ML110880469

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Acceptance Review Results Regarding Relief Request VRR3, VRR4, and VRR5 (ME5749, ME5750, ME5752, ME5781, and ME5782)
ML110880469
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 03/29/2011
From: Nadiyah Morgan
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Lashley P
FirstEnergy Corp
Morgan N, NRR/DORL, 415-1016
References
TAC ME5749, TAC ME5750, TAC ME5752, TAC ME5781, TAC ME5782
Download: ML110880469 (1)


Text

From: Morgan, Nadiyah Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 11:52 AM To: phlashley@firstenergycorp.com Cc: 'jfirestone@firstenergycorp.com'

Subject:

Acceptance Review Results Regarding Relief Request VRR3, VRR4, and VRR5 (ME5749, ME5750, ME5752, ME5781, and ME5782)

Phil, By letters dated February 21 and February 25, 2011, FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company submitted three relief requests for Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of the subject relief requests. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Thanks, Dee Nadiyah S. Morgan Beaver Valley Project Manager Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301) 415-1016 Nadiyah.Morgan@NRC.GOV