ML13270A215: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 10/04/2013
| issue date = 10/04/2013
| title = Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure for Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Regarding WCAP-17758-P, Revision 0
| title = Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure for Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Regarding WCAP-17758-P, Revision 0
| author name = Williams S A
| author name = Williams S
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| addressee name = Gatlin T D
| addressee name = Gatlin T
| addressee affiliation = South Carolina Electric & Gas Co
| addressee affiliation = South Carolina Electric & Gas Co
| docket = 05000395
| docket = 05000395
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 4,2013 Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin Vice President, Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88, Mail Code 800 Jenkinsville, SC 29065 REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE FOR VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION REGARDING WCAP-17758-P, REVISION 0  
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 4,2013 Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin Vice President, Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88, Mail Code 800 Jenkinsville, SC 29065
 
==SUBJECT:==
REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE FOR VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION REGARDING WCAP-17758-P, REVISION 0


==Dear Mr. Gatlin:==
==Dear Mr. Gatlin:==
By letter dated September 5, 2013, you submitted an affidavit dated August 26, 2013, executed by James A. Gresham on behalf of Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, and requested that the information contained in the following document be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2, Section 2.390: WCAP-17758-P, Revision 0, "Technical Basis for Westinghouse Embedded Flaw Repair for V.C. Summer Unit 1 Reactor Vessel Head Penetration Nozzles and Attachment Welds" A nonproprietary copy of this document has been placed in the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Public Document Room and added to the NRC Library in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). The affidavit stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons: The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse. The information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Westinghouse and not customarily disclosed to the public. Westinghouse has a rational basis for determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence.
 
The application of that system and the substance of that system constitutes Westinghouse policy and provides the rational basis required.
By letter dated September 5, 2013, you submitted an affidavit dated August 26, 2013, executed by James A. Gresham on behalf of Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, and requested that the information contained in the following document be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2, Section 2.390:
Under that system, information is held in confidence if it falls in one or more of several types, the release of which might result in the loss of an existing or potential competitive advantage, as follows: The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by T.Gatiin -2 any of Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies.
WCAP-17758-P, Revision 0, "Technical Basis for Westinghouse Embedded Flaw Repair for V.C. Summer Unit 1 Reactor Vessel Head Penetration Nozzles and Attachment Welds" A nonproprietary copy of this document has been placed in the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Public Document Room and added to the NRC Library in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).
ii) It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or improved marketability.
The affidavit stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons:
iii) Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product. iv) It reveals cost or price information, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers.
: a. The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse.
v) It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse.
: b. The information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Westinghouse and not customarily disclosed to the public. Westinghouse has a rational basis for determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence. The application of that system and the substance of that system constitutes Westinghouse policy and provides the rational basis required. Under that system, information is held in confidence if it falls in one or more of several types, the release of which might result in the loss of an existing or potential competitive advantage, as follows:
vi) It contains patentable ideas, for which patent protection may be desirable.
i}    The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by
 
T.Gatiin                                           -2 any of Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies.
ii)   It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or improved marketability.
iii)   Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product.
iv)   It reveals cost or price information, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers.
v)     It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse.
vi)   It contains patentable ideas, for which patent protection may be desirable.
We have reviewed your application and the material in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and, on the basis of the statements in the affidavit, have determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains proprietary commercial information and should be withheld from public disclosure.
We have reviewed your application and the material in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and, on the basis of the statements in the affidavit, have determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains proprietary commercial information and should be withheld from public disclosure.
Therefore, the version(s) of the submitted information marked as proprietary will be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(b)(5) and Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents.
Therefore, the version(s) of the submitted information marked as proprietary will be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(b)(5) and Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.
If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information.
Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information.
If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information.
If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.
In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.
 
T. Gatlin -If you have any questions regarding this matter, I may be reached at 301-415-1009.
T. Gatlin                                     - 3 If you have any questions regarding this matter, I may be reached at 301-415-1009.
Sincerely, Shawn Williams, Senior Project Manager Plant licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-395 cc: Westinghouse Electric Company LLC 1000 Westinghouse Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066 Additional distribution via Listserv T. -2 If you have any questions regarding this matter, I may be reached at 301-415-1009.
Sincerely, Shawn Williams, Senior Project Manager Plant licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-395 cc:   Westinghouse Electric Company LLC 1000 Westinghouse Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066 Additional distribution via Listserv
Sincerely, IRA! Shawn Williams, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-395 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC 1000 Westinghouse Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066 Additional distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
 
PUBLIC LPL2-1 RtF RidsAcrsAcnw_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl2-1 Resource RidsNrrLASFigueroa Resource RidsNrrPMSummer Resource RidsNrrDeFpnb Resource RidsRgn2MailCenter Resource ADAMS Accession No.: ML 13270A215 NRR/LPL2-1/LA NRR/LPL2-1/BC CE NRR/LPL2-1/PM SFigueroa BPascarelli SWiliiams 1011/13 10/4/13 10/1/13 1/PM OFFICIAL RECORD}}
ML13270A215 CE  NRR/LPL2-1/PM              NRR/LPL2-1/LA           NRR/LPL2-1/BC               1/PM SWiliiams                  SFigueroa               BPascarelli 10/1/13                    1011/13                 10/4/13}}

Latest revision as of 14:07, 4 November 2019

Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure for Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Regarding WCAP-17758-P, Revision 0
ML13270A215
Person / Time
Site: Summer South Carolina Electric & Gas Company icon.png
Issue date: 10/04/2013
From: Shawn Williams
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Gatlin T
South Carolina Electric & Gas Co
Williams Shawn, NRR/DORL 415-1009
References
Download: ML13270A215 (4)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 October 4,2013 Mr. Thomas D. Gatlin Vice President, Nuclear Operations South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Post Office Box 88, Mail Code 800 Jenkinsville, SC 29065

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR WITHHOLDING INFORMATION FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE FOR VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLEAR STATION REGARDING WCAP-17758-P, REVISION 0

Dear Mr. Gatlin:

By letter dated September 5, 2013, you submitted an affidavit dated August 26, 2013, executed by James A. Gresham on behalf of Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, and requested that the information contained in the following document be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 2, Section 2.390:

WCAP-17758-P, Revision 0, "Technical Basis for Westinghouse Embedded Flaw Repair for V.C. Summer Unit 1 Reactor Vessel Head Penetration Nozzles and Attachment Welds" A nonproprietary copy of this document has been placed in the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Public Document Room and added to the NRC Library in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS).

The affidavit stated that the submitted information should be considered exempt from mandatory public disclosure for the following reasons:

a. The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure is owned and has been held in confidence by Westinghouse.
b. The information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Westinghouse and not customarily disclosed to the public. Westinghouse has a rational basis for determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence. The application of that system and the substance of that system constitutes Westinghouse policy and provides the rational basis required. Under that system, information is held in confidence if it falls in one or more of several types, the release of which might result in the loss of an existing or potential competitive advantage, as follows:

i} The information reveals the distinguishing aspects of a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.) where prevention of its use by

T.Gatiin -2 any of Westinghouse's competitors without license from Westinghouse constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies.

ii) It consists of supporting data, including test data, relative to a process (or component, structure, tool, method, etc.), the application of which data secures a competitive economic advantage, e.g., by optimization or improved marketability.

iii) Its use by a competitor would reduce his expenditure of resources or improve his competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing a similar product.

iv) It reveals cost or price information, production capacities, budget levels, or commercial strategies of Westinghouse, its customers or suppliers.

v) It reveals aspects of past, present, or future Westinghouse or customer funded development plans and programs of potential commercial value to Westinghouse.

vi) It contains patentable ideas, for which patent protection may be desirable.

We have reviewed your application and the material in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.390 and, on the basis of the statements in the affidavit, have determined that the submitted information sought to be withheld contains proprietary commercial information and should be withheld from public disclosure.

Therefore, the version(s) of the submitted information marked as proprietary will be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390(b)(5) and Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.

Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. If the need arises, we may send copies of this information to our consultants working in this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the appropriate agreements for handling proprietary information.

If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be made available for public inspection, you should promptly notify the NRC. You also should understand that the NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, for example, if the scope of a Freedom of Information Act request includes your information. In all review situations, if the NRC makes a determination adverse to the above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.

T. Gatlin - 3 If you have any questions regarding this matter, I may be reached at 301-415-1009.

Sincerely, Shawn Williams, Senior Project Manager Plant licensing Branch 11-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-395 cc: Westinghouse Electric Company LLC 1000 Westinghouse Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066 Additional distribution via Listserv

ML13270A215 CE NRR/LPL2-1/PM NRR/LPL2-1/LA NRR/LPL2-1/BC 1/PM SWiliiams SFigueroa BPascarelli 10/1/13 1011/13 10/4/13