ML18026A539: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:PennsylvaniaPower8LightGompanyTwoNorthNinthStreet~Allentown,PA18101-1179~610/774-5151RobertG.ByramSeniorVicePreslderrr-iVuclear610/774-7502Fax:610i774-5019Jl.iw241996U.S.NuclearRegulatoryCommissionAttn:DocumentControlDeskMailStopP1-137Washington,D.C.20555SUSQUEHANNASTEAMELECTRICSTATIONREPLYTOANOTICEOFVIOLATION(50-387/96-04-02;50-388/96-04-02AND50-387/96-04-03;50-388/96-04-03)DocketNos.50-387and50-388ThisletterprovidesPennsylvaniaPowerandLightCompany'sresponsetotheNoticeofViolation(50-387/96-04-02;50-388/96-04-02and50-387/96-04-03;50-388/96-04-03)containedinNRCIntegratedInspectionReport50-387/96-04and50-388/96-04datedMay23,1996.IThenoticerequiredsubmittalofawrittenreplywithinthirty(30)dayofthedateoftheletter.WetrustthattheCommjssionwillfindtheattachedresponseacceptable.Ifyouhaveanyadditionalquestions,pleasecontactMr.R.D.Kichlineat(610)774-7705.Verytrulyyours,Attacntcopy:NRCRegionIMs.M.BanerjeeNRCSr.ResidentInspectorMr.C.Poslusny,Jr.NRCSr.ProjectManager  
{{#Wiki_filter:Pennsylvania
ATTACHMENTTOPLA-4473Page1of6(387/96-04-02;3SS/96-04-02)Pursuantto10CFR20.1003,ahighradiationareaisanarea,accessibletoindividuals,inwhichradiationlevelscouldresultinexcessof0.100remin1hourat30centimetersfromtheradiationsourceorfromanysurfacethattheradiationpenetrates.Contrarytotheabove,onJanuary4;1996,throughFebruary1,1996,ahighradiationareainthedecontaminationbuildingontherefuelingfloor(818ft.elevation),withdoseratesupto0.800remin1hourat30centimetersfromtheradiationsource(avacuum),wasnotconspicuouslypostedasahighradiationarea.RLQHHLSc:pe~OnJanuary4,1996,aradiationsource(under-watervacuumhousing)wasplacedinthedecontaminationbuildingontherefuelingfloor(818ft.elevation).Thedoseofthevacuumhousingwarrantedthatthedecontaminationbuildingbepostedasahighradiationarea.ThispostingwasperformedonFebruary1,1996.ThecausesforthefailuretopostthedecontaminationbuildingbetweenJanuary4,1996,andFebruary1,1996,are:~OnJanuary4,1996onlyonedoorofthedecontaminationbuildingwaspostedindicatingthatthebuildingwasahighradiationarea.Theneedtopostthe~remainingdoorswentundetectedbecauseofalackofclearproceduralandworkpracticeguidancewhichresultedinhumanerror.Asaresultnosurveyofthedecontaminationbuildingwascompletedafterthevacuumhousingwasplacedinit,andtheneedtopostalldoorswentuncorrecteduntilFebruary1,1996,whenthevacuumhousingwasidentifiedasahighradiationsource.~Surveysthatwereconductedsubsequenttoplacingthevacuumhousinginthedecontaminationbuildingalsofailedtoidentifythepostingdeficiencies.TheinitialsurveyperformedonJanuary4,1996,wasincomplete.AnothersurveyofthebuildingwasconductedonJanuary8,1996,butwasonlyperformedatonecornerofthebuildinganddidnotidentifyanyunusualradiationconditions.Subsequently,asurveyconductedonJanuary15,1996,dididentifyslightlyelevateddoseratesatonelocation-outsidethebuilding.However,theslightlyelevateddoserateswereconsideredinsignificantbecausethehealthphysicstechnicianperformingthesurveydidnotrecognizethattheelevateddoserateswerefromahighradiationsource,i.e.,thevacuumhousing.  
Power8LightGompanyTwoNorthNinthStreet~Allentown,
PA18101-1179
~610/774-5151
RobertG.ByramSeniorVicePreslderr
r-iVuclear
610/774-7502
Fax:610i774-5019
Jl.iw241996U.S.NuclearRegulatory
Commission
Attn:DocumentControlDeskMailStopP1-137Washington,
D.C.20555SUSQUEHANNA
STEAMELECTRICSTATIONREPLYTOANOTICEOFVIOLATION
(50-387/96-04-02;
50-388/96-04-02
AND50-387/96-04-03;
50-388/96-04-03)
DocketNos.50-387and50-388ThisletterprovidesPennsylvania
PowerandLightCompany's
responsetotheNoticeofViolation
(50-387/96-04-02;
50-388/96-04-02
and50-387/96-04-03;
50-388/96-04-03)
contained
inNRCIntegrated
Inspection
Report50-387/96-04
and50-388/96-04
datedMay23,1996.IThenoticerequiredsubmittal
ofawrittenreplywithinthirty(30)dayofthedateoftheletter.WetrustthattheCommjssion
willfindtheattachedresponseacceptable.
Ifyouhaveanyadditional
questions,
pleasecontactMr.R.D.Kichlineat(610)774-7705.
Verytrulyyours,Attacntcopy:NRCRegionIMs.M.BanerjeeNRCSr.ResidentInspector
Mr.C.Poslusny,
Jr.NRCSr.ProjectManager  
ATTACHMENT
TOPLA-4473Page1of6(387/96-04-02;
3SS/96-04-02)
Pursuantto10CFR20.1003,
ahighradiation
areaisanarea,accessible
toindividuals,
inwhichradiation
levelscouldresultinexcessof0.100remin1hourat30centimeters
fromtheradiation
sourceorfromanysurfacethattheradiation
penetrates.
Contrarytotheabove,onJanuary4;1996,throughFebruary1,1996,ahighradiation
areainthedecontamination
buildingontherefueling
floor(818ft.elevation),
withdoseratesupto0.800remin1hourat30centimeters
fromtheradiation
source(avacuum),wasnotconspicuously
postedasahighradiation
area.RLQHHLSc:
pe~OnJanuary4,1996,aradiation
source(under-water
vacuumhousing)wasplacedinthedecontamination
buildingontherefueling
floor(818ft.elevation).
Thedoseofthevacuumhousingwarranted
thatthedecontamination
buildingbepostedasahighradiation
area.Thispostingwasperformed
onFebruary1,1996.Thecausesforthefailuretopostthedecontamination
buildingbetweenJanuary4,1996,andFebruary1,1996,are:~OnJanuary4,1996onlyonedoorofthedecontamination
buildingwaspostedindicating
thatthebuildingwasahighradiation
area.Theneedtopostthe~remaining
doorswentundetected
becauseofalackofclearprocedural
andworkpracticeguidancewhichresultedinhumanerror.Asaresultnosurveyofthedecontamination
buildingwascompleted
afterthevacuumhousingwasplacedinit,andtheneedtopostalldoorswentuncorrected
untilFebruary1,1996,whenthevacuumhousingwasidentified
asahighradiation
source.~Surveysthatwereconducted
subsequent
toplacingthevacuumhousinginthedecontamination
buildingalsofailedtoidentifythepostingdeficiencies.
Theinitialsurveyperformed
onJanuary4,1996,wasincomplete.
Anothersurveyofthebuildingwasconducted
onJanuary8,1996,butwasonlyperformed
atonecornerofthebuildinganddidnotidentifyanyunusualradiation
conditions.
Subsequently,
asurveyconducted
onJanuary15,1996,dididentifyslightlyelevateddoseratesatonelocation-outside
thebuilding.
However,theslightlyelevateddoserateswereconsidered
insignificant
becausethehealthphysicstechnician
performing
thesurveydidnotrecognize
thattheelevateddoserateswerefromahighradiation
source,i.e.,thevacuumhousing.  
   
   
ATTACHMENTTOPLA-4473Page2of6W'lldoorstothedecontaminationbuildingontherefuelingfloorwereimmediatelypostedonFebruary,1,1996,followingidentificationthatthevacuumhousingwasahighradiationsource.Subsequently,anewropebarricadewaserectedtopreventaccesstothedecontaminationbuilding.Thereforecompliancewithhighradiationareapostingrequirementswasachieved.b.Althoughfunctionallyadequate,numerousprocedureshavebeenrevisedtoclarifystationsurvey,posting,andworkpracticeswhenworkingwithradioactiveequipment.Theseproceduralrevisionswillstrengthenthestation'sradiationcontrolsprogram.C.Thehealthphysicstechnicianinvolvedinthiseventwascounseled'astothenecessitytocompletesurveyandpostingrequirementspursuanttostationprocedures.d.HealthPhysicstrainingwasconductedwhichwillenhancea"questioningattitude"regardingradiologicalchangesnotedduringroutinesurveys.Thepurposeofthistrainingwastosensitizethehealthphysicstechniciansontheneedtofollow-upandperformadditionalinvestigativesurveyswhenelevatedradiationlevelsaremeasured.e.Lockingdeviceswereplacedonthedecontaminationbuildingdoorssothatinthefuturethisfacilitycanbelockedwhenradiationlevelsrequirelockedradiationcontrols.A"radiologicalsafetynote"wasdistributedtostationpersonnelreiteratingthenecessityofcontrollingradiologicalpostings.Appropriateradiologicalcontrolsworkprograms,andworkprioritiesandcommunicationenhancementsassociatedwithoutagemanagementactivitieshavebeendeveloped.Theseprogramswillincreasethesensitivityofstationpersonneltostationradiologicalcontrolconcerns,therebyreducingtheoccurrenceof'imilarevents.h.AreasoftheplantwhichwerenotalreadyunderlockedhighradiationcontrolsweresurveyedandupgradedasnecessarytoensurethestationwasincompliancewithNRCpostingandbarricaderequirements.  
ATTACHMENT
ATTACHMENTTOPLA-4473Page3of6Anindependentwalk-down,byfirstlinesupervisors,ofhighradiationpostingchangesisnowrequired.Thiscorrectiveaction,whichisinresponsetoasubsequentpostingevent,addsassurancesthatthe10CFR20andplantTechnicalSpecificationpostingandbarricadingrequirementsare'beingpromptlyandcorrectlyimplemented.W'P&Lmanagementimmediatelycommissionedanintensiveinvestigationtoestablishthecauseandrecommendcorrectiveactionsinresponsetothisevent.Theresultantcorrectiveactionstakentoaddressthiseventwereexpeditiouslydispositioned.PP&L,therefore,considersthecorrectiveactionsidentifiedabovetosatisfactorilyaddressthisviolation.Basedontheactiontakenin2.aabove,PP&Lisinfullcompliance.  
TOPLA-4473Page2of6W'lldoorstothedecontamination
ATTACHMENTTOPLA-4473page4of6'gjgQ~~(387/96-04-03;388/96-04-03)Pursuantto10CFR20.1003,surveymeansanevaluationoftheradiologicalconditionsandpotentialhazardsincidenttotheproduction,use,transfer,release,disposal,orpresenceofradioactivematerialorothersourcesofradiation.Contrarytotheabove,asofApril4,1996,thelicenseedidnotmakesurveystoassurecompliancewith10CFR20.2001(a),whichdescribesauthorizedmeaitsofdisposingoflicensedmaterial.Specifically,onSeptember21,1995,(Note:ThetankerwasreleasedoffsiteonSeptember14,1995,asstatedinInspectionReport50-387/96-04and50-388/96-04)thelicenseedidnotperformasurveybeforedisposingofsludgeinatankertruckasnormal,non-radioactivewaste.Onprioroccasions,thetankertruckcontainedradioactivewaterabovethelowerlimitsofdetectionforeffluentreleases.4RcBQ~H1KOnFebruary29,1996,PP&Lwasnotified,byanorganizationinMontreal,QuebecCanada,thatatankertruckpreviouslyusedbyPP&L(PP&Lidentification¹255-216)hadaradioactivematerialslabelaffixedtothetanker.Priortoreleasingthetankeroffsite,thetanker(whichhadpreviouslycontainedslightlycontaminatedwater)wassurveyedusingexistingprocedures,anddeterminedtobeacceptableforoffsiterelease.PriortotransporttoMontreal,QuebecthetankerwasthoroughlycleanedatatruckwashingfacilityinPennsylvania.Todetermineifthetankermayhavebeencontaminatedorifotherpotentiallyradioactivematerialmayhavebeeninthetankerfollowingreleasefromthesite,atanker(PP&Lidentification¹255-212)thathadbeenusedinasimilarmanner,wassurveyed.Thesurveyidentifiedasmallamountofslightlyradioactivesludgeinthebottomofthetanker.Dosecalculationsperformedonthissludgeconcludedthatanydosereceivedwouldhavebeenasmallfractionofapplicabledoselimitsforamemberofthepublicand,basedontransportationregulations,thesludgefoundwouldhavebeenclassifiedasan"exemptquantity."BecauseoftheprocessusedbyPP&Ltodetermineifradioactivitywasassociatedwiththetanker,thetankermayhavecontainedsimilarorslightlyloweramountsofslightlyradioactivesludge.Therefore,itwasconcludedthataninadequatesurveyhadbeenperformedontanker¹255-216.~Thereasonfortheinadequatesurveyperformedonthesubjecttanker,priortoitsreleaseoffsiteonSeptember14,1995,wasthat:  
buildingontherefueling
ATTACHMENTTOPLA-4473Page5of6~Noproceduralguidanceexistedthatspecificallylookedfororremovedunnecessarylabelingpriortoreleasefromtheradiologicallycontrolledarea(RCA)orthesite.~Theprocedureusedtosurveyforcontamination(HP-TP-602)waslessthanadequateinthatitdidnotspecificallyrequireaninternalsurveyofthetanker.~Nooverallprocedureexistedtocontroltheprocessforuse,surveying,sampling,orreleaseofthetankerbytheseveralaffectedfunctionalorganizationswithinPPAL.Althougheachfunctionalorganizationhasprocedurestoaddresstheirspecificactivity,thelackofacomprehensivegoverningprocedurecontributedtoalackoftrainingrelatedtoaspectsofreleasingofmaterialoffsite,weakprogrammaticcontroloftankersforreleasefromtheRCAandsite,lessthanadequatecontaminationcontrolofemptycontainers,andlessthanadequateworkplansforcompletelyemptyingthetanker.a.TheremainingtankersatSusquehannathatareutilizedforsimilarpurposeshavebeenrelocatedwithintheprotectedarea,andhavebeenphysicallysecured.Thiswillensurepositivecontrolofthesetankerspriortoreleaseoffsite.b.NuclearDepartmentprocedures(NDAP-00-0627andHP-TP-0602)havebeenrevisedtorequirethattheinternalsurfacesoftankersbesurveyedpriortoexitingthesite..C.NuclearDepartmentAdministrativeProcedure(NDAP-00-0627)hasbeenrevisedtoincorporatestepsthatremoveunnecessarylabelsontankerspriortoreleaseoffsite.IncorporationofaspecificproceduralsteptoremovelabelsinthisNDAP,whichappliesacrossfunctionalorganizations,providesassurancesthatonlyrequiredlabelingwillbeattachedtotankersexitingthesite.Thetruckwashfacilitywassurveyed.Nonuclidesattributabletonuclearpower.plantoperationwereidentified.Theinternalstructureofseveraltankershasbeeninspectedtodetermineifthereareanyphysicalobstructionsthatwillpreventthecompletedrainingofmaterialfromthetanker.Thisinspectionconcluded.thattherearenomajorstructuralinternalsthatshouldpreventthecompletedrainingofatanker.Atleasttwodesignshavebeenidentified;however,theypresentnosignificantimpedimentstoemptyingthetankers.  
floorwereimmediately
ATTACHMENTTOPLA-4473Page6of6PP&LcorrespondencewassenttotheorganizationinMontreal,Quebec,whoreceivedthetanker,statingthattherewasnotaradiologicalhazardassociatedwiththetanker,andthatthelabelcouldberemoved.WW'1Surveysoftheremainingtankersthatwereutilizedforsimilarpurposeswillbeperformedtoassurethattheyarenotradioactivelycontaminatednorcontain.radioactivesludgeabovestationreleaselimits.ThesesurveysarescheduledtobecompletedbyJuly31,1996.b.Inspectionsoftheremainingtankersthat,wereutilizedforsimilarpurposeswillbeconductedtoassurethatinappropriatelabelshavebeenremoved.TheseinspectionsarescheduledtobecompletedbyJuly31,1996.C.Requirementsassociatedwithtankeractivitieswithintheprotectedareawillbeenhancedtoassurethatadequatecontrolsexistfortheuse,surveying,sampling,labeling,etc.oftankers.TheserequirementsarescheduledtobedevelopedandimplementedbyJuly31,1996.TheoverallprogramforcontrollingandcoordinatingtheprocessforremovingmaterialfromtheRCAandsitewillbeevaluated.ThisevaluationisscheduledtobecompletedbyJuly31,1996.Trainingwillbeprovided,toapplicablefunctionalorganizations,thataddressesthereleaseofmaterialsfromtheRCAthatmaybeslightlyradioactive.Thistrainingwillcontainelementsassociatedwithappropriate.lowerlimitsofdetection(LLD's),plateoutmechanismsandthediferentrequirementsforreleaseofmaterialsfromtheRCAandoffsite.InitialtrainingforkeyfunctionalorganizationsisscheduledtobecompletedbySeptember30,1996.Basedon2.aand2.babove,PP&Lisinfullcompliance.
postedonFebruary,
1,1996,following
identification
thatthevacuumhousingwasahighradiation
source.Subsequently,
anewropebarricade
waserectedtopreventaccesstothedecontamination
building.
Therefore
compliance
withhighradiation
areapostingrequirements
wasachieved.
b.Althoughfunctionally
adequate,
numerousprocedures
havebeenrevisedtoclarifystationsurvey,posting,andworkpractices
whenworkingwithradioactive
equipment.
Theseprocedural
revisions
willstrengthen
thestation's
radiation
controlsprogram.C.Thehealthphysicstechnician
involvedinthiseventwascounseled
'astothenecessity
tocompletesurveyandpostingrequirements
pursuanttostationprocedures.
d.HealthPhysicstrainingwasconducted
whichwillenhancea"questioning
attitude"
regarding
radiological
changesnotedduringroutinesurveys.Thepurposeofthistrainingwastosensitize
thehealthphysicstechnicians
ontheneedtofollow-up
andperformadditional
investigative
surveyswhenelevatedradiation
levelsaremeasured.
e.Lockingdeviceswereplacedonthedecontamination
buildingdoorssothatinthefuturethisfacilitycanbelockedwhenradiation
levelsrequirelockedradiation
controls.
A"radiological
safetynote"wasdistributed
tostationpersonnel
reiterating
thenecessity
ofcontrolling
radiological
postings.
Appropriate
radiological
controlsworkprograms,
andworkpriorities
andcommunication
enhancements
associated
withoutagemanagement
activities
havebeendeveloped.
Theseprogramswillincreasethesensitivity
ofstationpersonnel
tostationradiological
controlconcerns,
therebyreducingtheoccurrence
of'imilar
events.h.Areasoftheplantwhichwerenotalreadyunderlockedhighradiation
controlsweresurveyedandupgradedasnecessary
toensurethestationwasincompliance
withNRCpostingandbarricade
requirements.  
ATTACHMENT
TOPLA-4473Page3of6Anindependent
walk-down,
byfirstlinesupervisors,
ofhighradiation
postingchangesisnowrequired.
Thiscorrective
action,whichisinresponsetoasubsequent
postingevent,addsassurances
thatthe10CFR20andplantTechnical
Specification
postingandbarricading
requirements
are'being
promptlyandcorrectly
implemented.
W'P&Lmanagement
immediately
commissioned
anintensive
investigation
toestablish
thecauseandrecommend
corrective
actionsinresponsetothisevent.Theresultant
corrective
actionstakentoaddressthiseventwereexpeditiously
dispositioned.
PP&L,therefore,
considers
thecorrective
actionsidentified
abovetosatisfactorily
addressthisviolation.
Basedontheactiontakenin2.aabove,PP&Lisinfullcompliance.  
ATTACHMENT
TOPLA-4473page4of6'gjgQ~~(387/96-04-03;
388/96-04-03)
Pursuantto10CFR20.1003,
surveymeansanevaluation
oftheradiological
conditions
andpotential
hazardsincidenttotheproduction,
use,transfer,
release,disposal,
orpresenceofradioactive
materialorothersourcesofradiation.
Contrarytotheabove,asofApril4,1996,thelicenseedidnotmakesurveystoassurecompliance
with10CFR20.2001(a),
whichdescribes
authorized
meaitsofdisposing
oflicensedmaterial.
Specifically,
onSeptember
21,1995,(Note:ThetankerwasreleasedoffsiteonSeptember
14,1995,asstatedinInspection
Report50-387/96-04
and50-388/96-04)
thelicenseedidnotperformasurveybeforedisposing
ofsludgeinatankertruckasnormal,non-radioactive
waste.Onprioroccasions,
thetankertruckcontained
radioactive
waterabovethelowerlimitsofdetection
foreffluentreleases.
4RcBQ~H1KOnFebruary29,1996,PP&Lwasnotified,
byanorganization
inMontreal,
QuebecCanada,thatatankertruckpreviously
usedbyPP&L(PP&Lidentification
¹255-216)
hadaradioactive
materials
labelaffixedtothetanker.Priortoreleasing
thetankeroffsite,thetanker(whichhadpreviously
contained
slightlycontaminated
water)wassurveyedusingexistingprocedures,
anddetermined
tobeacceptable
foroffsiterelease.Priortotransport
toMontreal,
Quebecthetankerwasthoroughly
cleanedatatruckwashingfacilityinPennsylvania.
Todetermine
ifthetankermayhavebeencontaminated
orifotherpotentially
radioactive
materialmayhavebeeninthetankerfollowing
releasefromthesite,atanker(PP&Lidentification
¹255-212)
thathadbeenusedinasimilarmanner,wassurveyed.
Thesurveyidentified
asmallamountofslightlyradioactive
sludgeinthebottomofthetanker.Dosecalculations
performed
onthissludgeconcluded
thatanydosereceivedwouldhavebeenasmallfractionofapplicable
doselimitsforamemberofthepublicand,basedontransportation
regulations,
thesludgefoundwouldhavebeenclassified
asan"exemptquantity."
BecauseoftheprocessusedbyPP&Ltodetermine
ifradioactivity
wasassociated
withthetanker,thetankermayhavecontained
similarorslightlyloweramountsofslightlyradioactive
sludge.Therefore,
itwasconcluded
thataninadequate
surveyhadbeenperformed
ontanker¹255-216.
~Thereasonfortheinadequate
surveyperformed
onthesubjecttanker,priortoitsreleaseoffsiteonSeptember
14,1995,wasthat:  
ATTACHMENT
TOPLA-4473Page5of6~Noprocedural
guidanceexistedthatspecifically
lookedfororremovedunnecessary
labelingpriortoreleasefromtheradiologically
controlled
area(RCA)orthesite.~Theprocedure
usedtosurveyforcontamination
(HP-TP-602)
waslessthanadequateinthatitdidnotspecifically
requireaninternalsurveyofthetanker.~Nooverallprocedure
existedtocontroltheprocessforuse,surveying,
sampling,
orreleaseofthetankerbytheseveralaffectedfunctional
organizations
withinPPAL.Althougheachfunctional
organization
hasprocedures
toaddresstheirspecificactivity,
thelackofacomprehensive
governing
procedure
contributed
toalackoftrainingrelatedtoaspectsofreleasing
ofmaterialoffsite,weakprogrammatic
controloftankersforreleasefromtheRCAandsite,lessthanadequatecontamination
controlofemptycontainers,
andlessthanadequateworkplansforcompletely
emptyingthetanker.a.Theremaining
tankersatSusquehanna
thatareutilizedforsimilarpurposeshavebeenrelocated
withintheprotected
area,andhavebeenphysically
secured.Thiswillensurepositivecontrolofthesetankerspriortoreleaseoffsite.b.NuclearDepartment
procedures
(NDAP-00-0627
andHP-TP-0602)
havebeenrevisedtorequirethattheinternalsurfacesoftankersbesurveyedpriortoexitingthesite..C.NuclearDepartment
Administrative
Procedure
(NDAP-00-0627)
hasbeenrevisedtoincorporate
stepsthatremoveunnecessary
labelsontankerspriortoreleaseoffsite.Incorporation
ofaspecificprocedural
steptoremovelabelsinthisNDAP,whichappliesacrossfunctional
organizations,
providesassurances
thatonlyrequiredlabelingwillbeattachedtotankersexitingthesite.Thetruckwashfacilitywassurveyed.
Nonuclidesattributable
tonuclearpower.plantoperation
wereidentified.
Theinternalstructure
ofseveraltankershasbeeninspected
todetermine
ifthereareanyphysicalobstructions
thatwillpreventthecompletedrainingofmaterialfromthetanker.Thisinspection
concluded.
thattherearenomajorstructural
internals
thatshouldpreventthecompletedrainingofatanker.Atleasttwodesignshavebeenidentified;
however,theypresentnosignificant
impediments
toemptyingthetankers.  
ATTACHMENT
TOPLA-4473Page6of6PP&Lcorrespondence
wassenttotheorganization
inMontreal,
Quebec,whoreceivedthetanker,statingthattherewasnotaradiological
hazardassociated
withthetanker,andthatthelabelcouldberemoved.WW'1Surveysoftheremaining
tankersthatwereutilizedforsimilarpurposeswillbeperformed
toassurethattheyarenotradioactively
contaminated
norcontain.radioactive
sludgeabovestationreleaselimits.Thesesurveysarescheduled
tobecompleted
byJuly31,1996.b.Inspections
oftheremaining
tankersthat,wereutilizedforsimilarpurposeswillbeconducted
toassurethatinappropriate
labelshavebeenremoved.Theseinspections
arescheduled
tobecompleted
byJuly31,1996.C.Requirements
associated
withtankeractivities
withintheprotected
areawillbeenhancedtoassurethatadequatecontrolsexistfortheuse,surveying,
sampling,
labeling,
etc.oftankers.Theserequirements
arescheduled
tobedeveloped
andimplemented
byJuly31,1996.Theoverallprogramforcontrolling
andcoordinating
theprocessforremovingmaterialfromtheRCAandsitewillbeevaluated.
Thisevaluation
isscheduled
tobecompleted
byJuly31,1996.Trainingwillbeprovided,
toapplicable
functional
organizations,
thataddresses
thereleaseofmaterials
fromtheRCAthatmaybeslightlyradioactive.
Thistrainingwillcontainelementsassociated
withappropriate.
lowerlimitsofdetection
(LLD's),plateoutmechanisms
andthediferentrequirements
forreleaseofmaterials
fromtheRCAandoffsite.Initialtrainingforkeyfunctional
organizations
isscheduled
tobecompleted
bySeptember
30,1996.Basedon2.aand2.babove,PP&Lisinfullcompliance.
}}
}}

Revision as of 04:43, 29 June 2018

Provides Response to Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-387/96-04 & 50-388/96-04.Corrective Actions:All Doors to Decontamination Bldg on Refueling Floor Immediately Posted on 960201
ML18026A539
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/24/1996
From: BYRAM R G
PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
PLA-4473, NUDOCS 9606280252
Download: ML18026A539 (8)


See also: IR 05000387/1996004

Text

Pennsylvania

Power8LightGompanyTwoNorthNinthStreet~Allentown,

PA18101-1179

~610/774-5151

RobertG.ByramSeniorVicePreslderr

r-iVuclear

610/774-7502

Fax:610i774-5019

Jl.iw241996U.S.NuclearRegulatory

Commission

Attn:DocumentControlDeskMailStopP1-137Washington,

D.C.20555SUSQUEHANNA

STEAMELECTRICSTATIONREPLYTOANOTICEOFVIOLATION

(50-387/96-04-02;

50-388/96-04-02

AND50-387/96-04-03;

50-388/96-04-03)

DocketNos.50-387and50-388ThisletterprovidesPennsylvania

PowerandLightCompany's

responsetotheNoticeofViolation

(50-387/96-04-02;

50-388/96-04-02

and50-387/96-04-03;

50-388/96-04-03)

contained

inNRCIntegrated

Inspection

Report50-387/96-04

and50-388/96-04

datedMay23,1996.IThenoticerequiredsubmittal

ofawrittenreplywithinthirty(30)dayofthedateoftheletter.WetrustthattheCommjssion

willfindtheattachedresponseacceptable.

Ifyouhaveanyadditional

questions,

pleasecontactMr.R.D.Kichlineat(610)774-7705.

Verytrulyyours,Attacntcopy:NRCRegionIMs.M.BanerjeeNRCSr.ResidentInspector

Mr.C.Poslusny,

Jr.NRCSr.ProjectManager

ATTACHMENT

TOPLA-4473Page1of6(387/96-04-02;

3SS/96-04-02)

Pursuantto10CFR20.1003,

ahighradiation

areaisanarea,accessible

toindividuals,

inwhichradiation

levelscouldresultinexcessof0.100remin1hourat30centimeters

fromtheradiation

sourceorfromanysurfacethattheradiation

penetrates.

Contrarytotheabove,onJanuary4;1996,throughFebruary1,1996,ahighradiation

areainthedecontamination

buildingontherefueling

floor(818ft.elevation),

withdoseratesupto0.800remin1hourat30centimeters

fromtheradiation

source(avacuum),wasnotconspicuously

postedasahighradiation

area.RLQHHLSc:

pe~OnJanuary4,1996,aradiation

source(under-water

vacuumhousing)wasplacedinthedecontamination

buildingontherefueling

floor(818ft.elevation).

Thedoseofthevacuumhousingwarranted

thatthedecontamination

buildingbepostedasahighradiation

area.Thispostingwasperformed

onFebruary1,1996.Thecausesforthefailuretopostthedecontamination

buildingbetweenJanuary4,1996,andFebruary1,1996,are:~OnJanuary4,1996onlyonedoorofthedecontamination

buildingwaspostedindicating

thatthebuildingwasahighradiation

area.Theneedtopostthe~remaining

doorswentundetected

becauseofalackofclearprocedural

andworkpracticeguidancewhichresultedinhumanerror.Asaresultnosurveyofthedecontamination

buildingwascompleted

afterthevacuumhousingwasplacedinit,andtheneedtopostalldoorswentuncorrected

untilFebruary1,1996,whenthevacuumhousingwasidentified

asahighradiation

source.~Surveysthatwereconducted

subsequent

toplacingthevacuumhousinginthedecontamination

buildingalsofailedtoidentifythepostingdeficiencies.

Theinitialsurveyperformed

onJanuary4,1996,wasincomplete.

Anothersurveyofthebuildingwasconducted

onJanuary8,1996,butwasonlyperformed

atonecornerofthebuildinganddidnotidentifyanyunusualradiation

conditions.

Subsequently,

asurveyconducted

onJanuary15,1996,dididentifyslightlyelevateddoseratesatonelocation-outside

thebuilding.

However,theslightlyelevateddoserateswereconsidered

insignificant

becausethehealthphysicstechnician

performing

thesurveydidnotrecognize

thattheelevateddoserateswerefromahighradiation

source,i.e.,thevacuumhousing.

ATTACHMENT

TOPLA-4473Page2of6W'lldoorstothedecontamination

buildingontherefueling

floorwereimmediately

postedonFebruary,

1,1996,following

identification

thatthevacuumhousingwasahighradiation

source.Subsequently,

anewropebarricade

waserectedtopreventaccesstothedecontamination

building.

Therefore

compliance

withhighradiation

areapostingrequirements

wasachieved.

b.Althoughfunctionally

adequate,

numerousprocedures

havebeenrevisedtoclarifystationsurvey,posting,andworkpractices

whenworkingwithradioactive

equipment.

Theseprocedural

revisions

willstrengthen

thestation's

radiation

controlsprogram.C.Thehealthphysicstechnician

involvedinthiseventwascounseled

'astothenecessity

tocompletesurveyandpostingrequirements

pursuanttostationprocedures.

d.HealthPhysicstrainingwasconducted

whichwillenhancea"questioning

attitude"

regarding

radiological

changesnotedduringroutinesurveys.Thepurposeofthistrainingwastosensitize

thehealthphysicstechnicians

ontheneedtofollow-up

andperformadditional

investigative

surveyswhenelevatedradiation

levelsaremeasured.

e.Lockingdeviceswereplacedonthedecontamination

buildingdoorssothatinthefuturethisfacilitycanbelockedwhenradiation

levelsrequirelockedradiation

controls.

A"radiological

safetynote"wasdistributed

tostationpersonnel

reiterating

thenecessity

ofcontrolling

radiological

postings.

Appropriate

radiological

controlsworkprograms,

andworkpriorities

andcommunication

enhancements

associated

withoutagemanagement

activities

havebeendeveloped.

Theseprogramswillincreasethesensitivity

ofstationpersonnel

tostationradiological

controlconcerns,

therebyreducingtheoccurrence

of'imilar

events.h.Areasoftheplantwhichwerenotalreadyunderlockedhighradiation

controlsweresurveyedandupgradedasnecessary

toensurethestationwasincompliance

withNRCpostingandbarricade

requirements.

ATTACHMENT

TOPLA-4473Page3of6Anindependent

walk-down,

byfirstlinesupervisors,

ofhighradiation

postingchangesisnowrequired.

Thiscorrective

action,whichisinresponsetoasubsequent

postingevent,addsassurances

thatthe10CFR20andplantTechnical

Specification

postingandbarricading

requirements

are'being

promptlyandcorrectly

implemented.

W'P&Lmanagement

immediately

commissioned

anintensive

investigation

toestablish

thecauseandrecommend

corrective

actionsinresponsetothisevent.Theresultant

corrective

actionstakentoaddressthiseventwereexpeditiously

dispositioned.

PP&L,therefore,

considers

thecorrective

actionsidentified

abovetosatisfactorily

addressthisviolation.

Basedontheactiontakenin2.aabove,PP&Lisinfullcompliance.

ATTACHMENT

TOPLA-4473page4of6'gjgQ~~(387/96-04-03;

388/96-04-03)

Pursuantto10CFR20.1003,

surveymeansanevaluation

oftheradiological

conditions

andpotential

hazardsincidenttotheproduction,

use,transfer,

release,disposal,

orpresenceofradioactive

materialorothersourcesofradiation.

Contrarytotheabove,asofApril4,1996,thelicenseedidnotmakesurveystoassurecompliance

with10CFR20.2001(a),

whichdescribes

authorized

meaitsofdisposing

oflicensedmaterial.

Specifically,

onSeptember

21,1995,(Note:ThetankerwasreleasedoffsiteonSeptember

14,1995,asstatedinInspection

Report50-387/96-04

and50-388/96-04)

thelicenseedidnotperformasurveybeforedisposing

ofsludgeinatankertruckasnormal,non-radioactive

waste.Onprioroccasions,

thetankertruckcontained

radioactive

waterabovethelowerlimitsofdetection

foreffluentreleases.

4RcBQ~H1KOnFebruary29,1996,PP&Lwasnotified,

byanorganization

inMontreal,

QuebecCanada,thatatankertruckpreviously

usedbyPP&L(PP&Lidentification

¹255-216)

hadaradioactive

materials

labelaffixedtothetanker.Priortoreleasing

thetankeroffsite,thetanker(whichhadpreviously

contained

slightlycontaminated

water)wassurveyedusingexistingprocedures,

anddetermined

tobeacceptable

foroffsiterelease.Priortotransport

toMontreal,

Quebecthetankerwasthoroughly

cleanedatatruckwashingfacilityinPennsylvania.

Todetermine

ifthetankermayhavebeencontaminated

orifotherpotentially

radioactive

materialmayhavebeeninthetankerfollowing

releasefromthesite,atanker(PP&Lidentification

¹255-212)

thathadbeenusedinasimilarmanner,wassurveyed.

Thesurveyidentified

asmallamountofslightlyradioactive

sludgeinthebottomofthetanker.Dosecalculations

performed

onthissludgeconcluded

thatanydosereceivedwouldhavebeenasmallfractionofapplicable

doselimitsforamemberofthepublicand,basedontransportation

regulations,

thesludgefoundwouldhavebeenclassified

asan"exemptquantity."

BecauseoftheprocessusedbyPP&Ltodetermine

ifradioactivity

wasassociated

withthetanker,thetankermayhavecontained

similarorslightlyloweramountsofslightlyradioactive

sludge.Therefore,

itwasconcluded

thataninadequate

surveyhadbeenperformed

ontanker¹255-216.

~Thereasonfortheinadequate

surveyperformed

onthesubjecttanker,priortoitsreleaseoffsiteonSeptember

14,1995,wasthat:

ATTACHMENT

TOPLA-4473Page5of6~Noprocedural

guidanceexistedthatspecifically

lookedfororremovedunnecessary

labelingpriortoreleasefromtheradiologically

controlled

area(RCA)orthesite.~Theprocedure

usedtosurveyforcontamination

(HP-TP-602)

waslessthanadequateinthatitdidnotspecifically

requireaninternalsurveyofthetanker.~Nooverallprocedure

existedtocontroltheprocessforuse,surveying,

sampling,

orreleaseofthetankerbytheseveralaffectedfunctional

organizations

withinPPAL.Althougheachfunctional

organization

hasprocedures

toaddresstheirspecificactivity,

thelackofacomprehensive

governing

procedure

contributed

toalackoftrainingrelatedtoaspectsofreleasing

ofmaterialoffsite,weakprogrammatic

controloftankersforreleasefromtheRCAandsite,lessthanadequatecontamination

controlofemptycontainers,

andlessthanadequateworkplansforcompletely

emptyingthetanker.a.Theremaining

tankersatSusquehanna

thatareutilizedforsimilarpurposeshavebeenrelocated

withintheprotected

area,andhavebeenphysically

secured.Thiswillensurepositivecontrolofthesetankerspriortoreleaseoffsite.b.NuclearDepartment

procedures

(NDAP-00-0627

andHP-TP-0602)

havebeenrevisedtorequirethattheinternalsurfacesoftankersbesurveyedpriortoexitingthesite..C.NuclearDepartment

Administrative

Procedure

(NDAP-00-0627)

hasbeenrevisedtoincorporate

stepsthatremoveunnecessary

labelsontankerspriortoreleaseoffsite.Incorporation

ofaspecificprocedural

steptoremovelabelsinthisNDAP,whichappliesacrossfunctional

organizations,

providesassurances

thatonlyrequiredlabelingwillbeattachedtotankersexitingthesite.Thetruckwashfacilitywassurveyed.

Nonuclidesattributable

tonuclearpower.plantoperation

wereidentified.

Theinternalstructure

ofseveraltankershasbeeninspected

todetermine

ifthereareanyphysicalobstructions

thatwillpreventthecompletedrainingofmaterialfromthetanker.Thisinspection

concluded.

thattherearenomajorstructural

internals

thatshouldpreventthecompletedrainingofatanker.Atleasttwodesignshavebeenidentified;

however,theypresentnosignificant

impediments

toemptyingthetankers.

ATTACHMENT

TOPLA-4473Page6of6PP&Lcorrespondence

wassenttotheorganization

inMontreal,

Quebec,whoreceivedthetanker,statingthattherewasnotaradiological

hazardassociated

withthetanker,andthatthelabelcouldberemoved.WW'1Surveysoftheremaining

tankersthatwereutilizedforsimilarpurposeswillbeperformed

toassurethattheyarenotradioactively

contaminated

norcontain.radioactive

sludgeabovestationreleaselimits.Thesesurveysarescheduled

tobecompleted

byJuly31,1996.b.Inspections

oftheremaining

tankersthat,wereutilizedforsimilarpurposeswillbeconducted

toassurethatinappropriate

labelshavebeenremoved.Theseinspections

arescheduled

tobecompleted

byJuly31,1996.C.Requirements

associated

withtankeractivities

withintheprotected

areawillbeenhancedtoassurethatadequatecontrolsexistfortheuse,surveying,

sampling,

labeling,

etc.oftankers.Theserequirements

arescheduled

tobedeveloped

andimplemented

byJuly31,1996.Theoverallprogramforcontrolling

andcoordinating

theprocessforremovingmaterialfromtheRCAandsitewillbeevaluated.

Thisevaluation

isscheduled

tobecompleted

byJuly31,1996.Trainingwillbeprovided,

toapplicable

functional

organizations,

thataddresses

thereleaseofmaterials

fromtheRCAthatmaybeslightlyradioactive.

Thistrainingwillcontainelementsassociated

withappropriate.

lowerlimitsofdetection

(LLD's),plateoutmechanisms

andthediferentrequirements

forreleaseofmaterials

fromtheRCAandoffsite.Initialtrainingforkeyfunctional

organizations

isscheduled

tobecompleted

bySeptember

30,1996.Basedon2.aand2.babove,PP&Lisinfullcompliance.