ML14167A089: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
| document type = E-Mail
| document type = E-Mail
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
| project =
| stage = Other
}}
}}



Latest revision as of 07:14, 11 November 2019

Operating License Renewal
ML14167A089
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 05/27/2014
From: Finfera J
US Dept of Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service
To: Briana Grange
NRC/NRR/DLR/RERGUB
References
Download: ML14167A089 (4)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Finfera, Jennifer [jennifer_finfera@fws.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 11:48 AM To: Grange, Briana

Subject:

Re: Davis Besse operating license renewal

Briana, For the tower lights if it possible these should either be eliminated or set so that if they blink they are off more than on. The longest time off possible would be the most beneficial. For lights within the complex they should be down-shielded or set on motion detectors so they are not on continuously. I am going to check and see if there is any sort of timeframe for the evaluation of the red knot and that will help us determine how to proceed.

Jenny On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Grange, Briana <Briana.Grange@nrc.gov> wrote:

Okay. Sounds good. Thanks for the update!

From: Finfera, Jennifer [1]

Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 1:43 PM To: Grange, Briana

Subject:

Re: Davis Besse operating license renewal

Briana, I need to talk with one of our biologist who does most of the bird work. I know that having the lights on continuous instead of flashing does help reduce bird collisions and by the information you included these collisions have been reduced. After I find out if there are any other avoidance or minimization measures I will give you a call so we can discuss this further. It will probably be next week. As I will be in the field most of the rest of this week.

Jenny Jenny 1

On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Grange, Briana <Briana.Grange@nrc.gov> wrote:

Hi Jenny, Per your request, I have attached an assessment for the proposed long-eared bat. In the course of considering the bat, I also identified another proposed speciesthe red knotthat occurs in the action area. Both species are considered in the attached assessment.

As you will see, I concluded not likely to adversely affect for the long-eared bat, but may affect for the red knot due to the potential for collision with plant structures. Given the may affect conclusion and the fact that the red knot is a proposed species at this time, I am not sure what the appropriate path forward will be. Maybe we can talk after you read the assessment? Thanks, Briana

______________

Briana A. Grange Biologist U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRR/DLR/RERB (301) 415-1042 briana.grange@nrc.gov

--

Jenny Finfera Wildlife Biologist Ecological Services 2

4625 Morse Road, Suite 104 Columbus, Ohio 43230 Phone: 614-416-8993 ext.13 Fax: 614-416-8994

--

Jenny Finfera Wildlife Biologist Ecological Services 4625 Morse Road, Suite 104 Columbus, Ohio 43230 Phone: 614-416-8993 ext.13 Fax: 614-416-8994 3

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1372 Mail Envelope Properties (CAAtVZcM6-6BzVhNdBtavBW=+4+JxQo+EFpoNpmF0eZ2Z0L2Wqw)

Subject:

Re: Davis Besse operating license renewal Sent Date: 5/27/2014 11:47:32 AM Received Date: 5/27/2014 11:47:44 AM From: Finfera, Jennifer Created By: jennifer_finfera@fws.gov Recipients:

"Grange, Briana" <Briana.Grange@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: mail.gmail.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2796 5/27/2014 11:47:44 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: