ML13260A202: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Chen. Qiao-Lynn From: Hon, Andrew Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:58 AM To: Shea, Joseph W (jwshea@tva.gov) | {{#Wiki_filter:Chen. Qiao-Lynn From: Hon, Andrew Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:58 AM To: Shea, Joseph W (jwshea@tva.gov) | ||
Cc: Mathew, Roy; Matharu, Gurcharan; Broaddus, Doug; Poole, Justin; Schrull, Edward Dustin (edschrull@tva.gov); | Cc: Mathew, Roy; Matharu, Gurcharan; Broaddus, Doug; Poole, Justin; Schrull, Edward Dustin (edschrull@tva.gov); Chen, Qiao-Lynn | ||
Chen, Qiao-Lynn | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Accepted for Review of Application to Modify Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Tech Spec Regarding AC Sources -TAC MF-2549, ML13260A202 | Accepted for Review of Application to Modify Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Tech Spec Regarding AC Sources - TAC MF-2549, ML13260A202 | ||
==Dear Mr. Shea,== | ==Dear Mr. Shea,== | ||
By letter dated August 1, 2013 (ADAMS NO. ML13220A103), TVA submitted the subject license amendment request for Watts Bar Unit-1. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. | |||
Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | By letter dated August 1, 2013 (ADAMS NO. ML13220A103), TVA submitted the subject license amendment request for Watts Bar Unit-1. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me. ADAMS Accession No. ML13260A202 Andy Hon, PE Project Manager (Watts Bar Nuclear Unit-1) Plant Licensing Branch 1/-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-8480 OWFN08E5 Mail Stop 08G-9a andrew.hon@nrc.gov 1}} | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me. | |||
ADAMS Accession No. ML13260A202 Andy Hon, PE Project Manager (Watts Bar Nuclear Unit-1) | |||
Plant Licensing Branch 1/-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-8480 OWFN08E5 Mail Stop 08G-9a andrew.hon@nrc.gov 1}} | |||
Latest revision as of 13:27, 4 November 2019
| ML13260A202 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Watts Bar  |
| Issue date: | 09/17/2013 |
| From: | Andrew Hon Plant Licensing Branch II |
| To: | James Shea Tennessee Valley Authority |
| Hon A | |
| References | |
| TAC MF2549 | |
| Download: ML13260A202 (1) | |
Text
Chen. Qiao-Lynn From: Hon, Andrew Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 10:58 AM To: Shea, Joseph W (jwshea@tva.gov)
Cc: Mathew, Roy; Matharu, Gurcharan; Broaddus, Doug; Poole, Justin; Schrull, Edward Dustin (edschrull@tva.gov); Chen, Qiao-Lynn
Subject:
Accepted for Review of Application to Modify Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Tech Spec Regarding AC Sources - TAC MF-2549, ML13260A202
Dear Mr. Shea,
By letter dated August 1, 2013 (ADAMS NO. ML13220A103), TVA submitted the subject license amendment request for Watts Bar Unit-1. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
ADAMS Accession No. ML13260A202 Andy Hon, PE Project Manager (Watts Bar Nuclear Unit-1)
Plant Licensing Branch 1/-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-8480 OWFN08E5 Mail Stop 08G-9a andrew.hon@nrc.gov 1