ML21361A271: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 NOTE: This ES-201-2 is for the NRC developed Written Examination Outline sent to the Facility ONLY Facility: Byron Nuclear Station Date of Examination: September 2021 Initials Item Task Description a b* c# | ||
: 1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401. BB N/A GMR W b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with BB N/A GMR R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled. | |||
I T c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. BB N/A GMR T | |||
E d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate. BB N/A GMR N | |||
: 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major S transients. | |||
I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and U mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. | |||
O | |||
: c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R | |||
quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, Specific Instructions for the Simulator Operating Test, of ES-301 (including overlap). | |||
: 3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: | |||
(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W among the safety functions as specified on the form. | |||
A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form. | |||
L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s). | |||
K (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form. | |||
T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form. | |||
R O b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: | |||
U (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form. | |||
G (2) At least one task is new or significantly modified. | |||
H (3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations. | |||
: c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. | |||
: 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. | |||
G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. | |||
N | |||
: c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. | |||
E R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams. | |||
A L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. | |||
: f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). | |||
Printed Name/Signature Date | |||
: a. Author Bryan A. Bergeon BB / 09/09/2020 | |||
: b. Facility Reviewer (*) N/A N/A Gregory M. Roach GMR / Gregory M. Roach Digitally signed by Gregory M. Roach | |||
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) Date: 2020.09.09 11:03:44 -05'00' | |||
: d. NRC Supervisor Patricia J. Pelke / Patricia J. Pelke Digitally signed by Patricia J. Pelke Date: 2020.09.09 13:25:59 -05'00' | |||
* Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines. | |||
# The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column c; the chief examiners concurrence is required.}} |
Revision as of 08:49, 18 January 2022
ML21361A271 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Byron |
Issue date: | 10/28/2021 |
From: | Gregory Roach NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
To: | Exelon Generation Co |
Roach G | |
Shared Package | |
ML21055A846 | List: |
References | |
Download: ML21361A271 (1) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 NOTE: This ES-201-2 is for the NRC developed Written Examination Outline sent to the Facility ONLY Facility: Byron Nuclear Station Date of Examination: September 2021 Initials Item Task Description a b* c#
- 1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401. BB N/A GMR W b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with BB N/A GMR R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.
I T c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. BB N/A GMR T
E d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate. BB N/A GMR N
- 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major S transients.
I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and U mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
O
- c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R
quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, Specific Instructions for the Simulator Operating Test, of ES-301 (including overlap).
- 3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed W among the safety functions as specified on the form.
A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.
L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s).
K (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.
T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form.
R O b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
U (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.
G (2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.
H (3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.
- c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
- 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
G E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
N
- c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
E R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams.
A L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
Printed Name/Signature Date
- a. Author Bryan A. Bergeon BB / 09/09/2020
- b. Facility Reviewer (*) N/A N/A Gregory M. Roach GMR / Gregory M. Roach Digitally signed by Gregory M. Roach
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) Date: 2020.09.09 11:03:44 -05'00'
- d. NRC Supervisor Patricia J. Pelke / Patricia J. Pelke Digitally signed by Patricia J. Pelke Date: 2020.09.09 13:25:59 -05'00'
- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
- The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column c; the chief examiners concurrence is required.