Letter Sequence Other |
---|
TAC:MC1330, (Open) TAC:MC1427, (Approved, Closed) TAC:MC2305, (Approved, Closed) TAC:MC3743, Revise Containment Requirements During Handling Irradiated Fuel and Core Alterations (Approved, Closed) TAC:MC3744, (Approved, Closed) TAC:MC3812, Revise Containment Requirements During Handling Irradiated Fuel and Core Alterations (Approved, Closed) TAC:MC4070, (Open) TAC:MC4071, (Open) TAC:MC4072, (Open) TAC:MC4161, (Open) |
|
MONTHYEARML0607202531975-05-23023 May 1975 May 23, 1975 - Final Summary Report Unit 2 Startup Project stage: Other ML0606805861975-05-23023 May 1975 May 23, 1975 - Final Summary Report Startup, Enclosure 4 Project stage: Other ML0606805901977-05-0909 May 1977 May 9, 1977 - Final Summary Report Startup, Enclosure 5 Project stage: Other ML0607202721977-05-0909 May 1977 May 9, 1977 - Final Summary Report Unit 3 Startup Project stage: Other ML0607202731992-11-30030 November 1992 a Guide for Environmental and Best Management Practices for Tennessee Valley Authority Transmission Construction and Maintenance Activities Project stage: Other ML0607202982001-03-13013 March 2001 Environmental Assessment Bear Creek Reservoirs Land Management Plan Project stage: Other ML0606805992001-03-31031 March 2001 Bear Creek Reservoirs Land Management Plan Project stage: Other ML0607202952001-03-31031 March 2001 Bear Creek Reservoirs Land Management Plan, Resource Stewardship Bear Creek Watershed Project stage: Other ML0411106652004-04-16016 April 2004 Brown Ferry, Unit 1, Request for Additional Information, Scram Discharge Volume Water Level Setpoint Project stage: RAI ML0412803272004-05-0606 May 2004 Technical Specifications (TS) Change 437 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Scram Discharge Volume Water Level Setpoint Project stage: Response to RAI ML0419802222004-07-0909 July 2004 Technical Specification 436 - Increased Main Steam Isolation Valve Leakage Rate Limits and Exemption from 10CFR50, Appendix J Project stage: Other ML0423708492004-08-23023 August 2004 (BFN) - Unit 1- Proposed Technical, Specifications (TS) Change TS - 431 - Request for License Amendment - Extended Power Uprate (EPU) Operation Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) Update Project stage: Request ML0423701002004-08-23023 August 2004 Browns Ferry, Ltr, Framatome Proprietary Review Project stage: Other ML0425702122004-09-13013 September 2004 RAI, Allowable Value for Reactor Vessel Water Level Project stage: RAI ML0429403302004-10-19019 October 2004 RAI, Power Range Neutron Monitor Upgrade Project stage: RAI ML0431303662004-11-0808 November 2004 Technical Specifications (TS) Change 430 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding Power Range Neutron Monitor Upgrade with Implementation of Average Power Range Monitor and Rod Block Monitor.. Project stage: Response to RAI ML0431004762004-11-18018 November 2004 Ltr, Results of Acceptance Review for EPU Project stage: Acceptance Review ML0429202832004-11-18018 November 2004 Ltr, Results of Acceptance Review for Extended Power Uprate Project stage: Acceptance Review ML0433701792004-12-29029 December 2004 RAI Re Extended Power Uprate Project stage: RAI ML0434400452004-12-30030 December 2004 RAI, Extended Power Uprate Project stage: RAI ML0500303612005-01-0606 January 2005 Ltr, Request for Information for Status of Amendment (Tac No. MC1330, MC1427, MC2305, MC3812, MC4070, MC4071, MC4072, MC4161, MC3743, MC3744) Project stage: RAI ML0436405562005-01-10010 January 2005 Ltr, Acceptance Review to Extend Technical Specification (TAC No. MC4070, MC4071, MC4072) (TS-447) Project stage: Acceptance Review ML0505900362005-02-16016 February 2005 Enclosure 2, 02/01/2005 Conference Call with TVA Presentation Slides on TS Changes Using Method 3 for Interim Solution Project stage: Other ML0505601502005-02-23023 February 2005 Response to NRC Acceptance Review Letter and Request for Additional Information Related to Technical Specifications Change No. TS-431 - Request for Extended Power Uprate Operation Project stage: Request ML0505603372005-02-23023 February 2005 (BFN) - Response to Nrc'S Acceptance Review Letter and Request for Additional Information Related to Technical Specifications Change No. TS-418 - Request for Extended Power Uprate Operation (Tac Nos MC3743 and MC3744) Project stage: Request ML0606805962005-02-28028 February 2005 Hydrothermal Modeling of Browns Ferry with Units 1, 2, and 3 at Extended Power Uprate Project stage: Other ML0607202932005-02-28028 February 2005 Hydrothermal Modeling of Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant with Units 1, 2, and 3 at Extended Power Uprate Project stage: Other ML0507703702005-03-11011 March 2005 Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-447, Request for Additional Information (RAI) - Extension of Channel Calibration Surveillance Requirement Performance Frequency and Allowable Value Revision Project stage: Request ML0511501912005-04-19019 April 2005 Enclosure 3, Ltr, Licensing Action Status and Interdependencies Project stage: Other ML0511702442005-04-25025 April 2005 (BFN) - Unit 1 - Response to Nrc'S Request for Additional Information Related to Technical Specifications (TS) Change No. TS-431 - Request for Extended Power Uprate Operation Project stage: Request ML0511702422005-04-25025 April 2005 (BFN) - Units 2, and 3 - Response to Nrc'S Request for Additional Information Related to Technical Specifications (TS) Change No. TS-418 - Request for Extended Power Uprate Operation Project stage: Request ML0514300362005-05-20020 May 2005 Response to Nrc'S Letter on Licensing Action Status and Interdependencies, Project stage: Other ML0513201462005-05-27027 May 2005 EPU Acceptance Review Results to Increase Maximum Authorized Power Level (TAC No. MC3743, MC3744) (TS-418) Project stage: Acceptance Review ML0516403912005-06-0606 June 2005 Response to Technical Specifications (TS) Change No. TS-418 - Request for License Amendment - Extended Power Uprate (EPU) Operation Project stage: Request ML0515802492005-06-0606 June 2005 Response to Nrc'S Request for Additional Information Related to Technical Specifications (TS) Change No. TS - 431 - Request for License Amendment Extended Power Uprate (EPU) Operation Project stage: Request ML0517902372005-06-24024 June 2005 Part 21 Notification - Critical Power Determination for G314 and GE12 Fuel with Zircaloy Spacers, 06/24/2005 Project stage: Request ML0513201482005-06-29029 June 2005 Ltr., Ind FRN Facility Operating License for EPU and Opportunity for a Hearing Project stage: Other ML0515703812005-06-29029 June 2005 Fanp, Withholding Information from Public (TACs MC3743, MC3744) Project stage: Other ML0516606022005-06-29029 June 2005 Ltr., Withholding Public Disclosure for GE Company (TACs MC3743, MC3744) Project stage: Other ML0511600362005-07-0101 July 2005 Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment and Notice of Opportunity for a Hearing Regarding Extended Power Uprate (Tac No. MC3743, MC3744) Project stage: Other ML0518703902005-07-0707 July 2005 06/08/05, Meeting Summary with TVA and Framatome Regarding Fuel Analysis Methodology, Enclosure 2, Framatome Presentation Project stage: Meeting ML0520706042005-07-26026 July 2005 Notice of Meeting with Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) BFN Units 1, 2, and 3, and Sequoyah Units 1 and 2 on Resolution of Instrument Setpoint Concerns Project stage: Meeting ML0521301352005-08-15015 August 2005 RAI, Regarding Channel Calibration Test Interval (TS-447) (Tac Nos. MC4070, MC4071, MC4072) Project stage: RAI ML0524204912005-08-23023 August 2005 Ltr., GE Request for Withholding Information from Public on Steam Dryer Analysis for EPU Conditions Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance ML0522903972005-09-0202 September 2005 TVA Handout Method 3 Issue BFN Proposed Resolution Project stage: Other ML0522901442005-09-0202 September 2005 Summary of Meeting with the Tennessee Valley Authority Regarding Plant-Specific Resolution of Instrument Setpoint Concerns Project stage: Meeting ML0527302952005-09-30030 September 2005 (BFN) - Unit 1 - Technical Specifications (TS) Change 433 - Response to Request for Additional Information Regarding 24-Month Fuel Cycle (Tac No. MC4161) Project stage: Response to RAI ML0524303412005-10-0303 October 2005 RAI, Extended Power Uprate (TS-431) (Tac No. MC3812) Project stage: RAI ML0525104462005-10-0303 October 2005 Request for Additional Information Regarding Extended Power Uprate Project stage: RAI ML0531103432005-11-0404 November 2005 Technical Specification Change TS-447 Second Request for Additional Information - Extension of Channel Calibration Surveillance Requirements Performance Frequency and Allowable Value Revision Project stage: Request 2005-11-04
[Table View] |
TVA Handout Method 3 Issue BFN Proposed ResolutionML052290397 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Browns Ferry |
---|
Issue date: |
09/02/2005 |
---|
From: |
Ellen Brown NRC/NRR/DLPM/LPD2 |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Brown E, NRR/DLPM, 415-2315 |
Shared Package |
---|
ML052290179 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
TAC MC1330, TAC MC1427, TAC MC2305, TAC MC3743, TAC MC3744, TAC MC3812, TAC MC4070, TAC MC4071, TAC MC4072, TAC MC4161 |
Download: ML052290397 (3) |
|
|
---|
Category:Meeting Briefing Package/Handouts
MONTHYEARML24284A0042024-10-16016 October 2024 Application to Use Online Monitoring Methodology for the Sequoyah Nuclear Plant and Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Session Slides ML24228A2312024-08-15015 August 2024 TVA Meeting Slides for August 19 Public Meeting Re QAPD Supplement ML24149A1332024-05-29029 May 2024 Pre-Submittal Meeting for Proposed License Amendment Regarding Hydrologic Analysis Updates Public Portion Meeting Slides ML24113A0962024-04-22022 April 2024 RIPE Pre-Submittal Meeting Slides ML24078A2722024-04-10010 April 2024 Subsequent License Renewal Public Scoping Meeting ML24067A2832024-03-27027 March 2024 2023 Browns Ferry, Sequoyah and Watts Bar Annual Assessment Public Meeting Presentation Slides ML24032A2752024-02-0707 February 2024 Pre-Pre-Submittal Meeting for Proposed License Amendment Regarding Hydrologic Analysis Updates (Slides) ML24019A1512024-01-22022 January 2024 Slides - Modification of Browns Ferry Technical Specifications to Eliminate LCO 3.3.2.1 Actions C.2.1.1 and C.2.1.2 for Rod Worth ML23130A0912023-05-11011 May 2023 TVA Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Safety Pre-Application Public Meeting Slides 05/11/2023 ML23130A0922023-05-11011 May 2023 NRC Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3, Subsequent License Renewal Application, Public Meeting Slides ML23128A2882023-05-0808 May 2023 TVA Nuclear Plants -2022 EOC Media Slides ML23025A0472023-01-25025 January 2023 Pre-Submittal Meeting for Proposed License Amendment Request Regarding Technical Specification Surveillance Requirements 3.4.3.2 and 3.5.1.11 Regarding Safety Relief Valves - January 25, 2023 ML22285A1902022-10-13013 October 2022 October 13, 2022 Public Meeting on 5th Interval Alternative Planned Requests - Licensee Slides ML22277A6562022-10-0606 October 2022 Subsequent License Renewal Application - SAMA Pre-Application Meeting October, 2022 (TVA Slides) ML22279A8992022-10-0606 October 2022 Subsequent License Renewal Application - SAMA Pre-Application Meeting October 6, 2022-TVA Slides ML22264A2332022-09-22022 September 2022 Slides for Pre-Submittal Meeting for Request to Use a Later Edition of the ASME OM Code for the Fifth Inservice Testing (IST) 10-Year Interval ML22080A1662022-03-21021 March 2022 TVA Nuclear Plants -2021 EOC Media Loop Slides for Automatic Play ML21281A2282021-10-13013 October 2021 Tennessee Valley Authority Fleet Pre-Submittal Meeting for License Amendment Request to Change Emergency Action Level Scheme Presentation - October 13, 2021 (EPID L-2021-LRM-0096) (Slides) ML21270A0322021-09-27027 September 2021 Presentation Slides for Browns Ferry Pre-submittal Public Meeting September 27, 2021 ML21265A0422021-09-21021 September 2021 Presentation Slides for Browns Ferry Pre-submittal Public Meeting 09/22/2021 ML21250A3012021-09-0707 September 2021 TVA Slides for September 7, 2021, Presubmittal Meeting to Discuss Planned Browns Ferry TSTF-505 License Amendment Request ML21152A1872021-06-0101 June 2021 TVA Slides for June 1, 2021, Presubmittal Meeting to Discuss Planned Control Bay Chiller Cross-Tie License Amendment Request ML24019A1322020-11-0909 November 2020 ANP-3874NP, Revision 1, Browns Ferry Atrium 11 Control Rod Drop Accident Analysis with the AURORA-B CRDA ML20175A0552020-06-23023 June 2020 TVA Slides for June 23, 2020, Emergency Plan Change Presubmittal Meeting ML20156A2812020-06-0808 June 2020 TVA Slides for June 8, 2020, ATRIUM-11 Presubmittal Meeting ML20092F5742020-04-0202 April 2020 TVA Slides for Browns Ferry 50.69 License Amendment Request Presubmittal Meeting ML20049G1822020-02-18018 February 2020 February 20, 2020 - Pre-submittal Meeting Presentation - Transition to Westinghouse Fuel ML20022A0262020-01-22022 January 2020 NEI Presentation Status Update for Ropte Short Term Action Plan: Removed Planned Unavailability for Mitigating Systems Performance Index ML24019A1482019-01-28028 January 2019 Surveillance Procedure 2-SR-3.1.6.1, BPWS Compliance Verification, Revision 006 ML18255A0102018-09-12012 September 2018 NRC Slides for Target Rock Public Meeting ML18255A0142018-09-12012 September 2018 BWROG Presentation Slides for Public Meeting Sept 12 2018 ML18239A2522018-08-27027 August 2018 Proposed Changes to NFPA 805 License Conditions ML18158A2862018-06-0707 June 2018 May 30, 2018 Summary of Public Meeting with Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Docket No. 50-259, 50-260, and 50-296 ML17271A0162017-09-28028 September 2017 Meeting Slide for Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Hydrology Precipitation Model Topical Report Review Status ML17212A8432017-08-0101 August 2017 Meeting Slides for Pre-submittal Meeting with Tennessee Valley Authority on Unbalanced Voltage License Amendment Request for TVA Nuclear Plants ML17034A3322017-02-0303 February 2017 Presentation Slides for Public Meeting Regarding Browns Ferry Extended Power Uprate License Amendment Request Transmission System Update Supplements ML16341A7422017-01-0404 January 2017 Presentation Slides for Browns Ferry Pre-application Meeting Regarding Mellla+ ML16356A0342017-01-0404 January 2017 Pre-app Meeting Mellla+ LAR Final ML16350A2962016-12-14014 December 2016 Enclosure 3- Reactor Oversight Process Task Force FAQ Log- November 16, 2016 ML16279A2332016-10-0505 October 2016 Summary of Closed Pre-Decisional Enforcement Conference with Tennessee Valley Authority Regarding Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant ML16189A3482016-07-19019 July 2016 Presentation Slides for July 19, 2016, Public Meeting ML16200A2592016-07-19019 July 2016 July 19, 2016: NRC Public Meeting on Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Extended Power Uprate License Amendment Request ML16028A0962016-02-0101 February 2016 Emergency Core Cooling System Preferred Pump Logic, Common Accident Signal Logic, and Unit Priority Re-Trip Logic License Amendment Request ML15308A1002015-11-10010 November 2015 Public Meeting Presentation Slides Extended Power Uprate License Amendment Request NRC Public Meeting ML15195A1252015-07-14014 July 2015 July 14, 2015 - Public Meeting Slides on Browns Ferry Seismic Risk Insights ML15293A4582015-07-14014 July 2015 Slides for July 14, 2015 Public Meeting on Browns Ferry Seismic Risk Evaluations (MF3764 Through MF3766) CNL-15-122, Presentation Slides for Closed Meeting Extended Power Uprate (EPU) License Amendment Request2015-07-0808 July 2015 Presentation Slides for Closed Meeting Extended Power Uprate (EPU) License Amendment Request ML15146A2792015-05-21021 May 2015 Bf EOC Meeting Summary 2015 ML15099A2912015-04-22022 April 2015 4/22/2015, Enclosure 2, Slides for TVA Presentation to the NRC in Support of Steam Dryer Replacement ML14147A3222014-05-27027 May 2014 Public Meeting Summary 05/21/2014 to Present Annual Assessment 2024-08-15
[Table view] |
Text
Method 3 Issue BFN Proposed Resolution NRC ISSUES
- 1) Need method to ensure licensee adheres to approved setpolnt methodology.
- 2) Need control to ensure licensee performs timely reset/re-calibration of instruments found out of tolerance (outside allowable as-left (AAL) range).
- 3) Need control to ensure licensee performs timely resettrecalibration of instruments found out of tolerance (outside allowable as-found (AAF) range).
- 4) Need control to ensure licensee evaluates in a timely manner the operability of Instruments found outside of AAF range.
- 5) Need control to ensure licensee evaluates unacceptable out of tolerance trends.
TVA ISSUES
- 1) Need method to make non-technical changes and conservative methodology changes under 10CFR50.59 process without a Technical Specification change.
- 2) Need process for resetting/recalibrating instruments without placing Instrument channel in a tripped condition if Instrument found outside AAF range.
- 3) Need reasonable time period for addressing past operability and setpoint drift trends.
- 4) Allow continued use of ISA Method 3 for setpoint determination.
- 5) Allow TVA at a future date to revise, if desired by TVA, the below agreement In accordance with the generic Issue resolution.
PROPOSAL
- 1) In BFN Technical Specifications Section 5.0 "Administrative Controls" add a section which states the following:
Instrument setpoints are determined using the methodology defined in TVA procedure TI-28, uSetpoint Calculations". The methodology for determining the nominal trip setpoint (NTSP), allowable as left (ML) range, allowable as found (AAF) range and allowable value (AV) (i.e.,
Technical Specification value) has been reviewed and approved by the NRC (References ??, ?? and ??) and is an NRC requirement.
During Instrument calibration, any LSSS instrument for a variable upon which a Technical Specification Safety Limit has been placed found outside the ML range will be immediately reset within the ML range and verified to function as expected. Operations will be Immediately notified of Instruments outside the AAF range and the deficient performance will be documented Inthe corrective action program. An Instrument outside the AAF range will not be declared operable until successfully reset within the AAL range and an evaluation performed to verify that the Instrument will perform In accordance with design basis assumptions. After the Instrument has been declared operable, the corrective action program will address out of tolerance trends as well as the Impact on past operability when the instrument was out of tolerance in accordance with 10CFR50.36 Section (c)(1)(ii)(A). The out of tolerance trend and past operability evaluations shall be completed within 25 percent of the next surveillance interval not to exceed 31 days.
- 2) Inthe BFN Technical Specifications Section 5.0 Administrative Controls", directly reference the NRC Safety Evaluation Report (SER) that approved the TVA methodology. This is included InRem 1 above.
Enclosure 3
- 3) For all instruments related to Limiting Safety System Settings for a variable upon which a Technical Specification Safety Limit has been placed as defined by 10CFR50.36 Section (c)(1)(ii)(A)), add a reference to the above requirement in BFN Technical Specifications Section 5.0 "Administrative Controls".
- 4) Inthe Technical Specification Bases for Section 5.0 "Administrative Controls", add the following:
- 1) Bases for Instrument Reset - The requirement to reset during Channel Calibration ensures that the channel is maintained within the design basis uncertainty analysis and verifies that the channel conforms to the expected performance criteria such as repeatability, hysteresis, deadband, etc.
- 2) Bases for Immediate Operability - The Channel's (all devices of the channel) ability to operate within the Acceptable As Left (ML) range ensures that the Channel is Operable.
- 3) Bases for Long Term Operability - Any Channel or individual devices of the Channel found outside of the Acceptable As Found (AAF) range shall be documented as a test deficiency and entered into the Corrective Action Program. The test deficiency shall be evaluated within 25% of the next surveillance interval not to exceed 31 days from the initiation of the Corrective Action documentation.
DISCUSSION NRC ISSUE 1 Even though the licensee has an NRC SER for the setpoint methodology, the NRC has no means to control changes to the methodology. If the utility deviates from the methodology, the NRC cannot issue a violation for not following the SER.
Referencing the SER in the Technical Specifications allows the NRC to issue a violation for not following the Technical Specifications if unacceptable methodology changes occur.
NRC ISSUE 2 AND 3 The statement in the Technical Specification will require an immediate reset of out of tolerance Instruments. In general, instruments are not operable while they are undergoing calibration/recalibration; therefore the Instrument would be reset before being declared operable.
NRC ISSUES 4 AND 5 The reset process will ensure the Instrument is functioning properly before it Is declared operable. A totally failed instrument would either fail high, fail low or fail as Is and would not be capable of being successfully reset; therefore, it would be unlikely that a non-functioning instrument could be returned to an operable status.
Instrument drift Is a slow process. Once the Instrument is reset, Itwill function as designed if called upon. Since drift is slow, it is not expected to exceed the ML within 25 per cent of the surveillance Interval. Therefore the instrument will perform its design function if called upon during the evaluation period. The statement Inthe Technical Specifications will require trending and ensure the timely addressing of impact on past operability..
TVA ISSUE I By only referencing the NRC SER Inthe Technical Specifications, the licensee can make non-technical and/or conservative methodology changes for the setpoint procedure under the 10CFR50.59 process. Conservative changes would be defined as those that move the setpoint and/or allowable ranges further from the associated safety limit. This would increase the margin of safety.
TVA ISSUE 2 The Immediate reset and documentation in the corrective action program (if required as described above) would allow continued operation without placing an Instrument channel in a tripped condition. Thus no off-normal alignments would be created.
Tripping of channels through either normal switches or jumpers Introduces the possibility of human error and spurious plant/system trips and actually reduces plant safety compared to merely quickly resetting the instrument. Instruments are in general not operable while undergoing calibration. The instrument would be maintained in a non-operable status until the successful reset.
TVA ISSUE 3 Allowing 25 percent of the next surveillance interval not to exceed one month allows a reasonable time period for trending and addressing past operability issues. Since drift is slow, It is not expected to exceed the ML within 25 per cent of the surveillance Intervals. Therefore the instrument will perform its design function if called upon during the evaluation period.
TVA ISSUE 4 ISA Method 3 would continue to be used thus eliminating the need for large Unit 1 restart documentation changes. Additionally, all BFN Technical Specifications would maintain a consistent technical basis.
TVA ISSUE 5 TVA would evaluate any generic resolution for possible inclusion in the future.
The evaluation process for instruments outside the AAF range may include a number of factors to provide confidence that the channel Isfunctional, such as:
- an evaluation of previous history (is Itthe first out-of-tolerance condition, or have their been previous occurrences for the instrument in question)
- the magnitude of change per unit time,
- the response of the instrument to reset,
- the repeatability of instrument response,
- effects of extreme or seasonal ambient environmental changes (temperature, pressure, etc.),
- human performance or M&TE errors during the current (or previous) calibrations,
- first-time pressure set or deformation on a diaphragm (for a newly installed instrument),
- induced errors due to response time variations of the calibration Input (for example, a thermal dispersion level measurement has a faster response time going from dry to wet that from wet to dry),
- known physical characteristic changes due to environment, or The evaluation, combined with resetting the trip setpoint, permits the channel to be returned to service. The specifics of the assessment need not be included In the Tech Specs or Bases. The corrective action program would be used to track assessments and define the threshold for trending. The program Is sufficiently robust to provide confidence that anomalies will be identified, tracked and resolved.