ML20236X172: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _                          _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
{{#Wiki_filter:- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
                                                                                                                                                    &R 1
&R 1
Af % -I NOTE TO: Mark Au, RES                                                                           "
Af % -I NOTE TO: Mark Au, RES February 26,1997 (N/3 FROM:
February 26,1997 FROM:         Kim Hardin, OC/DBA/PAB                                                           (N/3
Kim Hardin, OC/DBA/PAB


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
RULEMAKING PLAN: MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES TO 10 CFR PART 72 AND AMENDMENT TO 10 CFR PART 40 TO REMOVE NATURAL OR DEPLETED URANIUM USED IN STORAGE CASK SHIELDING FROM PART 40 L! CENSING REQUIREMENTS As requested in David Morrison's February 10,1997 memo to R. Scroggins, OC, OCFO has reviewed the rulemaking plan for miscellaneous changes to 10 CFR Part 72 and amendment to 10 CFR Part 40 to remove natural or depleted uranium used in storage cask shielding from Part 40 licensing requirements OCFO finds no outstanding resource-related issues and concurs ,n the approach with the following changes. We recommend that you (1) add the following statement to the " Resources needed" section of the plan:
RULEMAKING PLAN: MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES TO 10 CFR PART 72 AND AMENDMENT TO 10 CFR PART 40 TO REMOVE NATURAL OR DEPLETED URANIUM USED IN STORAGE CASK SHIELDING FROM PART 40 L! CENSING REQUIREMENTS As requested in David Morrison's February 10,1997 memo to R. Scroggins, OC, OCFO has reviewed the rulemaking plan for miscellaneous changes to 10 CFR Part 72 and amendment to 10 CFR Part 40 to remove natural or depleted uranium used in storage cask shielding from Part 40 licensing requirements OCFO finds no outstanding resource-related issues and concurs,n the approach with the following changes. We recommend that you (1) add the following statement to the " Resources needed" section of the plan:
                                                            "These resources are included in the current budget."
"These resources are included in the current budget."
and (2) replace the OCFO coordination statement with the following sentence:
and (2) replace the OCFO coordination statement with the following sentence:
                                                            "The Office of the Chief Financial Officer has no objection to the resource estimates contained in this paper."
"The Office of the Chief Financial Officer has no objection to the resource estimates contained in this paper."
I cc:                                                                                                     1 P.Rabideau, OC/DBA                                                                                   !
cc:
J. Evans, OC/DBA D.Corley, OC/DBA/PAB                                                                                 ,
P.Rabideau, OC/DBA J. Evans, OC/DBA D.Corley, OC/DBA/PAB P.Wolfe, OC/DBA/PAB C. Abbott, OC/DBA/PAB T.Heavey, OC/DBA/PAB DBA/PAB Action Item: 97-138 DBA File: NML-1.1 I
P.Wolfe, OC/DBA/PAB C. Abbott, OC/DBA/PAB T.Heavey, OC/DBA/PAB DBA/PAB Action Item: 97-138 DBA File: NML-1.1 l
g80 17e 980804 72 63FR31364 ppg y l[ lI
l I                                        g80                 17e 980804 72 63FR31364                   ppg y l[ lI   '}}
'}}

Latest revision as of 19:44, 2 December 2024

Informs of Completion of Review of RM Plan for Miscellaneous Changes to 10CFR72 & Amend to 10CFR40 to Remove Natural or Depleted U Used in Storage Cask Shielding from Part 40 Licensing Requirements.Concurs W/Stated Changes
ML20236X172
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/26/1997
From: Hardin K
NRC OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER
To: Au M
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES)
Shared Package
ML20236W816 List: ... further results
References
FRN-63FR31364, RULE-PR-40, RULE-PR-72 AF80-1-016, AF80-1-16, NUDOCS 9808070178
Download: ML20236X172 (1)


Text

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

&R 1

Af % -I NOTE TO: Mark Au, RES February 26,1997 (N/3 FROM:

Kim Hardin, OC/DBA/PAB

SUBJECT:

RULEMAKING PLAN: MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES TO 10 CFR PART 72 AND AMENDMENT TO 10 CFR PART 40 TO REMOVE NATURAL OR DEPLETED URANIUM USED IN STORAGE CASK SHIELDING FROM PART 40 L! CENSING REQUIREMENTS As requested in David Morrison's February 10,1997 memo to R. Scroggins, OC, OCFO has reviewed the rulemaking plan for miscellaneous changes to 10 CFR Part 72 and amendment to 10 CFR Part 40 to remove natural or depleted uranium used in storage cask shielding from Part 40 licensing requirements OCFO finds no outstanding resource-related issues and concurs,n the approach with the following changes. We recommend that you (1) add the following statement to the " Resources needed" section of the plan:

"These resources are included in the current budget."

and (2) replace the OCFO coordination statement with the following sentence:

"The Office of the Chief Financial Officer has no objection to the resource estimates contained in this paper."

cc:

P.Rabideau, OC/DBA J. Evans, OC/DBA D.Corley, OC/DBA/PAB P.Wolfe, OC/DBA/PAB C. Abbott, OC/DBA/PAB T.Heavey, OC/DBA/PAB DBA/PAB Action Item: 97-138 DBA File: NML-1.1 I

g80 17e 980804 72 63FR31364 ppg y l[ lI

'