ML13114A596: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
| author name = Schiller D
| author name = Schiller D
| author affiliation = - No Known Affiliation
| author affiliation = - No Known Affiliation
| addressee name = Macfarlane A M
| addressee name = Macfarlane A
| addressee affiliation = NRC/Chairman
| addressee affiliation = NRC/Chairman
| docket = 05000361, 05000362
| docket = 05000361, 05000362
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:keý J, C-Oj;00(?Joosten, Sandy From: Sent: To:  
{{#Wiki_filter:keý C-Oj;00(?J, Joosten, Sandy From:
Sent:
Doris Schiller [dorisschiller55@gmail.com]
Saturday, April 06, 2013 3:43 PM ogi    cýc To:


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Doris Schiller [dorisschiller55@gmail.com]
 
Saturday, April 06, 2013 3:43 PM CHAIRMAN Resource SONGS restart ogi cýc Vf OP PLease let me know if the following statement is true: "The NRC is approximately two years away from promulgating regulations addressing Beyond Design Basis events such as great quakes and tsunamis, yet they plan to make their restart decision within a couple of months -before they have fully addressed all circumstances that could result in a catastrophic meltdown.
CHAIRMAN Resource SONGS restart Vf OP PLease let me know if the following statement is true:
The NRC's claim that "safety is their highest priority" is clearly nothing more than misleading rhetoric designed to lull a trusting population into accepting a potential nuclear nightmare" If this is true, I can't believe that the NRC is not taking in account major earthquakes in deciding whether to restart SONGS. Please use common sense in your decision -don't hide behind red tape in doing the right thingl Don't experiment on the people who live ciose to SONGS -Edison doesn't have enough insurance to cover a failed experiment in turning on their flawed power plant.One person needs to be responsible for this potential fiasco. We will not let the blame be pushed around -you as the head of the NRC will be held personally responsible.
approximately two years away from promulgating regulations "The NRC isdecision                                                            addressing Beyond Design Basis events such as great quakes and tsunamis, yet they plan to make their restart           within a couple of months - before they have fully addressed all circumstances that could result in a catastrophic meltdown. The NRC's claim that "safety is their highest priority" is clearly nothing more than misleading rhetoric designed to lull a trusting population into accepting a potential nuclear nightmare" Ifthis is true, I can't believe that the NRC is not taking in account major earthquakes in deciding whether to restart SONGS. Please use common sense in your decision - don't hide behind red tape in doing the right thingl Don't experiment on the people who live ciose to SONGS - Edison doesn't have enough insurance to cover a failed experiment in turning on their flawed power plant.
You need to monitor things closely -NO excuses will be accepted.--rq (e- '- (,L/f--0 7~-~aS-: 55C1E}}
One person needs to be responsible for this potential fiasco. We will not let the blame be pushed around - you as the head of the NRC will be held personally responsible.
You need to monitor things closely - NO excuses will be accepted.
--rq (e- '- (,L/f--0 7                                                                                                                                 ~-~aS-:       55C1E}}

Latest revision as of 20:19, 4 November 2019

G20120809/LTR-12-0598 - E-mail Doris Schiller SONGS Restart
ML13114A596
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 04/06/2013
From: Schiller D
- No Known Affiliation
To: Macfarlane A
NRC/Chairman
References
G20120809, LTR-12-0598
Download: ML13114A596 (1)


Text

keý C-Oj;00(?J, Joosten, Sandy From:

Sent:

Doris Schiller [dorisschiller55@gmail.com]

Saturday, April 06, 2013 3:43 PM ogi cýc To:

Subject:

CHAIRMAN Resource SONGS restart Vf OP PLease let me know if the following statement is true:

approximately two years away from promulgating regulations "The NRC isdecision addressing Beyond Design Basis events such as great quakes and tsunamis, yet they plan to make their restart within a couple of months - before they have fully addressed all circumstances that could result in a catastrophic meltdown. The NRC's claim that "safety is their highest priority" is clearly nothing more than misleading rhetoric designed to lull a trusting population into accepting a potential nuclear nightmare" Ifthis is true, I can't believe that the NRC is not taking in account major earthquakes in deciding whether to restart SONGS. Please use common sense in your decision - don't hide behind red tape in doing the right thingl Don't experiment on the people who live ciose to SONGS - Edison doesn't have enough insurance to cover a failed experiment in turning on their flawed power plant.

One person needs to be responsible for this potential fiasco. We will not let the blame be pushed around - you as the head of the NRC will be held personally responsible.

You need to monitor things closely - NO excuses will be accepted.

--rq (e- '- (,L/f--0 7 ~-~aS-: 55C1E