ML15005A163: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 208 | | page count = 208 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:RULES TVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Z 0i1 Fl 29 9 2 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R CF ;1\!--As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name FWL G C- GP-15ý- 7 U Email c /+ ( M RULES A4IC, L)IBiECTIVES BRVNC:I-t U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 0!C 22 PM 41: 42 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RE:(-` tIVED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name __________________ | |||
Email t/ / ý)j--g 6i.,, ? | |||
RULES Ai,! DIRLC;IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201'1 71 29 Pi L: L2 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RPCH- --As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, t Name Al--x Email (1 (0 --a , tx!.J-RULEL NiD 'LCTIVES pF* .> l, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2l0q 0UC 29 VP 4: 12 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F F-' A\ /t As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email ILK 6 t) AP,(4 i a - | |||
RULES )IECTIVES k~LfI .'H,;,j-,f .! " U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014I 29 P'- ': 142 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
C i\IFD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, t.Name A, 7,, -Email V0 (1 6#f -f" b RULES AND JfRECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7014 RIEC 29 PM 4: 43 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
F DI\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Email C(c, "C(J -V4'6ie ..sa J. COl, J J RULES AIIL) DIRECTVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 0 .C 2 9 ' 4: 143 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F r -I\V/-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spe" rods remain there.Sincerely, Name q)4 Email e RULIS AL;0) LýI ETCJIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2LON 9-C 29 PH' L4 3 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
D R ..... ..- E C i I .!I--L As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Email | |||
1 --U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20M4 U 1 29 PHI 4: 43 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF(-' \!/-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerel'Name Email 0 M C, rrO .. C..o X0V , 4 RULES -):,A,0 , \r U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2BI' 29 Qi 43 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
Rwi'L \1\ D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, -Name (e_____--Email 1_ ,,, 71 RULES AND 1i<>CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 701q DELP, 29 PMl : 413 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF2 \ -)_D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely Name e-, /R6:§A Email d, RULES " :, LLEUC-T'!ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey HgiM DEC 29 PM : '43 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFr'!i\,"F\ | |||
D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name I_Email | |||
).7J, 4 L Ct, 9-'" | |||
RULES i) OIHECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 4 EC 29 PH 4: 143 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, /A Name J. d Email BULFS A;. '', LCVES L.i ANCH U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 29 PM Q 4 3 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCO-F\tV )D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name &,, '/-/--/ C // 6r.2-Email ~& ~ | |||
RULES L, Ir(CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2 rwý-C 29 P Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Email RULES "DF 15-CIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 29 H Office of Administration, NRC 0 29 P 1 1 ': '3 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F- F I\/E D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, I,.1 Name U .& q U1 Email kJ'ge s A b., | |||
RULES ',.. Lf U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 01 fPEC 2 9 P il 4: 43 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCFI\! D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincereay Narne eA Email RULES ii; [ DIECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 20114 BEC 29 Pi 4: q3 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
JIF As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name .-A Email CJh1t bW,51-7/ed (9j. n-760 -.Ocarn RULES ;,:,i, ', , iV- , U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 201LI UKC 29 PIN 4: 43 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R__C -L\//7 As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, e-C- /.Name___________ | |||
__Email RULES' I --_T k/E3 EIAN'.CH U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey GC ?9 P' 14:143 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF .- ..D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, I Name ev .U rO4 Email /MO,-rk. \ ° Cofl. | |||
RULES , `,\ L;-IIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2011 01_C 29 4L: fL3 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name _ _ _ _ _ _Email AYv IC9 (AJ6MA J<q7a. 1 (- c-RULES " F" ..T-VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2fM1 [07C 29 PI [4: 43 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCF\,F-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Email )Iic.- j. (. , eG4/ | |||
FULS ,, 'IVCTiVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 OF"' 29 P 4'- !143 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF2.R/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely f .-Name II& U4)Email_ _ _ _ _ ______i_)_____ | |||
RULE)' L, E-CTIVES RU E .A i~ CH----U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 OLE, 29 Pl 4: 143 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF2FI\,!D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spejU-ftmi-kods remain theV. | |||
RULES i .) DlTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201 L,:29P L1 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCFF_ D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ; ( 2 Name 'N.Email I RULES ";E' -`T1 V7S ff), ACH U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2U14 [DIC 29 P1'l LI: 4-l4 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rR pein-a ere.Sincerely, Email Ifl JA\ @KA1 3 r&y4V RULE1;1NL A ,A_-ITIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20..l DEC 29 PH1 4: L4 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RE7F i\iED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincer el y,- c HRULES A4,1' DSFECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20i1 C 22 P9tM q: L-14 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF2-i\/f-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spen> ro, remainrýhere. | |||
Email RULES A'M,) 11-i:ECT iVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 91CC ?9 PH 4: 44L-Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFC, \/EV)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name /Email /( i7-qM~gA& | |||
A t)S ,)Vd 10k14/7_ | |||
RULES .'.,i. J TI8''U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ZOlu DEC 29 P, rl 44LJ Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R OFIrF-\/FED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, L i ) '\) ThI Name Email RULES ..j-.... ' CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20 IEC 29 PM 4: 4L4 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFC>--I--D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and I>(2) To holda Suthern 1fornia Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the fuel there.Em ail .,. " | |||
RULES ," ) , E" IVS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 GEC 29 Pil l4: a 4 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCH\i'FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plapt was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safetý complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name_______________________ | |||
Email ezIl e Z ,> | |||
RULE , L)D P.C-TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201q 0f. 29 : 14-4 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCr I\!ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name JQ.If -S130.Email ýu , | |||
BULL' $ "" "": -'-"" U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 0 , 29 1: 14L Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RH.FV/_D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .Name -a QmWtor Email 0 rr3 _ ' | |||
RULLES Di ,, H LCC I ViEIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 OfEC 29 PH 4: 4 4 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
.-'.i-\f_.)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.SNmcrely, ..-4a.Email CN " (2 RULES Ai) D.iOTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 0`1-J- 29 PN O4 144 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R17-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ?Name 4 W --n ------Email RULES -\i%1L) A L.,` IECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ZOI OFF, 29 'PH 1: 4 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF F 7 \D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, i Name Ym lC a-ll Email 814Ad o RULES i/\1;,!JL DiHECTiVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201q U 29 PH 4: 4 4 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF(7-\.VFID As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Name Email HULLS AI. LFEOCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC WI01 L ' 9i L: '41 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF F --\/D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .01 Name Email a c4. t-94, e ) c.m , | |||
RULES o, .... ....Li)-; EGTIV'ES f,!-,L -,i ,, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 21I C1 1 29 P M4: 4 4 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
FFC(FI\/D- | |||
-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email AlSb RULES 101) I11LCT IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 A! 1-C 29 PM L' 45 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
D-2\/,D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel .rods remain there.Sincerely, L-/ ,)!, -Name '7cI-c 4c Email -.-, 0- co. L.. C rn'm NUL~b ":: i : UL , 'S' ; U I- -TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 21,- ,2 15 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there. -. --i .Email ChIe,-e -ý 401-"- | |||
RULE) , ;-' ,CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ZC1t DC1 29 PR- 1I: 115 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 RFCF'\/FD | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.SincerelA J ,'Name " AA L _A,, , Email k)NYk~~~s~OCIf' FULE, , L. -CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2f011 j f5L-i29 P1) 4:L-L5 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R Q -I\/ ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, i- t.Name pet L e k" /C? L Email iý C (T cC e6 RULE-D , U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2BIA ION 29 PI1 4: 45 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, / Name Email RULES ;`P'L, D:ý-IECTIVES 20qDEIC 29 PH .41L5 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F C V\/--FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Since Name Email rely, RULES' A,',.I )D,; `AEGCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ZOq DEC 2 9; P1 1 41 45 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R [7..] ,z D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ai -,6(2 Name (,a 'II Em ail _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __7 _ | |||
RULEUS ' J iVS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 20i4 DET 29 RI 1: 145 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFr-1. -D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, C A'Name Email v'- (? C Q) <. | |||
BUL.FS D\ ',_ ,-,-,iL,/_ | |||
R LP .-i I.. I"VE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 29 Pii 4' 45 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R .C F.,/HD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, " Name CNa4-iýýtUIk+ | |||
Email RULES ' " IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M (Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R CI..W As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, NEami e __._ (IA Email )", _C@ t i .)' 't.Z / | |||
R ULE ,,I,!: 'I;- VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey C9,-Office of Administration, NRC LPAq , 99 P1 ': '5 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF2 " \/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email-jr RULES ',,) D LECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 0 C 29 PM 4: 45 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFI_ F , V .D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, RULE,- Aii,') U1., TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 k+/- 29 1: 45 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F --I\ F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sinerely,7 Namemal _Email /L /Oorie-o C0,'_.?Q RULE U .iVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 720lq Pi20 :T q5 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
-F-H\iED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,,. | |||
Name 7'LA 'v Email C fO A /a RULES i,,; F,io DLOTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC YO1L [7i 29 L5 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R Ff7: F K'/F.D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, A .Name______ | |||
Email___________________ | |||
C& | |||
RULES!i IJ !--' '3E-CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 94 rPk929 t 14: .5 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
, -,"-\/'D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name .Email .., | |||
RULES i Ui " n-'LES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Kr ,[ 29 P11 q 4 5 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF-FR/r--- | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Namee _______Email HULF- i ;,') L: ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201 [q.C 29 PR1 L: 45 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCFK/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.S incerely, 'f"a, Name CC Email A',0 1A _ a u k b .cc nn RULES I ;,_J ICT- VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201q 10,C 29 P Q: '46 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF2FI\/ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name | |||
"/ /Email RULES L' , .3 1TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 211L 2 9 PM 1: 4, 6 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 R F\ D | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R 'C /.-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rod> remain there. --Sincerely, Name -Email 5 C Sf5t49'6o4Arf(0d RUILES 1 R Ei, uC -I IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7Gifl LC 2 9 Pl1 P- 4i 6 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel r remain there.Sincerely, Name Email RULEK Al 1J, ;:.CT1VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2[01 A 2 PTI -T 4 6 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F- !\ rD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name________________ | |||
___________ | |||
Email RULL ) .:, ECTRVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 0, , 99 Pr T 46 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F 7( \/. D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name__ K__-____Email I.-, /*7 ) ýj, - | |||
RULES F, C" F1"-OOTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC CGi 2B 1 ' R 1: 46 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCFC!F D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remaiiYi'ere. | |||
Email M,(- | |||
BULEL i L, brLECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC L 29 Pli L: 46 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R zQ.- IVFV_As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent f el rods remain there. | |||
Name Email ,ý,- 4ayko@ -o o C, r 4' n RULES " " J-,IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 20 f 29 Fi 1: '46 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RIF ' F I\/!D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name /L4 Email 0'O$~cj1Le RULES i,, E,-COTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey c} 2' i1 'Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F(77 ! i\E--- ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, >Name e__ ___ __Email bs&00,6iI7P~ | |||
6 P,11G4L C 0 (1 BULLS/b i) 9 TfiES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 01 [i C 2'9 PH L: 4 6 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
EC-" /EiD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fel rods remaiq there.Email A/a JIC/-- / 0 s RULES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ..14:'46 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R1C'V'J-i L)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,'] | |||
Name ______ y,_ _ _ ___ _ __ _: _Email RULES i. DaiOrECETES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC ...'Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
F, R (_D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name 5" fL\J*j.t" Email " C-LOI' RULES i. 'A}I-ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7j1j 7 f 29 P 4: 16 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R.F.FI\./FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .Namem_Email , , | |||
RULES!; j LDiC 6 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 29 P1 q 6 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFOF VED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email Y h jI ' | |||
RULES ,, R EFC'IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 70 14 G9 29 P, 1 4: 16 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, , " Name______________ | |||
_Email HULE A..:L uK.TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 PHfC 29 Pfl 4: 416 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF,2V7-k/ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name ..Email ej.. | |||
RULES i,% L.'J L'. IL,-ýCý ES.-A I f}P"l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey NON HE, 29 PM Q: 46 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spentjfe1-tds re~nain there.Email "T-40A, A -I/A LC., L t RULIESL i.') ECTiVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7C!/ 0yL 2OFJ" 99 : 47 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 Q | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
H I -I As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the s ent fuel rods re in there.S ince, __y'Namegi/Email - | |||
RULE) i, i JtEC-1 NES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201 1 7 PF 2 L4: 147 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
rF -. \!..-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Xd/.bid Name A LS4 Email I4A'-' 1A/.. ;>Q 1 RUL -",:u , 1 " U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC PH1tq 971 29 P11 L 47 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFH K....As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there. | |||
Name_ _ _ _ __Email A .' '5li& ? , | |||
D-1 , yES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey C 2 9 47 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .Name SU5@V\ Q 2hP Email of$(' 3 oQ 1 RULE.-\ JL " IVES" U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC f}t7F '29 F : Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
FF2FIV'!D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuelrds remain there.Sincerely,, Name Email j/ (e L /eS:b '/ | |||
HULES; "'" DEC'TIES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 20N yE 2- 14: 47 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
-..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ,..Name Email _-d(v4 5 e RULE ..U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7014 15"' 29 M 41: 4 7 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RVQFI'V/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name ___ ____ __ __V Email Y C eo-- r, .co!,.-- | |||
BUL E Ai,! L' it()` C TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC ?914 KC 20 PMI 4: 47 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
FC-'I\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Sop e California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the/sr nt/ftel rods t 're.Sincerely, Name___Email __ _________-,- | |||
RULE'- 1}-,"IE(TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 210111 V29 P.,jI 4: 47 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Namem RULES ibl LirFKCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 701q D-EC 29) PM 4: 4 7 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R 2F., \!FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Email q ý 6 ý C RULESJ r _ ; q l TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 014 p[ F. 2 9 Pi 4: 4 7 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, r Name_____________________ | |||
Email______________________________ | |||
%ULLJ j ICIVES RU E A....." ....- ..r U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7- ,-C 29 RN t": 47 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFO--\/-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name____Email 0 C, t RULE, 'ilt. CTI\VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20lq Fr-. 2" PNi 4" 4:7 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R FC D\/D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name_____ | |||
____ ___Email | |||
,UL. ,.) L.-CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey CI 72 P2 4":47 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF-FI\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email RULE! WlVE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7fl 1 -29 ?" L-: 147 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF-C(FV ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name _______ _Email 1-40 14 71 RULLES i'A J -CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Zili [KC 2 9 P104 1: 4 7 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 RFQH-\!,FD | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerem__ | |||
Name *b it ; )4 Email RULES J" h /E" S T I V-"Rp/ ,.ýV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 4 Office of Administration, NRC 70 ": Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCP7¶\/-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities;- | |||
and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ',r Name Id^14 L,&WLzjl/ -kad&"1 Email & / c Y -lzoe RULIo AL ' IVES Rif"., N.O;:: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2rI I F C 29 P M 4: '47 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 RFrOFR-!\FT | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, _Name_______________ | |||
Email 0ý r&o -~riI. &m RULES ',L i 1`1iC ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 29 , n /4: L47 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F FIL\/D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email u 2--k _C BULE ' ' F U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 0 8 Office of Administration, NRC Vq C 29 Pi 1: L8 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
r F1V\!_D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name 1 --Email RULE.) S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC JON PIIC 29 '111 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
.F'(71i7]\/_D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,//) | |||
Name aV1/V4 Email | |||
.- R,,IfL"1',EC | |||
-1ME WUL .S 2?C U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 0 29 148 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
iF D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincl I c t A/N a m e , _ .../Email .,- rc t ,C . | |||
BULLLS ," :-J.,T / --U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
IQ';FA/1/2D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Emai 'fr Di4(A )C Oe ..Oa .--er. C.;...orV RULES f,, OT.)C6I\/ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 70141 J 291 P : 484 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R[CF \I/_FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name!6 @1, Email Ll 1S\\p Mal BULES A'I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey BC 2 LI8 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R pFC As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name ..Email I." Y RULES AI.D CTVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2O]t1 _ 29 P'r l: 48 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R -..... ....As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, L Name Email_________________ | |||
2 BULES, ," ",- CTi"ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Zc 29 Pt L: L8 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF-I'\.-!."- | |||
-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name___Email 6A4-1? | |||
RULES /IN ,QLFCTiVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20111 OlC 29 PMI LI: 48 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
REC.FI\/F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name ____ 6A__ ____Email I. f , _ (-. A-RULES , 'ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 29 t : L8 Office of Administration, NRC ,LU1 2 9 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFrC\FP-1/,F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there. | |||
Name Emrna i l______________________ | |||
RULES/. L/ OTiJES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC HN PFC' 292 P 411: 4-8 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
.,F< -X/F_)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name A 4 Email A -av"E. | |||
RULES ', ,IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2 C11L cii: 29 H] 1: q48 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RP1F "N' A_ \\i'D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the s ent fuel ro s remain there.Sincerely, Name 9 ýN Email _ __ _________________ | |||
*fRQ1kh1~ | |||
RULES,**,,.LJ E-C]iVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 I]E1 29 14" 143 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
i--- r' ir As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email C 7-( | |||
RUL`;/,, :T V/ ESIQ, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7141 ,FDU 29 rL' 148 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF2F \/F As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the s uel rods remain there.Namem Email !' | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC t 2' 14 t Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
, _--As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,/ | |||
Name_ _ _ __Email C-0 11. a c.f0 | |||
, .'L '1 -E-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey H'q UJV 29 PO q: q4 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF.,"\iFV) | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely Name ___Email a o/o. L-to m RULES i.L CTiVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Q ,, Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF-? !\/F..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email l_._ii L, | |||
!") C)l+) ýVn-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7014 OET 29 P : Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
IV F. D-, -..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name crd4 C Email RULES /A;..V) LI- TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ,...,4 Office of Administration, NRC C 99 49 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF(- \F / V _As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern Califomia Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email I --C -'L ..Cc 4 RULE" D" U th-ES, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 29 ' 29 Lf 9 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 RF f!-\/.D | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely Name ______________________ | |||
Email V^*,,c_.a | |||
-.0 _ - | |||
RULEBI L'I+/-CIVLS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 ql C7( 2, 9 Ri Q: 49 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R -`F \/ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name______________________ | |||
Email -A .Q COnX RULES),"%,, _lo :O VEb U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 70N. 29 , Q: 49 Office of Administration, NRC ....Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
FF-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Lunc. L\ s.n5 Email M Pr _ | |||
AU! ES)AD 7-- ;LUTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Z014 D'IE 29 PI N 49 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 R | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name .Email sm, , lPetwf BUL,.,B ,', 0 , fb V,.-ul.?A , :o-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ,, 0 29 Pi3 It L49 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R_ -(T F'\./F--D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, (..X/ -/JS Name Email r4,._, yss Q0b,6 t.Co RULES 7iE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey i " 29 qN (49 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 R'J*-1 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.oince el, D" Nam%/" Email Q-'C ( l I .,- ; ..A ,"-; ' J 0 L.'. -W',?U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC U-I 29 P1! Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RK (J \...As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email ( | |||
H U L F_... :.'. , E.i IC_,. -1VLE.S US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2gI v 29 i: 149 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
1 .As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation' accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely._ | |||
Name Y-Email l .ITIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Gill -10H 29 P6 4: 149 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
i -As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuob-20 remain there.Name Email AA A-12-Vk-- | |||
&- 5-TO PJ E7FA-e!-.--r | |||
'C.- CO e PA ULES --1C TIVES i j , U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC B 2 P" R: 419 Mail Stop: 3WvFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
FC>IV!D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Name Email RULES t.#i9 j,-(jET'!ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ,-,' -, Lt: Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
-Rkt ,- r 7-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods re Sincerely, Name Email ( | |||
RULE" i, .) .CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2 ;-. ?Y p- 4: 14 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF, F V...As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Namem Email BULES CY;7K CTI VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2011 u-' 29 PIM 4: 49 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
p FO -/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name )Email C ! " Pr /]k 0 RULES: , D,,;1' n! I ,vLES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7r0tu C3,I 29 P4j ?4:149 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, JIh Name -Email ___.__________________________ | |||
RULES " I' ' E" .TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 14 10,' Pi L-.: 49 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF1.__F,`\,FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name § c, S 'y Email J ,, | |||
RULES i,2D r-IVES ,_J ; I .., ' i I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7l0 FUC 2?9 PN.I: 19 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF.77 F -\.! D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Souothe, California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long t p rods ere.Name Email i BULLS Y.'>-"fVC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2 f31q 1 s P 14: Y19 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 R -I\/-D | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison r sponsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spentfuel ro s remain th Sincerely, Namem_ | |||
RULES U.. L. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey eL)q rf 29 P'i li: 4-9 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R A!As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email ..7Z4 tjA RULES k',,- L J 1 lIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC U. 22 VI Li: 19 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RE.2F "!_--As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Email 6o W) /7,..,,1 1. /I06 RULES iN, ,Ib , IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC G Il 29 I'M 4 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFC7L.';"" As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the s t fue ds remain there.Sincerely, Name ma Email _ -" | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 50 Office of Administration, NRC "O., 2 .ti 2 0 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R CF. I\/ FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email RULES :,u L/ ';EOTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC f 99 PI11* 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F C."'!-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely Name Email W--%1-"Y ..2 RULES /TVVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 201q D[C 29 ,01 t4:50 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R FC C .. F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name____Email (% I Z44AJI /SAD2J RULL S -' UiT ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey nu ?0 50 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R 'F .. IL-)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold South rm California Ediion res onsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the Dlnt el rods emain th re.Sincerely, Name_________________ | |||
Email ________________ | |||
ULf-- L;-,CTIVES iUL-' , n LTIL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC F .[ L: 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R ` r \ `..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,~ | |||
Name ýty- & -?,a iVý-~Email RULLE .', ,I.3 I/ .U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 701Q FC 2 9 2 i Q: 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R, _ ,-,D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Email /OLYo[ -Rcr'OIie., | |||
RULL, A;, L) -CTIVES N, 1 " " U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 29 F' 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFC2-P '\'F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Ilze- msevf Email RULES 1.0 JiJ'[E(TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey L 1 99 ? Q -50 Office of Administration, NRC L95 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F. ../F..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Email 6Sy~v ~ C~ (/Ta9 .P~-f RULES,/, L i V EIS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201 KCI 29 PiN LI: 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RIF Y- F\ EF As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .l Name_________________ | |||
Email_____________________ | |||
RULES .[-,K_1 I VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 FDE B 29 PM.] O: 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R, As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name E(isabe,!t a Email RULES i, jYICTh\!ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2011O DEC 29 P11 LI: 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email RUL E;S /\'k , _- I..V..S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey , LEE C'9- 29 P H! L: 5 0 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R _ F \/'ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name kk~'~ /-~-el146lPW Emi I-LKLA a AoL.co Email RULES .v... JIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ,-,,9 4: 50 Office of Administration, NRC L Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF 'M3 i'-F D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, :_ ..--I Name C Ema " w. ,W 6 HULK;.- iK:! ) V Ii£VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2[1I11 LG F9 'Nr r4: 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
Rr -Q W D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincere, Name Eminail I~YA cc RULE,2 ',) ; VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 17W "- , fii. 0 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
PF , -/i.ID As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, _Name ýný _ Email Ut " J©VV R ULE AiL OIC1 I VE S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 111 r[ -LC 2?9 PIM ': 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
Rm(--/ --As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name ý' 4A .Email BULLS /kL Ci;I BCTVS ru L 21 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
0 / nVK As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.0.i, Name 5f Kevv]Email N uSi(iEj It 4 4(( mkýna4 c&/Vl RULES -i-,i DETVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 L: 51 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
FDFQ, \ -FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email RULE,`~U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey vE-, 9 2 9 , 51 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
pv.F -,; .As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern Califonmi- -Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain ere.emi. @ /. / " | |||
.UL Ai." y .ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey PM:5 Office of Administration, NRC [ 2 P i : 51 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFQ;F.\ .As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerel(Name .-Email 6 O ' - | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
JU~:~f VA-.mq ýo,29 pwF -D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, 1/2'Name ( _/J ,149 0* r 7ýEmail Emai V- 1` | |||
RULtJ ., L, TI VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC [1Y4 1 1: 5'Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF- 7V'F D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name ( L -J Email , /. a/ | |||
,UL S .... ' I, VES RUI_,_ ,,"--U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ]u '.. PVI L: 51 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF"2.FN\ .D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, "L Name 14T/rQIUA 0 1'zELER Email QO-. -i. ;ýZjim h V)CZ'e.d , | |||
RULL;) -TN iVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7 2? f L 5C Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F -" 7 i\/D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name _ _ _ _ __l_ _Email /,//-44 d'(_c.7._," | |||
UL , :',0JIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC T[14 ,- [ 51 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF(,A\!F.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincer e _ _ y__ __ _Name___________________ | |||
Email RUL-o ",, Li 7 ,IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 0 V11 031 2 9 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RR...' \/ /ED_As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name___ __ _Email )00 J 1 1do r _ , ( | |||
RULES ; [Ci[.I.S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey .Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name _ _ _ __Email kres+eh G hotam if corrm, RULEL P , 1 VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey L i- 2 9 1:5 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
F F i\FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name____________ | |||
Email (two' Yo/e,.J -_ | |||
RULES,-" , L, :S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 'L1 E-P29 P4: 5I Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
pE, Li V. _As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Email Plk V-BULL I U .iiECTNVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 95 Office of Administration, NRC 7_ 13q 29 Pi' U:" Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF2 ...J As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerel Name a ' -' V Email hD@ -NV RUULF~ -,I.,t)b t;',-l'-YDr\ ,',; V-'t-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 51 Attn: Cindy Bladey 2 9 %Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R c-. 1\t..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, V Name C______\___________ | |||
Email CI -"/\Y E-G ý'\k L. CC'V' RULE; ,\iiJ LCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 0,'[-C 92 DEN 41:5 1 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R FCVI\/f-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name 1,i.Email r ?,qY -) 0 bI W- "t it - | |||
RULE S L`,i r--CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2011ifI. f." 2 1? 13N 4: 5 1 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R_ H\E As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spen el rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email -Af- , e R~U L S ' ,Y L I: LC~- IV pS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 20 1 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 I R __,. ....t. | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name = t Email C& L)t ,- COi'~J I V RULES , iE.,..C,- ! ,""N i-I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201L .2,-Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
FrF ,I\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ()Name_ _ _ __Email l__________ | |||
gULES v :,U2TElVFS | |||
ý,l -. ,.'. ýr,:, CJI,: S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey PF .52 Office of Administration, NRC J U. 22 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, -'Name \) eY-?Email J 9, ý ý~V\ tý RUL , _ | |||
* S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2 L9 : 52 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
-..F )As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Email,_f-'i AC, .~l 0 .J.0 L), oC -ov'N RULEo/. .s -EC i ,riVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 70114 KC 29 Pl [: 52 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
F-\,F., As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name___________________ | |||
Email ( AJ BULLS "" 'U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ?- 52 Office of Administration, NRC ti 2Y 9 V : 52 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email. Cox HULES i1.]{ DLV;E(;Ti ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 LU C 29 PH1 4: 52 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R I.SI\/WD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, I Name Email RULE i', C-TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 20N ',,r-, 29' Phil 4: 52 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFP \-/VD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, A. .Name PULEo ,,,"E U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC R0 E C 29 PH1'1: 52 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
Rf I- -\/D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name 1.Z.O(A, -A. -C- O t Email ýn7lc ZiGQYW&Ak .k 1 0~- | |||
RULE") J _;fJi E U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Br;I' 29 P [- 52 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R t.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rod's from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, l Name i ,V ( cl<-ocd Email on [o | |||
~~hES5 "i!- y,'i,, "J-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 52 Office of Administration, NRC 2 2 2 52 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R ... -'... .As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Namem e _ _ _Email I (ktf cut. -_ ( -'4 (LL .. " .I L I'E- 0-I \JL,.0 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R .-- i..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,/ | |||
riY L 2 ,- i, ,c-.-Name 4 Email 41 -3 3~ &co ml HULEo,' ,L, TIVLS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20 F R 4 2 ,i : 52 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,.L4m Name " tl itVj.Email__________________ | |||
HU LS %'J RULEo L: " TEL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201i V C 2 9 P -: 52 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF-FI\FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, I-Name ""Z44, " Email A,, 6i~.f~1 | |||
_-" IT-,,,-, R .U L L S .U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey "j1` D E C 2? 9,P U: 2 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R %Q Fl. F1D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, -I Name Email , | |||
RULE-S K' L'JJ -CTIVES 2014 "DfC 29 PH 1-17 52 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R 17... V\ /F D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location--perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Saincerely, Name____ _____________ | |||
____________-__________ | |||
Email 6&&& da Q.Qty RULES "i L;CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission I'Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration,'NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M | |||
-!Pj1- 99 I f: 52 Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R .VI ,.r- 1--I As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile are-a'subject to t..permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name 6 AL Email RULES ,'."Lt I /ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2011 DEC 2 9 PH 41: 52 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCHi\/F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name_ __ __Email RULLS 6D ; ILO1iES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 11' U_11 29 IP'4 Q: 52 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F 2F' 1\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerelya e __Name Email RULES /\" 'QEf:TI'ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 70-14 0FC 29 Q i P : 53 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name___Email G-m ikfM -, t30 SCA 9C 1&, !o rY) | |||
RUL ....) L- CJ I V.'ES3 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20H HC 29 Fil Q: 53 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RD.F', r-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history.of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name m e _ _ _ _Email '!ý,CV r , t4 eV ý- | |||
RULLS :L h ,UT-"ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |||
[: Attn: Cindy Bladey 20111 OIC 29 PIt 41: 53 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, J-A wk-Name_ _ _ _ _*Email '/ -, | |||
RUL.; !UOTIES'U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 201I U[C 29 P : 53 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F I\/-.D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the) fuel rods rem t Sincerely' | |||
," " 1 Name_ _ _ _ _ | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC nv'- P14 L-: 53 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF .._ F ......As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name , V c,04i " [ | |||
RULES [ -,") Yr lFlTI1ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7 Pf1 14:53 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFC>C \iFD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email RULEL i 9"LCIYVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 20lL 29 Ri 4:53 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name 1 -Email RRULEE i 4 J L) !iri ,T.VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 211I (EFC 29 P'1 41: 53 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R -( ,. I As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Email NV ta Pv cJ L 5Ca, RULES ,C; !t R U LE.P,;. I LuJ I' L-0 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2 011 C 2. 9" 'M L0: 53 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCIF-, , '"t F \F As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.-X(Email P ( "'' | |||
RULES/"i. | |||
CTtVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2q 2 P H 53 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R--'F-, .D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name "a ,/VI/VJi Email "a Aiys,6? A1, Cc1/4'a oo3 1;F i-Z o/P7/#- | |||
RULES Z) r.F6\_/,S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20111. PC 2 9 P1i 4: 53 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RVF_ --ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely' Name )\4Qe 4T.c Email "M"._5av ý!s (, | |||
RULES .l;-ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ZA 4: 53 Office of Administration, NRC 2 0 N 5C Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F (71'As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent Juel rods remain there.Sincerely, Eame &E mail ý-z( | |||
_ If-1 | |||
,ULE" rIr U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7Q 29 : 53 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF\As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison res onsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain th Sincerely, -J 'Name 9Jt )Email l % ') ;" -TI ,-(L.\,, '.. -i.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7~lj 29 P] 4: 53 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF!2NJVF_As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name 6BJ Email RULES, " ., L.,ZI'JE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 U40 2 5 3 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFC" VFD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (I) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Nameme____ | |||
Email k\,yv\(No cii.'\. | |||
RULE" b~L -LCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 53 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R7 IV'.'As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email e 1 tP& c ( c- | |||
,- .1 .L V tC IE_U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20tI C 29 Pai 4: 54 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name__ _ __ _ __ _Email tVamk 0 RULES Di1v,, TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 0[1 -1 "'f'L-, _'2 9P i 1-:- 514 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCH\/FID As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name ve e ' 1 Email VI A) | |||
RULEto *ICIVES(H U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission r 2 9 P~ 14: 514 Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 RF-N \/FD | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, J1J .5'Name ____ _ _ _______Email RULES I ".-I IV , ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 20!" N ? .54 Office of Administration, NRC .G 2 P Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R I7C-V 1 .I _As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel remain there.Sincerely, Name___Email RUJLE; ý TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2011 0Zr" 9 ' 4: 54 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF.. \As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Emarn AS CL LL-,vtC- ." | |||
RULES / LL I IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Z ,I'1 ?9 7- 1: 511 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
.. F I- "1 1. -/F'f As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .Name Email .(' AQ,\ | |||
RULE: S 7FS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2i'1 UiT, 2 ? ,: 53 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFOHVJ- FD ! --- L--As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository. | |||
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors. | |||
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name -4] A Email e lý.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 08:15, 9 July 2018
| ML15005A163 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre, 05000360 |
| Issue date: | 12/29/2014 |
| From: | Berger M, Grasso M - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Bladey C K Division of Administrative Services |
| References | |
| 79FR61668, NRC-2014-0223 | |
| Download: ML15005A163 (208) | |
Text
RULES TVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Z 0i1 Fl 29 9 2 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R CF ;1\!--As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name FWL G C- GP-15ý- 7 U Email c /+ ( M RULES A4IC, L)IBiECTIVES BRVNC:I-t U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 0!C 22 PM 41: 42 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RE:(-` tIVED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name __________________
Email t/ / ý)j--g 6i.,, ?
RULES Ai,! DIRLC;IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201'1 71 29 Pi L: L2 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RPCH- --As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, t Name Al--x Email (1 (0 --a , tx!.J-RULEL NiD 'LCTIVES pF* .> l, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2l0q 0UC 29 VP 4: 12 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F F-' A\ /t As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email ILK 6 t) AP,(4 i a -
RULES )IECTIVES k~LfI .'H,;,j-,f .! " U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014I 29 P'- ': 142 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
C i\IFD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, t.Name A, 7,, -Email V0 (1 6#f -f" b RULES AND JfRECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7014 RIEC 29 PM 4: 43 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F DI\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Email C(c, "C(J -V4'6ie ..sa J. COl, J J RULES AIIL) DIRECTVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 0 .C 2 9 ' 4: 143 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F r -I\V/-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spe" rods remain there.Sincerely, Name q)4 Email e RULIS AL;0) LýI ETCJIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2LON 9-C 29 PH' L4 3 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
D R ..... ..- E C i I .!I--L As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Email
1 --U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20M4 U 1 29 PHI 4: 43 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF(-' \!/-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerel'Name Email 0 M C, rrO .. C..o X0V , 4 RULES -):,A,0 , \r U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2BI' 29 Qi 43 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
Rwi'L \1\ D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, -Name (e_____--Email 1_ ,,, 71 RULES AND 1i<>CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 701q DELP, 29 PMl : 413 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2 \ -)_D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely Name e-, /R6:§A Email d, RULES " :, LLEUC-T'!ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey HgiM DEC 29 PM : '43 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFr'!i\,"F\
D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name I_Email
).7J, 4 L Ct, 9-'"
RULES i) OIHECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 4 EC 29 PH 4: 143 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, /A Name J. d Email BULFS A;. , LCVES L.i ANCH U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 29 PM Q 4 3 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCO-F\tV )D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name &,, '/-/--/ C // 6r.2-Email ~& ~
RULES L, Ir(CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2 rwý-C 29 P Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Email RULES "DF 15-CIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 29 H Office of Administration, NRC 0 29 P 1 1 ': '3 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F- F I\/E D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, I,.1 Name U .& q U1 Email kJ'ge s A b.,
RULES ',.. Lf U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 01 fPEC 2 9 P il 4: 43 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCFI\! D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincereay Narne eA Email RULES ii; [ DIECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 20114 BEC 29 Pi 4: q3 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
JIF As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name .-A Email CJh1t bW,51-7/ed (9j. n-760 -.Ocarn RULES ;,:,i, ', , iV- , U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 201LI UKC 29 PIN 4: 43 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R__C -L\//7 As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, e-C- /.Name___________
__Email RULES' I --_T k/E3 EIAN'.CH U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey GC ?9 P' 14:143 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF .- ..D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, I Name ev .U rO4 Email /MO,-rk. \ ° Cofl.
RULES , `,\ L;-IIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2011 01_C 29 4L: fL3 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name _ _ _ _ _ _Email AYv IC9 (AJ6MA J<q7a. 1 (- c-RULES " F" ..T-VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2fM1 [07C 29 PI [4: 43 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCF\,F-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Email )Iic.- j. (. , eG4/
FULS ,, 'IVCTiVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 OF"' 29 P 4'- !143 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2.R/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely f .-Name II& U4)Email_ _ _ _ _ ______i_)_____
RULE)' L, E-CTIVES RU E .A i~ CH----U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 OLE, 29 Pl 4: 143 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2FI\,!D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spejU-ftmi-kods remain theV.
RULES i .) DlTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201 L,:29P L1 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCFF_ D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ; ( 2 Name 'N.Email I RULES ";E' -`T1 V7S ff), ACH U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2U14 [DIC 29 P1'l LI: 4-l4 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rR pein-a ere.Sincerely, Email Ifl JA\ @KA1 3 r&y4V RULE1;1NL A ,A_-ITIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20..l DEC 29 PH1 4: L4 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RE7F i\iED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincer el y,- c HRULES A4,1' DSFECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20i1 C 22 P9tM q: L-14 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2-i\/f-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spen> ro, remainrýhere.
Email RULES A'M,) 11-i:ECT iVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 91CC ?9 PH 4: 44L-Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC, \/EV)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name /Email /( i7-qM~gA&
A t)S ,)Vd 10k14/7_
RULES .'.,i. J TI8U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ZOlu DEC 29 P, rl 44LJ Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R OFIrF-\/FED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, L i ) '\) ThI Name Email RULES ..j-.... ' CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20 IEC 29 PM 4: 4L4 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC>--I--D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and I>(2) To holda Suthern 1fornia Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the fuel there.Em ail .,. "
RULES ," ) , E" IVS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 GEC 29 Pil l4: a 4 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCH\i'FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plapt was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safetý complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name_______________________
Email ezIl e Z ,>
RULE , L)D P.C-TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201q 0f. 29 : 14-4 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCr I\!ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name JQ.If -S130.Email ýu ,
BULL' $ "" "": -'-"" U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 0 , 29 1: 14L Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RH.FV/_D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .Name -a QmWtor Email 0 rr3 _ '
RULLES Di ,, H LCC I ViEIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 OfEC 29 PH 4: 4 4 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
.-'.i-\f_.)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.SNmcrely, ..-4a.Email CN " (2 RULES Ai) D.iOTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 0`1-J- 29 PN O4 144 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R17-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ?Name 4 W --n ------Email RULES -\i%1L) A L.,` IECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ZOI OFF, 29 'PH 1: 4 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF F 7 \D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, i Name Ym lC a-ll Email 814Ad o RULES i/\1;,!JL DiHECTiVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201q U 29 PH 4: 4 4 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF(7-\.VFID As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Name Email HULLS AI. LFEOCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC WI01 L ' 9i L: '41 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF F --\/D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .01 Name Email a c4. t-94, e ) c.m ,
RULES o, .... ....Li)-; EGTIV'ES f,!-,L -,i ,, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 21I C1 1 29 P M4: 4 4 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FFC(FI\/D-
-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email AlSb RULES 101) I11LCT IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 A! 1-C 29 PM L' 45 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
D-2\/,D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel .rods remain there.Sincerely, L-/ ,)!, -Name '7cI-c 4c Email -.-, 0- co. L.. C rn'm NUL~b ":: i : UL , 'S' ; U I- -TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 21,- ,2 15 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there. -. --i .Email ChIe,-e -ý 401-"-
RULE) , ;-' ,CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ZC1t DC1 29 PR- 1I: 115 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 RFCF'\/FD
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.SincerelA J ,'Name " AA L _A,, , Email k)NYk~~~s~OCIf' FULE, , L. -CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2f011 j f5L-i29 P1) 4:L-L5 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R Q -I\/ ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, i- t.Name pet L e k" /C? L Email iý C (T cC e6 RULE-D , U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2BIA ION 29 PI1 4: 45 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, / Name Email RULES ;`P'L, D:ý-IECTIVES 20qDEIC 29 PH .41L5 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F C V\/--FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Since Name Email rely, RULES' A,',.I )D,; `AEGCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ZOq DEC 2 9; P1 1 41 45 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R [7..] ,z D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ai -,6(2 Name (,a 'II Em ail _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __7 _
RULEUS ' J iVS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 20i4 DET 29 RI 1: 145 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFr-1. -D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, C A'Name Email v'- (? C Q) <.
BUL.FS D\ ',_ ,-,-,iL,/_
R LP .-i I.. I"VE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 29 Pii 4' 45 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R .C F.,/HD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, " Name CNa4-iýýtUIk+
Email RULES ' " IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M (Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R CI..W As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, NEami e __._ (IA Email )", _C@ t i .)' 't.Z /
R ULE ,,I,!: 'I;- VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey C9,-Office of Administration, NRC LPAq , 99 P1 ': '5 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2 " \/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email-jr RULES ',,) D LECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 0 C 29 PM 4: 45 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFI_ F , V .D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, RULE,- Aii,') U1., TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 k+/- 29 1: 45 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F --I\ F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sinerely,7 Namemal _Email /L /Oorie-o C0,'_.?Q RULE U .iVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 720lq Pi20 :T q5 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
-F-H\iED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,,.
Name 7'LA 'v Email C fO A /a RULES i,,; F,io DLOTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC YO1L [7i 29 L5 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R Ff7: F K'/F.D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, A .Name______
Email___________________
C&
RULES!i IJ !--' '3E-CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 94 rPk929 t 14: .5 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
, -,"-\/'D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name .Email ..,
RULES i Ui " n-'LES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Kr ,[ 29 P11 q 4 5 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF-FR/r---
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Namee _______Email HULF- i ;,') L: ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201 [q.C 29 PR1 L: 45 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCFK/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.S incerely, 'f"a, Name CC Email A',0 1A _ a u k b .cc nn RULES I ;,_J ICT- VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201q 10,C 29 P Q: '46 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2FI\/ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name
"/ /Email RULES L' , .3 1TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 211L 2 9 PM 1: 4, 6 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 R F\ D
Dear Commissioners,
R 'C /.-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rod> remain there. --Sincerely, Name -Email 5 C Sf5t49'6o4Arf(0d RUILES 1 R Ei, uC -I IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7Gifl LC 2 9 Pl1 P- 4i 6 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel r remain there.Sincerely, Name Email RULEK Al 1J, ;:.CT1VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2[01 A 2 PTI -T 4 6 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F- !\ rD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name________________
___________
Email RULL ) .:, ECTRVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 0, , 99 Pr T 46 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F 7( \/. D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name__ K__-____Email I.-, /*7 ) ýj, -
RULES F, C" F1"-OOTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC CGi 2B 1 ' R 1: 46 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCFC!F D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remaiiYi'ere.
Email M,(-
BULEL i L, brLECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC L 29 Pli L: 46 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R zQ.- IVFV_As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent f el rods remain there.
Name Email ,ý,- 4ayko@ -o o C, r 4' n RULES " " J-,IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 20 f 29 Fi 1: '46 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RIF ' F I\/!D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name /L4 Email 0'O$~cj1Le RULES i,, E,-COTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey c} 2' i1 'Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F(77 ! i\E--- ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, >Name e__ ___ __Email bs&00,6iI7P~
6 P,11G4L C 0 (1 BULLS/b i) 9 TfiES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 01 [i C 2'9 PH L: 4 6 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
EC-" /EiD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fel rods remaiq there.Email A/a JIC/-- / 0 s RULES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ..14:'46 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R1C'V'J-i L)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,']
Name ______ y,_ _ _ ___ _ __ _: _Email RULES i. DaiOrECETES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC ...'Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F, R (_D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name 5" fL\J*j.t" Email " C-LOI' RULES i. 'A}I-ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7j1j 7 f 29 P 4: 16 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R.F.FI\./FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .Namem_Email , ,
RULES!; j LDiC 6 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 29 P1 q 6 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFOF VED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email Y h jI '
RULES ,, R EFC'IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 70 14 G9 29 P, 1 4: 16 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, , " Name______________
_Email HULE A..:L uK.TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2014 PHfC 29 Pfl 4: 416 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF,2V7-k/ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name ..Email ej..
RULES i,% L.'J L'. IL,-ýCý ES.-A I f}P"l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey NON HE, 29 PM Q: 46 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spentjfe1-tds re~nain there.Email "T-40A, A -I/A LC., L t RULIESL i.') ECTiVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7C!/ 0yL 2OFJ" 99 : 47 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 Q
Dear Commissioners,
H I -I As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the s ent fuel rods re in there.S ince, __y'Namegi/Email -
RULE) i, i JtEC-1 NES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201 1 7 PF 2 L4: 147 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
rF -. \!..-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Xd/.bid Name A LS4 Email I4A'-' 1A/.. ;>Q 1 RUL -",:u , 1 " U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC PH1tq 971 29 P11 L 47 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFH K....As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Name_ _ _ _ __Email A .' '5li& ? ,
D-1 , yES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey C 2 9 47 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .Name SU5@V\ Q 2hP Email of$(' 3 oQ 1 RULE.-\ JL " IVES" U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC f}t7F '29 F : Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FF2FIV'!D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuelrds remain there.Sincerely,, Name Email j/ (e L /eS:b '/
HULES; "'" DEC'TIES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 20N yE 2- 14: 47 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
-..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ,..Name Email _-d(v4 5 e RULE ..U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7014 15"' 29 M 41: 4 7 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RVQFI'V/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name ___ ____ __ __V Email Y C eo-- r, .co!,.--
BUL E Ai,! L' it()` C TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC ?914 KC 20 PMI 4: 47 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FC-'I\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Sop e California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the/sr nt/ftel rods t 're.Sincerely, Name___Email __ _________-,-
RULE'- 1}-,"IE(TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 210111 V29 P.,jI 4: 47 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Namem RULES ibl LirFKCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 701q D-EC 29) PM 4: 4 7 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R 2F., \!FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Email q ý 6 ý C RULESJ r _ ; q l TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 014 p[ F. 2 9 Pi 4: 4 7 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, r Name_____________________
Email______________________________
%ULLJ j ICIVES RU E A....." ....- ..r U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7- ,-C 29 RN t": 47 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFO--\/-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name____Email 0 C, t RULE, 'ilt. CTI\VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20lq Fr-. 2" PNi 4" 4:7 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R FC D\/D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name_____
____ ___Email
,UL. ,.) L.-CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey CI 72 P2 4":47 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF-FI\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email RULE! WlVE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7fl 1 -29 ?" L-: 147 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF-C(FV ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name _______ _Email 1-40 14 71 RULLES i'A J -CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Zili [KC 2 9 P104 1: 4 7 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 RFQH-\!,FD
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerem__
Name *b it ; )4 Email RULES J" h /E" S T I V-"Rp/ ,.ýV U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 4 Office of Administration, NRC 70 ": Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCP7¶\/-D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities;-
and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ',r Name Id^14 L,&WLzjl/ -kad&"1 Email & / c Y -lzoe RULIo AL ' IVES Rif"., N.O;:: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2rI I F C 29 P M 4: '47 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 RFrOFR-!\FT
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, _Name_______________
Email 0ý r&o -~riI. &m RULES ',L i 1`1iC ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 29 , n /4: L47 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F FIL\/D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email u 2--k _C BULE ' ' F U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 0 8 Office of Administration, NRC Vq C 29 Pi 1: L8 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
r F1V\!_D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name 1 --Email RULE.) S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC JON PIIC 29 '111 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
.F'(71i7]\/_D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,//)
Name aV1/V4 Email
.- R,,IfL"1',EC
-1ME WUL .S 2?C U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 0 29 148 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
iF D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincl I c t A/N a m e , _ .../Email .,- rc t ,C .
BULLLS ," :-J.,T / --U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
IQ';FA/1/2D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Emai 'fr Di4(A )C Oe ..Oa .--er. C.;...orV RULES f,, OT.)C6I\/ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 70141 J 291 P : 484 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R[CF \I/_FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name!6 @1, Email Ll 1S\\p Mal BULES A'I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey BC 2 LI8 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R pFC As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name ..Email I." Y RULES AI.D CTVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2O]t1 _ 29 P'r l: 48 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R -..... ....As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, L Name Email_________________
2 BULES, ," ",- CTi"ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Zc 29 Pt L: L8 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF-I'\.-!."-
-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name___Email 6A4-1?
RULES /IN ,QLFCTiVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20111 OlC 29 PMI LI: 48 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
REC.FI\/F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name ____ 6A__ ____Email I. f , _ (-. A-RULES , 'ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 29 t : L8 Office of Administration, NRC ,LU1 2 9 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFrC\FP-1/,F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.
Name Emrna i l______________________
RULES/. L/ OTiJES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC HN PFC' 292 P 411: 4-8 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
.,F< -X/F_)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name A 4 Email A -av"E.
RULES ', ,IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2 C11L cii: 29 H] 1: q48 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RP1F "N' A_ \\i'D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the s ent fuel ro s remain there.Sincerely, Name 9 ýN Email _ __ _________________
- fRQ1kh1~
RULES,**,,.LJ E-C]iVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 I]E1 29 14" 143 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
i--- r' ir As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email C 7-(
RUL`;/,, :T V/ ESIQ, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7141 ,FDU 29 rL' 148 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2F \/F As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the s uel rods remain there.Namem Email !'
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC t 2' 14 t Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
, _--As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,/
Name_ _ _ __Email C-0 11. a c.f0
, .'L '1 -E-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey H'q UJV 29 PO q: q4 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF.,"\iFV)
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely Name ___Email a o/o. L-to m RULES i.L CTiVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Q ,, Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF-? !\/F..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email l_._ii L,
!") C)l+) ýVn-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 7014 OET 29 P : Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
IV F. D-, -..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name crd4 C Email RULES /A;..V) LI- TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ,...,4 Office of Administration, NRC C 99 49 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF(- \F / V _As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern Califomia Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email I --C -'L ..Cc 4 RULE" D" U th-ES, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 29 ' 29 Lf 9 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 RF f!-\/.D
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely Name ______________________
Email V^*,,c_.a
-.0 _ -
RULEBI L'I+/-CIVLS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 ql C7( 2, 9 Ri Q: 49 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R -`F \/ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name______________________
Email -A .Q COnX RULES),"%,, _lo :O VEb U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 70N. 29 , Q: 49 Office of Administration, NRC ....Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FF-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Lunc. L\ s.n5 Email M Pr _
AU! ES)AD 7-- ;LUTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Z014 D'IE 29 PI N 49 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 R
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name .Email sm, , lPetwf BUL,.,B ,', 0 , fb V,.-ul.?A , :o-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ,, 0 29 Pi3 It L49 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R_ -(T F'\./F--D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, (..X/ -/JS Name Email r4,._, yss Q0b,6 t.Co RULES 7iE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey i " 29 qN (49 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 R'J*-1
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.oince el, D" Nam%/" Email Q-'C ( l I .,- ; ..A ,"-; ' J 0 L.'. -W',?U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC U-I 29 P1! Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RK (J \...As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email (
H U L F_... :.'. , E.i IC_,. -1VLE.S US. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2gI v 29 i: 149 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
1 .As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation' accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely._
Name Y-Email l .ITIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Gill -10H 29 P6 4: 149 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
i -As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuob-20 remain there.Name Email AA A-12-Vk--
&- 5-TO PJ E7FA-e!-.--r
'C.- CO e PA ULES --1C TIVES i j , U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC B 2 P" R: 419 Mail Stop: 3WvFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FC>IV!D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Name Email RULES t.#i9 j,-(jET'!ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ,-,' -, Lt: Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
-Rkt ,- r 7-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods re Sincerely, Name Email (
RULE" i, .) .CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2 ;-. ?Y p- 4: 14 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF, F V...As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Namem Email BULES CY;7K CTI VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2011 u-' 29 PIM 4: 49 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
p FO -/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name )Email C ! " Pr /]k 0 RULES: , D,,;1' n! I ,vLES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7r0tu C3,I 29 P4j?4:149 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, JIh Name -Email ___.__________________________
RULES " I' ' E" .TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 14 10,' Pi L-.: 49 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF1.__F,`\,FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name § c, S 'y Email J ,,
RULES i,2D r-IVES ,_J ; I .., ' i I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7l0 FUC 2?9 PN.I: 19 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF.77 F -\.! D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Souothe, California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long t p rods ere.Name Email i BULLS Y.'>-"fVC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2 f31q 1 s P 14: Y19 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 R -I\/-D
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison r sponsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spentfuel ro s remain th Sincerely, Namem_
RULES U.. L. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey eL)q rf 29 P'i li: 4-9 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R A!As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email ..7Z4 tjA RULES k',,- L J 1 lIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC U. 22 VI Li: 19 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RE.2F "!_--As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Email 6o W) /7,..,,1 1. /I06 RULES iN, ,Ib , IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC G Il 29 I'M 4 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC7L.';"" As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the s t fue ds remain there.Sincerely, Name ma Email _ -"
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 50 Office of Administration, NRC "O., 2 .ti 2 0 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R CF. I\/ FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email RULES :,u L/ ';EOTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC f 99 PI11* 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F C."'!-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely Name Email W--%1-"Y ..2 RULES /TVVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 201q D[C 29 ,01 t4:50 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R FC C .. F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name____Email (% I Z44AJI /SAD2J RULL S -' UiT ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey nu ?0 50 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R 'F .. IL-)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold South rm California Ediion res onsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the Dlnt el rods emain th re.Sincerely, Name_________________
Email ________________
ULf-- L;-,CTIVES iUL-' , n LTIL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC F .[ L: 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R ` r \ `..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,~
Name ýty- & -?,a iVý-~Email RULLE .', ,I.3 I/ .U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 701Q FC 2 9 2 i Q: 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R, _ ,-,D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Email /OLYo[ -Rcr'OIie.,
RULL, A;, L) -CTIVES N, 1 " " U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 29 F' 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC2-P '\'F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Ilze- msevf Email RULES 1.0 JiJ'[E(TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey L 1 99 ? Q -50 Office of Administration, NRC L95 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F. ../F..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Email 6Sy~v ~ C~ (/Ta9 .P~-f RULES,/, L i V EIS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201 KCI 29 PiN LI: 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RIF Y- F\ EF As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .l Name_________________
Email_____________________
RULES .[-,K_1 I VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 FDE B 29 PM.] O: 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R, As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name E(isabe,!t a Email RULES i, jYICTh\!ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2011O DEC 29 P11 LI: 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email RUL E;S /\'k , _- I..V..S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey , LEE C'9- 29 P H! L: 5 0 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R _ F \/'ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name kk~'~ /-~-el146lPW Emi I-LKLA a AoL.co Email RULES .v... JIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ,-,,9 4: 50 Office of Administration, NRC L Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF 'M3 i'-F D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, :_ ..--I Name C Ema " w. ,W 6 HULK;.- iK:! ) V Ii£VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2[1I11 LG F9 'Nr r4: 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
Rr -Q W D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincere, Name Eminail I~YA cc RULE,2 ',) ; VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 17W "- , fii. 0 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
PF , -/i.ID As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, _Name ýný _ Email Ut " J©VV R ULE AiL OIC1 I VE S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 111 r[ -LC 2?9 PIM ': 50 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
Rm(--/ --As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name ý' 4A .Email BULLS /kL Ci;I BCTVS ru L 21 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
0 / nVK As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.0.i, Name 5f Kevv]Email N uSi(iEj It 4 4(( mkýna4 c&/Vl RULES -i-,i DETVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 L: 51 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FDFQ, \ -FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email RULE,`~U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey vE-, 9 2 9 , 51 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
pv.F -,; .As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern Califonmi- -Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain ere.emi. @ /. / "
.UL Ai." y .ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey PM:5 Office of Administration, NRC [ 2 P i : 51 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFQ;F.\ .As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerel(Name .-Email 6 O ' -
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
JU~:~f VA-.mq ýo,29 pwF -D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, 1/2'Name ( _/J ,149 0* r 7ýEmail Emai V- 1`
RULtJ ., L, TI VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC [1Y4 1 1: 5'Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF- 7V'F D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name ( L -J Email , /. a/
,UL S .... ' I, VES RUI_,_ ,,"--U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ]u '.. PVI L: 51 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF"2.FN\ .D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, "L Name 14T/rQIUA 0 1'zELER Email QO-. -i. ;ýZjim h V)CZ'e.d ,
RULL;) -TN iVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7 2? f L 5C Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F -" 7 i\/D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name _ _ _ _ __l_ _Email /,//-44 d'(_c.7._,"
UL , :',0JIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC T[14 ,- [ 51 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF(,A\!F.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincer e _ _ y__ __ _Name___________________
Email RUL-o ",, Li 7 ,IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 0 V11 031 2 9 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RR...' \/ /ED_As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name___ __ _Email )00 J 1 1do r _ , (
RULES ; [Ci[.I.S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey .Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name _ _ _ __Email kres+eh G hotam if corrm, RULEL P , 1 VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey L i- 2 9 1:5 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F F i\FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name____________
Email (two' Yo/e,.J -_
RULES,-" , L, :S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 'L1 E-P29 P4: 5I Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
pE, Li V. _As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Email Plk V-BULL I U .iiECTNVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 95 Office of Administration, NRC 7_ 13q 29 Pi' U:" Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2 ...J As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerel Name a ' -' V Email hD@ -NV RUULF~ -,I.,t)b t;',-l'-YDr\ ,',; V-'t-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 51 Attn: Cindy Bladey 2 9 %Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R c-. 1\t..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, V Name C______\___________
Email CI -"/\Y E-G ý'\k L. CC'V' RULE; ,\iiJ LCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 0,'[-C 92 DEN 41:5 1 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R FCVI\/f-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name 1,i.Email r ?,qY -) 0 bI W- "t it -
RULE S L`,i r--CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2011ifI. f." 2 1? 13N 4: 5 1 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R_ H\E As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spen el rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email -Af- , e R~U L S ' ,Y L I: LC~- IV pS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 20 1 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 I R __,. ....t.
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name = t Email C& L)t ,- COi'~J I V RULES , iE.,..C,- ! ,""N i-I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201L .2,-Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FrF ,I\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ()Name_ _ _ __Email l__________
gULES v :,U2TElVFS
ý,l -. ,.'. ýr,:, CJI,: S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey PF .52 Office of Administration, NRC J U. 22 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, -'Name \) eY-?Email J 9, ý ý~V\ tý RUL , _
- S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2 L9 : 52 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
-..F )As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Email,_f-'i AC, .~l 0 .J.0 L), oC -ov'N RULEo/. .s -EC i ,riVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 70114 KC 29 Pl [: 52 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F-\,F., As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name___________________
Email ( AJ BULLS "" 'U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ?- 52 Office of Administration, NRC ti 2Y 9 V : 52 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email. Cox HULES i1.]{ DLV;E(;Ti ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2014 LU C 29 PH1 4: 52 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R I.SI\/WD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, I Name Email RULE i', C-TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 20N ',,r-, 29' Phil 4: 52 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFP \-/VD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, A. .Name PULEo ,,,"E U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC R0 E C 29 PH1'1: 52 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
Rf I- -\/D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name 1.Z.O(A, -A. -C- O t Email ýn7lc ZiGQYW&Ak .k 1 0~-
RULE") J _;fJi E U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Br;I' 29 P [- 52 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R t.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rod's from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, l Name i ,V ( cl<-ocd Email on [o
~~hES5 "i!- y,'i,, "J-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 52 Office of Administration, NRC 2 2 2 52 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R ... -'... .As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Namem e _ _ _Email I (ktf cut. -_ ( -'4 (LL .. " .I L I'E- 0-I \JL,.0 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R .-- i..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,/
riY L 2 ,- i, ,c-.-Name 4 Email 41 -3 3~ &co ml HULEo,' ,L, TIVLS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20 F R 4 2 ,i : 52 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,.L4m Name " tl itVj.Email__________________
HU LS %'J RULEo L: " TEL U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 201i V C 2 9 P -: 52 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF-FI\FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, I-Name ""Z44, " Email A,, 6i~.f~1
_-" IT-,,,-, R .U L L S .U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey "j1` D E C 2? 9,P U: 2 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R %Q Fl. F1D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, -I Name Email ,
RULE-S K' L'JJ -CTIVES 2014 "DfC 29 PH 1-17 52 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R 17... V\ /F D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location--perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Saincerely, Name____ _____________
____________-__________
Email 6&&& da Q.Qty RULES "i L;CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission I'Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration,'NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M
-!Pj1- 99 I f: 52 Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R .VI ,.r- 1--I As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile are-a'subject to t..permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name 6 AL Email RULES ,'."Lt I /ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2011 DEC 2 9 PH 41: 52 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCHi\/F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name_ __ __Email RULLS 6D ; ILO1iES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 11' U_11 29 IP'4 Q: 52 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F 2F' 1\/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerelya e __Name Email RULES /\" 'QEf:TI'ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 70-14 0FC 29 Q i P : 53 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name___Email G-m ikfM -, t30 SCA 9C 1&, !o rY)
RUL ....) L- CJ I V.'ES3 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20H HC 29 Fil Q: 53 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RD.F', r-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history.of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name m e _ _ _ _Email '!ý,CV r , t4 eV ý-
RULLS :L h ,UT-"ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
[: Attn: Cindy Bladey 20111 OIC 29 PIt 41: 53 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, J-A wk-Name_ _ _ _ _*Email '/ -,
RUL.; !UOTIES'U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 201I U[C 29 P : 53 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F I\/-.D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the) fuel rods rem t Sincerely'
," " 1 Name_ _ _ _ _
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC nv'- P14 L-: 53 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF .._ F ......As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name , V c,04i " [
RULES [ -,") Yr lFlTI1ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7 Pf1 14:53 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC>C \iFD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email RULEL i 9"LCIYVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 20lL 29 Ri 4:53 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name 1 -Email RRULEE i 4 J L) !iri ,T.VES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 211I (EFC 29 P'1 41: 53 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R -( ,. I As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Email NV ta Pv cJ L 5Ca, RULES ,C; !t R U LE.P,;. I LuJ I' L-0 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2 011 C 2. 9" 'M L0: 53 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCIF-, , '"t F \F As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.-X(Email P ( "
RULES/"i.
CTtVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2q 2 P H 53 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R--'F-, .D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name "a ,/VI/VJi Email "a Aiys,6? A1, Cc1/4'a oo3 1;F i-Z o/P7/#-
RULES Z) r.F6\_/,S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20111. PC 2 9 P1i 4: 53 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RVF_ --ED As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely' Name )\4Qe 4T.c Email "M"._5av ý!s (,
RULES .l;-ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey ZA 4: 53 Office of Administration, NRC 2 0 N 5C Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F (71'As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent Juel rods remain there.Sincerely, Eame &E mail ý-z(
_ If-1
,ULE" rIr U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7Q 29 : 53 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF\As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison res onsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain th Sincerely, -J 'Name 9Jt )Email l % ') ;" -TI ,-(L.\,, '.. -i.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 7~lj 29 P] 4: 53 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF!2NJVF_As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name 6BJ Email RULES, " ., L.,ZI'JE U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 U40 2 5 3 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC" VFD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (I) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Nameme____
Email k\,yv\(No cii.'\.
RULE" b~L -LCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 53 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R7 IV'.'As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name Email e 1 tP& c ( c-
,- .1 .L V tC IE_U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 20tI C 29 Pai 4: 54 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name__ _ __ _ __ _Email tVamk 0 RULES Di1v,, TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC 2 0[1 -1 "'f'L-, _'2 9P i 1-:- 514 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCH\/FID As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name ve e ' 1 Email VI A)
RULEto *ICIVES(H U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission r 2 9 P~ 14: 514 Attn: Cindy Bladey Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 RF-N \/FD
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, J1J .5'Name ____ _ _ _______Email RULES I ".-I IV , ES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 20!" N ? .54 Office of Administration, NRC .G 2 P Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R I7C-V 1 .I _As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel remain there.Sincerely, Name___Email RUJLE; ý TIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2011 0Zr" 9 ' 4: 54 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF.. \As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Emarn AS CL LL-,vtC- ."
RULES / LL I IVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey Z ,I'1 ?9 7- 1: 511 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
.. F I- "1 1. -/F'f As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .Name Email .(' AQ,\
RULE: S 7FS U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2i'1 UiT, 2 ? ,: 53 Office of Administration, NRC Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFOHVJ- FD ! --- L--As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject to permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan for the plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years or indefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that: (1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens of thousands of generations and (2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in a recognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed from San Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and (2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name -4] A Email e lý.