ML21362A447: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
In the Matter of | |||
) | |||
Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC ) 05000219 | |||
) | |||
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ) DPR-16 | |||
) | |||
) EA-21- 041 | |||
CONFIRMATORY ORDER MODIFYING LICENSE | |||
I | |||
Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC (HDI or Licensee) is the holder of | |||
which a neutral mediator, with no decision-making authority, assists the parties in reaching an agreement on resolving any differences regarding the dispute. This Confirmatory Order is issued pursuant to the agreement reached during the ADR process. | Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-16 issued on June 3, 2009, by the U.S. | ||
III During the ADR session, the Licensee and the NRC reached a preliminary settlement agreement. The elements of the agreement include the following: | |||
Whereas, the NRC acknowledges that HDI has taken several corrective actions in response to the violations at Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek) so as to preclude the occurrence of similar violations in the future. These actions include: | Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) pursuant to Part 50 of Title 10 of | ||
: 1. Denying the former superintendents unescorted access authorization and denoting his entry in the Personnel Access Data System to indicate that there is additional information. | |||
: 2. Performing an internal fact-finding and accountability investigation and an apparent cause evaluation, which resulted in the following corrective measures: | the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR). The license authorizes the operation of | ||
: a. Revising the firearms maintenance, testing, and accountability procedure to remove the requirement to replace parts biennially; | |||
: b. Completing the initial development of an electronic application that will track weapons upon their removal from their assigned positions; 6 | Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (facility) in accordance with conditions | ||
: c. Holding face-to-face meetings between the Oyster Creek Security Manager and site armorers to ensure understanding of procedural requirements, complete and accurate recordkeeping, and accurate ammunition accounting, including logging unused ammunition returned to the armory after range activities; | |||
: d. Conducting, over a two-month period, spot checks of security personnel logging security weapons, ammunition, and equipment into and out of the armory and performing ammunition counts. | specified therein. The facility is located on the Licensee's site in Forked River, New | ||
: 3. Creating the position of Fleet Director of Security Operations and appointing an experienced nuclear security manager to the position as a concurrent role. | |||
Jersey. | |||
This Confirmatory Order is the result of an agreement reached during an | |||
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mediation session conducted by video conference | |||
on October 14, 2021. | |||
II | |||
On March 13, 2020, the NRC Office of Investigations (OI), Region I Field Office | |||
opened an investigation (OI Case No. 1-2020-007) at Oyster Creek. The investigation, | |||
1 which was completed on March 11, 2021, evaluated whether a (now -former) training | |||
superintendent at Oyster Creek, who was also responsible for performing armorer | |||
duties, deliberately failed to perform firearms maintenance activities and falsified records | |||
related to those activities. Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the | |||
NRC determined that the armorer deliberately failed to perform certain required firearms | |||
maintenance activities for calendar year 2019, that the armorer deliberately falsified | |||
records related to these activities, and that these falsified records were submitted to the | |||
NRC in response to an April 10, 2020, information request. | |||
Specifically, the NRC identified that on the Licensees 2019 firearms | |||
maintenance and testing logs that the Licensee submitted to the NRC in response to an | |||
information request for an NRC security inspection, the fields for date and performed | |||
by for annual material condition inspections were left blank, indicating to the NRC that | |||
the Licensee did not conduct this activity. On March 16, 2020, the armorer told an NRC | |||
Region I security inspector that Oyster Creek staff no longer performed this inspection | |||
and that the procedure was being changed to remove the requirement. However, the | |||
armorer acknowledged that the procedure change had not yet happened. Subsequently, | |||
in response to an April 10, 2020, information request from OI, the L icensee resubmitted | |||
its firearms logs to the NRC, and the date and performed by fields were filled out, | |||
which would indicate that the L icensee had completed the annual material condition | |||
inspections. The armorer informed OI that he filled in these fields after talking to the | |||
NRC inspector. He stated that he probably did not perform the inspections but | |||
maintained that he did not exactly remember what he did. The NRC determined that the | |||
annual material inspections were not performed in 2019 due to the armorers deliberate | |||
failure to perform them and that the armorer deliberately falsified the records provided to | |||
the NRC to indicate that the inspections had been performed. | |||
2 The NRC concluded that the deliberate failure of the armorer to perform required | |||
annual material condition inspections of firearms for calendar year 2019 caused the | |||
Licensee to be in violation of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part | |||
73, Appendix B, Criterion VI.G, Weapons, Personal Equipment, and Maintenance, and | |||
procedures required by the Commission-approved Oyster Creek Training and | |||
Qualification Plan. Specifically, 10 CFR Part 73, Appendix B, Criterion VI.G, Weapons, | |||
Personal Equipment, and Maintenance, Section 3(a), Firearms maintenance program, | |||
requires that each Licensee shall implement a firearms maintenance and accountability | |||
program in accordance with the Commission regulations and the Commission-approved | |||
training and qualification plan. The program must include, in part: (1) Semiannual test | |||
firing for accuracy and functionality; (2) Firearms maintenance procedures that include | |||
cleaning schedules and cleaning requirements; (3) Program activity documentation; and | |||
(4) Control and accountability (weapons and ammunition). The Oyster Creek Training | |||
and Qualification Plan is Appendix B to the sites Physical Security Plan. Section 20.5 of | |||
Revision 18 of the Training and Qualification Plan states, in part, that a testing and | |||
maintenance program for all assigned firearms is established to ensure that the firearms | |||
and related accessories function as intended. The program is described in facility | |||
procedures. Oyster Creek procedure SY -AA-150-103, Revision 0, Firearms | |||
Maintenance, Testing, and Accountability, constitutes the facility procedure for the | |||
testing, cleaning, and inspecting of security weapons. Step 4.2.4.2 states, in part, | |||
annually, perform the material condition inspection on all duty firearms. Step 2.3, in | |||
terms and definitions, defines "annual" as once per calendar year. | |||
The NRC determined that the armorers deliberate actions also caused the | |||
Licensee to provide information to the NRC regarding the annual material inspections of | |||
3 firearms that was not complete and accurate in all material respects, contrary to 10 CFR | |||
50.9(a). Specifically, 10 CFR 50.9(a) requires, in part, that information provided to the | |||
Commission by a Licensee or information required by the Commission's regulations to | |||
be maintained by the L icensee shall be complete and accurate in all material respects. | |||
10 CFR 73.70(e) states, in part, that each L icensee subject to the provisions of 10 CFR | |||
73.55 shall keep documentation of all tests, inspections, and maintenance performed on | |||
security related equipment used pursuant to the requirements of this part for three years | |||
from the date of documenting the event. 10 CFR 73.55(a)(1) indicates that the S ection | |||
applies to nuclear power reactor licensees that are licensed under 10 CFR Part 50. | |||
Logs submitted to the NRC in response to an April 10, 2020, information request | |||
documented that annual material condition inspections had been performed on each of | |||
the Licensees duty firearms; however, the L icensee had not performed the inspections. | |||
This information is material to the NRC because the NRC requires testing and | |||
maintenance of weapons to ensure they are in acceptable working condition. Accurate | |||
recordkeeping of such activities ensures that the weapons maintenance program is | |||
fulfilling these requirements. | |||
Through the investigation, the NRC also identified a third violation involving the | |||
failure by the armorer to perform required biennial firearms parts replacement. The NRC | |||
did not find sufficient evidence to conclude that this failure was willful. However, the | |||
failure caused the L icensee to be in violation of 10 CFR Part 73, Appendix B, Criterion | |||
VI.G, Weapons, Personal Equipment, and Maintenance, Section 3(a), Firearms | |||
maintenance program, which requires that each Licensee shall implement a firearms | |||
maintenance and accountability program in accordance with the Commission regulations | |||
and the Commission-approved training and qualification plan. The program must | |||
include, in part: (1) Semiannual test firing for accuracy and functionality; (2) Firearms | |||
4 maintenance procedures that include cleaning schedules and cleaning requirements; (3) | |||
Program activity documentation; and (4) Control and accountability (weapons and | |||
ammunition). The Oyster Creek Training and Qualification Plan is Appendix B to the | |||
sites Physical Security Plan. Section 20.5 of Revision 18 of the Training and | |||
Qualification Plan states, in part, that a testing and maintenance program for all | |||
assigned firearms is established to ensure that the firearms and related accessories | |||
function as intended. The program is described in facility procedures. Oyster Creek | |||
procedure SY-AA-150-103, Revision 0, Firearms Maintenance, Testing, and | |||
Accountability, constitutes the facility procedure for the testing, cleaning, and inspecting | |||
of security weapons. Step 4.2.5, states, replace the following components on duty rifles | |||
biennially: hammer spring, trigger spring, disconnector spring, extractor spring, ejector | |||
spring, and gas rings. SY-AA-150- 103-F-04, Rifle Material Condition Inspection/ | |||
Functionality/ Accuracy Tests states, in part, biennially, replace the following | |||
components on contingency rifles and note this as being completed in the weapons | |||
maintenance log. Step 2.7 defines "biennial" as at least once every two years. | |||
By letter, dated July 28, 2021 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management | |||
System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML21176A049), the NRC notified the Licensee of the | |||
results of the in vestigation with an opportunity to: (1) provide a response in writing, (2) | |||
attend a predecisional enforcement conference or (3) to participate in an ADR mediation | |||
session in an effort to resolve this matter. | |||
In response to the NRCs offer, the Licensee requested the use of the NRCs | |||
ADR process to resolve differences it had with the NRC. On October 14, 2021, the NRC | |||
and the Licensee met in an ADR session mediated by a professional mediator, arranged | |||
through Cornell Universitys Institute on Conflict Resolution. The ADR process is one in 5 | |||
which a neutral mediator, with no decision-making authority, assists the parties in | |||
reaching an agreement on resolving any differences regarding the dispute. This | |||
Confirmatory Order is issued pursuant to the agreement reached during the ADR | |||
process. | |||
III | |||
During the ADR session, the Licensee and the NRC reached a preliminary | |||
settlement agreement. The elements of the agreement include the following: | |||
Whereas, the NRC acknowledges that HDI has taken several corrective actions in | |||
response to the violations at Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek) so | |||
as to preclude the occurrence of similar violations in the future. These actions include: | |||
: 1. Denying the former superintendents unescorted access authorization and denoting | |||
his entry in the Personnel Access Data System to indicate that there is additional | |||
information. | |||
: 2. Performing an internal fact-finding and accountability investigation and an apparent | |||
cause evaluation, which resulted in the following corrective measures: | |||
: a. Revising the firearms maintenance, testing, and accountability procedure to | |||
remove the requirement to replace parts biennially; | |||
: b. Completing the initial development of an electronic application that will track | |||
weapons upon their removal from their assigned positions; | |||
6 | |||
: c. Holding face-to-face meetings between the Oyster Creek Security Manager and | |||
site armorers to ensure understanding of procedural requirements, complete and | |||
accurate recordkeeping, and accurate ammunition accounting, including logging | |||
unused ammunition returned to the armory after range activities; | |||
: d. Conducting, over a two-month period, spot checks of security personnel logging | |||
security weapons, ammunition, and equipment into and out of the armory and | |||
performing ammunition counts. | |||
: 3. Creating the position of Fleet Director of Security Operations and appointing an | |||
experienced nuclear security manager to the position as a concurrent role. | |||
: 4. Initiating development of a standardized set of fleet security procedures. | : 4. Initiating development of a standardized set of fleet security procedures. | ||
Therefore, the parties agree to the following terms and conditions: | Therefore, the parties agree to the following terms and conditions: | ||
: 1. Terms and Conditions to be taken by HDI: | : 1. Terms and Conditions to be taken by HDI: | ||
A. Items to Assure Restoration of Compliance: | A. Items to Assure Restoration of Compliance: | ||
: 1. Within 60 days of the date of the | : 1. Within 60 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall prepare a | ||
report of the maintenance status of all in-service and contingency weapons | |||
that are onsite at Oyster Creek as of the date of the C onfirmatory Order. The | |||
report shall specify the dates on which each weapon was last test-fired, | |||
cleaned, serviced, and inspected. Within 30 days of completing this action, | |||
7 HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete by sending a letter to the | |||
Region I Administrator and shall make the report available to the NRC for | |||
review during an inspection. | |||
: 2. Within 180 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall complete a | |||
root cause evaluation of the events related to the violations at Oyster Creek | |||
described in this Confirmatory Order in accordance with HDIs corrective | |||
action program. Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI sh all inform | |||
the NRC that the action is complete by sending a letter to the Region I | |||
Administrator and shall make the evaluation available to the NRC for review | |||
during an inspection. | |||
: 3. Within 180 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall review its | |||
process for performing and recording in-service and out-of-service weapons | |||
maintenance. The review shall include a comparison of Oyster Creeks | |||
process versus other nuclear sites, including at least one non-HDI nuclear | |||
site. The evaluation shall identify best practices and consider any changes | |||
needed at Oyster Creek and specify any identified corrective actions. Within | |||
30 days of completing this action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is | |||
complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the | |||
results of the evaluation available to the NRC for review during an inspection. | |||
B. Items to Address Wrongdoing: | B. Items to Address Wrongdoing: | ||
: 1. Within 60 days of the date of the | : 1. Within 60 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall communicate | ||
this issue to the security personnel at Oyster Creek and other HDI | |||
8 decommissioning nuclear reactor sites. The communication (which may be | |||
verbal or via written communication) will be conducted by the president of | |||
HDI and shall specify that wr ongdoing and falsification of records are | |||
unacceptable and shall also explain the specific actions staff must take when | |||
unable to complete required activities. Within 30 days of completing this | |||
action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete by sending a | |||
letter to the Region I Administrator. The letter shall also describe the content | |||
of the communication. | |||
: 2. Within 180 days of the date of the Confirmatory Order, HDI will conduct | |||
training to be given to Security personnel at each of HDI's nuclear sites. The | |||
training will: (a) emphasize the importance of complete and accurate | |||
information for all required records, correspondence, and communications | |||
with the NRC and its staff; (b) emphasize individual accountability and clearly | |||
express that willful or deliberate failures to comply with regulations, orders, or | |||
license requirements could result in significant individual enforcement by the | |||
NRC; and (c) reinforce that if any individual recognizes a non-compliance, | |||
they will immediately report the observation of the non-compliance. Within 30 | |||
days of completing this action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is | |||
complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the | |||
training materials available to the NRC for review during an inspection. | |||
C. Items to Address Armorer Function Weaknesses: | C. Items to Address Armorer Function Weaknesses: | ||
: 1. Within 240 days of the date of the Confirmatory Order, HDI shall evaluate its implementation of the | : 1. Within 240 days of the date of the Confirmatory Order, HDI shall evaluate its | ||
implementation of the a rmorer function at Oyster Creek. The evaluation shall | |||
9 include review of the staffing and responsibilities of the position, the | |||
methodology for tracking weapons maintenance status and activities, and | |||
supervisory involvement in verifying completion of required activities. The | |||
evaluation shall also include a comparison of HDI s weapons maintenance | |||
processes versus other nuclear reactor sites, including at least one non-HDI | |||
nuclear reactor site. The evaluation shall identify best practices and consider | |||
any changes needed at Oyster Creek and specify any identified corrective | |||
actions. Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI shall inform the NRC | |||
that the action is complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator | |||
and shall make the results of the evaluation available to the NRC for review | |||
during an inspection. | |||
: 2. Within 90 days of completing the evaluation described in Item C.1, HDI shall | |||
communicate (which may be verbal or in writing) to HDI Security | |||
management staff at Oyster Creek the results of the evaluation and any | |||
completed or pending corrective actions. Within 30 days of completing this | |||
action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete by sending a | |||
letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the content of the | |||
communication available to the NRC for review during an inspection. | |||
D. Items to Address Implementation of Security Program at Oyster Creek: | D. Items to Address Implementation of Security Program at Oyster Creek: | ||
: 1. Within 365 days of the date of the Confirmatory Order, HDI shall administer training to HDI and Holtec Security | : 1. Within 365 days of the date of the Confirmatory Order, HDI shall administer | ||
training to HDI and Holtec Security I nternational, LLC (HSI) Security staff at | |||
Oyster Creek that focuses on roles and expectations and that reinforces | |||
HDIs responsibility for assuring regulatory compliance. The training shall | |||
10 also include any insights developed from the root cause evaluation described | |||
in Item A.2. Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI shall inform the | |||
NRC that the action is complete by sending a letter to the Region I | |||
Administrator and shall make the training materials available to the NRC for | |||
E. Items to Address Corporate Security Oversight | review during an inspection. | ||
: 1. Within 90 days of the date of the | : 2. Within 365 days of the date of the Confirmatory Order, HDI shall evaluate the | ||
: 2. Within 365 days of the date of the | |||
12 | Oyster Creek security program to include the programs organizational | ||
effectiveness, the quality and effectiveness of site security procedures, the | |||
security organizations staffing, training, and communication of standards, | |||
expectations, management engagement and oversight, performance | |||
management, and the results of the root cause evaluation. The evaluation | |||
shall also include a review of the clarity for the security staff about lines of | |||
responsibility and reporting, and the performance and quality of how | |||
individual job performance results are evaluated, documented, and | |||
communicated. The results of the evaluation shall be placed in the Oyster | |||
Creek corrective action program. The evaluation team shall be comprised of | |||
no more than 50% HDI or HSI employees and the remaining participants | |||
shall be from an outside organization (such as a utility or industry group) | |||
including a safety culture expert, external to HDI and HSI. Within 30 days of | |||
completing this action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete | |||
by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the results of | |||
the evaluation and any related corrective actions available to the NRC for | |||
review during an inspection. | |||
11 E. Items to Address Corporate Security Oversight | |||
: 1. Within 90 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall install a Fleet | |||
Security Director position with sole responsibility for oversight of the security | |||
operations at all HDI nuclear sites. The Site Security Leads shall report to | |||
the Fleet Security Director and the Fleet Security Director shall report to the | |||
HDI President. Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI sh all inform the | |||
NRC that the action is complete by sending a letter to the Region I | |||
Administrator. HDI shall maintain an individual in this position for a period of | |||
5 years after the date of the Confirmatory Order or until fuel at all HDI nuclear | |||
sites is in dry storage, whichever is sooner. | |||
: 2. Within 365 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall effect an | |||
evaluation of HDIs implementation of the corporate security program. The | |||
evaluation team shall be comprised of no more than 50% HDI or HSI | |||
employees, and the remaining participants shall be from an outside | |||
organization (such as a utility or an industry group). The evaluation shall | |||
assess HSIs and HDIs corporate security staffing resources, direct and | |||
indirect oversight, and performance management. The evaluation shall | |||
review the fleet implementation of the security programs at each HDI site to | |||
identify areas of strengths and weaknesses. Within 30 days of completing | |||
this action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete by sending a | |||
letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the results of the | |||
evaluation available to the NRC for review during an inspection. | |||
12 F. Effectiveness Reviews | |||
: 1. Within 90 days of completion of the evaluation described in D.2, HDI shall | |||
complete the first of four quarterly reviews of the effectiveness of the Oyster | |||
Creek security program and the corrective actions implemented in response | |||
to this issue. Within 30 days of completing each review, HDI shall inform the | |||
NRC of the completion of the review by sending a letter to the Region I | |||
Administrator. | |||
: 2. The effectiveness reviews discussed in Item F.1 shall be conducted by a | |||
team that includes at least one individual from outside the HDI or HSI | |||
organization. For a period of one year after completion of the fourth review, | |||
the documented effectiveness reviews shall be made available to the NRC for | |||
review during an inspection. | |||
G. External Communication | |||
A. By December 31, 2023, HDI shall discuss this issue, including the results of | |||
all of the above-listed evaluations and resulting corrective actions, to the | |||
following industry working groups: a ) the 2023 National Nuclear Security | |||
Conference; and b) Region I Nuclear Security Association. The discussion | |||
shall include reference to any identified organizational weaknesses that HDI | |||
determined contributed to the issue. Within 30 days of completing each | |||
discussion, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete by sending a | |||
letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the presentation materials | |||
13 available to the NRC for one year after the presentation for review during an | |||
inspection. | |||
: 2. Terms and Conditions to be taken by NRC: | : 2. Terms and Conditions to be taken by NRC: | ||
A. The NRC agrees to issue a reduced civil penalty in the amount of $50,000. | A. The NRC agrees to issue a reduced civil penalty in the amount of $50,000. | ||
IV HDI has committed to a number of significant actions that are expected to improve the security performance of the fleet. The NRC notes that, prior to the ADR session, HDI initiated some measures to address the issues raised by the apparent violations. The NRC will continue to monitor HDIs progress in this area. I find that HDIs actions completed, as described in Section III above, combined with the commitments as set forth in Section V are acceptable and necessary, and conclude that, with these commitments, the public health and safety are reasonably assured. | B. The NRC agrees to not issue a separate Notice of Violation in addition to the | ||
In view of the foregoing, I have determined that public health and safety require that HDIs commitments be confirmed by this Confirmatory Order. Based on the above and HDIs consent, this Confirmatory Order is effective upon issuance. | |||
V Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 81, 104b, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's regulations in 10 CFR 2.202, 10 CFR Part 50, 10 CFR Part 72, and 10 CFR Part 73, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, EFFECTIVE UPON ISSUANCE, THAT LICENSE NO. DPR-16 IS MODIFIED AS FOLLOWS: | Confirmatory Order but, rather, to describe the violations in the body of the | ||
Order instead. | |||
C. The NRC agrees to include the following statement in the Confirmatory Order | |||
and related communications (i.e., press release): As part of this agreement, | |||
HDI has committed to a number of significant actions that are expected to | |||
improve the security performance of the fleet. The NRC notes that, prior to | |||
this ADR session, HDI initiated some measures to address the issues raised | |||
by the apparent violation. The NRC will continue to monitor HDIs progress in | |||
this area. | |||
D. For the NRCs future civil penalty assessment purposes as discussed in the | |||
NRC Enforcement Policy, the NRC agrees that the issuance of this | |||
Confirmatory Order will not be considered as escalated enforcement. | |||
On January 19, 2022, HDI consented to issuing this Confirmatory Order with the | |||
commitments, as described in Section V below. HDI further agreed that this | |||
Confirmatory Order is to be effective upon issuance, the agreement memorialized in this | |||
Confirmatory Order settles the matter bet ween the parties, and that it has waived its right | |||
to a hearing. | |||
14 IV | |||
HDI has committed to a number of significant actions that are expected to | |||
improve the security performance of the fleet. The NRC notes that, prior to the ADR | |||
session, HDI initiated some measures to address the issues raised by the apparent | |||
violations. The NRC will continue to monitor HDIs progress in this area. I find that | |||
HDIs actions completed, as described in Section III above, combined with the | |||
commitments as set forth in Section V are acceptable and necessary, and conclude that, | |||
with these commitments, the public health and safety are reasonably assured. | |||
In view of the foregoing, I have determined that public health and safety require | |||
that HDIs commitments be confirmed by this Confirmatory Order. Based on the above | |||
and HDIs consent, this Confirmatory Order is effective upon issuance. | |||
V | |||
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 81, 104b, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 186 of the | |||
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's regulations in 10 CFR | |||
2.202, 10 CFR Part 50, 10 CFR Part 72, and 10 CFR Part 73, IT IS HEREBY | |||
ORDERED, EFFECTIVE UPON ISSUANCE, THAT LICENSE NO. DPR-16 IS | |||
MODIFIED AS FOLLOWS: | |||
A. Items to Assure Restoration of Compliance: | A. Items to Assure Restoration of Compliance: | ||
: 1. Within 60 days of the date of the | : 1. Within 60 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall prepare a report | ||
of the maintenance status of all in-service and contingency weapons that are | |||
15 onsite at Oyster Creek as of the date of the C onfirmatory Order. The report shall | |||
specify the dates on which each weapon was last test-fired, cleaned, serviced, | |||
and inspected. Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI sh all inform the | |||
NRC that the action is complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator | |||
and shall make the report available to the NRC for review during an inspection. | |||
: 2. Within 180 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall complete a root | |||
cause evaluation of the events related to the violations at Oyster Creek described | |||
in this Confirmatory Order in accordance with HDIs corrective action program. | |||
Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action | |||
is complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the | |||
evaluation available to the NRC for review during an inspection. | |||
: 3. Within 180 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall review its | |||
process for performing and recording in-service and out-of-service weapons | |||
maintenance. The review shall include a comparison of Oyster Creeks process | |||
versus other nuclear sites, including at least one non-HDI nuclear site. The | |||
evaluation shall identify best practices and consider any changes needed at | |||
Oyster Creek and specify any identified corrective actions. Within 30 days of | |||
completing this action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete by | |||
sending a letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the results of the | |||
evaluation available to the NRC for review during an inspection. | |||
16 B. Items to Address Wrongdoing: | |||
: 1. Within 60 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall communicate this | |||
issue to the security personnel at Oyster Creek and other HDI decommissioning | |||
nuclear reactor sites. The communication (which may be verbal or via written | |||
communication) will be conducted by the president of HDI and shall specify that | |||
wrongdoing and falsification of records are unacceptable and shall also explain | |||
the specific actions staff must take when unable to complete required activities. | |||
Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI sh all inform the NRC that the action | |||
is complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator. The letter shall also | |||
describe the content of the communication. | |||
: 2. Within 180 days of the date of the Confirmatory Order, HDI will conduct training | |||
to be given to Security personnel at each of HDI's nuclear sites. The training will: | |||
(a) emphasize the importance of complete and accurate information for all | |||
required records, correspondence, and communications with the NRC and its | |||
staff; (b) emphasize individual accountability and clearly express that willful or | |||
deliberate failures to comply with regulations, orders, or license requirements | |||
could result in significant individual enforcement by the NRC; and (c) reinforce | |||
that if any individual recognizes a non-compliance, they will immediately report | |||
the observation of the non-compliance. Within 30 days of completing this action, | |||
: 1. Within | |||
Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator | HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete by sending a letter to the | ||
: 2. Within | |||
Region I Administrator and shall make the training materials available to the NRC | |||
for review during an inspection. | |||
17 C. Items to Address Armorer Function Weaknesses: | |||
: 1. Within 240 days of the date of the Confirmatory Order, HDI shall evaluate its | |||
implementation of the a rmorer function at Oyster Creek. The evaluation shall | |||
include review of the staffing and responsibilities of the position, the methodology | |||
for tracking weapons maintenance status and activities, and supervisory | |||
involvement in verifying completion of required activities. The evaluation shall | |||
also include a comparison of HDI s weapons maintenance processes versus | |||
other nuclear reactor sites, including at least one non-HDI nuclear reactor site. | |||
The evaluation shall identify best practices and consider any changes needed at | |||
Oyster Creek and specify any identified corrective actions. Within 30 days of | |||
completing this action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete by | |||
sending a letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the results of the | |||
evaluation available to the NRC for review during an inspection. | |||
: 2. Within 90 days of completing the evaluation described in Item C.1, HDI shall | |||
communicate (which may be verbal or in writing) to HDI Security management | |||
staff at Oyster Creek the results of the evaluation and any completed or pending | |||
corrective actions. Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI shall inform the | |||
NRC that the action is complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator | |||
and shall make the content of the communication available to the NRC for review | |||
during an inspection. | |||
18 D. Items to Address Implementation of Security Program at Oyster Creek: | |||
: 1. Within 365 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall administer | |||
training to HDI and Holtec Security International, LLC (HSI) Security staff at | |||
Oyster Creek that focuses on roles and expectations and that reinforces HDIs | |||
responsibility for assuring regulatory compliance. The training shall also include | |||
any insights developed from the root cause evaluation described in Item A.2. | |||
Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action | |||
is complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the | |||
training materials available to the NRC for review during an inspection. | |||
: 2. Within 365 days of the date of the Confirmatory Order, HDI shall evaluate the | |||
Oyster Creek security program to include the programs organizational | |||
effectiveness, the quality and effectiveness of site security procedures, the | |||
security organizations staffing, training, and communication of standards, | |||
expectations, management engagement and oversight, performance | |||
management, and the results of the root cause evaluation. The evaluation shall | |||
also include a review of the clarity for the security staff about lines of | |||
responsibility and reporting, and the performance and quality of how individual | |||
job performance results are evaluated, documented, and communicated. The | |||
results of the evaluation shall be placed in the Oyster Creek corrective action | |||
program. The evaluation team shall be comprised of no more than 50% HDI or | |||
HSI employees and the remaining participants shall be from an outside | |||
organization (such as a utility or industry group) including a safety culture expert, | |||
external to HDI and HSI. Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI shall | |||
inform the NRC that the action is complete by sending a letter to the Region I | |||
19 Administrator and shall make the results of the evaluation and any related | |||
corrective actions available to the NRC for review during an inspection. | |||
E. Items to Address Corporate Security Oversight | E. Items to Address Corporate Security Oversight | ||
: 1. Within 90 days of the date of the | : 1. Within 90 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall install a Fleet | ||
: 2. Within 365 days of the date of the | |||
Security Director position with sole responsibility for oversight of the security | |||
operations at all HDI nuclear sites. The Site Security Leads shall report to the | |||
Fleet Security Director and the Fleet Security Director shall report to the HDI | |||
President. Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI sh all inform the NRC | |||
that the action is complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator. HDI | |||
shall maintain an individual in this position for a period of 5 years after the date of | |||
the Confirmatory Order or until fuel at all HDI nuclear sites is in dry storage, | |||
whichever is sooner. | |||
: 2. Within 365 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall effect an | |||
evaluation of HDIs implementation of the corporate security program. The | |||
evaluation team shall be comprised of no more than 50% HDI or HSI emplo yees, | |||
and the remaining participants shall be from an outside organization (such as a | |||
utility or an industry group). The evaluation shall assess HSIs and HDIs | |||
corporate security staffing resources, direct and indirect oversight, and | |||
performance management. The evaluation shall review the fleet implementation | |||
of the security programs at each HDI site to identify areas of strengths and | |||
weaknesses. Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI shall inform the NRC | |||
that the action is complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator and | |||
20 shall make the results of the evaluation available to the NRC for review during an | |||
inspection. | |||
F. Effectiveness Reviews | F. Effectiveness Reviews | ||
: 1. Within 90 days of completion of the evaluation described in D.2, HDI shall complete the first of four quarterly reviews of the effectiveness of the Oyster Creek security program and the corrective actions implemented in response to this issue. Within 30 days of completing each review, HDI shall inform the NRC of the completion of the review by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator. | : 1. Within 90 days of completion of the evaluation described in D.2, HDI shall | ||
: 2. The effectiveness reviews discussed in Item F.1 shall be conducted by a team that includes at least one individual from outside the HDI or HSI organization. | |||
For a period of one year after completion of the fourth review, the documented effectiveness reviews shall be made available to the NRC for review during an inspection. | complete the first of four quarterly reviews of the effectiveness of the Oyster | ||
Creek security program and the corrective actions implemented in response to | |||
this issue. Within 30 days of completing each review, HDI shall inform the NRC | |||
of the completion of the review by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator. | |||
: 2. The effectiveness reviews discussed in Item F.1 shall be conducted by a team | |||
that includes at least one individual from outside the HDI or HSI organization. | |||
For a period of one year after completion of the fourth review, the documented | |||
effectiveness reviews shall be made available to the NRC for review during an | |||
inspection. | |||
G. External Communication | G. External Communication | ||
: 1. By December 31, 2023, HDI shall discuss this issue, including the results of all of the above-listed evaluations and resulting corrective actions, to the following industry working groups: a) the 2023 National Nuclear Security Conference; and b) Region One Nuclear Security | : 1. By December 31, 2023, HDI shall discuss this issue, including the results of all of the | ||
above-listed evaluations and resulting corrective actions, to the following industry | |||
working groups: a) the 2023 National Nuclear Security Conference; and b) Region One | |||
Nuclear Security Associ ation. The discussion shall include reference to any identified | |||
organizational weaknesses that HDI determined contributed to the issue. Within 30 days | |||
of completing each discussion, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete by | |||
21 sending a letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the presentation materials | |||
available to the NRC for one year after the presentation for review during an inspection. | |||
H. Civil Penalty | H. Civil Penalty | ||
: 1. Within 30 days of the date of issuance of the Confirmatory Order, HDI will pay a civil penalty of $50,000 through one of the following two methods: | : 1. Within 30 days of the date of issuance of the Confirmatory Order, HDI will pay a civil | ||
: a. Submit the payment with the enclosed invoice to this Order (EA-21-041) to the following address: | |||
Office of the Chief Financial Officer U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 979051 St. Louis, MO 63197 OR | penalty of $50,000 through one of the following two methods: | ||
: a. Submit the payment with the enclosed invoice to this Order (EA-21-041) to the | |||
following address: | |||
Office of the Chief Financial Officer | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |||
P.O. Box 979051 | |||
St. Louis, MO 63197 | |||
OR | |||
: b. Submit the payment in accordance with NUREG/BR-0254. | : b. Submit the payment in accordance with NUREG/BR-0254. | ||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852-2738. | In addition, at the time payment is made, the licensee shall submit a statement indicating | ||
This agreement is binding upon successors and assigns of HDI. The Regional Administrator, Region I may, in writing, relax or rescind any of the above conditions upon demonstration by HDI or its successors of good cause. | |||
VI In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR 2.309, any person adversely affected by this Confirmatory Order, other than HDI, may request a hearing within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of issuance of this Confirmatory Order. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the time to request a hearing. A request for extension of time must be made in writing to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, and include a statement of good cause for the extension. | when and by what method payment was made, to the Director, Office of Enforcement, | ||
All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including a request for hearing and petition for leave to intervene (petition), any motion or other document filed in the proceeding prior to the submission of a request for hearing or petition to intervene, and documents filed by interested governmental entities that request to participate under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must be filed in accordance with the NRCs E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139; August 28, 2007, as amended at 77 FR 46562; August 3, 2012). The E-Filing process requires participants to submit and serve all 23 | |||
22 | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, | |||
Rockville, MD 20852-2738. | |||
This agreement is binding upon successors and assigns of HDI. The Regional | |||
Administrator, Region I may, in writing, relax or rescind any of the above conditions upon | |||
demonstration by HDI or its successors of good cause. | |||
VI | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR 2.309, any person adversely affected by | |||
this Confirmatory Order, other than HDI, may request a hearing within thirty (30) calendar days | |||
of the date of issuance of this Confirmatory Order. Where good cause is shown, consideration | |||
will be given to extending the time to request a hearing. A request for extension of time must be | |||
made in writing to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, | |||
Washington, DC 20555, and include a statement of good cause for the extension. | |||
All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including a request for hearing and | |||
petition for leave to intervene (petition), any motion or other document filed in the proceeding | |||
prior to the submission of a request for hearing or petition to intervene, and documents filed by | |||
interested governmental entities that request to participate under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must be filed | |||
in accordance with the NRCs E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139; August 28, 2007, as amended at 77 | |||
FR 46562; August 3, 2012). The E-Filing process requires participants to submit and serve all | |||
23 | |||
adjudicatory documents over the internet, or in some cases to mail copies on electronic storage | |||
media. Detailed guidance on making electronic submissions may be found in the Guidance for | |||
Electronic Submissions to the NRC and on the NRC Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e- | |||
submittals.html. Participants may not submit paper copies of their filings unless they seek an | |||
exemption in accordance with the procedures described below. | |||
To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least 10 days prior to the filing | |||
deadline, the participant should contact the Office of the Secretary by e-mail at | |||
hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by telephone at 301-415-1677, to (1) request a digital identification | |||
(ID) certificate, which allows the participant (or its counsel or representative) to digitally sign | |||
submissions and access the E-Filing system for any proceeding in which it is participating; and | |||
(2) advise the Secretary that the participant will be submitting a petition or other adjudicatory | |||
document (even in instances in which the participant, or its counsel or representative, already | |||
holds an NRC-issued digital ID certificate). Based upon this information, the Secretary will | |||
establish an electronic docket for the hearing in this proceeding if the Secretary has not already | |||
established an electronic docket. | |||
Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is available on the NRCs public | |||
Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site -help/e-submittals/getting-started.html. Once a participant | |||
has obtained a digital ID certificate and a docket has been created, the participant can then | |||
submit adjudicatory documents. Submissions must be in Portable Document Format (PDF). | |||
Additional guidance on PDF submissions is available on the NRCs public Web site at | |||
24 | |||
https://www.nrc.gov/site -help/electronic-sub-ref-mat.html. A filing is considered complete at the | |||
time the document is submitted through the NRCs E-Filing system. To be timely, an electronic | |||
filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due | |||
date. Upon receipt of a transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends | |||
the submitter an e-mail notice confirming receipt of the document. The E-Filing system also | |||
distributes an e-mail notice that provides access to the document to the NRCs Office of the | |||
General Counsel and any others who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to | |||
participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the document on those participants | |||
separately. Therefore, applicants and other participants (or their counsel or representative) | |||
must apply for and receive a digital ID certificate before adjudicatory documents are filed so that | |||
they can obtain access to the documents via the E-Filing system. | |||
A person filing electronically using the NRCs adjudicatory E -Filing system may seek | |||
assistance by contacting the NRCs Electronic Filing Help Desk through the Contact Us link | |||
located on the NRCs public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site -help/e-submittals.html, by | |||
e-mail to MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a toll-free call at 1 -866-672-7640. The NRC | |||
Electronic Filing Help Desk is available between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday | |||
through Friday, excluding government holidays. | |||
Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not submitting documents | |||
electronically must file an exemption request, in accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their | |||
initial paper filing stating why there is good cause for not filing electronically and requesting | |||
25 | |||
authorization to continue to submit documents in paper format. Such filings must be submitted | |||
by: (1) first-class mail addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear | |||
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555- 0001, Attention: Rulemaking and | |||
Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service to the Office of the | |||
Secretary, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852, Attention: Rulemaking and | |||
Adjudications Staff. Participants filing adjudicatory documents in this manner are responsible | |||
for serving the document on all other participants. Filing is considered complete by first-class | |||
mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier, express mail, or expedited delivery | |||
service upon depositing the document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer, | |||
having granted an exemption request from using E-Filing, may require a participant or party to | |||
use E-Filing if the presiding officer subsequently determines that the reason for granting the | |||
exemption from use of E-Filing no longer exists. | |||
Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in the NRC s electronic | |||
hearing docket which is available to the public at https://adams.nrc.gov/ehd, unless excluded | |||
pursuant to an order of the Commission or the presiding officer. If you do not have an NRC- | |||
issued digital ID certificate as described above, click cancel when the link requests certificates | |||
and you will be automatically directed to the NRCs electronic hearing dockets where you will be | |||
able to access any publicly available documents in a particular hearing docket. Partic ipants are | |||
requested not to include personal privacy information, such as social security numbers, home | |||
addresses, or personal phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC regulation or other law | |||
requires submission of such information. For example, in s ome instances, individuals provide | |||
26 | |||
home addresses in order to demonstrate proximity to a facility or site. With respect to | |||
copyrighted works, except for limited excerpts that serve the purpose of the adjudicatory filings | |||
and would constitute a Fair Use application, participants are requested not to include | |||
copyrighted materials in their submission. | |||
The Commission will issue a notice or order granting or denying a hearing request or | |||
intervention petition, designating the issues for any hearing that will be held and designating the | |||
presiding officer. A notice granting a hearing will be published in the Federal Register and | |||
served on the parties to the hearing. | |||
If a person (other than HDI) requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with | |||
particularity the manner in which his interest is adversely affected by this Confirmatory Order | |||
and shall address the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.309(d) and (f). | |||
If a hearing is requested by a person whose interest is adversely affected, the | |||
Commission will issue an or der designating the time and place of any hearings. If a hearing is | |||
held, the issue to be considered at such hearing shall be whether this Confirmatory Order | |||
should be sustained. | |||
In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of an extension of time in | |||
which to request a hearing, the provisions specified in Section V above shall be final 30 days | |||
from the date of this Confirmatory Order without further order or proceedings. If an extension of | |||
27 | |||
time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the provisions specified in Section V shall be | |||
final when the extension expires if a hearing request has not been received. | |||
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |||
Raymond K. Lorson Deputy Regional Administrator NRC Region I | |||
Dated this 26th day of January, 2022. | |||
28}} | 28}} |
Latest revision as of 00:54, 19 November 2024
ML21362A447 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Oyster Creek |
Issue date: | 01/26/2022 |
From: | Ray Lorson NRC Region 1 |
To: | Holtec Decommissioning International |
Marjorie McLaughlin | |
References | |
EA-21-041 EAW-21-041 | |
Download: ML21362A447 (28) | |
Text
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
In the Matter of
)
Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC ) 05000219
)
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ) DPR-16
)
) EA-21- 041
CONFIRMATORY ORDER MODIFYING LICENSE
I
Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC (HDI or Licensee) is the holder of
Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-16 issued on June 3, 2009, by the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) pursuant to Part 50 of Title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR). The license authorizes the operation of
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (facility) in accordance with conditions
specified therein. The facility is located on the Licensee's site in Forked River, New
Jersey.
This Confirmatory Order is the result of an agreement reached during an
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mediation session conducted by video conference
on October 14, 2021.
II
On March 13, 2020, the NRC Office of Investigations (OI), Region I Field Office
opened an investigation (OI Case No. 1-2020-007) at Oyster Creek. The investigation,
1 which was completed on March 11, 2021, evaluated whether a (now -former) training
superintendent at Oyster Creek, who was also responsible for performing armorer
duties, deliberately failed to perform firearms maintenance activities and falsified records
related to those activities. Based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, the
NRC determined that the armorer deliberately failed to perform certain required firearms
maintenance activities for calendar year 2019, that the armorer deliberately falsified
records related to these activities, and that these falsified records were submitted to the
NRC in response to an April 10, 2020, information request.
Specifically, the NRC identified that on the Licensees 2019 firearms
maintenance and testing logs that the Licensee submitted to the NRC in response to an
information request for an NRC security inspection, the fields for date and performed
by for annual material condition inspections were left blank, indicating to the NRC that
the Licensee did not conduct this activity. On March 16, 2020, the armorer told an NRC
Region I security inspector that Oyster Creek staff no longer performed this inspection
and that the procedure was being changed to remove the requirement. However, the
armorer acknowledged that the procedure change had not yet happened. Subsequently,
in response to an April 10, 2020, information request from OI, the L icensee resubmitted
its firearms logs to the NRC, and the date and performed by fields were filled out,
which would indicate that the L icensee had completed the annual material condition
inspections. The armorer informed OI that he filled in these fields after talking to the
NRC inspector. He stated that he probably did not perform the inspections but
maintained that he did not exactly remember what he did. The NRC determined that the
annual material inspections were not performed in 2019 due to the armorers deliberate
failure to perform them and that the armorer deliberately falsified the records provided to
the NRC to indicate that the inspections had been performed.
2 The NRC concluded that the deliberate failure of the armorer to perform required
annual material condition inspections of firearms for calendar year 2019 caused the
Licensee to be in violation of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part
73, Appendix B, Criterion VI.G, Weapons, Personal Equipment, and Maintenance, and
procedures required by the Commission-approved Oyster Creek Training and
Qualification Plan. Specifically, 10 CFR Part 73, Appendix B, Criterion VI.G, Weapons,
Personal Equipment, and Maintenance, Section 3(a), Firearms maintenance program,
requires that each Licensee shall implement a firearms maintenance and accountability
program in accordance with the Commission regulations and the Commission-approved
training and qualification plan. The program must include, in part: (1) Semiannual test
firing for accuracy and functionality; (2) Firearms maintenance procedures that include
cleaning schedules and cleaning requirements; (3) Program activity documentation; and
(4) Control and accountability (weapons and ammunition). The Oyster Creek Training
and Qualification Plan is Appendix B to the sites Physical Security Plan. Section 20.5 of
Revision 18 of the Training and Qualification Plan states, in part, that a testing and
maintenance program for all assigned firearms is established to ensure that the firearms
and related accessories function as intended. The program is described in facility
procedures. Oyster Creek procedure SY -AA-150-103, Revision 0, Firearms
Maintenance, Testing, and Accountability, constitutes the facility procedure for the
testing, cleaning, and inspecting of security weapons. Step 4.2.4.2 states, in part,
annually, perform the material condition inspection on all duty firearms. Step 2.3, in
terms and definitions, defines "annual" as once per calendar year.
The NRC determined that the armorers deliberate actions also caused the
Licensee to provide information to the NRC regarding the annual material inspections of
3 firearms that was not complete and accurate in all material respects, contrary to 10 CFR
50.9(a). Specifically, 10 CFR 50.9(a) requires, in part, that information provided to the
Commission by a Licensee or information required by the Commission's regulations to
be maintained by the L icensee shall be complete and accurate in all material respects.
10 CFR 73.70(e) states, in part, that each L icensee subject to the provisions of 10 CFR
73.55 shall keep documentation of all tests, inspections, and maintenance performed on
security related equipment used pursuant to the requirements of this part for three years
from the date of documenting the event. 10 CFR 73.55(a)(1) indicates that the S ection
applies to nuclear power reactor licensees that are licensed under 10 CFR Part 50.
Logs submitted to the NRC in response to an April 10, 2020, information request
documented that annual material condition inspections had been performed on each of
the Licensees duty firearms; however, the L icensee had not performed the inspections.
This information is material to the NRC because the NRC requires testing and
maintenance of weapons to ensure they are in acceptable working condition. Accurate
recordkeeping of such activities ensures that the weapons maintenance program is
fulfilling these requirements.
Through the investigation, the NRC also identified a third violation involving the
failure by the armorer to perform required biennial firearms parts replacement. The NRC
did not find sufficient evidence to conclude that this failure was willful. However, the
failure caused the L icensee to be in violation of 10 CFR Part 73, Appendix B, Criterion
VI.G, Weapons, Personal Equipment, and Maintenance, Section 3(a), Firearms
maintenance program, which requires that each Licensee shall implement a firearms
maintenance and accountability program in accordance with the Commission regulations
and the Commission-approved training and qualification plan. The program must
include, in part: (1) Semiannual test firing for accuracy and functionality; (2) Firearms
4 maintenance procedures that include cleaning schedules and cleaning requirements; (3)
Program activity documentation; and (4) Control and accountability (weapons and
ammunition). The Oyster Creek Training and Qualification Plan is Appendix B to the
sites Physical Security Plan. Section 20.5 of Revision 18 of the Training and
Qualification Plan states, in part, that a testing and maintenance program for all
assigned firearms is established to ensure that the firearms and related accessories
function as intended. The program is described in facility procedures. Oyster Creek
procedure SY-AA-150-103, Revision 0, Firearms Maintenance, Testing, and
Accountability, constitutes the facility procedure for the testing, cleaning, and inspecting
of security weapons. Step 4.2.5, states, replace the following components on duty rifles
biennially: hammer spring, trigger spring, disconnector spring, extractor spring, ejector
spring, and gas rings. SY-AA-150- 103-F-04, Rifle Material Condition Inspection/
Functionality/ Accuracy Tests states, in part, biennially, replace the following
components on contingency rifles and note this as being completed in the weapons
maintenance log. Step 2.7 defines "biennial" as at least once every two years.
By letter, dated July 28, 2021 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML21176A049), the NRC notified the Licensee of the
results of the in vestigation with an opportunity to: (1) provide a response in writing, (2)
attend a predecisional enforcement conference or (3) to participate in an ADR mediation
session in an effort to resolve this matter.
In response to the NRCs offer, the Licensee requested the use of the NRCs
ADR process to resolve differences it had with the NRC. On October 14, 2021, the NRC
and the Licensee met in an ADR session mediated by a professional mediator, arranged
through Cornell Universitys Institute on Conflict Resolution. The ADR process is one in 5
which a neutral mediator, with no decision-making authority, assists the parties in
reaching an agreement on resolving any differences regarding the dispute. This
Confirmatory Order is issued pursuant to the agreement reached during the ADR
process.
III
During the ADR session, the Licensee and the NRC reached a preliminary
settlement agreement. The elements of the agreement include the following:
Whereas, the NRC acknowledges that HDI has taken several corrective actions in
response to the violations at Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (Oyster Creek) so
as to preclude the occurrence of similar violations in the future. These actions include:
- 1. Denying the former superintendents unescorted access authorization and denoting
his entry in the Personnel Access Data System to indicate that there is additional
information.
- 2. Performing an internal fact-finding and accountability investigation and an apparent
cause evaluation, which resulted in the following corrective measures:
- a. Revising the firearms maintenance, testing, and accountability procedure to
remove the requirement to replace parts biennially;
- b. Completing the initial development of an electronic application that will track
weapons upon their removal from their assigned positions;
6
- c. Holding face-to-face meetings between the Oyster Creek Security Manager and
site armorers to ensure understanding of procedural requirements, complete and
accurate recordkeeping, and accurate ammunition accounting, including logging
unused ammunition returned to the armory after range activities;
- d. Conducting, over a two-month period, spot checks of security personnel logging
security weapons, ammunition, and equipment into and out of the armory and
performing ammunition counts.
- 3. Creating the position of Fleet Director of Security Operations and appointing an
experienced nuclear security manager to the position as a concurrent role.
- 4. Initiating development of a standardized set of fleet security procedures.
Therefore, the parties agree to the following terms and conditions:
- 1. Terms and Conditions to be taken by HDI:
A. Items to Assure Restoration of Compliance:
- 1. Within 60 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall prepare a
report of the maintenance status of all in-service and contingency weapons
that are onsite at Oyster Creek as of the date of the C onfirmatory Order. The
report shall specify the dates on which each weapon was last test-fired,
cleaned, serviced, and inspected. Within 30 days of completing this action,
7 HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete by sending a letter to the
Region I Administrator and shall make the report available to the NRC for
review during an inspection.
- 2. Within 180 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall complete a
root cause evaluation of the events related to the violations at Oyster Creek
described in this Confirmatory Order in accordance with HDIs corrective
action program. Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI sh all inform
the NRC that the action is complete by sending a letter to the Region I
Administrator and shall make the evaluation available to the NRC for review
during an inspection.
- 3. Within 180 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall review its
process for performing and recording in-service and out-of-service weapons
maintenance. The review shall include a comparison of Oyster Creeks
process versus other nuclear sites, including at least one non-HDI nuclear
site. The evaluation shall identify best practices and consider any changes
needed at Oyster Creek and specify any identified corrective actions. Within
30 days of completing this action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is
complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the
results of the evaluation available to the NRC for review during an inspection.
B. Items to Address Wrongdoing:
- 1. Within 60 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall communicate
this issue to the security personnel at Oyster Creek and other HDI
8 decommissioning nuclear reactor sites. The communication (which may be
verbal or via written communication) will be conducted by the president of
HDI and shall specify that wr ongdoing and falsification of records are
unacceptable and shall also explain the specific actions staff must take when
unable to complete required activities. Within 30 days of completing this
action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete by sending a
letter to the Region I Administrator. The letter shall also describe the content
of the communication.
- 2. Within 180 days of the date of the Confirmatory Order, HDI will conduct
training to be given to Security personnel at each of HDI's nuclear sites. The
training will: (a) emphasize the importance of complete and accurate
information for all required records, correspondence, and communications
with the NRC and its staff; (b) emphasize individual accountability and clearly
express that willful or deliberate failures to comply with regulations, orders, or
license requirements could result in significant individual enforcement by the
NRC; and (c) reinforce that if any individual recognizes a non-compliance,
they will immediately report the observation of the non-compliance. Within 30
days of completing this action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is
complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the
training materials available to the NRC for review during an inspection.
C. Items to Address Armorer Function Weaknesses:
- 1. Within 240 days of the date of the Confirmatory Order, HDI shall evaluate its
implementation of the a rmorer function at Oyster Creek. The evaluation shall
9 include review of the staffing and responsibilities of the position, the
methodology for tracking weapons maintenance status and activities, and
supervisory involvement in verifying completion of required activities. The
evaluation shall also include a comparison of HDI s weapons maintenance
processes versus other nuclear reactor sites, including at least one non-HDI
nuclear reactor site. The evaluation shall identify best practices and consider
any changes needed at Oyster Creek and specify any identified corrective
actions. Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI shall inform the NRC
that the action is complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator
and shall make the results of the evaluation available to the NRC for review
during an inspection.
- 2. Within 90 days of completing the evaluation described in Item C.1, HDI shall
communicate (which may be verbal or in writing) to HDI Security
management staff at Oyster Creek the results of the evaluation and any
completed or pending corrective actions. Within 30 days of completing this
action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete by sending a
letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the content of the
communication available to the NRC for review during an inspection.
D. Items to Address Implementation of Security Program at Oyster Creek:
- 1. Within 365 days of the date of the Confirmatory Order, HDI shall administer
training to HDI and Holtec Security I nternational, LLC (HSI) Security staff at
Oyster Creek that focuses on roles and expectations and that reinforces
HDIs responsibility for assuring regulatory compliance. The training shall
10 also include any insights developed from the root cause evaluation described
in Item A.2. Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI shall inform the
NRC that the action is complete by sending a letter to the Region I
Administrator and shall make the training materials available to the NRC for
review during an inspection.
- 2. Within 365 days of the date of the Confirmatory Order, HDI shall evaluate the
Oyster Creek security program to include the programs organizational
effectiveness, the quality and effectiveness of site security procedures, the
security organizations staffing, training, and communication of standards,
expectations, management engagement and oversight, performance
management, and the results of the root cause evaluation. The evaluation
shall also include a review of the clarity for the security staff about lines of
responsibility and reporting, and the performance and quality of how
individual job performance results are evaluated, documented, and
communicated. The results of the evaluation shall be placed in the Oyster
Creek corrective action program. The evaluation team shall be comprised of
no more than 50% HDI or HSI employees and the remaining participants
shall be from an outside organization (such as a utility or industry group)
including a safety culture expert, external to HDI and HSI. Within 30 days of
completing this action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete
by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the results of
the evaluation and any related corrective actions available to the NRC for
review during an inspection.
11 E. Items to Address Corporate Security Oversight
- 1. Within 90 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall install a Fleet
Security Director position with sole responsibility for oversight of the security
operations at all HDI nuclear sites. The Site Security Leads shall report to
the Fleet Security Director and the Fleet Security Director shall report to the
HDI President. Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI sh all inform the
NRC that the action is complete by sending a letter to the Region I
Administrator. HDI shall maintain an individual in this position for a period of
5 years after the date of the Confirmatory Order or until fuel at all HDI nuclear
sites is in dry storage, whichever is sooner.
- 2. Within 365 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall effect an
evaluation of HDIs implementation of the corporate security program. The
evaluation team shall be comprised of no more than 50% HDI or HSI
employees, and the remaining participants shall be from an outside
organization (such as a utility or an industry group). The evaluation shall
assess HSIs and HDIs corporate security staffing resources, direct and
indirect oversight, and performance management. The evaluation shall
review the fleet implementation of the security programs at each HDI site to
identify areas of strengths and weaknesses. Within 30 days of completing
this action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete by sending a
letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the results of the
evaluation available to the NRC for review during an inspection.
12 F. Effectiveness Reviews
- 1. Within 90 days of completion of the evaluation described in D.2, HDI shall
complete the first of four quarterly reviews of the effectiveness of the Oyster
Creek security program and the corrective actions implemented in response
to this issue. Within 30 days of completing each review, HDI shall inform the
NRC of the completion of the review by sending a letter to the Region I
Administrator.
- 2. The effectiveness reviews discussed in Item F.1 shall be conducted by a
team that includes at least one individual from outside the HDI or HSI
organization. For a period of one year after completion of the fourth review,
the documented effectiveness reviews shall be made available to the NRC for
review during an inspection.
G. External Communication
A. By December 31, 2023, HDI shall discuss this issue, including the results of
all of the above-listed evaluations and resulting corrective actions, to the
following industry working groups: a ) the 2023 National Nuclear Security
Conference; and b) Region I Nuclear Security Association. The discussion
shall include reference to any identified organizational weaknesses that HDI
determined contributed to the issue. Within 30 days of completing each
discussion, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete by sending a
letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the presentation materials
13 available to the NRC for one year after the presentation for review during an
inspection.
- 2. Terms and Conditions to be taken by NRC:
A. The NRC agrees to issue a reduced civil penalty in the amount of $50,000.
B. The NRC agrees to not issue a separate Notice of Violation in addition to the
Confirmatory Order but, rather, to describe the violations in the body of the
Order instead.
C. The NRC agrees to include the following statement in the Confirmatory Order
and related communications (i.e., press release): As part of this agreement,
HDI has committed to a number of significant actions that are expected to
improve the security performance of the fleet. The NRC notes that, prior to
this ADR session, HDI initiated some measures to address the issues raised
by the apparent violation. The NRC will continue to monitor HDIs progress in
this area.
D. For the NRCs future civil penalty assessment purposes as discussed in the
NRC Enforcement Policy, the NRC agrees that the issuance of this
Confirmatory Order will not be considered as escalated enforcement.
On January 19, 2022, HDI consented to issuing this Confirmatory Order with the
commitments, as described in Section V below. HDI further agreed that this
Confirmatory Order is to be effective upon issuance, the agreement memorialized in this
Confirmatory Order settles the matter bet ween the parties, and that it has waived its right
to a hearing.
14 IV
HDI has committed to a number of significant actions that are expected to
improve the security performance of the fleet. The NRC notes that, prior to the ADR
session, HDI initiated some measures to address the issues raised by the apparent
violations. The NRC will continue to monitor HDIs progress in this area. I find that
HDIs actions completed, as described in Section III above, combined with the
commitments as set forth in Section V are acceptable and necessary, and conclude that,
with these commitments, the public health and safety are reasonably assured.
In view of the foregoing, I have determined that public health and safety require
that HDIs commitments be confirmed by this Confirmatory Order. Based on the above
and HDIs consent, this Confirmatory Order is effective upon issuance.
V
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 81, 104b, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 186 of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's regulations in 10 CFR
2.202, 10 CFR Part 50, 10 CFR Part 72, and 10 CFR Part 73, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED, EFFECTIVE UPON ISSUANCE, THAT LICENSE NO. DPR-16 IS
MODIFIED AS FOLLOWS:
A. Items to Assure Restoration of Compliance:
- 1. Within 60 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall prepare a report
of the maintenance status of all in-service and contingency weapons that are
15 onsite at Oyster Creek as of the date of the C onfirmatory Order. The report shall
specify the dates on which each weapon was last test-fired, cleaned, serviced,
and inspected. Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI sh all inform the
NRC that the action is complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator
and shall make the report available to the NRC for review during an inspection.
- 2. Within 180 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall complete a root
cause evaluation of the events related to the violations at Oyster Creek described
in this Confirmatory Order in accordance with HDIs corrective action program.
Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action
is complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the
evaluation available to the NRC for review during an inspection.
- 3. Within 180 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall review its
process for performing and recording in-service and out-of-service weapons
maintenance. The review shall include a comparison of Oyster Creeks process
versus other nuclear sites, including at least one non-HDI nuclear site. The
evaluation shall identify best practices and consider any changes needed at
Oyster Creek and specify any identified corrective actions. Within 30 days of
completing this action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete by
sending a letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the results of the
evaluation available to the NRC for review during an inspection.
16 B. Items to Address Wrongdoing:
- 1. Within 60 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall communicate this
issue to the security personnel at Oyster Creek and other HDI decommissioning
nuclear reactor sites. The communication (which may be verbal or via written
communication) will be conducted by the president of HDI and shall specify that
wrongdoing and falsification of records are unacceptable and shall also explain
the specific actions staff must take when unable to complete required activities.
Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI sh all inform the NRC that the action
is complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator. The letter shall also
describe the content of the communication.
- 2. Within 180 days of the date of the Confirmatory Order, HDI will conduct training
to be given to Security personnel at each of HDI's nuclear sites. The training will:
(a) emphasize the importance of complete and accurate information for all
required records, correspondence, and communications with the NRC and its
staff; (b) emphasize individual accountability and clearly express that willful or
deliberate failures to comply with regulations, orders, or license requirements
could result in significant individual enforcement by the NRC; and (c) reinforce
that if any individual recognizes a non-compliance, they will immediately report
the observation of the non-compliance. Within 30 days of completing this action,
HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete by sending a letter to the
Region I Administrator and shall make the training materials available to the NRC
for review during an inspection.
17 C. Items to Address Armorer Function Weaknesses:
- 1. Within 240 days of the date of the Confirmatory Order, HDI shall evaluate its
implementation of the a rmorer function at Oyster Creek. The evaluation shall
include review of the staffing and responsibilities of the position, the methodology
for tracking weapons maintenance status and activities, and supervisory
involvement in verifying completion of required activities. The evaluation shall
also include a comparison of HDI s weapons maintenance processes versus
other nuclear reactor sites, including at least one non-HDI nuclear reactor site.
The evaluation shall identify best practices and consider any changes needed at
Oyster Creek and specify any identified corrective actions. Within 30 days of
completing this action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete by
sending a letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the results of the
evaluation available to the NRC for review during an inspection.
- 2. Within 90 days of completing the evaluation described in Item C.1, HDI shall
communicate (which may be verbal or in writing) to HDI Security management
staff at Oyster Creek the results of the evaluation and any completed or pending
corrective actions. Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI shall inform the
NRC that the action is complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator
and shall make the content of the communication available to the NRC for review
during an inspection.
18 D. Items to Address Implementation of Security Program at Oyster Creek:
- 1. Within 365 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall administer
training to HDI and Holtec Security International, LLC (HSI) Security staff at
Oyster Creek that focuses on roles and expectations and that reinforces HDIs
responsibility for assuring regulatory compliance. The training shall also include
any insights developed from the root cause evaluation described in Item A.2.
Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action
is complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the
training materials available to the NRC for review during an inspection.
- 2. Within 365 days of the date of the Confirmatory Order, HDI shall evaluate the
Oyster Creek security program to include the programs organizational
effectiveness, the quality and effectiveness of site security procedures, the
security organizations staffing, training, and communication of standards,
expectations, management engagement and oversight, performance
management, and the results of the root cause evaluation. The evaluation shall
also include a review of the clarity for the security staff about lines of
responsibility and reporting, and the performance and quality of how individual
job performance results are evaluated, documented, and communicated. The
results of the evaluation shall be placed in the Oyster Creek corrective action
program. The evaluation team shall be comprised of no more than 50% HDI or
HSI employees and the remaining participants shall be from an outside
organization (such as a utility or industry group) including a safety culture expert,
external to HDI and HSI. Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI shall
inform the NRC that the action is complete by sending a letter to the Region I
19 Administrator and shall make the results of the evaluation and any related
corrective actions available to the NRC for review during an inspection.
E. Items to Address Corporate Security Oversight
- 1. Within 90 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall install a Fleet
Security Director position with sole responsibility for oversight of the security
operations at all HDI nuclear sites. The Site Security Leads shall report to the
Fleet Security Director and the Fleet Security Director shall report to the HDI
President. Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI sh all inform the NRC
that the action is complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator. HDI
shall maintain an individual in this position for a period of 5 years after the date of
the Confirmatory Order or until fuel at all HDI nuclear sites is in dry storage,
whichever is sooner.
- 2. Within 365 days of the date of the C onfirmatory Order, HDI shall effect an
evaluation of HDIs implementation of the corporate security program. The
evaluation team shall be comprised of no more than 50% HDI or HSI emplo yees,
and the remaining participants shall be from an outside organization (such as a
utility or an industry group). The evaluation shall assess HSIs and HDIs
corporate security staffing resources, direct and indirect oversight, and
performance management. The evaluation shall review the fleet implementation
of the security programs at each HDI site to identify areas of strengths and
weaknesses. Within 30 days of completing this action, HDI shall inform the NRC
that the action is complete by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator and
20 shall make the results of the evaluation available to the NRC for review during an
inspection.
F. Effectiveness Reviews
- 1. Within 90 days of completion of the evaluation described in D.2, HDI shall
complete the first of four quarterly reviews of the effectiveness of the Oyster
Creek security program and the corrective actions implemented in response to
this issue. Within 30 days of completing each review, HDI shall inform the NRC
of the completion of the review by sending a letter to the Region I Administrator.
- 2. The effectiveness reviews discussed in Item F.1 shall be conducted by a team
that includes at least one individual from outside the HDI or HSI organization.
For a period of one year after completion of the fourth review, the documented
effectiveness reviews shall be made available to the NRC for review during an
inspection.
G. External Communication
- 1. By December 31, 2023, HDI shall discuss this issue, including the results of all of the
above-listed evaluations and resulting corrective actions, to the following industry
working groups: a) the 2023 National Nuclear Security Conference; and b) Region One
Nuclear Security Associ ation. The discussion shall include reference to any identified
organizational weaknesses that HDI determined contributed to the issue. Within 30 days
of completing each discussion, HDI shall inform the NRC that the action is complete by
21 sending a letter to the Region I Administrator and shall make the presentation materials
available to the NRC for one year after the presentation for review during an inspection.
H. Civil Penalty
- 1. Within 30 days of the date of issuance of the Confirmatory Order, HDI will pay a civil
penalty of $50,000 through one of the following two methods:
- a. Submit the payment with the enclosed invoice to this Order (EA-21-041) to the
following address:
Office of the Chief Financial Officer
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
P.O. Box 979051
St. Louis, MO 63197
- b. Submit the payment in accordance with NUREG/BR-0254.
In addition, at the time payment is made, the licensee shall submit a statement indicating
when and by what method payment was made, to the Director, Office of Enforcement,
22
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, MD 20852-2738.
This agreement is binding upon successors and assigns of HDI. The Regional
Administrator, Region I may, in writing, relax or rescind any of the above conditions upon
demonstration by HDI or its successors of good cause.
VI
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR 2.309, any person adversely affected by
this Confirmatory Order, other than HDI, may request a hearing within thirty (30) calendar days
of the date of issuance of this Confirmatory Order. Where good cause is shown, consideration
will be given to extending the time to request a hearing. A request for extension of time must be
made in writing to the Director, Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555, and include a statement of good cause for the extension.
All documents filed in NRC adjudicatory proceedings, including a request for hearing and
petition for leave to intervene (petition), any motion or other document filed in the proceeding
prior to the submission of a request for hearing or petition to intervene, and documents filed by
interested governmental entities that request to participate under 10 CFR 2.315(c), must be filed
in accordance with the NRCs E-Filing rule (72 FR 49139; August 28, 2007, as amended at 77
FR 46562; August 3, 2012). The E-Filing process requires participants to submit and serve all
23
adjudicatory documents over the internet, or in some cases to mail copies on electronic storage
media. Detailed guidance on making electronic submissions may be found in the Guidance for
Electronic Submissions to the NRC and on the NRC Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-
submittals.html. Participants may not submit paper copies of their filings unless they seek an
exemption in accordance with the procedures described below.
To comply with the procedural requirements of E-Filing, at least 10 days prior to the filing
deadline, the participant should contact the Office of the Secretary by e-mail at
hearing.docket@nrc.gov, or by telephone at 301-415-1677, to (1) request a digital identification
(ID) certificate, which allows the participant (or its counsel or representative) to digitally sign
submissions and access the E-Filing system for any proceeding in which it is participating; and
(2) advise the Secretary that the participant will be submitting a petition or other adjudicatory
document (even in instances in which the participant, or its counsel or representative, already
holds an NRC-issued digital ID certificate). Based upon this information, the Secretary will
establish an electronic docket for the hearing in this proceeding if the Secretary has not already
established an electronic docket.
Information about applying for a digital ID certificate is available on the NRCs public
Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site -help/e-submittals/getting-started.html. Once a participant
has obtained a digital ID certificate and a docket has been created, the participant can then
submit adjudicatory documents. Submissions must be in Portable Document Format (PDF).
Additional guidance on PDF submissions is available on the NRCs public Web site at
24
https://www.nrc.gov/site -help/electronic-sub-ref-mat.html. A filing is considered complete at the
time the document is submitted through the NRCs E-Filing system. To be timely, an electronic
filing must be submitted to the E-Filing system no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the due
date. Upon receipt of a transmission, the E-Filing system time-stamps the document and sends
the submitter an e-mail notice confirming receipt of the document. The E-Filing system also
distributes an e-mail notice that provides access to the document to the NRCs Office of the
General Counsel and any others who have advised the Office of the Secretary that they wish to
participate in the proceeding, so that the filer need not serve the document on those participants
separately. Therefore, applicants and other participants (or their counsel or representative)
must apply for and receive a digital ID certificate before adjudicatory documents are filed so that
they can obtain access to the documents via the E-Filing system.
A person filing electronically using the NRCs adjudicatory E -Filing system may seek
assistance by contacting the NRCs Electronic Filing Help Desk through the Contact Us link
located on the NRCs public Web site at https://www.nrc.gov/site -help/e-submittals.html, by
e-mail to MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a toll-free call at 1 -866-672-7640. The NRC
Electronic Filing Help Desk is available between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday
through Friday, excluding government holidays.
Participants who believe that they have a good cause for not submitting documents
electronically must file an exemption request, in accordance with 10 CFR 2.302(g), with their
initial paper filing stating why there is good cause for not filing electronically and requesting
25
authorization to continue to submit documents in paper format. Such filings must be submitted
by: (1) first-class mail addressed to the Office of the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555- 0001, Attention: Rulemaking and
Adjudications Staff; or (2) courier, express mail, or expedited delivery service to the Office of the
Secretary, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852, Attention: Rulemaking and
Adjudications Staff. Participants filing adjudicatory documents in this manner are responsible
for serving the document on all other participants. Filing is considered complete by first-class
mail as of the time of deposit in the mail, or by courier, express mail, or expedited delivery
service upon depositing the document with the provider of the service. A presiding officer,
having granted an exemption request from using E-Filing, may require a participant or party to
use E-Filing if the presiding officer subsequently determines that the reason for granting the
exemption from use of E-Filing no longer exists.
Documents submitted in adjudicatory proceedings will appear in the NRC s electronic
hearing docket which is available to the public at https://adams.nrc.gov/ehd, unless excluded
pursuant to an order of the Commission or the presiding officer. If you do not have an NRC-
issued digital ID certificate as described above, click cancel when the link requests certificates
and you will be automatically directed to the NRCs electronic hearing dockets where you will be
able to access any publicly available documents in a particular hearing docket. Partic ipants are
requested not to include personal privacy information, such as social security numbers, home
addresses, or personal phone numbers in their filings, unless an NRC regulation or other law
requires submission of such information. For example, in s ome instances, individuals provide
26
home addresses in order to demonstrate proximity to a facility or site. With respect to
copyrighted works, except for limited excerpts that serve the purpose of the adjudicatory filings
and would constitute a Fair Use application, participants are requested not to include
copyrighted materials in their submission.
The Commission will issue a notice or order granting or denying a hearing request or
intervention petition, designating the issues for any hearing that will be held and designating the
presiding officer. A notice granting a hearing will be published in the Federal Register and
served on the parties to the hearing.
If a person (other than HDI) requests a hearing, that person shall set forth with
particularity the manner in which his interest is adversely affected by this Confirmatory Order
and shall address the criteria set forth in 10 CFR 2.309(d) and (f).
If a hearing is requested by a person whose interest is adversely affected, the
Commission will issue an or der designating the time and place of any hearings. If a hearing is
held, the issue to be considered at such hearing shall be whether this Confirmatory Order
should be sustained.
In the absence of any request for hearing, or written approval of an extension of time in
which to request a hearing, the provisions specified in Section V above shall be final 30 days
from the date of this Confirmatory Order without further order or proceedings. If an extension of
27
time for requesting a hearing has been approved, the provisions specified in Section V shall be
final when the extension expires if a hearing request has not been received.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Raymond K. Lorson Deputy Regional Administrator NRC Region I
Dated this 26th day of January, 2022.
28