] OR [[:05000000]] OR [[:Zimmer]] OR [[:Fort Saint Vrain]] OR [[:Shoreham]] OR [[:Satsop]] OR [[:Trojan]] OR [[:Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant]] </code>.
[Table view]The following query condition could not be considered due to this wiki's restrictions on query size or depth: <code> [[:Beaver Valley]] OR [[:Millstone]] OR [[:Hatch]] OR [[:Monticello]] OR [[:Calvert Cliffs]] OR [[:Dresden]] OR [[:Davis Besse]] OR [[:Peach Bottom]] OR [[:Browns Ferry]] OR [[:Salem]] OR [[:Oconee]] OR [[:Mcguire]] OR [[:Nine Mile Point]] OR [[:Palisades]] OR [[:Palo Verde]] OR [[:Perry]] OR [[:Indian Point]] OR [[:Fermi]] OR [[:Kewaunee]] OR [[:Catawba]] OR [[:Harris]] OR [[:Wolf Creek]] OR [[:Saint Lucie]] OR [[:Point Beach]] OR [[:Oyster Creek]] OR [[:Watts Bar]] OR [[:Hope Creek]] OR [[:Grand Gulf]] OR [[:Cooper]] OR [[:Sequoyah]] OR [[:Byron]] OR [[:Pilgrim]] OR [[:Arkansas Nuclear]] OR [[:Three Mile Island]] OR [[:Braidwood]] OR [[:Susquehanna]] OR [[:Summer]] OR [[:Prairie Island]] OR [[:Columbia]] OR [[:Seabrook]] OR [[:Brunswick]] OR [[:Surry]] OR [[:Limerick]] OR [[:North Anna]] OR [[:Turkey Point]] OR [[:River Bend]] OR [[:Vermont Yankee]] OR [[:Crystal River]] OR [[:Haddam Neck]] OR [[:Ginna]] OR [[:Diablo Canyon]] OR [[:Callaway]] OR [[:Vogtle]] OR [[:Waterford]] OR [[:Duane Arnold]] OR [[:Farley]] OR [[:Robinson]] OR [[:Clinton]] OR [[:South Texas]] OR [[:San Onofre]] OR [[:Cook]] OR [[:Comanche Peak]] OR [[:Yankee Rowe]] OR [[:Maine Yankee]] OR [[:Quad Cities]] OR [[:Humboldt Bay]] OR [[:La Crosse]] OR [[:Big Rock Point]] OR [[:Rancho Seco]] OR [[:Zion]] OR [[:Midland]] OR [[:Bellefonte]] OR [[:Fort Calhoun]] OR [[:FitzPatrick]] OR [[:McGuire]] OR [[:LaSalle]] OR [[:05000000]] OR [[:Zimmer]] OR [[:Fort Saint Vrain]] OR [[:Shoreham]] OR [[:Satsop]] OR [[:Trojan]] OR [[:Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant]] </code>. |
SSINS No.: 6835 IN 87-54 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 October 23, 1987 NRC INFORMATION
NOTICE NO. 87-54: EMERGENCY
RESPONSE EXERCISES
Addressees
All holders of operating
licenses or construction
permits for nuclear power reactors.
Purpose
- This information
notice is being provided to remind addressees
of flexibility
that exists in certain rewuiremnents
contiined
in emergency
planning rules. It is expected that recipientsvwill
review&the
information
for applicability
to their program. However, suggestions
contained
in this information
notice do not constitute
NRC requirements';
therefore,'no'specific
action or written response is'required.
Description
of Circumstances:
To satisfy the current requirements
of 10 CFR 50.47 and 10 CFR Part 50, Appen-dix E, each licensee must' annually exercise its emergency
plan. In addition, each licensee is required to exercise with offsite authorities
such that the State and local government
emergency
plans'are
exercised
biennially.
Currently there are no specific requirements
which address whether each exercise scenario must lead to the declaration
of A General Emergency.
Mowever, perhaps as a carryover
from the 'previous
requirements
for annual State and local exercises, almost all exercise scenarios
are planned to progress to a General Emergency condition.
Discussion:
While it may be-appropriate
for biennial offsite exercises
to proceed to a General Emergency
declaration, exercises
other than biennial offsite exercises (off-year
exercises)
are not required to proceed to severe core damace. Such exercises
can provide an opportunity
forlmore realistic
emergency
response trainine and evaluation
of licensee staff. For example, before severe core damage would be expected to occur, the operating
staff may be given the oppor-tunity to diagnose and attempt-to
correct the problem through an interactive
scenario.
In addition, some exercise scenarios.
may be. designed with initiating
events at the Alert or Site Area Emergency
classification.
Since actual events may go directly to these higher level classifications
without sequencing
8710190144
' -is'.IN 87-54 October 23, 1987 through each emergency
classi advance.Opportunity
to-activate
response facili-ties may not occur. The flexibility
within the requirements
allows for the development
of other realistic
scenarios
which, in turn, can improve emergency response capability.
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.3.f, states that "licensees
shall enable any State or local government
located within the plume exposure.pathway
EPZ to participate
in annual exercises
when requested
by such State or local government." To satisfy this requirement, it may be necessary
for licensees
to develop an exercise scenario which provides opportunities
to test the appropri-ate aspects of the offsite response plan. Such participation
may need to be negotiated
between the.licensee
and the offsite.authorities...
Licensees
that have conducted
realistic
and interactive
exercises
have identi-fied and corrected
weaknesses
in their ability to respond to such simulated
- onsite events as fire, loss of electrical
power, and equipment
failure. The response of personnel
and availability
and utilizationof
alternate.equipment, to mitigate simulated
severe, off-normal
plant conditions
have been;.challenging
and.have led somellicensees
to conduct further training and provide added.procedures
and support equipment.
In addition, interactive
exercises-can
provide a training opportunity
for personnel
that Would be called upon to make strategic
decisions
in areas that are not addressed
by existing procedures.-Licensees-arni
applc-a-its- may-_fShto-cons4de -neorpet-tig--thesetconcep~tsn, planning and conducting
off-year emergency
response-exercises.-
The revision to the exercise frequency
requirements
of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E has been previously
discussed
in.IE Information
Notice 85-55,: "Revised Emergency
Exercise Frequency
Rule." No specific action or written response is required by.this information!notice., If you have any questions
about.this
matter, please contact.the
technical.
contact listed below or the Regional Administrator
of the appropriate
regional office.Charles E. Rossi, Director Division of Operational
Events Assessment
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical
Contact: Cheryl A. Sakenas, AEOD .(301) 492-9004 Attachment:
List of Recently Issued NRC Information
Notices
4I-Attachment.
IN-87-54 October 23, 1987.LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED INFORMATION
NOTICES 1987 i I-I k, I Information
Date of Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to 87-53 87-52 87-51 87-50 Auxiliary
Feedwater
Pump Trips Resulting
from Low Suction Pressure Insulation
Breakdown
of Silicone Rubber-Insulated
Single Conductor
Cables During High Potential
Testing Failure of Low Pressure Safety Injection
Pump Due to Seal Problems Potential
LOCA at High-and Low-Pressure
Tnterfaces
from Fire Damage 10/20/87 10/16/87 10/13/87 10/9/87 All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors.All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors.All nuclear power reactor facilities
holding an OL or CP.All nuclear power reactor facilities
holding an OL or CP.87-49 Deficiencies
in Outside.! -Containment
Flooding -Protection
10/9/87 i o... .1 '7 , .,w E ..All nuclear power reactor facilities
holding an OL or CP.87-48 87-47 87-46 87-45 Information
Concerning
the Use of Anaerobic
Adhesive/Sealants Transportation
of Radio-graphy Devices Undetected
Loss of Reactor Coolant Recent Safety-Related
Violations
of NRC Requirements
by Industrial
Radiography
Licensees 10/9/87 10/5/87 9/30/87 9/25/87 All nuclear power reactor facilities
holding an OL or CP.All NRC licensees authorized
to manu-facture, distribute
and/or operate radio-graphic exposure devices and/or source changers.All PWR holding facilities
on OL or CP.All NRC licensees authorized
to possess and use sealed sources for industrial
radio-graphy.OL = Operating
License CP = Construction
Permit
IN 87-54 October 23, 1987 through each emergency
class, advance opportunity
to activate response facili-ties may not occur. The flexibility
within the requirements
allows for the development
of other realistic
scenarios
which, in turn, can improve emergency response capability.
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.3.f, states that "licensees
shall enable any State or local government
located within the plume exposure pathway EPZ to participate
in annual exercises
when requested
by such State or local government." To satisfy this requirement, it may be necessary
for licensees
to develop an exercise scenario which provides opportunities
to test the appropri-ate aspects of the offsite response plan. Such participation
may need to be negotiated
between the licensee and the offsite authorities.
Licensees
that have conducted
realistic
and interactive
exercises
have identi-fied and corrected
weaknesses
in their ability to respond to such simulated onsite events as fire, loss of electrical
power, and equipment
failure. The response of personnel
and availability
and utilization
of alternate
equipment to mitigate simulated
severe off-normal
plant conditions
have been challenging
and have led some licensees
to conduct further training and provide added procedures
and support equipment.
In addition, interactive
exercises
can provide a training opportunity
for personnel
that would be called upon to make strategic
decisions
in areas that are not addressed
by existing procedures.
Licensees
and applicants
may wish to consider incorporating
these concepts in planning and conducting
off-year emergency
response exercises.
The revision to the exercise frequency
requirements
of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E has been previously
discussed
in TE Information
Notice 85-55,"Revised Emergency
Exercise Frequency
Rule." No specific action or written response is required by this information
notice.If you have any questions
about this matter, please contact the technical contact listed below or the Regional Administrator
of the appropriate
regional office.Charles E. Rossi, Director Division of Operational
Events Assessment
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical
Contact: Cheryl A. Sakenas, AEOD (301) 492-9004 Attachment:
List of Recently Issued NRC Information
Notices*SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES
R C/OGCB:DOEA:NRR
D/DREP:NRR
CHBerlinger
FCongel 87 10/ /87 10/ /87*PPMB:ARM
OGCB:DOEA:NRR
IR : OA:A D C/IRB:DOA:AEOD
C/PEPB:DREP:NRR
TechEd JERamsey CASakenas
KEPerkins
DBMatthews
09/29/87 10/ /87 10/ /87 10/ /87 10/ /87 IN 87-XX October xx, 1987 through each emergency
class, advance opportunity
to activate response facili-ties may not occur. The flexibility
within the requirements
allows for the development
of other realistic
scenarios
which, in turn, can improve emergency response capability.
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.3.f, states that "licensees
shall enable any State or local government
located within the plume exposure pathway EPZ to participate
in annual exercises
when requested
by such State or local government." To satisfy this requirement, it may be necessary
for licensees
to develop an exercise scenario which provides opportunities
to test the appropri-ate aspects of the offsite response plan. Such participation
may need to be negotiated
between the licensee and the offsite authorities.
Licensees
that have conducted
realistic
and interactive
exercises
have identi-fied and corrected
weaknesses
in their ability to respond to such simulated onsite events as fire, loss of electrical
power, and equipment
failure. The response of personnel
and availability
and utilization
of alternate
equipment to mitigate simulated
severe off-normal
plant conditions
have been challenging
and have led some licensees
to conduct further training and provide added procedures
and support equipment.
In addition, interactive
exercises
can provide a training opportunity
for personnel
that would be called upon to make strategic
decisions
in areas that are not addressed
by existing procedures.
Licensees
and applicants
may wish to consider incorporating
these concepts in planning and conducting
off-year emergency
response exercises.
i-nadd4F4-en, 4c4ersees-may-w4-sh-te-oons
rsrlflrPRk
r generi-e---PRA
f o in selecting
other reallsti exercise osenarf-ix.
Reference:
The revision to the exercise frequency
requirements
of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E has been previously
discussed
in IE Information
Notice 85-55,"Revised Emergency
Exercise Frequency
Rule." No specific action or written response is required by this information
notice.If you have any questions
about this matter, please contact the technical contact listed below or the Regional Administrator
of the appropriate
regional office.Charles E. Rossi, Director Division of Operational
Events Assessment
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical
Contact: Cheryl A. Sakenas, AEOD (301) 492-9004 Attachment:
List of Recently Issued NRC Information
Notices N105*SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES
D/DOEA:NRR
C/OGCB:DOEA:NRR
D/DREP:NRR~4 C CERossi CHBerlinger
FCongel J 10/ /87 10/I /87 10/j5/87 II.l*PPMB:ARM
Of O Ut:NRR IRB:DOA:AEOD
C :A C/PEPB:DR
flR TechEd JE~ msey CASakons o l';r LV DBMatthew
l 09/29/87 10/13/87 ! /87 _ 10/1 /87 10/15/87 IN 87-XX October xx, 1987 through each emergency
class, advance opportunity
to activate response facili-ties may not occur. The flexibility
within the requirements
allows for the development
of other realistic
scenarios
which, in turn, can improve emergency response capability.
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.3.f, states that "licensees
shall enable any State or local government
located within the plume exposure pathway EPZ to participate
in annual exercises
when requested
by such State or local government." To satisfy this requirement, it may be necessary
for licensees
to develop an exercise scenario which provides opportunities
to test the appropri-ate aspects of the offsite response plan. Such participation
may need to be negotiated
between the licensee and the offsite authorities.
Licensees
that have conducted
realistic
and interactive
exercises
have identi-fied and corrected
weaknesses
in their ability to respond to such simulated onsite events as fire, loss of electrical
power, and equipment
failure. The response of personnel
and availability
and utilization
of alternate
equipment to mitigate simulated
severe off-normal
plant conditions
have been challenging
and have led some licensees
to conduct further training and provide added procedures
and support equipment.
In addition, interactive
exercises
can provide a training opportunity
for personnel
that would be called upon to make strategic
decisions
in areas that are not addressed
by existing procedures.
Licensees
and applicants
may wish to consider incorporating
these concepts in planning and conducting
off-year emergency
r 7 sponse exercises.
7n aoldtov&, l'4nfolb' oIt7Eer trho rtmtt of pdste or Vancieif P.4 Reference:
4A leaAect'm1 .Eovr tramitc eewrta 1 s1¢nQrO.The revision to the exercise frequency
requirements
of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E has been previously
discussed
in IE Information
Notice 85-55,"Revised Emergency
Exercise Frequency
Rule." No specific action or written response is required by this information
notice.If you have any questions
about this matter, please contact the ftgoena4 JAdm4fistratc
w-ef-the-approprH -e5he-t;heona4o*4o
t44#-ef+ce%
+tchnijcs
cow otAjt 1tad blksv or the flQonl Adef4inM.tmtcr
dlf en aopprocrte
steil *Charles E. Rossi, Director Division of Operational
Events Assessment
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical
Contact: Cheryl A. Sakenas, AEOD (301) 492-9004 Attachment:
List of Recently Issued NRC Information
Notices
IN 87-XX October xx, 1987 through each emergency
class, advance opportunity
to activate response facili-ties may not occur. The flexibility
within the requirements
allows for the development
of other realistic
scenarios
which, in turn, can improve emergency response capability.
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.3.f, states that "licensees
shall enable any State or local government
located within the plume exposure pathway EPZ to participate
in annual exercises
when requested
by such State or local government." To satisfy this requirement, it may be necessary
for licensees
to develop an exercise scenario which provides opportunities
to test the appropri-ate aspects of the offsite response plan. Such participation
may need to be negotiated
between the licensee and the offsite authorities.
Licensees
that have conducted
realistic
and interactive
exercises
have identi-fied and corrected
weaknesses
in their ability to respond to such simulated onsite events as fire, loss of electrical
power, and equipment
failure. The response of personnel
and availability
and utilization
of alternate
equipment to mitigate simulated
severe off-normal
plant conditions
have been challenging
and have led some licensees
to conduct further training and provide added procedures
and support equipment.
In addition, interactive
exercises
can provide a training opportunity
for personnel
that would be called upon to make strategic
decisions
in areas that are not addressed
by existing procedures.
Licensees
and applicants
may wish to consider incorporating
these concepts in planning and conducti o -year emergency
respopse exercises.
Irn h s io ¢ MA J WtA to ther lth rfts wrt t < aoh4t ao"#Fsc PX4 or Reference:
f.^c^u Pnd hkisbk5 In oel4tIVn ceewr nflwi*tlc
e~Gfrci6 fermn os.The revision to the exercise frequency
requirements
of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E has been previously
discussed
in IE Information
Notice 85-55,"Revised Emergency
Exercise Frequency
Rule." No specific action or written response is required by this information
notice.If you have any questions
about this matter, please contact the Regional Administrator
of the appropriate
regional office or this office.Charles E. Rossi, Director Division of Operational
Events Assessment
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical
Contact: Cheryl A. Sakenas, AEOD (301) 492-9004 Attachment:
List of Recently Issued NRC Information
Notices*SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES
D/DOEA:NRR
C/OGCB:DOEA:NRR
D/DREP:NRR
CERossi CHBerlinger
FCongel 10/ /87 10/ /87 10/ /87*PPMB:ARM
OGCB:DOEA:NRR
IRB:DOA:AEOD
C/IRB:DOA:AEOD
C/PEPB:DREP:NRR
TechEd JERamsey CASakenas
KEPerkins
DBMatthews
09/29/87 10/ /87 10/ /87 10/ /87 10/ /87
-I >IN 87-XX September
xx, 1987 through each emergency
class, advance opportunity
to activate response facili-ties, for example, may not occur. This flexibility
allows for the development
of more realistic
scenarios
which, in turn, can improve emergency
response capability.
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.3.f states that "Licensees
shall enable any State or local government
located within the plume exposure pathway EPZ to participate
in annual exercises
when requested
by such State or local government." In order to satisfy these requirements, it may be necessary
for licensees
to develop an exercise scenario which provides opportunities
to test the appropriate
aspects of the offsite response plan. The particulars
of such participation
may need to be negotiated
between the licensee and the offsite authorities.
Licensees
that have conducted
more realistic
and interactive
exercises
have identified
and corrected
weaknesses
in their ability to respond to such simu-lated onsite events as fire, loss of electrical
power, and equipment
failure.The response of personnel
and availability
and utilization
of alternate
equip-ment to mitigate simulated
severe off-normal
plant conditions
have been chal-lenging and have led some licensees
to conduct further training and provide added procedures
and support equipment.
Interactive
exercises
can provide a training opportunity
for personnel
that would be called upon to make strategic
decisions
should an actual event pro-gress beyond existing procedures.
Licensees
and applicants
may wish to con-sider incorporating
these concepts in planning and conducting
off-year emer-gency response exercises.
Reference:
The revision to the exercise frequency
requirements
of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E has been previously
discussed
in IE Information
Notice 85-55,"Revised Emergency
Exercise Frequency
Rule." No specific action or written response is required by this information
notice. If you have any questions
about this matter, please contact the Regional Administrator
of the appropriate
regional office or this office.Charles E. Rossi, Director Division of Operational
Events Assessment
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical
Contact: Cheryl A. Sakenas, AEOD (301) 492-9004 Attachment:
List of Recently Issued NRC Information
Notices D/DOEA:NRR
C/OGCB:DOEA:NRR
D/DREP:NRR
J EIpssi CHBerlinger
FCongel (0 /87 ep/ /87 &/ /87 PPMB:AR2 4 OGCB:DOEA:NRR
IRB:DOA:AEOD
C/IRB:DOA:AEOD
C/PEPB:DREP:NRR
TechEM J!Ramsey tJtakenas
WSPerkins
atthews 09/f27/87 ANY /87 t/87 A/ I/ /87 lo
|
---|
|
list | - Information Notice 1987-02, Inadequate Seismic Qualification of Diaphragm Valves by Mathematical Modeling and Analysis (13 January 1987, Topic: Boric Acid)
- Information Notice 1987-03, Segregation of Hazardous and Low-Level Radioactive Wastes (15 January 1987, Topic: Boric Acid)
- Information Notice 1987-04, Diesel Generator Fails Test Because of Degraded Fuel (16 January 1987, Topic: Boric Acid, Coatings)
- Information Notice 1987-05, Miswiring in a Westinghouse Rod Control System (2 February 1987, Topic: Unanalyzed Condition, Boric Acid)
- Information Notice 1987-06, Loss of Suction to Low-Pressure Service Water System Pumps Resulting from Loss of Siphon (30 January 1987, Topic: Boric Acid)
- Information Notice 1987-07, Quality Control of Onsite Dewatering/Solidification Operations by Outside Contractors (3 February 1987, Topic: Boric Acid, Process Control Program)
- Information Notice 1987-08, Degraded Motor Leads in Limitorque DC Motor Operators (4 February 1987, Topic: Boric Acid, Anchor Darling)
- Information Notice 1987-09, Emergency Diesel Generator Room Cooling Design Deficiency (5 February 1987, Topic: Probabilistic Risk Assessment)
- Information Notice 1987-10, Potential for Water Hammer During Restart of Residual Heat Removal Pumps (11 February 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-11, Enclosure of Vital Equipment within Designated Vital Areas (13 February 1987, Topic: Contraband)
- Information Notice 1987-11, Enclosure of Vital Equipment Within Designated Vital Areas (13 February 1987, Topic: Contraband)
- Information Notice 1987-12, Potential Problems with Metal Clad Circuit Breakers, General Electric Type AKF-2-25 (13 February 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-13, Potential for High Radiation Fields Following Loss of Water from Fuel Pool (24 February 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-14, Actuation of Fire Suppression System Causing Inoperability of Safety-Related Ventilation Equipment (23 March 1987, Topic: Water hammer)
- Information Notice 1987-15, Compliance with the Posting Requirements of Subsection 223b of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Amended (25 March 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-15, Compliance with the Posting Requirements of Subsection 223B of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, As Amended (25 March 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-16, Degradation of Static O Ring Pressure Switches (2 April 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-17, Response Time of Scram Instrument Volume Level Detectors (7 April 1987, Topic: Scram Discharge Volume)
- Information Notice 1987-18, Unauthorized Service on Teletherapy Units by Nonlicensed Maintenance Personnel (8 April 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-19, Perforation and Cracking of Rod Cluster Control Assemblies (9 April 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-20, Hydrogen Leak in Auxiliary Building (20 April 1987, Topic: Excess Flow Check Valve)
- Information Notice 1987-21, Shutdown Order Issued Because Licensed Operators Asleep While on Duty (11 May 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-22, Operator Licensing Requalification Examinations at Nonpower Reactors (22 May 1987, Topic: License Renewal)
- Information Notice 1987-23, Loss of Decay Heat Removal During Low Reactor Coolant Level Operation (27 May 1987, Topic: Boric Acid)
- Information Notice 1987-24, Operational Experience Involving Losses of Electrical Inverters (4 June 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-25, Potentially Significant Problems Resulting from Human Error Involving Wrong Unit, Wrong Train, or Wrong Component Events (11 June 1987, Topic: Boric Acid, Fire Watch, Overspeed trip)
- Information Notice 1987-25, Potentially Significant Problems Resulting From Human Error Involving Wrong Unit, Wrong Train, or Wrong Component Events (11 June 1987, Topic: Boric Acid, Fire Watch)
- Information Notice 1987-26, Cracks in Stiffening Rings on 48-Inch-Diameter UF6 Cylinders (11 June 1987, Topic: Boric Acid)
- Information Notice 1987-26, Cracks in Stiffening Rings on 48-Inch-Diameter Uf6 Cylinders (11 June 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-27, Iranian Official Implies Vague Threat to U.S. Resources (10 June 1987, Topic: Boric Acid)
- Information Notice 1987-28, Air Systems Problems at U.S. Light Water Reactors (28 December 1987, Topic: Boric Acid)
- Information Notice 1987-29, Recent Safety-Related Incidents at Large Irradiators (26 June 1987, Topic: Coatings, Temporary Modification, Biofouling, Uranium Hexafluoride)
- Information Notice 1987-30, Cracking of Surge Ring Brackets in Large General Electric Company Electric Motors (2 July 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-31, Blocking Bracing, and Securing of Radioactive Materials Packages in Transportation (10 July 1987, Topic: Uranium Hexafluoride)
- Information Notice 1987-32, Deficiencies in the Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal (10 July 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-33, Applicability of 10 CFR Part 21 to Nonlicensees (24 July 1987, Topic: Commercial Grade)
- Information Notice 1987-34, Single Failures in Auxiliary Feedwater Systems (24 July 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-35, Reactor Trip Breaker, Westinghouse Model DS-416, Failed to Open on Manual Initiation from the Control Room (30 July 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-36, Significant Unexpected Erosion of Feedwater Lines (4 August 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-37, Compliance with the General License Provisions of 10 CFR Part 31 (10 August 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-39, Control of Particle Contamination at Nuclear Power Plants (21 August 1987, Topic: Fuel cladding, Overexposure)
- Information Notice 1987-40, Backseating Valves Routinely to Prevent Packing Leakage (31 August 1987, Topic: Packing leak)
- Information Notice 1987-41, Failures of Certain Brown Boveri Electric Circuit Breakers (31 August 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-42, Diesel Generator Fuse Contacts (4 September 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-43, Gaps in Neutron-Absorbing Material in High-Density Spent Fuel Storage Racks (8 September 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-44, Thimble Tube Thinning in Westinghouse Reactors (16 September 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-45, Recent Safety-Related Violations of NRC Requirements by Industrial Radiography Licensees (25 September 1987, Topic: High Radiation Area)
- Information Notice 1987-46, Undetected Loss of Reactor Coolant (30 September 1987)
- Information Notice 1987-48, Information Concerning the Use of Anaerobic Adhesive/Sealants (9 October 1987, Topic: Loctite)
- Information Notice 1987-49, Deficiencies in Outside Containment Flooding Protection (9 October 1987, Topic: Safe Shutdown)
... further results |
---|