ML18052B063: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:March 7, 2018 | {{#Wiki_filter:March 7, 2018 Mr. Matthew Sanford Interim Reactor Facility Director University of Missouri-Columbia Research Reactor Center 1513 Research Park Drive Columbia, MO 65211 | ||
Mr. Matthew Sanford Interim Reactor Facility Director University of Missouri-Columbia Research Reactor Center 1513 Research Park Drive Columbia, MO | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT COLUMBIA - REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE RE: | UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT COLUMBIA - REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE RE: PUBLIC MEETING CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS PROPRIETARY INFORMATION ON THE SELECTIVE GAS EXTRACTION TARGET EXPERIMENTAL FACILITY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA RESEARCH REACTOR (CAC NO. A11010/05000186/L-2017-LLA-0227) | ||
==Dear Mr. Sanford:== | ==Dear Mr. Sanford:== | ||
| Line 29: | Line 27: | ||
By letter dated February 14, 2018 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML18047A138), the University of Missouri-Columbia Research Reactor requested a closed session for the February 26, 2018, public meeting to discuss the technical and licensing considerations associated with the Selective Gas Extraction (SGE) experimental facility, and submitted an affidavit executed by Christina A. Back, Vice President of Nuclear Technologies and Materials, General Atomics, requesting that the following information be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 2.390: | By letter dated February 14, 2018 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML18047A138), the University of Missouri-Columbia Research Reactor requested a closed session for the February 26, 2018, public meeting to discuss the technical and licensing considerations associated with the Selective Gas Extraction (SGE) experimental facility, and submitted an affidavit executed by Christina A. Back, Vice President of Nuclear Technologies and Materials, General Atomics, requesting that the following information be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 2.390: | ||
: 1. Project Timeline, including anticipated licensing action submittals and needed licensing approval schedules; and | : 1. Project Timeline, including anticipated licensing action submittals and needed licensing approval schedules; and | ||
: 2. Technical discussion of the SGE separation technology - presentation titled | : 2. Technical discussion of the SGE separation technology - presentation titled General Atomics Selective Gas Extraction Process. | ||
The affidavit stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons: | The affidavit stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons: | ||
: a. Information that discloses a process, method, or apparatus, including supporting data and analyses, where prevention of its use by General Atomics | : a. Information that discloses a process, method, or apparatus, including supporting data and analyses, where prevention of its use by General Atomics competitors without license from General Atomics constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies. | ||
: b. Information which, if used by a competitor, would reduce his or her expenditure of resources or improve his or her competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing of a similar product. | : b. Information which, if used by a competitor, would reduce his or her expenditure of resources or improve his or her competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing of a similar product. | ||
M. Sanford c. Information which discloses patentable subject matter for which it may be desirable to obtain patent protection. | |||
: d. The information sought to be withheld is being submitted to the NRC in confidence. The information is of a sort customarily held in confidence by General Atomics, and is in fact so held. The information sought to be withheld has, to the best of my knowledge and belief, consistently been held in confidence by General Atomics. No public disclosure has been made, and it is not available in public sources. | : d. The information sought to be withheld is being submitted to the NRC in confidence. The information is of a sort customarily held in confidence by General Atomics, and is in fact so held. The information sought to be withheld has, to the best of my knowledge and belief, consistently been held in confidence by General Atomics. No public disclosure has been made, and it is not available in public sources. | ||
: e. The information classified as proprietary was developed and compiled by General Atomics at a significant cost to General Atomics. This information is classified as proprietary because it contains detailed data and analytical results not available elsewhere. This information would provide other parties, including competitors, with information from General Atomics technical database and the results of evaluations performed by General Atomics. Release of this information would improve a competitor's position without the competitor having to expend similar resources for the development of the database. A significant effort has been expended by General | : e. The information classified as proprietary was developed and compiled by General Atomics at a significant cost to General Atomics. This information is classified as proprietary because it contains detailed data and analytical results not available elsewhere. This information would provide other parties, including competitors, with information from General Atomics technical database and the results of evaluations performed by General Atomics. Release of this information would improve a competitor's position without the competitor having to expend similar resources for the development of the database. A significant effort has been expended by General Atomics to develop this information. | ||
: f. The research, development, engineering, and analytical costs associated with General Atomics' unique selective gas extraction system and process comprise a substantial investment of time and resources by General Atomics, whose precise value is difficult to quantify, but clearly is substantial and extends beyond the original development cost. | |||
Atomics to develop this information. | Public disclosure of the information sought to be withheld is likely to cause substantial harm to General Atomics' competitive position. | ||
: f. The research, development, engineering, and analytical costs associated with General Atomics' unique selective gas extraction system and process comprise a substantial investment of time and resources by General Atomics, whose precise value is difficult to quantify, but clearly is substantial and extends beyond the original development cost. Public disclosure of the information sought to be withheld is likely to cause substantial harm to General Atomics' competitive position. | |||
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed your submittal in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and, on the basis of the statements in the affidavit, has determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains proprietary commercial information and should be withheld from public disclosure. | The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed your submittal in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and, on the basis of the statements in the affidavit, has determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains proprietary commercial information and should be withheld from public disclosure. | ||
Therefore, the submitted information marked as proprietary will be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(b)(5) as well as Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. | Therefore, the submitted information marked as proprietary will be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(b)(5) as well as Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. | ||
Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information. | |||
Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information. | If the basis for withholding information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure. | ||
If the basis for withholding information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request | |||
includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure. | |||
Reactor | M. Sanford If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact me at (301) 415-0893 or by electronic mail at Geoffrey.Wertz@nrc.gov. | ||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
Geoffrey A. Wertz, Project Manager Research and Test Reactors Licensing Branch Division of Licensing Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-186 License No. R-103 cc: See next page | |||
Gainesville, FL | University of Missouri-Columbia Docket No. 50-186 cc: | ||
Les Foyto, Associate Director Reactor and Facilities Operations University of Missouri - Columbia Research Reactor Center 1513 Research Park Drive Columbia, MO 65211 Homeland Security Coordinator Missouri Office of Homeland Security P.O. Box 749 Jefferson City, MO 65102 Planner, Dept of Health and Senior Services Section for Environmental Public Health P.O. Box 570 Jefferson City, MO 65102-0570 Deputy Director for Policy Department of Natural Resources 1101 Riverside Drive Fourth Floor East Jefferson City, MO 65101 A-95 Coordinator Commissioners Office Office of Administration P.O. Box 809 State Capitol Building, Room 125 Jefferson City, MO 65101 Planning Coordinator Missouri Department of Natural Resources 1101 Riverside Drive Jefferson City, MO 65101 Test, Research and Training Reactor Newsletter P.O. Box 118300 University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611 | |||
ML18052B063 | ML18052B063 *concurrence via e-mail NRR-088 OFFICE NRR/DLP/PRLB/PM NRR/DLP/PRLB/LA* NRR/DLP/PRLB/ABC NRR/DLP/PRLB/PM NAME GWertz NParker SLynch (SLynch for) GWertz DATE 2/21/18 2/21/18 3/7/18 3/71818}} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:32, 21 October 2019
| ML18052B063 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | University of Missouri-Columbia |
| Issue date: | 03/07/2018 |
| From: | Geoffrey Wertz Research and Test Reactors Licensing Projects Branch |
| To: | Sanford M Univ of Missouri - Columbia |
| Wertz G, NRR/DLP, 415-0893 | |
| References | |
| CAC A11010, EPID L-2017-LLA-0227 | |
| Download: ML18052B063 (5) | |
Text
March 7, 2018 Mr. Matthew Sanford Interim Reactor Facility Director University of Missouri-Columbia Research Reactor Center 1513 Research Park Drive Columbia, MO 65211
SUBJECT:
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT COLUMBIA - REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE RE: PUBLIC MEETING CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS PROPRIETARY INFORMATION ON THE SELECTIVE GAS EXTRACTION TARGET EXPERIMENTAL FACILITY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA RESEARCH REACTOR (CAC NO. A11010/05000186/L-2017-LLA-0227)
Dear Mr. Sanford:
By letter dated February 14, 2018 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML18047A138), the University of Missouri-Columbia Research Reactor requested a closed session for the February 26, 2018, public meeting to discuss the technical and licensing considerations associated with the Selective Gas Extraction (SGE) experimental facility, and submitted an affidavit executed by Christina A. Back, Vice President of Nuclear Technologies and Materials, General Atomics, requesting that the following information be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 2.390:
- 1. Project Timeline, including anticipated licensing action submittals and needed licensing approval schedules; and
- 2. Technical discussion of the SGE separation technology - presentation titled General Atomics Selective Gas Extraction Process.
The affidavit stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons:
- a. Information that discloses a process, method, or apparatus, including supporting data and analyses, where prevention of its use by General Atomics competitors without license from General Atomics constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies.
- b. Information which, if used by a competitor, would reduce his or her expenditure of resources or improve his or her competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing of a similar product.
M. Sanford c. Information which discloses patentable subject matter for which it may be desirable to obtain patent protection.
- d. The information sought to be withheld is being submitted to the NRC in confidence. The information is of a sort customarily held in confidence by General Atomics, and is in fact so held. The information sought to be withheld has, to the best of my knowledge and belief, consistently been held in confidence by General Atomics. No public disclosure has been made, and it is not available in public sources.
- e. The information classified as proprietary was developed and compiled by General Atomics at a significant cost to General Atomics. This information is classified as proprietary because it contains detailed data and analytical results not available elsewhere. This information would provide other parties, including competitors, with information from General Atomics technical database and the results of evaluations performed by General Atomics. Release of this information would improve a competitor's position without the competitor having to expend similar resources for the development of the database. A significant effort has been expended by General Atomics to develop this information.
- f. The research, development, engineering, and analytical costs associated with General Atomics' unique selective gas extraction system and process comprise a substantial investment of time and resources by General Atomics, whose precise value is difficult to quantify, but clearly is substantial and extends beyond the original development cost.
Public disclosure of the information sought to be withheld is likely to cause substantial harm to General Atomics' competitive position.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed your submittal in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and, on the basis of the statements in the affidavit, has determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains proprietary commercial information and should be withheld from public disclosure.
Therefore, the submitted information marked as proprietary will be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(b)(5) as well as Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.
Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information.
If the basis for withholding information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.
M. Sanford If you have any questions regarding this review, please contact me at (301) 415-0893 or by electronic mail at Geoffrey.Wertz@nrc.gov.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Geoffrey A. Wertz, Project Manager Research and Test Reactors Licensing Branch Division of Licensing Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-186 License No. R-103 cc: See next page
University of Missouri-Columbia Docket No. 50-186 cc:
Les Foyto, Associate Director Reactor and Facilities Operations University of Missouri - Columbia Research Reactor Center 1513 Research Park Drive Columbia, MO 65211 Homeland Security Coordinator Missouri Office of Homeland Security P.O. Box 749 Jefferson City, MO 65102 Planner, Dept of Health and Senior Services Section for Environmental Public Health P.O. Box 570 Jefferson City, MO 65102-0570 Deputy Director for Policy Department of Natural Resources 1101 Riverside Drive Fourth Floor East Jefferson City, MO 65101 A-95 Coordinator Commissioners Office Office of Administration P.O. Box 809 State Capitol Building, Room 125 Jefferson City, MO 65101 Planning Coordinator Missouri Department of Natural Resources 1101 Riverside Drive Jefferson City, MO 65101 Test, Research and Training Reactor Newsletter P.O. Box 118300 University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611
ML18052B063 *concurrence via e-mail NRR-088 OFFICE NRR/DLP/PRLB/PM NRR/DLP/PRLB/LA* NRR/DLP/PRLB/ABC NRR/DLP/PRLB/PM NAME GWertz NParker SLynch (SLynch for) GWertz DATE 2/21/18 2/21/18 3/7/18 3/71818