ML17301A039

St Lucie Units 1 & 2 & Turkey Point Units 3 & 4 Detailed Control Room Design Reviews Program Plan.

ML17301A039
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie, Turkey Point, 05000000
Issue date:	04/30/1983
From:	FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17301A040	List: ML17301A039 ML17345B098
References
PROC-830430, NUDOCS 8305250491
Download: ML17301A039 (36)

Text

ST.LUCIEUNITS1R2TURKEYPOINTUNITS3Bc4DETAILEDCONTROLROOMDESIGNREYIEWSPROGRAMPLANPreparedBy:FloridaPowerRLightCo.April1983 TABLEOF,CONTENTS1.0REVIEWPLAN1.1Introduction1.2TaskPhasing~Pae1-92.0MANAGEMENTANDSTAFFING2.1Introduction2.2ManagementResponsibility1010-103.0DOCUMENTATIONANDDOCUMENTCONTROL3.1Introduction3.2ReferenceDocumentation3.3Process2HEDdocumentationi3.0DetailedControlRoomDesignReviewReport151515-20210.0TECHNICALAPPROACH0.1Introduction'0.2TaskPlans22225.0ASSESSMENTRIMPLEMENTATION5.1Asse'sment5.2Implementation23-2728-31 LISTOFFIGURES~piurel.2.5.6.7e9.10.FourPhasesandTaskFlow/RelationshipsoftheCRReviewAssessment:SelectionofDesignImprovementsDctaiicdControlRoomDesignReviewProgramOrganizationInformationManagementHumanEngineeringDiscrepancyReportComponentReportsHEDPriorityFlowforCorrectionofHEDSbyEnhancementProcessforIdentifyingHEDDesignAlternativesHEDBackfitAssessment~Pae27111618'920293031LISTOFTABLESTable1Assessmentofcategoryandpriorityasafunctionoferror.assessmentandconsequencesoferror~Pae27 1.0REVIEWPLAN1.1IntroductionThisProgramPlanReporthasbeenpreparedinresponsetoNUREG-0700anddetailstheprogramforadetailedcontrolroomdesignreviewtobeconductedfortheSt.'ucieUnits1dc2andtheTurkeyPointUnits3dc0(Dockets50-250,251,335and389).Theoutlineofthisreportconformstoparagraph5.1ofNUREG-0700publishedSeptember,1981.l.2..35.ReviewPlanManagementandStaffingDocumentationandDocumentControlTechnicalApproach(ReviewProcedures)AssessmentandImplementation.ImplementationofthisprogramplanmeetsalltheobjectivesofNUREG-0700,.".ndcloselyfollowstheguidanceofthatdocument.1.2TaskPhasingThereviewisconductedasdelineatedinfourphases,asfollows:Phase2-ControlRoomReview.Thisrepresentstheperiodinwhichdata~collection,reductionandanalysisisconducted,resultinginHumanEngineeringDiscrepancy(HED)reports.Phase3.-Enhancement*DesinSolutions.Discrepanciesarecollated,alternateenhancementsanddesignsolutionsaregeneratedandtheresultsareconsideredintrade-offs.phaseS-~Reortin.Resultsofdetailedcontrolroomdesignreviewwithplansformodificationsarepublished.Figure1shows,ingeneral,thephasesandtaskflowforconductingthedetailedcontrolroomdesignreview.Abriefdiscussionoftheactivitiesconductedineachphaseofthereviewfollowsthisfigure.Fordetaileddescriptionsoftheobjectives,approach,datareductionandresultsofspecificevaluationmethods,refertoSection0.0TechnicalApproachofthisreviewplan.

PHASEIPLANNINGPHASEIIREVIEWPHASEIIIENHANCEMENTANDDESIGNSOLUTIONSPHASEIVREPORTINGREVIEWOPERATIONSEXPERIENCESYSTEMSFUNCTIONSANDTASKANALYSISVERIFYTASK'ERFOR-MANCECAPABILITYDEVELOPREPORTDEVELOPPROGRAMPLANASSESSDISCREPANCIESIDENTIFYANDSELECTOPTIONSASSEMBLECONTROLROOMDOCUMENTATIONCONDUCTCONTROLROOM.SURVEYSVALIDATECONTROLROOMSFUNCTIONSDEVELOPSCHEDULEFlGURE1Thefourphasesandthetaskflow/relationshipsoftheControlRoomreview.

1.2.1Phase1-ProjectPlanningThisdocumentdelineatestheprojectplanning.NUREG-0700anditsguidelinesformthebasisofthisdocument.1.2.2Phase2-ControlRoomReviewTheControlRoomreviewphaseisdividedintoseventasksasfoDows:1.Reviewofoperatingexperience2.AssembleControlRoomdocumentation3.4.~5.~6.ReviewofsystemfunctionsandtaskanalysisControlRoomsurveysVerifytaskperformancecapabilityValidateControlRoomfunctions7.Assessdiscrepancies1.2.2.1ReviewofOperatingExperience-Thistaskiscomposedoftwosubt&sks:1)conductoperatorinterviews,and2)reviewofplantoperationalexperiencethrough'LicensingEventReports,technicalspecificationmodifications,etc.ThisreviewtaskisconductedinaccordancewiththeguidelinesofNUREG-0700.1.2.2.2AssembleControlRoomDocumentation-Inthistask,aControlRoomdatabaseisestablishedtosupportthesubsequentevaluation.AlibraryisestablishedwithControlRoomrelateddocumentation(TechnicalSpecifications,drawings,etc.),ControlRoomcomponentsarephotoMocumented,anda1/3scalephoto-mosaicisconstructed.ThelibraryandphotoMocumentationarecentrallylocatedtosupportthe,effort.Inadditiontothelibraryandphotographicdocumentations,aControlRoominventoryofcomponentsisdeveloped,identifyingforeachcomponent,itslocation,systemrelationships,functions,andcharacteristics.Inventorydataisfiledforsubsequentuse.1.2.2.3ReviewofSystemFunctionsandTaskAnalysis-Systemfunctions,andtasksareidentifiedandevaluatedinthistask.Afourstepprocedureisemployed:oIdentificationofsystemsandsubsystemsbyreviewofplantdocumen-tationoIdentificationofeventsequencestoundergotaskanalysis,theseareidentifiedby:NUREGs-0737,0660,0700resultsofoperatingexperiencereviewoIdentificationofsystem/subsystemfunctionsthroughdocumentreviewandoperatorinterviews oIdentificationandanalysisofControlRoomoperationaltasksPTaskanalysisdataisaninputfortheverificationoftaskperformancecapabilityandthevalidationofControlRoomfunctions(seeparagraphs1.2.2.5and1.2.2.6).Theresults/productsofthistaskare:2.3.4,5.ResponseselectiondiagramsTaskanalysisoffunctionalsequencesTaskanalysisofeventsequencesSpatial-operationalsequencediagramsoftasksequencesTrafficpatterndiagrams.1.2.2.4ConductControlRoomSurveys-FourteensurveyswillbeperformedtodevelopthedetailedassessmentoftheControlRoom.Surveysrequirethecollectionofdatausingpreconstructedchecklists,interviewforms,anddirectmeasurementsofControlRoomparameterssuchasnoise.levels,lightlevelsetc.TheguidanceforthesurveycriteriaisfoundinNUREG-0700.Foreachsurvey,adraftreport(summarizingHEDs)ispreparedforsubsequentinclusionintoafinalreport.Thesurveystobeconductedare:oNoise-'directmeasurementsofnoiselevelsaretakenandcomparedtoindividualchecklistsitems.oLighting-measurementsaretakenundervariousambientconditions(e.g.,emergencylighting)andcomparedtoindividualchecklistitems.oControlRoomEnvironment-assessmentsaremadebydirectmeasurementoftheparameterslistedbelowandcomparisonofthedatatotheNUREG-0700guidelinesTemperatureHumidityVentilationWorkspacearrangementDocumentorganization,useandstorageControlRoomaccessoDesignconventions-evaluationsofsurveyfortheconventionslistedbelow.DatatobecomparedtoNUREG-0700guidelinesCodingmethods(color,shape,pattern,etc.)StandardizationofabbreviationsandacronymsConsistencyofcontroluseConsistencyofdisplaymovementorindicationoControls-checklistevaluationofcontrolsoDisplays-checklistevaluationof.displays oComputers-checklistevaluationofcomputersystems.oEmergencyGarments-datatobecollectedbywalk-throughs,useofemergencygarments,speechintelligibilityanalysis,andchecklistapplication.oLabeling-checklistevaluationoflabels.oAnnunciators-checklistevaluationofannunciatorsystems.oAnthropometrics-analysisofreachandvisualaccesstoControlRoomcomponentsgivenphysicalconfigurationofboards,panels,workspacelayout,etc.Datatobecomparedtochecklistitemrequirements.oForce/Torque-whenindicatedbyoperatorobservation,force/torqueinformationforcontroltypesarecollectedforcomparisontochecklistitems.oCommunications-checklistevaluationofcommunicationssystems.Speechintelligibility.analysisofcommunicationsmodes.oMaintainability-checklistandquestionnairedataconcerningoperator-maintainedcomponents(trendrecorders,bulbs,etc.).1.2.2.5VerifyTaskPerformanceCapability-Thisevaluationtaskinvolvestwo.subtasks:verificationofinstrument/controlavailability,andverificationofHumanEngineeringsuitability.Thefirst,verificationofavailability,isconductedusingthetaskanalysisandControlRoominventory.Ingeneral,tasksassociatedwithControlRoom'unctionsareexaminedintermsofappropriateinstrumentationintheControlRoom(ie.,taskequipmentdemandsvs.actualequipmentpresenceintheControlRoom).Oncethis.isaccomplished,estimatesofthefrequency-of-useforallinstrumentationaregenerated.for:oStartupoShutdownoChangeofreactorpower.Estimationsofnon~rocedurallyboundoperations(e.g.,boration,etc.)aregeneratedviaoperatorinterviews.Also,tasksequencesrequiredinselectedeventsequencesareestimatedastofrequencyofoccurrencein'theeventsequences.Comparingbothfrequencyandrequirementsdatatotheinventory,identificationismadeof:1)therabsence(intheControlRoom)oftaskrequiredinformationorcontrol,2)theestimatedfrequencywith,whichtheinformationorcontrolisrequired,and3)theconditions(events,procedures,etc.)underwhichtheinformationorcontrolisrequired.Basedontheabove,HEDsareidentifiedanddocumented.

Thesecondsubtask,verificationofsuitability,involvesusingspatial-operationalsequencediagrams,trafficpatterndiagrams,identifiedfunctionalgroups,andcheckliststoevaluatehumanengineeringsuitabilityintermsofsequenceofcomponentuse,control/displayproximity,etc.TheNUREGW?00guidelinesserveasthesourcedocumentforevaluationcriteria.1.2.2.6ValidateControlRoomFunctions-Thisinvolvesanalysisofworkloadanddistributionofworkloadforoperatorsforspecifictaskandeventsequences,andoverallControlRoomtraffic.Themeansoftheanalysisare:1)tasktimelines,2)trafficanalysis,and3)walk-andtalk-throughsimulationoftasksequences.ChecklistswillbeusedtoaidinthevalidationofControlRoomfunctions.1.2.2.7AssessDiscrepancies-AssessmentisdiscussedinSection5.0ofthisplan.Ingeneral,theprocess'issimilartothatdiscussedinNUREG-0801(draft,publishedinOctober,1981),andisasfollows:2.3.4,5..AssessextentofdeviationfromNUREG-0700guidelinesEstimateincreaseinhumanerrorforthediscrepancyDetermineifdiscrepantcomponent(s)performsafetyfunctionsDetermineiferrorsinusingdiscrepantcomponent(s)couldleadtoviohtionoftechspecsorleadtounsafeoperationAssignmentofcategoryandpriority,basedontheabove.1.2.3Phase3-EnhancementandDesignSolutionsThelogicpathtobeemployedinidentifyingandselectingenhancementsanddesignsolutionsisbasedonNUREG-0700,Exhibit4-2,asshowninPigure2.1.Analysisofcorrectionbyenhancement2.Analysisofcorrectionbydesignalternatives3.Assessextentofcorrection.1.2.3.1AnalysisofCorrectionbyEnhancement-Discrepanciesarefirstexaminedforpossiblecorrectionbyenhancement(labeling,demarcation,procedureaids,etc.).EachHEDisconsideredandwheresuchcorrectionispossible,thediscrepancyisreassessedforitseffectonoperatorperformance.Asappropriate,HEDsarereevaluatedviachecklistingandtaskanalysisuntilHumanEngineeringsuitabilityisverified.Whereitisdeterminedthatcorrectionbyenhancementisnotpossible,thediscrepancyisanalyzedforcorrectionbydesignalternatives.'

HUMANENGINEERINGDISCREPANCIESTOBEANALYZEDFORCORRECTION(FROMTHEHEDSELECTIONPROCESS)ANALYSISFORCORRECTIONBYENHANCEMENTCORRECTWITHENHANCEMENT?YESDESIGNANDVERIFYJUSTIFYANDDOCUMENT~b+o~OANALYSISTOIDENTIFYDESIGNIMPROVEMENTALTERNATIVESANDSELECTRECOMMENDEDSOLUTIONFUNCTIONANALYSISALLOCATIONMANMACHINEiVERIFYALLOCATIONISELECTPREFERREDDESIGNALTERNATIVEiIVALIDATEDESIGN-ASSESSEXTENTOFCORRECTIONIMPLEMENTANDDOCUMENTSCHEDULEIMPLEMENTATIONPartiallyCorrectedJUSTIFYANDDOCUMENTSCHEDULEIMPLEMENTATIONDOCUMENTDOCUMENT,FIGURE2ASSESSMENT:SELECTIONOFDESIGNIMPROVEMENTS(FROMNUREG0700) 1.2.3.2AnalysisofCorrection'yDesignAlternative-IdentificationofdesignalternativeswillbeachievedbytheexaminationoftheHED,referencetotaskanalysisdata,andidentificationofpotentialconstraints(e.g.,availabilityofequipment,Reg.Guide1.75,etc.).TheacceptabilityofdesignalternativeswillbeverifiedbyfurtherevaluationusingthefoDowing:oFunctionalanalysisoTaskanalysisoReapplicationofsurveyguidelines.1.2.3.3AssessExtentofCorrection-DuringtheHumanEngineeringmeetings,enhancementand/orredesigncorrectionswillbeselected,assessed,andnotedinSectionG"Disposition"oftheHEDreportshowninFigure5.1.2.4Phase4-ReportingTworequirementsofthisphaseare1)preparationofschedulesforimplementationofselectedbackfits,and2)preparationandsubmittalofthefinalreport.1.2.4.1DevelopBackfitSchedules-BackfitscheduleswillbeproposedasHEDsareidentified,documented,andassessed.SchedulingofHEDbackfitswillbeafunctionof:oHEDcategoryand'priorityoEngineeringandprocurementleadtimerequirementsandconstraintsoOverallplantoutageschedules.Scheduleswillbereviewedandupdatedaspartoftheimplementationprogram.1.2.4.2DevelopFinalReport-ThedetailedcontrolroomdesignreviewreportwillcloselyfollowtheoutlinerecommendedinSection5.2ofNUREG-0700.Specifically,thefinalreportwilladdress:oThedetailedcontrolroomdesignreviewphasesoThetechnicalactivities-'eviewofoperatingexperienceAssemblyofControlRoomdocumentationSystem/function/taskanalysis'ConductofControlRoomsurveysVerificationoftaskperformancecapabilityValidationofControlRoomfunctionsoMethodofassessmentofdiscrepanciesoMethodofidentificationandselectionofenhancementanddesignsolutionsoReviewresultsofHEDs,HEDassessment,andtheselectedenhancementanddesignsolutionswillbeorganizedintothefollowinggroups:

Surveyfindings(annunciator,communications,etc.)Taskanalysisfindings(panel/workspace)Humanengineeringsuitabilityandvalidationoffunctionsfindings(ControlRoomtraffic,workloaddistribution,man/machinefunctionalallocations)oImprovementstobemadeEnhancements/justification/extentofcorrectionDesignalternative/justification/extentofcorrectionoScheduleofimplementation.

2.0MANAGEMENT8cSTAFFING2.1IntroductionThissectiondetailsthe1)managementresponsibilityofthedetailedcontrol,roomdesignreviewand2)HEDreviewteamstructureandmanagement.Figure3showsthedetailedcontrolroomdesignreviewandHEDrevieworganizationsfortheSt.Lucie1and2andTurkeyPoint384NuclearPowerPlants.Responsibilitiesandteammemberqualificationsarediscussedbelow.2.2ManagementResponsibility2.2.1TheHumanEngineeringProgramManageristheFloridaPowerandLightCompanydesignatedrepresentativewhohastheoverallresponsibilityfortheadmin-istiationoftheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewprogram.Hisresponsibilitiesincludebutarenotlimitedto:A.B.C.TheoveraDadministrationoftheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewofFPRL'sNuclearGeneratingUnitslocatedattheSt.LucieandTurkeyPointsites.AdministeringvendorcontractsassociatedwiththeperformanceoftheDetailedControlRoomDesignReview.IntegratingandcoordinatingotherhumanfactorsprogramsasdescribedinotherNRCpublications;for.example:1.NRCTaskActionPlanNUREG-0660andNUREG-07372.AspectsoftheTMI-relatedrequirementsforne'woperatingLicenses,NUREGO6943.FunctionalCriteriaforEmergencyResponseFacilities,NUREGO6964.ImplementationofRegulatoryGuide1.975.HumanFactorsAcceptanceCriteriafortheSafetyParameterDisplaySystem,DraftNUREGO835.D.Coordinateanddevelopthenecessaryadminstrativecontrolstosupporttheorganizationcontrolsofanimplementationprogram.TheHumanEngineeringprogrammanagerwillhaveabachelor'sdegreeinanengineeringdisciplineorequivalentexperienceandaminimumof3yearsexperienceinamanagerialrole.Alsoaminimumof5yearsofapplieddesignoroperatingexperienceinpowerplantsand/orprocesscontrolapplicationincomplexcommercial,industrialormilitaryfacilitiesandsystemsisdesirable."10" HUMANENGINEERING-PROGRAMMANAGERHUMANFACTORSTASKTEAMCOORDINATORST.LUCIEUNITI~HUMANENGINEERINGDISCREPANCYREVIEWTEAMI.CHAIRMAN2.HUMANFACTORSCONSULTANTREVIE%.TEAMSITEMANAGER3.REACTOROPERATOR4.INSTRUMENTATION8CONTROLENGINEER5.HUMANFACTORSENGINEERINGIMPLEMENTATIONCOORDINATOR6.STAFFENGINEERING(ASREQUIRED).7.EBASCO(AS.REQUIRED)ST.LUCIEUNIT2HUMANENGINEERINGI.CHAIRMAN2.HUMANFACTORSCONSULTANTREVIDItTEAMSITEMANAGER3.REACTOROPERATOR4.'INSTRUMENTATION8CONTROLENGINEER5.HUMANFACTORSENGINEERINGIMPLEMENTATIONCOORDINATOR6.STAFFENGINEERING(ASREQUIRED)7.EBASCO(ASREQUIRED)TURKEYPOINTUNITSl82ENGINEERINGDISCREPANCYREVIENTEAMI.CHAIRMAN2.HUMANFACTORSCONSULTANTREVIENTEAMSITEMANAGER3.REACTOROPER%1OR4.INSTRUMENTATON8CONTROLENSNEER5.HUMANFACTORSENGINEERINGIMPLEMENTATIONCOORDINATOR6.STAFFENGINEERING(ASREQUIRED)7.BECHTEL(ASREQUIRED)FIGURE3DETAILEDCONTROLROOMDETAILEDREVIEWPROGRAMORGANIZATION 2.2.2TheHumanFactorsTaskTeamCoordinatorreportsdirectlytotheHumanEngineeringProgramManager.TheHumanFactorsTaskTeamCoordinatorisresponsiblefordirectingandcoordinatingthenecessarypersonnel,taskteamsandreviewgroupsrequiredtosupporttheDetailedControlRoomDesignRevieweffort.ThehumanfactorstaskteamcoordinatoralsopresidesovertheHEDreviewteam.ThisarrangementofadministrativeresponsibilityallowstheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewManagementTeamtoquicklyevaluateprojectpriorities,assignmentofspecializedkeypersonnelbasedontheoverallprojectschedule,aswellasconsistencyofprogramphilosophybetweensisterunits.TheassessmentanddispositionofHED'swillbeaddressedinSection2.2.3.TheHumanFactorsTaskTeamCoordinatorwillhaveabachelor'sdegreeinanengineeringdisciplineorequivalentexperience.Alsoaminimumof5yearsofapplieddesignoroperatingexperienceinpowerplantsand/orprocesscontrolapplicationsincomplexcommercial,industrialormilitaryfacilitiesandsystemsisdesirable.2.2.3HEDReviewTeamStructureandManagementTheHEDreviewte'amiscomprisedofaminimumoffourmembers,asfollows:2.2.3.1Chairman-TheHEDreviewteamchairmanisresponsibleforcoordinatingtheHEDreviewteameffort.ThechairmaninterfaceswiththedesignatedsiteoperationsIrepresentativestoarrangeforreview'teamaccessto:-plantinformation(records,documents,plans,procedures,drawings,etc.),requiredfacilities(controlroomcomputers,wordprocessing,cameras/YTR,etc.)and.personnelwithusefulornecessaryinformation(reactoroperators,equipmentdesignersorplanners,orutilitymanagement).TheHEDreviewteamchairmanpresidesovertheHEDreviewteammeetingsandcoordinatesthenecessarypersonnelandresourcesrequiredtosupport:heas::.essment,dispositionandrecommendedbackfitsforHED'ssubmittedtotheteamforreviewbythecontractedHumanFactorsconsultant.TheHEDreviewteamChairmanisresponsibleforsigningthedispositionblockandsignifyingHEDreviewteamconcurrenceordissentingopinion.TheHED'sarethenreviewedforengineeringscope,materialrequirementsandimplementationschedule.Theproposedimplementationschedulewillthenbeincorporatedintothedetailedcontrolroomdesignreviewfindingssectionofthefinalreport.TheHEDreviewteamchairmanwillhaveabachelor'sdegreeinanengineeringdisciplineorequivalentexperience.Aminimumof5yearsofapplieddesignoroperatingexperienceinpowerplantsand/orprocesscontrolapplicationsincomplexcommercial,industrialormilitaryfacilitiesandsystemsisdesirable.

2.2.3.2HumanFactorsConsultantReviewTeamSiteManager-TheHumanFactorsConsultantReviewTeamSiteManagerisresponsiblefordirectingtheDetailedControlRoomDesignRevieweffortonsiteinaccordancewiththeagreeduponcontractualscopebetweenFloridaPowerandLightCompanyandEssexCorporation(theHumanFactorsconsultingcompanyhiredtoperformtheControlRoomReview).TheHumanFactorsConsultantReviewTeamSiteManagerreportsdirectlytotheHumanFactorsTaskTeamCoordinatorandisalsoamemberoftheHEDReviewTeam.TheHumanFactorsConsultantReviewTeamSiteManagerisresponsiblefordirectingandmanagingtheon~iteEssexCorporationrevieweffortaswellasprovidinginputtohelpformulateassessment,dispositionandrecommendedbackfitsforHED'saddressedduringtheHEDReviewTeammeetings.TheHumanFactorsConsultantReviewTeamSiteManageralsoprovidesassistanceinoverallprojectplanningandtechnicalleadership.TheHumanFactorsConsultantReviewTeamSiteManagerwillhavefiveyearsofappliedhumanfactorsengineeringexperiencerelativetosystemdesign,includingtwoyearsinNuclearPowerPlantcontrolroomhumanfactorsengineering,testingandevaluation.Inaddition,academicandprofessionalexperienceinthefollowingareaswillapply:oHumanFactorsEngineering/ErgonomicsoSensory/PerceptualProcessesoExperimentaldesignandstatisticalanalysisoAnthropometricsoSurveyanalysisandotherdatacollectionmethodsoHumanperformancetheory.2.2.3.3ReactorOperator-AtleastoneReactorOperatorwillbeamemberoftheHEDReviewTeam.TheReactorOperatorwillprovideoperationalinputtohelpformulateassessments,dispositionsandrecommendedbackfitsforHED'saddressedduringtheHEDReviewTeammeetings.AReactorOperatorwillalsobeavailabletoassisttheHumanFactorsConsultantReviewTeamduring,theirDCRDRe'ffort.ThereactoroperatorsassignedtosupporttheHEDReviewTeameffortwillhaveaminimumoftwoyearsoperatingexperienceinacontrolroomsimilartotheonebeingreviewed.,2.2.3.4InstrumentationandControlEngineer-AnInstrumentationandControl(IRC)EngineerwillbeamemberoftheHEDReviewTeamastheneedarises.TheIRC IEngineerwillprovideinputtotheteamwithregardtoregulations,standardsanddesignconstraintsthathaveanimpactonnuclearpowerplantcontrolroomdesignaswellashelpformulateassessments,dispositionsandrecommendedbackfitsforHEDsaddressedduringtheHEDReviewTeammeetings.TheIRCengineerwiQhaveabachelor'sdegreeinengineeringorequivalentalongwithaminimumoffiveyearsofappliedexperience.Mostofthisexperienceshouldhavebeengainedinthenuclearfield;however,previousexperience.inpowerplantsorotherprocesscontrolapplicationsinvolvingcomplexcommercial,industrial,ormilitaryfacilitiesandsystemswillbeconsideredacceptable.2.2.3.5OtherDisciplineRepresentatives-AstheneedarisesotherdisciplinerepresentativesfromvariousorganizationssuchastheArchitectEngineer,NuclearSteamSupplierand/orutilitymay.berequiredtosupporttheHEDReviewteameffort.Theseindividualsshouldhaveabachelor'sdegreeorequivalentinacourseofstudyrelevanttothespecificdisciplineandaminimumofthreeyearsofapplieddesignofoperatingtechnicalexperience.Previousexperienceinpower'plantsorotherprocess.controlapplicationsincomplexcommercial,industrial,ormilitaryfacilitiesa'ndsystemswillbeconsideredacceptable."14-3.0DOCUMENTATIONANDDOCUMENTCONTROL3.1IntroductionThree.typesof.documentationwillbeaddressed;1)reference-documentation,2)processandHEDdocumentation,and,3)DetailedControlRoomDesignReviewoutputfindingsandreports.3.2ReferenceDocumentationAprogramlibrarywillbeestablishedwithreferencedocumentstosupporttheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewtasks.Thiswillcontain:oLiscenseeEventReportsoOutageAnalysisReportsoFSARoTechnicalSpecificationsandsystemdescriptionsoPipingandinstrumentationdrawingsoFloorplansoPaneldrawingsandphotographsoSoftwaredescriptionso-ProceduresoSamplesofcomputerprintoutsoVariousNRCandindustrydocumentsbearingonControlRoomdesign(NUREG-0660,NUREG<770,IEEEstandards,humanfactortexts,etc.)Asneeded,thesewillbereferencedtosupportspecifictaskswithintheControlRoomevaluations.3.3ProcessRHEDDocumentation3.3.1ProcessThemeansbywhichdatacollectionandreductiontakesplacewillbedocumentedforreportingpurposes.ThegeneralflowofinformationmanagementispresentedinFigure4.TheindividualtaskplanspresentedinSection4.0TechnicalApproach,willserveasthebasicprocessdocumentation.-.Where-deviationsfromtheguidanceinthesetasksplansoccurintheconductofevaluations,taskplanswiDbemodifiedtoreflectaccuratedatacollectionprocedure."15-

~,FlGURE4INFORINATIONMANAGEMENTDATACOLLECTIONDATACOLLECTIONPROCEDURE1PROCEDURE2DATACOLLECTIONPROCEDURENCOLLECTDATACOLLECTDATA~~~~~~~~COLLECTDATAIDENTIFYHEDsIDENTIFYHEDs~~~~~~~~IDENTIFYHEDsDOCUMENTFILE{MANUAL&ADP)DOCUMENTFILE(MANUAL&ADP)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~DOCUMENTFILE(MANUALEcADP)ASSESSHEDsUPDATEFILES.(MANUAL8cADP)IDENTIFYRESOLUTIONSUPDATEFILES(MANUALEcADP)DEVELOPSCHEDULESRESOLUTIONSREPORT 3.3.2GuidelineHEDDatafilesforeachtaskwillbegenerated.Poreachtaskrequiringareport,filespacewillbereservedforthatreport.HEDinformationwill,bestoredinacomputerfilewhichwillcontainthefollowinginformation:oGuidelinenumberwhichalsoservesastheHEDnumberoHEDdescriptionoHEDassessmentoHEDlocations(itemtypeswhicharediscrepantfromthesurveyguidelines)oActiontobetakenontheHED.TheHumanEngineeringDescrepancyReporttobeusedispresentedinPigure5.3.3.3ComponentHEDReportsAmanuallymaintainedfilewillbeestablishedwhichdocuments,foreachcom-'ponent,allHEDscitedforthatcomponent.Inaddition,theheadingforeachcomponent.HEDcontainsthefollowingControlRoominventoryinformation:oPanel/WorkstationoUniquelocationcodeoSystemrelationshipoComponentfunctionanduseoComponenttypeandcharacteristics.TheHEDsnotedagainstacomponentwhereappropriate,arelistedonthebottomoftheform,byHEDnumber(whichcorrespondstoNUREG-0700guidelinenumber).TheComponentLevelformusedispresentedinPigure6.3.3.4TaskReportsPoreachplaninSection4.0,aseparatereportsectionwillbegenerated,detailing:oObjectivesofthetaskplanoTheactualdatacoDectionandanalysismethodsemployedoThecriteria(guidelines)implementedoSummaryoffindings.Inshort,theprocessfollowedforeachsurveyorevaluationfrominception.towritingofHEDs,willbeincludedintaskreports.

FIGURE5HUMANENGINEERINGDISCREPANCYREPORTNO:REVIEWERNAME:0)KEDTITLE:PLANT.UNIT:DATE:b)ITEMSINVOLVED:ITEMTYPENOMENCLATURELOCATIONPHOTONO.c)PROBLEMDESCRIPTION{GUIDELINESVIOLATED):d}SPECIFICOPERATORERROR(S)THATCOULDRESULTFROMHED:18 FIGURE5(contInued)y),SUGGESTIONSFOROTENTIALBACKFITSDATACOLLECTORDATACOLLECTIONMGRPROGRAMMGRDATEDATEDATEg)DISPOSITION0FURTHERI'.EVIEWBY0TOBECORRECTEDBYDATEDATE'REFERTOOPERATIONS0NOACTION0OTHEREVALUATIONCOMPLETEDFPLPROJECTDIRECTORDATE,19

'FIGURE6~COMPONENTREPORlHUMANENGINEERINGDISCREPANCYREPORTCOMI'OIEITII)LAIELASSDClATEDEOtIPllEITOfCICIATlDIiLIIE'f~AIElUIE2LNEiSUBSYSTEM:CONTROLMODESIDISPLAYRANGE:USE:HEDNUMBERCATHEDNUMBER20 3.4DetailedControlRoomDesignReviewReportThisreportispreparedattheconclusionoftheDetailedControlRoomDesignReviewandconsistsprimarilyoftheprocessandHEDreportspreviouslyprepared.Thefollowingformatwillbeused:1.0Methodology1.1'verview-ReviewPlan1.2ManagementandStaffing1.3Documentation1.4Reviewproceduresemployeda),Operatingexperiencereviewandresultssummaryb)Systems,functions,andtaskanalysisc)SurveysofControlRoomequipmentoControls2.03.0oDisplaysoValidationofControlRoomFunctions1.5AssessmentproceduresFindings2.1.Surveyfinding2.2SystemfunctionstaskanalysisfindingsImplementation3.1Completedimprovements3.2Proposedimprovements"21-E.4.0TECHNICALAPPROACH4.1IntroductionThetechnicalapproach(reviewprocedures)tobeemployedisdiscussedinthissection.Taskplansareprovidedwhichdescribetheactivitiesforthefollowingtasks:0ReviewofoperatingexperienceAssemblyofControlRoomdocumentationReviewofsystemfunctionsandtaskanalysisSurveys(onetaskplanforeach)noiselightingControlRoomenvironmentdesignconventionscontrolsdispla'yscomputersemergencygarmentslabelingannunciatorsanthropometricsforce/torquecommunicationsmaintainabilityVerificationoftaskperformancecapabilityValidationofControlRoomfunctionsoAssessmentofdiscrepancies.4.2TaskPlanContentEachtaskplanaddresses:fi>>fvariablesunderanalysis.ReviewTeam-Thepersonnelrequiredtoconductthetask.Criteria-Generallythesurveyguidelinesappropriatetothetaskathand.TaskDefinition-Stepsorprocedurestobefollowedtoconductthetask.EuimentRuirements-'Listofanyequipmentrequiredtoconductthetask.InutandDataForms-Thedatacollectionformsrequiredbythetasks./OututsandResults-Taskresults.OftentheseareHEDs,'utmaybedatawhichisdrawnuponbysubsequenttasks'(e.g.,taskanalysis).

5.0ASSESSMENTANDIMPLEMENTATION5.1AssessmentWhenaHEDhasbeenidentified,itisassessedforerrorinducingpotentialandsystem'consequencesofinducederrors.TheassessmentdeterminestheschedulingofbackfitsasafunctionofthepotentialconsquencesoftheHED.TheHED'swillbecorrectedbyenhancement(colorcoding,labeling,etc.)ordesignalternatives.TheHEDcorrectionmayaffecttheoriginialbackfitscheduledependingontheavailabilityofmaterialsandextentofengineeringredesign.TheproposedcorrectionsareassessedtoensurethatHED'ahavebeenadequatelyaddresses.Thebasicassessmentprocessisdividedintofourstepsasfollows:oAssessextentofdeviationfromsurveyguidelinesoAssessHEDinpactinerror'occurrenceoAssesspotentialconsequencesoferroroccurrenceoAssignHEDschedulingpriority.AdiagramforassessmentispresentedinFigure7.5.1.1AssessExtentofDeviationfromSurveyGuidelinesThesteprequiresthatamoreorlesssubjectiveassessmentof.theextentofdiscrepancyfromsurveyguidelinesbemadewithregardtotheControlRoom.Forexample,symbol/backgroundcontrast.mightbe4096,rather.than5096,or,onlysmallamountsofparallaxmayexistinadisplay.AjudgementismadebasedonthecontentoftheguidelinebeingappliedandtheControlRoomcomponentunderassessment.Extentofdeviationisthensubjectivelyscaledfrom1(somedeviation)to5(completedeviation).ThereisalsoacatagoryN/A(notapplicable)forHEDswhicharenotapartofNUREG-0700(discrepanciesfromotherdocumentssuchasmilitarystandards,HFETexts,etc).Extentofdeviationjudgementsarenotdirectlyusedtoassesspriorityorschedulingofbackfits,butrelatetoassessmentofincreaseoperationalerrorpotentials.Itispossible

~~HEDN'FlGURE7HEDPRIORITY~1.EXTENTOFDEVIATIONFROM0700GUIDELINES2.ERRORASSESSMENT3.'SAFETYFUNCTION'p4.NONSAFETYRELATED,REQUIREDTOMITIGATECONSEQUENCESOFANACCIDENT5.CONSEQUENCESOFERROROCCURENCE'.UNSAFEOPERATIONB.VIOLATIONOFTECH.SPECS.N/AYESYESYESYESSOME12,3LOW'I2.3COMPLETE45HIGH45NONO1.DEV~0?YESCATEGORYIIIHEDTA2.ERRORASSESSMENT02YESCATEGORYIIIHEDTA.CATEGORYIICHED~TECHSPECVIO.YESLATEDORUN.SAFEOPERATION?YESCATEGORYIIAHED3.'SAFETYFUNCTIONOROBJECTIVE24TECHNYESCATEGORYIIBHEDSPECVIONLATEDPRUN.CATEGORY'SAFEOPERATION?

~~~~tohavelittledeviationfromthesurveyguidelinesandhigherrorassessments,andviseversa,butthetwowillprobablybepositivelycorrelated.ExtentofdeviationwillnotbeusedtoassesserrorsinducedbyHEDs.5'.1.2AssessHEDImpactonErrorOccurrenceGiventhatnocontrolsystemcanbedesignedtobeoperationallyerror-free,assessmenthereistoestimateHEDimpactonhypothetical(unknown)baselineerrorratesofcontrolroomcomponentaie.g.,willadditionalerrorsboinducodbydiscrepanciesfromtheguidelines?EstimatesofHEDimpactonerroroccurrencearequalitativelyarrivedatbyconsiderationofthefollowing:oBodyphysiologyFatigue/physicalstressDiscomfortInjuryAnthropometryoSensory/perceptualperfoimanceVisionAu'ditionPropioceptionTouchoInformationprocessingOverloadConfusionRecallPatternmatching/recognitionDatamanipulation(comparing,extrapolating,etc.)oLearningInhibitionHabituationResponsepredominanceTransferResponsecompetitionResponselatencyo,TaskDemandsFrequencyDurationCompetitionSequenceSpeedCommunicationPrecisionInformation

~~~<,)~~'I~'I,5.1.3AssessPotentialConsequencesofErrorOccurrenceReviewTeamtechnicalstaffandoperationsrepresentativesevaluatesystemconsequencesofhypothesizedoperationalerrors.Fourdeterminationsarerequired:1.DoestheHEDrelatetoplantsafetyfunctions?2.DoestheHEDrelatetoplantfunctionsrequiredtomitigatetheconsequencesofanaccident?3.Couldanerrorleadtounsafeoperationsorplantconditions?4.CouldanerrorleadtoviolationsofTechnicalSpecifications?Eachoftheserequireayes/notyperesponse.ThelogicdiagramonFigure7(HEDPriority)showshowthesedataareintegratedtoassigncategoriesandprioritiestoHEDs.Table1showsthebreakdownofcategoryandpriorityasafunctionoferrorassessmentandconsequencesoferror.NotethatCategoryIHEDsarethosewhichhavebeennotedfromdocumentedoperationalerrors.AllCategoryI,HEDsaredeemedtoincreaseerrorpotential,butconsequencesmuststillbeassignedtodetermineultimateschedulingpriority.Assessmentoferroroccurrenceisestimatedforthefollowing:1.Overalloperatorperformance.is/isnot.degradedbyHEDimpactonbodyphysiology?.2.HEDdoes/doesnotdegradesensoryperformance?3.Informationprocessingcapabilityis/isnotexceededviatheHED?4;.TheHEDdoes/doesnotinducedirecterrorduetoprinciplesoflearning?5.Taskdifficultyandreliabilityis/isnotaffectedbytheHED.Basedontheabove,asubjectiveerrorassessmentisgeneratedona5-pointscale,aonemeaningalow.probabilityofinducederrorsisexpectedasaresultoftheHED,afiveindicatingahighprobabilitylevelofadditionalerrorsbeinginduced.5.1.4AssignHEDPrioritySchedulingPriorityforschedulingofbackfitpurposesisperthefollowing:PriorityA-Prompt-Firstoutage,givenavailabilityofmaterialsandengineeringloadtime.PriorityB-NearTerm-Secondrefuelingoutagegivenavailabilityofpartsandengineeringleadtime.PriorityC-LongTerm-Atanytime."26-I~jI TABLEIASSESMENTOFCATEGORYANDHUOKITYASAFUNCTIONOFERRORASSESSMENTANDCONSEQUENCESOFERRORDocumentedErrors?YesDeviationfrom0700ErrorAssessment>2Safety-FunctionReq'dMitigateAccidentYesorYesLeadtoUnsafeOperationLeadtoTech.SpecViolationYesorYesC~ataor~PrioriA:Yes>2>2NoYes/NoNoYes/NoYesNoNoNoNo>2>2NoNoYesorYesYesorYesorYesNo<2Yes/NoYes/NoNoNoNoN/A\<3Yes/NoYes/NoYes/NoYes/NoN/A 5.2ImplementationImplementationisdiscussedinthreeparts,asfollows:0AnalysisforCorrectionbyEnhancement/assesscorrectionAnalysisofDesignAlternatives/assesscorrection-SchedulingandImplementationeachoftheseisdiscussed,inturn,below.5.2.1AnalysisforCorrectionbyEnhancementInthistaskeachHEDisconsideredforcorrectionbyenhancement..Many,e.g.,labelingHEDs,areimmediatelyandfullycorrected.ForotherHEDs,enhancementsolutionsmayonlypartiallyamelioratethediscrepancy..Figure8,showstheprocessfor~identifyingHEDstobecorrectedbyenhancement(colorcoding,labeling,demarcation,'tc,)5.2.2AnalysisforCorrectionbyDesignAlternativesThistaskrequiresthateachHEDselectedforanalysisofdesignalternativesundergoTaskandFunctionsanalysisreview.Thebasicprocedureemployedis.showninFigure9.Notethatwheredesignalternativesdonotexist,HEDsareagainconsideredforcorrectionbyenhancement,sincesomemitigationoftheerrorinducementmaybeachievable.5.2.3ScheduIingandImplementationHEDsselectedforcorrectionbyenhancementwillundergoir<<pie.aentationscheduling.LongertermcorrectionswillbescheduledandtheschedulereportedtotheNRCforteviewandapprovaLFigure10showstheformwhich.willdocumenttheresultsoftheHEDreassessmentofalternativeenhancementsand/ordesignsolutions.Reassessmentswillbeperformedwhereoriginalcorrectionscouldnotbeimplementedduetoconflictsinrequired.operationalfunction,availabilityofqualifiedequipment,and/orspacerequirements; FIGURE8FLOWFORCORRECTIONOFHEDsBYENHANCEMENTHEDsNOTES:CONSIDERENHANCEMENTALTERNATIVESUsingphotomosalcREEVALUATEHEDUsing0700guidelinesHEDRESOLVED'?YESPROCESSusingNUREG0801and0700ERRORYESASSESSMENT~2NO.HEDSELECTEDFORCORRECTIONBYDESIGNALTERNATIVESDETAILEDENHANCEMENTDESIGN,IMPLE.MENTATIONANDDOCUMENTATIONDetaileddesignproceeds,using0700guidelineswhereappropriate,asdesignrequirements29

~Ij~~~FIGURE9PROCESSFORANALYZINGHEDDESIGNALTERNATIVESHEDREVIEWSYSTEMS,FUNCTIONSANDTASK,ANALYSISIDENTIFYALTERNATIVESEVALUATEALTERNATIVESNOHEDRESOLVED?YESNOYESENHANCEMENTYESALTERNATIVESEXHAUSTED8OL.UTIONSPOSSIBL?NOYESNEWHEDsINTRODUCED?JUSTIFY5DOCUMENTNODESIGNFEASIBLE(ENGINEERING)?NOYESSCHEDULEIMPLEMENTDOCUMENT

~jVFIGURE10HEDNO.HEDBACKFITASSESSMENTIMPLEMENTEDBACKFITPROPOSEDBACKFITIENHANCEMENTa)LABELINGb)DEMARCATIONc)CODINGd)PROCEDURESe)TRAININGa)b)c)d)e)IIDESIGNALTERNATIVESa)RELOCATIONa)b)REPLACEMENTb)c)CONFORMANCETOPROCESSCONVENTIONc)d)RELOCTIONOFFUNCTIONd)1.EXTENTOFDEVIATIONFROM0700GUIDEL'INES.N/ASOMECOMPLETE342.ERRORASSESSMENTLOWHIGH5YES1DEV~0?RESOLVEDSIGNOFF:HEPMNODATE:2.ERRORASSESSMENT3>NORESOLVEDREDESIGNBACKflT31REASSESSMENTOFPROBABLEERRORANDDEVIATION

'A44l~'j40I