|
|
Line 19: |
Line 19: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:September 19, 2006Mr. Karl W. SingerChief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 | | {{#Wiki_filter:September 19, 2006 Mr. Karl W. Singer Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 |
|
| |
|
| ==SUBJECT:== | | ==SUBJECT:== |
| BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 - ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENTREGARDING THE SCRAM DISCHARGE VOLUME (TAC NO. MC1427) (TS-437) | | BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT REGARDING THE SCRAM DISCHARGE VOLUME (TAC NO. MC1427) (TS-437) |
|
| |
|
| ==Dear Mr. Singer:== | | ==Dear Mr. Singer:== |
|
| |
|
| The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 259 to Renewed Facility OperatingLicense No. DPR-33 for the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. This amendment is in response to your application dated November 3, 2003, as supplemented by a letter dated May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006.The amendment lowers the allowable value of the scram discharge volume from less than orequal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons in Technical Specification Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation, Function 7.b.A copy of the Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. Notice of Issuance will be included in theCommission's biweekly Federal Register notice.Sincerely,/RA by MChernoff for/Brian J. Benney, Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch 4 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket No. 50-259 | | The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 259 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-33 for the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. This amendment is in response to your application dated November 3, 2003, as supplemented by a letter dated May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006. |
| | The amendment lowers the allowable value of the scram discharge volume from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons in Technical Specification Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation, Function 7.b. |
| | A copy of the Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's biweekly Federal Register notice. |
| | Sincerely, |
| | /RA by MChernoff for/ |
| | Brian J. Benney, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 4 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-259 |
|
| |
|
| ==Enclosures:== | | ==Enclosures:== |
| : 1. Amendment No. 259 to License No. DPR-33 2. Safety Evaluationcc w/enclosures: See next page | | : 1. Amendment No. 259 to License No. DPR-33 |
| | : 2. Safety Evaluation cc w/enclosures: See next page |
|
| |
|
| ML062130618*NLO w/commentsNRR-058OFFICELPL4/PMLPL2-2/LASBWB/BCEICB/BCOGC*LPL2-2/SC NAMEMChernoff for BBenneyBClaytonGCranstonAHoweBWeismanLRaghavanDATE 9/19/069/19/068/9/068/7/068/30/069/19/06 DISTRIBUTION FOR BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 - ISSUANCE OFAMENDMENT REGARDING THE SCRAM DISCHARGE VOLUME (TAC NO. MC1427) Dated: September 19, 2006 Distribution | | ML062130618 *NLO w/comments NRR-058 OFFICE LPL4/PM LPL2-2/LA SBWB/BC EICB/BC OGC* LPL2-2/SC NAME MChernoff for BClayton GCranston AHowe BWeisman LRaghavan BBenney DATE 9/19/06 9/19/06 8/9/06 8/7/06 8/30/06 9/19/06 |
| :PUBLIC LPL2-2 R/F RidsNrrDorlLpl2-2 (LRaghavan)
| | |
| | DISTRIBUTION FOR BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT REGARDING THE SCRAM DISCHARGE VOLUME (TAC NO. MC1427) |
| | Dated: September 19, 2006 Distribution: |
| | PUBLIC LPL2-2 R/F RidsNrrDorlLpl2-2 (LRaghavan) |
| RidsNrrPMMChernoff (Hard Copy) | | RidsNrrPMMChernoff (Hard Copy) |
| RidsNrrPMEBrown (Hard Copy) | | RidsNrrPMEBrown (Hard Copy) |
| RidsNrrLABClayton (Hard Copy) | | RidsNrrLABClayton (Hard Copy) |
| RidsNrrLAKGoldstein (Hard Copy) | | RidsNrrLAKGoldstein (Hard Copy) |
Line 40: |
Line 49: |
| RidsNrrDirsItsb RidsNrrDeEicb (AHowe) | | RidsNrrDirsItsb RidsNrrDeEicb (AHowe) |
| RidsNrrDssSbwb (GCranston) | | RidsNrrDssSbwb (GCranston) |
| RidsRgn2MailCenter (MWidman)RidsNrrDorlDpr HLi GThomas TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITYDOCKET NO. 50-259BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSEAmendment No. 259License No. DPR-331.The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:A.The application for amendment by Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee) dated November 3, 2003, as supplemented May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, complieswith the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I;B.The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act,and the rules and regulations of the Commission;C.There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendmentcan be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission'sregulations;D.The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense andsecurity or to the health and safety of the public; andE.The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of theCommission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied. 2.Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications asindicated in the attachment to this license amendment and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-33 is hereby amended to read as follows:(2)Technical SpecificationsThe Technical Specifications contained in Appendices A and B, as revised throughAmendment No. 259, are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.3.This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implementedprior to the restart of Unit 1. FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION/RA/ L. Raghavan, Chief, Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | | RidsRgn2MailCenter (MWidman) |
| | RidsNrrDorlDpr HLi GThomas |
| | |
| | TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO. 50-259 BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 259 License No. DPR-33 |
| | : 1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that: |
| | A. The application for amendment by Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee) dated November 3, 2003, as supplemented May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C. There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D. The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied. |
| | : 2. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-33 is hereby amended to read as follows: |
| | (2) Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendices A and B, as revised through Amendment No. 259, are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications. |
| | : 3. This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented prior to the restart of Unit 1. |
| | FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION |
| | /RA/ |
| | L. Raghavan, Chief, Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
|
| |
|
| ==Attachment:== | | ==Attachment:== |
| Changes to the Technical SpecificationsDate of Issuance: September 19, 2006 ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 259TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-33DOCKET NO. 50-259Replace Page 3 of Renewed Operating License DPR-33 with the attached Page 3.Revise the Appendix A Technical Specifications by removing the page identified below andinserting the attached page. The revised page is identified by the captioned amendment number and contains marginal lines indicating the area of change. REMOVE INSERT3.3-73.3-7 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 259TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-33TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITYBROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1DOCKET NO. 50-25
| |
|
| |
|
| ==91.0 INTRODUCTION== | | Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: September 19, 2006 |
| By letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated November 3, 2003, assupplemented by letters dated May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, the Tennessee ValleyAuthority (TVA, the licensee) submitted a request for changes to the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN), Unit 1, Technical Specifications (TSs). The proposed TS changes would (1) lower the Allowable Value (AV) of the Scram Discharge Volume (SDV) Water Level - High Float Switches from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation, Function 7.b, and (2) remove thelow scram pilot air header pressure switches from service. The supplements dated May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, provided additional information that clarified the application,and did not change the staff's original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register on February 3, 2004 (69 FR 5207). | | |
| | ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 259 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-33 DOCKET NO. 50-259 Replace Page 3 of Renewed Operating License DPR-33 with the attached Page 3. |
| | Revise the Appendix A Technical Specifications by removing the page identified below and inserting the attached page. The revised page is identified by the captioned amendment number and contains marginal lines indicating the area of change. |
| | REMOVE INSERT 3.3-7 3.3-7 |
| | |
| | SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 259 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-33 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-259 |
| | |
| | ==1.0 INTRODUCTION== |
| | |
| | By letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated November 3, 2003, as supplemented by letters dated May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA, the licensee) submitted a request for changes to the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN), Unit 1, Technical Specifications (TSs). The proposed TS changes would (1) lower the Allowable Value (AV) of the Scram Discharge Volume (SDV) Water Level - High Float Switches from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation, Function 7.b, and (2) remove the low scram pilot air header pressure switches from service. The supplements dated May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, provided additional information that clarified the application, and did not change the staffs original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register on February 3, 2004 (69 FR 5207). |
| | |
| | ==2.0 BACKGROUND== |
| | /REGULATORY EVALUATION The SDV system receives the water displaced by the motion of the control rod drives during a reactor scram. The system contains two separate SDVs serving the east and west rod banks, each of which drains to its own scram discharge instrument volume (SDIV). The primary design objective of the SDV system is to ensure that sufficient free volume is maintained available to receive water displaced by the control rods during a full scram. Should the SDV fill to a point where there is insufficient free volume to accept the displaced water, control rod insertion would be impeded. SDIV water level is measured by two diverse methods: (1) two thermal probes (resistance-temperature detectors (RTDs)), and (2) two Magnetrol float switches. The trip logic is one-out-of-two taken twice for a scram, so actuation of either the float switches or the RTDs will initiate a high water level scram, and a trip in one of the SDIVs will initiate a reactor scram. |
| | For BFN Unit 1, the SDV high water level trip TS AV is currently 50 gallons measured in the SDIVs, as shown for Function 7 in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation. |
| | In addition, the licensee stated, in response to NRC, Inspection and Enforcement (IE) |
| | Bulletin 80-17, "Failure of 76 of 185 Control Rods to Fully Insert During a Scram at a BWR |
| | [Boiling-Water Reactor]," dated July 1980, and its supplements, that BFN implemented several short-term and long-term modifications to improve the performance of the SDV system and the |
| | |
| | SDIVs. One of the short-term modifications installed on BFN Units 2 and 3 was the scram pilot air header pressure switches, which scrams the reactor on sensing low pressure in the control air system that serves the control rod drive system. The licensee intended to remove these switches following the completion of the long-term modifications associated with the subject bulletin as discussed in Section 3.2 of this Safety Evaluation. |
| | Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.105, Revision 3, "Setpoints for Safety-Related Instrumentation," |
| | describes a method acceptable to the NRC staff for complying with the NRCs regulations for ensuring that setpoints for safety-related instrumentation are initiated within, and remain within, the TS limits. RG 1.105, Revision 3, endorses Instrumentation Society of America (ISA) |
| | Standard ISA-S67.04-1994, Part 1, "Setpoints for Nuclear Safety-Related Instrumentation." |
| | The NRC staff utilized the RG and the above ISA standard in performing this review. |
| | |
| | ==3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION== |
| | |
| | 3.1 Lower AV of the SDV The licensee proposed to revise the SDV Water Level - High Float Switches from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation. The staff reviewed the application as supplemented by the licensee's letter of August 1, 2006, and determined the following: |
| | C The licensees setpoint methodology and its calculations utilize the Analytical Limits to establish the nominal Trip Setpoint, Acceptable As Left (AAL) band, Acceptable As Found (AAF) band and the AV. |
| | C The licensees setpoint methodology accounts for all known uncertainties associated with the instrument loop when calculating the trip setpoint. |
| | C The licensees procedures incorporate the AAL and AAF calibration tolerance values. |
| | For setpoint values found inside the AAL value, the setpoint does not require adjustment. For setpoint values found outside the AAL value and inside the AAF value, the setpoint will be adjusted and left within the AAL valve per surveillance requirements. |
| | For setpoint values found outside the AAF value, the appropriate supervisors will be notified, a review will be performed to determine operability, and the corrective action will be documented in the test log. For setpoint values found outside the AV the channel will be declared inoperable and appropriate action for the Limiting Condition for Operation will be entered. |
| | C The licensee in its August 1, 2006, letter has stated that since credit is not taken in the BFN transient and accident analyses for TS instrument Table 3.3.1.1-1, Function 7.b, SDV Water Level - High Float Switches, in ensuring a Safety Limit is met or that the temperature acceptance criterion of 10 CFR 50.46 is met, this TS instrument function is not safety-limit related. Therefore, the operability of this TS function is controlled by licensee procedures. |
| | The staff has reviewed the licensee's submissions and has determined that the licensee, in order to determine the trip setpoint for the SDV Water Level - High Float Switches, uses a method that conforms to the recommendations of RG 1.105 with respect to establishment of |
| | |
| | analytical limits and the treatment of uncertainties. The licensee, therefore, has determined these trip setpoints and the associated AVs, together with AAL and AAF values, used to determine instrument operability, in an appropriately conservative manner. Accordingly, the proposed change to lower the AV in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Function 7.b, from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons is acceptable. |
| | 3.2 Removal of the Scram Pilot Air Header Pressure Switches from Service As stated above, TVA responded to the modification outlined in IE Bulletin 80-17 by installing the scram pilot air header pressure switches in BFN Units 2 and 3 with the intention of removing them upon the completion of the long-term modifications associated with the bulletin. The long-term modifications included the installation of separate SDIVs for each of the two control rod banks and the addition of diverse instruments in the SDIVs for the high-water level trip function. Field performance of the RTDs was satisfactory, however, a review of system data following reactor scrams showed that the actuation of the float switches typically lagged the RTDs by approximately 20 seconds. Pending remedy of the float switches slow response time, TVA maintained the scram pilot air pressure switches in service. |
| | TVAs system analysis determined that the slow response time of the float switches was due to an undersized piping connection between the SDIVs and the float switch assemblies, which limits the fill rate of the float switch assemblies and delays switch actuation. By this license amendment request, the licensee stated that prior to restart of BFN Unit 1, the connecting piping between the SDIVs and the float switches will be replaced with a larger pipe (from the existing 3/4-inch diameter, Schedule 160 piping, to 2-inch diameter, Schedule 80 piping). This piping change increases the cross-sectional flow area by a factor of 10. To further offset the float switch response time, the float switch assemblies will be physically lowered by approximately 10 inches, which translates to a decrease of the AV of 50 gallons to 46 gallons. |
| | These modifications will remedy the slow response time of the float switches, which eliminates the need to retain the low scram pilot air header pressure trip function. These modifications and the lowering of the SDV water level setpoints have previously been approved on BFN Units 2 and 3 (ADAMS Accession No. ML020990743). |
| | The staff accepted the resolution of the long-term fixes of the SDV system problem. On April 8, 2002, the NRC issued Amendment Nos. 276 and 235 to Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-52 and DPR-68 for the BFN Units 2 and 3, respectively. The amendments removed the requirements for the low-scram pilot air header pressure switches at the BFN Units 2 and 3. |
| | Since the low scram pilot air header pressure switches were never added to the Unit 1 TSs, there is no change for this item. The staff finds this acceptable for BFN Unit 1. |
| | |
| | ==4.0 CONCLUSION== |
| | |
| | Based on its review of the November 3, 2003, May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, submittals, the staff finds that the proposed TS changes for lowering the AV of SDV water level from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons is acceptable. |
| | |
| | ==5.0 STATE CONSULTATION== |
|
| |
|
| ==2.0 BACKGROUND==
| | In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Alabama State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments. |
| /REGULATORY EVALUATIONThe SDV system receives the water displaced by the motion of the control rod drives during areactor scram. The system contains two separate SDVs serving the east and west rod banks,each of which drains to its own scram discharge instrument volume (SDIV). The primary design objective of the SDV system is to ensure that sufficient free volume is maintained available toreceive water displaced by the control rods during a full scram. Should the SDV fill to a pointwhere there is insufficient free volume to accept the displaced water, control rod insertion would be impeded. SDIV water level is measured by two diverse methods: (1) two thermal probes (resistance-temperature detectors (RTDs)), and (2) two Magnetrol float switches. The trip logic is one-out-of-two taken twice for a scram, so actuation of either the float switches or the RTDswill initiate a high water level scram, and a trip in one of the SDIVs will initiate a reactor scram. For BFN Unit 1, the SDV high water level trip TS AV is currently 50 gallons measured in the SDIVs, as shown for Function 7 in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation.In addition, the licensee stated, in response to NRC, Inspection and Enforcement (IE)Bulletin 80-17, "Failure of 76 of 185 Control Rods to Fully Insert During a Scram at a BWR
| |
| [Boiling-Water Reactor]," dated July 1980, and its supplements, that BFN implemented several short-term and long-term modifications to improve the performance of the SDV system and the
| |
| - 2 -SDIVs. One of the short-term modifications installed on BFN Units 2 and 3 was the scram pilotair header pressure switches, which scrams the reactor on sensing low pressure in the control air system that serves the control rod drive system. The licensee intended to remove theseswitches following the completion of the long-term modifications associated with the subject bulletin as discussed in Section 3.2 of this Safety Evaluation. Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.105, Revision 3, "Setpoints for Safety-Related Instrumentation,"describes a method acceptable to the NRC staff for complying with the NRC's regulations forensuring that setpoints for safety-related instrumentation are initiated within, and remain within,the TS limits. RG 1.105, Revision 3, endorses Instrumentation Society of America (ISA)
| |
| Standard ISA-S67.04-1994, Part 1, "Setpoints for Nuclear Safety-Related Instrumentation." The NRC staff utilized the RG and the above ISA standard in performing this review.
| |
|
| |
|
| ==3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION== | | ==6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION== |
| 3.1 Lower AV of the SDVThe licensee proposed to revise the SDV Water Level - High Float Switches from less than orequal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation. The staff reviewed the application as supplemented by the licensee'sletter of August 1, 2006, and determined the following: The licensee's setpoint methodology and its calculations utilize the Analytical Limits toestablish the nominal Trip Setpoint, Acceptable As Left (AAL) band, Acceptable As Found (AAF) band and the AV. The licensee's setpoint methodology accounts for all known uncertainties associatedwith the instrument loop when calculating the trip setpoint. The licensee's procedures incorporate the AAL and AAF calibration tolerance values. For setpoint values found inside the AAL value, the setpoint does not requireadjustment. For setpoint values found outside the AAL value and inside the AAF value, the setpoint will be adjusted and left within the AAL valve per surveillance requirements. For setpoint values found outside the AAF value, the appropriate supervisors will benotified, a review will be performed to determine operability, and the corrective actionwill be documented in the test log. For setpoint values found outside the AV the channelwill be declared inoperable and appropriate action for the Limiting Condition forOperation will be entered.The licensee in its August 1, 2006, letter has stated that since credit is not taken in theBFN transient and accident analyses for TS instrument Table 3.3.1.1-1, Function 7.b,SDV Water Level - High Float Switches, in ensuring a Safety Limit is met or that the temperature acceptance criterion of 10 CFR 50.46 is met, this TS instrument function is not safety-limit related. Therefore, the operability of this TS function is controlled bylicensee procedures.The staff has reviewed the licensee's submissions and has determined that the licensee, inorder to determine the trip setpoint for the SDV Water Level - High Float Switches, uses a method that conforms to the recommendations of RG 1.105 with respect to establishment of
| |
| - 3 -analytical limits and the treatment of uncertainties. The licensee, therefore, has determinedthese trip setpoints and the associated AVs, together with AAL and AAF values, used todetermine instrument operability, in an appropriately conservative manner. Accordingly, theproposed change to lower the AV in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Function 7.b, from less than or equal to50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons is acceptable. 3.2 Removal of the Scram Pilot Air Header Pressure Switches from ServiceAs stated above, TVA responded to the modification outlined in IE Bulletin 80-17 by installingthe scram pilot air header pressure switches in BFN Units 2 and 3 with the intention of removing them upon the completion of the long-term modifications associated with the bulletin. The long-term modifications included the installation of separate SDIVs for each of the two control rod banks and the addition of diverse instruments in the SDIVs for the high-water level trip function. Field performance of the RTDs was satisfactory, however, a review of system datafollowing reactor scrams showed that the actuation of the float switches typically lagged theRTDs by approximately 20 seconds. Pending remedy of the float switches slow response time, TVA maintained the scram pilot air pressure switches in service.TVA's system analysis determined that the slow response time of the float switches was due toan undersized piping connection between the SDIVs and the float switch assemblies, which limits the fill rate of the float switch assemblies and delays switch actuation. By this licenseamendment request, the licensee stated that prior to restart of BFN Unit 1, the connectingpiping between the SDIVs and the float switches will be replaced with a larger pipe (from theexisting 3/4-inch diameter, Schedule 160 piping, to 2-inch diameter, Schedule 80 piping). This piping change increases the cross-sectional flow area by a factor of 10. To further offset the float switch response time, the float switch assemblies will be physically lowered byapproximately 10 inches, which translates to a decrease of the AV of 50 gallons to 46 gallons.
| |
| These modifications will remedy the slow response time of the float switches, which eliminatesthe need to retain the low scram pilot air header pressure trip function. These modifications and the lowering of the SDV water level setpoints have previously been approved on BFN Units 2 and 3 (ADAMS Accession No. ML020990743).The staff accepted the resolution of the long-term fixes of the SDV system problem. On April 8, 2002, the NRC issued Amendment Nos. 276 and 235 to Facility Operating LicenseNos. DPR-52 and DPR-68 for the BFN Units 2 and 3, respectively. The amendments removed the requirements for the low-scram pilot air header pressure switches at the BFN Units 2 and 3. Since the low scram pilot air header pressure switches were never added to the Unit 1 TSs,there is no change for this item. The staff finds this acceptable for BFN Unit 1.
| |
|
| |
|
| ==4.0 CONCLUSION==
| | The amendment changes a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding (69 FR 5207). Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment. |
| Based on its review of the November 3, 2003, May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, submittals, thestaff finds that the proposed TS changes for lowering the AV of SDV water level from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons is acceptable.
| |
| - 4 -
| |
|
| |
|
| ==5.0 STATE CONSULTATION== | | ==7.0 CONCLUSION== |
| In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Alabama State official was notified of theproposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.
| |
|
| |
|
| ==6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION==
| | The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public. |
| The amendment changes a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facilitycomponent located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff hasdetermined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and nosignificant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there isno significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding (69 FR 5207). Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categoricalexclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment. | |
|
| |
|
| ==7.0 CONCLUSION== | | ==8.0 REFERENCES== |
| The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) thereis reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered byoperation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with theCommission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to thecommon defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
| | : 1. Letter from TVA to NRC dated November 3, 2003, "Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN) |
| | Unit 1 TS Change 43 7- Scram Discharge Volume Water Level Set point." |
| | : 2. Letter from TVA to NRC dated May 6, 2004, "Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN) Unit 1 TS Change 437 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Scram Discharge Volume Water Level Set point (TAC No MC 1427)." |
| | : 3. IE Bulletin No. 80-17, "Failure of 76 of 185 Control Rods to Fully Insert During a Scram at a BWR," July 3, 1980. |
| | : 4. NUREG/CR-5191, "Close-out of IE Bulletin 80-17: Failure of 76 of 185 Control Rods to Fully Insert During a Scram at a BWR," December 1988. |
| | Principal Contributors: Hulbert Li George Thomas Date: September 19, 2006 |
|
| |
|
| ==8.0REFERENCES==
| | BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT cc: |
| 1.Letter from TVA to NRC dated November 3, 2003, "Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN)Unit 1 TS Change 43 7- Scram Discharge Volume Water Level Set point."2.Letter from TVA to NRC dated May 6, 2004, "Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN) Unit 1TS Change 437 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Scram Discharge Volume Water Level Set point (TAC No MC 1427)."3.IE Bulletin No. 80-17, "Failure of 76 of 185 Control Rods to Fully Insert During a Scramat a BWR," July 3, 1980.4.NUREG/CR-5191, "Close-out of IE Bulletin 80-17: Failure of 76 of 185 Control Rods toFully Insert During a Scram at a BWR," December 1988.Principal Contributors: Hulbert Li George ThomasDate: September 19, 2006 BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT cc:
| | Mr. Ashok S. Bhatnagar, Senior Vice President Mr. Robert G. Jones, General Manager Nuclear Operations Browns Ferry Site Operations Tennessee Valley Authority Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant 6A Lookout Place Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street P.O. Box 2000 Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Decatur, AL 35609 Mr. Larry S. Bryant, Vice President Mr. Larry S. Mellen Nuclear Engineering & Technical Services Browns Ferry Unit 1 Project Engineer Tennessee Valley Authority Division of Reactor Projects, Branch 6 6A Lookout Place U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1101 Market Street 61 Forsyth Street, SW. |
| Mr. Ashok S. Bhatnagar, Senior Vice President Nuclear Operations Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Mr. Larry S. Bryant, Vice PresidentNuclear Engineering & Technical Services Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801Brian O'Grady, Site Vice PresidentBrowns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL 35609Mr. Robert J. Beecken, Vice PresidentNuclear Support Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 General CounselTennessee Valley Authority ET 11A 400 West Summit Hill DriveKnoxville, TN 37902Mr. John C. Fornicola, ManagerNuclear Assurance and Licensing Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801Mr. Bruce Aukland, Plant ManagerBrowns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL 35609Mr. Masoud Bajestani, Vice PresidentBrowns Ferry Unit 1 Restart Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL 35609Mr. Robert G. Jones, General ManagerBrowns Ferry Site Operations Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL 35609Mr. Larry S. MellenBrowns Ferry Unit 1 Project Engineer Division of Reactor Projects, Branch 6 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 61 Forsyth Street, SW. | | Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303-8931 Brian OGrady, Site Vice President Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Mr. Glenn W. Morris, Manager Tennessee Valley Authority Corporate Nuclear Licensing P.O. Box 2000 and Industry Affairs Decatur, AL 35609 Tennessee Valley Authority 4X Blue Ridge Mr. Robert J. Beecken, Vice President 1101 Market Street Nuclear Support Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place Mr. William D. Crouch, Manager 1101 Market Street Licensing and Industry Affairs Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority General Counsel P.O. Box 2000 Tennessee Valley Authority Decatur, AL 35609 ET 11A 400 West Summit Hill Drive Senior Resident Inspector Knoxville, TN 37902 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Mr. John C. Fornicola, Manager 10833 Shaw Road Nuclear Assurance and Licensing Athens, AL 35611-6970 Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place State Health Officer 1101 Market Street Alabama Dept. of Public Health Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 RSA Tower - Administration Suite 1552 Mr. Bruce Aukland, Plant Manager P.O. Box 303017 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Montgomery, AL 36130-3017 Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Chairman Decatur, AL 35609 Limestone County Commission 310 West Washington Street Mr. Masoud Bajestani, Vice President Athens, AL 35611 Browns Ferry Unit 1 Restart Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL 35609}} |
| Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303-8931 Mr. Glenn W. Morris, Manager Corporate Nuclear Licensing and Industry Affairs Tennessee Valley Authority 4X Blue Ridge 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801Mr. William D. Crouch, M anagerLicensing and Industry Affairs Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL 35609Senior Resident InspectorU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant 10833 Shaw Road Athens, AL 35611-6970State Health OfficerAlabama Dept. of Public Health RSA Tower - Administration Suite 1552 P.O. Box 303017 Montgomery, AL 36130-3017ChairmanLimestone County Commission 310 West Washington Street Athens, AL 35611}} | |
Letter Sequence Approval |
---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML0411106652004-04-16016 April 2004 Brown Ferry, Unit 1, Request for Additional Information, Scram Discharge Volume Water Level Setpoint Project stage: RAI ML0412803272004-05-0606 May 2004 Technical Specifications (TS) Change 437 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Scram Discharge Volume Water Level Setpoint Project stage: Response to RAI ML0500303612005-01-0606 January 2005 Ltr, Request for Information for Status of Amendment (Tac No. MC1330, MC1427, MC2305, MC3812, MC4070, MC4071, MC4072, MC4161, MC3743, MC3744) Project stage: RAI ML0505900362005-02-16016 February 2005 Enclosure 2, 02/01/2005 Conference Call with TVA Presentation Slides on TS Changes Using Method 3 for Interim Solution Project stage: Other ML0511501912005-04-19019 April 2005 Enclosure 3, Ltr, Licensing Action Status and Interdependencies Project stage: Other ML0514300362005-05-20020 May 2005 Response to Nrc'S Letter on Licensing Action Status and Interdependencies, Project stage: Other ML0520706042005-07-26026 July 2005 Notice of Meeting with Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) BFN Units 1, 2, and 3, and Sequoyah Units 1 and 2 on Resolution of Instrument Setpoint Concerns Project stage: Meeting ML0522903972005-09-0202 September 2005 TVA Handout Method 3 Issue BFN Proposed Resolution Project stage: Other ML0522901442005-09-0202 September 2005 Summary of Meeting with the Tennessee Valley Authority Regarding Plant-Specific Resolution of Instrument Setpoint Concerns Project stage: Meeting ML0626303492006-09-19019 September 2006 Technical Specification Pages Scram Discharge Volume (TS 437) Project stage: Other ML0621306182006-09-19019 September 2006 Issuance of Amendment, Scram Discharge Volume (TS 437) Project stage: Approval 2005-04-19
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:Letter
MONTHYEARML24032A4762024-02-0101 February 2024 Final Report of a Part 21 Evaluation Associated with Starter Contactors for the BFN Unit 1 High Pressure Coolant Injection Suppression Pool Inboard Suction Valve ML24023A2802024-01-23023 January 2024 Final Report of a Deviation or Failure to Comply Associated with a Relay in the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Condensate Pump CNL-24-017, Tennessee Valley Authority - Central Emergency Control Center Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure and Emergency Preparedness Department Procedure Revisions2024-01-17017 January 2024 Tennessee Valley Authority - Central Emergency Control Center Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure and Emergency Preparedness Department Procedure Revisions ML24016A3042024-01-16016 January 2024 Final Report of a Part 21 Evaluation Associated with Check Valve 0-CKV-023-0565 for D1 Residual Heat Removal Service Water Pump CNL-23-071, Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3, Inservice Inspection and Augmented Program Interval Revised Request for Alternative 0-ISI-472024-01-11011 January 2024 Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3, Inservice Inspection and Augmented Program Interval Revised Request for Alternative 0-ISI-47 ML24022A1732024-01-0303 January 2024 Receipt and Availability of the Subsequent License Renewal Application ML23319A1992024-01-0303 January 2024 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 333, 356, and 316 Regarding the Technical Specification Surveillance Requirements 3.4.3.2 and 3.5.1.11 Regarding Safety Relief Valves ML23355A2062023-12-21021 December 2023 Request for Exemption from Enhanced Weapons, Firearms Background Checks, and Security Event Notifications Implementation ML23348A3942023-12-14014 December 2023 Interim Part 21 Report of a Potential Deviation or Failure to Comply Associated with Starter Contactors for the High Pressure Coolant Injection Suppression Pool Inboard Suction Valve IR 05000259/20230102023-12-11011 December 2023 Commercial Grade Dedication Inspection Report 05000259/2023010 and 05000260/2023010 and 05000296/2023010 ML23335A0722023-12-0101 December 2023 Interim Report of a Deviation or Failure to Comply Associated with a Relay in the Unit 2 Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Condensate Pump ML23334A2492023-11-30030 November 2023 Site Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revision CNL-23-070, Submittal of Fifth 10-Year Interval Inservice Testing Program Plan2023-11-29029 November 2023 Submittal of Fifth 10-Year Interval Inservice Testing Program Plan ML23331A2532023-11-27027 November 2023 Summary Report for 10 CFR 50.9 Evaluations, Technical Specifications Bases Changes, Technical Requirement Manual Changes, and NRC Commitment Revisions CNL-23-067, Central Emergency Control Center Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revisions2023-11-27027 November 2023 Central Emergency Control Center Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revisions ML23325A1102023-11-21021 November 2023 Anchor Darling Double Disc Gate Valve Commitment Revision ML23320A2542023-11-16016 November 2023 Interim Part 21 Report of a Deviation or Failure to Comply Associated with Check Valve 0-CKV-023-0565 for D1 Residual Heat Removal Service Water Pump IR 05000259/20230032023-11-13013 November 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000259/2023003, 05000260/2023003 and 05000296/2023003 IR 05000259/20230402023-11-0202 November 2023 Supplemental Inspection Supplemental Report 05000259 2023040 and Follow-Up Assessment Letter ML23292A2532023-10-18018 October 2023 BFN 2024-301, Corporate Notification Letter (210-day Ltr) ML23282A0022023-10-0606 October 2023 Interim Part 21 Report of a Deviation or Failure to Comply Associated with Check Valve 0-CKV-023-0565 for D1 Residual Heat Removal Service Water Pump ML23278A0122023-10-0505 October 2023 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Amendment 30 ML23271A1702023-09-28028 September 2023 Site Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revision ML23270A0702023-09-26026 September 2023 SLRA Pre-Application Meeting Summary 09-13-2023 ML23257A1232023-09-22022 September 2023 Administrative Changes to Technical Specification Pages Issued for License Amendment Nos. 332, 355, and 315 CNL-23-061, Tennessee Valley Authority - Central Emergency Control Center Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revision2023-09-20020 September 2023 Tennessee Valley Authority - Central Emergency Control Center Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revision ML23263B1042023-09-20020 September 2023 Special Report 260/2023-001 for Inoperable Post Accident Monitoring (PAM) Instrumentation ML23205A2132023-09-0808 September 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 332, 355, and 315 Regarding the Revision of Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-566-A and TSTF-580-A, Rev. 1 CNL-23-057, Central Emergency Control Center Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revisions. Includes CECC-EPIP-1, Revision 76 and CECC-EPIP-9, Revision 642023-09-0505 September 2023 Central Emergency Control Center Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revisions. Includes CECC-EPIP-1, Revision 76 and CECC-EPIP-9, Revision 64 IR 05000259/20230052023-08-29029 August 2023 Updated Inspection Plan for Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2 and 3 - Report 05000259/2023005, 05000260/2023005 and 05000296/2023005 ML23233A0432023-08-18018 August 2023 Enforcement Action EA-22-122 Inspection Readiness Notification ML23219A1542023-08-17017 August 2023 Request to Use Later Edition of ASME Code for Operation and Maintenance and Alternative Requests BFN-IST-01 Through 05 for the Fifth 10-Year Interval Inservice Testing Program ML23228A1642023-08-16016 August 2023 Site Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revision ML23228A0202023-08-15015 August 2023 (BFN) Unit 1 - Special Report 259/2023-001 for Inoperable Post Accident Monitoring (PAM) Instrumentation IR 05000259/20230022023-08-10010 August 2023 Integrated Inspection Report 05000259/2023002, 05000260/2023002, 05000296/2023002 and 07200052/2023001 ML23192A4472023-07-31031 July 2023 Staff Assessment of Updated Seismic Hazards at TVA Sites Following the NRC Process for the Ongoing Assessment of Natural Hazards Information CNL-23-055, Tennessee Valley Authority - Emergency Preparedness Department Procedure Revision. Includes EPDP-3, Revision 3, Emergency Plan Exercises and Preparedness Drills2023-07-25025 July 2023 Tennessee Valley Authority - Emergency Preparedness Department Procedure Revision. Includes EPDP-3, Revision 3, Emergency Plan Exercises and Preparedness Drills ML23171A8862023-07-24024 July 2023 Issuance of Amend. Nos. 331, 354, and 314; 365 and 359 Regarding Adoption of TSTF-541-A, Add Exceptions to Surveillance Requirements for Valves and Dampers Locked in the Actuated Position ML23201A2182023-07-20020 July 2023 Registration of Use of Cask to Store Spent Fuel (MPC-298 and -299) ML23159A2552023-07-20020 July 2023 Proposed Alternative to the Requirements of the ASME Code Regarding Volumetric Inspection of Standby Liquid Control Nozzles ML23199A3072023-07-18018 July 2023 Site Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revision CNL-23-053, Tennessee Valley Authority - Radiological Emergency Plan Revisions2023-07-18018 July 2023 Tennessee Valley Authority - Radiological Emergency Plan Revisions IR 05000259/20233012023-07-18018 July 2023 NRC Operator License Examination Report Nos. 05000259/2023301, 05000260/2023301, and 05000296/2023301 2024-02-01
[Table view] Category:License-Operating (New/Renewal/Amendments) DKT 50
MONTHYEARML23319A1992024-01-0303 January 2024 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 333, 356, and 316 Regarding the Technical Specification Surveillance Requirements 3.4.3.2 and 3.5.1.11 Regarding Safety Relief Valves ML23257A1232023-09-22022 September 2023 Administrative Changes to Technical Specification Pages Issued for License Amendment Nos. 332, 355, and 315 ML23205A2132023-09-0808 September 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 332, 355, and 315 Regarding the Revision of Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-566-A and TSTF-580-A, Rev. 1 ML23171A8862023-07-24024 July 2023 Issuance of Amend. Nos. 331, 354, and 314; 365 and 359 Regarding Adoption of TSTF-541-A, Add Exceptions to Surveillance Requirements for Valves and Dampers Locked in the Actuated Position ML23116A2472023-05-23023 May 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 330, 353, and 313 Regarding Adoption of TSTF-478, Revision 2 for Combustible Gas Control ML23101A1102023-05-16016 May 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 329, 352, and 312 Regarding Removal of Site Acreage Description from Technical Specifications ML23073A2902023-05-0202 May 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 328, 351, and 311 Adoption of TSTF-505, Revision 2, for Risk-Informed Completion Times and TSTF-439, Revision 2, to Eliminate Second Completion Times ML22348A0052023-01-25025 January 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 326, 349, and 309; 363 and 35; 159 and 67 Regarding Adoption of TSTF-554, Revise Reactor Coolant Leakage Requirements ML22349A6472023-01-20020 January 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 325, 348, and 308; 362 and 356; and 158 and 66 Regarding Adoption of TSTF-529, Rev. 4, Clarify Use and Application Rules ML22348A0662023-01-13013 January 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 325, 348, & 308 Regarding Application of Advanced Framatome Methodologies, & Adoption of TSTF Traveler TSTF-564-A, Rev. 2, in Support of Atrium 11 Fuel Use (EPID L-2021-LLA-0132) - Nonproprietary ML22271A9142022-12-0707 December 2022 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 324, 347, and 307; 360 and 354; 157 and 65 Regarding a Revision to the Emergency Action Level Scheme ML22327A0182022-12-0101 December 2022 Correction of Error Incurred During Issuance of License Amendment No. 322 ML22273A1032022-11-22022 November 2022 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 323, 346, and 306 Regarding Chilled Water Cross-Tie Modification ML22220A2602022-11-21021 November 2022 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 322, 345, and 305 Regarding Adoption of TSTF Traveler TSTF-205-A, Rev. 3, and TSTF-563-A ML22138A3252022-06-24024 June 2022 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 321, 344, and 304 Regarding Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Safety Analysis ML22020A2282022-03-16016 March 2022 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 320, 343, and 303 Regarding the Adoption of Approved Technical Specification Task Force Traveler TSTF-568, Revision 2 ML21285A0682021-10-28028 October 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 319, 342, and 302 Regarding the Adoption of Technical Specification Task Force Traveler TSTF-582, Revision 2 ML21214A1392021-08-30030 August 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 318, 341, and 301 Regarding Changes to Technical Specification 3.8.6, Battery Cell Parameters ML21173A1772021-07-27027 July 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 317, 340, and 300 Regarding Adoption of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Register Section 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems, and Components ML21075A0762021-04-30030 April 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 316, 339, and 299 Regarding the Incorporation of the Tornado Missile Risk Evaluator Into the Licensing Basis ML21041A4892021-04-0808 April 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 315, 338, and 298 Regarding the Adoption of Technical Specifications Task Force Traveler, TSTF-425, Revision 3 ML20268A0822021-01-12012 January 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 314, 337, and 297; 351 and 345; 140 and 46 Regarding Changes to the Technical Specifications ML20282A3452020-11-19019 November 2020 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 313, 336, 296, 350, 344, 138, and 44 Revise Emergency Plan On-Shift Emergency Medical Technician & Onsite Ambulance Requirements ML20190A1052020-08-11011 August 2020 Correction to Amendment No. 319 Regarding Revisions to Technical Specification 3.3.6.1, Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation ML20085G8962020-06-26026 June 2020 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 312, 335, and 295 Regarding Request to Revise Emergency Plan Staff Augmentation Times ML19294A0112019-12-26026 December 2019 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 311, 334, and 294 Adopt Technical Specifications Task Force Traveler, TSTF-542, Revision 2 ML18277A1102019-08-27027 August 2019 Units, 1 & 2 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 309, 332, 292, 345, 339, 128, and 31 Regarding Unbalanced Voltage Protection ML19198A0012019-08-13013 August 2019 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 308, 331, and 291 to Extend Implementation Due Date for Modifications 102 and 106 Related to NFPA 805 (Eid L-2019-LLA-0140) ML19037A1372019-04-0202 April 2019 Revisions to Modifications 85, 102 and 106 Related to National Fire Protection Association 805 Performance-based Standard for Fire Protection of Light Water Reactor Electric Generating Plants ML18241A3192018-10-0909 October 2018 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 306, 329, and 289 to Revise Approved NFPA 805 Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Electric Generating Plants-Revision ML18251A0032018-09-27027 September 2018 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 305, 328, and 288 to Revise Technical Specification 5.5.12, Primary Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program (CAC Nos. MG0113, MG0114, and MG0115; EPID L-2017-LLA-0292) ML18138A4522018-05-29029 May 2018 Bf, Units 1, 2, and 3; Sequoyah, Units 1 and 2; Watts Bar, Units 1 and 2 - Correction to an Omitted Reference for License Amendment Regarding Request to Upgrade (CAC Nos. MF9054, MF9055, MF9056, MF9057, MF9058, MF9059, and MF9060, EPID L-20 ML17289A0322017-12-22022 December 2017 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Request to Upgrade Emergency Action Level Scheme (CAC Nos. MF9054-60; EPID L2017-LLA-0160) ML17215A2432017-10-0202 October 2017 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3; Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Issuance of Amendments to Change Technical Specifications to Adopt Technical Specifications Task Force Traveler-522 (CAC No. MF9562-MF9566) ML17032A1202017-08-14014 August 2017 Non-Proprietary Issuance of Amendments Regarding Extended Power Uprate ML17034A3602017-03-27027 March 2017 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 298, 322, 282, and 338 and 331 - Revise Technical Specification 5.3, Unit Staff Qualifications to Replace References to Rg 1.8, Rev. 2 with TVA Nuclear Quality ... ML17052A1362017-03-16016 March 2017 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 - Issuance of Amendment Nos. 297, 321, and 281 to Change the Completion Date of Cyber Security Plan Implementation Milestone 8 (CAC Nos. MF8125, MF8126, and MF8127) ML16330A1582017-01-17017 January 2017 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Revisions to Technical Specification 4.3.1.2, Fuel Storage Criticality ML16028A4142016-04-26026 April 2016 Issuance of Amendment to Revise Technical Specifications Related to Cycle 18 Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio ML15317A4782016-02-0909 February 2016 Issuance of Amendment to Revise Technical Specifications Related to Cycle 18 Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio ML15344A3212016-01-0707 January 2016 Issuance of Amendment Regarding Modification of Technical Specification 3.4.9, RCS Pressure and Temperature (P/T) Limits ML15321A4722015-12-23023 December 2015 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Revision to Table 3.3.6.1-1, Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation ML15287A2132015-12-16016 December 2015 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Technical Specification Changes to Reactor Core Safety Limits ML15324A2472015-12-14014 December 2015 Issuance of Amendment to Adopt TSTF-501, Revision 1, Relocate Stored Fuel Oil and Lube Oil Volume Valves to Licensee Control ML15287A3712015-12-0404 December 2015 Issuance of Amendments for the Adoption of Technical Specifications Task Force Standard Technical Specifications Change Traveler TSTF-535 (CNL-15-029) ML15212A7962015-10-28028 October 2015 Issuance of Amendments to Transition to Fire Protection Program NFPA-805 ML15251A5402015-09-29029 September 2015 Issuance of Amendment Regarding Control Rod Scram Time Testing Frequency Per TSTF-460, Revision 0 ML15065A0492015-06-0202 June 2015 Issuance of Amendment Revising Pressure and Temperature Limit Curves ML13254A0812013-09-13013 September 2013 Issuance of Amendment Under Exigent Circumstances to Remove Notes from Technical Specifications 3.4.9-1 and 3.4.9-2 ML13199A2212013-08-30030 August 2013 Issuance of Amendments Re. Deletion of References to Section XI of the ASME Code and Incorporate References to the ASME OM Code and Allow Application of 25% Extension of Surveillance Intervals 2024-01-03
[Table view] Category:Safety Evaluation
MONTHYEARML23319A1992024-01-0303 January 2024 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 333, 356, and 316 Regarding the Technical Specification Surveillance Requirements 3.4.3.2 and 3.5.1.11 Regarding Safety Relief Valves ML23205A2132023-09-0808 September 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 332, 355, and 315 Regarding the Revision of Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-566-A and TSTF-580-A, Rev. 1 ML23219A1542023-08-17017 August 2023 Request to Use Later Edition of ASME Code for Operation and Maintenance and Alternative Requests BFN-IST-01 Through 05 for the Fifth 10-Year Interval Inservice Testing Program ML23171A8862023-07-24024 July 2023 Issuance of Amend. Nos. 331, 354, and 314; 365 and 359 Regarding Adoption of TSTF-541-A, Add Exceptions to Surveillance Requirements for Valves and Dampers Locked in the Actuated Position ML23116A2472023-05-23023 May 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 330, 353, and 313 Regarding Adoption of TSTF-478, Revision 2 for Combustible Gas Control ML23101A1102023-05-16016 May 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 329, 352, and 312 Regarding Removal of Site Acreage Description from Technical Specifications ML23073A2902023-05-0202 May 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 328, 351, and 311 Adoption of TSTF-505, Revision 2, for Risk-Informed Completion Times and TSTF-439, Revision 2, to Eliminate Second Completion Times ML23054A2902023-03-13013 March 2023 Request for Relief from the Requirements of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Regarding Weld Examination Coverage ML23048A3042023-03-0808 March 2023 Tennessee Valley Authority - Request for Relief from Requirements of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Regarding Weld Examination Coverage (EPID L-2022-LLR-0045,-0046,-0047) ML22348A0052023-01-25025 January 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 326, 349, and 309; 363 and 35; 159 and 67 Regarding Adoption of TSTF-554, Revise Reactor Coolant Leakage Requirements ML22349A6472023-01-20020 January 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 325, 348, and 308; 362 and 356; and 158 and 66 Regarding Adoption of TSTF-529, Rev. 4, Clarify Use and Application Rules ML22348A0662023-01-13013 January 2023 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 325, 348, & 308 Regarding Application of Advanced Framatome Methodologies, & Adoption of TSTF Traveler TSTF-564-A, Rev. 2, in Support of Atrium 11 Fuel Use (EPID L-2021-LLA-0132) - Nonproprietary ML22271A9142022-12-0707 December 2022 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 324, 347, and 307; 360 and 354; 157 and 65 Regarding a Revision to the Emergency Action Level Scheme ML22273A1032022-11-22022 November 2022 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 323, 346, and 306 Regarding Chilled Water Cross-Tie Modification ML22220A2602022-11-21021 November 2022 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 322, 345, and 305 Regarding Adoption of TSTF Traveler TSTF-205-A, Rev. 3, and TSTF-563-A ML22298A2852022-11-14014 November 2022 Request for Alternative to American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI, Paragraph IWB-2420(B) and Use of Code Case N-526 ML22138A3252022-06-24024 June 2022 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 321, 344, and 304 Regarding Spent Fuel Pool Criticality Safety Analysis ML22084A0012022-04-0505 April 2022 Clinch River Nuclear Site; Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2; Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, Review of Quality Assurance Plan Changes ML22020A2282022-03-16016 March 2022 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 320, 343, and 303 Regarding the Adoption of Approved Technical Specification Task Force Traveler TSTF-568, Revision 2 ML22010A1952022-01-12012 January 2022 Request to Use Later Edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants ML21285A0682021-10-28028 October 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 319, 342, and 302 Regarding the Adoption of Technical Specification Task Force Traveler TSTF-582, Revision 2 ML21214A1392021-08-30030 August 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 318, 341, and 301 Regarding Changes to Technical Specification 3.8.6, Battery Cell Parameters ML21173A1772021-07-27027 July 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 317, 340, and 300 Regarding Adoption of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Register Section 50.69, Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems, and Components ML21075A0762021-04-30030 April 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 316, 339, and 299 Regarding the Incorporation of the Tornado Missile Risk Evaluator Into the Licensing Basis ML21041A4892021-04-0808 April 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 315, 338, and 298 Regarding the Adoption of Technical Specifications Task Force Traveler, TSTF-425, Revision 3 ML20268A0822021-01-12012 January 2021 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 314, 337, and 297; 351 and 345; 140 and 46 Regarding Changes to the Technical Specifications ML20282A3452020-11-19019 November 2020 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 313, 336, 296, 350, 344, 138, and 44 Revise Emergency Plan On-Shift Emergency Medical Technician & Onsite Ambulance Requirements ML20253A1812020-09-23023 September 2020 Proposed Alternative to the Requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code ML20085G8962020-06-26026 June 2020 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 312, 335, and 295 Regarding Request to Revise Emergency Plan Staff Augmentation Times ML19329E3192020-01-0202 January 2020 SE Implementation of Hardened Containment Vents Capable of Operation Under Severe Accident Conditions Related to Order EA-13-109 (CAC Nos. MF4540, MF4541 and MF4542; EPID No. L-2014-JLD-0044) ML19294A0112019-12-26026 December 2019 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 311, 334, and 294 Adopt Technical Specifications Task Force Traveler, TSTF-542, Revision 2 ML18277A1102019-08-27027 August 2019 Units, 1 & 2 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 309, 332, 292, 345, 339, 128, and 31 Regarding Unbalanced Voltage Protection ML19198A0012019-08-13013 August 2019 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 308, 331, and 291 to Extend Implementation Due Date for Modifications 102 and 106 Related to NFPA 805 (Eid L-2019-LLA-0140) ML19037A1372019-04-0202 April 2019 Revisions to Modifications 85, 102 and 106 Related to National Fire Protection Association 805 Performance-based Standard for Fire Protection of Light Water Reactor Electric Generating Plants ML19010A2742019-03-18018 March 2019 Final Safety Evaluation by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Topical Report- TVA Overall Basin Probable Maximum Precipitation and Local Intense Precipitation, Calculation, CDQ0000002016000041 Tennessee Valley Authority ML19016A2152019-02-28028 February 2019 Relief from the Requirements of American Association of Mechanical Engineers Code Section XI Inservice Inspection Program, Request for an Alternative ISI-46 ML18323A1722018-12-31031 December 2018 Relief Request No. 1 ISI 29 Regarding Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval Regarding Examination Coverage for Certain Pressure Retaining Welds ML18323A0262018-12-0404 December 2018 Relief Request No. 1-ISI-28 Regarding Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval Regarding Examination Coverage for Certain Pressure Retaining Reactor Vessel Welds ML18241A3192018-10-0909 October 2018 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 306, 329, and 289 to Revise Approved NFPA 805 Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Electric Generating Plants-Revision ML18251A0032018-09-27027 September 2018 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 305, 328, and 288 to Revise Technical Specification 5.5.12, Primary Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program (CAC Nos. MG0113, MG0114, and MG0115; EPID L-2017-LLA-0292) ML18236A3312018-09-24024 September 2018 Safety Evaluation Regarding Implementation of Mitigating Strategies and Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Related to Orders EA-12-049 and EA-12-051 ML18197A3072018-08-30030 August 2018 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Request to Change Technical Specification 3.3.1 and Surveillance Requirement 3.2.4 ML18171A3372018-07-10010 July 2018 Issuance of Amendment to Revise License Condition 2.C(18)(a)3 ML18138A4522018-05-29029 May 2018 Bf, Units 1, 2, and 3; Sequoyah, Units 1 and 2; Watts Bar, Units 1 and 2 - Correction to an Omitted Reference for License Amendment Regarding Request to Upgrade (CAC Nos. MF9054, MF9055, MF9056, MF9057, MF9058, MF9059, and MF9060, EPID L-20 ML17289A0322017-12-22022 December 2017 Issuance of Amendments Regarding Request to Upgrade Emergency Action Level Scheme (CAC Nos. MF9054-60; EPID L2017-LLA-0160) ML17261A0362017-10-0606 October 2017 Request for Request 3-ISI-28 Regarding Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval Examination Coverage of Inside Radius and Nozzle-to-Vessel Welds ML17215A2432017-10-0202 October 2017 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3; Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Issuance of Amendments to Change Technical Specifications to Adopt Technical Specifications Task Force Traveler-522 (CAC No. MF9562-MF9566) ML17032A1202017-08-14014 August 2017 Non-Proprietary Issuance of Amendments Regarding Extended Power Uprate ML17145A5522017-08-11011 August 2017 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 - Alternative Request IST-RR-1 for the Fourth 10-Year Inservice Testing Interval (CAC Nos. MF9087, MF9088, and MF9089) ML17034A3602017-03-27027 March 2017 Issuance of Amendment Nos. 298, 322, 282, and 338 and 331 - Revise Technical Specification 5.3, Unit Staff Qualifications to Replace References to Rg 1.8, Rev. 2 with TVA Nuclear Quality ... 2024-01-03
[Table view] |
Text
September 19, 2006 Mr. Karl W. Singer Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801
SUBJECT:
BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT REGARDING THE SCRAM DISCHARGE VOLUME (TAC NO. MC1427) (TS-437)
Dear Mr. Singer:
The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 259 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-33 for the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. This amendment is in response to your application dated November 3, 2003, as supplemented by a letter dated May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006.
The amendment lowers the allowable value of the scram discharge volume from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons in Technical Specification Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation, Function 7.b.
A copy of the Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's biweekly Federal Register notice.
Sincerely,
/RA by MChernoff for/
Brian J. Benney, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 4 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-259
Enclosures:
- 1. Amendment No. 259 to License No. DPR-33
- 2. Safety Evaluation cc w/enclosures: See next page
ML062130618 *NLO w/comments NRR-058 OFFICE LPL4/PM LPL2-2/LA SBWB/BC EICB/BC OGC* LPL2-2/SC NAME MChernoff for BClayton GCranston AHowe BWeisman LRaghavan BBenney DATE 9/19/06 9/19/06 8/9/06 8/7/06 8/30/06 9/19/06
DISTRIBUTION FOR BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT REGARDING THE SCRAM DISCHARGE VOLUME (TAC NO. MC1427)
Dated: September 19, 2006 Distribution:
PUBLIC LPL2-2 R/F RidsNrrDorlLpl2-2 (LRaghavan)
RidsNrrPMMChernoff (Hard Copy)
RidsNrrPMEBrown (Hard Copy)
RidsNrrLABClayton (Hard Copy)
RidsNrrLAKGoldstein (Hard Copy)
RidsOgcRp RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter GHill (2 Hard Copies)
RidsNrrDirsItsb RidsNrrDeEicb (AHowe)
RidsNrrDssSbwb (GCranston)
RidsRgn2MailCenter (MWidman)
RidsNrrDorlDpr HLi GThomas
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY DOCKET NO. 50-259 BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 259 License No. DPR-33
- 1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A. The application for amendment by Tennessee Valley Authority (the licensee) dated November 3, 2003, as supplemented May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C. There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D. The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
- 2. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-33 is hereby amended to read as follows:
(2) Technical Specifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendices A and B, as revised through Amendment No. 259, are hereby incorporated in the license. The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
- 3. This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented prior to the restart of Unit 1.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
/RA/
L. Raghavan, Chief, Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Attachment:
Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: September 19, 2006
ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 259 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-33 DOCKET NO. 50-259 Replace Page 3 of Renewed Operating License DPR-33 with the attached Page 3.
Revise the Appendix A Technical Specifications by removing the page identified below and inserting the attached page. The revised page is identified by the captioned amendment number and contains marginal lines indicating the area of change.
REMOVE INSERT 3.3-7 3.3-7
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 259 TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-33 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-259
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated November 3, 2003, as supplemented by letters dated May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA, the licensee) submitted a request for changes to the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN), Unit 1, Technical Specifications (TSs). The proposed TS changes would (1) lower the Allowable Value (AV) of the Scram Discharge Volume (SDV) Water Level - High Float Switches from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation, Function 7.b, and (2) remove the low scram pilot air header pressure switches from service. The supplements dated May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, provided additional information that clarified the application, and did not change the staffs original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register on February 3, 2004 (69 FR 5207).
2.0 BACKGROUND
/REGULATORY EVALUATION The SDV system receives the water displaced by the motion of the control rod drives during a reactor scram. The system contains two separate SDVs serving the east and west rod banks, each of which drains to its own scram discharge instrument volume (SDIV). The primary design objective of the SDV system is to ensure that sufficient free volume is maintained available to receive water displaced by the control rods during a full scram. Should the SDV fill to a point where there is insufficient free volume to accept the displaced water, control rod insertion would be impeded. SDIV water level is measured by two diverse methods: (1) two thermal probes (resistance-temperature detectors (RTDs)), and (2) two Magnetrol float switches. The trip logic is one-out-of-two taken twice for a scram, so actuation of either the float switches or the RTDs will initiate a high water level scram, and a trip in one of the SDIVs will initiate a reactor scram.
For BFN Unit 1, the SDV high water level trip TS AV is currently 50 gallons measured in the SDIVs, as shown for Function 7 in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation.
In addition, the licensee stated, in response to NRC, Inspection and Enforcement (IE)
Bulletin 80-17, "Failure of 76 of 185 Control Rods to Fully Insert During a Scram at a BWR
[Boiling-Water Reactor]," dated July 1980, and its supplements, that BFN implemented several short-term and long-term modifications to improve the performance of the SDV system and the
SDIVs. One of the short-term modifications installed on BFN Units 2 and 3 was the scram pilot air header pressure switches, which scrams the reactor on sensing low pressure in the control air system that serves the control rod drive system. The licensee intended to remove these switches following the completion of the long-term modifications associated with the subject bulletin as discussed in Section 3.2 of this Safety Evaluation.
Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.105, Revision 3, "Setpoints for Safety-Related Instrumentation,"
describes a method acceptable to the NRC staff for complying with the NRCs regulations for ensuring that setpoints for safety-related instrumentation are initiated within, and remain within, the TS limits. RG 1.105, Revision 3, endorses Instrumentation Society of America (ISA)
Standard ISA-S67.04-1994, Part 1, "Setpoints for Nuclear Safety-Related Instrumentation."
The NRC staff utilized the RG and the above ISA standard in performing this review.
3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION
3.1 Lower AV of the SDV The licensee proposed to revise the SDV Water Level - High Float Switches from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Reactor Protection System Instrumentation. The staff reviewed the application as supplemented by the licensee's letter of August 1, 2006, and determined the following:
C The licensees setpoint methodology and its calculations utilize the Analytical Limits to establish the nominal Trip Setpoint, Acceptable As Left (AAL) band, Acceptable As Found (AAF) band and the AV.
C The licensees setpoint methodology accounts for all known uncertainties associated with the instrument loop when calculating the trip setpoint.
C The licensees procedures incorporate the AAL and AAF calibration tolerance values.
For setpoint values found inside the AAL value, the setpoint does not require adjustment. For setpoint values found outside the AAL value and inside the AAF value, the setpoint will be adjusted and left within the AAL valve per surveillance requirements.
For setpoint values found outside the AAF value, the appropriate supervisors will be notified, a review will be performed to determine operability, and the corrective action will be documented in the test log. For setpoint values found outside the AV the channel will be declared inoperable and appropriate action for the Limiting Condition for Operation will be entered.
C The licensee in its August 1, 2006, letter has stated that since credit is not taken in the BFN transient and accident analyses for TS instrument Table 3.3.1.1-1, Function 7.b, SDV Water Level - High Float Switches, in ensuring a Safety Limit is met or that the temperature acceptance criterion of 10 CFR 50.46 is met, this TS instrument function is not safety-limit related. Therefore, the operability of this TS function is controlled by licensee procedures.
The staff has reviewed the licensee's submissions and has determined that the licensee, in order to determine the trip setpoint for the SDV Water Level - High Float Switches, uses a method that conforms to the recommendations of RG 1.105 with respect to establishment of
analytical limits and the treatment of uncertainties. The licensee, therefore, has determined these trip setpoints and the associated AVs, together with AAL and AAF values, used to determine instrument operability, in an appropriately conservative manner. Accordingly, the proposed change to lower the AV in TS Table 3.3.1.1-1, Function 7.b, from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons is acceptable.
3.2 Removal of the Scram Pilot Air Header Pressure Switches from Service As stated above, TVA responded to the modification outlined in IE Bulletin 80-17 by installing the scram pilot air header pressure switches in BFN Units 2 and 3 with the intention of removing them upon the completion of the long-term modifications associated with the bulletin. The long-term modifications included the installation of separate SDIVs for each of the two control rod banks and the addition of diverse instruments in the SDIVs for the high-water level trip function. Field performance of the RTDs was satisfactory, however, a review of system data following reactor scrams showed that the actuation of the float switches typically lagged the RTDs by approximately 20 seconds. Pending remedy of the float switches slow response time, TVA maintained the scram pilot air pressure switches in service.
TVAs system analysis determined that the slow response time of the float switches was due to an undersized piping connection between the SDIVs and the float switch assemblies, which limits the fill rate of the float switch assemblies and delays switch actuation. By this license amendment request, the licensee stated that prior to restart of BFN Unit 1, the connecting piping between the SDIVs and the float switches will be replaced with a larger pipe (from the existing 3/4-inch diameter, Schedule 160 piping, to 2-inch diameter, Schedule 80 piping). This piping change increases the cross-sectional flow area by a factor of 10. To further offset the float switch response time, the float switch assemblies will be physically lowered by approximately 10 inches, which translates to a decrease of the AV of 50 gallons to 46 gallons.
These modifications will remedy the slow response time of the float switches, which eliminates the need to retain the low scram pilot air header pressure trip function. These modifications and the lowering of the SDV water level setpoints have previously been approved on BFN Units 2 and 3 (ADAMS Accession No. ML020990743).
The staff accepted the resolution of the long-term fixes of the SDV system problem. On April 8, 2002, the NRC issued Amendment Nos. 276 and 235 to Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-52 and DPR-68 for the BFN Units 2 and 3, respectively. The amendments removed the requirements for the low-scram pilot air header pressure switches at the BFN Units 2 and 3.
Since the low scram pilot air header pressure switches were never added to the Unit 1 TSs, there is no change for this item. The staff finds this acceptable for BFN Unit 1.
4.0 CONCLUSION
Based on its review of the November 3, 2003, May 6, 2004, and August 1, 2006, submittals, the staff finds that the proposed TS changes for lowering the AV of SDV water level from less than or equal to 50 gallons to less than or equal to 46 gallons is acceptable.
5.0 STATE CONSULTATION
In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Alabama State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.
6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
The amendment changes a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration, and there has been no public comment on such finding (69 FR 5207). Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.
7.0 CONCLUSION
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
8.0 REFERENCES
- 1. Letter from TVA to NRC dated November 3, 2003, "Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN)
Unit 1 TS Change 43 7- Scram Discharge Volume Water Level Set point."
- 2. Letter from TVA to NRC dated May 6, 2004, "Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN) Unit 1 TS Change 437 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Scram Discharge Volume Water Level Set point (TAC No MC 1427)."
- 3. IE Bulletin No. 80-17, "Failure of 76 of 185 Control Rods to Fully Insert During a Scram at a BWR," July 3, 1980.
- 4. NUREG/CR-5191, "Close-out of IE Bulletin 80-17: Failure of 76 of 185 Control Rods to Fully Insert During a Scram at a BWR," December 1988.
Principal Contributors: Hulbert Li George Thomas Date: September 19, 2006
BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT cc:
Mr. Ashok S. Bhatnagar, Senior Vice President Mr. Robert G. Jones, General Manager Nuclear Operations Browns Ferry Site Operations Tennessee Valley Authority Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant 6A Lookout Place Tennessee Valley Authority 1101 Market Street P.O. Box 2000 Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Decatur, AL 35609 Mr. Larry S. Bryant, Vice President Mr. Larry S. Mellen Nuclear Engineering & Technical Services Browns Ferry Unit 1 Project Engineer Tennessee Valley Authority Division of Reactor Projects, Branch 6 6A Lookout Place U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1101 Market Street 61 Forsyth Street, SW.
Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303-8931 Brian OGrady, Site Vice President Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Mr. Glenn W. Morris, Manager Tennessee Valley Authority Corporate Nuclear Licensing P.O. Box 2000 and Industry Affairs Decatur, AL 35609 Tennessee Valley Authority 4X Blue Ridge Mr. Robert J. Beecken, Vice President 1101 Market Street Nuclear Support Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place Mr. William D. Crouch, Manager 1101 Market Street Licensing and Industry Affairs Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority General Counsel P.O. Box 2000 Tennessee Valley Authority Decatur, AL 35609 ET 11A 400 West Summit Hill Drive Senior Resident Inspector Knoxville, TN 37902 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Mr. John C. Fornicola, Manager 10833 Shaw Road Nuclear Assurance and Licensing Athens, AL 35611-6970 Tennessee Valley Authority 6A Lookout Place State Health Officer 1101 Market Street Alabama Dept. of Public Health Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 RSA Tower - Administration Suite 1552 Mr. Bruce Aukland, Plant Manager P.O. Box 303017 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Montgomery, AL 36130-3017 Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Chairman Decatur, AL 35609 Limestone County Commission 310 West Washington Street Mr. Masoud Bajestani, Vice President Athens, AL 35611 Browns Ferry Unit 1 Restart Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Tennessee Valley Authority P.O. Box 2000 Decatur, AL 35609