ML083110454: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Fred Lyon Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 11:25 AM To: Humphreys, Michael C. Cc: 'Walli, Lori A.'  
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                     Fred Lyon Sent:                     Thursday, November 06, 2008 11:25 AM To:                       Humphreys, Michael C.
Cc:                       'Walli, Lori A.'


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review (TAC No. MD9850)
Acceptance Review (TAC No. MD9850)
By letter dated October 9, 2008, Energy Northwest submitted Inservice Inspection Program Request 3ISI-09 for Columbia Generating Station. The request was for NRC approval of the alternative to ASME Section XI, Subarticle IWB-2500, to allow reduced percentage requirements for nozzle to vessel weld and inner radius examinations for the 3rd ten-year interval ISI program.  
By letter dated October 9, 2008, Energy Northwest submitted Inservice Inspection Program Request 3ISI-09 for Columbia Generating Station. The request was for NRC approval of the alternative to ASME Section XI, Subarticle IWB-2500, to allow reduced percentage requirements for nozzle to vessel weld and inner radius examinations for the 3rd ten-year interval ISI program.
 
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff=s acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
=s acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.  
E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (1FA53ADF29758448974A8AC1118E627E85D49958C1)
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.  
 
E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (1FA53ADF29758448974A8AC1118E627E85D49958C1)  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review (TAC No. MD9850)  
Acceptance Review (TAC No. MD9850)
 
Sent Date:       11/06/2008 11:25:21 AM Received Date:        11/06/2008 11:25:00 AM From:           Fred Lyon Created By:       Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov Recipients:
Sent Date:       11/06/2008 11:25:21 AM Received Date:        11/06/2008 11:25:00 AM From:               Fred Lyon  
 
Created By:         Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov  
 
Recipients:
MCHUMPHREYS@energy-northwest.com (Humphreys, Michael C.)
MCHUMPHREYS@energy-northwest.com (Humphreys, Michael C.)
Tracking Status: None LWALLI@energy-northwest.com ('Walli, Lori A.')
Tracking Status: None LWALLI@energy-northwest.com ('Walli, Lori A.')
Tracking Status: None  
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
 
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov
Post Office:
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov  
 
Files                Size        Date & Time MESSAGE        6773        11/06/2008
 
Options Expiration Date:
Priority:                        olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:        False Return Notification:        False


Sensitivity:         olNormal Recipients received:}}
Files          Size    Date & Time MESSAGE          6773    11/06/2008 Options Expiration Date:
Priority:              olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:      False Return Notification:    False Sensitivity:     olNormal Recipients received:}}

Latest revision as of 12:27, 14 November 2019

E-Mail Acceptance Review for Columbia Relief Request
ML083110454
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 11/06/2008
From: Lyon C
Watts Bar Special Projects Branch
To: Humphreys M
Energy Northwest
Lyon C
References
TAC MD9850
Download: ML083110454 (1)


Text

From: Fred Lyon Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 11:25 AM To: Humphreys, Michael C.

Cc: 'Walli, Lori A.'

Subject:

Acceptance Review (TAC No. MD9850)

By letter dated October 9, 2008, Energy Northwest submitted Inservice Inspection Program Request 3ISI-09 for Columbia Generating Station. The request was for NRC approval of the alternative to ASME Section XI, Subarticle IWB-2500, to allow reduced percentage requirements for nozzle to vessel weld and inner radius examinations for the 3rd ten-year interval ISI program.

The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff=s acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (1FA53ADF29758448974A8AC1118E627E85D49958C1)

Subject:

Acceptance Review (TAC No. MD9850)

Sent Date: 11/06/2008 11:25:21 AM Received Date: 11/06/2008 11:25:00 AM From: Fred Lyon Created By: Fred.Lyon@nrc.gov Recipients:

MCHUMPHREYS@energy-northwest.com (Humphreys, Michael C.)

Tracking Status: None LWALLI@energy-northwest.com ('Walli, Lori A.')

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 6773 11/06/2008 Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: