ML18026A425: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ACCELERATED
{{#Wiki_filter:ACCELERATED
DOCUMENTDISTRIBUTION
DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEMREGULATORY
SYSTEM REGULATORY
INFORMATION
INFORMATION
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
SYSTEM(RIDS)ACCESSION
SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9303250120
NBR:9303250120
DOC.DATE: 93/03/19 NOTARIZED:
DOC.DATE:
NO=DOCKET CIL:50-387
93/03/19NOTARIZED:
NO=DOCKETCIL:50-387
Susquehanna
Susquehanna
SteamElectricStation,Unit1,Pennsylva
Steam Electric Station, Unit 1, Pennsylva 05000387 50-388 Susquehanna
0500038750-388Susquehanna
Steam Electric Station, Unit 2, Pennsylva 05000388 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION
SteamElectricStation,Unit2,Pennsylva
" KEISERgH.W.
05000388AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATION
"KEISERgH.W.
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
Power&LightCo.RECIP.NAME
Power&Light Co.RECIP.NAME
RECIPIENT
RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
AFFILIATION
HODGES,M.W.
HODGES,M.W.
Region1(Post820201)rSUBJECT:RespondstoNRC930210ltrreviolations
Region 1 (Post 820201)r SUBJECT: Responds to NRC 930210 ltr re violations
notedininsprepts50-287/93-23
noted in insp repts 50-287/93-23
&50-388/93-23.C/As:surveillance
&50-388/93-23.C/As:surveillance
procedures
procedures
willberevisedtoaddresstypesoffirebarriermatltobeinspected
will be revised to address types of fire barrier matl to be inspected to provide acceptance
toprovideacceptance
criteria for fire barrier.DISTRIBUTION
criteriaforfirebarrier.DISTRIBUTION
CODE: IE01D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR
CODE:IE01DCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR
ENCL SIZE: TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice
ENCLSIZE:TITLE:General(50Dkt)-Insp
of Vio ation Response NOTES: RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-2 PD INTERNAL: ACRS AEOD/DSP/TPAB
Rept/Notice
DEDRO NRR/DRCH/HHFBPT
ofVioationResponseNOTES:RECIPIENT
IDCODE/NAME
PD1-2PDINTERNAL:
ACRSAEOD/DSP/TPAB
DEDRONRR/DRCH/HHFBPT
NRR/DRSS/PEPB
NRR/DRSS/PEPB
NRR/PMAS/ILPB2
NRR/PMAS/ILPB2
DIR-REGIL02RGNIFILE01EXTERNALEG&G/BRYCE
DIR-REG IL 02 RGNI FILE 01 EXTERNAL EG&G/BRYCE
gJ~H~NSICCOPIESLTTRENCL112211111111111111111111RECIPIENT
g J~H~NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME CLARK,R AEOD/DEIB AEOD/TTC NRR/DORS/OEAB
IDCODE/NAME
CLARK,RAEOD/DEIB
AEOD/TTCNRR/DORS/OEAB
NRR/DRIL/RPEB
NRR/DRIL/RPEB
NRR/PMAS/ILPBl
NRR/PMAS/ILPBl
NUDOCS-ABSTRACT
NUDOCS-ABSTRACT
OGC/HDS2RESMORISSEAUiD
OGC/HDS2 RES MORISSEAUiD
NRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL11111111111111111111'DNOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:
NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'D NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTEICONTACTTHEDOCUMENTCONTROLDESK,ROOMPI-37(EXT.504-2065)
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTEI CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM PI-37 (EXT.504-2065)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION
TOELIMINATE
LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!D TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 23 ENCL 23
YOURNAMEFROMDISTRIBUTION
LISTSFORDOCUMENTS
YOUDON'TNEED!DTOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
LTTR23ENCL23
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania
Power8LightCompanyTwoNorthNinthStreet~Allentown,
Power 8 Light Company Two North Ninth Street~Allentown, PA 18101-1179
PA18101-1179
~215/774-5151
~215/774-5151
HaroldW.KeiserSeniorVicePresident-Nuclear
Harold W.Keiser Senior Vice President-Nuclear
215/7744194
215/7744194
MAR191993Mr.MarvinW.Hodges,DirectorDivisionofReactorSafetyU.S.NuclearRegulatory
MAR 1 9 1993 Mr.Marvin W.Hodges, Director Division of Reactor Safety U.S.Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
Commission
RegionI475Allendale
Region I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 SUSQUEHANNA
RoadKingofPrussia,PA19406SUSQUEHANNA
STEAM ELECTRIC STATION REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION (EA 92-234)(387/92-23
STEAMELECTRICSTATIONREPLYTONOTICEOFVIOLATION
(EA92-234)(387/92-23
&388/92-23)
&388/92-23)
PLA-3933FILER41-2DocketNos.50-38750-388DearMr.Hodges:ThisletterprovidesPennsylvania
PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 Docket Nos.50-387 50-388 Dear Mr.Hodges: This letter provides Pennsylvania
Power&LightCompany's
Power&Light Company's response to the Notice of Violation (EA 92-234)for NRC Combined Inspection
responsetotheNoticeofViolation
Report 50-387/92-23
(EA92-234)forNRCCombinedInspection
and 50-388/92-23.
Report50-387/92-23
The Notice of Violation was dated February 10, 1993.The notice required submittal of a written reply within thirty (30)days of the date of the letter.However, as discussed with Mr.John R.White of NRC Region I on February 19, 1993, PPkL has been authorized
and50-388/92-23.
to delay the response until March 19, 1993.We trust that the commission
TheNoticeofViolation
will find the attached response acceptable.
wasdatedFebruary10,1993.Thenoticerequiredsubmittal
Very truly yours, Keiser Attachment
ofawrittenreplywithinthirty(30)daysofthedateoftheletter.However,asdiscussed
CC: NRC Document Control Desk (original)
withMr.JohnR.WhiteofNRCRegionIonFebruary19,1993,PPkLhasbeenauthorized
Mr.G.S.Barber, NRC Sr.Resident Inspector Mr.R.J.Clark, NRC Sr.Project Manager Region I-Regional Administrator
todelaytheresponseuntilMarch19,1993.Wetrustthatthecommission
willfindtheattachedresponseacceptable.
Verytrulyyours,KeiserAttachment
CC:NRCDocumentControlDesk(original)
Mr.G.S.Barber,NRCSr.ResidentInspector
Mr.R.J.Clark,NRCSr.ProjectManagerRegionI-RegionalAdministrator
9303250i20
9303250i20
9303i9PDRADOCK050003878PDR
9303i9 PDR ADOCK 05000387 8 PDR
ATTACHMENT
ATTACHMENT
TOPLA-3933FILER41-2PAGE1OF10REPLYTOANOTICEOFVIOLATION
TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGE 1 OF 10 REPLY TO A NOTICE OF VIOLATION A.Violation A (387/92-23-07;
A.Violation
A(387/92-23-07;
388/92-23-07)
388/92-23-07)
Technical
Technical Specification
Specification
3.7.7 states: "All fire rated assemblies, including walls, floor/ceilings, cable tray enclosures
3.7.7states:"Allfireratedassemblies,
and other fire barriers separating
including
safety related fire areas or separating
walls,floor/ceilings,
portions of redundant systems important to safe shutdown within a fire area,'nd all sealing devices in fire rated assembly penetrations, including fire doors, fire windows, fire dampers, cable and piping penetrations, seals and ventilation
cabletrayenclosures
seals shall be OPERABLE." Technical Specification
andotherfirebarriersseparating
4.7.7.1.states: "Each of the above required rated assemblies
safetyrelatedfireareasorseparating
and sealing devices shall be verified OPERABLE at least once per 18 months by performing
portionsofredundant
a visual inspection
systemsimportant
of: a.The exposed surfaces of each fire rated assembly." Contrary to the above, between December 1989 and September 4, 1992, the exposed surfaces of each fire rated assembly constructed
tosafeshutdownwithinafirearea,'ndallsealingdevicesinfireratedassemblypenetrations,
of Kaowool and the gypsum board enclosures
including
in Fire Zones 0-28A and 0-28B had not been verified operable.~Res onse See LER 50-387/92-015-01
firedoors,firewindows,firedampers,cableandpipingpenetrations,
for additional
sealsandventilation
details.1.Reason or the Violation Surveillance
sealsshallbeOPERABLE."
of the exposed surfaces of Kaowool for station common areas was not adequately
Technical
performed between July 1990 and December 1992, and gypsum board enclosures
Specification
in Fire Zones 0-28A and 0-28B were not surveilled
4.7.7.1.states:"Eachoftheaboverequiredratedassemblies
between December 1989 and September 4, 1992 due to inadequacies
andsealingdevicesshallbeverifiedOPERABLEatleastonceper18monthsbyperforming
in surveillance
avisualinspection
procedure SM-013-013.
of:a.Theexposedsurfacesofeachfireratedassembly."
This"procedure, which was revised in 1990, did not specifically
Contrarytotheabove,betweenDecember1989andSeptember
identify Kaowool and gypsum board as being fire barrier material.Consequently, personnel performing
4,1992,theexposedsurfacesofeachfireratedassemblyconstructed
the surveillance
ofKaowoolandthegypsumboardenclosures
were not cognizant that Kaowool and gypsum board enclosure barrier materials were to be surveilled.
inFireZones0-28Aand0-28Bhadnotbeenverifiedoperable.
The procedural
~ResonseSeeLER50-387/92-015-01
weaknesses (contributing
foradditional
factors)in the 1990 revision were: Deletion of specific raceways required to be surveilled.
details.1.ReasonortheViolation
The raceway designations
Surveillance
were replaced with a reference to incorrect C-1700 series drawings that identified
oftheexposedsurfacesofKaowoolforstationcommonareaswasnotadequately
raceway locations.(see Violation B)  
performed
betweenJuly1990andDecember1992,andgypsumboardenclosures
inFireZones0-28Aand0-28Bwerenotsurveilled
betweenDecember1989andSeptember
4,1992duetoinadequacies
insurveillance
procedure
SM-013-013.
This"procedure,
whichwasrevisedin1990,didnotspecifically
identifyKaowoolandgypsumboardasbeingfirebarriermaterial.
Consequently,
personnel
performing
thesurveillance
werenotcognizant
thatKaowoolandgypsumboardenclosure
barriermaterials
weretobesurveilled.
Theprocedural
weaknesses
(contributing
factors)inthe1990revisionwere:Deletionofspecificracewaysrequiredtobesurveilled.
Theracewaydesignations
werereplacedwithareference
toincorrect
C-1700seriesdrawingsthatidentified
racewaylocations.
(seeViolation
B)  
-ATTACHMENT
-ATTACHMENT
TOPLA-3933FILER41-2PAGE2OF10Alackofadescription
TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGE 2 OF 10 A lack of a description
offire.barriermaterialtobeinspected,
of fire.barrier material to be inspected, and 2.Corrective
and2.Corrective
Ste s Wiiich Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved:, a.Kaowool fire barrier material was surveilled
StesWiiichHaveBeenTakenandtheResultsAchieved:,
in common plant areas in December 1992.Gypsum board enclosures
a.Kaowoolfirebarriermaterialwassurveilled
in Fire Zones 0-28A and 0-28B were declared inoperable
incommonplantareasinDecember1992.Gypsumboardenclosures
on January 5, 1993 and subsequently
inFireZones0-28Aand0-28Bweredeclaredinoperable
have been redesigned
onJanuary5,1993andsubsequently
and are currently being reinstalled
havebeenredesigned
to approved UL design.b.Additional
andarecurrently
training and engineering
beingreinstalled
overview were provided to personnel performing
toapprovedULdesign.b.Additional
the December 1992 and January 1993 surveillances.
trainingandengineering
overviewwereprovidedtopersonnel
performing
theDecember1992andJanuary1993surveillances.
3.Corrective
3.Corrective
StesWhichWillBeTakentoAvoidFurtherViolations:
Ste s Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Violations:
a.Surveillance
a.Surveillance
procedures
procedures
SM-013/113/213-013
SM-013/113/213-013
willberevisedtoaddressthetypesoffirebarriermaterialtobeinspected
will be revised to address the types of fire barrier material to be inspected and to provide appropriate
andtoprovideappropriate
acceptance
acceptance
criteriaforeachtypeoffirebarrier.Theseprocedures
criteria for each type of fire barrier.These procedures
willberevisedbyApril30,1993.b.Surveillances
will be revised by April 30, 1993.b.Surveillances
requiredbySM-013/113/213-013
required by SM-013/113/213-013
willbereperformed
will be reperformed
beginning
beginning in May 1993 and will be completed no later than the start up following the Unit 2 sixth'efueling
inMay1993andwillbecompleted
and inspection
nolaterthanthestartupfollowing
outage currently scheduled to end on May 20, 1994.Individuals
theUnit2sixth'efueling
andinspection
outagecurrently
scheduled
toendonMay20,1994.Individuals
performing
performing
thesesurveillances
these surveillances
willreceivetrainingontherevisedsurveillance
will receive training on the revised surveillance
procedures
procedures
priortoperforming
prior to performing
thesurveillances.
the surveillances.
4,DateoFullCornliance:Basedon(2a)above,PPEcLisinfullcompliance.  
4, Date o Full Corn liance: Based on (2a)above, PPEcL is in full compliance.  
ATTACHMENT
ATTACHMENT
TOPLA-3933FILER41-2PAGE3OF10B.Violation
TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGE 3 OF 10 B.Violation B (387/92-23-08)
B(387/92-23-08)
Technical Specification
Technical
6.8.1 states, in part, that written procedures
Specification
shall be implemented
6.8.1states,inpart,thatwrittenprocedures
for the Fire Protection
shallbeimplemented
Program.Procedure NDI-QA-15.3.1, Revision 3, Fire Protection
fortheFireProtection
Program, states, in part: "This NDI outlines the unique responsibilities
Program.Procedure
and interfaces
NDI-QA-15.3.1,
required to implement the Fire Protection
Revision3,FireProtection
Program." Attachment
Program,states,inpart:"ThisNDIoutlinestheuniqueresponsibilities
1,"Fire Protection
andinterfaces
Features And Activities
requiredtoimplement
Requiring Quality," of NDI-QA-15.3.1 specified, in part, that: "Quality requirements
theFireProtection
shall be, applied to the fire protection
Program."
features in the following areas:-a.Unit 1 Reactor Building;...d.Control Structure;
Attachment
...j.Fire barrier wrapping identified
1,"FireProtection
as being wrapped to meet Appendix R (10 CFR 50)in Drawings E 294 and E 295;k.Fire-rated
FeaturesAndActivities
walls, fire-rated
Requiring
Quality,"
ofNDI-QA-15.3.1specified,
inpart,that:"Qualityrequirements
shallbe,appliedtothefireprotection
featuresinthefollowing
areas:-a.Unit1ReactorBuilding;
...d.ControlStructure;
...j.Firebarrierwrappingidentified
asbeingwrappedtomeetAppendixR(10CFR50)inDrawingsE294andE295;k.Fire-rated
walls,fire-rated
floors,...fire-rated
floors,...fire-rated
penetration
penetration
sealswithinandenclosing
seals within and enclosing the above areas (as specified on engineering
theaboveareas(asspecified
drawings)Contrary to the above, as of September 4, 1992, the following are examples found where procedures
onengineering
had not been properly implemented
drawings)
and, therefore, adequate quality was not applied to two series of design drawings for required fire protection
Contrarytotheabove,asofSeptember
features in the Unit 1 Reactor Building and Control Structure.
4,1992,thefollowing
~Drawing E-294 did not show Kaowool as fire barrier wrap material on conduits A1P105, C1P107, and A1P071 in Fire Zone 0-28H located in the Control Structure.
areexamplesfoundwhereprocedures
~One of the C-1700 series of drawings, Drawing C-1754, failed to show correctly the conduit run for conduits E1P353 and C1P077 in Fire Zone 0-28B-I located in the Control Structure.
hadnotbeenproperlyimplemented
~Drawing C-1721, Sheet No.2, Revision 1, and E-294 omitted showing that conduits E1K586 and E1K758 were wrapped with The'rmo-Lag
and,therefore,
where they entered Fire Zone 1-2D located in the Control Structure.
adequatequalitywasnotappliedtotwoseriesofdesigndrawingsforrequiredfireprotection
~Drawing E-294, had no designation
featuresintheUnit1ReactorBuildingandControlStructure.
in the title block indicating
~DrawingE-294didnotshowKaowoolasfirebarrierwrapmaterialonconduitsA1P105,C1P107,andA1P071inFireZone0-28HlocatedintheControlStructure.
the quality level of the drawing, and the C-Series drawings were incorrectly
~OneoftheC-1700seriesofdrawings,
labelled in the title block"NONQUALITY-RELATED."  
DrawingC-1754,failedtoshowcorrectly
theconduitrunforconduitsE1P353andC1P077inFireZone0-28B-IlocatedintheControlStructure.
~DrawingC-1721,SheetNo.2,Revision1,andE-294omittedshowingthatconduitsE1K586andE1K758werewrappedwithThe'rmo-Lag
wheretheyenteredFireZone1-2DlocatedintheControlStructure.
~DrawingE-294,hadnodesignation
inthetitleblockindicating
thequalitylevelofthedrawing,andtheC-Seriesdrawingswereincorrectly
labelledinthetitleblock"NONQUALITY-RELATED."  
ATTACHMENT
ATTACHMENT
TOPLA-3933FILER41-2PAGE4OF10~Additional
TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGE 4 OF 10~Additional
exampleswherequalitywasinadequately
examples where quality was inadequately
appliedtothesetwoseriesofFireProtection
applied to these two series of Fire Protection
designdrawingsareidentified
design drawings are identified
inSection5.1andAttachment
in Section 5.1 and Attachment
3ofRegionIInspection
3 of Region I Inspection
Report50-387and388/92-23
Report 50-387 and 388/92-23 and are considered
andareconsidered
part of this violation.
partofthisviolation.
~Res ense 1.Reason or the Violation The errors in the Reactor Buildings and Control Structure E-294/295 and C-1700 series drawings, utilized for fire protection
~Resense1.ReasonortheViolation
activities, resulted from inadequate
TheerrorsintheReactorBuildings
drawing verifications
andControlStructure
when the drawings were originally
E-294/295
andC-1700seriesdrawings,
utilizedforfireprotection
activities,
resultedfrominadequate
drawingverifications
whenthedrawingswereoriginally
developed.
developed.
Following
Following initial installation
initialinstallation
of fire barriers (installed
offirebarriers(installed
under a nonquality-related
underanonquality-related
program), PP&L requested that our A/E develop drawings to identify the location of the installed fire barriers.These drawings, E-294/295, were never field verified as to fire barrier locations or type of material utilized.The C-1700 series drawings which identify raceway layouts were subsequently
program),
developed utilizing the E-294/295 drawings.No field verifications
PP&Lrequested
were performed on the C-1700 series drawings except for plant modification
thatourA/Edevelopdrawingstoidentifythelocationoftheinstalled
work activities
firebarriers.
that utilize these drawings.These drawing errors were then propagated
Thesedrawings,
in surveillance
E-294/295,
procedures (see Violation A), engineering
wereneverfieldverifiedastofirebarrierlocations
studies and calculations
ortypeofmaterialutilized.
that utilized inputs from these drawings.Plant modifications
TheC-1700seriesdrawingswhichidentifyracewaylayoutsweresubsequently
were field verified prior to installation.
developed
See Violation"C" for additional
utilizing
theE-294/295
drawings.
Nofieldverifications
wereperformed
ontheC-1700seriesdrawingsexceptforplantmodification
workactivities
thatutilizethesedrawings.
Thesedrawingerrorswerethenpropagated
insurveillance
procedures
(seeViolation
A),engineering
studiesandcalculations
thatutilizedinputsfromthesedrawings.
Plantmodifications
werefieldverifiedpriortoinstallation.
SeeViolation
"C"foradditional
deficiencies
deficiencies
identified
identified
fromthiswalkdown.
from this walkdown.2.Corrective
2.Corrective
Ste s Which Have Been Taken and the Results When the drawing errors were identified, PP&L initiated a comprehensive
StesWhichHaveBeenTakenandtheResultsWhenthedrawingerrorswereidentified,
walkdown of plant areas that contained fire rated raceway wrap.All accessible
PP&Linitiated
raceways have been inspected.
acomprehensive
Drawing errors have been corrected.
walkdownofplantareasthatcontained
Additionally, Drawing Change Notices have been attached to drawings to identify the actual fire barrier material installed if mischaracterized
fireratedracewaywrap.Allaccessible
on the drawings.Further, engineering
racewayshavebeeninspected.
studies and calculations
Drawingerrorshavebeencorrected.
which utilized these drawings have been reviewed and corrected, where necessary.
Additionally,
DrawingChangeNoticeshavebeenattachedtodrawingstoidentifytheactualfirebarriermaterialinstalled
ifmischaracterized
onthedrawings.
Further,engineering
studiesandcalculations
whichutilizedthesedrawingshavebeenreviewedandcorrected,
wherenecessary.
3.Corrective
3.Corrective
StesWhichWillBeTakentoAvoidFurtherViolations:
Ste s Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Violations:
a.Theappropriate
a.The appropriate
classification
classification
oftheE-294/295
of the E-294/295 and C-1700 series drawings are being dispositioned
andC-1700seriesdrawingsarebeingdispositioned
and will be maintained
andwillbemaintained
as"as-built" drawings.Additionally, by revision or attachment, the notation"Quality-F" will be added to the title block of these drawings.The estimated completion
as"as-built"
date for these activities
drawings.
is April 30, 1993.b.Inaccessible
Additionally,
area walkdowns will be completed no later than the start up following the Unit 2 sixth refueling and inspection
byrevisionorattachment,
outage currently scheduled to end on May 20, 1994.  
thenotation"Quality-F"
willbeaddedtothetitleblockofthesedrawings.
Theestimated
completion
datefortheseactivities
isApril30,1993.b.Inaccessible
areawalkdowns
willbecompleted
nolaterthanthestartupfollowing
theUnit2sixthrefueling
andinspection
outagecurrently
scheduled
toendonMay20,1994.  
ATTACHMENT
ATTACHMENT
TOPLA-3933FILER41-2PAGESOF104.DateoFu1lComliance:PPEcLwillbeinfullcompliance
TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGES OF 10 4.Date o Fu1l Com liance: PPEcL will be in full compliance
nolaterthanthestartupfollowing
no later than the start up following the Unit 2 sixth refueling and inspection
theUnit2sixthrefueling
outage currently scheduled to end on May 20, 1994.  
andinspection
outagecurrently
scheduled
toendonMay20,1994.  
   
   
ATTACHMENT
ATTACHMENT
TOPLA-3933FILER41-2PAGE6OF10C.Violation
TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGE 6 OF 10 C.Violation C (387/92-23-06)
C(387/92-23-06)
The Susquehanna
TheSusquehanna
Steam Electric Station Unit 1 Facility Operating License, NPF-14, was amended on March 27, 1990, by Amendment 95 to revise License Condition 2.C.(6), which states, in part:~"Pennsylvania
SteamElectricStationUnit1FacilityOperating
Power 8 Light Company shall implement and maintain in effect all provisions
License,NPF-14,wasamendedonMarch27,1990,byAmendment
of the approved fire protection
95toreviseLicenseCondition
program as described in the Fire Protection
2.C.(6),whichstates,inpart:~"Pennsylvania
Review Report for the facility and as approved in the NRC Safety Evaluation
Power8LightCompanyshallimplement
dated August 9, 1989...." Table 5.0-1, part C.4,"Inspection," of the Fire Protection
andmaintainineffectallprovisions
Review Report under the heading of"Susquehanna
oftheapprovedfireprotection
SES Compliance" states, in part, that field personnel witnessed the fire protection
programasdescribed
intheFireProtection
ReviewReportforthefacilityandasapprovedintheNRCSafetyEvaluation
datedAugust9,1989...."
Table5.0-1,partC.4,"Inspection,"
oftheFireProtection
ReviewReportundertheheadingof"Susquehanna
SESCompliance"
states,inpart,thatfieldpersonnel
witnessed
thefireprotection
installation
installation
andverifiedconformance
and verified conformance
withdesigndrawings.
with design drawings.Bechtel Specification
BechtelSpecification
8856-E-61, Revision 1,"Technical
8856-E-61,
Revision1,"Technical
Specification
Specification
forElectrical
for Electrical
RacewayFireInsulation
Raceway Fire Insulation
BarrierMaterials
Barrier Materials for the Susquehanna
fortheSusquehanna
Steam Electric Station Units-1 and 2 of the Pennsylvania
SteamElectricStationUnits-1and2ofthePennsylvania
Power A Light Company, Allentown, Pennsylvania," was Susquehanna
PowerALightCompany,Allentown,
Steam Electric Station's (SSES)design specification
Pennsylvania,"
for installing
wasSusquehanna
safe shutdown cable raceway fire barriers during construction.
SteamElectricStation's
Drawing A-107, Revision 21,"Control Structure Upper Cable Sprdg Rm-El 744'-0" Battery Room-'El 771'-0"," describes construction
(SSES)designspecification
features and details of gypsum board enclosures
forinstalling
used to provide Appendix R protection
safeshutdowncableracewayfirebarriersduringconstruction.
for redundant safe shutdown electrical
DrawingA-107,Revision21,"ControlStructure
circuits and circuit breakers..
UpperCableSprdgRm-El744'-0"BatteryRoom-'El771'-0","
1.Bechtel Specification
describes
8856-E-61, paragraph 6.4.6, states that Zetex shall have a minimum 3 inch overlap.Contrary to the above, on August 27, 1992, in Fire Zone 0-28H, the Cold Instrument
construction
Shop, an approximately
featuresanddetailsofgypsumboardenclosures
20 square inches triangular
usedtoprovideAppendixRprotection
section of Kaowool was not covered with Zetex and the Zetex did not have the specified 3 inch overlap.2.Bechtel Specification
forredundant
8856-E-61, paragraph 6.4.11, states that where the raceway penetrates
safeshutdownelectrical
a fire barrier wall the juncture will then be sealed with mastic coating to not less than 1/4 inch thickness and shall not extend less than 8 inches onto the exterior of the blanket and surface of the fire barrier and wall.Contrary to the above, on September 1, 1992, in Fire Zone 1-4A-N, a conduit D1P008 fire barrier wrap junction at a fire rated wall was observed not to be sealed with mastic coating to the specified not less than 1/4 inch thickness and to not less than 8 inches onto the exterior of the blanket and surface of the fire barrier and wall.  
circuitsandcircuitbreakers..
1.BechtelSpecification
8856-E-61,
paragraph
6.4.6,statesthatZetexshallhaveaminimum3inchoverlap.Contrarytotheabove,onAugust27,1992,inFireZone0-28H,theColdInstrument
Shop,anapproximately
20squareinchestriangular
sectionofKaowoolwasnotcoveredwithZetexandtheZetexdidnothavethespecified
3inchoverlap.2.BechtelSpecification
8856-E-61,
paragraph
6.4.11,statesthatwheretheracewaypenetrates
afirebarrierwallthejuncturewillthenbesealedwithmasticcoatingtonotlessthan1/4inchthickness
andshallnotextendlessthan8inchesontotheexterioroftheblanketandsurfaceofthefirebarrierandwall.Contrarytotheabove,onSeptember
1,1992,inFireZone1-4A-N,aconduitD1P008firebarrierwrapjunctionatafireratedwallwasobservednottobesealedwithmasticcoatingtothespecified
notlessthan1/4inchthickness
andtonotlessthan8inchesontotheexterioroftheblanketandsurfaceofthefirebarrierandwall.  
ATTACHMENT
ATTACHMENT
TOPLA-3933FILER41-2PAGE7OF103.DrawingA-107,Detail4,Eley.,providesdetailsofaonehourgypsumfirebarrierenclosure
TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGE 7 OF 10 3.Drawing A-107, Detail 4, Eley., provides details of a one hour gypsum fire barrier enclosure with an air gap between the inner and outer gypsum board.Contrary to the above, as of September 4, 1992, in Fire Zone 0-28B-II, a one-hour rated electrical
withanairgapbetweentheinnerandoutergypsumboard.Contrarytotheabove,asofSeptember
breaker enclosure fabricated
4,1992,inFireZone0-28B-II,
with gypsum board did not have the air gap between the inner and outer gypsum board making up the fire barrier enclosure as specified by the installation
aone-hourratedelectrical
drawing, A-107, in drawing detail number 4.4.Additional
breakerenclosure
examples where SSES's required fire protection
fabricated
quality assurance inspections
withgypsumboarddidnothavetheairgapbetweentheinnerandoutergypsumboardmakingupthefirebarrierenclosure
failed to identify installation
asspecified
bytheinstallation
drawing,A-107,indrawingdetailnumber4.4.Additional
exampleswhereSSES'srequiredfireprotection
qualityassurance
inspections
failedtoidentifyinstallation
deficiencies
deficiencies
thatwerenotinconformance-
that were not in conformance-
tothedesignspecifications
to the design specifications
aredetailedinSection4.3.4andAttachment
are detailed in Section 4.3.4 and Attachment
3ofRegionIInspection
3 of Region I Inspection
Report50-387&,388/92-23
Report 50-387&, 388/92-23 and are considered
andareconsidered
part of this violation.
partofthisviolation.
~Res ossse 1.Reason or the Violation This violation incorporates
~Resossse1.ReasonortheViolation
Thisviolation
incorporates
noncompliances
noncompliances
associated
associated
withinadequate
with inadequate
surveillance
surveillance
procedure
procedure acceptance
acceptance
criteria and discrepancies
criteriaanddiscrepancies
with initial construction
withinitialconstruction
design documents.
designdocuments.
Inadequate
Inadequate
surveillance
surveillance
procedure
procedure acceptance
acceptance
criteria (see Violation A)resulted in the following nonconformances
criteria(seeViolation
going undetected:
A)resultedinthefollowing
tom Zetex in Fire Zone 0-28H, and the interface between the raceway wrap and the wall was not sealed.The gypsum board construction
nonconformances
goingundetected:
tomZetexinFireZone0-28H,andtheinterface
betweentheracewaywrapandthewallwasnotsealed.Thegypsumboardconstruction
deficiency
deficiency
inFireZone0-28B-IIwouldonlyhavebeenidentified
in Fire Zone 0-28B-II would only have been identified
anddispositioned
and dispositioned
atthetimeofconstruction.
at the time of construction.
Initialconstruction
Initial construction
offirebarriersattheSusquehanna
of fire barriers at the Susquehanna
SESwerenotquality-related
SES were not quality-related
activities
activities
andinspections
and inspections
ofworkactivities
of work activities
weredetermined
were determined
byresponsible
by responsible
fieldengineers.
field engineers.
Norequirement
No requirement
existedstatingthatallactivities
existed stating that all activities
beinspected.
be inspected.
Additionally,
Additionally, documentation
documentation
associated
associated
withconstruction
with construction
ofnon-quality
of non-quality
inspection
inspection
activities
activities
wasonlyrequiredtobemaintained
was only required to be maintained
untilsystemturnovertoPP&L.Nodocumentation
until system turnover to PP&L.No documentation
onthegypsumboarddeviation
on the gypsum board deviation was located, therefore the reason for this violation cannot be determined., In any case this deficiency
waslocated,therefore
would not have been identified
thereasonforthisviolation
through normal surveillance
cannotbedetermined.,
Inanycasethisdeficiency
wouldnothavebeenidentified
throughnormalsurveillance
activities.
activities.
2.Corrective
2.Corrective
StesWhichHaveBeenTakenandtheResultsAchieved:
Ste s Which Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved: A comprehensive
Acomprehensive
walkdown of fire rated raceway wrap in accessible
walkdownoffireratedracewaywrapinaccessible
areas was conducted (see Violation B).Results of these walkdowns identified
areaswasconducted
three raceways with incorrect materials, approximately
(seeViolation
a dozen minor discrepancies, approximately
B).Resultsofthesewalkdowns
twenty minor maintenance
identified
concerns (wear and tear items), and various drawing discrepancies.
threeracewayswithincorrect
The completion
materials,
date of the actions associated
approximately
with these deficiencies
adozenminordiscrepancies,
is estimated to be April 30, 1993.  
approximately
twentyminormaintenance
concerns(wearandtearitems),andvariousdrawingdiscrepancies.
Thecompletion
dateoftheactionsassociated
withthesedeficiencies
isestimated
tobeApril30,1993.  
'ATTACHMENT
'ATTACHMENT
TOPLA-3933FILER41-2PAGE8OF103.Corrective
TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGE 8 OF 10 3.Corrective
StesWhichWillBeTakentoAvoidFurtherViolations:
Ste s Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Violations:
a.Enhancedsurveillance
a.Enhanced surveillance
procedures
procedures
willidentifythetypeofissuesnotedinthisviolation;
will identify the type of issues noted in this violation;
therefore,
therefore, additional
additional
actions are not required.b.The improperly
actionsarenotrequired.
installed gypsum board enclosure in Fire Zone 0-28B-II is being redesigned.
b.Theimproperly
This new design is scheduled to be installed by April 30, 1993.c.Actions associated
installed
with the drawing walkdown deficiencies
gypsumboardenclosure
are scheduled to be completed by April 30, 1993.Any deficiencies-identified
inFireZone0-28B-IIisbeingredesigned.
in inaccessible
Thisnewdesignisscheduled
areas by the performance
tobeinstalled
of the revised surveillance
byApril30,1993.c.Actionsassociated
will be dispositioned
withthedrawingwalkdowndeficiencies
and resolved through currently established
arescheduled
tobecompleted
byApril30,1993.Anydeficiencies-identified
ininaccessible
areasbytheperformance
oftherevisedsurveillance
willbedispositioned
andresolvedthroughcurrently
established
processes.
processes.
4.DateoFullComliance:PALwillbeinfullcompliance
4.Date o Full Com liance: PAL will be in full compliance
uponinstallation
upon installation
oftheredesigngypsumboardenclosure
of the redesign gypsum board enclosure in.Fire Zone 0-28B-II and the repair of other discrepancies
in.FireZone0-28B-IIandtherepairofotherdiscrepancies
noted in (3)above.The identified
notedin(3)above.Theidentified
activities
activities
arescheduled
are scheduled to be.completed by April 30, 1993.  
tobe.completed
byApril30,1993.  
ATTACHMENT
ATTACHMENT
TOPLA-3933FILER41-2PAGE9OF10C..Violation
TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGE 9 OF 10 C..Violation D (387/92-23-04)
D(387/92-23-04)
The Facility Operating License, NPF-14, was issued on July 17, 1982, for Susquehanna
TheFacilityOperating
Steam Electric Station Unit 1 and contained a condition, 2.C.(7), Battery Room Area[Section 9.5.4, Safety Evaluation
License,NPF-14,wasissuedonJuly17,1982,forSusquehanna
Report (SER), Supplemental
SteamElectricStationUnit1andcontained
Safety Evaluation
acondition,
Report SSER¹1 and SSER¹3]stated that: r"Prior to exceeding five percent of-full power and subject to NRC review and approval, PP&L shall either conduct at an approved'testing
2.C.(7),BatteryRoomArea[Section9.5.4,SafetyEvaluation
Report(SER),Supplemental
SafetyEvaluation
ReportSSER¹1andSSER¹3]statedthat:r"Priortoexceeding
fivepercentof-fullpowerandsubjecttoNRCreviewandapproval,
PP&Lshalleitherconductatanapproved'testing
laboratory
laboratory
anASTME-119testoftheas-installed
an ASTM E-119 test of the as-installed
one-hourcablewrapconfiguration
one-hour cable wrap configuration
orinstallanautomatic
or install an automatic fire extinguishing
fireextinguishing
system." The Facility Operating License, NPF-14 was amended on March 27, 1990, by Amendment 95 to revise License Condition 2.C.(6), which states in part: "Pennsylvania
system."TheFacilityOperating
Power&Light Company shall implement and maintain in effect all provisions
License,NPF-14wasamendedonMarch27,1990,byAmendment
of the approved fire protection
95toreviseLicenseCondition
program as described in the fire Protection
2.C.(6),whichstatesinpart:"Pennsylvania
Review Report for the facility and as approved in the Safety Evaluation
Power&LightCompanyshallimplement
dated August 9, 2989..." Contrary to the above, as of September 4, 1992, Susquehanna
andmaintainineffectallprovisions
Steam Electric Station was found to have a Kaowool wrap fire barrier installed in Fire Zone 0-28H., PP8rL did not subject this Kaowool cable wrap to an ASTM E-119 test at an approved testing laboratory
oftheapprovedfireprotection
and PPAL did not submit this Kaowool cable wrap configuration
programasdescribed
to the NRC for review and approval for use in Unit 1 Battery Room Area, Fire Zone 0-28H, at the Susquehanna
inthefireProtection
Steam Electric Station.There is no automatic fire extinguishing
ReviewReportforthefacilityandasapprovedintheSafetyEvaluation
system installed in Unit 1 Battery Room Area, Fire Zone 0-28H.Additional
datedAugust9,2989..."Contrarytotheabove,asofSeptember
examples of how SSES's use of Kaowool in Fire Zone 0-28H do not meet the requirements
4,1992,Susquehanna
of Deviation Request 8 or 17 of the Susquehanna
SteamElectricStationwasfoundtohaveaKaowoolwrapfirebarrierinstalled
Steam Electric Station Fire Protection
inFireZone0-28H.,PP8rLdidnotsubjectthisKaowoolcablewraptoanASTME-119testatanapprovedtestinglaboratory
Review Report are documented
andPPALdidnotsubmitthisKaowoolcablewrapconfiguration
in Region I Inspection
totheNRCforreviewandapprovalforuseinUnit1BatteryRoomArea,FireZone0-28H,attheSusquehanna
Report 50-387/92-23
SteamElectricStation.Thereisnoautomatic
and are considered
fireextinguishing
part of this violation.
systeminstalled
~Res onse 1.Reason or the Violation Deviation Request No.17 of the Susquehanna
inUnit1BatteryRoomArea,FireZone0-28H.Additional
Steam Electric Station Fire Protection
examplesofhowSSES'suseofKaowoolinFireZone0-28Hdonotmeettherequirements
Review Report requested a deviation from the requirements
ofDeviation
of 10 CFR 50, Appendix R, Section III.G.2.c to permit the use of Kaowool as a one-hour fire barrier in plant areas where Kaowool was already installed.
Request8or17oftheSusquehanna
This deviation request was a conservative
SteamElectricStationFireProtection
action intended to document the plant configuration.
ReviewReportaredocumented
Kaowool was accepted by the NRC as an
inRegionIInspection
Report50-387/92-23
andareconsidered
partofthisviolation.
~Resonse1.ReasonortheViolation
Deviation
RequestNo.17oftheSusquehanna
SteamElectricStationFireProtection
ReviewReportrequested
adeviation
fromtherequirements
of10CFR50,AppendixR,SectionIII.G.2.c
topermittheuseofKaowoolasaone-hourfirebarrierinplantareaswhereKaowoolwasalreadyinstalled.
Thisdeviation
requestwasaconservative
actionintendedtodocumenttheplantconfiguration.
KaowoolwasacceptedbytheNRCasan
ATTACHMENT
ATTACHMENT
TOPLA-3933FILER41-2PAGE10OF10adequateonehourfirebarrierin,GenericLetter86-10whichwasissuedpriortorequesting
TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGE 10 OF 10 adequate one hour fire barrier in, Generic Letter 86-10 which was issued prior to requesting
thisdeviation.
this deviation.
Thedeviation
The deviation request listed the affected fire areas/zones
requestlistedtheaffectedfireareas/zones
where Kaowool is installed.
whereKaowoolisinstalled.
The deviation request stated that fire zones that contained Kaowool also had automatic fire detection and suppression
Thedeviation
requeststatedthatfirezonesthatcontained
Kaowoolalsohadautomatic
firedetection
andsuppression
installed.
installed.
PPEcLdidnotrecognize
PPEcL did not recognize that Kaowool was installed in Fire Zone 0-28H in Deviation Request No.17 because of incorrect drawings used to develop the Request (see Violation B).Deviation Request No.8 of the Susquehanna
thatKaowoolwasinstalled
Steam Electric Station Fire Protection
inFireZone0-28HinDeviation
Review Report requested a deviation from the requirements
RequestNo.17becauseofincorrect
of 10CFR50, Appendix R, Section III,G.2.a to permit the use of a one-hour fire barrier to separate redundant safe shutdown equipment/cables
drawingsusedtodeveloptheRequest(seeViolation
in Fire Zone 0-28B-I, 0-28B-II, 1-2D, and 0-28H when automatic suppression
B).Deviation
is not present.In responding
RequestNo.8oftheSusquehanna
to Deviation Request No.8, NRC implemented
SteamElectricStationFireProtection
License Condition 2.C.7 in Operating License NPF-14 for Susquehanna
ReviewReportrequested
Unit 1 which required PPEcL to either conduct" at an approved testing laboratory
adeviation
an ASTM E-119 test of the as-installed
fromtherequirements
one-hour cable wrap configuration
of10CFR50,AppendixR,SectionIII,G.2.a
or install an automatic fire extinguishing
topermittheuseofaone-hourfirebarriertoseparateredundant
system." Since PPAL did not recognize that Kaowool was installed in Fire Zone 0-28H, we did not provide an ASTM E-119 test as required by this License Condition.
safeshutdownequipment/cables
inFireZone0-28B-I,0-28B-II,
1-2D,and0-28Hwhenautomatic
suppression
isnotpresent.Inresponding
toDeviation
RequestNo.8,NRCimplemented
LicenseCondition
2.C.7inOperating
LicenseNPF-14forSusquehanna
Unit1whichrequiredPPEcLtoeitherconduct"atanapprovedtestinglaboratory
anASTME-119testoftheas-installed
one-hourcablewrapconfiguration
orinstallanautomatic
fireextinguishing
system."SincePPALdidnotrecognize
thatKaowoolwasinstalled
inFireZone0-28H,wedidnotprovideanASTME-119testasrequiredbythisLicenseCondition.
2.Corrective
2.Corrective
StesWhichHaveBeenTakenandtheResultsAchieved;
Ste s Which Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved;The Kaowool fire barriers in 0-28H were replaced with pre-formed
TheKaowoolfirebarriersin0-28Hwerereplacedwithpre-formed
Thermo-Lag
Thermo-Lag
firebarriermaterial.
fire barrier material.3.Corrective
3.Corrective
Ste s Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Violations:
StesWhichWillBeTakentoAvoidFurtherViolations:
E Kaowool fire barrier material will not be utilized for new fire barrier installations.
EKaowoolfirebarriermaterialwillnotbeutilizedfornewfirebarrierinstallations.
Existing Kaowool fire barriers in use at Susquehanna
ExistingKaowoolfirebarriersinuseatSusquehanna
SES are being maintained.
SESarebeingmaintained.
4.Date o Full Com liance: By taking the actions required by Bulletin 92-01 and Supplement
4.DateoFullComliance:BytakingtheactionsrequiredbyBulletin92-01andSupplement
1, PPEcL is in full compliance
1,PPEcLisinfullcompliance
with Thermo-Lag
withThermo-Lag
fire barrier material requirements.
firebarriermaterialrequirements.
}}
}}

Revision as of 04:36, 6 July 2018

Responds to NRC 930210 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-287/92-23 & 50-388/92-23.C/As:surveillance Procedures Will Be Revised to Address Types of Fire Barrier Matl to Be Inspected to Provide Acceptance Criteria for Fire Barrier
ML18026A425
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/19/1993
From: KEISER H W
PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: HODGES M W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
References
PLA-3933, NUDOCS 9303250120
Download: ML18026A425 (13)


See also: IR 05000287/1992023

Text

ACCELERATED

DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION

SYSTEM REGULATORY

INFORMATION

DISTRIBUTION

SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9303250120

DOC.DATE: 93/03/19 NOTARIZED:

NO=DOCKET CIL:50-387

Susquehanna

Steam Electric Station, Unit 1, Pennsylva 05000387 50-388 Susquehanna

Steam Electric Station, Unit 2, Pennsylva 05000388 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION

" KEISERgH.W.

Pennsylvania

Power&Light Co.RECIP.NAME

RECIPIENT AFFILIATION

HODGES,M.W.

Region 1 (Post 820201)r SUBJECT: Responds to NRC 930210 ltr re violations

noted in insp repts 50-287/93-23

&50-388/93-23.C/As:surveillance

procedures

will be revised to address types of fire barrier matl to be inspected to provide acceptance

criteria for fire barrier.DISTRIBUTION

CODE: IE01D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR

ENCL SIZE: TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice

of Vio ation Response NOTES: RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD1-2 PD INTERNAL: ACRS AEOD/DSP/TPAB

DEDRO NRR/DRCH/HHFBPT

NRR/DRSS/PEPB

NRR/PMAS/ILPB2

DIR-REG IL 02 RGNI FILE 01 EXTERNAL EG&G/BRYCE

g J~H~NSIC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME CLARK,R AEOD/DEIB AEOD/TTC NRR/DORS/OEAB

NRR/DRIL/RPEB

NRR/PMAS/ILPBl

NUDOCS-ABSTRACT

OGC/HDS2 RES MORISSEAUiD

NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'D NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTEI CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM PI-37 (EXT.504-2065)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION

LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!D TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 23 ENCL 23

Pennsylvania

Power 8 Light Company Two North Ninth Street~Allentown, PA 18101-1179

~215/774-5151

Harold W.Keiser Senior Vice President-Nuclear

215/7744194

MAR 1 9 1993 Mr.Marvin W.Hodges, Director Division of Reactor Safety U.S.Nuclear Regulatory

Commission

Region I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 SUSQUEHANNA

STEAM ELECTRIC STATION REPLY TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION (EA 92-234)(387/92-23

&388/92-23)

PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 Docket Nos.50-387 50-388 Dear Mr.Hodges: This letter provides Pennsylvania

Power&Light Company's response to the Notice of Violation (EA 92-234)for NRC Combined Inspection

Report 50-387/92-23

and 50-388/92-23.

The Notice of Violation was dated February 10, 1993.The notice required submittal of a written reply within thirty (30)days of the date of the letter.However, as discussed with Mr.John R.White of NRC Region I on February 19, 1993, PPkL has been authorized

to delay the response until March 19, 1993.We trust that the commission

will find the attached response acceptable.

Very truly yours, Keiser Attachment

CC: NRC Document Control Desk (original)

Mr.G.S.Barber, NRC Sr.Resident Inspector Mr.R.J.Clark, NRC Sr.Project Manager Region I-Regional Administrator

9303250i20

9303i9 PDR ADOCK 05000387 8 PDR

ATTACHMENT

TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGE 1 OF 10 REPLY TO A NOTICE OF VIOLATION A.Violation A (387/92-23-07;

388/92-23-07)

Technical Specification 3.7.7 states: "All fire rated assemblies, including walls, floor/ceilings, cable tray enclosures

and other fire barriers separating

safety related fire areas or separating

portions of redundant systems important to safe shutdown within a fire area,'nd all sealing devices in fire rated assembly penetrations, including fire doors, fire windows, fire dampers, cable and piping penetrations, seals and ventilation

seals shall be OPERABLE." Technical Specification 4.7.7.1.states: "Each of the above required rated assemblies

and sealing devices shall be verified OPERABLE at least once per 18 months by performing

a visual inspection

of: a.The exposed surfaces of each fire rated assembly." Contrary to the above, between December 1989 and September 4, 1992, the exposed surfaces of each fire rated assembly constructed

of Kaowool and the gypsum board enclosures

in Fire Zones 0-28A and 0-28B had not been verified operable.~Res onse See LER 50-387/92-015-01

for additional

details.1.Reason or the Violation Surveillance

of the exposed surfaces of Kaowool for station common areas was not adequately

performed between July 1990 and December 1992, and gypsum board enclosures

in Fire Zones 0-28A and 0-28B were not surveilled

between December 1989 and September 4, 1992 due to inadequacies

in surveillance

procedure SM-013-013.

This"procedure, which was revised in 1990, did not specifically

identify Kaowool and gypsum board as being fire barrier material.Consequently, personnel performing

the surveillance

were not cognizant that Kaowool and gypsum board enclosure barrier materials were to be surveilled.

The procedural

weaknesses (contributing

factors)in the 1990 revision were: Deletion of specific raceways required to be surveilled.

The raceway designations

were replaced with a reference to incorrect C-1700 series drawings that identified

raceway locations.(see Violation B)

-ATTACHMENT

TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGE 2 OF 10 A lack of a description

of fire.barrier material to be inspected, and 2.Corrective

Ste s Wiiich Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved:, a.Kaowool fire barrier material was surveilled

in common plant areas in December 1992.Gypsum board enclosures

in Fire Zones 0-28A and 0-28B were declared inoperable

on January 5, 1993 and subsequently

have been redesigned

and are currently being reinstalled

to approved UL design.b.Additional

training and engineering

overview were provided to personnel performing

the December 1992 and January 1993 surveillances.

3.Corrective

Ste s Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Violations:

a.Surveillance

procedures

SM-013/113/213-013

will be revised to address the types of fire barrier material to be inspected and to provide appropriate

acceptance

criteria for each type of fire barrier.These procedures

will be revised by April 30, 1993.b.Surveillances

required by SM-013/113/213-013

will be reperformed

beginning in May 1993 and will be completed no later than the start up following the Unit 2 sixth'efueling

and inspection

outage currently scheduled to end on May 20, 1994.Individuals

performing

these surveillances

will receive training on the revised surveillance

procedures

prior to performing

the surveillances.

4, Date o Full Corn liance: Based on (2a)above, PPEcL is in full compliance.

ATTACHMENT

TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGE 3 OF 10 B.Violation B (387/92-23-08)

Technical Specification 6.8.1 states, in part, that written procedures

shall be implemented

for the Fire Protection

Program.Procedure NDI-QA-15.3.1, Revision 3, Fire Protection

Program, states, in part: "This NDI outlines the unique responsibilities

and interfaces

required to implement the Fire Protection

Program." Attachment

1,"Fire Protection

Features And Activities

Requiring Quality," of NDI-QA-15.3.1 specified, in part, that: "Quality requirements

shall be, applied to the fire protection

features in the following areas:-a.Unit 1 Reactor Building;...d.Control Structure;

...j.Fire barrier wrapping identified

as being wrapped to meet Appendix R (10 CFR 50)in Drawings E 294 and E 295;k.Fire-rated

walls, fire-rated

floors,...fire-rated

penetration

seals within and enclosing the above areas (as specified on engineering

drawings)Contrary to the above, as of September 4, 1992, the following are examples found where procedures

had not been properly implemented

and, therefore, adequate quality was not applied to two series of design drawings for required fire protection

features in the Unit 1 Reactor Building and Control Structure.

~Drawing E-294 did not show Kaowool as fire barrier wrap material on conduits A1P105, C1P107, and A1P071 in Fire Zone 0-28H located in the Control Structure.

~One of the C-1700 series of drawings, Drawing C-1754, failed to show correctly the conduit run for conduits E1P353 and C1P077 in Fire Zone 0-28B-I located in the Control Structure.

~Drawing C-1721, Sheet No.2, Revision 1, and E-294 omitted showing that conduits E1K586 and E1K758 were wrapped with The'rmo-Lag

where they entered Fire Zone 1-2D located in the Control Structure.

~Drawing E-294, had no designation

in the title block indicating

the quality level of the drawing, and the C-Series drawings were incorrectly

labelled in the title block"NONQUALITY-RELATED."

ATTACHMENT

TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGE 4 OF 10~Additional

examples where quality was inadequately

applied to these two series of Fire Protection

design drawings are identified

in Section 5.1 and Attachment

3 of Region I Inspection

Report 50-387 and 388/92-23 and are considered

part of this violation.

~Res ense 1.Reason or the Violation The errors in the Reactor Buildings and Control Structure E-294/295 and C-1700 series drawings, utilized for fire protection

activities, resulted from inadequate

drawing verifications

when the drawings were originally

developed.

Following initial installation

of fire barriers (installed

under a nonquality-related

program), PP&L requested that our A/E develop drawings to identify the location of the installed fire barriers.These drawings, E-294/295, were never field verified as to fire barrier locations or type of material utilized.The C-1700 series drawings which identify raceway layouts were subsequently

developed utilizing the E-294/295 drawings.No field verifications

were performed on the C-1700 series drawings except for plant modification

work activities

that utilize these drawings.These drawing errors were then propagated

in surveillance

procedures (see Violation A), engineering

studies and calculations

that utilized inputs from these drawings.Plant modifications

were field verified prior to installation.

See Violation"C" for additional

deficiencies

identified

from this walkdown.2.Corrective

Ste s Which Have Been Taken and the Results When the drawing errors were identified, PP&L initiated a comprehensive

walkdown of plant areas that contained fire rated raceway wrap.All accessible

raceways have been inspected.

Drawing errors have been corrected.

Additionally, Drawing Change Notices have been attached to drawings to identify the actual fire barrier material installed if mischaracterized

on the drawings.Further, engineering

studies and calculations

which utilized these drawings have been reviewed and corrected, where necessary.

3.Corrective

Ste s Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Violations:

a.The appropriate

classification

of the E-294/295 and C-1700 series drawings are being dispositioned

and will be maintained

as"as-built" drawings.Additionally, by revision or attachment, the notation"Quality-F" will be added to the title block of these drawings.The estimated completion

date for these activities

is April 30, 1993.b.Inaccessible

area walkdowns will be completed no later than the start up following the Unit 2 sixth refueling and inspection

outage currently scheduled to end on May 20, 1994.

ATTACHMENT

TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGES OF 10 4.Date o Fu1l Com liance: PPEcL will be in full compliance

no later than the start up following the Unit 2 sixth refueling and inspection

outage currently scheduled to end on May 20, 1994.

ATTACHMENT

TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGE 6 OF 10 C.Violation C (387/92-23-06)

The Susquehanna

Steam Electric Station Unit 1 Facility Operating License, NPF-14, was amended on March 27, 1990, by Amendment 95 to revise License Condition 2.C.(6), which states, in part:~"Pennsylvania

Power 8 Light Company shall implement and maintain in effect all provisions

of the approved fire protection

program as described in the Fire Protection

Review Report for the facility and as approved in the NRC Safety Evaluation

dated August 9, 1989...." Table 5.0-1, part C.4,"Inspection," of the Fire Protection

Review Report under the heading of"Susquehanna

SES Compliance" states, in part, that field personnel witnessed the fire protection

installation

and verified conformance

with design drawings.Bechtel Specification

8856-E-61, Revision 1,"Technical

Specification

for Electrical

Raceway Fire Insulation

Barrier Materials for the Susquehanna

Steam Electric Station Units-1 and 2 of the Pennsylvania

Power A Light Company, Allentown, Pennsylvania," was Susquehanna

Steam Electric Station's (SSES)design specification

for installing

safe shutdown cable raceway fire barriers during construction.

Drawing A-107, Revision 21,"Control Structure Upper Cable Sprdg Rm-El 744'-0" Battery Room-'El 771'-0"," describes construction

features and details of gypsum board enclosures

used to provide Appendix R protection

for redundant safe shutdown electrical

circuits and circuit breakers..

1.Bechtel Specification

8856-E-61, paragraph 6.4.6, states that Zetex shall have a minimum 3 inch overlap.Contrary to the above, on August 27, 1992, in Fire Zone 0-28H, the Cold Instrument

Shop, an approximately

20 square inches triangular

section of Kaowool was not covered with Zetex and the Zetex did not have the specified 3 inch overlap.2.Bechtel Specification

8856-E-61, paragraph 6.4.11, states that where the raceway penetrates

a fire barrier wall the juncture will then be sealed with mastic coating to not less than 1/4 inch thickness and shall not extend less than 8 inches onto the exterior of the blanket and surface of the fire barrier and wall.Contrary to the above, on September 1, 1992, in Fire Zone 1-4A-N, a conduit D1P008 fire barrier wrap junction at a fire rated wall was observed not to be sealed with mastic coating to the specified not less than 1/4 inch thickness and to not less than 8 inches onto the exterior of the blanket and surface of the fire barrier and wall.

ATTACHMENT

TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGE 7 OF 10 3.Drawing A-107, Detail 4, Eley., provides details of a one hour gypsum fire barrier enclosure with an air gap between the inner and outer gypsum board.Contrary to the above, as of September 4, 1992, in Fire Zone 0-28B-II, a one-hour rated electrical

breaker enclosure fabricated

with gypsum board did not have the air gap between the inner and outer gypsum board making up the fire barrier enclosure as specified by the installation

drawing, A-107, in drawing detail number 4.4.Additional

examples where SSES's required fire protection

quality assurance inspections

failed to identify installation

deficiencies

that were not in conformance-

to the design specifications

are detailed in Section 4.3.4 and Attachment

3 of Region I Inspection

Report 50-387&, 388/92-23 and are considered

part of this violation.

~Res ossse 1.Reason or the Violation This violation incorporates

noncompliances

associated

with inadequate

surveillance

procedure acceptance

criteria and discrepancies

with initial construction

design documents.

Inadequate

surveillance

procedure acceptance

criteria (see Violation A)resulted in the following nonconformances

going undetected:

tom Zetex in Fire Zone 0-28H, and the interface between the raceway wrap and the wall was not sealed.The gypsum board construction

deficiency

in Fire Zone 0-28B-II would only have been identified

and dispositioned

at the time of construction.

Initial construction

of fire barriers at the Susquehanna

SES were not quality-related

activities

and inspections

of work activities

were determined

by responsible

field engineers.

No requirement

existed stating that all activities

be inspected.

Additionally, documentation

associated

with construction

of non-quality

inspection

activities

was only required to be maintained

until system turnover to PP&L.No documentation

on the gypsum board deviation was located, therefore the reason for this violation cannot be determined., In any case this deficiency

would not have been identified

through normal surveillance

activities.

2.Corrective

Ste s Which Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved: A comprehensive

walkdown of fire rated raceway wrap in accessible

areas was conducted (see Violation B).Results of these walkdowns identified

three raceways with incorrect materials, approximately

a dozen minor discrepancies, approximately

twenty minor maintenance

concerns (wear and tear items), and various drawing discrepancies.

The completion

date of the actions associated

with these deficiencies

is estimated to be April 30, 1993.

'ATTACHMENT

TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGE 8 OF 10 3.Corrective

Ste s Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Violations:

a.Enhanced surveillance

procedures

will identify the type of issues noted in this violation;

therefore, additional

actions are not required.b.The improperly

installed gypsum board enclosure in Fire Zone 0-28B-II is being redesigned.

This new design is scheduled to be installed by April 30, 1993.c.Actions associated

with the drawing walkdown deficiencies

are scheduled to be completed by April 30, 1993.Any deficiencies-identified

in inaccessible

areas by the performance

of the revised surveillance

will be dispositioned

and resolved through currently established

processes.

4.Date o Full Com liance: PAL will be in full compliance

upon installation

of the redesign gypsum board enclosure in.Fire Zone 0-28B-II and the repair of other discrepancies

noted in (3)above.The identified

activities

are scheduled to be.completed by April 30, 1993.

ATTACHMENT

TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGE 9 OF 10 C..Violation D (387/92-23-04)

The Facility Operating License, NPF-14, was issued on July 17, 1982, for Susquehanna

Steam Electric Station Unit 1 and contained a condition, 2.C.(7), Battery Room Area[Section 9.5.4, Safety Evaluation

Report (SER), Supplemental

Safety Evaluation

Report SSER¹1 and SSER¹3]stated that: r"Prior to exceeding five percent of-full power and subject to NRC review and approval, PP&L shall either conduct at an approved'testing

laboratory

an ASTM E-119 test of the as-installed

one-hour cable wrap configuration

or install an automatic fire extinguishing

system." The Facility Operating License, NPF-14 was amended on March 27, 1990, by Amendment 95 to revise License Condition 2.C.(6), which states in part: "Pennsylvania

Power&Light Company shall implement and maintain in effect all provisions

of the approved fire protection

program as described in the fire Protection

Review Report for the facility and as approved in the Safety Evaluation

dated August 9, 2989..." Contrary to the above, as of September 4, 1992, Susquehanna

Steam Electric Station was found to have a Kaowool wrap fire barrier installed in Fire Zone 0-28H., PP8rL did not subject this Kaowool cable wrap to an ASTM E-119 test at an approved testing laboratory

and PPAL did not submit this Kaowool cable wrap configuration

to the NRC for review and approval for use in Unit 1 Battery Room Area, Fire Zone 0-28H, at the Susquehanna

Steam Electric Station.There is no automatic fire extinguishing

system installed in Unit 1 Battery Room Area, Fire Zone 0-28H.Additional

examples of how SSES's use of Kaowool in Fire Zone 0-28H do not meet the requirements

of Deviation Request 8 or 17 of the Susquehanna

Steam Electric Station Fire Protection

Review Report are documented

in Region I Inspection

Report 50-387/92-23

and are considered

part of this violation.

~Res onse 1.Reason or the Violation Deviation Request No.17 of the Susquehanna

Steam Electric Station Fire Protection

Review Report requested a deviation from the requirements

of 10 CFR 50, Appendix R, Section III.G.2.c to permit the use of Kaowool as a one-hour fire barrier in plant areas where Kaowool was already installed.

This deviation request was a conservative

action intended to document the plant configuration.

Kaowool was accepted by the NRC as an

ATTACHMENT

TO PLA-3933 FILE R41-2 PAGE 10 OF 10 adequate one hour fire barrier in, Generic Letter 86-10 which was issued prior to requesting

this deviation.

The deviation request listed the affected fire areas/zones

where Kaowool is installed.

The deviation request stated that fire zones that contained Kaowool also had automatic fire detection and suppression

installed.

PPEcL did not recognize that Kaowool was installed in Fire Zone 0-28H in Deviation Request No.17 because of incorrect drawings used to develop the Request (see Violation B).Deviation Request No.8 of the Susquehanna

Steam Electric Station Fire Protection

Review Report requested a deviation from the requirements

of 10CFR50, Appendix R, Section III,G.2.a to permit the use of a one-hour fire barrier to separate redundant safe shutdown equipment/cables

in Fire Zone 0-28B-I, 0-28B-II, 1-2D, and 0-28H when automatic suppression

is not present.In responding

to Deviation Request No.8, NRC implemented

License Condition 2.C.7 in Operating License NPF-14 for Susquehanna

Unit 1 which required PPEcL to either conduct" at an approved testing laboratory

an ASTM E-119 test of the as-installed

one-hour cable wrap configuration

or install an automatic fire extinguishing

system." Since PPAL did not recognize that Kaowool was installed in Fire Zone 0-28H, we did not provide an ASTM E-119 test as required by this License Condition.

2.Corrective

Ste s Which Have Been Taken and the Results Achieved;The Kaowool fire barriers in 0-28H were replaced with pre-formed

Thermo-Lag

fire barrier material.3.Corrective

Ste s Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Violations:

E Kaowool fire barrier material will not be utilized for new fire barrier installations.

Existing Kaowool fire barriers in use at Susquehanna

SES are being maintained.

4.Date o Full Com liance: By taking the actions required by Bulletin 92-01 and Supplement

1, PPEcL is in full compliance

with Thermo-Lag

fire barrier material requirements.