ML15098A014: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Lingam, SivaSent:Tuesday, April 07, 2015 3:08 PMTo:mjrm@pge.comCc:Markley, Michael; Shoop, Undine; Pedersen, Roger; Miller, Barry
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Lingam, Siva Sent:Tuesday, April 07, 2015 3:08 PM To:mjrm@pge.com Cc:Markley, Michael; Shoop, Undine; Pedersen, Roger; Miller, Barry


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2 - National Fire Protection Association Standard 805 Radiation Release Additional Requests for Additional Information (TAC Nos. MF2333 and MF2334)By letter dated December 31, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML14365A377), Pacific Gas and Electric Company (the licensee) responded to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) request for additional information (RAI) related to the review of the radioactive release portion of the subject license amendment request (LAR). The NRC staff noted that the response indicated that the licensee "-has chosen an alternative approach to ensure that 10 CFR 20 [Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 20] limits are met..."  The licensee further described that to support this alternative approach, two calculations are being developed to supersede existing calculations referenced in the LAR, but these calculations were not yet completed and/or approved. As a result, the NRC staff has the following official additional RAIs that need your responses by May 8, 2015:
Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2 - National Fire Protection Association Standard 805 Radiation Release Additional Requests for Additional Information (TAC Nos. MF2333 and MF2334)By letter dated December 31, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML14365A377), Pacific Gas and Electric Company (the licensee) responded to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) request for additi onal information (RAI) related to the review of the radioactive release portion of the subject license amendment request (LAR).
Radiation Release RAI 09 Will each zone/area/building of interest have its own administrative activity limit, based on a zone specific calculation? Radiation Release RAI 10 The response states that the Administrative Limit will ensure that "releases do not exceed 10 CFR Part 20 limits."  Is this statement referring to the dose limit for a member of the public?  If so, is the calculated dose to a real individual or a maximum exposed individual consistent with the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual?  Is the Administrative Limit set bases on meeting the concentration limits in Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 20? Radiation Release RAI 11 Describe the methodology used for each calculation to establish the maximum curie Administrative Limit, including all of the input assumptions and parameters used in these calculations.
The NRC staff noted that the response indicated that the licensee "-has chosen an alternative approach to ensure that 10 CFR 20 [Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 20] limits are met..."  The licensee further described that to support this alternative approach, two calculations are being developed to supersede existing calculations referenced in the LAR, but these calculations were not yet completed and/or approved. As a result, the NRC staff has the following official additional RAIs that need your responses by May 8, 2015:  
Radiation Release RAI 12 What fraction of the contaminated oil stored in the Fire Zone is assumed to be consumed in the fire?  If less than 1.0 provide basis for the assumption. What fraction of the activity in the contaminated oil is assumed to be released as an airborne effluent? - as a liquid effluent?
 
Radiation Release RAI 13 Are operator actions credited in the calculations for reducing the amount of effluent released?  If so, specify the operator actions and describe the assumed impact on the resulting dose.
Radiation Release RAI 09 Will each zone/area/building of interest have its own administrative activity limit, based on a zone specific calculation?
Siva P. Lingam U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Project Manager (NRR/DORL/LPL4-1)
Radiation Release RAI 10 The response states that the Administrative Limit will ensure that "releases do not exceed 10 CFR Part 20 limits."  Is this statement referring to the dose limit for a member of the public?  If so, is the calculated dose to a real individual or a maximum exposed individual consistent with the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual?  Is the Administrative Limit set bases on meeting the concentration limits in Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 20?
Cooper Nuclear Station Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Location: O8-D5; Mail Stop: O8-B3 Telephone: 301-415-1564; Fax: 301-415-1222 E-mail address: siva.lingam@nrc.gov Hearing Identifier:  NRR_PMDA Email Number:  1977  Mail Envelope Properties  (Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov20150407150800)  
Radiation Release RAI 11 Describe the methodology used for each calculation to establish the maximum curie Administrative Limit, including all of the input assumptions and parameters used in these calculations.  
 
Radiation Release RAI 12 What fraction of the contaminated oil stored in the Fire Zone is assumed to be consumed in the fire?  If less than 1.0 provide basis for the assumption. What fraction of the activity in the contaminated oil is assumed to be released as an airborne effluent? - as a liquid effluent?  
 
Radiation Release RAI 13 Are operator actions credited in the calculations for reducing the amount of effluent released?  If so, specify the  
 
operator actions and describe the assumed impact on the resulting dose.  
 
Siva P. Lingam U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Project Manager (NRR/DORL/LPL4-1)  
 
Cooper Nuclear Station Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Location: O8-D5; Mail Stop: O8-B3 Telephone: 301-415-1564; Fax: 301-415-1222 E-mail address: siva.lingam@nrc.gov
 
Hearing Identifier:  NRR_PMDA Email Number:  1977  Mail Envelope Properties  (Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov20150407150800)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2 - National Fire Protection Association Standard 805 Radiation Release Additional Requests for Additional Information (TAC Nos. MF2333 and MF2334)  Sent Date:  4/7/2015 3:08:27 PM  Received Date:  4/7/2015 3:08:00 PM From:    Lingam, Siva Created By:  Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov Recipients:    "Markley, Michael" <Michael.Markley@nrc.gov>  Tracking Status: None "Shoop, Undine" <Undine.Shoop@nrc.gov>  Tracking Status: None  "Pedersen, Roger" <Roger.Pedersen@nrc.gov>  Tracking Status: None  "Miller, Barry" <Barry.Miller@nrc.gov>  Tracking Status: None "mjrm@pge.com" <mjrm@pge.com>  Tracking Status: None Post Office:      Files    Size      Date & Time MESSAGE    2640      4/7/2015 3:08:00 PM Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:}}
Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2 - National Fire Protection Association Standard 805 Radiation Release Additional Requests for Additional Information (TAC Nos. MF2333 and MF2334)  Sent Date:  4/7/2015 3:08:27 PM  Received Date:  4/7/2015 3:08:00 PM From:    Lingam, Siva Created By:  Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov Recipients:    "Markley, Michael" <Michael.Markley@nrc.gov>  Tracking Status: None "Shoop, Undine" <Undine.Shoop@nrc.gov>  Tracking Status: None  "Pedersen, Roger" <Roger.Pedersen@nrc.gov>  Tracking Status: None  "Miller, Barry" <Barry.Miller@nrc.gov>  Tracking Status: None "mjrm@pge.com" <mjrm@pge.com>  Tracking Status: None Post Office:      Files    Size      Date & Time MESSAGE    2640      4/7/2015 3:08:00 PM
 
Options  Priority:    Standard  Return Notification:    No  Reply Requested:    No  Sensitivity:    Normal  Expiration Date:      Recipients Received:}}

Revision as of 03:06, 1 July 2018

2015/04/07 NRR E-mail Capture - Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2 - National Fire Protection Association Standard 805 Radiation Release Additional Requests for Additional Information (TAC Nos. MF2333 and MF2334)
ML15098A014
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon  Pacific Gas & Electric icon.png
Issue date: 04/07/2015
From: Lingam S P
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Richardson M
Pacific Gas & Electric Co
References
TAC MF2333, TAC MF2334
Download: ML15098A014 (2)


Text

1NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:Lingam, Siva Sent:Tuesday, April 07, 2015 3:08 PM To:mjrm@pge.com Cc:Markley, Michael; Shoop, Undine; Pedersen, Roger; Miller, Barry

Subject:

Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2 - National Fire Protection Association Standard 805 Radiation Release Additional Requests for Additional Information (TAC Nos. MF2333 and MF2334)By letter dated December 31, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML14365A377), Pacific Gas and Electric Company (the licensee) responded to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) request for additi onal information (RAI) related to the review of the radioactive release portion of the subject license amendment request (LAR).

The NRC staff noted that the response indicated that the licensee "-has chosen an alternative approach to ensure that 10 CFR 20 [Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 20] limits are met..." The licensee further described that to support this alternative approach, two calculations are being developed to supersede existing calculations referenced in the LAR, but these calculations were not yet completed and/or approved. As a result, the NRC staff has the following official additional RAIs that need your responses by May 8, 2015:

Radiation Release RAI 09 Will each zone/area/building of interest have its own administrative activity limit, based on a zone specific calculation?

Radiation Release RAI 10 The response states that the Administrative Limit will ensure that "releases do not exceed 10 CFR Part 20 limits." Is this statement referring to the dose limit for a member of the public? If so, is the calculated dose to a real individual or a maximum exposed individual consistent with the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual? Is the Administrative Limit set bases on meeting the concentration limits in Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 20?

Radiation Release RAI 11 Describe the methodology used for each calculation to establish the maximum curie Administrative Limit, including all of the input assumptions and parameters used in these calculations.

Radiation Release RAI 12 What fraction of the contaminated oil stored in the Fire Zone is assumed to be consumed in the fire? If less than 1.0 provide basis for the assumption. What fraction of the activity in the contaminated oil is assumed to be released as an airborne effluent? - as a liquid effluent?

Radiation Release RAI 13 Are operator actions credited in the calculations for reducing the amount of effluent released? If so, specify the

operator actions and describe the assumed impact on the resulting dose.

Siva P. Lingam U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Project Manager (NRR/DORL/LPL4-1)

Cooper Nuclear Station Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Location: O8-D5; Mail Stop: O8-B3 Telephone: 301-415-1564; Fax: 301-415-1222 E-mail address: siva.lingam@nrc.gov

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1977 Mail Envelope Properties (Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov20150407150800)

Subject:

Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2 - National Fire Protection Association Standard 805 Radiation Release Additional Requests for Additional Information (TAC Nos. MF2333 and MF2334) Sent Date: 4/7/2015 3:08:27 PM Received Date: 4/7/2015 3:08:00 PM From: Lingam, Siva Created By: Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov Recipients: "Markley, Michael" <Michael.Markley@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Shoop, Undine" <Undine.Shoop@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Pedersen, Roger" <Roger.Pedersen@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Miller, Barry" <Barry.Miller@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "mjrm@pge.com" <mjrm@pge.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office: Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2640 4/7/2015 3:08:00 PM

Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: