ML17334B511: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:DONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTCOOKNUCLEARPLANTUNITNUMBERS1AND2DOCKETNOS.50-135AND50-316LICENSENOS.DPR-58ANDDPR- | {{#Wiki_filter:DONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTCOOKNUCLEARPLANTUNITNUMBERS1AND2DOCKETNOS.50-135AND50-316LICENSENOS.DPR-58ANDDPR-74UPDATEDQUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAMDESCRIPTION FORTHECOOKNUCLEARPLANTJULY,~S:9,94Concurred by:AEPSCChiefNuclearEngineerM~@,isDate:Approvedby:AEPSCDirector-QlityAssurance Date:Approvedby:AEPSCSeniorViceresidentNuclearGeneration 9406020315 940523PDRADO!K05000315','!]P,,PDR | ||
<r~/,' | <r~/,' | ||
AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation 1Riverside PlazaColumbus, OH432156142231000gguHERKARH,F.CK'RIC PQWERSTATEMENT OFPOLICYFORTHEDONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTEQUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAMPOLICYAmericanElectricPowerCompanyIncrecognizes thefundamental importance ofcontrolling thedesign,modification, andoperation ofIndianaMichiganPowerCompany's DonaldC.CookNuclearPlant(CookNuclearPlant)byimplementing aplannedanddocumented qualityassurance program,including qualitycontrol,thatcomplieswithapplicable regulations, codes,andstandards. | |||
/1$'1' | Thequalityassurance programhasbeenestablished tocontrolactivities affecting safety-related functions ofstructures, systems,andcomponents in"',,';;":> | ||
CookNuclearPlant.Thequalityassurance programsupportsthegoa)ofmaintaining thesafetyand.reliability ofCookNuclearPlantatthehighestlevelthroughasystematic programdesignedtoassurethatactivities affecting safety-related functions areconducted incompliance withapplicable regulations, codes,standards, andestablished corporate policiesandpractices. | |||
Aschairmanoftheboard,pie's'srd'e''nt:, | |||
andchiefexecutive officerofAmericanElectricPowerCompany,Inc.,Imaintaintheultimateresponsibility forthequalityassurance programassociated withCookNuclearPlant.Ihavedelegated responsibilities forimplementation of,andcompliance with,thequalityassurance program,asoutlinedinthisstatement. | |||
IMPLEHENTATIONTheAEPSCdirector-quality assurance, underthe":.diV'acti:on''.".';o'.-:,":,"';:the,:.:,:.:AEPSC s'e'ni'ii;,.",Pi,ce,'.:;;pre& | |||
dengnucl:"ear,,':.gen'ii'.'a''tj'on, hasbe'enassignerJtheovera'1"f Fesporisib'ilY'ty" fo'r'"speci"Fyi'n'g thequali'tyassurance programrequirements forCookNuclearPlantandverifying theirimplementation. | |||
TheAEPSCdirector-quality assurance hasauthority tostopwork,onanyactivityaffectingsafety-rel ateditemsthatdoesnotmeetapplicableRevised5/2/941.7-1July,1994 | |||
/1$'1' Statement oFPolicyfortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantequalityAssurance ProgramPage2administrative, technical, and/orregulatory requirements. | |||
TheAEPSCdirector-quality assurance doesnothavetheauthority tostopunitoperations, butshallnotifyappropriate plantand/orcorporate management ofconditions notmeetingtheaforementioned criteriaandrecommend thatunitoperations beterminated. | |||
TheAEPSCse6j:"or"; | |||
vicepresident-nuclear gehei.'"ati;oY7, undermydirection, hasbeen'delegated responsibility foreffectively implementing thequalityassurance program.j~yAllotherAEPSCdivisions anddepartments | |||
@j".;;.havingasupporting rolefor@)CookNuclearPlantarefunctionally Theplantmanager,underthedirection oftheAEPSCserio'r,vicepresident-nuclear g'e'ne'ra'ti:on', | |||
isdelegated theresponsibility for~3implementing thequali"tyassurance programatgCookNuclearPlant.TheAEPSCdirector-quality assurance isi'.,'eipor'i'sib;Ie forestablishing gqualitycontrolprogramF~PatFÃ8CookNuclearPfanY.TheAEPSCdirector-quality assurance isresponsible forproviding technical direction totheplantmanagerFormattersrelatingtothequalityassurance programat."..~CookNuclearPlant.TheAEPSCdirector-qualityassurance is.."."i~<responsible formaintaining aqualityassurance sectionatP~.CookNuclearPlanttoperformrequiredreviews,audits,andsurveillances,andtoprovidetechnical liaisonservicestotheplantmanager.Theimplementation ofthequalityassurance programisdescribed intheAEPSCGeneralProcedures (GPs),AEP,'":;:';Nuclear,!'.,:;:Organi'.zat'i'oo>::.',:,Po~l'i.:,cy~:,:.::-,.:8; Pr''oc'ed6i'e"'::.-:;:Haijiigl;"",< | |||
andsubtierdepartment7di visionproce8u'res, PlantNa'nager"~s Instructions (PHIs),andsubtierdepartment headinstructions andprocedures, whichintotaldocumenttherequirements forimplementation oftheprogram.EachAEPSCandCookNuclearPlantorganization involvedinactivities affecting safety-related functions ofstructures, systems,andcomponents inP$gFCookNuclearPlanthasth'eresponsibility toimplement theappli'cable policiesandrequirements ofthequalityassurance program.Thisresponsibility includesbeingfamiliarwith,andcomplying with,theapplicable qualityassurance programrequirements. | |||
COMPLIANCE TheAEPSCdirector-quality assurance shallmonitorcompliance withtheestablishedqualityassurance program.Auditprogramsshal1beRevised5/2/941.7-2July,1994 lgJ Statement ofPolicyfortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantequalityAssurance ProgramPage3established toensurethatAEPSCandCookNuclearP'lantactivities complywithestablished programrequirements, identifydeficiencies ornoncompliances, andobtaineffective andtimelycorrective actions.Any,.employeeengagedinactivitiesaffecting safety-related functions ofstructures, systems,andcomponents inp'sCookNuclearPlantwhobelieve5'he qualityassurance programisnot"beingcompliedwith,orthatadeficiency inqualityexists,shouldnotifyhN:s/he'ij supervisor, theAEPSCdirector-quality assurance, and/ortheplantmanager.Ifthenotificationdoesnot/intheemployee's opinion~< | |||
receivepromptorappropriate attention," | |||
theemployeeshouldcontactsuccessively higherlevelsofmanagement. | |||
Pnemployeereporting suchconditions shallnotbediscriminated agains't'y companies oftheAmericanElectricPowerSystem,no'r,'-"',shal'.lgany7j'upplg;er';"-;u'(i dermic'onto'':.ac't"=%ij.'.th~-,'aji$ | |||
.'.;.l'o'f'<)th'e';;,cojii'pan'j',es df'scharge"or otheractionsrelative'tocomp'ensation, terms,conditions, orprivileges ofemployment. | |||
E.LinnDraper,Jr.ChairmanoftheBoard,President andChiefExecutive OfficerAmericanElectricPowerCompany,Inc.Revised5/2/94July,1994 4/C~Y,0 1.7.1OR6ANIZATION 1.7.1.1SCOPEAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation (AEPSC)isresponsible forestablishing andimplementing thegualityAssurance (gA)programfortheoperational phaseoftheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlant(CookNuclearPlant).Althoughauthority fordevelopment andexecution ofvariousportionsoftheprogrammaybedelegated toothers,suchascontractors, agentsorconsultants, AEPSCretainsoverallresponsibility. | |||
AEPSCshallevaluateworkdelegated tosuchorganizations. | |||
Evaluations shallbebasedonthestatusofsafetyimportance oftheactivitybeingperformed andshallbeinitiated earlyenoughtoassureeffective qualityassurance duringtheperformance ofthedelegated activity. | |||
ThissectionofthegualityAssurance ProgramDescription (gAPD)identifies theAEPSCorganizational responsibilities foractivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related nuclearpowerplantstructures, systems,andcomponents, anddescribes theauthority anddutiesassignedtothem.Itaddresses responsibilities forbothattaining qualityobjectives andforthefunctions ofestablishing thegAprogram,andverifying thatactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related itemsareperformed effectively inaccordance withgAprogramrequirements. | |||
1.7.1.2IHPLEHENTATION 1.7.1.2.1 SourceofAuthoritThechairmanoftheboard.',:qpresidenW,:. | |||
andchiefexecutive officerofAmericanE1ectricPowerCompany,Inc.(AEP)andAEPSCisresponsib1e forsafeoperation oftheCookNuclearPlant.Authority andresponsibility | |||
*foreffectively implementing thegAprogramforplantmodifications, operations andmaintenance aredelegated totheAEPSCi~en'iorvicepresident nucIearEe'n'eratgon. | |||
1.7-4July,1994 | |||
Intheoperation ofanuclearpowerplant,thelicenseeisrequiredtoestablish clearanddirectlinesofresponsibility, authority andaccountability. | |||
Thisrequirement isapplicable totheorganization providing supporttotheplant,aswellastotheplantstaff.Ih,,i",':P | |||
'It'It!)ltd~i!if."',!hi~i!h' | |||
'(i't)phd'trilfld):','p!I!,'ll(,,', | |||
I''(lith'i.:": | |||
dr'E':iii.""":!EI~!" | |||
'til)'I!P.""'":-::E" | |||
-'"0I"'llEI~!i!Ldftht)!M!!i" | |||
'*!l""il,:"'!I'i'Ehp'I iid"hi!-:PP'!lI'IIEP!!i!E" | |||
'I::I!:"'"!E'I ttid':)'I"",sli P"t."'"':::'-,::.I'ms'tmbd~ify~th~et; | |||
~ja'nt.'t::::; | |||
6e;.."AEpgt~seni Ior!Vitce''esi denpt5nu'el cuirri--;PI:-,:g'-*-*:::::E;I~f-:,:.:::--* | |||
'::::II)rrtf*;-:Ph | |||
--',:;:;E--:I::,EW'I: | |||
'--'::-PI I:-:-;::;::;-:::d)) | |||
*;EE)"EsiIIIf'di'd''E-I""tIi:--':E"'IEI::---'I:!Pii-: | |||
rW~M'")!it:"~:.:I'"!!IIEPN 4'ni'oi::::vj:c':e | |||
:ipr"',e'a)den'a~in'jhjcl'eal';:::::ge'neiiaCiaii:";l'~(r'epei'cence'ipigj)re~it | |||
.7;.-',::lg,.'n ordertofacilitate amorethoroughunderstanding ofthesupportfunctions, someoftheresponsibilities, authorities, andaccountabilities withintheorganization areasfollows:I)Ihpihi!i!ifthEPEE!ii'::. | |||
':Iilia.'I': | |||
i!i)jfftid,.t,:.: | |||
generation shallbededicated totheareaofcookNuclearPlantoperations andsupport.2)'he'AEPSLi'~sani~oi;:,.))i'ce;:::;:: | |||
.resid~en "nufcl''.ear,:,";:hgeierat'I'on shallberesponsible for,andhastheauthority todirect,allCookNuclearPlantoperational andsupportmattersLgg<andshal'Imake,orconcur,inallfinaldecisions regarding significant nuclearsafetymatters.3)O'KPNOmanagersQshallbefamiliarwithactivities withintheirscopeofresponsibility thataffectplantsafetyandreliability. | |||
Theyshallbecognizant of,andsensitive to,interna1andexternalfactorsthatmightaffecttheoperations ofCookNuclearPlant.1.7-5July,1994 | |||
! | ! | ||
S)AYP))GmanagersQj~ | S)AYP))GmanagersQj~haveacommitment toseekandidentifyproblemareasandtakecorrective actiontoeliminate unsafeconditions, ortoimprovetrendsthatwillupgradeplantsafetyandreliabi1ity.g)The:EpgC:::::iiii'jor,,,vd~e;;::pi | ||
":,.g~w,':::"Ai,---!::.-"-g-.::,i:,::.:':,:,I::,-,.I!!!!.:s!.:;-:!e---.!!~!!e-!,::!tv-,,:,,I,:0!(gunctions'll.:;of!~ | :coddestmac);eawWfensiation sacoeure.thatCookNuclearPlantpersonnel arenotrequested toperforminappropriate workottasksbycorporate personnel, andshallcontrolassignments andrequeststhathavethepotential fordiverting theattention oftheplantmanagerfromtheprimaryresponsibility forsafeandreliableplantoperation. | ||
2) | 6)'AEPHOlm'anna. | ||
~r'ICl | ~er'sshallbefamiliarwiththepolicystatements fromhighermanagement concerning nuclearsafetyandoperational priorities. | ||
Issue"StopMork" | Theyshallberesponsible forensuringthatactivities undertheirdirection areperformed inaccordance withthesepolicies. | ||
'!iliaiitva':,'Et:'jtj'III.'Eil'",tiai-,'t~i,'-:,I~tR~tiillOE'',~liii(it.i't%'' | l.7.1.2.2Resonsibilit forAttaininualitObectivesinAEPSCNuclear~~~~~~Genera%::'oITheAEPchairmanoftheboard~fj<'pres'ident'nd chiefexecutive officehasassignedtheoverallresponsibility forspecifying gAprogramrequirements andverifying theirimplementation totheAEPSCdirector-qualityassurance. | ||
~r~a | TheAEPSCsin'joPPvicepresident nuclear:jerjepatjoa, underthedirection oftheAEpchairmanoftheboardwpres'1'derntbj andchiefexecutive officer,isresponsible foreffectively implementing thegAprogram.ThIIXPSL'i!8): | ||
'f'I | ''','e~!II'hF!ii""'':"",'; | ||
4hdiifhAEFmi'or;vicepresident nuclearg'enid'i'it'ion, isresponsible forestablishing theCookNuclearPlantqualitycontrolprogram1.7-6July,1994 l | |||
":,.g~w,':::"Ai,---!::. | |||
-"-g-.::,i:,::.:':,:,I::,-,.I!!!!.: | |||
s!.:;-:!e---.!! | |||
~!!e-!,::!tv-,,:,,I,: | |||
0!(gunctions'll.:;of!~sguct urea'!a''sys terna"::::.';: | |||
and~!co~m-bne'ns,':!kiiRCoohg(eel'earT'P'1 ant-:,'," | |||
lk~~fti'",l!'.".":.,~lb!'! | |||
aF!itmjil,','--! | |||
t'mi::'pp~fl,,b'!:-!i | |||
-!I'-,"--!:,:::: | |||
'!::"!'!:::,::: | |||
!ll!!tlat'.\!I!!,'-:--. | |||
-":.-:';'!!!!-." | |||
':i!mtii!i:':p.:'.,-:::!vie!!es KnoixdeS~%i'fig*',"fieiiiii sr.::::.".W(%~hanL(;.Oempfyfn jjiitrh.."!.":t((e!!oppTO'C'ab e'.:it(u'ag(i@ | |||
ass~uranc'ei piog'ramIre((ui.imengssAEPSChasanindependent off-siteNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee (NSDRC)whichhasbeenestablished pursuanttotherequirements oftheTechnical Specifications fortheCookNuclearPlant.ThefunctionoftheNSDRCistooverseetheengineering, design,operation, andmaintenance oftheCookNuclearPlantbyperforming auditsandindependent reviewsofactivities whicharespecified inthefacilityTechnical Specifications. | |||
TheCookNuclearPlanton-sitereviewgroupistheIndianaMichiganPowerCompany(ISM)PlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee (PNSRC).Thiscommittee hasalsobeenestablished pursuanttotherequirements oftheCookNuclearPlantTechnical Specifications. | |||
ThefunctionofthePNSRCistoreviewplantoperations onacontinuing basisandadvisetheplantmanageronmattersrelatedtonuclearsafety.1.7.1.2.3CororateOranization AmericanElectricPowerComanAEP,theparentholdingcompany,whollyownsthecommonstockofallAEPSystemsubsidiary (operating) companies. | |||
Themajoroperating companies andgeneration subsidiaries areshowninFigure1.7-2.Thechairmanoftheboard:,:<pre's'!(dentp andchiefexecutive officerofAEFisthechiefexecutive officerofAEPSCandalloperating companies. | |||
Theresponsibility forthefunctional management ofthemajoroperating companies isvestedinthepresident ofeachoperating companyreporting 1~77July,1994 totheAEPSCchaicmanoftheboacd~j~i',-:: | |||
i,'.e'a'Oderi~t::!ahdc":chi'ef'.:::execiito)'i,* | |||
~o'ffei'ceo eih:."P,AmericanElectricPowerServiceCororationTheresponsibility foradministrative andtechnical direction oftheAEPSystemanditsfacilities isdelegated toAEPSC.AEPSCprovidesmanagement andtechnological servicestothevariousAEPSystemNcompanies. | |||
0eratinComaniesTheoperating facilities oftheAEPSystemareownedandoperatedbytherespective operating companies. | |||
Theresponsibility forexecuting theengineering, design,construction, specialized technical | |||
: training, andcertainoperations supervision isvestedinAEPSC,whileall,or'art,oftheadministrative functional responsibility isassignedtotheoperating companies. | |||
InthecaseofCookNuclearPlant,ILKgeneralofficestaff(headquarters), | |||
providespublicaffairs,accounting, alidindustrial safetydirection | |||
~?5:::.TheCookNuclearPlantisownedandoperatedbyILKwhichispartoftheAEPSystem.1.7.l.2.4ualitAssurance Resonsibilit ofAEPSCI)AEPSCprovidesthetechnical direction fortheCookNuclearPlant,andassuchmakesthefinaldecisions pertinent tosafety-related changesinplantdesign.Further,AEPSCreviewsNuclearRegulatory Commission (NRC)letters,bulletins, notices,etc.,forimpactonplantdesign,andtheneedfordesignchangesormodifications. | |||
1.7-8July,1994 at,' | |||
2)AEPSCfurnishes qualityassurance, engineering, design,construction, licensing, NRCcorrespondence, fuelmanagement andradiological supportactivities. | |||
3)AEPSCprovidesadditional serviceinmatterssuchassupplierqualification, procurement oforiginalequipment andreplacement parts,andtheprocessofdedicating commercial gradeitemsorservicestosafety-related applications. | |||
4)TheAEPSCqAdopa'riant providestechnical direction inqualityassurance matterstoAEPSCandtheCookNuclearPlant,andoverseestheadequacy, effectiveness andimplementation ofthegAProgramthroughreviewandauditactivities. | |||
5)Cognizant engineerQt'::.(e.g.,systemengineer, equipment | |||
: engineer, leadengineer, responsible | |||
: engineer, procurrement,:!eng~iieei'tc.) | |||
P!NisthatAEPSCindividualwhoprovidestheengineering/desi gnexpertise foraparticular areaofresponsibility. | |||
Thisresponsibility includestheimplementation ofthequalityassurance andqualitycontrolmeasuresforsystems,equipment, structures, orfunctional areasincludedinthatindividual sresponsibility. | |||
Thevarioustitlesusedfortheidentification ofanindividual's responsibility andassignment shallbeunderstood | |||
'omeanthesameascognizant engineerintherespective areasofresponsibility. | |||
ualitAssurance Resonsibilit ofI&M-CookNuclearPlantI&M'sCookNuclearPlantstaffoperatestheCookNuclearPlantinaccordance withlicensing requirements, including theTechnical Specifications andsuchothercommitments asestablished bytheoperating licenses. | |||
ThePlantManagerInstruction (PMI)system'nd subtierinstructions andprocedures describethemeansbywhichcompliance isachievedandresponsibilities areassigned, including interfaces withAEPSC.Figure1.7-Iindicates theorganizational July,1994 | |||
~r'ICl relationships withintheAEPSystempertaining totheoperation andsupportoftheCookNuclearPlant.1.7.1.2.5Oranization AEPSCThechairmanoftheboardreppr'eVidentp andchiefexecutive officerisultimately responsible forthei)Aprogramassociated withtheCookNuclearPlant.Thisresponsibility isadministered throughtheAEPSGseato%i:,:': | |||
ii'i~e::pre's'ident,':'nuc( | |||
e'a'r.";'."getne'tion'; | |||
iiuolearGenertat1enid)etTrMtntr II-ll',,;:,9",:tl:-"lt:::::::,- | |||
tp9'---'I,:::" | |||
919IIltpttl,I,-l,":pp:,pi-;.":9 "1:","""':.mm'1'l',pt,"'!!iiiitlt iiilitllllli:e::.'lI"",'ll',"'''bill~it, | |||
''Il",'lt"iiiitl9INiiclear,.-.::pl antt'ohgaiii'xa6'~~n'.. | |||
TheAEPSCdirector-qualityassurance) reporting tothehE~PBC:"'serjf~or. | |||
ittceiptpres(ddLt!pn utc1'ar!glenbnatp(on, isresponsible forthequaliyassurance (qA)Leper'tsie'nt:. | |||
TheqAdepartment consistsofthefollowing sections(Figure1.7-8):tl1lty99I9KIIII::.',,------ | |||
9*IISiippl':,'>,i'i.".:,per f9.ormance section8~it'equalityassuranceand".".!'c'opti~olvsde'paritment'he gADisorganizationally independent andisresponsible toperformthefollowing: | |||
SpecifygAprogramrequirements. | |||
Identifyqualityproblems. | |||
: Initiate, recommend, orprovidesolutions throughdesignated channels. | |||
Verifyimplementation ofsolutions, asappropriate. | |||
Prepare,issueandmaintaingAprogramdocuments, asrequired. | |||
1.7-10July,1994 Yerifytheimplementation ofthegAprogramthroughscheduled auditsandsurveillances. | |||
Yerifytheimplementation ofcomputersoftwarequalityassurance throughreviews,'surveillances andaudits.Auditengineering, design,procurement, construction andoperational documents forincorporation of,andcompliance with,applicable qualityassurance requirements totheextentspecified bytheAEPSCmanagement-approved gAprogram.OrganizeandconductthegAauditororientation, | |||
: training, certification andqualification ofAEPSCauditpersonnel. | |||
Providedirection forthecollection, storage,maintenance, andretention ofqualityassurance records.Naintain, ondatabase,alistofsuppliers ofnuclear(N)itemsandservices, plusotherselectedcategories ofsuppliers. | |||
Identifynoncompliances oftheestablished gAprogramtotheresponsible organizations forcorrective actions,andreportsignificant occurrences thatjeopardize qualitytoseniorAEPSCmanagement. | |||
Followuponcorrective actionsidentified bygAduringandafterdisposition implementation. | |||
Reviewthedisposition ofconditions adversetoqualitytoassurethatactiontakenwillprecluderecurrence. | |||
Conductin-process gAauditsorsurveHlancesatsupplier's facilities, asrequired. | |||
AssistandadviseotherAEP/AEPSC groupsinmattersrelatedtothegAprogram.ConductauditsasdirectedbytheNSDRC.ReviewAEPSCinvestigated Condition Reportsandassociated corrective andpreventive actionrecommendations. | |||
Haintaincognizance ofindustryandgovernmental qualityassurance requirements suchthatthegAprogramiscompatible withrequirements, asnecessary. | |||
Recommend forrevisionto,orimprovements in,theestabli'shed gAProgramtoseniorAEPSCmanagement. | |||
Auditdedication plansforcommercial gradeitemsandservices. | |||
July,1994 wyt0K44II<< | |||
Issue"StopMork"orderswhensignificant conditions adversetosafety-related itemsareidentified topreventunsafeconditions fromoccurring and/orontinuing. | |||
ProvideAEPSCmanagement withperiodicreportsconcerning thestatus,adequacyandimplementation ofthegAprogram.Prepareandconductspecialverification and/orsurveillance programsonin-houseactivities, asrequiredorrequested. | |||
Routinely attend,andparticipate in,dailyplantworkscheduleandstatusmeetings. | |||
ProvideadequategAcoveragerelativetoprocedural andinspection | |||
: controls, acceptance | |||
: criteria, andgAstaffingandqualification ofpersonnel tocarryoutgAassignments. | |||
Determine theacceptability ofvendorstosupplyproductsandservicesforsafety-re'Iated applications. | |||
~~'.:~j:':..gP'roijde,.:,ger fBnij.-,,',:l,ice'f)"'icoordjnVffon:,."';:Mi fh~4hgjfjjstf. | |||
Poser,':0pa,rra'tfonsi'(SNPO):::::; | |||
nite':;::::areas,"ofglNPon!itraqninp:':!is'em airs':.'a'n'dh'mnrtehppa'd::,;,::,~TiTiaiiePP~Oiti)i'iifuueeaa~i,"'::--r'Or~idinj!;: | |||
q5lTSGpCa'CeSsiai'~tO'!!i!Iii;, | |||
-:----:,,--'::,i.:,---,h'i::--'''ill0'f!'foal!em!iia'i*': | |||
-c!".::T--N4---,!T. | |||
;:,:~:,.";!i!OeY~l: | |||
.o,pr7a4%1iip'li;emei3i:,,an!,"ef!fe'ctni',,i nalYit3igCont: | |||
Lh@e":.:,.'enn>iaPaises::,'-:.hut:..",.gsjnoT!iqmolte'dM=;:~khei jl'ann'3nj~!and Ki'rect%'ng':.:,',o'f~;qdad tdy'ciaotnar,.l".;::: | |||
acWtyitessioi'as'serai'thdtf.::: | |||
s'nu~stry,cod'es,"j:::NRC;'-;rap'u)ath'ons",."i:.:'.and,"::cn'ompanydnnstrYctto'ons'!aYid:::;Polh cia's!riega~ldLnoaq~ua'I itiaiznht>~ol.;i foll!coopcYgiTcl'eat$ | |||
'P'tant!ari7c'!im,l emehte'draq! | |||
,qualÃfjad~piirsaw'e,ilia puifrerum!th!ia,user!'-sn!jjijialt!::htese',."mctiVjl"ffes aresjiraperlyf'do'cumen3Q. | |||
~i!,'.!e j~Dwi.'cata!!t!hePN'c'tqrltiesiiof'!contr'act oi"(]Cji'i'oii,d,e's'0 | |||
:.,'('NOE).:! | |||
pei~ioiiiie'll::ass!Needs to'htheysht'e':-,',:q'ua't ity,:::assurance:,,:a~nd".coh~iigo'q dea7tmenti".,;an'd.:;.;::- | |||
rop3ferorersiqh":;,t,:: | |||
o'.feIok!r".;: | |||
iierofriiiidg | |||
'-,-'-::iiiiiiill'-'Wl!4,"'Ehli: | |||
'"L::-'-NifrW!'>>'! | |||
fCHI!p.', | |||
'.!lip":.!-'::-.' | |||
mii;nteanncidit'Otf'hiF.;i":,i(qui; rementepfg'e@ii~;rOy)6'iiidai1768!jindVNYf 4572'::,"::,6,",:,",eeXce td."'as.'.noted>'4n';.:;:Ap jend'3'X~48:':heiet~o,'j':;.~$ | |||
telii;,;p Duly,1994 | |||
'!iliaiitva':,'Et: | |||
'jtj'III. | |||
'Eil'",tiai-,'t~i, | |||
'-:,I~tR~tiillOE' | |||
',~liii(it. | |||
i't%''eqNii emanTs;:.:of.-'-::tth'ev'AEP~NOETdNanuaQ | |||
:':,.--E~fiii! | |||
-It:::-::"-It E,tj,,t-,:j- | |||
-::::::,::::::t-:E,-':---E | |||
,'t'ai-.",":V,: | |||
-tvjaill~t,;:*,,tttltEIt'"!E!E''IE | |||
':I!EMIR; ANSI!'::NAT22'6,:.",.-: | |||
ASNEE!SKpV::: | |||
'Ceeie";.'!tend/Or."".:SNT,,-TC-.:.'I A':i::,:aarEapp'l'iCatbl'e,:; | |||
Amlification ofSecificResonsibilities ualification oftheAEPSCdirector-ualitassurance TheAEPSCdirector-qualityassurance shallpossessthefollowing positionrequirements: | |||
Bachelorsdegreeinengineering, scientific, orrelateddiscipline. | |||
Ten(10)yearsexperience inoneof,oracombination of,thefollowing areas:engineering, design,construction, operations, maintenance offossilornuclearpowergeneration facilities'r utilityfacilities'A, ofwhichatleastfour(4)yearsmustbeexperience innuclearqualityassurance relatedactivities. | |||
Knowledge ofQAregulations, | |||
: policies, practices andstandards. | |||
Thesame,orhigher,organization reporting levelasthehighestlinemanagerdirectlyresponsible forperforming activities affecting thequalityofsafety-related items,suchasengineering, procurement, construction andoperation, andissufficiently independent fromcostandschedule. | |||
Effective communication channelswithotherseniormanagement positions. | |||
Responsibility forapprovalofgAmanual(s). | |||
Performance ofnootherdutiesorresponsibilities unrelated togAthatwouldpreventfullattention togAmatters.StoWorkOrdersTheAEPSCOA~de'atrtment isresponsible forensuringthatactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related itemsareperformed inamannerthatmeetsapplicable administrative, 1.7-13July,1994 IH technical, andregulatory requirements. | |||
Inordertocarryoutthisresponsibility, theAEPchairmanoftheboard,jCes3:den8, andchiefexecutive officerhasgiventheAEPSCdirector-qualityassurance theauthority tostopworkonanyactivityaffecting thequalityofsafety-related itemsthatdoesnotmeettheaforementioned requirements. | |||
Stopworkauthority | |||
'hasbeenfurtherdelegated bytheAEPSCdirector-qualityassurance totheAEPSCi3'tequalityassurance a~d!,Cor'itr@N superintendent. | |||
TheAEPSCdirector-qualityassurance andtheAEPSCsBequalityassurance a~4'.,;.iiqtri3l superintendent donothavetheauthority tostopunitoperations, butwillnotifyappropriate CookNuclearPlantand/orcorporate management ofconditions whichdonotmeettheaforementioned | |||
: criteria, andrecommend thatunitoperations beterminated. | |||
AAuditoruglification andCertification ProramAEPSChasestablished andmaintains agAauditortrainingandcertification programforallAEPSCgAauditors. | |||
Condition Identification ReortinandEscalation AEPSChasestablished mechanisms fortheidentification, reporting andescalation ofconditions affecting thequalityofsafety-related itemstoalevelofmanagement wherebysatisfactory resolutions canbeobtained. | |||
Lh'ediiEps'0::."::":::c'iia dfdt.-,op'peretz'oiiai'-;manas'e'ianddi immaannais'edr'-"';niicl ear::,":." | |||
iaipfpo'ra'~aervi'cea ig'8'ssjg: | |||
departmentr,':;,-::::::rreeporstjgj~t: | |||
oi:theApSirtcsireag | |||
~cry''cef.'rAe:den>tiQc!le ai'.',p'",,'ol"'ll p111ftfll1p:11pll1dp11111,ll1g,operation, maintenance, fuelmanagement, andradiological support.1.7-14July,1994 IIV Providetheplantmanagerwiththetechnical andmanagerial | |||
: guidance, direction andsupporttoensurethesafeoperation oftheplant.Maintain'liaisonwiththeAEPSCdirector-qualityassurance. | |||
Implement therequirements oftheAEPSCgAprogram.Maintainknowledge ofthelatestsafety,licensing, andregulatory requirements, codes,standards, andfederalregulations applicable totheoperation ofCookNuclearPlant.Accomplish theprocurement, | |||
: economic, technical, licensing andqualityassurance activities dealingwiththereactorcoreanditsrelatedfuelassemblies andcomponents. | |||
Preparebidspecifications, evaluatebids,andnegotiate andadminister contracts fortheprocurement ofallnuclearfuelandrelatedcomponents andservices. | |||
Maintainaspecialnuclearmaterialaccountability system.Provideanalysestosupportnuclearsteamsupplysystemoperation, including reactorphysics,fueleconomics, fuelmechanical | |||
: behavior, corethermalhydraulic andLOCAandnon-LOCAtransient safetyanalysisandotheranalysisactivities asrequested, furnishplantTechnical Specification changesandotherlicensing work,andparticipate inNRCandNSDRCmeetingsasrequiredbytheseanalyses. | |||
Performreactorcoreoperation follow-up activities andotherreactorcoretechnical supportactivities asrequested, andarrangeforsupportfromthefuelfabricator, whenneeded.Contractfor,andprovidetechnical supportfor,disposalofbothhighlevelandlowlevelradioactive waste.Coordinate thedevelopment ofneutronics andthermalhydraulic safetycodesandconductsafetyanalyses. | |||
ConductstudiesoftheCookNuclearPlantlicensing basestodetermine theoptimalchangestosupportunitoperations atalowerprimarypressureandtemperature. | |||
Coordinate gu@"e>asrpdpo'!r'sterii cecaompute'rc'odedevelopment, andprovidetheinterface controlfornuclear,"':.,.";a'uppot',:,c'',':servi'ce'a wihtheAEPSCinformation systemdepartment andCookNuclearPlant.1.7-15July,1994 | |||
~r~a ObtainandmaintaintheNRCOperating LicenseandTechnical Specifications fortheCookNuclearPlant.Actasthecommunication linkbetweentheNRC,AEPSC,andtheplantstaff.Performandcoordinate effortsinvolvedingathering information, performing calculations andgenericstudies;preparing | |||
: criteria, reports,andresponses; reviewing itemsaffecting safety;andinterpreting regulations. | |||
Review,coordinate, andresolveallmatterspertaining tonuclearsafetybetweenCookNuclearPlantandAEPSC.Thisincludes, butisnotlimitedto:thereviewofcertain'plant designchangestoensurethattherequirements oflOCFR50.59 aremet;thepreparation ofsafetyevaluations, orreviews,foranydesignated subject;thepreparation ofchangesto,andappropriate interpretation of,theplantTechnical Specification submittals oflicenseamendments; andtheanalysisofplantcompliance withregulatory requirements. | |||
Primarycorporate contactformostoralandwrittencommunication withtheNRC.Providesupportinkeyareasofexpertise, suchasnuclearengineering, probabilistic | |||
: analysis, thermohydraulic | |||
: analysis, chemicalengineering, mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, andtechnical writing.Interface withvendorsandotheroutsideorganizations onmattersconnected withthenuclearsteamsupplysystemandotherareasaffecting thesafedesignandoperation ofnuclearplants.Participate, asappropriate, inthereviewofnuclearplantoperating experiences, andrelatethoseexperiences tothedesignandsafeoperation ofCookNuclearPlant.Review,evaluate, andrespondtoNRCrequestsforinformation andNRCnotifications ofregulatory changesresulting inplantmodifications ornewfacilities. | |||
Suchresponses aregenerated inaccordance withappropriate Hadministrative procedures. | |||
Develop,specify,and/orreviewconceptual nuclearsafetycriteriaforCookNuclearPlantinaccordance withestablished regulations. | |||
July,1994 | |||
'f'I IThisincludesallinformation contained intheFSAR,aswellasspecialized information suchasenvironmental qualification andseismiccriteria. | |||
Reviewandevaluateperformance requirements forsystems,equipment andmaterials forcompliance withspecified safetycriteria. | |||
Review,onaconceptual basis,plantreportsandproposedplantsafety-related designchanges,totheextentthattheyarerelatedtotheultimatesafeoperation oftheplant,forcompliance withsafetyregulations, plantTechnical Specifications, theUpdatedFSARdesignbasis,andwithanyotherrequirements undertheOperating License,todetermine ifthereareanyunreviewed safetyquestions asdefinedin10CFR50.59. | |||
PerformreviewsofCondition Reportsand10CFR21reviewsinaccordance withcorporate requirements. | |||
OperatetheActionItemTracking(AIT)systemforAEPSCinternalcommitment tracking. | |||
INP,0;,Coordinate dailycommunication withtheCookNuclearPlant,provideAEPSCmanagement withadailyplantstatusreport,andmakepresentations toseniormanagement atregularly scheduled construction staffmeetings: | |||
Processincomingvendorinformation. | |||
Contribute totheannualFSARupdatesthroughreviewsofLicenseeEventReports,designchangesandtheAnnualOperating Report.Radiological, emergency planningandsupportofthesecurityprogram.Corporate supportoftheCookNuclearPlant'sradiation protection andhealthphysicsprogram,technical reviewsandadviceontheradiological aspectsofdesignchanges,modifications orcapitalimprovements, theALARAprogram,theradiation monitoring system,theenvironmental radiological monitoring andsamplingprogram,doseandshielding | |||
: analysis, radiochemistry review,implications offederalregulations, andmeteorological monitoring. | |||
1.7-17July,1994 | |||
CookNuclearPlantandcorporate emergency | |||
: planning, including procedure development, exercisescheduling, facilityprocurement andmaintenance, andtheliaisonwithoff-siteemergency planninggroups,suchasFEMAandtheMichiganStatePolice.Reviewfederalcodesandregulations astheyrelatetothedevelopment, implementation, revisionanddistribution oftheModifiedAmendedSecurityPlan(MASP).Interface withtheplant'ssecuritydepartment providing supportandmaintaining securitydocumentfiles.ProvidenuclearGeneralEmployeeTraining(IGET)forAEPSCpersonnel. | |||
Coordinate thedevelopment oftrainingforAEPSCpersonnel whosupporttheoperation andmaintenance ofCookNuclearPlant,ensuringaunifiedtrainingprogrammeetingannualgoalsandobjectives. | |||
Participate ontheALARAcommittee. | |||
Prepareresponses totheNRConradiological, emergency planningandsecurityissues.Serveastechnical advisorsonplantaudits.Remaincognizant ofcurrentdecommissioning practices anddevelopments. | |||
AEPSCNuclearEnineerinDeartmentTheAEpSCchiefnuclearengineeriiiChmanageri~<iiiTclead.'i'en'gsneerdng dp'ai;Eme'nt, reporting totheAEpSCs~ehiorvicepresident nucleargenereation, isresPonsible forcertainengineering';". | |||
design~and pTocu'rtemesnt functions. | |||
TheAEpSCnuclearengineering department iscomprised ofengineering anddesignentitiesatAEPSC,asme11asanon-siteengineeringn design,:::,l::,anddpro'cu'remend'upport organization attheCookNuclearPlant.1.7-18July,1994 TheAEPSCcivilengineering | |||
: 8igisTon, electrical engineering~@'os'sIT1~i+n hydr'o~jeneratp~oj": | |||
andsystemplanningdepartments provideperiodic, technical assistance fortheCookNuclearPlant.Theadministrative andqualityassurance controlsforthisassistance arecontrolled throughdocumented interface agreements withAEPSCnuclearengineering. | |||
AEPSCnuclearengineering (NE)department isresponsible forthefollowing: | |||
Provideplanning, engineering anddesignoftheelectrical facilities insideCookNuclearPlantuptothehighvoltage(HV)bushingsofthemaingenerator transformers andmechanical facilities insideCookNuclearPlantincluding: | |||
determination ofgenerallayoutanddesign;selection ofequipment; preparation ofone-lineandflowdiagrams; and,coordination ofinsideandoutsideplantfacilities. | |||
Provideengineering anddesignofallcontrolsforoperation andprotection ofnuclearsteamsupply,steamgenerator, turbinegenerator, auxiliary equipment andgeneralplantprotection, including checkingandapproving elementary, one-line, andflowdrawings. | |||
Ensurethatallpurchased equipment conformstoacceptedstandards andfulfillsthedesiredfunction. | |||
Closelyfollowmanufacturer's engineering anddesignprocesses toassureprovision ofadequateandreliableequipment uponwhichdependthesafety,reliability, andperformance oftheunitandplant.Prepare,reviewand/orapprovedesignchanges,sketches, | |||
: drawings, calculations, anddesignverifications, asrequired. | |||
c~$4:;:i!a'PPerfor'missa: | |||
dty,;:::ate%i;,eliot''et!desi:gii~chan'g'esfp'ur'scant::.'.:;:toelTcp'IT60';.:599 Prepareand/orapprovededication plans,specifications andprocuraemenE.:.docuwent's. | |||
1.7-19July,1994 I~k Performdrawingreviewofequipment, asappropriate. | |||
Develop,reviewand/orapproveprocedures orcorrespondence asappropriate. | |||
Obtain,reviewandperformengineering anddesignevaluations, including environmental equipment qualification (Eg).Establish andmaintainacentralfileforequipment environmental qualification documentation. | |||
Coordinate operations withinAEPSCthatsupporttheCookNuclearPlantFacilityDataBase(FDB).Performcalculations forploper.application ofequipment. | |||
Performandevaluateinvestigations, analysesandreportsforfacilities pertaining totheengineering design,operation andmaintenance oftheCookNuclearPlant.Assistfieldpersonnel ininstallation, start-up, andsubsequent locatingofproblemsinequipment, andindetermining properoperation ofequipment, duringnormalorafteremergency operations. | |||
Naintainaconstantawareness forimprovements andmorereliabledesignofequipment andfacilities, maintenance andoperating methodsorprocedures. | |||
Haintainaconstantawareness ofactivities toensurecompliance withallapplicable policiesandprocedures, initiating, whenrequired, trainingorretraining programs. | |||
Participate, asassigned, ontheNSDRCandNSDRCsubcommittees, andparticipate inmatterscoveredinthecommittee's charter.Provideresponses toNRCcorrespondence, asrequired. | |||
Participate intheevaluation andremedyofanysituation requiring activation oftheEmergency gesponseOrganization. | |||
Providesupportpersonnel fortheEmergency ResponseOrganization. | |||
Providetechnical suppottinareasofoperation andmaintenance, including: | |||
theInservice Inspection | |||
{ISI)program;thegAprogram;thefireprotection gAprogram;theAEPALARAprogramcoveringradiation protection; and,thecorporate andplantindustrial safetyprogram.1.7-20July,1994 Providetechnical direction andassistance inthelayoutandarrangement ofequipment piping,systems,controls, etc.,forthedevelopment ofdrawings. | |||
DevelopSystemDescriptions. | |||
Provideanalytical supportinengineering anddesigndisciplines (e.g.,heattransfer, thermodynamics, fluiddynamics). | |||
Provideengineering anddesignevaluations forCRs,LERs,INPOSOERs,andNRCBu'}letins. | |||
.Participate, asassigned, ontheAEPSCCondition Assessment Group(CAG).Makerecommendations andassistintheformulation ofpoliciesandpractices relatingtothedesignandengineering ofofficeandservicebuildings, miscellaneous structures andmaterialhandlingequipment, andprovidethegeneralsupervision oftheengineering ofsuchfacilities, | |||
;tructures andequipment. | |||
Initiateand/orreview,approveandcontrollaboratory andfieldinvestigations andfeasibility studies.Prepareandadminister equipment', | |||
laborandservicecontracts. | |||
Arrangeforoutsideengineering, designandconsulting assistance, asrequired. | |||
Performshopandfieldsurveillance onequipment beingmanufactured, fabricated, orinstalled. | |||
ProvidefieldservicestotheCookNuclearPlant,including theassigning ofpersonnel, asarerequired, duringconstruction, normalorforcedoutages,orasrequested. | |||
Assistintheplanningandexecution ofmaintenance workonequipment, facilities, buildings andotherstructures. | |||
Supervise maintenance andrepairsofallmasonryandconcreteworkatCookNuclearPlant,including supplying qualified inspection personnel. | |||
Directtestingofmaterials usedinconcreteandtestingofsoilstobeusedinworkattheCookNuclearPlant.Reviewandrecommend concretemixformulations forallnewconstruction. | |||
1.7-21July,1994 hJ~1 Implement thecorrective actionprogram,withregardtoactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related itemsandservices, thatcontrolsanddocuments items,servicesoractivities whichdonotconformtorequirements. | |||
Assistinthepreparation ofapplications forfederal,stateandlocalpermitsrelativetoinstallations beingmadewhichrequire,suchpermits.Conductperiodicmanagement reviewsoftheactivities ofthedepartment toensurecompliance withtheobjectives ofthegAProgram,andexternaltechnical surveillance, asnecessary, ofconsultants, outsideorganizations andvendorsoverwhichthedepartment iscognizant. | |||
Establish andmaintainafileforgArecords.Develop,reviewandapprovedesignsanddrawingsformechanical, electrical andstructural systems,equipment andfacilities oftheCookNuclearPlant.Performrequiredcalculations andanalyses, including pipestress,pipesupportdesign,cablesizing,conduitandcabletraysupportandstructural steelandconcrete. | |||
Assistfieldpersonnel intheresolution ofproblemsstemmingfromtheinstallation ofdesignchanges,orfromas-foundplantconditions, including assigning personnel totheplant.Formulate, administer, andimplement policiesandpractices relatingtotheengineering, anddesignoftheCookNuclearPlant.Conductfunctions soastobeinconformance withtheoperating licensesoftheCookNuclearPlant.Investigate evaluateandcorrectproblems. | |||
Coordinate specialprojectsandstudies,asrequired. | |||
Coordinate thedevelopment andmaintenance ofthecomputerized gYendorDrawingControl(VDC)programswhichincludecoordinating theprogramswithinterfacing divisions/departments. | |||
Controltheissuanceanddistribution ofdrawingsfortheCookNuclearPlant,including monitoring oftheApertureCardNicrofilm Program.1.7-22July,1994 jp Supervise andcontroltheworkofconsultants, architect/engineers andoutsideengineering anddesignagenciessupplying servicestoAEPSCintheirdiscipline andprocessnotification ofdefectsinaccordance withcompanyrequirements. | |||
Alsoperformdetailedreviewsofengineering anddesignworksubmitted byoutsideagencies. | |||
Reviewandupdateapplicable sectionsofCookNuclearPlantUpdatedFSARasassigned. | |||
Participate, asmembersandasassigned, oncommittees andadhoctaskforcesthatreviewnuclearactivities. | |||
~t~!Coo,.dlnaVe::::,foao'':;:Mucl e~~r7Plant:,aeEivdl'Eius."'as'so@/~m'ed@iith~ths I::.!xoie:;-i.'--::,--,t. | |||
:-::;-:*'::::::: | |||
py:-,-':-, | |||
"!i'::::::::::::: | |||
'ii:::-.::::i::---ii':::::-:: | |||
I'ii,!::"::::::::s,."-i | |||
--:iim'"':-tl"'''lilies'-!I!i: | |||
"'lb'!i@i'!i!i. | |||
"-':"i'l:'-'il:"::,::i: | |||
"'lrii'.iii'~::-;-::iota aProcureiant~gr eceivin~g~,,;q ualdty.',."con trol~grsecei~Fi~Wn'sipect~yn:; | |||
'.i',,ii:;i!!I" iii-,~g--:i::::.,--'-ll",:Cmlii,:: | |||
I!!::Biii::.:-.!id::::::.,: | |||
il-::,,':::;-iY:::::::Iprovb'de':::,",matehTYL'-.":;:;:ser'vdca,',:and~su y'oi.',t~4iri>::a ccor.danceiuthipan~di~iproc'eduupesi,.",belie u'irehd::byi'.;:AEPvpurchafsng ah'd::;;:$ | |||
tai~gPAEPECSi lP!endtthe::::NAG~@hi ch~are'<!admiRn': | |||
stereVganCh!en forcedli>n~~i'a':::.-',:totals:"'e~fiforiti toi'ensurepisifietyjiianrdii!Pl'a Yi-timbrel!i'ah i!I'i~jti:i CookNuclearPlantThe!I'nilf~gna jHichl'gan':;Poueri!siite";:,,:;i$ | |||
ce>.",:p'r'esi',denti'::and plantmanagerreportsfunctionally andadministratively totheAEPSCs'en''oirf vicepresident nuclearg~jn'er'ati'o andisresponsible fortheCookNuclearplantactivities (Figure1.7-5).TheCookNuclearPlantorganization isresponsible forthefollowing: | |||
Ensurethesafetyofallfacilityemployees andthegeneralpublicrelativetogeneralplantsafety,aswellasradiological safety,bymaintaining strictcompliance withplantTechnical Specifications, procedures andinstructions. | |||
Recommend facilityengineering modification andinitiateandapproveplantimprovement requisitions. | |||
1.7-23July,1994 Ensurethatworkpractices inallplantdepartments areconsistent withregulatory standards, safety,approvedprocedures, andplantTechnical Specifications. | |||
Providemembership, asrequired, onthePNSRC.Maintaincloseworkingrelationships withtheNRC,aswellaslocal,state,andfederalgovernment regulatory officials regarding conditions whichcouldaffect,orareaffected, byCookNuclearPlantactivities. | |||
Setupplantloadschedules andarrangeforequipment outages.Developandefficiently implement allsitecentralized trainingactivities. | |||
Administer thecentralized facilitytrainingcomplex,simulator, andprogramsensuringthatprogramdevelopment isconsistent withthesystematic approachtotraining, maintainINPOaccreditations, regulatory andcorporate requirements. | |||
Ensurethathumanresourceactivities includeemployeesupportprograms(i.e.,fitnessforduty)consistent withINPO/NUHARC guidelines, companypolicies, andregulatory requirements andstandards. | |||
Administer theNRCapprovedphysicalSecurityProgramincompliance withregulatory standards, ModifiedAmendedSecurityPlan(MASP),andcompanypolicy.Supervise, plan,anddirecttheactivities relatedtothemaintenance andinstallation ofallCookNuclearPlantequipment, structures, grounds,andyards.Prepareandmaintainrecordsandreportspertinent toequipment maintenance andregulatory agencyrequirements. | |||
Administer contracts andscheduleoutsidecontractors'ork forces.Enforceandcoordinate Cook.NuclearPlantregulations, procedures, | |||
: policies, andobjectives toassuresafety,efficiency, andcontinuity intheoperation oftheCookNuclearPlantwithinthelimitsoftheoperating licenseandtheTechnical Specifications andformulation of'elated policiesandprocedures. | |||
1.7-24July,1994 | |||
Plan,schedule, anddirectactivities relatingtotheoperation oftheCookNuclearPlantandassociated switchyards; cooperateinplanningandscheduling ofworkandprocedures forrefueling andmaintenance oftheCookNuclearPlant;anddirectandcoordinate fuelloadingoperations. | |||
Reviewreportsandrecords,directgeneralinspection of.operating conditions ofplantequipment, andinvestigate anyabnormalconditions, makingrecommendations forrepairs.Establish andadminister equipment clearance procedures consistent withcompany,plant,andradiation protection standards; authorize andarrangeforequipment outagestomeetnormaloremergency conditions. | |||
Providetheshiftoperating crewswithappropriate procedures andinstructions toassisttheminoperating theCookNuclearPlantsafelyandefficiently. | |||
Approveoperatortrainingprogramsadministered bytheCooknuclearplanttrainingdepartment designedtoprovideoperatingpersonnel withtheknowledge andskillrequiredforsafeoperation ofthefacility, andforobtaining andholdingNRCoperatorlicenses. | |||
Coordinate trainingprogramsinplantsafetyandemergency procedures forCookNuclearPlantoperating department personnel toensurethateachshiftgroupwillfunctionproperlyintheeventofinjuryofpersonnel, fire,nuclearincident, orcivildisorder. | |||
Advanceplanningandoverallconductofscheduled andforcedoutages,including thescheduling andcoordination ofallplantactivities associated withrefueling, preventive maintenance, corrective maintenance, equipment | |||
: overhaul, Technical Specification surveillance, anddesignchangeinstallations. | |||
Preparereportsofreportable eventswhicharemandatedbytheNRCandtheTechnical Specifications. | |||
K4Preparestatistical reportsutilizedinNRCAppraisal NeetingsandEnforcement Conference. | |||
Coordinate theeffortsofoutsideagencies, suchasAmericanNuclearInsurers(ANI),INPO,andthird-party inspector programs. | |||
July,1994 | |||
~,P0 Maintainknowledge ofdevelopments andchangesinNRCrequirements, industrystandards andcodes,regulatory compliance activities, andqualitycontroldisciplines andtechniques. | |||
Stopplantoperation intheeventthatconditions arefoundwhichareinviolation oftheTechnical Specifications oradversetoquality.Maintainandrenewaccreditation oftrainingprograms. | |||
gualification ofIMpersonnel performing inspection ofnormaloperating activities toANSIN18.1.$<s;.<P(~ANPerformpeerinspections ofworkcompleted byISNpersonnel byindependent personsqualified toANSIN18.7.ConductoftheInservice Inspection (ISI)Program.9<'-''::Plananddirectengineering andtechnical studies,nuclearfuelmanagement, equipment performance, instrument andcontrolmaintenance, on-sitecomputersystems,ShiftTechnical | |||
: Advisors, andemergency planningfortheCookNuclearPlant.Theseactivitiessupportdailyon-siteoperations inasafe,reliable, andefficientmannerinaccordance withallcorporate | |||
: policies, applicable laws,regulations, | |||
: licenses, andTechnical Specification requirements. | |||
Implement stationperformance testingandmonitorprogramstoensureoptimumplantefficiency. | |||
Directprogramsrelatedtoon-sitefuelmanagement andreactorcorephysicstesting,andensuresatisfactory completion. | |||
Establish testingandpreventive maintenanceprogramsrelatedtostationinstrumentation, electrical systems,andcomputers. | |||
Recommend alternatives toCookNuclearPlantoperation, technical oremergency procedures, anddesignofequipment toimprovesafetyofoperations andoverallplantefficiency. | |||
Implement thecorporate Emergency PlanasitpertainstotheCookNuclearPlantsite.1.7-26July,1994 | |||
Plan, | manageconstruction laborrelations withtheInternational IBui]dingandConstruction TradesUnions.Scope,bid,recommend awardsandadminister construction laborandservicescontracts. | ||
Plan,organizeandcontrolmajorconstruction | |||
: projects, asgenerRT1'0'g. | |||
Maintaincognizance onmatterspertaining totheCookNuclearPlantandcorporate emergency responseorganization. | |||
Preparelaborestimates. | |||
Provideconstructability guidancewhenrequested insupportofengineering anddesignchanges.Participate ontheNuclearSafetyDesignReviewCommittee. | |||
Purchasin andStoresDeartment(notcharted)TheAEPSCexecutive vicepresident i'diiiirij,:sti.at'ior~i:<<.'..andkchj'e'fji4c'count'i;ng rjffjiicer,, | |||
reporting totheAEPchairmanoftheboard~ipr'esbd~ent>> | |||
andchiefexecutive officer,isresponsib'le forthepurchasing andstoresdepartment throughtheAEPSCvicepresident | |||
-purchasing andmaterials management. | |||
Thepurchasing andstoresdepartment isresponsible forthefollowing: | |||
Procurement ofsafety-related itemsfromonlyqualified andapprovedsuppliers. | |||
Providesupervision toCookNuclearPlantpurchasing section.Provideorderingandstockingdescriptions ofsafety-related itemsandincludethesedescriptions. | |||
intheCookNuclearPlantinventory catalog,including necessary communications withsuppliers, cognizant engineers, theCookNuclearPlantstoressupervisor andotherappropriate personnel. | |||
HaintainandcontroltheNaterialS.Equipment databasefileforsafety-related items.1.7-28Duly,1994 Establish computerized inventory statusreports,onlineinventory andpurchaseorderinquirycapabilities andotherprocedures toorder,trackandcontrolmaterials. | |||
Coordinate procurement activities withAEPSCnucleariiipjioi',-0 siersvlcePj. | |||
AEPSCnuclearengineering, CookNuclearPlantsitepurchasing, AEPSCqualityassurance andCookNuclearPlantpersonnel. | |||
Prepareandissuerequestsforquotations, contracts, serviceorders,blanketorders,andpurchaseordersforsafety-related items.Establish asystemtoimplement corrective actionasdescribed intheAEPSCgeneralprocedures fortheCookNuclearPlant.Establish asystemofdocumentkeepingandtransmittal. | |||
Establish asystemofdocumentcontrolforcontrolled procedures, instructions, andpurchasing documents forsafety-related items.Themaintenance andcontrolofselectedprocurement documentstandardphrasesasidentified bythedirector-qualityassurance, ordesignee. | |||
Conducttrainingsessionsinvolving purchasing personnel andothersonanannualbasis,ormorefrequently, asrequired, andascertain thattrainingsessionsincludecompleteresponsibilities associated withthepurchaseofsafety-related itemsandservices. | |||
1.7.21.7.2.1EQUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAHSCOPEPoliciesthatdefineandestablish theCookNuclearPlantgAProgramaresummarized intheindividual sectionsofthisdocument. | |||
Theprogramisimplemented throughprocedures andinstructions responsive toprovisions ofthegAPD,andwillbecarriedoutforthelifeoftheCookNuclearPlant.1.7-29July,1994 | |||
gualityassurance controlsapplytoactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related structures, systemsandcomponents toanextentbasedontheimportance ofthosestructures, systems,components, etc.,(items)tosafety.Suchactivities areperformed undercontrolled conditions, including theuseofappropriate equipment, environmental conditions, assignment ofqualified personnel, andassurance thatallapplicable prerequisites havebeenmet.Safety-related itemsaredefinedasitems:Mhichareassociated withthesafeshutdown(hot)ofthereactor;orisolation ofthereactor;ormaintenance oftheintegrity ofthereactorcoolantsystempressureboundary. | |||
ORWhosefailuremightcauseorincreasetheseverityofadesignbasisaccidentasdescribed intheUpdatedFSAR;orleadtoareleaseofradioactivity inexcessof10CFR100guidelines. | |||
Ingeneral,safety-';,:i71ated!~/tea'si~areTthos'e! | |||
+Icli~at''e,", | |||
ciai'ss'I'f)Fd seismicClassI,orElectrical Class1E;orassociated withtheEngineered SafetyFeaturesActuation System(ESFAS);orassociated withtheReactorProtection System(RPS).)(ot.'e';;:,::.,',":Soiii | |||
(!en!onsf,;aetyrlset8dfitems)~hays)!teen "6-!ill-dJ~k!II:::"..'sl::i!I!i | |||
-dgmei!:-ra~il!!gal: | |||
'."'iso!: | |||
-qe:>>,,""riii.Forexainp.Ie':gpos!:t:; | |||
ac~cdiintÃmo9:. | |||
tern),gisntru'm stoat:on'Panion'ot,,:::::s'at:,e fgjetateiP'.''b,-ut.i: | |||
AspecialgAProgramhasbeenimplemented forFireProtection items(Section1.7.19herein).ThegAProgramalsoincludesprovision forRadwastegAinaccordance withtherequirements of10CFR71,SubpartH.1.7-30July,1994 gAProgramstatus,scope,adequacy, andcompliance with10CFR50,AppendixB,areregularly reviewedbyAEPSCmanagement throughreports,meetings, andreviewofauditresults.Theimplementation ofthegAprogrammaybeaccomplished byAEPSCand/orIndianaMichiganPowerCompanyordelegated inwholeorinparttootherAEPSystemcompanies oroutsideparties.However,AEPSCand/orIndianaMichiganPowerCompanyretainfullresponsibility forallactivities affecting safety-related items.Theperformance ofthedelegated organization isevaluated byauditorsurveillances onafrequency commensurate withtheirscopeandimportance ofassignedwork.1.7.2.2INPLEHENTATION 1.7.2.2.1 Thhifthbel'~II'OldhififthmfAEPSChasstatedinasigned,formal"Statement ofPolicy",thatitisthecorporate policytocomplywiththeprovisions ofapplicable codes,standards andregulations pertaining toqualityassurance fornucleatpowerplantsasrequiredbytheCookNuclearPlantoperating licenses. | |||
Thestatement makesthisgAPDandtheassociated implementing procedures andinstructions mandatory, andrequirescompliance byallresponsible organizations andindividuals. | |||
Thestatement alsoidentifies themanagement positions withinthecompanies vestedwithresponsibility andauthority forimplementing theprogramandassuringitseffectiveness. | |||
1.7.2.2.2 ThegAprogramatAEPSCandtheCookNuclearPlantconsistofcontrolsexercised byorganizations responsible forattaining qualityobjectives, andbyorganizations responsible forassurance functions. | |||
1.7-31July,1994 | |||
)'V TheQAProgrameffectiveness iscontinually assessedthroughmanagement reviewofvariousreports,NSDRCreviewoftheQAauditprogram,andshallalsobeperiodically reviewedbyindependent outsidepartiesasdeemednecessary bymanagement. | |||
TheQAprogramdescribed inthisQAPDisintendedtoapplyforthelifeoftheCookNuclearPlant.TheQAprogramappliestoactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-relatedstructures, components, andrelatedconsumables duringplantoperation, maintenance, testing,andalldesignchanges.Safety-related structures, systemsandcomponents areidentified intheFacilityDataBaseandotherdocuments whicharedeveloped andmaintained forthep'lant.Asdeemednecessary byAEPSCmana'gemei~i, applicable portionsofthegAprogramcontrolswi11beapp'liedtononsafety-reiated activities associated withtheimplementation oftheQAprogramtoensurethatcommitments aremet(e.g.,off-siterecordsstorage,trainingservices, etc.).1.7.2.2.3 ThisQAPD,organized topresenttheQAProgramfortheCookNuclearPlantintheorderofthe18criteriaof10CFR50,AppendixB,statesAEPSCpolicyforeachofthecriteriaanddescribes howthecontrolspertinent toeacharecarriedout.AnychangesmadetothisQAPDthatdonotreducethecommitments previously acceptedbytheNRCmustbesubmitted totheNRCatleastannually. | |||
AnychangesmadetothisQAPDthatdoreducethecommitments previously acceptedbytheNRCmustbesubmitted tothe.NRCandreceiveNRCapprovalpriortoimplementation. | |||
Thesubmittal ofthechangesdescribed aboveshallbemadeinaccordance withtherequirements of10CFR50.54. | |||
'1.7-32July,1994 0 | |||
Theprogramdescribed inthisgAPDwillnotbeintentionally changedinanywaythatwouldpreventitfrommeetingthecriteriaof10CFR50,AppendixBandotherapplicable operating licenserequirements. | |||
1.7.2.2.4 Documents usedforimplementing theprovisions ofthisgAPDincludethefollowing: | |||
PlantManagerInstructions (PNIs)establish thepolicyattheplantforcompliance withspecified | |||
: criteria, andassignresponsibility tothevariousdepartments, asrequired, forimplementation. | |||
PlantManagerProcedures (PNPs),Department HeadProcedures (DHPs),andinsomecasesDepartment HeadInstructions (DHIs),havebeenpreparedtodescribethedetailedactivities requiredtosupportsafeandeffective plantoperation as,perthePNIs.ThePNIsarereviewedbyAEPSCgAforconcurrence thattheywillsatisfactorily implement regulatory requirements andcommitments. | |||
PNIsandPNPs'rereviewedbythePMSRCpriortoapprovalbytheplantmanager.DHPsandDHIsarereviewedwithinthedepartments priortoapprovalbythedepartment headoforigination. | |||
DHPsandDHIsthatmightinvolveanunreviewed safetyquestionasdefinedin10CFR50.59 arereviewedbyPNSRCpriortoapprovalbythedepartment head,oforigination. | |||
Procedures (GPs)areutilizedtodefine!::ggpoliciesandrequirements forqualityassurance, andtoimplement certainQqAprogramrequirements. | |||
AEPSCdivision/department and/orsectionprocedures arealsousedtoimplement gAProgramrequirements. | |||
1.7-33Duly,1994 | |||
Mhencontractors performworkon-siteundertheirownqualityassurance | |||
: | : programs, theprogramsareauditedforcompliance andconsistency withtheapplicable requirements oftheCookNuclearPlant'sgAProgramandthecontract, andareapprovedbyAEPSCgApriortothestartofwork.(>JImplementation ofon-sitecontractor's gAprograms, willbeauditedtoassurethatthecontractor's programsareeffective. | ||
1.7.2.2.5 Provisions ofthegAprogramfortheCookNuclearPlantapplytoactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related items.AppendixAtothisgAPDliststheRegulatory/Safety GuidesandANSIStandards thatidentifyAEPSC'scommitment. | |||
AppendixBdes'cribes necessary exceptions andclarifications totherequirements ofthosedocuments. | |||
Thescopeoftheprogram,andtheextenttowhichitscontrolsareapplied,areestablished asfollows:a)AEPSCusesthecriteriaspecified intheCookNuclearPlantUpdatedFSARforidentifying structures, systemsandcomponents towhichthegAprogramapplies.b)Thisidentification processresultsintheFacilityDataBasefortheCookNuclearPlant.ThisFacilityDataBaseiscontrolled byauthorized personnel. | |||
FacilityDataBaseitemsaredetermined byengineering analysisofthefunction(s) ofplantitemsinrelationtosafeoperation andshutdown. | |||
c)Theextenttowhichcontrolsspecified inthegAprogramareappliedtoFacilityDataBaseitemsisdetermined foreachitemconsidering itsrelativeimportance tosafety.Suchdeterminations arebasedondatainsuchdocuments astheCookNuclearPlantTechnical Specifications andtheUpdatedFSAR.1.7-34July,1994 | |||
1.7.2.2.6 Activities affecting safety-related itemsareaccomplished undercontrolled conditions. | |||
) | Preparationsforsuchactivities includeconsideration ofthefollowing: | ||
a)b)c)d)e)g)h)Assignedpersonnel arequalified. | |||
Workhasbeen,plannedtoapplicable engineering and/orTechnical Specifications. | |||
Specified equipment and/ortoolsareavailable. | |||
Itemsareinanacceptable status.Itemsonwhichworkistobeperformed areinthepropercondition forthetask.Properapprovedinstructions/procedures fortheworkareavailable foruse.Itemsandfacilities thatcouldbedamagedbytheworkhavebeenprotected, asrequired. | |||
Provisions havebeenmadeforspecialcontrols, processes, testsandverification methods'. | |||
1.7.2.2.7 Responsibility andauthority forplanningandimplementing indoctrination andtrainingofAEPSCandCookNuclearPlantstaffpersonnel arespecifically designated, asfollows:a)Thetrainingandindoctrination programprovidesforon-goingtrainingandperiodicfamiliarization withthegAprogramfortheCookNuclearPlant.b)Personnel whoperforminspection andexamination functions arequalified inaccordance withrequirements ofRegulatory Guide1.8,ANSIN18.1,Regulatory Guide).58,ANSIN45.2.6,theASNEBSPVCode,orSNT-TC-IA, asapplicable, andwithexceptions asnotedinAppendixBhereto.1.7-35July,1994 PF c)AEPSCgAauditorsarequalified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.146andANSIN45.2.23. | |||
d)Personnel assigneddutiessuchasspecialcleaningprocesses, welding,etc.,arequalified inaccordance withapplicable codes,standards, regulatory guidesand/orplantprocedures. | |||
e)Thetraining, qualification andcertification programincludes, asapplicable, provisions forretraining, reexamination andrecertification toensurethatproficiency ismaintained. | |||
f)Training, qualification, andcertification recordsincluding documentation ofobjectives, waivers/exceptions, attendees anddatesofattendance, aremaintained atleastaslongasthepersonnel involvedareperforming activities towhichthetraining, qualification andcertification isrelevant. | |||
g)Personnel responsible forperforming activities thataffectsafety-related itemsareinstructed astothepurpose,scopeandimplementation oftheapplicable manuals,instructions andprocedures. | |||
management/supervisory personnel receivefunctional trainingtothelevelnecessary toplan,coordinate andadminister theday-to-day verification activities ofthegAProgramforwhichtheyareresponsible. | |||
TrainingofAEPSCandCookNuclearPlantpersonnel isperformed employing thefollowing techniques, asapplicable: | |||
1)onthejobandformaltrainingadministered bythedepartment orsectiontheindividual worksfor;2)formaltrainingconducted byqualified instructors fromtheCookNuclearPlanttrainingdepartment orotherentities(internal andexternaltotheAEPSystem);and3)formal,INPOaccredited trainingconducted bytheCookNuclearPlanttrainingdepartment. | |||
Recordsoftrainingsessionsforsuchtrainingaremaintained. | |||
Wherepersonnel 1.7-36July,1994 htgI qualifications orcertifications arerequired, thesecertifications areperformed onascheduled basis(consistent withtheappropriate codeorstandard). | |||
CookNuclearPlantemployees receiveintroductory traininginqualityassurance usuallywithinthefirsttwoweeksofemployment. | |||
Inaddition, AEPSCpersonnel receivetrainingpriortobeingallowedunescorted accesstotheplant.Thistrainingincludesmanagement's policyforimplementation ofthegAprogramthroughplantmanageranddepartment headinstructions andprocedures. | |||
Theseinstructions alsoincludeadescription ofthegAprogram,theuseofinstructions andprocedures, personnel requirements forprocedure compliance andthesystemsandcomponents controlled bythegAprogram.1.7.31.7.3.1DESIGNCONTROLSCOPEDesignchangesareaccomplished inaccordance withapproveddesign.Activities todevelopsuchdesignsarecontrolled. | |||
Depending onthetypeofdesignchange,theseactivities includedesignandfieldengineering; theperformance ofphysics,seismic,stress,thermal,hydraulic andradiation evaluations; updateoftheFSAR;reviewofaccidentanalyses; thedevelopment andcontrolofassociated computerprograms; studiesofmaterialcompatibility; accessibility forinservice inspection andmaintenance; determination ofqualitystandards; andrequirement forequipment qualification. | |||
Thecontrolsapplytopreparation andreviewofdesigndocuments, including thecorrecttranslation ofapplicable regulatory requirements anddesignbasesintodesign,procurement andprocedural documents. | |||
1.7-37July,1994 1.7.3.2IHPLENEKfATION 1.7.3.2.1 Designchangesarecontrolled byprocedures andinstructions andarereviewedasrequiredby10CFR50.59 andtheTechnical Specifications. | |||
Safety-related designchangesareaccomplished byoneoftwoseparateprocesses: | |||
MinorModification (MM),orRequestforChange(RFC).Thosethatdonotaltertheintendedfunctionoftheitemandcanbedetermined byjudgement tohaveaminimaloverallimpactontheitembeingmodifiedmaybeimplemented viatheMNprocess.Allothersafety-relateddesignchanges,thatarenotappropriate forMNprocessing, areimplemented viatheRFCprocess.IncaseswheredesignchangescouldbedeemedtobewithinthescopeofRFCsorMNssolelyduetopossibleinsignificant adverseseismiceffects,thechangemaybeimplemented viathePlantModification (PM)process.Inthecasewheresafety-related itemsareinvolvedandthechangeintroduces onlyinsignificant adverseseismiceffects,thechangemaybeimplemented viathePlantModification (PN)process.1.7.3.2.2 Designchangesarereviewedtodetermine theirimpactonnuclearsafetyandtodetermine iftheproposedchangesinvolveanunreviewed safetyquestionasdefinedby10CFR50.59. | |||
Ifadesignchangeweretoinvolveanunreviewed safetyquestion, itwouldnotbeapprovedforimplementation untiltherequiredNRCapprovalwasreceived. | |||
RFCs(exceptthoserequiring emergency processing), | |||
NMsandPNs(havingonlyinsignificant seismiceffectonsafety-related items)arereviewedandapprovedpriortoimplementation, asaminimum,bythecognizant AEPSCsectionandplantmanager.ThePHSRCalsoreviewsthoseRFCs,1.7-38July,1994 NNs,andPNsforwhichsafetyevaluations aredeemednecessary, pursuantto10CFR50.59 andTechnical Specification 6.5.1.6.1.7.3.2.3 ForRFCs,theChangeControlBoardestablished withinAEPSCprovidesanadditional reviewandapprovallevel.TheChangeControlBoardiscomprised ofmembersofthenNci'earengineering, nuclearsupporriset~gsc'es;: | |||
andEAorganizations withinAEPSC,andissupplemented byotherAEPSCorganizations orindividuals, asrequired. | |||
Thecognizant memberoftheChangeControlBoardassignsaleadengineerforeachRFC.Theleadengineerisresponsible forcoordinating theRFCactivities withinAEPSCandmaintaining closeinterface withAEPSCsiteengineering supportprojectengineering. | |||
1.7.3.2.4 ProposedRFCswhichrequireemergency processing areoriginated attheplant,reviewedbythePNSRC,andapprovedbytheplantmanager.CookNuclearPlantmanagement thencontactstheAEPSCnUcVeai,:;:,isuPdforsb s'ei~vicesii'departmehg, andotherAEPSCmanagement, asrequired, describes thechangerequested and,implements thechangeonlyafterreceiving verbalAEPSCmanagement authorization toproceed.Thesereviewsandapprovals aredocumented andbecomeapartoftheRFCPacket.).7.3.2.5 MhenRFCsorHNsinvolvedesigninterfaces betweeninternalorexternaldesignorganizations, oracrosstechnical disciplines, theseinterfaces arecontrolled. | |||
Procedures areusedforthereview,approval, release,distribution andrevisionofdocuments involving designinterfaces toensurethatstructures, systemsandcomponents arecompatible geometrically andfunctionally withprocesses andtheenvironment. | |||
Linesofcommunication areestablished forcontrolling theflowof1.7-39July,1994 | |||
neededdesigninformation acrossdesigninterfaces,including changestotheinformation asworkprogresses. | |||
Decisions andproblemresolutions involving designinterfaces aremadebytheAEPSCorganization havingresponsibility forengineering direction ofthedesigneffort.1.7.3.2.6 Checksareperformed anddocumented toverifythedimensional accuracyandcompleteness ofdesigndrawingsandspecifications. | |||
.1.7.3.2.7 RFCdesigndocumentpackagesareauditedbyAEPSCgAtoassurethatthedocuments havebeenprepared, | |||
: verified, reviewedandapprovedinaccordance withcompanyprocedures. | |||
1.7.3.2.8 Theextentof;andmethodsfor,designverification aredocumented. | |||
Theextentof'esignverification performed isafunctionoftheimportance oftheitemtosafety,designcomplexity, degreeofstandardization, thestate-of-the-art, andsimilarity withpreviously provendesigns.methodsfordesignverification includeevaluation oftheapplicability ofstandardized orpreviously provendesigns,alternate calculations, qualification testinganddesignreviews.Thesemethodsmaybeusedsinglyorincombination, depending ontheneedsforthedesignunderconsideration. | |||
whendesignverification isdonebyevaluating standardized orpreviously provendesigns,theapplicability ofsuchdesignsisconfirmed. | |||
Anydifferences fromtheprovendesignaredocumented andevaluated fortheintended'pplication. | |||
1.7-40July,1994 gualification testingofprototypes, components, orfeaturesisusedwhentheabilityofanitemtoperformanessential safetyfunctioncannototherwise beadequately substantiated. | |||
Thistestingisperformed beforeplantequipment installation, wherepossible, butalwaysbeforerelianceupontheitemtoperformasafety-related function. | |||
gualification testingisperformed underconditions thatsimulatethemostadversedesignconditions, considering allrelevantoperating modes.Testrequirements, procedures andresultsaredocumented. | |||
Resultsareevaluated toassurethattestrequirements havebeensatisfied. | |||
Designchangesshowntobenecessary throughtestingaremade,andanynecessary retesting orotherverification isperformed. | |||
Testconfigurations areclearlydocumented. | |||
pDesignreviewsareperformed bymulti-organizational orinterdisciplinary groups,orbysingleindividuals. | |||
Criteriaareestablished todetermine'when aformalgroupreviewisrequired, andwhenreviewbyanindividual issufficient. | |||
Procedures requirethatminordesignchangesaccomplished bytheMMprocessalsoreceiveformaldesignverification. | |||
Applicable desi9nverification activities shallbecompleted priortodeclaring thedesignchange,orportionthereof,operational. | |||
1.7.3.2.9 Personsrepresenting applicable technical disciplines areassignedtoperformdesignverifications. | |||
Thesepersonsarequalified byappropriate education orexperience, butarenotdirectlyresponsible forthedesign.Thedesigner's immediate supervisor mayperformtheverification, providedthat:1)Thesupervisor istheonlytechnically qualified individual. | |||
2)orThesupervisor hasnotspecified asingulardesignapproach, ruledoutdesignconsiderations, norestablished thedesigninputs.1.7-41July,1994 I | |||
and3)Theneedisdocumented andapprovedbythesupervisor's management. | |||
ClRegularly scheduled gAauditsverifyconformance topreviousitems1through3.Designverification onsafety-related designchangesshallbecompleted priortodeclaring adesignchange,orportionsthereof,operational. | |||
1.7.3.2.10 Implementation ofdesignchangesiscoordinated'n sitebyAEPSCsiteengineering supportprojectengineering. | |||
Haterialtoperformthedesignchangemustmeetthespecifications established fortheoriginalsystem,orasspecified bytheleadengineer. | |||
Forthosedesignchangeswheretestingaftercompletion isrequired, thetestingdocumentation isreviewedbytheorganization performing thetestand,whenspecified, bytheAEPSCleadengineerorothercognizant engineer(s). | |||
Further,completed designchangesareaudited/surveilled byAEPSCgAfollowing installation andtesting.1.7.3.2.11 Changestodesigndocuments, including fieldchanges,arereviewed, approvedandcontrolled inamannercommensurate withthat'used fortheoriginaldesign.Suchchangesareevaluated forimpact.Information onapprovedchangesistransmitted toallaffectedorganizations. | |||
1.7.3.2.12 Erroranddeficienciesin,anddeviationsfrom,approveddesign~documents areidentified anddispositioned inaccordance withestablished designcontroland/orcorrective actionprocedures. | |||
1.7-42July,1994 1.7.3.2.13 Established 1)2)3)4)5)6)7)designcontrolprocedures providefor:controlled submission ofdesignchanges,engineering evaluation, reviewforimpactonnuclearsafety,auditbyAEPSCgA,designmodification, AEPSCmanagerial review,andapprovalandrecordkeepingfortheimplemented designchange.1.7.41.7.4.1PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTCONTROLSCOPEProcurement documents definethecharacteristics ofitem(s)tobeprocured, identifyapplicable regulatory andindustrycodes/standards requirements, andspecifysuppliergAProgramrequirements totheextentnecessary toassureadequatequality.1.7.4.2IMPLEMENTATION 1.7.4.2.1 Procurement controlisestablished byinstructions andprocedures. | |||
Thesedocuments requirethatp~r'oc'ur'ement'ocuments besufficiently detailedtoensurethatpurchased safety-related itemsandservicesare:1)purchased tospecification andcoderequirements equivalent tothoseoftheoriginalequipment orservice(exceptwhentheCodeofFederalRegulations requiresupgrading), | |||
2)properlydocumented toshowcompliance withtheapplicable specifications, codesandstandards, and3)purchased fromvendorsorcontractors whohavebeenevaluated anddeemedqualified, orbythecommercial gradededication process.1.7-43July,1994 Procedures establish thereviewofprocurement documents todetermine that:appropriate technical andqualityrequirements arecorrectly stated,inspectable andcontrollable; thereareadequateacceptance criteria; andprocurement documents havebeenprepared, reviewedandapprovedinaccordance withestablished requirements. | |||
Themanageroftheoriginating group,withsupportofthecognizant AEPSCengineering group,isresponsible forassuringthatapplicable requirements aresetforthinprocurement documents. | |||
TheCookNuclearPlantmayrequestassistance ofAEPSCcognizant engineers inanyprocurement activity. | |||
1.7.4.2.2 TheFacilityDataBase,inconjunction withothersources,isusedforequipment safetyclassification andprocurement grade.AEPSCspecifications areusedtodetermine requirements, codesorstandards thatitemsmustfulf'ill, anddefinethedocumentation thatmustaccompany theitemtotheplant.Procurement documents forsafety-related itemsandservicesarereviewedtoensurethat:correctclassification ismade;therequirements areproperlystated;andthatmeasureshavebeen,orwillbe,implemented toassuretherequirements aremetandadequately providedfor..pr~ocenpri en~dts~aomcnentfsor newsafety-related itemsareinitiated bythecognizant engineering groupwhichestablishes initialrequirements. | |||
Replacement/spares arepurchased torequirements equivalent totheoriginalunlessupgrading isrequiredby'federal~j'egulations, ordeemednecessary bythecognizant engineering group.1.7-44July,1994 1.7.4.2.3 Thecontentsofprocurement documents vary,according totheitem(s)beingpurchased anditsfunction(s) intheCookNuclearPlant.Provisions ofthisgAPDareconsidered forapplication toservicecontractors, also.Asapplicable, procurement documents include:a)Scopeofworktobeperformed. | |||
b)Technical requirements, withapplicable | |||
: drawings, specifications, c)d)e)g)h)codesandstandards identified bytitle,documentnumber,revisionanddate,withanyrequiredprocedures, suchasspecialprocessinstructions identified insuchawayastoindicatesourceandneed.Imposition ofguides/standards onAEPSC/IRK suppliers andsubtiersuppliers willbeonacase-by-case basisdepending upontheitemorservicetobesuppliedanduponthedegreethatAEPSC/IQl reliesonsuppliers toinvokeguides/standards. | |||
AEPSC/I&K recognizes thatcertainsuppliers haveacceptable 1OCFR50,AppendixBgAprograms, even%~h~o'Ug,thesuppliers arenotcommitted toRegulatory Guidesorindustrystandards (e.g.ANSIN45.2.6.). | |||
Inthosecases,inwhichsuppliers arenotcommitted tothesameguides/standards asAEPSC/I&K, AEPSC/IMwillassurethat(1)thesupplier's gAprogramprovidesadequategAcontrols, regardless ofthelackofspecificcommitment, or(2)controlswillbeinvokeddirectlybyAEPSC/IRK toassureadequatequalityofitems/services receivedbysuppliers. | |||
Regulatory, administrative andreporting requirements. | |||
gualityrequirements appropriate tothecomplexity andscopeofthework,including necessary testsand/orinspections. | |||
Arequirement foradocumented gAProgram,subjecttogAreviewandwrittenconcurrence priortothestartofwork.Arequirement forthesuppliertoinvokeapplicable qualityrequirements onsubtiersuppliers. | |||
Provisions foraccesstosupplier, andsubtiersuppliers', | |||
facilities andrecordsforinspections, surveillances andaudits.Identification ofdocumentation tobeprovidedbythesupplier, thescheduleofsubmittals anddocuments requiring AEPSCapproval. | |||
1.7-45July,1994 1.7.4.2.4 TheAEPSCgA8ejij;imeg performsauditsofprocurement documents toassurethatgAprogramrequirements havebeenmet.Theseauditsareconducted inaccordance withAEPSCiiAdoper'tment procedures. | |||
1.7.4.2.5 Changestoprocurement documents arecontrolled inamannercommensurate withthatusedfortheoriginaldocuments. | |||
1.7.5INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, ANDDRAMINGS1.7.5.1SCOPEActivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related structures, systemsandcomponents areaccomplished usinginstructions, procedures anddrawingsappropriate tothecircumstances, including acceptance criteriafordetermining ifanactivityhasbeensatisfactorily completed. | |||
1.7.5.21.7.5.2.1 INPLEHENTATION Instructions andprocedures incorporate: | |||
1)adescription oftheactivitytobeaccomplished, and2)appropriate quantitative (suchastolerances andoperating limits)andqualitative (suchasworkmanship andstandards) acceptance criteriasufficient todetermine thattheactivityhasbeensatisfactorily accomplished. | |||
Holdpointsforinspection areestablished whenrequired. | |||
Instructions andprocedures pertaining tothespecification of,and/orimplementation of',thegAProgramreceivemultiplereviewsfortechnical adequacyandinclusion ofappropriate qualityrequirements. | |||
Toptierinstructions andprocedures arereviewedand/orapprovedbyAEPSCgA.1.7-46July,1994 | |||
1.7.2.2. | Lowertierdocuments arereviewedandapproved, asaminimum,bymanagement/supervisory personnel trainedtothelevelnecessary toplan,coordinate andadminister thoseday-to-day verification activities ofthegAProgramforwhichtheyareresponsible. | ||
Specialprocedures maybeissuedforactivities whichhaveshort-term applicability. | |||
1.7.5.2.2 QEPN9activities Qareoutlinedbyprocedures whichprovidethecontrolsfortheimplementation oftheseactivities. | |||
AGPNOhas%~hejfoi)iowg'ng categories ofGAprogramimplementation procedures: | |||
I)GeneralprOCedureS (GpS)%'ipse'nYct'N | |||
'ana'e,r.;.Sgn'etiiieg | |||
)cole(pI~Span'd whichareapplicable toparr+i,:i~ir allAGPNOdivisions anddepartments involvedwithCookNuclearPlant.2)Organization procedures whichapplytothespecificdivision, department orsectioninvolved. | |||
1.7.5.2.3 ITEMS,-';': | |||
price'dur9s""'cintrof<ljiiijj;:AEPNO,"..".".actitviti'ii>,ar.;,e classifiedintothefollowing series:,1000Personnel Selection, PNSRCProcedures 2000Administration | |||
-DocumentControl,Security, | |||
: Training, Records,Emergency Plan,FireProtection, Clearance Permits,ChemicalControl,InternalCleanliness, SpillResponse, Standingorders,Corrective Naintenance. | |||
3000Procurement, Receiving, ShippingandStorage4000Operations, FuelHandling, Surveillance Testing,TestControls1.7-47July,1994 v' | |||
5000Haintenance, Repair,Hodification, SpecialProcesses, EgandISIControlofContractors 6000Technical | |||
-Chemistry/Radiological | |||
: Controls, Radiation Protection, Performance/Engineering Testing,andInstrument andControlNaintenance andCalibration, Neasuring andTestEquipment 7000gualityAssurance, gualityControlProgramandCondition/Problem Reporting Instructions andprocedures identifytheregulatory requirements andcommitments whichpertaintothesubjectthatitwillcontrolandestablish responsibilities forimplementation. | |||
Instructions andprocedures mayeitherprovidetheguidancenecessary forthedevelopment ofsupplemental instructions and/orprocedures toimplement theirrequirements, orprovidecomprehensive guidancebasedonthesubjectmatter.1.7.5.2.4 CookNuclearPlantdrawingsareproduced, controlled anddistributed underthecontrolofAEPSCandtheCookNuclearPlant.AEPSCdesigndrawingsareproducedby,orunderthecontrolof,theAEPSCnuclearengineering department underasetofprocedures whichdirecttheirdevelopment andreview.Theseprocedures specifyrequirements forinclusion ofquantitative andqualitative acceptance criteria. | |||
Specificadrawingsarereviewedandapprovedbythecognizant engineering organization. | |||
'AEPSChasstationed anon-sitedesignstafftoprovidefortherevisionofcertaintypesofdesigndrawingstoreflectas-builtconditions. | |||
1.7.5.2.5 ComplexAEPNGE'p'r'o'cii gers'%Ibad;:;::ice'i@ | |||
'p,,:ectd'i i,~:c.toCookNuclearplantsinaiaredesignated as"InHand"procedures. | |||
Examplesof"InHand"procedures arethosedeveloped forextensive orcomplexjobswhere1.7-48July,1994 | |||
relianceonmemorycannotbetrusted.Further,thoseprocedures whichdescribeasequencewhichcannotbealtered,orrequirethedocumentation ofdataduringthecourseoftheprocedure, areconsidered. | |||
"InHand"procedures aredesignated assuchbydoubleasterisks | |||
(**)whichprecedetheprocedure numberonthecoversheet,allpagesandattachments ofaprocedure andthecorresponding index.1.7.61.7.6.1DOCUNENTCONTROLSCOPEDocuments controlling activities withinthescopedefinedin1.7.2hereinareissuedandchangedaccording toestablished procedures. | |||
Documents suchasinstructions, procedures anddrawings, including changesthereto,arereviewedforadequacy, approvedforreleasebyauthorized personnel, andaredistributed andusedatthelocationwhereaprescribed activityisperformed. | |||
Changestocontrolled documents arereviewedandapprovedbythesameorganizations thatperformed theoriginalreviewandapproval, orbyotherqualified, responsible organizations specifically designated inaccordance withtheprocedures governing thesedocuments. | |||
Obsoleteorsuperseded documents arecontrolled topreventinadvertent use.1.7.6.21.7.6.2.1 INPLEHENTATION Controlsareestablished forapproval, issueandchangeofdocuments inthefollowing categories: | |||
a)Designdocuments (e.g.,calculations, specifications, analyses) b)Drawingsandrelateddocuments c)Procurement documents d)Instructions andprocedures e)UpdatedFinalSafetyAna'lysis Report(UFSAR)f)PlantTechnical Specifications g)Safeguards documents 1.7-49July,1994 Thereview,approval, issuanceandchangeofdocuments arecontrolled by:a)Establishment ofcriteriatoensurethatadequatetechnical andqualityrequirements areincorporated. | |||
b)Identification oftheorganization responsible forreview,approval, issueandmaintenance. | |||
c)Reviewofchangestodocuments bytheorganization thatperformed theinitialreviewandapproval, orbytheorganization designated inaccordance withtheprocedure egoverning thereviewandapprovalofspecifictypesofdocuments. | |||
1.7.6.2.3 Documents areissuedandcontrolled sothat:a)Thedocuments areavailable priortocommencing work.b)Obsoletedocuments arereplacedbycurrentdocuments inatimelymanner.1.7.6.2.4 Rasterlists,orequivalent | |||
: controls, areusedtoidentifythecurrentrevisionofinstructions, procedures, specifications anddrawings. | |||
Thesecontroldocuments areupdatedanddistributed todesignated personnel whoareresponsible formaintaining currentcopiesoftheapplicable documents. | |||
Thedistribution ofcontrolled documents isperformed underprocedures requiring receiptacknowledgement andinaccordance withestablished distribution lists.1.7-50July,1994 1.7.6.2.5 Intheeventadrawingisdeveloped on-sitetoreflectanas-builtconfiguration,'he marked-up drawingismaintained intheRasterPlantFileandallholdersofthedrawingareissuedappropriate notification toinformthemtherevisiontheyholdisnotcurrent,cannotbeusedand,if'equired, reference mustbemadetotheWasterPlantFiledrawing.1.7.6.2.6 Documents preparedforuseintrainingareappropriately markedtoindicatethattheycannotbeusedtooperateormaintainthefacHityortoconductactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related items.AttheCookNuclearPlant,unlessadocumentisidentified as'controlled'r | |||
'workingcopy'nly, itisautomatically assumedthatthedocumentisforinformation useonly.1.7.71.7.7.1CONTROLOFPURCHASED ITENANDSERVICESSCOPEActivities thatimplement approvedprocurement requestsforitemsandservicesarecontrolled toassureconformance withprocurement documentrequirements. | |||
Controlsincludeasystemofsupplierevaluation andselection audits,acceptance ofitemsanddocumentation upondelivery, | |||
~andperiodicassessment ofsupplierperformance. | |||
Objective evidenceofqualitythatdemonstrates conformance withspecified procurement documentrequirements isavailable totheCookNuclearPlantsitepriortouseofequipment, | |||
: material, orservices. | |||
1.7.7.21.7.7.2.1 IHPLENENTATION AEPSCqualifies suppliers (including distributors totheextenttheyperformqualityrelatedactivities) byperformingadocumented 1.7-51July,1994 evaluation oftheircapability toprovideitemsorservicesspecified byprocurement documents. | |||
Itemsandservicesdesignated assafety-related arepurchased fromsuppliers whosegAprogramshavebeenacceptedinaccordance withAEPSCrequirements, orfromcommercial gradesuppliers throughtheAEPSCdedication program.Suppliers ofotheritems/services aresubjecttoevaluation andapproval-basedonacceptance criteriaapplicable tothoseitems/services. | |||
gualification ofsuchsuppliers isdetermined bytheAEPSCgA8epietme04. | |||
Inthedischarge ofthisresponsibility, theAEPSCgAdeji$tgen$mayuseinformation generated byotherutilities. | |||
Thesuppliermustbeapprovedbeforeprocurement canbecompleted. | |||
AEPSCisamemberoftheNuclearProcurement IssuesCommittee (NUPIC),participates injointsupplieraudits,andsharesauditinformation consistent withNUPICrequirements. | |||
Thesuppliermustbeacceptable, oracceptable subjecttofollow-up, beforeaprocurement canbeapprovedandprocessed. | |||
Additional auditswillbeconducted, asnecessary, tomeetrequirements. | |||
Acceptance isnotcompleteuntilithasbeendetermined thatthesuppliers'A programcanmeettherequirements fortheitem(s)/service(s) offered.1.7.7.2.2 Foritemsthatarenotuniquetoanuclearpowerplant("Commercial 4"!hmi~i!i%"':-:.'.':e!!: | |||
q!ttb"e!'"t'4!!iv,imposedinapractical manneratthetimeofprocurement, programsfordedication tosafety-related standards areestablished bj;'/he,':,.:."ASPIC c'ocgnd;:za'nt'::::::.::en'gi'n'ee'ri:, | |||
andaccomp1ished priortotheitembeingacceptedforsafety-re1ated use.1.7.7.2.3 In-process auditsofsuppliers activities duringfabrication, inspection, testingandshipmentofitemsareperformed whendeemednecessary, depending uponsupplierqualification status,complexity of1.7-52July,1994 theitem(s)beingfurnished, theitems'mportance tosafety,and/orprevioussupplierhistory.Theseauditsareperformed byAEPSCgA.Thecognizant engineerand/orresponsible CookNuclearPlantpersonnel mayalsoparticipate, ifdeemednecessary. | |||
1.7.7.2.4 Spareandreplacement partsareprocuredinsuchamannerthattheirperformance andqualityareatleastequivalent tothoseof'hepartsthatwillbereplaced. | |||
a)Specifications andcodesreferenced inprocurement documents forspareorreplacement itemsareatleastequivalent tothosefortheoriginalitemsortoproperlyreviewedandapprovedrevisions. | |||
b)Partsintendedassparesorreplacement for"off-the-shelf" items,orotheritemsforwhichqualityrequirements werenotoriginally specified, areevaluated forperformance atleastequivalent totheoriginal. | |||
c)Mherequalityrequirements fortheoriginalitemscannotbedetermined, requirements andcontrolsareestablished byengineering evaluation performed byqualified individuals. | |||
Theevaluation assuresthereisnoadverseeffectoninterfaces, safety,interchangeability, fit,form,function, orcompliance withapplicable regulatory orcoderequirements. | |||
Evaluation resultsaredocumented. | |||
d)Anyadditional ormodifieddesigncriteria, imposedafterpreviousprocurement oftheitem(s),areidentified andincorporated. | |||
1.7.7.2.5 Instructions andprocedures addresstherequirements*for supplierselection andcontrol,aswellasprocurement documentcontrol.The1.7-53July,1994 | |||
programforreceiptinspection ofsafety-related itemsaddresses inspection ofincomingitems,including areviewofthedocumentation requiredundertheprocurement. | |||
Receiptinspection personnel arequalified andcertified inaccordance withtherequirements ofANSIN45.2.6.Provisions forreceiptinspection applyregardless ofwheretheprocurement originates. | |||
Additional inspections mayapplyifrequiredbytheprocurement document. | |||
Items,whichhavespecialprocurement requirements (suchasnuclearfuelandnuclearfuelcomponents), | |||
mayinvolvedetailedsourceevaluations ordithJ'g~iT!!',':":ll! | |||
!ii!!iVP!hiPtPP1treceiptinspection. | |||
Personnel performing theseevaluations andauditswillbequalified inaccordance withANSIN18.1and/orANSIN45.2.23. | |||
Receiptinspections atthesitewillbeperformed bypersonnel certified toANSIN45.2.6.Inaddition, reviewsofspecialprocurement documents orshippingmanifests willbeperformed bypersonnel trainedintheprocurement andqualified inaccordance withANSIN18.1.Whereitemsand/orservicesaresafety-related andprocurement isaccomplished withoutassistance ofAEPSC,supplierselection islimitedtothosecompanies identified asbeingqualified. | |||
1.7.7.2.6 Itemsreceivedatthesitearetaggedwitha"HOLD"tagand/orplacedinadesignated area(e.g.newnuclearfuel)untilreceiptinspected. | |||
Duringreceiptinspection, designated materialcharacteristics andattributes arechecked,anddocumentation ischeckedagainsttheprocurement documents. | |||
Whenthereceiptinspection ofitemsissupplemented bysourceevaluations orauditsatthevendorpriortoshipment, appropriate visualand/ormechanical inspections willbecompleted toensurethatshippingdamagehasnotoccurred. | |||
Iffoundacceptable, the"HOLD"tagisremovedandreplacedwithan"ACCEPTED" tagand/ortheitemisplacedinadesignated area.1.7-54July,1994 | |||
Itemtraceability toprocurement documents andtoenduseismaintained throughrecording ofidentification numbersor,"HOLD"'and "ACCEPTED" tagnumbersonapplicable documents. | |||
Nonconforming items,ormissingorquestionable documentation resultsinitemsbeingplacedon"HOLD"andmaintained inadesignated, controlled area.Ifthenonconformance cannotbecleared,theitemiseitherscrapped, returnedtomanufacturer, ordispositioned throughengineering analysis. | |||
1.7.7.2.7 Contractors providing services(on-site) forsafety-related components arerequiredtohaveeitheraformalqualityassurance programandprocedures, ortheymustabidebytheCookNuclearPlantgAProgramandprocedures. | |||
PriortotheirworkingattheCookNuclearPlant,contractors workingundertheirownqualityassurance programsmustbeauditedandapprovedbyAEPSCgA.Contractor procedures mustbereviewedandapprovedbytheoriginating/sponsoring department head.Further,periodicauditsofsitecontractor activities areconducted underthedirection oftheAEPSCqualityassurance superintendent. | |||
1.7.7.2.8 Totheextentprescribedinspecificprocurementdocuments, suppliersfurnishqualityrecords;documentary evidencethatmaterialandequipment eitherconformstorequirements oridentifies anyrequirements thathavenotbeenmet;anddescriptions ofthosenonconformances fromtheprocurement requirements, whichhavebeendispositioned "use-as-is" or"repair." | |||
ThisevidenceisretainedatthePlant,orattheServiceCorporation. | |||
Totheextentprescribed inspecificprocurement agreements, suppliers arerequiredtomaintainadditional (backup)documents intheirrecordsystem.l.7-55July,1994 Insomecases,suchaswithNSSS,suppliers aredesignated primaryrecordretention responsibility. | |||
1.7.7.2.9 Thecapability ofsuppliers tofurnishvaliddocumentation isevaluated duringprocurement documentreviews,annualsupplierevaluations, andduringaudits.1.7.8IDENTIFICATION ANDCON'iROLOFITEMS1.7.8.1SCOPEItemsareidentified andcontrolled topreventtheirinadvertent use.Identification ofitemsismaintained eitherontheitems,theirstorageareasorcontainers, oronrecordstraceable totheitems.1.7.8.21.7.8.2.1 IHPLEHENTATION Controlsareestablished thatprovidefortheidentification andcontrolofitems(including partially fabricated assemblies). | |||
1.7.8.2.2 Itemsareidentified byphysically markingtheitemoritscontainer, andbymaintaining recordstraceable totheitem.Themethodofidentification issuchthatthequalityoftheitemisnotdegraded. | |||
1.7.8.2.3 Itemsaretraceable toapplicable | |||
: drawings, specifications, orotherpertinent documents toensurethatonlycorrectandacceptable itemsareused.Yerification oftraceability isperformed anddocumented priortoreleaseforfabrication, | |||
: assembly, orinstallation. | |||
1.7-56Duly,1994 1.7.8.2.4 Requirements fortheidentification byuseofheatnumber,partnumber,serialnumber,etc.,areincludedinAEPSCSpecifications | |||
{DCCs)and/ortheprocurement document. | |||
1.7.8.2.5 Separatestorageisprovidedforincorrect ordefective itemsthatareonholdandmaterialwhichhasbeenacceptedforuse.Allsafety-relateditemsareappropriately taggedoridentified | |||
{stamping, etc.)toprovideeasyidentification astotheitems'sage status.Recordsaremaintained fortheissueofitemstoprovidetraceability fromstoragetoenduseintheCookNuclearPlant.1.7.8.2.6 Whenmaterials aresubdivided, appropriate identification numbersaretransferred toeachsectionofthematerial, ortraceability ismaintained throughdocumentation. | |||
1.7.91.7.9.1CONTROLOFSPECIALPROCESSES SCOPESpecialprocesses arecontrolled andaccomplished byqualified personnel usingapprovedprocedures andequipment inaccordance withapplicable codes,standards, specifications, criteriaandotherspecialrequirements. | |||
1.7.9.21.7.9.2.1 IRPLBlENTATION Processes subjecttospecialprocesscontrolsarethoseforwhichfullverification orcharacterization bydirectinspection isimpossible orimpractical. | |||
Suchprocesses includewelding,heattreating, chemical1.7-57July,1994 | |||
: cleaning, appl.ication ofprotective | |||
: coatings, concreteplacement andNDE.1.7.9.2.2 Specialprocessrequirements forchemicalcleaning, application ofprotective coatingsandconcreteplacement aresetforthinAEPSCSpecifications (DCCs)and/ordirectives preparedbytheresponsible AEPSCcognizant engineer. | |||
Thesedocuments arereviewedandapprovedbyotherpersonnel withthenecessary technical'ompetence. | |||
+?i:Specialprocessrequirements forwelding,heattreatingandNDEaresetforthinAEPSCSpecifications, theAEPWeldingandNDEmanualsandplantprocedures. | |||
Thesespecifications andmanualsarepreparedby,orarereviewedandapprovedby,theAEPSCcognizant engineer-weldingandNDEadministrator. | |||
Specialprocessprocedures, withtheexception ofweldingandheattreating, arepreparedbyCookNuc1'earPlantpersonnel withtechnical knowledge inthediscipline involved. | |||
Theseprocedures, whicharealsoreviewedbyotherpersonnel withthenecessary technical competence, arequalified bytesting.Weldingisperformed inaccordance withprocedures contained intheAEPMeIdingNanual,orbyapprovedcontractor's procedures. | |||
Theseprocedures arequalified inaccordance withapplicable codes,andProcedure gualification Recordsareprepared. | |||
Meld-p'r,'oce icespec3'flcatTons arereviewedandapprovedbytheAEPSCcognizant engineer-welding.Weldp'roce'duroc qualification documentation isretainedintheAEPMeldingmanual,ortheapprovedcontractor's manual.Contractor weldingprocedures arequalified bythecontractor. | |||
Theseprocedures andthequalification documentation arereviewedandapprovedbytheAEPSCcognizant engineer-.welding.Thisdocumentation isIretainedbythecontractor. | |||
1.7-58July,1994 1.7.9.2e3 NDEpersonnel arequalified andcertified byaCookNuclearPlantNDELevelIIIwhohasbeenqualified andcertified bythedesignated AEPSCNDEadministrator. | |||
Certification isbyexamination. | |||
Personnel qualification iskeptcurrentbyre-examination attimeintervals specified inqualification/certification procedures whichareinaccordance withtheASIDECode.CookNuclearPlantweldersarequalified bythemaintenance department usingAEPSCapprovedprocedures. | |||
Supervision ofCookNuclearPlantwelderqualifications isperformed bythemaintenance department. | |||
Examination ofspecimens isperformed underthesupervision ofthejfteqalgity.:assurarice'an Pcnntrol'QepartmiiriE inaccordance withtheAEPMeldingManualcoveringwelderqualification. | |||
CookNuclearPlantwelderqualification recordsaremaintained foreachwelderbythemaintenance department. | |||
Contractor andcraftweldersarequalified bythecontractor usingprocedures approvedbytheAEPSCcognizant engineer-Meldinginaccordance withAEPSCprocedures. | |||
Contractor andcraftwelderqualification recordsaremaintained bythecontractor. | |||
1.7.9.2.4 l}c/NDEtechnicians assignedtothesa't~eiqdai'ity~assuran'ce,:and~i,.oiitr'ol! | |||
depirtment performnondestructive testingforworkperformed byCookNuclearPlantandcontractor personnel. | |||
Theseindividuals arequalified toeitherSNT-TC-1A, orANSIN45.2.6,andrecordsofthequalifications/certifications aremaintained atCookNuclearPlant.1.7.9.2.5 Forspecialprocesses thatrequirequalified equipment, suchequipment isqualified inaccordance withapplicable codes,standards andspecifications. | |||
1.7-59July,1994 1.7.9.2.6 | |||
~~~Specialprocessqualifications arereviewedduringregularly scheduled gAaudits.gualification recordsaremaintained inaccordance with1.7.17herein.1.7.9.2.7 Thedocumentation resulting fromweldingandnondestructive testingisreviewedbyappropriate personnel. | |||
1.7.10INSPECTION 1.7.10.1SCOPEActivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related structures, systemsandcomponents areinspected toverifytheirconformance withrequirements. | |||
Theseinspections areperformed bypersonnel otherthanthosewhoperformtheactivity. | |||
Inspections areperformed byqualified personnel utilizing writtenprocedures whichestablish prerequisites andprovidedocumentation forevaluating testandinspection results.Directinspection, processmonitoring, orboth,areusedasnecessary. | |||
Mhenapplicable, holdpointsareusedtoensurethatinspections areaccomplished atthecorrectpointsinthesequenceofactivities. | |||
1.7.10.2IHPLEHENTATION 1.7.10.2.1 Inspections areappliedtoappropriate activities toassureconformance tospecified requirements. | |||
Holdpointsareprovidedinthesequenceofprocedures toallowfortheinspection, witnessing, examination, measurement, orreviewnecessary toassurethatthecritical, orirreversible, elementsofanactivityarebeingperformed asrequired. | |||
Notethatholdpointsmaynotapplytoallprocedures buteachmustbereviewedforthisattribute. | |||
1.7-60Duly,1994 | |||
Holdpointsspecifyexactlywhatistobedone(e.g.,typeofinspection orexamination, etc.),acceptance | |||
: criteria, orreference toanotherprocedure, etc.,forthesatisfactory completion oftheholdpoint.Mhenincludedinthesequenceofaprocedure, theactivities requiredbyholdpointsarecompleted priortocontinuing workbeyondthatpoint.Processmonitoring isusedinwhole,orinpart,wheredirectinspection aloneisimpractical orinadequate. | |||
1.7.10.2.2 | |||
: Training, qualification andcertification programsforpersonnel whoperforminspections areestablished, implemented anddocumented inaccordance with1.7.2hereinandasdescribed inAppendixBhereto,item9b,withexceptions asnotedtherein.1.7.10.2.3 Inspection requirements arespecified inprocedures, instructions, drawingsorchecklists asapplicable. | |||
Theyprovideforthefollowing, asappropriate: | |||
a)Identification ofapplicable revisions ofrequiredinstructions, drawingsandspecifications. | |||
b)Identification ofcharacteristics andactivities tobeinspected. | |||
c)Inspection methods.d)Specification ofmeasuring andtestequipment havingthenecessary accuracy. | |||
e)Identification ofpersonnel responsible forperforming theinspection. | |||
f)Acceptance andrejection criteria. | |||
Duly,1994 g)Recording oftheinspection resultsandtheidentification oftheinspector. | |||
1.7.10.2.4 Inspections areconducted usingthefollowing programs: | |||
a~PeerInsectionProram.ThePeerInspection ProgramisbasedonthepremisethatIMpersonnel arequalified toANSIN18.1(1971),Selection andTraininofNuclearPowerPlantPersonnel, andareperiodically trainedintheirskillareausingINPOaccreditedtraining. | |||
Asaresultoftheirexperience, qualifications, andtraining, IKNpersonnel mayperforminspections ofworkfunctions associated withnormaloperation ofthePlant,routinemaintenance, andcertainroutinetechnical activities whichareroutinely performed byILKpersonnel (peers)oi;:::contract: | |||
pere'onh'esf::. | |||
Peerinspection personnel areindependent inthatheydonotperformordirectlysupervise theworkbeinginspected, buttheymaybefromthesameworkgroup.83,e~stjuTia't~y::.as srunac,':eadsncon~traol personnel, qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.58andANSIN45.2.6,willensure(viasurveillance) thatpeerinspections arebeingcorrectly implemented andmakeperiodicreportstomanagement. | |||
b.ANSIN45.2.6InsectionProram.majormodification andnon-routine;maintenance workonsafety-related equipment isinspected perANSIN45.2.6,ualifications ofInsectionExamination andTestinPersonnel forNuclearPowerPlants,whetheritisperformed byI&Korcontractor personnel. | |||
Allmajii.;.-'.:.:;ioiB~f'i.'cia'i:.oo ancdj~n'on'rOutinb safety-related workperformed bycontractpersonnel isinspected perANSIN45.2.5.Inspections oftheseworkactivities areperformed byinspectors qualified andcertified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.58and'ANSIN45.2.6.Contractors performing workonsafety-related equipment are1.7-62July,1994 | |||
~' | ~' | ||
requiredtocomplywiththeapplicable requirements ofRegulatory Guide1.33andANSIN45.2.1.7.10.2.5 Inspections associated withthepackaging andshipmentofradioactive wasteandmaterials areconducted usingthefollowing program:a)NRCLicensedPackains-Inspections ofNRClicensedradioactive materialpackagings shallbeperformed byindividuals independent fromtheworkbeingperformed. | |||
Theindependent inspectors shallbeIndianaMichiganPowerpersonnel, qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1,'asaminimum.Additionally, theinspector shallbefamiliarwiththeactivities beingperformed. | |||
b)Non-NRCLicensedPackainsandContainers | |||
-Inspections ofnon-NRClicensedradioactive materialpackagings andcontainers (shipping and/orburial)shallbeperformed byIndianaMichiganPowerpersonnel, qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide2<'8andANSIN18.1,asaminimum.c)TransortationVehicles-Inspection oftransportation vehiclesbeingshippedas"exclusive use",shallbeperformed byIndianaMichiganPowerpersonnel, qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1,asaminimum.d)OtherinsectionsandVerification | |||
-Inspections andverifications of'theractivities associated withthepackaging andshipmentofradioactive materials andwasteshallbeperformed byIndiana~MichiganPowerpersonnel, qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1,asaminimum.1.7-63July,1994 1.7.10.2.6 | |||
~~~~Inspections areperformed, documented, andtheresultsevaluated bydesignated personnel inordertoensurethattheresultssubstantiate theacceptability oftheitemorwork.Evaluation andreviewresultsaredocumented. | |||
1.7.11TESTCONTROL1.7.11.1SCOPETestingisperformed inaccordance withestablished programstodemonstrate thatstructures, systemsandcomponents willperformsatisfactorily inservice.Thetestingisperformed byqualified personnel inaccordance withwrittenprocedures thatincorporate specified requirements andacceptance criteria. | |||
Typesoftestsare:Scheduled Surveillance, preventive maintenance, post-design, qualification. | |||
Unscheduled Pre-tiiagiitenan'c~e andpost-maintenance. | |||
Testparameters (including anyprerequisites), | |||
instrumentation requirements, andenvironmental conditions arespecified intestprocedures. | |||
Testresultsaredocumented andevaluated. | |||
1.7-64July,1994 II 1.7.11.2INPLENENTATIOH 1.7.11.2.1 | |||
~~~~Testsareperformed inaccordance withprograms, procedures andcriteriathatdesignate whentestsarerequiredandhowtheyaretobeperformed. | |||
Suchtestingincludesthefollowing: | |||
a)gualification tests,asapplicable, toverifydesignadequacy. | |||
b)Acceptance testsofequipment andcomponents toassuretheiroperation priortodeliveryorinstallation. | |||
c)Post-design teststoassureproperandsafeoperation ofsystemsandequipment priortounrestricted operation. | |||
d)Surveillance teststoassurecontinuing properandsafeoperation ofsystemsandequipment. | |||
ThePMIonsurveillance testingcontrolstheperiodictestingofequipment andsystemstofulfillthesurveillance requirements established bytheTechnical Specifications. | |||
Controlshavebeenestablished toidentifyuncompleted surveillance testingtoassureitisrescheduled forcompletion tomeetTechnical Specification frequency requirements. | |||
Datatakenduringsurveillance testingisreviewedbyappropriate management personnel toassurethatacceptance criteriaisfulfilled, orcorrective actionistakentocorrectdeficiencies. | |||
e)Haintenance testsafterpreventive orcorrective maintenance. | |||
1.7.11.2.2 Testprocedures, asrequired, providemandatory holdpointsforwitnessorreview.1.7-65July,1994" 1.7.11.2.3 Testingisaccomplished afterinstallation, maintenance, orrepair,bysurveillance testprocedures, orperformance tests,whichmustbesatisfactorily completed priortodetermining theequipment isinanoperablestatus.Alldataresulting fromthesetestsisretainedattheCookNuclearPlantafterreviewbyappropriate management personnel. | |||
1.7.12CONTROLOFHEASURING ANDTESTEgUIPHENT 1.7.12.1SCOPENeasuring andtestingequipment usedinactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related structures, systemsandcomponents areproperlyidentified, controlled, calibrated andadjustedatspecified intervals tomaintainaccuracywithinnecessary limits.1.7.12.2IHPLEHENTATION 1.7.12.2.1 Established procedures andinstructions areusedforcalibration andcontrolofmeasuring andtestequipment utilizedinthemeasurement, inspection andmonitotingofstructures, systemsandcomponents. | |||
Theseprocedures andinstructions describecalibration techniques andfrequencies, andmaintenance andcontroloftheequipment. | |||
AEPSCgAperiodically assessestheeffectiveness ofthecalibtationprogramviathegAauditprogram.1.7.12.2.2 Heasuring andtestequipment isuniquelyidentified andistraceable toitscalibration source.1.7-66July,1994 | |||
Asystemhasbeenestablished forattaching, oraffixinglabels,tomeasuring andtestequipment todisplaythedatecalibrated andthenextcalibration duedate,oracontrolsystemisusedthatidentifies topotential usersanyequipment beyondthecalibration duedate.1.7.12.2.4 Heasuring andtestequipment iscalibrated atspecified intervals. | |||
calibration, | Theseintervals arebasedonthefrequency ofuse,stability characteristics andotherconditions thatcouldadversely affecttherequiredmeasurement accuracy. | ||
Calibration standards aretraceable tonationally recognized standards; orwheresuchstandards donotexist,provisions areestablished todocumentthebasisforcalibration. | |||
Theprimarystandards usedtocalibrate secondary standards have,exceptincertaininstances, anaccuracyofatleastfour(4)timestherequiredaccuracyofthesecondary standard. | |||
Inthosecaseswherethefour{4)timesaccuracycannotbeachieved, thebasisforacceptance isdocumented andisauthorized bytheresponsible manager.Thesecondary standards haveanaccuracythatassuresequipment beingcalibrated willbewithinrequiredtolerances. | |||
Thebasisforacceptance isdocumented andauthorized bytheresponsible manager.1.7.12.2.5 CookNuclearPlantprocedures definetherequirements forthecontrolofstandards, testequipment andprocessequipment. | |||
1.7.12.2.6 Mhenmeasuring andtestingequipment usedforinspection andtestingisfoundtobeoutsideofrequiredaccuracylimitsatthetimeof1.7-67July,1994 I | |||
calibration, evaluations areconducted todetermine thevalidityoftheresultsobtainedsincethemostrecentcalibration. | |||
Retests,orreinspections, areperformed onsuspectitems.Theresultsofevaluations aredocumented. | |||
1.7.13HANDLING, STORAGE,ANDSHIPPING1.7.13.1SCOPEActivities withthepotential forcausingcontamination ordeterioration, byenvironmental conditions suchastemperature orhumiditythatcouldadversely affecttheabilityofanitemtoperformitssafety-related functions andactivities necessary topreventdamageorloss,areidentified andcontrolled. | |||
Theseactivities arecleaning, packaging, preserving, | |||
: handling, shippingandstoring.Controlsareeffectedthroughtheuseofappropriate procedures andinstructions. | |||
1.7.13.2INPLENENTATION 1.7.13.2.1 Procedures areusedtocontrolthecleaning, | |||
: handling, storing,packaging, preserving andshippingofmaterials, components andsystemsinaccordance withdesignated procurement requirements. | |||
Theseprocedures include,butarenotlimitedto,thefollowing functions: | |||
a)Cleaning-toassurethatrequiredcl."e'anne'ss levelsareachievedandmaintained. | |||
b)Packaging andpreservation | |||
-toprovideadequateprotection againstdamageordeterioration. | |||
Mhennecessary, theseprocedures provideforspecial.environments, suchasinertgasatmosphere, specificmoisturecontentlevelsandtemperature levels.c)Handling-toprecludedamageorsafetyhazards.1.7-68July,1994 | |||
d)Storing- | d)Storing-tominimizethepossibility ofloss,damageordeterioration ofitemsinstorage,including consumables suchaschemicals, reagentsandlubricants. | ||
1.7.13.2.2 Controlshavebeenestablished forlimitedshelflifeitemssuchas"0"rings,epoxy,lubricants, solventsandchemicals toassuretheyarecorrectly identified, storedandcontrolled topreventshelflifeexpiredmaterials frombeingusedintheCookNuclearPlant.Controlsareestablished inplantprocedures. | |||
1.7.13.2.3 Packaging andshippingrequirements areprovidedtovendorsinAEPSCSpecifications (DCCs)whichareapartoftheprocurement | |||
: document, orareotherwise specified intheprocurement document. | |||
Controlsforreceiptinspection, damageditemsandspecialhandlingrequirements attheCookNuclearPlantareestablished byplantprocedures. | |||
Specialcontrolsareprovidedtoassurethatstainless steelcomponents andmaterials arehandledwithapprovedliftingslings.1.7.13.2.4 Storageandsurveillance requirements havebeenestablished toassuresegregation ofstorage.Specialcontrolshavebeenimplemented forcritical, highvalue,orperishable items.Routinesurveillance isconducted onstoredmaterialtoprovideinspection fordamage,rotationofstoredpumpsandmotors,inspection forpro'tection ofexposedsurfacesandc'learns'sfs ofthestoragearea.1.7.13.2.5 Specialhandlingprocedures havebeenimplemented fortheprocessing ofnuclearfuelduringrefueling outages.Theseprocedures minimizethe1.7-69July,1994 riskofdamagetothenewandspentfuelandthepossiblereleaseofradioactive materialwhenplacingthespentfuelintothespentfuelpool.1.7.14INSPECTION, TEST,ANDOPERATING STATUS1.7.14.1SCOPEOperating statusofstructures, systemsandcomponents isindicated bytaggingofvalvesandswitches, orbyotherspecified means,insuchamannerastopreventinadvertent operation. | |||
Thestatusofinspections andtestsperformed onindividual itemsisclearlyindicated bymarkingsand/orloggingunderstrictprocedural controlstopreventinadvertent bypassing ofsuchinspections andtests.1.7.14.2IHPLENENTATION 1.7.14.2.1 Fordesignchangeactivities, including itemfabrication, installation andtest,aprogramexistswhichspecifies thedegreeofcontrolrequiredfortheidentification ofinspection andteststatusofstructures, systemsandcomponents. | |||
Physicalidentification isusedtotheextentpractical toindicatethestatusofitemsrequiring inspections, tests,orexaminations. | |||
Procedures existwhichprovidefortheuseofcalibration andrejection | |||
: stickers, tags,stampsandotherformsofidentification toindicatetestandinspection status.TheClearance PermitSystemusesvarioustagstoidentifyequipment andsystemoperability status.Anotherprogramestablishes ataggingsystemforliftedleads,etc.forthoseitemsrequiring calibration, theprogramprovidesforphysicalindication ofcalibration statusbycalibration | |||
: stickers, ora'ontrolsystemisused.1.7-70July,1994 | |||
Application andremovalofinspection andweldingstamps,andof'uchstatusindicators astags,markings, labels,etc.,iscontrolled byplantprocedures. | |||
Theinspection statusofmaterials receivedattheCookNuclearPlantisidentified inaccordance withestablished instructions. | |||
Thestatusisidentified asHold,HoldforgualityControlClearance, Reject,orAccept.Theinspection statusofworkinprogressiscontrolled bytheuseofholdpointsinprocedures. | |||
PlantgualityControl,ordepartmental ANSIN18.1qualified personnel (reference 1.7.10.2.4herein),inspectanactivityatvariousstagesandsignofftheprocedural inspection steps.Thestatusofweldingiscontrolled throughtheuseofawelddatablockwhichidentifies theinspection andNDEstatusofeachweld.1.7.14.2.3 Requiredsurveillance testprocedures aredefinedinPNIs.Theseinstructions providefordocumenting bypassedtestsandrescheduling ofthetest.Thestatusoftestingafterminormaintenance isrecordedaspartoftheDobOrderiud)ot;gir'i'ceder:e. | |||
Thestatusoftestingaftermajormaintenance isincludedaspartoftheprocedure, andincludestheperformance offunctional testingandapprovalofdatabysupervisory personnel. | |||
Testing,inspection andotheroperations important tosafetyareconducted inaccordance withproperlyreviewedandapprovedprocedures. | |||
ThePNIforplantprocedures requiresthatprocedures befollowedaswritten.Alteration tothesequenceofaprocedure canonlybeDuly,1994 | |||
accomplished byaprocedure changewhichissubjecttothesamecontrolsastheoriginalreviewandapproval. | |||
beenreleasedtotheCookNuclearPlant.Systems,components, | Mhenanimmediate procedure changeisrequiredtocontinuein-process workortestingandtherequiredcompletereviewandapprovalprocesscannotbeaccomplished, an"OnTheSpot"changeisprocessed inaccordance withthePNIonplantprocedures. | ||
1;7.14.2.4 Nonconforming, inoperable, ormalfunctioning structures, systemsandcomponents areclearlyidentified bytags,stickers, stamps,etc.,anddocumented topreventinadvertent use.1.7.15NONCONFORNING ITEMS1.7.15.1SCOPENaterials, parts,orcomponents thatdonotconformtorequirements arecontrolled inordertopreventtheirinadvertent use.Nonconforming itemsareidentified, documented; segregated whenpractical anddispositioned. | |||
1.7.19. | Affectedorganizations arenotifiedofnonconformances. | ||
1.7.15.2IHPLENENTATION 1.7.15.2.1 Items,services, oractivities thataredeficient incharacteristic, documentation, orprocedure, whichrenderthequalityunacceptable orindeterminate, areidentified asnonconforming andanyfurtheruseiscontrolled. | |||
,a~.3tl9 | Nonconformances aredocumented anddispositioned, andnotification ismadetoaffectedorganizations. | ||
6.Reg.Guide1.37(3/73)ANSIN45.2.1(1973) | Personnel authorized todisposition, conditionally releaseandcloseoutnonconformances aredesignated. | ||
ANSIN45.2.6(1978) | TheJobOrderSystemand/ortheCondition Reports(referto1.7.16herein)areusedatCookNuclearPlant'toidentifynonconforming itemsandinitiatecorrective actionforitemswhichareinstalled orhave1.7-72July,1994 V | ||
beenreleasedtotheCookNuclearPlant.Systems,components, ormaterials whichrequirerepairorinspection arecontrolled undertheJobOrderSystem.Inaddition, thevariousprocedures identified in1.7.14hereinprovideforidentification, segregation anddocumentation ofnonconforming items.1.7.15.2.2 Nonconforming itemsareidentified bymarking,tagging,segregating, orbydocumented administrative controls. | |||
Documentation describes thenonconformance, thedisposition ofthenonconformance andtheinspection requirements. | |||
Italsoincludessignature approvalofthedisposition. | |||
Completed JobOrdersarereviewedbythesupervisor responsible foraccomplishing thework,andthesupervisor ofthedepartment/section thatoriginated theJobOrder.TheOA8epgi,'tment periodically auditstheJobOrderSystem,andonasamplebasis,JobOrders.1.7.15.2.3 Itemsthathavebeenrepairedorreworkedareinspected andtestedinaccordance withtheoriginalinspection andtestrequirements, oralternatives, thathavebeendocumented. | |||
Itemsthathavethedisposition of"repair"or"use-as-is" requiredocumentation justifying acceptability. | |||
Thechangesarerecordedtodenotetheas-builtcondition. | |||
Mhenrequiredbyestablished procedures, surveillance oroperability testsareconducted onanitemafterrework,repairorreplacement. | |||
1.7.15.2.4 Disposition ofconditionally releaseditemsareclosedoutbeforetheitemsarereliedupontoperformsafety-related functions. | |||
1.7-73July,1994 1.7.16CORRECTIVE ACTION1.7.16.1SCOPE'Conditions adversetoquality,suchasfailures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective materialandequipment, andnonconformances areidentified promptlyandcorrected assoonaspractical. | |||
Forsignificant conditions adversetoquality,thecauseofthecondition isdetermined, corrective actionistakentocorrecttheimmediate eintfQV~,3,og, andpreventive actionisimplemented topreventrecurrence, Inthesecases,thecondition, causeandcorrective actiontakenisdocumented andreportedtoappropriate levelsofmanagement. | |||
1.7.16.2INPLEHENTATION 1.7.16.2.1 Procedures areestablished thatdescribetheplantandAEPSCcorrective actionprograms. | |||
Theseprocedures arereviewedandconcurred withbytheAEPSCgAdi.'apartment:. | |||
1.7.16.2.2 condition ReportsPn8Fiiidft/sorieA'!lan'cei'reporAte providethemechanism forplantandAEPSCpersonnel tonotifymanagement ofconditions adversetoquality.Condition Reportsarealsousedtoreportviolations tocodes,regulations andtheTechnical Specifications. | |||
Investigations ofreportedconditions adversetoqualityareassignedbymanagement. | |||
TheCondition Reportisusedtodocumenttheinvestigation ofanadversecondition; andtoidentifytheneedforadesignchangetocorrectsystemorequipment deficiencies, ortoidentifytheneedfortheinitiation ofJobOrderstocorrectminordeficiencies. | |||
Further,Condition Reportsareusedtoidentifythoseactionsnecessary topreventrecurrence ofthereportedcondition. | |||
1.7-74July,1994 4e1' ThePNSRCevaluates actionstakenorbeingtakentocorrectandpreventrecurrence ofthedeficiency forcondition reportsinvolving: | |||
a.aviolation ofTechnical Specification b.'.reportable eventc.anyaccidental, unplanned, oruncontrolled radioactive released.asafety-related adversetrende.apotential nuclearsafetyhazardf.anentryintoTechnical Specification LCO3.0.3(failuretocomplywithLCO'snotcontaining specificshutdownschedule) g.aTechnical Specification LCOentrythatwastheresultofpersonnel error.TheAEPSCNSDRCisresponsible forassuringthatindependent reviewsofviolations (asspecified intheTechnical Specifications) areperformed. | |||
Theseviolations areconsidered significant con'digi'on/ | |||
whicharedocumented onCondition Reports.Thereviewswillprovideanindependent evaluation ofthereportedmW'diYi'ons:-- | |||
andcorrective actions.TheAEPSCQA8ejar,':tmerit periodically auditsthecorrective actionsystemicforcompliance andeffectiveness. | |||
1.7.17QUALITYASSURANCE RECORDS1.7.17.1SCOPERecordsthatfurnishevidenceofactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related structures, systemsandcomponents aremaintained. | |||
Theyareaccurate, | |||
: complete, legibleandareprotected againstdamage,deterioration, orloss.Theyareidentifiable andretrievable. | |||
1.7.17.2IHPLEHENTATION 1.7.17.2.1 Documents thatfurnishevidenceofactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related itemsaregenerated andcontrolled inaccordance withthe1.7-75Duly,1994 procedure thatgovernsthoseactivities. | |||
Uponcompletion, thesedocuments areconsidered records.Theserecordsinclude:b)c)d)e)f)g)h)Resultsofreviews,inspections, surveillances, tests,auditsandmaterialanalyses. | |||
gualification ofpersonnel, procedures andequipment. | |||
Operation logs.Naintenance andmodification procedures andrelatedinspection results.Reportabl eoccurrences.RecordsrequiredbytheplantTechnical Specifications. | |||
Condition Reports.Otherdocumentation suchasdrawings, specifications, dedication plans,procurement documents, calibration procedures andreports.Radiographs. | |||
1.7.17.2.2 Instructions andprocedures establish therequirements fortheidentification andpreparation ofrecordsforsystemsandequipment underthel}AProgram;andprovidethecontrolsforretention oftheserecords.Criteriaforthestoragelocationofqualityrelatedrecords,andaretention schedulefortheserecords,hasbeenestablished. | |||
FileIndexeshavebeenestablished toprovidedirection forfiling,andtoprovidefortheretrievability oftherecords.Controlshavebeenestablished forlimitingaccesstothePlantNasterFiletopreventunauthorized entry,unauthorized removal,andforuseoftherecordsunderemergency conditions. | |||
TheNuclearRecordsNanagement Supervisor isresponsible forthecontroIandoperation ofthePlantNasterFileRoom.1.7-76July,1994 1.7.17.2.3 WithinAEPSC,eachdepartment/division managerisresponsible fortheidentification, collection, maintenance andstorageofrecordsgenerated bytheirdepartment/division. | |||
Procedures ensurethemaintenance ofrecordssufficient tofurnishobjective evidencethatactivities affecting qualityareincompliance withtheestablished gAProgram.1.7.17.2.4 Whenadocumentbecomesarecord,itisdesignated aspermanent, ornonpermanent, andthentransmitted tofile.Nonpermanent recordshavespecified retention times.Permanent recordsaremaintained forthelifeoftheplantorequipment, asapplicable. | |||
1.7.17.2.5 Onlyauthorized personnel mayissuecorrections orsupplements torecords.1.7.17.2.6 Traceability betweentherecordandtheitemoractivitytowhichitappliesisprovided. | |||
1.7.17.2.7 1Exceptforrecordsthatcanonlybestoredasoriginals, suchasradiographs andsomestripcharts,ormicrographs thereof,recordsarestoredinremote,dualfacilities topreventdamage,deterioration, orlossduetonaturalorunnatural causes.Whenonlythesingleoriginalcanberetained, specialfire-rated facilities areused.1.7-77July,1994 1.7.18.AUDITS1.7.18.1SCOPEAcomprehensive systemofauditsiscarriedouttoprovideindependent evaluation ofcompliance with,andtheeffectiveness of,thegAProgramincluding thoseelementsoftheprogramimplemented bysuppliers andth-:,:y!!r!-:,,f!!!..:.! | |||
,!,,::I::riilr!So,,::,-u:,:,-,->>,,!iaaf: | |||
:---!1!Koffp,:'~le"1l'WWITt(ymir.----: | |||
,:..--!t,':1Vi | |||
',,1i!:::-f;:: | |||
W!,.acta7iitdeig Auditsareperformed inaccordance withwrittenprocedures orchecklists byqualified personnel nothavingdirectresponsibility intheareasaudited.Auditresultsaredocumented andreviewedbymanagement. | |||
Follow-up actionistakenwhereindicated. | |||
1.7.18.2INPLENENTATION 1.7.18.2.1 AEPSCA5e5'r6iienti$ | |||
::AD':Resonsibilities Thebasicresponsibility fortheassessment ofthegAProgramisvestedintheAEPSCgAD.TheAEPSCgADisprimarily responsible forensuringthatpropergAprogramsareestablished andforverification oftheirimplementation. | |||
Theseresponsibilities aredischarged incooperation withtheAEPSCandCookNuclearPlantmanagement andtheirstaffs.1.7.18.2.2 Internalauditsareperformed inaccordance withestablished schedules thatreflectthestatusandimportance ofsafetytotheactivities beingperformed. | |||
Allareaswheretherequirements of10CFR50,AppendixBapplyareauditedwithinaperiodofonetotwoyears.1.7.18.2s3 TheAEPSCgADconductsauditstoverifytheadequacyandimplementation ofthegAProgramattheCookNuclearPlantandwithintheAEPSystem.gAauditreportsaredistributed totheappropriate management andtheNSDRC(allaudits).1.7-78July,1994 l | |||
Theindependent off-sitereviewandauditorganization istheAEPSCNSDRC.Thiscommittee iscomposedofAEPSC,IMandCookNuclearPlantmanagement members.AnNSDRCManualhasbeendeveloped forthiscommittee whichcontainstheNSDRCCharterandprocedures. | |||
TheNSDRCconductsperiodicauditsofCookNuclearPlantoperations pursuanttoestablished criteria(Technical Specifications, etc.).NSDRCauditreportsaresubmitted forreviewtotheNSDRCmembership andtheChairmanoftheNSDRC.Condition ReportsahV/ar:",,':audht:vrmepoita providefortherecording ofactionstakentocorrectdeficiencies foundduringtheseaudits.1.7.18.2a5 TheCookNuclearPlanton-sitereviewgroupisthePNSRC.Thiscommittee reviewsplantoperations asaroutineevaluation andservestoadvisethePlantNanageronmattersrelatedtonuclearsafety.Thecomposition ofthecommittee isdefinedintheTechnical Specifications. | |||
ThePNSRCalsoreviewsinstructions, procedures, anddesignchangesforsafety-related systemspriortoapprovalbythePlantNanager.Inaddition, thiscommittee servestoconductinvestigations ofviolations toTechnical Specifications, andreviewssignificant Condition Reportstodetermine ifappropriate actionhasbeentaken.1.7.18.2.6 Auditsofsuppliers andcontractors arescheduled basedonthestatusofsafetyimportance oftheactivities beingperformed, andareinitiated earlyenoughtoassureeffective qualityassurance duringdesign,procureement,manufacturing, construction, installation, inspection andtesting.1.7-79Quly,1994 Principal contractors arerequiredtoaudittheirsuppliers systematically inaccordance withthecriteriaestablished withintheirqualityassurance programs. | |||
1.7.18.2.7 Regularly scheduled auditsaresupplemented by"specialaudits"whensignificant changesaremadeinthegAprogram,whenitissuspected thatqualityisinjeopardy, orwhenanindependent assessment ofprogrameffectiveness isconsidered necessary. | |||
1.7.18.2.8 Auditsincludeanobjective evaluation ofpractices, procedures, instructions, activities anditemsrelatedtoquality;andareviewofdocuments andrecordstoconfirmthatthegAProgramiseffective andproperlyimplemented. | |||
1.7.18.2.9 Auditprocedures andthescope,plans,checklists andresultsofindividual auditsaredocumented. | |||
1.7.18.2.10 Personnel selectedforauditingassignments haveexperience, oraregiventrainingcommensurate withtheneedsoftheaudit,andhavenodirectresponsibilities intheareasaudited.1.7.18.2.11 management oftheauditedorganization identifies andtakesappropriate actiontocorrectobserveddeficiencies andtopreventrecurrence. | |||
Follow-up isperformed bytheauditingorganization toensurethatthe1.7-80Ju'ly,1994 appropriate actionsweretaken.Suchfollow-up includesreaudits, whennecessary. | |||
1.7.18.2.12 TheadequacyofthegAProgramisregularly assessedbyAEPSCmanagement. | |||
Thefollowing activities constitute formalelementsofthatassessment: | |||
a)Auditreports,including follow-up oncorrective actionaccomplihmentandeffectiveness, aredistributed toappropriate levelsofmanagement. | |||
b)Individuals independent fromthegAorganization, butknowledgeable inauditing, andqualityassurance, periodi.cally reviewtheeffectiveness ofthegAprograms. | |||
Conclusions andrecommendations arereportedtotheAEPSC:ji6ji~r"'ice president nuclearqeoirYfj,oo.'. | |||
1.7.19FIREPROTECTION l}APROGRAN1.7.19.1Introduction TheCookNuclearPlantFireProtection gAProgramhasbeendeveloped usingtheguidanceofNRCBranchTechnical Position(APCSB)9.5-1,AppendixA,SectionC,"gualityAssurance Program," | |||
andNRCclarification "NuclearPlantFireProtection Functional Responsibilities, Administrative | |||
: Controls, andgualityAssurance," | |||
datedJune14,1977.Assuch,theFireProtection gAProgramispartoftheoverallgAProgramfortheplant.TheFireProtection gAProgramencompasses design,procurement, fabrication, construction, surveillance, inspection, operation, maintenance, modification, andaudits.1.7-81July,1994 Implementation andassessment oftheFireProtection gAProgramistheresponsibility ofeachinvolvedAEPSCandIndianaMichiganPowerCompanyorganization. | |||
TheFireProtection gAProgramisunderthemanagement controlofAEPSC.Thiscontrolconsistsof:I)Verifying theeffectiveness oftheFireProtection gAProgramthroughreview,surveillance, andaudits.2)Directing formu'lation, implementation, andassessment oftheFireProtection gAProgrambyprocedural controls. | |||
3)AssuringthegAprogramisacceptable tothemanagement responsible forfireprotection. | |||
Theplantmanagerhasdelegated responsibHity tovariousCookNuclearPlantdepartments forthefollowing fireprotection activities: | |||
a)b)c)d)e)f)g)Maintenance offireprotection systems.Testingoffireprotection equipment. | |||
Firesafetyinspections. | |||
Firefightingprocedures. | |||
Firedrills.Emergency remoteshutdownprocedures. | |||
Emergency repairprocedures (lOCFR50, AppendixR).TheFireProtection gAProgramattheCookNuclearPlanta'isoprovides.forinspection offirehazards,explosion hazards,andtrainingoffirebrigadeandresponding firedepartments. | |||
Thepl8nb22!pretle2Cti'oj department2S fireproteCtiOn Shiftsupervisor onduty,ordesignee, isdesignated asthefirebrigadeleaderand1.7-82July,1994 coordinates thefirefightingeffortsofthefirebrigade.Theoperations department providesanindividual withplantsystemsknowledge toserveasanadvisortothefirebrigadeleader.1.7.19.3DesinControlandProcurement DocumentControlgualitystandards arespecified inthedesigndocuments suchasappropriate fireptotectioncodesandstandards, and,asnecessary, deviations andchangesfromthesequalitystandards arecontrolled. | |||
TheCookNuclearPlantdesignwasreviewedbyqualified personnel toensureinclusion ofappropriate fireprotection requirements. | |||
Thesereviewsincludeitemssuchas:1)Verification astotheadequacyofelectrical isolation andcableseparation criteria. | |||
2)Verification ofappropriate requirements forroomisolation (sealingpenetrations, floorsandotherfirebarriers). | |||
3)Determination forincreaseinfireloadings. | |||
4)'Determination fortheneedofadditional firedetection andsuppression equipment. | |||
Procurement offireprotection equipment andrelateditemsaresubjecttotherequirements ofthefireprotection procurement documents. | |||
Areviewofthesedocuments isperformed toassurefireprotection requirements andqualityrequirements arecorrectly stated,verifiable, andcontrollable, andthatthereisadequateacceptance andrejection criteria. | |||
Procurement documents mustbeprepared, | |||
: reviewed, andapprovedaccording togAProgramrequirements. | |||
Designandprocurement documentchanges,including fieldchangesanddesigndeviations, arecontrolled byprocedure. | |||
1.7-83July,1994 g4i~I1' 1.7.19.4Instructions Procedures andDrawinsInspections, tests,administrative | |||
: controls, firedrillsandtrainingthatassistinimplementing thefireprotection programareprescribed byapprovedinstructions orprocedures. | |||
Indoctrination andtrainingprogramsforfireprevention andfirefightingareimplemented inaccordance withapprovedprocedures. | |||
Activities associated withthefireprotection systemsandfireprotection relatedsystemsareprescribed andaccomplished inaccordance withdocumented instructions, procedures, anddrawings. | |||
Instructions andprocedures fordesign,installation, inspection, tests,maintenance, modification andadministrative controlsarereviewedthroughauditstoassurethatthefireprotection programismaintained. | |||
Operation andmaintenance information hasbeenprovidedtotheplantintheformofSystemDescriptions andequipment supplierinformation. | |||
1.7.19.5ControlofPurchased ItemsandServicesmeasuresareestablished toassurethatpurchased itemsandservicesconformtoprocurement documents. | |||
Thesemeasuresincludeprovisions, asappropriate, forsourceevaluation andselection, objective evidenceofqualityfurnished bythecontractor, inspections atsuppliers, orreceiptinspection. | |||
Sourceorreceiptinspection isprovided, asaminimum,forthoseitemswherequalitycannotbeverifiedafterinstallation. | |||
.7.1Aprogramforindependent inspection ofthefireprotection activities hasbeenestablished andimplemented. | |||
1.7-84July,1994 Theseinspections areperformed bypersonnel otherthanthoseresponsible forimplementation oftheactivity. | |||
Theinspections include:a)Inspection ofinstallation, maintenance andmodification offireprotection systemsandequipment. | |||
b)Inspections ofpenetration sealsandfireretardant coatinginstallations toverifytheactivityissatisfactot ilycompleted inaccordance withinstallation specifications. | |||
c)Inspections ofcableroutingtoverifyconformance withdesignrequirements asspecified inAEPSCSpecifications and/orplantprocedures. | |||
d)Inspections toverifythatappropriate requirements forfirebarriersaresatisfied following installation, modification, repairorreplacement activities. | |||
e)measurestoassurethatinspection personnel | |||
'areindependent fromtheindividuals performing theactivitybeinginspected andareknowledgeable inthedesignandinstal'lation requirements forfireprotection. | |||
f)Inspection procedures, instructions orchecklists forrequiredinspections. | |||
g)Periodicinspections oftireprotection systems,emergency breathing andauxiliary equipment. | |||
h)Periodicinspections ofmaterials subjecttodegradation, suchasfirestops,sealsandfireretardant coatingasrequiredbyTechnical Specifications ormanufacturer's recommendations. | |||
I.7-85July,1994 47 1.7.19.7TestandTestControla)Installation testing-Following installation, modification, repair,orreplacement, sufficient testingisperformed todemonstrate thatthefireprotection systemsandequipment willperformsatisfactorily. | |||
Mrittentestprocedures forinstallation testsincorporate therequirements andacceptance limitscontained inapplicable designdocuments. | |||
b)Periodictesting-Periodictestingoccurstodocumentthatfireprotection equipment functions inaccordance withitsdesign.c)Programshavebeenestablished toverifythetestingoffireprotection systems,andtoverifythattestpersonnel areeffectively trained.d)Testresultsaredocumented, evaluated, andtheiracceptability determined byaqualified responsible individual orgroup.1.7.19.8InsectionTestand0eratinStatusTheinspection, testandoperating statusforplantTechnical Specification fireprotection systemsareperformed asdescribed in1.7.14herein.1.7.19.9Nonconformin ItemsTechnical Specification fireprotection equipment nonconformances areidentified anddispositioned asdescribed in1.7.15herein.1.7.19.10Corrective ActionThecorrective actionmechanism described in1.7.16hereinappliestotheTechnical Specification fireprotection equipment. | |||
1.7-86July,1994 C( | |||
1.7.19.11 RecordsRecordsgenerated tosupportthefireprotection programarecontrolled asdescribed in1.7.17herein.1.7.19.12 AuditsAuditsareconducted anddocumented toverifycompliance withtheFireProtection gAProgramasdescribed in1.7.1.18herein.Auditsareperiodically performed toverifycompliance withtheadministrative controlsandimplementation offireprotection qualityassurance criteria. | |||
Theauditsareperformed inaccordance withpre-established writtenprocedures orchecklists. | |||
Auditresultsaredocumented andreviewedbymanagement havingresponsibility intheareaaudited.Follow-up actionistakenbyresponsible management tocorrectthedeficiencies revealedbytheaudit.1.7-87July,1994 L1r AMERICANELECTRICPOWERSERVICECORPORATION SupportOrganization fortheCookPlantCHAIRMANOFTHEBOARD,PRESIDENT ANDCHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICERSENIORVICEPRESIDENT NUCLEARGENERATION gEXECUTIVE VICEPRESIDENT ENGINEERING ANDCONSTRUCTION 4OTHERAEPSCSUPPORTNUCLEARSUPPORTSERVICESDEPARTMENT INDIANAMICHIGANPOWERSITEVICEPRESIDENT ANDPLANTMANAGERCOOKNUCLEARPLANT*QUALITYASSURANCE DEPARTMENT NUCLEARENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SITENUCLEARSERVICESDEPARTMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ANDCONTROLSSECTION~Pe~4+j>immi | |||
~g$~~I'~~~II@~wg-~jQ~~ | |||
sAFOSSIL&HYDROGENERATION DEPARTMENT | |||
'".-.":~~%~K | |||
>ARRAN'.. | |||
4I'k!TRANSMISSION ANDDISTRIBUTIONSERVICESDEPARTMENT | |||
*NOTPARTOFAEPSCORGANIZATION | |||
-SHOWNFORINFORMATION ONLYLI~ADMINISTRATIVE | |||
&FUNCTIONAL DIRECTION FUNCTIONAL DIRECTION FORl?IECOOKNUCLEARPLANT I4 AMERICANELECTRICPOWERCOMPANYAMERICANELECTRICPOWERCOMPANYAMERICANELECTRICPOWERSERVICECORPORATION APPALACHIAN POWERCOMPANY"~3INDIANAMICHIGANPOWERCOMPANYCOLUMBUSSOUTHERNPOWER/ANDOHIOPOWERCOMPANYKINGSPORT POWERCOMPANYKENTUCKYPOWERCOMPANY-;y;Q>U't'-.I,)g~+ | |||
WHEELINGPj,POWERCOMPANY)y)'.0-"4V'-A'Si-~%+' | |||
IIIIIIICOOKNUCLEARPLANT---ADMINISTRATIVE; TECHNICAL, ANDFUNCTIONAL DIRECTION IDC0 K&. | |||
AEPSCQUALITYASSURANCE DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION AEPSCDIRECTORQUALITYASSURANCE QUALITYASSURANCE PRINCIPLE ENGINEERSOFTWAREp5+54'~~i~W~+<9~;8(~ | |||
SECTIONMANAGERSUPPLIERPERFORMANCE SECTIONMANAGERQUALITYASSURANCE ENGINEERING 8ASSESSMENT QUALITYASSURANCE/CONTROL MANAGER(SITE)5,"Jgmm5-q~~5~55Ii+5m+"'*~5.-55~~y "5m~~ | |||
,a~.3tl9 ORGANIZATION FORTHE'OOKNUCLEARPLANTINDIANAMlCHIGANPOWERCOMPANYINDIANAMICHIGANPOWERSITEVICEPRESIDENT ANDPLANTMANAGERSECRETARY gwL@~ayge~j~ | |||
i>RNID'K<-.".=-!" | |||
'-"'":"'- | |||
EXECUTIVE STAFFASSISTANT"LSig---"M9Me'*EXECUTIVE STAFFASSISTANT ASSISTANT PLANTMANAOERPRODUCTION SP:~j~~M"Sg$9~gf~F%'4<jJX~$>>ASSISTANT PLANTNANAOERPROJECTSP~'F@Li1A 14sASSISTANT PLANTMANAOERTECHNICAL SUPPORTeP'""W',Fb'lI'I+gg4~yjJ'l+iT~O,R CA,"'IV+4IYIWM~i.'AINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT | |||
~Sfg-."TVlgPTZ-'q~~OPERATIONS SUPERINTENDE NTINTEORATEDSCHEDULINO | |||
~5',SUPERINTENDENT YJgCCPPVIKII GCITRCTOVtTRNIENCLNT PJTLTNSSAMANAOER-'~i<~-,<b | |||
--'~~4TRAININOSUPERINTENDENT ICS~w'-Ie"L~(I~)<t+-l4PLANTEN0INEERINOSUPERINTFNDENT V~vwmvvz-T'TAFF ASSISTANTK~hi.'6"fCHEMISTRY SUPERINTENDENT IwltkPII4'ig,ll,F+~DP$PPPLANTPROTECTION SUPERINTENDENT EMERGENCYPLANNINOCOORDINATOR RAOIA1ONPFDIECRONSUPERINTENSENTENVIRONMENTAL SAFETYTHEAI.THSUPERINTENDENT | |||
,4Ci~v74~<,."~Ski.~If9~5 | |||
~+"Ps(F+;.~ii f0Cr0ASSISTANT EMERGENCY PLANNINOCOORDINATOR HUMANRESOURCES SUPERVISOR APPENDIXAREGULATORY ANDSAFETYGUIDESANSISTANDARDS 1.Reg.Guide1.8(9/75)ANSIN18.1(1971)Personnel Selection andTrainingSelection andTrainingofNuclearPowerPlantPersonnel 2.Reg.Guide1.14(8/75)ReactorCoolantPumpFlywheelIntegrity 3.Reg.Guide1.16(8/75)Reporting ofOperating Information, AppendixA-Technical Specifications 4.SafetyGuide30(8/72)ANSIN45.2.4(1972)gualityAssurance Requirements fortheInstallation, Inspection, andTestingofInstrumentation andElectricEquipment Installation, Inspection, andTestingRequirements forInstrumentation andElectricEquipment DuringtheConstruction ofNuclearPowerGenerating Stations5.Reg.Guide1.33(02/78)ANSIN18.7(1976)(ANS3.21976)ANSIN45.2(1977)gualityAssurance ProgramRequirements (Operation) | |||
Administrative ControlsandgualityAssurance fortheOperational PhaseofNuclearPowerPlantsgualityAssurance ProgramRequirements forNuclearFacilities 1.7-92Ju]y,1994 I | |||
6.Reg.Guide1.37(3/73)ANSIN45.2.1(1973)gualityAssurance Requirements forCleaningofFluidSystemsandAssociated Components ofMater-CooledNuclearPowerPlantsCleaningofFluidSystemsandAssociated Components DuringConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlants7.Reg.Guide1.3I(10/76)ANSIN45.2.2(1972)gualityAssurance Requirements forPackaging, | |||
: Shipping, Receiving, StorageandHandlingofItemsforMater-Cooled NuclearPowerPlantsPackaging, | |||
: Shipping, Receiving, StorageandHandlingofItemsforNuclearPowerPlants(DuringtheConstruction Phase)8.Reg.Guide1.39(10/76)ANSIN45.2.3(1973)Housekeeping Requirements forMater-CooledNuclearpowerPlantsHousekeeping DuringtheConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlants9.Reg.Guide1.54(6/73)ANSIN101.4(1972)gualityAssurance Requirements forProtective CoatingsAppliedtoMater-Cooled NuclearPowerPlantsgualityAssurance forProtective CoatingsAppliedtoNuclearFacilities | |||
)0.Reg.Guide1.58(9/80)gualification ofNuclearPowerPlantInspection, Examination andTestingPersonnel 1.7-93July,1994 I | |||
ANSIN45.2.6(1978)gualifications ofInspection, Exami-nation,andTestingPersonnel forNuclearPowerPlants11.Reg.Guide1.63(7/78)ElectricPenetration Assemblies inContainment Structures forLight-Mater-Cooled NuclearPowerPlants12.Reg.Guide1.64(10/73)ANSIN45.2.11(1974)gualityAssurance Requirements fortheDesignofNuclearPowerPlantsgualityAssurance Requirements fortheDesignofNuclearPowerPlants13.Reg.Guide1.74(2/74)ANSIN45.2.10(1973)gualityAssurance TermsandDefinitions gualityAssurance TermsandDefinitions 14.Reg.Guide1.88(10/76)ANSIN45.2.9(1974)Collection, Storage,andNaintenance ofNuclearPowerPlantgualityAssurance RecordsRequirements forCollection, Storage,andNaintenance ofgualityAssurance RecordsforNuclearPowerPlants15.Reg.Guide1.94(4/76)gualityAssurance Requirements forInstal'lation, Inspection, andTestingofStructural ConcreteandStructural SteelDuringtheConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlants1.7-94July,1994 | |||
ANSIN45.2.5(1974)b"'~G16.Reg.Guide1.123(7/77)ANSIN45.2.13(1976) | ANSIN45.2.5(1974)b"'~G16.Reg.Guide1.123(7/77)ANSIN45.2.13(1976)Supplementary gualityAssurance Requirements fo'rInstallation, Inspection, andTestingofStructural ConcreteandStructural SteelDuringtheConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlantsgualityAssurance Requirements forControlofProcurement ofItemsandServicesforNuclearPowerPlantsequalityAssurance Requirements forControlofProcurement ofItemsandServicesforNuclearPowerPlants17.Reg.Guide1.144(1/79)ANSIN45.2.12(1977)AuditingofgualityAssurance ProgramsforNuclearPowerPlantsRequirements forAuditingofgualityAssurance ProgramsforNuclearPowerPlants18.Reg.Guide1.146(8/80)ANSIN45.2.23(1978)gualification ofgualityAssurance ProgramAuditPersonnel forNuclearPowerPlantsgualification ofgualityAssurance ProgramAuditPersonnel forNuclearPowerPlants19.ANSIN45.2.8(1975)Supplementary gualityAssurance Requirements forInstallation, Inspection andTestingofMechanical Equipment andSystemsfortheConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlants1.7-95Duly,1994 | ||
20.ANSIN45.4(1972)Leakage- | 20.ANSIN45.4(1972)Leakage-Rate TestingofContainment Structures forNuclearReactors1.7-96July,1994 APPENDIXBAEPSC/I&M EXCEPTIONS TOOPERATING PHASESTANDARDS ANDREGULATORY GUIDESl.GENERAL~llCertainRegulatory Guidesinvoke,orimply,Regulatory Guidesandstandards inadditiontothestandardeachprimarily endorses. | ||
CertainANSIStandards invoke,orimply,additional standards. | |||
ExcetionInterretationTheAEPSC/ISN commitment referstotheRegulatory GuidesandANSIStandards specifically identified inAppendixA.Additional Regulatory Guides,ANSIStandards andsimilardocuments implied,orreferenced, inthosespecifically identified arenotpartofthiscommitment. | |||
z.N18.7,GeneralExcetionInterretationAEPSCandISNhaveestablished bothanon-siteandoff-sitestandingcommittee forindependent reviewactivities; togethertheyformtheindependent reviewbody.Thestandardnumericandqualification requirement maynotbemetbyeachgroupindividually. | |||
Procedureswillbeestablished tospecifyhoweachgroupwillbeinvolvedinreviewactivities. | |||
Thisexception/interpretation isconsistent withtheplant'sTechnical Specifications. | |||
1.7-97July,1994 | |||
2a.Sec.4.3.1" | 2a.Sec.4.3.1"Personnel assignedresponsibility forindependent reviewsshallbespecified inbothnumberandtechnical disciplines, andshallcollectively havetheexperience andcompetence requiredtoreviewproblemsinthefollowing areas:...."ExcetionIntetretationAEPSCNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee (NSDRC)andPlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee (PNSRC)willnothavemembersspecified bynumber,norbytechnical disciplines, anditsmembersmaynothavetheexperience andcompetence requiredtoreviewproblemsinallareaslistedinthissection.Thisexception/interpretation isconsistent withtheplant'sTechnical Specifications. | ||
TheNSDRCandPNSRCwillnotspecifically includeamemberqualified innondestructive testing,butwillusequalified technical consultants toperformthisandotherfunctions asdetermined necessary bytherespective committee chairman. | |||
2b.Sec.4.3.2.1"Whenastandingcommittee isresponsible fortheindependent reviewprogram,itshallbecomposedofnolessthanfivepersonsof.whomnomorethanaminorityaremembersoftheon-siteoperating organization. | |||
Competent alternates arepermitted ifdesignated inadvance.Theuseofalternates shallberestricted tolegitimate absencesofprincipals." | |||
ExcetionInterretationSeeItem2a.1.7-98July,1994 2c.Sec.4.3.3.1R~i"...recommendations | |||
...shallbedisseminated promptlytoappropriate membersofmanagement havingresponsibility intheareareviewed." | |||
ExcetionInterretationRecommendations madeasaresultofreviewwillgenerally beconveyedtotheon-site,oroff-site, standingcommittee. | |||
Procedures willbemaintained specifying howrecommendations aretobeconsidered. | |||
2d.Sec.4.3.4Reuirement"Thefollowing subjectsshallbereviewedbytheindependent reviewb0dye~~~~ExcetionInterretation~Subjectsrequiring reviewwillbeasspecified intheplantTechnical Specifications. | |||
2e.Sec.4.3.4(3)"ChangesintheTechnical Specifications orLicenseAmendments relatingtonuclearsafetyaretobereviewedbytheindependent reviewbodypriortoimplementation, exceptinthosecaseswherethechangeisidentical toapreviously reviewedproposedchange."ExcetionInterretationAlthoughtheusualpracticeistomeetthisrequirement, exceptions aremadetoNSDRCreviewandapprovalpriortoimplementation inrarecaseswiththepermission oftheNSDRCChairmanandSecretary. | |||
PNSRCreviewandapprovalisalwaysdonepriortoimplementation ofTechnical Specification changes.1.7-99July,1994 2f.Sec.4.4"Theon-siteoperating organization shallprovide,aspartofthenormaldutiesofplantsupervisory personnel | |||
...."ExcetionInterretationSomeoftheresponsibilities oftheon-siteoperating organization described inSection4.4maybecarriedout'ythePNSRCand/orNSDRCasdescribed inplantTechnical Specifications. | |||
2g.Sec.5.2.2"Temporary changes,whichclearlydonotchangetheintentoftheapprovedprocedure, shallasaminimumbeapprovedbytwomembersoftheplantstaffknowledgeable intheareasaffectedbytheprocedures. | |||
Atleastoneoftheseindividuals shallbethesupervisor inchargeoftheshiftandholdasenioroperator's licenseontheunitaffected." | |||
ExcetionInterretationI&Kconsiders thatthisrequirement appliesonlytoprocedures identified inplantTechnical Specifications. | |||
Temporary changestotheseprocedures shallbeapprovedasdescribed inplantTechnical Specifications. | |||
2h.Sec.5.2.6"Incaseswhererequireddocumentary evidenceisnotavailable, theassociated equipment ormaterials mustbeconsidered nonconforming inaccordance withSection5.2.14.Untilsuitabledocumentary evidenceisavailable toshowtheequipment ormaterialisinconformance, affectedsystemsshallbeconsidered tobeinoperable andrelianceshallnotbeplacedonsuchsystemstofulfilltheirintendedsafetyfunctions." | |||
ExcetionInterretationISMinitiates appropriate corrective actionwhenitisdiscovered thatdocumentary evidencedoesnotexistforatestorinspection whichisa1.7-100July,1994 JLe0 requirement toverifyequipment acceptability. | |||
Thisactionincludesatechnical evaluation oftheequipment's operability status.2i.Sec.5.2.~ll"Asurveillance testingandinspection program...shallincludetheestablishment ofamastersurveillance schedulereflecting thestatusofallplannedin-plantsurveillance testsandinspections." | |||
ExcetionInterretationSeparatemasterschedules mayexistfordifferent | |||
: programs, suchasISI,pumpandvalvetesting,andTechnical Specification surveillance testing.2j.Sec.5.2.13.1~ll"Totheextentnecessary, procurement documents shallrequiresuppliers toprovidea(}ualityAssurance Programconsistent withthepertinent requirements ofANSIN45.2-1977."ExcetionInterretationTotheextentnecessary, procurement documents requirethatthesupplierhasadocumented gualityAssurance Programconsistent withthepertinent requirements of10CFR50,AppendixB;ANSIN45.2;orothernationally recognized codesandstandards. | |||
2k.Sec.5.2.13.2ANSIN18.7andN45.2.13specifythatwhererequiredbycode,regulation, orcontract, documentary evidencethatitemsconformtoprocurement requirements shallbeavailable atthenuclearpowerplantsitepriortoinstallation oruseofsuchitms.ExcetionInterretationTherequireddocumentary evidenceisavailable athesitepriortouse,butnotnecessarily priortoinstallation. | |||
Thisallowsinstallation to1.7-101Duly,1994 proceedwhileanymissingdocuments arebeingobtained, butprecludes dependence ontheitemforsafetypurposes. | |||
21.Sec.5.2.15"Plantprocedures shallbereviewedbyanindividual knowledgeable intheareaaffectedbytheprocedure nolessfrequently thaneverytwoyearstodetermine | |||
',fchangesarenecessary ordesirable." | |||
ExcetionInterretationBiennialreviewsarenotperformed inthat1&8hasprogrammatic controlrequirements inplacethatmakethebiennialreviewprocessredundant fromaregulatory perspective. | |||
Theseprogrammatic controlswereeffectedinanefforttoensurethatplantinstructions andprocedures arereviewedforpossiblerevisionwhenpertinent sourcematerialisrevised,therefore maintaining theprocedures current.Webelievethatthisapproach, inadditiontoanannualrandomsamplingofprocedures, betteraddresses theintentofthebiennialreviewprocessandismoreacceptable frombothatechnical andpractical perspective thanastatictwo-yearreviewprocess.2m.Sec.5.2.16Recordsshallbemade,andequipment suitablymarked,toindicatecalibration status.ExcetionInterretationSeeItem6b.1.7-102July,1994 2n.Sec.5.3.5(4)Thissectionrequiresthatwheresectionsofdocuments suchasvendormanuals,operating andmaintenance instructions, ordrawingsareincorporated | |||
: directly, orbyreference intoamaintenance procedure, theyshal'lreceivethesamelevelofreviewandapptovalasoperating procedures. | |||
ExcetionInterretationSuchdocuments arereviewedbyappropriately qualified personnel priortousetoensurethat,whenusedasinstructions, theyprovideproperandadequate'nformation toensuretherequiredqualityofwork.Maintenance procedures whichreference thesedocuments receivethesamelevelofreviewandapprovalasoperating procedures. | |||
3.N45.2.1,3a.Sec.3~RN45.2.1estabiishes criteriaforciassifying itemsinto"cieann'esp levels,"andrequiresthatitemsbesoclassified. | |||
Exce'ionInterretationInsteadofusingthecf",::eanness'evel classification systemofN5.2.I,therequirede1;eaiiiiss forspecificitemsandactivities isaddressed onacase-by-case basis.'C'1'ustness: | |||
ismaintained, consistent withtheworkbeingperformed, soastopreventtheintroduction offoreignmateria1. | |||
Asaminimum,g,"cenenoseinspections areperformed priortoclosureof"nuclear" systemsandequipment. | |||
Suchinspections aredocumented. | |||
1.7-103July,1994 | |||
3b.Sec.5~R"Fittingandtack- | 3b.Sec.5~R"Fittingandtack-welded joints(whichwillnotbeimmediately sealedbywelding)shallbewrappedwithpolyethylene orothernonhalogenated plasticfilmuntiltheweldscanbecompleted." | ||
ExcetionInterretationIMsometimes usesothernonhalogenated | |||
: material, compatible withtheparentmaterial, sinceplasticfilmissubjecttodamageanddoesnotalwaysprovideadequateprotection. | |||
4.N45.2.2,General~llN45.2.2establishes requirements andcriteriaforclassifying safety-relateditemsintoprotection levels.ExcetionInterretationInsteadofclassifying safety-related itemsintoprotection levels,controls'ver thepackaging, | |||
: shipping, handlingandstorageofsuchitemsareestablished onacase-by-case basiswithdueregardfortheitem'scomplexity, useandsensitivity todamage.Priortoinstallation oruse,theitemsareinspected andserviced, asnecessary, toassurethatnodamageordeterioration existswhichcouldaffecttheirfunction. | |||
4a.Sec.3.9andAppendixA3.9~lt"Theitemandtheoutsideofcontainers shallbemarked."(FurthercriteriaformarkingandtaggingaregivenintheAppendix.) | |||
ExcetionInterretationTheserequirements wereoriginally writtenforitemspackagedandshippedtoconstruction projects. | |||
Fullcompliance isnotalwaysnecessary inthecaseofitemsshippedtooperating plantsandmay,insomecases,1.7-104July,1994 | |||
increasetheprobability ofdamagetotheitem.Therequirements areimplemented totheextentnecessary toassuretraceability andintegrity oftheitem.4b.Sec.5.2.2~ll"Receiving inspections shallbeperformed inanareaequivalent tothelevelofstorage.". | |||
ExcetionInterretationReceiving inspection areaenvironmental controlsmaybelessstringent thanstorageenvironmental requirements foranitem.However,suchinspections areperformed inamannerandinanenvironment whichdonotendangertherequiredqualityoftheitem.4c.Sec.6.2.4"Theuseorstorageoffood,drinksandsalttabletdispensers inanystorageareashallnotbepermitted." | |||
ExcetionInterretationPackagedfoodforemergency orextendedovertimeusemaybestoredinmaterialstockrooms.Thepackaging assuresthatmaterials arenotcontaminated. | |||
Foodwillnotbe"used"intheseareas.4d.Sec.6.3.4"Allitemsandtheircontainers shallbeplainlymarkedsothattheyareeasilyidentified withoutexcessive handlingorunnecessary openingofcratesandboxes."ExcetionInterretationSeeN45.2.2,Section3.9(Exception 4b.).1.7-105Duly,1994 4e.Sec.6.4.1~R"Inspections andexaminations shallbeperformed anddocumented onaperiodicbasistoassurethattheintegrity oftheitemanditscontainer | |||
...isbeingmaintained." | |||
ExcetionInterretationTherequirement impliesthatallinspections andexaminations ofitemsinstoragearetobeperformed onthesameschedule. | |||
Instead,theinspections andexaminations areperformed inaccordance withmaterialstorageprocedures whichidentifythecharacteristics tobeinspected andincludetherequiredfrequencies. | |||
Theseprocedures arebasedontechnical considerations whichrecognize thatinspections andfrequencies neededvaryfromitemtoitem.5.N45.2.3,5a.Sec.2.1Cleanliness requirements forhousekeeping activities shallbeestablished onthebasisoffivezonedesignations. | |||
ExcetionInterretationInsteadofthefive-level zonedesignation systemreferenced inANSIN45.2.3,ILKbasesitscontrolsoverhousekeeping activities onaconsideration ofwhatisnecessary andappropriate fortheactivityinvolved. | |||
Thecontrolsareeffectedthroughprocedures orinstructions. | |||
Factorsconsidered indeveloping theprocedures andinstructions includecleanliness control,personnel safety,fireprevention andprotection, radiation controlandsecurity. | |||
Theprocedures andinstructions makeuseofstandardjanitorial andworkpractices totheextentpossible. | |||
However,inpreparing theseprocedures, consideration isalsogiventotherecommendations ofSection2.1ofANSIN45.2.3.1.7-106July,1994 SIj 6.N45.2.4,6a.Sec.2.2Section2.2establishes prerequisites whichmustbemetbeforetheinstallation, inspections andtestingofinstrumentation andelectrical equipment mayproceed.Theseprerequisites includepersonnel qualification, controlofdesign,conforming andprotected materials andavailability ofspecified documents. | |||
ExcetionInterretationDuringtheoperations phase,thisrequirement isconsidered tobeapplicable tomodifications andinitialstart-upofelectrical equipment. | |||
Forroutineotperiodicinspection andtesting,theprerequisite conditions willbeachieved, asnecessary. | |||
6b.Sec.6.2.1~ll"Itemsrequiring calibration shallbetaggedorlabeledoncompletion, indicating dateofcalibration andidentityofpersonthatperformed calibration."ExcetionInterretationFrequently, physicalsizeand/orlocationofinstalled plantinstrumentation precludes attachment ofcalibration labelsortags.Instead,eachinstrument isuniquelyidentified andistraceable toitscalibration record.Ascheduled calibration programassuresthateachinstrument's calibration iscurrent.1.7-107July,1994 7.N45.2.5,7a.Sec.2.5.2"Whendiscrepancies, malfunctions orinaccuracies ininspection andtestingequipment arefoundduringcalibration, allitemsinspected withthatequipment sincethelastpreviouscalibration shallbeconsidered unacceptable untilanevaluation hasbeenmadebytheresponsible authority andappropriate actiontaken."ExcetionInterretationILMusestherequirements ofN18.7,Section5.2.16,ratherthanN45.2.5,Section2.5.2.TheN18.7requirements aremoreapplicable toanoperating plant.7b,Sec.5.4~R"Handtorquewrenchesusedforinspection shallbecontrolled andmustbecalibrated atleastweeklyandmoreoftenifdeemednecessary. | |||
Impacttorquewrenchesusedforinspection mustbecalibrated atleasttwicedaily."ExcetionInterretationTorquewrenchesarecontrolled asmeasuring andtestequipment inaccordance withANSIN18.7,Section5.2.16.Calibration intervals arebasedonuseandcalibration historyratherthanasperN45.2.5.8.N45.2.6,Sec.1.2~ll"Therequirements ofthisstandardapplytopersonnel whoperforminspections, examinations andtestsduringfabrication priortoorduringreceiptofitemsattheconstruction site,duringconstruction, duringpreoperational andstart-uptestingandduringoperational phasesofnuclearpowerplants."1.7-108July,1994 ExcetionInterretationPersonnel participating intestingwhotakedataormakeobservations, wherespecialtrainingisnotrequiredtoperformthisfunction, neednotbequalified inaccordance withANSIN45.2.6,butneedonlybetrainedtotheextentnecessary toperformtheassignedfunction. | |||
9.Re.Guide1.58-Generalgualification ofnuclearpowerplantinspection, examination andtestingpersonnel. | |||
ga.C.2.a(7)Regulatory Guide1.58endorsestheguidelines ofSNT-TC-1A asanacceptable methodoftrainingandcertifying personnel conducting leaktests.ExcetionInterretationIKNtakesthepositionthatthe"Level"designation guidelines asrecommended inSNT-TC-1A, paragraph 4donotnecessarily assureadequateleaktestcapability. | |||
ISNmaintains thatdepartmental supervisors arebestabletojudgewhetherengineers andotherpersonnel arequalified todirectand/orperformleaktests.Therefore, I&Ndoesnotimplement therecommended "Level"designation guidelines. | |||
ItisI&M'sopinionthatthetrainingguidelines ofSNT-TC-lA, TableI-G,paragraph 5.2specifically areorientedtowardsthebasicphysicsinvolvedinleaktesting,andfurther,towardsindividuals whoarenotgraduateengineers. | |||
ISNmaintains thatitmeetstheessenceofthesetrainingguidelines. | |||
Thepreparation ofleaktestprocedures andtheconductofleaktestsatCookNucleaiPlantisunderthedirectsupervision ofperformance engineers whoholdengineering degreesfromaccredited engineering schools.Thebasicphysicsofleaktestinghavebeenincorporated intotheapplicable testprocedures. | |||
Thereviewand1.7-109July,1994 f~/' | |||
approvalofthedataobtainedfromleaktestsisperformed bydepartment supervisors whoarealsograduateengineers. | |||
ILKdoesrecognize theneedtoassurethatindividuals involvedinleaktestsarefullycognizant ofleaktestprocedural requirements andthoroughly familiarwiththetestequipment involved. | |||
Plantperformance engineers receiveroutine,informalorientation ontestingprogramstoensurethattheseindividuals fullyunderstand therequirements ofperforming aleaktest.9b.C5,CG,C7,C8,C10ExcetionInterretationIMtakesthepositionthattheclassification ofinspection, examination andtestpersonnel (inspection personnel) into"Levels"basedontherequirements statedinSection3.0ofANSIN45.2.6doesnotnecessarily assureadequateinspection capability. | |||
ISNmaintains thatdepartmental andfirstlinesupervisors arebestabletojudgetheinspection capability ofthepersonnel undertheirsupervision, andthat"Level"classification wouldrequireanoverlyburdensome administrative workload,couldinhibitinspection activities, andprovidesnoassurance ofinspection capabilities. | |||
Therefore, ILKdoesnotimplement the"Level"classification conceptforinspection, examination andtestpersonnel. | |||
Themethodology underwhichinspections, examinations andtestsareconducted attheCookNuclearPlantrequirestheinvolvement offirstlinesupervisors, engineering-personnel, departmental supervisors andplantmanagement. | |||
Inessence,thelastseven(7)projectfunctions showninTableItoANSIN45.2.6areassignedtosupervisory andengineering personnel, andnottopersonnel oftheinspector category. | |||
Thesemanagement supervisory andengineering personnel, asaminimum,meettheeducational andexperience requirements of"LevelIIandLevelIII"personnel, asrequired, tomeetthecriteriaofANSI18.IwhichexceedsthoseofANSIN45.2.6.InIRN'sopinion,nousefulpurposeisservedby1.7-110July,1994 classification ofmanagement, supervisory andengineering personnel into"Levels." | |||
Therefore, I&Mtakesthefollowing positions relativetoregulatory positions C5,6,7,8and10ofRegulatory Guide1.58.C-5C-6Basedonthediscussion in9b,thispositionisnotapplicable totheCookNuclearPla~t.Replacement personnel forCookNuclearPlantmanagement, supervisory andengineering positions subjecttoANSI18.1willmeettheeducational andexperience requirements ofANSI18.Iandtherefore, thoseofANSIN45.2.6.Replacement inspection personnel will,asaminimum,meettheeducational andexperience requirements ofANSIN45.2.6,Section3.5.1-"LevelI."C-7I&M,asageneralpractice, complieswiththetrainingrecommendations assetforthinthisregulatory position. | |||
C-8AllI&Minspection, examination andtestpersonnel areinstructed inthenormalcourseofemployeetraininginradiation protection andthemeanstominimizeradiation doseexposure. | |||
C-10I&Mmaintains documentation toshowthatinspection personnel meettheminimumrequirements of"LevelI,"andthatmanagement, supervisory andengineering personnel meettheminimumrequirements ofANSI18.1.10.N45.2.8,10a.Sec.2.9eSection2.9eofN45.2.8.listsdocuments relatingtothespecificstageofinstallation activitywhicharetobeavailable attheconstruction site.1.7-111July,1994 | |||
ExcetionInterretationAllofthedocuments listedarenotnecessarily requiredattheconstruction siteforinstallation andtesting.AEPSCandILKassurethattheyareavailable tothesite,asnecessary. | |||
10b.Sec.2.9e~llEvidencethatengineering ordesignchangesaredocumented andapprovedshallbeavailable attheconstruction sitepriortoinstallation. | |||
ExcetionInterretationEquipment maybeinstalled beforefinalapprovalofengineering ordesignchanges.However,thesystemisnotplacedintoserviceuntilsuchchangesaredocumented andapproved. | |||
10c.Sec.4.5.1"Installed systemsandcomponents shallbecleaned,flushedconditioned according totherequirements ofANSIN45.2.1.consideration shallbegiventothefollowing requirements: | |||
(Requirements aregivenforchemicalconditioning, flushingcontrols.) | |||
andSpecialandprocessExcetionInterretationSystemsandcomponents arecleaned,flushedandconditioned asdetermined onacase-by-case basis.measuresaretakentohelpprecludetheneedforcleaning, flushingandconditioning throughgoodpractices duringmaintenance ormodification activities. | |||
1.7-112July,1994 tVI 11.N45.2.9lla.Sec.5.4,Item2R~iRecordsshallnotbestoredloosely."Theyshallbefirmlyattachedinbindersorplacedinfoldersorenvelopes forstorageonshelvingincontainers." | |||
Steelfilecabinetsarepreferred. | |||
ExcetionInterretationRecordsaresuitablystoredinsteelfilecabinets, oronshelvingincontainers. | |||
Methodsotherthanbinders,folders,orenvelopes (forexample,dividers) maybeusedtoorganizetherecordsforstorage.11b.Sec.6.2R~i"Alistshallbemaintained designating thosepersonnel whoshallhaveaccesstothefiles".ExcetionInterretationRulesareestablished governing accesstoandcontroloffilesasprovidedfor-inANSIN45.2.9,Section5.3,Item5.Theserulesdonotalwaysincludearequirement foralistofpersonnel whoareauthorized access.Itshouldbenotedthatduplicate filesand/ormicroforms mayexistforgeneraluse.llc.Sec.5.6Whenasinglerecordsstoragefacilityismaintained, atleastthefollowing featuresshouldbeconsidered initsconstruction: | |||
etc.ExcetionInterretationTheCookNuclearPlantMasterFileRoomandotheroff-siterecordstoragefacilities complywiththerequirements ofNUREG-0800 (7/Sl),Section17.1.17.4. | |||
1.7-113July,1994 | |||
12.Re.Guide1.144ANSIN45.2.1212a.Sec.C3a{2)~ | 12.Re.Guide1.144ANSIN45.2.1212a.Sec.C3a{2)~llApplicable elementsofanorganization's gualityAssurance programfor"designandconstruction phaseactivities shouldbeauditedatleastannuallyoratleastoncewithinthelifeoftheactivity, whichever isshorter." | ||
ExcetionInterretationSincemostmodifications arestraightforward,theyarenotauditedindividually. | |||
Instead,selectedcontrolsovermodifications areauditedperiodically. | |||
12b.Sec.C3b{1)Thissectionidentifies procurement contracts whichareexemptedfrombeingaudited.ExcetionInterretationInadditiontotheexemptions ofReg.Guide1.144,AEPSC/ISH considers thattheNationalInstitute ofStandards and.Technology, orotherStateandFederalAgencieswhichmayprovideservicestoAEPSC/18K, arenotrequiredtobeaudited.12c.Sec.4.5.1ReuirementResponses toadverseauditfindings, givingresultsofthereviewandinvestigation, shallclearlystatethecorrective actiontakenorplannedtopreventrecurrence. | |||
"Intheeventthatcorrective actioncannotbecompleted withinthirtydays,theauditedorganization's responseshallincludeascheduled dateforthecorrective action."1.7-114July,1994 ExcetionInterretationAEPSC/ISM takethepositionthatcertaincircumstances warrantmorethanthirty(30)daystocompletely investigate thecauseand/ortotalimpactofanadversefinding.Forthesecircumstances, aninitialthirty(30)dayresponsewillbeprovidedwhichaddresses ascheduleforknowncorrective actions,thereasonwhyadditional investigation timeisneeded,andascheduleforcompletion oftheinvestigation. | |||
Theseinitialresponses requiretheapprovalofthedirector-qualityassurance. | |||
13.N45.2.13,13a.Sec.3.2.2~RN45.2.13requiresthattechnical requirements bespecified inprocurement documents breference totechnical requirement documents. | |||
Technical requirement documents aretobeprepared, reviewedandreleasedundertherequirements established byANSIN45.2.11.ExcetionInterretationForreplacement partsandmaterials, AEPSC/ISA followANSIN18.7,Section5.2.13,Subitem1,whichstates:"Wheretheoriginalitemorpartisfoundtobecommercially | |||
'offtheshelf'rwithoutspecifically identified gArequirements, spareandreplacement partsmaybesimilarly | |||
: procured, butcareshallbeexercised toensureatleastequivalent performance." | |||
13b.Sec.3.2.3"Procurement documents shallrequirethatthesupplierhaveadocumented qualityassurance programthatimplements partsorallofANSIN45.2aswellasapplicable qualityassurance programrequirements ofothernationally recognized codesandstandards." | |||
1.7-115July,1994 Qi4' ExcetionInterretationRefertoItem2j13c.Sec.3.3(a)Reviewsofprocurement documents shallbeperformed priortoreleaseforbidandcontractaward.ExcetionInterretationDocuments maybereleasedforbidorcontractawardbeforecompleting thenecessary reviews.However,thesereviewsarecompleted beforetheitemorserviceisputintoservice,orbeforeworkhasprogressed beyondthepointwhereitwouldbeimpractical toreversetheactiontaken.13d.Sec.3.3(b)Reviewofchangestoprocurement documents shallbeperformed priortoreleaseforbidandcontractaward.ExcetionInterretationThisrequirement appliesonlytoqualityrelatedchanges(i.e.,changestotheprocurement documentprovisions identified inANSIN18.7,Section5.2.13.1,Subitems1through5).Thetimingofreviewswillbethesameasforreviewoftheoriginalprocurement documents. | |||
13e.Sec.10.1"Whererequiredbycode,regulation, orcontractrequirement, documentary evidencethatitemsconformtoprocurement documents shallbeavailable atthenuclearpowerplantsitepriortoinstallation oruseofsuchitems,regardless ofacceptance methods." | |||
July,1994 | |||
ExcetionInterretationRefertoItem2k.~R"Post- | ExcetionInterretationRefertoItem2k.~R"Post-installation testrequirements andacceptance documentation shallbemutuallyestablished bythepurchaser andsupplier." | ||
' | ExcetionInterretationInexercising itsultimateresponsibility foritsqualityassurance program,AEPSC/ILK establishes post-installation testrequirements givingdueconsideration tosupplierrecommendations. | ||
14.Re.Guide1.146ANSIN45.2.23andANSIN45.2.2.12 14a.ANSIN45.2.23Sec.'.lThisstandardprovidesrequirements andguidanceforthequalification ofauditteamleaders,henceforth identified as"leadauditors." | |||
14b.ANSIN45.2.12, Sec.4.2.2Aleadauditorshallbeappointed teamleader.ExcetionInterretationTheAEPSCauditprogramisdirectedbytheAEPSCdirector-qualityassurance andisadminister'ed bydesignated gAdepar'tmirit sectionmanagers/supervisor'S:. | |||
whoarecertified leadauditors. | |||
Auditsare,inmostcases,conducted byindividual | |||
: auditors, notby"auditteams."Theseauditorsarecertified inaccordance withestablished procedures andareassignedbytheresponsible gAsectionmanager/supervisor basedontheirdemonstrated auditcapability andgeneralknowledge oftheauditsubject.Incertaincases,thisresultsinanindividual otherthana"leadauditor"conducting theactualauditfunction. | |||
1.7-117July,1994 a~SFgXpPehslm' | |||
'Established AEPSCauditprocedures requirethat,inallcases,theauditfunctions ofpreparation/organization, reporting ofauditfindingsandevaluation ofcorrective actionsbereviewedbygABep@'t)ii5A$ | |||
sectionmanagers/supervisor, therebymeetingtherequirements ofANSIN45.2.23relativeto"leadauditors", | |||
and"auditteamleaders." | |||
1~ASXN78$ | |||
1I~~ti':ii'.iiit.':!tiie."it 1m'!!!0fiit01tpal'iii40l,'9Aii roadjniigorii!Bppbggm'0 ntiitoi!thai'Bett'oe'!peeped'0+ | |||
ifjiiii:ie,,--ii.',e-ii',---Iw!i!i!i!ijs,',::: | |||
i,'~!i:-,:ii::iii-;.i::*-':,:i'i:, | |||
->>!ii.":-::..::::. | |||
i-.i:-::.-:-:i::,::::i-i~i'i'-n:~i! | |||
.~i-:::::: | |||
-!ai-.:--:,:='-!'e!":i:.:::::::,:- | |||
ernie'i:"rea'ctori::::.CpeiCtor!s;::;:liicanse~i.::canjt. | |||
j:;B:a~piontde."iiTas:.pC:artsdon!;'sm.Bnja~er,":.":";:(! | |||
LHi~lib':i:,'i::.p i:iiitiii!i','i'i'i!i,'"( | |||
j''i!i~i!:." | |||
i'):,""i,',i"''ii | |||
""'iii*','ili,'('i,'eiFi!at,;','Beni'cri!'opi jailor!-:;:Ie'cen'st":at@Cook::, | |||
uci'ea'r.'."lPla~nt::.o~r.:.",a~iisimil:ai'e'BCtc'r,; | |||
janorenei<iii'-"'.;i'ape'iioa erie'tSOnS",:::p'rteaudte'OniiiSu-'eppia'Or,:,::,tna!3i:'.nne!'Oi'0 8!*--1";i-j-,:-:iiti!-----, | |||
--ii',;-,,:,:,!Th1 | |||
-,.:::i~9::-- | |||
'Ii-!-e,.--',it!,-,-cps'ist'cri'lent> | |||
th:,:Te'chnsc'al~~':::.;Soe'cs::fic~6son':,6':.2':2!':h~) | |||
jraev>ous1 j~.'.Capjroyedgby Nuolear,:.".",:Rag'Ul alibi;::Cym~ti ssi'on.:1.7-118July,1994 lg}} |
Revision as of 06:20, 29 June 2018
ML17334B511 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Cook |
Issue date: | 07/31/1994 |
From: | INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML17334B510 | List: |
References | |
NUDOCS 9406020315 | |
Download: ML17334B511 (188) | |
Text
DONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTCOOKNUCLEARPLANTUNITNUMBERS1AND2DOCKETNOS.50-135AND50-316LICENSENOS.DPR-58ANDDPR-74UPDATEDQUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAMDESCRIPTION FORTHECOOKNUCLEARPLANTJULY,~S:9,94Concurred by:AEPSCChiefNuclearEngineerM~@,isDate:Approvedby:AEPSCDirector-QlityAssurance Date:Approvedby:AEPSCSeniorViceresidentNuclearGeneration 9406020315 940523PDRADO!K05000315','!]P,,PDR
<r~/,'
AmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation 1Riverside PlazaColumbus, OH432156142231000gguHERKARH,F.CK'RIC PQWERSTATEMENT OFPOLICYFORTHEDONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTEQUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAMPOLICYAmericanElectricPowerCompanyIncrecognizes thefundamental importance ofcontrolling thedesign,modification, andoperation ofIndianaMichiganPowerCompany's DonaldC.CookNuclearPlant(CookNuclearPlant)byimplementing aplannedanddocumented qualityassurance program,including qualitycontrol,thatcomplieswithapplicable regulations, codes,andstandards.
Thequalityassurance programhasbeenestablished tocontrolactivities affecting safety-related functions ofstructures, systems,andcomponents in"',,';;":>
CookNuclearPlant.Thequalityassurance programsupportsthegoa)ofmaintaining thesafetyand.reliability ofCookNuclearPlantatthehighestlevelthroughasystematic programdesignedtoassurethatactivities affecting safety-related functions areconducted incompliance withapplicable regulations, codes,standards, andestablished corporate policiesandpractices.
Aschairmanoftheboard,pie's'srd'ent:,
andchiefexecutive officerofAmericanElectricPowerCompany,Inc.,Imaintaintheultimateresponsibility forthequalityassurance programassociated withCookNuclearPlant.Ihavedelegated responsibilities forimplementation of,andcompliance with,thequalityassurance program,asoutlinedinthisstatement.
IMPLEHENTATIONTheAEPSCdirector-quality assurance, underthe":.diV'acti:on.".';o'.-:,":,"';:the,:.:,:.:AEPSC s'e'ni'ii;,.",Pi,ce,'.:;;pre&
dengnucl:"ear,,':.gen'ii'.'atj'on, hasbe'enassignerJtheovera'1"f Fesporisib'ilY'ty" fo'r'"speci"Fyi'n'g thequali'tyassurance programrequirements forCookNuclearPlantandverifying theirimplementation.
TheAEPSCdirector-quality assurance hasauthority tostopwork,onanyactivityaffectingsafety-rel ateditemsthatdoesnotmeetapplicableRevised5/2/941.7-1July,1994
/1$'1' Statement oFPolicyfortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantequalityAssurance ProgramPage2administrative, technical, and/orregulatory requirements.
TheAEPSCdirector-quality assurance doesnothavetheauthority tostopunitoperations, butshallnotifyappropriate plantand/orcorporate management ofconditions notmeetingtheaforementioned criteriaandrecommend thatunitoperations beterminated.
TheAEPSCse6j:"or";
vicepresident-nuclear gehei.'"ati;oY7, undermydirection, hasbeen'delegated responsibility foreffectively implementing thequalityassurance program.j~yAllotherAEPSCdivisions anddepartments
@j".;;.havingasupporting rolefor@)CookNuclearPlantarefunctionally Theplantmanager,underthedirection oftheAEPSCserio'r,vicepresident-nuclear g'e'ne'ra'ti:on',
isdelegated theresponsibility for~3implementing thequali"tyassurance programatgCookNuclearPlant.TheAEPSCdirector-quality assurance isi'.,'eipor'i'sib;Ie forestablishing gqualitycontrolprogramF~PatFÃ8CookNuclearPfanY.TheAEPSCdirector-quality assurance isresponsible forproviding technical direction totheplantmanagerFormattersrelatingtothequalityassurance programat."..~CookNuclearPlant.TheAEPSCdirector-qualityassurance is.."."i~<responsible formaintaining aqualityassurance sectionatP~.CookNuclearPlanttoperformrequiredreviews,audits,andsurveillances,andtoprovidetechnical liaisonservicestotheplantmanager.Theimplementation ofthequalityassurance programisdescribed intheAEPSCGeneralProcedures (GPs),AEP,'":;:';Nuclear,!'.,:;:Organi'.zat'i'oo>::.',:,Po~l'i.:,cy~:,:.::-,.:8; Proc'ed6i'e"'::.-:;:Haijiigl;"",<
andsubtierdepartment7di visionproce8u'res, PlantNa'nager"~s Instructions (PHIs),andsubtierdepartment headinstructions andprocedures, whichintotaldocumenttherequirements forimplementation oftheprogram.EachAEPSCandCookNuclearPlantorganization involvedinactivities affecting safety-related functions ofstructures, systems,andcomponents inP$gFCookNuclearPlanthasth'eresponsibility toimplement theappli'cable policiesandrequirements ofthequalityassurance program.Thisresponsibility includesbeingfamiliarwith,andcomplying with,theapplicable qualityassurance programrequirements.
COMPLIANCE TheAEPSCdirector-quality assurance shallmonitorcompliance withtheestablishedqualityassurance program.Auditprogramsshal1beRevised5/2/941.7-2July,1994 lgJ Statement ofPolicyfortheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantequalityAssurance ProgramPage3established toensurethatAEPSCandCookNuclearP'lantactivities complywithestablished programrequirements, identifydeficiencies ornoncompliances, andobtaineffective andtimelycorrective actions.Any,.employeeengagedinactivitiesaffecting safety-related functions ofstructures, systems,andcomponents inp'sCookNuclearPlantwhobelieve5'he qualityassurance programisnot"beingcompliedwith,orthatadeficiency inqualityexists,shouldnotifyhN:s/he'ij supervisor, theAEPSCdirector-quality assurance, and/ortheplantmanager.Ifthenotificationdoesnot/intheemployee's opinion~<
receivepromptorappropriate attention,"
theemployeeshouldcontactsuccessively higherlevelsofmanagement.
Pnemployeereporting suchconditions shallnotbediscriminated agains't'y companies oftheAmericanElectricPowerSystem,no'r,'-"',shal'.lgany7j'upplg;er';"-;u'(i dermic'onto:.ac't"=%ij.'.th~-,'aji$
.'.;.l'o'f'<)th'e';;,cojii'pan'j',es df'scharge"or otheractionsrelative'tocomp'ensation, terms,conditions, orprivileges ofemployment.
E.LinnDraper,Jr.ChairmanoftheBoard,President andChiefExecutive OfficerAmericanElectricPowerCompany,Inc.Revised5/2/94July,1994 4/C~Y,0 1.7.1OR6ANIZATION 1.7.1.1SCOPEAmericanElectricPowerServiceCorporation (AEPSC)isresponsible forestablishing andimplementing thegualityAssurance (gA)programfortheoperational phaseoftheDonaldC.CookNuclearPlant(CookNuclearPlant).Althoughauthority fordevelopment andexecution ofvariousportionsoftheprogrammaybedelegated toothers,suchascontractors, agentsorconsultants, AEPSCretainsoverallresponsibility.
AEPSCshallevaluateworkdelegated tosuchorganizations.
Evaluations shallbebasedonthestatusofsafetyimportance oftheactivitybeingperformed andshallbeinitiated earlyenoughtoassureeffective qualityassurance duringtheperformance ofthedelegated activity.
ThissectionofthegualityAssurance ProgramDescription (gAPD)identifies theAEPSCorganizational responsibilities foractivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related nuclearpowerplantstructures, systems,andcomponents, anddescribes theauthority anddutiesassignedtothem.Itaddresses responsibilities forbothattaining qualityobjectives andforthefunctions ofestablishing thegAprogram,andverifying thatactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related itemsareperformed effectively inaccordance withgAprogramrequirements.
1.7.1.2IHPLEHENTATION 1.7.1.2.1 SourceofAuthoritThechairmanoftheboard.',:qpresidenW,:.
andchiefexecutive officerofAmericanE1ectricPowerCompany,Inc.(AEP)andAEPSCisresponsib1e forsafeoperation oftheCookNuclearPlant.Authority andresponsibility
- foreffectively implementing thegAprogramforplantmodifications, operations andmaintenance aredelegated totheAEPSCi~en'iorvicepresident nucIearEe'n'eratgon.
1.7-4July,1994
Intheoperation ofanuclearpowerplant,thelicenseeisrequiredtoestablish clearanddirectlinesofresponsibility, authority andaccountability.
Thisrequirement isapplicable totheorganization providing supporttotheplant,aswellastotheplantstaff.Ih,,i",':P
'It'It!)ltd~i!if."',!hi~i!h'
'(i't)phd'trilfld):','p!I!,'ll(,,',
I(lith'i.:":
dr'E':iii.""":!EI~!"
'til)'I!P.""'":-::E"
-'"0I"'llEI~!i!Ldftht)!M!!i"
'*!l""il,:"'!I'i'Ehp'I iid"hi!-:PP'!lI'IIEP!!i!E"
'I::I!:"'"!E'I ttid':)'I"",sli P"t."'"':::'-,::.I'ms'tmbd~ify~th~et;
~ja'nt.'t::::;
6e;.."AEpgt~seni Ior!Vitceesi denpt5nu'el cuirri--;PI:-,:g'-*-*:::::E;I~f-:,:.:::--*
'::::II)rrtf*;-:Ph
--',:;:;E--:I::,EW'I:
'--'::-PI I:-:-;::;::;-:::d))
- EE)"EsiIIIf'di'dE-I""tIi:--':E"'IEI::---'I:!Pii-:
rW~M'")!it:"~:.:I'"!!IIEPN 4'ni'oi::::vj:c':e
- ipr"',e'a)den'a~in'jhjcl'eal';:::::ge'neiiaCiaii:";l'~(r'epei'cence'ipigj)re~it
.7;.-',::lg,.'n ordertofacilitate amorethoroughunderstanding ofthesupportfunctions, someoftheresponsibilities, authorities, andaccountabilities withintheorganization areasfollows:I)Ihpihi!i!ifthEPEE!ii'::.
':Iilia.'I':
i!i)jfftid,.t,:.:
generation shallbededicated totheareaofcookNuclearPlantoperations andsupport.2)'he'AEPSLi'~sani~oi;:,.))i'ce;:::;::
.resid~en "nufcl.ear,:,";:hgeierat'I'on shallberesponsible for,andhastheauthority todirect,allCookNuclearPlantoperational andsupportmattersLgg<andshal'Imake,orconcur,inallfinaldecisions regarding significant nuclearsafetymatters.3)O'KPNOmanagersQshallbefamiliarwithactivities withintheirscopeofresponsibility thataffectplantsafetyandreliability.
Theyshallbecognizant of,andsensitive to,interna1andexternalfactorsthatmightaffecttheoperations ofCookNuclearPlant.1.7-5July,1994
!
S)AYP))GmanagersQj~haveacommitment toseekandidentifyproblemareasandtakecorrective actiontoeliminate unsafeconditions, ortoimprovetrendsthatwillupgradeplantsafetyandreliabi1ity.g)The:EpgC:::::iiii'jor,,,vd~e;;::pi
- coddestmac);eawWfensiation sacoeure.thatCookNuclearPlantpersonnel arenotrequested toperforminappropriate workottasksbycorporate personnel, andshallcontrolassignments andrequeststhathavethepotential fordiverting theattention oftheplantmanagerfromtheprimaryresponsibility forsafeandreliableplantoperation.
6)'AEPHOlm'anna.
~er'sshallbefamiliarwiththepolicystatements fromhighermanagement concerning nuclearsafetyandoperational priorities.
Theyshallberesponsible forensuringthatactivities undertheirdirection areperformed inaccordance withthesepolicies.
l.7.1.2.2Resonsibilit forAttaininualitObectivesinAEPSCNuclear~~~~~~Genera%::'oITheAEPchairmanoftheboard~fj<'pres'ident'nd chiefexecutive officehasassignedtheoverallresponsibility forspecifying gAprogramrequirements andverifying theirimplementation totheAEPSCdirector-qualityassurance.
TheAEPSCsin'joPPvicepresident nuclear:jerjepatjoa, underthedirection oftheAEpchairmanoftheboardwpres'1'derntbj andchiefexecutive officer,isresponsible foreffectively implementing thegAprogram.ThIIXPSL'i!8):
','e~!II'hF!ii"":"",';
4hdiifhAEFmi'or;vicepresident nuclearg'enid'i'it'ion, isresponsible forestablishing theCookNuclearPlantqualitycontrolprogram1.7-6July,1994 l
":,.g~w,':::"Ai,---!::.
-"-g-.::,i:,::.:':,:,I::,-,.I!!!!.:
s!.:;-:!e---.!!
~!!e-!,::!tv-,,:,,I,:
0!(gunctions'll.:;of!~sguct urea'!asys terna"::::.';:
and~!co~m-bne'ns,':!kiiRCoohg(eel'earT'P'1 ant-:,',"
lk~~fti'",l!'.".":.,~lb!'!
aF!itmjil,','--!
t'mi::'pp~fl,,b'!:-!i
-!I'-,"--!:,::::
'!::"!'!:::,:::
!ll!!tlat'.\!I!!,'-:--.
-":.-:';'!!!!-."
':i!mtii!i:':p.:'.,-:::!vie!!es KnoixdeS~%i'fig*',"fieiiiii sr.::::.".W(%~hanL(;.Oempfyfn jjiitrh.."!.":t((e!!oppTO'C'ab e'.:it(u'ag(i@
ass~uranc'ei piog'ramIre((ui.imengssAEPSChasanindependent off-siteNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee (NSDRC)whichhasbeenestablished pursuanttotherequirements oftheTechnical Specifications fortheCookNuclearPlant.ThefunctionoftheNSDRCistooverseetheengineering, design,operation, andmaintenance oftheCookNuclearPlantbyperforming auditsandindependent reviewsofactivities whicharespecified inthefacilityTechnical Specifications.
TheCookNuclearPlanton-sitereviewgroupistheIndianaMichiganPowerCompany(ISM)PlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee (PNSRC).Thiscommittee hasalsobeenestablished pursuanttotherequirements oftheCookNuclearPlantTechnical Specifications.
ThefunctionofthePNSRCistoreviewplantoperations onacontinuing basisandadvisetheplantmanageronmattersrelatedtonuclearsafety.1.7.1.2.3CororateOranization AmericanElectricPowerComanAEP,theparentholdingcompany,whollyownsthecommonstockofallAEPSystemsubsidiary (operating) companies.
Themajoroperating companies andgeneration subsidiaries areshowninFigure1.7-2.Thechairmanoftheboard:,:<pre's'!(dentp andchiefexecutive officerofAEFisthechiefexecutive officerofAEPSCandalloperating companies.
Theresponsibility forthefunctional management ofthemajoroperating companies isvestedinthepresident ofeachoperating companyreporting 1~77July,1994 totheAEPSCchaicmanoftheboacd~j~i',-::
i,'.e'a'Oderi~t::!ahdc":chi'ef'.:::execiito)'i,*
~o'ffei'ceo eih:."P,AmericanElectricPowerServiceCororationTheresponsibility foradministrative andtechnical direction oftheAEPSystemanditsfacilities isdelegated toAEPSC.AEPSCprovidesmanagement andtechnological servicestothevariousAEPSystemNcompanies.
0eratinComaniesTheoperating facilities oftheAEPSystemareownedandoperatedbytherespective operating companies.
Theresponsibility forexecuting theengineering, design,construction, specialized technical
- training, andcertainoperations supervision isvestedinAEPSC,whileall,or'art,oftheadministrative functional responsibility isassignedtotheoperating companies.
InthecaseofCookNuclearPlant,ILKgeneralofficestaff(headquarters),
providespublicaffairs,accounting, alidindustrial safetydirection
~?5:::.TheCookNuclearPlantisownedandoperatedbyILKwhichispartoftheAEPSystem.1.7.l.2.4ualitAssurance Resonsibilit ofAEPSCI)AEPSCprovidesthetechnical direction fortheCookNuclearPlant,andassuchmakesthefinaldecisions pertinent tosafety-related changesinplantdesign.Further,AEPSCreviewsNuclearRegulatory Commission (NRC)letters,bulletins, notices,etc.,forimpactonplantdesign,andtheneedfordesignchangesormodifications.
1.7-8July,1994 at,'
2)AEPSCfurnishes qualityassurance, engineering, design,construction, licensing, NRCcorrespondence, fuelmanagement andradiological supportactivities.
3)AEPSCprovidesadditional serviceinmatterssuchassupplierqualification, procurement oforiginalequipment andreplacement parts,andtheprocessofdedicating commercial gradeitemsorservicestosafety-related applications.
4)TheAEPSCqAdopa'riant providestechnical direction inqualityassurance matterstoAEPSCandtheCookNuclearPlant,andoverseestheadequacy, effectiveness andimplementation ofthegAProgramthroughreviewandauditactivities.
5)Cognizant engineerQt'::.(e.g.,systemengineer, equipment
- engineer, leadengineer, responsible
- engineer, procurrement,:!eng~iieei'tc.)
P!NisthatAEPSCindividualwhoprovidestheengineering/desi gnexpertise foraparticular areaofresponsibility.
Thisresponsibility includestheimplementation ofthequalityassurance andqualitycontrolmeasuresforsystems,equipment, structures, orfunctional areasincludedinthatindividual sresponsibility.
Thevarioustitlesusedfortheidentification ofanindividual's responsibility andassignment shallbeunderstood
'omeanthesameascognizant engineerintherespective areasofresponsibility.
ualitAssurance Resonsibilit ofI&M-CookNuclearPlantI&M'sCookNuclearPlantstaffoperatestheCookNuclearPlantinaccordance withlicensing requirements, including theTechnical Specifications andsuchothercommitments asestablished bytheoperating licenses.
ThePlantManagerInstruction (PMI)system'nd subtierinstructions andprocedures describethemeansbywhichcompliance isachievedandresponsibilities areassigned, including interfaces withAEPSC.Figure1.7-Iindicates theorganizational July,1994
~r'ICl relationships withintheAEPSystempertaining totheoperation andsupportoftheCookNuclearPlant.1.7.1.2.5Oranization AEPSCThechairmanoftheboardreppr'eVidentp andchiefexecutive officerisultimately responsible forthei)Aprogramassociated withtheCookNuclearPlant.Thisresponsibility isadministered throughtheAEPSGseato%i:,:':
ii'i~e::pre's'ident,':'nuc(
e'a'r.";'."getne'tion';
iiuolearGenertat1enid)etTrMtntr II-ll',,;:,9",:tl:-"lt:::::::,-
tp9'---'I,:::"
919IIltpttl,I,-l,":pp:,pi-;.":9 "1:","""':.mm'1'l',pt,"'!!iiiitlt iiilitllllli:e::.'lI"",'ll',"bill~it,
Il",'lt"iiiitl9INiiclear,.-.::pl antt'ohgaiii'xa6'~~n'..
TheAEPSCdirector-qualityassurance) reporting tothehE~PBC:"'serjf~or.
ittceiptpres(ddLt!pn utc1'ar!glenbnatp(on, isresponsible forthequaliyassurance (qA)Leper'tsie'nt:.
TheqAdepartment consistsofthefollowing sections(Figure1.7-8):tl1lty99I9KIIII::.',,------
9*IISiippl':,'>,i'i.".:,per f9.ormance section8~it'equalityassuranceand".".!'c'opti~olvsde'paritment'he gADisorganizationally independent andisresponsible toperformthefollowing:
SpecifygAprogramrequirements.
Identifyqualityproblems.
- Initiate, recommend, orprovidesolutions throughdesignated channels.
Verifyimplementation ofsolutions, asappropriate.
Prepare,issueandmaintaingAprogramdocuments, asrequired.
1.7-10July,1994 Yerifytheimplementation ofthegAprogramthroughscheduled auditsandsurveillances.
Yerifytheimplementation ofcomputersoftwarequalityassurance throughreviews,'surveillances andaudits.Auditengineering, design,procurement, construction andoperational documents forincorporation of,andcompliance with,applicable qualityassurance requirements totheextentspecified bytheAEPSCmanagement-approved gAprogram.OrganizeandconductthegAauditororientation,
- training, certification andqualification ofAEPSCauditpersonnel.
Providedirection forthecollection, storage,maintenance, andretention ofqualityassurance records.Naintain, ondatabase,alistofsuppliers ofnuclear(N)itemsandservices, plusotherselectedcategories ofsuppliers.
Identifynoncompliances oftheestablished gAprogramtotheresponsible organizations forcorrective actions,andreportsignificant occurrences thatjeopardize qualitytoseniorAEPSCmanagement.
Followuponcorrective actionsidentified bygAduringandafterdisposition implementation.
Reviewthedisposition ofconditions adversetoqualitytoassurethatactiontakenwillprecluderecurrence.
Conductin-process gAauditsorsurveHlancesatsupplier's facilities, asrequired.
AssistandadviseotherAEP/AEPSC groupsinmattersrelatedtothegAprogram.ConductauditsasdirectedbytheNSDRC.ReviewAEPSCinvestigated Condition Reportsandassociated corrective andpreventive actionrecommendations.
Haintaincognizance ofindustryandgovernmental qualityassurance requirements suchthatthegAprogramiscompatible withrequirements, asnecessary.
Recommend forrevisionto,orimprovements in,theestabli'shed gAProgramtoseniorAEPSCmanagement.
Auditdedication plansforcommercial gradeitemsandservices.
July,1994 wyt0K44II<<
Issue"StopMork"orderswhensignificant conditions adversetosafety-related itemsareidentified topreventunsafeconditions fromoccurring and/orontinuing.
ProvideAEPSCmanagement withperiodicreportsconcerning thestatus,adequacyandimplementation ofthegAprogram.Prepareandconductspecialverification and/orsurveillance programsonin-houseactivities, asrequiredorrequested.
Routinely attend,andparticipate in,dailyplantworkscheduleandstatusmeetings.
ProvideadequategAcoveragerelativetoprocedural andinspection
- controls, acceptance
- criteria, andgAstaffingandqualification ofpersonnel tocarryoutgAassignments.
Determine theacceptability ofvendorstosupplyproductsandservicesforsafety-re'Iated applications.
~~'.:~j:':..gP'roijde,.:,ger fBnij.-,,',:l,ice'f)"'icoordjnVffon:,."';:Mi fh~4hgjfjjstf.
Poser,':0pa,rra'tfonsi'(SNPO):::::;
nite':;::::areas,"ofglNPon!itraqninp:':!is'em airs':.'a'n'dh'mnrtehppa'd::,;,::,~TiTiaiiePP~Oiti)i'iifuueeaa~i,"'::--r'Or~idinj!;:
q5lTSGpCa'CeSsiai'~tO'!!i!Iii;,
-:----:,,--'::,i.:,---,h'i::--ill0'f!'foal!em!iia'i*':
-c!".::T--N4---,!T.
- ,
- ~:,.";!i!OeY~l:
.o,pr7a4%1iip'li;emei3i:,,an!,"ef!fe'ctni',,i nalYit3igCont:
Lh@e":.:,.'enn>iaPaises::,'-:.hut:..",.gsjnoT!iqmolte'dM=;:~khei jl'ann'3nj~!and Ki'rect%'ng':.:,',o'f~;qdad tdy'ciaotnar,.l".;:::
acWtyitessioi'as'serai'thdtf.:::
s'nu~stry,cod'es,"j:::NRC;'-;rap'u)ath'ons",."i:.:'.and,"::cn'ompanydnnstrYctto'ons'!aYid:::;Polh cia's!riega~ldLnoaq~ua'I itiaiznht>~ol.;i foll!coopcYgiTcl'eat$
'P'tant!ari7c'!im,l emehte'draq!
,qualÃfjad~piirsaw'e,ilia puifrerum!th!ia,user!'-sn!jjijialt!::htese',."mctiVjl"ffes aresjiraperlyf'do'cumen3Q.
~i!,'.!e j~Dwi.'cata!!t!hePN'c'tqrltiesiiof'!contr'act oi"(]Cji'i'oii,d,e's'0
- .,'('NOE).:!
pei~ioiiiie'll::ass!Needs to'htheysht'e':-,',:q'ua't ity,:::assurance:,,:a~nd".coh~iigo'q dea7tmenti".,;an'd.:;.;::-
rop3ferorersiqh":;,t,::
o'.feIok!r".;:
iierofriiiidg
'-,-'-::iiiiiiill'-'Wl!4,"'Ehli:
'"L::-'-NifrW!'>>'!
fCHI!p.',
'.!lip":.!-'::-.'
mii;nteanncidit'Otf'hiF.;i":,i(qui; rementepfg'e@ii~;rOy)6'iiidai1768!jindVNYf 4572'::,"::,6,",:,",eeXce td."'as.'.noted>'4n';.:;:Ap jend'3'X~48:':heiet~o,'j':;.~$
telii;,;p Duly,1994
'!iliaiitva':,'Et:
'jtj'III.
'Eil'",tiai-,'t~i,
'-:,I~tR~tiillOE'
',~liii(it.
i't%eqNii emanTs;:.:of.-'-::tth'ev'AEP~NOETdNanuaQ
- ':,.--E~fiii!
-It:::-::"-It E,tj,,t-,:j-
-::::::,::::::t-:E,-':---E
,'t'ai-.",":V,:
-tvjaill~t,;:*,,tttltEIt'"!E!EIE
':I!EMIR; ANSI!'::NAT22'6,:.",.-:
ASNEE!SKpV:::
'Ceeie";.'!tend/Or."".:SNT,,-TC-.:.'I A':i::,:aarEapp'l'iCatbl'e,:;
Amlification ofSecificResonsibilities ualification oftheAEPSCdirector-ualitassurance TheAEPSCdirector-qualityassurance shallpossessthefollowing positionrequirements:
Bachelorsdegreeinengineering, scientific, orrelateddiscipline.
Ten(10)yearsexperience inoneof,oracombination of,thefollowing areas:engineering, design,construction, operations, maintenance offossilornuclearpowergeneration facilities'r utilityfacilities'A, ofwhichatleastfour(4)yearsmustbeexperience innuclearqualityassurance relatedactivities.
Knowledge ofQAregulations,
- policies, practices andstandards.
Thesame,orhigher,organization reporting levelasthehighestlinemanagerdirectlyresponsible forperforming activities affecting thequalityofsafety-related items,suchasengineering, procurement, construction andoperation, andissufficiently independent fromcostandschedule.
Effective communication channelswithotherseniormanagement positions.
Responsibility forapprovalofgAmanual(s).
Performance ofnootherdutiesorresponsibilities unrelated togAthatwouldpreventfullattention togAmatters.StoWorkOrdersTheAEPSCOA~de'atrtment isresponsible forensuringthatactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related itemsareperformed inamannerthatmeetsapplicable administrative, 1.7-13July,1994 IH technical, andregulatory requirements.
Inordertocarryoutthisresponsibility, theAEPchairmanoftheboard,jCes3:den8, andchiefexecutive officerhasgiventheAEPSCdirector-qualityassurance theauthority tostopworkonanyactivityaffecting thequalityofsafety-related itemsthatdoesnotmeettheaforementioned requirements.
Stopworkauthority
'hasbeenfurtherdelegated bytheAEPSCdirector-qualityassurance totheAEPSCi3'tequalityassurance a~d!,Cor'itr@N superintendent.
TheAEPSCdirector-qualityassurance andtheAEPSCsBequalityassurance a~4'.,;.iiqtri3l superintendent donothavetheauthority tostopunitoperations, butwillnotifyappropriate CookNuclearPlantand/orcorporate management ofconditions whichdonotmeettheaforementioned
- criteria, andrecommend thatunitoperations beterminated.
AAuditoruglification andCertification ProramAEPSChasestablished andmaintains agAauditortrainingandcertification programforallAEPSCgAauditors.
Condition Identification ReortinandEscalation AEPSChasestablished mechanisms fortheidentification, reporting andescalation ofconditions affecting thequalityofsafety-related itemstoalevelofmanagement wherebysatisfactory resolutions canbeobtained.
Lh'ediiEps'0::."::":::c'iia dfdt.-,op'peretz'oiiai'-;manas'e'ianddi immaannais'edr'-"';niicl ear::,":."
iaipfpo'ra'~aervi'cea ig'8'ssjg:
departmentr,':;,-::::::rreeporstjgj~t:
oi:theApSirtcsireag
~crycef.'rAe:den>tiQc!le ai'.',p'",,'ol"'ll p111ftfll1p:11pll1dp11111,ll1g,operation, maintenance, fuelmanagement, andradiological support.1.7-14July,1994 IIV Providetheplantmanagerwiththetechnical andmanagerial
- guidance, direction andsupporttoensurethesafeoperation oftheplant.Maintain'liaisonwiththeAEPSCdirector-qualityassurance.
Implement therequirements oftheAEPSCgAprogram.Maintainknowledge ofthelatestsafety,licensing, andregulatory requirements, codes,standards, andfederalregulations applicable totheoperation ofCookNuclearPlant.Accomplish theprocurement,
- economic, technical, licensing andqualityassurance activities dealingwiththereactorcoreanditsrelatedfuelassemblies andcomponents.
Preparebidspecifications, evaluatebids,andnegotiate andadminister contracts fortheprocurement ofallnuclearfuelandrelatedcomponents andservices.
Maintainaspecialnuclearmaterialaccountability system.Provideanalysestosupportnuclearsteamsupplysystemoperation, including reactorphysics,fueleconomics, fuelmechanical
- behavior, corethermalhydraulic andLOCAandnon-LOCAtransient safetyanalysisandotheranalysisactivities asrequested, furnishplantTechnical Specification changesandotherlicensing work,andparticipate inNRCandNSDRCmeetingsasrequiredbytheseanalyses.
Performreactorcoreoperation follow-up activities andotherreactorcoretechnical supportactivities asrequested, andarrangeforsupportfromthefuelfabricator, whenneeded.Contractfor,andprovidetechnical supportfor,disposalofbothhighlevelandlowlevelradioactive waste.Coordinate thedevelopment ofneutronics andthermalhydraulic safetycodesandconductsafetyanalyses.
ConductstudiesoftheCookNuclearPlantlicensing basestodetermine theoptimalchangestosupportunitoperations atalowerprimarypressureandtemperature.
Coordinate gu@"e>asrpdpo'!r'sterii cecaompute'rc'odedevelopment, andprovidetheinterface controlfornuclear,"':.,.";a'uppot',:,c,':servi'ce'a wihtheAEPSCinformation systemdepartment andCookNuclearPlant.1.7-15July,1994
~r~a ObtainandmaintaintheNRCOperating LicenseandTechnical Specifications fortheCookNuclearPlant.Actasthecommunication linkbetweentheNRC,AEPSC,andtheplantstaff.Performandcoordinate effortsinvolvedingathering information, performing calculations andgenericstudies;preparing
- criteria, reports,andresponses; reviewing itemsaffecting safety;andinterpreting regulations.
Review,coordinate, andresolveallmatterspertaining tonuclearsafetybetweenCookNuclearPlantandAEPSC.Thisincludes, butisnotlimitedto:thereviewofcertain'plant designchangestoensurethattherequirements oflOCFR50.59 aremet;thepreparation ofsafetyevaluations, orreviews,foranydesignated subject;thepreparation ofchangesto,andappropriate interpretation of,theplantTechnical Specification submittals oflicenseamendments; andtheanalysisofplantcompliance withregulatory requirements.
Primarycorporate contactformostoralandwrittencommunication withtheNRC.Providesupportinkeyareasofexpertise, suchasnuclearengineering, probabilistic
- analysis, thermohydraulic
- analysis, chemicalengineering, mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, andtechnical writing.Interface withvendorsandotheroutsideorganizations onmattersconnected withthenuclearsteamsupplysystemandotherareasaffecting thesafedesignandoperation ofnuclearplants.Participate, asappropriate, inthereviewofnuclearplantoperating experiences, andrelatethoseexperiences tothedesignandsafeoperation ofCookNuclearPlant.Review,evaluate, andrespondtoNRCrequestsforinformation andNRCnotifications ofregulatory changesresulting inplantmodifications ornewfacilities.
Suchresponses aregenerated inaccordance withappropriate Hadministrative procedures.
Develop,specify,and/orreviewconceptual nuclearsafetycriteriaforCookNuclearPlantinaccordance withestablished regulations.
July,1994
'f'I IThisincludesallinformation contained intheFSAR,aswellasspecialized information suchasenvironmental qualification andseismiccriteria.
Reviewandevaluateperformance requirements forsystems,equipment andmaterials forcompliance withspecified safetycriteria.
Review,onaconceptual basis,plantreportsandproposedplantsafety-related designchanges,totheextentthattheyarerelatedtotheultimatesafeoperation oftheplant,forcompliance withsafetyregulations, plantTechnical Specifications, theUpdatedFSARdesignbasis,andwithanyotherrequirements undertheOperating License,todetermine ifthereareanyunreviewed safetyquestions asdefinedin10CFR50.59.
PerformreviewsofCondition Reportsand10CFR21reviewsinaccordance withcorporate requirements.
OperatetheActionItemTracking(AIT)systemforAEPSCinternalcommitment tracking.
INP,0;,Coordinate dailycommunication withtheCookNuclearPlant,provideAEPSCmanagement withadailyplantstatusreport,andmakepresentations toseniormanagement atregularly scheduled construction staffmeetings:
Processincomingvendorinformation.
Contribute totheannualFSARupdatesthroughreviewsofLicenseeEventReports,designchangesandtheAnnualOperating Report.Radiological, emergency planningandsupportofthesecurityprogram.Corporate supportoftheCookNuclearPlant'sradiation protection andhealthphysicsprogram,technical reviewsandadviceontheradiological aspectsofdesignchanges,modifications orcapitalimprovements, theALARAprogram,theradiation monitoring system,theenvironmental radiological monitoring andsamplingprogram,doseandshielding
- analysis, radiochemistry review,implications offederalregulations, andmeteorological monitoring.
1.7-17July,1994
CookNuclearPlantandcorporate emergency
- planning, including procedure development, exercisescheduling, facilityprocurement andmaintenance, andtheliaisonwithoff-siteemergency planninggroups,suchasFEMAandtheMichiganStatePolice.Reviewfederalcodesandregulations astheyrelatetothedevelopment, implementation, revisionanddistribution oftheModifiedAmendedSecurityPlan(MASP).Interface withtheplant'ssecuritydepartment providing supportandmaintaining securitydocumentfiles.ProvidenuclearGeneralEmployeeTraining(IGET)forAEPSCpersonnel.
Coordinate thedevelopment oftrainingforAEPSCpersonnel whosupporttheoperation andmaintenance ofCookNuclearPlant,ensuringaunifiedtrainingprogrammeetingannualgoalsandobjectives.
Participate ontheALARAcommittee.
Prepareresponses totheNRConradiological, emergency planningandsecurityissues.Serveastechnical advisorsonplantaudits.Remaincognizant ofcurrentdecommissioning practices anddevelopments.
AEPSCNuclearEnineerinDeartmentTheAEpSCchiefnuclearengineeriiiChmanageri~<iiiTclead.'i'en'gsneerdng dp'ai;Eme'nt, reporting totheAEpSCs~ehiorvicepresident nucleargenereation, isresPonsible forcertainengineering';".
design~and pTocu'rtemesnt functions.
TheAEpSCnuclearengineering department iscomprised ofengineering anddesignentitiesatAEPSC,asme11asanon-siteengineeringn design,:::,l::,anddpro'cu'remend'upport organization attheCookNuclearPlant.1.7-18July,1994 TheAEPSCcivilengineering
- 8igisTon, electrical engineering~@'os'sIT1~i+n hydr'o~jeneratp~oj":
andsystemplanningdepartments provideperiodic, technical assistance fortheCookNuclearPlant.Theadministrative andqualityassurance controlsforthisassistance arecontrolled throughdocumented interface agreements withAEPSCnuclearengineering.
AEPSCnuclearengineering (NE)department isresponsible forthefollowing:
Provideplanning, engineering anddesignoftheelectrical facilities insideCookNuclearPlantuptothehighvoltage(HV)bushingsofthemaingenerator transformers andmechanical facilities insideCookNuclearPlantincluding:
determination ofgenerallayoutanddesign;selection ofequipment; preparation ofone-lineandflowdiagrams; and,coordination ofinsideandoutsideplantfacilities.
Provideengineering anddesignofallcontrolsforoperation andprotection ofnuclearsteamsupply,steamgenerator, turbinegenerator, auxiliary equipment andgeneralplantprotection, including checkingandapproving elementary, one-line, andflowdrawings.
Ensurethatallpurchased equipment conformstoacceptedstandards andfulfillsthedesiredfunction.
Closelyfollowmanufacturer's engineering anddesignprocesses toassureprovision ofadequateandreliableequipment uponwhichdependthesafety,reliability, andperformance oftheunitandplant.Prepare,reviewand/orapprovedesignchanges,sketches,
- drawings, calculations, anddesignverifications, asrequired.
c~$4:;:i!a'PPerfor'missa:
dty,;:::ate%i;,eliotet!desi:gii~chan'g'esfp'ur'scant::.'.:;:toelTcp'IT60';.:599 Prepareand/orapprovededication plans,specifications andprocuraemenE.:.docuwent's.
1.7-19July,1994 I~k Performdrawingreviewofequipment, asappropriate.
Develop,reviewand/orapproveprocedures orcorrespondence asappropriate.
Obtain,reviewandperformengineering anddesignevaluations, including environmental equipment qualification (Eg).Establish andmaintainacentralfileforequipment environmental qualification documentation.
Coordinate operations withinAEPSCthatsupporttheCookNuclearPlantFacilityDataBase(FDB).Performcalculations forploper.application ofequipment.
Performandevaluateinvestigations, analysesandreportsforfacilities pertaining totheengineering design,operation andmaintenance oftheCookNuclearPlant.Assistfieldpersonnel ininstallation, start-up, andsubsequent locatingofproblemsinequipment, andindetermining properoperation ofequipment, duringnormalorafteremergency operations.
Naintainaconstantawareness forimprovements andmorereliabledesignofequipment andfacilities, maintenance andoperating methodsorprocedures.
Haintainaconstantawareness ofactivities toensurecompliance withallapplicable policiesandprocedures, initiating, whenrequired, trainingorretraining programs.
Participate, asassigned, ontheNSDRCandNSDRCsubcommittees, andparticipate inmatterscoveredinthecommittee's charter.Provideresponses toNRCcorrespondence, asrequired.
Participate intheevaluation andremedyofanysituation requiring activation oftheEmergency gesponseOrganization.
Providesupportpersonnel fortheEmergency ResponseOrganization.
Providetechnical suppottinareasofoperation andmaintenance, including:
theInservice Inspection
{ISI)program;thegAprogram;thefireprotection gAprogram;theAEPALARAprogramcoveringradiation protection; and,thecorporate andplantindustrial safetyprogram.1.7-20July,1994 Providetechnical direction andassistance inthelayoutandarrangement ofequipment piping,systems,controls, etc.,forthedevelopment ofdrawings.
DevelopSystemDescriptions.
Provideanalytical supportinengineering anddesigndisciplines (e.g.,heattransfer, thermodynamics, fluiddynamics).
Provideengineering anddesignevaluations forCRs,LERs,INPOSOERs,andNRCBu'}letins.
.Participate, asassigned, ontheAEPSCCondition Assessment Group(CAG).Makerecommendations andassistintheformulation ofpoliciesandpractices relatingtothedesignandengineering ofofficeandservicebuildings, miscellaneous structures andmaterialhandlingequipment, andprovidethegeneralsupervision oftheengineering ofsuchfacilities,
- tructures andequipment.
Initiateand/orreview,approveandcontrollaboratory andfieldinvestigations andfeasibility studies.Prepareandadminister equipment',
laborandservicecontracts.
Arrangeforoutsideengineering, designandconsulting assistance, asrequired.
Performshopandfieldsurveillance onequipment beingmanufactured, fabricated, orinstalled.
ProvidefieldservicestotheCookNuclearPlant,including theassigning ofpersonnel, asarerequired, duringconstruction, normalorforcedoutages,orasrequested.
Assistintheplanningandexecution ofmaintenance workonequipment, facilities, buildings andotherstructures.
Supervise maintenance andrepairsofallmasonryandconcreteworkatCookNuclearPlant,including supplying qualified inspection personnel.
Directtestingofmaterials usedinconcreteandtestingofsoilstobeusedinworkattheCookNuclearPlant.Reviewandrecommend concretemixformulations forallnewconstruction.
1.7-21July,1994 hJ~1 Implement thecorrective actionprogram,withregardtoactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related itemsandservices, thatcontrolsanddocuments items,servicesoractivities whichdonotconformtorequirements.
Assistinthepreparation ofapplications forfederal,stateandlocalpermitsrelativetoinstallations beingmadewhichrequire,suchpermits.Conductperiodicmanagement reviewsoftheactivities ofthedepartment toensurecompliance withtheobjectives ofthegAProgram,andexternaltechnical surveillance, asnecessary, ofconsultants, outsideorganizations andvendorsoverwhichthedepartment iscognizant.
Establish andmaintainafileforgArecords.Develop,reviewandapprovedesignsanddrawingsformechanical, electrical andstructural systems,equipment andfacilities oftheCookNuclearPlant.Performrequiredcalculations andanalyses, including pipestress,pipesupportdesign,cablesizing,conduitandcabletraysupportandstructural steelandconcrete.
Assistfieldpersonnel intheresolution ofproblemsstemmingfromtheinstallation ofdesignchanges,orfromas-foundplantconditions, including assigning personnel totheplant.Formulate, administer, andimplement policiesandpractices relatingtotheengineering, anddesignoftheCookNuclearPlant.Conductfunctions soastobeinconformance withtheoperating licensesoftheCookNuclearPlant.Investigate evaluateandcorrectproblems.
Coordinate specialprojectsandstudies,asrequired.
Coordinate thedevelopment andmaintenance ofthecomputerized gYendorDrawingControl(VDC)programswhichincludecoordinating theprogramswithinterfacing divisions/departments.
Controltheissuanceanddistribution ofdrawingsfortheCookNuclearPlant,including monitoring oftheApertureCardNicrofilm Program.1.7-22July,1994 jp Supervise andcontroltheworkofconsultants, architect/engineers andoutsideengineering anddesignagenciessupplying servicestoAEPSCintheirdiscipline andprocessnotification ofdefectsinaccordance withcompanyrequirements.
Alsoperformdetailedreviewsofengineering anddesignworksubmitted byoutsideagencies.
Reviewandupdateapplicable sectionsofCookNuclearPlantUpdatedFSARasassigned.
Participate, asmembersandasassigned, oncommittees andadhoctaskforcesthatreviewnuclearactivities.
~t~!Coo,.dlnaVe::::,foao:;:Mucl e~~r7Plant:,aeEivdl'Eius."'as'so@/~m'ed@iith~ths I::.!xoie:;-i.'--::,--,t.
- -::;-:*':::::::
py:-,-':-,
"!i':::::::::::::
'ii:::-.::::i::---ii':::::-::
I'ii,!::"::::::::s,."-i
--:iim'"':-tl"lilies'-!I!i:
"'lb'!i@i'!i!i.
"-':"i'l:'-'il:"::,::i:
"'lrii'.iii'~::-;-::iota aProcureiant~gr eceivin~g~,,;q ualdty.',."con trol~grsecei~Fi~Wn'sipect~yn:;
'.i',,ii:;i!!I" iii-,~g--:i::::.,--'-ll",:Cmlii,::
I!!::Biii::.:-.!id::::::.,:
il-::,,':::;-iY:::::::Iprovb'de':::,",matehTYL'-.":;:;:ser'vdca,',:and~su y'oi.',t~4iri>::a ccor.danceiuthipan~di~iproc'eduupesi,.",belie u'irehd::byi'.;:AEPvpurchafsng ah'd::;;:$
tai~gPAEPECSi lP!endtthe::::NAG~@hi ch~are'<!admiRn':
stereVganCh!en forcedli>n~~i'a':::.-',:totals:"'e~fiforiti toi'ensurepisifietyjiianrdii!Pl'a Yi-timbrel!i'ah i!I'i~jti:i CookNuclearPlantThe!I'nilf~gna jHichl'gan':;Poueri!siite";:,,:;i$
ce>.",:p'r'esi',denti'::and plantmanagerreportsfunctionally andadministratively totheAEPSCs'enoirf vicepresident nuclearg~jn'er'ati'o andisresponsible fortheCookNuclearplantactivities (Figure1.7-5).TheCookNuclearPlantorganization isresponsible forthefollowing:
Ensurethesafetyofallfacilityemployees andthegeneralpublicrelativetogeneralplantsafety,aswellasradiological safety,bymaintaining strictcompliance withplantTechnical Specifications, procedures andinstructions.
Recommend facilityengineering modification andinitiateandapproveplantimprovement requisitions.
1.7-23July,1994 Ensurethatworkpractices inallplantdepartments areconsistent withregulatory standards, safety,approvedprocedures, andplantTechnical Specifications.
Providemembership, asrequired, onthePNSRC.Maintaincloseworkingrelationships withtheNRC,aswellaslocal,state,andfederalgovernment regulatory officials regarding conditions whichcouldaffect,orareaffected, byCookNuclearPlantactivities.
Setupplantloadschedules andarrangeforequipment outages.Developandefficiently implement allsitecentralized trainingactivities.
Administer thecentralized facilitytrainingcomplex,simulator, andprogramsensuringthatprogramdevelopment isconsistent withthesystematic approachtotraining, maintainINPOaccreditations, regulatory andcorporate requirements.
Ensurethathumanresourceactivities includeemployeesupportprograms(i.e.,fitnessforduty)consistent withINPO/NUHARC guidelines, companypolicies, andregulatory requirements andstandards.
Administer theNRCapprovedphysicalSecurityProgramincompliance withregulatory standards, ModifiedAmendedSecurityPlan(MASP),andcompanypolicy.Supervise, plan,anddirecttheactivities relatedtothemaintenance andinstallation ofallCookNuclearPlantequipment, structures, grounds,andyards.Prepareandmaintainrecordsandreportspertinent toequipment maintenance andregulatory agencyrequirements.
Administer contracts andscheduleoutsidecontractors'ork forces.Enforceandcoordinate Cook.NuclearPlantregulations, procedures,
- policies, andobjectives toassuresafety,efficiency, andcontinuity intheoperation oftheCookNuclearPlantwithinthelimitsoftheoperating licenseandtheTechnical Specifications andformulation of'elated policiesandprocedures.
1.7-24July,1994
Plan,schedule, anddirectactivities relatingtotheoperation oftheCookNuclearPlantandassociated switchyards; cooperateinplanningandscheduling ofworkandprocedures forrefueling andmaintenance oftheCookNuclearPlant;anddirectandcoordinate fuelloadingoperations.
Reviewreportsandrecords,directgeneralinspection of.operating conditions ofplantequipment, andinvestigate anyabnormalconditions, makingrecommendations forrepairs.Establish andadminister equipment clearance procedures consistent withcompany,plant,andradiation protection standards; authorize andarrangeforequipment outagestomeetnormaloremergency conditions.
Providetheshiftoperating crewswithappropriate procedures andinstructions toassisttheminoperating theCookNuclearPlantsafelyandefficiently.
Approveoperatortrainingprogramsadministered bytheCooknuclearplanttrainingdepartment designedtoprovideoperatingpersonnel withtheknowledge andskillrequiredforsafeoperation ofthefacility, andforobtaining andholdingNRCoperatorlicenses.
Coordinate trainingprogramsinplantsafetyandemergency procedures forCookNuclearPlantoperating department personnel toensurethateachshiftgroupwillfunctionproperlyintheeventofinjuryofpersonnel, fire,nuclearincident, orcivildisorder.
Advanceplanningandoverallconductofscheduled andforcedoutages,including thescheduling andcoordination ofallplantactivities associated withrefueling, preventive maintenance, corrective maintenance, equipment
- overhaul, Technical Specification surveillance, anddesignchangeinstallations.
Preparereportsofreportable eventswhicharemandatedbytheNRCandtheTechnical Specifications.
K4Preparestatistical reportsutilizedinNRCAppraisal NeetingsandEnforcement Conference.
Coordinate theeffortsofoutsideagencies, suchasAmericanNuclearInsurers(ANI),INPO,andthird-party inspector programs.
July,1994
~,P0 Maintainknowledge ofdevelopments andchangesinNRCrequirements, industrystandards andcodes,regulatory compliance activities, andqualitycontroldisciplines andtechniques.
Stopplantoperation intheeventthatconditions arefoundwhichareinviolation oftheTechnical Specifications oradversetoquality.Maintainandrenewaccreditation oftrainingprograms.
gualification ofIMpersonnel performing inspection ofnormaloperating activities toANSIN18.1.$<s;.<P(~ANPerformpeerinspections ofworkcompleted byISNpersonnel byindependent personsqualified toANSIN18.7.ConductoftheInservice Inspection (ISI)Program.9<'-::Plananddirectengineering andtechnical studies,nuclearfuelmanagement, equipment performance, instrument andcontrolmaintenance, on-sitecomputersystems,ShiftTechnical
- Advisors, andemergency planningfortheCookNuclearPlant.Theseactivitiessupportdailyon-siteoperations inasafe,reliable, andefficientmannerinaccordance withallcorporate
- policies, applicable laws,regulations,
- licenses, andTechnical Specification requirements.
Implement stationperformance testingandmonitorprogramstoensureoptimumplantefficiency.
Directprogramsrelatedtoon-sitefuelmanagement andreactorcorephysicstesting,andensuresatisfactory completion.
Establish testingandpreventive maintenanceprogramsrelatedtostationinstrumentation, electrical systems,andcomputers.
Recommend alternatives toCookNuclearPlantoperation, technical oremergency procedures, anddesignofequipment toimprovesafetyofoperations andoverallplantefficiency.
Implement thecorporate Emergency PlanasitpertainstotheCookNuclearPlantsite.1.7-26July,1994
manageconstruction laborrelations withtheInternational IBui]dingandConstruction TradesUnions.Scope,bid,recommend awardsandadminister construction laborandservicescontracts.
Plan,organizeandcontrolmajorconstruction
- projects, asgenerRT1'0'g.
Maintaincognizance onmatterspertaining totheCookNuclearPlantandcorporate emergency responseorganization.
Preparelaborestimates.
Provideconstructability guidancewhenrequested insupportofengineering anddesignchanges.Participate ontheNuclearSafetyDesignReviewCommittee.
Purchasin andStoresDeartment(notcharted)TheAEPSCexecutive vicepresident i'diiiirij,:sti.at'ior~i:<<.'..andkchj'e'fji4c'count'i;ng rjffjiicer,,
reporting totheAEPchairmanoftheboard~ipr'esbd~ent>>
andchiefexecutive officer,isresponsib'le forthepurchasing andstoresdepartment throughtheAEPSCvicepresident
-purchasing andmaterials management.
Thepurchasing andstoresdepartment isresponsible forthefollowing:
Procurement ofsafety-related itemsfromonlyqualified andapprovedsuppliers.
Providesupervision toCookNuclearPlantpurchasing section.Provideorderingandstockingdescriptions ofsafety-related itemsandincludethesedescriptions.
intheCookNuclearPlantinventory catalog,including necessary communications withsuppliers, cognizant engineers, theCookNuclearPlantstoressupervisor andotherappropriate personnel.
HaintainandcontroltheNaterialS.Equipment databasefileforsafety-related items.1.7-28Duly,1994 Establish computerized inventory statusreports,onlineinventory andpurchaseorderinquirycapabilities andotherprocedures toorder,trackandcontrolmaterials.
Coordinate procurement activities withAEPSCnucleariiipjioi',-0 siersvlcePj.
AEPSCnuclearengineering, CookNuclearPlantsitepurchasing, AEPSCqualityassurance andCookNuclearPlantpersonnel.
Prepareandissuerequestsforquotations, contracts, serviceorders,blanketorders,andpurchaseordersforsafety-related items.Establish asystemtoimplement corrective actionasdescribed intheAEPSCgeneralprocedures fortheCookNuclearPlant.Establish asystemofdocumentkeepingandtransmittal.
Establish asystemofdocumentcontrolforcontrolled procedures, instructions, andpurchasing documents forsafety-related items.Themaintenance andcontrolofselectedprocurement documentstandardphrasesasidentified bythedirector-qualityassurance, ordesignee.
Conducttrainingsessionsinvolving purchasing personnel andothersonanannualbasis,ormorefrequently, asrequired, andascertain thattrainingsessionsincludecompleteresponsibilities associated withthepurchaseofsafety-related itemsandservices.
1.7.21.7.2.1EQUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAHSCOPEPoliciesthatdefineandestablish theCookNuclearPlantgAProgramaresummarized intheindividual sectionsofthisdocument.
Theprogramisimplemented throughprocedures andinstructions responsive toprovisions ofthegAPD,andwillbecarriedoutforthelifeoftheCookNuclearPlant.1.7-29July,1994
gualityassurance controlsapplytoactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related structures, systemsandcomponents toanextentbasedontheimportance ofthosestructures, systems,components, etc.,(items)tosafety.Suchactivities areperformed undercontrolled conditions, including theuseofappropriate equipment, environmental conditions, assignment ofqualified personnel, andassurance thatallapplicable prerequisites havebeenmet.Safety-related itemsaredefinedasitems:Mhichareassociated withthesafeshutdown(hot)ofthereactor;orisolation ofthereactor;ormaintenance oftheintegrity ofthereactorcoolantsystempressureboundary.
ORWhosefailuremightcauseorincreasetheseverityofadesignbasisaccidentasdescribed intheUpdatedFSAR;orleadtoareleaseofradioactivity inexcessof10CFR100guidelines.
Ingeneral,safety-';,:i71ated!~/tea'si~areTthos'e!
+Icli~ate,",
ciai'ss'I'f)Fd seismicClassI,orElectrical Class1E;orassociated withtheEngineered SafetyFeaturesActuation System(ESFAS);orassociated withtheReactorProtection System(RPS).)(ot.'e';;:,::.,',":Soiii
(!en!onsf,;aetyrlset8dfitems)~hays)!teen "6-!ill-dJ~k!II:::"..'sl::i!I!i
-dgmei!:-ra~il!!gal:
'."'iso!:
-qe:>>,,""riii.Forexainp.Ie':gpos!:t:;
ac~cdiintÃmo9:.
tern),gisntru'm stoat:on'Panion'ot,,:::::s'at:,e fgjetateiP'.b,-ut.i:
AspecialgAProgramhasbeenimplemented forFireProtection items(Section1.7.19herein).ThegAProgramalsoincludesprovision forRadwastegAinaccordance withtherequirements of10CFR71,SubpartH.1.7-30July,1994 gAProgramstatus,scope,adequacy, andcompliance with10CFR50,AppendixB,areregularly reviewedbyAEPSCmanagement throughreports,meetings, andreviewofauditresults.Theimplementation ofthegAprogrammaybeaccomplished byAEPSCand/orIndianaMichiganPowerCompanyordelegated inwholeorinparttootherAEPSystemcompanies oroutsideparties.However,AEPSCand/orIndianaMichiganPowerCompanyretainfullresponsibility forallactivities affecting safety-related items.Theperformance ofthedelegated organization isevaluated byauditorsurveillances onafrequency commensurate withtheirscopeandimportance ofassignedwork.1.7.2.2INPLEHENTATION 1.7.2.2.1 Thhifthbel'~II'OldhififthmfAEPSChasstatedinasigned,formal"Statement ofPolicy",thatitisthecorporate policytocomplywiththeprovisions ofapplicable codes,standards andregulations pertaining toqualityassurance fornucleatpowerplantsasrequiredbytheCookNuclearPlantoperating licenses.
Thestatement makesthisgAPDandtheassociated implementing procedures andinstructions mandatory, andrequirescompliance byallresponsible organizations andindividuals.
Thestatement alsoidentifies themanagement positions withinthecompanies vestedwithresponsibility andauthority forimplementing theprogramandassuringitseffectiveness.
1.7.2.2.2 ThegAprogramatAEPSCandtheCookNuclearPlantconsistofcontrolsexercised byorganizations responsible forattaining qualityobjectives, andbyorganizations responsible forassurance functions.
1.7-31July,1994
)'V TheQAProgrameffectiveness iscontinually assessedthroughmanagement reviewofvariousreports,NSDRCreviewoftheQAauditprogram,andshallalsobeperiodically reviewedbyindependent outsidepartiesasdeemednecessary bymanagement.
TheQAprogramdescribed inthisQAPDisintendedtoapplyforthelifeoftheCookNuclearPlant.TheQAprogramappliestoactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-relatedstructures, components, andrelatedconsumables duringplantoperation, maintenance, testing,andalldesignchanges.Safety-related structures, systemsandcomponents areidentified intheFacilityDataBaseandotherdocuments whicharedeveloped andmaintained forthep'lant.Asdeemednecessary byAEPSCmana'gemei~i, applicable portionsofthegAprogramcontrolswi11beapp'liedtononsafety-reiated activities associated withtheimplementation oftheQAprogramtoensurethatcommitments aremet(e.g.,off-siterecordsstorage,trainingservices, etc.).1.7.2.2.3 ThisQAPD,organized topresenttheQAProgramfortheCookNuclearPlantintheorderofthe18criteriaof10CFR50,AppendixB,statesAEPSCpolicyforeachofthecriteriaanddescribes howthecontrolspertinent toeacharecarriedout.AnychangesmadetothisQAPDthatdonotreducethecommitments previously acceptedbytheNRCmustbesubmitted totheNRCatleastannually.
AnychangesmadetothisQAPDthatdoreducethecommitments previously acceptedbytheNRCmustbesubmitted tothe.NRCandreceiveNRCapprovalpriortoimplementation.
Thesubmittal ofthechangesdescribed aboveshallbemadeinaccordance withtherequirements of10CFR50.54.
'1.7-32July,1994 0
Theprogramdescribed inthisgAPDwillnotbeintentionally changedinanywaythatwouldpreventitfrommeetingthecriteriaof10CFR50,AppendixBandotherapplicable operating licenserequirements.
1.7.2.2.4 Documents usedforimplementing theprovisions ofthisgAPDincludethefollowing:
PlantManagerInstructions (PNIs)establish thepolicyattheplantforcompliance withspecified
- criteria, andassignresponsibility tothevariousdepartments, asrequired, forimplementation.
PlantManagerProcedures (PNPs),Department HeadProcedures (DHPs),andinsomecasesDepartment HeadInstructions (DHIs),havebeenpreparedtodescribethedetailedactivities requiredtosupportsafeandeffective plantoperation as,perthePNIs.ThePNIsarereviewedbyAEPSCgAforconcurrence thattheywillsatisfactorily implement regulatory requirements andcommitments.
PNIsandPNPs'rereviewedbythePMSRCpriortoapprovalbytheplantmanager.DHPsandDHIsarereviewedwithinthedepartments priortoapprovalbythedepartment headoforigination.
DHPsandDHIsthatmightinvolveanunreviewed safetyquestionasdefinedin10CFR50.59 arereviewedbyPNSRCpriortoapprovalbythedepartment head,oforigination.
Procedures (GPs)areutilizedtodefine!::ggpoliciesandrequirements forqualityassurance, andtoimplement certainQqAprogramrequirements.
AEPSCdivision/department and/orsectionprocedures arealsousedtoimplement gAProgramrequirements.
1.7-33Duly,1994
Mhencontractors performworkon-siteundertheirownqualityassurance
- programs, theprogramsareauditedforcompliance andconsistency withtheapplicable requirements oftheCookNuclearPlant'sgAProgramandthecontract, andareapprovedbyAEPSCgApriortothestartofwork.(>JImplementation ofon-sitecontractor's gAprograms, willbeauditedtoassurethatthecontractor's programsareeffective.
1.7.2.2.5 Provisions ofthegAprogramfortheCookNuclearPlantapplytoactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related items.AppendixAtothisgAPDliststheRegulatory/Safety GuidesandANSIStandards thatidentifyAEPSC'scommitment.
AppendixBdes'cribes necessary exceptions andclarifications totherequirements ofthosedocuments.
Thescopeoftheprogram,andtheextenttowhichitscontrolsareapplied,areestablished asfollows:a)AEPSCusesthecriteriaspecified intheCookNuclearPlantUpdatedFSARforidentifying structures, systemsandcomponents towhichthegAprogramapplies.b)Thisidentification processresultsintheFacilityDataBasefortheCookNuclearPlant.ThisFacilityDataBaseiscontrolled byauthorized personnel.
FacilityDataBaseitemsaredetermined byengineering analysisofthefunction(s) ofplantitemsinrelationtosafeoperation andshutdown.
c)Theextenttowhichcontrolsspecified inthegAprogramareappliedtoFacilityDataBaseitemsisdetermined foreachitemconsidering itsrelativeimportance tosafety.Suchdeterminations arebasedondatainsuchdocuments astheCookNuclearPlantTechnical Specifications andtheUpdatedFSAR.1.7-34July,1994
1.7.2.2.6 Activities affecting safety-related itemsareaccomplished undercontrolled conditions.
Preparationsforsuchactivities includeconsideration ofthefollowing:
a)b)c)d)e)g)h)Assignedpersonnel arequalified.
Workhasbeen,plannedtoapplicable engineering and/orTechnical Specifications.
Specified equipment and/ortoolsareavailable.
Itemsareinanacceptable status.Itemsonwhichworkistobeperformed areinthepropercondition forthetask.Properapprovedinstructions/procedures fortheworkareavailable foruse.Itemsandfacilities thatcouldbedamagedbytheworkhavebeenprotected, asrequired.
Provisions havebeenmadeforspecialcontrols, processes, testsandverification methods'.
1.7.2.2.7 Responsibility andauthority forplanningandimplementing indoctrination andtrainingofAEPSCandCookNuclearPlantstaffpersonnel arespecifically designated, asfollows:a)Thetrainingandindoctrination programprovidesforon-goingtrainingandperiodicfamiliarization withthegAprogramfortheCookNuclearPlant.b)Personnel whoperforminspection andexamination functions arequalified inaccordance withrequirements ofRegulatory Guide1.8,ANSIN18.1,Regulatory Guide).58,ANSIN45.2.6,theASNEBSPVCode,orSNT-TC-IA, asapplicable, andwithexceptions asnotedinAppendixBhereto.1.7-35July,1994 PF c)AEPSCgAauditorsarequalified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.146andANSIN45.2.23.
d)Personnel assigneddutiessuchasspecialcleaningprocesses, welding,etc.,arequalified inaccordance withapplicable codes,standards, regulatory guidesand/orplantprocedures.
e)Thetraining, qualification andcertification programincludes, asapplicable, provisions forretraining, reexamination andrecertification toensurethatproficiency ismaintained.
f)Training, qualification, andcertification recordsincluding documentation ofobjectives, waivers/exceptions, attendees anddatesofattendance, aremaintained atleastaslongasthepersonnel involvedareperforming activities towhichthetraining, qualification andcertification isrelevant.
g)Personnel responsible forperforming activities thataffectsafety-related itemsareinstructed astothepurpose,scopeandimplementation oftheapplicable manuals,instructions andprocedures.
management/supervisory personnel receivefunctional trainingtothelevelnecessary toplan,coordinate andadminister theday-to-day verification activities ofthegAProgramforwhichtheyareresponsible.
TrainingofAEPSCandCookNuclearPlantpersonnel isperformed employing thefollowing techniques, asapplicable:
1)onthejobandformaltrainingadministered bythedepartment orsectiontheindividual worksfor;2)formaltrainingconducted byqualified instructors fromtheCookNuclearPlanttrainingdepartment orotherentities(internal andexternaltotheAEPSystem);and3)formal,INPOaccredited trainingconducted bytheCookNuclearPlanttrainingdepartment.
Recordsoftrainingsessionsforsuchtrainingaremaintained.
Wherepersonnel 1.7-36July,1994 htgI qualifications orcertifications arerequired, thesecertifications areperformed onascheduled basis(consistent withtheappropriate codeorstandard).
CookNuclearPlantemployees receiveintroductory traininginqualityassurance usuallywithinthefirsttwoweeksofemployment.
Inaddition, AEPSCpersonnel receivetrainingpriortobeingallowedunescorted accesstotheplant.Thistrainingincludesmanagement's policyforimplementation ofthegAprogramthroughplantmanageranddepartment headinstructions andprocedures.
Theseinstructions alsoincludeadescription ofthegAprogram,theuseofinstructions andprocedures, personnel requirements forprocedure compliance andthesystemsandcomponents controlled bythegAprogram.1.7.31.7.3.1DESIGNCONTROLSCOPEDesignchangesareaccomplished inaccordance withapproveddesign.Activities todevelopsuchdesignsarecontrolled.
Depending onthetypeofdesignchange,theseactivities includedesignandfieldengineering; theperformance ofphysics,seismic,stress,thermal,hydraulic andradiation evaluations; updateoftheFSAR;reviewofaccidentanalyses; thedevelopment andcontrolofassociated computerprograms; studiesofmaterialcompatibility; accessibility forinservice inspection andmaintenance; determination ofqualitystandards; andrequirement forequipment qualification.
Thecontrolsapplytopreparation andreviewofdesigndocuments, including thecorrecttranslation ofapplicable regulatory requirements anddesignbasesintodesign,procurement andprocedural documents.
1.7-37July,1994 1.7.3.2IHPLENEKfATION 1.7.3.2.1 Designchangesarecontrolled byprocedures andinstructions andarereviewedasrequiredby10CFR50.59 andtheTechnical Specifications.
Safety-related designchangesareaccomplished byoneoftwoseparateprocesses:
MinorModification (MM),orRequestforChange(RFC).Thosethatdonotaltertheintendedfunctionoftheitemandcanbedetermined byjudgement tohaveaminimaloverallimpactontheitembeingmodifiedmaybeimplemented viatheMNprocess.Allothersafety-relateddesignchanges,thatarenotappropriate forMNprocessing, areimplemented viatheRFCprocess.IncaseswheredesignchangescouldbedeemedtobewithinthescopeofRFCsorMNssolelyduetopossibleinsignificant adverseseismiceffects,thechangemaybeimplemented viathePlantModification (PM)process.Inthecasewheresafety-related itemsareinvolvedandthechangeintroduces onlyinsignificant adverseseismiceffects,thechangemaybeimplemented viathePlantModification (PN)process.1.7.3.2.2 Designchangesarereviewedtodetermine theirimpactonnuclearsafetyandtodetermine iftheproposedchangesinvolveanunreviewed safetyquestionasdefinedby10CFR50.59.
Ifadesignchangeweretoinvolveanunreviewed safetyquestion, itwouldnotbeapprovedforimplementation untiltherequiredNRCapprovalwasreceived.
RFCs(exceptthoserequiring emergency processing),
NMsandPNs(havingonlyinsignificant seismiceffectonsafety-related items)arereviewedandapprovedpriortoimplementation, asaminimum,bythecognizant AEPSCsectionandplantmanager.ThePHSRCalsoreviewsthoseRFCs,1.7-38July,1994 NNs,andPNsforwhichsafetyevaluations aredeemednecessary, pursuantto10CFR50.59 andTechnical Specification 6.5.1.6.1.7.3.2.3 ForRFCs,theChangeControlBoardestablished withinAEPSCprovidesanadditional reviewandapprovallevel.TheChangeControlBoardiscomprised ofmembersofthenNci'earengineering, nuclearsupporriset~gsc'es;:
andEAorganizations withinAEPSC,andissupplemented byotherAEPSCorganizations orindividuals, asrequired.
Thecognizant memberoftheChangeControlBoardassignsaleadengineerforeachRFC.Theleadengineerisresponsible forcoordinating theRFCactivities withinAEPSCandmaintaining closeinterface withAEPSCsiteengineering supportprojectengineering.
1.7.3.2.4 ProposedRFCswhichrequireemergency processing areoriginated attheplant,reviewedbythePNSRC,andapprovedbytheplantmanager.CookNuclearPlantmanagement thencontactstheAEPSCnUcVeai,:;:,isuPdforsb s'ei~vicesii'departmehg, andotherAEPSCmanagement, asrequired, describes thechangerequested and,implements thechangeonlyafterreceiving verbalAEPSCmanagement authorization toproceed.Thesereviewsandapprovals aredocumented andbecomeapartoftheRFCPacket.).7.3.2.5 MhenRFCsorHNsinvolvedesigninterfaces betweeninternalorexternaldesignorganizations, oracrosstechnical disciplines, theseinterfaces arecontrolled.
Procedures areusedforthereview,approval, release,distribution andrevisionofdocuments involving designinterfaces toensurethatstructures, systemsandcomponents arecompatible geometrically andfunctionally withprocesses andtheenvironment.
Linesofcommunication areestablished forcontrolling theflowof1.7-39July,1994
neededdesigninformation acrossdesigninterfaces,including changestotheinformation asworkprogresses.
Decisions andproblemresolutions involving designinterfaces aremadebytheAEPSCorganization havingresponsibility forengineering direction ofthedesigneffort.1.7.3.2.6 Checksareperformed anddocumented toverifythedimensional accuracyandcompleteness ofdesigndrawingsandspecifications.
.1.7.3.2.7 RFCdesigndocumentpackagesareauditedbyAEPSCgAtoassurethatthedocuments havebeenprepared,
- verified, reviewedandapprovedinaccordance withcompanyprocedures.
1.7.3.2.8 Theextentof;andmethodsfor,designverification aredocumented.
Theextentof'esignverification performed isafunctionoftheimportance oftheitemtosafety,designcomplexity, degreeofstandardization, thestate-of-the-art, andsimilarity withpreviously provendesigns.methodsfordesignverification includeevaluation oftheapplicability ofstandardized orpreviously provendesigns,alternate calculations, qualification testinganddesignreviews.Thesemethodsmaybeusedsinglyorincombination, depending ontheneedsforthedesignunderconsideration.
whendesignverification isdonebyevaluating standardized orpreviously provendesigns,theapplicability ofsuchdesignsisconfirmed.
Anydifferences fromtheprovendesignaredocumented andevaluated fortheintended'pplication.
1.7-40July,1994 gualification testingofprototypes, components, orfeaturesisusedwhentheabilityofanitemtoperformanessential safetyfunctioncannototherwise beadequately substantiated.
Thistestingisperformed beforeplantequipment installation, wherepossible, butalwaysbeforerelianceupontheitemtoperformasafety-related function.
gualification testingisperformed underconditions thatsimulatethemostadversedesignconditions, considering allrelevantoperating modes.Testrequirements, procedures andresultsaredocumented.
Resultsareevaluated toassurethattestrequirements havebeensatisfied.
Designchangesshowntobenecessary throughtestingaremade,andanynecessary retesting orotherverification isperformed.
Testconfigurations areclearlydocumented.
pDesignreviewsareperformed bymulti-organizational orinterdisciplinary groups,orbysingleindividuals.
Criteriaareestablished todetermine'when aformalgroupreviewisrequired, andwhenreviewbyanindividual issufficient.
Procedures requirethatminordesignchangesaccomplished bytheMMprocessalsoreceiveformaldesignverification.
Applicable desi9nverification activities shallbecompleted priortodeclaring thedesignchange,orportionthereof,operational.
1.7.3.2.9 Personsrepresenting applicable technical disciplines areassignedtoperformdesignverifications.
Thesepersonsarequalified byappropriate education orexperience, butarenotdirectlyresponsible forthedesign.Thedesigner's immediate supervisor mayperformtheverification, providedthat:1)Thesupervisor istheonlytechnically qualified individual.
2)orThesupervisor hasnotspecified asingulardesignapproach, ruledoutdesignconsiderations, norestablished thedesigninputs.1.7-41July,1994 I
and3)Theneedisdocumented andapprovedbythesupervisor's management.
ClRegularly scheduled gAauditsverifyconformance topreviousitems1through3.Designverification onsafety-related designchangesshallbecompleted priortodeclaring adesignchange,orportionsthereof,operational.
1.7.3.2.10 Implementation ofdesignchangesiscoordinated'n sitebyAEPSCsiteengineering supportprojectengineering.
Haterialtoperformthedesignchangemustmeetthespecifications established fortheoriginalsystem,orasspecified bytheleadengineer.
Forthosedesignchangeswheretestingaftercompletion isrequired, thetestingdocumentation isreviewedbytheorganization performing thetestand,whenspecified, bytheAEPSCleadengineerorothercognizant engineer(s).
Further,completed designchangesareaudited/surveilled byAEPSCgAfollowing installation andtesting.1.7.3.2.11 Changestodesigndocuments, including fieldchanges,arereviewed, approvedandcontrolled inamannercommensurate withthat'used fortheoriginaldesign.Suchchangesareevaluated forimpact.Information onapprovedchangesistransmitted toallaffectedorganizations.
1.7.3.2.12 Erroranddeficienciesin,anddeviationsfrom,approveddesign~documents areidentified anddispositioned inaccordance withestablished designcontroland/orcorrective actionprocedures.
1.7-42July,1994 1.7.3.2.13 Established 1)2)3)4)5)6)7)designcontrolprocedures providefor:controlled submission ofdesignchanges,engineering evaluation, reviewforimpactonnuclearsafety,auditbyAEPSCgA,designmodification, AEPSCmanagerial review,andapprovalandrecordkeepingfortheimplemented designchange.1.7.41.7.4.1PROCUREMENT DOCUMENTCONTROLSCOPEProcurement documents definethecharacteristics ofitem(s)tobeprocured, identifyapplicable regulatory andindustrycodes/standards requirements, andspecifysuppliergAProgramrequirements totheextentnecessary toassureadequatequality.1.7.4.2IMPLEMENTATION 1.7.4.2.1 Procurement controlisestablished byinstructions andprocedures.
Thesedocuments requirethatp~r'oc'ur'ement'ocuments besufficiently detailedtoensurethatpurchased safety-related itemsandservicesare:1)purchased tospecification andcoderequirements equivalent tothoseoftheoriginalequipment orservice(exceptwhentheCodeofFederalRegulations requiresupgrading),
2)properlydocumented toshowcompliance withtheapplicable specifications, codesandstandards, and3)purchased fromvendorsorcontractors whohavebeenevaluated anddeemedqualified, orbythecommercial gradededication process.1.7-43July,1994 Procedures establish thereviewofprocurement documents todetermine that:appropriate technical andqualityrequirements arecorrectly stated,inspectable andcontrollable; thereareadequateacceptance criteria; andprocurement documents havebeenprepared, reviewedandapprovedinaccordance withestablished requirements.
Themanageroftheoriginating group,withsupportofthecognizant AEPSCengineering group,isresponsible forassuringthatapplicable requirements aresetforthinprocurement documents.
TheCookNuclearPlantmayrequestassistance ofAEPSCcognizant engineers inanyprocurement activity.
1.7.4.2.2 TheFacilityDataBase,inconjunction withothersources,isusedforequipment safetyclassification andprocurement grade.AEPSCspecifications areusedtodetermine requirements, codesorstandards thatitemsmustfulf'ill, anddefinethedocumentation thatmustaccompany theitemtotheplant.Procurement documents forsafety-related itemsandservicesarereviewedtoensurethat:correctclassification ismade;therequirements areproperlystated;andthatmeasureshavebeen,orwillbe,implemented toassuretherequirements aremetandadequately providedfor..pr~ocenpri en~dts~aomcnentfsor newsafety-related itemsareinitiated bythecognizant engineering groupwhichestablishes initialrequirements.
Replacement/spares arepurchased torequirements equivalent totheoriginalunlessupgrading isrequiredby'federal~j'egulations, ordeemednecessary bythecognizant engineering group.1.7-44July,1994 1.7.4.2.3 Thecontentsofprocurement documents vary,according totheitem(s)beingpurchased anditsfunction(s) intheCookNuclearPlant.Provisions ofthisgAPDareconsidered forapplication toservicecontractors, also.Asapplicable, procurement documents include:a)Scopeofworktobeperformed.
b)Technical requirements, withapplicable
- drawings, specifications, c)d)e)g)h)codesandstandards identified bytitle,documentnumber,revisionanddate,withanyrequiredprocedures, suchasspecialprocessinstructions identified insuchawayastoindicatesourceandneed.Imposition ofguides/standards onAEPSC/IRK suppliers andsubtiersuppliers willbeonacase-by-case basisdepending upontheitemorservicetobesuppliedanduponthedegreethatAEPSC/IQl reliesonsuppliers toinvokeguides/standards.
AEPSC/I&K recognizes thatcertainsuppliers haveacceptable 1OCFR50,AppendixBgAprograms, even%~h~o'Ug,thesuppliers arenotcommitted toRegulatory Guidesorindustrystandards (e.g.ANSIN45.2.6.).
Inthosecases,inwhichsuppliers arenotcommitted tothesameguides/standards asAEPSC/I&K, AEPSC/IMwillassurethat(1)thesupplier's gAprogramprovidesadequategAcontrols, regardless ofthelackofspecificcommitment, or(2)controlswillbeinvokeddirectlybyAEPSC/IRK toassureadequatequalityofitems/services receivedbysuppliers.
Regulatory, administrative andreporting requirements.
gualityrequirements appropriate tothecomplexity andscopeofthework,including necessary testsand/orinspections.
Arequirement foradocumented gAProgram,subjecttogAreviewandwrittenconcurrence priortothestartofwork.Arequirement forthesuppliertoinvokeapplicable qualityrequirements onsubtiersuppliers.
Provisions foraccesstosupplier, andsubtiersuppliers',
facilities andrecordsforinspections, surveillances andaudits.Identification ofdocumentation tobeprovidedbythesupplier, thescheduleofsubmittals anddocuments requiring AEPSCapproval.
1.7-45July,1994 1.7.4.2.4 TheAEPSCgA8ejij;imeg performsauditsofprocurement documents toassurethatgAprogramrequirements havebeenmet.Theseauditsareconducted inaccordance withAEPSCiiAdoper'tment procedures.
1.7.4.2.5 Changestoprocurement documents arecontrolled inamannercommensurate withthatusedfortheoriginaldocuments.
1.7.5INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, ANDDRAMINGS1.7.5.1SCOPEActivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related structures, systemsandcomponents areaccomplished usinginstructions, procedures anddrawingsappropriate tothecircumstances, including acceptance criteriafordetermining ifanactivityhasbeensatisfactorily completed.
1.7.5.21.7.5.2.1 INPLEHENTATION Instructions andprocedures incorporate:
1)adescription oftheactivitytobeaccomplished, and2)appropriate quantitative (suchastolerances andoperating limits)andqualitative (suchasworkmanship andstandards) acceptance criteriasufficient todetermine thattheactivityhasbeensatisfactorily accomplished.
Holdpointsforinspection areestablished whenrequired.
Instructions andprocedures pertaining tothespecification of,and/orimplementation of',thegAProgramreceivemultiplereviewsfortechnical adequacyandinclusion ofappropriate qualityrequirements.
Toptierinstructions andprocedures arereviewedand/orapprovedbyAEPSCgA.1.7-46July,1994
Lowertierdocuments arereviewedandapproved, asaminimum,bymanagement/supervisory personnel trainedtothelevelnecessary toplan,coordinate andadminister thoseday-to-day verification activities ofthegAProgramforwhichtheyareresponsible.
Specialprocedures maybeissuedforactivities whichhaveshort-term applicability.
1.7.5.2.2 QEPN9activities Qareoutlinedbyprocedures whichprovidethecontrolsfortheimplementation oftheseactivities.
AGPNOhas%~hejfoi)iowg'ng categories ofGAprogramimplementation procedures:
I)GeneralprOCedureS (GpS)%'ipse'nYct'N
'ana'e,r.;.Sgn'etiiieg
)cole(pI~Span'd whichareapplicable toparr+i,:i~ir allAGPNOdivisions anddepartments involvedwithCookNuclearPlant.2)Organization procedures whichapplytothespecificdivision, department orsectioninvolved.
1.7.5.2.3 ITEMS,-';':
price'dur9s""'cintrof<ljiiijj;:AEPNO,"..".".actitviti'ii>,ar.;,e classifiedintothefollowing series:,1000Personnel Selection, PNSRCProcedures 2000Administration
-DocumentControl,Security,
- Training, Records,Emergency Plan,FireProtection, Clearance Permits,ChemicalControl,InternalCleanliness, SpillResponse, Standingorders,Corrective Naintenance.
3000Procurement, Receiving, ShippingandStorage4000Operations, FuelHandling, Surveillance Testing,TestControls1.7-47July,1994 v'
5000Haintenance, Repair,Hodification, SpecialProcesses, EgandISIControlofContractors 6000Technical
-Chemistry/Radiological
- Controls, Radiation Protection, Performance/Engineering Testing,andInstrument andControlNaintenance andCalibration, Neasuring andTestEquipment 7000gualityAssurance, gualityControlProgramandCondition/Problem Reporting Instructions andprocedures identifytheregulatory requirements andcommitments whichpertaintothesubjectthatitwillcontrolandestablish responsibilities forimplementation.
Instructions andprocedures mayeitherprovidetheguidancenecessary forthedevelopment ofsupplemental instructions and/orprocedures toimplement theirrequirements, orprovidecomprehensive guidancebasedonthesubjectmatter.1.7.5.2.4 CookNuclearPlantdrawingsareproduced, controlled anddistributed underthecontrolofAEPSCandtheCookNuclearPlant.AEPSCdesigndrawingsareproducedby,orunderthecontrolof,theAEPSCnuclearengineering department underasetofprocedures whichdirecttheirdevelopment andreview.Theseprocedures specifyrequirements forinclusion ofquantitative andqualitative acceptance criteria.
Specificadrawingsarereviewedandapprovedbythecognizant engineering organization.
'AEPSChasstationed anon-sitedesignstafftoprovidefortherevisionofcertaintypesofdesigndrawingstoreflectas-builtconditions.
1.7.5.2.5 ComplexAEPNGE'p'r'o'cii gers'%Ibad;:;::ice'i@
'p,,:ectd'i i,~:c.toCookNuclearplantsinaiaredesignated as"InHand"procedures.
Examplesof"InHand"procedures arethosedeveloped forextensive orcomplexjobswhere1.7-48July,1994
relianceonmemorycannotbetrusted.Further,thoseprocedures whichdescribeasequencewhichcannotbealtered,orrequirethedocumentation ofdataduringthecourseoftheprocedure, areconsidered.
"InHand"procedures aredesignated assuchbydoubleasterisks
(**)whichprecedetheprocedure numberonthecoversheet,allpagesandattachments ofaprocedure andthecorresponding index.1.7.61.7.6.1DOCUNENTCONTROLSCOPEDocuments controlling activities withinthescopedefinedin1.7.2hereinareissuedandchangedaccording toestablished procedures.
Documents suchasinstructions, procedures anddrawings, including changesthereto,arereviewedforadequacy, approvedforreleasebyauthorized personnel, andaredistributed andusedatthelocationwhereaprescribed activityisperformed.
Changestocontrolled documents arereviewedandapprovedbythesameorganizations thatperformed theoriginalreviewandapproval, orbyotherqualified, responsible organizations specifically designated inaccordance withtheprocedures governing thesedocuments.
Obsoleteorsuperseded documents arecontrolled topreventinadvertent use.1.7.6.21.7.6.2.1 INPLEHENTATION Controlsareestablished forapproval, issueandchangeofdocuments inthefollowing categories:
a)Designdocuments (e.g.,calculations, specifications, analyses) b)Drawingsandrelateddocuments c)Procurement documents d)Instructions andprocedures e)UpdatedFinalSafetyAna'lysis Report(UFSAR)f)PlantTechnical Specifications g)Safeguards documents 1.7-49July,1994 Thereview,approval, issuanceandchangeofdocuments arecontrolled by:a)Establishment ofcriteriatoensurethatadequatetechnical andqualityrequirements areincorporated.
b)Identification oftheorganization responsible forreview,approval, issueandmaintenance.
c)Reviewofchangestodocuments bytheorganization thatperformed theinitialreviewandapproval, orbytheorganization designated inaccordance withtheprocedure egoverning thereviewandapprovalofspecifictypesofdocuments.
1.7.6.2.3 Documents areissuedandcontrolled sothat:a)Thedocuments areavailable priortocommencing work.b)Obsoletedocuments arereplacedbycurrentdocuments inatimelymanner.1.7.6.2.4 Rasterlists,orequivalent
- controls, areusedtoidentifythecurrentrevisionofinstructions, procedures, specifications anddrawings.
Thesecontroldocuments areupdatedanddistributed todesignated personnel whoareresponsible formaintaining currentcopiesoftheapplicable documents.
Thedistribution ofcontrolled documents isperformed underprocedures requiring receiptacknowledgement andinaccordance withestablished distribution lists.1.7-50July,1994 1.7.6.2.5 Intheeventadrawingisdeveloped on-sitetoreflectanas-builtconfiguration,'he marked-up drawingismaintained intheRasterPlantFileandallholdersofthedrawingareissuedappropriate notification toinformthemtherevisiontheyholdisnotcurrent,cannotbeusedand,if'equired, reference mustbemadetotheWasterPlantFiledrawing.1.7.6.2.6 Documents preparedforuseintrainingareappropriately markedtoindicatethattheycannotbeusedtooperateormaintainthefacHityortoconductactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related items.AttheCookNuclearPlant,unlessadocumentisidentified as'controlled'r
'workingcopy'nly, itisautomatically assumedthatthedocumentisforinformation useonly.1.7.71.7.7.1CONTROLOFPURCHASED ITENANDSERVICESSCOPEActivities thatimplement approvedprocurement requestsforitemsandservicesarecontrolled toassureconformance withprocurement documentrequirements.
Controlsincludeasystemofsupplierevaluation andselection audits,acceptance ofitemsanddocumentation upondelivery,
~andperiodicassessment ofsupplierperformance.
Objective evidenceofqualitythatdemonstrates conformance withspecified procurement documentrequirements isavailable totheCookNuclearPlantsitepriortouseofequipment,
- material, orservices.
1.7.7.21.7.7.2.1 IHPLENENTATION AEPSCqualifies suppliers (including distributors totheextenttheyperformqualityrelatedactivities) byperformingadocumented 1.7-51July,1994 evaluation oftheircapability toprovideitemsorservicesspecified byprocurement documents.
Itemsandservicesdesignated assafety-related arepurchased fromsuppliers whosegAprogramshavebeenacceptedinaccordance withAEPSCrequirements, orfromcommercial gradesuppliers throughtheAEPSCdedication program.Suppliers ofotheritems/services aresubjecttoevaluation andapproval-basedonacceptance criteriaapplicable tothoseitems/services.
gualification ofsuchsuppliers isdetermined bytheAEPSCgA8epietme04.
Inthedischarge ofthisresponsibility, theAEPSCgAdeji$tgen$mayuseinformation generated byotherutilities.
Thesuppliermustbeapprovedbeforeprocurement canbecompleted.
AEPSCisamemberoftheNuclearProcurement IssuesCommittee (NUPIC),participates injointsupplieraudits,andsharesauditinformation consistent withNUPICrequirements.
Thesuppliermustbeacceptable, oracceptable subjecttofollow-up, beforeaprocurement canbeapprovedandprocessed.
Additional auditswillbeconducted, asnecessary, tomeetrequirements.
Acceptance isnotcompleteuntilithasbeendetermined thatthesuppliers'A programcanmeettherequirements fortheitem(s)/service(s) offered.1.7.7.2.2 Foritemsthatarenotuniquetoanuclearpowerplant("Commercial 4"!hmi~i!i%"':-:.'.':e!!:
q!ttb"e!'"t'4!!iv,imposedinapractical manneratthetimeofprocurement, programsfordedication tosafety-related standards areestablished bj;'/he,':,.:."ASPIC c'ocgnd;:za'nt'::::::.::en'gi'n'ee'ri:,
andaccomp1ished priortotheitembeingacceptedforsafety-re1ated use.1.7.7.2.3 In-process auditsofsuppliers activities duringfabrication, inspection, testingandshipmentofitemsareperformed whendeemednecessary, depending uponsupplierqualification status,complexity of1.7-52July,1994 theitem(s)beingfurnished, theitems'mportance tosafety,and/orprevioussupplierhistory.Theseauditsareperformed byAEPSCgA.Thecognizant engineerand/orresponsible CookNuclearPlantpersonnel mayalsoparticipate, ifdeemednecessary.
1.7.7.2.4 Spareandreplacement partsareprocuredinsuchamannerthattheirperformance andqualityareatleastequivalent tothoseof'hepartsthatwillbereplaced.
a)Specifications andcodesreferenced inprocurement documents forspareorreplacement itemsareatleastequivalent tothosefortheoriginalitemsortoproperlyreviewedandapprovedrevisions.
b)Partsintendedassparesorreplacement for"off-the-shelf" items,orotheritemsforwhichqualityrequirements werenotoriginally specified, areevaluated forperformance atleastequivalent totheoriginal.
c)Mherequalityrequirements fortheoriginalitemscannotbedetermined, requirements andcontrolsareestablished byengineering evaluation performed byqualified individuals.
Theevaluation assuresthereisnoadverseeffectoninterfaces, safety,interchangeability, fit,form,function, orcompliance withapplicable regulatory orcoderequirements.
Evaluation resultsaredocumented.
d)Anyadditional ormodifieddesigncriteria, imposedafterpreviousprocurement oftheitem(s),areidentified andincorporated.
1.7.7.2.5 Instructions andprocedures addresstherequirements*for supplierselection andcontrol,aswellasprocurement documentcontrol.The1.7-53July,1994
programforreceiptinspection ofsafety-related itemsaddresses inspection ofincomingitems,including areviewofthedocumentation requiredundertheprocurement.
Receiptinspection personnel arequalified andcertified inaccordance withtherequirements ofANSIN45.2.6.Provisions forreceiptinspection applyregardless ofwheretheprocurement originates.
Additional inspections mayapplyifrequiredbytheprocurement document.
Items,whichhavespecialprocurement requirements (suchasnuclearfuelandnuclearfuelcomponents),
mayinvolvedetailedsourceevaluations ordithJ'g~iT!!',':":ll!
!ii!!iVP!hiPtPP1treceiptinspection.
Personnel performing theseevaluations andauditswillbequalified inaccordance withANSIN18.1and/orANSIN45.2.23.
Receiptinspections atthesitewillbeperformed bypersonnel certified toANSIN45.2.6.Inaddition, reviewsofspecialprocurement documents orshippingmanifests willbeperformed bypersonnel trainedintheprocurement andqualified inaccordance withANSIN18.1.Whereitemsand/orservicesaresafety-related andprocurement isaccomplished withoutassistance ofAEPSC,supplierselection islimitedtothosecompanies identified asbeingqualified.
1.7.7.2.6 Itemsreceivedatthesitearetaggedwitha"HOLD"tagand/orplacedinadesignated area(e.g.newnuclearfuel)untilreceiptinspected.
Duringreceiptinspection, designated materialcharacteristics andattributes arechecked,anddocumentation ischeckedagainsttheprocurement documents.
Whenthereceiptinspection ofitemsissupplemented bysourceevaluations orauditsatthevendorpriortoshipment, appropriate visualand/ormechanical inspections willbecompleted toensurethatshippingdamagehasnotoccurred.
Iffoundacceptable, the"HOLD"tagisremovedandreplacedwithan"ACCEPTED" tagand/ortheitemisplacedinadesignated area.1.7-54July,1994
Itemtraceability toprocurement documents andtoenduseismaintained throughrecording ofidentification numbersor,"HOLD"'and "ACCEPTED" tagnumbersonapplicable documents.
Nonconforming items,ormissingorquestionable documentation resultsinitemsbeingplacedon"HOLD"andmaintained inadesignated, controlled area.Ifthenonconformance cannotbecleared,theitemiseitherscrapped, returnedtomanufacturer, ordispositioned throughengineering analysis.
1.7.7.2.7 Contractors providing services(on-site) forsafety-related components arerequiredtohaveeitheraformalqualityassurance programandprocedures, ortheymustabidebytheCookNuclearPlantgAProgramandprocedures.
PriortotheirworkingattheCookNuclearPlant,contractors workingundertheirownqualityassurance programsmustbeauditedandapprovedbyAEPSCgA.Contractor procedures mustbereviewedandapprovedbytheoriginating/sponsoring department head.Further,periodicauditsofsitecontractor activities areconducted underthedirection oftheAEPSCqualityassurance superintendent.
1.7.7.2.8 Totheextentprescribedinspecificprocurementdocuments, suppliersfurnishqualityrecords;documentary evidencethatmaterialandequipment eitherconformstorequirements oridentifies anyrequirements thathavenotbeenmet;anddescriptions ofthosenonconformances fromtheprocurement requirements, whichhavebeendispositioned "use-as-is" or"repair."
ThisevidenceisretainedatthePlant,orattheServiceCorporation.
Totheextentprescribed inspecificprocurement agreements, suppliers arerequiredtomaintainadditional (backup)documents intheirrecordsystem.l.7-55July,1994 Insomecases,suchaswithNSSS,suppliers aredesignated primaryrecordretention responsibility.
1.7.7.2.9 Thecapability ofsuppliers tofurnishvaliddocumentation isevaluated duringprocurement documentreviews,annualsupplierevaluations, andduringaudits.1.7.8IDENTIFICATION ANDCON'iROLOFITEMS1.7.8.1SCOPEItemsareidentified andcontrolled topreventtheirinadvertent use.Identification ofitemsismaintained eitherontheitems,theirstorageareasorcontainers, oronrecordstraceable totheitems.1.7.8.21.7.8.2.1 IHPLEHENTATION Controlsareestablished thatprovidefortheidentification andcontrolofitems(including partially fabricated assemblies).
1.7.8.2.2 Itemsareidentified byphysically markingtheitemoritscontainer, andbymaintaining recordstraceable totheitem.Themethodofidentification issuchthatthequalityoftheitemisnotdegraded.
1.7.8.2.3 Itemsaretraceable toapplicable
- drawings, specifications, orotherpertinent documents toensurethatonlycorrectandacceptable itemsareused.Yerification oftraceability isperformed anddocumented priortoreleaseforfabrication,
- assembly, orinstallation.
1.7-56Duly,1994 1.7.8.2.4 Requirements fortheidentification byuseofheatnumber,partnumber,serialnumber,etc.,areincludedinAEPSCSpecifications
{DCCs)and/ortheprocurement document.
1.7.8.2.5 Separatestorageisprovidedforincorrect ordefective itemsthatareonholdandmaterialwhichhasbeenacceptedforuse.Allsafety-relateditemsareappropriately taggedoridentified
{stamping, etc.)toprovideeasyidentification astotheitems'sage status.Recordsaremaintained fortheissueofitemstoprovidetraceability fromstoragetoenduseintheCookNuclearPlant.1.7.8.2.6 Whenmaterials aresubdivided, appropriate identification numbersaretransferred toeachsectionofthematerial, ortraceability ismaintained throughdocumentation.
1.7.91.7.9.1CONTROLOFSPECIALPROCESSES SCOPESpecialprocesses arecontrolled andaccomplished byqualified personnel usingapprovedprocedures andequipment inaccordance withapplicable codes,standards, specifications, criteriaandotherspecialrequirements.
1.7.9.21.7.9.2.1 IRPLBlENTATION Processes subjecttospecialprocesscontrolsarethoseforwhichfullverification orcharacterization bydirectinspection isimpossible orimpractical.
Suchprocesses includewelding,heattreating, chemical1.7-57July,1994
- cleaning, appl.ication ofprotective
- coatings, concreteplacement andNDE.1.7.9.2.2 Specialprocessrequirements forchemicalcleaning, application ofprotective coatingsandconcreteplacement aresetforthinAEPSCSpecifications (DCCs)and/ordirectives preparedbytheresponsible AEPSCcognizant engineer.
Thesedocuments arereviewedandapprovedbyotherpersonnel withthenecessary technical'ompetence.
+?i:Specialprocessrequirements forwelding,heattreatingandNDEaresetforthinAEPSCSpecifications, theAEPWeldingandNDEmanualsandplantprocedures.
Thesespecifications andmanualsarepreparedby,orarereviewedandapprovedby,theAEPSCcognizant engineer-weldingandNDEadministrator.
Specialprocessprocedures, withtheexception ofweldingandheattreating, arepreparedbyCookNuc1'earPlantpersonnel withtechnical knowledge inthediscipline involved.
Theseprocedures, whicharealsoreviewedbyotherpersonnel withthenecessary technical competence, arequalified bytesting.Weldingisperformed inaccordance withprocedures contained intheAEPMeIdingNanual,orbyapprovedcontractor's procedures.
Theseprocedures arequalified inaccordance withapplicable codes,andProcedure gualification Recordsareprepared.
Meld-p'r,'oce icespec3'flcatTons arereviewedandapprovedbytheAEPSCcognizant engineer-welding.Weldp'roce'duroc qualification documentation isretainedintheAEPMeldingmanual,ortheapprovedcontractor's manual.Contractor weldingprocedures arequalified bythecontractor.
Theseprocedures andthequalification documentation arereviewedandapprovedbytheAEPSCcognizant engineer-.welding.Thisdocumentation isIretainedbythecontractor.
1.7-58July,1994 1.7.9.2e3 NDEpersonnel arequalified andcertified byaCookNuclearPlantNDELevelIIIwhohasbeenqualified andcertified bythedesignated AEPSCNDEadministrator.
Certification isbyexamination.
Personnel qualification iskeptcurrentbyre-examination attimeintervals specified inqualification/certification procedures whichareinaccordance withtheASIDECode.CookNuclearPlantweldersarequalified bythemaintenance department usingAEPSCapprovedprocedures.
Supervision ofCookNuclearPlantwelderqualifications isperformed bythemaintenance department.
Examination ofspecimens isperformed underthesupervision ofthejfteqalgity.:assurarice'an Pcnntrol'QepartmiiriE inaccordance withtheAEPMeldingManualcoveringwelderqualification.
CookNuclearPlantwelderqualification recordsaremaintained foreachwelderbythemaintenance department.
Contractor andcraftweldersarequalified bythecontractor usingprocedures approvedbytheAEPSCcognizant engineer-Meldinginaccordance withAEPSCprocedures.
Contractor andcraftwelderqualification recordsaremaintained bythecontractor.
1.7.9.2.4 l}c/NDEtechnicians assignedtothesa't~eiqdai'ity~assuran'ce,:and~i,.oiitr'ol!
depirtment performnondestructive testingforworkperformed byCookNuclearPlantandcontractor personnel.
Theseindividuals arequalified toeitherSNT-TC-1A, orANSIN45.2.6,andrecordsofthequalifications/certifications aremaintained atCookNuclearPlant.1.7.9.2.5 Forspecialprocesses thatrequirequalified equipment, suchequipment isqualified inaccordance withapplicable codes,standards andspecifications.
1.7-59July,1994 1.7.9.2.6
~~~Specialprocessqualifications arereviewedduringregularly scheduled gAaudits.gualification recordsaremaintained inaccordance with1.7.17herein.1.7.9.2.7 Thedocumentation resulting fromweldingandnondestructive testingisreviewedbyappropriate personnel.
1.7.10INSPECTION 1.7.10.1SCOPEActivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related structures, systemsandcomponents areinspected toverifytheirconformance withrequirements.
Theseinspections areperformed bypersonnel otherthanthosewhoperformtheactivity.
Inspections areperformed byqualified personnel utilizing writtenprocedures whichestablish prerequisites andprovidedocumentation forevaluating testandinspection results.Directinspection, processmonitoring, orboth,areusedasnecessary.
Mhenapplicable, holdpointsareusedtoensurethatinspections areaccomplished atthecorrectpointsinthesequenceofactivities.
1.7.10.2IHPLEHENTATION 1.7.10.2.1 Inspections areappliedtoappropriate activities toassureconformance tospecified requirements.
Holdpointsareprovidedinthesequenceofprocedures toallowfortheinspection, witnessing, examination, measurement, orreviewnecessary toassurethatthecritical, orirreversible, elementsofanactivityarebeingperformed asrequired.
Notethatholdpointsmaynotapplytoallprocedures buteachmustbereviewedforthisattribute.
1.7-60Duly,1994
Holdpointsspecifyexactlywhatistobedone(e.g.,typeofinspection orexamination, etc.),acceptance
- criteria, orreference toanotherprocedure, etc.,forthesatisfactory completion oftheholdpoint.Mhenincludedinthesequenceofaprocedure, theactivities requiredbyholdpointsarecompleted priortocontinuing workbeyondthatpoint.Processmonitoring isusedinwhole,orinpart,wheredirectinspection aloneisimpractical orinadequate.
1.7.10.2.2
- Training, qualification andcertification programsforpersonnel whoperforminspections areestablished, implemented anddocumented inaccordance with1.7.2hereinandasdescribed inAppendixBhereto,item9b,withexceptions asnotedtherein.1.7.10.2.3 Inspection requirements arespecified inprocedures, instructions, drawingsorchecklists asapplicable.
Theyprovideforthefollowing, asappropriate:
a)Identification ofapplicable revisions ofrequiredinstructions, drawingsandspecifications.
b)Identification ofcharacteristics andactivities tobeinspected.
c)Inspection methods.d)Specification ofmeasuring andtestequipment havingthenecessary accuracy.
e)Identification ofpersonnel responsible forperforming theinspection.
f)Acceptance andrejection criteria.
Duly,1994 g)Recording oftheinspection resultsandtheidentification oftheinspector.
1.7.10.2.4 Inspections areconducted usingthefollowing programs:
a~PeerInsectionProram.ThePeerInspection ProgramisbasedonthepremisethatIMpersonnel arequalified toANSIN18.1(1971),Selection andTraininofNuclearPowerPlantPersonnel, andareperiodically trainedintheirskillareausingINPOaccreditedtraining.
Asaresultoftheirexperience, qualifications, andtraining, IKNpersonnel mayperforminspections ofworkfunctions associated withnormaloperation ofthePlant,routinemaintenance, andcertainroutinetechnical activities whichareroutinely performed byILKpersonnel (peers)oi;:::contract:
pere'onh'esf::.
Peerinspection personnel areindependent inthatheydonotperformordirectlysupervise theworkbeinginspected, buttheymaybefromthesameworkgroup.83,e~stjuTia't~y::.as srunac,':eadsncon~traol personnel, qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.58andANSIN45.2.6,willensure(viasurveillance) thatpeerinspections arebeingcorrectly implemented andmakeperiodicreportstomanagement.
b.ANSIN45.2.6InsectionProram.majormodification andnon-routine;maintenance workonsafety-related equipment isinspected perANSIN45.2.6,ualifications ofInsectionExamination andTestinPersonnel forNuclearPowerPlants,whetheritisperformed byI&Korcontractor personnel.
Allmajii.;.-'.:.:;ioiB~f'i.'cia'i:.oo ancdj~n'on'rOutinb safety-related workperformed bycontractpersonnel isinspected perANSIN45.2.5.Inspections oftheseworkactivities areperformed byinspectors qualified andcertified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.58and'ANSIN45.2.6.Contractors performing workonsafety-related equipment are1.7-62July,1994
~'
requiredtocomplywiththeapplicable requirements ofRegulatory Guide1.33andANSIN45.2.1.7.10.2.5 Inspections associated withthepackaging andshipmentofradioactive wasteandmaterials areconducted usingthefollowing program:a)NRCLicensedPackains-Inspections ofNRClicensedradioactive materialpackagings shallbeperformed byindividuals independent fromtheworkbeingperformed.
Theindependent inspectors shallbeIndianaMichiganPowerpersonnel, qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1,'asaminimum.Additionally, theinspector shallbefamiliarwiththeactivities beingperformed.
b)Non-NRCLicensedPackainsandContainers
-Inspections ofnon-NRClicensedradioactive materialpackagings andcontainers (shipping and/orburial)shallbeperformed byIndianaMichiganPowerpersonnel, qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide2<'8andANSIN18.1,asaminimum.c)TransortationVehicles-Inspection oftransportation vehiclesbeingshippedas"exclusive use",shallbeperformed byIndianaMichiganPowerpersonnel, qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1,asaminimum.d)OtherinsectionsandVerification
-Inspections andverifications of'theractivities associated withthepackaging andshipmentofradioactive materials andwasteshallbeperformed byIndiana~MichiganPowerpersonnel, qualified inaccordance withRegulatory Guide1.8andANSIN18.1,asaminimum.1.7-63July,1994 1.7.10.2.6
~~~~Inspections areperformed, documented, andtheresultsevaluated bydesignated personnel inordertoensurethattheresultssubstantiate theacceptability oftheitemorwork.Evaluation andreviewresultsaredocumented.
1.7.11TESTCONTROL1.7.11.1SCOPETestingisperformed inaccordance withestablished programstodemonstrate thatstructures, systemsandcomponents willperformsatisfactorily inservice.Thetestingisperformed byqualified personnel inaccordance withwrittenprocedures thatincorporate specified requirements andacceptance criteria.
Typesoftestsare:Scheduled Surveillance, preventive maintenance, post-design, qualification.
Unscheduled Pre-tiiagiitenan'c~e andpost-maintenance.
Testparameters (including anyprerequisites),
instrumentation requirements, andenvironmental conditions arespecified intestprocedures.
Testresultsaredocumented andevaluated.
1.7-64July,1994 II 1.7.11.2INPLENENTATIOH 1.7.11.2.1
~~~~Testsareperformed inaccordance withprograms, procedures andcriteriathatdesignate whentestsarerequiredandhowtheyaretobeperformed.
Suchtestingincludesthefollowing:
a)gualification tests,asapplicable, toverifydesignadequacy.
b)Acceptance testsofequipment andcomponents toassuretheiroperation priortodeliveryorinstallation.
c)Post-design teststoassureproperandsafeoperation ofsystemsandequipment priortounrestricted operation.
d)Surveillance teststoassurecontinuing properandsafeoperation ofsystemsandequipment.
ThePMIonsurveillance testingcontrolstheperiodictestingofequipment andsystemstofulfillthesurveillance requirements established bytheTechnical Specifications.
Controlshavebeenestablished toidentifyuncompleted surveillance testingtoassureitisrescheduled forcompletion tomeetTechnical Specification frequency requirements.
Datatakenduringsurveillance testingisreviewedbyappropriate management personnel toassurethatacceptance criteriaisfulfilled, orcorrective actionistakentocorrectdeficiencies.
e)Haintenance testsafterpreventive orcorrective maintenance.
1.7.11.2.2 Testprocedures, asrequired, providemandatory holdpointsforwitnessorreview.1.7-65July,1994" 1.7.11.2.3 Testingisaccomplished afterinstallation, maintenance, orrepair,bysurveillance testprocedures, orperformance tests,whichmustbesatisfactorily completed priortodetermining theequipment isinanoperablestatus.Alldataresulting fromthesetestsisretainedattheCookNuclearPlantafterreviewbyappropriate management personnel.
1.7.12CONTROLOFHEASURING ANDTESTEgUIPHENT 1.7.12.1SCOPENeasuring andtestingequipment usedinactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related structures, systemsandcomponents areproperlyidentified, controlled, calibrated andadjustedatspecified intervals tomaintainaccuracywithinnecessary limits.1.7.12.2IHPLEHENTATION 1.7.12.2.1 Established procedures andinstructions areusedforcalibration andcontrolofmeasuring andtestequipment utilizedinthemeasurement, inspection andmonitotingofstructures, systemsandcomponents.
Theseprocedures andinstructions describecalibration techniques andfrequencies, andmaintenance andcontroloftheequipment.
AEPSCgAperiodically assessestheeffectiveness ofthecalibtationprogramviathegAauditprogram.1.7.12.2.2 Heasuring andtestequipment isuniquelyidentified andistraceable toitscalibration source.1.7-66July,1994
Asystemhasbeenestablished forattaching, oraffixinglabels,tomeasuring andtestequipment todisplaythedatecalibrated andthenextcalibration duedate,oracontrolsystemisusedthatidentifies topotential usersanyequipment beyondthecalibration duedate.1.7.12.2.4 Heasuring andtestequipment iscalibrated atspecified intervals.
Theseintervals arebasedonthefrequency ofuse,stability characteristics andotherconditions thatcouldadversely affecttherequiredmeasurement accuracy.
Calibration standards aretraceable tonationally recognized standards; orwheresuchstandards donotexist,provisions areestablished todocumentthebasisforcalibration.
Theprimarystandards usedtocalibrate secondary standards have,exceptincertaininstances, anaccuracyofatleastfour(4)timestherequiredaccuracyofthesecondary standard.
Inthosecaseswherethefour{4)timesaccuracycannotbeachieved, thebasisforacceptance isdocumented andisauthorized bytheresponsible manager.Thesecondary standards haveanaccuracythatassuresequipment beingcalibrated willbewithinrequiredtolerances.
Thebasisforacceptance isdocumented andauthorized bytheresponsible manager.1.7.12.2.5 CookNuclearPlantprocedures definetherequirements forthecontrolofstandards, testequipment andprocessequipment.
1.7.12.2.6 Mhenmeasuring andtestingequipment usedforinspection andtestingisfoundtobeoutsideofrequiredaccuracylimitsatthetimeof1.7-67July,1994 I
calibration, evaluations areconducted todetermine thevalidityoftheresultsobtainedsincethemostrecentcalibration.
Retests,orreinspections, areperformed onsuspectitems.Theresultsofevaluations aredocumented.
1.7.13HANDLING, STORAGE,ANDSHIPPING1.7.13.1SCOPEActivities withthepotential forcausingcontamination ordeterioration, byenvironmental conditions suchastemperature orhumiditythatcouldadversely affecttheabilityofanitemtoperformitssafety-related functions andactivities necessary topreventdamageorloss,areidentified andcontrolled.
Theseactivities arecleaning, packaging, preserving,
- handling, shippingandstoring.Controlsareeffectedthroughtheuseofappropriate procedures andinstructions.
1.7.13.2INPLENENTATION 1.7.13.2.1 Procedures areusedtocontrolthecleaning,
- handling, storing,packaging, preserving andshippingofmaterials, components andsystemsinaccordance withdesignated procurement requirements.
Theseprocedures include,butarenotlimitedto,thefollowing functions:
a)Cleaning-toassurethatrequiredcl."e'anne'ss levelsareachievedandmaintained.
b)Packaging andpreservation
-toprovideadequateprotection againstdamageordeterioration.
Mhennecessary, theseprocedures provideforspecial.environments, suchasinertgasatmosphere, specificmoisturecontentlevelsandtemperature levels.c)Handling-toprecludedamageorsafetyhazards.1.7-68July,1994
d)Storing-tominimizethepossibility ofloss,damageordeterioration ofitemsinstorage,including consumables suchaschemicals, reagentsandlubricants.
1.7.13.2.2 Controlshavebeenestablished forlimitedshelflifeitemssuchas"0"rings,epoxy,lubricants, solventsandchemicals toassuretheyarecorrectly identified, storedandcontrolled topreventshelflifeexpiredmaterials frombeingusedintheCookNuclearPlant.Controlsareestablished inplantprocedures.
1.7.13.2.3 Packaging andshippingrequirements areprovidedtovendorsinAEPSCSpecifications (DCCs)whichareapartoftheprocurement
- document, orareotherwise specified intheprocurement document.
Controlsforreceiptinspection, damageditemsandspecialhandlingrequirements attheCookNuclearPlantareestablished byplantprocedures.
Specialcontrolsareprovidedtoassurethatstainless steelcomponents andmaterials arehandledwithapprovedliftingslings.1.7.13.2.4 Storageandsurveillance requirements havebeenestablished toassuresegregation ofstorage.Specialcontrolshavebeenimplemented forcritical, highvalue,orperishable items.Routinesurveillance isconducted onstoredmaterialtoprovideinspection fordamage,rotationofstoredpumpsandmotors,inspection forpro'tection ofexposedsurfacesandc'learns'sfs ofthestoragearea.1.7.13.2.5 Specialhandlingprocedures havebeenimplemented fortheprocessing ofnuclearfuelduringrefueling outages.Theseprocedures minimizethe1.7-69July,1994 riskofdamagetothenewandspentfuelandthepossiblereleaseofradioactive materialwhenplacingthespentfuelintothespentfuelpool.1.7.14INSPECTION, TEST,ANDOPERATING STATUS1.7.14.1SCOPEOperating statusofstructures, systemsandcomponents isindicated bytaggingofvalvesandswitches, orbyotherspecified means,insuchamannerastopreventinadvertent operation.
Thestatusofinspections andtestsperformed onindividual itemsisclearlyindicated bymarkingsand/orloggingunderstrictprocedural controlstopreventinadvertent bypassing ofsuchinspections andtests.1.7.14.2IHPLENENTATION 1.7.14.2.1 Fordesignchangeactivities, including itemfabrication, installation andtest,aprogramexistswhichspecifies thedegreeofcontrolrequiredfortheidentification ofinspection andteststatusofstructures, systemsandcomponents.
Physicalidentification isusedtotheextentpractical toindicatethestatusofitemsrequiring inspections, tests,orexaminations.
Procedures existwhichprovidefortheuseofcalibration andrejection
- stickers, tags,stampsandotherformsofidentification toindicatetestandinspection status.TheClearance PermitSystemusesvarioustagstoidentifyequipment andsystemoperability status.Anotherprogramestablishes ataggingsystemforliftedleads,etc.forthoseitemsrequiring calibration, theprogramprovidesforphysicalindication ofcalibration statusbycalibration
- stickers, ora'ontrolsystemisused.1.7-70July,1994
Application andremovalofinspection andweldingstamps,andof'uchstatusindicators astags,markings, labels,etc.,iscontrolled byplantprocedures.
Theinspection statusofmaterials receivedattheCookNuclearPlantisidentified inaccordance withestablished instructions.
Thestatusisidentified asHold,HoldforgualityControlClearance, Reject,orAccept.Theinspection statusofworkinprogressiscontrolled bytheuseofholdpointsinprocedures.
PlantgualityControl,ordepartmental ANSIN18.1qualified personnel (reference 1.7.10.2.4herein),inspectanactivityatvariousstagesandsignofftheprocedural inspection steps.Thestatusofweldingiscontrolled throughtheuseofawelddatablockwhichidentifies theinspection andNDEstatusofeachweld.1.7.14.2.3 Requiredsurveillance testprocedures aredefinedinPNIs.Theseinstructions providefordocumenting bypassedtestsandrescheduling ofthetest.Thestatusoftestingafterminormaintenance isrecordedaspartoftheDobOrderiud)ot;gir'i'ceder:e.
Thestatusoftestingaftermajormaintenance isincludedaspartoftheprocedure, andincludestheperformance offunctional testingandapprovalofdatabysupervisory personnel.
Testing,inspection andotheroperations important tosafetyareconducted inaccordance withproperlyreviewedandapprovedprocedures.
ThePNIforplantprocedures requiresthatprocedures befollowedaswritten.Alteration tothesequenceofaprocedure canonlybeDuly,1994
accomplished byaprocedure changewhichissubjecttothesamecontrolsastheoriginalreviewandapproval.
Mhenanimmediate procedure changeisrequiredtocontinuein-process workortestingandtherequiredcompletereviewandapprovalprocesscannotbeaccomplished, an"OnTheSpot"changeisprocessed inaccordance withthePNIonplantprocedures.
1;7.14.2.4 Nonconforming, inoperable, ormalfunctioning structures, systemsandcomponents areclearlyidentified bytags,stickers, stamps,etc.,anddocumented topreventinadvertent use.1.7.15NONCONFORNING ITEMS1.7.15.1SCOPENaterials, parts,orcomponents thatdonotconformtorequirements arecontrolled inordertopreventtheirinadvertent use.Nonconforming itemsareidentified, documented; segregated whenpractical anddispositioned.
Affectedorganizations arenotifiedofnonconformances.
1.7.15.2IHPLENENTATION 1.7.15.2.1 Items,services, oractivities thataredeficient incharacteristic, documentation, orprocedure, whichrenderthequalityunacceptable orindeterminate, areidentified asnonconforming andanyfurtheruseiscontrolled.
Nonconformances aredocumented anddispositioned, andnotification ismadetoaffectedorganizations.
Personnel authorized todisposition, conditionally releaseandcloseoutnonconformances aredesignated.
TheJobOrderSystemand/ortheCondition Reports(referto1.7.16herein)areusedatCookNuclearPlant'toidentifynonconforming itemsandinitiatecorrective actionforitemswhichareinstalled orhave1.7-72July,1994 V
beenreleasedtotheCookNuclearPlant.Systems,components, ormaterials whichrequirerepairorinspection arecontrolled undertheJobOrderSystem.Inaddition, thevariousprocedures identified in1.7.14hereinprovideforidentification, segregation anddocumentation ofnonconforming items.1.7.15.2.2 Nonconforming itemsareidentified bymarking,tagging,segregating, orbydocumented administrative controls.
Documentation describes thenonconformance, thedisposition ofthenonconformance andtheinspection requirements.
Italsoincludessignature approvalofthedisposition.
Completed JobOrdersarereviewedbythesupervisor responsible foraccomplishing thework,andthesupervisor ofthedepartment/section thatoriginated theJobOrder.TheOA8epgi,'tment periodically auditstheJobOrderSystem,andonasamplebasis,JobOrders.1.7.15.2.3 Itemsthathavebeenrepairedorreworkedareinspected andtestedinaccordance withtheoriginalinspection andtestrequirements, oralternatives, thathavebeendocumented.
Itemsthathavethedisposition of"repair"or"use-as-is" requiredocumentation justifying acceptability.
Thechangesarerecordedtodenotetheas-builtcondition.
Mhenrequiredbyestablished procedures, surveillance oroperability testsareconducted onanitemafterrework,repairorreplacement.
1.7.15.2.4 Disposition ofconditionally releaseditemsareclosedoutbeforetheitemsarereliedupontoperformsafety-related functions.
1.7-73July,1994 1.7.16CORRECTIVE ACTION1.7.16.1SCOPE'Conditions adversetoquality,suchasfailures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective materialandequipment, andnonconformances areidentified promptlyandcorrected assoonaspractical.
Forsignificant conditions adversetoquality,thecauseofthecondition isdetermined, corrective actionistakentocorrecttheimmediate eintfQV~,3,og, andpreventive actionisimplemented topreventrecurrence, Inthesecases,thecondition, causeandcorrective actiontakenisdocumented andreportedtoappropriate levelsofmanagement.
1.7.16.2INPLEHENTATION 1.7.16.2.1 Procedures areestablished thatdescribetheplantandAEPSCcorrective actionprograms.
Theseprocedures arereviewedandconcurred withbytheAEPSCgAdi.'apartment:.
1.7.16.2.2 condition ReportsPn8Fiiidft/sorieA'!lan'cei'reporAte providethemechanism forplantandAEPSCpersonnel tonotifymanagement ofconditions adversetoquality.Condition Reportsarealsousedtoreportviolations tocodes,regulations andtheTechnical Specifications.
Investigations ofreportedconditions adversetoqualityareassignedbymanagement.
TheCondition Reportisusedtodocumenttheinvestigation ofanadversecondition; andtoidentifytheneedforadesignchangetocorrectsystemorequipment deficiencies, ortoidentifytheneedfortheinitiation ofJobOrderstocorrectminordeficiencies.
Further,Condition Reportsareusedtoidentifythoseactionsnecessary topreventrecurrence ofthereportedcondition.
1.7-74July,1994 4e1' ThePNSRCevaluates actionstakenorbeingtakentocorrectandpreventrecurrence ofthedeficiency forcondition reportsinvolving:
a.aviolation ofTechnical Specification b.'.reportable eventc.anyaccidental, unplanned, oruncontrolled radioactive released.asafety-related adversetrende.apotential nuclearsafetyhazardf.anentryintoTechnical Specification LCO3.0.3(failuretocomplywithLCO'snotcontaining specificshutdownschedule) g.aTechnical Specification LCOentrythatwastheresultofpersonnel error.TheAEPSCNSDRCisresponsible forassuringthatindependent reviewsofviolations (asspecified intheTechnical Specifications) areperformed.
Theseviolations areconsidered significant con'digi'on/
whicharedocumented onCondition Reports.Thereviewswillprovideanindependent evaluation ofthereportedmW'diYi'ons:--
andcorrective actions.TheAEPSCQA8ejar,':tmerit periodically auditsthecorrective actionsystemicforcompliance andeffectiveness.
1.7.17QUALITYASSURANCE RECORDS1.7.17.1SCOPERecordsthatfurnishevidenceofactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related structures, systemsandcomponents aremaintained.
Theyareaccurate,
- complete, legibleandareprotected againstdamage,deterioration, orloss.Theyareidentifiable andretrievable.
1.7.17.2IHPLEHENTATION 1.7.17.2.1 Documents thatfurnishevidenceofactivities affecting thequalityofsafety-related itemsaregenerated andcontrolled inaccordance withthe1.7-75Duly,1994 procedure thatgovernsthoseactivities.
Uponcompletion, thesedocuments areconsidered records.Theserecordsinclude:b)c)d)e)f)g)h)Resultsofreviews,inspections, surveillances, tests,auditsandmaterialanalyses.
gualification ofpersonnel, procedures andequipment.
Operation logs.Naintenance andmodification procedures andrelatedinspection results.Reportabl eoccurrences.RecordsrequiredbytheplantTechnical Specifications.
Condition Reports.Otherdocumentation suchasdrawings, specifications, dedication plans,procurement documents, calibration procedures andreports.Radiographs.
1.7.17.2.2 Instructions andprocedures establish therequirements fortheidentification andpreparation ofrecordsforsystemsandequipment underthel}AProgram;andprovidethecontrolsforretention oftheserecords.Criteriaforthestoragelocationofqualityrelatedrecords,andaretention schedulefortheserecords,hasbeenestablished.
FileIndexeshavebeenestablished toprovidedirection forfiling,andtoprovidefortheretrievability oftherecords.Controlshavebeenestablished forlimitingaccesstothePlantNasterFiletopreventunauthorized entry,unauthorized removal,andforuseoftherecordsunderemergency conditions.
TheNuclearRecordsNanagement Supervisor isresponsible forthecontroIandoperation ofthePlantNasterFileRoom.1.7-76July,1994 1.7.17.2.3 WithinAEPSC,eachdepartment/division managerisresponsible fortheidentification, collection, maintenance andstorageofrecordsgenerated bytheirdepartment/division.
Procedures ensurethemaintenance ofrecordssufficient tofurnishobjective evidencethatactivities affecting qualityareincompliance withtheestablished gAProgram.1.7.17.2.4 Whenadocumentbecomesarecord,itisdesignated aspermanent, ornonpermanent, andthentransmitted tofile.Nonpermanent recordshavespecified retention times.Permanent recordsaremaintained forthelifeoftheplantorequipment, asapplicable.
1.7.17.2.5 Onlyauthorized personnel mayissuecorrections orsupplements torecords.1.7.17.2.6 Traceability betweentherecordandtheitemoractivitytowhichitappliesisprovided.
1.7.17.2.7 1Exceptforrecordsthatcanonlybestoredasoriginals, suchasradiographs andsomestripcharts,ormicrographs thereof,recordsarestoredinremote,dualfacilities topreventdamage,deterioration, orlossduetonaturalorunnatural causes.Whenonlythesingleoriginalcanberetained, specialfire-rated facilities areused.1.7-77July,1994 1.7.18.AUDITS1.7.18.1SCOPEAcomprehensive systemofauditsiscarriedouttoprovideindependent evaluation ofcompliance with,andtheeffectiveness of,thegAProgramincluding thoseelementsoftheprogramimplemented bysuppliers andth-:,:y!!r!-:,,f!!!..:.!
,!,,::I::riilr!So,,::,-u:,:,-,->>,,!iaaf:
- ---!1!Koffp,:'~le"1l'WWITt(ymir.----:
,:..--!t,':1Vi
',,1i!:::-f;::
W!,.acta7iitdeig Auditsareperformed inaccordance withwrittenprocedures orchecklists byqualified personnel nothavingdirectresponsibility intheareasaudited.Auditresultsaredocumented andreviewedbymanagement.
Follow-up actionistakenwhereindicated.
1.7.18.2INPLENENTATION 1.7.18.2.1 AEPSCA5e5'r6iienti$
- AD':Resonsibilities Thebasicresponsibility fortheassessment ofthegAProgramisvestedintheAEPSCgAD.TheAEPSCgADisprimarily responsible forensuringthatpropergAprogramsareestablished andforverification oftheirimplementation.
Theseresponsibilities aredischarged incooperation withtheAEPSCandCookNuclearPlantmanagement andtheirstaffs.1.7.18.2.2 Internalauditsareperformed inaccordance withestablished schedules thatreflectthestatusandimportance ofsafetytotheactivities beingperformed.
Allareaswheretherequirements of10CFR50,AppendixBapplyareauditedwithinaperiodofonetotwoyears.1.7.18.2s3 TheAEPSCgADconductsauditstoverifytheadequacyandimplementation ofthegAProgramattheCookNuclearPlantandwithintheAEPSystem.gAauditreportsaredistributed totheappropriate management andtheNSDRC(allaudits).1.7-78July,1994 l
Theindependent off-sitereviewandauditorganization istheAEPSCNSDRC.Thiscommittee iscomposedofAEPSC,IMandCookNuclearPlantmanagement members.AnNSDRCManualhasbeendeveloped forthiscommittee whichcontainstheNSDRCCharterandprocedures.
TheNSDRCconductsperiodicauditsofCookNuclearPlantoperations pursuanttoestablished criteria(Technical Specifications, etc.).NSDRCauditreportsaresubmitted forreviewtotheNSDRCmembership andtheChairmanoftheNSDRC.Condition ReportsahV/ar:",,':audht:vrmepoita providefortherecording ofactionstakentocorrectdeficiencies foundduringtheseaudits.1.7.18.2a5 TheCookNuclearPlanton-sitereviewgroupisthePNSRC.Thiscommittee reviewsplantoperations asaroutineevaluation andservestoadvisethePlantNanageronmattersrelatedtonuclearsafety.Thecomposition ofthecommittee isdefinedintheTechnical Specifications.
ThePNSRCalsoreviewsinstructions, procedures, anddesignchangesforsafety-related systemspriortoapprovalbythePlantNanager.Inaddition, thiscommittee servestoconductinvestigations ofviolations toTechnical Specifications, andreviewssignificant Condition Reportstodetermine ifappropriate actionhasbeentaken.1.7.18.2.6 Auditsofsuppliers andcontractors arescheduled basedonthestatusofsafetyimportance oftheactivities beingperformed, andareinitiated earlyenoughtoassureeffective qualityassurance duringdesign,procureement,manufacturing, construction, installation, inspection andtesting.1.7-79Quly,1994 Principal contractors arerequiredtoaudittheirsuppliers systematically inaccordance withthecriteriaestablished withintheirqualityassurance programs.
1.7.18.2.7 Regularly scheduled auditsaresupplemented by"specialaudits"whensignificant changesaremadeinthegAprogram,whenitissuspected thatqualityisinjeopardy, orwhenanindependent assessment ofprogrameffectiveness isconsidered necessary.
1.7.18.2.8 Auditsincludeanobjective evaluation ofpractices, procedures, instructions, activities anditemsrelatedtoquality;andareviewofdocuments andrecordstoconfirmthatthegAProgramiseffective andproperlyimplemented.
1.7.18.2.9 Auditprocedures andthescope,plans,checklists andresultsofindividual auditsaredocumented.
1.7.18.2.10 Personnel selectedforauditingassignments haveexperience, oraregiventrainingcommensurate withtheneedsoftheaudit,andhavenodirectresponsibilities intheareasaudited.1.7.18.2.11 management oftheauditedorganization identifies andtakesappropriate actiontocorrectobserveddeficiencies andtopreventrecurrence.
Follow-up isperformed bytheauditingorganization toensurethatthe1.7-80Ju'ly,1994 appropriate actionsweretaken.Suchfollow-up includesreaudits, whennecessary.
1.7.18.2.12 TheadequacyofthegAProgramisregularly assessedbyAEPSCmanagement.
Thefollowing activities constitute formalelementsofthatassessment:
a)Auditreports,including follow-up oncorrective actionaccomplihmentandeffectiveness, aredistributed toappropriate levelsofmanagement.
b)Individuals independent fromthegAorganization, butknowledgeable inauditing, andqualityassurance, periodi.cally reviewtheeffectiveness ofthegAprograms.
Conclusions andrecommendations arereportedtotheAEPSC:ji6ji~r"'ice president nuclearqeoirYfj,oo.'.
1.7.19FIREPROTECTION l}APROGRAN1.7.19.1Introduction TheCookNuclearPlantFireProtection gAProgramhasbeendeveloped usingtheguidanceofNRCBranchTechnical Position(APCSB)9.5-1,AppendixA,SectionC,"gualityAssurance Program,"
andNRCclarification "NuclearPlantFireProtection Functional Responsibilities, Administrative
- Controls, andgualityAssurance,"
datedJune14,1977.Assuch,theFireProtection gAProgramispartoftheoverallgAProgramfortheplant.TheFireProtection gAProgramencompasses design,procurement, fabrication, construction, surveillance, inspection, operation, maintenance, modification, andaudits.1.7-81July,1994 Implementation andassessment oftheFireProtection gAProgramistheresponsibility ofeachinvolvedAEPSCandIndianaMichiganPowerCompanyorganization.
TheFireProtection gAProgramisunderthemanagement controlofAEPSC.Thiscontrolconsistsof:I)Verifying theeffectiveness oftheFireProtection gAProgramthroughreview,surveillance, andaudits.2)Directing formu'lation, implementation, andassessment oftheFireProtection gAProgrambyprocedural controls.
3)AssuringthegAprogramisacceptable tothemanagement responsible forfireprotection.
Theplantmanagerhasdelegated responsibHity tovariousCookNuclearPlantdepartments forthefollowing fireprotection activities:
a)b)c)d)e)f)g)Maintenance offireprotection systems.Testingoffireprotection equipment.
Firesafetyinspections.
Firefightingprocedures.
Firedrills.Emergency remoteshutdownprocedures.
Emergency repairprocedures (lOCFR50, AppendixR).TheFireProtection gAProgramattheCookNuclearPlanta'isoprovides.forinspection offirehazards,explosion hazards,andtrainingoffirebrigadeandresponding firedepartments.
Thepl8nb22!pretle2Cti'oj department2S fireproteCtiOn Shiftsupervisor onduty,ordesignee, isdesignated asthefirebrigadeleaderand1.7-82July,1994 coordinates thefirefightingeffortsofthefirebrigade.Theoperations department providesanindividual withplantsystemsknowledge toserveasanadvisortothefirebrigadeleader.1.7.19.3DesinControlandProcurement DocumentControlgualitystandards arespecified inthedesigndocuments suchasappropriate fireptotectioncodesandstandards, and,asnecessary, deviations andchangesfromthesequalitystandards arecontrolled.
TheCookNuclearPlantdesignwasreviewedbyqualified personnel toensureinclusion ofappropriate fireprotection requirements.
Thesereviewsincludeitemssuchas:1)Verification astotheadequacyofelectrical isolation andcableseparation criteria.
2)Verification ofappropriate requirements forroomisolation (sealingpenetrations, floorsandotherfirebarriers).
3)Determination forincreaseinfireloadings.
4)'Determination fortheneedofadditional firedetection andsuppression equipment.
Procurement offireprotection equipment andrelateditemsaresubjecttotherequirements ofthefireprotection procurement documents.
Areviewofthesedocuments isperformed toassurefireprotection requirements andqualityrequirements arecorrectly stated,verifiable, andcontrollable, andthatthereisadequateacceptance andrejection criteria.
Procurement documents mustbeprepared,
- reviewed, andapprovedaccording togAProgramrequirements.
Designandprocurement documentchanges,including fieldchangesanddesigndeviations, arecontrolled byprocedure.
1.7-83July,1994 g4i~I1' 1.7.19.4Instructions Procedures andDrawinsInspections, tests,administrative
- controls, firedrillsandtrainingthatassistinimplementing thefireprotection programareprescribed byapprovedinstructions orprocedures.
Indoctrination andtrainingprogramsforfireprevention andfirefightingareimplemented inaccordance withapprovedprocedures.
Activities associated withthefireprotection systemsandfireprotection relatedsystemsareprescribed andaccomplished inaccordance withdocumented instructions, procedures, anddrawings.
Instructions andprocedures fordesign,installation, inspection, tests,maintenance, modification andadministrative controlsarereviewedthroughauditstoassurethatthefireprotection programismaintained.
Operation andmaintenance information hasbeenprovidedtotheplantintheformofSystemDescriptions andequipment supplierinformation.
1.7.19.5ControlofPurchased ItemsandServicesmeasuresareestablished toassurethatpurchased itemsandservicesconformtoprocurement documents.
Thesemeasuresincludeprovisions, asappropriate, forsourceevaluation andselection, objective evidenceofqualityfurnished bythecontractor, inspections atsuppliers, orreceiptinspection.
Sourceorreceiptinspection isprovided, asaminimum,forthoseitemswherequalitycannotbeverifiedafterinstallation.
.7.1Aprogramforindependent inspection ofthefireprotection activities hasbeenestablished andimplemented.
1.7-84July,1994 Theseinspections areperformed bypersonnel otherthanthoseresponsible forimplementation oftheactivity.
Theinspections include:a)Inspection ofinstallation, maintenance andmodification offireprotection systemsandequipment.
b)Inspections ofpenetration sealsandfireretardant coatinginstallations toverifytheactivityissatisfactot ilycompleted inaccordance withinstallation specifications.
c)Inspections ofcableroutingtoverifyconformance withdesignrequirements asspecified inAEPSCSpecifications and/orplantprocedures.
d)Inspections toverifythatappropriate requirements forfirebarriersaresatisfied following installation, modification, repairorreplacement activities.
e)measurestoassurethatinspection personnel
'areindependent fromtheindividuals performing theactivitybeinginspected andareknowledgeable inthedesignandinstal'lation requirements forfireprotection.
f)Inspection procedures, instructions orchecklists forrequiredinspections.
g)Periodicinspections oftireprotection systems,emergency breathing andauxiliary equipment.
h)Periodicinspections ofmaterials subjecttodegradation, suchasfirestops,sealsandfireretardant coatingasrequiredbyTechnical Specifications ormanufacturer's recommendations.
I.7-85July,1994 47 1.7.19.7TestandTestControla)Installation testing-Following installation, modification, repair,orreplacement, sufficient testingisperformed todemonstrate thatthefireprotection systemsandequipment willperformsatisfactorily.
Mrittentestprocedures forinstallation testsincorporate therequirements andacceptance limitscontained inapplicable designdocuments.
b)Periodictesting-Periodictestingoccurstodocumentthatfireprotection equipment functions inaccordance withitsdesign.c)Programshavebeenestablished toverifythetestingoffireprotection systems,andtoverifythattestpersonnel areeffectively trained.d)Testresultsaredocumented, evaluated, andtheiracceptability determined byaqualified responsible individual orgroup.1.7.19.8InsectionTestand0eratinStatusTheinspection, testandoperating statusforplantTechnical Specification fireprotection systemsareperformed asdescribed in1.7.14herein.1.7.19.9Nonconformin ItemsTechnical Specification fireprotection equipment nonconformances areidentified anddispositioned asdescribed in1.7.15herein.1.7.19.10Corrective ActionThecorrective actionmechanism described in1.7.16hereinappliestotheTechnical Specification fireprotection equipment.
1.7-86July,1994 C(
1.7.19.11 RecordsRecordsgenerated tosupportthefireprotection programarecontrolled asdescribed in1.7.17herein.1.7.19.12 AuditsAuditsareconducted anddocumented toverifycompliance withtheFireProtection gAProgramasdescribed in1.7.1.18herein.Auditsareperiodically performed toverifycompliance withtheadministrative controlsandimplementation offireprotection qualityassurance criteria.
Theauditsareperformed inaccordance withpre-established writtenprocedures orchecklists.
Auditresultsaredocumented andreviewedbymanagement havingresponsibility intheareaaudited.Follow-up actionistakenbyresponsible management tocorrectthedeficiencies revealedbytheaudit.1.7-87July,1994 L1r AMERICANELECTRICPOWERSERVICECORPORATION SupportOrganization fortheCookPlantCHAIRMANOFTHEBOARD,PRESIDENT ANDCHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICERSENIORVICEPRESIDENT NUCLEARGENERATION gEXECUTIVE VICEPRESIDENT ENGINEERING ANDCONSTRUCTION 4OTHERAEPSCSUPPORTNUCLEARSUPPORTSERVICESDEPARTMENT INDIANAMICHIGANPOWERSITEVICEPRESIDENT ANDPLANTMANAGERCOOKNUCLEARPLANT*QUALITYASSURANCE DEPARTMENT NUCLEARENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SITENUCLEARSERVICESDEPARTMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ANDCONTROLSSECTION~Pe~4+j>immi
~g$~~I'~~~II@~wg-~jQ~~
sAFOSSIL&HYDROGENERATION DEPARTMENT
'".-.":~~%~K
>ARRAN'..
4I'k!TRANSMISSION ANDDISTRIBUTIONSERVICESDEPARTMENT
- NOTPARTOFAEPSCORGANIZATION
-SHOWNFORINFORMATION ONLYLI~ADMINISTRATIVE
&FUNCTIONAL DIRECTION FUNCTIONAL DIRECTION FORl?IECOOKNUCLEARPLANT I4 AMERICANELECTRICPOWERCOMPANYAMERICANELECTRICPOWERCOMPANYAMERICANELECTRICPOWERSERVICECORPORATION APPALACHIAN POWERCOMPANY"~3INDIANAMICHIGANPOWERCOMPANYCOLUMBUSSOUTHERNPOWER/ANDOHIOPOWERCOMPANYKINGSPORT POWERCOMPANYKENTUCKYPOWERCOMPANY-;y;Q>U't'-.I,)g~+
WHEELINGPj,POWERCOMPANY)y)'.0-"4V'-A'Si-~%+'
IIIIIIICOOKNUCLEARPLANT---ADMINISTRATIVE; TECHNICAL, ANDFUNCTIONAL DIRECTION IDC0 K&.
AEPSCQUALITYASSURANCE DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION AEPSCDIRECTORQUALITYASSURANCE QUALITYASSURANCE PRINCIPLE ENGINEERSOFTWAREp5+54'~~i~W~+<9~;8(~
SECTIONMANAGERSUPPLIERPERFORMANCE SECTIONMANAGERQUALITYASSURANCE ENGINEERING 8ASSESSMENT QUALITYASSURANCE/CONTROL MANAGER(SITE)5,"Jgmm5-q~~5~55Ii+5m+"'*~5.-55~~y "5m~~
,a~.3tl9 ORGANIZATION FORTHE'OOKNUCLEARPLANTINDIANAMlCHIGANPOWERCOMPANYINDIANAMICHIGANPOWERSITEVICEPRESIDENT ANDPLANTMANAGERSECRETARY gwL@~ayge~j~
i>RNID'K<-.".=-!"
'-"'":"'-
EXECUTIVE STAFFASSISTANT"LSig---"M9Me'*EXECUTIVE STAFFASSISTANT ASSISTANT PLANTMANAOERPRODUCTION SP:~j~~M"Sg$9~gf~F%'4<jJX~$>>ASSISTANT PLANTNANAOERPROJECTSP~'F@Li1A 14sASSISTANT PLANTMANAOERTECHNICAL SUPPORTeP'""W',Fb'lI'I+gg4~yjJ'l+iT~O,R CA,"'IV+4IYIWM~i.'AINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT
~Sfg-."TVlgPTZ-'q~~OPERATIONS SUPERINTENDE NTINTEORATEDSCHEDULINO
~5',SUPERINTENDENT YJgCCPPVIKII GCITRCTOVtTRNIENCLNT PJTLTNSSAMANAOER-'~i<~-,<b
--'~~4TRAININOSUPERINTENDENT ICS~w'-Ie"L~(I~)<t+-l4PLANTEN0INEERINOSUPERINTFNDENT V~vwmvvz-T'TAFF ASSISTANTK~hi.'6"fCHEMISTRY SUPERINTENDENT IwltkPII4'ig,ll,F+~DP$PPPLANTPROTECTION SUPERINTENDENT EMERGENCYPLANNINOCOORDINATOR RAOIA1ONPFDIECRONSUPERINTENSENTENVIRONMENTAL SAFETYTHEAI.THSUPERINTENDENT
,4Ci~v74~<,."~Ski.~If9~5
~+"Ps(F+;.~ii f0Cr0ASSISTANT EMERGENCY PLANNINOCOORDINATOR HUMANRESOURCES SUPERVISOR APPENDIXAREGULATORY ANDSAFETYGUIDESANSISTANDARDS 1.Reg.Guide1.8(9/75)ANSIN18.1(1971)Personnel Selection andTrainingSelection andTrainingofNuclearPowerPlantPersonnel 2.Reg.Guide1.14(8/75)ReactorCoolantPumpFlywheelIntegrity 3.Reg.Guide1.16(8/75)Reporting ofOperating Information, AppendixA-Technical Specifications 4.SafetyGuide30(8/72)ANSIN45.2.4(1972)gualityAssurance Requirements fortheInstallation, Inspection, andTestingofInstrumentation andElectricEquipment Installation, Inspection, andTestingRequirements forInstrumentation andElectricEquipment DuringtheConstruction ofNuclearPowerGenerating Stations5.Reg.Guide1.33(02/78)ANSIN18.7(1976)(ANS3.21976)ANSIN45.2(1977)gualityAssurance ProgramRequirements (Operation)
Administrative ControlsandgualityAssurance fortheOperational PhaseofNuclearPowerPlantsgualityAssurance ProgramRequirements forNuclearFacilities 1.7-92Ju]y,1994 I
6.Reg.Guide1.37(3/73)ANSIN45.2.1(1973)gualityAssurance Requirements forCleaningofFluidSystemsandAssociated Components ofMater-CooledNuclearPowerPlantsCleaningofFluidSystemsandAssociated Components DuringConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlants7.Reg.Guide1.3I(10/76)ANSIN45.2.2(1972)gualityAssurance Requirements forPackaging,
- Shipping, Receiving, StorageandHandlingofItemsforMater-Cooled NuclearPowerPlantsPackaging,
- Shipping, Receiving, StorageandHandlingofItemsforNuclearPowerPlants(DuringtheConstruction Phase)8.Reg.Guide1.39(10/76)ANSIN45.2.3(1973)Housekeeping Requirements forMater-CooledNuclearpowerPlantsHousekeeping DuringtheConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlants9.Reg.Guide1.54(6/73)ANSIN101.4(1972)gualityAssurance Requirements forProtective CoatingsAppliedtoMater-Cooled NuclearPowerPlantsgualityAssurance forProtective CoatingsAppliedtoNuclearFacilities
)0.Reg.Guide1.58(9/80)gualification ofNuclearPowerPlantInspection, Examination andTestingPersonnel 1.7-93July,1994 I
ANSIN45.2.6(1978)gualifications ofInspection, Exami-nation,andTestingPersonnel forNuclearPowerPlants11.Reg.Guide1.63(7/78)ElectricPenetration Assemblies inContainment Structures forLight-Mater-Cooled NuclearPowerPlants12.Reg.Guide1.64(10/73)ANSIN45.2.11(1974)gualityAssurance Requirements fortheDesignofNuclearPowerPlantsgualityAssurance Requirements fortheDesignofNuclearPowerPlants13.Reg.Guide1.74(2/74)ANSIN45.2.10(1973)gualityAssurance TermsandDefinitions gualityAssurance TermsandDefinitions 14.Reg.Guide1.88(10/76)ANSIN45.2.9(1974)Collection, Storage,andNaintenance ofNuclearPowerPlantgualityAssurance RecordsRequirements forCollection, Storage,andNaintenance ofgualityAssurance RecordsforNuclearPowerPlants15.Reg.Guide1.94(4/76)gualityAssurance Requirements forInstal'lation, Inspection, andTestingofStructural ConcreteandStructural SteelDuringtheConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlants1.7-94July,1994
ANSIN45.2.5(1974)b"'~G16.Reg.Guide1.123(7/77)ANSIN45.2.13(1976)Supplementary gualityAssurance Requirements fo'rInstallation, Inspection, andTestingofStructural ConcreteandStructural SteelDuringtheConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlantsgualityAssurance Requirements forControlofProcurement ofItemsandServicesforNuclearPowerPlantsequalityAssurance Requirements forControlofProcurement ofItemsandServicesforNuclearPowerPlants17.Reg.Guide1.144(1/79)ANSIN45.2.12(1977)AuditingofgualityAssurance ProgramsforNuclearPowerPlantsRequirements forAuditingofgualityAssurance ProgramsforNuclearPowerPlants18.Reg.Guide1.146(8/80)ANSIN45.2.23(1978)gualification ofgualityAssurance ProgramAuditPersonnel forNuclearPowerPlantsgualification ofgualityAssurance ProgramAuditPersonnel forNuclearPowerPlants19.ANSIN45.2.8(1975)Supplementary gualityAssurance Requirements forInstallation, Inspection andTestingofMechanical Equipment andSystemsfortheConstruction PhaseofNuclearPowerPlants1.7-95Duly,1994
20.ANSIN45.4(1972)Leakage-Rate TestingofContainment Structures forNuclearReactors1.7-96July,1994 APPENDIXBAEPSC/I&M EXCEPTIONS TOOPERATING PHASESTANDARDS ANDREGULATORY GUIDESl.GENERAL~llCertainRegulatory Guidesinvoke,orimply,Regulatory Guidesandstandards inadditiontothestandardeachprimarily endorses.
CertainANSIStandards invoke,orimply,additional standards.
ExcetionInterretationTheAEPSC/ISN commitment referstotheRegulatory GuidesandANSIStandards specifically identified inAppendixA.Additional Regulatory Guides,ANSIStandards andsimilardocuments implied,orreferenced, inthosespecifically identified arenotpartofthiscommitment.
z.N18.7,GeneralExcetionInterretationAEPSCandISNhaveestablished bothanon-siteandoff-sitestandingcommittee forindependent reviewactivities; togethertheyformtheindependent reviewbody.Thestandardnumericandqualification requirement maynotbemetbyeachgroupindividually.
Procedureswillbeestablished tospecifyhoweachgroupwillbeinvolvedinreviewactivities.
Thisexception/interpretation isconsistent withtheplant'sTechnical Specifications.
1.7-97July,1994
2a.Sec.4.3.1"Personnel assignedresponsibility forindependent reviewsshallbespecified inbothnumberandtechnical disciplines, andshallcollectively havetheexperience andcompetence requiredtoreviewproblemsinthefollowing areas:...."ExcetionIntetretationAEPSCNuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee (NSDRC)andPlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee (PNSRC)willnothavemembersspecified bynumber,norbytechnical disciplines, anditsmembersmaynothavetheexperience andcompetence requiredtoreviewproblemsinallareaslistedinthissection.Thisexception/interpretation isconsistent withtheplant'sTechnical Specifications.
TheNSDRCandPNSRCwillnotspecifically includeamemberqualified innondestructive testing,butwillusequalified technical consultants toperformthisandotherfunctions asdetermined necessary bytherespective committee chairman.
2b.Sec.4.3.2.1"Whenastandingcommittee isresponsible fortheindependent reviewprogram,itshallbecomposedofnolessthanfivepersonsof.whomnomorethanaminorityaremembersoftheon-siteoperating organization.
Competent alternates arepermitted ifdesignated inadvance.Theuseofalternates shallberestricted tolegitimate absencesofprincipals."
ExcetionInterretationSeeItem2a.1.7-98July,1994 2c.Sec.4.3.3.1R~i"...recommendations
...shallbedisseminated promptlytoappropriate membersofmanagement havingresponsibility intheareareviewed."
ExcetionInterretationRecommendations madeasaresultofreviewwillgenerally beconveyedtotheon-site,oroff-site, standingcommittee.
Procedures willbemaintained specifying howrecommendations aretobeconsidered.
2d.Sec.4.3.4Reuirement"Thefollowing subjectsshallbereviewedbytheindependent reviewb0dye~~~~ExcetionInterretation~Subjectsrequiring reviewwillbeasspecified intheplantTechnical Specifications.
2e.Sec.4.3.4(3)"ChangesintheTechnical Specifications orLicenseAmendments relatingtonuclearsafetyaretobereviewedbytheindependent reviewbodypriortoimplementation, exceptinthosecaseswherethechangeisidentical toapreviously reviewedproposedchange."ExcetionInterretationAlthoughtheusualpracticeistomeetthisrequirement, exceptions aremadetoNSDRCreviewandapprovalpriortoimplementation inrarecaseswiththepermission oftheNSDRCChairmanandSecretary.
PNSRCreviewandapprovalisalwaysdonepriortoimplementation ofTechnical Specification changes.1.7-99July,1994 2f.Sec.4.4"Theon-siteoperating organization shallprovide,aspartofthenormaldutiesofplantsupervisory personnel
...."ExcetionInterretationSomeoftheresponsibilities oftheon-siteoperating organization described inSection4.4maybecarriedout'ythePNSRCand/orNSDRCasdescribed inplantTechnical Specifications.
2g.Sec.5.2.2"Temporary changes,whichclearlydonotchangetheintentoftheapprovedprocedure, shallasaminimumbeapprovedbytwomembersoftheplantstaffknowledgeable intheareasaffectedbytheprocedures.
Atleastoneoftheseindividuals shallbethesupervisor inchargeoftheshiftandholdasenioroperator's licenseontheunitaffected."
ExcetionInterretationI&Kconsiders thatthisrequirement appliesonlytoprocedures identified inplantTechnical Specifications.
Temporary changestotheseprocedures shallbeapprovedasdescribed inplantTechnical Specifications.
2h.Sec.5.2.6"Incaseswhererequireddocumentary evidenceisnotavailable, theassociated equipment ormaterials mustbeconsidered nonconforming inaccordance withSection5.2.14.Untilsuitabledocumentary evidenceisavailable toshowtheequipment ormaterialisinconformance, affectedsystemsshallbeconsidered tobeinoperable andrelianceshallnotbeplacedonsuchsystemstofulfilltheirintendedsafetyfunctions."
ExcetionInterretationISMinitiates appropriate corrective actionwhenitisdiscovered thatdocumentary evidencedoesnotexistforatestorinspection whichisa1.7-100July,1994 JLe0 requirement toverifyequipment acceptability.
Thisactionincludesatechnical evaluation oftheequipment's operability status.2i.Sec.5.2.~ll"Asurveillance testingandinspection program...shallincludetheestablishment ofamastersurveillance schedulereflecting thestatusofallplannedin-plantsurveillance testsandinspections."
ExcetionInterretationSeparatemasterschedules mayexistfordifferent
- programs, suchasISI,pumpandvalvetesting,andTechnical Specification surveillance testing.2j.Sec.5.2.13.1~ll"Totheextentnecessary, procurement documents shallrequiresuppliers toprovidea(}ualityAssurance Programconsistent withthepertinent requirements ofANSIN45.2-1977."ExcetionInterretationTotheextentnecessary, procurement documents requirethatthesupplierhasadocumented gualityAssurance Programconsistent withthepertinent requirements of10CFR50,AppendixB;ANSIN45.2;orothernationally recognized codesandstandards.
2k.Sec.5.2.13.2ANSIN18.7andN45.2.13specifythatwhererequiredbycode,regulation, orcontract, documentary evidencethatitemsconformtoprocurement requirements shallbeavailable atthenuclearpowerplantsitepriortoinstallation oruseofsuchitms.ExcetionInterretationTherequireddocumentary evidenceisavailable athesitepriortouse,butnotnecessarily priortoinstallation.
Thisallowsinstallation to1.7-101Duly,1994 proceedwhileanymissingdocuments arebeingobtained, butprecludes dependence ontheitemforsafetypurposes.
21.Sec.5.2.15"Plantprocedures shallbereviewedbyanindividual knowledgeable intheareaaffectedbytheprocedure nolessfrequently thaneverytwoyearstodetermine
',fchangesarenecessary ordesirable."
ExcetionInterretationBiennialreviewsarenotperformed inthat1&8hasprogrammatic controlrequirements inplacethatmakethebiennialreviewprocessredundant fromaregulatory perspective.
Theseprogrammatic controlswereeffectedinanefforttoensurethatplantinstructions andprocedures arereviewedforpossiblerevisionwhenpertinent sourcematerialisrevised,therefore maintaining theprocedures current.Webelievethatthisapproach, inadditiontoanannualrandomsamplingofprocedures, betteraddresses theintentofthebiennialreviewprocessandismoreacceptable frombothatechnical andpractical perspective thanastatictwo-yearreviewprocess.2m.Sec.5.2.16Recordsshallbemade,andequipment suitablymarked,toindicatecalibration status.ExcetionInterretationSeeItem6b.1.7-102July,1994 2n.Sec.5.3.5(4)Thissectionrequiresthatwheresectionsofdocuments suchasvendormanuals,operating andmaintenance instructions, ordrawingsareincorporated
- directly, orbyreference intoamaintenance procedure, theyshal'lreceivethesamelevelofreviewandapptovalasoperating procedures.
ExcetionInterretationSuchdocuments arereviewedbyappropriately qualified personnel priortousetoensurethat,whenusedasinstructions, theyprovideproperandadequate'nformation toensuretherequiredqualityofwork.Maintenance procedures whichreference thesedocuments receivethesamelevelofreviewandapprovalasoperating procedures.
3.N45.2.1,3a.Sec.3~RN45.2.1estabiishes criteriaforciassifying itemsinto"cieann'esp levels,"andrequiresthatitemsbesoclassified.
Exce'ionInterretationInsteadofusingthecf",::eanness'evel classification systemofN5.2.I,therequirede1;eaiiiiss forspecificitemsandactivities isaddressed onacase-by-case basis.'C'1'ustness:
ismaintained, consistent withtheworkbeingperformed, soastopreventtheintroduction offoreignmateria1.
Asaminimum,g,"cenenoseinspections areperformed priortoclosureof"nuclear" systemsandequipment.
Suchinspections aredocumented.
1.7-103July,1994
3b.Sec.5~R"Fittingandtack-welded joints(whichwillnotbeimmediately sealedbywelding)shallbewrappedwithpolyethylene orothernonhalogenated plasticfilmuntiltheweldscanbecompleted."
ExcetionInterretationIMsometimes usesothernonhalogenated
- material, compatible withtheparentmaterial, sinceplasticfilmissubjecttodamageanddoesnotalwaysprovideadequateprotection.
4.N45.2.2,General~llN45.2.2establishes requirements andcriteriaforclassifying safety-relateditemsintoprotection levels.ExcetionInterretationInsteadofclassifying safety-related itemsintoprotection levels,controls'ver thepackaging,
- shipping, handlingandstorageofsuchitemsareestablished onacase-by-case basiswithdueregardfortheitem'scomplexity, useandsensitivity todamage.Priortoinstallation oruse,theitemsareinspected andserviced, asnecessary, toassurethatnodamageordeterioration existswhichcouldaffecttheirfunction.
4a.Sec.3.9andAppendixA3.9~lt"Theitemandtheoutsideofcontainers shallbemarked."(FurthercriteriaformarkingandtaggingaregivenintheAppendix.)
ExcetionInterretationTheserequirements wereoriginally writtenforitemspackagedandshippedtoconstruction projects.
Fullcompliance isnotalwaysnecessary inthecaseofitemsshippedtooperating plantsandmay,insomecases,1.7-104July,1994
increasetheprobability ofdamagetotheitem.Therequirements areimplemented totheextentnecessary toassuretraceability andintegrity oftheitem.4b.Sec.5.2.2~ll"Receiving inspections shallbeperformed inanareaequivalent tothelevelofstorage.".
ExcetionInterretationReceiving inspection areaenvironmental controlsmaybelessstringent thanstorageenvironmental requirements foranitem.However,suchinspections areperformed inamannerandinanenvironment whichdonotendangertherequiredqualityoftheitem.4c.Sec.6.2.4"Theuseorstorageoffood,drinksandsalttabletdispensers inanystorageareashallnotbepermitted."
ExcetionInterretationPackagedfoodforemergency orextendedovertimeusemaybestoredinmaterialstockrooms.Thepackaging assuresthatmaterials arenotcontaminated.
Foodwillnotbe"used"intheseareas.4d.Sec.6.3.4"Allitemsandtheircontainers shallbeplainlymarkedsothattheyareeasilyidentified withoutexcessive handlingorunnecessary openingofcratesandboxes."ExcetionInterretationSeeN45.2.2,Section3.9(Exception 4b.).1.7-105Duly,1994 4e.Sec.6.4.1~R"Inspections andexaminations shallbeperformed anddocumented onaperiodicbasistoassurethattheintegrity oftheitemanditscontainer
...isbeingmaintained."
ExcetionInterretationTherequirement impliesthatallinspections andexaminations ofitemsinstoragearetobeperformed onthesameschedule.
Instead,theinspections andexaminations areperformed inaccordance withmaterialstorageprocedures whichidentifythecharacteristics tobeinspected andincludetherequiredfrequencies.
Theseprocedures arebasedontechnical considerations whichrecognize thatinspections andfrequencies neededvaryfromitemtoitem.5.N45.2.3,5a.Sec.2.1Cleanliness requirements forhousekeeping activities shallbeestablished onthebasisoffivezonedesignations.
ExcetionInterretationInsteadofthefive-level zonedesignation systemreferenced inANSIN45.2.3,ILKbasesitscontrolsoverhousekeeping activities onaconsideration ofwhatisnecessary andappropriate fortheactivityinvolved.
Thecontrolsareeffectedthroughprocedures orinstructions.
Factorsconsidered indeveloping theprocedures andinstructions includecleanliness control,personnel safety,fireprevention andprotection, radiation controlandsecurity.
Theprocedures andinstructions makeuseofstandardjanitorial andworkpractices totheextentpossible.
However,inpreparing theseprocedures, consideration isalsogiventotherecommendations ofSection2.1ofANSIN45.2.3.1.7-106July,1994 SIj 6.N45.2.4,6a.Sec.2.2Section2.2establishes prerequisites whichmustbemetbeforetheinstallation, inspections andtestingofinstrumentation andelectrical equipment mayproceed.Theseprerequisites includepersonnel qualification, controlofdesign,conforming andprotected materials andavailability ofspecified documents.
ExcetionInterretationDuringtheoperations phase,thisrequirement isconsidered tobeapplicable tomodifications andinitialstart-upofelectrical equipment.
Forroutineotperiodicinspection andtesting,theprerequisite conditions willbeachieved, asnecessary.
6b.Sec.6.2.1~ll"Itemsrequiring calibration shallbetaggedorlabeledoncompletion, indicating dateofcalibration andidentityofpersonthatperformed calibration."ExcetionInterretationFrequently, physicalsizeand/orlocationofinstalled plantinstrumentation precludes attachment ofcalibration labelsortags.Instead,eachinstrument isuniquelyidentified andistraceable toitscalibration record.Ascheduled calibration programassuresthateachinstrument's calibration iscurrent.1.7-107July,1994 7.N45.2.5,7a.Sec.2.5.2"Whendiscrepancies, malfunctions orinaccuracies ininspection andtestingequipment arefoundduringcalibration, allitemsinspected withthatequipment sincethelastpreviouscalibration shallbeconsidered unacceptable untilanevaluation hasbeenmadebytheresponsible authority andappropriate actiontaken."ExcetionInterretationILMusestherequirements ofN18.7,Section5.2.16,ratherthanN45.2.5,Section2.5.2.TheN18.7requirements aremoreapplicable toanoperating plant.7b,Sec.5.4~R"Handtorquewrenchesusedforinspection shallbecontrolled andmustbecalibrated atleastweeklyandmoreoftenifdeemednecessary.
Impacttorquewrenchesusedforinspection mustbecalibrated atleasttwicedaily."ExcetionInterretationTorquewrenchesarecontrolled asmeasuring andtestequipment inaccordance withANSIN18.7,Section5.2.16.Calibration intervals arebasedonuseandcalibration historyratherthanasperN45.2.5.8.N45.2.6,Sec.1.2~ll"Therequirements ofthisstandardapplytopersonnel whoperforminspections, examinations andtestsduringfabrication priortoorduringreceiptofitemsattheconstruction site,duringconstruction, duringpreoperational andstart-uptestingandduringoperational phasesofnuclearpowerplants."1.7-108July,1994 ExcetionInterretationPersonnel participating intestingwhotakedataormakeobservations, wherespecialtrainingisnotrequiredtoperformthisfunction, neednotbequalified inaccordance withANSIN45.2.6,butneedonlybetrainedtotheextentnecessary toperformtheassignedfunction.
9.Re.Guide1.58-Generalgualification ofnuclearpowerplantinspection, examination andtestingpersonnel.
ga.C.2.a(7)Regulatory Guide1.58endorsestheguidelines ofSNT-TC-1A asanacceptable methodoftrainingandcertifying personnel conducting leaktests.ExcetionInterretationIKNtakesthepositionthatthe"Level"designation guidelines asrecommended inSNT-TC-1A, paragraph 4donotnecessarily assureadequateleaktestcapability.
ISNmaintains thatdepartmental supervisors arebestabletojudgewhetherengineers andotherpersonnel arequalified todirectand/orperformleaktests.Therefore, I&Ndoesnotimplement therecommended "Level"designation guidelines.
ItisI&M'sopinionthatthetrainingguidelines ofSNT-TC-lA, TableI-G,paragraph 5.2specifically areorientedtowardsthebasicphysicsinvolvedinleaktesting,andfurther,towardsindividuals whoarenotgraduateengineers.
ISNmaintains thatitmeetstheessenceofthesetrainingguidelines.
Thepreparation ofleaktestprocedures andtheconductofleaktestsatCookNucleaiPlantisunderthedirectsupervision ofperformance engineers whoholdengineering degreesfromaccredited engineering schools.Thebasicphysicsofleaktestinghavebeenincorporated intotheapplicable testprocedures.
Thereviewand1.7-109July,1994 f~/'
approvalofthedataobtainedfromleaktestsisperformed bydepartment supervisors whoarealsograduateengineers.
ILKdoesrecognize theneedtoassurethatindividuals involvedinleaktestsarefullycognizant ofleaktestprocedural requirements andthoroughly familiarwiththetestequipment involved.
Plantperformance engineers receiveroutine,informalorientation ontestingprogramstoensurethattheseindividuals fullyunderstand therequirements ofperforming aleaktest.9b.C5,CG,C7,C8,C10ExcetionInterretationIMtakesthepositionthattheclassification ofinspection, examination andtestpersonnel (inspection personnel) into"Levels"basedontherequirements statedinSection3.0ofANSIN45.2.6doesnotnecessarily assureadequateinspection capability.
ISNmaintains thatdepartmental andfirstlinesupervisors arebestabletojudgetheinspection capability ofthepersonnel undertheirsupervision, andthat"Level"classification wouldrequireanoverlyburdensome administrative workload,couldinhibitinspection activities, andprovidesnoassurance ofinspection capabilities.
Therefore, ILKdoesnotimplement the"Level"classification conceptforinspection, examination andtestpersonnel.
Themethodology underwhichinspections, examinations andtestsareconducted attheCookNuclearPlantrequirestheinvolvement offirstlinesupervisors, engineering-personnel, departmental supervisors andplantmanagement.
Inessence,thelastseven(7)projectfunctions showninTableItoANSIN45.2.6areassignedtosupervisory andengineering personnel, andnottopersonnel oftheinspector category.
Thesemanagement supervisory andengineering personnel, asaminimum,meettheeducational andexperience requirements of"LevelIIandLevelIII"personnel, asrequired, tomeetthecriteriaofANSI18.IwhichexceedsthoseofANSIN45.2.6.InIRN'sopinion,nousefulpurposeisservedby1.7-110July,1994 classification ofmanagement, supervisory andengineering personnel into"Levels."
Therefore, I&Mtakesthefollowing positions relativetoregulatory positions C5,6,7,8and10ofRegulatory Guide1.58.C-5C-6Basedonthediscussion in9b,thispositionisnotapplicable totheCookNuclearPla~t.Replacement personnel forCookNuclearPlantmanagement, supervisory andengineering positions subjecttoANSI18.1willmeettheeducational andexperience requirements ofANSI18.Iandtherefore, thoseofANSIN45.2.6.Replacement inspection personnel will,asaminimum,meettheeducational andexperience requirements ofANSIN45.2.6,Section3.5.1-"LevelI."C-7I&M,asageneralpractice, complieswiththetrainingrecommendations assetforthinthisregulatory position.
C-8AllI&Minspection, examination andtestpersonnel areinstructed inthenormalcourseofemployeetraininginradiation protection andthemeanstominimizeradiation doseexposure.
C-10I&Mmaintains documentation toshowthatinspection personnel meettheminimumrequirements of"LevelI,"andthatmanagement, supervisory andengineering personnel meettheminimumrequirements ofANSI18.1.10.N45.2.8,10a.Sec.2.9eSection2.9eofN45.2.8.listsdocuments relatingtothespecificstageofinstallation activitywhicharetobeavailable attheconstruction site.1.7-111July,1994
ExcetionInterretationAllofthedocuments listedarenotnecessarily requiredattheconstruction siteforinstallation andtesting.AEPSCandILKassurethattheyareavailable tothesite,asnecessary.
10b.Sec.2.9e~llEvidencethatengineering ordesignchangesaredocumented andapprovedshallbeavailable attheconstruction sitepriortoinstallation.
ExcetionInterretationEquipment maybeinstalled beforefinalapprovalofengineering ordesignchanges.However,thesystemisnotplacedintoserviceuntilsuchchangesaredocumented andapproved.
10c.Sec.4.5.1"Installed systemsandcomponents shallbecleaned,flushedconditioned according totherequirements ofANSIN45.2.1.consideration shallbegiventothefollowing requirements:
(Requirements aregivenforchemicalconditioning, flushingcontrols.)
andSpecialandprocessExcetionInterretationSystemsandcomponents arecleaned,flushedandconditioned asdetermined onacase-by-case basis.measuresaretakentohelpprecludetheneedforcleaning, flushingandconditioning throughgoodpractices duringmaintenance ormodification activities.
1.7-112July,1994 tVI 11.N45.2.9lla.Sec.5.4,Item2R~iRecordsshallnotbestoredloosely."Theyshallbefirmlyattachedinbindersorplacedinfoldersorenvelopes forstorageonshelvingincontainers."
Steelfilecabinetsarepreferred.
ExcetionInterretationRecordsaresuitablystoredinsteelfilecabinets, oronshelvingincontainers.
Methodsotherthanbinders,folders,orenvelopes (forexample,dividers) maybeusedtoorganizetherecordsforstorage.11b.Sec.6.2R~i"Alistshallbemaintained designating thosepersonnel whoshallhaveaccesstothefiles".ExcetionInterretationRulesareestablished governing accesstoandcontroloffilesasprovidedfor-inANSIN45.2.9,Section5.3,Item5.Theserulesdonotalwaysincludearequirement foralistofpersonnel whoareauthorized access.Itshouldbenotedthatduplicate filesand/ormicroforms mayexistforgeneraluse.llc.Sec.5.6Whenasinglerecordsstoragefacilityismaintained, atleastthefollowing featuresshouldbeconsidered initsconstruction:
etc.ExcetionInterretationTheCookNuclearPlantMasterFileRoomandotheroff-siterecordstoragefacilities complywiththerequirements ofNUREG-0800 (7/Sl),Section17.1.17.4.
1.7-113July,1994
12.Re.Guide1.144ANSIN45.2.1212a.Sec.C3a{2)~llApplicable elementsofanorganization's gualityAssurance programfor"designandconstruction phaseactivities shouldbeauditedatleastannuallyoratleastoncewithinthelifeoftheactivity, whichever isshorter."
ExcetionInterretationSincemostmodifications arestraightforward,theyarenotauditedindividually.
Instead,selectedcontrolsovermodifications areauditedperiodically.
12b.Sec.C3b{1)Thissectionidentifies procurement contracts whichareexemptedfrombeingaudited.ExcetionInterretationInadditiontotheexemptions ofReg.Guide1.144,AEPSC/ISH considers thattheNationalInstitute ofStandards and.Technology, orotherStateandFederalAgencieswhichmayprovideservicestoAEPSC/18K, arenotrequiredtobeaudited.12c.Sec.4.5.1ReuirementResponses toadverseauditfindings, givingresultsofthereviewandinvestigation, shallclearlystatethecorrective actiontakenorplannedtopreventrecurrence.
"Intheeventthatcorrective actioncannotbecompleted withinthirtydays,theauditedorganization's responseshallincludeascheduled dateforthecorrective action."1.7-114July,1994 ExcetionInterretationAEPSC/ISM takethepositionthatcertaincircumstances warrantmorethanthirty(30)daystocompletely investigate thecauseand/ortotalimpactofanadversefinding.Forthesecircumstances, aninitialthirty(30)dayresponsewillbeprovidedwhichaddresses ascheduleforknowncorrective actions,thereasonwhyadditional investigation timeisneeded,andascheduleforcompletion oftheinvestigation.
Theseinitialresponses requiretheapprovalofthedirector-qualityassurance.
13.N45.2.13,13a.Sec.3.2.2~RN45.2.13requiresthattechnical requirements bespecified inprocurement documents breference totechnical requirement documents.
Technical requirement documents aretobeprepared, reviewedandreleasedundertherequirements established byANSIN45.2.11.ExcetionInterretationForreplacement partsandmaterials, AEPSC/ISA followANSIN18.7,Section5.2.13,Subitem1,whichstates:"Wheretheoriginalitemorpartisfoundtobecommercially
'offtheshelf'rwithoutspecifically identified gArequirements, spareandreplacement partsmaybesimilarly
- procured, butcareshallbeexercised toensureatleastequivalent performance."
13b.Sec.3.2.3"Procurement documents shallrequirethatthesupplierhaveadocumented qualityassurance programthatimplements partsorallofANSIN45.2aswellasapplicable qualityassurance programrequirements ofothernationally recognized codesandstandards."
1.7-115July,1994 Qi4' ExcetionInterretationRefertoItem2j13c.Sec.3.3(a)Reviewsofprocurement documents shallbeperformed priortoreleaseforbidandcontractaward.ExcetionInterretationDocuments maybereleasedforbidorcontractawardbeforecompleting thenecessary reviews.However,thesereviewsarecompleted beforetheitemorserviceisputintoservice,orbeforeworkhasprogressed beyondthepointwhereitwouldbeimpractical toreversetheactiontaken.13d.Sec.3.3(b)Reviewofchangestoprocurement documents shallbeperformed priortoreleaseforbidandcontractaward.ExcetionInterretationThisrequirement appliesonlytoqualityrelatedchanges(i.e.,changestotheprocurement documentprovisions identified inANSIN18.7,Section5.2.13.1,Subitems1through5).Thetimingofreviewswillbethesameasforreviewoftheoriginalprocurement documents.
13e.Sec.10.1"Whererequiredbycode,regulation, orcontractrequirement, documentary evidencethatitemsconformtoprocurement documents shallbeavailable atthenuclearpowerplantsitepriortoinstallation oruseofsuchitems,regardless ofacceptance methods."
July,1994
ExcetionInterretationRefertoItem2k.~R"Post-installation testrequirements andacceptance documentation shallbemutuallyestablished bythepurchaser andsupplier."
ExcetionInterretationInexercising itsultimateresponsibility foritsqualityassurance program,AEPSC/ILK establishes post-installation testrequirements givingdueconsideration tosupplierrecommendations.
14.Re.Guide1.146ANSIN45.2.23andANSIN45.2.2.12 14a.ANSIN45.2.23Sec.'.lThisstandardprovidesrequirements andguidanceforthequalification ofauditteamleaders,henceforth identified as"leadauditors."
14b.ANSIN45.2.12, Sec.4.2.2Aleadauditorshallbeappointed teamleader.ExcetionInterretationTheAEPSCauditprogramisdirectedbytheAEPSCdirector-qualityassurance andisadminister'ed bydesignated gAdepar'tmirit sectionmanagers/supervisor'S:.
whoarecertified leadauditors.
Auditsare,inmostcases,conducted byindividual
- auditors, notby"auditteams."Theseauditorsarecertified inaccordance withestablished procedures andareassignedbytheresponsible gAsectionmanager/supervisor basedontheirdemonstrated auditcapability andgeneralknowledge oftheauditsubject.Incertaincases,thisresultsinanindividual otherthana"leadauditor"conducting theactualauditfunction.
1.7-117July,1994 a~SFgXpPehslm'
'Established AEPSCauditprocedures requirethat,inallcases,theauditfunctions ofpreparation/organization, reporting ofauditfindingsandevaluation ofcorrective actionsbereviewedbygABep@'t)ii5A$
sectionmanagers/supervisor, therebymeetingtherequirements ofANSIN45.2.23relativeto"leadauditors",
and"auditteamleaders."
1~ASXN78$
1I~~ti':ii'.iiit.':!tiie."it 1m'!!!0fiit01tpal'iii40l,'9Aii roadjniigorii!Bppbggm'0 ntiitoi!thai'Bett'oe'!peeped'0+
ifjiiii:ie,,--ii.',e-ii',---Iw!i!i!i!ijs,',:::
i,'~!i:-,:ii::iii-;.i::*-':,:i'i:,
->>!ii.":-::..::::.
i-.i:-::.-:-:i::,::::i-i~i'i'-n:~i!
.~i-::::::
-!ai-.:--:,:='-!'e!":i:.:::::::,:-
ernie'i:"rea'ctori::::.CpeiCtor!s;::;:liicanse~i.::canjt.
j:;B:a~piontde."iiTas:.pC:artsdon!;'sm.Bnja~er,":.":";:(!
LHi~lib':i:,'i::.p i:iiitiii!i','i'i'i!i,'"(
ji!i~i!:."
i'):,""i,',i"ii
""'iii*','ili,'('i,'eiFi!at,;','Beni'cri!'opi jailor!-:;:Ie'cen'st":at@Cook::,
uci'ea'r.'."lPla~nt::.o~r.:.",a~iisimil:ai'e'BCtc'r,;
janorenei<iii'-"'.;i'ape'iioa erie'tSOnS",:::p'rteaudte'OniiiSu-'eppia'Or,:,::,tna!3i:'.nne!'Oi'0 8!*--1";i-j-,:-:iiti!-----,
--ii',;-,,:,:,!Th1
-,.:::i~9::--
'Ii-!-e,.--',it!,-,-cps'ist'cri'lent>
th:,:Te'chnsc'al~~':::.;Soe'cs::fic~6son':,6':.2':2!':h~)
jraev>ous1 j~.'.Capjroyedgby Nuolear,:.".",:Rag'Ul alibi;::Cym~ti ssi'on.:1.7-118July,1994 lg