ML121090475: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 13: Line 13:
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Bamford, P eSent: Wednesday ,To: 'phlashley@
==Subject:==
Acceptance Nuclear Ene
By letter dated December 21, 2011 Nuclear Operating Company submi tlevel scheme change to a scheme bBeaver Valley Power Station, Units
The purpose of this email is to provi d(NRC) staff's acceptance review of tdetermine if there is sufficient techn icomplete its detailed technical revie wwhether the application has any rea dcharacterization of the regulatory re q
The NRC staff has reviewed your r einformation in sufficient detail to en aand make an independent assessmterms of regulatory requirements anenvironment. If additional informati oyou will be advised by separate cor r
In your submittal, you requested an Based on NRC staff resource avail aThe NRC staff anticipates that it will Peter Bamford  NRR/DORL/LPL 1-2 Beaver Valley & TMI-1 Project Manage r301-415-2833 eter , April 18, 2012 3:19 PM firstenergycorp.com' Review of Proposed BVPS Emergency Preparedness Prgy Institute 99-01, Revision 5 (ADAMS Accession No. ML11362A317), FirstEn tted a request for NRC approval of an emergenc y based on Nuclear Energy Institute 99-01, Revisio n1 and 2.
de the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Co this request. The acceptance review was perfor m ical information in scope and depth to allow the N w. The acceptance review is also intended to id e dily apparent information insufficiencies in its quirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
equest, and concluded that it does provide techni c able the staff to proceed with its detailed technicaent regarding the acceptability of the proposed s ud the protection of public health and safety and t on is needed for the staff to complete its technic a respondence. expedited review of the proposed change by Jul y ability, this requested disposition date will not be fdisposition the request by December 2012.
r    P lan Using ergy y action n 5, for mmission med to NRC staff to entify c al al review ubmittal in he al review, y 2, 2012.
feasible.}}

Revision as of 05:03, 2 August 2018

Acceptance Review of Proposed BVPS Emergency Preparedness Plan Using Nuclear Energy Institute 99-01, Revision 5
ML121090475
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 04/18/2012
From: Bamford P J
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Lashley P H
FirstEnergy Corp
Bamford, Peter J., NRR/DORL 415-2833
References
Download: ML121090475 (1)


Text

From: Bamford, P eSent: Wednesday ,To: 'phlashley@

Subject:

Acceptance Nuclear Ene

By letter dated December 21, 2011 Nuclear Operating Company submi tlevel scheme change to a scheme bBeaver Valley Power Station, Units

The purpose of this email is to provi d(NRC) staff's acceptance review of tdetermine if there is sufficient techn icomplete its detailed technical revie wwhether the application has any rea dcharacterization of the regulatory re q

The NRC staff has reviewed your r einformation in sufficient detail to en aand make an independent assessmterms of regulatory requirements anenvironment. If additional informati oyou will be advised by separate cor r

In your submittal, you requested an Based on NRC staff resource avail aThe NRC staff anticipates that it will Peter Bamford NRR/DORL/LPL 1-2 Beaver Valley & TMI-1 Project Manage r301-415-2833 eter , April 18, 2012 3:19 PM firstenergycorp.com' Review of Proposed BVPS Emergency Preparedness Prgy Institute 99-01, Revision 5 (ADAMS Accession No. ML11362A317), FirstEn tted a request for NRC approval of an emergenc y based on Nuclear Energy Institute 99-01, Revisio n1 and 2.

de the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Co this request. The acceptance review was perfor m ical information in scope and depth to allow the N w. The acceptance review is also intended to id e dily apparent information insufficiencies in its quirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

equest, and concluded that it does provide techni c able the staff to proceed with its detailed technicaent regarding the acceptability of the proposed s ud the protection of public health and safety and t on is needed for the staff to complete its technic a respondence. expedited review of the proposed change by Jul y ability, this requested disposition date will not be fdisposition the request by December 2012.

r P lan Using ergy y action n 5, for mmission med to NRC staff to entify c al al review ubmittal in he al review, y 2, 2012.

feasible.