ML16109A006: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: George, Andrea Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 3:50 PM To: CLARK, ROBERT W Cc:BICE, DAVID B (ANO); Koenick, Stephen | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review Results - Proposed Al ternative to Adopt ASME OM Code Case OMN-20, "Inservice Testing Frequency" | Acceptance Review Results - Proposed Al ternative to Adopt ASME OM Code Case OMN-20, "Inservice Testing Frequency" - ANO-1 and ANO-2 (CAC Nos. MF77538 and MF7537)Mr. Clark, By letters dated March 25, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos. ML16088A181 and ML16088A186, for Units 1 and 2, respectively), Entergy Operations, Inc. | ||
- ANO-1 and ANO-2 (CAC Nos. MF77538 and MF7537)Mr. Clark, By letters dated March 25, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos. ML16088A181 and ML16088A186, for Units 1 and 2, respectively), Entergy Operations, Inc. | |||
(Entergy, the licensee), submitted relief requests for Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO), Units 1 and 2, to propose an alternative to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Operations and Maintenance Code by adopting Code Case OMN-20, "Inservice Test Frequency," pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 50.55a(z)(2). Specifically, the proposed alternative is to use Code Case OMN-20 to extend or reduce the IST frequency requirements for the fourth 10-year IST interval or until OMN-20 is incorporated into the next revision of Regulatory Guide 1.192. This proposed alternative is linked to the licensee's license amendment request to adopt Technical Specifications Task Force change traveler (TSTF)- | (Entergy, the licensee), submitted relief requests for Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO), Units 1 and 2, to propose an alternative to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Operations and Maintenance Code by adopting Code Case OMN-20, "Inservice Test Frequency," pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 50.55a(z)(2). Specifically, the proposed alternative is to use Code Case OMN-20 to extend or reduce the IST frequency requirements for the fourth 10-year IST interval or until OMN-20 is incorporated into the next revision of Regulatory Guide 1.192. This proposed alternative is linked to the licensee's license amendment request to adopt Technical Specifications Task Force change traveler (TSTF)- | ||
545, Revision 3, "TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing," | 545, Revision 3, "TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing," | ||
for ANO, Units 1 and 2. | for ANO, Units 1 and 2. | ||
The purpose of this correspondence is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | The purpose of this correspondence is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of the above relie f requests. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
(NRC) staff's acceptance review of the above relie f requests. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded t hat it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief requests in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded t hat it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief requests in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, Andrea George | ||
Andrea George | |||
Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Operating Reactor Licensing andrea.george@nrc.gov 301-415-1081 | Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Operating Reactor Licensing andrea.george@nrc.gov 301-415-1081 | ||
| Line 45: | Line 40: | ||
Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: | Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: | ||
1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: George, Andrea Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 3:50 PM To: CLARK, ROBERT W Cc:BICE, DAVID B (ANO); Koenick, Stephen | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review Results - Proposed Al ternative to Adopt ASME OM Code Case OMN-20, "Inservice Testing Frequency" | Acceptance Review Results - Proposed Al ternative to Adopt ASME OM Code Case OMN-20, "Inservice Testing Frequency" - ANO-1 and ANO-2 (CAC Nos. MF77538 and MF7537)Mr. Clark, By letters dated March 25, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos. ML16088A181 and ML16088A186, for Units 1 and 2, respectively), Entergy Operations, Inc. | ||
- ANO-1 and ANO-2 (CAC Nos. MF77538 and MF7537)Mr. Clark, By letters dated March 25, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos. ML16088A181 and ML16088A186, for Units 1 and 2, respectively), Entergy Operations, Inc. | |||
(Entergy, the licensee), submitted relief requests for Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO), Units 1 and 2, to propose an alternative to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Operations and Maintenance Code by adopting Code Case OMN-20, "Inservice Test Frequency," pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 50.55a(z)(2). Specifically, the proposed alternative is to use Code Case OMN-20 to extend or reduce the IST frequency requirements for the fourth 10-year IST interval or until OMN-20 is incorporated into the next revision of Regulatory Guide 1.192. This proposed alternative is linked to the licensee's license amendment request to adopt Technical Specifications Task Force change traveler (TSTF)- | (Entergy, the licensee), submitted relief requests for Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO), Units 1 and 2, to propose an alternative to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Operations and Maintenance Code by adopting Code Case OMN-20, "Inservice Test Frequency," pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 50.55a(z)(2). Specifically, the proposed alternative is to use Code Case OMN-20 to extend or reduce the IST frequency requirements for the fourth 10-year IST interval or until OMN-20 is incorporated into the next revision of Regulatory Guide 1.192. This proposed alternative is linked to the licensee's license amendment request to adopt Technical Specifications Task Force change traveler (TSTF)- | ||
545, Revision 3, "TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing," | 545, Revision 3, "TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing," | ||
for ANO, Units 1 and 2. | for ANO, Units 1 and 2. | ||
The purpose of this correspondence is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | The purpose of this correspondence is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of the above relie f requests. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
(NRC) staff's acceptance review of the above relie f requests. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded t hat it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief requests in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded t hat it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief requests in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, Andrea George | ||
Andrea George | |||
Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Operating Reactor Licensing andrea.george@nrc.gov 301-415-1081 | Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Operating Reactor Licensing andrea.george@nrc.gov 301-415-1081 | ||
Revision as of 12:12, 8 July 2018
| ML16109A006 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 04/15/2016 |
| From: | Andrea George Plant Licensing Branch IV |
| To: | Clark R W Entergy Corp |
| References | |
| MF7537, MF7538 | |
| Download: ML16109A006 (2) | |
Text
1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: George, Andrea Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 3:50 PM To: CLARK, ROBERT W Cc:BICE, DAVID B (ANO); Koenick, Stephen
Subject:
Acceptance Review Results - Proposed Al ternative to Adopt ASME OM Code Case OMN-20, "Inservice Testing Frequency" - ANO-1 and ANO-2 (CAC Nos. MF77538 and MF7537)Mr. Clark, By letters dated March 25, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos. ML16088A181 and ML16088A186, for Units 1 and 2, respectively), Entergy Operations, Inc.
(Entergy, the licensee), submitted relief requests for Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO), Units 1 and 2, to propose an alternative to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Operations and Maintenance Code by adopting Code Case OMN-20, "Inservice Test Frequency," pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 50.55a(z)(2). Specifically, the proposed alternative is to use Code Case OMN-20 to extend or reduce the IST frequency requirements for the fourth 10-year IST interval or until OMN-20 is incorporated into the next revision of Regulatory Guide 1.192. This proposed alternative is linked to the licensee's license amendment request to adopt Technical Specifications Task Force change traveler (TSTF)-
545, Revision 3, "TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing,"
for ANO, Units 1 and 2.
The purpose of this correspondence is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of the above relie f requests. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded t hat it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief requests in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Sincerely, Andrea George
Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Operating Reactor Licensing andrea.george@nrc.gov 301-415-1081
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2783 Mail Envelope Properties (Andrea.George@nrc.gov20160415154900)
Subject:
Acceptance Review Results - Proposed Alternative to Adopt ASME OM Code Case OMN-20, "Inservice Testing Frequency" - ANO-1 and ANO-2 (CAC Nos. MF77538 and MF7537) Sent Date: 4/15/2016 3:49:37 PM Received Date: 4/15/2016 3:49:00 PM From: George, Andrea Created By: Andrea.George@nrc.gov Recipients: "BICE, DAVID B (ANO)" <DBICE@entergy.com> Tracking Status: None "Koenick, Stephen" <Stephen.Koenick@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "CLARK, ROBERT W" <RCLARK@entergy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2403 4/15/2016 3:49:00 PM
Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:
1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: George, Andrea Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 3:50 PM To: CLARK, ROBERT W Cc:BICE, DAVID B (ANO); Koenick, Stephen
Subject:
Acceptance Review Results - Proposed Al ternative to Adopt ASME OM Code Case OMN-20, "Inservice Testing Frequency" - ANO-1 and ANO-2 (CAC Nos. MF77538 and MF7537)Mr. Clark, By letters dated March 25, 2016 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession Nos. ML16088A181 and ML16088A186, for Units 1 and 2, respectively), Entergy Operations, Inc.
(Entergy, the licensee), submitted relief requests for Arkansas Nuclear One (ANO), Units 1 and 2, to propose an alternative to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Operations and Maintenance Code by adopting Code Case OMN-20, "Inservice Test Frequency," pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 50.55a(z)(2). Specifically, the proposed alternative is to use Code Case OMN-20 to extend or reduce the IST frequency requirements for the fourth 10-year IST interval or until OMN-20 is incorporated into the next revision of Regulatory Guide 1.192. This proposed alternative is linked to the licensee's license amendment request to adopt Technical Specifications Task Force change traveler (TSTF)-
545, Revision 3, "TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing,"
for ANO, Units 1 and 2.
The purpose of this correspondence is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of the above relie f requests. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded t hat it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief requests in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Sincerely, Andrea George
Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Division of Operating Reactor Licensing andrea.george@nrc.gov 301-415-1081
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 2783 Mail Envelope Properties (Andrea.George@nrc.gov20160415154900)
Subject:
Acceptance Review Results - Proposed Alternative to Adopt ASME OM Code Case OMN-20, "Inservice Testing Frequency" - ANO-1 and ANO-2 (CAC Nos. MF77538 and MF7537) Sent Date: 4/15/2016 3:49:37 PM Received Date: 4/15/2016 3:49:00 PM From: George, Andrea Created By: Andrea.George@nrc.gov Recipients: "BICE, DAVID B (ANO)" <DBICE@entergy.com> Tracking Status: None "Koenick, Stephen" <Stephen.Koenick@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "CLARK, ROBERT W" <RCLARK@entergy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2403 4/15/2016 3:49:00 PM
Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: