ML12014A003

2011/07/18 Davis-Besse Lr - Follow Up Phone Call with Davis-Besse Concerning the SAMA Review

ML12014A003
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	07/18/2011
From:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
Download: ML12014A003 (8)

Text

1 Davis-BesseNPEm Resource From: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 8:29 AM To: dorts@firstenergycorp.com

Subject:

RE: Follow up phone call with Davis-Besse concerning the SAMA review Thanks From: dorts@firstenergycorp.com [1]

Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 6:58 AM To: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel

Subject:

Fw: Follow up phone call with Davis-Besse concerning the SAMA review Sam..... for your info.

_____ Steve Dort DBNPS License Renewal 419.321.7662 work 412.974.3369 cell

---

Forwarded by Steven R. Dort/FirstEnergy on 07/18/2011 06:57 AM -----

From: Steven R. Dort/FirstEnergy To: "Cooper, Paula" <Paula.Cooper@nrc.gov>

Cc: Clifford I Custer/FirstEnergy@FirstEnergy Date: 07/18/2011 06:56 AM

Subject:

Re: FW: Follow up phone call with Davis-Besse concerning the SAMA review Paula..... attached are propos ed responses to t he SAMA questions asked. Please re view the propose d responses to determine which item(s) needs further clarification. We are available for a conference call today (Monday, 7/18).

Thanks, _____ Steve Dort DBNPS License Renewal 419.321.7662 work 412.974.3369 cell

From: "Cooper, Paula" <Paula.Cooper@nrc.gov>

To: "custerc@firstenergycorp.com" <custerc@firstenergycorp.com>, "dorts@firstenergycorp.com" <dorts@firstenergycorp.com>

Date: 07/14/2011 01:31 PM

Subject:

FW: Follow up phone call with Davis-Besse concerning the SAMA review

Cliff/Steve, We're having some road blocks in getting the phone call scheduled.

I spoke to John Parillo, and it seems the most efficient way may be to get as much

clarity out of the way prior to the phone call to see how many questions we can remove 2 from having to discuss. Thus we may be able to remove several parties that need to be involved and ease the conflicts in the schedule.

Would it be possible for you to provide answers to the attached file? Any questions you feel are best left to discussion is fine, but ultimately all responses will be captured

in a telephone summary.

You had mentioned some concerns over scheduling due to comment 4b. Garill Coles provided some feedback relating to that comment in the email chain below.

If you prefer to keep all items in the phone conversation, I'll keep going with the

coordination and schedule the party as soon as the schedules allow.

Thanks, Paula E. Cooper

Project Manager

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738

Email: paula.cooper@nrc.gov

Phone: (301) 415-2323

Fax: (301) 415-2002

---

Original Message-----

From: Parillo, John

Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 11:38 AM To: Cooper, Paula

Subject:

FW: Follow up phone call with Davis-Besse concerning the SAMA review

Paula, Per our discussion this is the latest on the Davis-Besse clarifications for the SAMA review.

Thanks,

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

John G. Parillo

Senior Reactor Engineer

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Division of Risk Assessment Accident Dose Branch

Office: O-10H18 / (301) 415-1344

Mail Stop: O-10C15

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The contents of this message are mine personally and do not necessarily reflect any position of the NRC.

---

Original Message-----

From: Coles, Garill A [

mailto:Garill.Coles@pnnl.gov

] Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 5:35 PM To: Parillo, John

Cc: Schmitt, Bruce E; Short, Steve M

Subject:

RE: Follow up phone call with Davis-Besse concerning the SAMA review

John, I spoke with our Level 3 analyst, and he suggested that if the answer to the telephone 3 clarification for RAI 4.b was: "Yes", "Yes", then we didn't need any further discussion with the FENOC analyst.

Yes, from the lab point of view, closing these "clarifications" by email is an acceptable approach.

As, I mentioned on the telephone I am not available at 8:00 am on Monday, July 18th (In

fact, I am not available much of that day as I will either be in route or in a session).

I am available this Friday, July 15th. I am on travel next week but can schedule to be

available by telephone for most of Tuesday through Thursday afternoon, with the exception

of Wednesday afternoon.

I have attached the most current version of the draft telephone clarification list (which has expanded a bit).

__________________________________________________

Garill Coles Principal Engineer Risk and Decision Science

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

902 Battelle Boulevard

P.O. Box 999, MSIN K6-52 Richland, WA 99352 USA Tel: 509-372-6246

Fax: 509-372-4995

garill.coles@pnl.gov

www.pnl.gov

---

Original Message-----

From: Parillo, John [

mailto:John.Parillo@nrc.gov

] Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 1:12 PM To: Coles, Garill A

Subject:

FW: Follow up phone call with Davis-Besse concerning the SAMA review

Garill, The licensee is not able to support a clarification call this week as a key individual needed to clarify 4b has limited availability. Can you support a call on Monday July

18th at 11:00 AM? We realize that puts you at 8:00 AM. The licensee is also open to a

split meeting if we want to have a call specifically for just 4b at 11:00 AM on Monday

and the remainder of the questions later on Monday afternoon.

Let me know if this will work for you.

JGP

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

John G. Parillo

Senior Reactor Engineer

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Division of Risk Assessment

Accident Dose Branch

Office: O-10H18 / (301) 415-1344

Mail Stop: O-10C15

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The contents of this message are mine personally and do not necessarily reflect any

position of the NRC.

4

---

Original Message-----

From: Cooper, Paula Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 2:26 PM

To: Parillo, John

Subject:

RE: Follow up phone call with Davis-Besse concerning the SAMA review

John, I spoke with the Applicant and they won't be able to support a Thursday call.

Unfortunately we have some coordination concerns as 4b requires an Areva staff member to be on the call to fully clarify the pertinent information. The only time the Areva staff member is available is on Monday 10:00-12:00. Otherwise he will be unavailable until the

following week.

Having the meeting at 11:00 puts PNNL at an 8:00 am meeting time and I saw a conflict with your schedule as well.

The applicant is also open to a split meeting if we want to have a call specifically for

just 4b at 11:00 on Monday and the remainder of the questions later on Monday afternoon.

Let me know how you'd like to proceed.

Thanks

Paula E. Cooper Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

11555 Rockville Pike

Rockville, MD 20852-2738

Email: paula.cooper@nrc.gov Phone: (301) 415-2323 Fax: (301) 415-2002

---

Original Message-----

From: Parillo, John Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 12:49 PM

To: Cooper, Paula

Subject:

FW: Follow up phone call with Davis-Besse concerning the SAMA review

Paula, The attached provides the latest information for the requested phone call.

Thank you, JGP

---

Original Message-----

From: Coles, Garill A [

mailto:Garill.Coles@pnnl.gov

] Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 12:43 PM

To: Parillo, John

Cc: Schmitt, Bruce E; 'Bob Schmidt'; Short, Steve M; Dozier, Jerry; Cooper, Paula

Subject:

RE: Follow up phone call with Davis-Besse concerning the SAMA review

John, 5 Here's a draft of the phone clarifications that will provide the licensee an idea who

should be on the call.

Please note that because we are still in the process of reviewing the RAI responses that this list may be subject to some modification or expansion. As you can see the list is

short, and so we do not expect this to take long. However, it will be important to get

FENOC's verbal response documented in a "Telephone Clarification" so that we can complete

the SAMA review report (e.g., the assumptions made for each of the new SAMA benefit calculations performed in response to RAI 7a-f should be written down in the Telephone Clarification)

__________________________________________________

Garill Coles Principal Engineer

Risk and Decision Science

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

902 Battelle Boulevard P.O. Box 999, MSIN K6-52 Richland, WA 99352 USA

Tel: 509-372-6246

Fax: 509-372-4995

garill.coles@pnl.gov www.pnl.gov

---

Original Message-----

From: Parillo, John [

mailto:John.Parillo@nrc.gov

] Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 6:04 AM To: Coles, Garill A; Cooper, Paula Cc: Schmitt, Bruce E; Coles, Garill A; 'Bob Schmidt'; Short, Steve M; Dozier, Jerry

Subject:

FW: Follow up phone call with Davis-Besse concerning the SAMA review

Garill, The licensee would like to have some additional information on the topics that will be

discussed on the follow up phone regarding Davis-Besse SAMA RAIs so that they can arrange

to have the cognizant individuals present for the call. We are working on setting up a

phone call for this Thursday.

Thank you,

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

John G. Parillo Reactor Engineer

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Division of Risk Assessment

Accident Dose Branch Office: O-10H18 / (301) 415-1344 Mail Stop: O-10C15

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The contents of this message are mine personally and do not necessarily reflect any

position of the NRC.

---

Original Message-----

6 From: Cooper, Paula Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 5:37 AM

To: Parillo, John

Subject:

FW: Follow up phone call with Davis-Besse concerning the SAMA review

John,

Is it possible to get some additional info on which topics will be discussed?

I'm currently on vacation and won't be in the office today however based on the urgency

and schedule I need to make sure we get the meeting scheduled for Thursday.

Thanks, Paula Cooper

________________________________________

From: custerc@firstenergycorp.com [custerc@firstenergycorp.com]

Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 3:23 PM To: Cooper, Paula Cc: dorts@firstenergycorp.com

Subject:

RE: Follow up phone call with Davis-Besse concerning the SAMA review

Paula, Please identify the SAMA areas for discussion. If we know the specifics, we can schedule the subject matter expert (SME) for the call. As I understand the e-mail, you

prefer to target the telecom for Thursday 7/21. I will give you a confirmation once we

can ensure the SME can be available. Do you prefer morning or afternoon telecom?

Cliff Custer FENOC Project Manager

License Renewal

Work: (724) 682-7139

BPR: (412) 305-4981

From: "Cooper, Paula" <Paula.Cooper@nrc.gov>

To: "custerc@firstenergycorp.com" <custerc@firstenergycorp.com>, "dorts@firstenergycorp.com" <dorts@firstenergycorp.com>

Date: 07/11/2011 03:13 PM

Subject:

RE: Follow up phone call with Davis-Besse concerning the SAMA review

________________________________

Cliff & Steve,

I'm currently out of the office until tomorrow but is your SAMA team available for a

conference call on Thursday to discuss the RAI responses?

PNNL is located on the pacific coast and thus an afternoon meeting will be necessary. If

you are available please let me know a preferred time so I can finalize the details.

Thanks Paula Cooper

________________________________________

From: Parillo, John

Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 3:32 PM

To: Cooper, Paula

Subject:

Follow up phone call with Davis-Besse concerning the SAMA review

Paula, 7 I just received a call from PNNL requesting that we set up a follow up phone call with

Davis-Besse on the SAMA RAI responses. At this point PNNL does not expect to need a second round of RAIs but just needs some clarification on the answers provided.

Steve Short from PNNL suggested either Wednesday or Thursday of next week for a call with

the licensee. Neither Jerry Dozier nor I will be available on Wednesday so Thursday

would be better from our end.

Please let me know if a call can be set up. PNNL does not expect that it will be a

lengthy call.

Thank you,

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

John G. Parillo

Senior Reactor Engineer US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Division of Risk Assessment

Accident Dose Branch

Office: O-10H18 / (301) 415-1344 Mail Stop: O-10C15

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The contents of this message are mine personally and do not necessarily reflect any

position of the NRC.

---

The information contained in this message is

intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received

this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of

this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.

[attachment "Draft Telephone Clarifications_ For Davis Besse_13July2011.doc" deleted by Steven R. Dort/FirstEnergy]

---

---

The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intende d recipient, you are hereby notif ied that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.

Hearing Identifier: Davis_BesseLicenseRenewal_Saf_NonPublic Email Number: 2960 Mail Envelope Properties (Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov20110718082800)

Subject:

RE: Follow up phone call with Davis-Besse concerning the SAMA review Sent Date: 7/18/2011 8:28:51 AM Received Date: 7/18/2011 8:28:00 AM From: CuadradoDeJesus, Samuel Created By: Samuel.CuadradoDeJesus@nrc.gov Recipients: "dorts@firstenergycorp.com" <dorts@firstenergycorp.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 13833 7/18/2011 8:28:00 AM

Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: