ML062130618: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:September 19, 2006Mr. Karl W. SingerChief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
{{#Wiki_filter:September 19, 2006 Mr. Karl W. Singer Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 - ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENTREGARDING THE SCRAM DISCHARGE VOLUME (TAC NO. MC1427) (TS-437)
BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT REGARDING THE SCRAM DISCHARGE VOLUME (TAC NO. MC1427) (TS-437)


==Dear Mr. Singer:==
==Dear Mr. Singer:==


The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 259 to Renewed Facility OperatingLicense No. DPR-33 for the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. This amendment is in response to your application dated November 3, 2003, as supplemented by a letter dated May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006.The amendment lowers the allowable value of the scram discharge volume from less than orequal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons in Technical Specification Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation, Function 7.b.A copy of the Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. Notice of Issuance will be included in theCommission's biweekly Federal Register notice.Sincerely,/RA by MChernoff for/Brian J. Benney, Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch 4 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket No. 50-259
The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 259 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-33 for the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. This amendment is in response to your application dated November 3, 2003, as supplemented by a letter dated May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006.
The amendment lowers the allowable value of the scram discharge volume from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons in Technical Specification Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation, Function 7.b.
A copy of the Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's biweekly Federal Register notice.
Sincerely,
                                            /RA by MChernoff for/
Brian J. Benney, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 4 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-259


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
: 1. Amendment No. 259 to             License No. DPR-33         2. Safety Evaluationcc w/enclosures: See next page  
: 1. Amendment No. 259 to License No. DPR-33
: 2. Safety Evaluation cc w/enclosures: See next page


ML062130618*NLO w/commentsNRR-058OFFICELPL4/PMLPL2-2/LASBWB/BCEICB/BCOGC*LPL2-2/SC NAMEMChernoff for BBenneyBClaytonGCranstonAHoweBWeismanLRaghavanDATE 9/19/069/19/068/9/068/7/068/30/069/19/06 DISTRIBUTION FOR BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 - ISSUANCE OFAMENDMENT REGARDING THE SCRAM DISCHARGE VOLUME (TAC NO. MC1427) Dated: September 19, 2006 Distribution
ML062130618                     *NLO w/comments              NRR-058 OFFICE LPL4/PM              LPL2-2/LA      SBWB/BC        EICB/BC    OGC*         LPL2-2/SC NAME MChernoff for         BClayton      GCranston      AHowe      BWeisman LRaghavan BBenney DATE      9/19/06          9/19/06        8/9/06        8/7/06      8/30/06      9/19/06
:PUBLIC LPL2-2 R/F RidsNrrDorlLpl2-2 (LRaghavan)
 
DISTRIBUTION FOR BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT REGARDING THE SCRAM DISCHARGE VOLUME (TAC NO. MC1427)
Dated: September 19, 2006 Distribution:
PUBLIC LPL2-2 R/F RidsNrrDorlLpl2-2 (LRaghavan)
RidsNrrPMMChernoff (Hard Copy)
RidsNrrPMMChernoff (Hard Copy)
RidsNrrPMEBrown (Hard Copy)
RidsNrrPMEBrown (Hard Copy)
RidsNrrLABClayton (Hard Copy)
RidsNrrLABClayton (Hard Copy)
RidsNrrLAKGoldstein (Hard Copy)
RidsNrrLAKGoldstein (Hard Copy)
Line 40: Line 49:
RidsNrrDirsItsb RidsNrrDeEicb (AHowe)
RidsNrrDirsItsb RidsNrrDeEicb (AHowe)
RidsNrrDssSbwb (GCranston)
RidsNrrDssSbwb (GCranston)
RidsRgn2MailCenter (MWidman)RidsNrrDorlDpr HLi GThomas TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITYDOCKET NO. 50-259BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSEAmendment No. 259License No. DPR-331.The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:A.The application for amendment by Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee) dated November 3, 2003, as supplemented May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, complieswith the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I;B.The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act,and the rules and regulations of the Commission;C.There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendmentcan be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission'sregulations;D.The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense andsecurity or to the health and safety of the public; andE.The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of theCommission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied. 2.Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications asindicated in the attachment to this license amendment and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-33 is hereby amended to read as follows:(2)Technical SpecificationsThe Technical Specifications contained in Appendices A and B, as revised throughAmendment No. 259, are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.3.This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implementedprior to the restart of Unit 1.                       FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION/RA/   L. Raghavan, Chief, Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
RidsRgn2MailCenter (MWidman)
RidsNrrDorlDpr HLi GThomas
 
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO. 50-259 BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 259 License No. DPR-33
: 1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A. The application for amendment by Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee) dated November 3, 2003, as supplemented May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C. There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D. The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
: 2. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-33 is hereby amended to read as follows:
(2)   Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendices A and B, as revised through Amendment No. 259, are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
: 3. This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented prior to the restart of Unit 1.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                /RA/
L. Raghavan, Chief, Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


==Attachment:==
==Attachment:==
Changes to the Technical SpecificationsDate of Issuance:  September 19, 2006 ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 259TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-33DOCKET NO. 50-259Replace Page 3 of Renewed Operating License DPR-33 with the attached Page 3.Revise the Appendix A Technical Specifications by removing the page identified below andinserting the attached page. The revised page is identified by the captioned amendment number and contains marginal lines indicating the area of change. REMOVE                            INSERT3.3-73.3-7 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 259TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-33TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITYBROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1DOCKET NO. 50-25


==91.0 INTRODUCTION==
Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: September 19, 2006
By letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated November 3, 2003, assupplemented by letters dated May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, the Tennessee ValleyAuthority (TVA, the licensee) submitted a request for changes to the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN), Unit 1, Technical Specifications (TSs). The proposed TS changes would (1) lower the Allowable Value (AV) of the Scram Discharge Volume (SDV) Water Level - High Float Switches from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation, Function 7.b, and (2) remove thelow scram pilot air header pressure switches from service. The supplements dated May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, provided additional information that clarified the application,and did not change the staff's original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register on February 3, 2004 (69 FR 5207).
 
ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 259 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-33 DOCKET NO. 50-259 Replace Page 3 of Renewed Operating License DPR-33 with the attached Page 3.
Revise the Appendix A Technical Specifications by removing the page identified below and inserting the attached page. The revised page is identified by the captioned amendment number and contains marginal lines indicating the area of change.
REMOVE                            INSERT 3.3-7                              3.3-7
 
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 259 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-33 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-259
 
==1.0       INTRODUCTION==
 
By letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated November 3, 2003, as supplemented by letters dated May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA, the licensee) submitted a request for changes to the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN), Unit 1, Technical Specifications (TSs). The proposed TS changes would (1) lower the Allowable Value (AV) of the Scram Discharge Volume (SDV) Water Level - High Float Switches from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation, Function 7.b, and (2) remove the low scram pilot air header pressure switches from service. The supplements dated May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, provided additional information that clarified the application, and did not change the staffs original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register on February 3, 2004 (69 FR 5207).
 
==2.0      BACKGROUND==
/REGULATORY EVALUATION The SDV system receives the water displaced by the motion of the control rod drives during a reactor scram. The system contains two separate SDVs serving the east and west rod banks, each of which drains to its own scram discharge instrument volume (SDIV). The primary design objective of the SDV system is to ensure that sufficient free volume is maintained available to receive water displaced by the control rods during a full scram. Should the SDV fill to a point where there is insufficient free volume to accept the displaced water, control rod insertion would be impeded. SDIV water level is measured by two diverse methods: (1) two thermal probes (resistance-temperature detectors (RTDs)), and (2) two Magnetrol float switches. The trip logic is one-out-of-two taken twice for a scram, so actuation of either the float switches or the RTDs will initiate a high water level scram, and a trip in one of the SDIVs will initiate a reactor scram.
For BFN Unit 1, the SDV high water level trip TS AV is currently 50 gallons measured in the SDIVs, as shown for Function 7 in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation.
In addition, the licensee stated, in response to NRC, Inspection and Enforcement (IE)
Bulletin 80-17, "Failure of 76 of 185 Control Rods to Fully Insert During a Scram at a BWR
[Boiling-Water Reactor]," dated July 1980, and its supplements, that BFN implemented several short-term and long-term modifications to improve the performance of the SDV system and the
 
SDIVs. One of the short-term modifications installed on BFN Units 2 and 3 was the scram pilot air header pressure switches, which scrams the reactor on sensing low pressure in the control air system that serves the control rod drive system. The licensee intended to remove these switches following the completion of the long-term modifications associated with the subject bulletin as discussed in Section 3.2 of this Safety Evaluation.
Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.105, Revision 3, "Setpoints for Safety-Related Instrumentation,"
describes a method acceptable to the NRC staff for complying with the NRCs regulations for ensuring that setpoints for safety-related instrumentation are initiated within, and remain within, the TS limits. RG 1.105, Revision 3, endorses Instrumentation Society of America (ISA)
Standard ISA-S67.04-1994, Part 1, "Setpoints for Nuclear Safety-Related Instrumentation."
The NRC staff utilized the RG and the above ISA standard in performing this review.
 
==3.0      TECHNICAL EVALUATION==
 
3.1      Lower AV of the SDV The licensee proposed to revise the SDV Water Level - High Float Switches from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation. The staff reviewed the application as supplemented by the licensee's letter of August 1, 2006, and determined the following:
C        The licensees setpoint methodology and its calculations utilize the Analytical Limits to establish the nominal Trip Setpoint, Acceptable As Left (AAL) band, Acceptable As Found (AAF) band and the AV.
C        The licensees setpoint methodology accounts for all known uncertainties associated with the instrument loop when calculating the trip setpoint.
C        The licensees procedures incorporate the AAL and AAF calibration tolerance values.
For setpoint values found inside the AAL value, the setpoint does not require adjustment. For setpoint values found outside the AAL value and inside the AAF value, the setpoint will be adjusted and left within the AAL valve per surveillance requirements.
For setpoint values found outside the AAF value, the appropriate supervisors will be notified, a review will be performed to determine operability, and the corrective action will be documented in the test log. For setpoint values found outside the AV the channel will be declared inoperable and appropriate action for the Limiting Condition for Operation will be entered.
C        The licensee in its August 1, 2006, letter has stated that since credit is not taken in the BFN transient and accident analyses for TS instrument Table 3.3.1.1-1, Function 7.b, SDV Water Level - High Float Switches, in ensuring a Safety Limit is met or that the temperature acceptance criterion of 10 CFR 50.46 is met, this TS instrument function is not safety-limit related. Therefore, the operability of this TS function is controlled by licensee procedures.
The staff has reviewed the licensee's submissions and has determined that the licensee, in order to determine the trip setpoint for the SDV Water Level - High Float Switches, uses a method that conforms to the recommendations of RG 1.105 with respect to establishment of
 
analytical limits and the treatment of uncertainties. The licensee, therefore, has determined these trip setpoints and the associated AVs, together with AAL and AAF values, used to determine instrument operability, in an appropriately conservative manner. Accordingly, the proposed change to lower the AV in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Function 7.b, from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons is acceptable.
3.2 Removal of the Scram Pilot Air Header Pressure Switches from Service As stated above, TVA responded to the modification outlined in IE Bulletin 80-17 by installing the scram pilot air header pressure switches in BFN Units 2 and 3 with the intention of removing them upon the completion of the long-term modifications associated with the bulletin. The long-term modifications included the installation of separate SDIVs for each of the two control rod banks and the addition of diverse instruments in the SDIVs for the high-water level trip function. Field performance of the RTDs was satisfactory, however, a review of system data following reactor scrams showed that the actuation of the float switches typically lagged the RTDs by approximately 20 seconds. Pending remedy of the float switches slow response time, TVA maintained the scram pilot air pressure switches in service.
TVAs system analysis determined that the slow response time of the float switches was due to an undersized piping connection between the SDIVs and the float switch assemblies, which limits the fill rate of the float switch assemblies and delays switch actuation. By this license amendment request, the licensee stated that prior to restart of BFN Unit 1, the connecting piping between the SDIVs and the float switches will be replaced with a larger pipe (from the existing 3/4-inch diameter, Schedule 160 piping, to 2-inch diameter, Schedule 80 piping). This piping change increases the cross-sectional flow area by a factor of 10. To further offset the float switch response time, the float switch assemblies will be physically lowered by approximately 10 inches, which translates to a decrease of the AV of 50 gallons to 46 gallons.
These modifications will remedy the slow response time of the float switches, which eliminates the need to retain the low scram pilot air header pressure trip function. These modifications and the lowering of the SDV water level setpoints have previously been approved on BFN Units 2 and 3 (ADAMS Accession No. ML020990743).
The staff accepted the resolution of the long-term fixes of the SDV system problem. On April 8, 2002, the NRC issued Amendment Nos. 276 and 235 to Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-52 and DPR-68 for the BFN Units 2 and 3, respectively. The amendments removed the requirements for the low-scram pilot air header pressure switches at the BFN Units 2 and 3.
Since the low scram pilot air header pressure switches were never added to the Unit 1 TSs, there is no change for this item. The staff finds this acceptable for BFN Unit 1.
 
==4.0      CONCLUSION==
 
Based on its review of the November 3, 2003, May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, submittals, the staff finds that the proposed TS changes for lowering the AV of SDV water level from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons is acceptable.
 
==5.0    STATE CONSULTATION==


==2.0  BACKGROUND==
In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Alabama State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.
/REGULATORY EVALUATIONThe SDV system receives the water displaced by the motion of the control rod drives during areactor scram. The system contains two separate SDVs serving the east and west rod banks,each of which drains to its own scram discharge instrument volume (SDIV). The primary design objective of the SDV system is to ensure that sufficient free volume is maintained available toreceive water displaced by the control rods during a full scram. Should the SDV fill to a pointwhere there is insufficient free volume to accept the displaced water, control rod insertion would be impeded. SDIV water level is measured by two diverse methods: (1) two thermal probes (resistance-temperature detectors (RTDs)), and (2) two Magnetrol float switches. The trip logic is one-out-of-two taken twice for a scram, so actuation of either the float switches or the RTDswill initiate a high water level scram, and a trip in one of the SDIVs will initiate a reactor scram. For BFN Unit 1, the SDV high water level trip TS AV is currently 50 gallons measured in the SDIVs, as shown for Function 7 in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation.In addition, the licensee stated, in response to NRC, Inspection and Enforcement (IE)Bulletin 80-17, "Failure of 76 of 185 Control Rods to Fully Insert During a Scram at a BWR
[Boiling-Water Reactor]," dated July 1980, and its supplements, that BFN implemented several short-term and long-term modifications to improve the performance of the SDV system and the  
- 2  -SDIVs. One of the short-term modifications installed on BFN Units 2 and 3 was the scram pilotair header pressure switches, which scrams the reactor on sensing low pressure in the control air system that serves the control rod drive system. The licensee intended to remove theseswitches following the completion of the long-term modifications associated with the subject bulletin as discussed in Section 3.2 of this Safety Evaluation. Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.105, Revision 3, "Setpoints for Safety-Related Instrumentation,"describes a method acceptable to the NRC staff for complying with the NRC's regulations forensuring that setpoints for safety-related instrumentation are initiated within, and remain within,the TS limits. RG 1.105, Revision 3, endorses Instrumentation Society of America (ISA)
Standard ISA-S67.04-1994, Part 1, "Setpoints for Nuclear Safety-Related Instrumentation." The NRC staff utilized the RG and the above ISA standard in performing this review.


==3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION==
==6.0     ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION==
3.1 Lower AV of the SDVThe licensee proposed to revise the SDV Water Level - High Float Switches from less than orequal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation. The staff reviewed the application as supplemented by the licensee'sletter of August 1, 2006, and determined the following:  The licensee's setpoint methodology and its calculations utilize the Analytical Limits toestablish the nominal Trip Setpoint, Acceptable As Left (AAL) band, Acceptable As Found (AAF) band and the AV. The licensee's setpoint methodology accounts for all known uncertainties associatedwith the instrument loop when calculating the trip setpoint. The licensee's procedures incorporate the AAL and AAF calibration tolerance values. For setpoint values found inside the AAL value, the setpoint does not requireadjustment. For setpoint values found outside the AAL value and inside the AAF value, the setpoint will be adjusted and left within the AAL valve per surveillance requirements. For setpoint values found outside the AAF value, the appropriate supervisors will benotified, a review will be performed to determine operability, and the corrective actionwill be documented in the test log. For setpoint values found outside the AV the channelwill be declared inoperable and appropriate action for the Limiting Condition forOperation will be entered.The licensee in its August 1, 2006, letter has stated that since credit is not taken in theBFN transient and accident analyses for TS instrument Table 3.3.1.1-1, Function 7.b,SDV Water Level - High Float Switches, in ensuring a Safety Limit is met or that the temperature acceptance criterion of 10 CFR 50.46 is met, this TS instrument function is not safety-limit related. Therefore, the operability of this TS function is controlled bylicensee procedures.The staff has reviewed the licensee's submissions and has determined that the licensee, inorder to determine the trip setpoint for the SDV Water Level - High Float Switches, uses a method that conforms to the recommendations of RG 1.105 with respect to establishment of
- 3  -analytical limits and the treatment of uncertainties. The licensee, therefore, has determinedthese trip setpoints and the associated AVs, together with AAL and AAF values, used todetermine instrument operability, in an appropriately conservative manner. Accordingly, theproposed change to lower the AV in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Function 7.b, from less than or equal to50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons is acceptable. 3.2  Removal of the Scram Pilot Air Header Pressure Switches from ServiceAs stated above, TVA responded to the modification outlined in IE Bulletin 80-17 by installingthe scram pilot air header pressure switches in BFN Units 2 and 3 with the intention of removing them upon the completion of the long-term modifications associated with the bulletin. The long-term modifications included the installation of separate SDIVs for each of the two control rod banks and the addition of diverse instruments in the SDIVs for the high-water level trip function. Field performance of the RTDs was satisfactory, however, a review of system datafollowing reactor scrams showed that the actuation of the float switches typically lagged theRTDs by approximately 20 seconds. Pending remedy of the float switches slow response time, TVA maintained the scram pilot air pressure switches in service.TVA's system analysis determined that the slow response time of the float switches was due toan undersized piping connection between the SDIVs and the float switch assemblies, which limits the fill rate of the float switch assemblies and delays switch actuation. By this licenseamendment request, the licensee stated that prior to restart of BFN Unit 1, the connectingpiping between the SDIVs and the float switches will be replaced with a larger pipe (from theexisting 3/4-inch diameter, Schedule 160 piping, to 2-inch diameter, Schedule 80 piping). This piping change increases the cross-sectional flow area by a factor of 10. To further offset the float switch response time, the float switch assemblies will be physically lowered byapproximately 10 inches, which translates to a decrease of the AV of 50 gallons to 46 gallons.
These modifications will remedy the slow response time of the float switches, which eliminatesthe need to retain the low scram pilot air header pressure trip function. These modifications and the lowering of the SDV water level setpoints have previously been approved on BFN Units 2 and 3 (ADAMS Accession No. ML020990743).The staff accepted the resolution of the long-term fixes of the SDV system problem. On April 8, 2002, the NRC issued Amendment Nos. 276 and 235 to Facility Operating LicenseNos. DPR-52 and DPR-68 for the BFN Units 2 and 3, respectively. The amendments removed the requirements for the low-scram pilot air header pressure switches at the BFN Units 2 and 3. Since the low scram pilot air header pressure switches were never added to the Unit 1 TSs,there is no change for this item. The staff finds this acceptable for BFN Unit 1.


==4.0  CONCLUSION==
The amendment changes a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding (69 FR 5207). Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.
Based on its review of the November 3, 2003, May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, submittals, thestaff finds that the proposed TS changes for lowering the AV of SDV water level from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons is acceptable.  
- 4  -


==5.0 STATE CONSULTATION==
==7.0     CONCLUSION==
In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Alabama State official was notified of theproposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.


==6.0  ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION==
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
The amendment changes a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facilitycomponent located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff hasdetermined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and nosignificant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there isno significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding (69 FR 5207). Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categoricalexclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.


==7.0 CONCLUSION==
==8.0     REFERENCES==
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:  (1) thereis reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered byoperation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with theCommission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to thecommon defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
: 1.      Letter from TVA to NRC dated November 3, 2003, "Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN)
Unit 1 TS Change 43 7- Scram Discharge Volume Water Level Set point."
: 2.      Letter from TVA to NRC dated May 6, 2004, "Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN) Unit 1 TS Change 437 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Scram Discharge Volume Water Level Set point (TAC No MC 1427)."
: 3.      IE Bulletin No. 80-17, "Failure of 76 of 185 Control Rods to Fully Insert During a Scram at a BWR," July 3, 1980.
: 4.      NUREG/CR-5191, "Close-out of IE Bulletin 80-17: Failure of 76 of 185 Control Rods to Fully Insert During a Scram at a BWR," December 1988.
Principal Contributors: Hulbert Li George Thomas Date: September 19, 2006


==8.0REFERENCES==
BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT cc:
1.Letter from TVA to NRC dated November 3, 2003, "Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN)Unit 1 TS Change 43 7- Scram Discharge Volume Water Level Set point."2.Letter from TVA to NRC dated May 6, 2004, "Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN) Unit 1TS Change 437 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Scram Discharge Volume Water Level Set point (TAC No MC 1427)."3.IE Bulletin No. 80-17, "Failure of 76 of 185 Control Rods to Fully Insert During a Scramat a BWR," July 3, 1980.4.NUREG/CR-5191, "Close-out of IE Bulletin 80-17: Failure of 76 of 185 Control Rods toFully Insert During a Scram at a BWR," December 1988.Principal Contributors:  Hulbert Li    George ThomasDate:  September 19, 2006 BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT cc:
Mr. Ashok S. Bhatnagar, Senior Vice President Mr. Robert G. Jones, General Manager Nuclear Operations                            Browns Ferry Site Operations Tennessee Valley Authority                   Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant 6A Lookout Place                             Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street                           P.O. Box 2000 Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801                   Decatur, AL 35609 Mr. Larry S. Bryant, Vice President          Mr. Larry S. Mellen Nuclear Engineering & Technical Services      Browns Ferry Unit 1 Project Engineer Tennessee Valley Authority                    Division of Reactor Projects, Branch 6 6A Lookout Place                              U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1101 Market Street                            61 Forsyth Street, SW.
Mr. Ashok S. Bhatnagar, Senior Vice President Nuclear Operations Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN  37402-2801  Mr. Larry S. Bryant, Vice PresidentNuclear Engineering & Technical Services Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN  37402-2801Brian O'Grady, Site Vice PresidentBrowns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL  35609Mr. Robert J. Beecken, Vice PresidentNuclear Support Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801   General CounselTennessee Valley Authority ET 11A 400 West Summit Hill DriveKnoxville, TN 37902Mr. John C. Fornicola, ManagerNuclear Assurance and Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN  37402-2801Mr. Bruce Aukland, Plant ManagerBrowns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL 35609Mr. Masoud Bajestani, Vice PresidentBrowns Ferry Unit 1 Restart Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL  35609Mr. Robert G. Jones, General ManagerBrowns Ferry Site Operations Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL  35609Mr. Larry S. MellenBrowns Ferry Unit 1 Project Engineer Division of Reactor Projects, Branch 6 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 61 Forsyth Street, SW.
Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801                    Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303-8931 Brian OGrady, Site Vice President Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant                    Mr. Glenn W. Morris, Manager Tennessee Valley Authority                    Corporate Nuclear Licensing P.O. Box 2000                                    and Industry Affairs Decatur, AL 35609                            Tennessee Valley Authority 4X Blue Ridge Mr. Robert J. Beecken, Vice President        1101 Market Street Nuclear Support                              Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place                              Mr. William D. Crouch, Manager 1101 Market Street                            Licensing and Industry Affairs Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801                    Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority General Counsel                              P.O. Box 2000 Tennessee Valley Authority                    Decatur, AL 35609 ET 11A 400 West Summit Hill Drive                    Senior Resident Inspector Knoxville, TN 37902                          U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Mr. John C. Fornicola, Manager                10833 Shaw Road Nuclear Assurance and Licensing              Athens, AL 35611-6970 Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place                              State Health Officer 1101 Market Street                            Alabama Dept. of Public Health Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801                    RSA Tower - Administration Suite 1552 Mr. Bruce Aukland, Plant Manager              P.O. Box 303017 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant                    Montgomery, AL 36130-3017 Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000                                Chairman Decatur, AL 35609                            Limestone County Commission 310 West Washington Street Mr. Masoud Bajestani, Vice President          Athens, AL 35611 Browns Ferry Unit 1 Restart Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL 35609}}
Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303-8931 Mr. Glenn W. Morris, Manager Corporate Nuclear Licensing and Industry Affairs Tennessee Valley Authority 4X Blue Ridge 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801Mr. William D. Crouch, M anagerLicensing and Industry Affairs Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL 35609Senior Resident InspectorU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant 10833 Shaw Road Athens, AL 35611-6970State Health OfficerAlabama Dept. of Public Health RSA Tower - Administration Suite 1552 P.O. Box 303017 Montgomery, AL 36130-3017ChairmanLimestone County Commission 310 West Washington Street Athens, AL 35611}}

Revision as of 16:41, 23 November 2019

Issuance of Amendment, Scram Discharge Volume (TS 437)
ML062130618
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 09/19/2006
From: Brian Benney
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIV
To: Singer K
Tennessee Valley Authority
Benney B, NRR/DORL, 415-3764
Shared Package
ML062630273 List:
References
TAC MC1427
Download: ML062130618 (10)


Text

September 19, 2006 Mr. Karl W. Singer Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801

SUBJECT:

BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT REGARDING THE SCRAM DISCHARGE VOLUME (TAC NO. MC1427) (TS-437)

Dear Mr. Singer:

The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 259 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-33 for the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. This amendment is in response to your application dated November 3, 2003, as supplemented by a letter dated May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006.

The amendment lowers the allowable value of the scram discharge volume from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons in Technical Specification Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation, Function 7.b.

A copy of the Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's biweekly Federal Register notice.

Sincerely,

/RA by MChernoff for/

Brian J. Benney, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 4 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-259

Enclosures:

1. Amendment No. 259 to License No. DPR-33
2. Safety Evaluation cc w/enclosures: See next page

ML062130618 *NLO w/comments NRR-058 OFFICE LPL4/PM LPL2-2/LA SBWB/BC EICB/BC OGC* LPL2-2/SC NAME MChernoff for BClayton GCranston AHowe BWeisman LRaghavan BBenney DATE 9/19/06 9/19/06 8/9/06 8/7/06 8/30/06 9/19/06

DISTRIBUTION FOR BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT REGARDING THE SCRAM DISCHARGE VOLUME (TAC NO. MC1427)

Dated: September 19, 2006 Distribution:

PUBLIC LPL2-2 R/F RidsNrrDorlLpl2-2 (LRaghavan)

RidsNrrPMMChernoff (Hard Copy)

RidsNrrPMEBrown (Hard Copy)

RidsNrrLABClayton (Hard Copy)

RidsNrrLAKGoldstein (Hard Copy)

RidsOgcRp RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter GHill (2 Hard Copies)

RidsNrrDirsItsb RidsNrrDeEicb (AHowe)

RidsNrrDssSbwb (GCranston)

RidsRgn2MailCenter (MWidman)

RidsNrrDorlDpr HLi GThomas

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO. 50-259 BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 259 License No. DPR-33

1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:

A. The application for amendment by Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee) dated November 3, 2003, as supplemented May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C. There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D. The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.

2. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-33 is hereby amended to read as follows:

(2) Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendices A and B, as revised through Amendment No. 259, are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.

3. This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented prior to the restart of Unit 1.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

/RA/

L. Raghavan, Chief, Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: September 19, 2006

ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 259 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-33 DOCKET NO. 50-259 Replace Page 3 of Renewed Operating License DPR-33 with the attached Page 3.

Revise the Appendix A Technical Specifications by removing the page identified below and inserting the attached page. The revised page is identified by the captioned amendment number and contains marginal lines indicating the area of change.

REMOVE INSERT 3.3-7 3.3-7

SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 259 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-33 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-259

1.0 INTRODUCTION

By letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated November 3, 2003, as supplemented by letters dated May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA, the licensee) submitted a request for changes to the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN), Unit 1, Technical Specifications (TSs). The proposed TS changes would (1) lower the Allowable Value (AV) of the Scram Discharge Volume (SDV) Water Level - High Float Switches from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation, Function 7.b, and (2) remove the low scram pilot air header pressure switches from service. The supplements dated May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, provided additional information that clarified the application, and did not change the staffs original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register on February 3, 2004 (69 FR 5207).

2.0 BACKGROUND

/REGULATORY EVALUATION The SDV system receives the water displaced by the motion of the control rod drives during a reactor scram. The system contains two separate SDVs serving the east and west rod banks, each of which drains to its own scram discharge instrument volume (SDIV). The primary design objective of the SDV system is to ensure that sufficient free volume is maintained available to receive water displaced by the control rods during a full scram. Should the SDV fill to a point where there is insufficient free volume to accept the displaced water, control rod insertion would be impeded. SDIV water level is measured by two diverse methods: (1) two thermal probes (resistance-temperature detectors (RTDs)), and (2) two Magnetrol float switches. The trip logic is one-out-of-two taken twice for a scram, so actuation of either the float switches or the RTDs will initiate a high water level scram, and a trip in one of the SDIVs will initiate a reactor scram.

For BFN Unit 1, the SDV high water level trip TS AV is currently 50 gallons measured in the SDIVs, as shown for Function 7 in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation.

In addition, the licensee stated, in response to NRC, Inspection and Enforcement (IE)

Bulletin 80-17, "Failure of 76 of 185 Control Rods to Fully Insert During a Scram at a BWR

[Boiling-Water Reactor]," dated July 1980, and its supplements, that BFN implemented several short-term and long-term modifications to improve the performance of the SDV system and the

SDIVs. One of the short-term modifications installed on BFN Units 2 and 3 was the scram pilot air header pressure switches, which scrams the reactor on sensing low pressure in the control air system that serves the control rod drive system. The licensee intended to remove these switches following the completion of the long-term modifications associated with the subject bulletin as discussed in Section 3.2 of this Safety Evaluation.

Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.105, Revision 3, "Setpoints for Safety-Related Instrumentation,"

describes a method acceptable to the NRC staff for complying with the NRCs regulations for ensuring that setpoints for safety-related instrumentation are initiated within, and remain within, the TS limits. RG 1.105, Revision 3, endorses Instrumentation Society of America (ISA)

Standard ISA-S67.04-1994, Part 1, "Setpoints for Nuclear Safety-Related Instrumentation."

The NRC staff utilized the RG and the above ISA standard in performing this review.

3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

3.1 Lower AV of the SDV The licensee proposed to revise the SDV Water Level - High Float Switches from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation. The staff reviewed the application as supplemented by the licensee's letter of August 1, 2006, and determined the following:

C The licensees setpoint methodology and its calculations utilize the Analytical Limits to establish the nominal Trip Setpoint, Acceptable As Left (AAL) band, Acceptable As Found (AAF) band and the AV.

C The licensees setpoint methodology accounts for all known uncertainties associated with the instrument loop when calculating the trip setpoint.

C The licensees procedures incorporate the AAL and AAF calibration tolerance values.

For setpoint values found inside the AAL value, the setpoint does not require adjustment. For setpoint values found outside the AAL value and inside the AAF value, the setpoint will be adjusted and left within the AAL valve per surveillance requirements.

For setpoint values found outside the AAF value, the appropriate supervisors will be notified, a review will be performed to determine operability, and the corrective action will be documented in the test log. For setpoint values found outside the AV the channel will be declared inoperable and appropriate action for the Limiting Condition for Operation will be entered.

C The licensee in its August 1, 2006, letter has stated that since credit is not taken in the BFN transient and accident analyses for TS instrument Table 3.3.1.1-1, Function 7.b, SDV Water Level - High Float Switches, in ensuring a Safety Limit is met or that the temperature acceptance criterion of 10 CFR 50.46 is met, this TS instrument function is not safety-limit related. Therefore, the operability of this TS function is controlled by licensee procedures.

The staff has reviewed the licensee's submissions and has determined that the licensee, in order to determine the trip setpoint for the SDV Water Level - High Float Switches, uses a method that conforms to the recommendations of RG 1.105 with respect to establishment of

analytical limits and the treatment of uncertainties. The licensee, therefore, has determined these trip setpoints and the associated AVs, together with AAL and AAF values, used to determine instrument operability, in an appropriately conservative manner. Accordingly, the proposed change to lower the AV in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Function 7.b, from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons is acceptable.

3.2 Removal of the Scram Pilot Air Header Pressure Switches from Service As stated above, TVA responded to the modification outlined in IE Bulletin 80-17 by installing the scram pilot air header pressure switches in BFN Units 2 and 3 with the intention of removing them upon the completion of the long-term modifications associated with the bulletin. The long-term modifications included the installation of separate SDIVs for each of the two control rod banks and the addition of diverse instruments in the SDIVs for the high-water level trip function. Field performance of the RTDs was satisfactory, however, a review of system data following reactor scrams showed that the actuation of the float switches typically lagged the RTDs by approximately 20 seconds. Pending remedy of the float switches slow response time, TVA maintained the scram pilot air pressure switches in service.

TVAs system analysis determined that the slow response time of the float switches was due to an undersized piping connection between the SDIVs and the float switch assemblies, which limits the fill rate of the float switch assemblies and delays switch actuation. By this license amendment request, the licensee stated that prior to restart of BFN Unit 1, the connecting piping between the SDIVs and the float switches will be replaced with a larger pipe (from the existing 3/4-inch diameter, Schedule 160 piping, to 2-inch diameter, Schedule 80 piping). This piping change increases the cross-sectional flow area by a factor of 10. To further offset the float switch response time, the float switch assemblies will be physically lowered by approximately 10 inches, which translates to a decrease of the AV of 50 gallons to 46 gallons.

These modifications will remedy the slow response time of the float switches, which eliminates the need to retain the low scram pilot air header pressure trip function. These modifications and the lowering of the SDV water level setpoints have previously been approved on BFN Units 2 and 3 (ADAMS Accession No. ML020990743).

The staff accepted the resolution of the long-term fixes of the SDV system problem. On April 8, 2002, the NRC issued Amendment Nos. 276 and 235 to Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-52 and DPR-68 for the BFN Units 2 and 3, respectively. The amendments removed the requirements for the low-scram pilot air header pressure switches at the BFN Units 2 and 3.

Since the low scram pilot air header pressure switches were never added to the Unit 1 TSs, there is no change for this item. The staff finds this acceptable for BFN Unit 1.

4.0 CONCLUSION

Based on its review of the November 3, 2003, May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, submittals, the staff finds that the proposed TS changes for lowering the AV of SDV water level from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons is acceptable.

5.0 STATE CONSULTATION

In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Alabama State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.

6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION

The amendment changes a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding (69 FR 5207). Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.

7.0 CONCLUSION

The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.

8.0 REFERENCES

1. Letter from TVA to NRC dated November 3, 2003, "Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN)

Unit 1 TS Change 43 7- Scram Discharge Volume Water Level Set point."

2. Letter from TVA to NRC dated May 6, 2004, "Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN) Unit 1 TS Change 437 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Scram Discharge Volume Water Level Set point (TAC No MC 1427)."
3. IE Bulletin No. 80-17, "Failure of 76 of 185 Control Rods to Fully Insert During a Scram at a BWR," July 3, 1980.
4. NUREG/CR-5191, "Close-out of IE Bulletin 80-17: Failure of 76 of 185 Control Rods to Fully Insert During a Scram at a BWR," December 1988.

Principal Contributors: Hulbert Li George Thomas Date: September 19, 2006

BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT cc:

Mr. Ashok S. Bhatnagar, Senior Vice President Mr. Robert G. Jones, General Manager Nuclear Operations Browns Ferry Site Operations Tennessee Valley Authority Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant 6A Lookout Place Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street P.O. Box 2000 Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Decatur, AL 35609 Mr. Larry S. Bryant, Vice President Mr. Larry S. Mellen Nuclear Engineering & Technical Services Browns Ferry Unit 1 Project Engineer Tennessee Valley Authority Division of Reactor Projects, Branch 6 6A Lookout Place U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1101 Market Street 61 Forsyth Street, SW.

Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303-8931 Brian OGrady, Site Vice President Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Mr. Glenn W. Morris, Manager Tennessee Valley Authority Corporate Nuclear Licensing P.O. Box 2000 and Industry Affairs Decatur, AL 35609 Tennessee Valley Authority 4X Blue Ridge Mr. Robert J. Beecken, Vice President 1101 Market Street Nuclear Support Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place Mr. William D. Crouch, Manager 1101 Market Street Licensing and Industry Affairs Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority General Counsel P.O. Box 2000 Tennessee Valley Authority Decatur, AL 35609 ET 11A 400 West Summit Hill Drive Senior Resident Inspector Knoxville, TN 37902 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Mr. John C. Fornicola, Manager 10833 Shaw Road Nuclear Assurance and Licensing Athens, AL 35611-6970 Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place State Health Officer 1101 Market Street Alabama Dept. of Public Health Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 RSA Tower - Administration Suite 1552 Mr. Bruce Aukland, Plant Manager P.O. Box 303017 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Montgomery, AL 36130-3017 Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Chairman Decatur, AL 35609 Limestone County Commission 310 West Washington Street Mr. Masoud Bajestani, Vice President Athens, AL 35611 Browns Ferry Unit 1 Restart Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL 35609