ML15005A163: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 208 | | page count = 208 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:RULES TVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey Z 0i1 Fl 29 9 2Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R CF ;1\!--As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name FWL G C- GP-15ý- 7 UEmail c /+ ( M RULES A4IC, L)IBiECTIVESBRVNC:I-tU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2014 0!C 22 PM 41: 42Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RE:(-` tIVEDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name __________________Email t/ / ý)j--g 6i.,, ? | |||
RULES Ai,! DIRLC;IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201'1 71 29 Pi L: L2Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RPCH- --As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, tName Al--xEmail (1 (0 --a , tx!.J-RULEL NiD 'LCTIVESpF* .> l,U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2l0q 0UC 29 VP 4: 12Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F F-' A\ /tAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail ILK 6 t) AP,(4 i a - | |||
RULES )IECTIVESk~LfI .'H,;,j-,f .! "U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2014I 29 P'- ': 142Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
C i\IFDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, t.Name A, 7,, -Email V0 (16#f -f" b RULES AND JfRECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7014 RIEC 29 PM 4: 43Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
F DI\/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Email C(c, "C(J -V4'6ie ..sa J. COl,JJ RULES AIIL) DIRECTVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 0 .C 2 9 ' 4: 143Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F r -I\V/-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spe" rods remain there.Sincerely,Name q)4Email e RULIS AL;0) LýI ETCJIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2LON 9-C 29 PH' L4 3Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
DR ..... ..- E C i I .!I--LAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Email 1 --U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20M4 U 1 29 PHI 4: 43Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF(-' \!/-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerel'NameEmail 0 M C, rrO .. C..o X0V , 4 RULES -):,A,0 , \rU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2BI' 29 Qi 43Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
Rwi'L \1\ DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, -Name (e_____--Email 1_ ,,, 71 RULES AND 1i<>CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 701q DELP, 29 PMl : 413Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF2 \ -)_DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.SincerelyName e-, /R6:§AEmail d, RULES " :, LLEUC-T'!ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey HgiM DEC 29 PM : '43Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFr'!i\,"F\ DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name I_Email ).7J,4L Ct, 9-'" | |||
RULES i) OIHECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 4 EC 29 PH 4: 143Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, /AName J. dEmail BULFS A;. '', LCVESL.i ANCHU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 29 PM Q 4 3Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCO-F\tV )DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name &,, '/-/--/ C // 6r.2-Email ~& ~ | |||
RULES L, Ir(CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2 rwý-C 29 PAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Email RULES "DF 15-CIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 29 HOffice of Administration, NRC 0 29 P11 ': '3Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F- F I\/E DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, I,.1Name U .& q U1Email kJ'ge s A b., | |||
RULES ',.. Lf U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 01 fPEC 2 9 P il 4: 43Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCFI\! DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.SincereayNarne eAEmail RULES ii; [ DIECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 20114 BEC 29 Pi 4: q3Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
JIFAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name .-AEmail CJh1t bW,51-7/ed (9j. n-760 -.Ocarn RULES ;,:,i, ', , iV- ,U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 201LI UKC 29 PIN 4: 43Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R__C -L\//7As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, e-C- /.Name___________ __Email RULES' I --_T k/E3EIAN'.CHU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey GC ?9 P' 14:143Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF .- ..DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, IName ev .U rO4Email /MO,-rk. \ ° Cofl. | |||
RULES , `,\ L;-IIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2011 01_C 29 4L: fL3Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name _ _ _ _ _ _Email AYv IC9 (AJ6MA J<q7a. 1(- c-RULES " F" ..T-VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2fM1 [07C 29 PI [4: 43Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCF\,F-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Email )Iic.- j. (. , eG4/ | |||
FULS ,, 'IVCTiVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2014 OF"' 29 P 4'- !143Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF2.R/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely f .-Name II& U4)Email_ _ _ _ _ ______i_)_____ | |||
RULE)' L, E-CTIVESRU E .A i~ CH----U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2014 OLE, 29 Pl 4: 143Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF2FI\,!DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spejU-ftmi-kods remain theV. | |||
RULES i .) DlTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201 L,:29P L1Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCFF_ DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ; ( 2Name 'N.EmailI RULES ";E' -`T1 V7Sff), ACHU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2U14 [DIC 29 P1'l LI: 4-l4Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rR pein-a ere.Sincerely,Email Ifl JA\ @KA1 3r&y4V RULE1;1NL A ,A_-ITIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20..l DEC 29 PH1 4: L4Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RE7F i\iEDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincer el y,- c HRULES A4,1' DSFECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20i1 C 22 P9tM q: L-14Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF2-i\/f-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spen> ro, remainrýhere.Email RULES A'M,) 11-i:ECT iVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 91CC ?9 PH 4: 44L-Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFC, \/EV)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name /Email /( i7-qM~gA& A t)S ,)Vd 10k14/7_ | |||
RULES .'.,i. J TI8''U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ZOlu DEC 29 P, rl 44LJOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R OFIrF-\/FEDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, L i ) '\) ThINameEmail RULES ..j-.... ' CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20 IEC 29 PM 4: 4L4Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFC>--I--DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; andI>(2) To holda Suthern 1fornia Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the fuel there.Em ail .,. " | |||
RULES ," ) , E" IVSU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2014 GEC 29 Pil l4: a 4Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCH\i'FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plapt was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safetý complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name_______________________Email ezIl e Z ,> | |||
RULE , L)D P.C-TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201q 0f. 29 : 14-4Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCr I\!EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name JQ.If -S130.Email ýu , | |||
BULL' $ "" "": -'-""U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 0 , 29 1: 14LMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RH.FV/_DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .Name -a QmWtorEmail 0 rr3 _ ' | |||
RULLES Di ,, H LCC I ViEIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2014 OfEC 29 PH 4: 4 4Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
.-'.i-\f_.)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.SNmcrely, ..-4a.Email CN " (2 RULES Ai) D.iOTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 0`1-J- 29 PN O4 144Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R17-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ?Name 4 W --n ------Email RULES -\i%1L) A L.,` IECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ZOI OFF, 29 'PH 1: 4Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF F 7 \DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, iName Ym lC a-llEmail 814Ad o RULES i/\1;,!JL DiHECTiVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201q U 29 PH 4: 4 4Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF(7-\.VFIDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.NameEmail HULLS AI. LFEOCTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC WI01 L ' 9i L: '41Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF F --\/DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .01NameEmail a c4. t-94, e ) c.m , | |||
RULES o, .... ....Li)-; EGTIV'ESf,!-,L -,i ,,U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 21I C1 1 29 P M4: 4 4Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
FFC(FI\/D- -As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail AlSb RULES 101) I11LCT IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 A! 1-C 29 PM L' 45Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
D-2\/,DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel .rods remain there.Sincerely, L-/ ,)!, -Name '7cI-c 4cEmail -.-, 0- co. L.. C rn'm NUL~b ":: i : UL , 'S' ; U I- -TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 21,- ,2 15Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there. -. --i .Email ChIe,-e -ý 401-"- | |||
RULE) , ;-' ,CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ZC1t DC1 29 PR- 1I: 115Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001RFCF'\/FD | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.SincerelA J ,'Name " AA L _A,, ,Email k)NYk~~~s~OCIf' FULE, , L. -CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2f011 j f5L-i29 P1) 4:L-L5Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R Q -I\/ EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, i- t.Name pet L e k" /C? LEmail iý C (T cC e6 RULE-D ,U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2BIA ION 29 PI1 4: 45Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, / NameEmail RULES ;`P'L, D:ý-IECTIVES20qDEIC 29 PH .41L5U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F C V\/--FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.SinceNameEmailrely, RULES' A,',.I )D,; `AEGCTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ZOq DEC 2 9; P1 1 41 45Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R [7..] ,z DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ai -,6(2Name (,a 'IIEm ail _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __7 _ | |||
RULEUS ' J iVSU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 20i4 DET 29 RI 1: 145Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFr-1. -DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, C A'Name Email v'- (? C Q) <. | |||
BUL.FS D\ ',_ ,-,-,iL,/_R LP .-i I.. I"VEU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 29 Pii 4' 45Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R .C F.,/HDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, "Name CNa4-iýýtUIk+Email RULES ' " IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M (Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R CI..WAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NEami e __._ (IAEmail )", _C@ t i .)' 't.Z / | |||
R ULE ,,I,!: 'I;- VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey C9,-Office of Administration, NRC LPAq , 99 P1 ': '5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF2 " \/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail-jr RULES ',,) D LECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 0 C 29 PM 4: 45Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFI_ F , V .DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, RULE,- Aii,') U1., TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 k+/- 29 1: 45Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F --I\ F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sinerely,7Namemal _Email /L /Oorie-o C0,'_.?Q RULE U .iVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 720lq Pi20 :T q5Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
-F-H\iEDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,,.Name 7'LA 'v Email C fO A /a RULES i,,; F,io DLOTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC YO1L [7i 29 L5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R Ff7: F K'/F.DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, A .Name______Email___________________ C& | |||
RULES!i IJ !--' '3E-CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 94 rPk929 t 14: .5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
, -,"-\/'DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name .Email .., | |||
RULES i Ui " n-'LESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC Kr ,[ 29 P11 q 4 5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF-FR/r---As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Namee _______Email HULF- i ;,') L: ECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201 [q.C 29 PR1 L: 45Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCFK/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.S incerely, 'f"a,Name CCEmail A',0 1A _ a u k b .cc nn RULES I ;,_J ICT- VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201q 10,C 29 P Q: '46Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF2FI\/EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name "/ /Email RULES L' , .3 1TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 211L 2 9 PM 1: 4, 6Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 R F\ D | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R 'C /.-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rod> remain there. --Sincerely,Name -Email 5 C Sf5t49'6o4Arf(0d RUILES 1 R Ei, uC -I IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7Gifl LC 2 9 Pl1 P- 4i 6Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel r remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail RULEK Al 1J, ;:.CT1VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2[01 A 2 PTI -T 4 6Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F- !\ rDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name________________ ___________Email RULL ) .:, ECTRVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 0, , 99 Pr T 46Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F 7( \/. DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name__ K__-____Email I.-, /*7 ) ýj, - | |||
RULES F, C" F1"-OOTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC CGi 2B 1 ' R 1: 46Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCFC!F DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remaiiYi'ere.Email M,(- | |||
BULEL i L, brLECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC L 29 Pli L: 46Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R zQ.- IVFV_As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent f el rods remain there.NameEmail ,ý,- 4ayko@ -o o C, r4' n RULES " " J-,IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 20 f 29 Fi 1: '46Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RIF ' F I\/!DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name /L4Email 0'O$~cj1Le RULES i,, E,-COTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey c} 2' i1 'Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F(77 ! i\E--- EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, >Name e__ ___ __Email bs&00,6iI7P~ 6 P,11G4L C 0 (1 BULLS/b i) 9 TfiESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 01 [i C 2'9 PH L: 4 6Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
EC-" /EiDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fel rods remaiq there.Email A/a JIC/-- / 0 s RULESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ..14:'46Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R1C'V'J-i L)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,']Name ______ y,_ _ _ ___ _ __ _: _Email RULES i. DaiOrECETESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC ...'Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
F, R (_DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name 5" fL\J*j.t"Email " C-LOI' RULES i. 'A}I-ECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7j1j 7f 29 P 4: 16Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R.F.FI\./FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .Namem_Email , , | |||
RULES!; j LDiC 6 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 29 P1 q 6Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFOF VEDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail Y h jI ' | |||
RULES ,, R EFC'IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70 14 G9 29 P, 1 4: 16Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R FAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, , "Name______________ _Email HULE A..:L uK.TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2014 PHfC 29 Pfl 4: 416Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF,2V7-k/EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name ..Email ej.. | |||
RULES i,% L.'J L'. IL,-ýCý ES.-A I f}P"lU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey NON HE, 29 PM Q: 46Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spentjfe1-tds re~nain there.Email "T-40A, A -I/A LC., L t RULIESL i.') ECTiVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7C!/ 0yL 2OFJ" 99 : 47Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001Q | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
H I -IAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the s ent fuel rods re in there.S ince, __y'Namegi/Email - | |||
RULE) i, i JtEC-1 NESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201 1 7 PF 2 L4: 147Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
rF -. \!..-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Xd/.bidName A LS4Email I4A'-' 1A/.. ;>Q 1 RUL -",:u , 1 "U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC PH1tq 971 29 P11 L 47Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFH K....As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Name_ _ _ _ __Email A .' '5li& ? , | |||
D-1 , yESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey C 2 9 47Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .Name SU5@V\ Q 2hPEmail of$(' 3 oQ 1 RULE.-\ JL " IVES"U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC f}t7F '29 F :Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
FF2FIV'!DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuelrds remain there.Sincerely,,NameEmail j/ (e L /eS:b '/ | |||
HULES; "'" DEC'TIESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 20N yE 2- 14: 47Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
-..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ,..NameEmail _-d(v4 5 e RULE ..U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7014 15"' 29 M 41: 4 7Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RVQFI'V/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name ___ ____ __ __VEmail Y C eo-- r, .co!,.-- | |||
BUL E Ai,! L' it()` C TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC ?914 KC 20 PMI 4: 47Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
FC-'I\/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Sop e California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the/sr nt/ftel rods t 're.Sincerely,Name___Email __ _________-,- | |||
RULE'- 1}-,"IE(TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 210111 V29 P.,jI 4: 47Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Namem RULES ibl LirFKCTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 701q D-EC 29) PM 4: 4 7Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R 2F., \!FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Email q ý 6 ý C RULESJ r _ ; q l TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 014 p[ F. 2 9 Pi 4: 4 7Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, rName_____________________Email______________________________ | |||
%ULLJ j ICIVESRU E A....." ....- ..rU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7- ,-C 29 RN t": 47Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFO--\/-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name____Email 0 C, t RULE, 'ilt. CTI\VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20lq Fr-. 2" PNi 4" 4:7Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R FC D\/DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name_____ ____ ___Email | |||
,UL. ,.) L.-CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey CI 72 P2 4":47Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF-FI\/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail RULE! WlVEU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7fl 1 -29 ?" L-: 147Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF-C(FV EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name _______ _Email 1-40 14 71 RULLES i'A J -CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey Zili [KC 2 9 P104 1: 4 7Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001RFQH-\!,FD | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerem__Name *b it ; )4Email RULES J" h /E" S T I V-"Rp/ ,.ýVU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 4Office of Administration, NRC 70 ":Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCP7¶\/-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities;- and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ',rName Id^14 L,&WLzjl/ -kad&"1Email & / c Y -lzoe RULIo AL ' IVESRif"., N.O;::U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2rI I F C 29 P M 4: '47Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001RFrOFR-!\FT | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, _Name_______________Email 0ý r&o -~riI. &m RULES ',L i 1`1iC ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2014 29 , n /4: L47Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F FIL\/DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail u2--k _C BULE ' ' FU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 0 8Office of Administration, NRC Vq C 29 Pi 1: L8Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
r F1V\!_DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name 1 --Email RULE.) SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC JON PIIC 29 '111Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
.F'(71i7]\/_DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,//)Name aV1/V4 Email | |||
.- R,,IfL"1',EC -1MEWUL .S 2?CU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 0 29 148Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
iF DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincl I c t A/N a m e , _ .../Email .,- rc t ,C . | |||
BULLLS ," :-J.,T / --U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
IQ';FA/1/2DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Emai 'fr Di4(A )C Oe ..Oa .--er. C.;...orV RULES f,, OT.)C6I\/ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70141 J 291 P : 484Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R[CF \I/_FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name!6 @1,Email Ll 1S\\p Mal BULES A'I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey BC 2 LI8Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R pFC As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name ..Email I." Y RULES AI.D CTVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2O]t1 _ 29 P'r l: 48Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R -..... ....As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, LNameEmail_________________ 2 BULES, ," ",- CTi"ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC Zc 29 Pt L: L8Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF-I'\.-!."- -As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name___Email 6A4-1? | |||
RULES /IN ,QLFCTiVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20111 OlC 29 PMI LI: 48Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
REC.FI\/F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name ____ 6A__ ____Email I. f , _ (-. A-RULES , 'ECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 29 t : L8Office of Administration, NRC ,LU1 2 9Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFrC\FP-1/,F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.NameEmrna i l______________________ | |||
RULES/. L/ OTiJESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC HN PFC' 292 P 411: 4-8Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
.,F< -X/F_)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name A 4Email A -av"E. | |||
RULES ', ,IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2 C11L cii: 29 H] 1: q48Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RP1F "N' A_ \\i'DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the s ent fuel ro s remain there.Sincerely,Name 9 ýNEmail _ __ _________________*fRQ1kh1~ | |||
RULES,**,,.LJ E-C]iVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2014 I]E1 29 14" 143Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
i--- r' irAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail C 7-( | |||
RUL`;/,, :T V/ ESIQ,U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7141 ,FDU 29 rL' 148Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF2F \/FAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the s uel rods remain there.NamemEmail !' | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC t 2' 14 tMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
, _--As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,/Name_ _ _ __Email C-0 11. a c.f0 | |||
, .'L '1 -E-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey H'q UJV 29 PO q: q4Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF.,"\iFV)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.SincerelyName ___Email a o/o. L-to m RULES i.L CTiVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey Q ,,Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF-? !\/F..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail l_._ii L, | |||
!") C)l+) ýVn-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7014 OET 29 P :Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
IV F. D-, -..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name crd4 CEmail RULES /A;..V) LI- TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ,...,4Office of Administration, NRC C 99 49Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF(- \F / V _As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern Califomia Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail I --C -'L ..Cc 4 RULE" D" U th-ES,U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 29 ' 29 Lf 9Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001RF f!-\/.D | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.SincerelyName ______________________Email V^*,,c_.a -.0 _ - | |||
RULEBI L'I+/-CIVLSU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 ql C7( 2, 9 Ri Q: 49Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R -`F \/EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name______________________Email -A .Q COnX RULES),"%,, _lo :O VEbU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70N. 29 , Q: 49Office of Administration, NRC ....Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
FF-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name Lunc. L\ s.n5Email M Pr _ | |||
AU! ES)AD 7-- ;LUTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey Z014 D'IE 29 PI N 49Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 R | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name .Email sm, , lPetwf BUL,.,B ,', 0 , fb V,.-ul.?A , :o-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ,, 0 29 Pi3 It L49Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R_ -(T F'\./F--DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, (..X/ -/JSNameEmail r4,._, yss Q0b,6t.Co RULES 7iEU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey i " 29 qN (49Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001R'J*-1 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.oince el, D"Nam%/"Email Q-'C ( l I .,- ; ..A ,"-; ' J0 L.'. -W',?U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC U-I 29 P1! Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RK (J \...As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail ( | |||
H U L F_... :.'. , E.i IC_,. -1VLE.SUS. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2gI v 29 i: 149Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
1 .As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation' accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely._Name Y-Email l .ITIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC Gill -10H 29 P6 4: 149Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
i -As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuob-20 remain there.NameEmail AA A-12-Vk-- &- 5-TO PJ E7FA-e!-.--r 'C.- CO e PA ULES --1C TIVESi j ,U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC B 2 P" R: 419Mail Stop: 3WvFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
FC>IV!DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.NameEmail RULES t.#i9 j,-(jET'!ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ,-,' -, Lt:Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
-Rkt ,- r7-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods reSincerely,NameEmail( | |||
RULE" i, .) .CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2 ;-. ?Y p- 4: 14Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF, F V...As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NamemEmail BULES CY;7K CTI VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2011 u-' 29 PIM 4: 49Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
p FO -/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name )Email C ! " Pr /]k 0 RULES: , D,,;1' n! I ,vLESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7r0tu C3,I 29 P4j ?4:149Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, JIhName -Email ___.__________________________ | |||
RULES " I' ' E" .TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 14 10,' Pi L-.: 49Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF1.__F,`\,FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name § c, S 'yEmail J ,, | |||
RULES i,2D r-IVES,_J ; I .., ' i IU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7l0 FUC 2?9 PN.I: 19Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF.77 F -\.! DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Souothe, California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong t p rods ere.NameEmaili BULLS Y.'>-"fVCU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2 f31q 1 s P 14: Y19Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 R -I\/-D | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison r sponsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spentfuel ro s remain thSincerely,Namem_ | |||
RULES U.. L. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey eL)q rf 29 P'i li: 4-9Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R A!As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail ..7Z4 tjA RULES k',,- L J 1 lIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC U. 22 VI Li: 19Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RE.2F "!_--As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Email 6o W) /7,..,,1 1. /I06 RULES iN, ,Ib , IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC G Il 29 I'M 4 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFC7L.';""As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the s t fue ds remain there.Sincerely,Name maEmail _ -" | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 50Office of Administration, NRC "O., 2 .ti 2 0Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R CF. I\/ FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail RULES :,u L/ ';EOTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC f 99 PI11* 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F C."'!-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.SincerelyNameEmail W--%1-"Y ..2 RULES /TVVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 201q D[C 29 ,01 t4:50Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R FC C .. F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name____Email (% I Z44AJI /SAD2J RULL S -' UiT ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey nu ?0 50Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R 'F .. IL-)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold South rm California Ediion res onsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the Dlnt el rods emain th re.Sincerely,Name_________________Email ________________ | |||
ULf-- L;-,CTIVESiUL-' , n LTILU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC F .[ L: 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R ` r \ `..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,~Name ýty- & -?,a iVý-~Email RULLE .', ,I.3 I/ .U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 701Q FC 2 9 2 i Q: 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R, _ ,-,DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Email /OLYo[ -Rcr'OIie., | |||
RULL, A;, L) -CTIVESN, 1 " "U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 29 F' 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFC2-P '\'F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name Ilze- msevfEmail RULES 1.0 JiJ'[E(TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey L 1 99 ? Q -50Office of Administration, NRC L95Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F. ../F..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Email 6Sy~v ~ C~ (/Ta9 .P~-f RULES,/, L i V EISU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201 KCI 29 PiN LI: 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RIF Y- F\ EFAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .lName_________________Email_____________________ | |||
RULES .[-,K_1 I VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2014 FDE B 29 PM.] O: 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R,As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name E(isabe,!t aEmail RULES i, jYICTh\!ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2011O DEC 29 P11 LI: 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail RUL E;S /\'k , _- I..V..SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey , LEE C'9- 29 P H! L: 5 0Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R _ F \/'EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name kk~'~ /-~-el146lPWEmi I-LKLA a AoL.coEmail RULES .v... JIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ,-,,9 4: 50Office of Administration, NRC LMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF 'M3 i'-F DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, :_ ..--IName CEma " w. ,W 6 HULK;.- iK:! ) V Ii£VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2[1I11 LG F9 'Nr r4: 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
Rr -Q W DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincere,NameEminail I~YA cc RULE,2 ',) ; VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 17W "- , fii. 0Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
PF , -/i.IDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, _Name ýný _ Email Ut " J©VV R ULE AiL OIC1 I VE SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 111 r[ -LC 2?9 PIM ': 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
Rm(--/ --As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name ý' 4A .Email BULLS /kL Ci;I BCTVSru L 21U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
0 / nVKAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.0.i,Name 5f Kevv]Email N uSi(iEj It 4 4(( mkýna4 c&/Vl RULES -i-,i DETVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 L: 51Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
FDFQ, \ -FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail RULE,`~U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey vE-, 9 2 9 , 51Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
pv.F -,; .As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern Califonmi- -Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain ere.emi. @ /. / " | |||
.UL Ai." y .ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey PM:5Office of Administration, NRC [ 2 P i : 51Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFQ;F.\ .As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerel(Name .-Email 6 O ' - | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
JU~:~fVA-.mq ýo,29pwF -DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, 1/2'Name ( _/J ,1490* r7ýEmailEmai V- 1` | |||
RULtJ ., L, TI VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC [1Y4 1 1: 5'Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF- 7V'F DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name ( L -JEmail , /. a/ | |||
,UL S .... ' I, VESRUI_,_ ,,"--U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ]u '.. PVI L: 51Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF"2.FN\ .DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, "LName 14T/rQIUA 0 1'zELEREmail QO-. -i. ;ýZjim h V)CZ'e.d , | |||
RULL;) -TN iVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7 2? f L 5COffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F -" 7i\/DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name _ _ _ _ __l_ _Email /,//-44 d'(_c.7._," | |||
UL , :',0JIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC T[14 ,- [ 51Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF(,A\!F.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincer e _ _ y__ __ _Name___________________Email RUL-o ",, Li 7 ,IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 0 V11 031 2 9Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RR...' \/ /ED_As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name___ __ _Email )00 J11do r _ , ( | |||
RULES ; [Ci[.I.SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey .Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name _ _ _ __Email kres+eh G hotam if corrm, RULEL P , 1 VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey L i- 2 9 1:5Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
F F i\FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name____________Email (two' Yo/e,.J -_ | |||
RULES,-" , L, :SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 'L1 E-P29 P4: 5IOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
pE, Li V. _As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Email Plk V-BULL I U .iiECTNVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 95Office of Administration, NRC 7_ 13q 29 Pi' U:"Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF2 ...JAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.SincerelName a ' -' VEmail hD@ -NV RUULF~ -,I.,t)b t;',-l'-YDr\ ,',; V-'t-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 51Attn: Cindy Bladey 2 9 %Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R c-. 1\t..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, VName C______\___________Email CI -"/\Y E-G ý'\k L. CC'V' RULE; ,\iiJ LCTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 0,'[-C 92 DEN 41:5 1Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R FCVI\/f-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name 1,i.Email r ?,qY -) 0 bI W- "t it - | |||
RULE S L`,i r--CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2011ifI. f." 2 1? 13N 4: 5 1Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R_ H\EAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spen el rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail -Af- , e R~U L S ' ,Y L I: LC~- IV pSU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 20 1Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001I R __,. ....t. | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name = tEmail C& L)t,- COi'~JI V RULES , iE.,..C,- ! ,""N i-IU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201L .2,-Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
FrF ,I\/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ()Name_ _ _ __Email l__________ | |||
gULES v :,U2TElVFSý,l -. ,.'. ýr,:, CJI,: SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey PF .52Office of Administration, NRC J U. 22Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, -'Name \) eY-?Email J 9, ý ý~V\ tý RUL , _ | |||
* SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2 L9 : 52Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
-..F )As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Email,_f-'i AC, .~l 0 .J.0 L), oC -ov'N RULEo/. .s -EC i ,riVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70114 KC 29 Pl [: 52Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
F-\,F.,As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name___________________Email ( AJ BULLS "" 'U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ?- 52Office of Administration, NRC ti 2Y 9 V : 52Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail. Cox HULES i1.]{ DLV;E(;Ti ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2014 LU C 29 PH1 4: 52Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R I.SI\/WDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, INameEmail RULE i', C-TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 20N ',,r-, 29' Phil 4: 52Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFP \-/VDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, A. .Name PULEo ,,,"EU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC R0 E C 29 PH1'1: 52Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
Rf I- -\/DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name 1.Z.O(A, -A. -C- O tEmail ýn7lc ZiGQYW&Ak .k 10~- | |||
RULE") J _;fJi EU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC Br;I' 29 P [- 52Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R t.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rod's from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, lName i ,V ( cl<-ocdEmail on [o | |||
~~hES5 "i!- y,'i,, "J-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 52Office of Administration, NRC 2 2 2 52Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R ... -'... .As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Namem e _ _ _Email I (ktf cut. -_ ( -'4 (LL .. " .I L I'E- 0-I \JL,.0U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R .-- i..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,/ riY L 2 ,- i, ,c-.-Name 4Email 41 -3 3~ &co ml HULEo,' ,L, TIVLSU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20 F R 4 2 ,i : 52Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,.L4mName " tl itVj.Email__________________ | |||
HU LS %'J RULEo L: " TELU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201i V C 2 9 P -: 52Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF-FI\FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, I-Name ""Z44, "Email A,, 6i~.f~1 | |||
_-" IT-,,,-,R .U L L S .U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey "j1` D E C 2? 9,P U: 2Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R %Q Fl. F1DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, -INameEmail , | |||
RULE-S K' L'JJ -CTIVES2014 "DfC 29 PH 1-17 52U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R 17... V\ /F DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location--perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Saincerely, Name____ _____________ ____________-__________Email 6&&& da Q.Qty RULES "i L;CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission I'Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration,'NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M -!Pj1- 99 I f: 52Washington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R .VI ,.r- 1--IAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile are-a'subject tot..permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name 6 ALEmail RULES ,'."Lt I /ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2011 DEC 2 9 PH 41: 52Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCHi\/F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name_ __ __Email RULLS 6D ; ILO1iESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 11' U_11 29 IP'4 Q: 52Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F 2F' 1\/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerelya e __Name Email RULES /\" 'QEf:TI'ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 70-14 0FC 29 Q i P : 53Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name___Email G-m ikfM -, t30 SCA 9C1&, !o rY) | |||
RUL ....) L- CJ I V.'ES3U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20H HC 29 Fil Q: 53Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RD.F', r-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history.of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name m e _ _ _ _Email '!ý,CV r , t4 eV ý- | |||
RULLS :L h ,UT-"ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission [:Attn: Cindy Bladey 20111 OIC 29 PIt 41: 53Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, J-A wk-Name_ _ _ _ _*Email '/ -, | |||
RUL.; !UOTIES'U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 201I U[C 29 P : 53Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F I\/-.DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the) fuel rods rem tSincerely' ," "1Name_ _ _ _ _ | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC nv'- P14 L-: 53Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF .._ F ......As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name , V c,04i " [ | |||
RULES [ -,") Yr lFlTI1ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7 Pf1 14:53Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFC>C \iFDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail RULEL i 9"LCIYVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 20lL 29 Ri 4:53Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name 1 -Email RRULEE i 4J L) !iri ,T.VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 211I (EFC 29 P'1 41: 53Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R -( ,. IAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Email NV ta Pv cJ L 5Ca, RULES ,C; !t R U LE.P,;. I LuJ I' L-0U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2 011 C 2. 9" 'M L0: 53Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCIF-, , '"t F \FAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.-X(Email P ( "'' | |||
RULES/"i. CTtVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2q 2 P H 53Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R--'F-, .DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name "a ,/VI/VJiEmail "a Aiys,6? A1, Cc1/4'a oo31;F i-Z o/P7/#- | |||
RULES Z) r.F6\_/,SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20111. PC 2 9 P1i 4: 53Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RVF_ --EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely'Name )\4Qe 4T.cEmail "M"._5av ý!s (, | |||
RULES .l;-ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ZA 4: 53Office of Administration, NRC 2 0 N 5CMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R F (71'As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent Juel rods remain there.Sincerely,Eame &E mail ý-z( _ If-1 | |||
,ULE" rIrU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7Q 29 : 53Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF\As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison res onsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain thSincerely, -J 'Name 9Jt )Email l % ') ;" -TI ,-(L.\,, '.. -i.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7~lj 29 P] 4: 53Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF!2NJVF_As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name 6BJEmail RULES, " ., L.,ZI'JEU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 U40 2 5 3Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFC" VFDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(I) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Nameme____Email k\,yv\(No cii.'\. | |||
RULE" b~L -LCTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 53Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R7 IV'.'As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail e 1tP& c ( c- | |||
,- .1 .L V tC IE_U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20tI C 29 Pai 4: 54Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name__ _ __ _ __ _Email tVamk 0 RULES Di1v,, TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 0[1 -1 "'f'L-, _'2 9P i 1-:- 514Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFCH\/FIDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name ve e ' 1Email VI A) | |||
RULEto *ICIVES(HU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission r 2 9 P~ 14: 514Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 RF-N \/FD | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, J1J .5'Name ____ _ _ _______Email RULES I ".-I IV , ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 20!" N ? .54Office of Administration, NRC .G 2 PMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
R I7C-V 1 .I _As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel remain there.Sincerely,Name___Email RUJLE; ý TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2011 0Zr" 9 ' 4: 54Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RF.. \As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Emarn AS CL LL-,vtC- ." | |||
RULES / LL I IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey Z ,I'1 ?9 7- 1: 511Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
.. F I- "1 1. -/F'fAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .NameEmail .(' AQ,\ | |||
RULE: S 7FSU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2i'1 UiT, 2 ? ,: 53Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 | |||
==Dear Commissioners,== | |||
RFOHVJ- FD ! --- L--As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name -4] AEmail e lý.}} | |||
Revision as of 05:51, 15 June 2018
| ML15005A163 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre, 05000360 |
| Issue date: | 12/29/2014 |
| From: | Berger M, Grasso M - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Bladey C K Division of Administrative Services |
| References | |
| 79FR61668, NRC-2014-0223 | |
| Download: ML15005A163 (208) | |
Text
RULES TVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey Z 0i1 Fl 29 9 2Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R CF ;1\!--As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name FWL G C- GP-15ý- 7 UEmail c /+ ( M RULES A4IC, L)IBiECTIVESBRVNC:I-tU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2014 0!C 22 PM 41: 42Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RE:(-` tIVEDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name __________________Email t/ / ý)j--g 6i.,, ?
RULES Ai,! DIRLC;IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201'1 71 29 Pi L: L2Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RPCH- --As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, tName Al--xEmail (1 (0 --a , tx!.J-RULEL NiD 'LCTIVESpF* .> l,U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2l0q 0UC 29 VP 4: 12Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F F-' A\ /tAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail ILK 6 t) AP,(4 i a -
RULES )IECTIVESk~LfI .'H,;,j-,f .! "U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2014I 29 P'- ': 142Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
C i\IFDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, t.Name A, 7,, -Email V0 (16#f -f" b RULES AND JfRECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7014 RIEC 29 PM 4: 43Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F DI\/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Email C(c, "C(J -V4'6ie ..sa J. COl,JJ RULES AIIL) DIRECTVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 0 .C 2 9 ' 4: 143Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F r -I\V/-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spe" rods remain there.Sincerely,Name q)4Email e RULIS AL;0) LýI ETCJIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2LON 9-C 29 PH' L4 3Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
DR ..... ..- E C i I .!I--LAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Email 1 --U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20M4 U 1 29 PHI 4: 43Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF(-' \!/-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerel'NameEmail 0 M C, rrO .. C..o X0V , 4 RULES -):,A,0 , \rU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2BI' 29 Qi 43Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
Rwi'L \1\ DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, -Name (e_____--Email 1_ ,,, 71 RULES AND 1i<>CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 701q DELP, 29 PMl : 413Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2 \ -)_DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.SincerelyName e-, /R6:§AEmail d, RULES " :, LLEUC-T'!ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey HgiM DEC 29 PM : '43Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFr'!i\,"F\ DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name I_Email ).7J,4L Ct, 9-'"
RULES i) OIHECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 4 EC 29 PH 4: 143Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, /AName J. dEmail BULFS A;. , LCVESL.i ANCHU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 29 PM Q 4 3Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCO-F\tV )DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name &,, '/-/--/ C // 6r.2-Email ~& ~
RULES L, Ir(CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2 rwý-C 29 PAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Email RULES "DF 15-CIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 29 HOffice of Administration, NRC 0 29 P11 ': '3Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F- F I\/E DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, I,.1Name U .& q U1Email kJ'ge s A b.,
RULES ',.. Lf U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 01 fPEC 2 9 P il 4: 43Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCFI\! DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.SincereayNarne eAEmail RULES ii; [ DIECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 20114 BEC 29 Pi 4: q3Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
JIFAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name .-AEmail CJh1t bW,51-7/ed (9j. n-760 -.Ocarn RULES ;,:,i, ', , iV- ,U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 201LI UKC 29 PIN 4: 43Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R__C -L\//7As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, e-C- /.Name___________ __Email RULES' I --_T k/E3EIAN'.CHU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey GC ?9 P' 14:143Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF .- ..DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, IName ev .U rO4Email /MO,-rk. \ ° Cofl.
RULES , `,\ L;-IIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2011 01_C 29 4L: fL3Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name _ _ _ _ _ _Email AYv IC9 (AJ6MA J<q7a. 1(- c-RULES " F" ..T-VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2fM1 [07C 29 PI [4: 43Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCF\,F-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Email )Iic.- j. (. , eG4/
FULS ,, 'IVCTiVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2014 OF"' 29 P 4'- !143Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2.R/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely f .-Name II& U4)Email_ _ _ _ _ ______i_)_____
RULE)' L, E-CTIVESRU E .A i~ CH----U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2014 OLE, 29 Pl 4: 143Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2FI\,!DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spejU-ftmi-kods remain theV.
RULES i .) DlTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201 L,:29P L1Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCFF_ DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ; ( 2Name 'N.EmailI RULES ";E' -`T1 V7Sff), ACHU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2U14 [DIC 29 P1'l LI: 4-l4Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rR pein-a ere.Sincerely,Email Ifl JA\ @KA1 3r&y4V RULE1;1NL A ,A_-ITIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20..l DEC 29 PH1 4: L4Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RE7F i\iEDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincer el y,- c HRULES A4,1' DSFECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20i1 C 22 P9tM q: L-14Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2-i\/f-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spen> ro, remainrýhere.Email RULES A'M,) 11-i:ECT iVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 91CC ?9 PH 4: 44L-Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC, \/EV)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name /Email /( i7-qM~gA& A t)S ,)Vd 10k14/7_
RULES .'.,i. J TI8U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ZOlu DEC 29 P, rl 44LJOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R OFIrF-\/FEDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, L i ) '\) ThINameEmail RULES ..j-.... ' CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20 IEC 29 PM 4: 4L4Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC>--I--DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; andI>(2) To holda Suthern 1fornia Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the fuel there.Em ail .,. "
RULES ," ) , E" IVSU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2014 GEC 29 Pil l4: a 4Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCH\i'FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plapt was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safetý complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name_______________________Email ezIl e Z ,>
RULE , L)D P.C-TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201q 0f. 29 : 14-4Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCr I\!EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name JQ.If -S130.Email ýu ,
BULL' $ "" "": -'-""U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 0 , 29 1: 14LMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RH.FV/_DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .Name -a QmWtorEmail 0 rr3 _ '
RULLES Di ,, H LCC I ViEIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2014 OfEC 29 PH 4: 4 4Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
.-'.i-\f_.)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.SNmcrely, ..-4a.Email CN " (2 RULES Ai) D.iOTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 0`1-J- 29 PN O4 144Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R17-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ?Name 4 W --n ------Email RULES -\i%1L) A L.,` IECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ZOI OFF, 29 'PH 1: 4Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF F 7 \DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, iName Ym lC a-llEmail 814Ad o RULES i/\1;,!JL DiHECTiVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201q U 29 PH 4: 4 4Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF(7-\.VFIDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.NameEmail HULLS AI. LFEOCTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC WI01 L ' 9i L: '41Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF F --\/DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .01NameEmail a c4. t-94, e ) c.m ,
RULES o, .... ....Li)-; EGTIV'ESf,!-,L -,i ,,U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 21I C1 1 29 P M4: 4 4Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FFC(FI\/D- -As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail AlSb RULES 101) I11LCT IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 A! 1-C 29 PM L' 45Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
D-2\/,DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel .rods remain there.Sincerely, L-/ ,)!, -Name '7cI-c 4cEmail -.-, 0- co. L.. C rn'm NUL~b ":: i : UL , 'S' ; U I- -TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 21,- ,2 15Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there. -. --i .Email ChIe,-e -ý 401-"-
RULE) , ;-' ,CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ZC1t DC1 29 PR- 1I: 115Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001RFCF'\/FD
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.SincerelA J ,'Name " AA L _A,, ,Email k)NYk~~~s~OCIf' FULE, , L. -CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2f011 j f5L-i29 P1) 4:L-L5Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R Q -I\/ EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, i- t.Name pet L e k" /C? LEmail iý C (T cC e6 RULE-D ,U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2BIA ION 29 PI1 4: 45Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, / NameEmail RULES ;`P'L, D:ý-IECTIVES20qDEIC 29 PH .41L5U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F C V\/--FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.SinceNameEmailrely, RULES' A,',.I )D,; `AEGCTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ZOq DEC 2 9; P1 1 41 45Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R [7..] ,z DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ai -,6(2Name (,a 'IIEm ail _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __7 _
RULEUS ' J iVSU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 20i4 DET 29 RI 1: 145Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFr-1. -DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, C A'Name Email v'- (? C Q) <.
BUL.FS D\ ',_ ,-,-,iL,/_R LP .-i I.. I"VEU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 29 Pii 4' 45Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R .C F.,/HDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, "Name CNa4-iýýtUIk+Email RULES ' " IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M (Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R CI..WAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NEami e __._ (IAEmail )", _C@ t i .)' 't.Z /
R ULE ,,I,!: 'I;- VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey C9,-Office of Administration, NRC LPAq , 99 P1 ': '5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2 " \/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail-jr RULES ',,) D LECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 0 C 29 PM 4: 45Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFI_ F , V .DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, RULE,- Aii,') U1., TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 k+/- 29 1: 45Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F --I\ F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sinerely,7Namemal _Email /L /Oorie-o C0,'_.?Q RULE U .iVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 720lq Pi20 :T q5Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
-F-H\iEDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,,.Name 7'LA 'v Email C fO A /a RULES i,,; F,io DLOTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC YO1L [7i 29 L5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R Ff7: F K'/F.DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, A .Name______Email___________________ C&
RULES!i IJ !--' '3E-CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 94 rPk929 t 14: .5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
, -,"-\/'DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Name .Email ..,
RULES i Ui " n-'LESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC Kr ,[ 29 P11 q 4 5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF-FR/r---As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Namee _______Email HULF- i ;,') L: ECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201 [q.C 29 PR1 L: 45Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCFK/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.S incerely, 'f"a,Name CCEmail A',0 1A _ a u k b .cc nn RULES I ;,_J ICT- VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201q 10,C 29 P Q: '46Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2FI\/EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name "/ /Email RULES L' , .3 1TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 211L 2 9 PM 1: 4, 6Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 R F\ D
Dear Commissioners,
R 'C /.-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rod> remain there. --Sincerely,Name -Email 5 C Sf5t49'6o4Arf(0d RUILES 1 R Ei, uC -I IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7Gifl LC 2 9 Pl1 P- 4i 6Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel r remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail RULEK Al 1J, ;:.CT1VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2[01 A 2 PTI -T 4 6Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F- !\ rDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name________________ ___________Email RULL ) .:, ECTRVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 0, , 99 Pr T 46Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F 7( \/. DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name__ K__-____Email I.-, /*7 ) ýj, -
RULES F, C" F1"-OOTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC CGi 2B 1 ' R 1: 46Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCFC!F DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remaiiYi'ere.Email M,(-
BULEL i L, brLECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC L 29 Pli L: 46Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R zQ.- IVFV_As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent f el rods remain there.NameEmail ,ý,- 4ayko@ -o o C, r4' n RULES " " J-,IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 20 f 29 Fi 1: '46Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RIF ' F I\/!DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name /L4Email 0'O$~cj1Le RULES i,, E,-COTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey c} 2' i1 'Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F(77 ! i\E--- EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, >Name e__ ___ __Email bs&00,6iI7P~ 6 P,11G4L C 0 (1 BULLS/b i) 9 TfiESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 01 [i C 2'9 PH L: 4 6Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
EC-" /EiDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fel rods remaiq there.Email A/a JIC/-- / 0 s RULESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ..14:'46Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R1C'V'J-i L)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,']Name ______ y,_ _ _ ___ _ __ _: _Email RULES i. DaiOrECETESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC ...'Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F, R (_DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name 5" fL\J*j.t"Email " C-LOI' RULES i. 'A}I-ECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7j1j 7f 29 P 4: 16Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R.F.FI\./FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .Namem_Email , ,
RULES!; j LDiC 6 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 29 P1 q 6Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFOF VEDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail Y h jI '
RULES ,, R EFC'IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70 14 G9 29 P, 1 4: 16Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R FAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, , "Name______________ _Email HULE A..:L uK.TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2014 PHfC 29 Pfl 4: 416Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF,2V7-k/EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name ..Email ej..
RULES i,% L.'J L'. IL,-ýCý ES.-A I f}P"lU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey NON HE, 29 PM Q: 46Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spentjfe1-tds re~nain there.Email "T-40A, A -I/A LC., L t RULIESL i.') ECTiVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7C!/ 0yL 2OFJ" 99 : 47Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001Q
Dear Commissioners,
H I -IAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the s ent fuel rods re in there.S ince, __y'Namegi/Email -
RULE) i, i JtEC-1 NESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201 1 7 PF 2 L4: 147Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
rF -. \!..-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, Xd/.bidName A LS4Email I4A'-' 1A/.. ;>Q 1 RUL -",:u , 1 "U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC PH1tq 971 29 P11 L 47Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFH K....As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Name_ _ _ _ __Email A .' '5li& ? ,
D-1 , yESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey C 2 9 47Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .Name SU5@V\ Q 2hPEmail of$(' 3 oQ 1 RULE.-\ JL " IVES"U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC f}t7F '29 F :Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FF2FIV'!DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuelrds remain there.Sincerely,,NameEmail j/ (e L /eS:b '/
HULES; "'" DEC'TIESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 20N yE 2- 14: 47Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
-..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ,..NameEmail _-d(v4 5 e RULE ..U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7014 15"' 29 M 41: 4 7Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RVQFI'V/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name ___ ____ __ __VEmail Y C eo-- r, .co!,.--
BUL E Ai,! L' it()` C TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC ?914 KC 20 PMI 4: 47Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FC-'I\/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Sop e California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the/sr nt/ftel rods t 're.Sincerely,Name___Email __ _________-,-
RULE'- 1}-,"IE(TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 210111 V29 P.,jI 4: 47Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Namem RULES ibl LirFKCTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 701q D-EC 29) PM 4: 4 7Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R 2F., \!FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Email q ý 6 ý C RULESJ r _ ; q l TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 014 p[ F. 2 9 Pi 4: 4 7Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, rName_____________________Email______________________________
%ULLJ j ICIVESRU E A....." ....- ..rU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7- ,-C 29 RN t": 47Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFO--\/-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name____Email 0 C, t RULE, 'ilt. CTI\VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20lq Fr-. 2" PNi 4" 4:7Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R FC D\/DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name_____ ____ ___Email
,UL. ,.) L.-CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey CI 72 P2 4":47Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF-FI\/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail RULE! WlVEU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7fl 1 -29 ?" L-: 147Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF-C(FV EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name _______ _Email 1-40 14 71 RULLES i'A J -CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey Zili [KC 2 9 P104 1: 4 7Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001RFQH-\!,FD
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerem__Name *b it ; )4Email RULES J" h /E" S T I V-"Rp/ ,.ýVU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 4Office of Administration, NRC 70 ":Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCP7¶\/-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities;- and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ',rName Id^14 L,&WLzjl/ -kad&"1Email & / c Y -lzoe RULIo AL ' IVESRif"., N.O;::U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2rI I F C 29 P M 4: '47Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001RFrOFR-!\FT
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, _Name_______________Email 0ý r&o -~riI. &m RULES ',L i 1`1iC ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2014 29 , n /4: L47Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F FIL\/DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail u2--k _C BULE ' ' FU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 0 8Office of Administration, NRC Vq C 29 Pi 1: L8Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
r F1V\!_DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name 1 --Email RULE.) SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC JON PIIC 29 '111Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
.F'(71i7]\/_DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,//)Name aV1/V4 Email
.- R,,IfL"1',EC -1MEWUL .S 2?CU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 0 29 148Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
iF DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincl I c t A/N a m e , _ .../Email .,- rc t ,C .
BULLLS ," :-J.,T / --U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
IQ';FA/1/2DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Emai 'fr Di4(A )C Oe ..Oa .--er. C.;...orV RULES f,, OT.)C6I\/ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70141 J 291 P : 484Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R[CF \I/_FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name!6 @1,Email Ll 1S\\p Mal BULES A'I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey BC 2 LI8Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R pFC As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name ..Email I." Y RULES AI.D CTVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2O]t1 _ 29 P'r l: 48Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R -..... ....As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, LNameEmail_________________ 2 BULES, ," ",- CTi"ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC Zc 29 Pt L: L8Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF-I'\.-!."- -As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name___Email 6A4-1?
RULES /IN ,QLFCTiVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20111 OlC 29 PMI LI: 48Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
REC.FI\/F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name ____ 6A__ ____Email I. f , _ (-. A-RULES , 'ECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 29 t : L8Office of Administration, NRC ,LU1 2 9Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFrC\FP-1/,F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.NameEmrna i l______________________
RULES/. L/ OTiJESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC HN PFC' 292 P 411: 4-8Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
.,F< -X/F_)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name A 4Email A -av"E.
RULES ', ,IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2 C11L cii: 29 H] 1: q48Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RP1F "N' A_ \\i'DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the s ent fuel ro s remain there.Sincerely,Name 9 ýNEmail _ __ _________________*fRQ1kh1~
RULES,**,,.LJ E-C]iVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2014 I]E1 29 14" 143Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
i--- r' irAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail C 7-(
RUL`;/,, :T V/ ESIQ,U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7141 ,FDU 29 rL' 148Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2F \/FAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the s uel rods remain there.NamemEmail !'
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC t 2' 14 tMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
, _--As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,/Name_ _ _ __Email C-0 11. a c.f0
, .'L '1 -E-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey H'q UJV 29 PO q: q4Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF.,"\iFV)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.SincerelyName ___Email a o/o. L-to m RULES i.L CTiVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey Q ,,Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF-? !\/F..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail l_._ii L,
!") C)l+) ýVn-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7014 OET 29 P :Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
IV F. D-, -..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name crd4 CEmail RULES /A;..V) LI- TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ,...,4Office of Administration, NRC C 99 49Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF(- \F / V _As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern Califomia Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail I --C -'L ..Cc 4 RULE" D" U th-ES,U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 29 ' 29 Lf 9Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001RF f!-\/.D
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.SincerelyName ______________________Email V^*,,c_.a -.0 _ -
RULEBI L'I+/-CIVLSU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 ql C7( 2, 9 Ri Q: 49Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R -`F \/EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name______________________Email -A .Q COnX RULES),"%,, _lo :O VEbU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70N. 29 , Q: 49Office of Administration, NRC ....Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FF-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name Lunc. L\ s.n5Email M Pr _
AU! ES)AD 7-- ;LUTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey Z014 D'IE 29 PI N 49Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 R
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name .Email sm, , lPetwf BUL,.,B ,', 0 , fb V,.-ul.?A , :o-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ,, 0 29 Pi3 It L49Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R_ -(T F'\./F--DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, (..X/ -/JSNameEmail r4,._, yss Q0b,6t.Co RULES 7iEU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey i " 29 qN (49Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001R'J*-1
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.oince el, D"Nam%/"Email Q-'C ( l I .,- ; ..A ,"-; ' J0 L.'. -W',?U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC U-I 29 P1! Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RK (J \...As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail (
H U L F_... :.'. , E.i IC_,. -1VLE.SUS. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2gI v 29 i: 149Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
1 .As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation' accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely._Name Y-Email l .ITIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC Gill -10H 29 P6 4: 149Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
i -As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuob-20 remain there.NameEmail AA A-12-Vk-- &- 5-TO PJ E7FA-e!-.--r 'C.- CO e PA ULES --1C TIVESi j ,U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC B 2 P" R: 419Mail Stop: 3WvFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FC>IV!DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.NameEmail RULES t.#i9 j,-(jET'!ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ,-,' -, Lt:Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
-Rkt ,- r7-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods reSincerely,NameEmail(
RULE" i, .) .CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2 ;-. ?Y p- 4: 14Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF, F V...As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NamemEmail BULES CY;7K CTI VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2011 u-' 29 PIM 4: 49Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
p FO -/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name )Email C ! " Pr /]k 0 RULES: , D,,;1' n! I ,vLESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7r0tu C3,I 29 P4j?4:149Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, JIhName -Email ___.__________________________
RULES " I' ' E" .TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 14 10,' Pi L-.: 49Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF1.__F,`\,FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name § c, S 'yEmail J ,,
RULES i,2D r-IVES,_J ; I .., ' i IU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7l0 FUC 2?9 PN.I: 19Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF.77 F -\.! DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Souothe, California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong t p rods ere.NameEmaili BULLS Y.'>-"fVCU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2 f31q 1 s P 14: Y19Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 R -I\/-D
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison r sponsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spentfuel ro s remain thSincerely,Namem_
RULES U.. L. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey eL)q rf 29 P'i li: 4-9Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R A!As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail ..7Z4 tjA RULES k',,- L J 1 lIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC U. 22 VI Li: 19Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RE.2F "!_--As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Email 6o W) /7,..,,1 1. /I06 RULES iN, ,Ib , IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC G Il 29 I'M 4 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC7L.';""As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the s t fue ds remain there.Sincerely,Name maEmail _ -"
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 50Office of Administration, NRC "O., 2 .ti 2 0Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R CF. I\/ FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail RULES :,u L/ ';EOTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC f 99 PI11* 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F C."'!-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.SincerelyNameEmail W--%1-"Y ..2 RULES /TVVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 201q D[C 29 ,01 t4:50Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R FC C .. F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name____Email (% I Z44AJI /SAD2J RULL S -' UiT ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey nu ?0 50Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R 'F .. IL-)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold South rm California Ediion res onsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the Dlnt el rods emain th re.Sincerely,Name_________________Email ________________
ULf-- L;-,CTIVESiUL-' , n LTILU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC F .[ L: 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R ` r \ `..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,~Name ýty- & -?,a iVý-~Email RULLE .', ,I.3 I/ .U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 701Q FC 2 9 2 i Q: 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R, _ ,-,DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Email /OLYo[ -Rcr'OIie.,
RULL, A;, L) -CTIVESN, 1 " "U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 29 F' 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC2-P '\'F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name Ilze- msevfEmail RULES 1.0 JiJ'[E(TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey L 1 99 ? Q -50Office of Administration, NRC L95Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F. ../F..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Email 6Sy~v ~ C~ (/Ta9 .P~-f RULES,/, L i V EISU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201 KCI 29 PiN LI: 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RIF Y- F\ EFAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .lName_________________Email_____________________
RULES .[-,K_1 I VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2014 FDE B 29 PM.] O: 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R,As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name E(isabe,!t aEmail RULES i, jYICTh\!ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2011O DEC 29 P11 LI: 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail RUL E;S /\'k , _- I..V..SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey , LEE C'9- 29 P H! L: 5 0Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R _ F \/'EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name kk~'~ /-~-el146lPWEmi I-LKLA a AoL.coEmail RULES .v... JIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ,-,,9 4: 50Office of Administration, NRC LMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF 'M3 i'-F DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, :_ ..--IName CEma " w. ,W 6 HULK;.- iK:! ) V Ii£VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2[1I11 LG F9 'Nr r4: 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
Rr -Q W DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincere,NameEminail I~YA cc RULE,2 ',) ; VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 17W "- , fii. 0Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
PF , -/i.IDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, _Name ýný _ Email Ut " J©VV R ULE AiL OIC1 I VE SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 111 r[ -LC 2?9 PIM ': 50Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
Rm(--/ --As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name ý' 4A .Email BULLS /kL Ci;I BCTVSru L 21U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
0 / nVKAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.0.i,Name 5f Kevv]Email N uSi(iEj It 4 4(( mkýna4 c&/Vl RULES -i-,i DETVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 L: 51Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FDFQ, \ -FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail RULE,`~U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey vE-, 9 2 9 , 51Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
pv.F -,; .As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern Califonmi- -Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain ere.emi. @ /. / "
.UL Ai." y .ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey PM:5Office of Administration, NRC [ 2 P i : 51Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFQ;F.\ .As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerel(Name .-Email 6 O ' -
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
JU~:~fVA-.mq ýo,29pwF -DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, 1/2'Name ( _/J ,1490* r7ýEmailEmai V- 1`
RULtJ ., L, TI VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC [1Y4 1 1: 5'Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF- 7V'F DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name ( L -JEmail , /. a/
,UL S .... ' I, VESRUI_,_ ,,"--U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ]u '.. PVI L: 51Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF"2.FN\ .DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, "LName 14T/rQIUA 0 1'zELEREmail QO-. -i. ;ýZjim h V)CZ'e.d ,
RULL;) -TN iVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7 2? f L 5COffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F -" 7i\/DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name _ _ _ _ __l_ _Email /,//-44 d'(_c.7._,"
UL , :',0JIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC T[14 ,- [ 51Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF(,A\!F.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincer e _ _ y__ __ _Name___________________Email RUL-o ",, Li 7 ,IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 0 V11 031 2 9Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RR...' \/ /ED_As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name___ __ _Email )00 J11do r _ , (
RULES ; [Ci[.I.SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey .Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name _ _ _ __Email kres+eh G hotam if corrm, RULEL P , 1 VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey L i- 2 9 1:5Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F F i\FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name____________Email (two' Yo/e,.J -_
RULES,-" , L, :SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 'L1 E-P29 P4: 5IOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
pE, Li V. _As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Email Plk V-BULL I U .iiECTNVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 95Office of Administration, NRC 7_ 13q 29 Pi' U:"Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF2 ...JAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.SincerelName a ' -' VEmail hD@ -NV RUULF~ -,I.,t)b t;',-l'-YDr\ ,',; V-'t-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 51Attn: Cindy Bladey 2 9 %Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R c-. 1\t..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, VName C______\___________Email CI -"/\Y E-G ý'\k L. CC'V' RULE; ,\iiJ LCTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 0,'[-C 92 DEN 41:5 1Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R FCVI\/f-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name 1,i.Email r ?,qY -) 0 bI W- "t it -
RULE S L`,i r--CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2011ifI. f." 2 1? 13N 4: 5 1Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R_ H\EAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spen el rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail -Af- , e R~U L S ' ,Y L I: LC~- IV pSU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 20 1Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001I R __,. ....t.
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name = tEmail C& L)t,- COi'~JI V RULES , iE.,..C,- ! ,""N i-IU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201L .2,-Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FrF ,I\/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, ()Name_ _ _ __Email l__________
gULES v :,U2TElVFSý,l -. ,.'. ýr,:, CJI,: SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey PF .52Office of Administration, NRC J U. 22Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, -'Name \) eY-?Email J 9, ý ý~V\ tý RUL , _
- SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2 L9 : 52Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
-..F )As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Email,_f-'i AC, .~l 0 .J.0 L), oC -ov'N RULEo/. .s -EC i ,riVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70114 KC 29 Pl [: 52Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F-\,F.,As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name___________________Email ( AJ BULLS "" 'U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ?- 52Office of Administration, NRC ti 2Y 9 V : 52Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail. Cox HULES i1.]{ DLV;E(;Ti ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2014 LU C 29 PH1 4: 52Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R I.SI\/WDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, INameEmail RULE i', C-TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 20N ',,r-, 29' Phil 4: 52Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFP \-/VDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, A. .Name PULEo ,,,"EU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC R0 E C 29 PH1'1: 52Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
Rf I- -\/DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name 1.Z.O(A, -A. -C- O tEmail ýn7lc ZiGQYW&Ak .k 10~-
RULE") J _;fJi EU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC Br;I' 29 P [- 52Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R t.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rod's from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, lName i ,V ( cl<-ocdEmail on [o
~~hES5 "i!- y,'i,, "J-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 52Office of Administration, NRC 2 2 2 52Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R ... -'... .As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Namem e _ _ _Email I (ktf cut. -_ ( -'4 (LL .. " .I L I'E- 0-I \JL,.0U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R .-- i..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,/ riY L 2 ,- i, ,c-.-Name 4Email 41 -3 3~ &co ml HULEo,' ,L, TIVLSU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20 F R 4 2 ,i : 52Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,.L4mName " tl itVj.Email__________________
HU LS %'J RULEo L: " TELU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201i V C 2 9 P -: 52Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF-FI\FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, I-Name ""Z44, "Email A,, 6i~.f~1
_-" IT-,,,-,R .U L L S .U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey "j1` D E C 2? 9,P U: 2Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R %Q Fl. F1DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, -INameEmail ,
RULE-S K' L'JJ -CTIVES2014 "DfC 29 PH 1-17 52U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R 17... V\ /F DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location--perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Saincerely, Name____ _____________ ____________-__________Email 6&&& da Q.Qty RULES "i L;CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission I'Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration,'NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M -!Pj1- 99 I f: 52Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R .VI ,.r- 1--IAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile are-a'subject tot..permanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name 6 ALEmail RULES ,'."Lt I /ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2011 DEC 2 9 PH 41: 52Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCHi\/F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name_ __ __Email RULLS 6D ; ILO1iESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 11' U_11 29 IP'4 Q: 52Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F 2F' 1\/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerelya e __Name Email RULES /\" 'QEf:TI'ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 70-14 0FC 29 Q i P : 53Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name___Email G-m ikfM -, t30 SCA 9C1&, !o rY)
RUL ....) L- CJ I V.'ES3U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20H HC 29 Fil Q: 53Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RD.F', r-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a history.of safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name m e _ _ _ _Email '!ý,CV r , t4 eV ý-
RULLS :L h ,UT-"ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission [:Attn: Cindy Bladey 20111 OIC 29 PIt 41: 53Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, J-A wk-Name_ _ _ _ _*Email '/ -,
RUL.; !UOTIES'U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 201I U[C 29 P : 53Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F I\/-.DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the) fuel rods rem tSincerely' ," "1Name_ _ _ _ _
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC nv'- P14 L-: 53Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF .._ F ......As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name , V c,04i " [
RULES [ -,") Yr lFlTI1ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7 Pf1 14:53Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC>C \iFDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail RULEL i 9"LCIYVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 20lL 29 Ri 4:53Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name 1 -Email RRULEE i 4J L) !iri ,T.VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 211I (EFC 29 P'1 41: 53Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R -( ,. IAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Email NV ta Pv cJ L 5Ca, RULES ,C; !t R U LE.P,;. I LuJ I' L-0U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2 011 C 2. 9" 'M L0: 53Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCIF-, , '"t F \FAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.-X(Email P ( "
RULES/"i. CTtVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2q 2 P H 53Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R--'F-, .DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name "a ,/VI/VJiEmail "a Aiys,6? A1, Cc1/4'a oo31;F i-Z o/P7/#-
RULES Z) r.F6\_/,SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20111. PC 2 9 P1i 4: 53Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RVF_ --EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely'Name )\4Qe 4T.cEmail "M"._5av ý!s (,
RULES .l;-ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ZA 4: 53Office of Administration, NRC 2 0 N 5CMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F (71'As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent Juel rods remain there.Sincerely,Eame &E mail ý-z( _ If-1
,ULE" rIrU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7Q 29 : 53Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF\As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison res onsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain thSincerely, -J 'Name 9Jt )Email l % ') ;" -TI ,-(L.\,, '.. -i.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7~lj 29 P] 4: 53Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF!2NJVF_As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name 6BJEmail RULES, " ., L.,ZI'JEU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 U40 2 5 3Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFC" VFDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(I) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Nameme____Email k\,yv\(No cii.'\.
RULE" b~L -LCTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 53Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R7 IV'.'As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameEmail e 1tP& c ( c-
,- .1 .L V tC IE_U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20tI C 29 Pai 4: 54Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name__ _ __ _ __ _Email tVamk 0 RULES Di1v,, TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 0[1 -1 "'f'L-, _'2 9P i 1-:- 514Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFCH\/FIDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name ve e ' 1Email VI A)
RULEto *ICIVES(HU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission r 2 9 P~ 14: 514Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001 RF-N \/FD
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, J1J .5'Name ____ _ _ _______Email RULES I ".-I IV , ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 20!" N ? .54Office of Administration, NRC .G 2 PMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R I7C-V 1 .I _As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel remain there.Sincerely,Name___Email RUJLE; ý TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2011 0Zr" 9 ' 4: 54Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF.. \As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Emarn AS CL LL-,vtC- ."
RULES / LL I IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey Z ,I'1 ?9 7- 1: 511Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
.. F I- "1 1. -/F'fAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, .NameEmail .(' AQ,\
RULE: S 7FSU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2i'1 UiT, 2 ? ,: 53Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFOHVJ- FD ! --- L--As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populatedlocation-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name -4] AEmail e lý.