ML14094A395: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML14094A395 | | number = ML14094A395 | ||
| issue date = 04/04/2014 | | issue date = 04/04/2014 | ||
| title = | | title = NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review of Cooper Nuclear Station Amendment Request Regarding Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Revision | ||
| author name = George A | | author name = George A | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV-1 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV-1 | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = Vanderkamp D | ||
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR | | addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR | ||
| docket = 05000298 | | docket = 05000298 | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| document type = E-Mail | | document type = E-Mail | ||
| page count = 2 | | page count = 2 | ||
| project = TAC:MF3631 | |||
| stage = Acceptance Review | |||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: George, Andrea Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 9:48 AM To: dwvande@nppd.com Cc: Sebrosky, Joseph | |||
==Subject:== | |||
Acceptance Review of Cooper Nuclear Station Amendment Request Regarding Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Revision (TAC No. MF3631) | |||
Mr. Van Der Kamp, By letter dated March 14, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML14078A027), Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD, the licensee) submitted a license amendment request to revise the Physical Protection license condition as it relates to the cyber security plan (CSP) for Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS). The proposed change would modify the CNS CSP Milestone 8 implementation date. | |||
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and follow as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | |||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | |||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1081. | |||
Thank you, Andrea George Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch IV-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-1081 1 | |||
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1202 Mail Envelope Properties (Andrea.George@nrc.gov20140404094700) | |||
==Subject:== | |||
Acceptance Review of Cooper Nuclear Station Amendment Request Regarding Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Revision (TAC No. MF3631) | |||
Sent Date: 4/4/2014 9:47:58 AM Received Date: 4/4/2014 9:47:00 AM From: George, Andrea Created By: Andrea.George@nrc.gov Recipients: | |||
"Sebrosky, Joseph" <Joseph.Sebrosky@nrc.gov> | |||
Tracking Status: None "dwvande@nppd.com" <dwvande@nppd.com> | |||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: | |||
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2278 4/4/2014 9:47:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: | |||
Recipients Received:}} | |||
Latest revision as of 21:08, 5 February 2020
| ML14094A395 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 04/04/2014 |
| From: | Andrea George Plant Licensing Branch IV |
| To: | Vanderkamp D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| MF3631 | |
| Download: ML14094A395 (2) | |
Text
NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: George, Andrea Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 9:48 AM To: dwvande@nppd.com Cc: Sebrosky, Joseph
Subject:
Acceptance Review of Cooper Nuclear Station Amendment Request Regarding Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Revision (TAC No. MF3631)
Mr. Van Der Kamp, By letter dated March 14, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML14078A027), Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD, the licensee) submitted a license amendment request to revise the Physical Protection license condition as it relates to the cyber security plan (CSP) for Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS). The proposed change would modify the CNS CSP Milestone 8 implementation date.
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the NRC staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and follow as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1081.
Thank you, Andrea George Project Manager, Plant Licensing Branch IV-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-1081 1
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1202 Mail Envelope Properties (Andrea.George@nrc.gov20140404094700)
Subject:
Acceptance Review of Cooper Nuclear Station Amendment Request Regarding Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule Revision (TAC No. MF3631)
Sent Date: 4/4/2014 9:47:58 AM Received Date: 4/4/2014 9:47:00 AM From: George, Andrea Created By: Andrea.George@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Sebrosky, Joseph" <Joseph.Sebrosky@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "dwvande@nppd.com" <dwvande@nppd.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2278 4/4/2014 9:47:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: